
In this work, we study the problem of p−th moment global exponential stability for functional differential equations and scalar chaotic delayed equations under random impulsive effects. Meanwhile, the p−th moment global exponential synchronization for the proposed equations is also discussed, whereas the main results are proved by using Lyapunov function and Razumikhin technique. Furthermore, the impact of fixed and random time impulses are presented by applying the results to Mackey Glass blood cell production model and Ikeda bistable resonator model. Finally, the effectiveness of fixed and random impulses are depicted via graphical representations.
Citation: A. Vinodkumar, T. Senthilkumar, S. Hariharan, J. Alzabut. Exponential stabilization of fixed and random time impulsive delay differential system with applications[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(3): 2384-2400. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021121
[1] | Yilin Tu, Jin-E Zhang . Event-triggered impulsive control for input-to-state stability of nonlinear time-delay system with delayed impulse. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(4): 876-896. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025031 |
[2] | Hongjing Shi, Wanbiao Ma . An improved model of t cell development in the thymus and its stability analysis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2006, 3(1): 237-248. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.237 |
[3] | Paolo Fergola, Marianna Cerasuolo, Edoardo Beretta . An allelopathic competition model with quorum sensing and delayed toxicant production. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2006, 3(1): 37-50. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.37 |
[4] | Haitao Zhu, Xinrui Ji, Jianquan Lu . Impulsive strategies in nonlinear dynamical systems: A brief overview. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 4274-4321. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023200 |
[5] | Linni Li, Jin-E Zhang . Input-to-state stability of stochastic nonlinear system with delayed impulses. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 2233-2253. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024098 |
[6] | Tingting Yu, Sanling Yuan . Dynamics of a stochastic turbidostat model with sampled and delayed measurements. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(4): 6215-6236. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023268 |
[7] | Biwen Li, Qiaoping Huang . Synchronization of time-delay systems with impulsive delay via an average impulsive estimation approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(3): 4501-4520. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024199 |
[8] | Xueyan Yang, Xiaodi Li, Qiang Xi, Peiyong Duan . Review of stability and stabilization for impulsive delayed systems. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(6): 1495-1515. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018069 |
[9] | Mohsen Dlala, Sharifah Obaid Alrashidi . Rapid exponential stabilization of Lotka-McKendrick's equation via event-triggered impulsive control. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 9121-9131. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021449 |
[10] | Guodong Li, Ying Zhang, Yajuan Guan, Wenjie Li . Stability analysis of multi-point boundary conditions for fractional differential equation with non-instantaneous integral impulse. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(4): 7020-7041. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023303 |
In this work, we study the problem of p−th moment global exponential stability for functional differential equations and scalar chaotic delayed equations under random impulsive effects. Meanwhile, the p−th moment global exponential synchronization for the proposed equations is also discussed, whereas the main results are proved by using Lyapunov function and Razumikhin technique. Furthermore, the impact of fixed and random time impulses are presented by applying the results to Mackey Glass blood cell production model and Ikeda bistable resonator model. Finally, the effectiveness of fixed and random impulses are depicted via graphical representations.
The time delay plays an important role in various fields such as biology, economics, chemistry, physiology, neural network, engineering, etc. Indeed, the presence of delay in models often results in chaos, instability, and poor performance. The effect of time delay on nonlinear models has been the objective of many researchers in the last decades. For instance in [1], Mackey and Glass investigated the time delay nonlinear model of blood cell production for patients with Leukemia. However in [2], Ikeda studied the chaotic nature of delay of the optical bistable resonator.
On other direction, time delay systems which describe real phenomena might undergo sudden changes in their nature. This case is best described by incorporating the action of impulses to time delay systems which provides more adequate interpretation for real situations. It has been realized that the action of the impulses may cause chaos and instability in systems. Alternatively, impulses can be used as a control to stabilize and synchronize the chaotic delayed systems. We refer here to the papers [3,4] where impulsive stabilization results for chaotic systems are studied and to the paper [5] where the impulsive stabilization and impulsive synchronization for Lorenz system are proved. In [6], it was shown that the impulsive controller guarantees the exponential convergence rate and exponential stability of chaotic time delay systems. Recently, several types of stability results are obtained based on impulsive control theory [7,8,9,10,11]. For more impulsive stability and synchronization results, we refer the reader to the literature [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
The study of delay differential systems with impulses has attracted the attention of many researchers due to their practical applicability in describing the nature of occurrences in real-world systems that often require past history and change from one state to another. However, most works have been conducted for systems with fixed impulses. Never the less, it has been realized that the impulsive arrival taken at random times leads to the solutions that are stochastic in nature and is different from the deterministic impulses. The literature has witnessed the appearance of some works on differential systems with random impulses. The existence, uniqueness, and stability of differential systems with random impulses have been carried out in [31]. The study of p−th moment exponential stability of differential systems with randomly occurring impulses has been done in [32]. Recently in [33], the authors investigated the applicability of random impulse control to make the unstable time-delay systems stable. Particularly, the exponential stability for stochastic differential systems under the impulsive effects taken at random time points was investigated in [34,35,36]. To the best of our observation, however, there is no paper has addressed the concepts of global exponential stability (GES) for random impulsive scalar delayed equation (RIDDEs) and random impulsive scalar chaotic delayed equation (RISCDEs) by using Lyapunov and Razumikhin technique. Most of the impulsive stabilization and impulsive synchronization results published in the literature have involved fixed time impulsive effects [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].
The objective of this paper is to fill in this gap and investigate functional differential equations and scalar chaotic delayed equations under the effects of impulses taken at fixed and random times. For this purpose, we consider the effects of impulses taken at random time points and assume the waiting time between two consecutive impulses to follow an exponential distribution. The Lyapunov-Razumikhin technique is employed to obtain p−th moment GES. Moreover, the p−th moment global exponential synchronization(GESy) for the given systems is addressed. For the purpose of applications, we examine the validity of our results by applying them to the Mackey-Glass blood cell production and Ikeda optical bistable resonator models. Comparing to the above mentioned results, we claim that our results are new and discusses different approach. The current paper extends and improves the results reported in [46].
The structure of the paper is as follows: In section 2, essential preliminaries and model formulation are adressed. In Section 3, we prove p−th moment GES and p−th moment GESy for the proposed systems. In section 4, the obtained results are applied to Mackey-Glass blood cell production and Ikeda optical bistable resonator models. The effectiveness of fixed and random impulses are illustrated via graphical representations. We end the paper by a conclusion.
Notations: Let R=(−∞,∞), R+=[0,∞), and Z+={1,2,…}. Let Rn be the Euclidean space and (Ω,F,P) be a probability space. Let PC([−r,0],Rn)={φ:[−r,0]→Rn} be the set of all piecewise right continuous real valued random variables, and E‖φ‖=supθ∈[−r,0]E‖φ(θ)‖, denotes the norm of function φ∈PC([−r,0],Rn), where E is the expectation operator and r>0. We use PCB(t) to denote set of all bounded piecewise right continuous real valued random variables φ. Let {τ′m}∞m=1 be a sequence of independent exponentially distributed random variable with parameter γ defined on sample space Ω and {τm}∞m=1 be a sequence of points, where τm are arbitrary values of the random variable τ′m,∀m∈Z+. Let {χ′m}∞m=0 be an increasing sequence of random variables and {χm}∞m=0 be an increasing sequence of points, where χm is an value of the corresponding random variable χ′m,∀m∈Z+. Note that χ′0=t0, where t0≥0 is a fixed point and τ′m=χ′m−χ′m−1 for m∈Z+, and τ′m define the waiting time between two consecutive impulses such that ∞∑m=1τ′m=∞ with probability 1.
Consider the random impulsive functional differential equations
{y′(t)=g(t,yt),χ′m<t<χ′m+1,t≥t0,y(χ′+m)=Im(χ′m,y(χ′−m)),m∈Z+,y(θ)=ϕ(θ),θ∈[−r,0], | (2.1) |
where g∈C([0,∞)×PC([−r,0],Rn),Rn), g(t,0)=0 and ϕ∈PCB(t). For every t≥t0,yt={y(t+θ),θ∈[−r,0]}, where r>0. For each m∈Z+,Im(t,y)∈C([0,∞)×Rn,Rn),Im(χ′m,0)=0 and for any ρ>0, there exists ρ1>0(ρ1<ρ) such that y∈S(ρ1) which implies that y+Im(χ′m,y)∈S(ρ), where S(ρ)={y:‖y‖<ρ,y∈Rn}. The quantities y(χ′+m) and y(χ′−m) denote the right and left limits at χ′m, respectively. Let φ(θ)=y(t+θ) then it implies φ(0)=y(t).
For convenience, we define χ0=t0 and τm=χm−χm−1,∀m∈Z+, where τm denote the value of the waiting time. Then, system (2.1) becomes
{y′(t)=g(t,yt),t≠χm,t≥t0,y(χ+m)=Im(χm,y(χ−m)),m∈Z+,y(θ)=ϕ(θ),θ∈[−r,0], | (2.2) |
where y(t;t0,ϕ,{τm}) is the solution of system (2.2) which depends on the impulses χm,m∈Z+ with the initial condition (t0,ϕ). We will say that y(t;t0,ϕ,{τm}) is a sample path solution of system (2.1) and we will assume that limt→χm−0y(t;t0,ϕ,{τm})=y(χm;t0,ϕ,{τm}). Moreover, the set of all solutions y(t;t0,ϕ,{τm}) of systems (2.2) generates a stochastic process. We will denote it by y(t;t0,ϕ,{τ′m}) and we will say that it is a solution of system (2.1).
For the initial value problem system (2.1), we assume its solution is exists and unique. Moreover and since g(t,0)=0, and Im(χ′m,0)=0,m∈Z+, we can conclude that y(t)=0 is the trivial solution of system (2.1).
Lemma 2.1. [32,33], Assume there exist exactly m impulses until the time t,t≥t0, and τ′m=χ′m−χ′m−1,∀m∈Z+, then the probability
P[Δm(t)]=γm(t−t0)mm!e−γ(t−t0), |
where the events Δm(t)={ω∈Ω:χ′m(ω)<t<χ′m+1(ω)},m∈Z+.
Definition 2.2. [46], The function W:[−r,∞)×PC([−r,0],Rn)⟶R+ belongs to class ω0 if
(i) W is continuous differentiable almost every where function.
(ii) W(t,y) is locally Lipschitzian in y and W(t,0)≡0.
Definition 2.3. [46], For given W∈ω0, D+W is defined as
D+W(t,φ(0))=lim suph→0+{[W(t+h,φ(0)+hg(t,φ))−W(t,φ(0))]h}, |
for (t,φ)∈R+×PC([−r,0],Rn).
Definition 2.4. Let p>0. Then the trivial solution of system (2.1) is said to be p−th moment GES, if there exist λ>0 and L≥1, such that E‖y(t)‖p≤LE‖ϕ‖pe−λ(t−t0),t≥t0, for any initial value ϕ∈PCB(t0).
Theorem 2.5. Assume there exist a function W(t,y)∈ω0, and constants a1>0,a2>0(a1≤a2),p>0,q>0,M>1,λ>0,wm>0,κ>0, such that E[wm]≤κ,m∈Z+. Then the following conditions hold:
(i) a1‖y‖p≤W(t,y)≤a2‖y‖p,(t,y)∈[−r,∞)×Rn;
(ii) For any t≥t0 and φ∈PC([−r,0],Rn), if MW(t,φ(0))≥W(t+θ,φ(θ))eλθ,−r≤θ≤0,χ′m<t<χ′m+1, then D+W(t,φ(0))≤qW(t,φ(0)).
(iii) For every (χ′m,φ)∈R+×PC([−r,0],Rn),W(χ′m,φ(0)+Im(χ′m,φ))≤M−1wmW(χ′−m,φ(0)), with M={∞∏i=1E[wi]}<∞;
(iv) lnMq>τ′, where τ′=maxm∈Z+{χ′m−χ′m−1}<∞. Then the trivial solution of system (2.1) is p−th moment GES.
Proof. Let y(t),t≥t0 be a solution of system (2.1). We shall show that
E‖y‖p≤LE‖ϕ‖pe−[η+γ(1−κ)](t−t0),t≥t0, | (2.3) |
where η=min{λ,0.5τ∗}. From (iv), we define positive constant τ∗=lnM−qττ>0, where τ is the value of τ′. Set W(t)=W(t,y(t)), and we define
W(t)={m∏s=1ws,t≥χ11,t0≤t<χ1,Λ(t)={W(t)eη(t−t0),t≥t0W(t),t0−r≤t<t0, |
then we shall prove that
Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(t),t≥t0. |
It is equal to show that
Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(t),t∈[χk,χk+1),k∈Z+. |
Assume k=0. First, we prove for t∈[t0,χ1),
Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(t)=Ma2‖ϕ‖p. |
Suppose on the contrary it is not, then there exists some t∈[t0,χ1) such that Λ(t)>Ma2‖ϕ‖p. Note that Λ(t0)<Ma2‖ϕ‖p.
We define
ˆt=inf{t∈[t0,χ1)|Λ(t)≥Ma2‖ϕ‖p}, |
then ˆt>t0, Λ(ˆt)=Ma2‖ϕ‖p and Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖p,t∈[t0,ˆt).
Since
Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖p,t∈[t0−r,ˆt). | (2.4) |
Furthermore, we note that Λ(ˆt)=Ma2‖ϕ‖p>a2‖ϕ‖p≥Λ(t0). So we define
ˆˆt=sup{t∈[t0,ˆt)|Λ(t)≤a2‖ϕ‖p}, |
then ˆˆt<ˆt,Λ(ˆˆt)=a2‖ϕ‖p and a2‖ϕ‖p<Λ(t),t∈(ˆˆt,ˆt]. Combining with Eq (2.4), we have
eλθW(t+θ)≤e−η(t−t0)Λ(t+θ)≤e−η(t−t0)MΛ(t)=MW(t),θ∈[−r,0],t∈[ˆˆt,ˆt]. |
From (ii), D+W(t)≤qW(t) holds for t∈[ˆˆt,ˆt]. Hence, we have
D+Λ(t)=D+W(t)eη(t−t0)+ηW(t)eη(t−t0)=eη(t−t0)(D+W(t)+ηW(t))≤eη(t−t0)(qW(t)+ηW(t))=W(t)eη(t−t0)(q+η)≤(q+η)Λ(t),t∈[ˆˆt,ˆt]. |
Thus
∫Λ(ˆt)Λ(ˆˆt)dss≤∫ˆtˆˆt(q+η)ds≤∫ˆˆt+τˆˆt(q+η)ds≤qτ+ητ. |
However, noting that
∫Λ(ˆt)Λ(ˆˆt)dss=∫Ma2‖ϕ‖pa2‖ϕ‖pdss=lnM=ττ∗+qτ>qτ+ητ. |
This is a contradiction. Hence, Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖p,t∈[t0,χ1).
We assume it is true for k=m−1,
Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(t),t∈[χm−1,χm), | (2.5) |
which implies
Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(χm−1),t∈[t0−r,χm). |
Next we shall prove for k=m,
Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(t),t∈[χm,χm+1). | (2.6) |
Suppose that this assertion is not true, then there exists some t∈[χm,χm+1) such that
Λ(t)>Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(χm). |
It follows from Eq (2.5) that Λ(χm)<Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(χm). Thus we define
t∗=inf{t∈[χm,χm+1)|Λ(t)≥Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(χm)}, |
then t∗>χm,Λ(t∗)=Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(χm) and Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(χm),t∈[χm,t∗). Also, from Eq (2.5), we know that
Λ(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(χm),∀t∈[t0−r,t∗). | (2.7) |
Noting that
Λ(χm)≤a2‖ϕ‖pW(χm), |
and
Λ(t∗)=Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(χm)>a2‖ϕ‖pW(χm). |
Further, we define
t∗∗=sup{t∈[χm,t∗)|Λ(t)≤a2‖ϕ‖pW(χm)}. |
Then t∗∗<t∗,Λ(t∗∗)=a2‖ϕ‖pW(χm) and Λ(t)>a2‖ϕ‖pW(χm),t∈[t∗∗,t∗]. We can deduce that
eλθW(t+θ)≤e−η(t−t0)Λ(t+θ)≤e−η(t−t0)Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(χm)≤e−η(t−t0)MΛ(t)=MW(t),θ∈[−r,0],t∈[t∗∗,t∗], |
from condition (ii)
D+W(t)≤qW(t),t∈[t∗∗,t∗], |
which implies that
D+Λ(t)≤(q+η)Λ(t),t∈[t∗∗,t∗]. |
Thus
∫Λ(t∗)Λ(t∗∗)dss≤∫t∗t∗∗(q+η)ds≤∫t∗∗+τt∗∗(q+η)ds≤qτ+ητ. |
However, we note that
∫Λ(t∗)Λ(t∗∗)dss=∫Ma2‖ϕ‖pW(χm)a2‖ϕ‖pW(χm)dss=InM=ττ∗+qτ>qτ+ητ. |
This is a contradiction. Thus, Eq (2.6) holds. Then by the definition of Λ(t) and W(t), we get
W(t)≤Ma2‖ϕ‖pm∏s=1wse−η(t−t0),t≥t0, |
from the condition (i), we obtain
‖y(t)‖p≤L‖ϕ‖pm∏s=1wse−η(t−t0),[χm,χm+1), |
where L=a2a1M≥1. This solution generates a stochastic process, and it denoted by
‖y(t)‖p≤L‖ϕ‖pm∏s=1wse−η(t−t0),χ′m<t<χ′m+1. |
By using Lemma 2.1, and taking expectation, we have
E[‖y(t)‖p]=∞∑m=0E[‖y‖p|Δm(t)]P[Δm(t)],≤LE‖ϕ‖p∞∑m=0m∏s=1E[ws]e−η(t−t0)P[Δm(t)]≤LE‖ϕ‖p∞∑m=0m∏s=1E[ws]e−η(t−t0)γm(t−t0)mm!e−γ(t−t0)E‖y(t)‖p≤LE‖ϕ‖pe−[η+γ(1−κ)](t−t0), |
where [η+γ(1−κ)]>0 is exponential convergent rate.
In this section, Theorem 2.5 will be applied to study the p−th moment GES and p−th moment GESy results for RISCDEs.
Consider the following RISCDEs
{˙y(t)=−ay(t)+bg[y(t)]+ch[y(t−r)],χ′m<t<χ′m+1,t≥t0,y(χ′+m)=wmy(χ′−m),t=χ′m,m∈Z+,y(θ)=ϕ(θ),θ∈[−r,0], | (3.1) |
where ϕ∈PCB(t), a,b,c are positive scalar constants, r>0 is delay constant and the nonlinear functions g and h satisfy the conditions |g(y)|≤N|y| and |h(y)|≤L|y| where N,L>0.
Corollary 3.1. Assume that there exist constants M>1,λ>0,p>0,wm>0,κ>0, such that E(wm)≤κ. Let the following conditions hold:
(i) p[−a+bN+cLM1peλrp]>0.
(ii) τ′<lnMp[−a+bN+cLM1peλrp], where τ′=maxm∈Z+{χ′m−χ′m−1}<∞.
Then the trivial solution of Eq (3.1) is p−th moment GES.
Proof. Choose the Lyapunov function W(t)=|y(t)|p. From Eq (3.1), we have
W(χm,y(χm))=|y(χm)|p=wm|y(χ−m)|p≤wmW(χ−m,y(χ−m)). |
From Theorem 2.5, the Razumikhin condition Me−λθW(t,φ(0))≥W(t+θ,φ(θ)),θ∈[−r,0], implies that M1peλrp|y(t)|≥|y(t−r)|. Then calculating D+W along the solution of Eq (3.1), we get
D+W(t,y(t))≤p|y(t)|p−1[−a|y(t)|+bg[|y(t)|]+ch[|y(t−r)|]]≤p|y(t)|p−1[−a|y(t)|+bN|y(t)|+cL|y(t−r)|]≤p|y(t)|p−1[−a|y(t)|+bN|y(t)|+cLM1peλrp|y(t)|]≤qW(t), |
where q=p[−a+bN+cLM1peλrp]. By using Theorem 2.5, we end up with
lnMp[−a+bN+cLM1peλrp]>τ′. |
Hence the trivial solution of Eq (3.1) is p−th moment GES.
Consider the following RISCDEs,
{˙x(t)=−ax(t)+bg[x(t)]+ch[x(t−r)],t≥t0,x(θ)=Φ(θ),θ∈[−r,0], | (3.2) |
where Φ∈PCB(t). To inspect the synchronization problem through random impulsive control, we define the following response system:
{˙y(t)=−ay(t)+bg[y(t)]+ch[y(t−r)],χ′m<t<χ′m+1,t≥t0,y(χ′+m)=−wm[x(χ′−m)−y(χ′−m)],t=χ′m,m∈Z+,y(θ)=ϕ(θ),θ∈[−r,0], | (3.3) |
where ϕ∈PCB(t). Let ϑ(t)=x(t)−y(t) be the synchronization error condition. Then we define the following error system between Eqs (3.2) and (3.3):
{˙ϑ(t)=−aϑ(t)+bf[ϑ(t)]+cf[ϑ(t−r)],χ′m<t<χ′m+1,t≥t0,ϑ(χ′+m)=wmϑ(χ′−m),t=χ′m,m∈Z+,ϑ(θ)=Φ(θ)−ϕ(θ),θ∈[−r,0], | (3.4) |
where f is a nonlinear bounded function, defined by f[ϑ(t)]=g[ϑ(t)+y(t)]−g[y(t)], f[ϑ(t−r)]=h[ϑ(t−r)+y(t−r)]−h[y(t−r)], where a,b,c are constants.
Corollary 3.2. Assume that then there exist constants M>1,λ>0,p>0,wm>0,κ>0, such that E(wm)≤κ. Let the following conditions hold:
(i) p[−a+bN+cLM1peλrp]>0.
(ii) τ′<lnMp[−a+bN+cLM1peλrp], where τ′=maxm∈Z+{χ′m−χ′m−1}<∞.
Then the trivial solution of system (3.4) is p−th moment GESy.
The proof is similar to the proof of Corollary 3.1 and hence it is omitted.
In this part, we shall discuss the stability results for nonlinear scalar time delay model under fixed and random time impulses.
Leukemia means cancer that starts in the blood forming cells of the bone marrow. It is nothing but the increase of abnormal white blood cells produced by the bone marrow that is relatively mature. This results in the excess production of abnormal white blood cells compared to the normal production rate. The patients with Leukemia may take treatments (with fixed or at random time period) such as chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, supportive care, leukapheresis, surgery and radiotherapy, the patient may be curative. The following random impulsive model reflects the effectiveness of the treatments.
Example 4.1. From [1,47], the blood cell production model can be represented by nonlinear first order random impulsive control system of the form
{˙y(t)=−ay(t)+by(t−r)1+yc(t−r),χ′m<t<χ′m+1,t≥t0,y(χ′+m)=wmy(χ′−m),t=χ′m,m∈Z+,y(θ)=ϕ(θ),θ∈[−r,0], | (4.1) |
where y(t) represents the density of mature cells at time t, y(t−r) represents the density of abnormal white blood cells and r is the time-delay between the production of abnormal white blood cells in the bone marrow and their release of the mature cells in to the blood streams. In patients with leukemia, when the time r is large, the rapid increase in the density of abnormal white blood cells may vary chaotically. There are various kinds of treatments wm like chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, supportive care, leukapheresis, surgery and radiotherapy. The aim of the treatment is to control the production of abnormal white blood cells which provides the cure of the disease. Here, a is the average density independent death rate of the population and the constants a,b, and c are obtained from [1,47]. Consider the particular values a=0.1,b=0.2,c=10,ϕ(θ)=0.1, r=17 and wm=0.011 in Eq (4.1). Then Eq (4.1) exhibits a chaotic behavior illustrated in Figure 1.
Proposition 4.2. If τ′<0.1591. Then the solution of system (4.1) is GES.
Proof. Consider the Lyapunov function W(t)=|y(t)|. From Corollary 3.1, we take p=1,M=16,λ=110 and use Razumikhin condition to obtain 16e110×17|y(t)|≥|y(t−17)|. Then we have
D+W(t)≤−0.1|y(t)|+0.2|y(t−17)|1+|y10(t−17)|≤−0.1|y(t)|+0.2|y(t−17)|≤−0.1|y(t)|+0.2×16e110×17|y(t)|≤qW(t), |
where q=17.4166. By using Corollary 3.1, we get ln1617.4166=0.1591>τ′. Therefore, the solution of system (4.1) is GES.
Remark 4.3. Proposition 1 says that in patients with leukemia, the treatment like chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, supportive care, leukapheresis and radiotherapy is taking at random within the maximum duration between two consecutive treatments is less than 0.1591 days, then the patient may cure.
Remark 4.4. Figures 2 and 3, show that the effective of the treatment like chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, supportive care, leukapheresis and radiotherapy is taking at fixed and random. Furthermore, Figure 4 demonstrates the effective of random time treatment compared to the fixed time treatment.
Example 4.5. [2], When the intensity of the incident light is increased in the optical bistable resonator the transmitted light from a ring cavity containing a nonlinear dielectric medium undergoes a transition from a stationary state to other states. Ikeda addressed the optical bistable resonator with time delay in the following system:
{˙x(t)=−ax(t)+bsin[x(t−r)],t≥t0,x(θ)=ϕ(θ),θ∈[−r,0], | (4.2) |
where, x is the phase lag of the electric field across the resonator and a is the relaxation coefficient, b is the laser intensity and r is the round-trip time of the light in the resonator. Then, system (4.2) exhibits a chaotic behavior as shown in Figure 5. Let wm be the amount of external cavity, it fit at the random way in system (4.2), then we obtain the following form of random impulsive system:
{˙y(t)=−ay(t)+bsin[y(t−r)],χ′m<t<χ′m+1,t≥t0,y(χ′+m)=wmy(χ′−m),t=χ′m,m∈Z+,y(θ)=ϕ(θ),θ∈[−r,0], | (4.3) |
where a=1,b=4,ϕ(θ)=0.1,r=2 and wm=0.29.
Proposition 4.6. If τ′<0.0558. Then the error value of Eqs (4.2) and (4.3) is GESy.
Proof. Consider the Lyapunov function W(t)=|ν(t)|. From Corollary 3.2, we take M=5,λ=15,p=1 and use the Razumikhin condition to obtain 5e15×2|y(t)|≥|y(t−2)|. Hence, we have
D+W(t)≤−1|y(t)|+4sin[|y(t−2)|]≤−1|y(t)|+4|y(t−2)|≤−1|y(t)|+4×5e15×2|y(t)|≤qW(t), |
where q=28.8364. By Corollary 3.2, we get ln528.8364=0.0558>τ′. Therefore, the error value of Eqs (4.2) and (4.3) is GESy.
Remark 4.7. Figures 6 and 7 illustrate the external cavity that controls the transmitted light with fixed and random times. Besides, the comparative results on external cavity (fixed and random time) is depicted in Figure 8.
In this paper, the p−th moment global exponential stability and p−th moment global exponential synchronization are studied for functional differential equations and scalar chaotic delayed equations. We propose the main equations under random impulsive effects and show the effeteness of impulses to stabilize and synchronize the solutions of the proposed equations. Our approach is based on the Lyapunov-Razumikhin techniques which help establishing new sufficient conditions that are extending the existing results in the literature. The blood cell production and optical bistable resonator models are proposed to examine the validity and applicability of the theoretical results. We illustrate the main theorems by graphical simulations that demonstrate the fast convergence of the random impulsive control compared to the fixed impulsive control.
The applications of random impulsive control can be extended to investigate many physical phenomena that involve delay systems. For future consideration, the consideration of random impulsive control for neural network time-delay systems could be a promising topic.
This work was supported by Science & Engineering Research Board (DST-SERB) project file number: ECR/ 2015/000301 in India. J. Alzabut would like to thank Prince Sultan University for supporting and funding this work.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] |
M. C. Mackey, L. Glass, Oscillation and chaos in physiological control systems, Science, 197 (1977), 287-289. doi: 10.1126/science.267326
![]() |
[2] |
K. Ikeda, Multiple-valued stationary state and its instability of the transmitted light by a ring cavity system, Opt. Commun., 30 (1979), 257-261. doi: 10.1016/0030-4018(79)90090-7
![]() |
[3] |
J. Sun, Y. Zhang, Q. Wu, Impulsive control for the stabilization and synchronization of lorenz systems, Phys. Lett. A, 298 (2002), 153-160. doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00466-8
![]() |
[4] |
T. Yang, L. B. Yang, C. M. Yang, Impulsive control of lorenz system, Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom., 110 (1997), 18-24. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(97)00116-4
![]() |
[5] |
X. Liu, Impulsive stabilization and control of chaotic system, Nonlinear Anal., 47 (2001), 1081-1092. doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00248-6
![]() |
[6] |
Z. Yang, D. Xu, Stability analysis and design of impulsive control systems with time delay, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 52 (2007), 1448-1454. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2007.902748
![]() |
[7] |
X. Li, S. Song, J. Wu, Exponential stability of nonlinear systems with delayed impulses and applications, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 64 (2019), 4024-4034. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2019.2905271
![]() |
[8] |
X. Li, J. Wu, Sufficient stability conditions of nonlinear differential systems under impulsive control with state-dependent delay, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 63 (2018), 306-311. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2639819
![]() |
[9] | X. Li, X. Yang, T. Huang, Persistence of delayed cooperative models: Impulsive control method, Appl. Math. Comput., 342 (2019), 130-146. |
[10] |
H. Danhua, X. Liguang, Ultimate boundedness of nonautonomous dynamical complex networks under impulsive control, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Express Briefs, 62 (2015), 997-1001. doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2015.2436191
![]() |
[11] |
D. Zhenlei, X. Liguang, G. S. Sam, Attracting sets of discrete-time Markovian jump delay systems with stochastic disturbances via impulsive control, J. Franklin Inst., 357 (2020), 9781-9810. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.07.049
![]() |
[12] |
E. A. Alzahrani, H. Akca, X. Li, New synchronization schemes for delayed chaotic neural networks with impulses, Neural. Comput. Appl., 28 (2017), 2823-2837. doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2218-7
![]() |
[13] |
J. Cao, D. W. Ho, Y. Yang, Projective synchronization of a class of delayed chaotic systems via impulsive control, Phys. Lett. A, 373 (2009), 3128-3133. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2009.06.056
![]() |
[14] |
I. Chaiya, C. Rattanakul, An impulsive mathematical model of bone formation and resorption: effects of parathyroid hormone, calcitonin and impulsive estrogen supplement, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2017 (2017), 1-20. doi: 10.1186/s13662-016-1057-2
![]() |
[15] |
M. Iswarya, R. Raja, G. Rajchakit, J. Cao, J. Alzabut, C. Huang, et al., Existence, uniqueness and exponential stability of periodic solution for discrete-time delayed bam neural networks based on coincidence degree theory and graph theoretic method, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1055. doi: 10.3390/math7111055
![]() |
[16] |
M. Iswarya, R. Raja, G. Rajchakit, J. Cao, J. Alzabut, C. Huang, et al., A perspective on graph theory-based stability analysis of impulsive stochastic recurrent neural networks with time-varying delays, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2019 (2019), 1-21. doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1939-6
![]() |
[17] |
C. Li, X. Liao, X. Yang, T. Huang, Impulsive stabilization and synchronization of a class of chaotic delay systems, Chaos, 15 (2005), 043103. doi: 10.1063/1.2102107
![]() |
[18] |
C. Li, X. Liao, R. Zhang, Impulsive synchronization of nonlinear coupled chaotic systems, Phys. Lett. A, 328 (2004), 47-50. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2004.05.065
![]() |
[19] |
X. Li, Y. Ding, Razumikhin-type theorems for time-delay systems with persistent impulses, Syst. Cont. Lett., 107 (2017), 22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2017.06.007
![]() |
[20] |
X. Li, D. W. Ho, J. Cao, Finite-time stability and settling-time estimation of nonlinear impulsive systems, Automatica, 99 (2019), 361-368. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.10.024
![]() |
[21] |
Z. Luo, J. Shen, Stability of impulsive functional differential equations via the Lyapunov functional, Appl. Math. Lett., 22 (2009), 163-169. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2008.03.004
![]() |
[22] |
G. Stamov, I. Stamova, J. O. Alzabut, Existence of almost periodic solutions for strongly stable nonlinear impulsive differential-difference equations, Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst., 6 (2012), 818-823. doi: 10.1016/j.nahs.2011.08.002
![]() |
[23] |
G. T. Stamov, J. O. Alzabut, Almost periodic solutions in the pc-space for uncertain impulsive dynamical systems, Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl., 74 (2011), 4653-4659. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.04.026
![]() |
[24] |
I. Stamova, G. T. Stamov, J. O. Alzabut, Global exponential stability for a class of impulsive bam neural networks with distributed delays, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 7 (2013), 1539. doi: 10.12785/amis/070438
![]() |
[25] |
J. Sun, Q. L. Han, X. Jiang, Impulsive control of time-delay systems using delayed impulse and its application to impulsive master-slave synchronization, Phys. Lett. A, 372 (2008), 6375-6380. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.08.067
![]() |
[26] |
Y. W. Wang, Z. H. Guan, J. W. Xiao, Impulsive control for synchronization of a class of continuous systems, Chaos, 14 (2004), 199-203. doi: 10.1063/1.1644351
![]() |
[27] |
Q. Wu, J. Zhou, L. Xiang, Global exponential stability of impulsive differential equations with any time delays, Appl. Math. Lett., 23 (2010), 143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2009.09.001
![]() |
[28] |
X. Yang, Z. Yang, X. Nie, Exponential synchronization of discontinuous chaotic systems via delayed impulsive control and its application to secure communication, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 19 (2014), 1529-1543. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.09.012
![]() |
[29] |
Z. Yang, D. Xu, Robust stability of uncertain impulsive control systems with time-varying delay, Comput. Math. Appl., 53 (2007), 760-769. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.10.023
![]() |
[30] |
X. Zhang, X. Lv, X. Li, Sampled-data-based lag synchronization of chaotic delayed neural networks with impulsive control, Nonlinear Dyn., 90 (2017), 2199-2207. doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3795-4
![]() |
[31] |
A. Anguraj, A. Vinodkumar, Existence, uniqueness and stability results of random impulsive semilinear differential systems, Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Systems, 4 (2010), 475-483. doi: 10.1016/j.nahs.2009.11.004
![]() |
[32] |
R. Agarwal, S. Hristova, D. ORegan, Exponential stability for differential equations with random impulses at random times, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2013 (2013), 1-12. doi: 10.1186/1687-1847-2013-1
![]() |
[33] |
A. Vinodkumar, T. Senthilkumar, X. Li, Robust exponential stability results for uncertain infinite delay differential systems with random impulsive moments, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2018 (2018), 1-12. doi: 10.1186/s13662-017-1452-3
![]() |
[34] |
W. Hu, Q. Zhu, Moment exponential stability of stochastic delay systems with delayed impulse effects at random times and applications in the stabilisation of stochastic neural networks, Int. J. Control, 93 (2020), 2505-2515. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2019.1566635
![]() |
[35] |
W. Hu, Q. Zhu, Moment exponential stability of stochastic nonlinear delay systems with impulse effects at random times, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 29 (2019), 3809-3820. doi: 10.1002/rnc.4031
![]() |
[36] |
W. Hu, Q. Zhu, Exponential stability of stochastic differential equations with impulse effects at random times, Asian J. Control, 22 (2020), 779-787. doi: 10.1002/asjc.1937
![]() |
[37] | M. Han, Y. Liu, J. Lu, Impulsive control for the synchronization of chaotic systems with time delay, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2012 (2012), 647561. |
[38] |
T. Ma, F. L. Lewis, Y. Song, Exponential synchronization of nonlinear multi-agent systems with time delays and impulsive disturbances, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 26 (2016), 1615-1631. doi: 10.1002/rnc.3370
![]() |
[39] |
T. Yu, H.Wang, D. Cao, Synchronization of delayed neural networks with hybrid coupling via impulsive control, Trans. Inst. Meas. Control, 41 (2019), 3714-3724. doi: 10.1177/0142331219834993
![]() |
[40] |
X. Liguang, G. S. Sam, Asymptotic behavior analysis of complex-valued impulsive differential systems with time-varying delays, Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Systems, 27 (2018), 13-28. doi: 10.1016/j.nahs.2017.07.002
![]() |
[41] |
X. Liguang, D. Zhenlei, H. Danhua, Exponential ultimate boundedness of impulsive stochastic delay differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 85 (2018), 70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2018.05.019
![]() |
[42] |
X. Liguang, G. S. Sam, The pth moment exponential ultimate boundedness of impulsive stochastic differential systems, Appl. Math. Lett., 42 (2015), 22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2014.10.018
![]() |
[43] |
H. Wei, Z. Quanxin, K. H. Reza, Some improved Razumikhin stability criteria for impulsive stochastic delay differential systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 64 (2019), 5207-5213. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2019.2911182
![]() |
[44] |
Z. Quanxin, pth Moment exponential stability of impulsive stochastic functional differential equations with Markovian switching, J. Franklin Inst., 351 (2014), 3965-3986. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.04.001
![]() |
[45] |
W. Hu, Q. Zhu, Stability analysis of impulsive stochastic delayed differential systems with unbounded delays, Syst. Control Lett., 136 (2020), 104606. doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2019.104606
![]() |
[46] |
A. Vinodkumar, T. Senthilkumar, X. Li, Exponential stability results on random and fixed time impulsive differential systems with infinite delay, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 843. doi: 10.3390/math7090843
![]() |
[47] |
M. A. De Menezes, R. Z. Dos Santos, The onset of mackey-glass leukemia at the edge of chaos, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 11 (2000), 1545-1553. doi: 10.1142/S0129183100001346
![]() |
1. | Qian-Bao Yin, Yu Guo, Dan Wu, Xiao-Bao Shu, Existence and Multiplicity of Mild Solutions for First-Order Hamilton Random Impulsive Differential Equations with Dirichlet Boundary Conditions, 2023, 22, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-023-00748-5 | |
2. | A. Vinodkumar, T. Senthilkumar, Hüseyin Işık, S. Hariharan, Nallappan Gunasekaran, An exponential stabilization of random impulsive control systems and its application to chaotic systems, 2023, 46, 0170-4214, 3237, 10.1002/mma.8688 | |
3. | Syed Omar Shah, Cemil Tunç, Rizwan Rizwan, Akbar Zada, Qayyum Ullah Khan, Iftikhar Ullah, Ibrar Ullah, Bielecki–Ulam’s Types Stability Analysis of Hammerstein and Mixed Integro–Dynamic Systems of Non–Linear Form with Instantaneous Impulses on Time Scales, 2022, 21, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-022-00639-1 | |
4. | Wei Hu, Stability of Impulsive Stochastic Delay Systems with Markovian Switched Delay Effects, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 1110, 10.3390/math10071110 | |
5. | Natalya O. Sedova, Olga V. Druzhinina, Exponential Stability of Nonlinear Time-Varying Delay Differential Equations via Lyapunov–Razumikhin Technique, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 896, 10.3390/math11040896 | |
6. | K. Pooja Lakshmi, T. Senthilkumar, Robust exponential synchronization results for uncertain infinite time varying distributed delayed neural networks with flexible delayed impulsive control, 2023, 209, 03784754, 267, 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.02.009 | |
7. | Haitao Zhu, Xinrui Ji, Jianquan Lu, Impulsive strategies in nonlinear dynamical systems: A brief overview, 2022, 20, 1551-0018, 4274, 10.3934/mbe.2023200 | |
8. | Wei Hu, Stochastic Finite-Time Stability for Stochastic Nonlinear Systems with Stochastic Impulses, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 817, 10.3390/sym14040817 | |
9. | P. Babu Dhivakaran, A. Vinodkumar, S. Vijay, S. Lakshmanan, J. Alzabut, R. A. El-Nabulsi, W. Anukool, Bipartite Synchronization of Fractional-Order Memristor-Based Coupled Delayed Neural Networks with Pinning Control, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 3699, 10.3390/math10193699 | |
10. | T. Senthilkumar, A. Vinodkumar, M. Gowrisankar, Stability results on random impulsive control for uncertain neutral delay differential systems, 2022, 0020-7179, 1, 10.1080/00207179.2022.2097126 | |
11. | Arumugam Vinodkumar, Senthilkumar Hemalatha, Results on relative controllability for nonlinear system with multi‐delays in control, 2023, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.9746 | |
12. | Arumugam Vinodkumar, Sivakumar Harinie, Michal Fečkan, Jehad Alzabut, Some stability results on non-linear singular differential systems with random impulsive moments, 2023, 13, 2146-5703, 259, 10.11121/ijocta.2023.1327 | |
13. | Chunli You, Linxin Shu, Xiao-bao Shu, Approximate controllability of second-order neutral stochastic differential evolution systems with random impulsive effect and state-dependent delay, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 28906, 10.3934/math.20241403 | |
14. | A. Anguraj, A. Vinodkumar, Global existence and stability results for partial delay integro-differential equations with random impulses, 2023, 37, 0354-5180, 317, 10.2298/FIL2301317A | |
15. | P. Babu Dhivakaran, M. Gowrisankar, A. Vinodkumar, Bipartite Synchronization of Fractional Order Multiple Memristor Coupled Delayed Neural Networks with Event Triggered Pinning Control, 2024, 56, 1573-773X, 10.1007/s11063-024-11507-1 | |
16. | Sibel DOĞRU AKGÖL, Existence of solutions for impulsive boundary value problems on infinite intervals, 2023, 72, 1303-5991, 721, 10.31801/cfsuasmas.1186785 | |
17. | T. Senthilkumar, A. Vinodkumar, Stability analysis for singular random impulsive control system: A novel neutral impulsive delay system approach, 2023, 46, 0170-4214, 14200, 10.1002/mma.9314 | |
18. | Reshma Ramaswami, Nivedha Vasu Thoppilkalam, Arumugam Vinodkumar, Jehad Alzabut, Exponential stabilization of hybrid event‐triggered singular time‐delay systems, 2024, 47, 0170-4214, 13283, 10.1002/mma.10190 | |
19. | Syed Omar Shah, Vipin Kumar, Sanket Tikare, Rizwan Rizwan, Usman Riaz, Qualitative Results of Non-linear Adjoint Dynamic System with Delays and Impulses on Arbitrary Time Domains, 2025, 24, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-01205-7 |