
Let du be the degree of a vertex u of a graph G. The atom-bond sum-connectivity (ABS) index of a graph G is the sum of the numbers (1−2(dv+dw)−1)1/2 over all edges vw of G. This paper gives the characterization of the graph possessing the minimum ABS index in the class of all trees of a fixed number of pendent vertices; the star is the unique extremal graph in the mentioned class of graphs. The problem of determining graphs possessing the minimum ABS index in the class of all trees with n vertices and p pendent vertices is also addressed; such extremal trees have the maximum degree 3 when n≥3p−2≥7, and the balanced double star is the unique such extremal tree for the case p=n−2.
Citation: Tariq A. Alraqad, Igor Ž. Milovanović, Hicham Saber, Akbar Ali, Jaya P. Mazorodze, Adel A. Attiya. Minimum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of trees with a fixed order and/or number of pendent vertices[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3707-3721. doi: 10.3934/math.2024182
[1] | Abeer M. Albalahi, Zhibin Du, Akbar Ali . On the general atom-bond sum-connectivity index. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23771-23785. doi: 10.3934/math.20231210 |
[2] | Xiaodi Song, Jianping Li, Jianbin Zhang, Weihua He . Trees with the second-minimal ABC energy. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18323-18333. doi: 10.3934/math.20221009 |
[3] | Zhen Wang, Kai Zhou . On the maximum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of unicyclic graphs with given diameter. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22239-22250. doi: 10.3934/math.20241082 |
[4] | Hicham Saber, Zahid Raza, Abdulaziz M. Alanazi, Adel A. Attiya, Akbar Ali . On trees with a given number of segments and their maximum general $ Z $-type index. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 195-207. doi: 10.3934/math.2025010 |
[5] | Hongzhuan Wang, Xianhao Shi, Ber-Lin Yu . On the eccentric connectivity coindex in graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 651-666. doi: 10.3934/math.2022041 |
[6] | Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Azeem Haider, Moin A. Ansari . Computation of eccentric topological indices of zero-divisor graphs based on their edges. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11509-11518. doi: 10.3934/math.2022641 |
[7] | Zhen Lin . The biharmonic index of connected graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6050-6065. doi: 10.3934/math.2022337 |
[8] | Alaa Altassan, Muhammad Imran, Bilal Ahmad Rather . On $ ABC $ energy and its application to anticancer drugs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21668-21682. doi: 10.3934/math.20231105 |
[9] | Usman Babar, Haidar Ali, Shahid Hussain Arshad, Umber Sheikh . Multiplicative topological properties of graphs derived from honeycomb structure. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1562-1587. doi: 10.3934/math.2020107 |
[10] | Fei Yu, Hifza Iqbal, Saira Munir, Jia Bao Liu . M-polynomial and topological indices of some transformed networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13887-13906. doi: 10.3934/math.2021804 |
Let du be the degree of a vertex u of a graph G. The atom-bond sum-connectivity (ABS) index of a graph G is the sum of the numbers (1−2(dv+dw)−1)1/2 over all edges vw of G. This paper gives the characterization of the graph possessing the minimum ABS index in the class of all trees of a fixed number of pendent vertices; the star is the unique extremal graph in the mentioned class of graphs. The problem of determining graphs possessing the minimum ABS index in the class of all trees with n vertices and p pendent vertices is also addressed; such extremal trees have the maximum degree 3 when n≥3p−2≥7, and the balanced double star is the unique such extremal tree for the case p=n−2.
A property of a graph that is preserved by isomorphism is known as a graph invariant [1]. The order and degree sequence of a graph are examples of graph invariants. The graph invariants that assume only numerical values are usually referred to as topological indices in the chemical graph theory [2].
For evaluating the extent of branching of the carbon-atom skeleton of saturated hydrocarbons, Randić [3] devised a topological index and called it as the branching index, which nowadays is known as the connectivity index (also, the Randić index).
The connectivity index of a graph G is the following number:
∑vw∈E(G)1√dvdw, |
where dv and dw denote the degrees of the vertices v and w of G respectively, and E(G) denotes the set of edges of a graph G. It is believed that the connectivity index is the most-studied topological index (in both theoretical and applied aspects) [4]. Detail about the study of the connectivity index can be found in the survey papers [5,6], books [7,8], and related papers cited therein.
Because of the success of the connectivity index, many modified versions of this index have been introduced in the literature. The atom-bond connectivity (ABC) index [9,10] and the sum-connectivity (SC) index [11] are among the well-studied modified versions of the connectivity index. The ABC and SC indices of a graph are defined as
ABC(G)=∑vw∈E(G)√dv+dw−2dvdw, |
and
SC(G)=∑vw∈E(G)1√dv+dw. |
The readers interested in detail about the ABC and SC indices are referred to the survey papers [12] and [13], respectively.
Using the main idea of the SC index, a modified version of the ABC index was proposed in [14] recently and it was referred to as the atom-bond sum-connectivity (ABS) index. The ABS index of a graph G is defined as
ABS(G)=∑uv∈E(G)√du+dv−2du+dv=∑uv∈E(G)√1−2du+dv. |
Although the ABS index is a special case of a general topological index considered in [15], no result reported in [15] covers the ABS index. The graphs possessing the maximum/minimum ABS index in the class of all (i) (molecular) trees (ii) general graphs, with a given order, were characterized in [14]. Analogous results for unicyclic graphs were reported in [16], where the chemical applicability of the ABS index was also investigated.
A vertex of degree one in a tree T is called a pendent vertex and a vertex of degree at least three in T is called a branching vertex. A path P in a tree T connecting a branching vertex and a pendent vertex is called a pendent path, provided that every other vertex (if existing) of P has degree two in T. A path P in a tree T is said to be an internal path if it connects two branching vertices and every other vertex (if existing) of P has degree two in T. A tree with one non-pendent vertex is called a star. A double star is a tree with exactly two non-pendent vertices. A double star tree with non-pendent vertices u and v is called balanced if |du−dv|≤1. For a general reference on graph theory, see [17].
Ali et al. [16] posed a problem asking to determine trees possessing the minimum value of the ABS index among all trees with a fixed number of pendent vertices. The main goal of the present paper is to determine trees possessing the minimum value of the ABS index in two classes of trees. For positive integers n and p, Γp denotes the class of all trees with p pendent vertices and Γn,p denotes the class of all trees of order n and p pendent vertices. In Section 2 we give a complete solution to the problem posed by Ali et al. [16], where we show that the star graph Sp+1 uniquely attains the minimum value of the ABS index in the class Γp. In Section 3 we provide results on trees that minimize the value of the ABS index in Γn,p.
We will need the next already known result.
Lemma 1. [14, Corollary 8] Let u and v be nonadjacent vertices in a connected graph G, then ABS(G+uv)>ABS(G), where G+uv is the graph obtained from G by adding the edge uv.
Lemma 2. Let p≥2 be an integer. If T∗ is a tree attaining the minimum value of the ABS index in the class Γp, then T∗ has no vertex of degree 2.
Proof. Suppose to the contrary that T∗ has at least one vertex of degree 2. Take v∈V(T∗) such that N(v)={u,w} and du≥dw≥1. Let T′ be the tree formed by removing the vertex v (and its incident edges) and adding the edge uw (see Figure 1). In what follows, by dx we denote the degree of a vertex x in T∗. Using the definition of the ABS index, we have
ABS(T∗)−ABS(T′)=√1−2du+2+√1−2dw+2−√1−2du+dw>0, |
a contradiction to the assumption that T∗ attains the minimum value of the ABS index among all trees with p pendent vertices.
Lemma 3. The function f defined by
f(x,y)=(x−1)(√1−2x+1−√1−2x+y−1) +(y−1)(√1−2y+1−√1−2x+y−1) +√1−2x+y, |
with x≥y≥3, is strictly decreasing on y.
Proof. We have
∂f∂y=1(x+y)3/2√x+y−2−x+y−2(x+y−1)3/2√x+y−3 −√x+y−3x+y−1+g(y), | (2.1) |
where
g(y)=y+2y+1√y−1y+1. |
Certainly, the function g is strictly increasing on y because y≥3. Hence, g(y)<g(x+y−2) as x≥3. Consequently, Eq (2.1) gives
∂f∂y<1(x+y)3/2√x+y−2−x+y−2(x+y−1)3/2√x+y−3 −√x+y−3x+y−1+x+yx+y−1√x+y−3x+y−1=1(x+y)3/2√x+y−2−1(x+y−1)3/2√x+y−3. | (2.2) |
Since the function ψ defined by
ψ(t)=1t3/2√t−2 |
is strictly decreasing for t>2, from (2.2) it follows that ∂f∂y<0.
Lemma 4. Let
f(x,y)=√1−2x+y, |
and define the function ψ(x,y;s) as
ψ(x,y;s)=f(x+s,y)−f(x,y), |
where x,y≥1 and s>0. Then ψ(x,y;s) is strictly decreasing on x and on y.
Proof. Since
ψ(x,y;s)=f(x+s,y)−f(x,y)=f(x,y+s)−f(x,y), |
it suffices to show the case of x. Note that the first partial derivatives of f are calculated as
∂f∂x(x,y)=∂f∂y(x,y)=(x+y−2)−12(x+y)−32, |
which are both strictly decreasing in x. This implies that
∂∂xψ(x,y;s)=∂f∂x(x+s,y)−∂f∂x(x,y)<0, |
and
∂∂yψ(x,y;s)=∂f∂y(x+s,y)−∂f∂y(x,y)<0. |
Thus ψ(x,y;s) is strictly decreasing on x and on y.
Theorem 1. Let p≥2 be an integer, then for every T∈Γp,
ABS(T)≥p√p−1p+1, |
with equality holds if and only if T≅Sp+1.
Proof. Let T be a graph attaining the minimum ABS value among all trees with p pendent vertices. By Lemma 2, T has no vertex of degree 2. We claim that T has only one vertex of degree greater than 2. Contrarily, we assume that T contains at least two vertices of degree greater than 2. Among the vertices of degrees at least 3, we pick u,v∈V(T) such that uv∈E(G) (Lemma 2 guarantees the existence of the vertices u and v when T has at least one pair of vertices of degrees greater than 2). Without loss of generality, we suppose that du≥dv. Let v1,⋯,vdv−1 be the neighbors of v different from u. Construct a new tree T′ by dropping the vertex v (and its incident edges) and inserting the edges v1u,⋯,vdv−1u, see Figure 2. Certainly, both the trees T and T′ have the same number of pendent vertices. However, in the following we show that ABS(T)>ABS(T′), which gives a contradiction to the minimality of ABS(T), and hence, T must contain exactly one vertex of degree greater than 2, as desired.
In what follows, by dw we denote the degree of a vertex w in T. If u1,⋯,udu−1 are the neighbors of u different from v, then
ABS(T)−ABS(T′)=du−1∑i=1(√1−2du+dui−√1−2du+dv+dui−2) +dv−1∑j=1(√1−2dv+dvj−√1−2du+dv+dvj−2) +√1−2du+dv. | (2.3) |
By Lemma 4, the following inequalities hold for all i=1,...,du−1 and j=1,...,dv−1:
√1−2du+dui−√1−2du+dv+dui−2≥√1−2du+1−√1−2du+dv−1, |
and
√1−2dv+dvj−√1−2du+dv+dvj−2≥√1−2dv+1−√1−2du+dv−1. |
Thus, Eq (2.3) yields
ABS(T)−ABS(T′)≥(du−1)(√1−2du+1−√1−2du+dv−1) +(dv−1)(√1−2dv+1−√1−2du+dv−1) +√1−2du+dv. | (2.4) |
Since du≥dv, by Lemma 3, Inequality (2.4) gives
ABS(T)−ABS(T′)≥2(du−1)(√1−2du+1−√1−22du−1) +√1−1du. | (2.5) |
By Lemma 3, the function g(s), which is defined by
g(s)=f(s,s)=2(s−1)(√1−2s+1−√1−22s−1)+√1−1s, |
with s≥3, is strictly decreasing, and
lims→∞g(s)=lims→∞[−4s2+12s−8√2s2+s−1(√2s2−3s+1+√2s2−s−3)+√1−1s]=0. |
Therefore, the righthand side of (2.5) is positive for du≥3. This completes the proof.
In this section, we characterize trees attaining the minimum value of the ABS index in Γn,p, where p≥3 and n≥3p−2.
Lemma 5. If y is a fixed real number greater than or equal to 3 then the function f, defined in Lemma 4, is strictly increasing in x.
For a tree T, denote by W1(T) the set of pendent vertices of T, W2(T)=∪v∈W1(T)N(v), and W3(T)=V(T)∖(W1(T)∪W2(T)). A vertex in T of degree at least three is called a branching vertex. A path is called an internal path, if its end vertices are branching vertices and every other vertex has degree two. A path is called a pendent path if one of the end vertices is pendent and every other vertex has degree two.
Lemma 6. Let T∗∈Γn,p be attaining minimum ABS value, then every internal path of T∗ has length one.
Proof. For a contradiction, assume T∗ contains an internal path v=v0−v1−v2−..−vr=u of length r≥2. Let w∈W2(T) and let y be a pendent vertex adjacent to w. Let T′=T∗−{vv1,uvr−1}+{vu,yv1}. Clearly T′∈Γn,p. In what follows, by dx we denote the degree of a vertex x in T∗. If r>2, then
ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)=f(dv,du)+f(2,2)+f(dw,2)−f(dv,2)−f(du,2)−f(2,2)+f(1,2)−f(dw,1)=(f(dv,du)−f(dv,2))−(f(2,du)−f(2,2))+(f(dw,2)−f(dw,1))−(f(2,2)−f(2,1))=ψ(2,dv;du−2)−ψ(2,2;du−2)+ψ(1,dw;1)−ψ(1,2;1)<0, |
which yields a contradiction. If r=2, then
ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)=f(dv,du)+f(2,1)+f(dw,2)−f(dv,2)−f(du,2)−f(dw,1)=(f(dv,du)−f(dv,2))−(f(2,du)−f(2,2))+(f(dw,2)−f(dw,1))−(f(2,2)−f(2,1))=ψ(2,dv;du−2)−ψ(2,2;du−2)+ψ(1,dw;1)−ψ(1,2;1)<0. |
Again, this contradicts the minimality of ABS(T∗). Thus T∗ does not have an internal path of length greater than one.
Lemma 7. Let T∗∈Γn,p be attaining minimum ABS value, then du≤dv for every u∈W2(T∗) and v∈W3(T∗).
Proof. Let y be a pendent vertex adjacent to u and let x be a non-pendent vertex adjacent to v and not on the u−v path. Let T′=T∗−{xz∣z∈N(x)∖{v}}+{zy∣z∈N(x)∖{v}}. In what follows, by dx we denote the degree of a vertex x in T∗. Clearly, T′∈Γn,p, and so ABS(T′)≥ABS(T∗). Thus, we have
0≤ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)=f(dv,1)−f(dv,dx)+f(du,dx)−d(du,1)=ψ(1,du;dx−1)−ψ1,dv,dx−1). |
Hence, du≤dv.
Lemma 8. Let T∈Γn,p. If n=3p−2+t for some t≥0, then the following assertions hold.
(i) dv=2 for all v∈W2(T).
(ii) ∑u∈W3(T)du=3p−6+2t.
Proof. (i) We have p+∑v∈W2(T)dv+∑u∈W3(T)du=6p−6+2t. Seeking a contradiction, assume dv0≥3 for some v0∈W2(T). Let β=min{du∣u∈W3(T)}, then by Lemma 7, β≥dv0≥3. On the other hand, since dv≥2 for all v∈W2(T), we have
p+2(|W2(T)|−1)+3+β(2p−2+t−|W2(T)|)≤6p−6+2t. |
Therefore,
β≤5p−7+2t−2|W2(T)|2p−2+t−|W2(T)|=p−32p−2+t−|W2(T)|+2<3, |
a contradiction. Thus, dv=2 for all v∈W2(T).
(ii) We conclude from part (i) that |W2(T)|=p, so p+2p+∑u∈W3(T)du=6p−6+2t, which yields ∑u∈W3(T)du=3p−6+2t.
Remark 9. Let T∗∈Γn,p be a tree attaining minimum ABS value. It results from Lemma 7 that every vertex of T∗ of degree two is on a pendent path. Assume there are two vertices u,v∈W3(T∗) such that du=dv=2 and u and v do not belong to the same pendent path. Since v∈W3(T∗) and dv=2, there are two vertices x and y such that dx≤dy=2 and v−y−x. Let z be the pendent vertex at the end of the pendent path containing u and let T′=T∗−xy+zy. Clearly, T′∈Γn,p and ABS(T′)=ABS(T∗). We conclude that it is possible to obtain a tree T∗1∈Γn,p, in which all vertices of degree two in W3(T∗1) belong to the same pendent path, such that ABS(T∗1)=ABS(T∗). Moreover, T∗ and T∗1 have the same maximum degree and the subtrees of T∗ and T∗1 induced on their sets of branching vertices are isomorphic.
Theorem 2. Let p≥3 and n≥3p−2. If T∗∈Γn,p be attaining the minimum ABS value, then the maximum degree of T∗ is three.
Proof. For a contradiction, assume T∗ has a vertex of degree at least 4. Let β=min{dv∣v∈W3(T)}, then by Lemma 8 (ii), 4+β(|W3(T∗)|−1)≤3p−6+2t. Consequently, β≤3p−10+2tp−3+t<3, so there is a vertex u∈W3(T∗) such that du=2. We select u so that one of its neighbors is of degree at least three. Now, let v be the farthest vertex from u that of degree at least 4. Clearly, for each vertex x∈N(v) that does not lie on the u−v path, we have dx≤3. In what follows, da denotes the degree of a vertex a in T∗.
Case 1. u∈N(v). In this case, choose y∈N(v)∖{u} and let T′=T∗−{yv}+{yu}, then
ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)=f(dy,3)−f(dy,dv)+f(2,3)−f(2,2)+f(3,dv−1)−f(2,dv)+∑x∈N(v)∖{y,u}(f(dx,dv−1)−f(dx,dv))≤f(3,3)+f(2,3)−f(2,2)−f(3,dv)−(dv−2)(f(3,dv)−f(3,dv−1)). |
Consider the function
h1(s)=f(3,3)+f(2,3)−f(3,s)−f(2,2)−(s−2)(f(3,s)−f(3,s−1)). |
We have
h′1(s)=A1−B1√s(s+1)(s+2)2(s+3)2, |
where A1=(s2+3s−2)(s+3)2√(s+1)(s+2) and B1=(s2+5s+2)(s+2)2√s(s+3). Since A21−B21=−14s5−137s4−456s3−577s2−140s+108≤0 for s≥1, we get h′1(s)≤0 for s≥1 and, thus, h1(s) is strictly decreasing for s≥1. This implies that ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)<h1(dv)≤h1(4)<0, a contradiction.
Case 2. u∉N(v). Let w∈N(v) and z∈N(u) such that w and z lie on the u−v path. By Case 1, we may suppose that dz≥3. Now, we divide this case into four subcases.
Subcase 2.1. dv≥5. Let y∈N(v)∖{w} and take T′=T∗−{yv}+{yu}, then T′∈Γn,p. Moreover, from Lemma 4, it follows that
ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)=f(dy,3)−f(dy,dv)+f(2,3)−f(2,2)+f(dz,3)−f(dz,2)+∑x∈N(v)∖{y}(f(dx,dv−1)−f(dx,dv))≤2f(3,3)−f(3,dv)−f(2,2)−(dv−2)(f(3,dv)−f(3,dv−1))+f(dw,dv−1)−f(dw,dv). |
The function h2(s)=2f(3,3)−f(3,s)−f(2,2)−(s−2)(f(3,s)−f(3,s−1)) is strictly decreasing for s≥1, and so ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)<h2(5)<0, a contradiction.
Subcase 2.2. dv=4 and dw≤3. Let y∈N(v)∖{w} and take T′=T∗−{yv}+{yu}, then T′∈Γn,p. Moreover,
ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)=f(dy,3)−f(dy,4)+f(2,3)−f(2,2)+f(dz,3)−f(dz,2)+∑x∈N(v)∖{y}(f(dx,3)−f(dx,4))≤5f(3,3)−4f(3,4)−f(2,2)<0, | (3.1) |
a contradiction.
Subcase 2.3. dv=4 and dw≥6. Note that dx≤4 for each x∈Nw∖{w1,v} because, otherwise, we reach a contradiction as in Subcase 2.1, where w1 is the unique neighbor of w in the u−v path. Let T′=T∗−{vw}+{vu}, then
ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)=f(4,3)−f(4,dw)+f(2,3)−f(2,2)+f(dz,3)−f(dz,2)+∑x∈N(w)∖{v}(f(dx,dw−1)−f(dx,dw))<f(4,3)−f(4,dw)+f(3,3)−f(2,2)−(dw−1)(f(4,dw)−f(4,dw−1)). | (3.2) |
The function
h4(s)=f(4,3)−f(4,s)+f(3,3)−f(2,2)−(s−1)(f(4,s)−f(4,s−1)), |
is strictly decreasing for s≥1. Thus, ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)<h4(6)<0, a contradiction.
Subcase 2.4. dv=4 and 4≤dw≤5. Let w1 be the unique neighbor of w in the u−v path and let b1,...,bk be all vertices in N(w)∖{w1} of degree four (with b1=v), then by Lemma 8 (ii), there are k+1 distinct vertices xi∈W3(T∗) such that dxi=2. The vertex xk+1 exists because dw≥4. By Remark 9, we may assume that these vertices form a path u=x1−x2−...−xk−xk+1. For each i=2,...,k, select ci∈N(bi)∖{w} and let T′=T∗−({cibi,i=2,...,k}∪{vw})+({cixi,i=2,...,k}∪{vu}). Note that since v is closer to u than ci, we have dci≤3. Thus,
ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)=f(2,3)−f(2,2)+f(dz,3)−f(dz,2)+f(4,3)−f(4,dw)+(k−1)(f(3,3)−f(2,2))+(k−1)(f(4,dw)−f(3,dw−1))+k∑i=2(f(dci,3)−f(dci,4))+k∑i=2∑x∈N(bi)∖{w,ci}(f(dx,3)−f(dx,4))+∑e∈N(w)∖{b2,...,bk,v}(f(de,dw−1))−f(de,dw))≤(4k−2)f(3,3)−3(k−1)f(3,4))−kf(2,2)−f(4,dw)−(k−1)(f(4,dw)−f(3,dw−1))−(dw−k)(f(3,dw)−f(3,dw−1)). |
Calculations show that the righthand side of this inequality is negative when dw∈{4,5} and k∈{1,...,dw}. This also yields a contradiction. Therefore, the maximum degree of T∗ is 3 as desired.
Now, we are ready to characterize the trees that minimize ABS index in Γn,p, where p≥3 and n≥3p−2. For p≥3 and n=3p−2+t with t≥0, let Γ∗n,p⊂Γn,p such that an arbitrary tree T∗ belonging to the class Γ∗n,p is defined as follows.
(1) Let T0 be a tree of order p−2 and maximum degree Δ=min{p−3,3}.
(2) Construct a tree T1 from T0 by attaching 3−i pendent path(s) of length two at each vertex of degree i for i=1,2,3. (Note that the order of T1 is 5n1(T0)+3n2(T0)+n3(T0), which is equal to 3p−2 because n1(T0)+n2(T0)+n3(T0)=p−2 and n1(T0)+2n2(T0)+3n3(T0)=2(p−3), where nk(T0) denotes the number of vertices of degree k in T0.
(3) Finally, T∗ is obtained from T1 by inserting t vertices of degree two into one or more pendent paths.
Figure 3 gives a tree of the class Γ∗n,p.
Theorem 3. Let p≥3 and n=3p−2+t where t≥0. If T∈Γn,p, then
ABS(T)≥(2√6+√35+1√3)p+√22t+4√6, |
with equality if, and only if, T∈Γ∗n,p.
Proof. Let T∗∈Γn,p have the minimum ABS value, then by Theorem 2, the maximum degree in T is three. For i,j=1,2,3 let ni,j be the number of edges in T∗ that joints vertices of degrees i and j. Clearly, n1,1=0. From Lemma 8 (i), we get n1,2=p and n1,3=0. Let d be the number of vertices of degree 3, then by Lemma 8 (ii), we get 2(p−2+t−d)+3d=3p−6+2t. Thus, d=p−2. Since T has no internal paths of length more than one, the induced subgraph of T over the set of vertices of degree three is a tree on p−2 vertices. Thus, n3,3=p−3. There are 3(p−2) edges incident with the vertices of degree 3. Each one of these edges is either joining two vertices of degree 3 or a vertex of degree 3 and a vertex of degree 2. Thus, we get n2,3+2n3,3=3(p−2) and, hence, n2,2=3(p−2)−2(p−3)=p. By subtracting the values n1,2=p, n2,3=p, n3,3=p−3 from n−1=3p−3+t, we get n2,2=t. Thus,
ABS(T∗)=pf(1,2)+tf(2,2)+pf(2,3)+(p−2)f(3,3)=(2√6+√35+1√3)p+√22t+4√6. |
Here, we remark that the statements of Lemma 3.11 and Corollary 3.12 in paper [18] concerning chemical trees are not complete; these statements should include the condition n≥3p−2. Indeed, Figure 4 gives the example of (general and chemical) trees with maximum degree Δ≥4 attaining minimum ABS value in the class Γn,p with n≤3p−3. Thus, the condition n≥3p−2 in Theorem 2 and in the aforementioned two results of [18] is necessary. The problem of characterizing trees attaining the minimum values of the ABS index in Γn,p under the conditions p≥3 and p+1≤n≤3p−3 is still open (the maximal version of this problem was recently solved in [19]). In the remainder of this section, we address this problem. Note that Γp+1,p consists of only one tree, namely, the star tree. The next theorem deals with the case n=p+2.
Theorem 4. Let p≥3, then the minimum ABS index in Γp,p+2 is attained uniquely by the balanced double star.
Proof. Let T∗∈Γp,p+2 be attaining minimum ABS index. Assume that u,v∈V(T∗) are the non-pendent vertices with du≥dv+2. Let w∈N(u)∖{v} and let T′=T−{uw}+{vw}, then
ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)=(f(1,dv+1)−f(1,dv))dv−(du−1)(f(1,du)−f(1,du−1))+f(1,dv+1)−f(1,du)=g(dv)−g(du−1); |
where g(x)=x(f(1,x+1)−f(1,x))+f(1,x+1). The derivative of g(x) is given by
g′(x)=A−B(x+1)2(x+2)2√x(x−1), |
where A=(x2+3x+1)(x+1)2√(x−1)(x+2) and B=(x2+x−1)(x+2)2√x(x+1). Since A2−B2>0 for x≥1, we get that g(x) is decreasing, so ABS(T′)−ABS(T∗)<0, a contradiction.
We have characterized the unique graph possessing the minimum ABS index in the class of all trees of a fixed number of pendent vertices; the star is the unique extremal graph in the mentioned class of graphs (see Theorem 1). We have also addressed the problem of determining graphs possessing the minimum ABS index in the class of all trees with n vertices and p pendent vertices; such extremal trees have the maximum degree 3 when n≥3p−2≥7, and the balanced double star is the unique such extremal tree for the case p=n−2 (see Theorems 2, 3 and 4). Figure 4 gives all the graphs attaining minimum ABS index in the class Γn,p for p=4,5,6 and p+3≤n≤3p−3. These graphs are obtained by utilizing a computer software. Observe that for every (n,p)∉{(8,4),(9,5),(13,6)} with p=4,5,6 and p+3≤n≤3p−3, there is the unique graph attaining minimum ABS index in the class Γn,p; however, for every (n,p)∈{(8,4),(9,5),(13,6)}, there exist exactly two such extremal graphs. From the trees depicted in Figure 4, one may expect some certain structural properties of a tree attaining minimum ABS index in the class Γn,p when p≥7 and p+3≤n≤3p−3. However, these trees seem to be insufficient for making some sound conjectures. In the future, it would be interesting to solve the problem of determining graphs possessing the minimum ABS index in the class Γn,p when p≥7 and p+3≤n≤3p−3.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This work is supported by Scientific Research Deanship, University of Ha'il, Saudi Arabia, through project number RG-23 093.
The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.
[1] | J. L. Gross, J. Yellen, M. Anderson, Graph theory and its applications, New York: CRC Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429425134 |
[2] | S. Wagner, H. Wang, Introduction to chemical graph theory, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2018. |
[3] |
M. Randić, On characterization of molecular branching, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97 (1975), 6609–6615. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00856a001 doi: 10.1021/ja00856a001
![]() |
[4] |
I. Gutman, Degree-based topological indices, Croat. Chem. Acta, 86 (2013), 351–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.5562/cca2294 doi: 10.5562/cca2294
![]() |
[5] | X. Li, Y. Shi, A survey on the Randić index, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 59 (2008), 127–156. |
[6] |
M. Randić, The connectivity index 25 years after, J. Mol. Graph. Model., 20 (2001), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00098-5 doi: 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00098-5
![]() |
[7] | I. Gutman, B. Furtula, Recent results in the theory of Randić index, Math. Chem. Monogr., 2008. |
[8] | X. Li, I. Gutman, Mathematical aspects of Randić-type molecular structure descriptors, Univ. Kragujevac, 2006. |
[9] | E. Estrada, L. Torres, L. Rodríguez, I. Gutman, An atom-bond connectivity index: Modelling the enthalpy of formation of alkanes, Indian J. Chem. Sec. A, 37 (1998), 849–855. |
[10] |
E. Estrada, Atom-bond connectivity and the energetic of branched alkanes, Chem. Phys. Lett., 463 (2008), 422–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2008.08.074 doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.08.074
![]() |
[11] |
B. Zhou, N. Trinajstić, On a novel connectivity index, J. Math. Chem., 46 (2009), 1252–1270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-008-9515-z doi: 10.1007/s10910-008-9515-z
![]() |
[12] |
A. Ali, K. C. Das, D. Dimitrov, B. Furtula, Atom-bond connectivity index of graphs: A review over extremal results and bounds, Discrete Math. Lett., 5 (2021), 68–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.47443/dml.2020.0069 doi: 10.47443/dml.2020.0069
![]() |
[13] | A. Ali, L. Zhong, I. Gutman, Harmonic index and its generalization: Extremal results and bounds, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 81 (2019), 249–311. |
[14] |
A. Ali, B. Furtula, I. Redžepović, I. Gutman, Atom-bond sum-connectivity index, J. Math. Chem., 60 (2022), 2081–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-022-01403-1 doi: 10.1007/s10910-022-01403-1
![]() |
[15] |
Y. Tang, D. B. West, B. Zhou, Extremal problems for degree-based topological indices, Discrete Appl. Math., 203 (2016), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2015.09.011 doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2015.09.011
![]() |
[16] |
A. Ali, I. Gutman, I. Redžepović, Atom-bond sum-connectivity index of unicyclic graphs and some applications, Electron. J. Math., 5 (2023), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.47443/ejm.2022.039 doi: 10.47443/ejm.2022.039
![]() |
[17] | J. A. Bondy, U. S. R. Murty, Graph theory, Springer, 2008. |
[18] |
J. Du, X. Sun, On bond incident degree index of chemical trees with a fixed order and a fixed number of leaves, Appl. Math. Comp., 464 (2024), 128390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2023.128390 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2023.128390
![]() |
[19] | S. Noureen, A. Ali, Maximum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of n-order trees with fixed number of leaves, Discrete Math. Lett., 12 (2023), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.47443/dml.2023.016 |
1. | Tariq Alraqad, Hicham Saber, Akbar Ali, Abeer M. Albalahi, On the maximum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of graphs, 2024, 22, 2391-5455, 10.1515/math-2023-0179 | |
2. | Zhonglin Cheng, Akbar Jahanbani, Jun Wang, On the maximum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of molecular trees, 2024, 0972-8600, 1, 10.1080/09728600.2024.2364183 | |
3. | Zhen Wang, Kai Zhou, On the maximum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of unicyclic graphs with given diameter, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 22239, 10.3934/math.20241082 | |
4. | Akbar Ali, Tomislav Došlić, Zahid Raza, On trees of a fixed maximum degree with extremal general atom-bond sum-connectivity index, 2024, 1598-5865, 10.1007/s12190-024-02275-1 | |
5. | Sadia Noureen, Rimsha Batool, Abeer M. Albalahi, Yilun Shang, Tariq Alraqad, Akbar Ali, On tricyclic graphs with maximum atom–bond sum–connectivity index, 2024, 10, 24058440, e33841, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33841 | |
6. | Kannan Aarthi, Suresh Elumalai, Selvaraj Balachandran, Sourav Mondal, On difference between atom-bond sum-connectivity index and Randić index of graphs, 2025, 1598-5865, 10.1007/s12190-024-02339-2 | |
7. | Kalpana R., Shobana L., Vladimir Mityushev, Harmonic‐Arithmetic Index: Lower Bound for n‐Order Trees With Fixed Number of Pendant Vertices and Monogenic Semigroup for Graph Operations, 2025, 2025, 0161-1712, 10.1155/ijmm/5576652 |