In this paper, we investigate mean Li-Yorke chaos along some sequence and Li-Yorke chaos for cookie-cutter systems. By applying bounded distortion and a locally α-H¨older condition, we show that the cookie-cutter set contains a mean Li-Yorke scrambled set along some sequence in which the Hausdorff dimension equals the Hausdorff dimension of the cookie-cutter set. That is to say, a cookie-cutter system is mean Li-Yorke chaotic along some sequence. Meanwhile, we proved that every mean Li-Yorke scrambled set is also a scrambled set; hence a cookie-cutter system is also Li-Yorke chaotic.
Citation: Alqahtani Bushra Abdulshakoor M, Weibin Liu. Li-Yorke chaotic property of cookie-cutter systems[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13192-13207. doi: 10.3934/math.2022727
[1] | Daniel Clemente-López, Esteban Tlelo-Cuautle, Luis-Gerardo de la Fraga, José de Jesús Rangel-Magdaleno, Jesus Manuel Munoz-Pacheco . Poincaré maps for detecting chaos in fractional-order systems with hidden attractors for its Kaplan-Yorke dimension optimization. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5871-5894. doi: 10.3934/math.2022326 |
[2] | Yulong Li, Long Zhou, Fengjie Geng . Dynamics on semi-discrete Mackey-Glass model. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2771-2807. doi: 10.3934/math.2025130 |
[3] | Rami Amira, Mohammed Salah Abdelouahab, Nouressadat Touafek, Mouataz Billah Mesmouli, Hasan Nihal Zaidi, Taher S. Hassan . Nonlinear dynamic in a remanufacturing duopoly game: spectral entropy analysis and chaos control. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7711-7727. doi: 10.3934/math.2024374 |
[4] | Hany A. Hosham, Thoraya N. Alharthi . Bifurcation and chaos in simple discontinuous systems separated by a hypersurface. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17025-17038. doi: 10.3934/math.2024826 |
[5] | Xinna Mao, Hongwei Feng, Maryam A. Al-Towailb, Hassan Saberi-Nik . Dynamical analysis and boundedness for a generalized chaotic Lorenz model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19719-19742. doi: 10.3934/math.20231005 |
[6] | Xiaoyuan Zhang, Meng Bao, Xinpeng Wen, Xiaoquan Xu . On weakly bounded well-filtered spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17026-17044. doi: 10.3934/math.2022936 |
[7] | Le Fu, Jingxuan Chen, Xuanchen Li, Chunfeng Suo . Novel information measures considering the closest crisp set on fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2974-2997. doi: 10.3934/math.2025138 |
[8] | Wanjuan Du . A further study on an attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system with logistic source. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 16924-16930. doi: 10.3934/math.2024822 |
[9] | Nehad Ali Shah, Iftikhar Ahmed, Kanayo K. Asogwa, Azhar Ali Zafar, Wajaree Weera, Ali Akgül . Numerical study of a nonlinear fractional chaotic Chua's circuit. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1636-1655. doi: 10.3934/math.2023083 |
[10] | Sukono, Siti Hadiaty Yuningsih, Endang Rusyaman, Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan, Aceng Sambas . Investigation of chaos behavior and integral sliding mode control on financial risk model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18377-18392. doi: 10.3934/math.20221012 |
In this paper, we investigate mean Li-Yorke chaos along some sequence and Li-Yorke chaos for cookie-cutter systems. By applying bounded distortion and a locally α-H¨older condition, we show that the cookie-cutter set contains a mean Li-Yorke scrambled set along some sequence in which the Hausdorff dimension equals the Hausdorff dimension of the cookie-cutter set. That is to say, a cookie-cutter system is mean Li-Yorke chaotic along some sequence. Meanwhile, we proved that every mean Li-Yorke scrambled set is also a scrambled set; hence a cookie-cutter system is also Li-Yorke chaotic.
The chaotic property is a characterization of the asymptotic behaviors between different orbits in the dynamical system. Until now, many versions of chaos have been studied, such as Devaney chaos [10], Li-Yorke chaos [22], distributional chaos [34] and mean Li-Yorke chaos [11]. These types of chaos are closely connected. Blanchard, Glasner, Kolyada and Maass [5] proved that positive entropy implied Li-Yorke chaos for a surjective continuous map. Huang and Ye [18] showed that Devaney chaos implies Li-Yorke chaos. Wang, Huang and Huan [36] introduced distributional chaos in a sequence, and showed that a continuous map of an interval is Li-Yorke chaotic if and only if it is distributively chaotic in a sequence. Downarowicz [11] observed that mean Li-Yorke chaos is equivalent to the DC2 chaos and proved that positive topological entropy implies mean Li-Yorke chaos. Liu, Wang and Chu [28] proved that Devaney chaos is stronger than distributional chaos in a sequence. Garcia-Ramos and Jin [16] found a new condition that implies mean Li-Yorke chaos. Cánovas [9] considered that {fn}∞n=1 is a sequence of continuous interval maps that converges uniformly to a continuous map f, and showed that the chaoticity of f implied that the chaoticity of {fn}∞n=1. Mangang [30] studied the mean equicontinuity, sensitivity, expansiveness and distality of the product dynamical systems. The reader can refer to [6,12,13,17,19,21,33,35,37], which are related to Li-Yorke chaos.
Throughout this paper, we focus on Li-Yorke chaos and mean Li-Yorke chaos. Let us recall the definition of the scrambled set and mean Li-Yorke scrambled set.
Let (X,ρ) be a metric space and f:X→X be a self-map. The pair (X,f) is called a topological dynamical system.
Definition 1.1. [22] Let (X,ρ) be a metric space. For two points x,y∈X, (x,y) is a scrambled pair for the map f:X→X, if
lim supn→∞ρ(fn(x),fn(y))>0andlim infn→∞ρ(fn(x),fn(y))=0. |
A subset S⊆X, containing at least two points, is a scrambled set of f, if for any x,y∈S where x≠y, (x,y) is a scrambled pair for f. If a scrambled set S for f is uncountable, we say that f is chaotic in the sense of Li-Yorke.
Definition 1.2. A subset M of X is called a mean Li-Yorke scrambled set if any two distinct points x,y in M satisfy
lim infn→∞1nn∑j=1ρ(fj(x),fj(y))=0andlim supn→∞1nn∑j=1ρ(fj(x),fj(y))>0. |
A system (X,f) is said to be mean Li-Yorke chaotic, if it contains an uncountable mean Li-Yorke scrambled set.
The sequence version of mean Li-Yorke chaos was introduced in [20].
Definition 1.3. Let B={b1<b2<⋯} be a strictly increasing sequence of N. According to [20], a subset M of X is called a mean Li-Yorke scrambled set along the sequence B if any two distinct points x,y in M satisfy
lim infn→∞1nn∑j=1ρ(fbj(x),fbj(y))=0andlim supn→∞1nn∑j=1ρ(fbj(x),fbj(y))>0. | (1.1) |
If the set M is uncountable, then we say that the system (X,f) is mean Li-Yorke chaotic along the sequence B.
The definitions of Li-Yorke chaos, and mean Li-Yorke chaos only require that the cardinality of the chaotic set is uncountable, so a natural further question is how 'large' the size of a scrambled set can be. There are three approaches to analyze the size: topological, measure-theoretic and dimension-theoretic. In [7], Blanchard, Huang and Snoha studied the topological size of scrambled sets extensively; see also the references therein. In [2], Balibrea and Lˊopez surveyed the Lebesgue measure of scrambled sets for continuous maps on the interval. In [8], Bruin and Lˊopez studied the Lebesgue measure of scrambled sets for C2 and C3 multimodal interval maps f with non-flat critical points. In [39], Xiong proved that there exists a scrambled set of the full Hausdorff dimension for the symbolic dynamics with finite symbols. Recently, the second author and his coauthors [25,27] constructed a Li-Yorke chaotic set with full Hausdorff dimension for continued fractions and the β-transformation. Xiao [38] constructed a mean Li-Yorke chaotic set along a polynomial sequence with full Hausdorff dimension for the β-transformation. In 2021, the second author and his coauthor [26] studied the mean Li-Yorke chaotic property for continued fractions, and constructed a mean Li-Yorke chaotic set with full Hausdorff dimension for a sequence with some mild conditions.
Both continued fractions and the β-transformations are interval mappings, which are defined on the unit [0,1). An interesting question is as follows: what about the dynamical system defined on a fractal set? For example, is a 3-adic transformation on the classical middle-third Cantor set Li-Yorke chaotic? that is to say, does the classic middle-third Cantor set contain an uncountable scrambled set?
Motivated by the ideas and results above, we focus on the size of the scrambled set for cookie-cutter sets from the dimensional sense. We first recall the definition of the cookie-cutter mappings, which was defined and studied by Bedford [4].
Definition 1.4. A mapping f is called a cookie-cutter map if there exists a finite collection of disjoint closed intervals I1,I2,⋯,Iq⊂I=[0,1], such that
(1). f is defined in ⋃qj=1Ij, the restriction of f on each Ij is 1 to 1 and surjective, the corresponding branch inverse is denoted by ϕj=(f|Ij)−1:I→Ij;
(2). f is differentiable becoming the H¨older continuous derivative f′, i.e. there exist constants c>0 and r∈(0,1] such that |f′(x)−f′(y)|≤c|x−y|r for any x,y∈Ij, 1≤j≤q;
(3). f is bounded expanding in the sense that
1<b:=infx|f′(x)|≤supx|f′(x)|:=B<+∞. |
The cookie-cutter set associated with f is
C={x∈[0,1]:fn−1(x)∈q⋃j=1Ij,∀n≥1}=+∞⋂k=0f−k(I), |
where f0 denotes identity mapping.
In [32], Nakata gave a method of the approximation of Hausdorff dimensions of generalized cookie-cutter Cantor sets using the thermodynamic formalism. In [23], Liang, Yu and Ren proved the existence of self-similar measures, conformal measures and Gibbs measures on cookie-cutter sets and analysed the dimension spectrum of each of these measures. Barral and Seuret [3] computed the singularity spectrum of the inverse measure of Gibbs measures on cookie-cutter sets. Baker [1] proposed a new multifractal zeta function and showed that under certain conditions the abscissa of convergence yields the Hausdorff multifractal spectrum for a class of measures supported on cookie-cutter sets. In [29], Ma, Rao and Wen defined the cookie-cutter-like sets by the limit sets of a sequence of classical cookie-cutter mappings, and they calculated the dimensions, Hausdorff and packing measures of the cookie-cutter-like sets. Liu [24] proved that for the Cookie-cutter-like dynamic system with unbounded expansion, the properties such as bounded variation and bounded distortion, the existence of a Gibbs-like measure still holds. Recently, Fan, Liao and Wu [15] studied the multifractal spectrum of some multiple ergodic averages in linear Cookie-Cutter dynamical systems.
Let "dimH" denote the Hausdorff dimension and Hs denote the s-dimensional Hausdorff measure. Let C(X) denote the continuous functions defined on X, and P(⋅) denote the pressure function on C(X). The Hausdorff dimensions of a cookie-cutter set is given by the pressure function P(⋅).
Theorem 1.5. [4] Suppose that C is the cookie-cutter set associatedwith f on [0,1].Then 0<Hβ(C)<+∞ and dimHC=β, where β is a unique real number withP(−βlog|f′(x)|)=0.
The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate the Hausdorff dimensions of scrambled sets and the mean Li-Yorke scrambled set along B in cookie-cutter sets. Let'[⋅]' denote the integer part.
Theorem 1.6. Let G(x)=emxm+em−1xm−1+⋯+e1x+e0a polynomial with a degree m≥3 and em>0. LetB={b1<b2<⋯}⊂{[G(n)]:n≥1}be a sequence of positive integers.Let C be the cookie-cutter set associated with f on [0,1].Then there exists a meanLi-Yorke scrambled set along B in Cfor which the Hausdorff dimension equals to dimHC.
Corollary 1.7. Let C be the cookie-cutter set associated with f on [0,1].Then there exists a scrambled set in Cfor which the Hausdorff dimension equals to dimHC.In particular, every cookie-cutter system is chaotic in the sense of Li-Yorke.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we collect and establish some elementary properties of the Hausdorff dimension, pressure function and cookie-cutter sets that will be used later. Section 3 is devoted to proving Theorem 1.6 and Corollary 1.7. In Section 4, Theorem 1.6 is applied to a linear example and a non-linear one. Finally, the authors' conclusions are given in Section 5.
Let A={1,2,⋯,q} with q≥2. Denote the symbolic space of one-sided infinite sequences over A by
AN={u=(u1,u2,⋯):ui∈A,∀i∈N}. |
The symbol ui is called the i-th coordinate of u.
We assign the discrete topology to A and the product topology to AN. For u,v∈AN, the distance d is defined by
d(u,v)=q−i,wherei=inf{j≥0:uj+1≠vj+1}. |
Denote by An the set of all n-letter words and A∗ for the set of all finite words over A. For any u, v∈A∗, uv denotes the concatenation of u and v. For two finite words u and v, u is called the prefix of v if there exists a finite word w such that uw=v. The finite word u is called the prefix of v∈AN if there exists an infinite sequence w∈AN such that uw=v. Both of them denote u⊑v. The symbol "|⋅|" means the diameter, the length and the absolute value with respect to a set, a word, and a real number respectively. For i,j∈N with i<j, we write (u|ji)=(ui,ui+1,⋯,uj).
The shift map σ:AN→AN is defined by
(σ(u))i=ui+1,∀i∈N. |
Let E be a subset of R; a finite or countable collection of subsets {Ui}i≥1 of R is called a δ-cover of a set E⊂R if E⊂∪i≥1Ui and |Ui|<δ for all i≥1. For s≥0, δ≥0, define
Hsδ(E)=inf{∑i≥1|Ui|s:{Ui}i≥1isaδ−coverofE}. |
The s-dimensional Hausdorff measure of E is defined as
Hs(E)=limδ→0Hsδ(E). |
There exists a number dimHE, called the Hausdorff dimension of E, such that
Hs(E)={∞ifs<dimHE,0ifs>dimHE. |
Thus
dimHE=inf{s:Hs(E)=0}=sup{s:Hs(E)=∞}. |
The basics on the Hausdorff dimension can be found in [14], to which we refer the reader.
Let α be a positive real number. We say that a map F:X→R (X⊂R) satisfies the local α-H¨older condition if there exists a real number r>0 and a constant c>0 such that, for any x,y∈X with |x−y|<r,
|F(x)−F(y)|≤c|x−y|α. |
The following well-known lemma can be easily deduced from the definitions of the Hausdorff dimension and the local α-H¨older condition. One can refer to [31] for more details.
Lemma 2.1. Let X be a metric space and s, α>0 be real numbers.If a mapF:X→R satisfiesthe local α-H¨older condition, then Hs(F(X))≤csHsα(X), where c is the constant in the definition of thelocally α-H¨older condition. Moreover, αdimH(F(X))≤dimH(X).
Let f:X→X and φ:X→R be a continuous function. Denote
Snφ(x)=n−1∑i=0φ(fi(x)) |
for x∈X. We define the pressure function P:C(X)→R by
P(φ)=limn→∞1nlog∑x∈F(fn)eSnφ(x) |
where F(fn) denotes the set of fixed points of fn.
In this subsection, we collect and establish some elementary properties on cookie-cutter sets. the reader can refer to [4] for more details.
Since I1,I2,⋯,Iq are disjoint closed intervals, as according to Definition 1.4, we can define a mapping π from {1,2,⋯,q}N to C by
π(a1,a2,⋯,an,⋯)=⋂n>0ϕu1∘ϕu2∘⋯∘ϕun(I) |
for any (a1,a2,⋯,an,⋯)∈{1,2,⋯,q}N. It can be verified that the mapping π is a continuous bijection.
For w=u1u2⋯un∈{1,2,⋯,q}n, define the basic interval of the order n corresponding to w by
I(w)=I(u1u2⋯un)=ϕu1∘ϕu2∘⋯∘ϕun(I). |
For example, when n=1, I(i)=ϕi(I)=Ii for 1≤i≤q.
The following diagram is commutative, that is, f∘π=π∘σ. Since π is bijective, the equation π−1∘f=σ∘π−1 also holds.
![]() |
Remark 2.2. (1). Since I1,I2,⋯,Iq are disjoint closed intervals, as according to Definition 1.4, the distance of between two intervals ρ(Ii,Ij)>0 for any 1≤i≠j≤q; then, denote ρmin=min1≤i≠j≤qρ(Ii,Ij).
(2). According to the condition (3) of Definition 1.4, the map f is monotonous on each Ij(1≤j≤q).
(3). For any n and any w∈{1,2,⋯,q}n, |I(w)|≤1bn.
The following lemmas are useful for proving Theorem 1.6.
Lemma 2.3. [14]Let C be a cookie-cutter set andρmin=min1≤i≠j≤qρ(Ii,Ij).For any w∈{1,2,⋯,q}∗, there existsa constant d1 such that
ρmind1|I(w)|≤ρ(I(wi),I(wj))≤|I(w)|, |
for any 1≤i≠j≤q.
Lemma 2.4. [14](bounded distortion)Let C be a cookie-cutter set associated with f on [0,1].There exists a constant K1>0 such that for any N≥1 andany x,y∈I(w), w∈{1,2,⋯,q}∗,
K−11≤|(fN)′(x)||(fN)′(y)|≤K1. |
The idea of proving Theorem 1.6 is to construct a mean Li-Yorke scrambled set in the symbolic space {1,⋯,q}N, then project such set onto the unit interval [0,1] where the projection is a mean Li-Yorke scrambled set along B, and finally calculate the Hausdorff dimension of the projection set.
Actually, the idea for constructing a mean Li-Yorke scrambled set was inspired by [28]. In the following, we write Σq={1,2,⋯,q}N.
We define a positive integer sequence {ck}k≥1 such that c1=1 and c2=2c1 for any k≥2 and
c2k−1=c1+c2+⋯+c2k−2 |
and
c2k=2c1+c2+⋯+c2k−2+c2k−1. |
Let
J1={j∈N:2k−1∑i=1ci<j≤2k∑i=1ciforsomek≥1} |
and
J2={j∈N:2k∑i=1ci<j≤2k+1∑i=1ciforsomek≥1}. |
For u=(u1,u2,⋯)∈Σq, and denote (1j)=(11⋯1⏟j), we set a sequence of finite words {Vj(u)}j≥1 as follows.
Vj(u)={u1ifj=1,1jifj∈J1,u1u2⋯ujifj∈J2. |
Recall that B={bj}j≥1, (v|ji)=(vi,vi+1,⋯,vj) and |v|ji|=j−i+1. For u=(u1,u2,⋯)∈Σq, we define a mapping g:Σq→Σq by
g(u)=(u|b11,V1(u),u|b2−|V1(u)|b1+1,V2(u),⋯,Vn−1(u),u|bn−n−1∑i=1|Vi(u)|bn−1−n−2∑i=1|Vi(u)|+1,Vn(u),⋯) |
Denote W1(u)=u|b11, and Wn(u)=u|bn−∑n−1i=1|Vi(u)|bn−1−∑n−2i=1|Vi(u)|+1 for any n≥2. The mapping g:Σq→Σq can be written as:
g(u)=(W1(u),V1(u),W2(u),V2(u),⋯,Vn−1(u),Wn(u),Vn(u),⋯). |
Remark 3.1. (1). The mapping g is continuous and injective.
(2). For j∈J1, σbj(g(u))=(1j,Wj+1(u),Vj+1(u),⋯).
(3). For j∈J2, σbj(g(u))=(u1u2⋯uj,Wj+1(u),Vj+1(u),⋯).
Remark 3.2. (1). When j→+∞, the length of the finite word 1j tends to infinity which can guarantee the equality of (1.1).
(2). For u,v∈Σq with u≠v, there exists k≥1 such that uk≠vk. For j∈J2 and j→+∞, uk and vk appear infinitely in Vj(u) and Vj(u) which can guarantee the inequality of (1.1).
Let M:=g(Σq). Recall that the mapping π from {1,2,⋯,q}N to C is
π(a1,a2,⋯,an,⋯)=⋂n>0ϕu1∘ϕu2∘⋯∘ϕun(I) |
for any (a1,a2,⋯,an,⋯)∈Σq, and that the equation f∘π=π∘σ holds.
The following lemma indicates π(M) is a mean Li-Yorke scrambled set of f on C.
Lemma 3.3. The set π(M) is a mean Li-Yorkescrambled set along B of f on C.
Proof. For any u,v∈M with u≠v, we shall show that (π(u),π(v)) is a mean Li-Yorke scrambled pair for f.
Since the map π is continuous and satisfies f∘π=π∘σ, we obtain
|fbj∘π(u)−fbj∘π(v)|=|π(σbj(u))−π(σbj(v))|. |
(1). Lowerlimits. Taking n=2k∑i=1ci, since |π(σbj(u))−π(σbj(v))|≤1 for 1≤j≤n−c2k, we get
n∑j=1|π(σbj(u))−π(σbj(v))|≤n−c2k+n∑j=n−c2k+1|π(σbj(u))−π(σbj(v))|. |
By Remark 2.2(3) and Remark 3.1(2),
n∑j=n−c2k+1|π(σbj(u))−π(σbj(v))|≤n∑j=n−c2k+1|I(1j)|≤n∑j=n−c2k+1b−j≤1b−1. |
Therefore
1nn∑j=1|fbj∘π(u)−fbj∘π(v)|≤n−c2k+1b−1n. |
Note that c2k=2∑2k−1i=1ci and n=2k∑i=1ci; taking the lim inf gives
lim infn→∞1nn∑j=1|fbj∘π(u)−fbj∘π(v)|=0. |
(2). Upperlimits.
For any u,v∈M with u≠v, there exists ξ≠η∈Σq satisying g(ξ)=u and g(η)=v. Since the mapping g is injective, it follows that ξ≠η. Let t≥1 be the least positive integer such that ξt≠ηt and ξi=ηi for any 1≤i≤t−1.
For k>t large enough, taking n=2k+1∑i=1ci, we obtain
n∑j=1|π(σbj(u))−π(σbj(v))|≥n∑j=n−c2k+1+1|π(σbj(u))−π(σbj(v))| |
By Remark 3.1(3), for j∈J2,
σbj(u)=σbj(g(ξ))=(ξ1ξ2⋯ξj,Wj+1(ξ),Vj+1(ξ),⋯) |
and
σbj(v)=σbj(g(η))=(η1η2⋯ηj,Wj+1(η),Vj+1(η),⋯). |
When n−c2k+1+1≤j≤n, it follows that j∈J2 and j>t. By the definition of g, the distinct symbols ξt and ηt appear infinitely often in the same location of g(ξ) and g(η) respectively. Hence
n∑j=n−c2k+1+1|π(σbj(u))−π(σbj(v))|≥n∑j=n−c2k+1+1ht=c2k+1ht, |
where ht=ρ(I(ξ1ξ2⋯ξt),I(η1η2⋯ηt))≥ρmind1|I(ξ1ξ2⋯ξt−1)|. Therefore
1nn∑j=1|fbj∘π(u)−fbj∘π(v)|≥c2k+1htn. |
Note that c2k+1=∑2ki=1ci and n=2k+1∑i=1ci=2c2k+1, taking the lim sup gives
lim supn→∞1nn∑j=1|fbj∘π(u)−fbj∘π(v)|=ht2>0. |
Note that π(M)⊆C, so we have dimHπ(M)≤dimHC.
Consider a mapping h:π(M)→C defined by
h(a)=π∘g−1∘π−1(a), |
for a∈π(M). Since π is continuous and bijective from Σq to C and the mapping g is continuous and bijective from Σq to M, the mapping h is a continuous bijection on π(M).
Proposition 3.4. We have dimHπ(M)≥dimHC.
By Lemma 2.1, Proposition 3.4 is the corollary of the following lemma.
Lemma 3.5. For any ϵ>0, the mapping h satisfies the local 11+ϵ-H¨older condition.
Before proving Lemma 3.5, we make use of a kind of symbolic space described as follows:
For any n≥1, we can check that
π(M)=⋂n≥1⋃(u1,u2,⋯,un)∈AnI(u1,u2,⋯,un), |
where
An={(u1,u2,⋯,un)∈{1,⋯,q}n:(u1,⋯,un)=(x1,⋯,xn),∀(x1,x2,⋯)∈M}. |
For any n≥1, let t(n) be the sum of the length of all of the inserted pieces before the element in the position of n for any g(u)∈M, that is,
t(n)={0if1≤n≤b1,n−b1ifb1+1≤n≤b1+|V1(u)|,k∑j=1|Vj(u)|ifbk+|Vk(u)|+1≤n≤bk+1forsomek≥1,k−1∑j=1|Vj(u)|+n−bkifbk+1≤n≤bk+|Vk(u)|forsomek≥2. |
Since
t(bk+1)=k∑j=1|Vj(u)|=k∑j=1j=k(k+1)2, |
according to the condition of Theorem 1.6, G(x)=emxm+em−1xm−1+⋯+e0 is a polynomial with degree m≥3 and B={b1<b2<⋯}⊂{[G(n)]:n≥1}; thus, we have limk→∞t(bk+1)bk=0.
For any n>1, there exists l≥1 such that bl≤n<bl+1; thus, t(n)n≤t(bl+1)bl, which implies limn→∞t(n)n=0.
For any finite word (u1,u2,⋯,un), let ¯(u1,u2,⋯,un) be the finite word by eliminating the finite words {Vj(u)}j≥1. Then
¯(u1,u2,⋯,un)∈{1,2,⋯,q}n−t(n). |
The word ¯(u1,u2,⋯,un) has different cases for n and t(n), that is,
¯(u1,u2,⋯,un)=¯(u|n1)={(u|n1)if1≤n≤b1,(u|b11)ifb1+1≤n≤b1+|V1(u)|,(u|n−k∑j=1|Vj(u)|1)ifbk+|Vk(u)|+1≤n≤bk+1forsomek≥1,(u|bk−k−1∑j=1|Vj(u)|1)ifbk+1≤n≤bk+|Vk(u)|forsomek≥2. |
For any u=(u1,u2,⋯),v=(v1,v2,⋯)∈M and u≠v, there exists n≥1 such that (u1,⋯,un)=(v1,⋯,vn) and un+1≠vn+1.
Lemma 3.6. We have |π(u)−π(v)|≥ρmind1|I(u1,⋯,un)|where d1 is defined in Lemma 2.3.
Proof. Applying Lemma 2.3, we immediately obtain the conclusion.
Proof of Lemma 3.5:
According to Lagrange's mean value theorem, for any n and any finite word (u1,⋯,un), there exist ξ∈I(u1,⋯,un) and η∈I¯(u1,⋯,un) such that
(fn)′(ξ)|I(u1,⋯,un)|=1 |
and
(fn−t(n))′(η)|I¯(u1,⋯,un)|=1. |
Recall that u⊑v means that u is the prefix of v. By the form of g(u),
g(u)=(W1(u),V1(u),W2(u),V2(u),⋯,Wn(u),Vn(u),⋯) |
for any n>1; thus, we can find the maximum integer n0, where n0≤√2n+1, satisfying
(W1(u),V1(u),⋯,Wn0(u),Vn0(u))⊑g(u)|n1 |
and
g(u)|n1⊑(W1(u),V1(u),⋯,Wn0+1(u),Vn0+1(u)). |
We denote the location of the finite word Wi(u) (1≤i≤n0+1) by [N2i−2,N2i−1] and
R=[1,n]∖n0+1⋃i=1[N2i−2,N2i−1]. |
Let ϵ>0; then, by limn→∞t(n)n=0, there exists K=K(ϵ) such that
Bt(n)Kn0+11<b(n−t(n))ϵ |
for any n≥K, where b is the lower bound and B is the upper bound in Definition 1.4, and K1 is defined as Lemma 2.4.
For any (u1,u2,⋯,un)∈An with n≥K,
|I(u1,u2,⋯,un)|=1(fn)′(ξ)=1n−1∏k=0f′(fk(ξ))≥1Bt(n)1∏0≤k≤n−1,k∉Rf′(fk(ξ))=1Bt(n)1∏1≤k≤n0+1(fN2k−1−N2k−2+1)′(fN2k−2(ξ))=1Bt(n)(fn−t(n))′(η)|I¯(u1,⋯,un)|∏1≤k≤n0+1(fN2k−1−N2k−2+1)′(fN2k−2(ξ))≥1Bt(n)1Kn0+11|I¯(u1,⋯,un)|≥1b(n−t(n))ϵ|I¯(u1,⋯,un)|≥|I¯(u1,⋯,un)|1+ϵ |
where the first inequality holds according to the condition (3) of Definition 1.4, the second inequality holds by Lemma 2.4, and the last inequality holds according to (3) of Remark 2.2.
Let r<ρmind1min(u1,⋯,uK)∈AK|I(u1,⋯,uK)|. For any π(v)∈(π(u)−r,π(u)+r), there exists n such that (u1,⋯,un)=(v1,⋯,vn) and un+1≠vn+1; then
|h(π(u))−h(π(v))|=|π∘g−1∘π−1(π(u))−π∘g−1∘π−1(π(v))|≤|I¯(u1,⋯,un)|≤|I(u1,⋯,un)|11+ϵ≤(ρmind1)−11+ϵ|π(u)−π(v)|11+ϵ |
where the last inequality holds by Lemma 3.6.
Proof of Theorem 1.6: Proposition 3.4 implies that dimHπ(M)=dimHC.
The following lemma indicates that every mean Li-Yorke scrambled set along B is a scrambled set. Hence Corollary 1.7 is proved by Theorem 1.6 and Lemma 3.7.
Lemma 3.7. Let (X,ρ) be a metric space and f:X→X be aself-map. Suppose that M isa mean Li-Yorke scrambled set along some sequenceB⊂N; then, M is a scrambled set of f.
Proof.
For any x,y∈M with x≠y, that is, x and y satisfy the condition (1.1), the proof is divided into two parts.
(1). Suppose that
lim supn→∞ρ(fn(x),fn(y))=0. |
Thus
limn→∞ρ(fn(x),fn(y))=0, |
that is, we have
limn→∞ρ(fbn(x),fbn(y))=0, |
and
limn→∞1nn∑j=1ρ(fbj(x),fbj(y))=0. |
Therefore
lim supn→∞1nn∑j=1ρ(fbj(x),fbj(y))=0. |
This is a contradiction. So lim supn→∞ρ(fn(x),fn(y))>0.
(2). Given
lim infn→∞ρ(fn(x),fn(y))>0, |
there exist a constant δ>0 and an integer N>1 such that, for any n≥N, we have
ρ(fn(x),fn(y))>δ. |
Therefore,
1nn∑j=1ρ(fbj(x),fbj(y))≥(n−N)δn, |
which implies that
lim infn→∞1nn∑j=1ρ(fbj(x),fbj(y))>δ>0. |
This is also a contradiction. Hence, lim infn→∞ρ(fn(x),fn(y))=0.
Combining (1) and (2), we know that M is a scrambled set of f.
In this section, we give a linear example and a non-linear one by applying Theorem 1.6.
Firstly, we recall the classical middle-third Cantor set C as follows.
Let I=[0,1], I0=[0,1/3] and I2=[2/3,1]. Define the mapping f:I0⊔I2→I by
f(x)={3x,x∈I0,3x−2,x∈I2, |
where '⊔' denotes the disjoint union. We can check that C1/3=⋂+∞k=0f−k(I) is a cookie-cutter set.
On the symbolic space {0,2}N, we can define the projection mapping π:{0,2}N→[0,1] by
π(x1,x2,⋯)=+∞∑i=1xi3i |
for (x1,x2,⋯)∈{0,2}N. The middle-third Cantor set can also be described by the projection mapping π, that is,
C1/3=π({0,2}N)={x∈[0,1):x=+∞∑i=1xi3i,xi∈{0,2},∀i≥1}. |
It is well known that dimHC1/3=log2log3; thus, applying Theorem 1.6, the middle-third Cantor set contains a scrambled set for which the Hausdorff dimension is log2log3.
The example in Section 4.1 is piecewise linear. Here, we give a non-linear one that is from [14].
Let I=[0,1]. Define the mappings ϕ1 and ϕ2 from I to I as
ϕ1(x)=13x+110x2,ϕ2(x)=13x+23−110x2. |
Then
f(x)={ϕ−11(x),x∈ϕ1(I),ϕ−12(x),x∈ϕ2(I). |
We can check that C=⋂+∞k=0f−k(I) is a cookie-cutter set. By Theorem 1.5, dimHC is the unique solution of P(−βlog|f′(x)|)=0.
Applying Theorem 1.6, we see that the above cookie-cutter set contains a scrambled set for which the Hausdorff dimension equals to dimHC.
In this paper, we demonstrated the Li-Yorke chaos of the cookie-cutter sets. In fact, according to the definitions of scrambled sets and mean Li-Yorke scrambled sets along the sequence B, mean Li-Yorke chaos along the sequence B is stronger than Li-Yorke chaos. Downarowicz [11] observed that mean Li-Yorke chaos is equivalent to the DC2 chaos and proved that positive topological entropy implies mean Li-Yorke chaos for a continuous interval map. A natural question is below.
Question 5.1. Is every cookie-cutter system mean Li-Yorke chaotic?
In this paper, we demonstrated mean Li-Yorke chaos along some sequence and Li-Yorke chaos for cookie-cutter system. For a given polynomial sequence B, by constructing a mean Li-Yorke scrambled set along B, we prove that the cookie-cutter set contains a mean Li-Yorke scrambled set along B for which the Hausdorff dimension equals the Hausdorff dimension of the cookie-cutter set. That is to say, cookie-cutter system is mean Li-Yorke chaotic along B. Meanwhile, we proved that every mean Li-Yorke scrambled set is also a scrambled set, hence, cookie-cutter system is also Li-Yorke chaotic.
This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project of Guangzhou Municipal Colleges and Universities grant no.202032802, and Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou grant no.202102021152.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
S. P. Baker, A multifractal zeta function for Gibbs measures supported on cookie-cutter sets, Nonlinearity, 26 (2013), 1125–1142. https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/26/4/1125 doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/26/4/1125
![]() |
[2] | F. Balibrea, V. J. López, The measure of scrambled sets: A survey, Acta Univ. M. Belii Ser. Math., 7 (1999), 3–11. |
[3] |
J. Barral, S. Seuret, The singularity spectrum of the inverse of cookie-cutters, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Syst., 29 (2009), 1075–1095. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385708000618 doi: 10.1017/S0143385708000618
![]() |
[4] |
T. Bedford, Applications of dynamical systems theory to fractal sets: A study of cookie-cutter sets, Fractal Geometry Anal., 346 (1991), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7931-5_1 doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-7931-5_1
![]() |
[5] |
F. Blanchard, E. Glasner, S. Kolyada, A. Maass, On Li-Yorke pairs, J. Reine Angew. Math., 547 (2002), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.2002.053 doi: 10.1515/crll.2002.053
![]() |
[6] |
F. Blanchard, B. Host, S. Ruette, Asymptotic pairs in positive-entropy systems, Ergod. Theory Dynam. Syst., 22 (2002), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385702000342 doi: 10.1017/S0143385702000342
![]() |
[7] |
Y. F. Blanchard, W. Huang, L. Snoha, Topological size of scrambled sets, Colloq. Math., 110 (2008), 293–361. https://doi.org/10.4064/cm110-2-3 doi: 10.4064/cm110-2-3
![]() |
[8] |
H. Bruin, V. J. López, On the Lebesgue measure of Li-Yorke pairs for interval maps, Comm. Math. Phys., 299 (2010), 523–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-010-1085-9 doi: 10.1007/s00220-010-1085-9
![]() |
[9] |
J. S. Cánovas, Li-Yorke chaos in a class of nonautonmous discrete systems, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 17 (2011), 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236190903049025 doi: 10.1080/10236190903049025
![]() |
[10] | R. L. Devaney, An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems, 2 Eds., Redwood City: Addison-Wesley Studies in Nonlinearity, 1989. |
[11] |
T. Downarowicz, Positive topological entropy implies chaos DC2, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 142 (2014), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2013-11717-X doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-2013-11717-X
![]() |
[12] |
R. A. El-Nabulsi, Emergence of quasiperiodic quantum wave functions in Hausdorff dimensional crystals and improved intrinsic carrier concentrations, J. Phys. Chem. Sol., 127 (2019), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.12.025 doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.12.025
![]() |
[13] |
R. A. El-Nabulsi, W. Anukool, A mapping from Schrodinger equation to Navier-Stokes equations through the product-like fractal geometry, fractal time derivative operator and variable thermal conductivity, Acta Mechanica, 232 (2021), 5031–5039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-021-03090-6 doi: 10.1007/s00707-021-03090-6
![]() |
[14] | K. J. Falconer, Techniques in Fractal Geometry, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997. |
[15] |
A. H. Fan, L. M. Liao, M. Wu, Multifractal analysis of some multiple ergodic averages in linear cookie-cutter dynamical systems, Math. Z., 290 (2018), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-017-2008-7 doi: 10.1007/s00209-017-2008-7
![]() |
[16] |
F. Garcia-Ramos, L. Jin, Mean proximality and mean Li-Yorke chaos, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 145 (2017), 2959–2969. https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13440 doi: 10.1090/proc/13440
![]() |
[17] |
P. Grassberger, I. Procaccia, Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors, Physica D., 9 (1983), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-1 doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-1
![]() |
[18] |
W. Huang, X. Ye, Devaney's chaos or 2-scattering implies Li-Yorke's chaos, Topol. Appl., 117 (2002), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-8641(01)00025-6 doi: 10.1016/S0166-8641(01)00025-6
![]() |
[19] |
S. F. Kolyada, Li-Yorke sensitivity and other concepts of chaos, Ukr. Math. J., 56 (2004), 1242–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11253-005-0055-4 doi: 10.1007/s11253-005-0055-4
![]() |
[20] |
J. Li, Y. Qiao, Mean Li-Yorke chaos along some good sequences, Monatsh. Math., 186 (2018), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00605-017-1086-2 doi: 10.1007/s00605-017-1086-2
![]() |
[21] |
J. Li, X. D. Ye, Recent development of chaos theory in topological dynamics, Acta Math. Sin., 32 (2016), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10114-015-4574-0 doi: 10.1007/s10114-015-4574-0
![]() |
[22] |
T. Y. Li, J. A. Yorke, Period three implies chaos, Amer. Math. Monthly, 82 (1975), 985–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1975.11994008 doi: 10.1080/00029890.1975.11994008
![]() |
[23] |
J. R. Liang, Z. G. Yu, F. Y. Ren, Measures and their dimension spectrums for cookie-cutter sets in Rd, Acta Math. Appl. Sin., 16 (2000), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02670959 doi: 10.1007/BF02670959
![]() |
[24] |
Q. H. Liu, Cookie-cutter-like dynamic system of unbounded expansion, Difference Equations, Discrete Dynamical Syst. Appl., 8 (2015), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24747-2_8 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24747-2_8
![]() |
[25] |
W. B. Liu, C. Huang, L. M. Li, S. L. Wang, A construction of the scrambled set with full Hausdorff dimension for beta-transformations, Fractals, 26 (2018), 1850005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X18500056 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X18500056
![]() |
[26] |
W. B. Liu, S. L. Wang, Mean Li-Yorke chaotic set with full Hausdorff dimension for continued fractions, Fractals, 29 (2021), 2150258. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X21502583 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X21502583
![]() |
[27] |
W. B. Liu, B. Li, Chaotic and topological properties of continued fractions, J. Number Theory, 174 (2017), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2016.10.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jnt.2016.10.019
![]() |
[28] |
H. Liu, L. D. Wang, Z. Y. Chu, Devaney's chaos inplies distributional chaos in a sequence, Nonlinear Anal., 71 (2009), 6144–6147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2009.06.007 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2009.06.007
![]() |
[29] |
J. H. Ma, H. Rao, Z. Y. Wen, Dimensions of cookie-cutter-like sets, Sci. China Ser. A., 44 (2001), 1400–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02877068 doi: 10.1007/BF02877068
![]() |
[30] |
K. B. Mangang, Mean equicontinuity, sensitivity, expansiveness and distality of product dynamical systems, J. Dyn. Syst. Geom. The., 13 (2015), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/1726037X.2015.1027106 doi: 10.1080/1726037X.2015.1027106
![]() |
[31] |
M. A. Martin, P. Mattila, Hausdorff measures, Hölder continuous maps and self-similar fractals, Math. Poc. Camb. Philo. Soc., 114 (1993), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100071383 doi: 10.1017/S0305004100071383
![]() |
[32] |
T. Nakata, An approximation of Hausdorff dimensions of generalized cookie-cutter Cantor sets, Hiroshima Math. J., 27 (1997), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.32917/hmj/1206126964 doi: 10.32917/hmj/1206126964
![]() |
[33] |
M. Nag, S. Poria, Li-Yorke chaos in globally coupled map lattice with delays, Int. J. Bif. Chaos, 29 (2019), 1950183. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127419501839 doi: 10.1142/S0218127419501839
![]() |
[34] | B. Schweizer, J. Sm′ital, Measures of chaos and a spectral decomposition of dynamical systems on the interval, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 344 (1994), 737–754. https://doi.org/S0002-9947-1994-1227094-X |
[35] |
D. R. Stockman, Li-Yorke chaos in models with backward dynamics, Studies Nonl. Dyn. Econom., 20 (2016), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2015-0076 doi: 10.1515/snde-2015-0076
![]() |
[36] |
L. Wang, G. Huang, S. Huan, Distributional chaos in a sequence, Nonlinear Anal., 67 (2007), 2131–2136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2006.09.005 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2006.09.005
![]() |
[37] |
X. X. Wu, P. Y. Zhu, Li-Yorke chaos in a coupled lattice system related with Belusov-Zhabotinskii reaction, J. Math. Chem., 50 (2012), 1304–1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-011-9971-8 doi: 10.1007/s10910-011-9971-8
![]() |
[38] |
Y. F. Xiao, Mean Li-Yorke chaotic set along polynomial sequence with full Hausdorff dimension for β-transformation, Discrete Cont. Dyn-A, 41 (2021), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2020267 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020267
![]() |
[39] | J. Xiong, Hausdorff dimension of a chaotic set of shift of a symbolic space, Sci. China, 38 (1995), 696–708. |
1. | Xinna Mao, Hongwei Feng, Maryam A. Al-Towailb, Hassan Saberi-Nik, Dynamical analysis and boundedness for a generalized chaotic Lorenz model, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 19719, 10.3934/math.20231005 |