Research article

Dynamics of the positive almost periodic solution to a class of recruitment delayed model on time scales

  • Received: 23 November 2022 Revised: 31 December 2022 Accepted: 09 January 2023 Published: 12 January 2023
  • MSC : 34C27, 34D23

  • By employing the operator theory, the Lyapunov function on time scales and the famous Gronwall's inequality, this paper addresses some dynamic properties of almost periodic solutions for a class of two species co-existence delayed model on time scales with almost periodic coefficients and Ricker, as well as the Beverton-Holt type function. First, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the almost periodic solution with a positive infimum by transforming the initial model into an equivalent integral equation. Second, we investigate the global exponential stability and uniformly asymptotic stability of the positive almost periodic solution. Finally, we give two examples to illustrate the main presented results.

    Citation: Ping Zhu. Dynamics of the positive almost periodic solution to a class of recruitment delayed model on time scales[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 7292-7309. doi: 10.3934/math.2023367

    Related Papers:

    [1] Shihe Xu, Zuxing Xuan, Fangwei Zhang . Analysis of a free boundary problem for vascularized tumor growth with time delays and almost periodic nutrient supply. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 13291-13312. doi: 10.3934/math.2024648
    [2] Xiaofang Meng, Yongkun Li . Pseudo almost periodic solutions for quaternion-valued high-order Hopfield neural networks with time-varying delays and leakage delays on time scales. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 10070-10091. doi: 10.3934/math.2021585
    [3] Jing Ge, Xiaoliang Li, Bo Du, Famei Zheng . Almost periodic solutions of neutral-type differential system on time scales and applications to population models. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3866-3883. doi: 10.3934/math.2025180
    [4] Yongkun Li, Xiaoli Huang, Xiaohui Wang . Weyl almost periodic solutions for quaternion-valued shunting inhibitory cellular neural networks with time-varying delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 4861-4886. doi: 10.3934/math.2022271
    [5] Qi Shao, Yongkun Li . Almost periodic solutions for Clifford-valued stochastic shunting inhibitory cellular neural networks with mixed delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 13439-13461. doi: 10.3934/math.2024655
    [6] Yanshou Dong, Junfang Zhao, Xu Miao, Ming Kang . Piecewise pseudo almost periodic solutions of interval general BAM neural networks with mixed time-varying delays and impulsive perturbations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21828-21855. doi: 10.3934/math.20231113
    [7] Chun Peng, Xiaoliang Li, Bo Du . Positive periodic solution for enterprise cluster model with feedback controls and time-varying delays on time scales. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6321-6335. doi: 10.3934/math.2024308
    [8] Ramazan Yazgan . An analysis for a special class of solution of a Duffing system with variable delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11187-11199. doi: 10.3934/math.2021649
    [9] Xin Liu, Yan Wang . Averaging principle on infinite intervals for stochastic ordinary differential equations with Lévy noise. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5316-5350. doi: 10.3934/math.2021314
    [10] Ping Zhu, Yongchang Wei . The dynamics of a stochastic SEI model with standard incidence and infectivity in incubation period. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18218-18238. doi: 10.3934/math.20221002
  • By employing the operator theory, the Lyapunov function on time scales and the famous Gronwall's inequality, this paper addresses some dynamic properties of almost periodic solutions for a class of two species co-existence delayed model on time scales with almost periodic coefficients and Ricker, as well as the Beverton-Holt type function. First, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the almost periodic solution with a positive infimum by transforming the initial model into an equivalent integral equation. Second, we investigate the global exponential stability and uniformly asymptotic stability of the positive almost periodic solution. Finally, we give two examples to illustrate the main presented results.



    In the research on population dynamics in biological applications, a recruitment-delayed model

    x(t)=B(x(tτ))D(x(t)) (1.1)

    is persistently used, where x(t) is the population size of mature adults at time t, B is the birth function involving maturation delay τ and D represents the death rate [1]. In particular, the birth function has two common forms, where one is the Ricker-type function Pxeαx for PR+, and the other is the Beverton-Holt function pxq+xm for mZ+ and PqR+. In order to model a laboratory fly population, Nicholson considered Eq (1.1) with B(x)=Pxebx and D(x)=δx, which is the well-known Nicholson's blowflies equation [2]; here, P is the per capita daily maximum egg production rate, 1b is the size at which the population reproduces at its maximum rate, τ is the time generated from birth to maturity and δR+ is adult mortality rate per capita daily.

    In recent years, there have been many researchers who have taken great interest in the investigation of dynamic behaviors based on Eq (1.1) and its analogous equations with Ricker's type or Beverton-Holt type functions, such as the existence and uniqueness of periodic solutions, oscillation, persistence, stability, etc.; see [3,4,5,6,7,8] for details. However, as far as we know, few authors have considered the problem on both Ricker's and Beverton-Holt type differential equations, let alone its positive almost periodic solutions and qualitative behavior.

    In many ecological dynamical systems, on the one hand, the growth rate of a population for a natural mature adult species in the real world would not react instantaneously to changes in its own total amount or that of an interacting species, but it certainly does after a time lag. In addition, the different delays and variable coefficients in differential equations are much more suitable and realistic to depict the variations in a natural environment [9,10]. On the other hand, the frequent almost periodic varying environment has been the target of extensive analysis on evolutionary theory because of the superiority and actuality as compared with a periodic environment; see [11,12,13,14] for details. Therefore, investigating the dynamical behavior in delayed models with an almost periodic term is an interesting and worthy topic.

    In spite of the fact that both continuous and discrete systems have a huge amount of research achievements, as a link between continuity and dispersion, the theory of time scales has occupied an irreplaceable position in fields such as the application of population models, quantum physics, etc. In recent years, there have been incremental investigations into a huge number of mathematical modelings with time scales, such as the permanence, existence and stability of periodic and almost periodic solutions; see [15,16,17] for details; this trend has become inevitable in the research on dynamical systems. Therefore, it is valuable in the exploration of dynamic equations on time scales.

    Inspired by the above discussions, in this paper, we consider the two species co-existence delayed model with the almost periodic coefficients and Ricker- and Beverton-Holt-type functions on time scales, as follows:

    {xΔ(t)=α1(t)x(t)+β(t)x(t)γ(t)+x(t)+p1(t)x(t)ebx(t)+h1(t)0K1(t,s)y(t+s)eby(t+s)Δs,yΔ(t)=α2(t)y(t)+p2(t)y(t)eby(t)+h2(t)0K2(t,s)x(t+s)ebx(t+s)Δs, (1.2)

    where x(t) and y(t) are the population densities of two species coexisting at time tT, respectively, for the almost periodic time scale T; xΔ(t) and yΔ(t) are the delta derivatives of the functions x(t) and y(t) respectively; αi, β, γ, pi and hi are positive almost periodic functions for i=1,2; β(t)x(t)γ(t)+x(t) is the Beverton-Holt type birth function; p1(t)x(t)ebx(t) and p2(t)y(t)eby(t) represent the Ricker-type birth function; Ki(t,s) represents the transmission delay kernels for i=1,2. Under the suitable assumptions, by transforming the model (1.2) into an equivalent integral equation and using the fixed point theorem in a normal and solid cone in Banach space, we establish some sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the positive almost periodic solution; further, we investigate the global exponential stability and uniformly asymptotic stability of this positive solution.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present some necessary preliminaries. In Section 3, we will give the main results on the existence, uniqueness and the stability of its positive almost periodic solutions of (1.2). In Section 4, we present two examples to illustrate the main results.

    Assume that C=C((,0]T,R) and HR+. Let CH={φ:φC,φ=supϑ(,0]T|φ(ϑ)|<H} and SH={x:xR,x<H}. For convenience, throughout this work, we denote the following nonnegative values:

    α+=suptRα(t),   α=inftRα(t),   β+=suptRβ(t),
    γ=inftRγ(t),   p+=suptRp(t),   p=inftRp(t),   h+=suptRh(t).

    In addition, for some definitions, lemmas and preliminary results on time scales and almost periodic functions, one can see [4,11,14,17] for more details, which are valuable in proving the main results in Section 3.

    Let the symbol T be a time scale, which is a closed nonempty subset of R. In fact, R and kZ[2k,2k+1] are some examples of T. Assume that the forward and backward jump operators σ, ρ: TT and the graininess μ: TR+ are respectively defined by

    σ(t)=sup{sT:s>t},   ρ(t)=inf{sT:s<t},   μ(t)=σ(t)t.

    A point tT is called left-dense if ρ(t)=t and t>infT, right-dense if σ(t)=t and t<supT, left-scattered if ρ(t)<t and right-scattered if σ(t)>t. In addition, if T has a left-scattered maximum m, then define Tk=Tm; otherwise, let Tk=T; if T has a right-scattered minimum m, then define Tk=Tm; otherwise, let Tk=T.

    Definition 2.1. A function f: TR is right-dense/left-dense continuous provided that it is continuous at right-dense/left-dense points in T and its left-dense/right-dense limits exist (finite) at left-dense/right-dense points in T. If f is continuous at each right-dense point and each left-dense point, then f is said to be a continuous function on T.

    Definition 2.2. Let the function f: TR, and define fΔ(t) to be the number (if it exists) with the property that for any given ε>0, there exists a neighborhood U of t such that, for all sU,

    |f(σ(t))f(s)fΔ(t)(σ(t)s)|<ε|σ(t)s|.

    Definition 2.3. We call fΔ(t) the delta derivative of f at t. If FΔ(t)=f(t), then the delta integral is defined by

    trf(s)Δs=F(t)F(r) for r,tT.

    Definition 2.4. A function p: TR is called regressive provided that 1+μ(t)p(t)0 for all tT. The set of all such regressive and rd-continuous functions will be denoted by R=R(T,R). Let the set R+=R+(T,R)={pR:1+μ(t)p(t)>0, tT}.

    Definition 2.5. If p is a regressive function, then the generalized exponential function ep is given as the unique solution of the initial value problem yΔ=p(t)y, y(s)=1, where sT. An explicit formula for ep(t,s) is defined as

    ep(t,s)=exp{tsξμ(τ)(p(τ))Δτ} for all s,tT

    with

    ξh(z)={log(1+hz)h, for h0,z, for h=0. 

    Definition 2.6. Let Γ be a collection of sets which is constructed by subsets of R. A time scale T is called an almost periodic time scale with respect to Γ if

    Γ={±τΛ:ΛT, t±τT, for tT},

    and Γ is called the smallest almost periodic set of T.

    Definition 2.7. Let T be an almost periodic time scale with respect to Γ. A function x:TR is called almost periodic if, for any ε>0, the set E(ε,x)={τΓ:|x(t+τ)x(t)|<ε for tT} is relatively dense in T.

    E(ε,x) and τ are called the ε-translation set and ε-translation number of x, respectively. Denote the space of all such almost periodic functions by AP(T,R).

    Definition 2.8. Let T be an almost periodic time scale with respect to Γ. A function f:T×BR is called almost periodic in tT uniformly for xS if the ε-translation set of f

    E(ε,f,S)={τΓ:|f(t+τ,x)f(t,x)|<ε for (t,x)(T×S)}

    is relatively dense in T for all ε>0 and for each compact subset S of B.

    Definition 2.9. Let Q(t) be an n×n continuous matrix defined on T. The linear system

    xΔ(t)=Q(t)x(t),  tT, (2.1)

    is said to admit exponential dichotomy if there are positive constants ˉk and ˉα, a projection ˉP and the fundamental solution matrix X(t) of (2.1) satisfying

    X(t)ˉPX1(σ(s))ˉkeˉα(t,σ(s)) for all tσ(s), s, tT,
    X(t)(1ˉP)X1(σ(s))ˉkeˉα(σ(s),t) for all tσ(s), s, tT.

    Lemma 2.1. If the linear system (2.1) admits an exponential dichotomy, then the almost periodic system

    xΔ(t)=Q(t)x(t)+g(t)

    has a unique almost periodic solution x(t) and

    x(t)=tX(t)ˉPX1(σ(s))g(s)s+tX(t)(1ˉP)X1(σ(s))g(s)s.

    Lemma 2.2. Let ˉci(t) be an almost periodic function on T, where ˉci(t)>0, ˉci(t)R+ and min1in{inftTˉci(t)}>0. Then, the linear system

    xΔ(t)=diag(ˉc1(t),ˉc2(t),,ˉcn(t))x(t)

    admits an exponential dichotomy.

    Lemma 2.3. Let C=diag(ˉc1(t),ˉc2(t),,ˉcn(t)); then, X(t)=eC(t,t0) is a fundamental solution matrix of the linear system

    xΔ(t)=diag(ˉc1(t),ˉc2(t),,ˉcn(t))x(t).

    Lemma 2.4. Assume that a>0 and aR+; it follows that

    (ⅰ) if xΔ(t)bax(t), then lim supt+x(t)ba;

    (ⅱ) if xΔ(t)bax(t), then lim inft+x(t)ba.

    Definition 2.10. Let X be a Banach space and P be a closed nonempty subset of X; P is called a cone if (i) xP, λ0 implies λxP and (ii) xP, xP implies x=θ.

    Definition 2.11. A cone P of X is called a normal cone if there exists a positive constant ϵ such that x+yϵ for any x,yP, x=y=1.

    Lemma 2.5. Let C be a normal and solid cone in a real Banach space X and Φ: C0C0 be a nondecreasing operator, where C0 is the interior of C. Suppose further that there exists a function ϕ: (0,1)×C0(0,+) such that for each λ(0,1) and xC0, ϕ(λ,x)>λ, ϕ(λ,) is nondecreasing in C0 and

    Φ(λx)ϕ(λ,x)Φ(x).

    In addition, assume that there exists zC0 such that Φ(z)z. Then, Φ has a unique fixed point x in C0. Moreover, for any initial x0C0, the iterative sequence

    xn=Φ(xn1), nN,

    satisfies

    xnx0 as n+.

    Consider the system

    xΔ=f(t,x), (2.2)

    where f(t,ϕ) is continuous in (R,C), and almost periodic in t uniformly for ϕCHC; for any κ>0, there exists L(κ)>0 such that |f(t,ϕ)|L(κ). For the purpose of investigating the uniformly asymptotic stability of the almost periodic solution of System (1.2), the next conclusion is needed.

    Lemma 2.6. Assume that there exists a Lyapunov function V(t,x,y) defined on T+×SH×SH satisfying the following conditions:

    (ⅰ) a1(|xy|)V(t,x,y)a2(|xy|), where ai: R+R+ are continuous and increasing and ai(0)=0 for i=1,2;

    (ⅱ) |V(t,x1,y1)V(t,x2,y2)|L(|x1x2|+|y1y2|), where L>0 is a constant;

    (ⅲ) D+VΔ(t,x,y)cV(t,x,y), where c>0 and cR+.

    Moreover, if there exists a solution x(t)S of System (2.2) for tT+, where SSH is a compact set, then System (2.2) has a unique almost periodic solution in S, which is uniformly asymptotically stable.

    Before establishing the main results, we list the following assumptions.

    (H1) pi>α+i and αiR+ for i=1, 2.

    (H2) Ki(t,s)kiemi(ts) for ki, miR+.

    (H3) (p+1+h+1k1m1)eβ+γα11<α1 and (p+2+h+2k2m2)<eα2.

    (H4) β+γ+e2p+1+2e2h+1k1m1<α1 and e2p+2+2e2h+2k2m2<α2.

    From Lemma 2.4, it is not difficult to deduce the next result.

    Lemma 3.1. Assume that (H1) and (H2) hold. Then, System (1.2) is permanent, that is, there exist constants x, y, x, yR+ that are independent of the solutions of System (1.2), satisfying

    xlim inft+x(t)lim supt+x(t)x and ylim inft+y(t)lim supt+y(t)y

    for any positive solution (x(t),y(t)) of (1.2).

    In order to use the fixed-point theorem directly, we first transform System (1.2) into an equivalent equation because of its not nondecreasing nonlinear term.

    Lemma 3.2. Assume that (H2) and (H3) hold. Then, System (1.2) is equivalent to the following integral equation in the sense of an almost periodic nonnegative solution:

    {x(t)=teα1(t,σ(s))[f1(x(s))+p1(s)f2(x(s))+h1(s)0K1(s,u)f3(y(s+u))Δu]Δs,y(t)=teα2(t,σ(s))[p2(s)g1(y(s))+h2(s)0K2(s,u)g2(x(s+u))Δu]Δs, (3.1)

    where

    f1(x)={β(t)xγ(t)+x,   0x1b,β(t)bγ(t)+1,   x>1b,     f2(x)=g2(x)={xebx,   0x1b,1be,   x>1b,
    f3(y)=g1(y)={yeby,   0y1b,1be,   y>1b.

    Proof. Let (ψ(t),η(t)) be a nonnegative almost periodic solution of (1.2); then, from the almost periodicity of αi>0 for i=1,2 and Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2, it is not difficult to obtain that

    {ψ(t)=teα1(t,σ(s))[β(s)ψ(s)γ(s)+ψ(s)+p1(s)ψ(s)ebψ(s)+h1(s)0K1(s,u)η(s+u)ebη(s+u)Δu]Δs,η(t)=teα2(t,σ(s))[p2(s)η(s)ebη(s)+h2(s)0K2(s,u)ψ(s+u)ebψ(s+u)Δu]Δs.

    By using the fact that

    suptRf1(t)=β(t)bγ(t)+1,  suptRf2(t)=suptRf3(t)=suptRg1(t)=suptRg2(t)=1be,

    it follows from (H2) that

    ψ(t)teα1(t,σ(s))[β+ψ(s)γ+p+1be+h+1be0K1(s,u)Δu]Δsteα1(t,σ(s))[β+ψ(s)γ+p+1be+h+1k1be0em1(su)Δu]Δsβ+γteα1(t,σ(s))ψ(s)ds+1beα1(p+1+h+1k1m1).

    Based on the well known Gronwall's inequality and (H3), it follows that

    ψ(t)1bα1(p+1+h+1k1m1)eβ+γα11<1b.

    Similarly, it deduces

    η(t)teα2(t,σ(s))[p+2be+h+2be0K2(s,u)Δu]Δs1beα2(p+2+h+2k2m2)<1b.

    Therefore, we have

    f1(ψ(s))=β(s)ψ(s)γ(s)+ψ(s),  f2(ψ(s))=ψ(s)ebψ(s),  f3(η(s+u))=η(s+u)ebη(s+u),
    g1(η(s))=η(s)ebη(s),    g2(ψ(s+u))=ψ(s+u)ebψ(s+u) for tT.

    Further, it follows for tT that

    {ψ(t)=teα1(t,σ(s))[f1(ψ(s))+p1(s)f2(ψ(s))+h1(s)0K1(s,u)f3(η(s+u))du]Δs,η(t)=teα2(t,σ(s))[p2(s)g1(η(sτ(s)))+h2(s)0K2(s,u)g2(ψ(s+u))Δu]Δs.

    Therefore, it follows that (ψ,η) is an almost periodic solution of System (3.1). Analogously, for every nonnegative almost periodic solution (ψ,η) of System (3.1), it yields that (ψ,η) is an almost periodic solution of System (1.2).

    Theorem 3.1. Assume that (H1)–(H3) hold. Then, System (1.2) exists as exactly one almost periodic solution (x,y) with a positive infimum. Moreover, for any almost periodic initial (x0,y0) with a positive infimum, the iterative sequence

    {xn(t)=teα1(t,σ(s))[β(s)xn1(s)γ(s)+xn1(s)+p1(s)xn1(s)ebxn1(s)+h1(s)0K1(s,u)yn1(s+u)ebyn1(s+u)Δu]Δs,yn(t)=teα2(t,σ(s))[p2(s)yn1(s)ebyn1(s)+h2(s)0K2(s,u)xn1(s+u)ebxn1(s+u)Δu]Δs, n=1,2,

    satisfies (xn,yn)(x,y)0 as n+.

    Proof. Define

    C={(x,y)AP(T,R):x(t)0,y(t)0, tT},C0={(x,y)AP(T,R): ε>0 such that x(t)>ε,y(t)>ε, tT},

    it is obvious that C is a normal and solid cone in Banach space AP(T,R), and that C0 is the interior of C. From Lemma 3.2, define the operator (Ψ1,Ψ2) on C0×C0 as follows:

    {Ψ1(x,y)(t)=teα1(t,σ(s))[f1(x(s))+p1(s)f2(x(s))+h1(s)0K1(s,u)f3(y(s+u))Δu]Δs,Ψ2(x,y)(t)=teα2(t,σ(s))[p2(s)g1(y(s))+h2(s)0K2(s,u)g2(x(s+u))Δu]Δs.

    Next, we will complete the proof in three steps.

    Step 1. Ψi: C0×C0C0×C0 is set as a nondecreasing operator.

    Due to the fact that fi and gj are both nondecreasing on (0,+) for i=1,2,3, j=1,2, it follows that Ψi is also nondecreasing. In view of the bounded properties of fi and gj, it is not difficult to derive that fi and gj satisfies the Lipschitz condition. Based on the composition theorem and the invariance of convolution for the almost periodic functions, it is not difficult to deduce that Ψi is a self-map operator on AP(T,R). Moreover, we have

    {Ψ1(x,y)(t)p1teα+1(t,σ(s))minsRf2(x(s))Δs>0,Ψ2(x,y)(t)p2teα+2(t,σ(s))minsRg1(y(s))Δs>0,

    which yields that there exists a suitable ε1>0 such that Ψi(x,y)(t)>ε1 for any tR and i=1, 2.

    Step 2. There exists a function ψi: (0,1)×C0×C0(0,+) such that for each λ(0,1) and x,yC0×C0, ψi(λ,x,y)>λ, ψi(λ,x,y) is nondecreasing in C0×C0 and

    Ψi(λx,λy)ψi(λ,x,y)Ψi(x,y) where i=1,2.

    Let

    ϕ1(λ,x)={λ,   0x1bλ,1,   x>1bλ,
    ϕ2(λ,x)=φ2(λ,x)={λeb(1λ)x,   0x1b,bλxe1bλx,   1b<x1bλ,1,   x>1bλ,
    ϕ3(λ,y)=φ1(λ,y)={λeb(1λ)y,   0y1b,bλye1bλy,   1b<y1bλ,1,   y>1bλ;

    therefore, for each λ(0,1) and (x,y)(C0×C0), there exist functions ϕi, φj: (0,1)×C0(0,+) for i=1,2,3, j=1,2 such that

    (1) ϕi(λ,)>λ and φj(λ,)>λ.

    (2) ϕi(λ,), φj(λ,) is nondecreasing in C0.

    (3) fi(λ,)ϕi(λ,)fi() and gj(λ,)φi(λ,)gj().

    Let

    ψ1(λ,x,y)=min{ϕ1(λ,x),ϕ2(λ,x),ϕ3(λ,y)}

    and

    ψ2(λ,x,y)=min{φ1(λ,y),φ2(λ,x)};

    then, it follows that ψi(λ,x,y)>λ and nondecreasing in C0×C0 for i=1,2. Moreover, it follows that

    Ψ1(λx,λy)(t)=teα1(t,σ(s))[f1(λx(s))+p1(s)f2(λx(s))+h1(s)0τK1(s,u)f3(λy(s+u))Δu]Δsteα1(t,σ(s))[ϕ1(λ,x)f1(x(s))+p1(s)ϕ2(λ,x)f2(x(s))+h1(s)0τK1(s,u)ϕ3(λ,y)f3(y(s+u))Δu]Δsψ1(λ,x,y)Ψ1(x,y)(t).

    Similarly, one obtains that Ψ2(λx,λy)(t)ψ2(λ,x,y)Ψ2(x,y)(t).

    Step 3. There exists (z,z)C0×C0 such that (Ψ1(z,z),Ψ2(z,z))(z,z).

    Choose an appropriate ε(0,1b); from (H1), it deduces that

    {Ψ1(ε,ε)(t)p1teα+1(t,σ(s))f2(ε(s))Δsp1εebεα+1ε,Ψ2(ε,ε)(t)p2teα+2(t,σ(s))g1(ε(s))Δsp2εebεα+2ε.

    Based on the above discussion and Lemma 2.5, it follows that (Ψ1,Ψ2) has a unique fixed point (x,y)C0×C0. Moreover, for any initial (x0,y0)C0×C0, the iterative sequence

    (xn,yn)=(Ψ1(xn1,yn1),Ψ2(xn1,yn1)), nN,

    satisfies (xn,yn)(x,y)0 as n+.

    Remark 3.1. Based on the conditions (H1)–(H3), Theorem 3.1 implies the existence and uniqueness of the positive almost periodic solution (x,y) of System (1.2). If we attach another condition (H4), is the unique solution (x,y) globally stable? Even more generally, is it uniformly asymptotically stable? The next conclusions will give the answer.

    Theorem 3.2. Assume that (H1)–(H4) hold. Then the solution (x(t;t0,ξ1),y(t;t0,ξ2)) of System (1.2) converges exponentially to the positive almost periodic solution (x,y) as t+.

    Proof. Let x(t)=x(t;t0,ξ1), y(t)=y(t;t0,ξ2) and z1(t)=x(t)x(t), z2(t)=y(t)y(t); then, one has

    {zΔ1(t)=β(t)[x(t)γ(t)+x(t)x(t)γ(t)+x(t)]+p1(t)[x(t)ebx(t)x(t)ebx(t)]+h1(t)0K1(t,s)[y(t+s)eby(t+s)y(t+s)eby(t+s)]Δsα1(t)z1(t),zΔ2(t)=h2(t)0K2(t,s)[y(t+s)eby(t+s)y(t+s)eby(t+s)]Δsα2(t)z2(t)+p2(t)[x(t)ebx(t)x(t)ebx(t)].

    Let ζi[0,1] for i=1,2 and

    {Φ1(ζ1)=α1+ζ1(1+μ+α+1)+β+γ(1+ζ1μ+)+(1+ζ1μ+)e2p+1+2(1+ζ1μ+)eζ12h+1k1m1,Φ2(ζ2)=α2+ζ2(1+μ+α+2)+(1+ζ2μ+)e2p+2+2(1+ζ2μ+)eζ22h+2k2m2;

    in view of (H4), one obtains

    {Φ1(0)=α1+β+γ+e2p+1+2e2h+1k1m1<0,Φ2(0)=α2+e2p+2+2e2h+2k2m2<0,

    which yields that there exist constants λi(0,1], i=1,2, satisfying

    Φi(λi)<0. (3.2)

    Choose the appropriate Lyapunov functional

    V(t,z1(t),z2(t))=|z1(t)(t)|eλ1t+|z2(t)(t)|eλ2t, where λ1,λ2(0,1], (3.3)

    and calculate its upper right derivative D+VΔ along the solution of Eq (3.3); it follows for t>t0 that

    D+VΔ(t,z1(t),z2(t))sgn(z1(t))zΔ1(t)eλ1t+λ1|z1(t)|eλ1t+sgn(z2(t))zΔ2(t)eλ2t+λ2|z2(t)|eλ2t7i=1Vi(t,z1(t),z2(t)), (3.4)

    where

    V1=eλ1t[α1+λ1(1+μ+α+1)]|z1(t)|,V2=eλ2t[α2+λ2(1+μ+α+2)]|z2(t)|,V3=eλ1t(1+λ1μ+)β(t)|x(t)γ(t)+x(t)x(t)γ(t)+x(t)|,V4=eλ1t(1+λ1μ+)p1(t)|x(t)ebx(t)x(t)ebx(t)|,V5=eλ1t(1+λ1μ+)h1(t)0K1(t,s)|y(t+s)eby(t+s)y(t+s)eby(t+s)|Δs,V6=eλ2t(1+λ2μ+)p2(t)|y(t)eby(t)y(t)eby(t)|,V7=eλ2t(1+λ2μ+)h2(t)0K2(t,s)|x(t+s)ebx(t+s)x(t+s)ebx(t+s)|Δs.

    It follows that there exists a constant M that satisfies V(t,z1(t),z2(t))<M for t>t0; otherwise, there exists t>t0 such that

    V(t,z1(t),z2(t))M=0 and V(t,z1(t),z2(t))M<0 for rt<t. (3.5)

    Consider (3.5) with the inequalities

    |ϑea1ϑϱea1ϱ|e2|ϑϱ| and |ϑa2+ϑϱa2+ϱ|1a2|ϑϱ|, (3.6)

    for ϑ,ϱC0 and a1,a2R+; it follows that

    V3(t,z1(t),z2(t))β(t)γ(t)(1+λ1μ+)|z1(t)|eλt<β+γ(1+λ1μ+)M, (3.7)
    V4(t,z1(t),z2(t))(1+λ1μ+)p1(t)e2|z1(t)|eλ1(t)<(1+λ1μ+)p+1Me2, (3.8)
    V6(t,z1(t),z2(t))(1+λ2μ+)p2(t)e2|z2(t)|eλ2(t)<(1+λ2μ+)p+2Me2. (3.9)

    In addition, consider

    0K1(t,s)|y(t+s)eby(t+s)y(t+s)eby(t+s)|Δse20K1(t,s)|t+st(yΔ(m)yΔ(m))Δm+y(t)y(t)|Δs2e2k1m1|y(t)y(t)|;

    one further deduces that

    V5(t,z1(t),z2(t))2(1+λ1μ+)eλ12h+1k1Mm1, (3.10)
    V7(t,z1(t),z2(t))2(1+λ2μ+)eλ22h+2k2Mm2. (3.11)

    Substituting (3.7)–(3.11) into (3.4), then

    0D+(V(t,z1(t),z2(t))M){[α1+λ1(1+μ+α+1)]+[α2+λ2(1+μ+α+2)]+β+γ(1+λ1μ+)+(1+λ1μ+)e2(p+1+2eλ1h+1k1m1)+(1+λ2μ+)e2(p+2+2eλ2h+2k2m2)}M,

    which contradicts (3.2). Therefore, V(t,z1(t),z2(t))<M for t>t0; choose λ=mintT{λ1,λ2}, that is

    |(z1(t),z2(t))|<Meλt for t>t0.

    Theorem 3.3. Assume that (H1)–(H3) hold. Then there exists a unique uniformly asymptotically stable positive almost periodic solution of System (1.2) provided that Θ=min{Θ1,Θ2}>0 and ΘR+, where

    Θ1=α1[(2μα1)+(μ++μ)β+γ+(μ++μ)e2(p+1+k1h+1m1)](2+μ+β+γ+μ+p+1e2)(β+γ+p+1e2+k1h+1m1e2)k1μ+h+1m1e2(β+γ+p+1e2),[2+μ+e2(2p+2+4k2h+2m2)(μ+μ+)α2]k2h+2m2e2,Θ2=α2[(2μα2)+(μ++μ)e2(p+2+k2h+2m2)]1e2(2+μ+p+2e2)(p+2+k2h+2m2)k2μ+h+2p+2m2e4,[2+μ+(2β+γ+2p+1e2+4k1h+1m1e2)(μ+μ+)α1]k1h+1m1e2.

    Proof. Consider the Lyapunov function defined on T×C×C by

    V(t,X(t),Y(t))=[x(t)x1(t)]2+[y(t)y1(t)]2, (3.12)

    where X(t)=(x(t),y(t))T and Y(t)=(x1(t),y1(t))T are the almost periodic solutions of (1.2). Based on Theorem 4.2 in [15], it follows that the condition (i) in Lemma 2.6 holds. By using the fact that

    (s1s2)2(s3s4)24max{|s1|,|s2|,|s3|,|s4|}(|s1s3|+|s2s4|) for siR,

    it follows for X(t)=(x(t),y(t))T and Y(t)=(x1(t),y1(t))T that

    |V(t,X(t),Y(t))V(t,X(t),Y(t))|M(|X(t)X(t)|+|Y(t)Y(t)|),

    with M=4max{|x|,|x|,|y|,|y|}. Further, the condition (ii) in Lemma 2.6 holds.

    Calculating the right derivative D+VΔ of V along the solution of (3.12) yields

    D+VΔ(t,X(t),Y(t))=[2(x(t)x1(t))+μ(t)(x(t)x1(t))Δ](x(t)x1(t))Δ+[2(y(t)y1(t))+μ(t)(y(t)y1(t))Δ](y(t)y1(t))Δ=:Π1(t)+Π2(t), (3.13)

    where

    {(xx1)Δ(t)=β(t)[x(t)γ(t)+x(t)x1(t)γ(t)+x1(t)]+p1(t)[x(t)ebx(t)x1(t)ebx1(t)]α1(t)[x(t)x1(t)]+h1(t)0K1(t,s)[y(t+s)eby(t+s)y1(t+s)eby1(t+s)]Δs,(yy1)Δ(t)=α2(t)[y(t)y1(t)]+p2(t)[y(t)eby(t)y1(t)eby1(t)]+h2(t)0K2(t,s)[x(t+s)ebx(t+s)x1(t+s)ebx1(t+s)]Δs.

    Based on the inequalities of (3.6), and for any zC satisfying

    0K1(t,s)[z(t+s)ebz(t+s)z1(t+s)ebz1(t+s)]Δs2k1m1e2[z(t)z1(t)],

    one can deduce

    Π1(t){(2μα1+μ+β+γ+μ+p+1e2)[x(t)x1(t)]+2k1μ+h+1m1e2[y(t)y1(t)]}{(α1+β+γ+p+1e2)[x(t)x1(t)]+2k1h+1m1e2[y(t)y1(t)]}(2μα1+μ+β+γ+μ+p+1e2)(α1+β+γ+p+1e2)[x(t)x1(t)]2+[2(μ+μ+)α1+2μ+β+γ+2μ+p+1e2]2k1h+1m1e2[x(t)x1(t)][y(t)y1(t)]+μ+(2k1h+1m1e2)2[y(t)y1(t)]2(A1B1)[x(t)x1(t)]2+(A2B2)[y(t)y1(t)]2, (3.14)

    where

    A1=(2+μ+β+γ+μ+p+1e2)(β+γ+p+1e2+k1h+1m1e2)+k1μ+h+1m1e2(β+γ+p+1e2)+μ(α1)2,B1=α1[2+μ+β+γ+μ+e2(p+1+k1h+1m1)+μ(β+γ+p+1e2+k1h+1m1e2)],A2=[2+μ+(2β+γ+2p+1e2+4k1h+1m1e2)]k1h+1m1e2,B2=(μ+μ+)α1k1h+1m1e2,

    and

    Π2(t){(2μα2+μ+p+2e2)[y(t)y1(t)]+2k2μ+h+2m2e2[x(t)x1(t)]}{(α2+p+2e2)[y(t)y1(t)]+2k2h+2m2e2[x(t)x1(t)]}(A3B3)[x(t)x1(t)]2+(A4B4)[y(t)y1(t)]2, (3.15)

    where

    A3=[2+μ+e2(2p+2+4k2h+2m2)]k2h+2m2e2,B3=(μ+μ+)α2k2h+2m2e2,A4=1e2(2+μ+p+2e2)(p+2+k2h+2m2)+k2μ+h+2p+2m2e4+μ(α2)2,B4=α2[2+(μ++μ)e2(p+2+k2h+2m2)].

    Substituting (3.14) and (3.15) into (3.13), it follows that

    D+VΔ(t,X(t),Y(t))ΘV(t,X(t),Y(t)),

    where

    Θ=min{(B1+B3)(A1+A3),(B2+B4)(A2+A4)}>0.

    Combine Lemma 2.6 with Theorem 3.1; it follows that the unique positive almost periodic solution of System (1.2) is uniformly asymptotically stable.

    In this section, we introduce some suitable examples to support the main results.

    Example 4.1. Let us illustrate that System (1.2) exists as exactly one almost periodic solution with a positive infimum. Assume that

    α1(t)=0.79+0.001sin(5t),          α2(t)=0.84+0.002sin(3t),β(t)=0.592sin2(πt)sin2t,         γ(t)=1.0010.001sin(3t),p1(t)=0.8+0.005cos(3t),           p2(t)=0.85+0.005cos(2t),h1(t)=0.1+0.04sin(2t),              h2(t)=0.2+0.06sin(6t),K1(t,s)=K2(t,s)=e2(ts);

    then,

    α+1=0.791,       α1=0.789,       α+2=0.842,       α2=0.838,β+=0.592,       γ=1,              p+1=0.805,       p1=0.795,p+2=0.855,       p2=0.845,       h+1=0.14,         h+2=0.26,k1=k2=1,      m1=m2=2.

    Obviously, p1>α+1 and p2>α+2; further, one chooses e=2.718 and calculates that

    (p+1+h+1k1m1)eβ+γα110.681<0.789=α1,       (p+2+h+2k2m2)=0.985<2.278=eα2,

    which indicates that (H1)(H3) hold. Therefore, according to Theorem 3.1, it follows that System (1.2) exists with exactly one almost periodic solution (x,y) with a positive infimum.

    Example 4.2. Let us illustrate the stability of the positive almost periodic solution of System (1.2). Assume that the conditions in Example 4.1 hold; then,

    β+γ+e2p+1+2e2h+1k1m10.72<0.789=α1,       e2p+2+2e2h+2k2m20.151<0.838=α2,

    that is, (H4) is satisfied. Therefore, from Theorem 3.2, it obtains that the unique almost periodic solution is exponentially stable.

    Let μ+=μ=1; then,

    Θ1=α1[(2μα1)+(μ++μ)β+γ+(μ++μ)e2(p+1+k1h+1m1)]k1μ+h+1m1e2(β+γ+p+1e2)(2+μ+β+γ+μ+p+1e2)(β+γ+p+1e2+k1h+1m1e2)[2+μ+e2(2p+2+4k2h+2m2)(μ+μ+)α2]k2h+2m2e20.141>0,

    and

    Θ2=α2[(2μα2)+(μ++μ)e2(p+2+k2h+2m2)]1e2(2+μ+p+2e2)(p+2+k2h+2m2)k2μ+h+2p+2m2e4[2+μ+(2β+γ+2p+1e2+4k1h+1m1e2)(μ+μ+)α1]k1h+1m1e20.896>0.

    Moreover, Θ=min{0.141,0.896}=0.141>0 and Θ=0.141R+. From Example 4.1, it follows that (H1)(H3) hold; hence, Theorem 3.3 implies that System (1.2) has a unique uniformly asymptotically stable positive almost periodic solution.

    In this paper, we introduced a class of two species co-existence delayed model with the almost periodic coefficients on time scales defined as System (1.2). Based on the operator theory, Lyapunov function and Gronwall's inequality, by choosing an appropriate Lyapunov function, this paper addresses some dynamic properties of almost periodic solutions of this model. First, we presented System (1.2) is permanent and further established the existence and uniqueness of the almost periodic solution with a positive infimum by transforming the initial model into an equivalent integral equation. Second, we investigated the global exponential stability and uniformly asymptotic stability of the positive almost periodic solution. In some existing works, for example, the work in [4,8], for a class of continuous system, which is a particular case of systems on time, the authors only studied the existence and uniqueness of the positive almost periodic solution, but did not further verify whether the obtained solution is stable or not. In addition, in [17], although the authors explored a class of high-order neural networks model with variable delays on time scales and showed some sufficient conditions to prove the existence and uniqueness of the almost periodic solution, the results were obtained based on the Lipschitz condition. Compared to these existing works on almost periodic solutions, our conclusions are valuable in the exploration of dynamic equations on time scales.

    Thanks sincerely for the constructive comments and suggestions of editors and reviewers for this manuscript. The work was supported by the Research Start-up Fund (No. 180141051218) and the National Cultivating Fund (No. 2020-PYJJ-012) of Luoyang Normal University.

    The author declares no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.



    [1] H. I. Freedman, K. Gopalsamy, Global stability in time-delayed single-species dynamics, Bull. Math. Biology, 48 (1986), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02462319 doi: 10.1007/BF02462319
    [2] A. J. Nicholson, An outline of the dynamics of animal populations, Aust. J. Zool., 2 (1954), 9–65. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9540009 doi: 10.1071/ZO9540009
    [3] L. Berezansky, E. Braverman, L. Idels, Nicholson's blowflies differential equations revisited: main results and open problems, Appl. Math. Model., 34 (2010), 1405–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.08.027 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.08.027
    [4] H. S. Ding, J. J. Nieto, A new approach for positive almost periodic solutions to a class of Nicholson's blowflies model, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 253 (2013), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2013.04.028 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.04.028
    [5] N. Sk, P. K. Tiwari, S. Pal, A delay nonautonomous model for the impacts of fear and refuge in a three species food chain model with hunting cooperation, Math. Comput. Simul., 192 (2022), 136–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.018 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.018
    [6] F. Chérif, Pseudo almost periodic solution of Nicholson's blowflies model with mixed delays, Appl. Math. Model., 39 (2015), 5152–5163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.03.043 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.03.043
    [7] L. G. Yao, Dynamics of Nicholson's blowflies models with a nonlinear density-dependent mortality, Appl. Math. Model., 64 (2018), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.07.007 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.07.007
    [8] C. J. Xu, M. Liao, P. L. Li, Q. M. Xiao, S. Yuan, A new method to investigate almost periodic solutions for an Nicholson's blowflies model with time-varying delays and a linear harvesting term, Math. Biosci. Eng., 16 (2019), 3830–3840. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2019189 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019189
    [9] S. Biswas, P. K. Tiwari, S. Pal, Effects of toxicity and zooplankton selectivity on plankton dynamics under seasonal patterns of viruses with time delay, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), 585–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7799 doi: 10.1002/mma.7799
    [10] A. Sarkar, P. K. Tiwari, S. Pal, A delay nonautonomous model for the effects of fear and refuge on predator-prey interactions with water-level fluctuations, Int. J. Model. Simul. Sci. Comput., 13 (2022), 2250033. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793962322500337 doi: 10.1142/S1793962322500337
    [11] A. M. Fink, Almost periodic differential equations, Berlin: Springer, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0070324
    [12] X. A. Hao, M. Y. Zuo, L. S. Liu, Multiple positive solutions for a system of impulsive integral boundary value problems with sign-changing nonlinearities, Appl. Math. Lett., 82 (2018), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2018.02.015 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2018.02.015
    [13] X. Z. Liu, K. X. Zhang, Input-to-state stability of time-delay systems with delay-dependent impulses, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 65 (2019), 1676–1682. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2019.2930239 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2019.2930239
    [14] R. Yuan, Existence of almost periodic solution of functional differential equations, Ann. Diff. Equ., 7 (1991), 234–242.
    [15] Q. S. Liao, Almost periodic solution for a Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system with feedback controls on time scales, Proceedings of the 2018 6th International Conference on Machinery, Materials and Computing Technology (ICMMCT 2018), Atlantis Press, 152 (2018), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.2991/icmmct-18.2018.9
    [16] X. D. Lu, H. T. Li, C. K. Wang, X. F. Zhang, Stability analysis of positive switched impulsive systems with delay on time scales, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 30 (2020), 6879–6890. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.5145 doi: 10.1002/rnc.5145
    [17] Y. K. Li, C. Wang, Almost periodic functions on time scales and applications, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2011 (2011), 727068. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/727068 doi: 10.1155/2011/727068
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Chun Peng, Xiaoliang Li, Bo Du, Periodic solution for neutral-type differential equation with piecewise impulses on time scales, 2024, 2024, 1687-2770, 10.1186/s13661-024-01916-5
    2. Lin Yang, Dinghua Xu, An inverse problem for nonlocal reaction-diffusion equations with time-delay, 2024, 103, 0003-6811, 3067, 10.1080/00036811.2024.2334758
    3. Shihong Zhu, Xiaoliang Li, Bo Du, Dynamical behaviors of Gilpin–Ayala competitive model with periodic coefficients on time scales, 2025, 2025, 2731-4235, 10.1186/s13662-025-03884-1
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1366) PDF downloads(60) Cited by(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog