Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/Latin1Supplement.js
Research article

Injective edge coloring of generalized Petersen graphs

  • Received: 07 January 2021 Accepted: 11 May 2021 Published: 19 May 2021
  • MSC : 05C15

  • Three edges e1, e2 and e3 in a graph G are consecutive if they form a cycle of length 3 or a path in this order. A k-injectiveedgecoloring of a graph G is an edge coloring of G, (not necessarily proper), such that if edges e1, e2, e3 are consecutive, then e1 and e3 receive distinct colors. The minimum k for which G has a k-injective edge coloring is called the injectiveedgecoloringnumber, denoted by χi(G). In this paper, we consider the injective edge coloring numbers of generalized Petersen graphs P(n,1) and P(n,2). We determine the exact values of injective edge coloring numbers for P(n,1) with n3, and for P(n,2) with 4n7. For n8, we show that 4χi(P(n,2))5.

    Citation: Yanyi Li, Lily Chen. Injective edge coloring of generalized Petersen graphs[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 7929-7943. doi: 10.3934/math.2021460

    Related Papers:

    [1] Hongyu Chen, Li Zhang . A smaller upper bound for the list injective chromatic number of planar graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 289-310. doi: 10.3934/math.2025014
    [2] Yuehua Bu, Qi Jia, Hongguo Zhu, Junlei Zhu . Acyclic edge coloring of planar graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10828-10841. doi: 10.3934/math.2022605
    [3] Ningge Huang, Lily Chen . AVD edge-colorings of cubic Halin graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27820-27839. doi: 10.3934/math.20231423
    [4] Yuehua Bu, Qiang Yang, Junlei Zhu, Hongguo Zhu . Injective coloring of planar graphs with girth 5. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 17081-17090. doi: 10.3934/math.2023872
    [5] Baolin Ma, Chao Yang . Distinguishing colorings of graphs and their subgraphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26561-26573. doi: 10.3934/math.20231357
    [6] Shuangliang Tian, Ping Chen . Edge-coloring of generalized lexicographic product of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 15988-15995. doi: 10.3934/math.2024774
    [7] Meiqin Jin, Ping Chen, Shuangliang Tian . Interval edge colorings of the generalized lexicographic product of some graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30597-30611. doi: 10.3934/math.20241477
    [8] Xiaoxue Hu, Jiangxu Kong . An improved upper bound for the dynamic list coloring of 1-planar graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7337-7348. doi: 10.3934/math.2022409
    [9] Yunfeng Tang, Huixin Yin, Miaomiao Han . Star edge coloring of K2,t-free planar graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13154-13161. doi: 10.3934/math.2023664
    [10] Jing Su, Qiyue Zhang, Bing Yao . The connection between the magical coloring of trees. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27896-27907. doi: 10.3934/math.20241354
  • Three edges e1, e2 and e3 in a graph G are consecutive if they form a cycle of length 3 or a path in this order. A k-injectiveedgecoloring of a graph G is an edge coloring of G, (not necessarily proper), such that if edges e1, e2, e3 are consecutive, then e1 and e3 receive distinct colors. The minimum k for which G has a k-injective edge coloring is called the injectiveedgecoloringnumber, denoted by χi(G). In this paper, we consider the injective edge coloring numbers of generalized Petersen graphs P(n,1) and P(n,2). We determine the exact values of injective edge coloring numbers for P(n,1) with n3, and for P(n,2) with 4n7. For n8, we show that 4χi(P(n,2))5.



    Let G be a finite and simple graph. We use V(G), E(G) and Δ(G) to denote its vertex set, edge set and maximum degree, respectively. A proper vertex(edge) coloring is a mapping from the vertex (edge) set to a finite set of colors, such that adjacent vertices (edges) receive distinct colors. A k-injective coloring of a graph G is a mapping ψ:V(G){1,2,,k}, such that if two vertices have a common neighbor, then they receive distinct colors. The injective chromatic number of G, denoted by χi(G), is the minimum k for which G has a k-injective coloring. The injective coloring of graphs was originated from the Complexity Theory on Random Access Machines, which was proposed by Hahn et al. [8] and applied to the theory of error correcting codes and the designing of computer networks [2].

    Similarly, Cardoso et al. [6] introduced the concept of injective edge coloring, motivated by a Packet Radio Network problem. Three edges e1, e2 and e3 in a graph G are consecutive if they form a cycle of length 3 or a path in this order. A k-injective edge coloring of a graph G is a mapping ψ:E(G){1,2,,k}, such that if e1, e2, e3 are consecutive, then ψ(e1)ψ(e3). If there is a k-injective edge coloring of G, then we say that G is k-injectiveedgecolored. The minimum k for which G has a k-injective edge coloring is called the injective edge coloring number of G, denoted by χi(G).

    Cardoso et al. [6] showed that it is NP-complete to decide whether χi(G)=k. They determined the injective edge coloring numbers for paths, cycles, complete bipartite graphs, and Petersen graph, and they also gave bounds on some other classes of graphs.

    Proposition 1.1 ([6]). Let Pn(Cn) be a path (cycle) of order n, Kp,q be a complete bipartite graph, and P be the Petersen graph. Then

    χi(Pn)=2,forn4.

    χi(Cn)={2ifn0(mod4),3otherwise.

    χi(Kp,q)=min{p,q}.

    χi(P)=5.

    A graph G is an ωedgeinjectivecolorable(perfectEIC)graph if χi(G)=ω(G), where ω(G) is the number of edges in a maximum clique of G. In [11], Yue et al. constructed some perfect EIC-graphs, and gave a sharp bound of the injective edge coloring number of a 2-connected graph with some forbidden conditions. Bu and Qi [5] and Ferdjallah [7] studied the injective edge coloring of sparse graphs in terms of the maximum average degree. Kostochka [9] studied the injective edge coloring in terms of the maximum degree. Recently, in [3,4], Bu et al. presented some results on the injective edge coloring numbers of planar graphs. In this paper, we will consider the injective edge coloring of generalized Petersen graphs.

    For positive integers n and k, where n3 and 1k<n2, thegeneralizedPetersengraph P(n,k) is a graph with vertex set V={u1,u2,,un;v1,v2,,vn} and edge set E={uiui+1,uivi,vivi+k|i{1,2,,n},thesubscriptsaretakenmodulon}.} We denote u1,u2,,un as outer vertices and v1,v2,,vn as inner vertices. The edges uiui+1, vivi+k, and uivi are denoted as outer edges, inner edges and leg edges, respectively, where i{1,2,...,n}. Generalized Petersen graphs are being analyzed extensively because of their applications. There have been some results about the colorings of generalized Petersen graphs, see in [1,10,12].

    Here we consider the injective edge colorings of generalized Petersen graphs P(n,k) for k=1 and k=2. We prove the following theorems:

    Theorem 1.1. If n6, then we have that

    χi(P(n,1))={3ifn0(mod6),4otherwise.

    Moreover, χi(P(3,1))=6, χi(P(4,1))=4,χi(P(5,1))=5.

    Theorem 1.2. If n8, then 4χi(P(n,2))5. Moreover, χi(P(4,2))=4, χi(P(5,2))=χi(P(6,2))=χi(P(7,2))=5.

    The paper is organized as follows. The exact values of the injective edge coloring numbers of P(n,1) are presented in Section 2. In Section 3, we estimate the injective edge coloring numbers of P(n,2).

    In this section, we determine χi(P(n,1)) for n3. The graph P(n,1) is shown in Figure 1. We denote the cycle u1u2...un as outer cycle, and the cycle v1v2...vn as inner cycle. We say that an edge e1 sees an edge e2, if there is an edge e such that e1,e,e2 are consecutive. A labelling of P(n,1) is a mapping L from vertices of P(n,1) to a set {1,2,...,k}.

    Figure 1.  The generalized Petersen graph P(n,1).

    We need a proposition posed by Cardoso et al. [6].

    Proposition 2.1 ([6]). If H is a subgraph of a connected graph G, then χi(H)χi(G).

    By this proposition, we have the following lemma.

    Lemma 2.1. If n3, then χi(P(n,1))3.

    Proof. Since the edges u1u2,u2u3,u3v3,v3v2,v2v1,v1u1 form a cycle of length 6, C6 is a subgraph of P(n,1). By Proposition 1.1 and Proposition 2.1, we have that χi(P(n,1))3.

    Lemma 2.2. For n6, χi(P(n,1))=3 if and only if n is a multiple of 6.

    Proof. Suppose that P(n,1) has an injective edge coloring ψ using only three colors 1, 2 and 3. Let C=v1v2v3v4vn1vnv1.

    Claim 1: Every edge e on C must receive the same color as one of its adjacent edges on C.

    Proof. Assume this is not the case. Then there exist three consecutive edges on C that receive distinct colors. Assume without loss of generality that ψ(v1v2)=1,ψ(v2v3)=2,ψ(v3v4)=3, then the edge u2u3 cannot be colored.

    Since ψ is an injective edge coloring, no three consecutive edges can receive the same color. Therefore, the edges of C can be divided into adjacent pairs and each pair receives the same color. In particular, C must have even length.

    Without loss of generality, we assume that ψ(v1v2)=1,ψ(v2v3)=1,ψ(v3v4)=2,ψ(v4v5)=2.

    Claim 2: ψ(v5v6)=ψ(v6v7)=3.

    Proof. Clearly ψ(v5v6)2. Assume that ψ(v5v6)=1. Then by Claim 1, ψ(v6v7)=1. It follows that ψ(u5u6)=3. Now the edge u3u4 can not be colored, a contradiction. Therefore, ψ(v5v6)=3. By Claim 1, ψ(v6v7)=3. This completes the proof of Claim 2.

    By Claim 1 and 2, the edges of C are colored in the pattern 112233 (up to renaming colors). Therefore, the length of C is a multiple of 6.

    On the other hand, if the length of C is a multiple of 6, then we give a 3-injective edge coloring of P(n,1) in the following way. We first label some of the vertices in P(n,1) as follows: L(vi)=1 for i{1,7,...,n5}; L(vi)=2 for i{3,9,...,n3}; L(vi)=3 for i{5,11,...,n1}; L(ui)=1 for i{4,10,...,n2}; L(ui)=2 for i{6,12,...,n}; L(ui)=3 for i{2,8,...,n4}. If a vertex v is labelled, then we color the edges incident with v by the color L(v). Since n is a multiple of 6, all the edges are colored, and it is easy to check that this coloring is a 3-injective edge coloring of P(n,1). Therefore, we complete the proof of this lemma.

    Now we show that if n>6 and n is not a multiple of 6, then there is a 4-injective edge coloring of P(n,1).

    Lemma 2.3. If n0(mod6) and n>6, then χi(P(n,1))4.

    Proof. Clearly there are five cases depending on n (modulo 6). We will give the coloring in each case: we first label some of the vertices of P(n,1) with numbers in {1,2,3,4}. Let ϕ be an edge coloring such that if a vertex v is labelled by L(v), then we color the edges incident with v by the color L(v). This edge coloring ϕ might not be injective edge coloring. If this is the case, then we adjust the colors of some edges to obtain an injective edge coloring ψ.

    Case 1. n=6m+1,mN. We label the vertices as follows:

    L(vi)=1,L(uj)=1,i{1,7,13,,n6},j{4,10,16,,n3};

    L(vi)=2,L(uj)=2,i{5,11,17,,n2},j{2,8,14,,n5};

    L(vi)=3,L(uj)=3,i{3,9,15,,n4},j{6,12,18,,n1}.

    Let ϕ be the edge coloring defined above. We can see that ϕ is not an injective edge coloring, so we adjust the colors of some edges in the following way:

    Set ψ(un2un1)=ψ(un1vn1)=ψ(un1un)=4, ψ(unu1)=ψ(u1v1)=ψ(u1u2)=2, ψ(vn1vn)=ψ(unvn)=3, ψ(v2u2)=ψ(u2u3)=4. Let ψ(e)=ϕ(e) for all the other edges of P(n,1). It is easy to check that the coloring ψ is an injective edge coloring.

    Case 2. n=6m+2,mN. We label the vertices as follows:

    L(vi)=1,L(uj)=1,i{1,7,13,,n7},j{4,10,16,,n4};

    L(vi)=2,L(uj)=2,i{5,11,17,,n9},j{2,8,14,,n6};

    L(vi)=3,L(uj)=3,i{3,9,15,,n5},j{6,12,18,,n8}.

    Let ϕ be the coloring defined above. We define ψ in the following way: ψ(vn4vn3)=ψ(vn3vn2)=ψ(un3vn3)=4, ψ(un3un2)=ψ(un2un1)=ψ(un2vn2)=2, ψ(vn2vn1)=ψ(vn1vn)=ψ(un1vn1)=3, ψ(un1un)=ψ(unu1)=ψ(unvn)=4, ψ(e)=ϕ(e) for all the other edges of P(n,1). It is easy to check that ψ is an injective edge coloring of P(n,1).

    Case 3. n=6m+3,mN. We label the vertices as follows:

    L(vi)=1,L(uj)=1,i{1,7,13,,n8},j{4,10,16,,n5};

    L(vi)=2,L(uj)=2,i{5,11,17,,n4},j{2,8,14,,n7};

    L(vi)=3,L(uj)=3,i{3,9,15,,n6},j{6,12,18,,n3}.

    Let ϕ be the coloring defined above. We define ψ in the following way: ψ(vn3vn2)=ψ(un2vn2)=1, ψ(un2un1)=ψ(un1un)=2, ψ(unvn)=ψ(unu1)=3, ψ(vn2vn1)=ψ(vn1un1)=ψ(vn1vn)=4, ψ(u1u2)=4, ψ(e)=ϕ(e) for all the other edges of P(n,1). It is easy to check that ψ is an injective edge coloring of P(n,1).

    Case 4. n=6m+4,mN. We label the vertices as follows:

    L(vi)=1,L(uj)=1,i{1,7,13,,n3},j{4,10,16,,n6};

    L(vi)=2,L(uj)=2,i{5,11,17,,n5},j{2,8,14,,n2};

    L(vi)=3,L(uj)=3,i{3,9,15,,n1},j{6,12,18,,n4}.

    Let ϕ be the coloring defined above. We define ψ as follows: ψ(un1un)=ψ(unvn)=ψ(unu1)=4, ψ(e)=ϕ(e) for all the other edges of P(n,1). Then ψ is an injective edge coloring of P(n,1).

    Case 5. n=6m+5,mN. We label the vertices as follows:

    L(vi)=1,L(uj)=1,i{1,7,13,,n10},j{4,10,16,,n7};

    L(vi)=2,L(uj)=2,i{5,11,17,,n6},j{2,8,14,,n9};

    L(vi)=3,L(uj)=3,i{3,9,15,,n8},j{6,12,18,,n5};

    L(vn4)=L(un)=4, L(un2)=1.

    Let ϕ be the coloring defined above. We define ψ in the following way: ψ(un4un3)=ψ(un3vn3)=2,ψ(vn3vn2)=ψ(vn2vn1)=3,ψ(vn1vn)=ψ(vn1un1)=2, ψ(e)=ϕ(e) for all the other edges of P(n,1). Then ψ is an injective edge coloring of P(n,1).

    It follows from Cases 1-5 that χi(P(n,1))4 for all n with n0(mod6) and n>6.

    Next we determine χi(P(n,1)) for 3n5.

    Lemma 2.4. χi(P(3,1))=6.

    Proof. Since every pair of edges in {u1u2,u2u3,u3u1,v1v2,v2v3,v3v1} see each other, they should be colored with different colors. This implies that χi(P(3,1))6. On the other hand, P(3,1) has a 6-injective edge coloring as follows: ψ(u1v1)=ψ(u1u2)=1; ψ(u2v2)=ψ(u2u3)=2; ψ(u3v3)=ψ(u3u1)=3; ψ(v1v2)=4;ψ(v2v3)=5;ψ(v3v1)=6. Therefore, χi(P(3,1))=6.

    Lemma 2.5. χi(P(4,1))=4.

    Proof. Since every pair of edges in {v1v2,u2u3,v3v4,u4u1} see each other, they must be colored with different colors. So χi(P(4,1))4. On the other hand, P(4,1) has a 4-injective edge coloring as follows: ψ(u1v1)=ψ(u1u2)=ψ(u1u4)=1; ψ(v2u2)=ψ(v2v1)=ψ(v2v3)=2; ψ(u3u2)=ψ(u3v3)=ψ(u3u4)=3; ψ(v4u4)=ψ(v4v3)=ψ(v4v1)=4. Therefore, χi(P(4,1))=4.

    Lemma 2.6. χi(P(5,1))=5.

    Proof. By Lemma 2.1, we have that χi(P(5,1))3. We claim that χi(P(5,1))4, for otherwise we would color the outer cycle with three colors. Then there exist three consecutive edges on the outer cycle that are colored differently. Without loss of generality, let ψ(u1u2)=1,ψ(u2u3)=2,ψ(u3u4)=3, then the edge v2v3 must be colored with a fourth color, and hence, χi(P(5,1))4.

    Next we show that χi(P(5,1))5. We assume by contradiction that P(n,1) has an injective edge coloring using four colors.

    If only three colors are used to color the edges of the outer cycle, then there are two pairs of adjacent edges such that each pair is colored with one color and the remaining edge is colored with a third color. Without loss of generality, let ψ(u1u2)=ψ(u2u3)=1,ψ(u3u4)=2,ψ(u4u5)=2,ψ(u5u1)=3, then we must have that ψ(v5v1)=4,ψ(v2v3)=3,ψ(v3v4)=3,ψ(u1v1)=4, but now the edge u5v5 cannot be colored.

    If four colors are used to color the edges of the outer cycle, then there are two adjacent edges colored with the same color, all other edges are colored differently. Without loss of generality, let ψ(u1u2)=1,ψ(u2u3)=1,ψ(u3u4)=2,ψ(u4u5)=3,ψ(u5u1)=4, then we get that ψ(v5v1)=2,ψ(v3v4)=4,ψ(u4v4)=3, but now the edge u5v5 cannot be colored.

    So an injective edge coloring of P(5,1) requires at least five colors, that is, χi(P(5,1))5. In Figure 7, we give a 5-injective edge coloring of P(5,1), therefore, χi(P(5,1))=5.

    Figure 2.  An injective edge coloring of P(n,1) when n1(mod 6).
    Figure 3.  An injective edge coloring of P(n,1) when n2(mod 6).
    Figure 4.  An injective edge coloring of P(n,1) when n3(mod 6).
    Figure 5.  An injective edge coloring of P(n,1) when n4(mod 6).
    Figure 6.  An injective edge coloring of P(n,1) when n5(mod 6).
    Figure 7.  An injective edge coloring of generalized Petersen graph P(5,1).

    Combining Lemma 2.1 to Lemma 2.6, we obtain the exact values of injective edge coloring numbers of P(n,1) for n3, which completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.

    In this section, we study the injective edge coloring number of P(n,2). We first show that χi(P(n,2))4.

    Lemma 3.1. If n6, then χi(P(n,2))4.

    Proof. Suppose by contradiction that χi(P(n,2))=3. Let ψ be a 3-injective edge coloring of P(n,2). We may assume that ψ(uivi)=1. Then since every pair of edges in {uivi,ui1vi1,ui+1vi+1} see each other, they must be colored differently. Without loss of generality, let ψ(ui1vi1)=2,ψ(ui+1vi+1)=3. Then we have ψ(ui+2vi+2)=2,ψ(ui+3vi+3)=1,ψ(ui+4vi+4)=3. Now note that ψ(ui+1ui+2)=2 or 3.

    Case 1. ψ(ui+1ui+2)=2: Since the edge vivi+2 sees the edges ui+1ui+2 and ui+4vi+4, ψ(vivi+2)=1. Similarly, ψ(uiui+1)=3. But then since the edge vi1vi+1 sees edges uiui+1,ui+1ui+2,ui+3vi+3, it must be colored with a fourth color, a contradiction.

    Case 2. ψ(ui+1ui+2)=3: Since the edge vi+2vi+4 sees the edges ui+1ui+2 and uivi, vi+2vi+4 must be colored with 2. Similarly, ψ(ui+2ui+3)=1. Now since the edge vi+1vi+3 sees edges ui1vi1,ui+1ui+2,ui+2ui+3, it must be colored with a fourth color, a contradiction.

    Therefore, at least four colors are required in an injective edge coloring of P(n,2).

    Next we find a 5-injective edge coloring of P(n,2) where n8. There are two cases depending on whether n is even or odd.

    Lemma 3.2. If n8 and n is even, then χi(P(n,2))5.

    Proof. Let n=2q. The inner vertices of P(n,2) induce two cycles, each of length q. We denote these two cycles as C1 and C2, where C1=v1v3v2q1v1 and C2=v2v4v2qv2. The graph P(2q,2) is shown in Figure 9.

    Figure 8.  Partial structure of generalized Petersen graph P(n,2).
    Figure 9.  The generalized Petersen graph P(2q,2).

    Case 1. 2q=4m+2, m2 and mN.

    We first label some of the vertices on the outer cycle as follows: L(ui)=1 for i{1,5,9,,2q5}, L(ui)=2 for i{3,7,11,,2q3}, L(u2q1)=3. Then if a vertex is labelled, we color the three edges incident with this vertex by its labelling. Now the uncolored edges are the edges on the cycles C1 and C2, and the edges u2iv2i for 1iq.

    Subcase 1.1. q1(mod4). For the edges on the cycle C1, let ψ(v3v5)=3, the other edges v5v7,v7v9,,v1v3 are colored in the order 44554455 55. For the edges on the cycle C2, let ψ(v2v4)=ψ(v4v6)=3, the other edges v6v8,v8v10,,v2qv2 are colored in the order 44554455 5. Finally, let ψ(u2iv2i)=3 for i{5,7,9,,q2}, ψ(u2iv2i)=4 for i{4,8,,q1}, ψ(u2iv2i)=5 for i{6,10,,q3}, ψ(u2v2)=ψ(u6v6)=5, ψ(u4v4)=3, ψ(u2qv2q)=2. It's easy to check that the coloring ψ is an injective edge coloring of P(2q,2).

    Subcase 1.2. q3(mod4). Then q21(mod4). For the edges on the cycle C1, let ψ(v3v5)=ψ(v5v7)=3, the other edges v7v9,v9v11,,v1v3 are colored in the order 44554455 554. For the edges on the cycle C2, let ψ(v2v4)=ψ(v4v6)=3, the other edges v6v8,v8v10,,v2qv2 are colored in the order 44554455 554. Finally, let ψ(u2iv2i)=3 for i{5,7,9,,q2}, ψ(u2iv2i)=4 for i{4,8,,q3}, ψ(u2iv2i)=5 for i{6,10,,q1}, ψ(u2v2)=4, ψ(u4v4)=3, ψ(u6v6)=5, ψ(u2qv2q)=2. It's easy to check that the coloring ψ is an injective edge coloring of P(2q,2).

    Case 2. 2q=4m, m2 and mN.

    In this case, the labelling of the vertices on the outer cycle are: L(ui)=1 for i{1,5,9,13,,2q3}, L(ui)=2 for i{3,7,11,15,,2q1}. Similar to Case 1, if a vertex is labelled, we color the three edges incident with this vertex by its labelling. Now the uncolored edges are the edges on the cycles C1 and C2, and the edges u2iv2i for 1iq.

    Subcase 2.1. q2(mod4). For the edges on the cycle C1, let ψ(v1v3)=ψ(v3v5)=3, the other edges v5v7,v7v9,,v2q1v1 are colored in the order 44554455 55. For the edges on the cycle C2, let ψ(v2v4)=ψ(v4v6)=3, the other edges v6v8,v8v10,,v2qv2 are colored in the order 44554455 55. Finally, let ψ(u2iv2i)=3 for i{5,7,9,,q1}, ψ(u2iv2i)=4 for i{4,8,,q2}, ψ(u2iv2i)=5 for i{6,10,,q}, ψ(u2v2)=4, ψ(u4v4)=3, ψ(u6v6)=5. It's easy to check that the coloring ψ is an injective edge coloring of P(2q,2).

    Subcase 2.2. q0(mod4). We color the edges v1v3,v3v5,,v2q1v1 on the cycle C1 and the edges v2v4,v4v6,,v2qv2 on the cycle C2 both in the order 33443344 44. Then let ψ(u2iv2i)=3 for i{2,6,,q2}, ψ(u2iv2i)=4 for i{4,8,,q}, ψ(u2iv2i)=5 for i{1,3,5,,q1}. It's easy to check that the coloring ψ is an injective edge coloring of P(2q,2).

    Lemma 3.3. If n9 and n is odd, then χi(P(n,2))5.

    Proof. Since n is odd, the inner vertices of P(n,2) induce a cycle of length n, denote the cycle as C, where C=v1v3v5vn2vnv2v4vn1v1. It suffices to consider the following five cases.

    Case 1. n=5m, m2:

    Since n is odd, m is odd. We color the edges as follows:

    ψ(uivi)=1 for i{1,6,11,,n4}; ψ(uivi)=2 for i{2,7,12,,n3}; ψ(uivi)=3 for i{3,8,13,,n2}; ψ(uivi)=4 for i{4,9,14,,n1}; ψ(uivi)=5 for i{5,10,15,,n}.

    ψ(ui1ui)=ψ(uiui+1)=ψ(uivi) for i{3,5,7,9,,n2}; ψ(un1un)=2,ψ(unu1)=ψ(u1u2)=1.

    ψ(vivi+2)=ψ(ui+1vi+1) for i{1,3,5,,n2}; ψ(vivi+2)=ψ(ui+2vi+2) for i{2,4,6,,n3}; ψ(vn1v1)=5,ψ(vnv2)=5.

    Now we obtain a 5-injective edge coloring of P(n,2).

    Case 2. If n=5m+1, m2:

    In this case m must be even since n is odd. Let

    ψ(uivi)=1 for i{1,6,11,,n5}; ψ(uivi)=2 for i{2,7,12,,n4}; ψ(uivi)=3 for i{3,8,13,,n3}; ψ(uivi)=4 for i{4,9,14,,n2}; ψ(uivi)=5 for i{5,10,15,,n1}; ψ(unvn)=3.

    ψ(ui1ui)=ψ(uiui+1)=ψ(uivi) for i{3,5,7,,n2}; ψ(un1un)=3,ψ(unu1)=ψ(u1u2)=1.

    ψ(vivi+2)=ψ(ui+1vi+1) for i{1,3,5,,n6}; ψ(vivi+2)=ψ(ui+2vi+2) for i{2,4,6,,n3}; ψ(vn4vn2)=1,ψ(vn2vn)=5,ψ(vnv2)=2,ψ(vn1v1)=2.

    This way we obtain a 5-injective edge coloring of P(n,2).

    Case 3. If n=5m+2, m2:

    In this case m is odd. Let

    ψ(uivi)=1 for i{1,6,11,,n6}; ψ(uivi)=2 for i{2,7,12,,n5}; ψ(uivi)=3 for i{3,8,13,,n4}; ψ(uivi)=4 for i{4,9,14,,n3}; ψ(uivi)=5 for i{5,10,15,,n7}; ψ(un2vn2)=2,ψ(un1vn1)=5,ψ(unvn)=3.

    ψ(ui1ui)=ψ(uiui+1)=ψ(uivi) for i{3,5,7,,n2}; ψ(un1un)=3,ψ(unu1)=ψ(u1u2)=1.

    ψ(vivi+2)=ψ(ui+1vi+1) for i{1,3,5,,n8}; ψ(vivi+2)=ψ(ui+2vi+2) for i{4,6,8,,n7}; ψ(vn6vn4)=5,ψ(vn4vn2)=4,ψ(vn2vn)=4,ψ(vnv2)=5,ψ(v2v4)=2;ψ(vn5vn3)=4,ψ(vn3vn1)=4,ψ(vn1v1)=5.

    It is easy to check that this way we obtain a 5-injective edge coloring of P(n,2).

    Case 4. If n=5m+3, m2:

    Then m is even. Let

    ψ(uivi)=1 for i{1,6,11,,n2}; ψ(uivi)=2 for i{2,7,12,,n1}; ψ(uivi)=3 for i{3,8,13,,n5}; ψ(uivi)=4 for i{4,9,14,,n4}; ψ(uivi)=5 for i{5,10,15,,n3}; ψ(unvn)=4.

    ψ(ui1ui)=ψ(uiui+1)=ψ(uivi) for i{3,5,7,,n4}; ψ(un3un2)=1,ψ(un2un1)=3,ψ(un1un)=3,ψ(unu1)=1,ψ(u1u2)=1.

    ψ(vivi+2)=ψ(ui+1vi+1) for i{3,5,7,,n4}; ψ(vivi+2)=ψ(ui+2vi+2) for i{4,6,8,,n5}; ψ(vn3vn1)=2,ψ(vn1v1)=2,ψ(v1v3)=4,ψ(vn2vn)=5,ψ(vnv2)=2,ψ(v2v4)=2.

    We again obtain a 5-injective edge coloring of P(n,2).

    Case 5. If n=5m+4, m2:

    Then m is odd since n is odd. Let

    ψ(uivi)=1 for i{1,6,11,,n3}; ψ(uivi)=2 for i{2,7,12,,n2}; ψ(uivi)=3 for i{3,8,13,,n1}; ψ(uivi)=4 for i{4,9,14,,n}; ψ(uivi)=5 for i{5,10,15,,n4}.

    ψ(ui1ui)=ψ(uiui+1)=ψ(uivi) for i{3,5,7,,n2}; ψ(un1un)=4,ψ(unu1)=ψ(u1u2)=1.

    ψ(vivi+2)=ψ(ui+1vi+1) for i{1,3,5,,n2}; ψ(vivi+2)=ψ(ui+2vi+2) for i{2,4,6,,n3}; ψ(vn1v1)=5,ψ(vnv2)=5,ψ(v2v4)=2.

    We again obtain a 5-injective edge coloring of P(n,2).

    It follows from Lemma 3.2 and Lemma 3.3 that χi(P(n,2))5 for n8.

    Now we study χi(P(n,2)) for 4n7. If n=5, then the graph P(5,2) is just the Petersen graph, by proposition 1, χi(P(5,2))=5.

    Lemma 3.4. χi(P(4,2))=4.

    Proof. Since every pair of edges in {u1v1,u2v2,u3v3,u4v4} see each other, they should be colored differently, that is, χi(P(4,2))4. On the other hand, P(4,2) has a 4-injective edge coloring as follows: ψ(u1v1)=ψ(u1u2)=ψ(u1u4)=1; ψ(u3u2)=ψ(u3v3)=ψ(u3u4)=2; ψ(u2v2)=ψ(v1v3)=3; ψ(v4u4)=ψ(v2v4)=4. Therefore, χi(P(4,2))=4.

    Lemma 3.5. χi(P(6,2))=5.

    Proof. Denote the outer cycle of P(6,2) as C=u1u2u3u4u5u6u1. By Lemma 3.1, χi(P(6,2))4. Assume by contradiction that P(6,2) has a 4-injective edge coloring.

    Case 1. Only three colors are used to color the edges of C.

    In any 3-injective edge coloring of C, there exist two adjacent edges that are colored differently, and each color is used twice. Without loss of generality, let ψ(u1u2)=1,ψ(u2u3)=2. By symmetry, we only need to consider the cases ψ(u3u4)=3 or ψ(u4u5)=3.

    If ψ(u3u4)=3, then ψ(v2v4)=4. Since the edge v4v6 sees edges u4u5,u5u6, u6u1,v2v4, these four edges are colored with different colors in {1,2,3,4}. So v4v6 cannot be colored.

    If ψ(u4u5)=3, then ψ(v2v4)=4. Similarly, the edge v4v6 cannot be colored.

    Case 2. Four colors are used to color the edges of C.

    First note that there exist no four successive edges uiui+1,ui+1ui+2,ui+2ui+3, ui+3ui+4 that are colored differently, because otherwise the edge vi+1vi+3 cannot be colored. So there exists an i such that ψ(uiui+1)=ψ(ui+1ui+2), ψ(ui+3ui+4)=ψ(ui+4ui+5), the subscripts are taken modulo 6. Without loss of generality, let ψ(u1u2)=ψ(u2u3)=1, ψ(u3u4)=2, ψ(u4u5)=ψ(u5u6)=3, and ψ(u6u1)=4. Then we have that ψ(v2v4)=4,ψ(u6v6)=2,ψ(v3v5)=4, and hence, the edge u1v1 cannot be colored.

    Therefore, at least five colors are needed in an injective edge coloring of P(6,2), that is χi(P(6,2))5. On the other hand, Figure 19 shows a 5-injective edge coloring of P(6,2). So we have that χi(P(6,2))=5, as required.

    Figure 10.  An injective edge coloring of P(2q,2) when q1(mod 4).
    Figure 11.  An injective edge coloring of P(2q,2) when q3(mod 4).
    Figure 12.  An injective edge coloring of P(2q,2) when q2(mod 4).
    Figure 13.  An injective edge coloring of P(2q,2) when q0(mod 4).
    Figure 14.  An injective edge coloring of P(n,2) when n0(mod 5).
    Figure 15.  An injective edge coloring of P(n,2) when n1(mod 5).
    Figure 16.  An injective edge coloring of P(n,2) when n2(mod 5).
    Figure 17.  An injective edge coloring of P(n,2) when n3(mod 5).
    Figure 18.  An injective edge coloring of P(n,2) when n4(mod 5).
    Figure 19.  An injective edge coloring of P(6,2).

    Lemma 3.6. χi(P(7,2))=5.

    Proof. Denote the outer cycle of P(7,2) by C=u1u2u3u4u5u6u7u1. By Lemma 3.1, χi(P(7,2))4. We assume by contradiction that P(7,2) has a 4-injective edge coloring.

    Case 1. Only three colors are used to color the edges of C:

    Then there exist three edges colored with the same color, two of them must be adjacent, and the third one is opposite to them. Without loss of generality, let ψ(u1u2)=ψ(u2u3)=ψ(u5u6)=1. By symmetry, if suffices to consider the following three sub-cases.

    If ψ(u1u2)=1,ψ(u2u3)=1,ψ(u3u4)=2,ψ(u4u5)=2,ψ(u5u6)=1,ψ(u6u7)=3,ψ(u7u1)=2, then the edge v7v2 must be colored with 4, but now the edge v4v6 cannot be colored.

    If ψ(u1u2)=1,ψ(u2u3)=1,ψ(u3u4)=2,ψ(u4u5)=2,ψ(u5u6)=1,ψ(u6u7)=3,ψ(u7u1)=3, then the edge v4v6 must be colored with 4, but now the edge v1v3 cannot be colored.

    If ψ(u1u2)=1,ψ(u2u3)=1,ψ(u3u4)=2,ψ(u4u5)=3,ψ(u5u6)=1,ψ(u6u7)=2,ψ(u7u1)=3, then the edge v7v2 must be colored with 4, but now the edge v3v5 cannot be colored.

    Case 2. Four colors are used to color the edges of C:

    First note that there exist no four successive edges uiui+1,ui+1ui+2,ui+2ui+3, ui+3ui+4 (the subscripts are taken modulo 7) that are colored differently, because otherwise the edge vi+1vi+3 cannot be colored. Since there are four colors and seven edges on C, at least one color, say 4, that is used only once. Without loss of generality, let ψ(u1u2)=4. Since edges u2u3,u7u1,u1u2 are colored differently, suppose ψ(u2u3)=1 and ψ(u7u1)=2, then u3u4 and u6u7 must be colored with 1 or 2. So ψ(u4u5)=3 or ψ(u5u6)=3.

    In both case, we have that ψ(u3u4)=1, ψ(u4u5)=3, ψ(u5u6)=3 and ψ(u6u7)=2. Then we deduce that ψ(v2v4)=2,ψ(v4v6)=4,ψ(u7v7)=1,ψ(u1v1)=3, now the edge u2v2 cannot be colored, a contradiction.

    So we have shown that χi(P(7,2))5. In Figure 20, we give a 5-injective edge coloring of P(7,2). Therefore, χi(P(7,2))=5.

    Figure 20.  An injective edge coloring of P(7,2).

    From Lemma 3.1 to Lemma 3.6, we complete the proof of Theorem1.2.

    In this paper, we have determined the exact values of the injective edge coloring numbers for P(n,1) with n3 and for P(n,2) with 4n7. For n8, we have showed that 4χi(P(n,2))5. However, we don't know whether the exact values of the injective edge coloring numbers for P(n,2) are 4 or 5. We conjecture that χi(P(n,2))=5. It is also open to compute the exact values of the injective edge coloring numbers of P(n,k) for k3.

    This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2020J05058).

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] M. Alaeiyan, H. Karami, Perfect 2-colorings of the generalized Petersen graph, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci., 126 (2016), 289–294. doi: 10.1007/s12044-016-0285-4
    [2] A. A. Bertossi, M. A. Bonuccelli, Code assignment for hidden terminal interference avoidance in multihop packet radio networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 3 (1995), 441–449. doi: 10.1109/90.413218
    [3] Y. Bu, W. Chen, Injective-edge coloring of planar graphs with girth at least 6, Journal of Zhejiang Normal University, 43 (2020), 19–25 (In Chinese).
    [4] Y. Bu, C. Qi, J. Zhu, Injective edge coloring of planar graphs, Adv. Math., 6 (2020), 675–684(In Chinese).
    [5] Y. Bu, C. Qi, Injective edge coloring of sparse graphs, Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications, 10 (2018), 1850022. doi: 10.1142/S1793830918500222
    [6] D. M. Cardoso, J. O. Cerdeira, J. P. Cruz, C. Dominic, Injective edge coloring of graphs, Filomat, 33 (2019), 6411–6423. doi: 10.2298/FIL1919411C
    [7] B. Ferdjallah, S. Kerdjoudj, A. Raspaud, Injective edge-coloring of sparse graphs, arXiv: 1907.0983v2 [math.CO], 2019.
    [8] G. Hahn, J. Kratochviˊl, J. Sir\acute{a}, D. Sotteau, On the injective chromatic number of graphs, Discrete Math., 256 (2002), 179–192. doi: 10.1016/S0012-365X(01)00466-6
    [9] A. Kostochka, A. Raspaud, J. Xu, Injective edge-coloring of graphs with given maximum degree, Eur. J. Combin., 96 (2021), 103355. doi: 10.1016/j.ejc.2021.103355
    [10] Z. Yang, B. Wu, Strong edge chromatic index of the generalized Petersen graphs, Appl. Math. Comput., 321 (2018), 431–441.
    [11] J. Yue, S. Zhang, X. Zhang, Note on the perfect EIC-graphs, Appl. Math. Comput., 289 (2016), 481–485.
    [12] E. Zhu, Z. Li, Z. Shao, J. Xu, C. Liu, Acyclic 3-coloring of generalized Petersen graphs, J. Comb. Optim., 31 (2016), 902–911. doi: 10.1007/s10878-014-9799-9
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. 小兵 胡, List Injective Edge Coloring of Sparse Graphs, 2022, 12, 2163-1476, 738, 10.12677/ORF.2022.123078
    2. Jian Lu, Huiqing Liu, Xiaolan Hu, Injective Edge Coloring for Graphs with Small Edge Weight, 2022, 38, 0911-0119, 10.1007/s00373-022-02562-3
    3. Shanshan Zheng, Hongyan Cai, Yuanpei Wang, Qiang Sun, On the Chromatic Index of the Signed Generalized Petersen Graph GP(n,2), 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 393, 10.3390/axioms11080393
    4. Xiaolan Hu, Belayneh-Mengistu Legass, Injective Edge Chromatic Index of Generalized Petersen Graphs, 2023, 46, 0126-6705, 10.1007/s40840-022-01442-6
    5. Jian Lu, Xiang-Feng Pan, Injective edge coloring of some sparse graphs, 2023, 69, 1598-5865, 3421, 10.1007/s12190-023-01888-2
    6. Xiaolan Hu, Belayneh-Mengistu Legass, Injective edge chromatic index of generalized Petersen graph P(ck,k), 2024, 16, 1793-8309, 10.1142/S1793830922501890
    7. C.K. Bhanupriya, Charles Dominic, M.S. Sunitha, Injective edge coloring of product graphs and some complexity results, 2023, 37, 0354-5180, 3963, 10.2298/FIL2312963K
    8. 莉 周, Vertex Reducible Edge (Total) Coloring of Two Classes of Generalized Petersen Graph, 2023, 13, 2160-7583, 1851, 10.12677/PM.2023.136188
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3393) PDF downloads(229) Cited by(7)

Figures and Tables

Figures(20)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog