Cubic m-polar fuzzy topology with multi-criteria group decision-making

Muhammad Riaz; Khadija Akmal; Yahya Almalki; S. A. Alblowi; Muhammad Riaz; Khadija Akmal; Yahya Almalki; S. A. Alblowi

doi:10.3934/math.2022721

AIMS Mathematics

2022, Volume 7, Issue 7: 13019-13052. doi: 10.3934/math.2022721

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Cubic m-polar fuzzy topology with multi-criteria group decision-making

1.
Department of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
2.
Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
3.
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Received: 26 January 2022 Revised: 19 April 2022 Accepted: 22 April 2022 Published: 09 May 2022
MSC : 03E72, 94D05, 90B50

The concept of cubic m-polar fuzzy set (CmPFS) is a new approach to fuzzy modeling with multiple membership grades in terms of fuzzy intervals as well as multiple fuzzy numbers. We define some fundamental properties and operations of CmPFSs. We define the topological structure of CmPFSs and the idea of cubic m-polar fuzzy topology (CmPF topology) with P-order (R-order). We extend several concepts of crisp topology to CmPF topology, such as open sets, closed sets, subspaces and dense sets, as well as the interior, exterior, frontier, neighborhood, and basis of CmPF topology with P-order (R-order). A CmPF topology is a robust approach for modeling big data, data analysis, diagnosis, etc. An extension of the VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making with CmPF topology is designed. An application of the proposed method is presented for chronic kidney disease diagnosis and a comparative analysis of the proposed approach and existing approaches is also given.

Keywords:

Citation: Muhammad Riaz, Khadija Akmal, Yahya Almalki, S. A. Alblowi. Cubic m-polar fuzzy topology with multi-criteria group decision-making[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13019-13052. doi: 10.3934/math.2022721

Related Papers:

[1]	Sarker Ashraful Islam, Farhana Kabir Esheta, Md Mahir Shahriar, Dewan Hasan Ahmed . Numerical study of aerodynamic drag reduction of a circular cylinder with an inbuilt nozzle. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(4): 379-400. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024018
[2]	Hussein Kokash, G. Gilou Agbaglah . A two- to three-dimensional wake transition mechanism induced by the angle of attack of a NACA0012 airfoil. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(3): 329-345. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024015
[3]	Jubilee Prasad Rao, Sai Naveen Chimata . Machine learning-based surrogates for eVTOL performance prediction and design optimization. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(3): 246-267. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024011
[4]	Hui Ying WANG, Némo DECAMPS . Effects of oxygen concentration of oxidizer flow on laminar diffusion flame established over liquid fuel beds at microgravity. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(2): 159-184. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024007
[5]	Pasynok Sergey . Cumulative STF coefficients evaluation and validation. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(4): 371-378. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024017
[6]	Dulce M Graciano, Fernando Z Sierra-Espinosa, Juan C García . Numerical simulation of vortex-induced vibration in a bladeless turbine: Effects of separation distance between tandem harvesters. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(3): 309-328. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024014
[7]	James H. Page, Lorenzo Dorbolò, Marco Pretto, Alessandro Zanon, Pietro Giannattasio, Michele De Gennaro . Sensitivity analysis of mixed analysis-synthesis flight profile reconstruction. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(4): 401-415. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024019
[8]	Xu Han, Bin Yu, Hong Liu . Mixing mechanisms in the view of mixing indicators: from passive-scalar mixing to variable-density mixing. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(1): 1-37. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024001
[9]	Weizhen Tang, Jie Dai, Zhousheng Huang . Comprehensive assessment of air pollutant and noise emissions at airports across different altitudes. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(3): 292-308. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024013
[10]	Yuan Hu, Zhihao Jiang, Xintai Yuan, Xifan Hua, Wei Liu . Isometric mapping algorithm based GNSS-R sea ice detection. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(1): 38-52. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024002

Abstract

1. Introduction and preliminaries

We begin with the following definitions of notations:

$\begin{equation*} \mathbb{N = }\left\{ 1, 2, 3, \cdots \right\} \text{ and }\mathbb{N}_{0}: = \mathbb{ N\cup }\left\{ 0\right\} \text{.} \end{equation*}$

Also, as usual, $\mathbb{R}$ denotes the set of real numbers and $\mathbb{C}$ denotes the set of complex numbers.

The two variable Laguerre polynomials $L_{n}(u, v)$ ^[1] are defined by the Taylor expansion about $\tau = 0$ (also popularly known as generating function) as follows:

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }L_{p}(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = e^{v\tau }C_{0}(u\tau ), \end{equation*}$

where is the $0$ -th order Tricomi function ^[19] given by

$\begin{equation*} C_{0}(u) = \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\frac{(-1)^{p}u^{p}}{(p!)^{2}} \end{equation*}$

and has the series representation

$\begin{equation*} L_{p}(u, v) = \sum\limits_{s = 0}^{p}\; \frac{p!(-1)^{s}v^{p-s}u^{s}}{(p-s)!(s!)^{2}}. \end{equation*}$

The classical Euler polynomials $E_{p}(u)$ , Genocchi polynomials $G_{p}(u)$ and the Bernoulli polynomials $B_{p}(u)$ are usually defined by the generating functions (see, for details and further work, ^{[1,2,4,5,6,7,9,11,12,20]}):

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }E_{p}(u)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = \frac{2}{e^{\tau }+1} e^{u\tau }\quad (|\tau | \lt \pi ), \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }G_{p}(u)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = \frac{2\tau }{e^{\tau }+1} e^{u\tau }\quad (|\tau | \lt \pi ) \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }B_{p}(u)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = \frac{\tau }{e^{\tau }-1} e^{u\tau }\quad (|\tau | \lt 2\pi ). \end{equation*}$

The Daehee polynomials, recently originally defined by Kim et al. ^[9], are defined as follows

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }D_{p}(u)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = \frac{\log (1+\tau )}{\tau } (1+\tau )^{u}, \end{equation}$

(1.1)

where, for $u = 0$ , $D_{p}(0) = D_{p}$ stands for Daehee numbers given by

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }D_{p}\, \frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = \frac{\log (1+\tau )}{\tau }. \end{equation}$

(1.2)

Due to Kim et al.'s idea ^[9], Jang et al. ^[3] gave the partially degenarate Genocchi polynomials as follows:

$\begin{equation} \frac{2\log (1+\tau \lambda )^{\frac{1}{\lambda }}}{e^{\tau }+1}e^{u\tau } = \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }G_{p, \lambda }(u)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!}, \end{equation}$

(1.3)

which, for the case $u = 0$ , yields the partially degenerate Genocchi numbers $G_{n, \lambda }: = G_{n, \lambda }(0)$ .

Pathan et al. ^[17] considered the generalization of Hermite-Bernoulli polynomials of two variables ${}_{H}B_{p}^{(\alpha)}(u, v)$ as follows

$\begin{equation} \left( \frac{\tau }{e^{\tau }-1}\right) ^{\alpha }e^{u\tau +v\tau ^{2}} = \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{H}B_{p}^{(\alpha )}(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!}. \end{equation}$

(1.4)

On taking $\alpha = 1$ in (1.4) yields a well known result of [2,p. 386 (1.6)] given by

$\begin{equation} \left( \frac{\tau }{e^{\tau }-1}\right) e^{u\tau +v\tau ^{2}} = \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{H}B_{p}(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!}. \end{equation}$

(1.5)

The two variable Laguerre-Euler polynomials (see ^[7,8]) are defined as

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}E_{p}(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = \frac{2}{e^{\tau }+1}e^{v\tau }C_{0}(u\tau ). \end{equation}$

(1.6)

The alternating sum $T_{k}(p)$ , where $k\in \mathbb{N}_{0}$ , (see ^[14]) is given as

$\begin{equation*} T_{k}(p) = \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{p}(-1)^{j}j^{k} \end{equation*}$

and possess the generating function

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{r = 0}^{\infty }T_{k}(p)\frac{\tau ^{r}}{r!} = \frac{1-(-e^{\tau })^{(p+1)} }{e^{\tau }+1}. \end{equation}$

(1.7)

The idea of degenerate numbers and polynomials found existence with the study related to Bernoulli and Euler numbers and polynomials. Lately, many researchers have begun to study the degenerate versions of the classical and special polynomials (see ^{[3,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,18]}, for a systematic work). Influenced by their works, we introduce partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials and also a new generalization of partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials and then give some of their applications. We also derive some implicit summation formula and general symmetry identities.

2. Partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials

Let $\lambda, \tau \in \mathbb{C}$ with $|\tau \lambda |\leq 1$ and $\tau \lambda \neq -1$ . We introduce and investigate the partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials as follows:

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = \frac{ 2\log (1+\lambda \tau )^{\frac{1}{\lambda }}}{e^{\tau }+1}e^{v\tau }C_{0}(u\tau ). \end{equation}$

(2.1)

In particular, when $\lambda\to 0$ , ${}_LG_{p, \lambda}(u, v)\to {}_LG_p(u, v)$ and they have the closed form given as

$\begin{equation*} {}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}G_{q, \lambda }L_{p-q}(u, v). \end{equation*}$

Clearly, $u = 0$ in (2.1) gives ${}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(0, 0): = G_{p, \lambda }$ that stands for the partially degenerate Genocchi polynomials ^[3].

Theorem 1. For $p \in \mathbb{N}_{o}$ , the undermentioned relation holds:

$\begin{equation} {}_LG_{p, \lambda}(u, v) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p} \binom{p}{q+1}\, q!(-\lambda)^{q}{}_LG_{p-q-1}(u, v). \end{equation}$

(2.2)

Proof. With the help of (2.1), one can write

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = & \frac{ 2\log (1+\lambda \tau )^{\frac{1}{\lambda }}}{e^{\tau }+1}e^{v\tau }C_{0}(u\tau ) \\ = & \tau\left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{\infty }\frac{(-1)^{q}}{q+1}(\lambda \tau )^{q}\right\} \left\{ \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p}(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p! }\right\} \\ = & \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\frac{(-\lambda )^{q}}{q+1}q!{}_{L}G_{p-q}(u, v)\right\} \frac{\tau ^{p+1}}{p!}, \end{align*}$

where, ${}_{L}G_{p-q}(u, v)$ are the Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials (see ^[8]). Finally, the assertion easily follows by equating the coefficients $\frac{ \tau ^{p}}{p!}$ .

Theorem 2. For $p\in \mathbb{N}_{o}$ , the undermentioned relation holds:

$\begin{equation} {}_{L}G_{p+1, \lambda }(u, v) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\lambda ^{q}(p+1){}_{L}G_{p-q+1}(u, v)D_{q}. \end{equation}$

(2.3)

Proof. We first consider

$\begin{align*} I_{1} = \frac{1}{\tau }\frac{2\log (1+\lambda \tau )^{\frac{1}{\lambda }}}{ e^{\tau }+1}e^{v\tau }C_{0}(u\tau ) = & \left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{\infty }D_{q}\frac{ (\lambda \tau )^{q}}{q!}\right\} \left\{ \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p}(u, v) \frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!}\right\} \\ = & \sum\limits_{p = 1}^{\infty }\left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}(\lambda )^{q} D_{q}{}_{L}G_{p-q}(u, v)\right\} \frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!}. \end{align*}$

Next we have,

$\begin{align*} I_{2} = \frac{1}{\tau}\frac{2\log(1+\lambda \tau)^{\frac{1}{\lambda}}}{ e^{\tau}+1}e^{v\tau}C_{o}(u\tau) = &\frac{1}{\tau}\sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty}{}_LG_{p, \lambda}(u, v)\frac{\tau^{p}}{p!} \\ = &\sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty}\frac{{}_LG_{p+1, \lambda}(u, v)}{p+1}\frac{\tau^{p}}{p!}. \end{align*}$

Since $I_{1} = I_{2}$ , we conclude the assertion (2.3) of Theorem 2.

Theorem 3. For $p\in \mathbb{N}_{0}$ , the undermentioned relation holds:

$\begin{equation} {}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v) = p\sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p-1}\binom{p-1}{q}(\lambda )^{q}{}_{L}E_{p-q-1}(u, v)D_{q}. \end{equation}$

(2.4)

Proof. With the help of (2.1), one can write

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(x, y)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = & \left\{ \frac{\tau \log (1+\lambda \tau )}{\lambda \tau }\right\} \left\{ \frac{2}{ e^{\tau }+1}e^{v\tau }C_{0}(u\tau )\right\} \\ = & \tau \left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{\infty }D_{q}\frac{(\lambda \tau )^{q}}{q!} \right\} \left\{ \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}E_{p}(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} \right\} \\ = & \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}(\lambda )^{q}D_{q}\, {}_{L}E_{p-q}(u, v)\right\} \frac{\tau ^{p+1}}{p!}. \end{align*}$

Finally, the assertion (2.4) straightforwardly follows by equating the coefficients of same powers of $\tau$ above.

Theorem 4. For $p\in \mathbb{N}_{o}$ , the following relation holds:

$\begin{equation} {}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v+1) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}{}\; _{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u, v). \end{equation}$

(2.5)

Proof. Using (2.1), we find

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }& \left\{ {}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v+1)-{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v)\right\}\frac{\tau^p}{p!} = \frac{2\log (1+\lambda \tau )^{\frac{1}{\lambda }}}{e^{\tau }+1} \\ \times & e^{(v+1)\tau }C_{0}(u\tau )-\frac{2\log (1+\lambda \tau )^{\frac{1}{ \lambda }}}{e^{\tau }+1}e^{v\tau }C_{0}(u\tau ) \\ = & \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{\infty }\frac{\tau ^{q}}{q!}-\sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} \\ = & \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\; {}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u, v)-{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v)\right\} \frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!}. \end{align*}$

Hence, the assertion (2.5) straightforwardly follows by equating the coefficients of $\tau ^{p}$ above.

Theorem 5. For $p\in \mathbb{N}_{o}$ , the undermentioned relation holds:

$\begin{equation} {}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\sum\limits_{l = 0}^{q}\binom{p}{q}\binom{q}{l }G_{p-q}D_{q-l}\; \lambda ^{q-l}L_{l}(u, v). \end{equation}$

(2.6)

Proof. Since

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = & \frac{ 2\log (1+\lambda \tau )^{\frac{1}{\lambda }}}{e^{\tau }+1}e^{v\tau }C_{0}(u\tau ) \\ = & \left\{ \frac{2\tau }{e^{\tau }+1}\right\} \left\{ \frac{2\log (1+\lambda \tau )}{\lambda \tau }\right\} e^{v\tau }C_{0}(u\tau ) \\ = & \left\{ \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }G_{p}\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!}\right\} \left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{\infty }D_{q}\frac{(\lambda \tau )^{q}}{q!}\right\} \left\{ \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty }L_{l}(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{l}}{l!}\right\} , \end{align*}$

we have

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\sum\limits_{l = 0}^{q}\binom{p}{q}\binom{q }{l}G_{p-q}D_{q-l}\lambda ^{q-l}L_{l}(u, v)\right\} \frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!}. \end{equation*}$

We thus complete the proof of Theorem 5.

Theorem 6. (Multiplication formula). For $p\in \mathbb{N}_{o}$ , the undermentioned relation holds:

$\begin{equation} {}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v) = f^{p-1}\sum\limits_{a = 0}^{f-1}{}_{L}G_{p, \frac{\lambda }{f }}\left( u, \frac{v+a}{f}\right). \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \end{equation}$

(2.7)

Proof. With the help of (2.1), we obtain

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty}{}_LG_{p, \lambda}(u, v)\frac{\tau^{p}}{p!} = &\frac{ 2\log(1+\lambda \tau)^{\frac{1}{\lambda}}}{e^{\tau}+1}e^{v\tau}C_{0}(u\tau) \\ = &\frac{2\log(1+\lambda \tau)^{\frac{1}{\lambda}}}{e^{\tau}+1} C_{0}(u\tau)\sum\limits_{a = 0}^{f-1}e^{(a+v)\tau} \\ = &\sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty}\left\lbrace f^{p-1}\sum\limits_{a = 0}^{f-1}{}_LG_{p, \frac{ \lambda}{f}}\left(u, \frac{v+a}{f}\right)\right\rbrace\frac{\tau^{p}}{p!}. \end{align*}$

Thus, the result in (2.7) straightforwardly follows by comparing the coefficients of $\tau^{p}$ above.

3. Generalized partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials

Consider a Dirichlet character $\chi$ and let $d\; \; (d\in \mathbb{N})$ be the conductor connected with it such that $d\equiv 1(\mod 2)$ (see ^[22]). Now we present a generalization of partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials attached to $\chi$ as follows:

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p, \chi , \lambda }(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = \frac{2\log (1+\lambda \tau )^{\frac{1}{\lambda }}}{e^{f\tau }+1} \sum\limits_{a = 0}^{f-1}(-1)^{a}\chi (a)e^{(v+a)\tau }C_{0}(u\tau ). \end{equation}$

(3.1)

Here, $G_{p, \chi, \lambda } = {}_{L}G_{p, \chi, \lambda }(0, 0)$ are in fact, the generalized partially degenerate Genocchi numbers attached to the Drichlet character $\chi$ . We also notice that

$\underset{\begin{smallmatrix} \lambda \to 0 \\ v = 0 \end{smallmatrix}}{\mathop \lim\limits }\, \ {{\ }_{L}}{{G}_{p, \chi , \lambda }}(u, v) = {{G}_{p, \chi }}(u),$

is the familiar looking generalized Genocchi polynomial (see ^[20]).

Theorem 7. For $p\in \mathbb{N}_{0}$ , the following relation holds:

$\begin{equation} {}_{L}G_{p, \chi , \lambda }(u, v) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\lambda ^{q}D_{q}\, {}_{L}G_{p-q, \chi }(u, v). \end{equation}$

(3.2)

Proof. In view of (3.1), we can write

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty}{}_LG_{p, \chi, \lambda}(u, v)\frac{\tau^{p}}{p!} = \frac{ 2\log(1+\lambda \tau)^{\frac{1}{\lambda}}}{e^{f\tau}+1} \sum\limits_{a = 0}^{f-1} (-1)^{a} \chi(a) e^{(v+a)\tau} C_{0}(u\tau) \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} = \left\lbrace\frac{\log(1+\lambda \tau)}{\lambda \tau}\right\rbrace\left \lbrace \frac{2\tau}{e^{f\tau}+1}\sum\limits_{a = 0}^{f-1} (-1)^{a} \chi(a) e^{(v+a)\tau} C_{0}(u\tau)\right\rbrace \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} = \left\lbrace\sum\limits_{q = 0}^{\infty}D_{q}\frac{\lambda^{q}}{\tau^{q}}{q!} \right\rbrace\left\lbrace \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty}{}_LG_{p, \chi}(u, v)\frac{ \tau^{p}}{p!}\right\rbrace. \end{equation*}$

Finally, the assertion (3.2) of Theorem 7 can be achieved by equating the coefficients of same powers of $\tau$ .

Theorem 8. The undermentioned formula holds true:

$\begin{equation} {}_LG_{p, \chi, \lambda}(u, v) = f^{p-1} \sum\limits_{a = 0}^{f-1} (-1)^{a} \chi(a) {}_LG_{p, \frac{\lambda}{f}}\left(u, \frac{a+v}{f}\right). \end{equation}$

(3.3)

Proof. We first evaluate

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty}{}_LG_{p, \chi, \lambda}(u, v)\frac{\tau^{p}}{p!} = &\frac{ 2\log(1+\lambda \tau)^{\frac{1}{\lambda}}}{e^{f\tau}+1} \sum\limits_{a = 0}^{f-1} (-1)^{a} \chi(a) e^{(v+a)\tau} C_{0}(u\tau) \\ = &\frac{1}{f} \sum\limits_{a = 0}^{f-1} (-1)^{a} \chi(a) \frac{2\log(1+\lambda \tau)^{ \frac{f}{\lambda}}}{e^{f\tau}+1} e^{\left(\frac{a+v}{f}\right)f\tau} C_{0}(u\tau) \\ = &\sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty}\left\lbrace f^{p-1} \sum\limits_{a = 0}^{f-1} (-1)^{a} \chi(a) {}_LG_{p, \frac{\lambda}{f}}\left(u, \frac{a+v}{f}\right)\right\rbrace\frac{ \tau^{p}}{p!}. \end{align*}$

Now, the Theorem 8 can easily be concluded by equating the coefficients $\frac{\tau^{p}}{p!}$ above.

Using the result in (3.1) and with a similar approach used just as in above theorems, we provide some more theorems given below. The proofs are being omitted.

Theorem 9. The undermentioned formula holds true:

$\begin{equation} {}_{L}G_{p, \chi , \lambda }(u, v) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\frac{G_{p-q, \chi , \lambda }(v)\; (-u)^{q}\; p!}{(q!)^{2}\, (p-q)!}. \end{equation}$

(3.4)

Theorem 10. The undermentioned formula holds true:

$\begin{equation} {}_{L}G_{p, \chi , \lambda }(u, v) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p, l}\frac{G_{p-q-l, \chi , \lambda }\; (v)^{q}\; (-u)^{l}\; p!}{(p-q-l)!\; (q)!\; (l!)^{2}}. \end{equation}$

(3.5)

4. Implicit summation formulae

Theorem 11. The undermentioned formula holds true:

$\begin{equation} {}_{L}G_{l+h, \lambda }(u, \nu ) = \sum\limits_{p, n = 0}^{l, h}\binom{l}{p}\binom{h}{n} (u -v)^{p+n}{}_{L}G_{l+h-n-p, \lambda }(u, v). \end{equation}$

(4.1)

Proof. On changing $\tau$ by $\tau+\mu$ and rewriting (2.1), we evaluate

$\begin{equation*} e^{-v(\tau+\mu)} \sum\limits_{l, h = 0}^{\infty} {}_LG_{l+h, \lambda}(u, v) \frac{ \tau^{l}\mu^{h}}{l!h!} = \frac{2\log(1+\lambda (\tau+\mu))^{\frac{1}{\lambda}} }{e^{\tau+\mu}+1} C_{o}(u(\tau+\mu)), \end{equation*}$

which, upon replacing $v$ by $u$ and solving further, gives

$\begin{equation*} e^{(u-v)(\tau+\mu)} \sum\limits_{l, h = 0}^{\infty} {}_LG_{l+h, \lambda}(u, v) \frac{ \tau^{l}\mu^{h}}{l!h!} = \sum\limits_{l, h = 0}^{\infty} {}_LG_{l+h, \lambda}(u, \nu) \frac{\tau^{l}\mu^{h}}{l!h!}, \end{equation*}$

and also

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{P = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(u-v)^{P}(\tau+u)^{P}}{P!}\sum\limits_{l, h = 0}^{\infty} {}_LG_{l+h, \lambda}(u, v) \frac{\tau^{l}\mu^{h}}{l!h!} = \sum\limits_{l, h = 0}^{\infty} {}_LG_{l+h, \lambda}(u, \nu) \frac{\tau^{l}\mu^{h}}{l!h!}. \end{equation}$

(4.2)

Now applying the formula [21,p.52(2)]

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{P = 0}^{\infty} f(P) \frac{(u+v)^{P}}{P!} = \sum\limits_{p, q = 0}^{\infty} f(p+q) \frac{u^{p}}{p!}\frac{v^{q}}{q!}, \end{equation*}$

in conjunction with (4.2), it becomes

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{p, n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(u-v)^{p+n}\tau^{p}\mu^{n}}{p!n!} \sum\limits_{l, h = 0}^{\infty} {}_LG_{l+h, \lambda}(u, v) \frac{\tau^{l}\mu^{h}}{l!h!} = \sum\limits_{l, h = 0}^{\infty} {}_LG_{l+h, \lambda}(u, \nu) \frac{\tau^{l}\mu^{h}}{l!h! }.\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \end{equation}$

(4.3)

Further, upon replacing $l$ by $l-p$ , $h$ by $h-n$ , and using the result in [21,p.100 (1)], in the left of (4.3), we obtain

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{p, n = 0}^{\infty} \sum\limits_{l, h = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(u-v)^{p+n}}{p!\, n!} {} _LG_{l+h-p-n, \lambda}(u, v) \frac{\tau^{l}\mu^{h}}{(l-p)!(h-n)!} = \sum\limits_{l, h = 0}^{\infty} {}_LG_{l+h, \lambda}(u, \nu) \frac{\tau^{l}\mu^{h}}{ l!\, h!}. \end{equation*}$

Finally, the required result can be concluded by equating the coefficients of the identical powers of $\tau^{l}$ and $\mu^{h}$ above.

Corollary 4.1. For $h = 0$ in (4.1), we get

$\begin{equation*} {}_{L}G_{l, \lambda }(u, \nu ) = \sum\limits_{\rho = 0}^{l}\binom{l}{\rho } \; {(u-v)^p}_{L}G_{l-\rho , \lambda }(u, v). \end{equation*}$

Some identities of Genocchi polynomials for special values of the parameters $u$ and $\nu$ in Theorem 11 can also be obtained. Now, using the result in (2.1) and with a similar approach, we provide some more theorems given below. The proofs are being omitted.

Theorem 12. The undermentioned formula holds good:

$\begin{equation*} {}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v+\mu ) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\mu ^{q}{}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u, v) \end{equation*}$

Theorem 13. The undermentioned implicit holds true:

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v)\frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} = \frac{ 2\log (1+\lambda \tau )^{\frac{1}{\lambda }}}{e^{\tau }+1}e^{v\tau }C_{o}(u\tau ) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}G_{p-q, \lambda }\; L_{p}(u, v) \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} {}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u, v)\; L_{p}(u, v)\mathit{\text{.}} \end{equation*}$

Theorem 14. The undermentioned implicit summation formula holds:

$\begin{equation*} {}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v+1)+{}_{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u, v) = 2p\; \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p-1} \binom{p-1}{q}\frac{(-\lambda )^{q}q!}{q+1}L_{p-q-1}(u, v). \end{equation*}$

Theorem 15. The undermentioned formula holds true:

$\begin{equation*} {}_LG_{p, \lambda}(u, v+1) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p} {}_LG_{p-q, \lambda}(u, v). \end{equation*}$

5. Symmetry identities

Symmetry identities involving various polynomials have been discussed (e.g., ^{[7,9,10,11,17]}). As in above-cited work, here, in view of the generating functions (1.3) and (2.1), we obtain symmetry identities for the partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials ${}_{L}G_{n, \lambda }(u, v)$ .

Theorem 16. Let $\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $p\in \mathbb{N}_{0}$ , we have

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\beta ^{q}\alpha ^{p-q}{}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u\beta , v\beta ){}_{L}G_{q, \lambda }(u\alpha , v\alpha ) \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\alpha ^{q}\beta ^{p-q}{}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u\alpha , v\alpha ){}_{L}G_{q, \lambda }(u\beta , v\beta )\mathit{\text{.}} \end{equation*}$

Proof. We first consider

$\begin{equation*} g(\tau ) = \frac{\left\{ 2\log (1+\lambda )^{\frac{\beta }{\lambda }}\right\} }{(e^{\alpha \tau }+1)}\frac{\left\{ 2\log (1+\lambda )^{\frac{\alpha }{ \lambda }}\right\} }{\; (e^{\beta \tau }+1)}e^{(\alpha +\beta )v\tau }C_{0}(u\alpha \tau )C_{0}(u\beta \tau ). \end{equation*}$

Now we can have two series expansion of $g(\tau)$ in the following ways:

On one hand, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} g(\tau ) & = &\left( \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\; _{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u\beta , v\beta )\frac{\left( \alpha \tau \right) ^{p}}{p!}\right) \left( \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{\infty }\; _{L}G_{q, \lambda }(u\alpha , v\alpha )\frac{ \left( \beta \tau \right) ^{q}}{q!}\right) \\ & = &\sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\left( \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q} \beta ^{q}\alpha ^{p-q}\; _{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u\beta , v\beta )\; _{L}G_{q, \lambda }(u\alpha , v\alpha )\right) \frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!}. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.1)

and on the other, we can write

$\begin{eqnarray} g(\tau ) & = &\left( \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\; _{L}G_{p, \lambda }(u\alpha , v\alpha )\frac{\left( \beta \tau \right) ^{p}}{p!}\right) \left( \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{\infty }\; _{L}G_{q, \lambda }(u\beta , v\beta )\frac{\left( \alpha \tau \right) ^{q}}{q!}\right) \\ & = &\sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\left( \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q} \alpha ^{q}\beta ^{p-q}\; _{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u\alpha , v\alpha )\; _{L}G_{q, \lambda }(u\beta , v\beta )\right) \frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!}. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.2)

Finally, the result easily follows by equating the coefficients of $\tau ^{p}$ on the right-hand side of Eqs (5.1) and (5.2).

Theorem 17. Let $\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{Z}$ with $p\in \mathbb{N}_{0}$ , Then,

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\beta ^{q}\alpha ^{p-q}\sum\limits_{\sigma = 0}^{\alpha -1}\sum\limits_{\rho = 0}^{\beta -1}(-1)^{\sigma +\rho }{}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u, v\beta +\frac{\beta }{\alpha }\sigma +\rho )G_{q, \lambda }(z\alpha ) \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\alpha ^{p}\beta ^{p-q}\sum\limits_{\sigma = 0}^{\beta -1}\sum\limits_{\rho = 0}^{\alpha -1}(-1)^{\sigma +\rho }{}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u, v\alpha +\frac{\beta }{\alpha }\sigma +\rho )G_{q, \lambda }(z\beta ) \mathit{\text{.}} \end{equation*}$

Proof. Let

$\begin{equation*} g(\tau) = \frac{\left\lbrace 2\log(1+\lambda)^{\frac{\alpha}{\lambda} }\right\rbrace}{(e^{\alpha\tau}+1)^{2}}\frac{\left\lbrace 2\log(1+\lambda)^{ \frac{\beta}{\lambda}}\right\rbrace}{(e^{\beta\tau}+1)^{2}} e^{(\alpha\beta\tau+1)^{2}} e^{(\alpha\beta)(v+z)\tau}[Cs_{0}(u\tau)]. \end{equation*}$

Considering $g(\tau)$ in two forms. Firstly,

$\begin{align*} g(\tau)& = \frac{\left\lbrace2\log(1+\lambda)^{\frac{\alpha}{\lambda} }\right\rbrace}{e^{\alpha\tau}+1}e^{\alpha\beta v\tau}C_{o}(u\tau) \left( \frac{e^{\alpha\beta\tau}+1}{e^{\beta\tau}+1}\right) \notag \\ &\times\frac{\left\lbrace2\log(1+\lambda)^{\frac{\beta}{\lambda} }\right\rbrace}{e^{\beta\tau}+1} e^{\alpha\beta z\tau} \left(\frac{ e^{\alpha\beta\tau}+1}{e^{\alpha\tau}+1}\right) \end{align*}$

$\begin{align} & = \frac{\left\{ 2\log (1+\lambda )^{\frac{\alpha }{\lambda }}\right\} }{ e^{\alpha \tau }+1}e^{\alpha \beta v\tau }C_{0}(u\tau )\left( \sum\limits_{\sigma = 0}^{\alpha -1}(-1)^{\sigma }e^{\beta \tau \sigma }\right) \\ & \times \frac{\left\{ 2\log (1+\lambda )^{\frac{\beta }{\lambda }}\right\} }{e^{\beta \tau }+1}e^{\alpha \beta \tau z}C_{0}(u\tau )\left( \sum\limits_{\rho = 0}^{\beta -1}(-1)^{\rho }e^{\alpha \tau \rho }\right) , \end{align}$

(5.3)

Secondly,

$\begin{align} & g(\tau ) \\ & = \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\; \beta ^{q}\alpha ^{p-q}\sum\limits_{\sigma = 0}^{\alpha -1}\sum\limits_{\rho = 0}^{\beta -1}(-1)^{\sigma +\rho }{}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }\left( u\alpha , v\beta +\frac{\beta }{\alpha } \sigma +\rho \right) G_{q, \lambda }(\alpha z)\right\} \frac{\tau ^{p}}{p!} \\ & = \sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\infty }\left\{ \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\; \alpha ^{q}\beta ^{p-q}\sum\limits_{\sigma = 0}^{\alpha -1}\sum\limits_{\rho = 0}^{\beta -1}(-1)^{\sigma +\rho }{}_{L}G_{\sigma -\rho , \lambda }\left( u, v\alpha +\frac{\alpha }{ \beta }\sigma +\rho \right) G_{q, \lambda }(z\beta )\right\} \frac{\tau ^{p}}{ p!}.\; \; \; \; \end{align}$

(5.4)

Finally, the result straightforwardly follows by equating the coefficients of $\tau^{p}$ in Eqs (5.3) and (5.4).

We now give the following two Theorems. We omit their proofs since they follow the same technique as in the Theorems 16 and 17.

Theorem 18. Let $\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $p\in \mathbb{N}_{0}$ , Then,

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\beta ^{q}\alpha ^{p-q}\sum\limits_{\sigma = 0}^{\alpha -1}\sum\limits_{\rho = 0}^{\beta -1}(-1)^{\sigma +\rho }{}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }\left( u, v\beta +\frac{\beta }{\alpha }\sigma \right) G_{q, \lambda }\left( z\alpha + \frac{\alpha }{\beta }\rho \right) \\ & = &\sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\alpha ^{q}\beta ^{p-q}\sum\limits_{\sigma = 0}^{\beta -1}\sum\limits_{\rho = 0}^{\alpha -1}(-1)^{\sigma +\rho }{}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }\left( u, v\alpha +\frac{\alpha }{\beta }\sigma +\rho \right) {}_{L}G_{q, \lambda }\left( z\beta +\frac{\beta }{\alpha }\rho \right) \mathit{\text{.}} \end{eqnarray*}$

Theorem 19. Let $\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $p\in \mathbb{N}_{0}$ , Then,

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\beta ^{q}\alpha ^{p-q}{}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u\beta , v\beta )\sum\limits_{\sigma = 0}^{q}\binom{q}{\sigma }T_{\sigma }(\alpha -1)G_{q-\sigma , \lambda }(u\alpha ) \\ & = &\sum\limits_{q = 0}^{p}\binom{p}{q}\beta ^{p-q}\alpha ^{q}{}_{L}G_{p-q, \lambda }(u\alpha , v\alpha )\sum\limits_{\sigma = 0}^{q}\binom{q}{\sigma }T_{\sigma }(\beta -1)G_{q-\sigma , \lambda }(u\beta ). \end{eqnarray*}$

6. Concluding remark and observation

Motivated by importance and potential for applications in certain problems in number theory, combinatorics, classical and numerical analysis and other fields of applied mathematics, various special numbers and polynomials, and their variants and generalizations have been extensively investigated (for example, see the references here and those cited therein). The results presented here, being very general, can be specialized to yield a large number of identities involving known or new simpler numbers and polynomials. For example, the case $u = 0$ of the results presented here give the corresponding ones for the generalized partially degenerate Genocchi polynomials ^[3].

Acknowledgment

The authors express their thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which help to improve the paper in the current form.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interests.

References

[1]	L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control., 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
[2]	L. A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Inform. Sci., 8 (1975), 199–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5 doi: 10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
[3]	K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 20 (1986), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
[4]	K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Theory and applications, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH, 283 (2012), 1–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3 doi: 10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3
[5]	R. R. Yager, Pythagorean fuzzy subsets, 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), 2013, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375
[6]	R. R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 22 (2014), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
[7]	R. R. Yager, Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 25 (2017), 1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005
[8]	W. R. Zhang, Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: A computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis, NAFIPS/IFIS/NASA94. Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference of The North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society Biannual Conference, The Industrial Fuzzy Control and Intellige., (1994), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCF.1994.375115
[9]	W. R. Zhang, (Yin)(Yang) bipolar fuzzy sets, IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings, IEEE World Congress Comput. Intell., 1 (1998), 835–840. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1998.687599 doi: 10.1109/FUZZY.1998.687599
[10]	J. Chen, S. Li, S. Ma, X. Wang, m-Polar fuzzy sets: An extension of bipolar fuzzy sets, Sci. World J., 2014 (2014), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/416530 doi: 10.1155/2014/416530
[11]	F. Smarandache, A unifying field in logics, neutrosophy: Neutrosophic probability, set and logic, Amer. Res. Press: Rehoboth, DE, USA., (1999). 1–141.
[12]	F. Smarandache, Neutrosophic set-a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 24 (2005), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2005.24.297 doi: 10.1089/blr.2005.24.297
[13]	B. C. Cuong, Picture fuzzy sets, J. Comput. Sci. Cybern., 30 (2014), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032
[14]	Z. S. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 15 (2007), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678
[15]	H. Garg, Nancy, Linguistic single-valued neutrosophic prioritized aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute group decision-making, J. Ambient. Intell. Human. Comput., 9 (2018), 1975–1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0723-5 doi: 10.1007/s12652-018-0723-5
[16]	D. Molodtsov, Soft set theory-first results, Comput. Math. Appl., 37 (1999), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00056-5 doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00056-5
[17]	N. agman, S. Enginoglu, Soft set theory and uniint decision making, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 207 (2010), 848–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.004
[18]	Y. B. Jun, C. S. Kim, K. O. Yang, Cubic Sets, Annal. Fuzzy Math. Inform., 4 (2012), 83–98.
[19]	M. Riaz, M. R. Hashmi, MAGDM for agribusiness in the environment of various cubic m-polar fuzzy averaging aggregation operators, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 37 (2019), 3671–3691. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-182809 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-182809
[20]	M. Riaz, M. R. Hashmi, Linear Diophantine fuzzy set and its applications towards multi-attribute decision making problems, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 37 (2019), 5417–5439. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190550 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-190550
[21]	M. Riaz, M. R. Hashmi. H. Kalsoom, D. Pamucar, Y. M. Chu, Linear Diophantine fuzzy soft rough sets for the selection of sustainable material handling equipment, Symmetry., 12 (2020), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12081215 doi: 10.3390/sym12081215
[22]	M. Riaz, M. R. Hashmi, D. Pamucar, Y. M. Chu, Spherical linear Diophantine fuzzy sets with modeling uncertainties in MCDM, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 126 (2021), 1125–1164. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2021.013699 doi: 10.32604/cmes.2021.013699
[23]	P. Liu, Z. Ali, T. Mahmood, N. Hassan, Group decision-making using complex $q$ -rung orthopair fuzzy Bonferroni mean, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 13 (2020), 822–851. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.200514.001 doi: 10.2991/ijcis.d.200514.001
[24]	P. Liu, P. Wang, Multiple attribute group decision making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein interactive operations, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 22 (2020), 790–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-00809-w doi: 10.1007/s40815-020-00809-w
[25]	A. Jain, J. Darbari, A. Kaul, P. C. Jha, Selection of a green marketing strategy using MCDM under fuzzy environment, In: Soft Computing for Problem Solving, (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0184-5_43
[26]	C. L. Chang, Fuzzy topological spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 24 (1968), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(68)90057-7
[27]	D. Coker, An introduction to intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 88 (1997), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00076-0 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00076-0
[28]	M. Olgun, M. Unver, Yardimci, Pythagorean fuzzy topological spaces, Complex Intell. Syst., 5 (2019), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-019-0095-2 doi: 10.1007/s40747-019-0095-2
[29]	N. Cagman, S. Karatas, S. Enginoglu, Soft topology, Comput. Math. Applic., 62 (2011), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.05.016
[30]	A. Saha, T. Senapati, R. R. Yager, Hybridizations of generalized Dombi operators and Bonferroni mean operators under dual probabilistic linguistic environment for group decision-making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 11 (2021), 6645–6679. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22563 doi: 10.1002/int.22563
[31]	A. Saha, H. Garg, D. Dutta, Probabilistic linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy generalized Dombi and Bonferroni mean operators for group decision-making with unknown weights of experts, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 12 (2021), 7770–7804. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22607 doi: 10.1002/int.22607
[32]	C. Jana, G. Muhiuddin, M. Pal, D. Al-Kadi, Intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi hybrid decision-making method and their applications to enterprise financial performance evaluation, Math. Prob. Eng., 2021 (2021), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3218133 doi: 10.1155/2021/3218133
[33]	C. Jana, M. Pal, J. Wang, Bipolar fuzzy Dombi prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Soft Comput., 24 (2020), 3631–3646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04130-z. doi: 10.1007/s00500-019-04130-z
[34]	M. Akram, G. Ali, J. C. R. Alcantud, Attributes reduction algorithms for m-polar fuzzy relation decision systems, Int. J. Approx. Reas., 140 (2022), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2021.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2021.10.005
[35]	M. Akram, A. Luqman, J. C. R. Alcantud, Risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis: Hybrid TOPSIS and ELECTRE I solutions with Pythagorean fuzzy information, Neural Comput. Applic., 33 (2021), 5675–5703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05350-3 doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-05350-3
[36]	S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, Decision aid modeling based on sine trigonometric spherical fuzzy aggregation information, Soft Comput., 25 (2021), 8549–8572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05712-6 doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-05712-6
[37]	A. O. Almagrabi, S. Abdullah, M. Shams, Y. D. Al-Otaibi, S. Ashraf, A new approach to q-linear Diophantine fuzzy emergency decision support system for COVID19, J. Ambient. Intell. Human. Comput., 13 (2021), 1687–1713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03130-y doi: 10.1007/s12652-021-03130-y
[38]	M. Ali, I. Deli, F. Smarandache, The theory of neutrosophic cubic sets and their applications in pattern recognition, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2016), 1957–1963. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-151906 doi: 10.3233/IFS-151906
[39]	M. Ali, L. H. Son, I. Deli, N. D. Tien, Bipolar neutrosophic soft sets and applications in decision making, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 33 (2017), 4077–4087. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-17999 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-17999
[40]	J. Zhao, X. Y. You, H. C. Liu, S. M. Wu, An extended VIKOR method using intuitionistic fuzzy sets and combination weights for supplier selection, Symmetry, 9 (2017), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9090169 doi: 10.3390/sym9090169
[41]	R. Joshi, S. Kumar, An intuitionistic fuzzy information measure of order- $(\alpha, \beta)$ with a new approach in supplier selection problems using an extended VIKOR method, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 60 (2019), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-018-1202-z doi: 10.1007/s12190-018-1202-z
[42]	J. H. Park, H. J. Cho, J. S. Hwang, Y. C. Kwun, Extension of the VIKOR method to dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Third International Workshop on Advanced Computational Intelligence, (2010), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWACI.2010.5585223
[43]	Z. Shouzhen, C. S. Ming, K. L. Wei, Multiattribute decision making based on novel score function of intuitionistic fuzzy values and modified VIKOR method, Inform. Sci., 488 (2019), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.03.018 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.03.018
[44]	V. Arya, S. Kumar, A novel VIKOR-TODIM Approach based on Havrda-Charvat-Tsallis entropy of intuitionistic fuzzy sets to evaluate management information system, Fuzzy Inform. Eng., 11 (2019), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/16168658.2020.1840317 doi: 10.1080/16168658.2020.1840317
[45]	K. Devi, Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection, Expert Syst. Applic., 38 (2011), 14163–14168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.227 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.227
[46]	X. Luo, X. Wang, Extended VIKOR method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute decision-making based on a new distance measure, Math. Prob. Eng., 2017 (2017), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4072486 doi: 10.1155/2017/4072486
[47]	T. Y. Chen, Remoteness index-based Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR methods with a generalized distance measure for multiple criteria decision analysis, Inf. Fus., 41 (2018), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.003
[48]	F. Zhou, T. Y. Chen, An extended Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR method with risk preference and a novel generalized distance measure for multicriteria decision-making problems, Neural Comput. Applic., 33 (2021), 11821–11844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05829-7 doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-05829-7
[49]	G. Bakioglu, A. O. Atahan, AHP integrated TOPSIS and VIKOR methods with Pythagorean fuzzy sets to prioritize risks in self-driving vehicles, Appl. Soft Comput., 99 (2021), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106948 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106948
[50]	A. Guleria, R. K. Bajaj, A robust decision making approach for hydrogen power plant site selection utilizing (R, S)-Norm Pythagorean Fuzzy information measures based on VIKOR and TOPSIS method, Int. J. Hydr. Energy., 45 (2020), 18802–18816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.091 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.091
[51]	M. Gul, Application of Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: the case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and colouring unit, Int. J. Occup. Safety Ergon., 26 (2020), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1492251 doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1492251
[52]	M. Kirisci, I. Demir, N. Simsek, N. Topa, M. Bardak, The novel VIKOR methods for generalized Pythagorean fuzzy soft sets and its application to children of early childhood in COVID-19 quarantine, Neural Comput. Applic., 34 (2021), 1877–1903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06427-3 doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-06427-3
[53]	S. Dalapati, S. Pramanik, A revisit to NC-VIKOR based MAGDM strategy in neutrosophic cubic set environment, Neutrosophic Sets Sy., 21 (2018), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201803.0230.v1 doi: 10.20944/preprints201803.0230.v1
[54]	S. Pramanik, S. Dalapati, S. Alam, T. K. Roy, NC-VIKOR based MAGDM strategy under neutrosophic cubic set environment, Neutrosophic Sets Sy., 20 (2018), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201803.0230.v1 doi: 10.20944/preprints201803.0230.v1
[55]	S. Pramanik, S. Dalapati, S. Alam, T. K. Roy, VIKOR based MAGDM strategy under bipolar neutrosophic set environment, Neutrosophic Sets Sy., 19 (2018), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201801.0006.v1 doi: 10.20944/preprints201801.0006.v1
[56]	L. Wang, H. Y. Zhang, J. Q. Wang, L. Li, Picture fuzzy normalized projection-based VIKOR method for the risk evaluation of construction project, Appl. Soft Comput., 64 (2018), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.014 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.014
[57]	V. Arya, S. Kumar, A picture fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making approach based on the combined TODIM-VIKOR and entropy weighted method, Cogn. Comput., 13 (2021), 1172–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09892-z doi: 10.1007/s12559-021-09892-z
[58]	R. Joshi, A novel decision-making method using R-Norm concept and VIKOR approach under picture fuzzy environment, Expert Syst. Applic., 147 (2020), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113228 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113228
[59]	V. Arya, S. Kumar, A new picture fuzzy information measure based on shannon entropy with applications in opinion polls using extended VIKOR-TODIM approach, Comp. Appl. Math., 39 (2020), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01228-1 doi: 10.1007/s40314-020-01228-1
[60]	M. J. Khan, P. Kumam, W. Kumam, A. N. A. Kenani, Picture fuzzy soft robust VIKOR method and its applications in decision-making, Fuzzy Inf. Eng., 13 (2021), 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/16168658.2021.1939632. doi: 10.1080/16168658.2021.1939632
[61]	C. Yue, Picture fuzzy normalized projection and extended VIKOR approach to software reliability assessment, Appl. Soft Comput., 88 (2020), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.106056. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.106056
[62]	P. Meksavang, H. Shi, S. M. Lin, H. C. Liu, An extended picture fuzzy VIKOR approach for sustainable supplier management and its application in the beef industry, Symmetry., 11 (2019), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11040468. doi: 10.3390/sym11040468
[63]	A. Singh, S. Kumar, Picture fuzzy Choquet integral-based VIKOR for multicriteria group decision-making problems, Gran. Comput., 6 (2021), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00218-2. doi: 10.1007/s41066-020-00218-2

This article has been cited by:

Sarker Ashraful Islam, Farhana Kabir Esheta, Md Mahir Shahriar, Dewan Hasan Ahmed, Numerical study of aerodynamic drag reduction of a circular cylinder with an inbuilt nozzle, 2024, 1, 2996-0800, 379, 10.3934/mina.2024018

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Mathematics

1.8 3.4

Metrics

Article views(2116) PDF downloads(81) Cited by(4)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(11)

AIMS Mathematics

Cubic m-polar fuzzy topology with multi-criteria group decision-making

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction and preliminaries

2. Partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials

3. Generalized partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials

4. Implicit summation formulae

5. Symmetry identities

6. Concluding remark and observation

Acknowledgment

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Mathematics

Cubic m-polar fuzzy topology with multi-criteria group decision-making

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction and preliminaries

2. Partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials

3. Generalized partially degenerate Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials

4. Implicit summation formulae

5. Symmetry identities

6. Concluding remark and observation

Acknowledgment

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog