Bounded rationality, asymmetric information and spillover effects are widespread in the economic market, and had been studied extensively in oligopoly games, however, few literature discussed the incomplete information between bounded rational oligopolists in an enterprise cluster. Considering the positive externalities brought by the spillover effect between cluster enterprises, a duopoly Cournot-Bertrand game with bounded rationality and asymmetric information is proposed in this paper. In our model, firm 1 with an information advantage knows all the price information of firm 2 with an information advantage, while firm 2 only partially knows the output information of firm 1, and they adopt boundedly rational expectation and naïve expectation respectively. Interestingly, our theoretical analysis reveals that: (1) When the output adjustment speed of enterprises with information advantage is large or the substitutability between monopoly products is high, moderate effective information is beneficial to the stability of product market, while too low or too high effective information may lead to market disorder. (2) The relationship between cluster spillover and Nash equilibrium stability depends on product substitutability. When the substitutability is small, smaller cluster spillovers are more conducive to the stability of product output or price; when the substitutability is large, the larger the cluster spillover is, the more stable the product market is. Our research has an important theoretical and practical significance to the production-price competition in oligopoly markets.
Citation: Jianjun Long, Hui Huang. Stability of equilibrium production-price in a dynamic duopoly Cournot-Bertrand game with asymmetric information and cluster spillovers[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 14056-14073. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022654
Bounded rationality, asymmetric information and spillover effects are widespread in the economic market, and had been studied extensively in oligopoly games, however, few literature discussed the incomplete information between bounded rational oligopolists in an enterprise cluster. Considering the positive externalities brought by the spillover effect between cluster enterprises, a duopoly Cournot-Bertrand game with bounded rationality and asymmetric information is proposed in this paper. In our model, firm 1 with an information advantage knows all the price information of firm 2 with an information advantage, while firm 2 only partially knows the output information of firm 1, and they adopt boundedly rational expectation and naïve expectation respectively. Interestingly, our theoretical analysis reveals that: (1) When the output adjustment speed of enterprises with information advantage is large or the substitutability between monopoly products is high, moderate effective information is beneficial to the stability of product market, while too low or too high effective information may lead to market disorder. (2) The relationship between cluster spillover and Nash equilibrium stability depends on product substitutability. When the substitutability is small, smaller cluster spillovers are more conducive to the stability of product output or price; when the substitutability is large, the larger the cluster spillover is, the more stable the product market is. Our research has an important theoretical and practical significance to the production-price competition in oligopoly markets.
[1] | A. A. Cournot, Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, Hachette, Paris, 1838. |
[2] | J. Bertrand, Théorie mathematique de la richesse sociale, J. des Savants, 68 (1883), 303–317. |
[3] | A. A. Elsadany, A. M. Awad, Dynamical analysis and chaos control in a heterogeneous Kopel duopoly game, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 47 (2016), 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-016-0206-3 doi: 10.1007/s13226-016-0206-3 |
[4] | J. Long, H. Huang, A dynamic stackelberg cournot duopoly model with heterogeneous strategies through one-way spillovers, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2020 (2020), 3251609. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3251609 doi: 10.1155/2020/3251609 |
[5] | S. S. Askar, Tripoly Stackelberg game model: One leader versus two followers, Appl. Math. Comput., 328 (2018), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.01.041 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.01.041 |
[6] | Y. Peng, Q. Lu, Y. Xiao, X, Wu, Complex dynamics analysis for a remanufacturing duopoly model with nonlinear cost, Phys. A, 514 (2019), 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.09.143 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.09.143 |
[7] | Y. Peng, Q. Lu, X. Wu, Y. Zhao, Y. Xiao, Dynamics of hotelling triopoly model with bounded rationality, Appl. Math. Comput., 373 (2020), 12507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.125027 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.125027 |
[8] | M. Bai, Y. Gao, Chaos control on a duopoly game with homogeneous strategy, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2016 (2016), 7418252. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7418252 doi: 10.1155/2016/7418252 |
[9] | J. Long, H. Zhao, Stability of equilibrium prices in a dynamic duopoly bertrand game with asymmetric information and cluster spillovers, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos, 31 (2021), 2150240. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127421502400 doi: 10.1142/S0218127421502400 |
[10] | G. I. Bischi, A. K. Naimzada, L. Sbragia, Oligopoly games with local monopolistic approximation, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 62 (2007), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.08.006 |
[11] | S. S. Askar, K. Alnowibet, Nonlinear oligopolistic game with isoelastic demand function: Rationality and local monopolistic approximation, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 84 (2016), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2015.12.019 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2015.12.019 |
[12] | J. Ma, Y. Hou, Z. Wang, W. Yang, Pricing strategy and coordination of automobile manufacturers based on government intervention and carbon emission reduction, Energy Policy, 148 (2021), 111919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111919 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111919 |
[13] | Y. Tian, J. Ma, L. Xie, T. Koivumäki, V. Seppänen, Coordination and control of multi-channel supply chain driven by consumers' channel preference and sales effort, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 132 (2020), 109576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109576 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109576 |
[14] | T. Xu, J. Ma, Feed-in tariff or tax-rebate regulation? dynamic decision model for the solar photovoltaic supply chain, Appl. Math. Modell., 89 (2021), 1106–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.007 |
[15] | I. Torcicollo, On the dynamics of a non-linear duopoly game model, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 57 (2013), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.06.011 |
[16] | S. Rionero, I. Torcicollo, Stability of a continuous reaction-diffusion cournot-kopel duopoly game model, Acta Appl. Math., 132 (2014), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-014-9932-x doi: 10.1007/s10440-014-9932-x |
[17] | J. Zhou, R. Zhao, W. Wang, Pricing decision of a manufacturer in a dual-channel supply chain with asymmetric information, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 278, (2019), 809–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.05.006 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.05.006 |
[18] | M. Porter, Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, New York, 1998. |
[19] | L. Li, Multi-dimensional Proximities and Industrial Cluster Innovation, Peking University Press, Beijing, 2014. |
[20] | G. I. Bischi, F. Lamantia, Nonlinear duopoly games with positive cost externalities due to spillover effects, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 13 (2002), 805–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(01)00006-6 doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(01)00006-6 |
[21] | C. D'Aspremont, A. Jacquemin, Cooperative and noncooperative R & D in duopoly with spillover, Am. Econ. Rev., 78 (1988), 1133–1137. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1807173 |
[22] | A. Tesoriere, Endogenous R & D symmetry in linear duopoly with one-way spillovers, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 66 (2006), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.04.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2006.04.007 |
[23] | G. I. Bischi, F. Lamantia, A dynamic model of oligopoly with R & D externalities along networks: Part I, Math. Comput. Simul., 84 (2012), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2012.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2012.08.006 |
[24] | T. Li, J. Ma, The complex dynamics of R & D competition models of three oligarchs with heterogeneous players, Nonlinear Dyn., 74 (2013), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-0947-z doi: 10.1007/s11071-013-0947-z |
[25] | H. Tu, X. Wang, Complex dynamics and control of a dynamic R & D Bertrand triopoly game model with bounded rational rule, Nonlinear Dyn., 88 (2017), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3271-6 doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-3271-6 |
[26] | J. Zhou, W. Zhou, T. Chu, Y. Chang, M. Huang, Bifurcation, intermittent chaos and multi-stability in a two-stage Cournot game with R & D spillover and product differentiation, Appl. Math. Comput., 341 (2019), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.09.004 |
[27] | S. Bylka, J. Komar, Cournot-bertrand mixed oligopolies, in Warsaw Fall Seminars in Mathematical Economics, 133 (1975), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48296-0_3 |
[28] | N. Singh, X. Vives, Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly, RAND J. Econ., 15 (1984), 546–554. |
[29] | J. Häckner, A note on price and quantity competition in differentiated oligopolies, J. Econ. Theory, 93, (1999), 233–239. |
[30] | A. Arya, B. Mittendorf, D. E. M. Sappington, Outsourcing, vertical integration, and price vs. quantity competition, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 26 (2008), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.10.006 |
[31] | C. H. Tremblay, V. J. Tremblay, The cournot-bertrand model and the degree of product differentiation, Econo. Lett., 111 (2011), 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.02.011 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.02.011 |
[32] | A. K. Naimzada, F. Tramontana, Dynamic properties of a cournot-bertrand duopoly game with differentiated products, Econ. Modell., 29 (2012), 1436–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.016 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.016 |
[33] | H. Wang, J. Ma, Complexity analysis of a cournot-bertrand duopoly game model with limited information, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2013 (2013), 287371. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/287371 doi: 10.1155/2013/287371 |
[34] | S. S. Askar, On complex dynamics of cournot-bertrand game with asymmetric market information, Appl. Math. Comput., 393 (2021), 125823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125823 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125823 |
[35] | G. I. Bischi, F. Lamantia, A dynamic model of oligopoly with R & D externalities along networks. part Ⅱ, Math. Comput. Simul., 84 (2012), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2012.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2012.09.001 |
[36] | W. Yu, Y. Yu, The stability of bayesian nash equilibrium of dynamic Cournot duopoly model with asymmetric information, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numerl. Simul., 63 (2018), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.03.001 |
[37] | A. Medio, M. Lines, Nonlinear Dynamics: A Primer, Cambridge University Press, London, 2010. |
[38] | J. L. Kaplan, J. A. York, Preturbulence: A regime observed in a fluid flow model of lorenz, Commun. Math. Phys., 67 (1979), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01221359 doi: 10.1007/BF01221359 |