Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

A regularity criterion of smooth solution for the 3D viscous Hall-MHD equations

  • Received: 20 August 2018 Accepted: 20 October 2018 Published: 28 November 2018
  • In this work, we investigate the regularity criterion for the solution of the Hall-MHD system in three-dimensions. It is proved that if the pressure π and the gradient of magnetic field B satisfies some kind of space-time integrable condition on [0,T], then the corresponding solution keeps smoothness up to time T. This result improves some previous works to the Morrey space M2,3r for 0r<1 which is larger than L3r.

    Citation: A. M. Alghamdi, S. Gala, M. A. Ragusa. A regularity criterion of smooth solution for the 3D viscous Hall-MHD equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2018, 3(4): 565-574. doi: 10.3934/Math.2018.4.565

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ahmad Mohammed Alghamdi, Sadek Gala, Maria Alessandra Ragusa . A regularity criterion of weak solutions to the 3D Boussinesq equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2017, 2(3): 451-457. doi: 10.3934/Math.2017.2.451
    [2] Sadek Gala, Maria Alessandra Ragusa . A logarithmically improved regularity criterion for the 3D MHD equations in Morrey-Campanato space. AIMS Mathematics, 2017, 2(1): 16-23. doi: 10.3934/Math.2017.1.16
    [3] Li Lu . One new blow-up criterion for the two-dimensional full compressible magnetohydrodynamic equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15876-15891. doi: 10.3934/math.2023810
    [4] Sadek Gala, Mohamed Mechdene, Maria Alessandra Ragusa . Logarithmically improved regularity criteria for the Boussinesq equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2017, 2(2): 336-347. doi: 10.3934/Math.2017.2.336
    [5] Jae-Myoung Kim . Local interior regularity for the 3D MHD equations in nonendpoint borderline Lorentz space. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2440-2453. doi: 10.3934/math.2021148
    [6] Yanping Zhou, Xuemei Deng, Qunyi Bie, Lingping Kang . Energy conservation for the compressible ideal Hall-MHD equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17150-17165. doi: 10.3934/math.2022944
    [7] Sadek Gala . A note on the Liouville type theorem for the smooth solutions of the stationary Hall-MHD system. AIMS Mathematics, 2016, 1(3): 282-287. doi: 10.3934/Math.2016.3.282
    [8] Qiang Li, Mianlu Zou . A regularity criterion via horizontal components of velocity and molecular orientations for the 3D nematic liquid crystal flows. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 9278-9287. doi: 10.3934/math.2022514
    [9] Tariq Mahmood, Zhaoyang Shang . Blow-up criterion for incompressible nematic type liquid crystal equations in three-dimensional space. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 746-765. doi: 10.3934/math.2020051
    [10] Zhaoyang Shang . Osgood type blow-up criterion for the 3D Boussinesq equations with partial viscosity. AIMS Mathematics, 2018, 3(1): 1-11. doi: 10.3934/Math.2018.1.1
  • In this work, we investigate the regularity criterion for the solution of the Hall-MHD system in three-dimensions. It is proved that if the pressure π and the gradient of magnetic field B satisfies some kind of space-time integrable condition on [0,T], then the corresponding solution keeps smoothness up to time T. This result improves some previous works to the Morrey space M2,3r for 0r<1 which is larger than L3r.


    1. Introduction

    This work is devoted to the study of the regularity criterion of smooth solutions for the 3D Hall-magnetohydrodynamics (Hall-MHD) equations [1,29] :

    {tu+uuBBΔu+(π+|B|22)=0,tB+uBBu+curl[curlB×B]ΔB=0,u=B=0,(u,B)(x,0)=(u0(x),B0(x)), (1.1)

    where xR3 and t0. Here u=u(x,t)R3, B=B(x,t)R3 and π=π(x,t) are non-dimensional quantities corresponding to the fluid velocity field, the magnetic field and the pressure at the point (x,t), while u0(x) and B0(x) are the given initial velocity and initial magnetic field with u0=0 and B0=0, respectively. The Hall-MHD equations are of relevance to study a number of models coming from magnetic reconnection in space plasmas [19], star formation [2] and also neutron stars [32].

    The Hall term curl [curl B×B] included in (1.1)2 due to the Ohm's law plays an important role in magnetic reconnection which is happening in the case of large magnetic shear. For the physical background of the Hall-MHD, we refer the readers to [19,29] and references therein. When the Hall term is absent, it is obvious to see that the system (1.1) reduces to the classical magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations.

    The global existence of weak solutions and the local well-posedness of classical solution in the whole space R3 were established by Chae-Degond-Liu in [4]. But due to the presence of Navier-Stokes equations in the system (1.1) whether this unique local solution can exist globally is an outstanding challenge problem. For this reason, there have been a lot of literatures devoted to finding sufficient conditions to ensure the smoothness of the solutions (see [4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,16,17,18,25,26,27,33,34,35,38,39] and reference therein. Meanwhile, in [4], the authors obtained a blow-up criterion and the global existence of smooth solution for small initial data. Later, both blow-up criterion and the small data results were refined by Chae-Lee [5]. In particular, Chae and Lee proved the following regularity criteria

    uL2pp3(0,T;Lp(R3))  and  BL2ββ3(0,T;Lβ(R3)) with 3<p,β (1.2)

    or

    uL2(0,T;BMO(R3)) and BL2(0,T;BMO(R3)), (1.3)

    which is an improvement of the Prodi-Serrin condition (1.2). Here BMO is the space of functions of bounded mean oscillation of John and Nirenberg. The regularity criterion (1.3) was improved by [15] as

    uL2(0,T;B0,(R3)) and BL2(0,T;BMO(R3)). (1.4)

    On the other hand, based on the well-known pressure-velocity-magnetic relation of the Hall-MHD equations (1.1) in R3, certain growth conditions in terms of pressure were proposed to ensure the regularity criterion of smooth solutions. Fan et al. [15] showed that if the pressure satisfies one of the following two conditions :

    πL2pp3(0,T;Lp(R3))  and  BL2pp3(0,T;Lp(R3)) with 3<p, (1.5)

    or

    πL2p3p3(0,T;Lp(R3))  and  BL2pp3(0,T;Lp(R3)) with 3<p, (1.6)

    with 0<T<, then the solution (u,B) can be smoothly extended beyond time T. Recently, Fan et al. [10] proved the following regularity criterion, which can be regarded as the end-point cases of (1.5) and (1.6) :

    πL1(0,T;B0,(R3))  and  BL2ββ3(0,T;Lβ(R3)) with 3<β (1.7)

    or

    πL23(0,T;BMO(R3))  and  BL2ββ3(0,T;Lβ(R3)) with 3<β. (1.8)

    Motivated by the above cited works, our aim is to establish a regularity criterion of the smooth solution in terms of πL2(0,T;B1,(R3)) and BL21r(0,T;M2,3r(R3))L2(0,T;M2,3(R3)) with 0<r1. Due to the facts that

    L3(R3)B1,(R3)  and  L3(R3)B1,(R3),

    and from a mathematical viewpoint, Besov space B1,(R3) is the largest scaling invariant space of system (1.1).


    2. Preliminaries and main result

    First, we recall the definition and some properties of the space we are going to use (see e.g. [3]).

    Definition 2.1. Let {φj}jZ be the Littlewood-Paley dyadic decomposition of unity that satisfies ˆφC0(B2B12), ˆφj(ξ)=ˆφ(2jξ) and

    jZˆφj(ξ)=1  for any ξ0,

    where BR is the ball in R3 centered at the origin with radius R>0. The homogeneous Besov space is defined by

    ˙Bsp,q={fS/P:f˙Bsp,q<}

    with norm

    f˙Bsp,q=(jZ2jsφjfqLp)1q

    for sR, 1p,q, where S is the space of tempered distributions and P is the space of polynomials.

    The following is a key lemma to prove Theorem 2.7 due to Meyer–Gerard–Oru [31], which a simple proof can be found in [24].

    Lemma 2.2. For any function f belonging to H1(R3)B1,(R3), one has

    f2L4CfL2fB1,.

    It is well known that B1,(R3) is the biggest critical homogeneous space of degree 1 and as shown by Frazier, Jawerth and Weiss [40] any critical homogeneous space continuously embedded in S(R3) is also continuously embedded into B1,(R3).

    Next, we give the definition of the Morrey spaces. For more details see [28].

    Definition 2.3. For 0<r<32, the homogeneous Morrey space M2,3r(R3) is defined as

    M2,3r(R3)={fL2loc(R3):fM2,3r<+},

    where

    fM2,3r=supxR3sup0<R<Rr32(B(x,R)|f(y)|2)12.

    Here B(x,R) denotes the closed ball in R3 with center x and radius R.

    In order to prove our result, we need the following lemma which plays a very important role in the proof. This lemma can be found in [28] (see also [20,21,36,37]) which gives an equivalence between M2,3r(R3) and a multiplier space Zr(R3).

    Lemma 2.4. For 0<r<32, let the space Zr(R3) as the space of functions which are locally square integrable on R3 and such that pointwise multiplication with these functions maps boundedly the Besov space .Br2,1(R3) to L2(R3). The norm in Zr(R3) is given by the operator norm of pointwise multiplication:

    fZr=supg.Br2,11fgL2<.

    Then f belongs to M2,3r(R3) if and only if f belongs to Zr(R3) with equivalence of norms.

    The following simple lemma is fundamental and shows that any function in L3r is also in M2,3r.

    Lemma 2.5. Let 0<r<32. If fL3r(R3), then fM2,3r(R3) and fM2,3rCfL3r.

    Proof: Let fL3r(R3). By using the following well-known Sobolev embedding Br2,1(R3)Hr(R3)Lq(R3) with 1q=12r3, we have by Hölder's inequality,

    fgL2fL3rgLqfL3rgHrfL3rg.Br2,1,

    Then, it follows that

    fM2,3rfZr=supg.Br2,11fgL2CfL3r.

    While L3rM2,3r, clearly M2,3r is a larger space than L3r : for example,

    |x|rM2,3r(R3),

    but this function is not an element of L3r(R3).

    Remark 2.1. By the embedding L3rM2,3r, we see that our results generalize that in [10] and [15].

    We will use the following inequality (see [23,36,37]).

    Lemma 2.6. If fH1(R3) and fM2,3(R3), then fBMO(R3). Furthermore, one has

    f2L2qCfL2fBMOCfL2fM2,3,  1<q<.

    Our result on the regularity criterion now reads as follows.

    Theorem 2.7 (Regularity criterion). Assume that (u0,B0)Hs(R3)×Hs(R3) with s>52 and divu0=divB0=0 in R3, in the sense of distributions. Let (u,B) be the corresponding local smooth solution to the Hall-MHD equations (1.1) on [0,T) for some T>0. If the pressure π and the magnetic field B satisfy

    πL2(0,T;B1,(R3)) (2.1)

    and

    BL21r(0,T;M2,3r(R3))L2(0,T;M2,3(R3)) (2.2)

    with 0<r<1, then (u,B) can be extended beyond T.

    Our result (2.2) is just refer to Morrey space with the combined assumption (2.1). As an application of Theorem 2.7, we also obtain the following regularity criterion

    Corollary 2.8. Let (u,B), (u0,B0) be as in Theorem 2.7. Suppose that the pressure π and the magnetic field B satisfy

    πL1(0,T;BMO(R3))

    and

    BL21r(0,T;M2,3r(R3))L2(0,T;M2,3(R3))

    with 0<r<1, then (u,B) can be extended beyond T.

    Remark 2.2. Therefore, Corollary 2.8 is a further improvement of the result of work [10].

    Since M2,3(R3)B1,(R3) (for the proof, see e.g. [24]), we have the following result.

    Corollary 2.9. Let (u,B), (u0,B0) be as in Theorem 2.7. Suppose that the pressure π and the magnetic field B satisfy

    πL2(0,T;M2,3(R3))

    and

    BL21r(0,T;M2,3r(R3))L2(0,T;M2,3(R3))

    with 0<r<1, then (u,B) can be extended beyond T.


    3. Proof of Theorem 2.7

    Now we are in a position to prove Theorem 2.7.

    Proof: Firstly, we derive the energy inequality. For this purpose, we take the L2(R3) inner product of u and B with equations (1.1), respectively, sum the resulting equations and then integrate by parts to obtain

    12ddtR3(|u|2+|B|2)dx+R3(|u|2+|B|2)dx=0,

    where we used u=B=0. This proves

    (u,B)L(0,T;L2)+(u,B)L2(0,T;H1)C.

    In the following, from Serrin type criteria (1.2) with p=β=4 on the 3D Hall-MHD equations (1.1), it is sufficient to prove that

    uL(0,T;L4(R3))L8(0,T;L4(R3)).

    To this end, let T>0 be a given fixed time. Multiplying (1.1)1 by |u|2u and integrating by parts over R3, we obtain

    14ddtu4L4+|u||u|2L2+12|u|22L2=R3(BB12|B|2)|u|2udxR3uπ|u|2dx=3i=1R3BiBi(|u|2u)dx+12R3|B|2((|u|2u))dxR3uπ|u|2dxC|B|2L4uL4|u||u|L2+|R3uπ|u|2dx|CB2L8uL4|u||u|L2+2|R3πu|u|udx|CBL4B.M2,3uL4|u||u|L2+2πuL2|u||u|L2CB2.M2,3(B4L4+u4L4)+12|u||u|2L2+Cπ2L4u2L4CB2.M2,3(B4L4+u4L4)+14|u||u|2L2+Cπ.B1,πL2u2L4CB2.M2,3(B4L4+u4L4)+14|u||u|2L2+Cπ.B1,(|u||u|L2+|B||B|L2)u2L4CB2.M2,3(B4L4+u4L4)+12|u||u|2L2+12|B||B|2L2+Cπ2.B1,u4L4, (3.1)

    where we have used the Lemma 2.6 and the fact :

    R3(uu)|u|2udx=0,(u)((|u|2u))=|u|2|u|2+12||u|2|2.

    In a similar way, multipying (1.1)2 by |B|2B, and integrating by parts yield

    14ddtB4L4+12|B||B|2L2+12|B|22L2=R3(B)u|B|2Bdx+R3(B×curl B)curl(|B|2B)dx=R3(B)|B|2Budx+R3(B×curl B)(|B|2×B)dxCR3|u||B|3|B|dx+CR3|B|3|B|2dxC|B|2|B|L2BL4uL4+C|B||B|2L2|B||B|L2CB.M2,3r|B|2.Br2,1BL4uL4+C|B||B|L2B.M2,3r|B|2.Br2,1CB.M2,3r|B|21rL2|B|2rL2BL4uL4+C|B||B|L2B.M2,3r|B|21rL2|B|2rL2CB.M2,3rB32rL4|B|2rL2uL4+C|B||B|L2B.M2,3rB2(1r)L4|B|2rL2CB22r.M2,3rB2(32r)2rL4u22rL4+18|B|22L2+18|B||B|2L2+CB21r.M2,3rB4L4+18|B|22L2CB22r.M2,3r(B4L4+u4L4)+14|B|22L2+12|B||B|2L2+CB21r.M2,3rB4L4C(1+B21r.M2,3r)(B4L4+u4L4)+14|B|22L2+12|B||B|2L2+CB21r.M2,3rB4L4C(1+B21r.M2,3r)(B4L4+u4L4)+14|B|22L2+12|B||B|2L2, (3.2)

    where we have used the following interpolation inequality due to [30]:

    f.Br2,1Cf1rL2frL2  with 0<r<1.

    Summing (3.1) and (3.2), we get

    14ddt(u4L4+B4L4)+12|u||u|2L2+12|B||B|2L2+12(|u|22L2+|B|22L2)C(1+B2.M2,3+B21r.M2,3r)(B4L4+u4L4)+π2B1,u4L4.

    Using Gronwall's inequality, we obtain

    sup0<t<T(u(,t)4L4+B(,t)4L4)(u04L4+B04L4)exp(t0{B(,τ)2.M2,3+B(,τ)21r.M2,3r+π(,τ)2B1,+1}dτ)<.

    This implies that

    uL(0,T;L4(R3))L8(0,T;L4(R3)).

    Now due to regularity criterion (1.2), the proof of Theorem 2.7 is complete.


    Acknowledgments

    The part of the work was carried out while the second author was long-term visitor at University of Catania. The hospitality and support of Catania University are graciously acknowledged. The authors would like to expresses gratitude to reviewer(s) for careful reading of the manuscript, useful comments and suggestions for its improvement which greatly improved the presentation of the paper. The research of M.A. Ragusa is partially supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Agreement number N. 02.03.21.0008).


    Conflict of interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.


    [1] M. Acheritogaray, P. Degond, A. Frouvelle, et al. Kinetic fomulation and global existence for the Hall-magneto-hydrodynamics system, Kinet. Relat. Mod., 4 (2011), 901–918.
    [2] S. A. Balbus and C. Terquem, Linear analysis of the Hall e_ect in protostellar disks, The Astrophysical Journal, 552 (2001), 235–247.
    [3] J. Bergh and J. L¨ofstrom, Inerpolation Spaces. An Introduction, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976.
    [4] D. Chae, P. Degond and J. G. Liu, Well-posedness for Hall-magnetohydrodynamics, Ann. I. H. Poincaré-An, 31 (2014), 555–565
    [5] D. Chae and J. Lee, On the blow-up criterion and small data global existence for the Hallmagnetohydrodynamics, J. Di_er. Equations, 256 (2014), 3835–3858.
    [6] D. Chae and M. Schonbek, On the temporal decay for the Hall-magnetohydrodynamic equations, J. Di_er. Equations, 255 (2013), 3971–3982.
    [7] D. Chae and S. Weng, Singularity formation for the incompressible Hall-MHD equations without resistivity, Ann. I. H. Poincaré-An, 33 (2016), 1009–1022.
    [8] D. Chae and J. Wolf, On partial regularity for the steady Hall-magnetohydrodynamics system, Commun. Math. Phys., 339 (2015), 1147–1166.
    [9] D. Chae and J. Wolf, On partial regularity for the 3D nonstationary Hall magnetohydrodynamics equations on the plane, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 48 (2016), 443–469.
    [10] J. Fan, Y. Fukumoto, G. Nakamura, et al. Regularity criteria for the incompressible Hall-MHD system, Zamm-Z Angew. Math. Me., 95 (2015), 1156–1160.
    [11] J. Fan, X. Jia, G. Nakamura, et al. On well-posedness and blowup criteria for the
    [12] magnetohydrodynamics with the Hall and ion-slip e_ects, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 66 (2015), 1695–1706.
    [13] J. Fan, A. Alsaedi, T. Hayat, et al. On strong solutions to the compressible Hallmagnetohydrodynamic system, Nonlinear Anal-Real, 22 (2015), 423–434.
    [14] J. Fan, H. Malaikah, S. Monaquel, et al. Global Cauchy problem of 2D generalized MHD equations, Monatsh. Math., 175 (2014), 127–131.
    [15] J. Fan and T. Ozawa, Regularity criteria for the incompressible MHD with the Hall or Ion-Slip e_ects, International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 9 (2015), 1173–1186.
    [16] J. Fan, F. Li and G. Nakamura, Regularity criteria for the incompressible Hallmagnetohydrodynamic equations, Nonlinear Anal-Theor, 109 (2014), 173–179.
    [17] J. Fan, B. Samet and Y. Zhou, A regularity criterion for a generalized Hall-MHD system, Comput. Math. Appl., 74 (2017), 2438–2443.
    [18] J. Fan, B. Ahmad, T. Hayat, et al. On well-posedness and blow-up for the full compressible Hall-MHD system, Nonlinear Anal-Real, 31 (2016), 569–579.
    [19] M. Fei and Z. Xiang, On the blow-up criterion and small data global existence for the Hallmagnetohydrodynamics with horizontal dissipation, J. Math. Phys., 56 (2015), 051504.
    [20] T. G. Forbes, Magnetic reconnection in solar flares, Geophys. Astro. Fluid, 62 (1991), 15–36.
    [21] S. Gala, Regularity criterion for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations in the Morrey-Campanato space, NoDEA-Nonlinear Di_., 17 (2010), 181–194.
    [22] S. Gala, On the regularity criteria for the three-dimensional micropolar fluid equations in the critical Morrey-Campanato space, Nonlinear Anal-Real, 12 (2011), 2142–2150.
    [23] S. Gala, A new regularity criterion for the 3D MHD equations in R3 , Commun. Pur. Appl. Anal., 11 (2012), 973–980.
    [24] J. Geng, X. Chen and S. Gala, On regularity criteria for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations in the critical Morrey-Campanato space, Commun. Pur. Appl. Anal., 10 (2011), 583–592.
    [25] Z. Guo and S. Gala, Remarks on logarithmical regularity criteria for the Navier-Stokes equations, J. Math. Phys., 52 (2011), 063503.
    [26] F. He, B. Ahmad, T. Hayat, et al. On regularity criteria for the 3D Hall-MHD equations in terms of the velocity, Nonlinear Anal-Real, 32 (2016), 35–51.
    [27] X. Jia and Y. Zhou, Ladyzhenskaya-Prodi-Serrin type regularity criteria for the 3D incompressible MHD equations in terms of 3 × 3 mixture matrices, Nonlinearity, 28 (2015), 3289–3307.
    [28] Z. Jiang, Y. Wang and Y. Zhou, On regularity criteria for the 2D generalized MHD system, J. Math. Fluid Mech., 18 (2016), 331–341.
    [29] P. G. Lemarié-Rieusset, The Navier-Stokes equations in the critical Morrey-Campanato space, Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 23 (2007), 897–930.
    [30] M. J. Lighthill, Studies on magneto-hydrodynamic waves and other anisotropic wave motions, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 252 (1960), 397–430.
    [31] S. Machihara and T. Ozawa, Interpolation inequalities in Besov spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 131 (2003), 1553–1556.
    [32] Y. Meyer, P. Gerard and F. Oru, Inégalités de Sobolev précisées, Séminaire sur les équations aux Dérivées Partielles (Polytechnique), 1996 (1997), 1–8.
    [33] D. A. Shalybkov and V. A. Urpin, The Hall e_ect and the decay of magnetic fields, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 321 (1997), 685–690.
    [34] R.Wan and Y. Zhou, On global existence, energy decay and blow up criterions for the Hall-MHD system, J. Di_er. Equations, 259 (2015), 5982–6008.
    [35] Y. Wang and W. Zuo, On the blow-up criterion of smooth solutions for Hallmagnetohydrodynamics system with partial viscosity, Commun. Pur. Appl. Anal., 13 (2014), 1327–1336.
    [36] Z. Ye, Regularity criterion for the 3D Hall-magnetohydrodynamic equations involving the vorticity, Nonlinear Anal-Theor, 144 (2016), 182–193.
    [37] Y. Zhou and S. Gala, A new regularity criterion for weak solutions to the viscous MHD equations in terms of the vorticity field, Nonlinear Anal-Theor, 72 (2010), 3643–3648.
    [38] Y. Zhou and S. Gala, Regularity criteria in terms of the pressure for the Navier-Stokes Equations in the critical Morrey-Campanato space, Z. Anal. Anwend., 30 (2011), 83–93.
    [39] R. Wan and Y. Zhou, Low regularity well-posedness for the 3D generalized Hall-MHD system, Acta Appl. Math., 147 (2017), 95–111.
    [40] R. Wan and Y. Zhou, On global existence, energy decay and blow-up criteria for the Hall-MHD system, J. Di_er. Equations, 259 (2015), 5982–6008.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Q. Rubbab, Y. Mahsud, S. Irshad, M. A. Imran, A. Ahmadian, S. Salahshour, M. Ferrara, Numerical simulations of unsteady flows in a rotating channel using a novel eigenfunction expansion method, 2020, 10, 2158-3226, 065035, 10.1063/5.0012874
    2. Maria Alessandra Ragusa, Fan Wu, Regularity Criteria for the 3D Magneto-Hydrodynamics Equations in Anisotropic Lorentz Spaces, 2021, 13, 2073-8994, 625, 10.3390/sym13040625
    3. Sadek Gala, Eugeny Galakhov, Maria Alessandra Ragusa, Olga Salieva, Beale–Kato–Majda Regularity Criterion of Smooth Solutions for the Hall-MHD Equations with Zero Viscosity, 2021, 1678-7544, 10.1007/s00574-021-00256-7
    4. Sharad K. Yadav, Hideaki Miura, Rahul Pandit, Statistical properties of three-dimensional Hall magnetohydrodynamics turbulence, 2022, 34, 1070-6631, 095135, 10.1063/5.0107434
    5. Sadek Gala, Michel Théra, Logarithmically improved regularity criterion for the 3D Hall-MHD equations, 2021, 40, 2238-3603, 10.1007/s40314-021-01585-5
    6. Baoying Du, On three-dimensional Hall-magnetohydrodynamic equations with partial dissipation, 2022, 2022, 1687-2770, 10.1186/s13661-022-01587-0
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4564) PDF downloads(533) Cited by(6)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog