In the agricultural sector, farmers and agribusiness are confronted with a multitude of complex choices every day. These selections are influenced by multiple variables that significantly affect their outcomes. The primary source of revenue for a good deal of individuals is derived from the agricultural sector. The provision of precise and punctual predictions on crop yields has significant importance in facilitating informed investment choices and shaping agricultural policies. One of the challenges encountered is the presence of old or incomplete data about the accessibility of resources. This represents a significant obstacle in accurately ascertaining the present state of affairs. The process of evaluating becomes complex as a result of the diverse range of soil conditions and climatic factors. This research introduces a novel approach called Enhanced Gravitational Search Optimized based Gated Recurrent Unit (EGSO-GRU) for the purpose of calculating crop production. The dataset was first gathered and pre-processed using a normalization method. Enhanced independent component analyses (EICA) have been employed for the purpose of extracting features. To determine the suggest method achievement with regard to accuracy (95.89%), specificity (92.4%), MSE (0.071), RMSE (0.210) and MAE (0.199). The proposed method achieved greater crop prediction accuracy, outperforming the majority of the existing models. The necessity of this progress is vital to the successful operation of crops. The concept signifies a technological advancement aimed at optimizing agricultural resources, hence fostering enhanced productivity and long-term sustainability within the farming industry.
Citation: Min Tang. Analysis and evaluate of agricultural resources using data analytic methods[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 627-649. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024027
In the agricultural sector, farmers and agribusiness are confronted with a multitude of complex choices every day. These selections are influenced by multiple variables that significantly affect their outcomes. The primary source of revenue for a good deal of individuals is derived from the agricultural sector. The provision of precise and punctual predictions on crop yields has significant importance in facilitating informed investment choices and shaping agricultural policies. One of the challenges encountered is the presence of old or incomplete data about the accessibility of resources. This represents a significant obstacle in accurately ascertaining the present state of affairs. The process of evaluating becomes complex as a result of the diverse range of soil conditions and climatic factors. This research introduces a novel approach called Enhanced Gravitational Search Optimized based Gated Recurrent Unit (EGSO-GRU) for the purpose of calculating crop production. The dataset was first gathered and pre-processed using a normalization method. Enhanced independent component analyses (EICA) have been employed for the purpose of extracting features. To determine the suggest method achievement with regard to accuracy (95.89%), specificity (92.4%), MSE (0.071), RMSE (0.210) and MAE (0.199). The proposed method achieved greater crop prediction accuracy, outperforming the majority of the existing models. The necessity of this progress is vital to the successful operation of crops. The concept signifies a technological advancement aimed at optimizing agricultural resources, hence fostering enhanced productivity and long-term sustainability within the farming industry.
| [1] |
J. E. Koltes, J. B Cole, R. Clemmens, R. N. Dilger, L. M. Kramer, J. K Lunney, A vision for the development and utilization of high-throughput phenotyping and big data analytics in livestock, Front. Genet., 10 (2019), 1197–1202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01197 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01197
|
| [2] | J. Seyedmohammadi, F. Sarmadian, A. A. Jafarzadeh, R. W. McDowell, Development of a model using matter element, AHP, and GIS techniques to assess land suitability for agriculture, Geoderma, 352 (2019), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.046 |
| [3] |
S. Gokool, M. Mahomed, R. Kunz, A. Clulow, M. Sibanda, V. Naiken, et al., Crop monitoring in smallholder farms using uncrewed aerial vehicles to facilitate precision agriculture practices: a scoping review and bibliometric analysis, Sustainability, 15 (2023), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043557 doi: 10.3390/su15043557
|
| [4] |
M. M. Ali, N. Hashim, S. A. Aziz, O. Lasekan, Principles and recent advances in the electronic nose for quality inspection of agricultural and food products, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 99 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.028 doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.028
|
| [5] |
C. Maraveas, D. Piromalis, K. G. Arvanitis, T. Bartzanas, D. Loukatos, Applications of IoT for optimized greenhouse environment and resources management, Comput. Electron. Agric., 198 (2022), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106993 doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106993
|
| [6] |
N, N. K Krisnawijaya, B. Tekinerdogan, C. Catal, R. van der Tol, Multi-criteria decision analysis approach for selecting feasible data analytics platforms for precision farming, Comput. Electron. Agric., 209 (2023), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107869 doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.107869
|
| [7] | K. E. A. Saputro, L. Hasim, Karlinasari, I. S. Beik, Evaluation of Sustainable Rural Tourism Development with an Integrated Approach Using MDS and ANP Methods: Case Study in Ciamis, West Java, Indonesia, Sustainability, 15 (2023), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031835 |
| [8] |
M. F. B. Alam, S. R. Tushar, S. M. Zaman, E. D. S Gonzalez, A. M. Bari, C. L. Karmaker, Analysis of the drivers of Agriculture 4.0 implementation in the emerging economies: Implications towards sustainability and food security, Green Technol. Sustainability, 1 (2023), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2023.100021 doi: 10.1016/j.grets.2023.100021
|
| [9] |
I. D. Lopez, J. F. Grass, A. Figueroa, J. C. Corrales, A proposal for a multi‐domain data fusion strategy in a climate‐smart agriculture context, Int. Trans. Oper. Res., 30 (2023), 2049–2070. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12899 doi: 10.1111/itor.12899
|
| [10] |
L. Li, J. Lin, Y. Ouyang, X. R. Luo, Evaluating the impact of big data analytics usage on the decision-making quality of organizations, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change., 175 (2022), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121355 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121355
|
| [11] |
A. Rejeb, A. Abdollahi, K. Rejeb, H. Treiblmaier, Drones in agriculture: A review and bibliometric analysis, Comput. Electron. Agric., 198 (2022), 107017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107017 doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107017
|
| [12] |
Y. Sheng, Z. Ma, X. Wang, Y. Han, Ethanol organosolv lignin from different agricultural residues: Toward basic structural units and antioxidant activity, Food Chem., 376 (2022), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131895 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131895
|
| [13] |
M. Paul, M. Negahban-Azar, A. Shirmohammadi, H. Montas, Assessment of agricultural land suitability for irrigation with reclaimed water using geospatial multi-criteria decision analysis, Agric. Water Manage., 231 (2020), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105987 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105987
|
| [14] | X. Cao, W. Zeng, M. Wu, X. Guo, W. Wang, The hybrid analytical framework for regional agricultural water resource utilization and efficiency evaluation, Agric. Water Manage., 231 (2020), 1–14. |
| [15] | N. Chergui, M. T. Kechadi, M. McDonnell, The impact of data analytics in digital agriculture: a review, O. Knowl. Adv. Technol., (2020), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCTA49274.2020.9151851 |
| [16] | M. Kavurmacı, C. B. Karakuş, Evaluation of irrigation water quality by data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy process-based water quality indices: The case of Aksaray City, Turkey, Water Air Soil Pollut., 231 (2020), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-4427-z |
| [17] |
K. A. Shastry, H. A. Sanjay, Data analysis and prediction using big data analytics in agriculture, Internet Things Anal. Agric., 2 (2020), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0663-5_10 doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0663-5_10
|
| [18] |
Z. Wang, J. Wang, G. Zhang, Z. Wang, Evaluation of agricultural extension service for sustainable rural development using a hybrid entropy and TOPSIS method, Sustainability, 13 (2021), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010347 doi: 10.3390/su13010347
|
| [19] | X. Wang, Analysis and evaluation research on the influencing factors of the development of local agricultural products, in E3S Web of Conferences, 251 (2021), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125102096 |
| [20] | S. Talukdar, M. W. Naikoo, J. Mallick, B. Praveen, P. Sharma, A. Rahman, Coupling geographic information system integrated fuzzy logic-analytical hierarchy process with global and machine learning-based sensitivity analysis for agricultural suitability mapping, Agric. Syst., 196 (2022) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103343 |
| [21] |
M. Raj, S. Gupta, V. Chamola, A. Elhence, M. Atiquzzaman, D. A. Niyato, Survey on the role of the Internet of Things in adopting and promoting Agriculture 4.0, J. Network Comput. Appl., 187 (2021), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103107 doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103107
|
| [22] |
R. Sharma, S. S. Kamble, A. Gunasekaran, Big GIS analytics framework for agriculture supply chains: A literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives, Comput. Electron. Agric., 155 (2018), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.10.001
|
| [23] | O. Elijah, T. A. Rahman, I. Orikumhi, C. Y. Leow, M. N. Hindia, An overview of the Internet of Things (IoT) and data analytics in agriculture: Benefits and challenges, IEEE Internet Things J., 5 (2018), 3758–3773. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2844296 |
| [24] |
C. Arora, A. Kamat, S. Shanker, A. Barve, Integrating agriculture and industry 4.0 under "agri-food 4.0" to analyze suitable technologies to overcome agronomical barriers, Br. Food J., 124 (2022), 2061–2095. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2021-0934 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-08-2021-0934
|
| [25] |
A. Kumar, S. Pant, Analytical hierarchy process for sustainable agriculture: An overview, MethodsX, 10 (2023), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101954 doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101954
|
| [26] |
T. H. Nguyen, D. Nong, K. Paustian, Surrogate-based multi-objective optimization of management options for agricultural landscapes using artificial neural networks, Ecol. Modell., 400 (2019), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.02.018 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.02.018
|
| [27] |
G. Latif, S. E. Abdelhamid, R. E. Mallouhy, J. Alghazo, Z. A. Kazimi, Deep learning utilization in agriculture: Detection of rice plant diseases using an improved CNN model, Plants, 11 (2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172230 doi: 10.3390/plants11172230
|
| [28] |
Y. Kittichotsatsawat, V. Jangkrajarng, K. Y. Tippayawong, Enhancing the coffee supply chain towards sustainable growth with big data and modern agricultural technologies, Sustainability, 13 (2021), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084593 doi: 10.3390/su13084593
|
| [29] |
L. N. Yang, Z. C. Pan, W. Zhu, E. J. Wu, D. C. He, X. Yuan, et al., Enhanced agricultural sustainability through within-species diversification, Nat. Sustainability, 2 (2019), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0201-2 doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0201-2
|
| [30] |
K. F. Davis, J. A. Gephart, K. A. Emery, A. M. Leach, J. N. Galloway, P. Dorico, Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources, Glob. Environ. Change, 39 (2016), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.004
|
| [31] |
C. Maraveas, Incorporating artificial intelligence technology in smart greenhouses: Current state of the art, Appl. Sci., 13 (2022), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010014 doi: 10.3390/app13010014
|
| [32] |
C. Maraveas, P. G. Asteris, K. G. Arvanitis, T. Bartzanas, D. Loukatos, Application of bio and nature-inspired algorithms in agricultural engineering, Arch Comput. Methods Eng., 30 (2022), 1979–2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09857-x doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09857-x
|
Figures(8) / Tables(6)
Min Tang. Analysis and evaluate of agricultural resources using data analytic methods[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 627-649. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024027
DownLoad: