A surface model of nonlinear, non-steady-state phloem transport

Youcef Mammeri; Damien Sellier; Youcef Mammeri; Damien Sellier

doi:10.3934/mbe.2017055

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering

2017, Volume 14, Issue 4: 1055-1069. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017055

Previous Article Next Article

A surface model of nonlinear, non-steady-state phloem transport

Youcef Mammeri ^{1
,
,},
Damien Sellier ²

1.
Laboratoire Amiénois de Mathématique Fondamentale et Appliquée, CNRS UMR 7352, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 80069 Amiens, France
2.
SCION, New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Private bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand

Received: 01 April 2016 Accepted: 01 February 2017 Published: 01 August 2017
MSC : Primary: 35K61, 92C80; Secondary: 65M60

Phloem transport is the process by which carbohydrates produced by photosynthesis in the leaves get distributed in a plant. According to Münch, the osmotically generated hydrostatic phloem pressure is the force driving the long-distance transport of photoassimilates. Following Thompson and Holbrook[35]'s approach, we develop a mathematical model of coupled water-carbohydrate transport. It is first proven that the model presented here preserves the positivity. The model is then applied to simulate the flow of phloem sap for an organic tree shape, on a 3D surface and in a channel with orthotropic hydraulic properties. Those features represent an significant advance in modelling the pathway for carbohydrate transport in trees.

Keywords:

Citation: Youcef Mammeri, Damien Sellier. A surface model of nonlinear, non-steady-state phloem transport[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(4): 1055-1069. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017055

Related Papers:

[1]	Muajebah Hidan, Abbas Kareem Wanas, Faiz Chaseb Khudher, Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy, Mohamed Abdalla . Coefficient bounds for certain families of bi-Bazilevič and bi-Ozaki-close-to-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8134-8147. doi: 10.3934/math.2024395
[2]	Abdulmtalb Hussen, Mohammed S. A. Madi, Abobaker M. M. Abominjil . Bounding coefficients for certain subclasses of bi-univalent functions related to Lucas-Balancing polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18034-18047. doi: 10.3934/math.2024879
[3]	Tariq Al-Hawary, Ala Amourah, Abdullah Alsoboh, Osama Ogilat, Irianto Harny, Maslina Darus . Applications of $q-$ Ultraspherical polynomials to bi-univalent functions defined by $q-$ Saigo's fractional integral operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17063-17075. doi: 10.3934/math.2024828
[4]	Abeer O. Badghaish, Abdel Moneim Y. Lashin, Amani Z. Bajamal, Fayzah A. Alshehri . A new subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions associated with Legendre polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23534-23547. doi: 10.3934/math.20231196
[5]	Bilal Khan, H. M. Srivastava, Muhammad Tahir, Maslina Darus, Qazi Zahoor Ahmad, Nazar Khan . Applications of a certain $q$ -integral operator to the subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 1024-1039. doi: 10.3934/math.2021061
[6]	Sheza. M. El-Deeb, Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy, Kaliyappan Vijaya, Alhanouf Alburaikan . Certain class of bi-univalent functions defined by quantum calculus operator associated with Faber polynomial. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2989-3005. doi: 10.3934/math.2022165
[7]	Luminiţa-Ioana Cotîrlǎ . New classes of analytic and bi-univalent functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10642-10651. doi: 10.3934/math.2021618
[8]	F. Müge Sakar, Arzu Akgül . Based on a family of bi-univalent functions introduced through the Faber polynomial expansions and Noor integral operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5146-5155. doi: 10.3934/math.2022287
[9]	Norah Saud Almutairi, Adarey Saud Almutairi, Awatef Shahen, Hanan Darwish . Estimates of coefficients for bi-univalent Ma-Minda-type functions associated with $\mathfrak{q}$ -Srivastava-Attiya operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 7269-7289. doi: 10.3934/math.2025333
[10]	Tingting Du, Zhengang Wu . Some identities involving the bi-periodic Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5838-5846. doi: 10.3934/math.2023294

Abstract

1. Introduction and preliminaries

Let $\mathcal{A}$ indicate an analytic functions family, which is normalized under the condition $f$ $(0) =$ $f^{\prime}(0)-1 = 0$ in $\mathbb{U} = \{z:z\in \mathbb{C}$ and $\left \vert z \ \right \vert < 1\}$ and given by the following Taylor-Maclaurin series:

$\begin{equation} f \ (z) = z+\sum \limits_{n = 2}^{\infty}a_{n}z^{n}\ .\ \ \ \ \ \end{equation}$

(1.1)

Further, by $\mathcal{S}$ we shall denote the class of all functions in $\mathcal{A}$ which are univalent in $\mathbb{U}$ .

With a view to recalling the principle of subordination between analytic functions, let the functions $f$ and $g$ be analytic in $\mathbb{U}$ . Then we say that the function $f$ is subordinate to $g$ if there exists a Schwarz function $w\left(z\right)$ , analytic in $\mathbb{U}$ with

$\begin{equation*} \omega \left( 0\right) = 0, \ \left\vert \omega (z)\right\vert < 1, \ \left( z\in \mathbb{U}\right) \end{equation*}$

such that

$\begin{equation*} f \ \left( z\right) = g \ (\omega \left( z\right) ). \end{equation*}$

We denote this subordination by

$\begin{equation*} f\prec g\text{ or}\ f \ (z)\prec g \ (z). \end{equation*}$

In particular, if the function $g$ is univalent in $\mathbb{U}$ , the above subordination is equivalent to

$\begin{equation*} f \ (0) = g \ (0), \ f \ (\mathbb{U})\subset g \ ( \mathbb{U}). \end{equation*}$

The Koebe-One Quarter Theorem ^[11] asserts that image of $\mathbb{U}$ under every univalent function $f\in \mathcal{A}$ contains a disc of radius $\frac{1}{4}.\$ thus every univalent function $f$ has an inverse $\ f^{-1}\$ satisfying $\ f^{-1}(f(z)) = z$ and $f$ $(\ f^{-1}$ $(w)) = w$ $(\left\vert w\right\vert < r$ $_{0}(f$ $), r$ $_{0}(f$ $)$ $> \frac{ 1}{4}$ $)$ , where

$\begin{equation} \ f^{-1}(w) = w-a_{2}w^{2}+(2a_{2}^{2}-a_{3})w^{3}-(5a_{2}^{3}-5a_{2}a_{3}+a_{4})w^{4}+\cdots . \end{equation}$

(1.2)

A function $f\in \mathcal{A}$ is said to be bi-univalent functions in $\mathbb{U}$ if both $f$ and $\ f^{-1}$ are univalent in $\mathbb{U}$ . A function $f\in \mathcal{S}$ is said to be bi-univalent in $\mathbb{U}$ if there exists a function $g\in \mathcal{S}$ such that $g(z)$ is an univalent extension of $f^{-1}$ to $\mathbb{U}$ . Let $\Lambda$ denote the class of bi-univalent functions in $\mathbb{U}$ . The functions $\frac{z}{ 1-z}$ , $-\log (1-z)$ , $\frac{1}{2}\log \left(\frac{1+z}{1-z}\right)$ are in the class $\Lambda$ (see details in ^[20]). However, the familiar Koebe function is not bi-univalent. Lewin ^[17] investigated the class of bi-univalent functions $\Lambda$ and obtained a bound $|a_{2}|\leq 1.51$ . Motivated by the work of Lewin ^[17], Brannan and Clunie ^[9] conjectured that $|a_{2}|\leq \sqrt{2}.$ The coefficient estimate problem for $|a_{n}|\, \, \, \, (n\in \mathbb{N}, \, \, \, \, n\geq 3)$ is still open (^[20]). Brannan and Taha ^[10] also worked on certain subclasses of the bi-univalent function class $\Lambda$ and obtained estimates for their initial coefficients. Various classes of bi-univalent functions were introduced and studied in recent times, the study of bi-univalent functions gained momentum mainly due to the work of Srivastava et al. ^[20]. Motivated by this, many researchers ^[1], ^[4,5,6,7,8], ^[13,14,15], ^[20], ^[21], and ^[27,28,29], also the references cited there in) recently investigated several interesting subclasses of the class $\Lambda$ and found non-sharp estimates on the first two Taylor-Maclaurin coefficients. Recently, many researchers have been exploring bi-univalent functions, few to mention Fibonacci polynomials, Lucas polynomials, Chebyshev polynomials, Pell polynomials, Lucas–Lehmer polynomials, orthogonal polynomials and the other special polynomials and their generalizations are of great importance in a variety of branches such as physics, engineering, architecture, nature, art, number theory, combinatorics and numerical analysis. These polynomials have been studied in several papers from a theoretical point of view (see, for example, ^{[23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]} also see references therein).

We recall the following results relevant for our study as stated in ^[3].

Let $p(x)$ and $q(x)$ be polynomials with real coefficients. The $(p, q)-$ Lucas polynomials $\mathcal{L}_{p, q, n}(x)$ are defined by the recurrence relation

$\begin{equation*} \mathcal{L}_{p, q, n}(x) = p(x)\mathcal{L}_{p, q, n-1}(x)+q(x)\mathcal{L} _{p, q, n-2}(x)\quad (n\geq 2), \end{equation*}$

from which the first few Lucas polynomials can be found as

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 0}(x) & = &2, \\ \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x) & = &p(x), \\ \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x) & = &p^{2}(x)+2q(x), \\ \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 3}(x) & = &p^{3}(x)+3p(x)q(x), ...\text{.} \end{eqnarray}$

(1.3)

For the special cases of $p(x)$ and $q(x),$ we can get the polynomials given $\mathcal{L}_{x, 1, n}(x)\equiv \mathcal{L}_{n}(x)$ Lucas polynomials, $\mathcal{L}_{2x, 1, n}(x)\equiv \mathcal{D}_{n}(x)$ Pell–Lucas polynomials, $\mathcal{L}_{1, 2x, n}(x)\equiv j_{n}(x)$ Jacobsthal–Lucas polynomials, $\mathcal{L}_{3x, -2, n}(x)\equiv F_{n}(x)$ Fermat–Lucas polynomials, $\mathcal{L}_{2x, -1, n}(x)\equiv T_{n}(x)$ Chebyshev polynomials first kind.

Lemma 1.1. ^[16] Let $G\{ \mathcal{L}(x)\}(z)$ be the generating function of the $(p, q)-$ Lucas polynomial sequence $\mathcal{L}_{p, q, n}(x).$ Then,

$\begin{equation*} G\{ \mathcal{L}(x)\}(z) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty }\mathcal{L}_{p, q, n}(x)z^{n} = \frac{2-p(x)z}{1-p(x)z-q(x)z^{2}} \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} \mathcal{G}_{\{ \mathcal{L}(x)\}}(z) = G\{ \mathcal{L}(x)\}(z)-1 = 1+ \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty }\mathcal{L}_{p, q, n}(x)z^{n} = \frac{1+q(x)z^{2}}{ 1-p(x)z-q(x)z^{2}}. \end{equation*}$

Definition 1.2. ^[22] For $\vartheta \geq 0,$ $\delta \in \mathbb{R},$ $\vartheta +i\delta \neq 0$ and $f\in \mathcal{A}$ , let $\mathcal{B} (\vartheta, \delta)$ denote the class of Bazilevič function if and only if

$\begin{equation*} Re\left[ {\left( {\frac{{z{f^\prime }(z)}}{{f(z)}}} \right){{\left( {\frac{{f(z)}}{z}} \right)}^{\vartheta + i\delta }}} \right] > 0\;. \end{equation*}$

Several authors have researched different subfamilies of the well-known Bazilevič functions of type $\vartheta$ from various viewpoints (see ^[3] and ^[19]). For Bazilevič functions of order $\vartheta +i\delta$ , there is no much work associated with Lucas polynomials in the literature. Initiating an exploration of properties of Lucas polynomials associated with Bazilevič functions of order $\vartheta +i\delta$ is the main goal of this paper. To do so, we take into account the following definitions. In this paper motivated by the very recent work of Altinkaya and Yalcin ^[3] (also see ^[18]) we define a new class $\mathcal{B}(\vartheta, \delta)$ , bi-Bazilevič function of $\Lambda$ based on $(p, q)-$ Lucas polynomials as below:

Definition 1.3. For $f\in \Lambda$ , $\vartheta \geq0,$ $\delta \in \mathbb{R},$ $\vartheta+i\delta \neq0$ and let $\mathcal{B}(\vartheta, \delta)$ denote the class of Bi-Bazilevič functions of order $t\ \$ and type $\vartheta+i\delta$ if only if

$\begin{equation} \left[ \left( \frac{zf^{\prime}(z)}{f(z)}\right) \left( \frac{f(z)}{z} \right) ^{\vartheta+i\delta}\right] \prec \mathcal{G}_{\{ \mathcal{L} (x)\}}(z)\quad (z\in \mathbb{U}) \end{equation}$

(1.4)

and

$\begin{equation} \left[ \left( \frac{zg^{\prime}(w)}{g(w)}\right) \left( \frac{g(w)}{w}% \right) ^{\vartheta+i\delta}\right] \prec \mathcal{G}_{\{ \mathcal{L}% (x)\}}(w)\quad (w\in \mathbb{U}), \label{ieq4} \end{equation}$

(1.5)

where $\mathcal{G}_{\mathcal{L}_{p, q, n}} (z) \in \Phi$ and the function $g$ is described as $g(w) = f^{-1}(w).$

Remark 1.4. We note that for $\delta = 0$ the class $R(\vartheta, 0) = R(\vartheta)$ is defined by Altinkaya and Yalcin ^[2].

The class $\mathcal{B}(0, 0) = \mathcal{S}_\Lambda^*$ is defined as follows:

Definition 1.5. A function $f\in \Lambda$ is said to be in the class $\mathcal{S }_\Lambda^*$ , if the following subordinations hold

$\begin{equation*} \frac{zf^{\prime}(z)}{f(z)}\prec \mathcal{G}_{\{ \mathcal{L}(x)\}}(z)(z\in \mathbb{U}) \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} \frac{wg^{\prime }(w)}{g(w)}\prec \mathcal{G}_{\{ \mathcal{L}(x)\}}(w)(w\in \mathbb{U}) \end{equation*}$

where $g(w) = f^{-1}(w).$

We begin this section by finding the estimates of the coefficients $|a_{2}|$ and $|a_{3}|$ for functions in the class $\mathcal{B}(\vartheta, \delta)$ .

2. Coefficient bounds for the function class $\mathcal{B}(\vartheta, \delta)$

Theorem 2.1. Let the function $f(z)$ given by 1.1 be in the class $\mathcal{B}(\vartheta, \delta)$ . Then

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert a_{2}\right \vert \leq \frac{p(x)\sqrt {2p(x)}}{ \sqrt{\vert \{ \left( \left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) ^{2}+3\left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) +2\right)-2\left( \vartheta +i\delta +1\right) ^{2}\}p^2(x)-4q(x)\left( \vartheta +i\delta +1\right) ^{2} \vert }}. \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert a_{3}\right \vert \leq \frac{p^{2}(x)}{(\vartheta +1)^2+ \delta^2 } +\frac{p(x)}{\sqrt {(\vartheta +2)^2+ \delta^2} } . \end{equation*}$

Proof. Let $f\in \mathcal{B}(\vartheta, \delta, x)$ there exist two analytic functions $u, v:\mathbb{U}\rightarrow \mathbb{U}$ with $u(0) = 0 = v(0)$ , such that $|u(z)| < 1$ , $|v(w)| < 1,$ we can write from (1.4) and (1.5), we have

$\begin{equation} \left[ \left( \frac{zf^{\prime }(z)}{f(z)}\right) \left( \frac{f(z)}{z} \right) ^{\vartheta +i\delta }\right] = \mathcal{G}_{\{ \mathcal{L} (x)\}}(z)\quad (z\in \mathbb{U}) \quad \end{equation}$

(2.1)

and

$\begin{equation} \left[ \left( \frac{zg^{\prime}(w)}{g(w)}\right) \left( \frac{g(w)}{w} \right) ^{\vartheta+i\delta}\right] = \mathcal{G}_{\{ \mathcal{L} (x)\}}(w)\quad (w\in \mathbb{U}), \end{equation}$

(2.2)

It is fairly well known that if

$\begin{equation*} |u(z)| = |u_{1}z+u_{2}z^{2}+\cdots | < 1 \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} |v(w)| = |v_{1}w+v_{2}w^{2}+\cdots | < 1. \end{equation*}$

then

$\begin{equation*} |u_{k}|\leq 1\qquad and\qquad |v_{k}|\leq 1\quad (k\in \mathbb{N}) \end{equation*}$

It follows that, so we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{G}_{\{ \mathcal{L}(x)\}}(u(z)) & = &1+\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)u(z)+ \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x)u^{2}(z)+\ldots \\ & = &1+\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)u_{1}z+[\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)u_{2}+\mathcal{L} _{p, q, 2}(x)u_{1}^{2}]z^{2}+\ldots \end{eqnarray}$

(2.3)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{G}_{\{ \mathcal{L}(x)\}}(v(w)) & = &1+\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)v(w)+ \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x)v^{2}(w)+\ldots \\ & = &1+\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)v_{1}w+[\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)v_{2}+\mathcal{L} _{p, q, 2}(x)v_{1}^{2}]w^{2}+\ldots \end{eqnarray}$

(2.4)

From the equalities (2.1) and (2.2), we obtain that

$\begin{equation} \left[ \left( \frac{zf^{\prime }(z)}{f(z)}\right) \left( \frac{f(z)}{z} \right) ^{\vartheta +i\delta }\right] = 1+\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)u_{1}z+[ \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)u_{2}+\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x)u_{1}^{2}]z^{2}+\ldots, \end{equation}$

(2.5)

and

$\begin{equation} \left[ \left( \frac{zg^{\prime}(w)}{g(w)}\right) \left( \frac{g(w)}{w} \right) ^{\vartheta+i\delta}\right] = 1+\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)v_{1}w+[ \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)v_{2}+\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x)v_{1}^{2}]w^{2}+\ldots, \end{equation}$

(2.6)

It follows from (2.5) and (2.6) that

$\begin{equation} \left( \vartheta +i\delta +1\right) a_{2} = \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)u_1, , \end{equation}$

(2.7)

$\begin{equation} \frac{\left( \vartheta +i\delta -1\right) \left( \vartheta +i\delta +2\right) }{2}a_{2}^{2}-\left( \vartheta +i\delta +2\right) a_3 = \mathcal{L} _{p, q, 1}(x)u_2+\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x)u_1^2, \end{equation}$

(2.8)

and

$\begin{equation} -\left( \vartheta+i\delta+1\right) a_{2} = \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)v_1, \end{equation}$

(2.9)

$\begin{equation} \frac{\left( \vartheta+i\delta+2\right) \left( \vartheta+i\delta+3\right) }{2 }a_{2}^{2}+\left( \vartheta+i\delta+2\right) a_3 = \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)v_2+ \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x)v_1^2, \end{equation}$

(2.10)

From (2.7) and (2.9)

$\begin{equation} u_{1} = -v_{1} \end{equation}$

(2.11)

and

$\begin{equation} 2\left( \vartheta+i\delta+1\right) ^{2}a_{2}^{2} = \mathcal{L} _{p, q, 1}^{2}(x)(u_{1}^{2}+v_{1}^{2})., \end{equation}$

(2.12)

by adding (2.8) to (2.10), we get

$\begin{equation} \left( \left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) ^{2}+3\left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) +2\right) a_{2}^{2} = \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)(u_{2}+v_{2})+\mathcal{L} _{p, q, 2}(x)(u_{1}^{2}+v_{1}^{2}), \end{equation}$

(2.13)

by using (2.12) in equality (2.13), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \left[ \left( \left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) ^{2}+3\left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) +2\right) -\frac{2\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x)\left( \vartheta +i\delta +1\right) ^{2}}{\mathcal{L}^{2}_{p, q, 1}(x)}\right] a_{2}^{2}& = & \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)(u_{2}+v_{2}), \end{eqnarray}$

$\begin{eqnarray} a_{2}^{2}& = &\frac{\mathcal{L}^3_{p, q, 1}(x)(u_{2}+v_{2})} {\left[ \left( \left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) ^{2}+3\left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) +2\right)\mathcal{L}^{2}_{p, q, 1}(x)-2\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x)\left( \vartheta +i\delta +1\right) ^{2}\right]}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.14)

Thus, from (1.3) and (2.14) we get

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert a_{2}\right \vert \leq \frac{p(x)\sqrt {2p(x)}}{\sqrt{\vert \{ \left( \left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) ^{2}+3\left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) +2\right)-2\left( \vartheta +i\delta +1\right) ^{2}\}p^2(x)-4q(x)\left( \vartheta +i\delta +1\right) ^{2} \vert }}. \end{equation*}$

Next, in order to find the bound on $|a_{3}|$ , by subtracting (2.10) from (2.8), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} 2\left( \vartheta +i\delta +2\right) a_{3}-2\left( \vartheta +i\delta +2\right) a_{2}^{2}& = &\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)(u_{2}-v_{2})+\mathcal{L} _{p, q, 2}(x)(u_{1}^{2}-v_{1}^{2}) \\ 2\left( \vartheta +i\delta +2\right) a_{3}& = &\mathcal{L} _{p, q, 1}(x)(u_{2}-v_{2})+2\left( \vartheta +i\delta +2\right) a_{2}^{2} \\ a_{3}& = &\frac{\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)(u_{2}-v_{2})}{2\left( \vartheta +i\delta +2\right)}+a_{2}^{2} \end{eqnarray}$

(2.15)

Then, in view of (2.11) and (2.12), we have from (2.15)

$\begin{equation*} a_{3} = \frac{\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}^{2}(x)}{2\left( \vartheta +i\delta +2\right) ^{2}}(u_{1}^{2}+v_{1}^{2})+\frac{\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)}{2\left( \vartheta +i\delta +2\right) }(u_{2}-v_{2}). \end{equation*}$

$\begin{eqnarray*} |a_{3}|&\leq&\frac{p^{2}(x)}{\left|\vartheta +i\delta +1\right| ^{2}}+\frac{ p(x)}{|\vartheta +i\delta +2| } \notag \\ & = &\frac{p^{2}(x)}{(\vartheta +1)^2+ \delta^2 } +\frac{p(x)}{\sqrt { (\vartheta +2)^2+ \delta^2} } \end{eqnarray*}$

This completes the proof.

Taking $\delta = 0,$ in Theorem 2.1, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 2.2. Let the function $f(z)$ given by (1.1) be in the class $\mathcal{B} (\vartheta)$ . Then

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert a_{2}\right \vert \leq \frac{p(x)\sqrt {2p(x)}}{\sqrt{\vert \{ \left( \vartheta ^{2}+3\vartheta +2\right)-2\left( \vartheta+1\right) ^{2}\}p^2(x)-4q(x)\left( \vartheta +1\right) ^{2} \vert }} \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert a_{3}\right \vert \leq \frac{p^{2}(x)}{(\vartheta +2)^2} +\frac{ p(x)}{\vartheta +2} \end{equation*}$

Also, taking $\vartheta = 0$ and $\delta = 0,$ in Theorem 2.1, we get the results given in ^[18].

3. Fekete-Szegö inequality for the class $\mathcal{B}(\vartheta, \delta)$

Fekete-Szegö inequality is one of the famous problems related to coefficients of univalent analytic functions. It was first given by ^[12], the classical Fekete-Szegö inequality for the coefficients of $f\in \mathcal{S}$ is

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert a_{3}-\mu a_{2}^{2}\right \vert \leq1+2\exp \left( -2\mu /(1-\mu)\right) \text{ for }\mu \in \left[ 0, 1\right) . \end{equation*}$

As ${\mu} \rightarrow1^{-}$ , we have the elementary inequality $\left \vert a_{3}-a_{2}^{2}\right \vert \leq1$ . Moreover, the coefficient functional

$\begin{equation*} \varsigma_{\mu}(f) = a_{3}-\mu a_{2}^{2} \end{equation*}$

on the normalized analytic functions $f$ in the unit disk $\mathbb{U}$ plays an important role in function theory. The problem of maximizing the absolute value of the functional $\varsigma {\mu} (f)$ is called the Fekete-Szegö problem.

In this section, we are ready to find the sharp bounds of Fekete-Szegö functional $\varsigma _{\mu }(f)$ defined for $f\in \mathcal{B}(\vartheta, \delta)$ given by (1.1).

Theorem 3.1. Let f given by (1.1) be in the class $\mathcal{B} (\vartheta, \delta)$ and ${\mu} \in \mathbb{R}$ . Then

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert a_{3}- {\mu} a_{2}^{2}\right \vert \leq \left \{ \begin{array}{c} \frac{p(x)}{\sqrt{(\vartheta+2)^{2}+\delta ^{2}}}, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0\leq \left \vert h(\mu )\right \vert \leq \frac{1}{2\sqrt{ (\vartheta+2)^{2}+\delta ^{2}}} \\ 2p(x)\left \vert h(\mu )\right \vert , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \left \vert h(\mu )\right \vert \geq \frac{1}{2\sqrt{(\vartheta+2)^{2}+ \delta ^{2}}} \end{array} \right. \end{equation*}$

where

$\begin{equation*} h(\mu) = \frac{\mathcal{L}^2_{p, q, 1}(x)(1-\mu)}{\left( \left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) ^{2}+3\left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) +2\right)\mathcal{L} ^{2}_{p, q, 1}(x)-2\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x)\left( \vartheta +i\delta +1\right) ^{2}}. \end{equation*}$

Proof. From (2.14) and (2.15), we conclude that

$\begin{eqnarray*} a_{3}- {\mu} a_{2}^{2}& = &(1-\mu )\frac{\mathcal{L}^3_{p, q, 1}(x)(u_{2}+v_{2})} {\left[ \left( \left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) ^{2}+3\left( \vartheta +i\delta \right) +2\right)\mathcal{L}^{2}_{p, q, 1}(x)-2\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 2}(x)\left( \vartheta +i\delta +1\right) ^{2}\right]} \\ &+&\frac{\mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)}{2\left( \vartheta +i\delta +2\right) } (u_{2}-v_{2}) \end{eqnarray*}$

$\begin{eqnarray*} = \mathcal{L}_{p, q, 1}(x)\left[ \left( h(\mu )+\frac{1}{2(\vartheta +i\delta +2)}\right) u_{2}+\left( h(\mu )-\frac{1}{2(\vartheta +i\delta +2)}\right) v_{2}\right] \end{eqnarray*}$

where

Then, in view of (1.3), we obtain

We end this section with some corollaries.

Taking ${\mu} = 1$ in Theorem 3.1, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 3.2. If $f\in \mathcal{B}(\vartheta, \delta)$ , then

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert a_{3}-a_{2}^{2}\right \vert \leq \frac{p(x)}{\sqrt{ (\vartheta+2)^{2}+\delta ^{2}}}. \end{equation*}$

Taking $\delta = 0$ in Theorem 3.1, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 3.3. Let $f$ given by (1.1) be in the class $\mathcal{B}(\vartheta, 0)$ . Then

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert a_{3}- {\mu} a_{2}^{2}\right \vert \leq \left \{ \begin{array}{c} \frac{p(x)}{\vartheta+2}, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0\leq \left \vert h(\mu )\right \vert \leq \frac{1}{2(\vartheta+2)} \\ 2p(x)\left \vert h(\mu )\right \vert , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \left \vert h(\mu )\right \vert \geq \frac{1}{2(\vartheta+2)} \end{array} \right. \end{equation*}$

Also, taking $\vartheta = 0,$ $\delta = 0$ and ${\mu} = 1$ in Theorem 3.1, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 3.4. Let $f$ given by (1.1) be in the class $\mathcal{B}$ . Then

$\begin{equation*} \left| {{a_3} - a_2^2} \right| \le \frac{{p(x)}}{2}. \end{equation*}$

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

References

[1]	[ P. Cabrita,M. Thorpe,G. Huber, Hydrodynamics of steady state phloem transport with radial leakage of solute, Frontiers Plant Sci., 4 (2013): 531-543.
[2]	[ A. L. Christy,J. M. Ferrier, A mathematical treatment of Münch's pressure-flow hypothesis of phloem translocation, Plant Physio., 52 (1973): 531-538.
[3]	[ T. K. Dey,J. A. Levine, Delaunay meshing of isosurfaces, Visual Comput., 24 (2008): 411-422.
[4]	[ J. M. Ferrier, Further theoretical analysis of concentration-pressure-flux waves in phloem transport systems, Can. J. Bot., 56 (1978): 1086-1090.
[5]	[ F. G. Feugier,A. Satake, Dynamical feedback between circadian clock and sucrose availability explains adaptive response of starch metabolism to various photoperiods, Frontiers Plant Sci., 305 (2013): 1-11.
[6]	[ D. B. Fisher,C. Cash-Clark, Sieve tube unloading and post-phloemtransport of fluorescent tracers and proteins injected into sieve tubes via severed aphid stylets, Plant Physio., 123 (2000): 125-137.
[7]	[ J. D. Goeschl,C. E. Magnuson, Physiological implications of the Münch--Horwitz theory of phloem transport: effect of loading rates, Plant Cell Env., 9 (1986): 95-102.
[8]	[ J. Gričar,L. Krže,K. Čufar, Number of cells in xylem, phloem and dormant cambium in silver fir (Abies alba), in trees of different vitality, IAWA Journal, 30 (2009): 121-133.
[9]	[ J. Hansen,E. Beck, The fate and path of assimilation products in the stem of 8-year-old {Scots} pine (Pinus sylvestris {L}.) trees, Trees, 4 (1990): 16-21.
[10]	[ F. Hecht, New Developments in Freefem++, J. Num. Math., 20 (2012): 251-265.
[11]	[ L. Horwitz, Some simplified mathematical treatments of translocation in plants, Plant Physio., 33 (1958): 81-93.
[12]	[ T. Hölttä,M. Mencuccini,E. Nikinmaa, Linking phloem function to structure: Analysis with a coupled xylem-phloem transport model, J. Theo. Bio., 259 (2009): 325-337.
[13]	[ T. Hölttä,T. Vesala,S. Sevanto,M. Perämäki,E. Nikinmaa, Modeling xylem and phloem water flows in trees according to cohesion theory and Münch hypothesis, Trees, 20 (2006): 67-78.
[14]	[ W. Hundsdorfer and J. G. Verwer, Numerical Solution of Time-Dependent Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Equations Springer Series in Comput. Math., 33, Springer, 2003.
[15]	[ K. H. Jensen,J. Lee,T. Bohr,H. Bruus,N. M. Holbrook,M. A. Zwieniecki, Optimality of the Münch mechanism for translocation of sugars in plants, J. R. Soc. Interface, 8 (2011): 1155-1165.
[16]	[ A. Kagawa,A. Sugimoto,T. C. Maximov, CO 2 pulse-labelling of photoassimilates reveals carbon allocation within and between tree rings, Plant Cell Env., 29 (2006): 1571-1584.
[17]	[ E. M. Kramer, Wood grain pattern formation: A brief review, J. Plant Growth Reg., 25 (2006): 290-301.
[18]	[ H.-O. Kreiss and J. Lorenz, Initial-Boundary Value Problems and the Navier-Stokes Equations Classics in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, 2004.
[19]	[ A. Lacointe,P. E. H. Minchin, Modelling phloem and xylem transport within a complex architecture, Funct. Plant Bio., 35 (2008): 772-780.
[20]	[ A. Lang, A model of mass flow in the phloem, Funct. Plant Bio., 5 (1978): 535-546.
[21]	[ P. E. H. Minchin,M. R. Thorpe,J. F. Farrar, A simple mechanistic model of phloem transport which explains sink priority, Journal of Experimental Botany, 44 (1993): 947-955.
[22]	[ E. Münch, Die Stoffbewegungen in der Pflanze Jena, Gustav Fischer, 1930.
[23]	[ K. A. Nagel,B. Kastenholz,S. Jahnke,D. van Dusschoten,T. Aach,M. Mühlich,D. Truhn,H. Scharr,S. Terjung,A. Walter,U. Schurr, Temperature responses of roots: Impact on growth, root system architecture and implications for phenotyping, Funct. Plant Bio., 36 (2009): 947-959.
[24]	[ E. M. Ouhabaz, Analysis of Heat Equations on Domains London Math. Soc. Monographs Series, Princeton University Press, 2005.
[25]	[ S. Payvandi,K. R. Daly,K. C. Zygalakis,T. Roose, Mathematical modelling of the phloem: The importance of diffusion on sugar transport at osmotic equilibrium, Bull. Math Biol., 76 (2014): 2834-2865.
[26]	[ S. Pfautsch,J. Renard,M. G. Tjoelker,A. Salih, Phloem as capacitor: Radial transfer of water into xylem of tree stems occurs via symplastic transport in ray parenchyma, Plant Physio., 167 (2015): 963-971.
[27]	[ O. Pironneau,M. Tabata, Stability and convergence of a Galerkin-characteristics finite element scheme of lumped mass type, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 64 (2000): 1240-1253.
[28]	[ G. E. Phillips,J. Bodig,J. Goodman, Flow grain analogy, Wood Sci., 14 (1981): 55-64.
[29]	[ R. J. Phillips,S. R. Dungan, Asymptotic analysis of flow in sieve tubes with semi-permeable walls, J. Theor. Biol., 162 (1993): 465-485.
[30]	[ D. Rotsch, T. Brossard, S. Bihmidine, W. Ying, V. Gaddam, M. Harmata, J. D. Robertson, M. Swyers, S. S. Jurisson and D. M. Braun, Radiosynthesis of 6'-Deoxy-6'[18F]Fluorosucrose via automated synthesis and its utility to study in vivo sucrose transport in maize (Zea mays) leaves PLoS ONE 10 (2015), e0128989.
[31]	[ D. Sellier,J. J. Harrington, Phloem transport in trees: A generic surface model, Eco. Mod., 290 (2014): 102-109.
[32]	[ D. Sellier,M. J. Plank,J. J. Harrington, A mathematical framework for modelling cambial surface evolution using a level set method, Annals Bot., 108 (2011): 1001-1011.
[33]	[ R. Spicer, Symplasmic networks in secondary vascular tissues: Parenchyma distribution and activity supporting long-distance transport, J. Exp. Bot., 65 (2014): 1829-1848.
[34]	[ J. F. Swindells, C. F. Snyder, R. C. Hardy and P. E. Golden, Viscosities of sucrose solutions at various temperatures: Tables of recalculated values, NBS Circular 440 (1958).
[35]	[ M. V. Thompson,N. M. Holbrook, Application of a single-solute non-steady-state phloem model to the study of long-distance assimilate transport, J. Theo. Bio., 220 (2003): 419-455.

This article has been cited by:

1.	Ala Amourah, Basem Aref Frasin, Thabet Abdeljawad, Sivasubramanian Srikandan, Fekete-Szegö Inequality for Analytic and Biunivalent Functions Subordinate to Gegenbauer Polynomials, 2021, 2021, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2021/5574673
2.	Mohamed Illafe, Ala Amourah, Maisarah Haji Mohd, Coefficient Estimates and Fekete–Szegö Functional Inequalities for a Certain Subclass of Analytic and Bi-Univalent Functions, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 147, 10.3390/axioms11040147
3.	Nazmiye Yilmaz, İbrahim Aktaş, On some new subclasses of bi-univalent functions defined by generalized Bivariate Fibonacci polynomial, 2022, 33, 1012-9405, 10.1007/s13370-022-00993-y
4.	Daniel Breaz, Halit Orhan, Luminiţa-Ioana Cotîrlă, Hava Arıkan, A New Subclass of Bi-Univalent Functions Defined by a Certain Integral Operator, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 172, 10.3390/axioms12020172
5.	Luminiţa-Ioana Cotîrlǎ, Abbas Kareem Wanas, Applications of Laguerre Polynomials for Bazilevič and θ-Pseudo-Starlike Bi-Univalent Functions Associated with Sakaguchi-Type Functions, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 406, 10.3390/sym15020406
6.	Isra Al-Shbeil, Abbas Kareem Wanas, Afis Saliu, Adriana Cătaş, Applications of Beta Negative Binomial Distribution and Laguerre Polynomials on Ozaki Bi-Close-to-Convex Functions, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 451, 10.3390/axioms11090451
7.	Tariq Al-Hawary, Ala Amourah, Basem Aref Frasin, Fekete–Szegö inequality for bi-univalent functions by means of Horadam polynomials, 2021, 27, 1405-213X, 10.1007/s40590-021-00385-5
8.	Abbas Kareem Wanas, Luminiţa-Ioana Cotîrlă, Applications of (M,N)-Lucas Polynomials on a Certain Family of Bi-Univalent Functions, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 595, 10.3390/math10040595
9.	Abbas Kareem Wanas, Haeder Younis Althoby, Fekete-Szegö Problem for Certain New Family of Bi-Univalent Functions, 2022, 2581-8147, 263, 10.34198/ejms.8222.263272
10.	Arzu Akgül, F. Müge Sakar, A new characterization of (P, Q)-Lucas polynomial coefficients of the bi-univalent function class associated with q-analogue of Noor integral operator, 2022, 33, 1012-9405, 10.1007/s13370-022-01016-6
11.	Tariq Al-Hawary, Coefficient bounds and Fekete–Szegö problem for qualitative subclass of bi-univalent functions, 2022, 33, 1012-9405, 10.1007/s13370-021-00934-1
12.	Ala Amourah, Basem Aref Frasin, Tamer M. Seoudy, An Application of Miller–Ross-Type Poisson Distribution on Certain Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions Subordinate to Gegenbauer Polynomials, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 2462, 10.3390/math10142462
13.	Abbas Kareem Wanas, Alina Alb Lupaş, Applications of Laguerre Polynomials on a New Family of Bi-Prestarlike Functions, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 645, 10.3390/sym14040645
14.	Ibtisam Aldawish, Basem Frasin, Ala Amourah, Bell Distribution Series Defined on Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions That Are Subordinate to Horadam Polynomials, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 362, 10.3390/axioms12040362
15.	Ala Amourah, Omar Alnajar, Maslina Darus, Ala Shdouh, Osama Ogilat, Estimates for the Coefficients of Subclasses Defined by the Bell Distribution of Bi-Univalent Functions Subordinate to Gegenbauer Polynomials, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 1799, 10.3390/math11081799
16.	Omar Alnajar, Maslina Darus, 2024, 3150, 0094-243X, 020005, 10.1063/5.0228336
17.	Muajebah Hidan, Abbas Kareem Wanas, Faiz Chaseb Khudher, Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy, Mohamed Abdalla, Coefficient bounds for certain families of bi-Bazilevič and bi-Ozaki-close-to-convex functions, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 8134, 10.3934/math.2024395
18.	Ala Amourah, Ibtisam Aldawish, Basem Aref Frasin, Tariq Al-Hawary, Applications of Shell-like Curves Connected with Fibonacci Numbers, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 639, 10.3390/axioms12070639
19.	Tariq Al-Hawary, Ala Amourah, Abdullah Alsoboh, Osama Ogilat, Irianto Harny, Maslina Darus, Applications of $q-$ Ultraspherical polynomials to bi-univalent functions defined by $q-$ Saigo's fractional integral operators, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 17063, 10.3934/math.2024828
20.	İbrahim Aktaş, Derya Hamarat, Generalized bivariate Fibonacci polynomial and two new subclasses of bi-univalent functions, 2023, 16, 1793-5571, 10.1142/S1793557123501474
21.	Abbas Kareem Wanas, Fethiye Müge Sakar, Alina Alb Lupaş, Applications Laguerre Polynomials for Families of Bi-Univalent Functions Defined with (p,q)-Wanas Operator, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 430, 10.3390/axioms12050430
22.	Ala Amourah, Zabidin Salleh, B. A. Frasin, Muhammad Ghaffar Khan, Bakhtiar Ahmad, Subclasses of bi-univalent functions subordinate to gegenbauer polynomials, 2023, 34, 1012-9405, 10.1007/s13370-023-01082-4
23.	Tariq Al-Hawary, Basem Aref Frasin, Abbas Kareem Wanas, Georgia Irina Oros, On Rabotnov fractional exponential function for bi-univalent subclasses, 2023, 16, 1793-5571, 10.1142/S1793557123502170
24.	Tariq Al-Hawary, Ala Amourah, Hasan Almutairi, Basem Frasin, Coefficient Inequalities and Fekete–Szegö-Type Problems for Family of Bi-Univalent Functions, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1747, 10.3390/sym15091747
25.	Omar Alnajar, Osama Ogilat, Ala Amourah, Maslina Darus, Maryam Salem Alatawi, The Miller-Ross Poisson distribution and its applications to certain classes of bi-univalent functions related to Horadam polynomials, 2024, 10, 24058440, e28302, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28302
26.	Tariq Al-Hawary, Basem Frasin, Daniel Breaz, Luminita-Ioana Cotîrlă, Inclusive Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions Defined by Error Functions Subordinate to Horadam Polynomials, 2025, 17, 2073-8994, 211, 10.3390/sym17020211

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)