Research article Special Issues

Threat assessment of aerial targets based on improved GRA-TOPSIS method and three-way decisions


  • Received: 19 March 2023 Revised: 25 May 2023 Accepted: 26 May 2023 Published: 08 June 2023
  • Target threat assessment is a critical aspect of information warfare and can offer valuable auxiliary support to combat command decision-making. Aiming to address the shortcomings of three decision-making methods in air combat target assessment, such as the inability to effectively handle uncertain situation information and quantitatively rank the decision-making targets according to their importance, a dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy decision model based on the improved GRA-TOPSIS method and three-way decisions is proposed. First, the target attribute weight is obtained by cosine intuitionistic fuzzy entropy algorithm; then, a novel intuitionistic fuzzy distance measure is introduced, and grey incidence analysis and TOPSIS are used to build the conditional probability for three-way decisions that fully utilize the existing information and reflect the consistency of dynamic change trend; finally, the comprehensive loss function matrix is constructed and the threat classification results are obtained using the decision rules. The example analysis shows that the proposed method can not only effectively handle complex battlefield situations and dynamic uncertain information, but it can also classify targets, improving the effectiveness and rationality of decision-making and providing a reference basis for scientific command decision-making.

    Citation: Yongfeng Yin, Routing Zhang, Qingran Su. Threat assessment of aerial targets based on improved GRA-TOPSIS method and three-way decisions[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 13250-13266. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023591

    Related Papers:

  • Target threat assessment is a critical aspect of information warfare and can offer valuable auxiliary support to combat command decision-making. Aiming to address the shortcomings of three decision-making methods in air combat target assessment, such as the inability to effectively handle uncertain situation information and quantitatively rank the decision-making targets according to their importance, a dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy decision model based on the improved GRA-TOPSIS method and three-way decisions is proposed. First, the target attribute weight is obtained by cosine intuitionistic fuzzy entropy algorithm; then, a novel intuitionistic fuzzy distance measure is introduced, and grey incidence analysis and TOPSIS are used to build the conditional probability for three-way decisions that fully utilize the existing information and reflect the consistency of dynamic change trend; finally, the comprehensive loss function matrix is constructed and the threat classification results are obtained using the decision rules. The example analysis shows that the proposed method can not only effectively handle complex battlefield situations and dynamic uncertain information, but it can also classify targets, improving the effectiveness and rationality of decision-making and providing a reference basis for scientific command decision-making.



    加载中


    [1] B. W. Yu, L. Yu, M. Lv, Target threat assessment model based on M-ANFIS-PNN, J. Syst. Eng. Electron., 44 (2022), 3155–3163.
    [2] L. S. Peng, T. Zhang, X. Y. Zhang, X. Zhou, Threat assessment for aerial targets based on three-way multi-criteria decision making, in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), IEEE, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC52481.2021.9702251
    [3] Y. Deng, A threat assessment model under uncertain environment, Math. Probl. Eng., 2015 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/878024
    [4] K. Zhang, W. R. Kong, P. P. Liu, J. Shi, Y. Lei, J. Zou, Assessment and sequencing of air target threat based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and dynamic VIKOR, J. Syst. Eng. Electron., 29 (2018), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.21629/JSEE.2018.02.11 doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2018.02.11
    [5] C. L. Fan, Q. Fu, Y. F. Song, Y. Lu, W. Li, X. Zhu, A new model of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted operators and their application in dynamic fusion target threat assessment, Entropy, 24 (2022), 1825. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24121825 doi: 10.3390/e24121825
    [6] C. L. Fan, Q. Fu, Y. Lu, P. S. Guo, X. W. Zhu, Variable weight target threat assessment method of air defense based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted operators fusion, Acta Electonica Sinica, 1 (2022).
    [7] R. Zhao, F. Yang, L. Ji, An extended fuzzy CPT-TODIM model based on possibility theory and its application to air target dynamic threat assessment, IEEE Access, 10 (2022), 21655–21669. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3153361 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3153361
    [8] Y. K. Sun, Z. G. Fang, D. Chen, Multi-time threat assessment based on dynamic grey principal component analysis, Syst. Eng. Electron. Technol., 43 (2021), 740–746.
    [9] Z. F. Xi, A. Xu, Y. X. Kou, Z. W. Li, A. W. Yang, Threat assessment of air combat target based on grey principal component, Syst. Eng. Electron. Technol., 43 (2021), 147–155.
    [10] W. Li, Y. Q. Lu, C. L. Fan, X. W. Zhu, Air cluster threat assessment based on the Weight of Changes on the Battlefield, J. Air Force Eng. Univ. (Natural Science Edition), 23 (2022), 89–96.
    [11] R. Di, X. Gao, Z. Guo, K. Wan, A threat assessment method for unmanned aerial vehicle based on bayesian networks under the condition of small data sets, Math. Probl. Eng., 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8484358
    [12] L. Huang, G. Cai, H. Yuan, J. Chen, A hybrid approach for identifying the structure of a Bayesian network model, Expert Syst. Appl., 131 (2019), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.060 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.060
    [13] Z. K. Chen, S. Y. Chen, Y. H. Xu, P. Y. Dong, H. P. Zhang, Threat assessment of radiation sources based on IOWA-TOPSIS under missing data, J. Air Force Eng. Univ. (Natural Science Edition), 22 (2021), 105–111.
    [14] P. Y. Dong, H. W. Wang, Y. Chen, Radiation source threat assessment based on GRA and TOPSIS under interval conditions, J. Control Decis., 36 (2021), 1516–1522.
    [15] M. Liu, M. Y. Dong, C. Wu, A new ANFIS for parameter prediction with numeric and categorical inputs, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 7 (2010), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2010.2045499 doi: 10.1109/TASE.2010.2045499
    [16] J. A. Danial, H. Hooman, M. Ehsan, Load carrying capacity assessment of thin-walled foundations: An ANFIS–PNN model optimized by genetic algorithm, Eng. Comput., 38 (2021), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01380-0 doi: 10.1007/s00366-021-01380-0
    [17] J. Chen, Y. Zhang, X. W. Chen, Y. Tong, Modeling method of complex battlefield intelligent situation awareness based on Fuzzy Grey cognitive map, Acta Armamentarii, 43 (2022), 1093–1106.
    [18] Y. X. Sun, X. Z. Zhou, D. Di, A threat assessment method for warship targets based on attribute reduction and BP neural network, J. Command Control, 7 (2021), 397–402.
    [19] Z. F. Xi, A. Xu, Y. X. Kou, Z. W. Li, A. W. Yang, Air combat threat assessment based on improved GRA-TOPSIS, J. BeiHang Univ., 46 (2020), 388–397.
    [20] H. Garg, Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 60 (2017), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.02.008
    [21] A. Memari, A. Darg, Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method, J. Manuf. Syst., 50 (2019), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002
    [22] B. W. Han, P. Y. Yao, Assessment of human/drone combat threat based on the QABC-IFMADM algorithm, Electron. J., 46 (2018), 1584–1592.
    [23] H. R. Ranjbar, M. A. Nekooie, An improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS approach to identify endangered earthquake-induced buildings, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 76 (2018), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2018.08.007
    [24] Z. N. Hao, Z. S. Xu, H. Zhao, R. Zhang, Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making models in the framework of decision field theory, Inf. Fusion, 33 (2017), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2016.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2016.05.001
    [25] Y. Yao, An outline of a theory of three-way decisions, in International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2012), 1–17.
    [26] Y. Yao, Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets, Inf. Sci., 180 (2010), 341–353.
    [27] J. M. Zhan, J. J. Wang, W. P. Ding, Y. Y. Yao, Three-way behavioral decision making with hesitant fuzzy information systems: Survey and challenges, IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin., 10 (2023), 330–350. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2022.106061 doi: 10.1109/JAS.2022.106061
    [28] C. Zhang, D. Y. Li, J. Liang, Multi-granularity three-way decisions with adjustable hesitant fuzzy linguistic multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets over two universes, Inf. Sci., 507 (2020), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.033 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.033
    [29] C. Zhang, J. J. Ding, J. M. Zhan, D. Y. Li, Incomplete three-way multi-attribute group decision making based on adjustable multigranulation Pythagorean fuzzy probabilistic rough sets, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 147 (2022), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2022.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2022.05.004
    [30] J. J. Ding, C. Zhang, D. Y. Li. A. K. Sangaiah, Hyperautomation for air quality evaluations: A perspective of evidential three-way decision-making, Cogn. Comput., 2023 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-022-10101-8
    [31] J. Deng, J. M. Zhan, W. Ding, P. Liu, W. Pedrycz, A novel prospect-theory-based three-way decision methodology in multi-scale information systems, Artif. Intell. Rev. 56 (2023), 6591–6625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10339-6
    [32] Y. Gao, D. S. Li, H. Zhong, A novel target threat assessment method based on three-way decisions under intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making environment, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 87 (2020), 103276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103276 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103276
    [33] C. Jin, J. Sun, Y. J. Wang, P. S. Cai, X. Rong, Comprehensive threat assessment of air defense targets based on intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS and variable weight VIKOR, Syst. Eng. Electron. Technol., 44 (2022), 172–180.
    [34] Z. Qiang, J. F. Feng, Z. C. Ma, G. M. Chen, Threat assessment of air target based on dynamic relative entropy ranking method, in 2019 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), IEEE, (2019), 3750–3754. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2019.8833283
    [35] P. A. Ejegwa, S. O. Akowe, P. M. Otene, J. M. Ikyule, An overview on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 3 (2014), 142–145.
    [36] S. Fu, H. J. Zhou, Y. Z. Xiao, Optimum selection of energy service company based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and VIKOR framework, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 186572–186584. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030651 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030651
    [37] D. T. Wei, X. D. Liu, J. Deng, Group decision making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy similarity and grey correlation and its application, J. Ordnance Equip. Eng., 42 (2021), 172–177.
    [38] F. Shen, X. Ma, Z. Li, Z. Xu, D. Cai, An extended intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on a new distance measure with an application to credit risk evaluation, Inf. Sci., 428 (2018), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.10.045 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.10.045
    [39] Y. Q. Lu, C. L. Fan, Q. Fu, X. W. Zhu, W. Li, Target threat assessment of anti missile warfare based on improved IFRS similarity and information entropy, Syst. Eng. Electron. Technol., 44 (2022), 1230–1238.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1602) PDF downloads(112) Cited by(28)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog