The camel is well-adapted to utilize the poor-quality forages in the harsh desert conditions as the camel rumen sustains fibrolytic microorganisms, mainly bacteria that are capable of breaking down the lignocellulosic biomass efficiently. Exploring the composition of the bacterial community in the rumen of the camel and quantifying their cellulolytic and xylanolytic activities could lead to understanding and improving fiber fermentation and discovering novel sources of cellulases and xylanases. In this study, Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the V4 region on 16S rRNA was applied to identify the bacterial and archaeal communities in the rumen of three camels fed wheat straw and broom corn. Furthermore, rumen samples were inoculated into bacterial media enriched with xylan and different cellulose sources, including filter paper (FP), wheat straw (WS), and alfalfa hay (AH) to assess the ability of rumen bacteria to produce endo-cellulase and endo-xylanase at different fermentation intervals. The results revealed that the phylum Bacteroidetes dominated the bacterial community and Candidatus Methanomethylophilus dominated the archaeal community. Also, most of the bacterial community has fibrolytic potential and the dominant bacterial genera were Prevotella, RC9_gut_group, Butyrivibrio, Ruminococcus, Fibrobacteres, and Treponema. The highest xylanase production (884.8 mU/mL) was observed at 7 days. The highest cellulase production (1049.5 mU/mL) was observed when rumen samples were incubated with Alfalfa hay for 7 days.
Citation: Alaa Emara Rabee, Robert Forster, Ebrahim A Sabra. Lignocelluloytic activities and composition of bacterial community in the camel rumen[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(3): 354-367. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021022
[1] | Yilin Tu, Jin-E Zhang . Event-triggered impulsive control for input-to-state stability of nonlinear time-delay system with delayed impulse. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(4): 876-896. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025031 |
[2] | Siyu Li, Shu Li, Lei Liu . Fuzzy adaptive event-triggered distributed control for a class of nonlinear multi-agent systems. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 474-493. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024021 |
[3] | Chaoyue Wang, Zhiyao Ma, Shaocheng Tong . Adaptive fuzzy output-feedback event-triggered control for fractional-order nonlinear system. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 12334-12352. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022575 |
[4] | Wenjing Wang, Jingjing Dong, Dong Xu, Zhilian Yan, Jianping Zhou . Synchronization control of time-delay neural networks via event-triggered non-fragile cost-guaranteed control. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 52-75. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023004 |
[5] | Dong Xu, Xinling Li, Weipeng Tai, Jianping Zhou . Event-triggered stabilization for networked control systems under random occurring deception attacks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 859-878. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023039 |
[6] | Duoduo Zhao, Fang Gao, Jinde Cao, Xiaoxin Li, Xiaoqin Ma . Mean-square consensus of a semi-Markov jump multi-agent system based on event-triggered stochastic sampling. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(8): 14241-14259. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023637 |
[7] | Guodong Zhao, Haitao Li, Ting Hou . Survey of semi-tensor product method in robustness analysis on finite systems. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 11464-11481. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023508 |
[8] | Na Zhang, Jianwei Xia, Tianjiao Liu, Chengyuan Yan, Xiao Wang . Dynamic event-triggered adaptive finite-time consensus control for multi-agent systems with time-varying actuator faults. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(5): 7761-7783. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023335 |
[9] | Qiushi Wang, Hongwei Ren, Zhiping Peng, Junlin Huang . Dynamic event-triggered consensus control for nonlinear multi-agent systems under DoS attacks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 3304-3318. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024146 |
[10] | Mingxia Gu, Zhiyong Yu, Haijun Jiang, Da Huang . Distributed consensus of discrete time-varying linear multi-agent systems with event-triggered intermittent control. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 415-443. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024019 |
The camel is well-adapted to utilize the poor-quality forages in the harsh desert conditions as the camel rumen sustains fibrolytic microorganisms, mainly bacteria that are capable of breaking down the lignocellulosic biomass efficiently. Exploring the composition of the bacterial community in the rumen of the camel and quantifying their cellulolytic and xylanolytic activities could lead to understanding and improving fiber fermentation and discovering novel sources of cellulases and xylanases. In this study, Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the V4 region on 16S rRNA was applied to identify the bacterial and archaeal communities in the rumen of three camels fed wheat straw and broom corn. Furthermore, rumen samples were inoculated into bacterial media enriched with xylan and different cellulose sources, including filter paper (FP), wheat straw (WS), and alfalfa hay (AH) to assess the ability of rumen bacteria to produce endo-cellulase and endo-xylanase at different fermentation intervals. The results revealed that the phylum Bacteroidetes dominated the bacterial community and Candidatus Methanomethylophilus dominated the archaeal community. Also, most of the bacterial community has fibrolytic potential and the dominant bacterial genera were Prevotella, RC9_gut_group, Butyrivibrio, Ruminococcus, Fibrobacteres, and Treponema. The highest xylanase production (884.8 mU/mL) was observed at 7 days. The highest cellulase production (1049.5 mU/mL) was observed when rumen samples were incubated with Alfalfa hay for 7 days.
The Navier-Stokes equations are a typical nonlinear system, which model the mechanics law for fluid flow and have been applied in many fields. There are many research findings on the Navier-Stokes system, involving well-posedness, long-time behavior, etc., [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Furthermore, to simulate the fluid movement modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations, some regularized systems are proposed, such as the Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations. The Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations were introduced by Oskolkov in 1973, which describe the motion of Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic incompressible fluid. Based on the global well-posedness of 3D Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations in [11], many interesting results on long-time behavior of solutions have been obtained, such as the existence of global attractor and pullback attractors, determining modes and estimate on fractal dimension of attractor [12,13,14] and references therein for details.
The influence of past history term on dynamical system is well known, we refer to [15,16,17,18] for interesting conclusions, such as the global well-posedness, the existence of attractors and so on. In 2013, Gal and Tachim-Medjo [17] studied the Navier-Stokes-Voigt system with instantaneous viscous term and memory-type viscous term, and obtained the well-posedness of solution and exponential attractors of finite dimension. In 2018, Plinio et al. [18] considered the Navier-Stokes-Voigt system in [18], in which the instantaneous viscous term was completely replaced by the memory-type viscous term and the Ekman damping βu was presented. The authors showed the existence of regular global and exponential attractors with finite dimension. The presence of Ekman damping was to eliminate the difficulties brought by the memory term in deriving the dissipation of system.
Some convergence results of solutions or attractors as perturbation vanishes for the non-autonomous dynamical systems without memory can be seen in [19,20,21,22]. However, there are few convergence results on the system with memory. Therefore, our purpose is to study the tempered pullback dynamics and robustness of the following 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations on the bounded domain Ω with memory and the Ekman damping:
{∂∂t(u−αΔu)−∫∞0g(s)Δu(t−s)ds+(u⋅∇)u+βu+∇p=fε(t,x), (t,x)∈Ωτ,divu=0, (t,x)∈Ωτ,u(t,x)=0, (t,x)∈∂Ωτ,u(τ,x)=u(τ), x∈Ω,u(τ−s,x)=φ(s,x), (s,x)∈Ω0, | (1.1) |
where Ωτ=(τ,+∞)×Ω, ∂Ωτ=(τ,+∞)×∂Ω, Ω0=(0,∞)×Ω, τ∈R+ is the initial time, α>0 is a length scale parameter characterizing the elasticity of fluid, β>0 is the Ekman dissipation constant, u=(u1(t,x),u2(t,x),u3(t,x)) is the unknown velocity field of fluid, and p is the unknown pressure. The non-autonomous external force is fε(t,x)=f1(x)+εf2(t,x) (0≤ε<ε0), where ε0 is a fixed constant small enough. In addition, u(τ) is the initial velocity, and φ(s,x) denotes the past history of velocity. The memory kernel g: [0,∞)→[0,∞) is supposed to be convex, smooth on (0,∞) and satisfies that
g(∞)=0, ∫∞0g(s)ds=1. |
In general, we give the past history variable
η=ηt(s)=∫s0u(t−σ)dσ, s≥0, |
which satisfies
∂∂tη=−∂∂sη+u(t). |
Also, η has the explicit representation
{ηt(s)=∫s0u(t−σ)dσ, 0<s≤t,ηt(s)=η0(s−t)+∫t0u(t−σ)dσ, s>t, | (1.2) |
and
ητ(s)=∫s0φ(σ)dσ. |
Next, we give the main features of this paper as follows.
1) Inspired by [18,23], we provide a detailed representation and Gronwall type estimates for the energy of (1.1) dependent on ε in Lemma 2.1, with a focus on the parameters ω, Λ and the increasing function J(∗). Using these parameters, we construct the universe D and derive the existence of D−pullback absorbing sets, see Lemma 4.9.
2) Via the decomposition method, we show that the process of the system has the property of D−κ−pullback contraction in the space NV, and the D−pullback asymptotic compactness is obtained naturally. Based on the theory of attractor in [1,24], the D-pullback attractors for the process {Sε(t,τ)} in NV are derived, see Theorem 3.3.
3) When the perturbation parameter ε→0 with the non-autonomous external force, the robustness is obtained via the upper semi-continuity of pullback attractors of (1.1) by using the technique in [18,21,22], see Theorems 3.2 in Section 3.
This paper is organized as follows. Some preliminaries are given in Section 2, and the main results are stated in Section 3, which contains the global well-posedness of solution, the existence of pullback attractors and robustness. Finally, the detailed proofs are provided in Sections 4 and 5.
● The Sobolev spaces
Let E={u|u∈(C∞0(Ω))3,divu=0}, H is the closure of E in (L2(Ω))3 topology with the norm and inner product as
|u|=‖u‖H=(u,v)1/2, (u,v)=3∑j=1∫Ωuj(x)vj(x)dx, ∀ u,v∈H. |
V is the closure of E in (H1(Ω))3 topology with the norm and inner product as
‖u‖=‖u‖V=((u,u))1/2V, ((u,v))V=3∑i,j=1∫Ω∂uj∂xi∂vj∂xidx, ∀ u,v∈V. |
Also, we denote
((u,v))Vα=(u,v)+α((u,v))V, ||u||2Vα=|u|2+α||u||2. |
H and V are Hilbert spaces with their dual spaces H and V′ respectively, ‖⋅‖∗ and ⟨⋅,⋅⟩ denote the norm in V′ and the dual product between V and V′ respectively, and also H to itself.
● The fractional power functional spaces
Let PL be the Helmholz-Leray orthogonal projection in (L2(Ω))3 onto H [3,7], and
PL: H⊕H⊥→H, |
where
H⊥={u∈(L2(Ω))3; ∃ χ∈(L2loc(Ω))3: u=∇χ}. |
A=−PLΔ is the Stokes operator with eigenvalues {λj}∞j=1 and orthonormal eigenfunctions {ωj}∞j=1.
Define the fractional operator As by
Asu=∑jλsj(u,ωj)ωj, s∈R, j∈Z+ |
for u=∑j(u,ωj)ωj with the domain D(As)={u|Asu∈H}, and we use the norm of D(As) as
‖u‖22s=|Asu|2=∑jλ2sj|(u,ωj)|2. |
Especially, denote W=D(A), and V=D(A1/2) with norm ‖u‖1=|A1/2u|=‖u‖ for any u∈V.
● The memory spaces
For any s∈(0,∞), we define μ(s)=−g′(s), which is nonnegative, absolutely continuous, decreasing (μ′≤0 almost everywhere) and
κ=∫∞0μ(s)ds>0. | (2.1) |
Also, there exists δ>0 such that
μ′(s)+δμ(s)≤0, a.e. s∈(0,∞). | (2.2) |
Let
MX=L2μ(R+;X), X=Vor W, |
which is a Hilbert space on R+ with inner product and norm
((η,ζ))MX=∫∞0μ(s)((η(s),ζ(s))Xds, ‖η‖MX=(∫∞0μ(s)||η(s)||2Xds)1/2. |
Moreover, the extended memory space can be defined as
NX=X×MX |
equipped with the norm
‖(u,η)‖2NX=‖u‖2X+‖η‖2MX. |
● The bilinear and trilinear operators
The bilinear and trilinear operators are defined as follows [8]
B(u,v):=PL((u⋅∇)v), ∀ u,v∈V, | (2.3) |
b(u,v,w)=<B(u,v),w>=3∑i,j=1∫Ωui∂vj∂xiwjdx. | (2.4) |
Denote B(u)=B(u,u), B(u,v) is a continuous operator from V×V to V′, and there hold
b(u,v,v)=0, b(u,v,w)=−b(u,w,v), ∀ u,v,w∈V. | (2.5) |
● Some useful lemmas
Lemma 2.1. ([23]) Assume that
1) A nonnegative function h is locally summable on R+, and for any ε∈(0,ε0] and any t≥τ≥0 there holds
ε∫tτe−ε(t−s)h(s)ds≤85supt≥0∫t+1th(s)ds<∞. |
2) The nonnegative function yε(t) is absolutely continuous on [τ,∞), and satisfies for some constants R,C0≥0 that
yε(t)≤Re−ε(t−τ)+εp∫tτe−ε(t−s)h(s)yε(s)qds+C0ε1+r, |
where p,q,r≥0, and p−1>(q−1)(1+r)≥0.
3) Let z(t)≥0 be a continuous function on (0,∞) equivalent to yε(t), which means there exist some constants M≥1, L≥0 such that
z(t)≤Myε(t)≤M(z(t)+L). |
Then, there exist ω, Λ>0 and an increasing function J(∗): R+→R+ such that
z(t)≤J(MR)e−ω(t−τ)+Λ(MC0+L). |
Remark 2.1. Under the assumptions in Lemma 2.1, there exists a constant θ∈(0,1) satisfying
p1=pθ−θ+1−q>0, p2=1−θ−rθ>0. |
Denote
p3=max{ε−1/θ0,(2supt≥0∫t+1th(s)ds)1/p1,C1/p20}, p4=2max{6Rp−13,1}, |
then
ω=ωθ,p,q,r,C0=12p−θ3, Λ=Λθ,p,q,r,C0=5p1−p23, |
J(R)=Jθ,p,q,r,C0(R)=2pq4p3exp(pθ41−2−θln(6pq4)). |
Lemma 2.2. ([15]) Let η be the past history variable and (1.2) holds. Then
‖ηt(s)‖2MX−‖ητ(s)‖2MX≤2∫tτ((ησ,u(σ)))MXdσ. |
We assume that f1(x) and f2(t,x) satisfy the following hypotheses:
(C1) The function f1∈H.
(C2) f2(t,x) is translation bounded in L2loc(R,H), which means there exists a constant K>0 such that
supt∈R∫t+1t|f2(s)|2ds<K, |
and for any t∈R, there also holds
∫t−∞eιs‖f2(s)‖2ds<∞, 0<ι≤νε0, ν=min{ακδ72,1}, | (3.1) |
where κ,δ are the same as parameters in (2.1) and (2.2) respectively.
Construct the infinitesimal generator of right-translation semigroup on MX
Tη=−∂∂sη, |
whose domain is
D(T)={η∈MX: ∂∂sη∈MX, η(0)=0}. |
Given initial datum U(τ)=(u(τ),ητ)∈NV, then (1.1) can be transformed into the following abstract form
{∂∂t(u+αAu)+∫∞0μ(s)Aη(s)ds+B(u,u)+βu=PLfε(t,x), (t,x)∈Ωτ,∂∂tη=Tη+u,divu=0, (t,x)∈Ωτ,u(t,x)=0, (t,x)∈∂Ωτ,u(τ,x)=u(τ), x∈Ω,ητ(s)=∫s0φ(σ)dσ. | (3.2) |
● Global well-posedness of solution
Definition 3.1 A function U(t)=(u(t),ηt): [τ,+∞)→NV is called the weak solution to (3.2), if for any fixed T>τ there hold
(i) U(t)∈C([τ,T];NV), ∂u∂t∈L2(τ,T;V).
(ii) U(τ)=(u(τ),ητ).
(iii) for any w∈C1([τ,T];V) with w(T,x)=0, there holds
−∫Tτ⟨u+αAu,wt⟩dt+∫Tτ∫∞0μ(s)((η(s),w))Vdsdt+∫Tτb(u,u,w)dt+∫Tτ(βu,w)dt=((u(τ),w(τ)))Vα+∫Tτ(PLfε,w)dt. | (3.3) |
Theorem 3.2. Let U(τ)∈NV, and the hypotheses (C1)–(C2) hold. Then the global weak solution U(t,x) to system (3.2) uniquely exists on (τ,T), which generates a strongly continuous process
Sε(t,τ): NV→NV, ∀ t≥τ,0≤ε<ε0 |
and Sε(t,τ)U(τ)=U(t).
Proof. The global well-posedness of solution can be obtained by the Galerkin approximation method, energy estimates and compact scheme. The detailed proof can be found in [15,18] and is omitted here.
● Existence of D-pullback attractors
Theorem 3.3. Assume U(τ)∈NV and the hypotheses (C1)–(C2) hold. Then the process Sε(t,τ): NV→NV generated by the system (3.2) possesses a minimal family of D-pullback attractors Aε={Aε(t)}t∈R in NV.
Proof. See Section 4.2.
When ε=0, the system (3.2) can be reduced to the following autonomous system
{∂∂t(u+αAu)+∫∞0μ(s)Aη(s)ds+B(u,u)+βu=PLf1(x), (t,x)∈Ωτ,∂∂tη=Tη+u,divu=0, (t,x)∈Ωτ,u(t,x)=0, (t,x)∈∂Ωτ,u(τ,x)=u(τ), x∈Ω,ητ(s)=∫s0φ(σ)dσ. | (3.4) |
Remark 3.1. The existence of global attractor A0 in NV can be achieved for the semigroup S0(t−τ) generated by (3.4).
● Robustness: upper semi-continuity of D-pullback attractors
Let ⋁ be a metric space, and {Aλ}λ∈⋁ is a family of subsets in X. Then it is said that {Aλ} has the property of upper semi-continuity as λ→λ0 in X if
limλ→λ0distX(Aλ,Aλ0)=0. |
The upper semi-continuity of attractors and related conclusions can be referred to [1,19,20,22] for more details.
In the following way, we intend to establish some results on the convergence between D-pullback attractors Aε to system (3.2) and global attractor A0 to system (3.4) as ε→0.
Theorem 3.4. Let U(τ)∈NV, Aε is the family of D-pullback attractors of Sε(t,τ) in NV to system (3.2), and A0 is the global attractor of S0(t−τ) in NV to system (3.4). Then the robustness of system is obtained by the following upper semi-continuity
limε→0distNV(Aε,A0)=0. |
Proof. See Section 5.
In this section, we first give the fundamental theory of attractors for dissipative systems, and the related conclusions can be seen in [1,2,3,7].
● Some relevant definitions
Definition 4.1. Assume that P(X) is the family of all nonempty subsets in a metric space X. If D is some nonempty class of families in the form ˆD={D(t):t∈R}⊂P(X), where D(t)⊂X is nonempty and bounded, then D is said to be a universe in P(X).
Definition 4.2. The family ˆD0={D0(t):t∈R}⊂P(X) is D-pullback absorbing for the process S(⋅,⋅) on X if for any t∈R and any ˆD∈D, there exists a τ0(t,ˆD)≤t such that
S(t,τ)D(τ)⊂D0(t), ∀ τ≤τ0(t,ˆD). |
Definition 4.3. A process S(⋅,⋅) on X is said to be D-pullback asymptotically compact if for any t∈R, any ˆD∈D, and any sequences {τn}⊂(−∞,t] and {xn}⊂X satisfying τn→−∞ and xn∈D(τn), the sequence {S(t,τn)xn} is relatively compact in X.
The D-pullback asymptotic compactness can be characterized by the Kuratowski measure of noncompactness κ(B) (B⊂X), relating definition and properties can be referred to [25,26], and the definition of D−κ-pullback contraction will be given as follows.
Definition 4.4. For any t∈R and ε>0, a process S(t,τ) on X is said to be D−κ-pullback contracting if there exists a constant TD(t,ε)>0 such that
κ(S(t,t−τ)D(t−τ))≤ε, ∀ τ≥TD(t,ε). |
Definition 4.5. A family A(t)={A(t)}t∈R is called the D-pullback attractors of process S(t,τ), if for any t∈R and any {D(t)}∈D, the following properties hold.
(i) A(t) is compact in X.
(ii) S(t,τ)A(τ)=A(t), t≥τ.
(iii) limτ→−∞distX(S(t,τ)D(τ),A(t))=0.
In addition, D-pullback attractor A is said to be minimal if whenever ˆC is another D-attracting family of closed sets, then A(t)⊂C(t) for all t∈R.
● Some conclusions
Theorem 4.6. ([1,27]) Let S(⋅,⋅):R2d×X→X be a continuous process, where R2d={(t,τ)∈R2|t≥τ}, D is a universe in P(X), and a family ˆD0={D0(t):t∈R}⊂P(X) is D-pullback absorbing for S(⋅,⋅), which is D-pullback asymptotically compact. Then, the family of D-pullback attractors AD={AD(t):t∈R} exists and
AD(t)=⋂s≥0¯⋃τ≥sS(t,t−τ)D(t−τ)X, t∈R. |
Remark 4.1. If ˆD0∈D, then AD is minimal family of closed subsets attracting pullback to D. It is said to be unique provided that ˆD0∈D, D0(t) is closed for any t∈R, and D is inclusion closed.
Theorem 4.7. ([21]) Assume that ˜D={ˆ˜D(t)} is a family of sets in X, S(⋅,⋅) is continuous, and, for any t∈R, there exists a constant T(t,D,˜D) such that
S(t,t−τ)D(t−τ)⊂˜D(t), ∀ τ≥T(t,D,˜D). |
If S(⋅,⋅) is D-pullback absorbing and ˆD−κ-pullback contracting, then the D-pullback attractors AD={AD(t):t∈R} exist for S(⋅,⋅).
Lemma 4.8. ([28]) Assume that S(⋅,⋅)=S1(⋅,⋅)+S2(⋅,⋅), ˜D={ˆ˜D(t)} is a family of subsets in X, and for any t∈R and any τ∈R+ there hold
(i) For any u(t−τ)∈˜D(t−τ),
‖S1(t,t−τ)u(t−τ)‖X≤Φ(t,τ)→0 (τ→+∞). |
(ii) For any T≥τ, ∪0≤τ≤TS2(t,t−τ)˜D(t−τ) is bounded, and S2(t,t−τ)˜D(t−τ) is relatively compact in X.
Then S(⋅,⋅) is ˆD−κ-pullback contracting in X.
From Theorems 3.2, we know that the system (3.2) generates a continuous process Sε(t,τ) in NV. To obtain the D-pullback attractors, we need to establish the existence of D-pullback absorbing set and the D-pullback asymptotic compactness of Sε(t,τ).
● Existence of D-pullback absorbing set in NV
Let D denote a family of all {D(t)}t∈R⊂P(NV) satisfying
limτ→−∞eωτsupU(τ)∈D(τ)J(2|U(τ)|2)=0, |
where ω=ω3/4,1,4,3,fε>0 and J(⋅)=J3/4,1,4,3,fε(⋅). Next, we establish the existence of D-pullback absorbing set.
Lemma 4.9. Let (u(τ),ητ)∈NV, then the process {Sε(t,τ)} to system (3.2) possesses a D-pullback absorbing set ˆDε0(t)={Dε0(t)}t∈R in NV, where
Dε0(t)=ˉBNV(0,ρεNV(t)), |
with radius
ρεNV(t)=√2√Λ3/4,1,4,3,fε(2C(|f1|2+εK)+1). | (4.1) |
Proof. Multiplying (3.2) by u, we have
12ddt‖u‖2Vα+∫∞0μ(s)Aη(s)u(t)ds+β|u|2=(PLfε,u), | (4.2) |
that is
12ddt‖u‖2Vα+∫∞0μ(s)Aη(s)(∂tη(s)+∂sη(s))ds+β|u|2=12ddt(‖u‖2Vα+‖η‖2MV)+12∫∞0μ(s)dds‖η‖2ds+β|u|2≤|(fε,u)|. | (4.3) |
Multiplying (3.2) by ut, we have
‖ut‖2Vα+((η,ut))MV+12βddt|u|2+b(u,u,ut)=(PLfε,ut). | (4.4) |
Then, the interpolation inequality and Young inequality lead to
βddt|u|2+2‖ut‖2Vα≤2|((η,ut))MV|+2|(fε,ut)|+2|b(u,u,ut)|≤2|((η,ut))MV|+2|(fε,ut)|+C‖u‖L3‖u‖‖u‖L6≤2|((η,ut))MV|+2|(fε,ut)|+C|u|1/2‖u‖1/2‖u‖‖u‖L6≤α‖ut‖2+C‖η‖2MV+C|u|‖u‖3+C|fε|2. | (4.5) |
To estimate the term ∫∞0μ(s)dds‖η‖2ds in (4.3) and avoid the possible singularity of μ at zero, we refer to [18] and construct the following new function
˜μ(s)={μ(˜s),0<s≤˜s,μ(s),s>˜s |
where ˜s is fixed such that ∫˜s0μ(s)ds≤κ/2. Also, if we set
Φ(t)=−4κ∫∞0˜μ(s)((η(s),u(t)))ds, |
then differentiating in t leads to
ddtΦ(t)+‖u‖2≤4μ(˜s)κ2∫∞0μ(s)dds‖η‖2ds+4ακε‖η‖2MV+αε‖ut‖2. | (4.6) |
We use the technique in [18] and set
yε(t)=E(t)+νεΦ(t)+ε2Ψ(t), |
where
E(t)=12(‖u‖2Vα+‖η‖2MV), Ψ(t)=2β|u|2. |
For sufficient small ε, it leads to
E(t)≤2yε(t)≤2(E(t)+1), |
where we choose ε0 satisfying
νε0supt∈[τ,T]Φ(t)+ε20supt∈[τ,T]Ψ(t)=1, |
and 0≤ε<ε0. Then, there holds
ddtyε(t)+Cεyε(t)≤Cε4yε(t)3+C|fε|2, | (4.7) |
and
yε(t)≤yε(τ)e−ε(t−τ)+Cε4∫tτe−ε(t−s)⋅1⋅yε(s)3ds+Csupt∈R∫t+1t|fε|2ε−1ds≤yε(τ)e−ε(t−τ)+Cε4∫tτe−ε(t−s)⋅1⋅yε(s)3ds+C(|f1|2+εK)ε−1. | (4.8) |
Then by Lemma 2.1, there exist
ω=ω3/4,1,4,3,fε>0, Λ=Λ3/4,1,4,3,fε>0, |
and an increasing function
J(⋅)=J3/4,1,4,3,fε(⋅): R+→R+ |
such that
E(t)≤J(2E(τ))e−ω(t−τ)+Λ(2C(|f1|2+εK)+1), |
which implies the conclusion holds.
Remark 4.2. For the semigroup S0(t−τ), it has the global absorbing set D00 in NV, where
D00={U∈NV; ‖U‖NV≤ρ0NV=√2√Λ3/4,1,4,3,f1(2C|f1|2+1)} | (4.9) |
and
lim supε→0ρεNV(t)=ρ0NV. | (4.10) |
● D−κ-pullback contraction of Sε(t,τ) in NV
To verify the pullback contraction of Sε(t,τ), we decompose Sε(t,τ) as follows
Sε(t,τ)U(τ)=Sε1(t−τ)U1(τ)+Sε2(t,τ)U2(τ)=:U1(t)+U2(t), |
which solve the following two problems respectively
{∂∂t(u1+αAu1)+∫∞0μ(s)Aη1(s)ds+B(u,u1)=0, (t,x)∈Ωτ,∂∂tη1=Tη1+u1,divu1=0, (t,x)∈Ωτ,u1(t,x)=0, (t,x)∈∂Ωτ,u1(τ,x)=u(τ), x∈Ω,ητ1(s)=∫s0φ(σ)dσ, | (4.11) |
and
{∂∂t(u2+αAu2)+∫∞0μ(s)Aη2(s)ds+B(u,u2)+βu2=PLfε−βu1, (t,x)∈Ωτ,∂∂tη2=Tη2+u2,divu2=0, (t,x)∈Ωτ,u2(t,x)=0, (t,x)∈∂Ωτ,u2(τ,x)=0, x∈Ω,ητ2(s)=0. | (4.12) |
Lemma 4.10. Let U(τ)∈Dε0(τ), then the solution Sε1(t−τ)U(τ) to the system (4.11) satisfies
‖Sε1(t−τ)U(τ)‖NV≤J(2E(τ))e−ω(t−τ)→0 (τ→−∞). |
Proof. Multiplying (4.11) by u1 and ∂∂tu1 respectively, and repeating the reasonings as shown as in Lemma 4.9, in which β=0 and fε=0, we can derive the conclusion finally. The parameter ω is dependent on ε and the increasing function J(∗) is different from the one in Lemma 4.9. Despite all this, these parameters can be unified in same representation, and the concrete details are omitted here.
Lemma 4.11. Let U(τ)∈Dε0(τ), then for any t∈R, there exists Cε(t)>0 such that the solution Sε2(t,τ)U(τ) to the system (4.12) satisfies
‖Sε2(t,τ)U(τ)‖NW≤Cε(t). |
Proof. Multiplying (4.12) by Au2, we have
12ddt(‖u2‖2+α|Au2|2)+∫∞0μ(s)Aη2(s)Au2(t)ds+β‖u2‖2+b(u,u2,Au2)=(PLfε−βu1,Au2), | (4.13) |
from the existence of pullback absorbing set, Lemma 4.10, the interpolation inequality and Young inequality, we have
12ddt(‖u2‖2+α|Au2|2+‖η2‖2MW)+12∫∞0μ(s)dds|Aη2|2ds+β‖u2‖2≤|(fε,Au2)|+|(βu1,Au2)|+‖u‖L6‖∇u2‖L3|Au2|≤νε4|Au2|2+C‖u‖‖u2‖1/2|Au2|1/2|Au2|+C|fε|2≤νε2|Au2|2+C|fε|2+C. | (4.14) |
Multiplying (4.12) by A∂tu2, we have
‖∂tu2‖2+α|A∂tu2|2+((η2,∂tu2))MW+12βddt‖u2‖2+b(u,u2,∂tu2)=(PLfε−βu1,A∂tu2). | (4.15) |
By the existence of pullback absorbing set, Lemma 4.10 and Young inequality, one has
βddt‖u2‖2+2‖∂tu2‖2+2α|A∂tu2|2≤2|((η2,∂tu2))MW|+2|(PLfε−βu1,A∂tu2)|+2|b(u,u2,∂tu2)|≤2|((η2,∂tu2))MW|+2|(PLfε−βu1,A∂tu2)|+C|Au2||A∂tu2|≤α|A∂tu2|2+C‖η2‖2MW+C|Au2|2+C|fε|2. | (4.16) |
To estimate the term ∫∞0μ(s)dds|Aη2|2ds in (4.14), we set
Φ2(t)=−6κ∫∞0˜μ(s)(Aη2(s),Au2(t))ds, |
and differentiating in t leads to
ddtΦ2(t)+6κ∫∞0˜μ(s)(Au2(t),Au2(t))ds≤−6κ∫∞0˜μ(s)(−A∂sη2,Au2(t))ds−6κ∫∞0˜μ(s)(Aη2(s),A∂tu2(t))ds, | (4.17) |
where
6κ∫∞0˜μ(s)(Au2(t),Au2(t))ds≥6κ∫∞˜s˜μ(s)ds⋅|Au2(t)|2, | (4.18) |
and
−6κ∫∞0˜μ(s)(−A∂sη2,Au2(t))ds=−6κ∫∞˜sμ′(s)(Aη2,Au2(t))ds≤6κ∫∞˜s−μ′(s)|Aη2||Au2(t)|ds≤6κ(∫∞˜s−μ′(s)|Aη2|2ds)1/2(∫∞˜s−μ′(s)|Au2(t)|2ds)1/2≤6κ(∫∞˜sμ(s)dds|Aη2|2ds)1/2(2μ(˜s))1/2|Au2(t)|≤|Au2(t)|2+18μ(˜s)κ2∫∞˜sμ(s)dds|Aη2|2ds, | (4.19) |
and
−6κ∫∞0˜μ(s)(Aη2(s),A∂tu2(t))ds≤6κ∫∞0μ(s)|Aη2(s)||A∂tu2(t)|ds≤αε|A∂tu2(t)|2+9ακ2ε‖η‖2MW. | (4.20) |
Also, from the fact that μ′(s)+δμ(s)≤0, we have
∫∞0μ(s)dds|Aη2|2ds≥∫∞0δμ(s)|Aη2|2ds=δ‖η2‖2MW. | (4.21) |
Thus
ddtΦ2(t)+2|Au2|2≤18μ(˜s)κ2∫∞0μ(s)dds|Aη2|2ds+9ακε‖η2‖2MW+αε|A∂tu2|2. | (4.22) |
We use the technique in [18] and set
zε(t)=E2(t)+νεΦ2(t)+ε2Ψ2(t), |
where
E2(t)=12(‖u2‖2+α|Au2|2+‖η2‖2MW), Ψ2(t)=β‖u‖2. |
For sufficient small enough ε, it leads to
E2(t)≤2zε(t)≤2(E2(t)+1), |
and there holds
ddtzε(t)+νεzε(t)≤C+C|fε|2, | (4.23) |
it follows from the Gronwall lemma that
E2(t)≤Ce−νε(t−τ)E2(τ)+Cε∫tτeνε(s−t)|f2(s,x)|2ds+C|f1|2+C≤Cεe−νεt∫tτeνε0s|f2(s,x)|2ds+C|f1|2+C, | (4.24) |
which means the conclusion holds.
Above all, Lemmas 4.10, 4.11 and 4.8 lead to
Lemma 4.12. Let U(τ)∈NV, then the process Sε(t,τ): NV→NV generated by the system (3.2) is D−κ-pullback contracting in NV.
Consequently, from Theorem 4.7, we can finish the proof of Theorem 3.3.
By the definition of upper semi-continuity, the following lemmas can be used to obtain the robustness of pullback attractors for evolutionary systems.
Lemma 5.1. ([20]) Let ε∈(0,ε0], {Sε(t,τ)} is the process of evolutionary system with non-autonomous term (depending on ε), which is obtained by perturbing the semigroup S0(τ) of system without ε, and, for any t∈R, there also hold that
(i) Sε(t,τ) has the pullback attractors Aε(t), and A0 is the global attractor for S0(τ).
(ii) For any τ∈R+ and any u∈X, there holds uniformly that
limε→0dX(Sε(t,t−τ)u,S0(τ)u)=0. |
(iii) There exists a compact subset G⊂X such that
limε→0distX(Aε(t),G)=0. |
Then, for any t∈R, there holds
limε→0distX(Aε,A0)=0. |
Lemma 5.2. ([21]) For any t∈R, τ∈R+, and ε∈(0,ε0], ˆDε0(t)={Dε0(t):t∈R} is the pullback absorbing set for Sε(t,τ), and ˆCε0(t)={Cε0(t):t∈R} is a family of compact subsets in X. Assume that Sε(⋅,⋅)=Sε1(⋅,⋅)+Sε2(⋅,⋅), and there hold
(i) For any ut−τ∈Dε0(t−τ),
‖Sε1(t,t−τ)ut−τ‖X≤Φ(t,τ)→0 (τ→∞). |
(ii) For any T≥τ, ∪0≤τ≤TSε2(t,t−τ)Dε0(t−τ) is bounded, and there exists a constant TDε0(t), independent of ε, such that
Sε2(t,t−τ)Dε0(t−τ)⊂Cε0(t), ∀ τ>TDε0(t). |
(iii) There is a compact subset G⊂X such that
limε→0distX(Cε0(t),G)=0. |
Then, the process Sε(t,τ) has the pullback attractors Aε(t), and
limε→0distX(Aε,G)=0. |
We give the following procedure to verify Theorem 3.4.
Lemma 5.3. Let (uε,ηε)=Sε(t,τ)U(τ) be the solution to system (3.2), and (u,η)=S0(t−τ)U(τ) is the solution to system (3.4), then, for any bounded subset B⊂NV, there holds
limε→0supU(τ)∈BdNV(Sε(t,τ)U(τ),S0(t−τ)U(τ))=0. |
Proof. We know
{∂∂t(uε+αAuε)+∫∞0μ(s)Aηε(s)ds+B(uε,uε)+βuε=PLfε(t,x), (t,x)∈Ωτ,∂∂tηε=Tηε+uε, | (5.1) |
and
{∂∂t(u+αAu)+∫∞0μ(s)Aη(s)ds+B(u,u)+βu=PLf1(x), (t,x)∈Ωτ,∂∂tη=Tη+u. | (5.2) |
Let wε=uε−u and ξε=ηε−η, we can derive
∂∂t(wε+αAwε)+∫∞0μ(s)Aξε(s)ds+B(uε,wε)+B(wε,u)+βwε=εPLf2(t,x), | (5.3) |
and multiplying it by wε leads to
12ddt‖wε‖2α+∫∞0μ(s)(Aξε(s),wε(t))ds+b(wε,u,wε)+β|wε|2=ε(PLf2(t,x),wε), | (5.4) |
it follows that
12ddt‖wε‖2α+∫∞0μ(s)((ξε(s),wε))ds≤|b(wε,u,wε)|+ε|(f2(t,x),wε)|. | (5.5) |
Integrating (5.5) over [τ,t], from Lemma 2.2 we derive that
‖wε(t)‖2α+‖ξε(t−s)‖2MV≤‖wε(τ)‖2α+‖ξε(τ−s)‖2MV+2∫tτ|b(wε,u,wε)|ds+2ε∫tτ|(f2(t,x),wε)|ds≤‖(wε,ξε)|τ‖2NV+C∫tτ‖u‖‖wε‖2ds+2ε∫tτ|(f2(t,x),wε)|ds≤‖(wε,ξε)|τ‖2NV+ε2∫tτ|f2|2ds+C∫tτ‖wε‖2ds, | (5.6) |
that is
‖(wε,ξε)|t‖2NV≤‖(wε,ξε)|τ‖2NV+ε2∫tτ|f2|2ds+C∫tτ‖(wε,ξε)|s‖2NVds, | (5.7) |
and the Gronwall inequality leads to
‖(wε,ξε)|t‖2NV≤C(‖(wε,ξε)|τ‖2NV+ε2∫tτ|f2|2ds)→0 (ε→0), | (5.8) |
which means that the conclusion is finished.
Proof of Theorem 3.4. From (4.24) and the fact that W↪V is compact, we know that there exists a compact subset G⊂NV such that
limε→0distX(Cε0(t),G)=0. | (5.9) |
Combining Lemma 4.10, Lemma 5.2 and (5.9), we have
limε→0distX(Aε,G)=0. |
In addition, the confirmation of condition (ii) in Lemma 5.1 is finished from Lemma 5.3, and we have
limε→0distX(Aε,A0)=0. |
Rong Yang was partially supported by the Science and Technology Project of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (No. KM202210005011).
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
[1] |
Samsudin AA, Evans PN, Wright AD, et al. (2011) Molecular diversity of the foregut bacteria community in the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Environ Microbiol 13: 3024-3035. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02579.x
![]() |
[2] | Kay RNB, Maloiy GMO (1989) Digestive secretions in camels. Options Méditerranéennes–Série Séminaires-n.°2 83-87. |
[3] |
Gharechahi J, Zahiri HS, Noghabi KA, et al. (2015) In-depth diversity analysis of the bacterial community resident in the camel rumen. Syst Appl Microbiol 38: 67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.09.004
![]() |
[4] |
Lechner-Doll M, Engelhardt WV (1989) Particle size and passage from the forestomach in camels compared to cattle and sheep fed a similar diet. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 61: 120-128. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.1989.tb00091.x
![]() |
[5] | Iqbal A, Khan BB (2001) Feeding behaviour of camel. Pak J Agric Sci 38: 58-63. |
[6] |
Samsudin AA, Wright ADG, Al Jassim R (2012) Cellulolytic bacteria in the foregut of the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 8836-8839. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02420-12
![]() |
[7] |
Rabee AE, Forster RJ, Elekwachi CO, et al. (2020) Comparative analysis of the metabolically active microbial communities in the rumen of dromedary camels under different feeding systems using total rRNA sequencing. Peer J 8: e10184. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10184
![]() |
[8] |
Bhatt VD, Dande SS, Patil NV, et al. (2013) Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiome in the forestomach fluid from the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Mol Biol Rep 40: 3363-3371. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-2411-4
![]() |
[9] |
Gharechahi J, Salekdeh GH (2018) A metagenomic analysis of the camel rumen's microbiome identifies the major microbes responsible for lignocellulose degradation and fermentation. Biotechnol Biofuels 11: 216. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1214-9
![]() |
[10] |
Ameri R, Laville E, Potocki-VeÂronèse G, et al. (2018) Two new gene clusters involved in the degradation of plant cell wall from the fecal microbiota of Tunisian dromedary. PLoS One 13: e0194621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194621
![]() |
[11] |
Jami E, White BA, Mizrahi I (2014) Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed ffficiency. PLoS One 9: e85423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085423
![]() |
[12] |
Moss AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J (2000) Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann Zootech 49: 231-253. doi: 10.1051/animres:2000119
![]() |
[13] |
Van Nevel CJ, Demeyer DI (1996) Control of rumen methanogenesis. Environ Monit Assess 42: 73-97. doi: 10.1007/BF00394043
![]() |
[14] |
Lee K, Webb RI, Janssen PH, et al. (2009) Phylum Verrucomicrobia representatives share a compartmentalized cell plan with members of bacterial phylum Planctomycetes. BMC Microbiol 9: 5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-5
![]() |
[15] | Ekinci MS, Özcan N, ÖzkÖse E, et al. (2001) A Study on cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes of anaerobic rumen bacterium Ruminococcus flavefaciens Strain 17. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 25: 703-709. |
[16] |
Seo JK, Park TS, Kwon IH, et al. (2013) Characterization of cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes of Bacillus licheniformis JK7 isolated from the rumen of a native Korean goat. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 26: 50-58. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12506
![]() |
[17] |
Sadhu S, Ghosh PK, Aditya G, et al. (2014) Optimization and strain improvement by mutation for enhanced cellulase production by Bacillus sp. (MTCC10046) isolated from cow dung. J King Saud UnivSci 26: 323-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2014.06.001
![]() |
[18] |
Khatab MSA, Abd El Tawab AM, Fouad MT (2017) Isolation and characterization of anaerobic bacteria from frozen rumen liquid and its potential characterization. Int J Dairy Sci 12: 47-51. doi: 10.3923/ijds.2017.47.51
![]() |
[19] |
Selinger LB, Fosberg CW, Cheng KJ (1996) The rumen: A unique source of enzymes for enhancing livestock production. Anaerobe 2: 263-284. doi: 10.1006/anae.1996.0036
![]() |
[20] |
Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R, et al. (2011) Metagenomic discovery of biomass degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science 331: 463-467. doi: 10.1126/science.1200387
![]() |
[21] |
Rabee AE, Al Ahl AAS, Sabra EA, et al. (2019a) Assessment of xylanolytic and cellulolytic activities of anaerobic bacterial community in the rumen of camel using different substrates. Menoufia J Animal Poultry Fish Prod 3: 69-82. doi: 10.21608/mjapfp.2019.174814
![]() |
[22] | Molina-Guerrero CE, de la Rosa G, Gonzalez Castañeda J, et al. (2018) Optimization of culture conditions for production of cellulase by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Bio Res 13: 8358-8372. |
[23] | Sethi S, Datta A, Gupta BL, et al. (2013) Optimization of Cellulase Production from Bacteria Isolated from Soil. Inter Scholarly Res Not 2013. |
[24] | Rabee AE, Forster RJ, Elekwachi CO, et al. (2019b) Community structure and fibrolytic activities of anaerobic rumen fungi in dromedary camels. J Basic Microbiol 49: 1-10. |
[25] |
Phillips MW, Gordon GLR (1988) Sugar and polysaccharide fermentation by rumen anaerobic fungi from Australia, Britain and New Zealand. BioSystems 21: 377-383. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(88)90036-6
![]() |
[26] | Wang Z, Elekwachi C, Jiao J, et al. (2017) Changes in Metabolically Active Bacterial Community during Rumen Development, and Their Alteration by Rhubarb Root Powder Revealed by 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing. Front Microbiol 8: 159. |
[27] |
Liu K, Xu Q, Wang L, et al. (2016) Comparative studies of the composition of bacterial microbiota associated with the ruminal content, ruminal epithelium and in the faeces of lactating dairy cows. Microb Biotechnol 9: 257-268. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12345
![]() |
[28] |
Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. (2010) QIIMEE allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7: 335-336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
![]() |
[29] | Andrews S Fast QC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data (2010) .Available from: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc. |
[30] |
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina Sequence Data. Bioinformatics 30: 2114-2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
![]() |
[31] |
Zhang J, Kobert K, Flouri T, et al. (2014) PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 30: 614-620. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593
![]() |
[32] |
Caldwell DR, Bryant MP (1966) Medium without rumen fluid for nonselective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria. Appl Microbiol 14: 794-801. doi: 10.1128/am.14.5.794-801.1966
![]() |
[33] | McSweeney CS, Denman SE, Mackie RI (2005) Rumen bacteria. Methods in Gut Microbial Ecology for Ruminants Dordrecht: Springer. |
[34] | IBM Corp. Released (2011) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. |
[35] |
Petri RM, Schwaiger T, Penner GB, et al. (2013) Characterization of the core rumen microbiome in cattle during transition from forage to concentrate as well as during and after an acidotic challenge. PLoS One 8: e83424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083424
![]() |
[36] |
Pandya PR, Singh KM, Parnerkar S, et al. (2010) Bacterial diversity in the rumen of Indian Surti buffalo (Bubalus bubalis), assessed by 16S rDNA analysis. J Appl Genet 51: 395-402. doi: 10.1007/BF03208869
![]() |
[37] |
Pitta DW, Kumar S, Veiccharelli B, et al. (2014) Bacterial diversity associated with feeding dry forage at different dietary concentrations in the rumen contents of Mehshana buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) using 16S pyrotags. Anaerobe 25: 31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.11.008
![]() |
[38] | Naas AE, Mackenzie AK, Mravec J, et al. (2014) Do rumen Bacteroidetes utilize an alternative mechanism for cellulose degradation? mBio 5: e01401-e01414. |
[39] |
Fouts DE, Szpakowski S, Purushe J, et al. (2012) Next generation sequencing to define prokaryotic and fungal diversity in the bovine rumen. PLoS One 7: e48289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048289
![]() |
[40] |
Russell JB, Rychlik JL (2001) Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology. Science 292: 1119-1122. doi: 10.1126/science.1058830
![]() |
[41] |
Nathani NM, Patel AK, Mootapally CS, et al. (2015) Effect of roughage on rumen microbiota composition in the efficient feed converter and sturdy Indian Jaffrabadi buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). BMC Genomics 16: 1116. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2340-4
![]() |
[42] |
Koike S, Yoshitani S, Kobayashi Y, et al. (2003) Phylogenetic analysis of fiber-associated rumen bacterial community and PCR detection of uncultured bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 229: 23-30. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00760-2
![]() |
[43] |
Liu K, Xu Q, Wang L, et al. (2017) The impact of diet on the composition and relative abundance of rumen microbes in goat. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 30: 531-537. doi: 10.5713/ajas.16.0353
![]() |
[44] |
Gruninger RJ, McAllister TA, Forster RJ (2016) Bacterial and archaeal diversity in the gastrointestinal tract of the orth American beaver (Castor canadensis). PLoS One 11: e0156457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156457
![]() |
[45] |
Ransom-Jones E, Jones DL, McCarthy AJ, et al. (2012) The Fibrobacteres: an important phylum of cellulose-degrading bacteria. Microb Ecol 63: 267-281. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9998-1
![]() |
[46] |
Ishaq SL, Wright AG (2012) Insight into the bacterial gut microbiome of the North American moose (Alces alces). BMC Microbiol 12: 212. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-212
![]() |
[47] |
Leahy S, Kelly W, Ronimus R, et al. (2013) Genome sequencing of rumen bacteria and archaea and its application to methane mitigation strategies. Animal 7: 235-243. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113000700
![]() |
[48] |
Herlemann DPR, Geissinger O, Ikeda-Ohtsubo W, et al. (2009) Genomic analysis of “Elusimicrobium minutum,” the first cultivated representative of the phylum “Elusimicrobia” (formerly termite group 1). Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 2841-2849. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02698-08
![]() |
[49] | Ishaq S, Sundset M, Crouse J, et al. (2015) High-throughput DNA sequencing of the moose rumen from different geographical locations reveals a core ruminal methanogenic archaeal diversity and a differential ciliate protozoal diversity. Microb Genom 1: e000034. |
[50] |
Zoetendal E, Plugge CM, Akkermans ADL, et al. (2003) Victivallisvadensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a sugar-fermenting anaerobe from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53: 211-215. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02362-0
![]() |
[51] |
Jewell KA, McComirck C, Odt CL, et al. (2015) Ruminal bacterial community composition in dairy cows is dynamic over the course of two lactations and correlates with feed efficiency. Appl Environ Microbiol 18: 4697-4710. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00720-15
![]() |
[52] | Noel SJ, Højberg O, Urich T, et al. (2016) Draft genome sequence of “Candidatus Methanomethylophilus” sp. 1R26, enriched from bovine rumen, a methanogenic archaeon belonging to the Methanomassiliicoccales order. Genome Announc 4: e01734-e01715. |
[53] | Zorec M, Vodovnik M, MarinŠek-Logar R, et al. (2014) Potential of selected rumen bacteria for cellulose and hemicellulose degradation. Food Technol Biotechnol 52: 210-221. |
[54] |
Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, et al. (2015) Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep 5: 14567. doi: 10.1038/srep14567
![]() |
[55] |
Carberry CA, Kenny DA, Han S, et al. (2012) Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 4949-4958. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07759-11
![]() |
[56] |
Shrivastava B, Jain KK, Kalra A, et al. (2014) Bioprocessing of wheat straw into nutritionally rich and digested cattle feed. Sci Rep 4: 6360. doi: 10.1038/srep06360
![]() |
[57] |
Asem D, Leo VV, Passari AK, et al. (2017) Evaluation of gastrointestinal bacterial population for the production of holocellulose enzymes for biomass deconstruction. PLoS One 12: e0186355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186355
![]() |
[58] |
Salmon DNX, Spier MR, Soccol CR, et al. (2014) Analysis of inducers of xylanase and cellulase activities production by Ganoderma applanatum LPB MR-56. Fungal Biol 118: 655-662. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2014.04.003
![]() |
[59] |
Williams AG, Withers SE (1982) The production of plant cell wall polysaccharide-degrading enzymes by hemicellulolytic rumen bacterial isolates grown on a range of carbohydrate substrates. J Appl Bacteriol 52: 377-387. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1982.tb05068.x
![]() |
[60] |
Yang W, Meng F, Peng J, et al. (2014) Isolation and identification of a cellulolytic bacterium from the Tibetan pig's intestine and investigation of its cellulase production. Electron J Biotechnol 17: 262-267. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.08.002
![]() |
[61] | Hook SE, Wright ADG, McBride BW (2010) Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies. Archaea 2010: 945785. |
[62] |
St-Pierre B, Wright AG (2012) Molecular analysis of methanogenic archaea in the forestomach of the alpaca (Vicugna pacos). BMC Microbiol 12: 1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-1
![]() |
[63] | Salgado-Flores A, Bockwoldt M, Hagen L, et al. (2016) First insight into the faecal microbiota of the high Arctic muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Microb Genom 2. |
[64] |
Franzolin R, Wright AG (2016) Microorganisms in the rumen and reticulum of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed two different feeding systems. BMC Research Notes 9: 243. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2046-y
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |