The goal of this article is to define, explore and analyze two new families of meromorphically harmonic functions by applying the concept of a certain generalized convolution $ q $-operator along with the idea of convolution. We investigate convolution properties and sufficiency criteria for these families of meromorphically harmonic functions. Some of the interesting consequences of our investigation are also included.
Citation: Hari Mohan Srivastava, Muhammad Arif, Mohsan Raza. Convolution properties of meromorphically harmonic functions defined by a generalized convolution $ q $-derivative operator[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5869-5885. doi: 10.3934/math.2021347
[1] | Hongyan Guo . Automorphism group and twisted modules of the twisted Heisenberg-Virasoro vertex operator algebra. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(4): 2673-2685. doi: 10.3934/era.2021008 |
[2] | Agustín Moreno Cañadas, Robinson-Julian Serna, Isaías David Marín Gaviria . Zavadskij modules over cluster-tilted algebras of type $ \mathbb{A} $. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(9): 3435-3451. doi: 10.3934/era.2022175 |
[3] | Youming Chen, Weiguo Lyu, Song Yang . A note on the differential calculus of Hochschild theory for $ A_{\infty} $-algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(9): 3211-3237. doi: 10.3934/era.2022163 |
[4] | Xue Yu . Orientable vertex imprimitive complete maps. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(4): 2466-2477. doi: 10.3934/era.2024113 |
[5] | Yizheng Li, Dingguo Wang . Lie algebras with differential operators of any weights. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1195-1211. doi: 10.3934/era.2023061 |
[6] | Ming Ding, Zhiqi Chen, Jifu Li . The properties on F-manifold color algebras and pre-F-manifold color algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(1): 87-101. doi: 10.3934/era.2025005 |
[7] | Liqian Bai, Xueqing Chen, Ming Ding, Fan Xu . A generalized quantum cluster algebra of Kronecker type. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(1): 670-685. doi: 10.3934/era.2024032 |
[8] | Xiuhai Fei, Haifang Zhang . Additivity of nonlinear higher anti-derivable mappings on generalized matrix algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 6898-6912. doi: 10.3934/era.2023349 |
[9] | Doston Jumaniyozov, Ivan Kaygorodov, Abror Khudoyberdiyev . The algebraic classification of nilpotent commutative algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 3909-3993. doi: 10.3934/era.2021068 |
[10] | Quanguo Chen, Yong Deng . Hopf algebra structures on generalized quaternion algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(5): 3334-3362. doi: 10.3934/era.2024154 |
The goal of this article is to define, explore and analyze two new families of meromorphically harmonic functions by applying the concept of a certain generalized convolution $ q $-operator along with the idea of convolution. We investigate convolution properties and sufficiency criteria for these families of meromorphically harmonic functions. Some of the interesting consequences of our investigation are also included.
Existing methods and algorithms appeared in some literatures assume that variables are independent, but it is not plausible. In many stochastic models and statistical applications, those variables involved are dependent. Hence, it is important and meaningful to extend the results of independent variables to dependent cases. One of these dependence structures is weakly dependent (i.e., $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing or $ \tilde{\rho} $-mixing), which has attracted the concern by many researchers.
Definition 1.1. Let $ \left\{ {{X}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ be a sequence of random variables defined on a probability space $ \left(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P \right) $. For any $ S\subset \text{N = }\left\{ 1, 2, \ldots \right\} $, define $ {{\mathcal{F}}_{S}} = \sigma \left({{X}_{i}}, i\in S \right) $. The set $ {{L}_{2}}\left({{\mathcal{F}}_{S}} \right) $ is the class of all $ \mathcal{F} $-measureable random variables with the finite second moment. For some integer $ s\ge 1 $, denote the mixing coefficient by
$ \begin{equation} {{\rho }^{*}}\left( s \right) = \sup \left\{ \rho \left( {{\mathcal{F}}_{S}}, {{\mathcal{F}}_{T}} \right):S, T\subset \text{N}, \text{dist}\left( S, T \right)\ge s \right\}, \end{equation} $ | (1.1) |
where
$ \begin{equation} \rho \left( {{\mathcal{F}}_{S}}, {{\mathcal{F}}_{T}} \right) = \sup \left\{ \frac{\left| EXY-EXEY \right|}{\sqrt{\operatorname{Var}X}\cdot \sqrt{\operatorname{Var}Y}}:X\in {{L}_{2}}\left( {{\mathcal{F}}_{S}} \right), Y\in {{L}_{2}}\left( {{\mathcal{F}}_{T}} \right) \right\}. \end{equation} $ | (1.2) |
Noting that the above fact $ \text{dist}\left(S, T \right)\ge s $ denotes $ \text{dist}\left(S, T \right) = \inf \left\{ \left| i-j \right|:i\in S, j\in T \right\}\ge s $. Obviously, $ 0\le {{\rho }^{*}}\left(s+1 \right)\le {{\rho }^{*}}\left(s \right)\le 1 $ and $ {{\rho }^{*}}\left(0 \right) = 1 $. The sequence $ \left\{ {{X}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ is called $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing if there exists $ s\in \text{N} $ such that $ {{\rho }^{*}}\left(s \right) < 1 $. Clearly, if $ \left\{ {{X}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ is a sequence of independent random variables, then $ {{\rho }^{*}}\left(s \right) = 0 $ for all $ s\ge 1 $.
$ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing seems similarly to another dependent structure: $ \rho $-mixing, but they are quite different from each other. $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing is also a wide range class of dependent structures, which was firstly introduced to the limit theorems by Bradley [4]. From then on, many scholars investigated the limit theory for $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing random variables, and a number of important applications for $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing have been established. For more details, we refer to [12,16,18,19,21,23,24] among others.
The concept of complete convergence was firstly given by Hsu and Robbins[9] as follows: A sequence of random variables $ \left\{ {{X}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ converges completely to a constant $ \lambda $ if $ \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{P\left(\left| {{X}_{n}}-\lambda \right| > \varepsilon \right)} < \infty $ for all $ \varepsilon > 0 $. By the Borel-Cantelli lemma, the above result implies that $ {{X}_{n}}\to \lambda $ almost surely (a.s.). Thus, the complete convergence plays a crucial role in investigating the limit theory for summation of random variables as well as weighted sums.
Chow [8] introduced the following notion of complete moment convergence: Let $ \left\{ {{Z}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ be a sequence of random variables, and $ {{a}_{n}} > 0 $, $ {{b}_{n}} > 0 $, $ q > 0 $. If $ \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{{{a}_{n}}E\left(b_{n}^{-1}\left| {{Z}_{n}} \right|-\varepsilon \right)_{+}^{q}} < \infty $ for all $ \varepsilon \ge 0 $, then the sequence $ \left\{ {{Z}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ is called to be the complete $ q $-th moment convergence. It will be shown that the complete moment convergence is the more general version of the complete convergence, and is also much stronger than the latter (see Remark 2.1).
According to the related statements of Rosalsky and Thành[14] as well as that of Thành[17], we recall the definition of stochastic domination as follows.
Definition 1.2. A sequence of random variables $ \left\{ {{X}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ is said to be stochastically dominated by a random variable $ X $ if for all $ x\ge 0 $ and $ n\ge 1 $,
$ \begin{equation*} {\mathop {\sup }\limits_{n \ge 1} }\, P\left( \left| {{X}_{n}} \right|\ge x \right)\le P\left( \left| X \right|\ge x \right). \end{equation*} $ |
The concept of stochastic domination is a slight generalization of identical distribution. It is clearly seen that stochastic dominance of $ \left\{ {{X}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ by the random variable $ X $ implies $ E{{\left| {{X}_{n}} \right|}^{p}}\le E{{\left| X \right|}^{p}} $ if the $ p $-th moment of $ \left| X \right| $ exists, i.e. $ E{{\left| X \right|}^{p}} < \infty $.
As is known to us all, the weighted sums of random variables are used widely in some important linear statistics (such as least squares estimators, nonparametric regression function estimators and jackknife estimates). Based on this respect, many probability statisticians devote to investigate the probability limiting behaviors for weighted sums of random variables. For example, Bai and Cheng[3], Cai[5], Chen and Sung[6], Cheng et al.[7], Lang et al.[11], Peng et al.[13], Sung[15,16] and Wu[20] among others.
Recently, Li et al.[12] extended the corresponding result of Chen and Sung[6] from negatively associated random variables to $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing cases by a total different method, and obtained the following theorem.
Theorem A. Let $ \left\{ X, {{X}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ be a sequence of identically distributed $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing random variables with $ E{{X}_{n}} = 0 $, and let $ \left\{ {{a}_{ni}}; 1\le i\le n, n\ge 1 \right\} $ be an array of real constants such that $ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{{{\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|}^{\alpha }}} = O\left(n \right) $ for some $ 1 < \alpha \le 2 $. Set $ {{b}_{n}} = {{n}^{1/\alpha }}{{\left(\log n \right)}^{1/\gamma }} $ for $ 0 < \gamma < \alpha $. If $ E{{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}}/{{{\left(\log \left(1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\alpha /\gamma -1}}}\; < \infty $, then
$ \begin{equation} \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}}P\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right| > \varepsilon {{b}_{n}} \right) < \infty \quad \text{for} \quad\forall \varepsilon > 0. \end{equation} $ | (1.3) |
In addition, Huang et al.[10] proved the following complete $ \alpha $-th moment convergence theorem for weighted sums of $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing random variables under some moment conditions.
Theorem B. Let $ \left\{ {{X}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ be a sequence of $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing random variables, which is stochastically dominated by a random variable $ X $, let $ \left\{ {{a}_{ni}}; 1\le i\le n, n\ge 1 \right\} $ be an array of real constants such that $ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{{{\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|}^{\alpha }}} = O\left(n \right) $ for some $ 0 < \alpha \le 2 $. Set $ {{b}_{n}} = {{n}^{1/\alpha }}{{\left(\log n \right)}^{1/\gamma }} $ for some $ \gamma > 0 $. Assume further that $ E{{X}_{n}} = 0 $ when $ 1 < \alpha \le 2 $. If
$ \begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} E{{|X|}^{\alpha }} < \infty, &\;{\rm{for}}\;\quad\alpha > \gamma, \\ E|X|^{\alpha}\log (1+|X|) < \infty, &\;{\rm{for}}\;\quad \alpha = \gamma, \\ E|X|^{\gamma} < \infty, &\;{\rm{for}}\;\quad \alpha < \gamma, \\ \end{array} \end{equation} $ | (1.4) |
then
$ \begin{equation} \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}}E\left( \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right|-\varepsilon \right)_{+}^{\alpha } < \infty \quad \text{ for } \forall \varepsilon > 0. \end{equation} $ | (1.5) |
It is interesting to find the optimal moment conditions for (1.5). Huang et al.[10] also posed a worth pondering problem whether the result (1.5) holds for the case $ \alpha > \gamma $ under the almost optimal moment condition $ E{{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}}/{{{\left(\log \left(1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\alpha /\gamma -1}}}\; < \infty $?
Mainly inspired by the related results of Li et al.[12], Chen and Sung[6] and Huang et al.[10], the authors will further study the convergence rate for weighted sums of $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing random variables without assumptions of identical distribution. Under the almost optimal moment condition $ E{{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}}/{{{\left(\log \left(1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\alpha /\gamma -1}}}\; < \infty $ for $ 0 < \gamma < \alpha $ with $ 1 < \alpha \le 2 $, a version of the complete $ \alpha $-th moment convergence theorem for weighted sums of $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing random variables is established. The main result not only improves the corresponding ones of Li et al.[12], Chen and Sung[6], but also partially settles the open problem posed by Huang et al.[10].
Now, we state the main result as follows. Some important auxiliary lemmas and the proof of the theorem will be detailed in the next section.
Theorem 1.1. Let $ \left\{ {{X}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ be a sequence of $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing random variables with $ E{{X}_{n}} = 0 $, which is stochastically dominated by a random variable $ X $, let $ \left\{ {{a}_{ni}}; 1\le i\le n, n\ge 1 \right\} $ be an array of real constants such that $ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{{{\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|}^{\alpha }}} = O\left(n \right) $ for some $ 0 < \alpha \le 2 $. Set $ {{b}_{n}} = {{n}^{1/\alpha }}{{\left(\log n \right)}^{1/\gamma }} $ for $ \gamma > 0 $. If $ E{{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}}/{{{\left(\log \left(1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\alpha /\gamma -1}}}\; < \infty $ for $ \alpha > \gamma $ with $ 1 < \alpha \le 2 $, then (1.5) holds.
Throughout this paper, let $ I\left(A \right) $ be the indicator function of the event $ A $ and $ I(A, B) = I(A\bigcap B) $. The symbol $ C $ always presents a positive constant, which may be different in various places, and $ {{a}_{n}} = O\left({{b}_{n}} \right) $ stands for $ {{a}_{n}}\le C{{b}_{n}} $.
To prove our main result of this paper, we need the following important lemmas.
Lemma 2.1. (Utev and Peligrad[18]) Let $ p\ge 2 $, $ \left\{ {{X}_{n}}; n\ge 1 \right\} $ be a sequence of $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing random variables with $ E{{X}_{n}} = 0 $ and $ E{{\left| {{X}_{n}} \right|}^{p}} < \infty $ for all $ n\ge 1 $. Then there exists a positive constant $ C $ depending only on $ p $, $ s $ and $ {{\rho }^{*}}\left(s \right) $ such that
$ \begin{equation} E\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, {{\left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{X}_{i}}} \right|}^{p}} \right)\le C\left( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{X}_{i}} \right|}^{p}}}+{{\left( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{EX_{i}^{2}} \right)}^{p/2}} \right). \end{equation} $ | (2.1) |
In particular, if $ p = 2 $,
$ \begin{equation} E\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, {{\left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{X}_{i}}} \right|}^{2}} \right)\le C\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{EX_{i}^{2}}. \end{equation} $ | (2.2) |
The following one is a basic property for stochastic domination. For the details, one refers to Adler and Rosalsky[1] and Adler et al.[2], or Wu[22]. In fact, we can remove the constant $ C $ in those of Adler and Rosalsky[1] and Adler et al.[2], or Wu[22], since it was proved in Reference [[14], Theorem 2.4] (or [[17], Corollary 2.3]) that this is indeed equivalent to $ C = 1 $.
Lemma 2.2. Let $ \left\{ {{X}_{n}}, n\ge 1 \right\} $ be a sequence of random variables which is stochastically dominated by a random variable $ X $. For all $ \beta > 0 $ and $ b > 0 $, the following statements hold:
$ \begin{equation} E{{\left| {{X}_{n}} \right|}^{\beta }}I\left( \left| {{X}_{n}} \right|\le b \right)\le \left( E{{\left| X \right|}^{\beta }}I\left( \left| X \right|\le b \right)+{{b}^{\beta }}P\left( \left| X \right| > b \right) \right), \end{equation} $ | (2.3) |
$ \begin{equation} E{{\left| {{X}_{n}} \right|}^{\beta }}I\left( \left| {{X}_{n}} \right| > b \right)\le E{{\left| X \right|}^{\beta }}I\left( \left| X \right| > b \right). \end{equation} $ | (2.4) |
Consequently, $ E{{\left| {{X}_{n}} \right|}^{\beta }}\le E{{\left| X \right|}^{\beta }} $.
Lemma 2.3. Under the conditions of Theorem 1.1, if $ E{{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}}/{{{\left(\log \left(1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\alpha /\gamma -1}}}\; < \infty $ for $ 0 < \gamma < \alpha $ with $ 0 < \alpha \le 2 $, then
$ \begin{equation} \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{P\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)}dt}} < \infty. \end{equation} $ | (2.5) |
Proof. By Definition 1.2, noting that
$ \begin{eqnarray} \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{P\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)}dt}}&\le& \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{P\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)}dt}} \\ &\le& \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{0}^{\infty }{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{P\left( \frac{{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{\alpha }}}{b_{n}^{\alpha }} > t \right)}dt}} \\ &\le& \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{{{n}^{-1}}b_{n}^{-\alpha }\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{\alpha }}}}. \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.6) |
It is easy to show that
$ \begin{eqnarray} \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{{{n}^{-1}}b_{n}^{-\alpha }\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{{{\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|}^{\alpha }}E{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{n}} \right)}}&\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{b_{n}^{-\alpha }E{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{n}} \right)} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{b_{n}^{-\alpha }\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( {{b}_{k}} < \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{k+1}} \right)}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty }{E{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( {{b}_{k}} < \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{k+1}} \right){{\left( \log k \right)}^{1-\left( \alpha /\gamma \right)}}} \\ &\le& CE{{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}}/{{{\left( \log \left( 1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\left( \alpha /\gamma \right)-1}}}\; < \infty, \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.7) |
and
$ \begin{eqnarray} \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{{{n}^{-1}}b_{n}^{-\alpha }\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{{{\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|}^{\alpha }}E{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( \left| X \right| > {{b}_{n}} \right)}}&\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{b_{n}^{-\alpha }E{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( \left| X \right| > {{b}_{n}} \right)} \\ & = &C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{b_{n}^{-\alpha }\sum\limits_{j = n}^{\infty }{E{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( {{b}_{j}} < \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{j+1}} \right)}} \\ & = &C\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{\infty }{E{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( {{b}_{j}} < \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{j+1}} \right)\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{j}{{{n}^{-1}}{{\left( \log n \right)}^{-\alpha /\gamma }}}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{\infty }{{{\left( \log j \right)}^{1-\left( \alpha /\gamma \right)}}E{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( {{b}_{j}} < \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{j+1}} \right)} \\ &\le& CE{{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}}/{{{\left( \log \left( 1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\left( \alpha /\gamma \right)-1}}}\; < \infty. \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.8) |
Hence, (2.5) holds by (2.6)–(2.8).
Proof of Theorem 1.1. For any given $ \varepsilon > 0 $, observing that
$ \begin{eqnarray} \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}}E\left( \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right|-\varepsilon \right)_{+}^{\alpha} & = & \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{0}^{\infty }{P\left( \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right|-\varepsilon > {{t}^{1/\alpha}} \right)dt}} \\ & = & \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{0}^{1}{P\left( \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right| > \varepsilon +{{t}^{1/\alpha}} \right)dt}} \\ &&+ \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{P\left( \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right| > \varepsilon +{{t}^{1/\alpha}} \right)dt}} \\ &\le& \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}P\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right| > \varepsilon {{b}_{n}} \right)} \\ &&+ \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{P\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha}} \right)dt}} \\ &\triangleq& I+J. \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.9) |
By Theorem A of Li et al.[12] declared in the first section, we get directly $ I < \infty $. In order to prove (1.5), it suffices to show that $ J < \infty $.
Without loss of generality, assume that $ {{a}_{ni}}\ge 0 $. For all $ t\ge 1 $ and $ 1\le i\le n $, $ n\in \text{N} $, define
$ \begin{equation*} {{Y}_{i}} = {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right|\le {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right). \end{equation*} $ |
It is easy to check that
$ \begin{equation*} \left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)\subset \left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{Y}_{i}}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)\bigcup \left( \bigcup\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)} \right), \end{equation*} $ |
which implies
$ \begin{eqnarray} P\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)&\le& P\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{Y}_{i}}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right) \\ && +P\left( \bigcup\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)} \right). \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.10) |
To prove $ J < \infty $, we need only to show that
$ \begin{equation*} {{J}_{1}} = \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{P\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{Y}_{i}}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)dt}} < \infty, \end{equation*} $ |
$ \begin{equation*} {{J}_{2}} = \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{P\left( \bigcup\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)} \right)dt}} < \infty. \end{equation*} $ |
Since
$ P\left( \bigcup\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)} \right)\le \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{P\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)}, $ |
it follows from Lemma 2.3 that
$ \begin{equation*} {{J}_{2}}\le \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{P\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)}dt}} < \infty. \end{equation*} $ |
Next, we prove that
$ \begin{equation} {\mathop {\sup }\limits_{t \ge 1} }\, \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{E{{Y}_{i}}} \right|\to 0. \end{equation} $ | (2.11) |
By $ E{{X}_{n}} = 0 $ and (2.4) of Lemma 2.2, it follows that
$ \begin{array}{l} {\mathop {\sup }\limits_{t \ge 1} }\, \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{E{{Y}_{i}}} \right| = {\mathop {\sup }\limits_{t \ge 1} }\, \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{E{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right|\le {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)} \right|\\ = {\mathop {\sup }\limits_{t \ge 1} }\, \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{E{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)} \right|\\ \le C{\mathop {\sup }\limits_{t \ge 1} }\, \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)}. \end{array} $ |
Observe that,
$ \begin{eqnarray} E\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)& = &E\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}, \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{n}} \right) \\ &&+E\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}, \left| X \right| > {{b}_{n}} \right). \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.12) |
For $ 0 < \gamma < \alpha $ and $ 1 < \alpha \le 2 $, it is clearly shown that
$ \begin{align} & E\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}, \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{n}} \right) \le {{C}}b_{n}^{1-\alpha }{{t}^{\left( 1/\alpha \right)-1}}{{\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|}^{\alpha }}E{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{n}} \right) \\ & \le {{C}}b_{n}^{1-\alpha }{{t}^{\left( 1/\alpha \right)-1}}{{\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|}^{\alpha }}E\left( \frac{{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}}{{{\left( \log \left( 1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\alpha /\gamma -1}}}{{\left( \log \left( 1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\alpha /\gamma -1}} \right)I\left( \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{n}} \right) \\ & \le {{C}}{{t}^{\left( 1/\alpha \right)-1}}{{n}^{-1+\left( 1/\alpha \right)}}{{\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|}^{\alpha }}{{(\log n)}^{\left( 1/\gamma \right)-1}}, \end{align} $ | (2.13) |
and
$ \begin{eqnarray} E\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}, \left| X \right| > {{b}_{n}} \right)&\le& {{C}}\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|E\left| X \right|I\left( \left| X \right| > {{b}_{n}} \right) \\ &\le& {{C}}b_{n}^{1-\alpha }{{\left( \log \left( 1+{{b}_{n}} \right) \right)}^{\left( \alpha /\gamma \right)-1}}\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right| \\ &\le& {{C}}{{n}^{-1+\left( 1/\alpha \right)}}{{(\log n)}^{-1+\left( 1/\gamma \right)}}\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|. \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.14) |
Thus,
$ \begin{eqnarray} {\mathop {\sup }\limits_{t \ge 1} }\, \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}, \left| X \right|\le {{b}_{n}} \right)}&\le& Cb_{n}^{-1}{{n}^{-1+\left( 1/\alpha \right)}}{{(\log n)}^{\left( 1/\gamma \right)-1}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{{{\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|}^{\alpha }}} \\ &\le& C{{(\log n)}^{-1}}\to 0, \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.15) |
and
$ \begin{eqnarray} {\mathop {\sup }\limits_{t \ge 1} }\, \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}, \left| X \right| > {{b}_{n}} \right)}&\le& Cb_{n}^{-1}{{n}^{-1+\left( 1/\alpha \right)}}{{(\log n)}^{-1+\left( 1/\gamma \right)}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{\left| {{a}_{ni}} \right|} \\ &\le& C{{(\log n)}^{-1}}\to 0. \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.16) |
Then, (2.11) holds by the argumentation of (2.12)–(2.16).
Hence, for $ n $ sufficiently large, we have that $ {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{E{{Y}_{i}}} \right|\le \frac{{{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}}{2} $ holds uniformly for all $ t\ge 1 $. Therefore,
$ \begin{equation} {{J}_{1}} = \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{P\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{\left( {{Y}_{i}}-E{{Y}_{i}} \right)} \right| > \frac{{{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }}}{2} \right)dt}}. \end{equation} $ | (2.17) |
By the Markov's inequality, (2.2) of Lemma 2.1 and (2.3) of Lemma 2.2, we get that
$ \begin{eqnarray} {{J}_{1}}&\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{b_{n}^{2}{{t}^{2/\alpha }}}E\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, {{\left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{\left( {{Y}_{i}}-E{{Y}_{i}} \right)} \right|}^{2}} \right)dt}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{b_{n}^{2}{{t}^{2/\alpha }}}\left( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{Y}_{i}}-E{{Y}_{i}} \right|}^{2}}} \right)dt}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{b_{n}^{2}{{t}^{2/\alpha }}}\left( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right|}^{2}}I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}} \right|\le {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)} \right)dt}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{b_{n}^{2}{{t}^{2/\alpha }}}\left( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)} \right)dt}} \\ &&+C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{P\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)}dt}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{b_{n}^{2}{{t}^{2/\alpha }}}\left( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}} \right)} \right)dt}} \\ &&+C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{b_{n}^{2}{{t}^{2/\alpha }}}\left( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( {{b}_{n}} < \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)} \right)dt}} \\ &&+C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{P\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)}dt}} \\ & = &{{J}_{11}}+{{J}_{12}}+{{J}_{13}}. \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.18) |
Based on the formula (2.2) of Lemma 2.2 in Li et al.[10], we get that
$ \begin{eqnarray} {{J}_{11}}& = &\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{b_{n}^{2}{{t}^{2/\alpha }}}\left( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}} \right)} \right)dt}} \\ &\le& \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\frac{1}{b_{n}^{\alpha }}\left( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}} \right)} \right)} < \infty. \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.19) |
Denoting $ t = {{x}^{\alpha }} $, by (2.3) of Lemma 2.2, the Markov's inequality and Lemma 2.3, we also get that
$ \begin{eqnarray} {{J}_{12}}& = &\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{b_{n}^{2}{{t}^{2/\alpha }}}\left( \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( {{b}_{n}} < \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)} \right)dt}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{nb_{n}^{2}}\int_{1}^{\infty }{{{x}^{\alpha -3}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( {{b}_{n}} < \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}}x \right)}dx}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{nb_{n}^{2}}\sum\limits_{m = 1}^{\infty }{\int_{m}^{m+1}{{{x}^{\alpha -3}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( {{b}_{n}} < \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}}x \right)}dx}}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{nb_{n}^{2}}\sum\limits_{m = 1}^{\infty }{{{m}^{\alpha -3}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( {{b}_{n}} < \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}}\left( m+1 \right) \right)}}} \\ & = &C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{nb_{n}^{2}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{\sum\limits_{m = 1}^{\infty }{\sum\limits_{s = 1}^{m}{{{m}^{\alpha -3}}E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( {{b}_{n}}s < \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}}\left( s+1 \right) \right)}}}} \\ & = &C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{nb_{n}^{2}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{\sum\limits_{s = 1}^{\infty }{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( {{b}_{n}}s < \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}}\left( s+1 \right) \right)\sum\limits_{m = s}^{\infty }{{{m}^{\alpha -3}}}}}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{nb_{n}^{2}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{\sum\limits_{s = 1}^{\infty }{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{2}}I\left( {{b}_{n}}s < \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|\le {{b}_{n}}\left( s+1 \right) \right){{s}^{\alpha -2}}}}} \\ &\le& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{nb_{n}^{\alpha }}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{E{{\left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right|}^{\alpha }}I\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}} \right)}} \\ &\le& CE{{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}}/{{{\left( \log \left( 1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\alpha /\gamma -1}}}\; < \infty. \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.20) |
Analogous to the argumentation of Lemma 2.3, it is easy to show that
$ \begin{equation} {{J}_{13}} = \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{\infty }{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{P\left( \left| {{a}_{ni}}X \right| > {{b}_{n}}{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)}dt}}\le CE{{{\left| X \right|}^{\alpha }}}/{{{\left( \log \left( 1+\left| X \right| \right) \right)}^{\alpha /\gamma -1}}}\; < \infty. \end{equation} $ | (2.21) |
Hence, the desired result $ {{J}_{1}} < \infty $ holds by the above statements. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is completed.
Remark 2.1. Under the conditions of Theorem 1.1, noting that
$ \begin{eqnarray} \infty & > & \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}}E\left( \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right|-\varepsilon \right)_{+}^{\alpha} \\ & = & \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}}\int_{0}^{\infty }{P\left( \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right|-\varepsilon > {{t}^{1/\alpha}} \right)d}t \\ &\ge& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}\int_{0}^{{{\varepsilon }^{\alpha }}}{P\left( \frac{1}{{{b}_{n}}}{\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right| > \varepsilon +{{t}^{1/\alpha }} \right)}dt} \\ &\ge& C\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }{\frac{1}{n}}P\left( {\mathop {\max }\limits_{1 \le j \le n} }\, \left| \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{j}{{{a}_{ni}}{{X}_{i}}} \right| > 2\varepsilon{{b}_{n}} \right)\quad \text{for} \quad\forall \varepsilon > 0. \end{eqnarray} $ | (2.22) |
Since $ \varepsilon > 0 $ is arbitrary, it follows from (2.22) that the complete moment convergence is much stronger than the complete convergence. Compared with the corresponding results of Li et al.[12], Chen and Sung[6], it is worth pointing out that Theorem 1.1 of this paper is an extension and improvement of those of Li et al.[12], Chen and Sung[6] under the same moment condition. In addition, the main result partially settles the open problem posed by Huang et al.[10] for the case $ 0 < \gamma < \alpha $ with $ 1 < \alpha \le 2 $.
In this work, we consider the problem of complete moment convergence for weighted sums of weakly dependent (or $ {{\rho }^{*}} $-mixing) random variables. The main results of this paper are presented in the form of the main theorem and a remark as well as Lemma 2.3, which plays a vital role to prove the main theorem. The presented main theorem improves and generalizes the corresponding complete convergence results of Li et al.[12] and Chen and Sung[6].
The authors are most grateful to the Editor as well as the anonymous referees for carefully reading the manuscript and for offering some valuable suggestions and comments, which greatly enabled them to improve this paper. This paper is supported by the Doctor and Professor Natural Science Foundation of Guilin University of Aerospace Technology.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] | S. Agrawal, S. K. Sahoo, A generalization of starlike functions of order alpha, Hokkaido Math. J., 46 (2017), 15–27. |
[2] | O. P. Ahuja, J. M. Jahangiri, Certain meromorphic harmonic functions, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 25 (2002), 1–10. |
[3] | H. Al-Dweby, M. Darus, On harmonic meromorphic functions associated with basic hypergeometric functions, Sci. World J., 2013 (2013), 1–8. |
[4] | K. Al-Shaqsi, M. Darus, On meromorphic harmonic functions with respect to symmetric points, J. Inequal. Appl., 2008 (2008), 1–11. |
[5] | H. A. Al-Zkeri, F. M. Al-Oboudi, On a class of harmonic starlike multivalent meromorphic functions, Int. J. Open Probl. Complex Anal., 3 (2011), 68–81. |
[6] |
M. Arif, B. Ahmad, New subfamily of meromorphic multivalent starlike functions in circular domain involving $q$-differential operator, Math. Slovaca, 68 (2018), 1049–1056. doi: 10.1515/ms-2017-0166
![]() |
[7] | M. Arif, O. Barkub, H. M. Srivastava, S. Abdullah, S. A. Khan, Some Janowski type harmonic $q$-starlike functions associated with symmetrical points, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 1–16. |
[8] | M. Arif, M. U. Haq, J. L. Liu, A subfamily of univalent functions associated with $q$-analogue of Noor integral operator, J. Funct. Spaces, 2018 (2018), 1–8. |
[9] | M. Arif, H. M. Srivastava, S. Umar, Some applications of a $q$-analogue of the Ruscheweyh type operator for multivalent functions, Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. (RACSAM), 113 (2019), 1211–1221. |
[10] |
H. Bostanci, A new subclass of the meromorphic harmonic $\gamma$-starlike functions, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2011), 683–688. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.03.149
![]() |
[11] |
H. Bostanci, M. Öztürk, A new subclass of the meromorphic harmonic starlike functions, Appl. Math. Lett., 23 (2010), 1027–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2010.04.031
![]() |
[12] | H. Bostanci, M. Öztürk, On meromorphic harmonic starlike functions with missing coefficients, Hacet. J. Math. Stat., 38 (2009), 173–183. |
[13] |
H. Bostanci, S. Yalçin, M. Öztürk, On meromorphically harmonic starlike functions with respect to symmetric conjugate points, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 328 (2007), 370–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.05.044
![]() |
[14] | J. Clunie, T. Sheil-Small, Harmonic univalent functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A. I. Math., 9 (1984), 3–25. |
[15] | J. Dziok, On Janowski harmonic functions, J. Appl. Anal., 21 (2015), 99–107. |
[16] | J. Dziok, Classes of harmonic functions defined by subordination, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2015 (2015), 1–9. |
[17] |
J. Dziok, Classes of meromorphic harmonic functions and duality principle, Anal. Math. Phys., 10 (2020), 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s13324-019-00351-5
![]() |
[18] | S. Elhaddad, H. Aldweby, M. Darus, On a subclass of harmonic univalent functions involving a new operator containing $q$-Mittag-Leffler function, Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci., 14 (2019), 833–847. |
[19] | S. Elhaddad, H. Aldweby, M. Darus, Some properties on a class of harmonic univalent functions defined by $q$-analogue of Ruscheweyh operator, J. Math. Anal., 9 (2018), 28–35. |
[20] | M. U. Haq, M. Raza, M. Arif, Q. Khan, H. Tang, $q$-analogue of differential subordinations, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1–16. |
[21] | W. Hengartner, G. Schober, Univalent harmonic functions, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 299 (1987), 1–31. |
[22] | M. E. H. Ismail, E. Merkes, D. Styer, A generalization of starlike functions, Complex Var. Theory Appl., 14 (1990), 77–84. |
[23] | F. H. Jackson, On $q$-definite integrals, Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math., 41 (1910), 193–203. |
[24] |
F. H. Jackson, On $q$-functions and a certain difference operator, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 46 (1909), 253–281. doi: 10.1017/S0080456800002751
![]() |
[25] | J. M. Jahangiri, Harmonic meromorphic starlike functions, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 37 (2000), 291–301. |
[26] |
J. M. Jahangiri, Y. C. Kim, H. M. Srivastava, Construction of a certain class of harmonic close-to-convex functions associated with the Alexander integral transform, Integr. Transf. Spec. Funct., 14 (2003), 237–242. doi: 10.1080/1065246031000074380
![]() |
[27] | J. M. Jahangiri, H. Silverman, Meromorphic univalent harmonic functions with negative coefficients, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 36 (1999), 763–770. |
[28] | S. Kanas, D. Rǎducanu, Some class of analytic functions related to conic domains, Math. Slovaca, 64 (2014), 1183–1196. |
[29] | B. Khan, H. M. Srivastava, N. Khan, M. Darus, M. Tahir, A. Samad, Applications of higher-order derivatives to the subclasses of meromorphic starlike functions, J. Appl. Comput. Mech., 7 (2021), 321–333. |
[30] | Q. Khan, M. Arif, M. Raza, G. Srivastava, H. Tang, S. U. Rehman, Some applications of a new integral operator in $q$-analog for multivalent functions, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1–13. |
[31] |
H. Lewy, On the non-vanishing of the Jacobian in certain one-to-one mappings, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 42 (1936), 689–692. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1936-06397-4
![]() |
[32] | S. Mahmood, G. Srivastava, H. M. Srivastava, E. S. A. Abujarad, M. Arif, F. Ghani, Sufficiency criterion for a subfamily of meromorphic multivalent functions of reciprocal order with respect to symmetric points, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 1–7. |
[33] | G. Murugusundaramoorthy, Harmonic meromorphic convex functions with missing coefficients, J. Indones. Math. Soc., 10 (2004), 15–22. |
[34] |
G. Murugusundaramoorthy, Starlikeness of multivalent meromorphic harmonic functions, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 40 (2003), 553–564. doi: 10.4134/BKMS.2003.40.4.553
![]() |
[35] |
M. Öztürk, H. Bostanci, Certain subclasses of meromorphic harmonic starlike functions, Integr. Transf. Spec. Funct., 19 (2008), 377–385. doi: 10.1080/10652460801895588
![]() |
[36] |
K. Piejko, J. Sokół, K. Trabka-Wiecław, On $q$-calculus and starlike functions, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A: Sci., 43 (2019), 2879–2883. doi: 10.1007/s40995-019-00758-6
![]() |
[37] | S. Ponnusamy, N. Rajasekaran, New sufficient conditions for starlike and univalent functions, Soochow J. Math., 21 (1995), 193–201. |
[38] |
T. Sheil-Small, Constants for planar harmonic mappings, J. London Math. Soc., s2-42 (1990), 237–248. doi: 10.1112/jlms/s2-42.2.237
![]() |
[39] |
H. Silverman, Harmonic univalent functions with negative coefficients, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 220 (1998), 283–289. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5882
![]() |
[40] |
H. M. Srivastava, Operators of basic (or $q$-) calculus and fractional $q$-calculus and their applications in geometric function theory of complex analysis, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A: Sci.,
44 (2020), 327–344. doi: 10.1007/s40995-019-00815-0
![]() |
[41] | H. M. Srivastava, Univalent functions$, $ fractional calculus$, $ and associated generalized hypergeometric functions, In: Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus, and Their Applications (H. M. Srivastava, S. Owa, Eds.), Halsted Press (Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester), John Wiley and Sons: New York, Chichester, Brisbane and Toronto, (1989), 329–354. |
[42] |
H. M. Srivastava, M. K. Aouf, A. O. Mostafa, Some properties of analytic functions associated with fractional $q$-calculus operators, Miskolc Math. Notes, 20 (2019), 1245–1260. doi: 10.18514/MMN.2019.3046
![]() |
[43] | H. M. Srivastava, B. Khan, N. Khan, Q. Z. Ahmad, Coefficient inequalities for $q$-starlike functions associated with the Janowski functions, Hokkaido Math. J., 48 (2019), 407–425. |
[44] | H. M. Srivastava, M. Tahir, B. Khan, Q. Z. Ahmad, N. Khan, Some general classes of $q$-starlike functions associated with the Janowski functions, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 1–14. |
[45] | B. A. Stephen, P. Nirmaladevi, T. V. Sudharsan, K. G. Subramanian, A class of harmonic meromorphic functions with negative coefficients, Chamchuri J. Math., 1 (2009), 87–94. |
[46] | Z. G. Wang, H. Bostanci, Y. Sun, On meromorphically harmonic starlike functions with respect to symmetric and conjugate points, Southeast Asian Bull. Math., 35 (2011), 699–708. |
[47] |
Z. Z. Zou, Z. R. Wu, On meromorphically starlike functions and functions meromorphically starlike with respect to symmetric conjugate points, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 261 (2001), 17–27. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7441
![]() |
1. | Yukun Xiao, Jianzhi Han, Cocommutative connected vertex (operator) bialgebras, 2025, 212, 03930440, 105461, 10.1016/j.geomphys.2025.105461 |