A nonmonton active interior point trust region algorithm based on CHKS smoothing function for solving nonlinear bilevel programming problems

B. El-Sobky; Y. Abo-Elnaga; G. Ashry; M. Zidan; B. El-Sobky; Y. Abo-Elnaga; G. Ashry; M. Zidan

doi:10.3934/math.2024318

AIMS Mathematics

2024, Volume 9, Issue 3: 6528-6554. doi: 10.3934/math.2024318

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

A nonmonton active interior point trust region algorithm based on CHKS smoothing function for solving nonlinear bilevel programming problems

1.
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2.
Department of basic science, Tenth of Ramadan City, Higher Technological Institute, Egypt
3.
Department of Physics and Engineering Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering-Tanta University, Egypt

Received: 30 October 2023 Revised: 27 December 2023 Accepted: 29 December 2023 Published: 06 February 2024
MSC : 49N35, 49N10, 93D52, 93D22, 65K05

In this paper, an approach is suggested to solve nonlinear bilevel programming (NBLP) problems. In the suggested method, we convert the NBLP problem into a standard nonlinear programming problem with complementary constraints by applying the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker condition to the lower-level problem. By using the Chen-Harker-Kanzow-Smale (CHKS) smoothing function, the nonlinear programming problem is successively smoothed. A nonmonton active interior-point trust-region algorithm is introduced to solve the smoothed nonlinear programming problem to obtain an approximately optimal solution to the NBLP problem. Results from simulations on several benchmark problems and a real-world case about a watershed trading decision-making problem show how the effectiveness of the suggested approach in NBLP solution development.

Keywords:

Citation: B. El-Sobky, Y. Abo-Elnaga, G. Ashry, M. Zidan. A nonmonton active interior point trust region algorithm based on CHKS smoothing function for solving nonlinear bilevel programming problems[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6528-6554. doi: 10.3934/math.2024318

Related Papers:

[1]	Haitham Qawaqneh, Ali Altalbe, Ahmet Bekir, Kalim U. Tariq . Investigation of soliton solutions to the truncated M-fractional (3+1)-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation with periodic potential. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23410-23433. doi: 10.3934/math.20241138
[2]	Zhe Ji, Yifan Nie, Lingfei Li, Yingying Xie, Mancang Wang . Rational solutions of an extended (2+1)-dimensional Camassa-Holm- Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in liquid drop. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3163-3184. doi: 10.3934/math.2023162
[3]	Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Syeda Sarwat Kazmi, Adil Jhangeer, Jan Martinovic . Unveiling solitons and dynamic patterns for a (3+1)-dimensional model describing nonlinear wave motion. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20390-20412. doi: 10.3934/math.2024992
[4]	Haci Mehmet Baskonus, Md Nurul Raihen, Mehmet Kayalar . On the extraction of complex behavior of generalized higher-order nonlinear Boussinesq dynamical wave equation and (1+1)-dimensional Van der Waals gas system. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28379-28399. doi: 10.3934/math.20241377
[5]	Naeem Ullah, Muhammad Imran Asjad, Jan Awrejcewicz, Taseer Muhammad, Dumitru Baleanu . On soliton solutions of fractional-order nonlinear model appears in physical sciences. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7421-7440. doi: 10.3934/math.2022415
[6]	Jin Hyuk Choi, Hyunsoo Kim . Exact traveling wave solutions of the stochastic Wick-type fractional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-Sawada-Kotera equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 4053-4072. doi: 10.3934/math.2021240
[7]	Shami A. M. Alsallami . Investigating exact solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional KdV-CBS equation: A non-traveling wave approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6853-6872. doi: 10.3934/math.2025314
[8]	Huitzilin Yépez-Martínez, Mir Sajjad Hashemi, Ali Saleh Alshomrani, Mustafa Inc . Analytical solutions for nonlinear systems using Nucci's reduction approach and generalized projective Riccati equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16655-16690. doi: 10.3934/math.2023852
[9]	Mohammed Aly Abdou, Loubna Ouahid, Saud Owyed, A. M. Abdel-Baset, Mustafa Inc, Mehmet Ali Akinlar, Yu-Ming Chu . Explicit solutions to the Sharma-Tasso-Olver equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7272-7284. doi: 10.3934/math.2020465
[10]	Yanxia Hu, Qian Liu . On traveling wave solutions of a class of KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto type equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1450-1465. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1450

Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent decades, researchers have paid considerable attention to nonlinear waves at the ocean surface. Phenomena of nonlinear waves play a key role in many fields of engineering and science, such as ocean engineering, plasma physics, Control theory, tsunami waves, communications industry, fluid dynamics, and coastal engineering, etc.

Non-linear PDEs have great potential for application in various fields; therefore, researchers pay special attention to their analytical and numerical solutions ^{[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]}. In the literature, many researchers in mathematics and physics have developed various methods to analyze the nonlinear evolution equations (NLEEs), such as the exp-function approach ^[9], the modified simple equation technique ^{[10,11,12,13,14]}, the generalized Kudryashov technique ^[15,16], the $\frac{G'}{G}$ -expansion approach ^{[17,18,19,20,21,22,23]}, the extended rational function expansion approach ^[23], the Hirota bilinear method ^{[24,25,26,27,28,29,30]}, the extended homoclinic approach ^[31], the traveling wave scheme ^[32], the Darboux transformation method ^{[32,33,34,35]}, the sine-cosine approach ^[36], the semi-inverse variational principle ^[37], He's variational iteration technique ^[38], the sine-Gordon method ^[39,40,41], A special kind of distributive product ^[42], the Lie symmetric method ^[43], the extended homogeneous principal method ^[44], the power series method ^[45] and some other methods ^[46,47].

The Boussinesq equation represents a long-wavelength and weakly nonlinear approximation used in numerical models, water waves, and coastal engineering for simulating water waves in shallow seas and harbors. A Scottish engineer named John Scott Russell closely observed solitary waves (also called translational waves and solitons). Joseph Boussinesq based his approximation on the obervation of John Scott Russell observation. In 1872, the simulation of one-dimensional water waves was determined by Boussinesq which states that the horizontal velocity is constant and the vertical velocity is linear in addition to the water depth, referred to as the Boussinesq equation ^[48]. Previously, the Boussinesq equation was investigated using various mathematical approaches ^{[49,50,51,52,53]}.

Consider, the Boussinesq equation in the following form

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{tt}-Q_{xx} = (Q^2)_{xx}+\lambda Q_{xxxx}, \end{eqnarray}$

(1.1)

where $Q = Q(x, t)$ represents the wave envelope containing x as a spatial variable and $t$ as a temporal variable. Here $\lambda$ is an arbitrary constant. This is called frequency dispersion phenomenon when water waves of different wavelengths are related, and in the case of an infinitesimal wave amplitude it is also called a linear frequency dispersion. For this reason, this is a valid approximation. The Boussinesq equation allows for waves to propagate in different directions as well, but it is advantageous to consider waves that propagate in the same direction. To form strong and reliable solitons of the Boussinesq equation using (SSET) ^[54,55,56], the following traveling wave transformation is used.

$\begin{eqnarray} X(x, t) = X(\beta), \, \, \, \, \ \beta = \eta x+\chi t. \end{eqnarray}$

(1.2)

Here $\eta$ and $\chi$ are real constants. Applying Eq (1.2) in Eq (1.1), the following ordinary differential equation (ODE) is constructed.

$\begin{eqnarray} \chi^2 Q''-\eta^2 Q''-\eta^2(Q^2)''-\lambda\eta^4 Q^{(iv)} = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(1.3)

Integrating Eq (1.3) twice with respect to $\beta$ and neglecting the integration constants, we obtain the following equation.

$\begin{eqnarray} (\chi^2-\eta^2) Q-\eta^2 Q^2-\lambda \eta^4 Q'' = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(1.4)

Where $\chi$ and $\eta$ are the velocity and frequency of the propagating wave.

2. Mathematical description

We proceed with these main steps in this work:

Step 1:

$\begin{eqnarray} H(X, X_{x}, X_{t}, X_{xx}, X_{tt}, ...) = 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.1)

where $H$ is a polynomial of $X$ and $X(\beta) = X(x, t)$ is a unknown function. Consider the wave transformation

$\begin{eqnarray*} \beta = \eta x+\chi t, \end{eqnarray*}$

where $\chi\neq 0$ is a constant to be determined later.

Using the transformation, Eq (2.1) is converted to the following ODE.

$\begin{eqnarray} G = (Q, Q', Q'', ..., ) = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.2)

Step 2: $G$ is a function of $Q(\beta)$ and prime express the derivatives in regard to $\beta$ .

Solution of Eq (2.2) can be formulated as

$\begin{eqnarray} Q(\beta) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^N c_{l} M^l (\beta), \, \, \, \, \ c_{l}\neq 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.3)

where $c_l(0\leq l\leq N)$ are real constants and $M(\beta)$ satisfying the ODE in the form

$\begin{eqnarray} M'(\beta) = \sqrt{\xi+u M(\beta)^2+M(\beta)^4}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.4)

Here $\xi$ and $u$ are real constants and Eq (2.4) presents the solutions as

Case I: If $u > 0$ and $\xi = 0$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray*} M_{1}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm \sqrt{-pq u} \, \, {\rm{sech}}_{pq}(\sqrt{u}\beta), \\ M_{2}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm \sqrt{pq u}\, \, {\rm{csch}}_{pq}(\sqrt{u}\beta), \\ \end{eqnarray*}$

where

$\text{sech}_{pq}(\beta) = \frac{2}{pe^{\beta}+qe^{-\beta}} , \, \, \, \text{csch}_{pq}(\beta) = \frac{2}{pe^{\beta}-qe^{-\beta}}$ .

Case II: If $u < 0$ and $\xi = 0$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray*} M_{3}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm \sqrt{-pq u}\, \, \sec_{pq}(\sqrt{-u}\beta), \\ M_{4}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm \sqrt{-pq u} \, \, \csc_{pq}(\sqrt{-u}\beta), \\\end{eqnarray*}$

where

$\sec_{pq}(\beta) = \frac{2}{pe^{\iota\beta}+qe^{-\iota\beta}}, \, \, \, \csc_{pq}(\beta) = \frac{2\iota}{pe^{\iota\beta}-qe^{-\iota\beta}}$ .

Case III: If $u < 0$ and $\xi = \frac{u^{2}}{4}$ , then

$\begin{array}{l} M_{5}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm{\sqrt{\frac{-u}{2}}}\tanh_{pq}({\sqrt{\frac{-u}{2}}}\beta), \\ M_{6}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm{\sqrt{\frac{-u}{2}}}\coth_{pq}({\sqrt{\frac{-u}{2}}}\beta), \\ M_{7}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm{\sqrt{\frac{-u}{2}}}(\tanh_{pq}(\sqrt{-2u}\beta)\pm\iota\sqrt{pq}\, \, {\rm{sech}}_{pq}(\sqrt{-2u}\beta)), \\ M_{8}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm{\sqrt{\frac{-u}{2}}}(\coth_{pq}(\sqrt{-2u}\beta)\pm\sqrt{pq}\, \, {\rm{csch}}_{pq}(\sqrt{-2u}\beta)), \\ M_{9}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm{\sqrt{\frac{-u}{8}}}(\tanh_{pq}({\sqrt{\frac{-u}{8}}}\beta)+\coth_{pq}({\sqrt{\frac{-u}{8}}}\beta)), \end{array}$

where

$\tanh_{pq}(\beta) = \frac{pe^{\beta}-qe^{-\beta}}{pe^{\beta}+qe^{-\beta}}, \, \, \,\coth_{pq}(\beta) = \frac{pe^{\beta}+qe^{-\beta}}{pe^{\beta}-qe^{-\beta}}$ .

Case IV: If $u > 0$ and $\xi = \frac{u^{2}}{4}$ , then

$\begin{array}{l} M_{10}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm{\sqrt{\frac{u}{2}}}\tan_{pq}({\sqrt{\frac{u}{2}}}\beta), \\ M_{11}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm{\sqrt{\frac{u}{2}}}\cot_{pq}({\sqrt{\frac{u}{2}}}\beta), \\ M_{12}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm{\sqrt{\frac{u}{2}}}(\tan_{pq}(\sqrt{2u}\beta)\pm\sqrt{pq}\, \, \sec_{pq}(\sqrt{2u}\beta)), \\ M_{13}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm{\sqrt{\frac{u}{2}}}(\cot_{pq}(\sqrt{2u}\beta)\pm\sqrt{pq}\, \, \csc_{pq}(\sqrt{2u}\beta)), \\ M_{14}^{\pm}(\beta) = \pm{\sqrt{\frac{u}{8}}}(\tan_{pq}({\sqrt{\frac{u}{8}}}\beta)+\cot_{pq}({\sqrt{\frac{u}{8}}}\beta)), \end{array}$

where

$\tan_{pq}(\beta) = -\iota{\frac{pe^{\iota\beta}-qe^{-\iota\beta}}{pe^{\iota\beta}+qe^{-\iota\beta}}}, \, \, \,\cot_{pq}(\beta) = \iota{\frac{pe^{\iota\beta}+qe^{-\iota\beta}}{pe^{\iota\beta}-qe^{-\iota\beta}}}.$

These are generalized trigonometric and hyperbolic functions with parameters p and q. If we take $p = q = 1$ , they become known trigonometric and hyperbolic functions.

Step 3: We calculate the integer $N$ by balancing the capital. Substituting Eq (2.3) into Eq (2.2) we obtain an algebraic equation in the form of $M^{l}(\beta)$ , which we balance by equating the powers of $M^{l}(\beta)$ l = (0, 1, 2, ...) to zero thus obtaining a set of algebraic equations.

Step 4: This set of equations leads to the required parameters and the exact solution of the given equation.

3. Execution of Sardar sub-equation technique

In this section, SSET is applied to the Boussinesq equation to construct the traveling wave solution. By the equilibrium rule Eq (2.3) reduces into

$\begin{eqnarray} Q(\beta) = c_0+c_1 M(\beta )+c_2 M(\beta )^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

where $c_{0}$ , $c_{1}$ , $c_{2}$ are constants. Substitute Eq (3.1), Eq (1.4) into Eq (2.4), we obtain a polynomial in the form of $M^{l}(\beta)$ and equate powers of $M^{l}(\beta)$ to zero resulting in algebraic equations in $c_{0}$ , $c_{1}$ , $c_{2}$ , $\chi$ , $\eta$ and $\lambda$ .

Set of algebraic equations are as:

$\begin{eqnarray*} -2 c_2 \eta ^4 \lambda \xi -c_0^2 \eta ^2-c_0 \eta ^2+c_0 \chi ^2 = 0, \end{eqnarray*}$

$\begin{eqnarray*} -2 c_0 c_1 \eta ^2-c_1 \eta ^2+c_1 \eta ^4 \lambda (-u)+c_1 \chi ^2 = 0, \end{eqnarray*}$

$\begin{eqnarray*} -2 c_0 c_2 \eta ^2-c_2 \eta ^2-c_1^2 \eta ^2-4 c_2 \eta ^4 \lambda u+c_2 \chi ^2 = 0, \end{eqnarray*}$

$\begin{eqnarray*} -2 c_1 \eta ^4 \lambda -2 c_1 c_2 \eta ^2 = 0, \end{eqnarray*}$

$-6 c_2 \eta ^4 \lambda -c_2^2 \eta ^2 = 0.$

(3.2)

With the help of Mathematica software, the following parameters are determined.

$c_0 = \frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right), \, \, \,c_{1} = 0, \, \, \,c_2 = c_2$ ,

$\begin{eqnarray} \label{e11} \chi = -\frac{\sqrt{3 \eta ^2-2 \eta ^2 \sqrt{c_2^2 \left(u^2-3 \xi \right)}}}{\sqrt{3}}, \, \, \, \lambda = -\frac{c_2}{6 \eta ^2}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.3)

Using Eqs (2.4), (3.1) and (3.3) with Eq (1.2), following solutions are constructed.

Case I: If $u > 0$ and $\xi = 0$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{1}^{\pm}(x, t) = \frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \sqrt{-p q u}\right)^2 {\rm{sech}}_{pq}\left(\sqrt{u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.4)

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{2}^{\pm}(x, t) = \frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \sqrt{p q u}\right)^2 {\rm{csch}}_{{pq}}\left(\sqrt{u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)^2. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.5)

Case II: If $u < 0$ and $\xi = 0$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{3}^{\pm}(x, t) = \frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \sqrt{-p q u}\right)^2 \sec_{{pq}}\left(\sqrt{-u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.6)

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{4}^{\pm}(x, t) = \frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \sqrt{-p q u}\right)^2 \csc_{{pq}}\left(\sqrt{-u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)^2. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.7)

Case III: If $u < 0$ and $\xi = \frac{u^{2}}{4}$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{5}^{\pm}(x, t) = \frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \frac{\sqrt{-u}}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2 \tanh _{p q}\left(\frac{\sqrt{-u} (t \chi +\eta x)}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.8)

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{6}^{\pm}(x, t) = \frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \frac{\sqrt{-u}}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2 \coth _{p q}\left(\frac{\sqrt{-u} (t \chi +\eta x)}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.9)

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{7}^{\pm}(x, t) = &&\frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \frac{\sqrt{-u}}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\tanh _{p q}\left(\sqrt{2} \sqrt{-u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right.\right.\right)\\&&\pm i \sqrt{p q} {\rm{sech}}_{p q}\left.\left.\left(\sqrt{2} \sqrt{-u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)\right)\right)^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.10)

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{8}^{\pm}(x, t) = &&\frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \frac{\sqrt{-u}}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\coth _{p q}\left(\sqrt{2} \sqrt{-u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)\right.\right.\\&&\pm \sqrt{p q} {\rm{csch}}_{p q}\left.\left.\left(\sqrt{2} \sqrt{-u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)\right)\right)^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.11)

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{9}^{\pm}(x, t) = &&\frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \frac{\sqrt{-u}}{2 \sqrt{2}}\left(\tanh _{p q}\left(\frac{\sqrt{-u} (t \chi +\eta x)}{2 \sqrt{2}}\right)\right.\right.+\\&&\coth _{p q}\left.\left.\left(\frac{\sqrt{-u} (t \chi +\eta x)}{2 \sqrt{2}}\right)\right)\right)^2. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.12)

Case IV: If $u > 0$ and $\xi = \frac{u^{2}}{4}$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{10}^{\pm}(x, t) = \frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \frac{\sqrt{u}}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2 \tan _{p q}\left(\frac{\sqrt{u} (t \chi +\eta x)}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.13)

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{11}^{\pm}(x, t) = \frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \frac{\sqrt{u}}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2 \cot _{p q}\left(\frac{\sqrt{u} (t \chi +\eta x)}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.14)

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{12}^{\pm}(x, t) = &&\frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \frac{\sqrt{u}}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\tan _{p q}\left(\sqrt{2} \sqrt{u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)\right.\right.\\&& \pm \sqrt{p q} \sec _{p q}\left.\left.\left(\sqrt{2} \sqrt{u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)\right)\right)^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.15)

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{13}^{\pm}(x, t) = &&\frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \frac{\sqrt{u}}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\cot _{p q}\left(\sqrt{2} \sqrt{u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)\right.\right.\\&&\pm \sqrt{p q} \csc _{p q}\left.\left.\left(\sqrt{2} \sqrt{u} (t \chi +\eta x)\right)\right)\right)^2, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.16)

$\begin{eqnarray} Q_{14}^{\pm}(x, t) = &&\frac{1}{3} \left(c_2 u-\sqrt{c_2^2 u^2-3 c_2^2 \xi }\right)+c_2 \left(\pm \frac{\sqrt{u}}{2 \sqrt{2}}\left(\tan _{p q}\left(\frac{\sqrt{u} (t \chi +\eta x)}{2 \sqrt{2}}\right)\right.\right.+\\&&\cot _{p q}\left.\left.\left(\frac{\sqrt{u} (t \chi +\eta x)}{2 \sqrt{2}}\right)\right)\right)^2. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.17)

3.1. Results and discussion

Mathematical calculations of achieved exact solutions are more proficient and advantageous in analyzing the dynamical behavior of non-linear wave phenomena based upon their graphical depiction. These obtained solutions elaborates different types of soliton solutions. Some of which are presented in 3D, 2D and contour plots with the help of maple. Figure 1 represents bright soliton solution, Figure 2 represents singular soliton solution for Eqs (3.4) and (3.5) respectively. Figures 3 and 5 demonstrate periodic singular soliton solutions for Eqs (3.7) and (3.17). Solution (3.10) represents dark-bright soliton and is plotted in Figure 4.

Figure 1. (a) and (b), 3D and contour graphs of

$Q_{1}^{\pm}(x, t)$ are sketched with

$\eta$ = 0.91,

$\xi = 0, p = 0.98, q = 0.95, u = 0.2,$ for

$-8\leq x\leq 8$ ,

$-8\leq t \leq 8$ respectively. (c) 2D graph with

$\eta$ = 0.91,

$\xi = 0, p = 0.98, q = 0.95, u = 0.2,$ and

$t = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1$ for

$-10\leq x \leq 10$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 2. (a) and (b), 3D and contour graphs of

$Q_{2}^{\pm}(x, t)$ are sketched with

$\eta$ = 0.9,

$\xi = 0, p = 0.98, q = 0.99, u = 0.21$ for

$-10\leq x\leq 10$ ,

$-10\leq t \leq 10$ respectively. (c) 2D graph with

$\eta$ = 0.9,

$\xi = 0, p = 0.98, q = 0.99, u = 0.1,$ and

$t = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5$ for

$-20\leq x \leq 20$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 3. (a) and (b), 3D and contour graphs of

$Q_{4}^{\pm}(x, t)$ are sketched with

$\eta$ = 0.91,

$\xi = 0, p = 0.98, q = 0.95, u = -0.2,$ for

$-7\leq x\leq 7$ ,

$-7\leq t \leq 7$ respectively. (c) 2D graph with

$\eta$ = 0.91,

$\xi = 0, p = 0.98, q = 0.95, u = -0.2,$ and

$t = 0, 0.1, 0.14, 0.16, 0.18, 0.2$ for

$-12\leq x \leq 12$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 4. (a) and (b), 3D and contour graphs of

$Q_{7}^{\pm}(x, t)$ are sketched with

$\eta$ = 0.91,

$\xi = 0.0200, p = 0.98, q = 0.95, u = -0.2,$ for

$-8\leq x\leq 8$ ,

$-8\leq t \leq 8$ respectively. (c) 2D graph with

$\eta$ = 0.91,

$\xi = 0.0200, p = 0.98, q = 0.95, u = -0.2,$ and

$t = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05$ for

$-15\leq x \leq 15$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 5. (a) and (b), 3D and contour graphs of

$Q_{14}^{\pm}(x, t)$ are sketched with

$\eta$ = 0.91,

$\xi = 0.0200, p = 0.98, q = 0.95, u = 0.2,$ for

$-8\leq x\leq 8$ ,

$-8\leq t \leq 8$ respectively. (c) 2D graph with

$\eta$ = 0.91,

$\xi = 0.0200, p = 0.98, q = 0.95, u = 0.2,$ and

$t = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5$ for

$-25\leq x \leq 25$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

4. Conclusions

SSET is a realistic, effective, and expressive tool that has been successfully implemented in the Boussinesq equation to extract exact traveling wave solutions that are highly beneficial. The obtained results are in the form of rational, hyperbolic and trigonometric functions. As we can see, this method is powerful, efficient and simple tool for solving various types of nonlinear PDEs found in different models of engineering and natural sciences. The obtained results may be practical, beneficial and can explain the water waves in marine engineering, shallow water with long wavelength, optics, nonlinear grids, coupled circuits, elastic rods and so on. At the end 3D, 2D and contour plots of these solutions are sketched using maple.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia for funding this work through research groups program under grant number RGP.2/20/43.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	M. A. Amouzegar, A global optimization method for nonlinear bilevel programming problems, IEEE Trans. Syst. Men Cybernet., 29 (1999), 771–777. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.809031 doi: 10.1109/3477.809031
[2]	R. Byrd, Omojokun, Robust trust-region methods for nonlinearly constrained optimization, In: Second SIAM Conference on Optimization, Houston, 1987.
[3]	J. F. Bard, Coordination of a multidivisional organization through two levels of management, Omega, 11 (1983), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(83)90038-5 doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(83)90038-5
[4]	J. F. Bard, Convex two-level optimization, Math. Program., 40 (1988), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580720 doi: 10.1007/BF01580720
[5]	B. Chen, P. T. Harker, A non-interior-point continuation method for linear complementarity problem, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 14 (1993), 1168–1190. https://doi.org/10.1137/0614081 doi: 10.1137/0614081
[6]	I. Das, An interior point algorithm for the general nonlinear programming problem with trust region globlization, In: Technical Report, 1996.
[7]	J. Dennis, M. Heinkenschloss, L. Vicente, Trust-region interior-point SQP algorithms for a class of nonlinear programming problems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 36 (1998), 1750–1794. https://doi.org/10.1137/S036012995279031 doi: 10.1137/S036012995279031
[8]	J. Dennis, M. El-Alem, K. Williamson, A trust-region approach to nonlinear systems of equalities and inequalities, SIAM J. Optim., 9 (1999), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623494276208 doi: 10.1137/S1052623494276208
[9]	N. Y. Deng, Y. Xiao, F. J. Zhou, Nonmonotonic trust region algorithm, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 76 (1993), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939608 doi: 10.1007/BF00939608
[10]	B. El-Sobky, A multiplier active trust-region algorithm for solving general nonlinear programming problem, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012), 928–946.
[11]	B. El-Sobky, An interior-point penalty active-set trust-region algorithm, J. Egypt. Math. Soc., 24 (2016), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joems.2016.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.joems.2016.04.003
[12]	B. El-Sobky, An active-set interior-point trust-region algorithm, Pacific J. Optim., 14 (2018), 125–159.
[13]	B. El-Sobky, A. Abotahoun, An active-set algorithm and a trust-region approach in constrained minimax problem, Comp. Appl. Math., 37 (2018), 2605–2631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0468-3 doi: 10.1007/s40314-017-0468-3
[14]	B. El-Sobky, A. Abotahoun, A trust-region algorithm for solving mini-max problem, J. Comput. Math., 36 (2018), 881–902.
[15]	B. El-Sobky, Y. Abouel-Naga, A penalty method with trust-region mechanism for nonlinear bilevel optimization problem, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 340 (2018), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2018.03.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2018.03.004
[16]	B. El-Sobky, Y.Abo-Elnaga, A. Mousa, A. El-Shorbagy, Trust-region based penalty barrier algorithm for constrained nonlinear programming problems: an application of design of minimum cost canal sections, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9131551 doi: 10.3390/math9131551
[17]	B. El-Sobky, G. Ashry, An interior-point trust-region algorithm to solve a nonlinear bilevel programming problem, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 5534–5562. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2022307 doi: 10.3934/math.2022307
[18]	B. El-Sobky, G. Ashry, An Active-set Fischer-Burmeister trust-region algorithm to solve a nonlinear bilevel optimization problem, Fractal Fract., 6 (2022), 412. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6080412 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6080412
[19]	B. El-Sobky, G. Ashry, Y. Abo-Elnaga, An active-set with barrier method and trust-region mechanism to solve a nonlinear bilevel programming problem, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 16112–16146. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2022882 doi: 10.3934/math.2022882
[20]	B. El-Sobky, M. F. Zidan, A trust-region based an active-set interior-point algorithm for fuzzy continuous Static Games, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 13706–13724. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2023696 doi: 10.3934/math.2023696
[21]	J. B. E. Etoa, Solving quadratic convex bilevel programming problems using a smoothing method, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2011), 6680–6690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.01.066 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.01.066
[22]	J. E. Falk, J. M. Liu, On bilevel programming, Part Ⅰ: general nonlinear cases, Math. Program., 70 (1995), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585928 doi: 10.1007/BF01585928
[23]	H. Gumus, A. Flouda, Global optimization of nonlinear bilevel programming problems, J. Global Optim., 20 (2001), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011268113791 doi: 10.1023/A:1011268113791
[24]	Y. Ishizuka, E. Aiyoshi, Double penalty method for bilevel optimization problems, Ann. Oper. Res., 34 (1992), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098173 doi: 10.1007/BF02098173
[25]	Y. Jiang, X. Li, C. Huang, X. Wu, Application of particle swarm optimization based on CHKS smoothing function for solving nonlinear bilevel programming problem, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2013), 4332–4339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2012.10.010 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.10.010
[26]	C. Kanzow, Some noninterior continuation methods for linear complementarity problems, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 17 (1996), 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0895479894273134 doi: 10.1137/S0895479894273134
[27]	S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, M. P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 220 (1983), 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671 doi: 10.1126/science.220.4598.671
[28]	H. Li, Y. Jiao, L. Zhang, Orthogonal genetic algorithm for solving quadratic bilevel programming problems, J. Syst. Eng. Elect., 21 (2010), 763–770. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2010.05.008 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2010.05.008
[29]	Y. B. Lv, T. S. Hu, G. M. Wang, Z. P. Wan, A penalty function method based on Kuhn-Tucker condition for solving linear bilevel programming, Appl. Math. Comput., 188 (2007) 808–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.10.045 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.10.045
[30]	D. Muu, N. Quy, A global optimization method for solving convex quadratic bilevel programming problems, J. Global Optim., 26 (2003), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023047900333 doi: 10.1023/A:1023047900333
[31]	J. Mo, C. Liu, S. Yan, A nonmonotone trust region method based on nonincreasing technique of weighted average of the successive function value, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 209 (2007), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2006.10.070 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2006.10.070
[32]	E. Omojokun, Trust-region strategies for optimization with nonlinear equality and inequality constraints, PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 1989.
[33]	V. Oduguwa, R. Roy, Bi-level optimization using genetic algorithm, In: Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Systems (ICAIS 2002), 2002,123–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIS.2002.1048121
[34]	T. Steihaug, The conjugate gradient method and trust-region in large scale optimization, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 20 (1983), 0720042. https://doi.org/10.1137/0720042 doi: 10.1137/0720042
[35]	S. Smale, Algorithms for solving equations, In: Proceeding of International Congress of Mathematicians, American Mathematics Society, Rhode Island, 1987, 72–195.
[36]	G. Savard, J. Gauvin, The steepest descent direction for the nonlinear bilevel programming problem, Oper. Res. Lett., 15 (1994), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6377(94)90086-8 doi: 10.1016/0167-6377(94)90086-8
[37]	Z. J. Shi, J. H. Guo, A new trust region methods for unconstrained optimization, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 213 (2008), 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2007.01.027 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2007.01.027
[38]	P. L. Toint, Non-monotone trust-region algorithm for nonlinear optimization subject to convex constraints, Math. Program., 77 (1997), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614518 doi: 10.1007/BF02614518
[39]	Y. Yuan, On the convergence of a new trust region algorithm, Numer. Math., 70 (1995), 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002110050133 doi: 10.1007/s002110050133
[40]	Y. Wang, Y. Jiao, H. Li, An evolutionary algorithm for solving nonlinear bilevel programming based on a new constraint-Handling scheme, IEEE T. Syst. Man Cy. C, 35 (2005), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2004.841908 doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.841908
[41]	G. M. Wang, X. J. Wang, Z. P. Wan, Y. B. Lv, A globally convergent algorithm for a class of bilevel nonlinear programming problem, Appl. Math. Comput., 188 (2007), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.09.130 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.09.130
[42]	C. Y. Wu, Y. Z. Zhao, Watershed water trading decision-making model based on bilevel programming, Oper. Res. Manage. Sci., in Chinese, 20 (2011), 30–37.
[43]	X. S. Zhang, J. L. Zhang, L. Z. Liao, A nonmonotone adaptive trust region method and its convergence, Comput. Math. Appl., 45 (2003), 1469–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(03)00130-5 doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(03)00130-5
[44]	H. C. Zhang, W. W. Hager, A nonmonotone line search technique for unconstrained optimization, SIAM J. Optim., 14 (2004), 1043–1056.

This article has been cited by:

1.	Gulaly Sadiq, Amir Ali, Shabir Ahmad, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Ali Akgül, Bright Soliton Behaviours of Fractal Fractional Nonlinear Good Boussinesq Equation with Nonsingular Kernels, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2113, 10.3390/sym14102113
2.	Hamood Ur Rehman, Mustafa Inc, Muhammad Imran Asjad, Azka Habib, Qamar Munir, New soliton solutions for the space-time fractional modified third order Korteweg–de Vries equation, 2022, 24680133, 10.1016/j.joes.2022.05.032
3.	Hamood ur Rehman, Aziz Ullah Awan, Azka Habib, Fehmi Gamaoun, ElSayed M. Tag El Din, Ahmed M. Galal, Solitary wave solutions for a strain wave equation in a microstructured solid, 2022, 39, 22113797, 105755, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105755
4.	Muhammad Imran Asjad, Mustafa Inc, Ifrah Iqbal, Exact solutions for new coupled Konno–Oono equation via Sardar subequation method, 2022, 54, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-022-04208-3
5.	Kang-Jia Wang, Diverse soliton solutions to the Fokas system via the Cole-Hopf transformation, 2023, 272, 00304026, 170250, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.170250
6.	Hamood Ur Rehman, Aziz Ullah Awan, Seham Ayesh Allahyani, ElSayed M. Tag-ElDin, Muhammad Ahsan Binyamin, Sadia Yasin, Exact solution of paraxial wave dynamical model with Kerr Media by using ϕ6 model expansion technique, 2022, 42, 22113797, 105975, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105975
7.	Muhammad Zafarullah Baber, Nauman Ahmed, Muhammad Waqas Yasin, Muhammad Sajid Iqbal, Ali Akgül, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Muhammad Rafiq, Ali Raza, Comparative analysis of numerical with optical soliton solutions of stochastic Gross–Pitaevskii equation in dispersive media, 2023, 44, 22113797, 106175, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.106175
8.	Aqilah Aljuaidan, Mamdouh Elbrolosy, Adel Elmandouh, Nonlinear Wave Propagation for a Strain Wave Equation of a Flexible Rod with Finite Deformation, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 650, 10.3390/sym15030650
9.	Kang-Jia Wang, Jing Si, Jing-Hua Liu, Diverse optical soliton solutions to the Kundu-Mukherjee-Naskar equation via two novel techniques, 2023, 273, 00304026, 170403, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.170403
10.	Shao-Wen Yao, Selahattin Gulsen, M.S. Hashemi, Mustafa Inc, Harun Bicer, Periodic Hunter–Saxton equation parametrized by the speed of the Galilean frame: Its new solutions, Nucci’s reduction, first integrals and Lie symmetry reduction, 2023, 22113797, 106370, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106370
11.	Tahira Sumbal Shaikh, Muhammad Zafarullah Baber, Nauman Ahmed, Muhammad Sajid Iqbal, Ali Akgül, Sayed M. El Din, Investigation of solitary wave structures for the stochastic Nizhnik–Novikov–Veselov (SNNV) system, 2023, 48, 22113797, 106389, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106389
12.	Waqas Ali Faridi, Muhammad Abu Bakar, Zhaidary Myrzakulova, Ratbay Myrzakulov, Mawahib Elamin, Lakhdar Ragoub, Lanre Akinyemi, The Construction of Analytical Exact Soliton Waves of Kuralay Equation, 2024, 18, 2300-5319, 603, 10.2478/ama-2024-0064
13.	Hassan Eltayeb, Said Mesloub, A Note on the Application of the Double Sumudu–Generalized Laplace Decomposition Method and 1+1- and 2+1-Dimensional Time-Fractional Boussinesq Equations, 2024, 16, 2073-8994, 665, 10.3390/sym16060665
14.	Kang-Jia Wang, Feng Shi, Peng Xu, Multiple soliton, soliton molecules and the other diverse wave solutions to the (2+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation, 2024, 38, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984924502592
15.	Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Vikash Yadav, On weakly nonlinear electron-acoustic waves in the fluid ions, bifurcation analysis, generalized symmetries and series solution propagated via Biswas–Milovic equation, 2023, 55, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-04925-3
16.	Asghar Ali, Jamshad Ahmad, Sara Javed, Shafqat-Ur- Rehman, Analysis of chaotic structures, bifurcation and soliton solutions to fractional Boussinesq model, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 075217, 10.1088/1402-4896/acdcee
17.	Khalid K. Ali, M. S. Mehanna, Mohamed S. Mohamed, Optical soliton solutions for Kudryashov’s quintuple power-law coupled with dual form of non-local refractive index, 2023, 55, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-05512-2
18.	Nazek Alessa, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Hamood Ur Rehman, Sidra Noreen, Nonlinear wave dynamics in ferromagnetic media: A study with the Kuralay-IIA equation, 2024, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984925500356
19.	Hamood Ur Rehman, Sadia Yasin, Ifrah Iqbal, Optical soliton for (2+1)-dimensional coupled integrable NLSE using Sardar-subequation method, 2024, 38, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984924500441
20.	Tayyaba younas, Jamshad Ahmad, Dynamical behavior of the higher-order cubic-quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation with stability analysis, 2024, 0972-8821, 10.1007/s12596-024-01864-4
21.	Mashael M. ALBaidani, Umair Ali, Abdul Hamid Ganie, The closed-form solution by the exponential rational function method for the nonlinear variable-order fractional differential equations, 2024, 12, 2296-424X, 10.3389/fphy.2024.1347636
22.	Hamood Ur Rehman, Aziz Ullah Awan, Sayed M. Eldin, Ifrah Iqbal, Study of optical stochastic solitons of Biswas-Arshed equation with multiplicative noise, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 21606, 10.3934/math.20231101
23.	Renfei Luo, Homan Emadifar, Mati ur Rahman, Bifurcations, chaotic dynamics, sensitivity analysis and some novel optical solitons of the perturbed non-linear Schrödinger equation with Kerr law non-linearity, 2023, 54, 22113797, 107133, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107133
24.	Mi Chen, Zhen Wang, Analytical three-periodic solution and interaction for nonlocal Boussinesq equation, 2023, 138, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04518-9
25.	Ifrah Iqbal, Hamood Ur Rehman, Mohammad Mirzazadeh, Mir Sajjad Hashemi, Retrieval of optical solitons for nonlinear models with Kudryashov’s quintuple power law and dual-form nonlocal nonlinearity, 2023, 55, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-04866-x
26.	Khadija Shakeel, Alina Alb Lupas, Muhammad Abbas, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Farah Aini Abdullah, Mohamed Abdelwahed, Construction of Soliton Solutions of Time-Fractional Caudrey–Dodd–Gibbon–Sawada–Kotera Equation with Painlevé Analysis in Plasma Physics, 2024, 16, 2073-8994, 824, 10.3390/sym16070824
27.	Jamshad Ahmad, Tayyaba Younas, Dynamical behavior of soliton solutions to the fractional phi-four model via two analytical techniques, 2024, 38, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S021798492450310X
28.	Jamshad Ahmad, Tayyaba Younas, Wave structures of the (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear extended quantum Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation: analytical insights utilizing two high impact methods, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06691-2
29.	Kang-Jia Wang, Guo-Dong Wang, Feng Shi, Nonlinear dynamics of soliton molecules, hybrid interactions and other wave solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili–Boussinesq equation, 2024, 38, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S021798492450194X
30.	Muhammad Shakeel, Xinge Liu, Almetwally M. Mostafa, Salman A. AlQahtani, Nouf F. AlQahtani, Mohamed R. Ali, Exploring of soliton solutions in optical metamaterials with parabolic law of nonlinearity, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06452-1
31.	Sidra Ghazanfar, Nauman Ahmed, Muhammad Sajid Iqbal, Syed Mansoor Ali, Ali Akgül, Shah Muhammad, Mubasher Ali, Murad Khan Hassani, Analysis of multi-wave solitary solutions of (2+1)-dimensional coupled system of Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-67698-z
32.	Hamood Ur Rehman, Rehan Akber, Abdul-Majid Wazwaz, Hashim M. Alshehri, M.S. Osman, Analysis of Brownian motion in stochastic Schrödinger wave equation using Sardar sub-equation method, 2023, 289, 00304026, 171305, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.171305
33.	Hamood Ur Rehman, Ghada S. Said, Aamna Amer, Hameed Ashraf, M.M. Tharwat, Mahmoud Abdel-Aty, Nasser S. Elazab, M.S. Osman, Unraveling the (4+1)-dimensional Davey-Stewartson-Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation: Exploring soliton solutions via multiple techniques, 2024, 90, 11100168, 17, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.01.058
34.	Dean Chou, Hamood Ur Rehman, Aamna Amer, Aatika Amer, New solitary wave solutions of generalized fractional Tzitzéica-type evolution equations using Sardar sub-equation method, 2023, 55, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-05425-0
35.	Karim K. Ahmed, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Wafaa B. Rabie, Mohammed F. Shehab, Effect of noise on wave solitons for (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation in optical fiber, 2024, 0973-1458, 10.1007/s12648-024-03222-3
36.	Kang-Jia Wang, Manuel De León, The Perturbed Chen–Lee–Liu Equation: Diverse Optical Soliton Solutions and Other Wave Solutions, 2024, 2024, 1687-9120, 10.1155/2024/4990396
37.	Anwar Ja’afar Mohamad Jawad, Anjan Biswas, Yakup Yildirim, Ali Saleh Alshomrani, Highly dispersive optical solitons with generalized quadratic—cubic form of self—phase modulation by Sardar sub—equation scheme, 2024, 0972-8821, 10.1007/s12596-024-01848-4
38.	Kang-Jia Wang, Resonant multiple wave, periodic wave and interaction solutions of the new extended (3 + 1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation, 2023, 111, 0924-090X, 16427, 10.1007/s11071-023-08699-x
39.	Mohammed F. Shehab, Mohamed M.A. El-Sheikh, Hamdy M. Ahmed, A.A. El-Gaber, Soliman Alkhatib, Effects of Wiener process on analytical wave solutions for (3+1) dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation using modified extended mapping method, 2024, 56, 22113797, 107297, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107297
40.	Sibel Tarla, Karmina K Ali, Abdullahi Yusuf, Retracted: Exploring new optical solutions for nonlinear Hamiltonian amplitude equation via two integration schemes, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 095218, 10.1088/1402-4896/aceb40
41.	Karmina K. Ali, Abdullahi Yusuf, Soliton waves with optical solutions to the three-component coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equation, 2024, 39, 0217-7323, 10.1142/S0217732324500688
42.	Muhammad Ishfaq Khan, Aamir Farooq, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Nehad Ali Shah, Unveiling new exact solutions of the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation using the improved modified Sardar sub-equation method, 2024, 59, 22113797, 107593, 10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107593
43.	Kang-Jia Wang, Feng Shi, Jing-Hua Liu, Soliton molecules and the novel hybrid interaction solutions of the new extended (3 + 1)-dimensional Boiti–Leon–Manna–Pempinelli equation, 2024, 98, 0973-7111, 10.1007/s12043-024-02747-w
44.	Khalid K. Ali, Salman A. AlQahtani, M. S. Mehanna, Ahmet Bekir, New optical soliton solutions for the (2+1) Fokas system via three techniques, 2023, 55, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-04900-y
45.	Chanidaporn Pleumpreedaporn, Elvin J. Moore, Sekson Sirisubtawee, Nattawut Khansai, Songkran Pleumpreedaporn, Exact Solutions for the Sharma–Tasso–Olver Equation via the Sardar Subequation Method with a Comparison between Atangana Space–Time Beta-Derivatives and Classical Derivatives, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 2155, 10.3390/math12142155
46.	Sibel Tarla, Karmina K. Ali, Hatıra Günerhan, Optical soliton solutions of generalized Pochammer Chree equation, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06711-1
47.	Rajib Mia, Arjun Kumar Paul, New exact solutions to the generalized shallow water wave equation, 2024, 38, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984924503019
48.	PENG XU, HUAN HUANG, HUI LIU, SEMI-DOMAIN SOLUTIONS TO THE FRACTAL (3+1)-DIMENSIONAL JIMBO–MIWA EQUATION, 2024, 32, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X24400425
49.	Kang-Jia Wang, Feng Shi, Non-singular complexiton, singular complexiton and complex N-soliton solutions of the new extended (3+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 035251, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad2966
50.	Hira Tariq, Hira Ashraf, Hadi Rezazadeh, Ulviye Demirbilek, Travelling wave solutions of nonlinear conformable Bogoyavlenskii equations via two powerful analytical approaches, 2024, 39, 1005-1031, 502, 10.1007/s11766-024-5030-7
51.	Waqas Ali Faridi, Muhammad Abu Bakar, Zhaidary Myrzakulova, Ratbay Myrzakulov, Ali Akgül, Sayed M. El Din, The formation of solitary wave solutions and their propagation for Kuralay equation, 2023, 52, 22113797, 106774, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106774
52.	Yan-Nan Chen, Kang-Jia Wang, On the Wave Structures to the (3+1)-Dimensional Boiti–Leon–Manna–Pempinelli Equation in Incompressible Fluid, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 519, 10.3390/axioms12060519
53.	Manar S. Ahmed, Ahmed H. Arnous, Khaled A. Gepreel, Aydin Secer, Analyzing the influence of multiplicative white noise on optical solitons in birefringent fibers through the perturbed Gerdjikov–Ivanov model, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-07329-z
54.	Mehmet Şenol, Mehmet Gençyiğit, Ulviye Demirbilek, Emad A. Az-Zo’bi, Sensitivity and wave propagation analysis of the time-fractional (3+1)-dimensional shallow water waves model, 2024, 75, 0044-2275, 10.1007/s00033-024-02216-9
55.	Tariq Alraqad, Muntasir Suhail, Hicham Saber, Khaled Aldwoah, Nidal Eljaneid, Amer Alsulami, Blgys Muflh, Investigating the Dynamics of a Unidirectional Wave Model: Soliton Solutions, Bifurcation, and Chaos Analysis, 2024, 8, 2504-3110, 672, 10.3390/fractalfract8110672
56.	Muhammad Zain Yousaf, Muhammad Abbas, Muhammad Kashif Iqbal, Imen Ali Kallel, Adequate dynamical perspective of traveling wave solutions to the perturbed Boussinesq equation appearing in ocean engineering, 2024, 2198-6444, 10.1007/s40722-024-00359-5
57.	Zeting Li, Ben Gao, Investigation for the exact solutions of two classes of extended Sakovich equations, 2025, 533, 03759601, 130203, 10.1016/j.physleta.2024.130203
58.	Mingyue Wang, Youhe Zhou, Jizeng Wang, New exact traveling wave solutions of the coupled Boussinesq equations, 2025, 20950349, 100568, 10.1016/j.taml.2024.100568
59.	Kang-Jia Wang, Xiao-Lian Liu, Feng Shi, Geng Li, Bifurcation and sensitivity analysis, chaotic behaviors, variational principle, Hamiltonian and diverse wave solutions of the new extended integrable Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation, 2025, 03759601, 130246, 10.1016/j.physleta.2025.130246
60.	Kang‐Jia Wang, Bo‐Rong Zou, Hong‐Wei Zhu, Shuai Li, Geng Li, Phase Portrait, Bifurcation and Chaotic Analysis, Variational Principle, Hamiltonian, Novel Solitary, and Periodic Wave Solutions of the New Extended Korteweg–de Vries–Type Equation, 2025, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.10852
61.	Sibel Tarla, Karmina K. Ali, Abdullahi Yusuf, Berna Uzun, Soheil Salahshour, Exact solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky system using Sardar sub-equation method, 2025, 39, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984924504852

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Mathematics

1.8 3.4

Metrics

Article views(1155) PDF downloads(60) Cited by(2)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(3)

AIMS Mathematics

A nonmonton active interior point trust region algorithm based on CHKS smoothing function for solving nonlinear bilevel programming problems

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Mathematical description

3. Execution of Sardar sub-equation technique

3.1. Results and discussion

4. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Mathematics

A nonmonton active interior point trust region algorithm based on CHKS smoothing function for solving nonlinear bilevel programming problems

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Mathematical description

3. Execution of Sardar sub-equation technique

3.1. Results and discussion

4. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog