Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js

Embedding opportunities for participation and feedback in large mathematics lectures via audience response systems

  • The purpose of this work is to interpret the experiences of students when audience response systems (ARS) were implemented as a strategy for teaching large mathematics lecture groups at university. Our paper makes several contributions to the literature. Firstly, we furnish a basic model of how ARS can form a teaching and learning strategy. Secondly, we examine the impact of this strategy on student attitudes of their experiences, focusing on the ability of ARS to: assess understanding; identify strengths and weaknesses; furnish feedback; support learning; and to encourage participation. Our findings support the position that there is a place for ARS as part of a strategy for teaching and learning mathematics in large groups.

    Citation: Christopher C. Tisdell. Embedding opportunities for participation and feedback in large mathematics lectures via audience response systems[J]. STEM Education, 2021, 1(2): 75-91. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021006

    Related Papers:

    [1] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Sameh Askar, Thongchai Botmart, Aqeel Ahmad, Hijaz Ahmad . Modeling and analysis of fractional order Zika model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3912-3938. doi: 10.3934/math.2022216
    [2] Sabri T. M. Thabet, Reem M. Alraimy, Imed Kedim, Aiman Mukheimer, Thabet Abdeljawad . Exploring the solutions of a financial bubble model via a new fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8587-8614. doi: 10.3934/math.2025394
    [3] Zongmin Yue, Yitong Li, Fauzi Mohamed Yusof . Dynamic analysis and optimal control of Zika virus transmission with immigration. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21893-21913. doi: 10.3934/math.20231116
    [4] Jonas Ogar Achuobi, Edet Peter Akpan, Reny George, Austine Efut Ofem . Stability analysis of Caputo fractional time-dependent systems with delay using vector lyapunov functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28079-28099. doi: 10.3934/math.20241362
    [5] Liping Wang, Peng Wu, Mingshan Li, Lei Shi . Global dynamics analysis of a Zika transmission model with environment transmission route and spatial heterogeneity. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4803-4832. doi: 10.3934/math.2022268
    [6] Jutarat Kongson, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Weerawat Sudsutad . Analysis of a fractional model for HIV CD4+ T-cells with treatment under generalized Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7285-7304. doi: 10.3934/math.2021427
    [7] Muhammad Altaf Khan, Sajjad Ullah, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan . Fractional order SEIR model with generalized incidence rate. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 2843-2857. doi: 10.3934/math.2020182
    [8] Fidel Meléndez-Vázquez, Guillermo Fernández-Anaya, Aldo Jonathan Muñóz-Vázquez, Eduardo Gamaliel Hernández-Martínez . Generalized conformable operators: Application to the design of nonlinear observers. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12952-12975. doi: 10.3934/math.2021749
    [9] Miled El Hajji, Mohammed Faraj S. Aloufi, Mohammed H. Alharbi . Influence of seasonality on Zika virus transmission. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19361-19384. doi: 10.3934/math.2024943
    [10] Zafar Iqbal, Muhammad Aziz-ur Rehman, Muhammad Imran, Nauman Ahmed, Umbreen Fatima, Ali Akgül, Muhammad Rafiq, Ali Raza, Ali Asrorovich Djuraev, Fahd Jarad . A finite difference scheme to solve a fractional order epidemic model of computer virus. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2337-2359. doi: 10.3934/math.2023121
  • The purpose of this work is to interpret the experiences of students when audience response systems (ARS) were implemented as a strategy for teaching large mathematics lecture groups at university. Our paper makes several contributions to the literature. Firstly, we furnish a basic model of how ARS can form a teaching and learning strategy. Secondly, we examine the impact of this strategy on student attitudes of their experiences, focusing on the ability of ARS to: assess understanding; identify strengths and weaknesses; furnish feedback; support learning; and to encourage participation. Our findings support the position that there is a place for ARS as part of a strategy for teaching and learning mathematics in large groups.



    Zika infection is a kind of vector-borne disease caused and spread by the bite infected Aedes mosquitos. The Zika infection was first discovered in Uganda in 1947. In 2007, the first case of Zika virus was reported occurred in the Island of Yap (Federated States of Micronesia). After that, it spread very quickly in Asia, Africa and USA [1]. The Aides mosquitoes is the main source from which the Zika virus is spread and is also responsible for dengue infection. The transmission of virus of Zika infection to humans occurred by the bites of infected female mosquitoes from the Aedes genus. This infection can also be transmitted having unprotected sexual relations, if one partner is suffering from Zika virus. People who have infected with Zika will have mild symptom due to which they feel mild illness and get severe ailment. Zika infected people main symptoms are skin rashes, headache, mild fever, conjunctivitis, and muscle pains. Usually the symptoms last for 2–7 days but sometimes the infected individuals due to Zika virus de not developed symptoms. This infection can also affect a pregnant women to her developing fetus [2,3]. If this happened then most probably the newly born babies have abnormal brain and small head development along with muscle weakness which effects nervous system.

    Epidemic models are used as powerful tool to predict the dynamics and control of various communicable diseases. These models usually consist of nonlinear differential equations describing the dynamics of the concern disease. A number of transmission models and effective possible controlling strategies have been developed in literature to explore the effective strategies for controlling of Zika infection in different regions around the globe. Kucharsk et al. [4] proposed a mathematical model and provided a detail analysis of French Polynesia Zika outbreak appeared in 2013-14. Kucharsk et al. used the total Zika infected cases between October 2013 till April 2014 which are reported in six main places of French Polynesia for model parameters estimation. Bonyah and Okosun [5] used optimal control theory to derived three different controlling strategies to reduce the spreed of this infection. The impact of bednets, used of insecticides spry and possible treatment was studied in detail in [6]. However, these models are based integer-order classical differential systems. The classical integer-order derivatives have some limitations as they are local in nature and do not posses the memory effects which are appear in most of biological systems. Secondly, classical derivative are unable to provides information about the rate of changes between two points not necessarily same. To overcome such limitations of local derivatives, various concepts on new derivatives with non-integer or fractional order were developed in recent years and can e found in [7,9,10]. The classical Caputo fractional operator [7] has been used to model many complex phenomena in different fields. For example in [11], a numerical scheme was proposed for of the diffusive fractional HBV model in Caputo sense. A numerical scheme for Caputo fractional reaction-diffusion equation and its stability analysis can be found in [12]. Also a detail stability analysis and simulations of Caputo sub-diffusion equation has been developed in [13]. The real world application of non-local and non-singular fractional operator [9] can be found in [14]. A comparative analysis Sturm-Liouville fractional problems has been carried out in [15]. Other applications of singular and non-singular fractional order operators in modeling various phenomena can be found in [18,16,19,20,17]. There is no rich literate on the modeling of Zika virus in fractional order. Only few models with fractional order has been presented in literature for Zika infection [21,22]. Keeping the above discussion in view and applicability of fractional order derivatives, in the preset investigation, a mathematical transmission model is considered in the Caputo sense in order to explore the dynamics of the Zika virus. We simulate the proposed Zika model for different values of relevant parameters and for several values of arbitrary fractional order α.

    The structure of the paper is follows is as: groundwork of the fractional derivative is given in Section 2. The basic model formulation is given in Section 3. Sections 4 is devoted to explore the basic properties of the model. Sections 5 and 6 are concern to obtain the stability results of the model equilibria. Graphical analysis are given in Section 7. The whole work is summarized with a brief conclusion in Section 8.

    The basic definitions regarding the fractional derivative in Caputo sense are as follows [7,8]:

    Definition 2.1. The Caputo fractional derivative of order α(n1,n) with nN for a function hCn is stated as follow:

    CDαt(h(t))=1Γ(nα)t0h(n)ξ(tξ)αn+1dξ.

    Clearly CDαt(h(t)) approaches to h(t) as α1.

    Definition 2.2. The corresponding fractional integral having order α>0 of the function h:R+R is described by the following expression

    Iαt(h(t))=1Γ(α)t0(tξ)α1h(ξ)dξ,

    where Γ represent the Gamma function.

    Definition 2.3. The constant point x is said to be an equilibrium point of the following Caputo fractional dynamic system:

    CDαtx(t)=h(t,x(t)),α(0,1), (2.1)

    if and only if it observed that h(t,x)=0.

    To present the stability analysis of nonlinear fractional systems in the Caputo sense via Lyapunov method we first recall the following necessary results from [23,24].

    Theorem 2.4. Suppose x be an equilibrium point for the above system (2.1) and ΩRn be a domain containing x. Let L:[0,)×Ω into to R be a continuously differentiable function such that

    W1(x)L(t,x(t))W2(x),

    and

    CDαtL(t,x(t))W3(x),

    α(0,1) and xΩ. Whereas W1(x), W2(x) and W3(x) are continuously positive definite functions on Ω. Then x is uniformly asymptotically stable equilibrium point for the model (2.1).

    Next we recall the following lemma from [24], which we will use in presenting the global stability via Lyapunov function.

    Lemma 2.5. For a continuous and derivable function z(t)R+ and α(0,1), then for any time tt0 we have

    CDαt{z(t)zzlnz(t)z}(1zz(t))CDαtz(t),zR+.

    To formulate the model, we divide the human population into two sub-classes, susceptible individuals and infected individuals. The total human population is represented by xh(t)=x1(t)+x2(t), where x1 represent susceptible and x2 represent numbers of infected human individuals. Similarly, xm is the total number of mosquitos which are further divided into susceptible mosquitos x3, and infected mosquitos x4, so that xm(t)=x3(t)+x4(t). The compartmental mathematical model is given by the following system of four ordinary differential equations to describe the mechanism of the transmission of Zika virus.

    {CDαtx1=Λhβ1γ1x1(t)x4(t)d1x1(t),CDαtx2=β1γ1x1(t)x4(t)d1x2(t),CDαtx3=Λmβ2γ2x2(t)x3(t)d2x3(t),CDαtx4=β2γ2x2(t)x3(t)d2x4(t), (3.1)

    with the initial conditions

    x1(0)=x100, x2(0)=x200, x3(0)=x300, x4(0)=x400.

    In the above proposed model Λh and Λm respectively represent the recruitment rate of human and mosquito populations. The natural death rate of the human and mosquitos are d1 and d2 respectively. The contact rate of suspectable human and infected mosquitos is β1, while β2 is the contact rate OF susceptible mosquitos and infected humans. The parameters γ1 and γ2 shows the transmission probabilities of humans and mosquitos.

    In order to present the non-negativity of the system solution, let

    R4+={yR4y0}  and  y(t)=(x1(t),x2(t),x3(t),x4(t))T.

    To proceeds further, first we recall the generalized mean values theorem [25].

    Lemma 4.1. Let suppose that h(t)C[a,b] and CDαth(t)(a,b], then

    h(t)=h(a)+1Γ(α)(CDαth)(ζ)(ta)α,

    with aζt,t(a,b].

    Corollary 4.2. Suppose that h(t)C[a,b] and CDαth(t)(a,b], where α(0,1]. Then if

    (i)  CDαth(t)0,  t(a,b),  then  h(t)  is  nondecreasing.
    (ii)  CDαth(t)0,  t(a,b),  then  h(t)  is  nonincreasing.

    We are now able to give the following result.

    Theorem 4.3. A unique solution y(t) of the model (3.1) exists and will remain in R4+. Further more, the solution is positive.

    Proof. The exitance of the Caputo fractional Zika model can be shown with the help of theorem 3.1 from [26,27], while the uniqueness of the solution can be easily obtained by making use of the Remark 3.2 in [26] for all positive values of t. In order to explore the solution positivity, it is necessary to show that on each hyperplane bounding the positive orthant, the vector field points to R4+. Form the system (3.1), we deduced that

    CDαtx1x1=0=Λh0,  CDαtx2x2=0=β1γ1x1(t)x4(t)0,CDαtx3x3=0=Λm0,  CDαtx4x4=0=β2γ2x2(t)x3(t)0.

    Hence, using the above corollary (4.2), we obtain the desired target i.e. the solution will remain in R4+ and hence biologically feasible region is constructed as:

    Φ={(x1,x2,x3,x4)R4+:x1,x2,x3,x40 }.

    Next we explore the equilibria and basic threshold quantity R0 of the model (3.1) in the following subsection.

    The equilibria of our proposed system (3.1) are obtained by solving the system below

    CDαtx1= CDαtx2= CDαtx3= CDαtx4=0.

    Hence we deduced that the proposed model exhibit two type of equilibrium points. The disease free equilibrium (DFE) calculated as

    E0=(x01,x02,x03,x04)=(Λhd1,0,Λmd2,0),

    and the endemic equilibrium (EE) is as evaluated as follows E1=(x1,x2,x3,x4), where

    x1=Λhd1+x4β1γ1,x2=Λhx4β1γ1d1(d1+x4β1γ1),x3=d1Λm(d1+β1γ1x4)β1γ1x4(d1d2+β2γ2Λh)+d2d21. (4.1)

    The EE E1, exist only if R0>1. The threshold quantity known as the basic reproduction number for the fractional Zika model is obtained by using the well known approach discussed in [28]. The basic reproduction number is biologically very important and determine the global dynamics of the model. The corresponding matrices F and V are given by

    F=(0β1γ1Λhd1β2γ2Λmd20),  V=(d100d2).

    Further, the inverse of V is

    V1=(1d1001d2), FV1=(0β1γ1Λhd1d2β2γ2Λmd1d20)

    The spectral radius ρ(FV1) is the basic reproduction number of the model and after some simplification the reproduction number is

    R0=ΛhΛmβ2γ2β1γ1d21d22.

    In this section we proceed to confirm the stability results in both local and global case. The Jacobian of linearization matrix of model (3.1).

    JE0=(d100β1γ1Λhd10d10β1γ1Λhd10β2γ2Λmd2d200β2γ2Λmd20d2).

    Theorem 5.1. For positive integers r1 and r2 such that gcd(r1,r2)=1. Let α=(r1r2) and define N=r2, then the model DFE denoted by E0 is stable locally asymptotically provided that |arg(λ)|>π2N, where λ denotes the possible roots of the characteristic equation of the matrix JE0 given below.

    det(diag[λp1λp1λp1λp1]JE0)=0. (5.1)

    Proof. By expansion of Eq. (5.1), we get the below equation in term of λ.

    (λr1+d1)(λr1+d2)(λ2r1+a1λr1+a2)=0, (5.2)

    where the coefficients are given below:

    a1=d1+d2,a2=d1d1(1R0).

    The arguments of the roots of the equation λp1+d1=0 are as follow:

    arg(λk)=πr1+k2πr1>πN>π2N,wherek=0,1,(r11). (5.3)

    In similar pattern, it can be shown that argument of the roots of λp1+d2=0 are also greater than π2M. Further, if R0<1, then the desired condition (|arg(λ)|>π2N) is satisfied for all roots of polynomial (5.2). For R0>1, then with the help of Descartes rule of signs, there exits exactly one root of characteristic equation with |arg(λ)|<π2N. Thus the DFE is locally asymptotically stable for R0<1, otherwise unstable.

    For global stability result we prove the following theorem. This subsection provide the global analysis of the model for the DF and endemic case. We have the following results.

    Theorem 5.2. For arbitrary fractional order α in the interval (0, 1], and R0<1, the DFE of the proposed model is stable globally asymptotically and unstable otherwise.

    Proof. To prove our result we define consider the following Lyapunov function

    V(t)=W1(x1x01x01lnx1x01)+W2x2+W3(x3x03x03lnx3x03)+W4x4. (5.4)

    Where Wi, i=1,24, are arbitrary positive constants to be chosen latter. Using lemma (5.1), the time derivative of (5.4), along the solution of (3.1) is given by

    CDαtV(t)=W1(x1x01x1) CDαtx1+W2 CDαtx2+W3(x3x03x3) CDαtx3+W4 CDαtx4=W1(x1x01x1)[Λhd1x1β1γ1x4x1]+W2[β1γ1x4x1d1x2]+W3(x3x03x3)[Λmd2x3β2γ2x3x2]+W4[β2γ2x3x2d2x4]=(W2W1)[β1γ1x4x1]+(W4W3)[β2γ2x3x2]+x4(W1β1γ1x01W4d2)+x2(W3β2γ2x03W2d1).

    Using x01=Λhd1 and x03=Λmd2, we get

    CDαtV=(W2W1)[β1γ1x4x1]+(W4W3)[β2γ2x3x2]+x4(W1β1γ1Λhd1W4d2)+x2(W3β1γ1Λmd2W2d1).

    Choosing the constants W1=W2=β2γ2Λmd2 and W3=W4=d1 and after simplification, we get

    CDαtV=x4d1d2(R01).

    CDαtV(t) is negative for R0<1. Therefore, by theorem (2.4) [23,24], the DFE E0, is globally asymptotically stable in Φ.

    Here, we present the global stability of the system (3.1) at E1. At the steady state the model (3.1) at E1 we obtained

    {Λh=β1γ1x4x1+d1x1,d1x2=β1γ1x4x1,Λm=β2γ2x3x2+d2x3,d2x4=β2γ2x3x2. (6.1)

    Theorem 6.1. If R0>1, the EE E1 of the system (3.1) is stable globally asymptotically.

    Proof. We consider the following Lyapunov function:

    L(t)=(x1x1x1logx1x1)+(x2x2x2logx2x2)+(x3x3x3logx3x3)+(x4x4x4logx4x4).

    Using lemma (5.1), the derivative of L(t) along the solutions of (3.1) is as follows

     CDαtL=(1x1x1) CDαtx1+(1x2x2) CDαtx2+(1x3x3) CDαtx3+(1x4x4) CDαtx4.   

    By direct calculations, we have that:

    (1x1x1) CDαtx1=(1x1x1)(Λhd1x1β1γ1x4x1)(1x2x2) CDαtx2=(1x2x2)(β1γ1x4x1d1x2)(1x3x3) CDαtx3=(1x3x3)(Λmd2x3β2γ2x3x2)(1x4x4) CDαtx2=(1x4x4)(β2γ2x3x2d2x4).     (6.2)
    (1x1x1) CDαtx1=(1x1x1)(Λhd1x1β1γ1x4x1)=(1x1x1)(d2x1+β1γ1x4x1d2x1β1γ1x4x1)=d2x1(1x1x1)(1x1x1)+(1x1x1)(β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1)=d2x1(2x1x1x1x1)+β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1x1x1+β1γ1x4x1.     (6.3)
    (1x2x2) CDαtx2=(1x2x2)(β1γ1x4x1d1x2)=β1γ1x4x1d1x2β1γ1x4x1x2x2+d1x2=β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1x2x2β1γ1x4x1x2x2+β1γ1x4x1.     (6.4)
    (1x3x3) CDαtx3=(1x3x3)(Λmd2x3β2γ2x3x2)=(1x3x3)(d2x3+β2γ2x3x2d2x3β2γ2x3x2)=d2x3(1x3x3)(1x3x3)+(1x3x3)(β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3x2)=d2x3(2x3x3x3x3)+β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3x3x3x3+β2γ2x3x2. (6.5)
    (1x4x4) CDαtx4=(1x4x4)(β2γ2x3x2d2x4)=β2γ2x3x2d2x4β2γ2x3x2x4x4+d2x4=β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3xx2x4x4β2γ2x3x2x4x4+β2γ2x3x2.     (6.6)

    It follows from (6.3-6.6)

     CDαtL=d1x1(2x1x1x1x1)+β1γ1x4x1(2x1x1x2x2x4x4(x1x2x1x21))+d2x3(2x3x3x3x3)+β2γ2x3x2(2x3x3x4x4x2x2(x3x4x3x41)).      (6.7)

    Make use of arithmetical-geometrical inequality we have in equation (6.7)

    d1x1(2x1x1x1x1)0,d2x3(2x3x3x3x3)0,β1γ1x4x1(2x1x1xx2x2x3x3(x1x2x1x21))0,β2γ2x3x2(2x3x3x4x4x2x2(x3x4x3x41))0.    

    Therefore,  CDαtL0 and hence by using theorem (2.4) the EE E1 of the proposed model is globally asymptotically stable whenever R0>1.

    The present section is devoted to obtain the numerical results of the proposed Zika fractional order model (3.1). The Adams-type predictor-corrector method is applied to obtained the approximate solution of the model. The numerical values used in the simulations are Λh=1.2, Λm=0.3, β1=0.0004, β2=0.005, d1=0.004, d2=0.0014, γ1=0.02. γ2=0.0003. The graphical results using different five values of fractional order α=1,0.95,0.9,0.85,0.8 are presented in the Figures 1-4. From these figures we can see than the susceptible human and mosquitoes are increasing when we decreases the fractional order α. While there is a significant decrease in the graphs of infected humans and mosquitoes with decrease in α. Hence, the fractional order α has an important role in the model.

    Figure 1.  The graph shows the behavior of the susceptible humans for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.
    Figure 2.  The graph shows the behavior of the infected humans for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.
    Figure 3.  The graph shows the behavior of the susceptible mosquitos for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.
    Figure 4.  The graph shows the behavior of the infected mosquitos for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.

    Zika is a rapidly spreading epidemic and is one of serious health issue, specially for pregnant women. A number of deterministic models have been presented in last few year, for the possible control and eradication of this infection from the community. But, almost all of these models are based on classical or local derivative. In order to better explore the complex behavior of Zika infection, in this paper, a fractional order transmission model in Caputo sense is developed. The detail analysis such as positivity and existence of the solution, basic reproduction numberer and model equilibria of the proposed model are presented. The stability results for both local and global cases are derived in detail in fractional environment. From the numerical results we conclude that the fractional order derivative provides more information about the proposed model which are unable by classical integer-order epidemic models. Also these results ensure that by including the memory effects in the model seems very appropriate for such an investigation. In future, we will explore the proposed model using non-local and non-singular fractional derivatives presented in [9,10].

    All authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress (2007) 40: p. 64-65.
    [2] Archer, M.S., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., Norrie, A. Critical Realism: Essential Readings. 2009, London, UK: Routledge.
    [3] Bagley, S.F., Improving student success in calculus: a comparison of four college calculus classes[dissertation]. 2014, San Diego State University: San Diego, USA.
    [4] Baker, J.W., The 'classroom flip': using web course management tools to become the guide by the side, in Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning. 2001, Florida Community College at Jacksonville: Jacksonville (FL), p. 9–17.
    [5] Banks, D.A., Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases. 2006, Hershey, PA, USA: Information Science Publishing.
    [6] Berends, M., Survey methods in educational research, in Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research, J.L. Green, G. Camilli, P.B. Elmore, Ed. 2006, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 623-640. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-05382-038
    [7] Bligh, D.A., What's the Use of Lectures? 1972, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
    [8] Bonwell, C.C., Eison, J.A., Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 2005, San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.
    [9] Box, G.E., Robustness in the Strategy of Scientific Model Building. 1979, Ft. Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA070213
    [10] Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology (2016) 47: p. 1096-1112.
    [11] Codecogs. Retrieved from https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php?latex=D
    [12] Coe, R., Waring, M., Hedges, L.V., Arthur, J., Research Methods and Methodologies in Education. 2017, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
    [13] Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 1988, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.
    [14] Things I have learned (so far). Am Psychol (1990) p. 1304-1312.
    [15] Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., Research Methods in Education. 2018, London: Routledge.
    [16] Creswell, J.W., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 2007, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [17] Cronhjort, M., Filipsson, L., Weurlander, M., Improved engagement and learning in flipped-classroom calculus. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 2018. 37(3): p. 113–121. doi: 10.1093/teamat/hrx007.
    [18] Day A.L., Case study research, in Research Methods & Methodologies in Education, 2nd ed. R. Coe, M. Waring, L.V. Hedges, J. Arthur, Ed. 2017, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. p. 114-121.
    [19] Duncan, D., Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems. 2005, San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education.
    [20] Instructor perceptions of using a mobile-phone-based free classroom response system in first-year statistics undergraduate courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2012) 43: p. 1041-1056.
    [21] Mobile-phone-based classroom response systems: Students' perceptions of engagement and learning in a large undergraduate course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2013) 44: p. 1160-1174.
    [22] Google, Create forms. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.google.com.au/forms/about/
    [23] Higher Education Research & Development Society of Australasia, HERDSA Fellowship Scheme Handbook. 2014, Milperra, NSW: HERSDSA. Retrieved from https://www.herdsa.org.au/sites/default/files/Fellowship\%20Handbook_6_5_2014.pdf
    [24] Implementing a flipped classroom approach in a university numerical methods mathematics course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2017) 48: p. 485-498.
    [25] On flipping the classroom in large first year calculus courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2015) 46: p. 508-520.
    [26] 'Pretty lights' and maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems. Computers & Education (2009) 53: p. 189-199.
    [27] Kline, R.B., Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research. 2004, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, p. 95.
    [28] Mathematics education and mobile technologies. Math Ed Res J (2016) 28: p. 1-7.
    [29] Lomen, D.O., Robinson, M.K., Using ConcepTests in single and multivariable calculus, in Electronic Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics. 2005. Retrieved October 17, 2017 from http://archives.math.utk.edu/ICTCM/i/16/S107.html
    [30] Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2014) 45: p. 317-324.
    [31] Flipping the calculus classroom: an evaluative study. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications (2016) 35: p. 187-201.
    [32] Markie, P., Rationalism vs. Empiricism. 2017. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/
    [33] Student performance and attitudes in a collaborative and flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2015) 47: p. 653-673.
    [34] Expectations and implementations of the flipped classroom model in undergraduate mathematics courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2015) 46: p. 968-978.
    [35] von Neumann, J., The mathematician, in Works of the Mind, R.B., Haywood Ed. 1947, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 180-196.
    [36] Novak, J., Kensington-Miller, B., Evans, T., Flip or flop? Students' perspectives of a flipped lecture in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2017. 48(5): p. 647-658. doi: 10.1080/0020739x.2016.1267810.
    [37] Center for Educational Research and Innovation, Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/38654317.pdf
    [38] On flipping first-semester calculus: a case study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2016) 47: p. 573-582.
    [39] Robson, L., Guide to Evaluating the Effectiveness of Strategies for Preventing Work Injuries: How to Show Whether a Safety Intervention Really Works. 2001, Cincinnati, OH: DHHS.
    [40] Smartphones as audience response systems for lectures and seminars. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2018) 410: p. 1609-1613.
    [41] New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods (2009) 8: p. 467-474.
    [42] Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T., Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. 2001, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
    [43] Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education (2013) 5: p. 541-542.
    [44] Critical perspectives of pedagogical approaches to reversing the order of integration in double integrals. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2017) 48: p. 1285-1292.
    [45] Pedagogical alternatives for triple integrals: moving towards more inclusive and personalized learning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2018) 49: p. 792-801.
    [46] On Picard's iteration method to solve differential equations and a pedagogical space for otherness. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2019) 50: p. 788-799.
    [47] Schoenfeld's problem-solving models viewed through the lens of exemplification. For the Learning of Mathematics (2019) 39: p. 24-26.
    [48] Trochim, W.M.K., The Research Methods Knowledge Base. 2006. Retrieved from https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/positvsm.php
    [49] University of Edinburgh. What is digital education? 2019. Retrieved from https://www.ed.ac.uk/institute-academic-development/learning-teaching/staff/digital-ed/what-is-digital-education
    [50] Wang, V.C., Handbook of Research on e-learning Applications for Career and Technical Education: Technologies for Vocational Training. 2009, Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
    [51] Wasserman, N., Norris, S., Carr, T., Comparing a "flipped" instructional model in an undergraduate Calculus Ⅲ course, in Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education; S. Brown, G. Karakok, K.H. Roh, M. Oehrtman Ed..2013, Denver, CO.
    [52] Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. 2009, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Sania Qureshi, Real life application of Caputo fractional derivative for measles epidemiological autonomous dynamical system, 2020, 134, 09600779, 109744, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109744
    2. Bahatdin DAŞBAŞI, Stability analysis of the hiv model through incommensurate fractional-order nonlinear system, 2020, 137, 09600779, 109870, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109870
    3. Muhammad Farooq Khan, Hussam Alrabaiah, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Farooq, Mustafa bin Mamat, Muhammad Imran Asjad, A new fractional model for vector-host disease with saturated treatment function via singular and non-singular operators, 2021, 60, 11100168, 629, 10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.057
    4. Khaled M. Saad, Manal Alqhtani, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Fractal-fractional study of the hepatitis C virus infection model, 2020, 19, 22113797, 103555, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103555
    5. Wenbin Yang, Xiaozhou Feng, Shuhui Liang, Xiaojuan Wang, Asymptotic Behavior Analysis of a Fractional-Order Tumor-Immune Interaction Model with Immunotherapy, 2020, 2020, 1076-2787, 1, 10.1155/2020/7062957
    6. Parikshit Gautam Jamdade, Shrinivas Gautamrao Jamdade, Modeling and prediction of COVID-19 spread in the Philippines by October 13, 2020, by using the VARMAX time series method with preventive measures, 2021, 20, 22113797, 103694, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103694
    7. Kolade M. Owolabi, Analysis and simulation of herd behaviour dynamics based on derivative with nonlocal and nonsingular kernel, 2021, 22, 22113797, 103941, 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103941
    8. Dawei Ding, Yecui Weng, Nian Wang, Dynamics analysis of a fractional-order delayed SBT memristive chaotic system without equilibrium points, 2019, 134, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12688-8
    9. Giro Candelario, Alicia Cordero, Juan R. Torregrosa, Multipoint Fractional Iterative Methods with (2α + 1)th-Order of Convergence for Solving Nonlinear Problems, 2020, 8, 2227-7390, 452, 10.3390/math8030452
    10. Abdon Atangana, Seda İğret Araz, New concept in calculus: Piecewise differential and integral operators, 2021, 145, 09600779, 110638, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110638
    11. Bahar Acay, Ramazan Ozarslan, Erdal Bas, Fractional physical models based on falling body problem, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 2608, 10.3934/math.2020170
    12. M. A. Khan, Arshad Khan, A. Elsonbaty, A. A. Elsadany, Modeling and simulation results of a fractional dengue model, 2019, 134, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12765-0
    13. Subhasis Bhattacharya, Suman Paul, The behaviour of infection, survival and testing effort variables of SARS-CoV-2: A theoretical modelling based on optimization technique, 2020, 19, 22113797, 103568, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103568
    14. Abdon Atangana, Seda İğret Araz, Nonlinear equations with global differential and integral operators: Existence, uniqueness with application to epidemiology, 2021, 20, 22113797, 103593, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103593
    15. Alicia Cordero, Ivan Girona, Juan R. Torregrosa, A Variant of Chebyshev’s Method with 3αth-Order of Convergence by Using Fractional Derivatives, 2019, 11, 2073-8994, 1017, 10.3390/sym11081017
    16. Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Ismail, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan, Fractional order SIR model with generalized incidence rate, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 1856, 10.3934/math.2020124
    17. Taza Gul, Haris Anwar, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Ilyas Khan, Poom Kumam, Integer and Non-Integer Order Study of the GO-W/GO-EG Nanofluids Flow by Means of Marangoni Convection, 2019, 11, 2073-8994, 640, 10.3390/sym11050640
    18. Hegagi Mohamed Ali, Ismail Gad Ameen, Optimal control strategies of a fractional order model for Zika virus infection involving various transmissions, 2021, 146, 09600779, 110864, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110864
    19. M. M. El-Dessoky, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Application of Caputo-Fabrizio derivative to a cancer model with unknown parameters, 2020, 0, 1937-1179, 0, 10.3934/dcdss.2020429
    20. S.O. Akindeinde, Eric Okyere, A.O. Adewumi, R.S. Lebelo, Olanrewaju. O. Fabelurin, Stephen. E. Moore, Caputo Fractional-order SEIRP model for COVID-19 epidemic, 2021, 11100168, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.097
    21. Chellamuthu Gokila, Muniyagounder Sambath, Modeling and simulations of a Zika virus as a mosquito-borne transmitted disease with environmental fluctuations, 2021, 0, 1565-1339, 10.1515/ijnsns-2020-0145
    22. M. R. Vinagre, G. Blé, L. Esteva, Dynamical Analysis of a Model for Secondary Infection of the Dengue, 2023, 0971-3514, 10.1007/s12591-022-00628-5
    23. Zain Ul Abadin Zafar, Nigar Ali, Mustafa Inc, Zahir Shah, Samina Younas, Mathematical modeling of corona virus (COVID-19) and stability analysis, 2022, 1025-5842, 1, 10.1080/10255842.2022.2109020
    24. Peijiang Liu, Anwarud Din, Rahat Zarin, Numerical dynamics and fractional modeling of hepatitis B virus model with non-singular and non-local kernels, 2022, 39, 22113797, 105757, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105757
    25. Aatif Ali, Saeed Islam, M. Riaz Khan, Saim Rasheed, F.M. Allehiany, Jamel Baili, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Hijaz Ahmad, Dynamics of a fractional order Zika virus model with mutant, 2022, 61, 11100168, 4821, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.031
    26. Sunil Kumar, Ram P. Chauhan, Mohamed S. Osman, S. A. Mohiuddine, A study on fractional HIV‐AIDs transmission model with awareness effect, 2021, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.7838
    27. Xinjie Fu, JinRong Wang, Dynamic stability and optimal control of SISqIqRS epidemic network, 2022, 163, 09600779, 112562, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112562
    28. Xiaotao Han, Hua Liu, Xiaofen Lin, Yumei Wei, Ma Ming, Yao Zhong Zhang, Dynamic Analysis of a VSEIR Model with Vaccination Efficacy and Immune Decline, 2022, 2022, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2022/7596164
    29. Emmanuel Addai, Lingling Zhang, Joseph Ackora-Prah, Joseph Frank Gordon, Joshua Kiddy K. Asamoah, John Fiifi Essel, Fractal-fractional order dynamics and numerical simulations of a Zika epidemic model with insecticide-treated nets, 2022, 603, 03784371, 127809, 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127809
    30. Thongchai Botmart, Qusain Hiader, Zulqurnain Sabir, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Wajaree Weera, Stochastic Investigations for the Fractional Vector-Host Diseased Based Saturated Function of Treatment Model, 2023, 74, 1546-2226, 559, 10.32604/cmc.2023.031871
    31. Giro Candelario, Alicia Cordero, Juan R. Torregrosa, María P. Vassileva, 2022, 9780323900898, 119, 10.1016/B978-0-32-390089-8.00010-6
    32. Shewafera Wondimagegnhu Teklu, Birhanu Baye Terefe, Khalid Hattaf, Mathematical Modeling Investigation of Violence and Racism Coexistence as a Contagious Disease Dynamics in a Community, 2022, 2022, 1748-6718, 1, 10.1155/2022/7192795
    33. Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Jutarat Kongson, Weerawat Sudsutad, Jehad Alzabut, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Analysis of a nonlinear fractional system for Zika virus dynamics with sexual transmission route under generalized Caputo-type derivative, 2022, 68, 1598-5865, 4273, 10.1007/s12190-021-01663-1
    34. Jutarat Kongson, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Apichat Neamvonk, Jehad Alzabut, Weerawat Sudsutad, Investigation of fractal-fractional HIV infection by evaluating the drug therapy effect in the Atangana-Baleanu sense, 2022, 19, 1551-0018, 10762, 10.3934/mbe.2022504
    35. Liping Wang, Peng Wu, Mingshan Li, Lei Shi, Global dynamics analysis of a Zika transmission model with environment transmission route and spatial heterogeneity, 2021, 7, 2473-6988, 4803, 10.3934/math.2022268
    36. Xiao-Ping Li, Mahmoud H. DarAssi, Muhammad Altaf Khan, C.W. Chukwu, Mohammad Y. Alshahrani, Mesfer Al Shahrani, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Assessing the potential impact of COVID-19 Omicron variant: Insight through a fractional piecewise model, 2022, 38, 22113797, 105652, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105652
    37. Muhammad Altaf Khan, Abdon Atangana, Emile Franc D Goufo, Mathematical analysis of an eco-epidemiological model with different competition factors in its fractional-stochastic form, 2021, 96, 0031-8949, 104015, 10.1088/1402-4896/ac1026
    38. M. Higazy, Shami A.M. Alsallami, Sayed Abdel-Khalek, A. El-Mesady, Dynamical and structural study of a generalized Caputo fractional order Lotka-Volterra model, 2022, 37, 22113797, 105478, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105478
    39. Mohammed A. Almalahi, Satish K. Panchal, Fahd Jarad, Mohammed S. Abdo, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, Qualitative analysis of a fuzzy Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equation with an Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 15994, 10.3934/math.2022876
    40. D. Baleanu, S. Arshad, A. Jajarmi, W. Shokat, F. Akhavan Ghassabzade, M. Wali, Dynamical behaviours and stability analysis of a generalized fractional model with a real case study, 2022, 20901232, 10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.010
    41. Yi Zhao, Ehab E. Elattar, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Mohammed Asiri, Pongsakorn Sunthrayuth, The dynamics of the HIV/AIDS infection in the framework of piecewise fractional differential equation, 2022, 40, 22113797, 105842, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105842
    42. Muhammad Farhan, Zhi Ling, Zahir Shah, Saeed Islam, Mansoor H. Alshehri, Elisabeta Antonescu, A multi-layer neural network approach for the stability analysis of the Hepatitis B model, 2024, 113, 14769271, 108256, 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108256
    43. A. Alla Hamou, E. Azroul, S. L'Kima, The effect of migration on the transmission of HIV/AIDS using a fractional model: Local and global dynamics and numerical simulations, 2024, 47, 0170-4214, 6868, 10.1002/mma.9946
    44. Yeliz Karaca, Mati ur Rahman, Dumitru Baleanu, 2023, Chapter 11, 978-3-031-37104-2, 144, 10.1007/978-3-031-37105-9_11
    45. Asifa Tassaddiq, Sania Qureshi, Amanullah Soomro, Omar Abu Arqub, Mehmet Senol, Comparative analysis of classical and Caputo models for COVID-19 spread: vaccination and stability assessment, 2024, 2024, 2730-5422, 10.1186/s13663-024-00760-7
    46. Sapan Kumar Nayak, P. K. Parida, Abhimanyu Kumar, A study of 3μ
    th-order of convergence of Chebyshev–Halley family method and its convergence plane, 2024, 81, 2254-3902, 457, 10.1007/s40324-023-00326-4
    47. Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Rashid Jan, Saeed Islam, A fractional modeling approach of Buruli ulcer in Possum mammals, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 065219, 10.1088/1402-4896/acd27d
    48. Waleed Ahmed, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, 2023, Chapter 8, 978-981-99-5000-3, 181, 10.1007/978-981-99-5001-0_8
    49. Linji Yang, Qiankun Song, Yurong Liu, Stability and Hopf bifurcation analysis for fractional-order SVEIR computer virus propagation model with nonlinear incident rate and two delays, 2023, 547, 09252312, 126397, 10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126397
    50. Mutaz Mohammad, Mohyeedden Sweidan, Alexander Trounev, Piecewise fractional derivatives and wavelets in epidemic modeling, 2024, 101, 11100168, 245, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.05.053
    51. Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Zhi Ling, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, Saeed Islam, Hakim A. L. Garalleh, Yury E Khudyakov, Global dynamics and computational modeling for analyzing and controlling Hepatitis B: A novel epidemic approach, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0304375, 10.1371/journal.pone.0304375
    52. Muhammad Farhan, Fahad Aljuaydi, Zahir Shah, Ebraheem Alzahrani, Ebenezer Bonyah, Saeed Islam, A fractional modeling approach to a new Hepatitis B model in light of asymptomatic carriers, vaccination and treatment, 2024, 24, 24682276, e02127, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02127
    53. Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Rashid Jan, Saeed Islam, Mansoor H. Alshehri, Zhi Ling, A fractional modeling approach for the transmission dynamics of measles with double-dose vaccination, 2023, 1025-5842, 1, 10.1080/10255842.2023.2297171
    54. Preety Kumari, Harendra Pal Singh, Swarn Singh, Modeling COVID-19 and heart disease interactions through Caputo fractional derivative: memory trace analysis, 2024, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02133-w
    55. Jhoana P. Romero-Leiton, Elda K.E. Laison, Rowin Alfaro, E. Jane Parmley, Julien Arino, Kamal R. Acharya, Bouchra Nasri, Exploring Zika's Dynamics: A Scoping Review Journey from Epidemic to Equations Through Mathematical Modelling, 2024, 24680427, 10.1016/j.idm.2024.12.016
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2448) PDF downloads(286) Cited by(4)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(11)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog