Combination of Laplace transform and residual power series techniques of special fractional-order non-linear partial differential equations

M. Mossa Al-Sawalha; Osama Y. Ababneh; Rasool Shah; Nehad Ali Shah; Kamsing Nonlaopon; M. Mossa Al-Sawalha; Osama Y. Ababneh; Rasool Shah; Nehad Ali Shah; Kamsing Nonlaopon

doi:10.3934/math.2023264

AIMS Mathematics

2023, Volume 8, Issue 3: 5266-5280. doi: 10.3934/math.2023264

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Combination of Laplace transform and residual power series techniques of special fractional-order non-linear partial differential equations

1.
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Ha'il, Ha'il 2440, Saudi Arabia
2.
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Zarqa University, Zarqa 13110, Jordan
3.
Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali khan university Mardan, 23200, Pakistan
4.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
5.
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
^† These authors contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors

Received: 21 September 2022 Revised: 05 November 2022 Accepted: 17 November 2022 Published: 14 December 2022
MSC : 33B15, 34A34, 35A20, 35A22, 44A10

This paper investigates fractional-order partial differential equations analytically by applying a modified technique called the Laplace residual power series method. The analytical solution was utilized to test the accuracy and precision of the proposed methodologies and shown by tables and graphs. The solution is a convergent series established on Taylor's new form. When determining the series coefficients like RPSM, the fractional derivatives must be calculated every time. We only need to perform a few computations to obtain the coefficients because LRPSM only requires the concept of an infinite limit. The advantage of this method is that it does not require Adomian polynomials or he's polynomials to solve nonlinear problems. As a result, the method's reduced computation size is a strength. The outcome we got supports the idea that the suggested method is the best one for handling any non-linear models that appear in technology and science.

Keywords:

residual power series,
fractional-order partial differential equations,
Laplace transform,
Caputo operator

Citation: M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Osama Y. Ababneh, Rasool Shah, Nehad Ali Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon. Combination of Laplace transform and residual power series techniques of special fractional-order non-linear partial differential equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5266-5280. doi: 10.3934/math.2023264

Related Papers:

[1]	Emad Salah, Ahmad Qazza, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad El-Ajou . A hybrid analytical technique for solving multi-dimensional time-fractional Navier-Stokes system. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1713-1736. doi: 10.3934/math.2023088
[2]	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Khalil Hadi Hakami, Mohammad Alqudah, Qasem M. Tawhari, Hussain Gissy . Novel Laplace-integrated least square methods for solving the fractional nonlinear damped Burgers' equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 7099-7126. doi: 10.3934/math.2025324
[3]	Zeliha Korpinar, Mustafa Inc, Dumitru Baleanu . On the fractional model of Fokker-Planck equations with two different operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 236-248. doi: 10.3934/math.2020015
[4]	Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Choonkil Park . A novel analytical Aboodh residual power series method for solving linear and nonlinear time-fractional partial differential equations with variable coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16917-16948. doi: 10.3934/math.2022929
[5]	Tareq Eriqat, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad El-Ajou, Ahmad Qazza, Moa'ath N. Oqielat, Ahmad Ghazal . A new analytical algorithm for uncertain fractional differential equations in the fuzzy conformable sense. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9641-9681. doi: 10.3934/math.2024472
[6]	Ali Khalouta, Abdelouahab Kadem . A new computational for approximate analytical solutions of nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations with variable coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 1-14. doi: 10.3934/math.2020001
[7]	Mohammad Alaroud, Osama Ababneh, Nedal Tahat, Shrideh Al-Omari . Analytic technique for solving temporal time-fractional gas dynamics equations with Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 17647-17669. doi: 10.3934/math.2022972
[8]	Musawa Yahya Almusawa, Hassan Almusawa . Numerical analysis of the fractional nonlinear waves of fifth-order KdV and Kawahara equations under Caputo operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31898-31925. doi: 10.3934/math.20241533
[9]	Azzh Saad Alshehry, Humaira Yasmin, Ali M. Mahnashi . Analyzing fractional PDE system with the Caputo operator and Mohand transform techniques. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32157-32181. doi: 10.3934/math.20241544
[10]	Amjad Ali, Iyad Suwan, Thabet Abdeljawad, Abdullah . Numerical simulation of time partial fractional diffusion model by Laplace transform. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2878-2890. doi: 10.3934/math.2022159

Abstract

1. Introduction

Due to its well-established applications in various scientific and technical fields, fractional calculus has gained prominence during the last three decades. Many pioneers have shown that when adjusted by integer-order models, fractional-order models may accurately represent complex events ^[1,2]. The Caputo fractional derivatives are nonlocal in contrast to the integer-order derivatives, which are local in nature ^[1]. In other words, the integer-order derivative may be used to analyze changes in the area around a point, but the Caputo fractional derivative can be used to analyze changes in the whole interval. Senior mathematicians including Riemann ^[4], Caputo ^[5], Podlubny ^[6], Ross ^[7], Liouville ^[8], Miller and others, collaborated to create the fundamental foundation for fractional order integrals and derivatives. The theory of fractional-order calculus has been related to real-world projects, and it has been applied to chaos theory ^[9], signal processing ^[10], electrodynamics ^[11], human diseases ^[12,13], and other areas ^[14,15,16].

Due to the numerous applications of fractional differential equations in engineering and science such as electrodynamics ^[17], chaos ideas ^[18], accounting ^[19], continuum and fluid mechanics ^[20], digital signal ^[21] and biological population designs ^[22] fractional differential equations are now more widely known. For such issues to be resolved, efficient tools are needed ^[23,24,25]. Because of this, we will attempt to apply an efficient analytical technique to solve nonlinear arbitrary order differential equations in this article. Many strategies in collaboration fields may be delightfully and even more accurately analyzed using fractional differential equations. Various strategies have been developed in this regard, some of them are as follows, such as the fractional Reduced differential transformation technique ^[26], Adomian decomposition technique ^[27], the fractional Variational iteration technique ^[28], Elzaki decomposition technique ^[29,30], iterative transformation technique ^[31], the fractional natural decomposition method (FNDM) ^[32], and the fractional homotopy perturbation method ^[33].

The power series solution is used to solve some classes of the differential and integral equations of fractional or non-fractional order, and it is based on assuming that the solution of the equation can be expanded as a power series. RPS is an easy and fast technique for determining the coefficients of the power series solution. The Jordanian mathematician Omar Abu Arqub created the residual power series method in 2013, as a technique for quickly calculating the coefficients of the power series solutions for 1st and 2nd-order fuzzy differential equations ^[34]. Without perturbation, linearization, or discretization, the residual power series method provides a powerful and straightforward power series solution for highly linear and nonlinear equations ^{[35,36,37,38]}. The residual power series method has been used to solve an increasing variety of nonlinear ordinary and partial differential equations of various sorts, orders, and classes during the past several years. It has been used to make non-linear fractional dispersive partial differential equation have solitary pattern results and to predict them ^[39], to solve the highly nonlinear singular differential equation known as the generalized Lane-Emden equation ^[40], to solve higher-order ordinary differential equations numerically ^[41], to approximate solve the fractional nonlinear KdV-Burger equations, to predict and represent the RPSM differs from several other analytical and numerical approaches in some crucial ways ^[42]. First, there is no requirement for a recursion connection or for the RPSM to compare the coefficients of the related terms. Second, by reducing the associated residual error, the RPSM offers a straightforward method to guarantee the convergence of the series solution. Thirdly, the RPSM doesn't suffer from computational rounding mistakes and doesn't use a lot of time or memory. Fourth, the approach may be used immediately to the provided issue by selecting an acceptable starting guess approximation since the residual power series method does not need any converting when transitionary from low-order to higher-order and from simple linearity to complicated nonlinearity ^[43,44,45]. The process of solving linear differential equations using the LT method consists of three steps. The first step depends on transforming the original differential equation into a new space, called the Laplace space. In the second step, the new equation is solved algebraically in the Laplace space. In the last step, the solution in the second step is transformed back into the original space, resulting in the solution of the given problem.

In this article, we apply the Laplace residual power series method to achieve the definitive solution of the fractional-order nonlinear partial differential equations. The Laplace transformation efficiently integrates the residual power series method for the renewability algorithmic technique. This proposed technique produces interpretive findings in the sense of a convergent series. The Caputo fractional derivative operator explains quantitative categorizations of the partial differential equations. The offered methodology is well demonstrated in modelling and enumeration investigations. The exact-analytical findings are a valuable way to analyze the problematic dynamics of systems, notably for computational fractional partial differential equations.

2. Preliminaries

Definition 2.1. The fractional Caputo derivative of a function $u(\zeta, t)$ of order $\alpha$ is given as ^[46]

$\begin{equation} ^{C}D_{{t}}^{{\alpha}}{u}({\zeta},{t}) = J_{{t}}^{m-{\alpha}}{u}^{{m}}({\zeta},{t}),\; m-1 < \alpha\leq m,\; t > 0, \end{equation}$

(2.1)

where $m\in N$ and $J_{{t}}^{\alpha}$ is the fractional integral Riemann-Liouville (RL) of ${u}({\zeta}, {t})$ of order $\alpha$ is given as

$\begin{equation} J_{t}^{\sigma} u(\zeta, t) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)} \int_{0}^{t}(t-\tau)^{\alpha-1} u(\varphi, \tau) d \tau \end{equation}$

(2.2)

Definition 2.2. The Laplace transformation (LT) of ${u}({\zeta}, {t})$ is given as ^[46]

$\begin{equation} {u}({\zeta},{s}) = \mathcal{L}_{{t}}[{u}({\zeta},{t})] = \int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-s{t}}{u}({\zeta},{t})d{t},\; s > {\alpha}, \end{equation}$

(2.3)

where the Laplace transform inverse is defined as

$\begin{equation} {u}({\zeta},{t}) = \mathcal{L}_{{t}}^{-1}[{u}({\zeta},{s})] = \int_{l-i\infty}^{l+i\infty}e^{s{t}}{u}({\zeta},{s})ds,\; l = Re(s) > l_{0}. \end{equation}$

(2.4)

Lemma 2.1. Suppose that ${u}({\zeta}, {t})$ is piecewise continue term and ${U}({\zeta}, {s}) = \mathcal{L}_{t}[{u}({\zeta}, {t})]$ , we get

(1) $\mathcal{L}_{{t}}[J_{t}^{\alpha}{u}({\zeta}, {t})] = \frac{{U}({\zeta}, {s})}{s^{\alpha}}, \; \alpha > 0.$

(2) $\mathcal{L}_{{t}}[D_{t}^{\alpha}{u}({\zeta}, {t})] = s^{\sigma}{U}({\zeta}, {s})-\sum_{k = 0}^{m-1}s^{\alpha-{k}-1}{u}^{{k}}({\zeta}, {0}), \; m-1 < \alpha\leq m.$

(3) $\mathcal{L}_{{t}}[D_{t}^{n\alpha}{u}({\zeta}, {t})] = s^{n\alpha}{U}({\zeta}, {s})-\sum_{{k} = 0}^{n-1}s^{(n-{k})\alpha-1}D_{t}^{{k}\alpha}{u}({\zeta}, {0}), \; 0 < \alpha\leq1.$

Proof. For proof see Refs. ^[46].

Theorem 2.1. Let $u(\zeta, t)$ be a piecewise continuous function on $I \times[0, \infty)$ with exponential order $\zeta$ . Assume that the fractional expansion of the function ${U}({\zeta}, s) = \mathcal{L}_t[{u}({\zeta}, t)]$ is as follows:

$\begin{equation} {U}({\zeta}, s) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{f_{n}({\zeta})}{s^{1+n \alpha}},\; 0 < \alpha \leq 1,\; {\zeta} \in I,\; s > \zeta . \end{equation}$

(2.5)

Then, $f_{n}({\zeta}) = {D}_{t}^{n \sigma} {u}({\zeta}, 0)$ .

Proof. For proof see Refs. ^[46].

Remark 2.1. The inverse Laplace transform of the Eq (2.5) is represented as ^[46]

$\begin{equation} {u}(\zeta,{t}) = \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}\frac{D_{{t}}^{\alpha}{u}({\zeta},{0})}{\Gamma(1+i{\alpha})}{t}^{i(\zeta)},\; 0 < \zeta\leq1,\; {t}\geq0. \end{equation}$

(2.6)

3. Road map of the proposed method

Consider the fractional order partial differential equation,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} D_{t}^{\alpha}U(\zeta, t)+\frac{\partial^{3} U({\zeta}, {t})}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, {t})}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, {t})}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\+a\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, {t})}{\partial {\zeta}^{2}}\right)^{2}-b\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, {t})}{\partial t^{2}}\right)^{3}+cU({\zeta}, {t}) = 0. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.1)

Applying LT of Eq (3.1), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U(\zeta, s)+\frac{f_{0}({\zeta},s)}{s}+\frac{1}{s^{\alpha}}\Bigg[-\frac{\partial^{3} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\ &+a\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}-b\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\right)^{3}+cU({\zeta}, s)\Bigg] = 0. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.2)

Suppose that the result of Eq (3.2), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\zeta},s) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{f_{n}({\zeta},s)}{s^{n\alpha+1}}. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.3)

The $k^{th}$ -truncated term series are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\zeta},s) = \frac{f_{0}({\zeta},s)}{s}+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}\frac{f_{n}({\zeta},s)}{s^{n\alpha+1}},\; k = 1,2,3,4\cdots. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.4)

Residual Laplace function (RLF) is given as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{u}({\zeta},s)& = U({\zeta}, s)+\frac{f_{0}({\zeta},s)}{s}+\frac{1}{s^{\alpha}}\Bigg[\frac{\partial^{3} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\ &+a\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}-b\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\right)^{3}+cU({\zeta}, s)\Bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.5)

And the ${k}^{th}$ -LRFs as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{k}({\zeta},s)& = U_{k}({\zeta}, s)+\frac{f_{0}({\zeta},s)}{s}+\frac{1}{s^{\sigma}}\Bigg[\frac{\partial^{3} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\ &+a\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}-b\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\right)^{3}+cU_{k}({\zeta}, s)\Bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.6)

To illustrate a few facts, the following LRPSM features are provided:

$(1)$ $\mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res({\zeta}, s) = 0$ and $\lim_{{j}\rightarrow \infty}\mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{{k}}({\zeta}, s) = \mathcal{L}_{{{t}}}Res_{{u}}({\zeta}, s)$ for each $s > 0.$

$(2)$ $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}s\mathcal{L}_{{{t}}}Res_{{u}}({\zeta}, s) = 0\Rightarrow \lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}s\mathcal{L}_{{{t}}}Res_{{u}, {k}}({\zeta}, s) = 0.$

$(3)$ $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}s^{k{\alpha}+1}\mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{{u}, {k}}({\zeta}, s) = \lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}s^{k{\alpha}+1}\mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{{u}, {k}}({\zeta}, s) = 0, \; 0 < {\alpha}\leq 1, \; {k} = 1, 2, 3, \cdots$ .

To calculate the coefficients using $f_{n}({\zeta}, s)$ , $g_{n}({\zeta}, s)$ , $h_{n}({\zeta}, s)$ and $l_{n}({\zeta}, s)$ , the following system is recursively solved:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &\lim\limits_{s\rightarrow \infty}s^{{k}{\alpha}+1}\mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{{u},{k}}({\alpha},s) = 0,\; {k} = 1,2,\cdots.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.7)

In finally inverse Laplace transform to Eq (3.4), to get the ${k}^{th}$ analytical result of ${u}_{{k}}({\zeta}, {t})$ .

4. Applications

Example 4.1. Consider the fractional partial differential equations ^[47],

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &D_{t}^{\alpha} u({\zeta}, t)-\frac{\partial^{3} u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}+\frac{1}{9}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial {\zeta}^{2}}\right)^{2}\\ &-\frac{1}{216}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)^{3}+16u({\zeta}, t) = 0,\; \text { where } 2 < \alpha \leq 3, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.1)

with the following IC's:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({x}, 0) = -{\zeta}^{4},\; \frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}u({\zeta}, 0) = 0,\; \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t^{2}} u({\zeta}, 0) = 0. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.2)

Using Laplace transform to Eq (4.1), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\zeta}, s)+\frac{{\zeta}^{4}}{s}+\frac{1}{s^{\alpha}}\Bigg[-\frac{\partial^{3} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\ &+\frac{1}{9}\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}-\frac{1}{216}\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\right)^{3}+16U({\zeta}, s)\Bigg] = 0, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.3)

and so the $k^{th}$ -truncated term series are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split}\zeta u({\zeta},s) = \frac{-{\zeta}^{4}}{s}+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}\frac{f_{n}({\zeta},s)}{s^{n\alpha+1}},\; k = 1,2,3,4\cdots. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.4)

Residual Laplace function is given as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{u}({\zeta},s)& = U({\zeta}, s)+\frac{{\zeta}^{4}}{s}+\frac{1}{s^{\alpha}}\Bigg[\frac{\partial^{3} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\ &+\frac{1}{9}\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}-\frac{1}{216}\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\right)^{3}+16U({\zeta}, s)\Bigg],\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.5)

and the ${k}^{th}$ -LRFs as:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{k}({\zeta},s)& = U_{k}({\zeta}, s)+\frac{{\zeta}^{4}}{s}+\frac{1}{s^{\sigma}}\Bigg[\frac{\partial^{3} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\ &+\frac{1}{9}\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}-\frac{1}{216}\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\right)^{3}+16U_{k}({\zeta}, s)\Bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.6)

Table 1. Comparison of the exact and proposed technique solution and various fractional-orders

$\alpha$ and

$t = 0.25$ for Example 4.1.

${{\zeta}}$	$\alpha=2.5$	$\alpha=2.7$	$\alpha=2.9$	$\alpha=3$	HPM ^[47]	Exact
0	0.0222397	0.0111683	0.00553658	0.00388069	0.00388069	0.0038812
0.2	0.0206397	0.00956834	0.00393658	0.00228069	0.00228069	0.0022812
0.4	-0.00336028	-0.0144317	-0.0200634	-0.0217193	-0.0217193	-0.0217188
0.6	-0.10736	-0.118432	-0.124063	-0.125719	-0.125719	-0.125719
0.8	-0.38736	-0.398432	-0.404063	-0.405719	-0.405719	-0.405719
1.0	-0.97776	-0.988832	-0.994463	-0.996119	-0.996119	-0.996119

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Now, we calculate $f_{k}({\zeta}, s)$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots,$ substituting the $k^{th}$ -truncate series of Eq (4.4) into the $k^{th}$ residual Laplace term Eq (4.6), multiply the solution equation by $s^{k{\alpha}+1}$ , and then solve recursively the link $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}(s^{k{\alpha}+1}\mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{u, k}({\zeta}, s)) = 0$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots$ . Following are the first some term:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} f_{1}({\zeta},s) = 24,\; f_{2}({\zeta},s) = -384,\; f_{3}({\zeta},s) = 6144. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.7)

Putting the value of $f_{k}({\zeta}, s)$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots,$ in Eq (4.4), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\zeta},s) = -\frac{{\zeta}^{4}}{s}+\frac{24}{s^{\alpha+1}}-\frac{384}{s^{2\alpha+1}}+\frac{6144}{s^{3\alpha+1}}+\cdots.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.8)

Using inverse LT, we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &u({\zeta},{t}) = -{\zeta}^{4}+\frac{24{t}^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}-\frac{384{t}^{2\alpha}}{\Gamma(2\alpha+1)}+\frac{6144{t}^{3\alpha}}{\Gamma(3\alpha+1)}+\cdots,\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.9)

and the exact solution are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u = -{\zeta}^{4}+4t^{3}. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.10)

In , the exact and LRPSM solutions for $u({\zeta}, t)$ at ${\alpha} = 3$ at $\zeta$ and $t = 0.3$ of Example 4.1. In , analytical solution for $u({\zeta}, t)$ at different value of ${\alpha} = 2.8$ and $2.6$ at $\zeta$ and $t = 0.3$ . In , analytical solution for $u({\zeta}, t)$ at various value of ${\alpha}$ at $t = 0.3$ of Example 4.1.

Figure 1. The actual and LRPSM results for

$u({\zeta}, t)$ at

${\alpha} = 3$ at

$\zeta$ and

$t = 0.3$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 2. Analytical solution for

$u({\zeta}, t)$ at different value of

${\alpha} = 2.8$ and

$2.6$ at

$\zeta$ and

$t = 0.3$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 3. Analytical solution for

$u({\zeta}, t)$ at various value of

${\alpha}$ at

$t = 0.3$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Example 4.2. Consider the fractional partial differential equations ^[47]:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &D_{t}^{\alpha} U({\zeta}, t)-\frac{\partial^{3} U({\zeta}, t)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, t)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, t)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}+\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, t)}{\partial {\zeta}^{2}}\right)^{2}\\ &-\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, t)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)^{2}+2U^{2}({\zeta}, t) = 0,\; \text { where }\; 2 < \alpha \leq 3, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.11)

with the following IC's:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} U(\zeta, 0) = e^{\zeta},\; \frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}U(\zeta, 0) = e^{\zeta},\; \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t^{2}} U(\zeta, 0) = e^{\zeta}. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.12)

Using Laplace transform to Eq (4.11), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\zeta}, s)-\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s}-\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s^{2}}-\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s^{3}}+\frac{1}{s^{\alpha}}\Bigg[-\frac{\partial^{3} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\ &+\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}-\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}+2\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(U({\zeta}, s)\right)\right)^{2}\Bigg] = 0. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.13)

Table 2. Comparison of the exact and proposed technique solution and various fractional-orders

$\alpha$ and

$t = 0.099$ for Example 4.2.

${{\zeta}}$	$\alpha=2.5$	$\alpha=2.7$	$\alpha=2.9$	$\alpha=3$	Exact
0	1.08911	1.09052	1.09122	1.09142	1.09199
0.2	1.32968	1.33169	1.33268	1.33297	1.33376
0.4	1.62325	1.62612	1.62754	1.62795	1.62905
0.6	1.98139	1.98553	1.98759	1.98818	1.98973
0.8	2.41823	2.42422	2.42721	2.42807	2.43026
1	2.95086	2.95959	2.96394	2.96519	2.96833

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Residual Laplace function is given as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{u}({\zeta},s)& = U(\zeta, s)-\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s}-\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s^{2}} -\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s^{3}}+\frac{1}{s^{\alpha}}\Bigg[\frac{\partial^{3} U(\zeta, s)}{\partial t \partial \zeta^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U(\zeta, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial \zeta^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U(\zeta, s)}{\partial \zeta^{4}}\\ &+\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U(\zeta, s)}{\partial \zeta^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}-\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U(\zeta, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}+2\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(U(\zeta, s)\right)\right)^{2}\Bigg],\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.14)

and so the $k^{th}$ -truncated term series are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\zeta},s) = \frac{e^{\zeta}}{s}+\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s^{2}} +\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s^{3}}+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}\frac{f_{n}({\zeta},s)}{s^{n\alpha+1}},\; k = 1,2,3,4\cdots, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.15)

and the ${k}^{th}$ -LRFs as:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{k}({\zeta},s)& = U_{k}(\zeta, s)-\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s}-\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s^{2}} -\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s^{3}}+\frac{1}{s^{\sigma}}\\ &\Bigg[\frac{\partial^{3} U_{k}(\zeta, s)}{\partial t \partial \zeta^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U_{k}(\zeta, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial \zeta^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U_{k}(\zeta, s)}{\partial \zeta^{4}}\\ &+\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U_{k}(\zeta, s)}{\partial \zeta^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}-\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\\ &\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} U_{k}(\zeta, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\right)^{2}+2\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(U_{k}(\zeta, s)\right)\right)^{2}\Bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.16)

Now, we calculate $f_{k}({\zeta}, s)$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots,$ substituting the $k^{th}$ -truncate series of Eq (4.15) into the $k^{th}$ residual Laplace term Eq (4.16), multiply the solution equation by $s^{k{\alpha}+1}$ , and then solve recursively the link $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}(s^{k{\alpha}+1}\mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{u, k}({\zeta}, s)) = 0$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots$ . Following are the first some term:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &f_{1}({\zeta},s) = -(e^{\zeta}+3e^{2\zeta}),\\ &f_{2}({\zeta},s) = e^{\zeta}+54e^{2\zeta}+36e^{3\zeta},\\ &f_{3}({\zeta},s) = -(e^{\zeta}+870e^{2\zeta}+3564e^{3\zeta}+792e^{4\zeta}).\ \ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.17)

Putting the value of $f_{k}({\zeta}, s)$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots,$ in Eq (4.15), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} U({\zeta},s)& = \frac{e^{\zeta}}{s}+\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s^{2}}+\frac{e^{\zeta}}{s^{3}}-\frac{e^{\zeta}+3e^{2\zeta}}{s^{\alpha+1}}-\frac{e^{\zeta}+54e^{2{\zeta}}+36e^{3{\zeta}}}{s^{2\alpha+1}}\\ &-\frac{e^{\zeta}+870e^{2\zeta}+3564e^{3\zeta}+792e^{4\zeta}}{s^{3\alpha+1}}+\cdots.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.18)

Using inverse LT, we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\zeta},{t})& = e^{\zeta}+{e^{\zeta}t}+\frac{e^{\zeta}t}{2}-\frac{(e^{\zeta}+3e^{2\zeta}){t}^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}+\frac{(e^{\zeta}+54e^{2{\zeta}}+36e^{3{\zeta}}){t}^{2\alpha}}{\Gamma(2\alpha+1)}\\ &+\frac{(e^{\zeta}+870e^{2{\zeta}}+3564e^{3{\zeta}}+792e^{4{\zeta}}){t}^{3\alpha}}{\Gamma(3\alpha+1)}+\cdots,\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.19)

and the exact solution are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u = e^{{\zeta}+t}. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.20)

In , the exact and LRPSM solutions for $u({\zeta}, t)$ at ${\alpha} = 3$ at $\zeta$ and $t = 0.3$ of Example 4.2. In , LRPSM solutions for $u({\zeta}, t)$ at ${\alpha} = 2.5$ and ${\alpha} = 2.8$ and $t = 0.3$ of Example 4.2.

Figure 4. Exact and LRPSM solutions for

$u({\zeta}, t)$ at

${\alpha} = 3$ at

$\zeta$ and

$t = 0.3$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 5. LRPSM solutions for

$u({\zeta}, t)$ at

${\alpha} = 2.5$ and

${\alpha} = 2.8$ and

$t = 0.3$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Example 4.3. Consider the fractional partial differential equations ^[47]:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &D_{t}^{\alpha} u({\zeta}, t)-\frac{\partial^{3} u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial t^{2} \partial x^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\ &-\left(\frac{\partial^{2} u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\left(\frac{\partial u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial {\zeta}}\right)-u({\zeta},{t})(\frac{\partial u({\zeta}, t)}{\partial t}) = 0,\; \text { where }\; 2 < \alpha \leq 3, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.21)

with the following IC's:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} U({\zeta}, 0) = \cos{\zeta},\; \frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}U({\zeta}, 0) = -\sin{\zeta},\; \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t^{2}} U({\zeta}, 0) = -\cos{\zeta}. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.22)

Table 3. Comparison of the exact and proposed technique solution and various fractional-orders

$\alpha$ and

$t = 0.22$ for Example 4.3.

${{\zeta}}$	$\alpha=2.5$	$\alpha=2.7$	$\alpha=2.9$	$\alpha=3$	Exact
0	0.	0.97178	0.973463	0.974025	0.975897
0.2	-0.04370738	0.908702	0.910351	0.910903	0.913089
0.4	-0.085672	0.809397	0.810946	0.811465	0.813878
0.6	-0.124221	0.677823	0.679212	0.679677	0.682221
0.8	-0.157818	0.519227	0.5204	0.520792	0.523366
1	-0.185124	0.339931	0.34084	0.341145	0.343646

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Using Laplace transform to Eq (4.21), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\zeta}, s)-\frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s}+\frac{\sin{\zeta}}{s^{2}} +\frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s^{3}}+\frac{1}{s^{\sigma}}\bigg[-\frac{\partial^{3} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\ &+\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} u({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial u({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}}\right)\right)-\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(U({\zeta}, s)\right)\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t}\right)\right)\bigg] = 0. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.23)

Residual Laplace function is given as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{u}({\zeta},s)& = U({\zeta}, s)-\frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s}+\frac{\sin{\zeta}}{s^{2}} +\frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s^{3}}+\frac{1}{s^{\sigma}}\\ &\bigg[-\frac{\partial^{3} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{4} U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}\\ &+\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial^{2} u({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\right)\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial u({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}}\right)\right)\\ &-\mathcal{L}\left(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(U({\zeta}, s)\right)\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\left(\frac{\partial U({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t}\right)\right)\bigg], \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.24)

and so the $k^{th}$ -truncated term series are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\zeta},s) = \frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s}+\frac{-\sin{\zeta}}{s^{2}} +\frac{-\cos{\zeta}}{s^{3}}+\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{k}\frac{f_{n}({\zeta},s)}{s^{n\alpha+1}},\; k = 1,2,3,4\cdots, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.25)

and the ${k}^{th}$ -LRFs as:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{k}({\zeta},s)& = U_{k}({\zeta}, s)-\frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s}+\frac{\sin{\zeta}}{s^{2}} +\frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s^{3}}+\frac{1}{s^{\alpha}}\bigg[-\frac{\partial^{3} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t \partial {\zeta}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{4} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2} \partial {\zeta}^{2}}\\&+\frac{\partial^{4} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}^{4}}+\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\bigg(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1} \bigg(\frac{\partial^{2} U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t^{2}}\bigg)\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\bigg(\frac{\partial U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial {\zeta}}\bigg)\bigg) \\&-\mathcal{L}_{{t}}\bigg(\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\bigg(U_{k}({\zeta}, s)\bigg)\mathcal{L}_{t}^{-1}\bigg(\frac{\partial U_{k}({\zeta}, s)}{\partial t}\bigg)\bigg)\bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.26)

Now, we calculate $f_{k}({\zeta}, s)$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots,$ substituting the $k^{th}$ -truncate series of Eq (4.25) into the $k^{th}$ residual Laplace term Eq (4.26), multiply the solution equation by $s^{k{\alpha}+1}$ , and then solve recursively the link $\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}(s^{k{\alpha}+1}\mathcal{L}_{{t}}Res_{u, k}({\zeta}, s)) = 0$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots$ . Following are the first some term:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &f_{1}({\zeta},s) = -\cos{\zeta},\; f_{2}({\zeta},s) = \cos{\zeta},\; f_{3}({\zeta},s) = -\cos{\zeta}.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.27)

Putting the value of $f_{k}({x}, s)$ , $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots,$ in Eq (4.25), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\zeta},s) = \frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s}-\frac{\sin{\zeta}}{s^{2}}-\frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s^{3}}-\frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s^{\alpha+1}}+\frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s^{2\alpha+1}}-\frac{\cos{\zeta}}{s^{3\alpha+1}}+\cdots.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.28)

Using inverse LT, we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &u({\zeta},{t}) = \cos{\zeta}-t\sin{\zeta}-\frac{t^{2}\cos{\zeta}}{2}-\frac{{t}^{\alpha}\cos{\zeta}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}+\frac{{t}^{2\alpha}\cos{\zeta}}{\Gamma(2\alpha+1)}-\frac{{t}^{3\alpha}\cos{\zeta}}{\Gamma(3\alpha+1)}+\cdots,\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.29)

and the exact solution are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u = \cos({\zeta}+t). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.30)

In , exact and LRPSM solutions for $u({\zeta}, t)$ at ${\alpha} = 3$ and $t = 0.3$ of Example 4.3. , LRPSM solutions for $u({\zeta}, t)$ at ${\alpha} = 2.5$ , ${\alpha} = 2.8$ , and $t = 0.3$ .

Figure 6. Exact and LRPSM solutions for

$u({\zeta}, t)$ at

${\alpha} = 3$ at and

$t = 0.3$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 7. LRPSM solutions for

$u({\zeta}, t)$ at

${\alpha} = 2.5$

${\alpha} = 2.8$ , and

$t = 0.3$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

5. Conclusions

In this article, the fractional partial differential equation has been solved analytically by employing the Laplace residual power series method in conjunction with the Caputo operator. To demonstrate the validity of the recommended method, we analyzed three distinct partial differential equation problems. The simulation results demonstrate that the outcomes of our method are in close accordance with the exact answer. The new method is highly straightforward, efficient, and suitable for getting numerical solutions to partial differential equations. The primary advantage of the proposed approach is the series form solution, which rapidly converges to the exact answer. We can therefore conclude that the suggested approach is quite methodical and efficient for a more thorough investigation of fractional-order mathematical models.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, In: North-Holland mathematics studies, Elsevier, 204 (2006), 1–523.
[2]	D. Baleanu, Z. B. Guvenc, J. A. Tenreiro Machado, New trends in nanotechnology and fractional calculus applications, New York: Springer, 2010.
[3]	M. Alqhtani, K. M. Saad, R. shah, W. Weera, W. M. Hamanah, Analysis of the fractional-order local poisson equation in fractal porous media, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1323. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071323 doi: 10.3390/sym14071323
[4]	B. Riemann, Versuch einer allgemeinen auffassung der integration und differentiation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[5]	A. S. Alshehry, R. Shah, N. A. Shah, I. Dassios, A reliable technique for solving fractional partial differential equation, Axioms, 11 (2022), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11100574 doi: 10.3390/axioms11100574
[6]	I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, New York: Academic Press, 1999.
[7]	K. S. Miller, B. Ross, An introduction to fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, Wiley-Interscience, 1993.
[8]	J. Liouville, Memoire sur quelques questions de geometrie et de mecanique, et sur un nouveaugenre de calcul pour resoudre ces questions, J. Ecole Polytech., 1832, 1–69.
[9]	W. Lin, Global existence theory and chaos control of fractional differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 332 (2007), 709–726.
[10]	Y. L. Li, F. W. Liu, I. W. Turner, T. Li, Time-fractional diffusion equation for signal smoothing, Appl. Math. Comput., 326 (2018), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.01.007
[11]	H. Nasrolahpour, A note on fractional electrodynamics, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 18 (2013), 2589–2593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.01.005 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.01.005
[12]	P. Veeresha, D. G. Prakasha, H. M. Baskonus, Solving smoking epidemic model of fractional order using a modified homotopy analysis transform method, Math. Sci., 13 (2019), 115–128. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s40096-019-0284-6 doi: 10.1007/s40096-019-0284-6
[13]	D. G. Prakasha, P. Veeresha, H. M. Baskonus, Analysis of the dynamics of hepatitis E virus using the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 134 (2019), 241. http://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12590-5 doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12590-5
[14]	L. Akinyemi, K. S. Nisar, C. A. Saleel, H. Rezazadeh, P. Veeresha, M. M. Khater, et al., Novel approach to the analysis of fifth-order weakly nonlocal fractional Schrodinger equation with Caputo derivative, Results Phys., 31 (2021), 104958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104958 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104958
[15]	L. M. Yan, Numerical solutions of fractional Fokker-Planck equations using iterative Laplace transform method, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2013 (2013), 465160. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/465160 doi: 10.1155/2013/465160
[16]	D. Ntiamoah, W. Ofori-Atta, L. Akinyemi, The higher-order modified Korteweg-de Vries equation: its soliton, breather and approximate solutions, J. Ocean Eng. Sci., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.06.042 doi: 10.1016/j.joes.2022.06.042
[17]	K. Nonlaopon, M. Naeem, A. M. Zidan, R. Shah, A. Alsanad, Numerical investigation of the time-fractional Whitham-Broer-Kaup equation involving without singular kernel operators, Complexity, 2021, (2021), 7979365. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7979365 doi: 10.1155/2021/7979365
[18]	D. Baleanu, G. C. Wu, S. D. Zeng, Chaos analysis and asymptotic stability of generalized Caputo fractional differential equations, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 102 (2017), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.02.007 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2017.02.007
[19]	E. Scalas, R. Gorenflo, F. Mainardi, Fractional calculus and continuous-time finance, Phys. A, 284 (2000), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00255-7 doi: 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00255-7
[20]	M. M. Al-Sawalha, A. S. Alshehry, K. Nonlaopon, R. Shah, O. Y. Ababneh, Approximate analytical solution of time-fractional vibration equation via reliable numerical algorithm, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 19739–19757. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20221082 doi: 10.3934/math.20221082
[21]	J. M. Cruz-Duarte, J. Rosales-Garcia, C. R. Correa-Cely, A. Garcia-Perez, J. G. Avina-Cervantes, A closed form expression for the Gaussian-based Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative for signal processing applications, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 61 (2018), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.020 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.020
[22]	M. M. Al-Sawalha, K. Nonlaopon, I. Khan. Fractional evaluation of Kaup-Kupershmidt equation with the exponential-decay kernel, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 3730–3746. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023186 doi: 10.3934/math.2023186
[23]	M. M. Al-Sawalha, O. Y. Ababneh, R. Shah, A. Khan, K. Nonlaopon, Numerical analysis of fractional-order Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations with non-singular kernel operators, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 2308–2336. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023120 doi: 10.3934/math.2023120
[24]	M. M. Al-Sawalha, N. Amir, R. Shah, M. Yar, Novel analysis of fuzzy fractional Emden-Fowler equations within new iterative transform method, J. Funct. Spaces, 2022 (2022), 7731135. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7731135 doi: 10.1155/2022/7731135
[25]	M. M. Al-Sawalha, A. S. Alshehry, K. Nonlaopon, R. Shah, O. Y. Ababneh, Fractional view analysis of delay differential equations via numerical method, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 20510–20523. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20221123 doi: 10.3934/math.20221123
[26]	Y. Keskin, G. Oturanc, Reduced differential transform method for partial differential equations, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 10 (2009), 741–749. http://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.6.741 doi: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.6.741
[27]	S. Momani, Z. Odibat, Analytical solution of a time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation by Adomian decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comput., 177 (2006), 488–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.025 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.025
[28]	G. C. Wu, A fractional variational iteration method for solving fractional nonlinear differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 61 (2011), 2186–2190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.09.010 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.09.010
[29]	M. K. Alaoui, K. Nonlaopon, A. M. Zidan, A. Khan, R. Shah, Analytical investigation of fractional-order cahn-hilliard and gardner equations using two novel techniques, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10101643 doi: 10.3390/math10101643
[30]	N. A. Shah, Y. S. Hamed, K. M. Abualnaja, J. D. Chung, R. Shah, A. Khan, A comparative analysis of fractional-order kaup-kupershmidt equation within different operators, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 986. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050986 doi: 10.3390/sym14050986
[31]	M. Alqhtani, K. M. Saad, R. Shah, W. Weera, W. M. Hamanah, Analysis of the fractional-order local poisson equation in fractal porous media, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1323. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071323 doi: 10.3390/sym14071323
[32]	D. G. Prakasha, P. Veeresha, M. S. Rawashdeh, Numerical solution for (2+1)-dimensional time-fractional coupled Burger equations using fractional natural decomposition method, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 3409–3427. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.5533 doi: 10.1002/mma.5533
[33]	N. H. Aljahdaly, R. Shah, M. Naeem, M. A. Arefin, A comparative analysis of fractional space-time advection-dispersion equation via semi-analytical methods, J. Funct. Spaces, 2022 (2022), 4856002. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4856002 doi: 10.1155/2022/4856002
[34]	O. A. Arqub, Series solution of fuzzy differential equations under strongly generalized differentiability, J. Adv. Res. Appl. Math., 5 (2013), 31–52. http://doi.org/10.5373/jaram.1447.051912 doi: 10.5373/jaram.1447.051912
[35]	V. N. Kovalnogov, R. V. Fedorov, D. A. Generalov, E. V. Tsvetova, T. E. Simos, C. Tsitouras, On a new family of Runge-Kutta-Nystrom pairs of orders 6(4), Mathematics, 10 (2022), 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10060875 doi: 10.3390/math10060875
[36]	K. Liu, Z. X. Yang, W. F. Wei, B. Gao, D. L. Xin, C. M. Sun, et al., Novel detection approach for thermal defects: study on its feasibility and application to vehicle cables, High Volt., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1049/hve2.12258 doi: 10.1049/hve2.12258
[37]	X. Gong, L. X. Wang, Y. Y. Mou, H. L. Wang, X. Q. Wei, W. F. Zheng, et al., Improved four-channel PBTDPA control strategy using force feedback bilateral teleoperation system, Internat. J. Control, 20 (2022), 1002–1017. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-021-0096-y doi: 10.1007/s12555-021-0096-y
[38]	L. Liu, J. Wang, L. C. Zhang, S. Zhang, Multi-AUV dynamic maneuver countermeasure algorithm based on interval information game and fractional-order DE, Fractal Fract., 6 (2022), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6050235 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6050235
[39]	O. A. Arqub, A. El-Ajou, S. Momani, Constructing and predicting solitary pattern solutions for nonlinear time-fractional dispersive partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 293 (2015), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.09.034 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.09.034
[40]	O. A. Arqub, A. El-Ajou, A. S. Bataineh, I. Hashim, A representation of the exact solution of generalized Lane-Emden equations using a new analytical method, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2013 (2013), 378593. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/378593 doi: 10.1155/2013/378593
[41]	O. A. Arqub, Z. Abo-Hammour, R. Al-Badarneh, S. Momani, A reliable analytical method for solving higher-order initial value problems, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2013 (2013), 673829. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/673829 doi: 10.1155/2013/673829
[42]	A. El-Ajou, O. A. Arqub, S. Momani, D. Baleanu, A. Alsaedi, A novel expansion iterative method for solving linear partial differential equations of fractional order, Appl. Math. Comput., 257 (2015), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.12.121 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.12.121
[43]	S. Mukhtar, R. Shah, S. Noor, The numerical investigation of a fractional-order multi-dimensional model of Navier-Stokes equation via novel techniques, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061102 doi: 10.3390/sym14061102
[44]	M. M. Al-Sawalha, R. P. Agarwal, R. Shah, O.Y. Ababneh, W. Weera, A reliable way to deal with fractional-order equations that describe the unsteady flow of a polytropic gas, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 2293. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10132293 doi: 10.3390/math10132293
[45]	N. A. Shah, H. A. Alyousef, S. A. El-Tantawy, R. Shah, J. D. Chung, Analytical investigation of fractional-order Korteweg-de-Vries-type equations under Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo operator: modeling nonlinear waves in a plasma and fluid, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040739 doi: 10.3390/sym14040739
[46]	A. El-Ajou, Adapting the Laplace transform to create solitary solutions for the nonlinear time-fractional dispersive PDEs via a new approach, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 136 (2021), 229.
[47]	A. Roozi, E. Alibeiki, S. S. Hosseini, S. M. Shafiof, M. Ebrahimi, Homotopy perturbation method for special nonlinear partial differential equations, J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 23 (2011), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2010.06.014 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2010.06.014

This article has been cited by:

1.	Saleh Fahad Aljurbua, Extended existence results for FDEs with nonlocal conditions, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 9049, 10.3934/math.2024440
2.	Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, A constructive numerical approach to solve the Fractional Modified Camassa–Holm equation, 2024, 106, 11100168, 19, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.06.076
3.	Nikita Saha, Randhir Singh, An efficient new numerical algorithm for solving Emden–Fowler pantograph differential equation using Laguerre polynomials, 2023, 72, 18777503, 102108, 10.1016/j.jocs.2023.102108
4.	Rashida Hussain, Javeria Murtaza, Jamshad Ahmad, Shalan Alkarni, Nehad Ali Shah, Dynamical perspective of sensitivity analysis and optical soliton solutions to the fractional Benjamin–Ono model, 2024, 58, 22113797, 107453, 10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107453

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Mathematics

1.8 3.4

Metrics

Article views(1944) PDF downloads(185) Cited by(4)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(7) / Tables(3)

AIMS Mathematics

Combination of Laplace transform and residual power series techniques of special fractional-order non-linear partial differential equations

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminaries

3. Road map of the proposed method

4. Applications

5. Conclusions

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Mathematics

Combination of Laplace transform and residual power series techniques of special fractional-order non-linear partial differential equations

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminaries

3. Road map of the proposed method

4. Applications

5. Conclusions

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog