Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js

Uniform stability and mean-field limit for the augmented Kuramoto model

  • Received: 01 July 2017 Revised: 01 March 2018
  • 70F99, 92D25

  • We present two uniform estimates on stability and mean-field limit for the "augmented Kuramoto model (AKM)" arising from the second-order lifting of the first-order Kuramoto model (KM) for synchronization. In particular, we address three issues such as synchronization estimate, uniform stability and mean-field limit which are valid uniformly in time for the AKM. The derived mean-field equation for the AKM corresponds to the dissipative Vlasov-McKean type equation. The kinetic Kuramoto equation for distributed natural frequencies is not compatible with the frequency variance functional approach for the complete synchronization. In contrast, the kinetic equation for the AKM has a similar structural similarity with the kinetic Cucker-Smale equation which admits the Lyapunov functional approach for the variance. We present sufficient frameworks leading to the uniform stability and mean-field limit for the AKM.

    Citation: Seung-Yeal Ha, Jeongho Kim, Jinyeong Park, Xiongtao Zhang. Uniform stability and mean-field limit for the augmented Kuramoto model[J]. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13(2): 297-322. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018013

    Related Papers:

    [1] Seung-Yeal Ha, Jeongho Kim, Jinyeong Park, Xiongtao Zhang . Uniform stability and mean-field limit for the augmented Kuramoto model. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13(2): 297-322. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018013
    [2] Young-Pil Choi, Seung-Yeal Ha, Seok-Bae Yun . Global existence and asymptotic behavior of measure valued solutions to the kinetic Kuramoto--Daido model with inertia. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8(4): 943-968. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.943
    [3] Tingting Zhu . Emergence of synchronization in Kuramoto model with frustration under general network topology. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2022, 17(2): 255-291. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2022005
    [4] Seung-Yeal Ha, Jaeseung Lee, Zhuchun Li . Emergence of local synchronization in an ensemble of heterogeneous Kuramoto oscillators. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(1): 1-24. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017001
    [5] Tingting Zhu . Synchronization of the generalized Kuramoto model with time delay and frustration. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(4): 1772-1798. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023077
    [6] Seung-Yeal Ha, Yongduck Kim, Zhuchun Li . Asymptotic synchronous behavior of Kuramoto type models with frustrations. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2014, 9(1): 33-64. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2014.9.33
    [7] Seung-Yeal Ha, Se Eun Noh, Jinyeong Park . Practical synchronization of generalized Kuramoto systems with an intrinsic dynamics. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10(4): 787-807. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.787
    [8] Nastassia Pouradier Duteil . Mean-field limit of collective dynamics with time-varying weights. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2022, 17(2): 129-161. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2022001
    [9] Maria Teresa Chiri, Xiaoqian Gong, Benedetto Piccoli . Mean-field limit of a hybrid system for multi-lane car-truck traffic. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(2): 723-752. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023031
    [10] Charles Bordenave, David R. McDonald, Alexandre Proutière . A particle system in interaction with a rapidly varying environment: Mean field limits and applications. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5(1): 31-62. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.31
  • We present two uniform estimates on stability and mean-field limit for the "augmented Kuramoto model (AKM)" arising from the second-order lifting of the first-order Kuramoto model (KM) for synchronization. In particular, we address three issues such as synchronization estimate, uniform stability and mean-field limit which are valid uniformly in time for the AKM. The derived mean-field equation for the AKM corresponds to the dissipative Vlasov-McKean type equation. The kinetic Kuramoto equation for distributed natural frequencies is not compatible with the frequency variance functional approach for the complete synchronization. In contrast, the kinetic equation for the AKM has a similar structural similarity with the kinetic Cucker-Smale equation which admits the Lyapunov functional approach for the variance. We present sufficient frameworks leading to the uniform stability and mean-field limit for the AKM.



    Synchronization of weakly coupled oscillators is ubiquitous in our nature, e.g., rhythmic heart beatings of pacemaker cells, synchronous flashing of fireflies and collective hand clapping in a concert hall, etc [1,6,34,35]. After Huygen's observation on two pendulum clocks hanging on the same bar, collective behaviors of weakly coupled oscillators have been reported from time to time in scientific literature (see [34]). However, major scientific progress on the collective dynamics of complex systems was initiated by Winfree and Kuramoto about a half century ago in [26,27,41]. Recently, research on the collective dynamics of complex systems has received lots of attention due to engineering applications in sensor network, mobile network and control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) etc. In [22], the authors observed a formal analogy between the Cucker-Smale flocking model and the Kuramoto model for synchronization, and provide a quantitive estimate for the synchronization based on Lyapunov functional approach. In the paper, we further investigate this formal analogy and study dynamic asymptotic properties of the AKM.

    Consider an ensemble of Kuramoto oscillators lying on the nodes of the complete graph with $N$-nodes, and assume that the state of an oscillator is described by a real-valued function "phase". Let $\theta_i$ be the phase of the $i$-th oscillator whose dynamics is given by the Kuramoto model:

    $ \label{Ku} \displaystyle \dot{\theta}_{i} = \nu_{i} + \frac{\kappa}{N}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N}\sin(\theta_{k} - \theta_{i}), ~~~ 1 \leq i \leq N, $ (1)

    where $\kappa$ and $\nu_i$ denote the coupling strength, and the natural frequency of the $i$-th Kuramoto oscillator, respectively. On the other hand, it is well known in [28] that the dynamics of system (1) with $N \gg 1$ can be described by the corresponding mean-field equation, namely kinetic Kuramoto equation. To be specific, let $f = f (\theta, \nu, t)$ be the one-particle distribution function at phase $\theta$, natural frequency $\nu$ at time $t$. Then, the kinetic Kuramoto equation reads as follows.

    $ tf+θ(L[f]f)=0,   (θ,ν)T×R,  t>0,L[f](θ,ν,t):=ν+κ2π0sin(θθ)f(θ,ν,t)dνdθ, $ (2)

    where $\mathbb{T}$ denotes the 1-dimensional torus. The Kuramoto model (1) and its corresponding mean-field kinetic equation (2) have been extensively studied in applied mathematics, control theory and statistical physics communities from various aspects, e.g., existence of partial and fully phase-locked states [2,8,29,39], emergence of complete synchronization [4,5,7,9,10,11,14,17,18,19,22,25,37], stability of partial and fully phase-locked states and incoherent state [3,30,31,32], slow-fast dynamics [23], existence of the critical coupling strength and its computing algorithm for phase-locked states [13,38], phase-transition phenomena at critical coupling strength [1], relation with other models [22,36] and rigorous mean-field limit [28] etc. For details, we refer to survey articles and a book [1,12,20,34,35]. Our main concern is to derive complete synchronization estimate for (2). For identical oscillators with $g(\nu) = \delta_0$, the kinetic equation (2) can be reduced to

    $ tf+θ(L[f]f)=0,   θT,  t>0,L[f](θ,t):=κ2π0sin(θθ)f(θ,t)dθ. $ (3)

    In this case, the variance function $\Lambda[f] : = \int_{\mathbb T^2} |\theta - \theta_*|^2 f(\theta,t) f(\theta_*,t) d\theta_* d\theta$ can measure the emergence of complete (phase) synchronization. However, for distributed natural frequencies, the functional $\Lambda[f]$ cannot be used for the complete synchronization. Then, it is not clear how to derive a complete synchronization estimate directly for the kinetic equation (2) without lifting corresponding particle results as in [7]. This motivates the works in this paper.

    Next, we briefly explain how to bypass the aforementioned difficulty for the complete synchronization of the kinetic equation (2) for distributed natural frequencies. Our idea is to lift the first-order model (1) into a second-order model by introducing an auxiliary frequency variable $\omega_i = {\dot \theta}_i$, i.e., we differentiate the equation (1) with respect to $t$ and obtain an augmented Kuramoto model (AKM):

    $ ˙θi=ωi,   t>0,   1iN,˙ωi=κNNk=1cos(θkθi)(ωkωi). $ (4)

    On the other hand, we consider a mean-field limit $N \to \infty$. In this case, we set $f = f(\theta, \omega, t)$ to be a probability density function corresponding to (4). Then, a formal BBGKY Hierarchy argument yields the kinetic equation:

    $ ft+ωθf+κω(L[f]f)=0,   (θ,ω)T×R,  t>0,L[f](θ,ω,t):=2π0cos(θθ)(ωω)f(θ,ω,t)dθdω. $ (5)

    As an analogy with the kinetic Cucker-Smale model in [16], we can use the frequency variance functional

    $ \Lambda_1[f] : = \int_{\mathbb T^2 \times \mathbb R^2} |\omega - \omega_*|^2 f(\theta, \omega,t) f(\theta_*, \omega_*,t) d\omega_* d\omega d\theta_* d\theta $

    to measure the emergence of complete synchronization for (5).

    In this paper, we are interested in the following questions for (4) and (5):

    ● (Q1): Under what conditions, can system (4) exhibit the complete synchronization?

    ● (Q2): Is the system (4) uniformly $\ell_p$-stable with respect to initial data?

    ● (Q3): Can we derive the mean-field kinetic equation (5) from the particle model (4) as $N \to \infty$ uniformly in time?

    The first two questions might be generalized to the locally coupled Kuramoto model on a general symmetric and connected networks. However, the last question, i.e., uniform mean-field limit can be treated only for mean-field couplings (e.g., BBGKY hierarchy arguments break down for the locally coupled case). As aforementioned, since our main motivation is to study the complete synchronization of the kinetic level in a direct manner, we consider only the complete network case.

    The main results of this paper are four-fold: First, we provide a sufficient framework for the complete synchronization estimate. Our sufficient conditions are expressed in terms of the coupling strength $\kappa$, the diameter of the set of natural frequencies and initial data, and they are free of the number of oscillators (see Theorem 3.2). Second, we provide the uniform stability estimate of (4) with respect to initial data in a metric equivalent to the $\ell_p$-distance in phase space. Our uniform stability roughly says that the $\ell_p$-distance between two configurations at time $t$ is uniformly bounded by the constant multiple of initial $\ell_p$-distance between two initial data (see Theorem 4.3). Third, we present a uniform-in-time mean-field limit for (4) as a direct application of the exponential flocking estimate in Theorem 3.2 and uniform-in-time stability estimates in Theorem 4.3. Our last result is to derive the complete synchronization estimate for the mean-field kinetic equation (5) using a robust Lyapunov functional approach.

    The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we briefly discuss theoretical minimum for the Kuramoto model and its augmented model. In Section 3, we present a synchronization estimate for the AKM (4). In Section 4, we present a uniform $\ell_p$-stability estimate for the augmented model. In Section 5, we study the uniform mean-field limit from the particle model (4) to the corresponding kinetic equation uniformly in time, and we also study the complete frequency synchronization estimate for the kinetic equation. In Section 6, we provide a synchronization estimate for the kinetic Kuramoto equation (5) with distributed natural frequencies. Finally, Section 7 is devoted to a brief summary of our main results and discussion for future works.

    Before we proceed to the next section, we introduce the notation which will be used in the rest of the paper.

    Notation. When we discuss the distance in the spatial dimension $\mathbb T$, we use the orthodromic distance: let $\theta$ be a constant in $\mathbb R$, then we define

    $ |\theta|_o: = |\bar\theta| ~~ \text{where} ~~ \bar\theta \in (-\pi, \pi] ~~ \text{and} ~~\theta \equiv \bar\theta ~~ (\text{mod} ~ 2\pi). $

    In the following discussion, we only consider the case in which the oscillators are confined in a half circle. It is obvious that

    $ |\theta|_o = |\theta| ~~ \text{for} ~~ \theta \in (-\pi, \pi). $

    For notational simplicity, we use $|\cdot|$ instead of $|\cdot|_o$ for the spatial distance. Throughout the paper, we use the following simplified notation: for $Z : = (z_1, \cdots, z_N),$ we set

    $D(Z):=max1i,jN|zizj|,Zp:=(Ni=1|zi|p)1p,   p[1,),Z:=max1iN|zi|,$

    and

    $ \Theta : = (\theta_1, \cdots, \theta_N), ~~ \Omega : = (\omega_1, \cdots, \omega_N), ~~{\mathcal V} : = (\nu_1, \cdots, \nu_N). $

    In this section, we briefly review a theoretical minimum for the Kuramoto model and the augmented Kuramoto model.

    In this subsection, we briefly discuss an associated conservation law, and review the state-of-the-art results on the complete synchronization for the Kuramoto model. First, we introduce a time-dependent quantity ${\mathcal C}(\Theta, {\mathcal V}, t)$:

    $ {\mathcal C}(\Theta, {\mathcal V}, t) : = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \theta_i - t \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \nu_i. $

    Lemma 2.1. Let $\Theta = \Theta(t)$ be a phase vector whose dynamics is governed by (1). Then, the quantity $ {\mathcal C}(\Theta, {\mathcal V}, t)$ is a constant of motion.

    $ \label{B-1} \frac{d}{dt} {\mathcal C}(\Theta(t),{\mathcal V}, t) = 0, ~~~~ t > 0. $

    Proof. Let $\Theta = \Theta(t)$ be a Kuramoto flow. Then, we have

    $ \frac{d}{dt} {\mathcal C}(\Theta(t),{\mathcal V}, t) = \frac{d}{dt} \Big( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \theta_i - t \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \nu_i \Big) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} {\dot \theta}_i - \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \nu_i = 0. $

    This yields the desired estimate.

    Remark 1. Note that unless $\sum_{i = 1}^{N} \nu_i$ is zero, the total phase $\sum_{i = 1}^{N} \theta_i$ is not conserved.

    Next, we discuss the equilibrium for the Kuramoto model (1). Note that the equilibrium solution $\Theta = (\theta_1, \cdots, \theta_N)$ is a solution to the following equilibrium system:

    $ \label{B-0-1} \nu_{i} + \frac{\kappa}{N}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N}\sin(\theta_{k} - \theta_{i}) = 0, ~~~ 1 \leq i \leq N. $ (6)

    We sum up the equation (6) with respect to $i$ to obtain

    $ \label{B-0-2} 0 = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \nu_i + \frac{\kappa}{N}\sum\limits_{i, k = 1}^{N}\sin(\theta_{k} - \theta_{i}) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \nu_i. $

    Thus, if the system (6) does have a solution, then the total sum of natural frequencies is zero. Hence if $\sum_{i = 1}^{N} \nu_i \not = 0,$ then system (6) does not have a solution. This leads to the need of the relaxed equilibria in the following definition. We first recall several definitions for a phase-locked state and asymptotic phase-locking.

    Definition 2.2. [1,12,19] Let $\Theta(t) = (\theta_1(t), \cdots, \theta_N(t))$ be a time-dependent phase vector.

    1. $\Theta$ is a phase-locked state if all relative phase differences are constants:

    $ \theta_i(t) - \theta_j(t) = \theta_i(0) - \theta_j(0), ~~ t \geq 0, ~~~~ 1 \leq i, j \leq N. $

    2. $\Theta$ exhibits asymptotic phase-locking (complete synchronization) if the relative frequencies tend to zero asymptotically:

    $ \lim\limits_{t \to \infty} |{\dot \theta}_i(t) - {\dot \theta}_j(t)| = 0, ~~~ 1 \leq i, j \leq N. $

    Remark 2. Note that solutions to the following equilibrium system:

    $ \label{B-0-3} \nu_{i} + \frac{\kappa}{N}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N}\sin(\theta_{j} - \theta_{i}) = 0, ~~~ i = 1, \cdots, N,~~~ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \nu_i = 0 $

    correspond to phase-locked states of (1).

    We next briefly review the state-of-the-art result for the Kuramoto model (1). It is well known in [11,24,36] that system (1) can be lifted as a dynamical system on $\mathbb R^N$ and can also be written as a gradient flow with an analytical potential in $\mathbb R^N$:

    $ {\dot \Theta}(t) = -\nabla_{\Theta} V(\Theta), ~~~ \mbox{where} ~~~ V(\Theta) : = -\sum\limits_{k = 1}^N \nu_k \theta_k +\frac{\kappa}{2N} \sum\limits_{1 \leq k, l \leq N} (1-\cos(\theta_k - \theta_l)). $

    For a gradient flow system with analytical potential, uniform boundedness is equivalent to the convergence of solution toward the phase-locked state. As a dynamical system in $\mathbb R^N$, the uniform boundedness of (1) in $\mathbb R^N$ in a rotating frame moving with the speed of average of natural frequencies is not obvious since nonidentical oscillators can cross each other.

    In the following theorem, we summarize the state-of-the-art results for the emergence of phase-locked states from generic initial data in a large coupling strength regime with $\kappa \gg 1$.

    Theorem 2.3. [9,11,13,19] The following assertions hold.

    1. Suppose that the initial phase configuration $\Theta^0$ is confined in a half circle and the coupling strength $\kappa$ is positive such that

    $ D(\Theta^0) < \pi, ~~~ \kappa > 0, ~~~ D({\mathcal V}) = 0. $

    Then, for any solution $\Theta = \Theta(t)$ to (1), we have

    $ \lim\limits_{t \to \infty} D({\dot \Theta}(t)) = 0. $

    2. Suppose that the initial phase configuration $\Theta^0$ is confined in a half circle and the coupling strength $\kappa$ is sufficient large such that

    $ D(\Theta^0) < \pi, \kappa > D({\mathcal V}) > 0. $

    Then, for any solution $\Theta = \Theta(t)$ to (1), there exists a positive constant $\lambda$ such that

    $ D({\dot \Theta}(t)) \leq C e^{-\lambda t},~~~ {as ~t ~\to \infty}. $

    3. Suppose that natural frequencies are distributed and initial configurations satisfy

    $ D({\mathcal V}) > 0, ~~~ R^0 = \frac{1}{N} \Big| \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N} e^{{ \rm{i}} \theta^0_k} \Big| > 0, ~~~ \theta^0_{j} \not = \theta^0_{k}, ~~~ 1 \leq j \not = k \leq N. $

    Then there exists a large coupling strength $\kappa_{\infty}>0$ such that if $\kappa \ge \kappa_{\infty}$ there exists a phase-locked state $\Theta^{\infty}$ such that the solution with initial data $\Theta_0$ satisfies

    $ \lim\limits_{t \to \infty} \|\Theta(t) - \Theta^{\infty}\|_{\infty} = 0, $

    where the norm $\|\cdot\|_{\infty}$ is the standard $\ell^{\infty}$-norm in $\mathbb R^N$.

    Remark 3. 1. In the course of the proof for the first statement, we can show that there exists a finite time $t_0$ and $D^{\infty} \in (0, \frac{\pi}{2})$ such that

    $ D(\Theta(t))\leq D^{\infty}, ~~\text{for }t\geq t_0.$

    2. The result of [11] does not yield detailed asymptotic dynamics of identical Kuramoto oscillators. However, when the diameter of the emergent phase-locked state is less than $\pi$ and the coupling strength is sufficiently large, then we can show that convergence speed is at least exponential. See [9,12,13] for detailed discussion.

    In this subsection, we discuss basic structural properties of the AKM and relationship between the Kuramoto model and AKM. We set averaged quantities and fluctuations of phase and frequency around them:

    $θc:=1NNk=1θk,  ωc:=1NNk=1ωk,ˆθi:=θiθc,  ˆωi:=ωiωc.$

    Then, it is easy to see that the averaged quantities and fluctuations satisfy

    $ \label{New-1} {\dot \theta}_c = \omega_c, ~~~~ {\dot {\hat \omega}}_i = \frac{\kappa}{N}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N}\cos({\hat \theta}_{k} - {\hat \theta}_{i}) ({\hat \omega}_k - {\hat \omega}_i). $ (7)

    Lemma 2.4. Let $\{ (\theta_i, \omega_i) \}_{i = 1}^{N}$ be a solution to (4). Then, the averaged quantities $(\theta_c, \omega_c)$ satisfy the following relations:

    $ \omega_c(t) = \omega_c(0), ~~~~\theta_c(t) = \theta_c(0) + t \omega_c(0),~~~~ t \geq 0. $

    Proof. We sum $(4)$ with respect to $i$ and use the skew symmetry of $\cos (\theta_j - \theta_i) (\omega_j - \omega_i)$ in the transformation of $(i, j) ~ \Longleftrightarrow ~ (j, i)$ to get

    $ \frac{d}{dt} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \omega_i = \frac{\kappa}{N} \sum\limits_{i,k = 1}^N \cos (\theta_k - \theta_i) (\omega_k - \omega_i) = -\frac{\kappa}{N} \sum\limits_{i,k = 1}^N \cos (\theta_k - \theta_i) (\omega_k - \omega_i) = 0. $

    The second relation follows from $(7)_1$.

    Next, we discuss the relation between the first-order model (1) and the second-order model (4) which is stated in the following theorem.

    Theorem 2.5. The Kuramoto model (1) is equivalent to the augmented Kuramoto model (4) in the following sense.

    1. If $\{ \theta_i \}$ is a solution to (1) with initial data $\{ \theta_i^0 \}$, then $\{(\theta_i, \omega_i : = {\dot \theta}_i) \}$ is a solution to (4) with well-prepared initial data $\{ (\theta_i^0, \omega_i^0) \}$:

    $ \omega_i^0 : = \nu_i + \frac{\kappa}{N} \sum\limits_{j = 1}^N \sin (\theta_{j}^0 - \theta_{i}^{0}), ~~~ i = 1, \cdots, N. $

    2. If $\{(\theta_i, \omega_i) \}$ is a solution to (4) with initial data $\{ (\theta_i^0, \omega_i^0) \}$, then $\{ \theta_i \}$ is a solution to (1) with natural frequencies:

    $ \nu_i : = \omega_i^0 - \frac{\kappa}{N} \sum\limits_{j = 1}^N \sin (\theta_{j}^0 - \theta_{i}^{0}), ~~~ i = 1, \cdots, N. $

    Proof. (ⅰ) Let $\Theta = \Theta(t)$ be a solution to (1) with initial data $\Theta^0$. Then, it satisfies

    $ \dot{\theta}_{i} = \nu_{i} + \frac{\kappa}{N}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N}\sin(\theta_{k} - \theta_{i}). $ (8)

    We set

    $ \label{B-2} \omega_i = {\dot \theta}_i $ (9)

    and differentiate the above equation to obtain

    $ \label{B-3} {\dot \omega}_i = \frac{\kappa}{N}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N}\cos(\theta_{k} - \theta_{i})(\omega_k - \omega_i). $ (10)

    We use (8) to find

    $ \label{B-4} \omega_i = \nu_{i} + \frac{\kappa}{N}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N}\sin(\theta_{k} - \theta_{i}). $ (11)

    Letting $t \to 0+$ in (11), we obtain

    $ \label{B-5} \omega_i^0 = \nu_i + \frac{\kappa}{N} \sum\limits_{k = 1}^N \sin (\theta_{k}^0 - \theta_{i}^{0}). $ (12)

    Finally, we combine (9), (10) and (12) to see that $(\theta_i, \omega_i)$ is a solution to (4) with initial data $(\theta_i^0, \omega_i^0)$.

    (ⅱ) Let $\{ (\theta_i, \omega_i) \}$ be a solution to (4) with initial data $\{ (\theta_i^0, \omega_i^0) \}$, i.e., it satisfies

    $ \dot{\omega}_i = \frac{\kappa}{N}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N}\cos(\theta_{k} - \theta_{i}) (\omega_k - \omega_i). $

    Then, we use the relations:

    $ \omega_i = {\dot \theta}_i ~~~ \mbox{and}~~~ \cos (\theta_k - \theta_i) (\omega_k - \omega_i) = \frac{d}{dt} \sin(\theta_k - \theta_i) $

    to integrate (10) to obtain

    $ \label{B-6} {\dot \theta}_i = \omega_i = \omega_{i}^0 - \frac{\kappa}{N} \sum\limits_{k = 1}^N \sin (\theta_{k}^0 - \theta_{i}^0) +\frac{\kappa}{N} \sum\limits_{k = 1}^N \sin (\theta_k - \theta_i). $ (13)

    Then, we set

    $ \label{B-7} \nu_i : = \omega_{i}^0 - \frac{\kappa}{N} \sum\limits_{k = 1}^N \sin (\theta_{k}^0 - \theta_{i}^0). $ (14)

    Finally, we combine (13) and (14) to recover the Kuramoto model.

    Before we close this section, we quote the following lemma to be crucially used in later sections.

    Lemma 2.6. [21] Suppose that two nonnegative Lipschitz functions $X$ and $V$ satisfy the system of differential inequalities:

    $\displaystyle \Big| \frac{dX}{dt} \Big| \leq V, ~~~~\frac{dV}{dt} \leq -\alpha V + \gamma e^{-\alpha t} X, ~~~~ {a.e.}~~t > 0, $

    where $\alpha$ and $\gamma$ are positive constants. Then, $X$ and $V$ satisfy the uniform bound and decay estimates:

    $X(t)\leq \frac{2M}{\alpha}(X(0)+V(0)), ~~~~~V(t)\leq M(X(0)+ V(0))e^{-\frac{\alpha t}{2}},~~~~ t \geq 0, $

    where $M$ is a positive constant defined by,

    $M: = \max\Big\{1,\frac{2\gamma}{\alpha e}\Big\}+\frac{8\gamma}{\alpha^3 e^3}.$

    In this section, we present complete synchronization estimates for the AKM (4) in $\ell_\infty$ and $\ell_p,~p \in [1, \infty)$ frameworks by deriving a system of Grönwall's inequalities.

    In this subsection, we present a synchronization estimate in $\ell_\infty$-framework. In each case, the synchronization estimates are obtained in the following three steps:

    ● Step A (Existence of positively invariant set). We identify a positively invariant set which is translation invariant in phase space.

    ● Step B (Derivation of Grönwall's inequality). We introduce a Lyapunov type functional and derive a Grönwall type differential inequality.

    ● Step C (Complete synchronization estimate). Once we derive a Grönwall type inequality for a suitable Lyapunov functional, suitable Grönwall's lemma and continuity arguments yield the desired synchronization estimate.

    As candidates for Lyapunov functionals and an invariant set, we introduce phase and frequency diameters:

    $ D(\Theta) : = \max\limits_{1 \leq i, j \leq N} |\theta_i - \theta_j|, ~~~~~D(\Omega) : = \max\limits_{1 \leq i, j \leq N} |\omega_i - \omega_j|, $

    and for $D^\infty<\frac{\pi}{2},$ we set

    $ {\mathcal S}(D^{\infty}) : = \Big \{ \Theta = (\theta_1, \cdots, \theta_N)~:~ D(\Theta) < D^\infty \Big \}. $

    Lemma 3.1. Suppose that initial data $(\Theta^0, \Omega^0)$ and the coupling strength $\kappa$ satisfy

    $ \Theta^0 \in {\mathcal S}(D^{\infty}) , ~~~~~~ \kappa > \frac{D(\Omega^0)}{\cos(D^\infty)(D^\infty- D(\Theta^0))}, ~~~~ {where}~~D^{\infty} < \frac{\pi}{2}. $

    Then, the set ${\mathcal S}$ is positively invariant under the flow (4), i.e., for any solution $\Theta = \Theta(t)$ with initial data $\Theta^0 \in {\mathcal S}$, we have

    $ \Theta(t) \in {\mathcal S}(D^{\infty}), ~~~~ t \geq 0. $

    Proof. Let $\Theta^0$ be a initial data with $D(\Theta^0) < D^\infty$. Suppose that $\mathcal{S}$ is not positively invariant under flow. Then, there exists a finite time $t^*$ such that

    $t^* = \sup\{~t:~D(\Theta(s)) < D^\infty,~~~ 0\le s\le t\}.$

    By the continuity, we have

    $ D(\Theta(t^*)) = D^\infty. $

    On the other hand, for any indices $i$ and $j$, we integrate $(4)_2$ from $0$ to $t$ for $t<t^*$ to obtain

    $ωi(t)ωj(t)=ω0iω0j+κNNk=1t0cos(θkθi)(ωk(s)ωi(s))dsκNNk=1t0cos(θkθj)(ωk(s)ωj(s))ds.$

    Now we choose maximal indices $M$ and $m$ which might be dependent on $t$:

    $\omega_M(t): = \max\limits_{1\le i\le N} \omega_i(t), ~~~\omega_m(t): = \min\limits_{1\le i\le N} \omega_i(t).$

    Then, for $t\in [0,t^*]$, we get

    $ D(˙Θ(t))=ωM(t)ωm(t)=ωM(0)ωm(0)+κNNk=1t0cos(θk(s)θM(s))(ωk(s)ωM(s))dsκNNk=1t0cos(θk(s)θm(s))(ωk(s)ωm(s))ds. $ (15)

    For $0\le s\le t^*$, we have

    $ \label{C-0-0} |\theta_k(s)-\theta_M(s)| \le D^\infty, |\theta_k(s)-\theta_m(s)|\le D^\infty. $ (16)

    Therefore, it follows from (15) and (16) that we have

    $ D(˙Θ(t))D(˙Θ(0))+κcosDNNk=1t0(ωk(s)ωM(s))dsκcosDNNk=1t0(ωk(s)ωm(s))ds=D(˙Θ(0))κcosDt0D(˙Θ(s))ds. $ (17)

    This yields

    $ D(\dot{\Theta}(t)) \le D(\dot{\Theta}(0)) -\kappa\cos D^\infty \int_0^t D(\dot{\Theta}(s)) \,ds. $ (18)

    We set

    $ u(t): = \int_0^t D(\dot{\Theta}(s))\, ds. $

    Then, it is easy to see that

    $ \label{C-0-3-0} {\dot u}(t) = D(\dot{\Theta}(t)), ~~`u(0) = 0,~~~ \dot{u}(0) = D(\dot{\Theta}(0)). $ (19)

    Then, the relation (18) is equivalent to

    $ \label{C-0-3-1} {\dot u}(t) + \kappa \cos D^{\infty} u(t) \leq \dot{u}(0). $ (20)

    Then, (19) and (20) yield

    $ \label{C-0-4} u(t) \leq \frac{ \dot{u}(0)}{\kappa \cos D^{\infty}} \Big( 1 - e^{-\kappa (\cos D^{\infty}) t} \Big) \leq \frac{\dot{u}(0)}{\kappa \cos D^{\infty}}, ~~~t \geq 0. $ (21)

    On the other hand, since $D(\Theta(t^*)) = D^\infty$, there exist indices $i$ and $j$ such that

    $\theta_i(t^*)-\theta_j(t^*) = D^\infty.$

    Then, it follows from (4)$_1$ that we have

    $D=θi(t)θj(t)=θ0iθ0j+t0(ωi(s)ωj(s))dsD(Θ0)+t0D(˙Θ(s))dsD(Θ0)+D(˙Θ(0))κcos(D)<D,$

    where we used the hypothesis on $\kappa$ and (21), which yields contradiction.

    Theorem 3.2. Suppose that initial data and coupling strength satisfy

    $ \Theta^0 \in {\mathcal S}(D^{\infty}) , ~~~~~ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \omega^0_i = 0,~~~~~ \kappa > \frac{D(\Omega^0)}{\cos(D^\infty)(D^\infty- D(\Theta^0))}, ~~~~~{where}~~D^{\infty} < \frac{\pi}{2}. $

    Then, we have an exponential synchronization:

    $ D(\Omega(t)) \leq D(\Omega^0) e^{-\kappa \cos (D^{\infty}) t},~~~~ t \geq 0. $

    Proof. Due to the conservation law in Lemma 2.4, we have

    $ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \omega_i(t) = 0,~~~~ t \geq 0. $

    We set extremal indices $M$ and $m$ such that

    $ \omega_M : = \max\limits_{1 \leq i \leq N} \omega_i, ~~~~~ \omega_m : = \min\limits_{1 \leq i \leq N} \omega_i. $

    Then, it follows from $(4)_2$ that we have

    $ \label{NN-1} \dot{\omega}_M = \frac{\kappa}{N}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N}\cos(\theta_{k} - \theta_{i}) (\omega_k - \omega_M) \leq -\kappa \cos D^{\infty} \omega_M. $ (22)

    Similarly, we have

    $ \label{NN-2} {\dot \omega}_m \geq -\kappa \cos D^{\infty} \omega_m. $ (23)

    Then, it follows from (22) and (23) that we have

    $ \frac{d}{dt} D({\dot \Theta}(t)) \leq -\kappa \cos D^{\infty} D({\dot \Theta}), t > 0. $

    This yields the desired exponential decay estimate.

    In this subsection, we present $\ell_p$-estimate for (4) for later use. For phase and frequency vectors

    $ \Theta = (\theta_1, \cdots, \theta_N) ~~~ \text{and} ~~~ \Omega = (\omega_1, \cdots, \omega_N), $

    we set $\|\Theta\|_p$ and $\|\Omega\|_p$:

    $ \|\Theta\|_p: = \Big( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^N|\theta_i|^p \Big)^{\frac{1}{p}},~~~~~ \|\Omega\|_p: = \Big( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^N|\omega_i|^p \Big)^{\frac{1}{p}},~~~~~ p \in [1, \infty). $

    Proposition 1. Suppose that initial data and coupling strength satisfy

    $ \Theta^0 \in {\mathcal S}(D^{\infty}), ~~~ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \omega^0_i = 0, ~~~~ \kappa > \frac{D(\Omega^0)}{\cos(D^\infty)(D^\infty- D(\Theta^0))}, ~~~ {where}~~D^{\infty} < \frac{\pi}{2}. $

    Then for any solution $\{ (\theta_i, \omega_i) \}_{i = 1}^{N}$ to (4), we have

    $ \label{C-1} \Big|\frac{d}{dt}\|\Theta\|_p \Big| \leq \|\Omega\|_p, ~~~~~ \frac{d}{dt}\|\Omega\|_p\leq -\kappa \cos(D^{\infty})\|\Omega\|_p, ~~~~ {a.e.}~t > 0. $ (24)

    Proof. (ⅰ) Note that

    $ \frac{d |\theta_i|}{dt} \leq |\omega_i|. $

    We multiply by $p |\theta_i|^{p-1}$ to the above relation, take a sum the resulting relation, and use Hölder's inequality to get the following estimate:

    $ \frac{d}{dt} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} |\theta_i|^p \leq p \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} |\theta_i|^{p-1} |\omega_i| \leq p \Big( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} |\theta_i|^{p} \Big) ^{\frac{p-1}{p}} \Big( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} |\omega_i|^p \Big)^{\frac{1}{p}} \leq p \|\Theta\|_p^{p-1} \|\Omega\|_{p}. $

    This yields the desired first differential inequality.

    (ⅱ) It follows from $(4)_2$ that we have

    $ \label{C-2} |\omega_i| \frac{d|\omega_i|}{dt} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{d|\omega_i|^2}{dt} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{d\omega_i^2}{dt} = \omega_i \frac{d\omega_i}{dt} = \frac{\kappa}{N} \sum\limits_{j = 1}^N \cos (\theta_j - \theta_i) \omega_i (\omega_j - \omega_i). $ (25)

    We use $(25)$ to obtain

    $ dΩppdt=Ni=1ddt|ωi|p=Ni=1p|ωi|p2|ωi|ddt|ωi|=Ni=1p|ωi|p2[κNNj=1cos(θjθi)ωi(ωjωi)]=κpNNi=1Nj=1cos(θjθi)|ωi|p2ωi(ωjωi)=κp2NNi=1Nj=1cos(θjθi)(ωjωi)(|ωi|p2ωi|ωj|p2ωj). $ (26)

    We use the monotonicity of $f(x) = |x|^{p-2} x$ to see

    $ \label{C-4} (\omega_j -\omega_i)(|\omega_i|^{p-2} \omega_i -|\omega_j|^{p-2} \omega_j) \leq 0. $ (27)

    Then, we use (26), (27), $\sum_{i = 1} \omega_i = 0$ and a priori condition:

    $ \cos(\theta_j - \theta_i) \geq \cos D^{\infty} $

    to obtain

    $dΩppdtκpcosD2NNi,j=1(ωjωi)(|ωi|p2ωi|ωj|p2ωj)=κpcosDNi=1|ωi|p=κpcosDΩpp.$

    This yields the desired second differential inequality.

    Finally, we combine Proposition 1 and Lemma 3.1 to derive the exponential synchronization.

    Theorem 3.3. Let $\{ (\theta_i, \omega_i) \}$ be a solution to (4) with initial data and coupling strength:

    $ \Theta^0 \in {\mathcal S}(D^{\infty}), ~~~ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \omega^0_i = 0, ~~~ \kappa > \frac{D(\Omega^0)}{\cos(D^\infty)(D^\infty- D(\Theta^0))}, ~~~~{where}~~D^{\infty} < \frac{\pi}{2}. $

    Then, there exists a positive constant $\theta_p^{\infty}$ such that for $p \in [1, \infty)$,

    $ \| \Omega(t)\|_p\leq \| \Omega^0 \|_pe^{-\kappa \cos(D^{\infty}) t}, ~~~ \|\Theta(t)\|_p\leq \theta_p^{\infty}, t \geq0. $

    Proof. The exponential decay of $\Omega$ follows from the second equation of (24). On the other hand, it follows from $(24)_1$ that we have

    $ \Big| \| \Theta(t) \|_p - \| \Theta(0) \|_p \Big| \leq \int_{0}^{t} \|\Omega(s) \|_p\,ds \leq \frac{ \| \Omega^0 \|_p}{\kappa \cos D^{\infty}} \Big( 1 - e^{-\kappa \cos (D^{\infty})t } \Big) \leq \frac{ \| \Omega^0 \|_p}{\kappa \cos D^{\infty}}. $

    Thus, we have

    $ \| \Theta(t) \|_p \leq \| \Theta^0 \|_p + \frac{ \| \Omega^0 \|_p}{\kappa \cos D^{\infty}} = : \theta_p^{\infty}(D^{\infty}, \kappa, \| \Theta^0 \|_p,\|\Omega^0\|_p ). $

    Thanks to Theorem 3.3, we can conclude that there exists a unique phase-locked state $\Theta^{\infty}$. Moreover, $\Theta(t)$ will tend to $\Theta^{\infty}$ exponentially.

    Corollary 1. Let $\{ (\theta_i, \omega_i) \}$ be a solution to (4) with initial data $\{ (\theta^0_i, \omega^0_i) \}$ and coupling strength $\kappa$:

    $ \Theta^0 \in {\mathcal S}(D^{\infty}), ~~~~ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \omega^0_i = 0, ~~~~ \kappa > \frac{D(\Omega^0)}{\cos(D^\infty)(D^\infty- D(\Theta^0))}, ~~~~ {where}~~D^{\infty} < \frac{\pi}{2}. $

    Then, for any solution $\{ (\theta_i, \omega_i) \}$, there exists a unique phase lock state $\Theta^{\infty}: = (\theta_1^{\infty}, \cdots, \theta_N^{\infty})$ such that

    $ |\theta_i(t)-\theta_i^{\infty}|\leq Ce^{-\kappa \cos(D^{\infty})t}, ~~~~ i = 1, \cdots, N. $

    Proof. Let $\Theta = \Theta(t)$ be a solution to system (4). Then, since $\kappa$ is sufficiently large, we have

    $ \sup\limits_{0 \leq t < \infty} D(\Theta(t)) \leq D^{\infty}. $

    Then, we use Theorem 3.2 to obtain

    $ |θi(˜t)θi(t)|=|˜ttωi(s)ds|˜tt|ωi(s)|ds˜tt(Ni=1|ωi(s)|p)1/pds˜ttΩ(s)pdsΩ0p˜tteκcos(D)sdsΩ0pκcosD(eκ(cosD)teκ(cosD)˜t). $ (28)

    Then for any $\varepsilon>0$, we can find a positive number $T$ such that if $\tilde{t}\geq T$ and $t\geq T$, then

    $|\theta_i(\tilde{t})-\theta_i(t)| < \varepsilon.$

    This immediately implies that there exists a unique asymptotic limit $\theta_i^{\infty}$. Moreover, we combine (28) to show that

    $|\theta_i(t)-\theta_i^{\infty}|\leq Ce^{-\kappa (\cos D^{\infty})t}.$

    In this section, we study the uniform $\ell_p$-stability for the augmented system (4) with respect to initial data.

    Let $Z: = (\Theta, \Omega)$ and $\tilde{Z}: = ({\tilde \Theta}, {\tilde \Omega})$ be two solutions to (4) corresponding to initial data $(\Theta^0, \Omega^0)$ and $({\tilde \Theta}^0, {\tilde \Omega}^0)$, respectively. For the uniform stability estimate, we introduce a metric which is equivalent to $\ell_p$-distance: for $p \in [1, \infty)$ and two solutions $Z = (\Theta, \Omega) $ and ${\tilde Z} = ({\tilde \Theta}, \tilde \Omega),$ we define the distance as

    $ \label{New-2} d_p(Z(t), {\tilde Z}(t)) : = \| \Theta(t) - {\tilde \Theta}(t) \|_p + \| \Omega(t) - {\tilde \Omega}(t) \|_p. $ (29)

    Next, we present a uniform $\ell_p$-stability of system (4) with respect to initial data as follows.

    Definition 4.1. The system (4) is uniformly $\ell_p$-stable with respect to initial data if the following relation holds: For two solutions $Z$ and ${\tilde Z}$ to (4) with initial data $Z^0$ and ${\tilde Z}^0$, respectively, there exists a positive constant $G$ independent of $t$ such that

    $ d_p(Z(t), {\tilde Z}(t)) \leq G d_p(Z_0, {\tilde Z}_0), ~~~~ t \geq 0. $

    In the following lemma, we will derive differential inequalities for two subfunctionals $ \| \Theta(t) - {\tilde \Theta}(t) \|_p$ and $\| \Omega(t) - {\tilde \Omega}(t) \|_p$ for $p \in [1, \infty)$.

    Lemma 4.2. Let $(\Theta, \Omega)$ and $({\tilde \Theta}, {\tilde \Omega})$ be two solutions to (4) corresponding to initial data $(\Theta^0, \Omega^0)$ and $({\tilde \Theta}^0, {\tilde \Omega}^0)$, respectively. Suppose that initial data and coupling strength satisfies following conditions:

    $Θ0S(D),   ˜Θ0S(D),   Ni=1ω0i=0   and   Ni=1˜ω0i=0,κ>max{D(Ω0)cos(D)(DD(Θ0)),D(˜Ω0)cos(D)(DD(˜Θ0))}.$

    Then, we have

    $ ddtΘ˜ΘpΩ˜Ωp,a.e.,  t>0,ddtΩ˜Ωpκcos(D)Ω˜Ωp+2κ˜Ω0peκcos(D)tΘ˜Θp. $ (30)

    Proof. ● Case A (Derivation of the first inequality $(30)_1$). Note that $\theta_i - {\tilde \theta}_i$ satisfies

    $ \frac{d}{dt} (\theta_i - {\tilde \theta}_i) = \omega_i - {\tilde \omega}_i. $

    This yields

    $ \frac{d}{dt} |\theta_i - {\tilde \theta}_i| \leq |\omega_i - {\tilde \omega}_i|. $

    We multiply by $p|\theta_i-\tilde{\theta}_i|^{p-1}$ on both sides, sum up the resulting relations with respect to $i$ and apply Hölder's inequality to obtain

    $ \frac{d}{dt} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} |\theta_i - {\tilde \theta}_i|^p \leq p \| \Theta - {\tilde \Theta} \|^{p-1}_p \| \Omega - {\tilde \Omega} \|_p. $

    This implies the desired estimate.

    ● Case B (Derivation of the first inequality $(30)_2$). Note that $\omega_i - {\tilde \omega}_i$ satisfies

    $ddt(ωi˜ωi)=κNNk=1[cos(θkθi)(ωkωi)cos(˜θk˜θi)(˜ωk˜ωi)]=κNNk=1cos(θkθi)[(ωkωi)(˜ωk˜ωi)]+κNNk=1[cos(θkθi)cos(˜θk˜θi)](˜ωk˜ωi)=κNNk=1cos(θkθi)[(ωk˜ωk)(ωi˜ωi)]κNNk=1sinθik[(θkθi)(˜θk˜θi)](˜ωk˜ωi).$ (31)

    where $\theta^*_{ik}$ is located between $(\theta_k-\theta_i)$ and $(\tilde{\theta}_k-\tilde{\theta}_i)$ by mean value theorem. By multiplying $(\omega_i-\tilde{\omega}_i)$ on both sides of (31), we have

    $ |ωi˜ωi|ddt|ωi˜ωi|=(ωi˜ωi)ddt(ωi˜ωi)=κNNk=1cos(θkθi)(ωi˜ωi)[(ωk˜ωk)(ωi˜ωi)]κNNk=1sinθik[(θk˜θk)(θi˜θi)](ωi˜ωi)(˜ωk˜ωi).κNNk=1cos(θkθi)(ωi˜ωi)[(ωk˜ωk)(ωi˜ωi)]+κNNk=1[|θk˜θk|+|θi˜θi|]|ωi˜ωi||˜ωk˜ωi|. $ (32)

    We use (32) and similar argument used in Proposition 1 to obtain

    $ ddtΩ˜Ωpp=Ni=1ddt|ωi˜ωi|p=Ni=1p|ωi˜ωi|p2|ωi˜ωi|ddt|ωi˜ωi|κpNi,kcos(θkθi)|ωi˜ωi|p2(ωi˜ωi)[(ωk˜ωk)(ωi˜ωi)]+κpNi,k(|θk˜θk|+|θi˜θi|)|ωi˜ωi|p1|˜ωk˜ωi| $ (33)

    By Hölder's inequality, we have

    $i,k|θk˜θk||ωi˜ωi|p1|˜ωk˜ωi|(i,k|ωi˜ωi|p)p1p(i,k|θk˜θk|p|˜ωk˜ωi|p)1pND(˜Ω)Θ˜ΘpΩ˜Ωp1p$

    and similarly

    $ \sum\limits_{i,k} |\omega_i - {\tilde \omega}_i|^{p-1} |\theta_i - {\tilde \theta}_i| |{\tilde \omega}_k - {\tilde \omega}_i | \leq N D({\tilde \Omega}) \| \Omega - {\tilde \Omega} \|^{p-1}_p \| \Theta - {\tilde \Theta} \|_p.$

    Then, by using these estimation and relation (33), we obtain

    $\frac{d}{dt}\|\Omega-\tilde{\Omega}\|_p^p\le -\kappa p \cos (D^{\infty}) \| \Omega - {\tilde \Omega} \|_p^p + 2 \kappa p D({\tilde \Omega}) \|\Theta - {\tilde \Theta} \|_p \| \Omega - {\tilde \Omega} \|_p^{p-1}.$

    By applying the relation $D(\tilde\Omega) \leq \|\tilde\Omega\|_p$ and Theorem 3.3, we attain the desired result.

    We combine Lemma 2.6 and Lemma 4.2 to obtain the uniform $\ell_p$-stability.

    Theorem 4.3. Suppose that initial data and coupling strength satisfy the following relations:

    $Θ0S(D),   ˜Θ0S(D),   Ni=1ω0i=0   and   Ni=1˜ω0i=0,κ>max{D(Ω0)cos(D)(DD(Θ0)),D(˜Ω0)cos(D)(DD(˜Θ0))}.$

    Then, for any two solutions $(\Theta,\Omega)$ and $(\tilde{\Theta},\tilde\Omega)$, we have uniform $\ell_p$-stability estimate (29).

    As a direct application of Theorem 4.3, we have the following corollary for the first-order Kuramoto model (1).

    Corollary 2. Suppose that initial data and coupling strength $\kappa$ satisfy the following relations:

    $Θ0S(D),   ˜Θ0S(D),   Ni=1νi=0,   Ni=1˜νi=0,κ>max{D(Ω0)cos(D)(DD(Θ0)),D(˜Ω0)cos(D)(DD(˜Θ0))}.$

    Then, for any two solutions $\Theta$ and $\tilde{\Theta}$ to (1) with natural frequency ${\mathcal V}: = (\nu_i)$ and $\tilde{{\mathcal V}}: = (\tilde{\nu}_i)$ respectively, there exists a positive constant $C$ independent of $t$ such that

    $ \label{NE-0-0} \|\Theta(t)-{\tilde \Theta}(t)\|_p\le C\Big[\|\Theta^0-{\tilde \Theta}^0\|_p+\|{\mathcal V}-{\tilde {\mathcal V}}\|_p\Big],~~~ t \geq 0. $

    Proof. Let $\Theta$ and $\tilde{\Theta}$ be phase processes for (1) corresponding to the following initial data and natural frequencies, respectively:

    $ \label{NE-0} (\theta_1^0, \cdots, \theta_N^0),~~(\nu_1, \cdots, \nu_N); ~~~~ ({\tilde \theta}_1^0, \cdots, {\tilde \theta}_N^0),~~({\tilde \nu}_1, \cdots, {\tilde \nu}_N). $ (34)

    On the other hand, we also set initial frequencies:

    $ ω0i:=νi+κNNj=1sin(θ0jθ0i),˜ω0i:=˜νi+κNNj=1sin(˜θ0j˜θ0i). $ (35)

    Then, we solve the second-order system (4) with initial data (34) and (35). It follows from the equivalence relation between KM (1) and AKM (4) in Theorem 4.3 and Theorem 4.3 that we have

    $ \label{NE-2} \|\Theta(t)-{\tilde \Theta}(t)\|_p\le C\Big[\|\Theta^0-{\tilde \Theta}^0\|_p+\|\Omega^0-\tilde\Omega^0\|_p\Big], $ (36)

    where $\Omega^0 = (\omega_1^0, \cdots, \omega_N^0)$. We again use the relations (35) to find

    $|ω0i˜ω0i||νi˜νi|+κNNj=1|sin(θ0jθ0i)sin(˜θ0j˜θ0i)||νi˜νi|+κNNj=1(|θ0j˜θ0j|+|θ0i˜θ0i|).$

    This yields

    $ \label{NE-3} \|\Omega^0-\tilde\Omega^0\|_p\le C\Big[\|\Theta^0-{\tilde \Theta}^0\|_p + \|\mathcal V-\tilde{\mathcal V} \|_p\Big]. $ (37)

    Finally, we combine (36) and (37) to obtain the desired stability estimate.

    In this section, we present the uniform mean-field limit for the AKM in a measure theoretic framework. The limiting mean-field kinetic equation can be formally derived from the particle model (4) via the formal procedure of BBGKY hierarchy, and it can be rigorously justified using the standard empirical measure approximations and local-in-time stability estimates in Monge-Kantorovich distance which is equivalent to Wasserstein-$1$ distance in any finite time.

    The formal BBGKY hierarchy procedure yields a formal mean-field limit of system (4) toward the mean-field kinetic equation as $N \to \infty$. More precisely, let $f = f (\theta, \omega, t)$ be the one-particle distribution function. Then, the kinetic equation reads as follows.

    $ {ft+ωθf+ω(L[f]f)=0,   (θ,ω)T×R,  t>0,L[f](θ,ω,t):=κ2π0cos(θθ)(ωω)f(θ,ω,t)dθdω. $ (38)

    Recall that our main purpose of this section is to justify the rigorous transition from (4) to (38) in the mean-field limit $(N \to \infty)$.

    In this subsection, we briefly discuss some framework which embodies (4) and (38) in a common framework. For this, we first review concept of measure-valued solutions to (38).

    Let $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$ be the set of all Radon probability measures with compact support on the phase space $\mathbb T\times\mathbb R$, which can be understood as normalized nonnegative bounded linear functionals on $C_0(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$. For a probability measure $\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$, we use a standard duality relation:

    $\langle\mu,f\rangle = \int_{\mathbb T\times\mathbb R}f(\theta,\omega) \, d\mu(\theta,\omega), ~~~~f \in C_0(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R).$

    Next, we recall several definitions to be used later.

    Definition 5.1. [7] For $T\in[0,\infty)$, let $\mu_t\in L^{\infty}([0,T);\mathcal{P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R))$ be a measure-valued solution to (38) with initial data $\mu_0\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$ if the following three assertions hold:

    1. Total mass is normalized: $\langle\mu_t,1\rangle = 1$.

    2. $\mu$ is weakly continuous in $t$:

    $ \langle\mu_t,f\rangle~\mbox{is continuous in $t$} ~~~ \forall~f \in C_0^1(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R\times [0,T)). $

    3. $\mu$ satisfies the equation (38) in a weak sense: for $\forall~\varphi \in C^1_0(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R \times [0, T))$,

    $ \label{msol} \langle\mu_t, \varphi(\cdot,\cdot,t)\rangle-\langle \mu_0, \varphi(\cdot,\cdot,0)\rangle = \int_0^t\langle\mu_s,\partial_s \varphi + \omega\partial_\theta \varphi + L[\mu_s] \partial_\omega \varphi \rangle \, ds, $

    Remark 4. Note that for a solution $\{(\theta_i, \omega_i) \}$ to (4), the empirical measure

    $ \label{PP-1} \mu^N_t : = \frac{1}{N} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} \delta_{\theta_i} \otimes \delta_{\omega_i}, $

    is a measure-valued solution in the sense of Definition 5.1 to (38). Thus, ODE solution to (4) can be understood as a measure-valued solution for (38). Likewise, the classical solution for the kinetic AKM model (38) is also a measure-valued solution as well. Thus, we can treat the particle and kinetic AKM models in the same framework.

    We now discuss how to measure the distance between the solutions of (4) and (38) by equipping a metric to the probability measure space ${\mathcal P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$, and the concept of local-in-time mean-field limit. In fact, we can endow Wasserstein-$p$ distance $W_p$ in the probability space ${\mathcal P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$.

    Definition 5.2. [33,40]

    1. For $p\in \mathbb Z_+ $, let ${\mathcal P}_p(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$ be a collection of all probability measures with finite $p^{th}$ moment: for some $z_0\in\mathbb T\times\mathbb R$

    $\langle\mu, \|z - z_0\|_p^p \rangle < +\infty.$

    Then, Wasserstein $p$-distance $W_{p}(\mu, \nu)$ is defined for any $\mu,\nu\in {\mathcal P}_p(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$ as

    $W_{p}(\mu,\nu): = \inf\limits_{\gamma\in\Gamma(\mu,\nu)} \Big( \int_{\mathbb T^2\times\mathbb R^2} \|z-z^*\|_p^p \, d\gamma(z,z^*) \Big)^{\frac{1}{p}}, $

    where $\Gamma(\mu,\nu)$ denotes the collection of all probability measures on $\mathbb T^2\times\mathbb R^2$ with marginals $\mu$ and $\nu$.

    2. If $\lim\limits_{p\rightarrow \infty} W_{p}$ exists, then we define $W_{\infty}$ metric as the limit.

    3. For any $T \in (0, \infty]$, the kinetic equation (38) is derivable from the particle model (4) in $[0,T)$, or equivalent to say the mean-field limit from the particle system (4) to the kinetic equation (38), which is valid in $[0,T)$, if for every solution $\mu_t$ of the kinetic equation (38) with initial data $\mu_0$, the following condition holds: for some $p \in [1, \infty)$ and $t \in [0, T)$,

    $ \lim\limits_{N\rightarrow +\infty}W_p(\mu_0^N,\mu_0) = 0 ~~~ \Longleftrightarrow ~~~ \lim\limits_{N\rightarrow +\infty}W_p(\mu_t^N,\mu_t) = 0,$

    where $\mu^N_t$ is a measure valued solution of the particle system (4) with initial data $\mu^N_0$.

    For later use, we quote two results on the approximation of a measure by empirical measures and mean-field limit in any finite time interval without proofs.

    Proposition 2. [40] For any given $p \in [1, \infty)$ and $\mu \in\mathcal{P}_p(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$ with compact support, there exists a sequence of empirical measures $\mu^N\in\mathcal{P}_p(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$ such that

    $ \mu^N~ has ~a~ common ~compact ~support ~with~\mu ~and~~ \lim\limits_{N\rightarrow+\infty}W_p(\mu^N,\mu) = 0. $

    Remark 5. The construction of the approximation can be followed by the method of Theorem 6.18 in the book [40] by finding a sequence of atomic measures $\sum_{j = 1}^{N} a_j\delta_j$ with rational numbers $a_j$ such that $\displaystyle \sum_{j = 1}^{N} a_j = 1$.

    In this subsection, we present a uniform mean-field limit to the kinetic equation (38). We basically follow the approach given in [21], Corollary 1 and Lemma 3.2.

    Theorem 5.3. Suppose that the initial probability measure $\mu_0\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$ and coupling strength satisfy

    $ Dμ0ΘD<π2,T×Rωμ0(dθ,dω)=0,T×Rμ0(dθ,dω)m0,T×R(|θ|p+|ω|p)μ0(dθ,dω)m2,κ>Dμ0ωcos(D)(DDμ0Θ), $ (39)

    where $D_{\Theta}^{\mu_0}$ and $D_{\omega}^{\mu_0}$ are diameters of the projected supports of $\mu_0$ in $\theta$ and $\omega$-spaces. Then, the following assertions hold: for $p \in [1,\infty)$,

    1. There exists a unique measure-valued solution $\mu_t\in L^{\infty}\left([0,\infty);\mathcal{P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)\right)$ to (38) with initial data $\mu_0$ such that $\mu_t$ is approximated by empirical measure $\mu_t^N$ in Wasserstein-$p$ distance uniformly in time:

    $\varlimsup\limits_{N\rightarrow +\infty}\sup\limits_{t\in[0,+\infty)}W_{p}(\mu_t^N,\mu_t) = 0.$

    2. Suppose that $\nu_t$ is the measure-valued solution to (38) with initial measure $\nu_0$ which has the same property in (39). Then there exists nonnegative constant $G$ independent of $t$ such that

    $ W_{p}(\mu_t, \nu_t) \leq G W_{p}(\mu_0, \nu_0), ~~~ t \in [0, \infty).$

    Proof. Since the overall proof of Theorem 5.3 is almost the same as that of Corollary 1.1 in [21], we will provide only sketch of the proof.

    ● Step A (Extraction of Cauchy approximation for $\mu_0$ in $W_p$). We take a sequence of empirical measures $\mu_0^N$ that approximate $\mu_0$ satisfying

    $ \label{F-1} \lim\limits_{N\rightarrow+\infty}W_p(\mu_0^N,\mu_0) = 0. $ (40)

    The existence of such approximation is guaranteed by [40]. Then, owing to (40), for any $\varepsilon>0$, there exists a positive integer $N = N(\varepsilon)$ such that

    $W_p(\mu^n_0,\mu^m_0) < \varepsilon,~~ for ~\ n,m > N(\varepsilon).$

    ● Step B (Approximation of $W_p(\mu_0^n,\mu_0^m)$). Using the argument used in the proof of the Corollary 1.1 in [21], we can find a natural number $M_{mn}$ such that

    $ \left|W_p^p(\mu_0^n,\mu_0^m)-\frac{1}{M_{mn}}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{M_{mn}}\|z_{k0}-\bar{z}_{k0}\|_p^p\right|\le \varepsilon^p, $ (41)

    where, $z_{k0}: = (\theta_{k0},\omega_{k0})$ and $\bar{z}_{k0}: = (\bar{\theta}_{k0},\bar{\omega}_{k0})$ are support of initial approximated empirical measures $\mu_0^n$ and $\mu_0^m$ respectively.

    ● Step C (Lifting the information at time $s = 0$ to $s = t>0$). Now, using (41) and the previous $\ell_p$-stability in particle level, Theorem 4.3, we can directly estimate $W_p(\mu_t^n,\mu_t^m)$ as

    $ W^p_p(\mu_t^n,\mu_t^m)\le 2^{p-1}G^p(W_p^p(\mu_0^n,\mu_0^m)+\varepsilon^p)\le2^pG^p\varepsilon^p. $ (42)

    which implies that the sequence $\mu_t^n$ is Cauchy in $W_p$-metric. Thus, we can find a limit measure $\mu_t$. We next apply similar arguments in [15] and show that the limit measure $\mu_t$ is the unique measure-valued solution of the kinetic equation (38) with initial data $\mu_0$. Moreover, because of the estimate (42), we can conclude that for any $\varepsilon$, there exists a positive constant $L$, such that

    $\sup\limits_{t\in[0,+\infty)}W_p(\mu^n_t,\mu_t)\leq 4G\varepsilon,~~~ \mbox{for}~~~ n > L.$

    This yields

    $ \varlimsup\limits_{N\rightarrow +\infty}\sup\limits_{t\in[0,+\infty)}W_p(\mu_t^N,\mu_t) = 0. $ (43)

    The uniform compact support of $\mu_t$ follows this uniform convergence.

    ● Step D (Uniform stability of kinetic equation). For measures $\mu_0$ and $\nu_0$ in ${\mathcal P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$, let $\mu$ and $\nu$ be measure-valued solutions to (38). Then, it follows from (43) that for any $\varepsilon \ll 1$, there exists $N_0(\varepsilon) \in \mathbb N$ such that

    $ W_p(\mu, \mu^n) < \frac{\varepsilon}{2}, ~~~~ W_p(\nu^n, \nu) < \frac{\varepsilon}{2} ~~~~ \text{and} ~~~~ n \geq N_0(\varepsilon). $

    Then, we use the above estimates and (42) to obtain

    $Wpp(μt,νt)(Wp(μt,μnt)+Wp(μnt,νnt)+Wp(νnt,νt))p(ε+Wp(μnt,νnt))p2p1(εp+Wpp(μnt,νnt))2p1(2εp+GpWpp(μn0,νn0)).$

    Letting $n \to \infty$, we have

    $ W^p_p(\mu_t, \nu_t) \leq 2^{p} \varepsilon^p + 2^{p-1} G^p W_p^p(\mu_0,\nu_0). $

    Since $\varepsilon$ was arbitrary, we have the uniform $W_p$-stability:

    $ W_p(\mu_t, \nu_t) \leq 2^{\frac{p-1}{p}} G W_p(\mu_0, \nu_0), t \geq 0. $

    Remark 6. The same arguments can be applied for the mean-field limit for the Kuramoto model to the corresponding kinetic equation uniform in time in the class of synchronizing solutions in the next section.

    As a direct application of Theorem 5.3, we have the following synchronization estimate for the measure-valued solutions to (38).

    Corollary 3. Suppose that the assumptions (39) hold, and let $\mu_t$ be a measure-valued solution to (38) whose existence is guaranteed by Theorem 5.3. Then, we have the complete frequency synchronization:

    $\Big( \int_{\mathbb T\times\mathbb R} |\omega|^p \, d\mu_t\Big)^{\frac{1}{p}} \leq C e^{-\kappa (\cos D^{\infty}) t} \Big(\int_{\mathbb T\times\mathbb R}|\omega|^p \, d\mu_0\Big)^{\frac{1}{p}}.$

    Proof. Let $\mu_t^N$ be a sequence of empirical measures appearing in the course of the proof of Theorem 3.2. Then, it follows from Theorem 3.2 that we have

    $ \label{ineq} \Big( \int_{\mathbb R^{2d}} |\omega|^p \, d\mu_t^N\Big)^{\frac{1}{p}} \leq e^{-\kappa(\cos D^{\infty}) t} \Big(\int_{\mathbb R^{2d}}|\omega|^p \, d\mu_0^N\Big)^{\frac{1}{p}}. $ (44)

    On the other hand, since $\mu_t^N$ has a common compact support, we can view $\|\mathcal{V}\|_p^p$ as a test function. Then, due to Theorem 5.3, we have,

    $\lim\limits_{N\rightarrow 0} W_{p}(\mu_t^N, \mu_t) = 0. $

    This implies the weak convergence of $\mu_t^N$ to $\mu_t$. Thus, we can pass to the limit $N \to \infty$ to (44) to obtain

    $\Big( \int_{\mathbb R^{2d}} |\omega|^p \, d\mu_t\Big)^{\frac{1}{p}} \leq e^{-\kappa(\cos D^{\infty}) t} \Big(\int_{\mathbb R^{2d}}|\omega|^p \, d\mu_0\Big)^{\frac{1}{p}}.$

    In this subsection, we present an alternative approach for the complete synchronization estimate for (38) introduced in previous subsection. As mentioned in abstract, the kinetic equation (38) for the AKM is more suitable for the Lyapunov functional approach, compared to the kinetic Kuramoto equation for the KM with distributed natural frequencies. For simplicity of presentation, we suppress $t$-dependence in $f$:

    $ f(\theta, \omega) : = f(\theta, \omega, t), ~~~ \theta \in [0, 2\pi],~~\omega \in \mathbb R. $

    Lemma 5.4. Let $f$ be a classical solution of (38) whose support is compact. Then, we have

    $ \frac{d}{dt}\int_0^{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f \, d\omega d\theta = 0, ~~~~~ \frac{d}{dt}\int_0^{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \omega f \, d\omega d\theta = 0, ~~~~~ t > 0. $

    Proof. It directly comes from multiplying by $1$ and $\omega$ to (38) and integrating the resulting relation over the phase and frequency space, hence we omit the detailed calculation.

    Next, we discuss the derivation of the complete (frequency) synchronization estimate. For this, we use the Lyapunov functional defined as follows.

    $ \Lambda[f(t)] : = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\omega - \omega_c|^2 f(\theta, \omega) \, d\omega d\theta, ~~~~~ \omega_c : = \frac{\int_0^{2\pi}\int_\mathbb R \omega f \, d\omega d\theta}{\int_0^{2\pi}\int_\mathbb R f \, d\omega d\theta}, $ (45)

    where $\omega_c$ is the mean frequency which is constant due to Lemma 5.4.

    If complete synchronization occurs, it is natural to expect that frequency will converge to $\omega_c$, i.e., the Lyapunov functional $\Lambda(f)$ converges to 0. To show this, we will use the standard Lyapunov functional estimate on $\Lambda(f)$.

    Theorem 5.5. Let $f$ be a classical solution of (38) whose support is compact and initial datum $f^0$ satisfying

    $ D^0_\Theta \le D^\infty < \frac{\pi}{2},$

    where $D^0_\Theta$ is the diameter of support of $f_0$ projected to $\theta$-space. Then, if the coupling strength $\kappa$ is large enough, the Lyapunov functional $\Lambda[f]$ decays exponentially:

    $\Lambda[f(t)] \le\Lambda[f^0]e^{-2\kappa (\cos D^\infty)\|f_0\|_{L^1}t}, ~~~~{as ~t ~\to \infty}. $

    Proof. It follows from Lemma 3.1 and condition for support of initial data that we have

    $D_\Theta(t) \le D^\infty < \frac{\pi}{2},$

    where $D_{\Theta}(t)$ is the diameter of support of $f(\cdot,\cdot,t)$. Now we use (45) and use the periodicity of $f$ in $\theta$-variable to obtain

    $ddtΛ[f]=2π0R(ωωc)2tfdωdθ=2π0R(ωωc)2ωθfdωdθ2π0R(ωωc)2ω(L[f]f)dωdθ=2π0R2(ωωc)(L[f]f)dωdθ=2κ[0,2π]2×R2cos(θθ)(ωωc)(ωω)f(θ,ω)f(θ,ω)dθdθdωdω=2κ[0,2π]2×R2cos(θθ)ω(ωω)f(θ,ω)f(θ,ω)dθdθdωdω2κ[0,2π]2×R2cos(θθ)ωc(ωω)f(θ,ω)f(θ,ω)dθdθdωdω=:I1+I2.$

    Next, we estimate the terms ${\mathcal I}_i$ separately.

    ● (estimate of $\mathcal{I}_1$). By interchanging $\omega$ and $\omega_*$, we obtain

    $I1=2κ[0,2π]2×R2cos(θθ)ω(ωω)f(θ,ω)f(θ,ω)dθdθdωdω=κ[0,2π]2×R2cos(θθ)(ωω)2f(θ,ω)f(θ,ω)dθdθdωdωκcosD[0,2π]2×R2((ωωc)(ωωc))2f(θ,ω)f(θ,ω)dθdθdωdω=κcosD[0,2π]2×R2(ωωc)2f(θ,ω)f(θ,ω)dθdθdωdω+2κcosD[0,2π]2×R2(ωωc)(ωωc)f(θ,ω)f(θ,ω)dθdθdωdωκcosD[0,2π]2×R2(ωωc)2f(θ,ω)f(θ,ω)dθdθdωdω=2κcosD[0,2π]2×R2(ωωc)2f(θ,ω)f(θ,ω)dθdθdωdω=2κcosDf0L1Λ[f],$

    where we use the condition $|\theta_*-\theta| \le D^\infty$ when $\theta$ and $\theta_*$ are contained in support of $f(\cdot,\cdot,t)$, which is guaranteed by condition on support of initial data.

    ● (estimate of $\mathcal{I}_2$). From the anti-symmetry of integrand, it is easy to see

    $\mathcal{I}_2 = -2\kappa\omega_c\int_{[0,2\pi]^2\times\mathbb R^2}\cos(\theta_*-\theta)(\omega_*-\omega)f(\theta,\omega)f(\theta_*,\omega_*) \, d\theta d\theta_* d\omega d\omega_* = 0.$

    From the estimation of $\mathcal{I}_i$, $i = 1,2$, we derive following differential inequality

    $\frac{d}{dt}\Lambda[f]\le -2\kappa\cos D^\infty \|f_0\|_{L^1}\Lambda[f].$

    By using Grönwall's lemma, we can obtain the desired exponential decay.

    In this section, we study the uniform mean-field limit of the Kuramoto model and as a direct application of previous results, we also show the existence of phase-locked states for the kinetic Kuramoto equation via uniform mean-field limit by lifting particle results to the kinetic regime. For the local-in-time stability and mean-field limit of the kinetic Kuramoto equation, we refer to [28].

    Let $f = f(\theta, \nu, t)$ be a one-oscillator probability density function for the ensemble of Kuramoto oscillators. Then, the dynamics of $f$ is governed by the kinetic Kuramoto equation:

    $ {tf+θ(v[f]f)=0,(θ,ν)T×R,  t>0,v[f](θ,ν,t)=ν+κ2π0sin(θθ)f(θ,ν,t)dνdθ. $ (46)

    Note that the probability density function $g = g(\nu)$ for natural frequencies appears as a $\nu$-marginal density function of $f$:

    $ \int_0^{2\pi}f(\theta,\nu,t)d\theta = g(\nu).$

    Unlike to (38), it is not clear how to show the emergence of the complete frequency synchronization for (46) using the nonlinear functional approach as in Section 5.3. This is why we introduce a second order model (4) and its mean-field limit (38). Similar to Definition 5.2, we can define the measure valued solution of the kinetic Kuramoto equation (46).

    Definition 6.1. [7] For $T\in[0,\infty)$, $\mu_t\in L^{\infty}([0,T);\mathcal{P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R))$ is a measure valued solution to (46) with initial data $\mu_0\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$ if the following three assertions hold:

    1. Total mass is normalized: $\langle\mu_t,1\rangle = 1$.

    2. $\mu$ is weakly continuous in $t$:

    $ \langle\mu_t,f\rangle~\mbox{is continuous in $t$} ~~~ \forall~f(\theta,\nu) \in C_0^1(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R\times [0,T)). $

    3. $\mu$ satisfies the equation (46) in a weak sense: for $\forall~\varphi \in C^1_0(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R \times [0, T))$,

    $ \langle\mu_t, \varphi(\cdot,\cdot,t)\rangle-\langle \mu_0, \varphi(\cdot,\cdot,0)\rangle = \int_0^t\langle\mu_s,\partial_s \varphi + v[\mu] \partial_\theta \varphi \rangle \, ds. $ (47)

    Remark 7. As mentioned in Remark 4, both the solution of the original Kuramoto model (1) and the solution of the kinetic equation (46) can be viewed as a measure valued solution in the sense of Definition 6.1. Thus, we can apply the Wasserstein metric in Definition 5.2 to measure the distance between two measure valued solutions.

    According to Proposition 2 and Remark 5, we have the following result.

    Theorem 6.2. Suppose that initial probability measure $\mu_0\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)$ and coupling strength satisfy

    $ Dμ0ΘD<π2,   2π0νμ0(dθ,dν)=0,   T×Rμ0(dθ,dν)m0,T×R(|θ|p+|ν|p)μ0(dθ,dν)m2,   κ>Dμ0ωcos(D)(DDμ0Θ). $ (48)

    Then, the following assertions hold. For $p \in [1, \infty)$,

    1. There exists a unique measure-valued solution $\mu_t\in L^{\infty}\left([0,\infty);\mathcal{P}(\mathbb T\times\mathbb R)\right)$ to (46) with initial data $\mu_0$ such that $\mu_t$ is approximated by empirical measure $\mu_t^N$ in Wasserstein-$p$ distance uniformly in time:

    $\varlimsup\limits_{N\rightarrow +\infty}\sup\limits_{t\in[0,+\infty)}W_{p}(\mu_t^N,\mu_t) = 0.$

    2. Moreover, if ${\tilde \mu}_t$ is the measure-valued solution to (46) with initial measure ${\tilde \mu}_0$ with compact support and finite moments (48), then there exists nonnegative constant $G$ independent of $t$ such that

    $ W_{p}(\mu_t, {\tilde \mu}_t) \leq G W_{p}(\mu_0, {\tilde \mu}_0), ~~~t \in [0, \infty).$

    Proof. The construction of the proof is similar to Theorem 5.3. In fact, as the distribution of natural frequency $\nu$ does not have its own dynamics, i.e., it does not change in time, thus the variance of $\nu$ between $\mu$ and ${\tilde \mu}$ will be a constant, i.e.,

    $\inf\limits_{\gamma\in\Gamma(\mu_t,{\tilde \mu}_t)}\int_{\mathbb T^2 \times\mathbb R^2}|\nu-\bar{\nu}|^p \, \gamma(\nu,\bar{\nu}) = \inf\limits_{\gamma\in\Gamma(\mu_0,{\tilde \mu}_0)}\int_{\mathbb T^2\times\mathbb R^2}|\nu-\bar{\nu}|^p \, \gamma(\nu,\bar{\nu}).$

    Therefore, we only need to control the variance on $\theta$. Applying the uniform stability in Corollary 2, we can construct the uniform mean-field limit and stability for kinetic Kuramoto model (46) as same as Theorem 5.3.

    Now, for large time behavior, we can apply Corollary 1 to the approximate solution $\mu^N_t$. Notice that the decay rate in Corollary 1 is independent of $N$. Hence, the mean-field limit preserves the decay rate, when $N$ tends to infinity.

    Corollary 4. (Emergence of a phase-locked state) Suppose that the initial data $\mu_0$ and coupling strength satisfy the assumptions (39). Then, there exists a phase-locked state $\mu_{\infty}$ such that

    $W_p(\mu_t,\mu_{\infty})\leq Ce^{-K D^{\infty}t}, ~~~~{as ~t ~\to \infty}. $

    Proof. It follows from Corollary 1 that for each $\mu^N_t,$ we have a unique asymptotic equilibrium $\mu^N_{\infty}$. Then from the uniform stability in Corollary 2, we can obtain the sequence $\{\mu^N_{\infty}\}$ is Cauchy, and thus generates a unique limit measure $\mu_{\infty}$. Moreover, it follows from Corollary 1 that we have

    $W_p(\mu^N_t,\mu^N_{\infty})\leq Ce^{-\kappa D^{\infty}t}.$

    Notice here the $p$-th moment of $\nu$ would be cancelled because $\mu^N_t$ and $\mu^N_{\infty}$ has the same natural frequency distribution $\int\nu \mu^N_0(d\theta,d\Omega)$. Now for any $\varepsilon>0$, we can find $N_0$ large enough such that, for $N\geq N_0$ we have

    $W_p(\mu_t,\mu_{\infty})\leq W_p(\mu_t,\mu^N_t)+W_p(\mu^N_t,\mu^N_{\infty})+W_p(\mu^N_{\infty},\mu_{\infty})\leq 2\varepsilon+Ce^{-\kappa D^{\infty}t}.$

    Thus, we have

    $W_p(\mu_t,\mu_{\infty})\leq Ce^{- \kappa D^{\infty}t}.$

    We presented the dynamic properties of the augmented Kuramoto model which is a second-order lifting of the Kuramoto model for synchronization. For the particle Kuramoto model with distributed natural frequencies, the complete (frequency) synchronization can be studied by analyzing the temporal evolution of $D({\dot \Theta})$. However, it is not clear how to verify the complete synchronization for the corresponding mean-field kinetic equation directly. This is why we introduced a second-order lifting of the Kuramoto model. For the corresponding kinetic equation, the complete frequency synchronization can be obtained via the Lyapunov functional measuring the dispersion of the frequency variations. Our proposed second-order model has a formal similarity to the Cucker-Smale flocking model. As long as the phase diameter is confined in a quarter arc, the flocking estimate, uniform $\ell_p$-stability and mean-field limit for the extended Kuramoto model can be analyzed using the similar techniques done for the Cucker-Smale model. As aforementioned in Introduction, the reason that we focus on the mean-field case (all-to-all couplings) is that we are interested in the complete synchronization estimate for the kinetic Kuramoto equation at the kinetic level without lifting particle results to the kinetic level. Other than this, some of the estimates studied in this paper can be extended to a more general setting. For example, we considered synchronization dynamics of Kuramoto oscillators on the complete network, but some estimates such as the uniform stability and synchronization estimates at the particle level can be certainly extended to the locally coupled Kuramoto oscillators over the general networks, say symmetric and connected networks. Moreover, nonlinear stability and instability of the incoherent state can be studied for the proposed kinetic equation. We leave these interesting issues as a future work.

    [1] The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys (2005) 77: 137-185.
    [2] Existence of partial entrainment and stability of phase-locking behavior of coupled oscillators. Prog. Theor. Phys. (2004) 112: 921-941.
    [3] Exponential dephasing of oscillators in the kinetic Kuramoto model. J. Stat. Phys. (2016) 162: 813-823.
    [4] On the complete phase synchronization for the Kuramoto model in the mean-field limit. Commun. Math. Sci. (2015) 13: 1775-1786.
    [5] J. Bronski, L. Deville and M. J. Park, Fully synchronous solutions and the synchronization phase transition for the finite-N Kuramoto model, Chaos, 22 (2012), 033133, 17pp. doi: 10.1063/1.4745197
    [6] Biology of synchronous flashing of fireflies. Nature (1966) 211: 562-564.
    [7] Contractivity of transport distances for the kinetic Kuramoto equation. J. Stat. Phys. (2014) 156: 395-415.
    [8] Phase transitions and topology changes in configuration space. J. Statist. Phys. (2003) 111: 1091-1123.
    [9] Asymptotic formation and orbital stability of phase-locked states for the Kuramoto model. Physica D (2012) 241: 735-754.
    [10] On exponential synchronization of Kuramoto oscillators. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (2009) 54: 353-357.
    [11] Synchronization analysis of Kuramoto oscillators. Commun. Math. Sci. (2013) 11: 465-480.
    [12] Synchronization in complex networks of phase oscillators: A survey. Automatica (2014) 50: 1539-1564.
    [13] On the critical coupling for Kuramoto oscillators. SIAM. J. Appl. Dyn. Syst (2011) 10: 1070-1099.
    [14] Synchronization in a pool of mutually coupled oscillators with random frequencies. J. Math. Biol (1985) 22: 1-9.
    [15] A simple proof of Cucker-Smale flocking dynamics and mean field limit. Commun. Math. Sci. (2009) 7: 297-325.
    [16] From particle to kinetic and hydrodynamic description of flocking. Kinet. and Relat. Model. (2008) 1: 415-435.
    [17] On the complete synchronization for the globally coupled Kuramoto model. Physica D (2010) 239: 1692-1700.
    [18] Remarks on the complete synchronization of Kuramoto oscillators. Nonlinearity (2015) 28: 1441-1462.
    [19] Emergence of phase-locked states for the Kuramoto model in a large coupling regime. Commun. Math. Sci (2016) 4: 1073-1091.
    [20] Collective synchronization of classical and quantum oscillators. EMS Surveys in Mathematical Sciences (2016) 3: 209-267.
    [21] S.-Y. Ha, J. Kim and X. Zhang, Uniform stability of the Cucker-Smale model and its application to the mean-field limit, To appear to Kinet. and Relat. Model.
    [22] Flocking and synchronization of particle models. Quart. Appl. Math. (2011) 69: 91-103.
    [23] A fast-slow dynamical systems theory for the Kuramoto type phase model. J. Differential Equations (2011) 251: 2685-2695.
    [24] Formation of phase-locked states in a population of locally interacting Kuramoto oscillators. J. Differential Equations (2013) 255: 3053-3070.
    [25] On the stability of the Kuramoto model of coupled nonlinear oscillators. Proceedings of the American Control Conference (2014) 4296-4301.
    [26] Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 1984. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-69689-3
    [27] Y. Kuramoto, International symposium on mathematical problems in mathematical physics, Lecture Notes in Theoretical Physics, 30 (1975), 420.
    [28] On the vlasov limit for systems of nonlinearly coupled oscillators without noise. Transport Theory and Statistical Physics (2005) 34: 523-535.
    [29] D. Mehta, N. S. Daleo, F. Dörfler and J. D. Hauenstein, Algebraic geometrization of the Kuramoto model: Equilibria and stability analysis, Chaos, 25 (2015), 053103, 7pp. doi: 10.1063/1.4919696
    [30] The spectrum of the partially locked state for the Kuramoto model. J. Nonlinear Science (2007) 17: 309-347.
    [31] The spectrum of the locked state for the Kuramoto model of coupled oscillators. Physica D (2005) 205: 249-266.
    [32] Stability of incoherence in a population of coupled oscillators. J. Stat. Phys (1991) 63: 613-635.
    [33] H. Neunzert, An introduction to the nonlinear boltzmann-vlasov equation, In Kinetic Theories and the Boltzmann Equation(Montecatini, 1981), 60-110, Lecture Notes in Math., 1048, Springer, Berlin, 1984. doi: 10.1007/BFb0071878
    [34] A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511755743
    [35] From Kuramoto to Crawford: Exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators. Physica D (2000) 143: 1-20.
    [36] Lyapunov function for the Kuramoto model of nonlinearly coupled oscillators. J. Stat. Phys. (1993) 72: 145-166.
    [37] A convergence result for the Kurmoto model with all-to-all couplings. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. (2011) 10: 906-920.
    [38] On computing the critical coupling coefficient for the Kuramoto model on a complete bipartite graph. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. (2009) 8: 417-453.
    [39] Global phase-locking in finite populations of phase-coupled oscillators. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. (2008) 7: 134-160.
    [40] C. Villani, Optimal Transport, Old and New, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-71050-9
    [41] Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators. J. Theor. Biol. (1967) 16: 15-42.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. G. Albi, N. Bellomo, L. Fermo, S.-Y. Ha, J. Kim, L. Pareschi, D. Poyato, J. Soler, Vehicular traffic, crowds, and swarms: From kinetic theory and multiscale methods to applications and research perspectives, 2019, 29, 0218-2025, 1901, 10.1142/S0218202519500374
    2. Chanho Min, Hyunjin Ahn, Seung-Yeal Ha, Myeongju Kang, Sufficient conditions for asymptotic phase-locking to the generalized Kuramoto model, 2023, 16, 1937-5093, 97, 10.3934/krm.2022024
    3. Hyunjin Ahn, Seung-Yeal Ha, Jeongho Kim, Uniform stability of the relativistic Cucker-Smale model and its application to a mean-field limit, 2021, 20, 1534-0392, 4209, 10.3934/cpaa.2021156
    4. Seung-Yeal Ha, Myeongju Kang, Hansol Park, Tommaso Ruggeri, Woojoo Shim, Uniform stability and uniform-in-time mean-field limit of the thermodynamic Kuramoto model, 2021, 79, 0033-569X, 445, 10.1090/qam/1588
    5. Seung-Yeal Ha, Jeongho Kim, Peter Kuchling, Oleksandr Kutoviy, Infinite particle systems with collective behaviour and related mesoscopic equations, 2019, 60, 0022-2488, 122704, 10.1063/1.5095487
    6. Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Emergent Behavior of a Second-Order Lohe Matrix Model on the Unitary Group, 2019, 175, 0022-4715, 904, 10.1007/s10955-019-02270-y
    7. Javier Morales, Jan Peszek, Eitan Tadmor, Flocking With Short-Range Interactions, 2019, 176, 0022-4715, 382, 10.1007/s10955-019-02304-5
    8. Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Jeongho Kim, Xiongtao Zhang, Uniform-in-time transition from discrete to continuous dynamics in the Kuramoto synchronization, 2019, 60, 0022-2488, 051508, 10.1063/1.5051788
    9. Hyunjin Ahn, Seung-Yeal Ha, Jeongho Kim, Nonrelativistic limits of the relativistic Cucker–Smale model and its kinetic counterpart, 2022, 63, 0022-2488, 082701, 10.1063/5.0070586
    10. Seung-Yeal Ha, Jeongho Kim, Jinyeong Park, Fast and slow clustering dynamics of Cucker–Smale ensemble with internal oscillatory phases, 2023, 33, 0218-2025, 1053, 10.1142/S0218202523500239
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6986) PDF downloads(612) Cited by(10)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog