Research article

Simulations and fractional modeling of dengue transmission in Bangladesh


  • Received: 15 January 2023 Revised: 17 February 2023 Accepted: 06 March 2023 Published: 27 March 2023
  • Dengue is one of the most infectious diseases in the world. In Bangladesh, dengue occurs nationally and has been endemic for more than a decade. Therefore, it is crucial that we model dengue transmission in order to better understand how the illness behaves. This paper presents and analyzes a novel fractional model for the dengue transmission utilizing the non-integer Caputo derivative (CD) and are analysed using q-homotopy analysis transform method (q-HATM). By using the next generation method, we derive the fundamental reproduction number R0 and show the findings based on it. The global stability of the endemic equilibrium (EE) and the disease-free equilibrium (DFE) is calculated using the Lyapunov function. For the proposed fractional model, numerical simulations and dynamical attitude are seen. Moreover, A sensitivity analysis of the model is performed to determine the relative importance of the model parameters to the transmission.

    Citation: Saima Akter, Zhen Jin. Simulations and fractional modeling of dengue transmission in Bangladesh[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 9891-9922. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023434

    Related Papers:

    [1] Biao Tang, Weike Zhou, Yanni Xiao, Jianhong Wu . Implication of sexual transmission of Zika on dengue and Zika outbreaks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 5092-5113. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019256
    [2] Süleyman Cengizci, Aslıhan Dursun Cengizci, Ömür Uğur . A mathematical model for human-to-human transmission of COVID-19: a case study for Turkey's data. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 9787-9805. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021480
    [3] Saima Akter, Zhen Jin . A fractional order model of the COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 2544-2565. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023119
    [4] Fatmawati, Rashid Jan, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Yasir Khan, Saif ullah . A new model of dengue fever in terms of fractional derivative. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 5267-5287. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020285
    [5] Rundong Zhao, Qiming Liu, Huazong Zhang . Dynamical behaviors of a vector-borne diseases model with two time delays on bipartite networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 3073-3091. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021154
    [6] Mingtao Li, Xin Pei, Juan Zhang, Li Li . Asymptotic analysis of endemic equilibrium to a brucellosis model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 5836-5850. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019291
    [7] Hardik Joshi, Brajesh Kumar Jha, Mehmet Yavuz . Modelling and analysis of fractional-order vaccination model for control of COVID-19 outbreak using real data. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 213-240. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023010
    [8] Alian Li-Martín, Ramón Reyes-Carreto, Cruz Vargas-De-León . Dynamics of a dengue disease transmission model with two-stage structure in the human population. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 955-974. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023044
    [9] Vanessa Steindorf, Sergio Oliva, Jianhong Wu . Cross immunity protection and antibody-dependent enhancement in a distributed delay dynamic model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(3): 2950-2984. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022136
    [10] Maryam Al-Yahyai, Fatma Al-Musalhi, Ibrahim Elmojtaba, Nasser Al-Salti . Mathematical analysis of a COVID-19 model with different types of quarantine and isolation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 1344-1375. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023061
  • Dengue is one of the most infectious diseases in the world. In Bangladesh, dengue occurs nationally and has been endemic for more than a decade. Therefore, it is crucial that we model dengue transmission in order to better understand how the illness behaves. This paper presents and analyzes a novel fractional model for the dengue transmission utilizing the non-integer Caputo derivative (CD) and are analysed using q-homotopy analysis transform method (q-HATM). By using the next generation method, we derive the fundamental reproduction number R0 and show the findings based on it. The global stability of the endemic equilibrium (EE) and the disease-free equilibrium (DFE) is calculated using the Lyapunov function. For the proposed fractional model, numerical simulations and dynamical attitude are seen. Moreover, A sensitivity analysis of the model is performed to determine the relative importance of the model parameters to the transmission.



    Dengue is a debilitating viral infection spread by the bite of Aedes mosquitoes carrying any one of the four dengue viral serotypes. It is common in urban and semi-urban areas of tropical and subtropical climates around the world. These serotypes of the virus that can cause dengue are closely related but antigenically distinct (DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, DEN-4). While recovery from one virus confers lifetime immunity against that virus, [1] notes that recovery from the other three viruses offers no protection against infection. The majority of the world's population, particularly those who live in tropical and subtropical regions like Bangladesh, are at risk. About 390 million dengue infections are estimated to occur annually, of which a quarter of the cases (67–136 million) will manifest clinically [2], with the overall incidence of dengue having increased 30-fold over the past 50 years [3]. In Asia, a severe dengue outbreak was reported in 1950 in the Philippines and Thailand [3], and in 1964 Bangladesh experienced a dengue outbreak for the first time. Between 1964 and 1999, sporadic cases and small outbreaks clinically suggestive of dengue occurred across the country but were not officially reported, even though 5551 people were affected with 93 accounted fatalities [4].

    Dengue Fever (DF) is marked by an onset of sudden high fever, severe headache, pain behind the eyes, and pain in muscles and joints. Some may also have a rash and varying degrees of bleeding from various parts of the body. Dengue has a wide spectrum of infection outcomes (asymptomatic to symptomatic). Symptomatic illness can vary from DF to more serious dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) [5,6]. DHF is a more severe form, seen only in a small proportion of those infected. DHF is a stereotypic illness characterized by 3 phases; the febrile phase with high continuous fever usually lasting for less than 7 days; the critical phase lasting 1–2 days usually apparent when the fever comes down, leading to shock if not detected and treated early; convalescence phase lasting 2–5 days with an improvement of appetite. Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS) is a dangerous complication of dengue infection and is associated with high mortality. Severe dengue occurs as a result of secondary infection with a different virus serotype. Statistics show that Bangladesh reported its first case of mosquito-borne virus infection in 2000, and about 100 people died of the disease from 2000 to 2003.

    The first official outbreak of DF in Bangladesh was in 2000, and since then the number of hospitalized patients have exceeded 3000 patients six times: 6232 in 2002, 3934 in 2004, 3162 in 2015, 6060 in 2016, 10,148 in 2018, and 1, 00107 as of Nov 30, 2019, with estimated projections of more than 1, 12,000 cases by the end of 2019 (appendix) [4,7,8]. In parallel with the major epidemics in 2018 and 2019's outbreak, 26 deaths and 129 deaths, respectively, have been officially documented by the government surveillance systems with a clear predominance of cases and fatalities during the summer months (July to November), even if the death tally is likely to be much higher because of actual under-reporting (appendix) [8,9].

    In reality, Bangladesh is suffering from the pain of mosquitoes. On Saturday 15 October 2022, A total of 1,916 people are admitted to different government and private hospitals in Dhaka and 799 outside Dhaka. A total of 23,592 patients were admitted to the hospital from January 1 to October 14 this year. Of them, 20,794 people left the hospital after recovering. The number of dengue patients is increasing every day. The list of deaths is getting longer. So far this year, 83 people have died of dengue. Of these, 28 this month. In two weeks of this month, 7,500 patients were admitted to the hospital with the infection. Experts said pre-monsoon, post-monsoon, and monsoon surveillance are being done every year to see the mosquito situation.

    A month-wise patient admission analysis showed that 126 patients were admitted to the hospital in January 2022, 20 in February, 20 in March, 23 in April, 163 in May, 737 in June, 1,571 in July, and 3,521 in August. The highest number of dengue patients were admitted in September and 9,911 people were admitted, 34 people died. In 2019, 1, 01,354 people were admitted to the hospital with dengue. This is the highest number of patients admitted in a year in the country so far. That year, 164 people died. In 2018, 10,148 people were admitted to hospitals with dengue and 26 died. Although dengue infection was not seen much during the corona epidemic in 2020, 28,429 people were infected and 105 people died of dengue across the country in 2021 [10]. DF is the fastest-growing infectious disease in the world, causing an average of more than 500,000 potentially fatal infections and about 20,000 deaths each year. As of 17 November, 26,000 dengue cases were reported with 98 deaths [11]. So far, the case fatality rate seems higher in this outbreak (98/26,000) as compared to 2019 massive outbreak (179/101,354) (Table 1).

    Table 1.  Number of reported dengue cases by months and yearly data between 2012 and 2022.
    Months 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
    January 0 0 15 0 13 92 26 38 199 32 126
    February 0 0 7 0 3 58 7 18 45 9 20
    March 0 0 2 2 17 36 19 17 27 13 20
    April 0 0 0 6 38 73 29 58 25 3 23
    May 0 4 8 10 70 134 52 193 10 43 163
    June 16 44 9 28 254 267 295 1884 20 272 737
    July 108 220 82 171 926 286 946 16253 23 2286 1571
    August 138 353 80 765 1451 346 1796 53636 68 7698 3521
    September 262 495 76 965 1544 430 3087 16856 47 7841 9911
    October 90 363 63 869 1077 512 2406 8143 164 5458 21932
    November 57 212 22 271 522 409 1192 4011 546 3567 3457
    December 0 58 11 75 145 126 293 1247 231 1207
    Total cases 671 1749 375 3162 6060 2769 10148 101354 1405 28429 41481

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Recently, fractional calculus has gained much interest from researchers. Because it has been widely used in different fields of science, and engineering, and also in different real-world problems. Several scholars have used different types of operator approaches and applied them to many linear and non-linear diseases and complex models [12,13,14,15,16]. In this paper, the proposed dengue epidemic model is derived using the Caputo fractional derivatives. In recent years, fractional-order calculus is found to be more appealing in modeling for a real-world problem in comparison to a classical integer order as it provides a tool for the description of memory effects and genetic properties of various materials. Recent entomological studies revealed that mosquitoes did not feed randomly on human blood, but they use their prior experience with human location and human defensiveness to select the host to feed on [17]. Thus, in dengue transmission, a future state does depend on the history of the transmission. Hence, the fractional-order differential equation is found to be the best approach to model the transmission. The purpose of this study is to propose and study a more accurate mathematical model of dengue transmission using the fractional-order derivative than those previously presented in the literature [18,19,20].

    This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, preliminaries and notations; Section 3 describes the model formulation for the fractional-order derivative; Section 4 explains the existence and uniqueness of a non-negative solution; Section 5, presents model equilibria and basic reproduction number; Section 6, stability analysis of equilibrium (DFE and EE state) presents, where the Jacobian matrix uses for disease-free and Lyapunov function uses for endemic equilibria; Section 7 basic reproduction number is presented through sensitivity analysis by calculating relevant parameters; Section 8, the numerical simulations; Section 9, the discussion and conclusion.

    The study of derivatives and integrals of any real number, even those of complex order, can be done very well using fractional calculus. Even though we use the CD in our proposed fractional dengue model, there are some fundamental concepts concerning the CD that we must understand first. Other relevant properties are listed below [21,22,23,24,25].

    Definition 1([25]) Suppose α>0 and fL1([0,b],R) where [0,b]R+. The fractional integral of order α of function f in the sense of Riemann-Liouville is defined as follows:

    Iα0+f(x)=1Γ(α)t0(xt)α1f(t)dt,

    where Γ() is the classical gamma function defined by

    Γ(α)=0xα1exdx.

    The initial value problem for Caputo fractional differential equation is

    CaDαu(t)=f(t,u(t)),u(t0)=u0,t0tT.

    and the corresponding fractional Volterra integral Eq [26] is

    u(t)=u0+1Γ(q)tt0(ts)q1f(s,u(s))ds. (2.1)

    Definition 2[22] The Caputo fractional derivative of order α(n1,n] of f(x) is defined as

    CaDαxf(x)=1Γ(nα)t0(xt)nα1f(n)(t)dt,

    where n=[α]+1 and [α] represent the largest integer that is less or equal to α.

    Definition 3[27] The Laplace transform of an n-th derivative operator is obtained as

    L{fn(t)}=SnL{f(t)}n1k=0Snk1f(k)(t0),

    Similarly for α(n1,n] we obtain the Laplace transform of the Caputo fractional operator as

    L{Ct0Dαt}=SαL{N(t)}n1k=0Sαk1N(k)(t0).

    Definition 4[23]. An entire function called Mittag-Leffler is defined in the form of power series as

    Eα,β(Z)=n=0ZkΓ(αk+β),α>0,β>0,

    and

    Eα,1(Z)=Eα(Z)=n=0ZkΓ(αk+1),β=1.

    The notion of convergence of mittag-Leffler function is fully discussed in [21].

    Theorem 1 [28,29]. Let us consider a fractional non-autonomous system like (4) with x say an equilibrium point and XRn a domain containing x and let H:[0,)×XR be a continuous and differentiable function, such that

    V1(x)H(t,x(t))V2(x) (2.2)

    and

    CDα0(H(t,x(t))V3(x), (2.3)

    α(0,1) and all xX, where V1(x), V2(x) and V3(x) are positive definite continuous functions of X, then the equilibrium point of system (4) is uniformly asymtotically stable [30].

    The Lyapunov function described above will be used to investigate the global stability of the proposed fractional dengue model.

    Lemma 1[31]. For a continuous and differentiable function H(t)R+ and α(0,1), then for any time tt0 we have

    CDαt[H(t)HHlnH(t)H][1HH(t)]CDαtH(t),HR+.

    In this paper, we investigate the ShIhHhRhSmIm human-mosquito fractional model, which comprises of two distinct populations, including human populations and mosquito populations. Three epidemiological states of humans are included in the proposed fractional-order dengue model: Sh(t) susceptible (individuals who can contract the virus), Ih(t) infected (individuals who can transmit the virus to others), Hh(t) hospitalized human (the compartment of people who are hospitalized after infection), and Rh(t) recovered (individuals who have required immunity). Since Nh is assumed to be constant, Nh(t)=Sh(t)+Ih(t)+Hh(t)+Rh(t). For the mosquito model, we only consider the susceptible and infected mosquitoes, since the mosquito does not enter the recovery phase after being infected due to its shortened lifespan. On the other hand, the mosquito population is divided into two compartments, susceptible (Sm), and infectious (Im) with Nm(t)=Sm(t)+Im(t), where α(0,1] is the order of the fractional derivative. All model parameters are assumed to be non-negative. The following Table 1 lists the parameters that are used in our model. The fractional derivatives use in model (3.1) are all in the Caputo sense. So the model diagram of human-mosquito transmission dynamics of the disease is given below in Figure 1:

    Figure 1.  The flow chart of the considered dengue model.

    Now we present a fractional model with CD given by,

    {CDαtSh(t)=ΛαhϕαmβαmImShNhγαhSh,CDαtIh(t)=ϕαmβαmImShNh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih,CDαtHh(t)=μαhIh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh,CDαtRh(t)=ταhIh+υαhHhγαhRh,CDαtSm(t)=ΛαmϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmSm,CDαtIm(t)=ϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmIm. (3.1)

    With the following non-negative initial conditions

    Sh(0)0,Ih(0)0,Hh(0)0,Rh(0)0,Sm(0)0,Im(0)0,tR, (3.2)

    where 0<α1 and CDαt is the Caputo fractional derivative of order α. The size of the entire human population and mosquito population is represented by the Nh and Nm so that, Nh(t)=Sh(t)+Ih(t)+Hh(t)+Rh(t) and Nm(t)=Sm(t)+Im(t). The birth rate of human and mosquito populations are denoted as Λh and Λm respectively. The natural death rate for humans and mosquitoes is described by the parameters γh and γm and disease related death rate of human is denoted by ϵh. We assume that biting rate for humans and mosquitoes are ϕh and ϕm, respectively. βh is the transmission probability from infected human to susceptible mosquito, βm is the transmission probability from infected mosquito to susceptible human, τh represents natural recovery rate of infected human, μh is the rate of hospitalized infected humans and υh is the recovery rate of hospitalized infected human.

    The different parameters used in this fractional model with their values and references are given below in Table 2:

    Table 2.  Description of parametric values for the dengue model of Bangladesh.
    Parameter Interpretation Values Reference
    Λh birth rate of human 2278130.05 Fitted
    Λm birth rate of mosquito 11874069.5 Fitted
    ϕh infected humans for the biting rate 0.68 Estimated
    ϕm infected mosquitoes for the biting rate 0.50 Estimated
    γh natural death rate of human 0.0137 Fitted
    γm natural death rate of mosquito 0.0238 [32,33]
    βh transmission probability from infected human to susceptible mosquito 0.0824 Fitted
    βm transmission probability from infected mosquito to susceptible human 0.1648 Assumed
    τh natural recovery rate of infected human 0.01 Fitted
    δh incubation period of human 0.2599 Estimated
    δm incubation period of mosquito 0.1 Fitted
    ϵh disease related death rate of human 0.0001452 Fitted
    μh rate of hospitalized infected human 0.1 Fitted
    υh recovery rate of hospitalized infected human 0.440 [34]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this section, we present the solution procedure of q-HATM [35] by using LT with q-HAM. Soon after, it is employed by number of authors to evaluate the solution for numerous families of differential equations exemplifying diverse phenomena including economic growth, biological models, human disease, chaotic behaviour, chemical reaction, optics, fluid mechanics and others [35,36,37] and further derived some fascinating consequences in comparison of other modified and classical algorithms.

    Here, to present the procedure of q-HATM we hire the following differential equation of fractional order

    CDαtv(x,t)+Rv(x,t)+Nv(x,t)=f(x,t), (4.1)

    with the initial condition

    v(x,0)=g(x), (4.2)

    where CDαtv(x,t) denotes the CD of v(x, t). On employing LT on Eq (4.1), we obtain

    L[v(x,t)]g(x)s+1sαL[Rv(x,t)]+L[Nv(x,t)]L[f(x,t)]=0. (4.3)

    For ϕ(x,t;q), N is contracted as follows

    N[ϕ(x,t;q)]=L[ϕ(x,t;q)]g(x)s+1sαL[Rϕ(x,t;q)]+L[Nϕ(x,t;q)]L[f(x,t)]. (4.4)

    where q[0,1n]. Then, we present homotopy with the embedding parameter q and non-zero auxiliary parameter by HAM as

    (1nq)L[ϕ(x,t;q)v0(x,t)]=qN[ϕ(x,t;q)], (4.5)

    where L is signifying LT. For q=0 and q=1n, the following conditions satisfies

    ϕ(x,t;0)=v0(x,t),ϕ(x,t;1n)=v(x,t). (4.6)

    With the help of Taylor theorem, we have

    ϕ(x,t;q)=v0(x,t)+m=1vm(x,t)qm, (4.7)

    where

    vm(x,t)=1m![δmϕ(x,t;q)δqm]q=0. (4.8)

    After differentiating Eq (4.7) m-times with q and multiplying by 1m! and substituting q=0, one can get

    L[vm(x,t)kmvm1(x,t)]=Rm(ˉvm1), (4.9)

    where the vectors are defined as

    ˉvm=v0(x,t),v1(x,t),...,vm(x,t). (4.10)

    Eq (4.9) reduces after employing inverse LT to

    vm(x,t)=kmvm1(x,t)+L1[Rm(ˉvm1)], (4.11)

    where

    Rm(ˉvm1)=L[vm1(x,t)]+1sαL[Rvm1+Hm1](1kmn)(g(x)s+1sαL[f(x,t)]), (4.12)

    and

    km={0,m1n,m>1 (4.13)

    Here, Hm is homotopy polynomial and presented as

    Hm=1m![δmϕ(x,t;q)δqm]q=0,ϕ(x,t;q)=ϕ0+qϕ1+q2ϕ2+.... (4.14)

    By using Eqs (4.11) and (4.12), we get

    vm(x,t)=(km+)vm1(x,t)(1kmn)L1[g(x)s+1sαL[f(x,t)]]+L1[1sαL[Rvm1+Hm1]]. (4.15)

    The series solution by projected algorithm is defined as

    v(x,t)=v0(x,t)+m=1vm(x,t). (4.16)

    Here, we evaluate the solutions for model (3.1) with different parameters. Consider the system of the equation describing the fractional-order ShIhHhRhSmIm epidemic model of dengue disease

    {CDαtSh(t)=ΛαhϕαmβαmImShNhγαhSh,CDαtIh(t)=ϕαmβαmImShNh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih,CDαtHh(t)=μαhIh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh,CDαtRh(t)=ταhIh+υαhHhγαhRh,CDαtSm(t)=ΛαmϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmSm,CDαtIm(t)=ϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmIm. (5.1)

    With the following initial conditions

    Sh(0)0,Ih(0)0,Hh(0)0,Rh(0)0,Sm(0)0,Im(0)0,

    Taking LT on Eq (5.1) and then using the initial conditions, we get

    L[Sh(t)]1s(Sh0)1sαL[ΛαhϕαmβαmImShNhγαhSh]=0,L[Ih(t)]1s(Ih0)1sαL[ϕαmβαmImShNh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih]=0,L[Hh(t)]1s(Hh0)1sαL[μαhIh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh]=0,L[Rh(t)]1s(Rh0)1sαL[ταhIh+υαhHhγαhRh]=0,L[Sm(t)]1s(Sm0)1sαL[ΛαmϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmSm]=0,L[Im(t)]1s(Im0)1sαL[ϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmIm]=0. (5.2)

    Now, the non-linear operator N presented as:

    N1[π1(t;p),π2(t;p),π3(t;p),π4(t;p),π5(t;p),π6(t;p)]=L[π1(t;p)]1s(Sh0)1sαL[Λαhϕαmβαmπ5(t;p)π1(t;p)Nhγαhπ1(t;p)]=0,N2[π1(t;p),π2(t;p),π3(t;p),π4(t;p),π5(t;p),π6(t;p)]=L[π2(t;p)]1s(Ih0)1sαL[ϕαmβαmπ6(t;p)π1(t;p)Nh(μαh+ταh+γαh)π2(t;p)],N3[π1(t;p),π2(t;p),π3(t;p),π4(t;p),π5(t;p),π6(t;p)]=L[π3(t;p)]1s(Hh0)1sαL[μαhπ2(t;p)(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)π3(t;p)],N4[π1(t;p),π2(t;p),π3(t;p),π4(t;p),π5(t;p),π6(t;p)]=L[π4(t;p)]1s(Rh0)1sαL[ταhπ2(t;p)+υαhπ3(t;p)γαhπ4(t;p)]=0,N5[π1(t;p),π2(t;p),π3(t;p),π4(t;p),π5(t;p),π6(t;p)]=L[π5(t;p)]1s(Sm0)1sαL[Λαmϕαhβαhπ2(t;p)π5(t;p)Nmγαmπ5(t;p)],N6[π6(t;p),π2(t;p),π3(t;p),π4(t;p),π5(t;p),π6(t;p)]=L[π1(t;p)]1s(Im0)1sαL[ϕαhβαhπ2(t;p)π5(t;p)Nmγαmπ6(t;p)]. (5.3)

    By applying the considered method and for H(t)=1, the n-th order deformation equation is presented as

    L[Shn(t)knShn1(t)]=(B1,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]),L[Ihn(t)knIhn1(t)]=(B2,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]),L[Hhn(t)knHhn1(t)]=(B3,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]),L[Rhn(t)knRhn1(t)]=(B4,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]),L[Smn(t)knSmn1(t)]=(B5,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]),L[Imn(t)knImn1(t)]=(B6,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]). (5.4)

    where

    B1,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]=L[Shn1(t)](1knn)1s(Sh0)1sαL[Λαhϕαmβαmn1i=0Imn1iShiNhγαhShn1]B2,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]=L[Ihn1(t)](1knn)1s(Ih0)1sαL[ϕαmβαmn1i=0Imn1iShiNh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ihn1]B3,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]=L[Hhn1(t)](1knn)1s(Hh0)1sαL[μαhIhn1(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hhn1],B4,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]=L[Rhn1(t)](1knn)1s(Rh0)1sαL[ταhIhn1+υαhHhn1γαhRhn1],B5,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]=L[Smn1(t)](1knn)1s(Sm0)1sαL[Λαmϕαhβαhn1i=0Ihn1iSmiNmγαmSmn1],B6,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]=L[Imn1(t)](1knn)1s(Im0)1sαL[ϕαhβαhIhn1iSmiNmγαmImn1]. (5.5)

    Now using inverse LT on Eq (5.4), we get

    Shn(t)=knShn1(t)+L1(B1,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]),Ihn(t)=knIhn1(t)+L1(B2,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]),Hhn(t)=knHhn1(t)+L1(B3,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]),Rhn(t)=knRhn1(t)+L1(B4,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]),Smn(t)=knSmn1(t)+L1(B5,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]),Imn(t)=knImn1(t)+L1(B6,n[ˉShn1,ˉIhn1,ˉHhn1,ˉRhn1,ˉSmn1,ˉImn1]). (5.6)

    Using the initial conditions and the above system, we have

    Sh1(t)=[ΛαhϕαmβαmIm0Sh0NhγαhSh0]tαΓ(α+1),Ih1(t)=[ϕαmβαmIm0Sh0Nh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih0]tαΓ(α+1),Hh1(t)=[μαhIh0(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh0]tαΓ(α+1),Rh1(t)=[ταhIh0+υαhHh0γαhRh0]tαΓ(α+1),Sm1(t)=[ΛαmϕαhβαhIh0Sm0NmγαmSm0]tαΓ(α+1),Im1(t)=[ϕαhβαhIh0Sm0NmγαmIm0]tαΓ(α+1),Sh2(t)=ΛhtαΓ(α+1)+(γαhΛαhγαhϕαmβαmIm0Sh0Nhγ2αhSh0)2t2αΓ(2α+1)(ϕαmβαmϕαhβαhΛαhIh0Sm0NhNmϕ2αmβ2αmϕαhβαhIh0Im0Sh0Sm0N2hNmϕαmϕαhβαhβαmγαhSh0Sm0Ih0NhNmϕαmβαmγαhΛαhϕ2αmβ2αmγαhI2m0Sh0Nh+γαhϕαmβαmSh0Im0)3t3αΓ(3α+1),Ih2(t)=ϕαmβαm(ϕαhβαhIh0Sm0NmϕγαmIm0)(ΛαhϕαmβαmIm0Sh0NhγαhSh0)3t3αΓ(3α+1)(μαh+ταh+γαh)[(ϕαmβαm)Im0Sh0NhIh0(μαh+ταh+γαh)]2t2αΓ(2α+1),Hh2(t)=[ϕαmβαmμαhIm0Sh0Nhμαh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih0(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)μαhIh0+(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)2Hh0]2t2αΓ(2α+1),Rh2(t)=[ταmϕαmβαmIm0Sh0Nhταh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih0+υαhμαhIh0υαh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh0γαhταhIh0γαhυαhHh0+γ2αhRh0]2t2αΓ(2α+1),Sm2(t)=ΛαmtαΓ(α+1)γαm(ΛαmϕαhβαhIh0Sm0NmγαmSm0)2t2αΓ(2α+1)[ϕαhβαhϕαmβαmImoSh0Nh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih0(ΛαmϕαhβαhIh0Sm0NmγαmSm0)Nm]3t3αΓ(3α+1),Im2(t)=γαm(ΛαmϕαhβαhIh0Sm0NmγαmSm0)2t2αΓ(2α+1)+[(ϕαhβαhϕαmβαmIm0Sh0Nhϕαhβαh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih0)(ΛαmϕαhβαhIh0Sm0NmγαmSm0)Nm]3t3αΓ(3α+1).

    We can get the rest of the term in a similar way. The q-HATM series solution for the FBM equation considered in Eq (5.1) is given by

    Sh(t)=Sh0(t)+n=1Shn(t)(1m)n,Ih(t)=Ih0(t)+n=1Ihn(t)(1m)n,Hh(t)=Hh0(t)+n=1Hhn(t)(1m)n,Rh(t)=Rh0(t)+n=1Rhn(t)(1m)n,Sm(t)=Sm0(t)+n=1Smn(t)(1m)n,Im(t)=Im0(t)+n=1Imn(t)(1m)n. (5.7)

    In this section the total population is denoted as

    Nh(t)=Sh(t)+Ih(t)+Hh(t)+Rh(t)

    and the total mosquito population is denoted as

    Nm(t)=Sm(t)+Im(t).

    The linearity of the Caputo operator in the above two different populations becomes,

    CDαtNh(t)=CDαtSh(t)+CDαtIh(t)+CDαtHh(t)+CDαtRh(t),=ΛαhϵαhHh(t)γαhNh(t),ΛαhγαhNh(t). (5.8)

    and

    CDαtNm(t)=CDαtSm(t)+CDαtIm(t),ΛαmγαmNh(t). (5.9)

    We apply the Laplace transform method [27] to solve the Gronwall's inequality in (5.8) and (5.9) with initial condition N(t0)0

    L{C0DαtNh(t)+γαhNh(t)}L{Λαh},

    and

    L{C0DαtNm(t)+γαhNm(t)}L{Λαm}.

    The linearity property of the Laplace transform gives

    L{C0DαtNh(t)}+γαhL{Nh(t)}L{Λαh},SαL{Nh(t)}n1k=0Sαk1N(k)h(t0)+γαhL{Nh(t)}ΛαhS,L{Nh(t)}ΛαhS(Sα+γαh)+n1k=0Sαk1Sα+γαhN(k)h(t0). (5.10)

    and

    L{C0DαtNm(t)}+γαmL{Nm(t)}L{Λαm},SαL{Nm(t)}n1k=0Sαk1N(k)m(t0)+γαmL{Nm(t)}ΛαmS,L{Nm(t)}ΛαmS(Sα+γαm)+n1k=0Sαk1Sα+γαmN(k)m(t0). (5.11)

    Splitting (5.10) and (5.11) to partial fraction gives the following:

    L{Nh(t)}Λαh(1SSα1Sα+γαh)+n1k=0Sαk1Sα+γαhN(k)h(t0),=Λαh(1S1S11+γαhSα)+n1k=01Sk+111+γαhSαN(k)h(t0).

    and

    L{Nm(t)}Λαm(1SSα1Sα+γαm)+n1k=0Sαk1Sα+γαmN(k)m(t0),=Λαm(1S1S11+γαmSα)+n1k=01Sk+111+γαmSαN(k)m(t0).

    According to Taylor series, we get

    11+γαhSα=n=0(γαhSα)n,11+γαmSα=n=0(γαmSα)n.

    Therefore

    L{Nh(t)}Λαh(1S1Sn=0(γαhSα)n)+n1k=01Sk+1N(k)h(t0)n=0(γαhSα)n,=Λαh(1Sn=0(γαh)nSαn+1)+n1k=0n=01Sk+1(γαh)nSαn+k+1N(k)h(t0). (5.12)

    and

    L{Nm(t)}Λαm(1S1Sn=0(γαmSα)n)+n1k=01Sk+1N(k)m(t0)n=0(γαmSα)n,=Λαm(1Sn=0(γαm)nSαn+1)+n1k=0n=01Sk+1(γαm)nSαn+k+1N(k)m(t0). (5.13)

    using the inverse Laplace transform of (5.12) and (5.13), we have

    Nh(t)ΛαhL1[1S]Λαhn=0(γαh)nL1[1Sαn+1]+n1k=0n=0(γαh)nN(k)h(t0)L1[1Sαn+k+1   ],

    and

    Nm(t)ΛαmL1[1S]Λαmn=0(γαm)nL1[1Sαn+1]+n1k=0n=0(γαm)nN(k)m(t0)L1[1Sαn+k+1   ].

    According to Laplace formula,

    L[tm]=m!Sm+1=Γ(m+1)Sm+1,

    or

    L1[1Sm+1]=tmΓ(m+1).

    Thus

    Nh(t)ΛαhΛαhn=0(γαh)ntαnΓ(αn+1)+n1k=0n=0(γαh)nN(k)h×(t0)tαn+kΓ(αn+k+1),
    Nh(t)ΛαhΛαhn=0(γαhtα)nΓ(αn+1)+n1k=0n=0(γαhtα)nΓ(αn+k+1)tkN(k)h(t0).

    and

    Nm(t)ΛαmΛαmn=0(γαm)ntαnΓ(αn+1)+n1k=0n=0(γαm)nN(k)m×(t0)tαn+kΓ(αn+k+1),
    Nm(t)ΛαmΛαmn=0(γαmtα)nΓ(αn+1)+n1k=0n=0(γαmtα)nΓ(αn+k+1)tkN(k)m(t0).

    Substituting the Mittag-Leffler function we get,

    Nh(t)Λαh[1E1(γαhtα)]+n1k=0Ek+1(γαhtα)Nhh(k)(t0)tk. (5.14)

    and

    Nm(t)Λαm[1E1(γαmtα)]+n1k=0Ek+1(γαmtα)N(k)m(t0)tk. (5.15)

    where E1(γαhtα), Ek+1(γαhtα), and E1(γαmtα), Ek+1(γαmtα) are the series of Mittag-Leffler function (as in definition 4), so we say that the solution to the model is bounded. Thus,

    {(Sh(t),Ih(t),Hh(t),Rh(t))R4+:Sh(t),Ih(t),Hh(t),Rh(t)Λαh[1E1(γαhtα)]+n1k=0Ek+1(γαhtα)N(k)(t0)tk}. (5.16)

    and

    {(Sm(t),Im(t))R2+:Sm(t),Im(t)Λαm[1E1(γαmtα)]+n1k=0Ek+1(γαmtα)N(k)(t0)tk}. (5.17)

    In this section we will prove the uniqueness of (3.1). Consider the system (3.1) written as

    C0Dαtx(t)=F(t,x), x(0)=x0, (5.18)
    F(t,x)=Ax+g(x)+b,
    x=x(t)=(Sh(t),Ih(t),Hh(t),Rh(t))T,b=(Λh,o,o,o)T,
    A=[γαh0000μαhταhγαh000μαhϵαhυαhγαh00ταhυαhγαh],  g(x(t))=[ϕαmβαmImShNhϕαmβαmImShNh00]. (5.19)

    Theorem 2. System (5.18) satisfies Lipschitz continuity

    Proof. Since

    |F(t,x)F(t,x)|=|A(x(t))A(x(t))+g(x(t))g(x(t))|(||A||+1)||x(t)x(t)||,||F(t,x(t))F(t,x(t))||L||x(t)x(t)||,L=||A||+1<. (5.20)

    It is clear that F is continuous and bounded function. Using Picard-Lindelof theorem [29] we establish the following theorem.

    Theorem 3. Let 0<α<1,I=[0,h]R and J=|x(t)x(0)|k and let f:I×JR be continuous bounded function, that is M>0 such that |f(t,x)|M, Since f satisfies Lipschitz conditions. If Lk<M, then there exists a unique xCα[0,h] that holds for the initial value problem (5.18). Where h=min{h,(kΓ(α+1)M)1α}.

    Proof. Suppose T=xC[0,h]:||x(t)x(0)||k, Since TR and its closed set, then T is complete metric space. The continuous system (5.18) can be transformed to equivalent equations as;

    C0Dαt[C0Dαtx(t)]=C0Dαtf(t,x)),x(t)x(0)=1Γ(α)t0(tτ)α1f(τ,x(τ))dτ,x(t)=x0+1Γ(α)t0(tτ)α1f(τ,x(τ))dτ. (5.21)

    Equation (5.21) is equivalent to Volterra integral equation that solves (5.18). Define an operator F in T

    F[x](t)=x0+1Γ(α)t0(tτ)α1f(τ,x(τ))dτ. (5.22)

    Now we need to proof that (5.22) satisfies the hypothesis of contradiction mapping principle. First to show F:TT,

    |F[x(t)]x(0)|=|1Γ(α)t0(tτ)α1f(τ,x(τ))dτ|1Γ(α)t0(tτ)α1|f(τ,x(τ))|dτ1Γ(α)t0(tτ)α1Mdτ=MΓ(α+1)tα=MΓ(α+1)(h)αMΓ(α+1)kΓ(α+1)M. (5.23)

    Or, x(0)kF[x](t)x(0)+k,t[0,h]. Hence the operator F maps T onto itself. Secondly, to show that T is a contradiction, we have

    |F[x](t)F[x](t)|=|1Γ(α)t0(tτ)α1[f(τ,x(τ))f(τ,x(τ))]dτ|1Γ(α)t0(tτ)α1|f(τ,x(τ))f(τ,x(τ))|dτ1Γ(α)t0(tτ)α1L||xx||dτ=LΓ(α)||xx||t0(tτ)α1τ0dτ=LΓ(α)||xx||Γ(α)(Γα+1)tα=LΓ(α)||xx||tαLΓ(α+1)||xx||(h)αLΓ(α+1)||xx||kΓ(α+1)M. (5.24)

    Since by hypothesis LkM<1, then T is a contradiction and has a unique fixed point. Thus, system (5.18) has a unique solution in ˉΩ.

    Theorem 4. The closed set Ω={(x1,x2,x3,x4)R4+:0x1+x2+x3+x4M1,0x5+x6M2} is a positive invariant set for the proposed fractional order system (3.1).

    Proof. To prove that the system of Eq (3.1) has a non-negative solution, the system of Eq (3.1) implies

    {C0DαtSh|Sh=0=Λαh>0,C0DαtIh|Ih=0=ϕαmβαmImShNh0,C0DαtHh|Hh=0=μαhIh0,C0DαtRh|Rh=0=ταhIh+υαhHh0,C0DαtSm|Sm=0=Λαm>0,C0DαtIm|Im=0=ϕαhβαhIhSmNm0. (5.25)

    Thus, the fractional system (3.1) has non-negative solutions. In the end, from the first four equations of the fractional system (3.1), we obtain C0Dαt(x1+x2+x3+x4)Λαhγαh(x1+x2+x3+x4). Solving the above inequality, we obtain

    (x1(t)+x2(t)+x3(t)+x4(t))(x1(0)+x2(0)+x3(0)+x4(0)Λαhγαh)Eα(γαhtα)+Λαhγαh.

    so by the asymptotic behavior of Mittag-Leffler function [25], we obtain (x1(t)+x2(t)+x3(t)+x4(t))ΛαhγαhM1. Taking the same steps for the last two equations of system (3.1), we get

    x5(t)+x6(t)M2,M2=Λαmγαm.

    Hence, the closed set Ω is a positive invariant region for the fractional-order dengue model (3.1).

    By getting the model equilibria from the fractional dengue model (3.1) we obtain and by setting

    CDαtSh=CDαtIh=CDαtHh=CDαtRh=CDαtSm=CDαtIm=0.

    So from some algebraic solution of (3.1) we get,

    {ΛαhϕαmβαmImShNhγαhSh=0ϕαmβαmImShNh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih=0μαhIh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh=0ταhIh+υαhHhγαhRh=0ΛαmϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmSm=0ϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmIm=0. (6.1)

    The fractional dengue model (3.1) obtain the following two equilibrium points: (1) The DFE for the model (3.1) is given by,

    E0=(Λαhγαh,0,0,0,Λαmγαm,0).

    (2) The EE for the model (3.1) is given by,

    E=(Sh,Ih,Hh,Rh,Sm,Im).

    where

    Sh=Λαhτh+γαh,Ih=τhShμαh+τh+γαh,Hh=μαhIhϵαh+υαh+γαh,Rh=τhIh+υαhHhγαh,
    Sm=Λαmτm+γαm,Im=τmSmγαm.

    where, τh=ϕαmβαmImNh and τm=ϕαhβαhIhNm. Observe that Sh, Ih, Hh, Rh, Sm, Im are positive if and only if [ϕαhϕαmβαhβαmShSmNhNmγαm(μαh+ταh+γαh)]>0. Calculate the reproduction number of the fractional model (3.1) by using the method of next generation matrix and the basic reproduction number present in [38]. Let us define a vector, X=[Ih,Hh,Im]T, And

    f=[ϕαmβαmImShNh0ϕαhβαhIhSmNm], v=[(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)HhμαhIhγαmIm]. (6.2)
    F=[00ϕαmβαmShNh000ϕαhβαhSmNm00], V=[(μαh+ταh+γαh)00μαh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)000γαm]. (6.3)

    Thus the basic reproduction number of the model (3.1) is

    R0=ρ(FV1)=ϕαhϕαmβαhβαmShSmNhNmγαm(μαh+ταh+γαh).

    It is easy to prove that Sh, Ih, Hh, Rh, Sm, Im, and R>0 if and only if R0>1.

    Simplifying the stability of the DFE, Suppose DFE is E0=(Sh0,Ih0,Hh0,Rh0,Sm0,Im0) = (Λhγh,0,0,0,Λmγm,0) and the Jacobian matrix of the system in (3.1) can be written as

    J(E0)=[γαh0000ϕαmβαm0(μαh+ταh+γαh)000ϕαmβαm0μαh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)0000ταhυαhγαh000ϕαhβαhSmNm00γαm00ϕαhβαhSmNm00ϕαhβαhIhNmγαm] (7.1)

    Now calculating the Jacobian matrix J at DFE point E0 and solved det(JλI), we obtain, Pj(x)=(λ+γαh)2(λ+ϵαh+υαh+γαh)(λ+γαm)(λ2+Aλ+B), Where A=μαh+ταh+γαh+γαm and

    B=γαm(μαh+ταh+γαh)ϕαhϕαmβαhβαmSmNm=γαm(μαh+ταh+γαh)[1ϕαhϕαmβαhβαmShNmγαmNh(μαh+ταh+γαh)]=γαm(μαh+ταh+γαh)[1R0].

    It is easy to proof that if R0<1, then A>0 and B>0. This polynomial λ2+Aλ+B have two roots with negative real parts. Thats why, E0 is locally stable because the real parts of six eigenvalues of the matrix J(E0) are all negative. Therefore, overall we can tell the DFE is stable when B>0 and DFE is unstable when B<0. The following theorem is presented for the global stability of the disease free equilibrium case E0.

    Theorem 5. The fractional dengue model given by (3.1) for the arbitrary fractional order α(0,1], with R0<1, is globally asymtotically stable.

    Proof. The following Lyapunov function is considered for the proof of the global stability of the dengue fractional model (3.1):

    G(t)=η1(ShS0hS0hlogShS0h)+η2Ih+η3(HhH0hH0hlogHhH0h)Hh+η4(SmS0mS0mlogSmS0m)+η5Im,

    where ηi>0 for i = 1, 2, 3, 4, are arbitrary constants to be determined later. We consider the result described in sect. 2 and taking the time derivative of G(t), we obtain

    CDαtG(t)=η1(1S0hSh)CDαtSh+η2CDαtIh+η3(1H0hHh)CDαtHh+η4(1S0mSm)CDαtSm+η5CDαtIm.

    Considering the fractional system (3.1), we obtain

    CDαtG(t)=η1(1S0hSh)[ΛαhϕαmβαmImShNhγαhSh]+η2[ϕαmβαmImShNh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih]+η3(1H0hHh)[μαhIh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh]+η4(1S0mSm)[ΛαmϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmSm]+η5[ϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmIm]. (7.2)

    Using the values of S0h and S0m at the DFE and simplifying we obtain

    CDαtG(t)=γαhγαm(ShS0h)2Shϕαmβαmγαm(SmS0m)2Smγαm(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih(1R20),

    where η1=η2=γαm, η4=η5=ϕαhβαh. Thus, CDαtG(t) is negative for R01. So it follows from the established results and those given by theorem 1 in [24,39] that the fractional dengue model is globally asymptotically stable at the DFE case E0.

    We prove the global stability results for the fractional model (3.1). Firstly we have the following results for the model (3.1) at the constant state:

    Λαh=ϕαmβαmImShNh+γαhSh,Λαm=ϕαhβαhIhNm+γαmSm,γαm=ϕαhβαhSmIhNmIm,
    (μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih=ϕαmβαmImShNh,(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh=μαhIh.

    Now showing the global stability of the model (3.1) in the following theorem.

    Theorem 6. If R0>1, then the fractional dengue model (3.1) at E is globally asymptotically stable.

    Proof. We suppose the following Lyapunov function:

    L(t)=ϕαhβαhIhSmNm[(ShShSHlogShSh)+(IhIhIhlogIhIh)+(HhHhHhlogHhHh)]+ϕαmβαmImShNh[(SmSmSmlogSmSm)+(ImImImlogImIm)]. (7.3)

    The derivative of L(t) with the application of the lemma 1 given in sec. 2 yields

    CDαtL(t)=ϕαhβαhIhSmNm[(1ShSh)CDαtSh+(1IhIh)CDαtIh+(1HhHh)CDαtHh]+ϕαmβαmImShNh[(1SmSm)CDαtSm+(1ImIm)CDαtIm]. (7.4)

    From the fractional dengue model (3.1), we can consider the following way:

    CDαtL(t)=ϕαhβαhIhSmNm[(1ShSh)(ΛαhϕαmβαmImShNhγαhSh)+(1IhIh)(ϕαmβαmImShNh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih)+(1HhHh)(μαhIh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh)]+ϕαmβαmImShNh[(1SmSm)(ΛαmϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmIm)+(1ImIm)(ϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmIm)]. (7.5)

    By direct calculation, we get the following:

    (1ShSh)CDαtSh=(1ShSh)(ΛαhϕαmβαmImShNhγαhSh)=(1ShSh)(ϕαmβαmImShNh+γαhShϕαmβαmImShNhγαhSh)=γαh(ShSh)2Sh+ϕαmβαmImShNh(1ShShShImNhShIm+ImNhImNh).(1IhIh)CDαtIh=(1IhIh)[ϕαmβαmImShNh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih]=(1IhIh)(ϕαmβαmImShNhϕαmβαmImShNh)=ϕαmβαmImShNh(1IhIhShImNhIhNhShImIh+ShImNhShNhIm).(1HhHh)CDαtHh=(1HhHh)[μαhIh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh]=(1HhHh)(μαhIhμαhIh)=μαhIh(1HhHhIhHhIhHh+IhIh). (7.6)
    (1SmSm)CDαtSm=(1SmSm)(ΛαmϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmSm)=(1SmSm)(ϕαhβαhIhSmNm+γαmSmϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmSm)=γαm(SmSm)2Sm+ϕαhβαhIhSmNm(1SmSmSmIhNmNmSmIh+IhNmIhNm).(1ImIm)CDαtIm=(1ImIm)(ϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmIm)=(1ImIm)(ϕαhβαhIhSmNmϕαhβαhIhSmNm)=ϕαhβαhIhSmNm(1ImImSmIhNmImNmSmIhIm+SmIhNmSmNmIh). (7.7)

    Using the above expressions (7.6) and (7.7) in Eq (7.5), we obtain

    CDαtL(t)=ϕαmγαhβαmSmIhShNh(2ShShShSh)+ϕαhγαmβαhSmImShNh(2SmSmSmSm)+ϕαhϕαmβαhβαmShSmIhIm(Nh)2(5ShShIhIhHhHhSmSmImImShImNhIhNhShImImIhIhHhIhHhSmIhNhImNhSmIhIm+ImNhNhIm+IhNhNhIh). (7.8)

    From Eq (7.8), we get the following result,

    (2ShShShSh)0,(2SmSmSmSm)0

    and, in the same way, if

    (5ShShIhIhHhHhSmSmImImShImNhIhNhShImImIhIhHhIhHhSmIhNhImNhSmIhIm+ImNhNhIm+IhNhNhIh)0

    then CDαtL(t)0, So it observes that, at the EE point E, the fractional dengue model is globally asymptotically stable at E, when R0>1.

    Sensitivity analysis helps us to identify parameters that have a big impact on the disease transmission. Such information is important not only for experimental design but also for data assimilation and reduction to complex nonlinear models [40]. This provides a good strategy to prevent and restrain the disease. The disease will be controlled and mitigated if we can change the value of parameters by the control strategies. Usually, in the epidemiological model, the analysis is used to discover parameters that have greatest influence on the basic reproduction number R0 and should be targeted by the control strategies. The sensitivity indices of the R0 are determined to allow us to measure which parameter has the greatest influence on the changes of R0 and, hence, the greatest effect in determining whether the disease can be eliminated in the population. The normalized forward sensitivity index of a variable (R0) with respect to a parameter is the ratio of the relative change in the variable (R0) to the relative change in the parameter. The systematic description of the sensitivity analysis of the different parameters in R0 for the model is:

    δR0θ=dRodθθRo.

    So the basic reproduction number is,

    R0=ρ(FV1)=ϕαhϕαmβαhβαmShSmNhNmγαm(μαh+ταh+γαh).

    It is easy to verify that

    dR0dϕhϕhR0=ϕhϕmβhβmγm(μh+τh+γh)γmϕhϕmβhβm(μh+τh+γh)=1>0
    dR0dϕmϕmR0=ϕhϕmβhβmγm(μh+τh+γh)γmϕhϕmβhβm(μh+τh+γh)=1>0
    dR0dβhβhR0=ϕhϕmβhβmγm(μh+τh+γh)ϕhϕmβhβmγm(μh+τh+γh)=1>0
    dR0dβmβmR0=ϕhϕmβhβmγm(μh+τh+γh)ϕhϕmβhβmγm(μh+τh+γh)=1>0
    dR0dγmγmR0=ϕhϕmβhβmγ2m(μh+τh+γh)ϕhϕmβhβmγ2m(μh+τh+γh)=1<0
    dR0dμhμhR0=μh(μh+τh+γh)<0
    dR0dτhτhR0=τh(μh+τh+γh)<0
    dR0dγhγhR0=γh(μh+τh+γh)<0

    Using the parameter values from Table 2, the sensitivity indices of R0 with respect to the parameters are given in Table 3.

    Table 3.  Sensitivity indices of R0 to the model parameters.
    Parameter Sensitivity indices
    ϕh 1
    ϕm 1
    βh 1
    βm 1
    γm 1
    γh 0.11075182
    τh 0.08084074
    μh 0.80840744

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We can conclude from Table 3 that the sensitivity indices are sign-related and, R0 is more sensitive to the following parameters (ϕh, ϕm, βh, βm) increasing order and a corresponding decrease in R0 as the following parameters (μh, γh, γm, τh) have a negative impact on R0, that means an increase in these parameters will reduce R0, while (ϕh, ϕm, βh, βm) has a positive impact, and reducing the value of these parameters will reduce R0. After the above analytical results, we now perform an R0 sensitivity analysis to find exact ways to choose the various parameters in R0. The following can be inferred from the sensitive analysis:

    (1). If can reduce the value of the transmission rates βh, βm, and biting rate ϕh, ϕm could be effective control measures to stop the spread of the dengue virus.

    (2). If can increase the natural death rate of mosquitoes γm and natural recovery rate of infected humans τh so that it will not affect other susceptible individuals.

    In this section, we carry out numerical simulations for system (3.1) by using Euler's algorithm method [41]. To have a numerical scheme, we write the model (3.1) in the following form:

    CDαtg(t)=G(t,g(t)),α(0,1],t[0,T],g(0)=g0,0<T<, (9.1)

    where g=(x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6)R6+,G(t,g(t)) is used for a continuous real valued vector function, which additionally satisfies the Lipschitz condition and g0 stands for initial state vector. Taking Caputo integral on both sides of (7.1) we get

    g(t)=g0+1Γ(α)t0(tλ)α1G(λ,g(λ))dλ. (9.2)

    To formulate an iterative scheme, we consider a uniform grid on [0, T] with h=T0m is the step size and mN. Thus, Eq (7.2) gets the structure as follows after making use of the Euler method

    {gn+1=g0+hαΓ(α+1)Σnj=0((nj+1)α(nj)α)G(tj,g(tj)),n=0,1,2,...,m. (9.3)

    Thus, utilizing the above scheme (7.3), we deduced the following iterative formulae for the corresponding classes of the model (3.1).

    We used the above approximation for the solution of our fractional system. In Figures (2) to (5), we demonstrate the dynamics of susceptible human (Sh), infected human (Ih), hospitalized human (Hh), recovered human (Rh), dead human (Dh), new cases of human, reported dengue cases of human, cumulative dengue cases of human, susceptible human with different biting rates, infected human with different biting rates, susceptible mosquitoes (Sm), infected mosquitoes (Im), and infected mosquitoes (with different biting rates b=0.45,0.50,0.68 with the variation of fractional order α=0.75, integer order and actual values. We noticed that the variation of fractional order has a great influence on the infection level of dengue in both populations. In other words, it can highly reduce the level of DF in the community. We demonstrated the effect of the biting rate ϕh of the mosquitoes on the dynamics of dengue and observed that the peak of infection can be greatly decreased by decreasing the biting rate ϕh. The mosquito biting and its generation further can be decreased by spraying or wasting the standing water around the home or inside the home, which has a great influence on the population of mosquitoes that end up biting humans. Using bed nets, avoid to visit areas prone to mosquitoes, using mosquito repellent, and covering legs and arms by wearing long sleeves and long pants are useful to prevent biting of mosquitoes. These scenarios predict that the infection can be controlled and prevented by decreasing the index of memory and biting rate of vectors in the community. In this model, we use the real data of Bangladesh from (2012–2022)[42].

    Figure 2.  Numerical simulation of (a) Susceptible humans Sh(t) (b) Infected human Ih(t) for different values of α and actual values with time (yearly).
    Figure 3.  Numerical simulation of (a) Hospitalized human Hh(t) (b) Recovered human Rh(t) for different values of α and actual values with time (yearly).
    Figure 4.  Numerical simulation of (a) Death human Dh(t) for integer and fractional values of α and actual values (yearly) (b) New cases of human for integer and fractional values of α and actual values (monthly).
    Figure 5.  Numerical simulation of (a) Reported dengue cases of human (b) Cumulative dengue cases of (2012--2022) with time (monthly) for integer and fractional values of α and actual values.

    First, we simulate different values of fractional order α with fixed values of the model parameters. In this work, the dengue cases data of 11 years (2012–2022) are used with different parametric values for the numerical simulations based on a case study of Bangladesh cited from the literature; some are fitted, some are estimated and some are referred. We use the total population of Bangladesh, Nh=166303494 [43]. The life expectancy in Bangladesh for the year 2022 is 72.87, so we estimate γh=1/72.87 per year. The parameter Λh is estimated from Λh/γh=166303494, and assumed that this is to be the limiting population in the disease absence, so Λh=2278130.05 per year. For the initial values of the model variables, we use the total initial population Nh(0)=166303494, so that Nh(0)=Sh(0) + Ih(0) + Hh(0) + Rh(0) and Nm(0)=Sm(0) + Im(0), The initial conditions are assumed as Sh(0)=5000,Ih(0)=1000,Hh(0)=500,Rh(0)=100,Sm(0)=100000, Im(0)=80000 and the parameter values are taken from the literature as given in Table 1. As illustrated in Figures 2 to 8, a smaller fractional order reduces the peak significantly and flattens the progression curve. The dengue cases reported in Bangladesh are shown in the following Figures and the solution obtained by the Euler algorithm method is presented in Figure 2 to 8 for different values of α. The number of infected human real data and simulated results will reach the highest level in eight months for α=0.75,1. These scenarios predict that the infection can be controlled and prevented by decreasing the index of memory and biting rate of vectors in the community. Fig 6 and 8 describe the behavior of the solutions showing the dynamics of susceptible human, infected human and infected mosquito population for the biting rates 0.45 and 0.68 respectively.

    cShp+1=S0+hαΓ(α+1)×Σpk=0((pk+1)α(pk)α)(ΛαhϕαmβαmImShNhγαhSh),cIhp+1=I0+hαΓ(α+1)×Σpk=0((pk+1)α(pk)α)(ϕαmβαmImShNh(μαh+ταh+γαh)Ih),cHhp+1=H0+hαΓ(α+1)×Σpk=0((pk+1)α(pk)α)(μαhIh(ϵαh+υαh+γαh)Hh),cRhp+1=R0+hαΓ(α+1)×Σpk=0((pk+1)α(pk)α)(ταhIh+υαhHhγαhRh),cSmp+1=X0+hαΓ(α+1)×Σpk=0((pk+1)α(pk)α)(ΛαmϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmSm),cImp+1=Y0+hαΓ(α+1)×Σpk=0((pk+1)α(pk)α)(ϕαhβαhIhSmNmγαmIm). (9.4)
    Figure 6.  Numerical simulation of (a) Suspected human Sh(t) (b) Infected human Ih(t) for different biting rates b=0.45,0.50,0.68.
    Figure 7.  Numerical simulation of (a) Suspected mosquitoes Sm(t) (b) Infected mosquitoes Im(t) for different values of α and actual values (yearly).
    Figure 8.  Numerical simulation of (a) Infected mosquitoes Im(t) for different values of biting rate b=0.45,0.50,0.68.

    The objective of this work is to understand, analyze and find the solution to the fractional epidemiological models. In this paper, we analyze a new fractional epidemic model for the transmission of dengue infection with a non-integer derivatives and are analysed using q-HATM. The existence of the solutions of the model is investigated by solving the fractional Grownwall's inequality using the Laplace transform approach. The positivity and boundedness of unique solutions are investigated. The basic reproduction number of the system is calculated by the next-generation method. We establish two equilibrium solutions, disease-free and endemic are obtained. Both local and global stability of the equilibria is investigated to depend on the magnitude of the basic reproduction ratio. Sensitivity analysis of R0 is carried out to know the contribution of input factors in the results of R0 and observed that ϕh, ϕm, βh, βm are the most critical parameters that highly contribute to the control and subsequent spread of dengue infection. We showed that the dengue infection is uniformly persistent in the system for R0>1. Numerical simulations are carried out and dynamics of the populations are shown to vary for different values of α. We obtain feasible results for the dynamics of dengue infection with the variation of memory index α and suggest that the index of memory has a dominant influence on the system. We conclude that the fractional-order model can explore the dengue epidemic disease transmission model rather than the integer-order derivative models. We can suggest that fractional-order (index of memory) α and biting rate for humans and mosquitoes ϕh, ϕm can remarkably control and greatly decrease the level of disease in society.

    Ethics approval and consent to participate:

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication:

    Not applicable.

    Availability of data and materials:

    All data and materials used in this study are publicly available.

    Competing Interest:

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Funding:

    This work was supported by the Shanxi Science and Technology innovation team under grant no. (201805D131012-1), and the key projects of the Health Commission of Shanxi Province (2020XM18).

    Authors' contributions:

    The authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for the careful checking and suggestions that improved the presentation of the paper greatly. The authors thank the Chinese Government and the Complex Systems Research Centre, Shanxi University, for their support.



    [1] T. Koizumi, K. Yamaguchi, K. Tonomura, An epidemiological study of dengue fever, Taiwan J. Med. Assoc. Formosa., 176 (1917), 369–392.
    [2] S. Bhatt, P. W. Gething, O. J. Brady, J. P. Messina, A. W. Farlow, C. L. Moyes, et al., The global distribution and burden of dengue, Nature, 496 (2013), 504–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12060 doi: 10.1038/nature12060
    [3] WHO, Dengue fact sheet, 2019. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/entity/vector-borne-tropical-diseases/data/data-factsheet/en/
    [4] S. Sharmin, E. Viennet, K. Glass, D. Harley, The emergence of dengue in Bangladesh: epidemiology, challenges and future disease risk, Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 109 (2015), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trv067 doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trv067
    [5] Z. Feng, J. X. Velasco-Hernandez, Competitive exclusion in a vector-host model for the dengue fever, J. Math. Biol., 35 (1997), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002850050064 doi: 10.1007/s002850050064
    [6] S. A. Carvalho, S. O. da Silva, I. C. Charret, Mathematical modeling of dengue epidemic: control methods and vaccination strategies, Theory Biosci., 138 (2019), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-019-00273-7 doi: 10.1007/s12064-019-00273-7
    [7] T. Shirin, A. K. M. Muraduzzaman, A. N. Alam, S. Sultana, M. Siddiqua, M. H. Khan, et al. Largest dengue outbreak of the decade with high fatality may be due to reemergence of DEN-3 serotype in Dhaka Bangladesh, necessitating immediate public health attention, New Microbes New Infect., 29 (2019), 100511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2019.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2019.01.007
    [8] Prothom Alo, The number of dengue victims has increased by three and a half million, 2019. Available from: https://www.prothomalo.com/bangladesh/article/1605652/
    [9] M. S. Hossain, R. Amin, A. A. Mosabbir, COVID-19 onslaught is masking the 2021 dengue outbreak in Dhaka, Bangladesh, PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., 16 (2022), e0010130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010130 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010130
    [10] Mahbuba Chowdhury, Dengue is not under control at all, 2022. Available from: https://mzamin.com/news.php?news = 25147
    [11] The Daily Star, Dengue fever: Cases cross 14,000 mark, 321 hospitalised in a day, 2021. Available from: https://www.thedailystar.net/health/disease/news/dengue-fever-cases-cross-14000-mark-321-hospitalised-day-2174981
    [12] W. Y. Shen, Y. M. Chu, M. U. Rahman, I. Mahariq, A. Zeb, Mathematical analysis of HBV and HCV co-infection model under nonsingular fractional order derivative, Results Phys., 28 (2021), 104582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104582 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104582
    [13] M. Rahman, S. Ahmad, M. Arfan, A. Akgül, F. Jarad, Fractional order mathematical model of serial killing with different choices of control strategy, Fractal Fractional, 6 (2022), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6030162 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6030162
    [14] C. Xu, M. U. Rahman, D. Baleanu, On fractional-order symmetric oscillator with offset-boosting control, Nonlinear Anal.: Modell. Control, 27 (2022), 994–1008. https://doi.org/10.15388/namc.2022.27.28279 doi: 10.15388/namc.2022.27.28279
    [15] H. Qu, X. Liu, X. Lu, M. ur Rahman, Z. She, Neural network method for solving nonlinear fractional advection-diffusion equation with spatiotemporal variable-order, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 156 (2022), 111856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111856 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111856
    [16] Q. Haidong, M. Rahman, M. Arfan, Fractional model of smoking with relapse and harmonic mean type incidence rate under Caputo operator, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 69 (2023), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-022-01747-6 doi: 10.1007/s12190-022-01747-6
    [17] T. Sardar, S. Rana, J. Chattopadhyay, A mathematical model of dengue transmission with memory, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 22 (2015), 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.08.009 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.08.009
    [18] H. Al-Sulami, M. El-Shahed, J. J. Nieto, W. Shammakh, On fractional order dengue epidemic model, Math. Probl. Eng., 2014 (2014), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/456537 doi: 10.1155/2014/456537
    [19] M. Derouich, A. Boutayeb, Dengue fever: Mathematical modelling and computer simulation, Appl. Math. Comput., 177 (2006), 528–544 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.031 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.031
    [20] K. Diethelm, A fractional calculus based model for the simulation of an outbreak of dengue fever, Nonlinear Dyn., 71 (2013), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-012-0475-2 doi: 10.1007/s11071-012-0475-2
    [21] I. Polubny, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic press, New York, 1999.
    [22] D. Qian, C. Li, R. P. Agarwal, P. J. Y. Wong, Stabilty analysis of fractional differential system with Riemann-Liouville derivative, Math. Comput. Modell., 52 (2010), 862–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.05.016 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.05.016
    [23] A. A. Kilbas, J. J. Trujillo, Differential equation of fractional order: Methods, results and problems, Appl. Anal., 81 (2002), 435–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003681021000022032 doi: 10.1080/0003681021000022032
    [24] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to methods of their Solution and some of their Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999.
    [25] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(06)80001-0
    [26] F. A. McRae, Monotone method for periodic boundary value problems of caputo fractional differential equations, Commun. Appl. Anal., 14 (2010), 73–79.
    [27] C. F. Lorenzo, T. T. Hartley, J. L. Adams, Time-varying initialization and corrected laplace transform of the caputo derivative, IFAC Proc. Vol., 46 (2013), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130204-3-FR-4032.00189 doi: 10.3182/20130204-3-FR-4032.00189
    [28] Y. Li, Y. Q. Chen, Igor Podlubny, Stability of fractional-order nonlinear dynamic systems: Lyapunov direct method and generalized Mittag-Leffler stability, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 1810–1821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.019 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.019
    [29] H. Delvary, D. Baleanu, J. Sadati, Stability analysis of Caputo fractonal-order non-linear systems revisited, Nonlinear Dyn., 67 (2012), 2433–2439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0157-5 doi: 10.1007/s11071-011-0157-5
    [30] Y. Li, Y. Chen, I. Podlubny, Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional order nonlinear dynamic systems, Automatica, 45 (2009), 1965–1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.04.003
    [31] C. Vargas-De-Le'on, Volterra-type Lyapunov functions for fractional-order epidemic systems, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 24 (2015), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.12.013 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.12.013
    [32] F. B. Agusto, M. A. Khan, Optimal control strategies for dengue transmission in Pakistan, Math. Biosci., 305 (2018), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2018.09.007 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2018.09.007
    [33] C. A. Manore, K. S. Hickmann, S. Xu, H. J. Wearing, J. M. Hyman, Comparing Dengue and Chikongunya emergence and endemic transmission in A.aegypti and A.albopictus, J. Theor. Biol., 356 (2014), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.04.033 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.04.033
    [34] M. A. Khan, C. Alfiniyah, E. Alzahrani, Analysis of dengue model with fractal-fractional Caputo-Fabrizio operator, Adv. Differ. Equations, 42 (2020), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02881-w doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02881-w
    [35] J. Singh, D. Kumar, R. Swroop, Numerical solution of time and space-fractional coupled Burgers equations via homotopy algorithm, Alexandria Eng. J., 55 (2016), 1753–1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.03.028 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2016.03.028
    [36] P. Veeresha, D. G. Prakasha, Z. Hammouch, An efficient approach for the model of thrombin receptor activation mechanism with Mittag-Leffler function, in The International Congress of the Moroccan Society of Applied Mathematics, 168 (2020), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62299-2_4
    [37] P. Veeresha, D. G. Prakasha, D. Baleanu, An efficient technique for fractional coupled system arisen in magneto thermoelasticity with rotation using Mittag-Leffler kernel, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam., 16 (2021), 011002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048577 doi: 10.1115/1.4048577
    [38] P. V. Driessche, J. Watmough, Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission, Math. Biosci., 180 (2002), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6 doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6
    [39] S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Marichev, Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Philadelphia, 1993.
    [40] H. S. Rodrigues, M. T. T. Monteiro, D. F. M. Torres, Sensitivity analysis in a dengue epidemiological model, in Conference Papers in Science, (2013), 721406. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/721406
    [41] S. Akter, Z. Jin, A fractional order model of the COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh, Math. Biosci. Eng., 20 (2023), 2544–2565. http://doi.org./10.3934/mbe.2023119 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023119
    [42] Reliefweb, Dengue Case Reporting, Updated on 04.11.2022, 2022. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/dengue-case-reporting-updated-04112022
    [43] Statista, Bangladesh: Total population from 2017 to 2027, 2022. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/438167/total-population-of-bangladesh/
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Jiraporn Lamwong, Puntani Pongsumpun, A fractional derivative model of the dynamic of dengue transmission based on seasonal factors in Thailand, 2025, 457, 03770427, 116256, 10.1016/j.cam.2024.116256
    2. Hua He, Wendi Wang, Asymptotically periodic solutions of fractional order systems with applications to population models, 2024, 476, 00963003, 128760, 10.1016/j.amc.2024.128760
    3. Lemesa Bedjisa Dano, Dessalegn Geleta Gobena, Legesse Lemecha Obsu, Mesay Hailu Dangisso, Medhanaye Habtetsion Kidanie, Fractional modeling of dengue fever with optimal control strategies in Dire Dawa, Ethiopia, 2025, 27, 24682276, e02500, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02500
    4. Arun Kumar Sikder, Md Hamidul Islam, Fractional order modeling of dengue transmission dynamics in Bangladesh, 2025, 14, 26668181, 101150, 10.1016/j.padiff.2025.101150
    5. Md. Rezwan Ahmed Mahedi, Pujita Roy, Asma Akhter Radia, Sadia Afrin, Md. Faisal Ahmed, Nikolaos Syrmos, Symptomatic pattern changes and climatic factors in dengue outbreaks in Bangladesh, 2025, 0, 2584-136X, 1, 10.25259/FH_78_2024
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1983) PDF downloads(146) Cited by(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog