Existence of solutions and a numerical scheme for a generalized hybrid class of n-coupled modified ABC-fractional differential equations with an application

Hasib Khan; Jehad Alzabut; Dumitru Baleanu; Ghada Alobaidi; Mutti-Ur Rehman; Hasib Khan; Jehad Alzabut; Dumitru Baleanu; Ghada Alobaidi; Mutti-Ur Rehman

doi:10.3934/math.2023334

AIMS Mathematics

2023, Volume 8, Issue 3: 6609-6625. doi: 10.3934/math.2023334

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Existence of solutions and a numerical scheme for a generalized hybrid class of n-coupled modified ABC-fractional differential equations with an application

1.
Department of Mathematics and Sciences, Prince Sultan University, 11586 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2.
Department of Mathematics, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Uniersity, Sheringal, Dir Upper, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
3.
Department of Industrial Engineering, OSTİM Technical University, 06374 Ankara, Turkey
4.
Department of Mathematics, Cankaya University, Ankara 06530, Turkey
5.
Institute of Space Science, Magurele-Bucharest, Romania
6.
Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
7.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, American University of Sharjah, PO Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
8.
Department of Mathematics, Akfa University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
9.
Department of Mathematics, Sukkur IBA University, Sukkur, Pakistan

Received: 19 October 2022 Revised: 28 November 2022 Accepted: 12 December 2022 Published: 05 January 2023
MSC : 34A08, 49J15, 65P99

In this article, we investigate some necessary and sufficient conditions required for the existence of solutions for mABC-fractional differential equations (mABC-FDEs) with initial conditions; additionally, a numerical scheme based on the the Lagrange's interpolation polynomial is established and applied to a dynamical system for the applications. We also study the uniqueness and Hyers-Ulam stability for the solutions of the presumed mABC-FDEs system. Such a system has not been studied for the mentioned mABC-operator and this work generalizes most of the results studied for the ABC operator. This study will provide a base to a large number of dynamical problems for the existence, uniqueness and numerical simulations. The results are compared with the classical results graphically to check the accuracy and applicability of the scheme.

Keywords:

modified ABC-operator,
hybrid fractional differential equations,
existence of solutions, unique solution,
Hyers-Ulam-stability,
numerical simulations

Citation: Hasib Khan, Jehad Alzabut, Dumitru Baleanu, Ghada Alobaidi, Mutti-Ur Rehman. Existence of solutions and a numerical scheme for a generalized hybrid class of n-coupled modified ABC-fractional differential equations with an application[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6609-6625. doi: 10.3934/math.2023334

Related Papers:

[1]	Harman Kaur, Meenakshi Rana . Congruences for sixth order mock theta functions $\lambda(q)$ and $\rho(q)$ . Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4257-4268. doi: 10.3934/era.2021084
[2]	Meenakshi Rana, Shruti Sharma . Combinatorics of some fifth and sixth order mock theta functions. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(1): 1803-1818. doi: 10.3934/era.2020092
[3]	Changjian Wang, Jiayue Zhu . Global dynamics to a quasilinear chemotaxis system under some critical parameter conditions. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 2180-2202. doi: 10.3934/era.2024099
[4]	Chang-Jian Wang, Yu-Tao Yang . Boundedness criteria for the quasilinear attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system with nonlinear signal production and logistic source. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(1): 299-318. doi: 10.3934/era.2023015
[5]	Maoji Ri, Shuibo Huang, Canyun Huang . Non-existence of solutions to some degenerate coercivity elliptic equations involving measures data. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(1): 165-182. doi: 10.3934/era.2020011
[6]	Nan Li . Summability in anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(9): 3362-3376. doi: 10.3934/era.2022171
[7]	Lili Li, Boya Zhou, Huiqin Wei, Fengyan Wu . Analysis of a fourth-order compact $\theta$ -method for delay parabolic equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(4): 2805-2823. doi: 10.3934/era.2024127
[8]	Jianxing Du, Xifeng Su . On the existence of solutions for the Frenkel-Kontorova models on quasi-crystals. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4177-4198. doi: 10.3934/era.2021078
[9]	Zihan Zheng, Juan Wang, Liming Cai . Global boundedness in a Keller-Segel system with nonlinear indirect signal consumption mechanism. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(8): 4796-4808. doi: 10.3934/era.2024219
[10]	Ying Hou, Liangyun Chen . Constructions of three kinds of Bihom-superalgebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 3741-3760. doi: 10.3934/era.2021059

Abstract

1. Introduction

Ramanujan's last letter to Hardy is one of the most mysterious and important mathematical letters in the history of mathematics. He introduced a class of functions that he called mock theta functions in his letter. For nearly a century, properties of these functions have been widely studied by different mathematicians. The important direction involves the arithmetic properties (see ^[1,2]), combinatorics (see ^[3,4]), identities between these functions, and generalized Lambert series (see ^[5,6]). For the interested reader, regarding the history and new developments in the study of mock theta functions, we refer to ^[7].

In 2007, McIntosh studied two second order mock theta functions in reference ^[8]; more details are given in reference ^[9]. These mock theta functions are:

$\begin{align} A(q) & = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{q^{(n+1)^2}(-q;q^2)_n}{(q;q^2)_{(n+1)}^2} = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{q^{n+1}(-q^2;q^2)_n}{(q;q^2)_{n+1}}, \end{align}$

(1.1)

$\begin{align} B(q)& = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{q^n(-q;q^2)_n}{(q;q^2)_{n+1}} = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{q^{n(n+1)}(-q^2;q^2)_n}{(q;q^2)_{n+1}^2}, \end{align}$

(1.2)

where

$(a;q)_n = \prod\limits_{i = 0}^{n-1}(1-aq^i),\;\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; { }(a;q)_{\infty} = \prod\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}(1-aq^i),$

$(a_1,a_2,\cdots,a_m;q)_{\infty} = (a_1;q)_{\infty}(a_2;q)_{\infty} \cdots (a_m;q)_{\infty},$

for $|q| < 1$ .

The functions $A(q)$ and $B(q)$ have been combinatorially interpreted in terms of overpartitions in ^[3] using the odd Ferrers diagram. In this paper, we study some arithmetic properties of one of the second order mock theta functions $B(q)$ . We start by noting, Bringmann, Ono and Rhoades ^[10] obtained the following identity:

$\begin{equation} \frac{B(q)+B(-q)}{2} = \frac{f_4^5}{f_2^4}, \end{equation}$

(1.3)

where

$f_m^k: = (q^m;q^m)_{\infty}^k,$

for positive integers $m$ and $k$ . We consider the function

$\begin{equation} B(q): = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(n)q^n. \end{equation}$

(1.4)

Followed by Eq (1.3), the even part of $B(q)$ is given by:

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n = \frac{f_2^5}{f_1^4}. \end{equation}$

(1.5)

In 2012, applying the theory of (mock) modular forms and Zwegers' results, Chan and Mao ^[5] established two identities for $b(n)$ , shown as:

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n & = 2\frac{f_2^8}{f_1^7}, \end{align}$

(1.6)

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+2)q^n & = 4\frac{f_2^2f_4^4}{f_1^5}. \end{align}$

(1.7)

In a sequel, Qu, Wang and Yao ^[6] found that all the coefficients for odd powers of $q$ in $B(q)$ are even. Recently, Mao ^[11] gave analogues of Eqs (1.6) and (1.7) modulo 6

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b({6n+2})q^n & = 4\frac{f_{2}^{10}f_{3}^{2}}{f_1^{10}f_6}, \end{align}$

(1.8)

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b({6n+4})q^n & = 9\frac{f_{2}^4f_{3}^{4}f_{6}}{f_1^{8}}, \end{align}$

(1.9)

and proved several congruences for the coefficients of $B(q)$ . Motivated from this, we prove similar results for $b(n)$ by applying identities on the coefficients in arithmetic progressions. We present some congruence relations for the coefficients of $B(q)$ modulo certain numbers of the form $2^{\alpha}\cdot 3^{\beta}, 2^{\alpha}\cdot 5^{\beta}, 2^{\alpha}\cdot 7^{\beta}$ where $\alpha, \beta \geq 0.$ Our main theorems are given below:

Theorem 1.1. For $n \geq 0$ , we have

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+9)q^n& = 18\left[\frac{f_2^9f_3^{12}}{f_1^{17}f_6^3}+2\frac{f_2^5f_3^4f_6}{f_1^9}+28\frac{f_2^6f_3^3f_6^6}{f_1^{14}}\right], \end{align}$

(1.10)

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+10)q^n& = 36\left[2\frac{f_2^{16}f_6^{10}}{f_1^{20}f_3f_{12}^4}-q\frac{f_2^{28}f_3^3f_{12}^2}{f_1^{24}f_4^8f_6^2}-16q^2\frac{f_2^2f_3^3f_4^8f_{12}^2}{f_1^{16}f_6^2}\right]. \end{align}$

(1.11)

In particular, $b(12n+9)\equiv 0\pmod{18}, b(12n+10)\equiv 0\pmod{36}$ .

Theorem 1.2. For $n \geq 0$ , we have

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(18n+10)q^n& = 72\left[\frac{f_2^{16}f_3^{21}}{f_1^{27}f_6^9}+38q\frac{f_2^{13}f_3^{12}}{f_1^{24}}+64q^2\frac{f_2^{10}f_3^3f_6^9}{f_1^{21}}\right], \end{align}$

(1.12)

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(18n+16)q^n& = 72\left[5\frac{f_2^{15}f_3^{18}}{f_1^{26}f_6^6}+64q\frac{f_2^{12}f_3^9f_6^3}{f_1^{23}}+32q^2\frac{f_2^9f_6^{12}}{f_1^{20}}\right]. \end{align}$

(1.13)

In particular, $b(18n+10)\equiv 0\pmod{72}, b(18n+16)\equiv 0\pmod{72}.$

Apart from these congruences, we find some relations between $b(n)$ and restricted partition functions. Here we recall, Partition of a positive integer $\nu$ , is a representation of $\nu$ as a sum of non-increasing sequence of positive integers $\mu_1, \mu_2, \cdots, \mu_n$ . The number of partitions of $\nu$ is denoted by $p(\nu)$ which is called the partition function. If certain conditions are imposed on parts of the partition, is called the restricted partition and corresponding partition function is named as restricted partition function. Euler proved the following recurrence for $p(n)$ ^[12] [p. 12, Cor. 1.8]:

$\begin{array} p(n)-p(n-1)-p(n-2)+p(n-5)+p(n-7)-p(n-12)-p(n-15)+\cdots\\+(-1)^kp(n-k(3k-1)/2)+(-1)^kp(n-k(3k+1)/2)+\cdots = \begin{cases} 1, & \text { if } n = 0, \\ 0, & \text { otherwise. }\end{cases} \end{array}$

The numbers $k(3k\pm1)/2$ are pentagonal numbers. Following the same idea, different recurrence relations have been found by some researchers for restricted partition functions. For instance, Ewell ^[13] presented the recurrence for $p(n)$ involving the triangular numbers. For more study of recurrences, see ^[14,15,16]. Under the influence of these efforts, we express the coefficients of mock theta function $B(q)$ which are in arithmetic progression in terms of recurrence of some restricted partition functions.

This paper is organized as follows: Section 2, here we recall some preliminary lemmas and present the proof of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2. Section 3 includes some more congruences based on the above results. Section 4 depicts the links between $b(n)$ and some of the restricted partition functions.

2. Proof of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2

Before proving the results, we recall Ramanujan's theta function:

$j(a,b) = \sum\limits_{n = {-\infty}}^{\infty}a^{\frac{n(n+1)}{2}}b^{\frac{n(n-1)}{2}}, \text{ for} \; |ab| < 1.$

Some special cases of $j(a, b)$ are:

$\begin{align*} \phi(q)&: = j(q,q) = \sum\limits_{n = -\infty}^{\infty}q^{n^2} = \frac{f_2^5}{f_1^2f_4^2},\\ \psi(q)&: = j(q,q^3) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}q^{n(n+1)/2} = \frac{f_2^2}{f_1}. \end{align*}$

Also,

$\phi(-q) = \frac{f_1^2}{f_2}.$

The above function satisfy the following properties (see Entries 19, 20 in ^[17]).

$j(a,b) = (-a,-b,ab;ab)_{\infty}, \quad \text{(Jacobi's triple product identity)},$

$j(-q,-q^2) = (q;q)_{\infty}, \quad \text{(Euler's pentagonal number theorem)}.$

We note the following identities which will be used below.

Lemma 2.1. [^[18], Eq (3.1)] We have

$\begin{equation} \frac{f_2^3}{f_1^3} = \frac{f_6}{f_3}+3q\frac{f_6^4f_9^5}{f_3^8f_{18}}+6q^2\frac{f_6^3f_9^2f_{18}^2}{f_3^7}+12q^3\frac{f_6^2f_{18}^5}{f_3^6f_9}. \end{equation}$

(2.1)

Lemma 2.2. We have

$\begin{align} \frac{f_2^2}{f_1}& = \frac{f_6f_9^2}{f_3f_{18}}+q\frac{f_{18}^2}{f_9}, \end{align}$

(2.2)

$\begin{align} \frac{f_2}{f_1^2}& = \frac{f_6^4f_9^6}{f_3^8f_{18}^3}+2q\frac{f_6^3f_9^3}{f_3^7}+4q^2\frac{f_6^2f_{18}^3}{f_3^6}. \end{align}$

(2.3)

Proof. The first identity follows from [^[19] Eq (14.3.3)]. The proof of second identity can be seen from ^[20].

Lemma 2.3. We have

$\begin{align} \frac{1}{f_1^4}& = \frac{f_4^{14}}{f_2^{14}f_8^4}+4q\frac{f_4^2f_8^4}{f_2^{10}}, \end{align}$

(2.4)

$\begin{align} f_1^4& = \frac{f_4^{10}}{f_2^2f_8^4}-4q\frac{f_2^2f_8^4}{f_4^2}. \end{align}$

(2.5)

Proof. Identity (2.4) is Eq (1.10.1) from ^[19]. To obtain (2.5), replacing $q$ by $-q$ and then using

$(-q;-q)_{\infty} = \frac{f_2^3}{f_1f_4}.$

Now, we present the proof of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2.

Proof of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2. From Eq (1.6), we have

$\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n = 2\left(\frac{f_2^3}{f_1^3}\right)^3\cdot\frac{f_2^2}{f_1}.$

Substituting the values from Eqs (2.1) and (2.2) in above, we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n & = &2\frac{f_6^3f_9^2}{f_3^3f_{18}}+2q\frac{f_6^2f_{18}^2}{f_3^2f_9}+12q\frac{f_6^6f_9^7}{f_3^{10}f_{18}^2}+18q^2\frac{f_6^9f_9^{12}}{f_3^{17}f_{18}^3}+36q^2\frac{f_6^5f_9^4f_{18}}{f_3^9}+\\&&90q^3\frac{f_6^8f_9^9}{f_3^{16}}+72q^3\frac{f_6^4f_9f_{18}^4}{f_3^8}+48q^4\frac{f_6^3f_{18}^7}{f_3^7f_9^2}+288q^4\frac{f_6^7f_9^6f_{18}^3}{f_3^{15}}+\\&&504q^5\frac{f_6^6f_9^3f_{18}^6}{f_3^{14}}+576q^6\frac{f_6^5f_{18}^9}{f_3^{13}}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.6)

Bringing out the terms involving $q^{3n+2}$ , dividing by $q^2$ and replacing $q^3$ by $q$ , we get (1.10). Considering Eq (1.5), we have

$\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n = \frac{f_2^3}{f_1^3}\cdot \frac{f_2^2}{f_1}.$

Substituting the values from Eqs (2.1) and (2.2), we obtain

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n = \left(\frac{f_6}{f_3}+3q\frac{f_6^4f_9^5}{f_3^8f_{18}}+6q^2\frac{f_6^3f_9^2f_{18}^2}{f_3^7}+12q^3\frac{f_6^2f_{18}^5}{f_3^6f_9}\right)\left(\frac{f_6f_9^2}{f_3f_{18}}+q\frac{f_{18}^2}{f_9}\right). \end{equation*}$

Extracting the terms involving $q^{3n}, q^{3n+1}, q^{3n+2}$ from the above equation, we have

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(6n)q^n& = \frac{f_2^2f_3^2}{f_1^2f_6}+18q\frac{f_2^3f_3f_6^4}{f_1^7}, \end{align}$

(2.7)

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(6n+2)q^n& = \frac{f_2f_6^2}{f_1f_3}+3\frac{f_2^5f_3^7}{f_1^9f_6^2}+12q\frac{f_2^2f_6^7}{f_1^6f_3^2}, \end{align}$

(2.8)

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(6n+4)q^n& = 9\frac{f_2^4f_3^4f_6}{f_1^8}. \end{align}$

(2.9)

Using Eqs (2.4) and (2.5) in Eq (2.9), we get

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(6n+4)q^n = 9f_2^4f_6\left(\frac{f_4^{14}}{f_2^{14}f_8^4}+4q\frac{f_4^2f_8^4}{f_2^{10}}\right)^2 \left(\frac{f_{12}^{10}}{f_6^2f_{24}^4}-4q^3\frac{f_6^2f_{24}^4}{f_{12}^2}\right). \end{equation*}$

Extracting the terms involving $q^{2n}, q^{2n+1}$ from above, we arrive at

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+4)q^n& = 9\left(\frac{f_2^{28}f_6^{10}}{f_1^{24}f_3f_4^8f_{12}^4}+16q\frac{f_2^4f_4^8f_6^{10}}{f_1^{16}f_3f_{12}^4}-32q^2\frac{f_2^{16}f_3^3f_{12}^4}{f_1^{20}f_6^2}\right), \end{align}$

(2.10)

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+10)q^n& = 9\left(8\frac{f_2^{16}f_6^{10}}{f_1^{20}f_3f_{12}^4}-4q\frac{f_2^{28}f_3^3f_{12}^4}{f_1^{24}f_4^8f_6^2}-16q^2\frac{f_2^4f_3^3f_4^8f_{12}^4}{f_1^{16}f_6^2}\right). \end{align}$

(2.11)

From Eq (2.11), we ultimately arrive at Eq (1.11). To prove Theorem 1.2, consider Eq (2.9) as:

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(6n+4)q^n = 9f_3^4f_6\left(\frac{f_2}{f_1^2}\right)^4. \end{equation*}$

Using Eq (2.3) in above, we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(6n+4)q^n& = &9\frac{f_6^{17}f_9^{24}}{f_3^{28}f_{18}^{12}}+72q\frac{f_6^{16}f_9^{21}}{f_3^{27}f_{18}^9}+360q^2\frac{f_6^{15}f_9^{18}}{f_3^{26}f_{18}^6}+288q^3\frac{f_6^{14}f_9^{15}}{f_3^{25}f_{18}^3}+\\&&864q^3\frac{f_6^{12}f_9^{15}}{f_3^{19}f_{18}^6}+2736q^4\frac{f_6^{13}f_9^{12}}{f_3^{24}}+4608q^5\frac{f_6^{12}f_{9}^{9}f_{18}^{3}}{f_{3}^{23}}+\\&&5760q^6\frac{f_{6}^{11}f_{9}^{6}f_{18}^{6}}{f_{3}^{22}}+4608q^7\frac{f_{6}^{10}f_{9}^{3}f_{18}^{9}}{f_{3}^{21}}+2304q^8\frac{f_{6}^{9}f_{18}^{12}}{f_{3}^{20}}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.12)

Bringing out the terms involving $q^{3n+1}$ and $q^{3n+2}$ from Eq (2.12), we get Eqs (1.12) and (1.13), respectively.

3. Congruences

This segment of the paper contains some more interesting congruence relations for $b(n)$ .

Theorem 3.1. For $n \geq 0$ , we have

$\begin{align} b(12n+1) \equiv \begin{cases} 2(-1)^{k} \pmod 6, & \mathit{\text{if}}\; n = 3k(3 k+1)/2, \\ 0\pmod 6, & \mathit{\text{otherwise.}}\end{cases} \end{align}$

(3.1)

Theorem 3.2. For $n \geq 0$ , we have

$\begin{align} b(2n) \equiv \begin{cases} (-1)^{k}(2k+1) \pmod 4, & \mathit{\text{if}}\; n = k(k+1), \\ 0\pmod 4, & \mathit{\text{otherwise.}}\end{cases} \end{align}$

(3.2)

Theorem 3.3. For $n \geq 0$ , we have

$\begin{align} b(36n+10)& \equiv 0\pmod{72}, \end{align}$

(3.3)

$\begin{align} b(36n+13)& \equiv 0\pmod{6}, \end{align}$

(3.4)

$\begin{align} b(36n+25)& \equiv 0\pmod{12}, \end{align}$

(3.5)

$\begin{align} b(36n+34)& \equiv 0\pmod{144}, \end{align}$

(3.6)

$\begin{align} b(108n+t)& \equiv 0\pmod{18},\; \; \mathit{\text{for t}} \in \{49,85\}. \end{align}$

(3.7)

Theorem 3.4. For $n \geq 0$ , we have

$\begin{align} b(20n+t)& \equiv 0\pmod{5},\; \; \mathit{\text{for t}} \in \{8,16\} \end{align}$

(3.8)

$\begin{align} b(20n+t)& \equiv 0\pmod{20}, \; \; \mathit{\text{for t}} \in \{6,18\} \end{align}$

(3.9)

$\begin{align} b(20n+17)& \equiv 0\pmod{10}, \end{align}$

(3.10)

$\begin{align} b(28n+t)& \equiv 0\pmod{14},\; \; \mathit{\text{for t}} \in \{5,21,25\}. \end{align}$

(3.11)

Proof of Theorem 3.1. From Eq (2.6), picking out the terms involving $q^{3n}$ and replacing $q^3$ by $q$ , we have

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty} b(12 n+1) q^{n} = 2 \frac{f_{2}^{3} f_{3}^{2}}{f_{1}^{3} f_{6}}+90 q \frac{f_{2}^{8} f_{3}^{9}}{f_{1}^{16}}+72 q \frac{f_{2}^{4} f_{3} f_{6}^{4}}{f_{1}^{8}}+576 q^{2} \frac{f_{2}^{5} f_{6}^{9}}{f_{1}^{3}}. \end{align}$

(3.12)

Reducing modulo 6, we obtain

$\begin{align} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty} b(12n+1) q^{n} \equiv 2f_3 \pmod 6. \end{align}$

(3.13)

With the help of Euler's pentagonal number theorem,

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty} b(12 n+1) q^{n} \equiv 2\sum\limits_{k = -\infty}^{\infty}(-1)^kq^{\frac{3k(3k+1)}{2}} \pmod 6, \end{align*}$

which completes the proof of Theorem 3.1.

Proof of Theorem 3.2. Reducing Eq (1.5) modulo 4, we get

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n\equiv f_2^3 \pmod 4. \end{equation}$

(3.14)

From Jacobi's triple product identity, we obtain

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n\equiv \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\infty}(-1)^k(2k+1)q^{k(k+1)} \pmod 4, \end{equation*}$

which completes the proof of Theorem 3.2.

Proof of Theorem 3.3. Consider Eq (1.11), reducing modulo 72

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+10)q^n \equiv 36q \frac{f_{2}^{28}f_{3}^{3}f_{12}^{4}}{f_{1}^{24}f_{4}^{8}f_{6}^{2}} \pmod{72}, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+10)q^n& \equiv 36q\frac{f_{2}^{28}f_{3}^{3}f_{12}^{4}}{f_{2}^{12}f_{4}^{8}f_{12}} = 36q\frac{f_{2}^{16}f_{3}^{3}f_{12}^3}{f_{4}^{8}}\pmod{72} \end{align*}$

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+10)q^n \equiv 36qf_3^3f_{12}^3\pmod{72}. \end{equation}$

(3.15)

Extracting the terms involving $q^{3n}$ , replacing $q^3$ by $q$ in Eq (3.15), we arrive at Eq (3.3). Similarly, consider Eq (1.13) and reducing modulo 144, we have

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(18n+16)q^n & \equiv 72\cdot5\frac{f_{2}^{15}f_{3}^{18}}{f_{1}^{26}f_{6}^{6}}\pmod{144},\\ &\equiv72\frac{f_{2}^{15}f_{6}^{9}}{f_{2}^{13}f_{6}^{6}} = 72f_{2}^{2}f_{6}^{3}\pmod{144}. \end{align*}$

Extracting the terms involving $q^{2n+1}$ , dividing both sides by $q$ and replacing $q^2$ by $q$ , we get Eq (3.6).

From Eq (3.20), we get

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+1)q^n & \equiv 2f_3 \pmod6. \end{align*}$

Bringing out the terms containing $q^{3n+1}$ , dividing both sides by $q$ and replacing $q^3$ by $q$ , we have $b(36n+13) \equiv 0 \pmod6.$ Reducing Eq (3.12) modulo 12, we have

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+1)q^n \equiv 2\frac{f_2^3f_3^2}{f_1^3f_{6}}+90q\frac{f_2^8f_3^9}{f_1^{16}}\pmod{12}, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+1)q^n \equiv 2\frac{f_3^2}{f_{6}}\left(\frac{f_6}{f_3}+3q\frac{f_6^4f_9^5}{f_3^8f_{18}}+6q^2\frac{f_6^3f_9^2f_{18}^2}{f_3^7}+12q^3\frac{f_6^2f_{18}^5}{f_3^6f_9}\right)+6q\frac{f_2^8f_3^9}{f_2^{8}}. \end{equation*}$

Extracting the terms containing $q^{3n+2}$ , dividing by $q^2$ and replacing $q^3$ by $q$ , we obtain Eq (3.5). Reducing Eq (3.12) modulo 18,

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(12n+1)q^n &\equiv 2\frac{f_2^3f_3^2}{f_1^3f_{6}}\pmod{18},\\ & = 2\frac{f_3^2}{f_{6}}\left(\frac{f_6}{f_3}+3q\frac{f_6^4f_9^5}{f_3^8f_{18}}+6q^2\frac{f_6^3f_9^2f_{18}^2}{f_3^7}+12q^3\frac{f_6^2f_{18}^5}{f_3^6f_9}\right). \end{align*}$

Extracting the terms involving $q^{3n+1}$ , dividing both sides by $q$ and replacing $q^3$ by $q$ , we have

$\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(36n+13)q^n \equiv 6\frac{f_2^3f_3^5}{f_1^6f_6} \equiv 6\frac{f_6f_3^5}{f_3^2f_6}\pmod{18}$

$\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(36n+13)q^n \equiv 6f_3^3\pmod{18}.$

Extracting the terms containing $q^{3n+1}, q^{3n+2}$ from above to get Eq (3.7).

Proof of Theorem 3.4. From Eqs (1.5) and (2.4), we have

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n = f_2^5\left(\frac{f_4^{14}}{f_2^{14}f_8^4}+4q\frac{f_4^2f_8^4}{f_2^{10}}\right). \end{equation*}$

Bringing out the terms containing even powers of $q$ , we obtain

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n)q^n = \frac{f_2^{14}}{f_1^9f_4^4}, \end{equation*}$

which can be written as:

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n)q^n = \frac{f_2^{15}}{f_1^{10}f_4^5}.\frac{f_1f_4}{f_2} \equiv \frac{f_{10}^3}{f_5^2f_{20}}.\frac{f_1f_4}{f_2}\pmod{5}. \end{equation*}$

Here

$\begin{align*} \frac{f_1f_4}{f_2}& = \frac{(q;q)_{\infty}(q^4;q^4)_{\infty}}{(q^2;q^2)_{\infty}},\\ & = \frac{(q;q^2)_{\infty}(q^2;q^2)_{\infty}(q^4;q^4)_{\infty}}{(q^2;q^2)_{\infty}}, \end{align*}$

$\begin{equation} \frac{f_1f_4}{f_2} = (q,q^3,q^4;q^4)_{\infty} = \sum\limits_{n = {-\infty}}^{\infty}(-1)^nq^{2n^2-n}, \end{equation}$

(3.16)

where the last equality follows from Jacobi's triple product identity. Using the above identity, we have

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n)q^n \equiv \frac{f_{10}^3}{f_5^2f_{20}}\sum\limits_{n = {-\infty}}^{\infty}(-1)^nq^{2n^2-n}\pmod{5}. \end{equation}$

(3.17)

Since ${2n^2-n} \not\equiv 2, 4\pmod5$ , it follows that the coefficients of $q^{5n+2}, q^{5n+4}$ in $\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n)q^n$ are congruent to $0\pmod5$ , which proves that $b(20n+t)\equiv 0\pmod5$ , for $t \in \{8, 16\}$ .

Consider Eq (1.7)

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+2)q^n = 4\frac{f_4^5}{f_1^5}\frac{f_2^2}{f_4}\equiv 4\frac{f_{20}}{f_5}\frac{f_2^2}{f_4}\pmod{20}. \end{equation*}$

Now

$\begin{align*} \frac{f_2^2}{f_4}& = \frac{(q^2;q^2)_{\infty}^2}{(q^4;q^4)_{\infty}},\\ & = \frac{(q^2;q^2)_{\infty}(q^2;q^4)_{\infty}(q^4;q^4)_{\infty}}{(q^4;q^4)_{\infty}}, \end{align*}$

$\frac{f_2^2}{f_4} = (q^2,q^2,q^4;q^4)_{\infty} = \sum\limits_{n = {-\infty}}^{\infty}(-1)^nq^{2n^2}.$

Using the above identity, we get

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+2)q^n\equiv 4\frac{f_{20}}{f_5}\sum\limits_{n = {-\infty}}^{\infty}(-1)^nq^{2n^2}\pmod{20}. \end{equation}$

(3.18)

Since ${2n^2} \not\equiv 1, 4\pmod5$ , it follows that the coefficients of $q^{5n+1}, q^{5n+4}$ in $\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+2)q^n$ are congruent to $0\pmod{20}$ , which proves Eq (3.9). For the proof of next part, consider Eq (1.6) as:

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n = 2\frac{f_2^5}{f_1^{10}}{f_1^3}{f_2^3} \equiv 2\frac{f_{10}}{f_{5}^2}f_1^3f_2^3\pmod{10}, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n\equiv 2\frac{f_{10}}{f_{5}^2}\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\infty}(-1)^k(2k+1)q^{\frac{k(k+1)}{2}}\sum\limits_{m = 0}^{\infty}(-1)^m (2m+1)q^{m(m+1)}\pmod{10}. \end{equation}$

(3.19)

Therefore, to contribute the coefficient of $q^{5n+4}$ , $(k, m)\equiv (2, 2)\pmod5$ and thus the contribution towards the coefficient of $q^{5n+4}$ is a multiple of 5.

Consider Eq (1.6) as:

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n = 2\frac{f_2^7}{f_1^7}f_2 \equiv 2\frac{f_{14}}{f_{7}}f_2\pmod{14}. \end{equation*}$

With the help of Euler's pentagonal number theorem,

$\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n \equiv 2\frac{f_{14}}{f_{7}}\sum\limits_{n = {-\infty}}^{\infty}(-1)^nq^{n(3n+1)}\pmod{14}. \end{equation}$

(3.20)

As ${n(3n+1)}\not\equiv 1, 5, 6\pmod7$ , it readily proves Eq (3.11).

4. Recurrence relations

In this section, we find some recurrence relations connecting $b(n)$ and restricted partition functions. First we define some notations. Let $\overline{p}_l(n)$ denotes the number of overpartitions of $n$ with $l$ copies. Then

$\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\overline{p}_l(n)q^n = \left(\frac{f_2}{f_1^2}\right)^l.$

Let $p_{ld}(n)$ denotes the number of partitions of $n$ into distinct parts with $l$ copies. Then

$\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{ld}(n)q^n = \left(\frac{f_2}{f_1}\right)^l.$

Theorem 4.1. We have

$\begin{align} b(2n)& = \overline{p}_2(n)-3\overline{p}_2(n)+5\overline{p}_2(n)+\cdots+(-1)^k(2k+1)\overline{p}_2(n-k(k+1))+\cdots,{ \quad } \end{align}$

(4.1)

$\begin{array} b(2n) = p_{4d}(n)-p_{4d}(n-2)-p_{4d}(n-4)+p_{4d}(n-10)+p_{4d}(n-14)+\cdots+\\ (-1)^kp_{4d}(n-{k(3k-1)})+(-1)^kp_{4d}(n-{k(3k+1)})+\cdots. \end{array}$

(4.2)

Theorem 4.2.

$\begin{array} b(4n+1) = 2p_{8d}(n)-2p_{8d}(n-1)-2p_{8d}(n-2)+2p_{8d}(n-5)+2p_{8d}(n-7)+ \cdots+\\ (-1)^k2p_{8d}\left(n-\frac{k(3k-1)}{2}\right)+(-1)^k2p_{8d}\left(n-\frac{k(3k+1)}{2}\right)+\cdots, \end{array}$

(4.3)

$\begin{equation} b(4n+1) = 2\sum\limits_{c = 0}^{n}b(2c)p_{3d}(n-c). \quad \end{equation}$

(4.4)

Theorem 4.3.

$\begin{array} b(6n+2) = 4p_{10d}(n)-8p_{10d}(n-3)+8p_{10d}(n-12)+8p_{10d}(n-27)+\cdots\\ +8(-1)^kp_{10d}(n-3k^2)+\cdots. \end{array}$

(4.5)

Proof of Theorem 4.1. Consider (1.5) as:

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n = \left(\frac{f_2}{f_1^2}\right)^2\cdot f_2^3. \end{equation*}$

Then

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n& = \left(\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\overline{p}_2(n)q^n\right)\left(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\infty}(-1)^k(2k+1)q^{k(k+1)}\right),\\ & = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\infty}(-1)^k(2k+1)\overline{p}_2(n)q^{n+k(k+1)},\\ & = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\left(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\infty}(-1)^k(2k+1)\overline{p}_2(n-k(k+1))\right)q^n. \end{align*}$

From the last equality, we readily arrive at (4.1). To prove (4.2), consider (1.5) as:

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n& = \left(\frac{f_{2}}{f_{1}}\right)^4\cdot{f_2},\\ & = \left(\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{4d}(n)q^n\right)\left(\sum\limits_{k = -\infty}^{\infty}(-1)^kq^{k(3k+1)}\right),\\ & = \left(\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{4d}(n)q^n\right)\left(1+\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kq^{k(3k-1)}+\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kq^{k(3k+1)}\right), \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*}\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{4d}(n)q^n+\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\left(\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kp_{4d}(n)q^{k(3k-1)+n}\right)+\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\left(\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kp_{4d}(n)q^{k(3k+1)+n}\right), \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{4d}(n)q^n+\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\left(\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kp_{4d}(n-k(3k-1))q^{n}\right)\\+\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\left(\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kp_{4d}(n-k(3k+1))q^{n}\right), \end{align*}$

which proves Eq (4.2).

Proof of Theorem 4.2. Consider Eq (1.6) as:

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n& = 2\left(\frac{f_2}{f_1}\right)^8{f_1},\\ & = 2\left(\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{8d}(n)q^n\right)\left(\sum\limits_{k = -\infty}^{\infty}(-1)^kq^{\frac{k(3k+1)}{2}}\right),\\ & = 2\left(\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{8d}(n)q^n\right)\left(1+\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kq^{k(3k-1)/2}+\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kq^{k(3k+1)/2}\right), \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{8d}(n)q^n+\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kp_{8d}(n)q^{k(3k-1)/2+n}+\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kp_{8d}(n)q^{k(3k+1)/2+n}, \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{8d}(n)q^n+\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\left(\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kp_{8d}\left(n-\frac{k(3k-1)}{2}\right)\right)q^{n}\\+\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\left(\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kp_{8d}\left(n-\frac{k(3k+1)}{2}\right)\right)q^{n}, \end{align*}$

which proves Eq (4.3). To prove Eq (4.4), consider Eq (1.6) as:

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(4n+1)q^n& = 2\left(\frac{f_2^5}{f_1^4}\right)\frac{f_2^3}{f_1^3},\\ & = 2\left(\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(2n)q^n\right)\left(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\infty}p_{3d}(k)q^k\right),\\ & = 2\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\left(\sum\limits_{c = 0}^{n}b(2c)p_{3d}(n-c)\right)q^n. \end{align*}$

Comparing the coefficients of $q^{n}$ , we arrive at Eq (4.4).

Proof of Theorem 4.3. Consider Eq (1.8) as:

$\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}b(6n+2)q^n& = 4\left(\frac{f_2}{f_1}\right)^{10}\cdot \frac{f_3^2}{f_6},\\ & = 4\left(\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{10d}(n)q^n\right)\left(\sum\limits_{k = -\infty}^{\infty}(-1)^kq^{3k^2}\right),\\ & = 4\left(\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{10d}(n)q^n\right)\left(1+2\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kq^{3k^2}\right),\\ & = 4\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{10d}(n)q^n+8\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\left(\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kp_{10d}(n)q^{3k^2+n}\right),\\ & = 4\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}p_{10d}(n)q^n+8\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\left(\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\infty}(-1)^kp_{10d}(n-3k^2)\right) q^{n}. \end{align*}$

Comparing the coefficients of $q^n$ to obtain Eq (4.5).

5. Conclusion and open problems

In this paper, we have provided the arithmetic properties of second order mock theta function $B(q)$ , introduced by McIntosh. Some congruences are proved for the coefficients of $B(q)$ modulo specific numbers. The questions which arise from this work are:

(i) Are there exist congruences modulo higher primes for $B(q)$ ?

(ii) Is there exist any other technique (like modular forms) that helps to look for some more arithmetic properties of $B(q)$ ?

(iii) How can we explore the other second order mock theta function $A(q)$ ?

Acknowledgments

The first author is supported by University Grants Commission (UGC), under grant Ref No. 971/(CSIR-UGC NET JUNE 2018) and the the second author is supported by Science and Engineering Research Research Board (SERB-MATRICS) grant MTR/2019/000123. The authors of this paper are thankful to Dr. Rupam Barman, IIT Guwahati, for his valuable insight during establishing Theorems 3.1 and 3.2. We would like to thank the referee for carefully reading our paper and offering corrections and helpful suggestions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	K. Deimling, Nonlinear functional analysis, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00547-7
[2]	B. Dhage, Quadratic perturbations of periodic boundary value problems of second order ordinary differential equations, Differ. Equat. Appl., 2 (2010), 465–486. http://dx.doi.org/10.7153/dea-02-28 doi: 10.7153/dea-02-28
[3]	Y. Zhao, S. Sun, Z. Han, Q. Li, Theory of fractional hybrid differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 1312–1324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.041 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.041
[4]	S. Sitho, S. Ntouyas, J. Tariboon, Existence results for hybrid fractional integro-differential equations, Bound. Value Probl., 2015 (2015), 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13661-015-0376-7 doi: 10.1186/s13661-015-0376-7
[5]	M. Awadalla, K. Abuasbeh, On system of nonlinear sequential hybrid fractional differential equations, Math. Probl. Eng., 2022 (2022), 8556578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8556578 doi: 10.1155/2022/8556578
[6]	S. Gul, R. Khan, H. Khan, R. George, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, Analysis on a coupled system of two sequential hybrid BVPs with numerical simulations to a model of typhoid treatment, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 10085–10098. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.020
[7]	A. Khan, Z. Khan, T. Abdeljawad, H. Khan, Analytical analysis of fractional-order sequential hybrid system with numerical application, Adv. Cont. Discr. Mod., 2022 (2022), 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-022-03685-w doi: 10.1186/s13662-022-03685-w
[8]	J. Losada, J. Nieto, Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 87–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010202 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010202
[9]	M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010201 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010201
[10]	A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763–769. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160111018A doi: 10.2298/TSCI160111018A
[11]	M. Al-Refai, D. Baleanu, On an extension of the operator with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22401296 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22401296
[12]	B. Dhage, G. Khurape, A. Shete, J. Salunkhe, Existence and approximate solutions for nonlinear hybrid fractional integro-differential equations, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 11 (2016), 157–167.
[13]	B. Dhage, Existence and attractivity theorems for nonlinear hybrid fractional differential equations with anticipation and retardation, J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal., 2020 (2020), 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.23952/jnfa.2020.47 doi: 10.23952/jnfa.2020.47
[14]	M. Al-Refai, Proper inverse operators of fractional derivatives with nonsingular kernels, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo. II Ser., 71 (2022), 525–535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12215-021-00638-2 doi: 10.1007/s12215-021-00638-2
[15]	Z. Khan, A. Khan, T. Abdeljawad, H. Khan, Computational analysis of fractional order imperfect testing infection disease model, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22401697 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22401697
[16]	R. Shi, Y. Cui, Global analysis of a mathematical model for Hepatitis C virus transmissions, Virus Res., 217 (2016), 8–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2016.02.006 doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.02.006
[17]	M. Subramanian, M. Manigandan, C. Tunç, T. Gopal, J. Alzabut, On system of nonlinear coupled differential equations and inclusions involving Caputo-type sequential derivatives of fractional order, J. Taibah Uni. Sci., 16 (2022), 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2021.2010984 doi: 10.1080/16583655.2021.2010984
[18]	M. Subramanian, J. Alzabut, M. Abbas, C. Thaiprayoon, W. Sudsutad, Existence of solutions for coupled higher-order fractional integro-differential equations with nonlocal integral and multi-point boundary conditions depending on lower-order fractional derivatives and integrals, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 1823. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10111823 doi: 10.3390/math10111823
[19]	M. Herzallah, D. Baleanu, On fractional order hybrid differential equations, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014 (2014), 389386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/389386 doi: 10.1155/2014/389386
[20]	N. Mahmudov, M. Matar, Existence of mild solution for hybrid differential equations with arbitrary fractional order, TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math., 8 (2017), 160–169.
[21]	H. Jafari, D. Baleanu, H. Khan, R. Khan, A. Khan, Existence criterion for the solutions of fractional order p-Laplacian boundary value problems, Bound. Value Probl., 2015 (2015), 164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13661-015-0425-2 doi: 10.1186/s13661-015-0425-2
[22]	A. Khan, Z. Khan, T. Abdeljawad, H. Khan, Analytical analysis of fractional-order sequential hybrid system with numerical application, Adv. Cont. Discr. Mod., 2022 (2022), 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-022-03685-w doi: 10.1186/s13662-022-03685-w
[23]	G. Wang, B. Ahmad, L. Zhang, J. Nieto, Comments on the concept of existence of solution for impulsive fractional differential equations, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 19 (2014), 401–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.04.003
[24]	W. Al-Sadi, Z. Huang, A. Alkhazzan, Existence and stability of a positive solution for nonlinear hybrid fractional differential equations with singularity, J. Taibah Uni. Sci., 13 (2019), 951–960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2019.1663783 doi: 10.1080/16583655.2019.1663783
[25]	A. Shah, R. Khan, H. Khan, A fractional‐order hybrid system of differential equations: existence theory and numerical solutions, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), 4024–4034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.8029 doi: 10.1002/mma.8029
[26]	S. Aljoudi, B. Ahmad, J. Nieto, A. Alsaedi, A coupled system of Hadamard type sequential fractional differential equations with coupled strip conditions, Chaos, Solition. Fract., 91 (2016) 39–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.05.005
[27]	S. Jose, R. Ramachandran, J. Cao, J. Alzabut, M. Niezabitowski, V. Balas, Stability analysis and comparative study on different eco‐epidemiological models: stage structure for prey and predator concerning impulsive control, Optim. Contr. Appl. Method., 43 (2022), 842–866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oca.2856 doi: 10.1002/oca.2856
[28]	S. Etemad, B. Tellab, J. Alzabut, S. Rezapour, M. Abbas, Approximate solutions and Hyers-Ulam stability for a system of the coupled fractional thermostat control model via the generalized differential transform, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03563-x doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03563-x
[29]	A. Selvam, D. Baleanu, J. Alzabut, D. Vignesh, S. Abbas, On Hyers-Ulam Mittag-Leffler stability of discrete fractional Duffing equation with application on inverted pendulum, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02920-6 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02920-6
[30]	A. Zada, J. Alzabut, H. Waheed, I. Popa, Ulam-Hyers stability of impulsive integrodifferential equations with Riemann-Liouville boundary conditions, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-2534-1 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-2534-1
[31]	A. Akgul, M. Modanli, Crank-Nicholson difference method and reproducing kernel function for third order fractional differential equations in the sense of Atangana-Baleanu Caputo derivative, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 127 (2019), 10–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.06.011
[32]	J. Solis-Perez, J. Gomez-Aguilar, A. Atangana, Novel numerical method for solving variable-order fractional differential equations with power, exponential and Mittag-Leffler laws, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 114 (2018), 175–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.06.032 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.06.032
[33]	M. Akinlar, F. Tchier, M. Inc, Chaos control and solutions of fractional-order Malkus waterwheel model, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 135 (2020), 109746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109746 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109746
[34]	H. Khan, J. Gomez-Aguilar, A. Khan, T. Khan, Stability analysis for fractional order advection-reaction diffusion system, Physica A, 521 (2019), 737–751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.102 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.102
[35]	S. Gul, R. Khan, H. Khan, R. George, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, Analysis on a coupled system of two sequential hybrid BVPs with numerical simulations to a model of typhoid treatment, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 10085–10098. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.020
[36]	J. Singh, A. Alshehri, S. Momani, S. Hadid, D. Kumar, Computational analysis of fractional diffusion equations occurring in oil pollution, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 3827. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10203827 doi: 10.3390/math10203827
[37]	J. Singh, D. Kumar, S. Purohit, A. Mishra, M. Bohra, An efficient numerical approach for fractional multidimensional diffusion equations with exponential memory, Numer. Meth. Part. D. E., 37 (2021), 1631–1651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/num.22601 doi: 10.1002/num.22601
[38]	V. Dubey, J. Singh, A. Alshehri, S. Dubey, D. Kumar, Analysis of local fractional coupled Helmholtz and coupled Burgers' equations in fractal media, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 8080–8111. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2022450 doi: 10.3934/math.2022450

This article has been cited by:

1.	Olivia X.M. Yao, New congruences modulo 9 for the coefficients of Gordon-McIntosh's mock theta function ξ ( q ) , 2024, 47, 1607-3606, 239, 10.2989/16073606.2023.2205604
2.	Yueya Hu, Eric H. Liu, Olivia X. M. Yao, Congruences modulo 4 and 8 for Ramanujan’s sixth-order mock theta function $\rho (q)$ , 2025, 66, 1382-4090, 10.1007/s11139-024-01018-x

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)