Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

Finite-volume two-step scheme for solving the shear shallow water model

  • The shear shallow water (SSW) model introduces an approximation for shallow water flows by including the effect of vertical shear in the system. Six non-linear hyperbolic partial differential equations with non-conservative laws make up this system. Shear, contact, rarefaction, and shock waves are all admissible in this model. We developed the finite-volume two-step scheme, the so-called generalized Rusanov (G. Rusanov) scheme, for solving the SSW model. This method is split into two stages. The first one relies on a local parameter that permits control over the diffusion. In stage two, the conservation equation is recovered. Numerous numerical instances were taken into consideration. We clarified that the G. Rusanov scheme satisfied the C-property. We also compared the numerical solutions with those obtained from the Rusanov, Lax-Friedrichs, and reference solutions. Finally, the G. Rusanov technique may be applied for solving a wide range of additional models in developed physics and applied science.

    Citation: H. S. Alayachi, Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, Kamel Mohamed. Finite-volume two-step scheme for solving the shear shallow water model[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20118-20135. doi: 10.3934/math.2024980

    Related Papers:

    [1] Zainab Alsheekhhussain, Ahmed Gamal Ibrahim, Rabie A. Ramadan . Existence of S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions for non-instantaneous impulsive semilinear differential equations and inclusions of fractional order 1<α<2. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 76-101. doi: 10.3934/math.2023004
    [2] Dongdong Gao, Daipeng Kuang, Jianli Li . Some results on the existence and stability of impulsive delayed stochastic differential equations with Poisson jumps. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15269-15284. doi: 10.3934/math.2023780
    [3] Ramkumar Kasinathan, Ravikumar Kasinathan, Dumitru Baleanu, Anguraj Annamalai . Well posedness of second-order impulsive fractional neutral stochastic differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9222-9235. doi: 10.3934/math.2021536
    [4] Huanhuan Zhang, Jia Mu . Periodic problem for non-instantaneous impulsive partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3345-3359. doi: 10.3934/math.2022186
    [5] Ahmed Salem, Kholoud N. Alharbi . Fractional infinite time-delay evolution equations with non-instantaneous impulsive. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 12943-12963. doi: 10.3934/math.2023652
    [6] Mohamed Adel, M. Elsaid Ramadan, Hijaz Ahmad, Thongchai Botmart . Sobolev-type nonlinear Hilfer fractional stochastic differential equations with noninstantaneous impulsive. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20105-20125. doi: 10.3934/math.20221100
    [7] Marimuthu Mohan Raja, Velusamy Vijayakumar, Anurag Shukla, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Wedad Albalawi, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty . A new discussion concerning to exact controllability for fractional mixed Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equations of order r(1,2) with impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10802-10821. doi: 10.3934/math.2023548
    [8] Kanagaraj Muthuselvan, Baskar Sundaravadivoo, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Suliman Alsaeed . Discussion on iterative process of nonlocal controllability exploration for Hilfer neutral impulsive fractional integro-differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16846-16863. doi: 10.3934/math.2023861
    [9] M. Manjula, K. Kaliraj, Thongchai Botmart, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, C. Ravichandran . Existence, uniqueness and approximation of nonlocal fractional differential equation of sobolev type with impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4645-4665. doi: 10.3934/math.2023229
    [10] Dumitru Baleanu, Rabha W. Ibrahim . Optical applications of a generalized fractional integro-differential equation with periodicity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11953-11972. doi: 10.3934/math.2023604
  • The shear shallow water (SSW) model introduces an approximation for shallow water flows by including the effect of vertical shear in the system. Six non-linear hyperbolic partial differential equations with non-conservative laws make up this system. Shear, contact, rarefaction, and shock waves are all admissible in this model. We developed the finite-volume two-step scheme, the so-called generalized Rusanov (G. Rusanov) scheme, for solving the SSW model. This method is split into two stages. The first one relies on a local parameter that permits control over the diffusion. In stage two, the conservation equation is recovered. Numerous numerical instances were taken into consideration. We clarified that the G. Rusanov scheme satisfied the C-property. We also compared the numerical solutions with those obtained from the Rusanov, Lax-Friedrichs, and reference solutions. Finally, the G. Rusanov technique may be applied for solving a wide range of additional models in developed physics and applied science.



    Fractional differential equations rise in many fields, such as biology, physics and engineering. There are many results about the existence of solutions and control problems (see [1,2,3,4,5,6]).

    It is well known that the nonexistence of nonconstant periodic solutions of fractional differential equations was shown in [7,8,11] and the existence of asymptotically periodic solutions was derived in [8,9,10,11]. Thus it gives rise to study the periodic solutions of fractional differential equations with periodic impulses.

    Recently, Fečkan and Wang [12] studied the existence of periodic solutions of fractional ordinary differential equations with impulses periodic condition and obtained many existence and asymptotic stability results for the Caputo's fractional derivative with fixed and varying lower limits. In this paper, we study the Caputo's fractional evolution equations with varying lower limits and we prove the existence of periodic mild solutions to this problem with the case of general periodic impulses as well as small equidistant and shifted impulses. We also study the Caputo's fractional evolution equations with fixed lower limits and small nonlinearities and derive the existence of its periodic mild solutions. The current results extend some results in [12].

    Set ξq(θ)=1qθ11qϖq(θ1q)0, ϖq(θ)=1πn=1(1)n1θnq1Γ(nq+1)n!sin(nπq), θ(0,). Note that ξq(θ) is a probability density function defined on (0,), namely ξq(θ)0, θ(0,) and 0ξq(θ)dθ=1.

    Define T:XX and S:XX given by

    T(t)=0ξq(θ)S(tqθ)dθ,  S(t)=q0θξq(θ)S(tqθ)dθ.

    Lemma 2.1. ([13,Lemmas 3.2,3.3]) The operators T(t) and S(t),t0 have following properties:

    (1) Suppose that supt0S(t)M. For any fixed t0, T() and S() are linear and bounded operators, i.e., for any uX,

    T(t)uMu and S(t)uMΓ(q)u.

    (2) {T(t),t0} and {S(t),t0} are strongly continuous.

    (3) {T(t),t>0} and {S(t),t>0} are compact, if {S(t),t>0} is compact.

    Let N0={0,1,,}. We consider the following impulsive fractional equations

    {cDqtk,tu(t)=Au(t)+f(t,u(t)), q(0,1), t(tk,tk+1), kN0,u(t+k)=u(tk)+Δk(u(tk)), kN,u(0)=u0, (2.1)

    where cDqtk,t denotes the Caputo's fractional time derivative of order q with the lower limit at tk, A:D(A)XX is the generator of a C0-semigroup {S(t),t0} on a Banach space X, f:R×XX satisfies some assumptions. We suppose the following conditions:

    (Ⅰ) f is continuous and T-periodic in t.

    (Ⅱ) There exist constants a>0, bk>0 such that

    {f(t,u)f(t,v)auv, tR, u,vX,uv+Δk(u)Δk(v)bkuv, kN, u,vX.

    (Ⅲ) There exists NN such that T=tN+1,tk+N+1=tk+T and Δk+N+1=Δk for any kN.

    It is well known [3] that (2.1) has a unique solution on R+ if the conditions (Ⅰ) and (Ⅱ) hold. So we can consider the Poincaré mapping

    P(u0)=u(T)+ΔN+1(u(T)).

    By [14,Lemma 2.2] we know that the fixed points of P determine T-periodic mild solutions of (2.1).

    Theorem 2.2. Assume that (I)-(III) hold. Let Ξ:=Nk=0MbkEq(Ma(tk+1tk)q), where Eq is the Mittag-Leffler function (see [3, p.40]), then there holds

    P(u)P(v)Ξuv, u,vX. (2.2)

    If Ξ<1, then (2.1) has a unique T-periodic mild solution, which is also asymptotically stable.

    Proof. By the mild solution of (2.1), we mean that uC((tk,tk+1),X) satisfying

    u(t)=T(ttk)u(t+k)+ttkS(ts)f(s,u(s))ds. (2.3)

    Let u and v be two solutions of (2.3) with u(0)=u0 and v(0)=v0, respectively. By (2.3) and (II), we can derive

    u(t)v(t)T(ttk)(u(t+k)v(t+k))+ttk(ts)q1S(ts)(f(s,u(s)f(s,v(s))dsMu(t+k)v(t+k)+MaΓ(q)ttk(ts)q1f(s,u(s)f(s,v(s))ds. (2.4)

    Applying Gronwall inequality [15, Corollary 2] to (2.4), we derive

    u(t)v(t)Mu(t+k)v(t+k)Eq(Ma(ttk)q), t(tk,tk+1), (2.5)

    which implies

    u(tk+1)v(tk+1)MEq(Ma(tk+1tk)q)u(t+k)v(t+k),k=0,1,,N. (2.6)

    By (2.6) and (Ⅱ), we derive

    P(u0)P(v0)=u(tN+1)v(tN+1)+ΔN+1(u(tN+1))ΔN+1(v(tN+1))bN+1u(tN+1)v(tN+1)(Nk=0MbkEq(Ma(tk+1tk)q))u0v0=Ξu0v0, (2.7)

    which implies that (2.2) is satisfied. Thus P:XX is a contraction if Ξ<1. Using Banach fixed point theorem, we obtain that P has a unique fixed point u0 if Ξ<1. In addition, since

    Pn(u0)Pn(v0)Ξnu0v0, v0X,

    we get that the corresponding periodic mild solution is asymptotically stable.

    We study

    {cDqkhu(t)=Au(t)+f(u(t)), q(0,1), t(kh,(k+1)h), kN0,u(kh+)=u(kh)+ˉΔhq, kN,u(0)=u0, (2.8)

    where h>0, ˉΔX, and f:XX is Lipschitz. We know [3] that under above assumptions, (2.8) has a unique mild solution u(u0,t) on R+, which is continuous in u0X, tR+{kh|kN} and left continuous in t ant impulsive points {kh|kN}. We can consider the Poincaré mapping

    Ph(u0)=u(u0,h+).

    Theorem 2.3. Let w(t) be a solution of following equations

    {w(t)=ˉΔ+1Γ(q+1)f(w(t)), t[0,T],w(0)=u0. (2.9)

    Then there exists a mild solution u(u0,t) of (2.8) on [0,T], satisfying

    u(u0,t)=w(tqq1)+O(hq).

    If w(t) is a stable periodic solution, then there exists a stable invariant curve of Poincaré mapping of (2.8) in a neighborhood of w(t). Note that h is sufficiently small.

    Proof. For any t(kh,(k+1)h),kN0, the mild solution of (2.8) is equivalent to

    u(u0,t)=T(tkh)u(kh+)+tkh(ts)q1S(ts)f(u(u0,s))ds=T(tkh)u(kh+)+tkh0(tkhs)q1S(tkhs)f(u(u(kh+),s))ds. (2.10)

    So

    u((k+1)h+)=T(h)u(kh+)+ˉΔhq+h0(hs)q1S(hs)f(u(u(kh+),s))ds=Ph(u(kh+)), (2.11)

    and

    Ph(u0)=u(u0,h+)=T(h)u0+ˉΔhq+h0(hs)q1S(hs)f(u(u0,s))ds. (2.12)

    Inserting

    u(u0,t)=T(t)u0+hqv(u0,t), t[0,h],

    into (2.10), we obtain

    v(u0,t)=1hqt0(ts)q1S(ts)f(T(t)u0+hqv(u0,t))ds=1hqt0(ts)q1S(ts)f(T(t)u0)ds+1hqt0(ts)q1S(ts)(f(T(t)u0+hqv(u0,t))f(T(t)u0))ds=1hqt0(ts)q1S(ts)f(T(t)u0)ds+O(hq),

    since

    t0(ts)q1S(ts)(f(T(t)u0+hqv(u0,t))f(T(t)u0))dst0(ts)q1S(ts)f(T(t)u0+hqv(u0,t))f(T(t)u0)dsMLlochqtqΓ(q+1)maxt[0,h]{v(u0,t)}h2qMLlocΓ(q+1)maxt[0,h]{v(u0,t)},

    where Lloc is a local Lipschitz constant of f. Thus we get

    u(u0,t)=T(t)u0+t0(ts)q1S(ts)f(T(t)u0)ds+O(h2q), t[0,h], (2.13)

    and (2.12) gives

    Ph(u0)=T(h)u0+ˉΔhq+h0(hs)q1S(hs)f(T(h)u0)ds+O(h2q).

    So (2.11) becomes

    u((k+1)h+)=T(h)u(kh+)+ˉΔhq+(k+1)hkh((k+1)hs)q1S((k+1)hs)f(T(h)u(kh+))ds+O(h2q). (2.14)

    Since T(t) and S(t) are strongly continuous,

    limt0T(t)=I and limt0S(t)=1Γ(q)I. (2.15)

    Thus (2.14) leads to its approximation

    w((k+1)h+)=w(kh+)+ˉΔhq+hqΓ(q+1)f(w(kh+)),

    which is the Euler numerical approximation of

    w(t)=ˉΔ+1Γ(q+1)f(w(t)).

    Note that (2.10) implies

    u(u0,t)T(tkh)u(kh+)=O(hq), t[kh,(k+1)h]. (2.16)

    Applying (2.15), (2.16) and the already known results about Euler approximation method in [16], we obtain the result of Theorem 2.3.

    Corollary 2.4. We can extend (2.8) for periodic impulses of following form

    {cDqkhu(t)=Au(t)+f(u(t)), t(kh,(k+1)h), kN0,u(kh+)=u(kh)+ˉΔkhq, kN,u(0)=u0, (2.17)

    where ˉΔkX satisfy ˉΔk+N+1=ˉΔk for any kN. Then Theorem 2.3 can directly extend to (2.17) with

    {w(t)=N+1k=1ˉΔkN+1+1Γ(q+1)f(w(t)), t[0,T], kN,w(0)=u0 (2.18)

    instead of (2.9).

    Proof. We can consider the Poincaré mapping

    Ph(u0)=u(u0,(N+1)h+),

    with a form of

    Ph=PN+1,hP1,h

    where

    Pk,h(u0)=ˉΔkhq+u(u0,h).

    By (2.13), we can derive

    Pk,h(u0)=ˉΔkhq+u(u0,h)=T(h)u0+ˉΔkhq+h0(hs)q1S(hs)f(T(h)u0)ds+O(h2q).

    Then we get

    Ph(u0)=T(h)u0+N+1k=1ˉΔkhq+(N+1)h0(hs)q1S(hs)f(T(h)u0)ds+O(h2q).

    By (2.15), we obtain that Ph(u0) leads to its approximation

    u0+N+1k=1ˉΔkhq+(N+1)hqΓ(q+1)f(u0). (2.19)

    Moreover, equations

    w(t)=N+1k=1ˉΔkN+1+1Γ(q+1)f(w(t))

    has the Euler numerical approximation

    u0+hq(N+1k=1ˉΔkN+1+1Γ(q+1)f(u0))

    with the step size hq, and its approximation of N+1 iteration is (2.19), the approximation of Ph. Thus Theorem 2.3 can directly extend to (2.17) with (2.18).

    Now we consider following equations with small nonlinearities of the form

    {cDq0u(t)=Au(t)+ϵf(t,u(t)), q(0,1), t(tk,tk+1), kN0,u(t+k)=u(tk)+ϵΔk(u(tk)), kN,u(0)=u0, (3.1)

    where ϵ is a small parameter, cDq0 is the generalized Caputo fractional derivative with lower limit at 0. Then (3.1) has a unique mild solution u(ϵ,t). Give the Poincaré mapping

    P(ϵ,u0)=u(ϵ,T)+ϵΔN+1(u(ϵ,T)).

    Assume that

    (H1) f and Δk are C2-smooth.

    Then P(ϵ,u0) is also C2-smooth. In addition, we have

    u(ϵ,t)=T(t)u0+ϵω(t)+O(ϵ2),

    where ω(t) satisfies

    {cDq0ω(t)=Aω(t)+f(t,T(t)u0), t(tk,tk+1), k=0,1,,N,ω(t+k)=ω(tk)+Δk(T(tk)u0), k=1,2,,N+1,ω(0)=0,

    and

    ω(T)=Nk=1T(Ttk)Δk(T(tk)u0)+T0(Ts)q1S(Ts)f(s,T(s)u0)ds.

    Thus we derive

    {P(ϵ,u0)=u0+M(ϵ,u0)+O(ϵ2)M(ϵ,u0)=(T(T)I)u0+ϵω(T)+ϵΔN+1(T(T)u0). (3.2)

    Theorem 3.1. Suppose that (I), (III) and (H1) hold.

    1). If (T(T)I) has a continuous inverse, i.e. (T(T)I)1 exists and continuous, then (3.1) has a unique T-periodic mild solution located near 0 for any ϵ0 small.

    2). If (T(T)I) is not invertible, we suppose that ker(T(T)I)=[u1,,uk] and X=im(T(T)I)X1 for a closed subspace X1 with dimX1=k. If there is v0[u1,,uk] such that B(0,v0)=0 (see (3.7)) and the k×k-matrix DB(0,v0) is invertible, then (3.1) has a unique T-periodic mild solution located near T(t)v0 for any ϵ0 small.

    3). If rσ(Du0M(ϵ,u0))<0, then the T-periodic mild solution is asymptotically stable. If rσ(Du0M(ϵ,u0))(0,+), then the T-periodic mild solution is unstable.

    Proof. The fixed point u0 of P(ϵ,x0) determines the T-periodic mild solution of (3.1), which is equivalent to

    M(ϵ,u0)+O(ϵ2)=0. (3.3)

    Note that M(0,u0)=(T(T)I)u0. If (T(T)I) has a continuous inverse, then (3.3) can be solved by the implicit function theorem to get its solution u0(ϵ) with u0(0)=0.

    If (T(T)I) is not invertible, then we take a decomposition u0=v+w, v[u1,,uk], take bounded projections Q1:Xim(T(T)I), Q2:XX1, I=Q1+Q2 and decompose (3.3) to

    Q1M(ϵ,v+w)+Q1O(ϵ2)=0, (3.4)

    and

    Q2M(ϵ,v+w)+Q2O(ϵ2)=0. (3.5)

    Now Q1M(0,v+w)=(T(T)I)w, so we can solve by implicit function theorem from (3.4), w=w(ϵ,v) with w(0,v)=0. Inserting this solution into (3.5), we get

    B(ϵ,v)=1ϵ(Q2M(ϵ,v+w)+Q2O(ϵ2))=Q2ω(T)+Q2ΔN+1(T(t)v+w(ϵ,v))+O(ϵ). (3.6)

    So

    B(0,v)=Nk=1Q2T(Ttk)Δk(T(tk)v)+Q2T0(Ts)q1S(Ts)f(s,T(s)v)ds. (3.7)

    Consequently we get, if there is v0[u1,,uk] such that B(0,v0)=0 and the k×k-matrix DB(0,v0) is invertible, then (3.1) has a unique T-periodic mild solution located near T(t)v0 for any ϵ0 small.

    In addition, Du0P(ϵ,u0(ϵ))=I+Du0M(ϵ,u0)+O(ϵ2). Thus we can directly derive the stability and instability results by the arguments in [17].

    In this section, we give an example to demonstrate Theorem 2.2.

    Example 4.1. Consider the following impulsive fractional partial differential equation:

    { cD12tk,tu(t,y)=2y2u(t,y)+sinu(t,y)+cos2πt,  t(tk,tk+1), kN0,  y[0,π], Δk(u(tk,y))=u(t+k,y)u(tk,y)=ξu(tk,y),  kN,  y[0,π], u(t,0)=u(t,π)=0,  t(tk,tk+1),  kN0, u(0,y)=u0(y),  y[0,π], (4.1)

    for ξR, tk=k3. Let X=L2[0,π]. Define the operator A:D(A)XX by Au=d2udy2 with the domain

    D(A)={uXdudy,d2udy2X, u(0)=u(π)=0}.

    Then A is the infinitesimal generator of a C0-semigroup {S(t),t0} on X and S(t)M=1 for any t0. Denote u(,y)=u()(y) and define f:[0,)×XX by

    f(t,u)(y)=sinu(y)+cos2πt.

    Set T=t3=1, tk+3=tk+1, Δk+3=Δk, a=1, bk=|1+ξ|. Obviously, conditions (I)-(III) hold. Note that

    Ξ=2k=0|1+ξ|E12(13)=|1+ξ|3(E12(13))3.

    Letting Ξ<1, we get E12(13)1<ξ<E12(13)1. Now all assumptions of Theorem 2.2 hold. Hence, if E12(13)1<ξ<E12(13)1, (4.1) has a unique 1-periodic mild solution, which is also asymptotically stable.

    This paper deals with the existence and stability of periodic solutions of impulsive fractional evolution equations with the case of varying lower limits and fixed lower limits. Although, Fečkan and Wang [12] prove the existence of periodic solutions of impulsive fractional ordinary differential equations in finite dimensional Euclidean space, we extend some results to impulsive fractional evolution equation on Banach space by involving operator semigroup theory. Our results can be applied to some impulsive fractional partial differential equations and the proposed approach can be extended to study the similar problem for periodic impulsive fractional evolution inclusions.

    The authors are grateful to the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and valuable comments. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11661016), Training Object of High Level and Innovative Talents of Guizhou Province ((2016)4006), Major Research Project of Innovative Group in Guizhou Education Department ([2018]012), Foundation of Postgraduate of Guizhou Province (YJSCXJH[2019]031), the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-18-0308, and the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA No. 2/0153/16 and No. 1/0078/17.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] G. B. Whitham, Linear and nonlinear waves, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 1999. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118032954
    [2] M. A. E. Abdelrahman, On the shallow water equations, ZNA, 72 (2017), 873–879. https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2017-0146 doi: 10.1515/zna-2017-0146
    [3] K. Mohamed, S. Sahmim, F. Benkhaldoun, M. A. E. Abdelrahman, Some recent finite volume schemes for one and two layers shallow water equations with variable density, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 46 (2023), 12979–12995. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.9227 doi: 10.1002/mma.9227
    [4] K. Mohamed, H. S. Alayachi, M. A. E. Abdelrahman, The mR scheme to the shallow water equation with horizontal density gradients in one and two dimensions, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 25754–25771. http://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231314 doi: 10.3934/math.20231314
    [5] J. Ren, O. A. Ilhan, H. Bulut, J. Manafian, Multiple rogue wave, dark, bright, and solitary wave solutions to the KP–BBM equation, J. Geom. Phys., 164 (2021), 104159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104159 doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104159
    [6] X. Zhou, O. A. Ilhan, J. Manafian, G. Singh, N. S. Tuguz, N-lump and interaction solutions of localized waves to the (2+1)-dimensional generalized KDKK equation, J. Geom. Phys., 168 (2021), 104312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104312 doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104312
    [7] X. Hong, J. Manafian, O. A. Ilhan, A. I. A. Alkireet, M. K. M. Nasution, Multiple soliton solutions of the generalized Hirota-Satsuma-Ito equation arising in shallow water wave, J. Geom. Phys., 170 (2021), 104338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104338 doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104338
    [8] W. Cai, R. Mohammaditab, G. Fathi, K. Wakil, A. G. Ebadi, N. Ghadimi, Optimal bidding and offering strategies of compressed air energy storage: A hybrid robust-stochastic approach, Renewable Energy, 143 (2019), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.008 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.008
    [9] V. M. Teshukov, Gas-dynamic analogy for vortex free-boundary flows, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., 48 (2007), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10808-007-0039-2 doi: 10.1007/s10808-007-0039-2
    [10] M. M. A. Khater, S. H. Alfalqi, J. F. Alzaidi, S. A. Salama, F. Wang, Plenty of wave solutions to the ill-posed Boussinesq dynamic wave equation under shallow water beneath gravity, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 54–81. http://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022004 doi: 10.3934/math.2022004
    [11] A. I. Delis, H. Guillard, Y. C. Tai, Numerical simulations of hydraulic jumps with the shear shallow water model, SMAI J. Comput. Math., 4 (2018), 319–344. http://doi.org/10.5802/smai-jcm.37 doi: 10.5802/smai-jcm.37
    [12] J. Zhang, F. Wang, S. Nadeem, M. Sun, Simulation of linear and nonlinear advection-diffusion problems by the direct radial basis function collocation method, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Trans., 130 (2022), 105775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105775 doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105775
    [13] F. Wang, E. Hou, I. Ahmad, H. Ahmad, Y. Gu, An efficient meshless method for hyperbolic telegraph equations in (1+1) dimensions, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 128 (2021), 687–698. https://doi.10.32604/cmes.2021.014739 doi: 10.32604/cmes.2021.014739
    [14] Z. Zhang, F. Wang, J. Zhang, The space-time meshless methods for the solution of one-dimensional Klein-Gordon equations, Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci., 27 (2022), 313–320. https://doi.10.1051/wujns/2022274313 doi: 10.1051/wujns/2022274313
    [15] O. A. Ilhan, J. Manafian, M. Shahriari, Lump wave solutions and the interaction phenomenon for a variable-coefficient Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 78 (2019), 2429–2448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.03.048 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.03.048
    [16] H. Zhang, J. Manafian, G. Singh, O. A. Ilhan, A. O. Zekiy, N-lump and interaction solutions of localized waves to the (2+1)-dimensional generalized KP equation, Results Phys., 25 (2021), 104168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104168 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104168
    [17] Y. Gu, S. Malmir, J. Manafian, O. A. Ilhan, A. Alizadeh, A. J. Othman, Variety interaction between K-lump and K-kink solutions for the (3+1)-D Burger system by bilinear analysis, Results Phys., 43 (2022), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104490 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104490
    [18] A. Yadav, D. Bhoriya, H. Kumar, P. Chandrashekar, Entropy stable schemes for the shear shallow water model equations, J. Sci. Comput., 97 (2023), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-023-02374-4 doi: 10.1007/s10915-023-02374-4
    [19] K. Mohamed, Simulation numérique en volume finis, de problémes d'écoulements multidimensionnels raides, par un schéma de flux á deux pas, University of Paris, PhD thesis, 2005.
    [20] K. Mohamed, M. Seaid, M. Zahri, A finite volume method for scalar conservation laws with stochastic time-space dependent flux function, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 237 (2013), 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2012.07.014 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2012.07.014
    [21] K. Mohamed, S. Sahmim, M. A. E. Abdelrahman, A predictor-corrector scheme for simulation of two-phase granular flows over a moved bed with a variable topography, Eur. J. Mech. - B/Fluids, 96 (2022), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2022.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2022.07.001
    [22] K. Mohamed, F. Benkhaldoun, A modified Rusanov scheme for shallow water equations with topography and two phase flows, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 131 (2016), 207. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2016-16207-3 doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2016-16207-3
    [23] K. Mohamed, A finite volume method for numerical simulation of shallow water models with porosity, Comput. Fluids, 104 (2014), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.07.020 doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.07.020
    [24] B. Nkonga1, P. Chandrashekar, Exact solution for Riemann problems of the shear shallow water model, ESAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal., 56 (2022), 1115–1150.
    [25] F. Benkhaldoun, K. Mohamed, M. Seaid, A Generalized Rusanov method for Saint-Venant Equations with Variable Horizontal Density, Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VI Problems & Perspectives, 2011, 89–96.
    [26] K. Mohamed, A. R. Seadawy, Finite volume scheme for numerical simulation of the sediment transport model, Int. J. Modern Phys. B, 33 (2019), 1950283. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979219502837 doi: 10.1142/S0217979219502837
    [27] K. Mohamed, M. A. E. Abdelrahman, The modified Rusanov scheme for solving the ultra-relativistic Euler equations, Eur. J. Mech. - B/Fluids, 90 (2021), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2021.07.014 doi: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2021.07.014
    [28] R. J. LeVeque, Numerical methods for conservation laws, Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 1992.
    [29] B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference schemes. V. A second-order Ssequal to Godunov's method, J. Comput. Phys., 32 (1979), 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1 doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1
    [30] A. Bermudez, M. E. Vazquez, Upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with source term, Comput. Fluids, 23 (1994), 1049–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)90004-3 doi: 10.1016/0045-7930(94)90004-3
    [31] L. Gosse, A well-balanced scheme using non-conservative products designed for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws with source terms, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 11 (2001), 339–365. http://doi.org/10.1142/S021820250100088X doi: 10.1142/S021820250100088X
    [32] P. Chandrashekar, B. Nkonga, A. Kumari Meena, A. Bhole, A path conservative finite volume method for a shear shallow water model, J. Comput. Phys., 413 (2020), 109457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109457 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109457
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Xinguang Zhang, Lixin Yu, Jiqiang Jiang, Yonghong Wu, Yujun Cui, Gisele Mophou, Solutions for a Singular Hadamard-Type Fractional Differential Equation by the Spectral Construct Analysis, 2020, 2020, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2020/8392397
    2. Xinguang Zhang, Jiqiang Jiang, Lishan Liu, Yonghong Wu, Extremal Solutions for a Class of Tempered Fractional Turbulent Flow Equations in a Porous Medium, 2020, 2020, 1024-123X, 1, 10.1155/2020/2492193
    3. Jingjing Tan, Xinguang Zhang, Lishan Liu, Yonghong Wu, Mostafa M. A. Khater, An Iterative Algorithm for Solving n -Order Fractional Differential Equation with Mixed Integral and Multipoint Boundary Conditions, 2021, 2021, 1099-0526, 1, 10.1155/2021/8898859
    4. Ahmed Alsaedi, Fawziah M. Alotaibi, Bashir Ahmad, Analysis of nonlinear coupled Caputo fractional differential equations with boundary conditions in terms of sum and difference of the governing functions, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 8314, 10.3934/math.2022463
    5. Lianjing Ni, Liping Wang, Farooq Haq, Islam Nassar, Sarp Erkir, The Effect of Children’s Innovative Education Courses Based on Fractional Differential Equations, 2022, 0, 2444-8656, 10.2478/amns.2022.2.0039
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1091) PDF downloads(72) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(15)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog