Research article

Neumann gradient estimate for nonlinear heat equation under integral Ricci curvature bounds

  • Received: 05 October 2023 Revised: 24 December 2023 Accepted: 01 January 2024 Published: 11 January 2024
  • MSC : Primary 53C44; Secondary 53C55

  • In this paper, we consider a Li-Yau gradient estimate on the positive solution to the following nonlinear parabolic equation

    tf=Δf+af(lnf)p

    with Neumann boundary conditions on a compact Riemannian manifold satisfying the integral Ricci curvature assumption, where p0 is a real constant. This contrasts Olivé's gradient estimate, which works mainly for the heat equation rather than nonlinear parabolic equations and the result can be regarded as a generalization of the Li-Yau [P. Li, S. T. Yau, On the parabolic kernel of the Schrödinger operator, Acta Math., 156 (1986), 153–201] and Olivé [X. R. Olivé, Neumann Li-Yau gradient estimate under integral Ricci curvature bounds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 147 (2019), 411–426] gradient estimates.

    Citation: Hao-Yue Liu, Wei Zhang. Neumann gradient estimate for nonlinear heat equation under integral Ricci curvature bounds[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3881-3894. doi: 10.3934/math.2024191

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yanlin Li, Nasser Bin Turki, Sharief Deshmukh, Olga Belova . Euclidean hypersurfaces isometric to spheres. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28306-28319. doi: 10.3934/math.20241373
    [2] Quincy Stévène Nkombo, Fengquan Li, Christian Tathy . Stability properties of Radon measure-valued solutions for a class of nonlinear parabolic equations under Neumann boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12182-12224. doi: 10.3934/math.2021707
    [3] Yanlin Li, Dipen Ganguly, Santu Dey, Arindam Bhattacharyya . Conformal $ \eta $-Ricci solitons within the framework of indefinite Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5408-5430. doi: 10.3934/math.2022300
    [4] Yanlin Li, Aydin Gezer, Erkan Karakaş . Some notes on the tangent bundle with a Ricci quarter-symmetric metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17335-17353. doi: 10.3934/math.2023886
    [5] Abdul Haseeb, Fatemah Mofarreh, Sudhakar Kumar Chaubey, Rajendra Prasad . A study of $ * $-Ricci–Yamabe solitons on $ LP $-Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22532-22546. doi: 10.3934/math.20241096
    [6] Noura Alhouiti, Fatemah Mofarreh, Fatemah Abdullah Alghamdi, Akram Ali, Piscoran-Ioan Laurian . Geometric topology of CR-warped products in six-dimensional sphere. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25114-25126. doi: 10.3934/math.20241224
    [7] Zhanwei Gou, Jincheng Shi . Blow-up phenomena and global existence for nonlinear parabolic problems under nonlinear boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11822-11836. doi: 10.3934/math.2023598
    [8] Hongmei Li . Convergence of smooth solutions to parabolic equations with an oblique derivative boundary condition. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2824-2853. doi: 10.3934/math.2024140
    [9] Fahad Sikander, Tanveer Fatima, Sharief Deshmukh, Ayman Elsharkawy . Curvature analysis of concircular trajectories in doubly warped product manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21940-21951. doi: 10.3934/math.20241066
    [10] Mohd. Danish Siddiqi, Fatemah Mofarreh . Hyperbolic Ricci soliton and gradient hyperbolic Ricci soliton on relativistic prefect fluid spacetime. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21628-21640. doi: 10.3934/math.20241051
  • In this paper, we consider a Li-Yau gradient estimate on the positive solution to the following nonlinear parabolic equation

    tf=Δf+af(lnf)p

    with Neumann boundary conditions on a compact Riemannian manifold satisfying the integral Ricci curvature assumption, where p0 is a real constant. This contrasts Olivé's gradient estimate, which works mainly for the heat equation rather than nonlinear parabolic equations and the result can be regarded as a generalization of the Li-Yau [P. Li, S. T. Yau, On the parabolic kernel of the Schrödinger operator, Acta Math., 156 (1986), 153–201] and Olivé [X. R. Olivé, Neumann Li-Yau gradient estimate under integral Ricci curvature bounds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 147 (2019), 411–426] gradient estimates.



    We investigate the Li-Yau gradient estimate for positive solutions to the following nonlinear parabolic equation:

    tf=Δf+af(lnf)p.

    This equation is subject to Neumann boundary conditions on a compact Riemannian manifold that fulfills the integral Ricci curvature assumption. Here, p0 is a real constant. It is noteworthy that, when a=0, the aforementioned equation aligns with the universally recognized heat equation. Empirical studies have underscored the extensive applicability of scrutinizing solutions to parabolic equations on a Riemannian manifold in various fields, encompassing biology, physics, dynamical systems, and image processing. Furthermore, it serves as a crucial instrument in the domain of geometric analysis. In the pursuit of understanding such correlated issues, it becomes essential to contemplate initial estimates of the solution. In this regard, the Li-Yau type gradient estimation emerges as a significant subject.

    The exploration of Li-Yau gradient estimates for the heat equation was initiated in the seminal paper by Li and Yau [1]. In this work, they derived gradient estimates for positive solutions of the heat equation on a complete Riemannian manifold with bounded Ricci curvature, employing the maximum principle. Subsequently, Hamilton utilized a similar technique to establish Harnack inequalities for the Ricci flow. Moreover, Hamilton extended the Li-Yau gradient estimates of the heat equation to a full matrix version in [2]. From this point forward, differential Harnack inequalities have played a pivotal role in the research of geometric flows. In 2002, Perelman [3] applied this method to formulate the Harnack inequality for the fundamental solution of the conjugate heat equation. Leveraging the Harnack inequality, Perelman demonstrated the non-collapse theorem for the Ricci flow. This ground breaking achievement laid the essential foundation for proving the feasibility of the Poincaré conjecture. Numerous papers have been published on the study of parabolic equations based on the Ricci curvature condition, including works by Hamilton [2], Li-Xu [4], and others [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Additionally, the authors [11,12] examined a heat equation problem within the framework of control theory.

    It is a logical approach to investigate the gradient estimation of positive solutions to equations under integral curvature conditions. It is worth mentioning that this research direction has seen substantial contributions. Prior to presenting the results, we establish some notations. For each xMn, let g(x) represent the smallest eigenvalue for the Ricci tensor Ric: TxMTxM. For any given number K,

    Ric(x)=max{0,(n1)Kg(x)}

    the amount of n-dimensional Ricci curvature lying below (n1)K. Now consider, for any constants q,r>0,

    k(q,r)=supxMr2(B(x,r)|Ric|qdV)1q.

    Note that k(q,r)=0 if and only if Ric(n1)K. It is crucial to recognize that the integral curvature bound is a natural condition, which is substantially weaker than a lower bound Ricci curvature condition. Consequently, the relationship between the integral Ricci curvature condition and the topology and geometry of manifolds necessitates comprehensive examination. Specifically, by formulating a global version of gradient estimates, Wang [13] achieved the Li-Yau type gradient estimates for the positive solution of the heat equation with Neumann boundary condition. In this scenario, the boundary of M is not convex, but it satisfies the interior rolling R-ball condition, with constants

    C1=6nb(b1)(1+H)7K(b(1+H)2)2+309n2b3(b1)(1+H)10H(b(1+H)2)4R2d,
    C2=nb2(b1)2(1+H)4(2d)(1d)(b(1+H)2)2.

    It should be noted that our research also encompasses the second fundamental form of M and the interior rolling R-ball condition. The interior rolling ball condition was employed by Chen in [14] to derive an estimate for the first nonzero Neumann eigenvalue of M.

    The central focus in gradient estimation under integral curvature conditions, tracing back to the paper by Petersen and Wei [15], revolves around an extension of the Bishop-Gromov relative volume comparison estimate to scenarios where there is only an integral bound for the portion of the Ricci curvature that falls below a specified number. Utilizing Yang's estimates on the Sobolev constants from [16] and capitalizing on the relative volume comparison for integral Ricci curvature, Petersen and Wei [17] broadened several geometric results for manifolds with lower Ricci curvature bounds to integral lower bounds. Building on this groundwork, Zhang and Zhu [18] proposed a Li-Yau gradient bound for positive solutions of the heat equation on compact manifolds. This result was predicated on the assumption that either |Ric|Lp(M) for some p>n2 and the manifold is noncollapsed, or a certain Kato type of norm of |Ric| is finite and the heat kernel possesses a Gaussian upper bound. Subsequently, Zhang and Zhu [19] expanded the result in [18] with the aid of the Sobolev inequality demonstrated by Dai, Wei, and Zhang [20].

    In a similar vein, the application of analogous methods to the study of general equations has yielded significant results and findings. The utilization of such methodologies facilitates valuable insights and advancements in our comprehension of diverse techniques. Wang [21] extended the gradient estimates for the heat equation (tΔ)f=0 to (tΔ)f=aflnf, where a is a constant. These outcomes represented substantial generalizations of the Li-Yau [1], Hamilton [2], and Li-Xu [4] type gradient estimates under the integral Ricci curvature bounds. Wang [22] and Wang [23] conducted research on the elliptic gradient estimates on a Riemannian manifold with control on integral Ricci curvature. Wang and Wang [24] concentrated on investigating a class of nonlinear elliptic equations on a collapsed complete Riemannian manifold and its parabolic counterpart under integral curvature conditions.

    In this context, for the scenario where the boundary of M is not convex, Olivé [25] formulated a Li-Yau type gradient estimate for positive solutions to the heat equation with Neumann boundary conditions under the integral Ricci curvature assumption. To be more precise, the principal theorem proposed by Olivé was:

    Theorem A. Given H>0, n>0, p>n2, and R>0 small enough, there exists K(n,p)>0 such that if Mn is a compact Riemannian submanifold with boundary of a Riemannian manifold Nn with the properties:

    (1) D2supxN(B(x,D)|Ric|qdy)1q<K, where diam(M)D;

    (2) IIH, where II is the second fundamental form of M;

    (3) M satisfies the interior rolling R-ball condition,

    then any positive solution u(x,t) to:

    {tf=Δf,inM×(0,),νf=0,onM×(0,),

    satisfies the Li-Yau type gradient estimate:

    αJ_|f|2f2tffC2J_1t+C1. (1.1)

    where, given any 0<ξ<1, we can choose any 0<α<1ξ(1+H)2 and any 0<βξ2(1ξ)2ξ2+n2(1+H)2, and where

    C1=n2α2ξ3(12β)(32n2αH2(1+H)2ξ3R2+2α(1+H)[HR2+2(n1)H(3H+1)R]+(β+4α1)[4αH(1+H)R]2),
    C2=n2α(12β).

    Our objective is to derive a gradient estimate for the positive solutions to the nonlinear heat equation with Neumann conditions, under the integral Ricci curvature assumption. The methodology utilized to establish the primary results fundamentally draws upon Olivé [25]. However, in contrast to the previously mentioned points, our preliminary task entails identifying a methodology that can proficiently manage the nonlinear terms. Moreover, the function Q(t) can be inferred through analysis, leveraging the Sobolev inequality [20] and volume doubling results [17].

    The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we revisit some definitions and prior works that will serve a fundamental role. Our principal results are presented in Section 3.

    In this section, we will effectively derive and present the definitions and lemmas that were instrumental in shaping the arguments and conclusions of this paper. Initially, let τ(s) denote a nonnegative function on [0,) and the properties of τ(s) as

    {τ(s)H,s[0,12),τ(s)=H,s[1,)

    with τ(0)=0, 0τ(s)2H, τ(0)=H, τ(s)H.

    For convenience, τ(D(s)R) is written as σ(s), where D(s) denotes the distance from a point sM to the boundary of M. Then, we introduce two functions, namely ω(s) and ˜ω(s), as proposed in references [13,14]. The specific expressions of two functions are defined as

    ω(s):=(1+σ(s))2,˜ω(s):=bσ(s)

    where b satisfies the conditions outlined in the following lemma.

    Lemma 2.1. ([13,14]) The function ˜ω satisfies

    b˜ωb(1+H)2, (2.1)
    |˜ω|4bH(1+H)R, (2.2)
    Δ˜ω2b(1+H)[HR2+2(n1)H(3H+1)R]. (2.3)

    Let ν be the outward pointing unit normal vector to M. To estimate a unique smooth solution Q(x,t), we need the following lemma provided in [25] and the key tools are referenced in [26,27,28].

    Lemma 2.2. ([25]) There exists a unique smooth solution Q(x,t) to the problem

    {ΔQtQc|Q|2Q2Q|Ric|=0,inM×(0,),νQ=0,onM×(0,),Q=1,onM×{0},

    where c>1 is a constant, and satisfies

    0<Q_Q1

    with

    Q_=Q_(t):=21c1e˜C3c1t

    and

    ˜C3=C(c,n,p)[KD2npRnp+K2p2pnD4p6n2pnR4n2pn]>0.

    Remark 2.1. ([25]) The function Q_(t) is decreasing in t.

    Definition 2.1. ([14]) Let O(x,r) be a geodesic ball centered at x with raduis r. For any yN, there exists xN such that O(x,r)N, and O(x,r)N=y. Then, this condition is commonly referred to as the interior rolling r-ball condition on a Riemannian manifold N with boundary.

    Based on the above important definitions and lemmas, for q>n2 and n>0, we need to point out that this paper investigates manifold Mn in light of the scaling invariant curvature condition

    D2supxN(B(x,D)|Ric|qdy)1q<K

    where K=K(n,q)>0 small enough satisfies the volume doubling proprty[17] and diam(M)D.

    The objective of this section is to establish estimates on the positive solution of the equation

    {tf=Δf+au(lnf)pinM×(0,),νf=0onM×(0,) (3.1)

    and we will give the proof of the main theorem. In order to use the maximum principle, by substituting u=lnf into (3.1), we can transform equation (3.1).

    Theorem 3.1. Let Mn be a compact Riemannian submanifold with boundary of a Riemannian manifold Nn and K, H, and r small enough be nonnegative constants. Given H>0, n>0, p>n2, there exists K(n,p)>0. The second fundamental form denoted as II and the boundary of the manifold M is bounded from below by H. Suppose that M satisfies the interior rolling r-ball conditon. If u(x,t) is a positive solution of equation (3.1) on M×(0,), then the Li-Yau type gradient estimate is given by

    bQ_|f|2f2tff+af(lnf)pC1Q_1t+C2 (3.2)

    for all constants 0<b<1ξ(1+H)2, 0<dξ2(1ξ)2ξ2+n2(1+H)2, 0<ξ<1, where

    C2=n2b2ξ3(12d)(32n2bH2(1+H)2ξ3R2+2b(1+H)[HR2+2(n1)H(3H+1)R]+(d+4b1)[4bH(1+H)R]22t0apξ|up1|t0ap|up1|(˜ωQ1)t0ap(p1)|up2|),
    C3=1+t0ap|up1|,C1=C3E,

    and Q_ satisfies Lemma 2.2 corresponding to c=(3+1b)1d.

    Proof. Before we give our proof of main results in this section, for simplicity of notation, we define

    P(x,t):=t[˜ωQ(|u|2+ε)tu+aup] (3.3)

    where u=lnf, ε>0, and Q_ satisfies the lemma corresponding to c=(3+1b)1d. For T>0, we suppose that P takes the maximum at point (x,t0) in M×[0,T], thus ΔPtP0 at point (x,t0). The difference from [25] is that we need to deal with the terms involving the coefficient of aup.

    Now we deal with the case that, for xM=MM, P takes the maximum at point (x,t0). Without loss of generality, we can assume that P(x,t0)>0, then

    ˜P=˜ωQhtu+aup (3.4)

    where h=|u|2+ε.

    Obviously, the first step of this section should calculate the evolution equation. Computing the evolution equation of ˜P and using Bochner's formula, the following result is straightforward:

    Δ(˜ωQhtu+aup)=Δ(˜ωQ)h+2(˜ωQ)h+2˜ωQ[|iju|2+u(Δu)+Ric(u,u)]t(Δu)+ap(p1)up2|u|2+apup1Δu=Δ(˜ωQ)h+2(˜ωQ)h+2˜ωQh+2˜ωQ[|iju|2+u(Δu)+Ric(u,u)]t(Δu)+ap(p1)up2|u|2+apup1Δu (3.5)

    and

    t(˜ωQhtu+aup)=(˜ωQ)th+˜ωQtht(Δu)t|u|2. (3.6)

    Combine (3.5) and (3.6), leading to

    (Δt)˜P=(Δt)(˜ωQ)h+2˜ωhQ+2˜ωQh+2˜ωQ[|ijf|2+Ric(u,u)]+2˜ωQu(Δu)˜ωQth+t|u|2+ap(p1)fp2|u|2+apup1Δu. (3.7)

    We see that

    (Δt)˜P(Δt)(˜ωQ)h+2Q˜φh2˜ωdQ|Q|2|u|22˜ωdQ|iju|2+2˜ωQ[|iju|2+Ric(u,u)]+2˜ωQu(Δu)˜ωQth+t|u|2+ap(p1)up2|u|2+apup1Δu (3.8)

    and here use the upper bound of the terms, for d>0,

    Q(|u|2)1dQ|Q|2|u|2dQ|iju|2.

    Now, based on the boundedness of |u|2 and Ric(u,u),

    |u|2h,Ric(u,u)|Ric||u|2

    and it is obvious that

    (Δt)˜P(Δt)(˜ωQ)h+2(1d)˜ωQ|iju|22˜ωQ|Ric||u|22˜ωdQ|Q|2|u|2+2Q˜ωh+2Q˜ωu+2˜ωhQu2u˜P+2ap(1˜ωQ)up1|u|2+t|u|2+ap(p1)up2|u|2+apup1Δu. (3.9)

    Towards the same direction, for the term of 2|u||Q| on the right-hand side, we need to find the upper bound. Taking 2|u||Q||Q|2dQdQ|u|2 and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality into consideration, the derivation of (3.9) is as follows:

    (Δt)˜P(Δt)(˜ωQ)h+2(1d)˜ωQ|iju|22˜ωQh|Ric|2˜ωdQ|Q|2h+2hQ˜ωu|Q|2dQ˜ωhdQ˜ωh|u|2+2Q˜ωh2uQ+2ap(1˜ωQ)up1|u|2+t|u|2+ap(p1)up2|u|2+apup1Δu. (3.10)

    By employing a similar calculation as previously described, we can determine the upper bound of 2˜ωQ, where 2˜ωQ1bd˜ω|Q|2QdQ|˜ω|2. We arrive at

    (Δt)˜Ph[Δ˜ωQ+2˜ωQ]+2(1d)˜ωQ|iju|2dQ˜ωh|u|2+2Q˜ω(|u|2)+2hQ˜ωu2u˜P+˜ωh[ΔQtQ3d|Q|2Q2Q|Ric|]+2ap(1˜ωQ)up1|u|2+ap(p1)up2|u|2+apup1ΔuhQΔ˜ω+2(1d)˜ωQ|iju|2dQ˜ωh|u|2+2Q˜ω(|u|2)+2hQ˜ωu2u˜PdhQ|˜ω|2+[ΔQtQ(3+1b)1d|Q|2Q2Q|Ric|]˜ωh+2ap(1˜ωQ)up1|u|2+ap(p1)fp2|u|2+apup1Δu. (3.11)

    Subsequently, from (3.11) we obtain

    (Δt)˜PQ[Δ˜ωh+2(1d)˜ωQ|iju|2dh˜ω|u|2+2˜ω(|u|2)+2h˜ωudh|˜ω|2]2u˜P+2ap(1˜ωQ)up1|u|2+ap(p1)up2|u|2+apup1Δu, (3.12)

    where Q satisfies Lemma 2.2 corresponding to c=(3+1b)1d.

    Since G achieves its maximum value at the point (x,t0) in Mn×(0,T], then

    0t0Q[Δ˜ωh+2(1d)˜ωQ|iju|2dh˜ω|u|2+2˜ω(|u|2)+2h˜ωudh|˜ω|2]˜P+2t0ap(1˜ωQ)up1|u|2+t0ap(p1)up2|u|2+t0apup1Δu. (3.13)

    The following identities are widely recognized and will be utilized in (3.13):

    2˜ω(|u|2)4b1|˜ω|2|u|2b|iju|2

    and

    |iju|21n2(ni,j=1|iju|)21n2(Δu)2=1n2(|u|2+auptu)2.

    Therefore, this can be demonstrated by rearranging the inequality as follows:

    0t0Q[hΔ˜ω+(2(1d)˜ωb)|iju|2dh˜ω|u|24b1|˜ω|2|u|2+2h˜ωudh|˜ω|2]˜P+2t0ap(1˜ωQ)up1|u|2+t0ap(p1)up2|u|2+t0apup1Δut0Q[hΔ˜ω+2(1d)˜ωbn2(|u|2+auptu)2dh˜ω|u|24b1|˜ω|2|u|2+2h˜ωudh|˜ω|2]˜P+2t0ap(1˜ωQ)up1|u|2+t0ap(p1)up2|u|2+t0apup1Δu. (3.14)

    Here, we expand the terms containing h=|u|2+ε in (3.14) and note the merging of the terms involving the coefficient of afp. Since we have the inequality 2˜ωu(|˜ω|2+|u|2), we check

    0t0Q[(Δ˜ω(d+4b1)|˜ω|2+θ(ε))|u|22|˜ω||u|3d˜ω|u|4+2(1d)˜ωbn2(|u|2+auptu)2]˜P+θ(ε)+2t0ap(1˜ωQ)up1|u|2+t0ap(p1)up2|u|2+t0apup1Δu (3.15)

    where θ(ε) denotes a function that goes to zero as ε goes to zero.

    To apply the maximum principle, we further simplify the right-hand side of the inequality. It is necessary to compute the relationship between the term (|u|2tu)2 and ˜P2. That is to say that

    ˜P2=(|u|2+auptu)2+(˜ω2Q21)|u|4+2(1˜ωQ)|u|2tu+θ(ε)|u|2+θ(ε)tu+θ(ε)2a(1˜ωQ)|u|2up. (3.16)

    By substituting tu=˜ωQ(|u|+ε)+aup˜P, we derive the transformation of (3.16) to be

    ˜P2=(|u|2+auptu)2(1˜ωQ)|u|42(1˜ωQ)˜P|u|2+θ(ε)|u|2+θ(ε)˜P+θ(ε). (3.17)

    The negativity of 2(1˜ωQ)|u|2 can lead to the inequality

    (|u|2+auptu)2˜P2+(1˜ωQ)2|u|4+θ(ε)|u|2+θ(ε)˜P+θ(ε). (3.18)

    Combining the above two identities, (3.17) and (3.18), we deduce, at point (x,t0), that

    0t0Q[(Δ˜ω(d+4b1)|˜ω|2+θ(ε))|u|22|˜ω||u|3+(2(1d)˜ωbn2(1˜ωQ)2d˜ω)|u|4+2(1d)˜ωbn2˜P2](1+θ(ε))˜P+θ(ε)+2t0ap(1˜ωQ)up1|u|2+t0ap(p1)up2|u|2+t0apup1Δu. (3.19)

    In the following step, we appropriately select values for b, d and estimate each of the coefficient terms. We choose b1ξ(1H)2 for some 0<ξ<1 and choose d>0 so that 2(1d)˜ωbn2>0.

    The coefficient of |u|4 in the inequality derived from (3.19) can be further refined. For some G>0, we have

    2(1d)˜ωbn2(1˜ωQ)2d˜ωG. (3.20)

    Based on Lemma 2.1, it is established that

    2(1d)˜ωbn2(1˜ωQ)2d˜ω2(1d)˜ωbn2ξ2db(1+H)2. (3.21)

    Given the evolution of (3.21), the bound of d is given by

    daξ2Gn22aξ2+an2(1+H)2. (3.22)

    In (3.22), we assume that d is a positive and consider choosing G=bξ2n2. Then,

    dξ2(1ξ)2ξ2+n2(1+H)2. (3.23)

    As Lemma 2.1 holds for ˜ω, it allows that the coefficients of |u|2 satisfies

    Δ˜ω(d+4b1)|˜ω|2+θ(ε)C(b,d,n,H,R)+θ(ε) (3.24)

    where C:=2b(1+H)[HR2+2(n1)H(3H+1)R]+(d+4b1)[4bH(1+H)R]2.

    The scaling forms for the coefficients of |u|3 and ˜P2, respectively, are

    2|˜ω|8bH(1+H)R=B1(b,H,R) (3.25)

    and

    2(1d)˜ωbn2b(12d)n2=E(b,d,n). (3.26)

    For convenience, we assume that

    Δ˜ω(d+4b1)|˜ω|22t0apξ|up1||u|2t0ap|up1|(˜ωQ1)|u|2t0ap(p1)|up2||u|2+θ(ε)D(b,d,n,H,R,|u|)+θ(ε). (3.27)

    Combining the above inequalities, (3.24), (3.25), (3.26), and (3.27), we can construct, after elementary estimates,

    0t0Q[C|u|2B1|u|3+G|u|4+E˜P2](1+θ(ε))˜P+θ(ε)+2t0apξup1|u|2+t0ap(p1)up2|u|2+t0apup1Δut0Q[C|u|2B1|u|3+G|u|4+E˜P2](1+t0apup1+θ(ε))˜P+θ(ε)+2t0apξup1|u|2+t0apup1(˜ωQ1)|u|2+t0ap(p1)up2|u|2. (3.28)

    It follows from Lemma 2.2 that (3.28) attains

    0t0Q[D|u|2B1|u|3+G|u|4+E˜P2](1+t0apup1+θ(ε))˜P+θ(ε), (3.29)

    where |u|=maxM|u|.

    Since the calculations are similar to that of Wang [13] and Olivé [25], we will only sketch the key steps. Calling x=|u|2, the coefficient of t0J is transformed such that

    Ax2Bx32Dx(A2x12A(B22A+D))212A(B22A+D)212A(B22A+D)2+θ(ε):=M+θ(ε). (3.30)

    By substituting the result of (3.30) into (3.29), we derive that (3.29) becomes

    0Et0Q˜P2(1+t0apup1+θ(ε))˜PMt0Q+θ(ε)Et0Q˜P2(1+t0ap|up1|+θ(ε))˜PMt0Q+θ(ε). (3.31)

    Multiplying both sides of (3.31) by t0 gives rise to

    0EQP2(1+t0ap|up1|+θ(ε))PMt20Q+θ(ε). (3.32)

    Obviously, the right side of (3.32) is quadratic in P. So, if it is nonpositive, we need, at point (p,t0),

    P(p,t0)N2EQ(t0)+N24E2Q2(t0)+Mt20E+θ(ε)+θ(ε) (3.33)

    where P takes the maximum at point (p,t0) in M×[0,T], N=1+t0ap|up1|.

    For any point xM, under the conditions satisfied by Q outlined in Lemma 2.2, (3.33) can be transformed into

    P(x,T)N2EQ_(T)+N24E2Q_2(T)+MT2E+θ(ε)+θ(ε). (3.34)

    Expanding the definition of P, we observe

    T[˜ωQ_(|u|2+ε)tu+aup]PN2EQ_+N24E2Q_2+MT2E+θ(ε)+θ(ε)

    where the inequality is being evaluated at (x,T). At this point, the inequality does not depend on the (x,t0), so we have

    T[˜ωQ_|u|2tu+aup]N2EQ_+N24E2Q_2+MT2E. (3.35)

    Then, at any point (x,t)M×(0,), we derive

    t[˜ωQ|u|2tu+aup]N2EQ_+N24E2Q_2+Mt2ENEQ_+Mt2E. (3.36)

    Hence, dividing by t on both sides of (3.36) leads to

    bQ_|f|2f2tff+af(lnf)pC1Q_1t+C2 (3.37)

    where 0<ξ<1, 0<b<1ξ(1+H)2, 0<dξ2(1ξ)2ξ2+n2(1+H)2, C1=C3E, C3=1+t0ap|up1|,

    C2=n2b2ξ3(12d)(32n2bH2(1+H)2ξ3R2+2b(1+H)[HR2+2(n1)H(3H+1)R]+(d+4b1)[4bH(1+H)R]22t0apξ|up1|t0ap|up1|(˜φQ1)t0ap(p1)|up2|).

    Finally, we aim to bound the case of xM. Following [13], here we employ an idea that has been developed in [19] and [18] to deal with manifolds. We will only sketch the key steps. Choosing an orthonormal frame {e1,e2......en} at x so that en=ν and νP(x,t0)=0, we obtain

    t0[ν˜φQ(|u|2+ε)+˜ω(νQ(|u|2+ε)+2Qiuνiu)νtf+apup1νu]0.

    Using the fact that νu=0 and νJ=0 on M×(0,), and dividing by t0˜ω(|u|+ε), at point (x,t0), one can show that

    1˜ων˜ω+2iuνiu|u|2+ε0.

    This leads to a contradiction. Then, this case can not occur, which completes the proof.

    Remark 3.1. In Table 1, there have been observed inconsistencies in the assignment of constants among the theorems. However, in the case where a=0, equation (3.1) can indeed be simplified to equation (1) using appropriate transformations. The constant C1 in Theorem A is equivalent to the constant C2 in Theorem 3.1, and the remaining constants in the theorems exhibit a similar relationship. The equivalence of these constants underscores the close relationship between the two theorems, further reinforcing the interconnectedness and consistency of the results.

    Table 1.  Constants in theorems.
    C1 C2
    Theorem A n2α2ξ3(12β)(32n2αH2(1+H)2ξ3R2+2α(1+H)[HR2+2(n1)H(3H+1)R]+(β+4α1)[4αH(1+H)R]2) n2α(12β)
    Theorem 3.1 1+t0ap|up1|E,E=b(12d)n2 n2b2ξ3(12d)(32n2bH2(1+H)2ξ3R2+2b(1+H)[HR2+2(n1)H(3H+1)R]+(d+4b1)[4bH(1+H)R]22t0apξ|up1|t0ap|up1|(˜φQ1)t0ap(p1)|up2|)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the editor and the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and insightful suggestions. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11571361) and Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2208085QA05).

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] P. Li, S. T. Yau, On the parabolic kernel of the Schrödinger operator, Acta Math., 156 (1986), 153–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02399203 doi: 10.1007/BF02399203
    [2] R. S. Hamilton, A matrix Harnack estimate for the heat equation, Comm. Anal. Geom., 1 (1993), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-99-04967-9 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-99-04967-9
    [3] G. Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications, arXiv preprint math/0211159, 2002.
    [4] J. F. Li, X. J. Xu, Differential Harnack inequalities on Riemannian manifolds I: linear heat equation, Adv. Math., 226 (2011), 4456–4491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2010.12.009 doi: 10.1016/j.aim.2010.12.009
    [5] B. Peng, Y. D. Wang, G. D. Wei, Yau type gradient estimates for Δu+au(logu)p+bu=0 on Riemannian manifolds, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 498 (2021), 124963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.124963 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.124963
    [6] J. Y. Wu, Elliptic gradient estimates for a nonlinear heat equation and applications, Nonlinear Anal., 151 (2017), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2016.11.014 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2016.11.014
    [7] L. V. Dai, N. T. Dung, N. D. Tuyen, L. Zhao, Gradient estimates for weighted p-Laplacian equations on Riemannian manifolds with a Sobolev inequality and integral Ricci bounds, Kodai Math. J., 45 (2022), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.2996/kmj/kmj45102 doi: 10.2996/kmj/kmj45102
    [8] X. J. Xu, Gradient estimates for ut=ΔF(u) on manifolds and some Liouvilletype theorems, J. Differential Equations, 252 (2012), 1403–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2011.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2011.08.004
    [9] X. B. Zhu, Gradient estimates and Liouville theorems for nonlinear parabolic equations on noncompact Riemannian manifolds, Nonlinear Anal., 74 (2011), 5141–5146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2011.05.008 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.05.008
    [10] Y. Li, X. R. Zhu, Harnack estimates for a heat-type equation under the Ricci flow, J. Differential Equations, 260 (2016), 3270–3301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2015.10.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.10.024
    [11] I. P. de Jesus, A. M. Oliveira, M. R. Clark, P. P. A. Oliveira, Controllability for semilinear heat equation with globally Lipschitz nonlinearities and memory term, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 60 (2021), 103277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2020.103277 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2020.103277
    [12] I. P. de Jesus, S. B. de Menezes, On the approximate controllability of Stackelberg-Nash strategies for linear heat equations in RN with potentials, Appl. Anal., 94 (2015), 780–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2014.901503 doi: 10.1080/00036811.2014.901503
    [13] J. P. Wang, Global heat kernel estimates, Pacific J. Math., 178 (1997), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1997.178.377 doi: 10.2140/pjm.1997.178.377
    [14] R. Chen, Neumann eigenvalue estimate on a compact Riemannian manifold, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 108 (1990), 961–970. https://doi.org/10.2307/2047954 doi: 10.2307/2047954
    [15] P. Petersen, G. F. Wei, Relative volume comparison with integral curvature bounds, Geom. Funct. Anal., 7 (1997), 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000390050036 doi: 10.1007/s000390050036
    [16] D. Yang, Convergence of Riemannian manifolds with integral bounds on curvature. I, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup., 25 (1992), 77–105. https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.1644
    [17] P. Petersen, G. F. Wei, Analysis and geometry on manifolds with integral Ricci curvature bounds. II, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 353 (2001), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02621-0 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02621-0
    [18] Q. S. Zhang, M. Zhu, Li-Yau gradient bounds on compact manifolds under nearly optimal curvature conditions, J. Funct. Anal., 275 (2018), 478–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFA.2018.02.001 doi: 10.1016/J.JFA.2018.02.001
    [19] Q. S. Zhang, M. Zhu, Li-Yau gradient bound for collapsing manifolds under integral curvature condition, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 145 (2017), 3117–3126. https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13418 doi: 10.1090/proc/13418
    [20] X. Z. Dai, G. F. Wei, Z. L. Zhang, Local Sobolev constant estimate for integral Ricci curvature bounds, Adv. Math., 325 (2018), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2017.11.024 doi: 10.1016/j.aim.2017.11.024
    [21] W. Wang, Harnack inequality, heat kernel bounds and eigenvalue estimates under integral Ricci curvature bounds, J. Differential Equations, 269 (2020), 1243–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2020.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2020.01.003
    [22] W. Wang, Elliptic-type gradient estimates under integral Ricci curvature bounds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 150 (2022), 4965–4979. https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/14774 doi: 10.1090/proc/14774
    [23] J. H. Wang, Elliptic gradient estimate for heat equation with integral Ricci curvature condition, Acta Math. Sinica (Chinese Ser.), 65 (2022), 763–774. https://doi.org/10.12386/A20210040 doi: 10.12386/A20210040
    [24] J. Wang, Y. D. Wang, Gradient estimates for Δu+a(x)ulogu+b(x)u=0 and its parabolic countepart under integral Ricci curvature bounds, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2109.05235, 2022.
    [25] X. R. Olivé, Neumann Li-Yau gradient estimate under integral Ricci curvature bounds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 147 (2019), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/14213 doi: 10.1090/proc/14213
    [26] C. Rose, Heat kernel upper bound on Riemannian manifolds with locally uniform Ricci curvature integral bounds, J. Geom. Anal., 27 (2017), 1737–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12220-016-9738-3 doi: 10.1007/S12220-016-9738-3
    [27] M. Choulli, L. Kayser, E. M. Ouhabaz, Observations on Gaussian upper bounds for Neumann heat kernels, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc., 92 (2015), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972715000611 doi: 10.1017/S0004972715000611
    [28] S. Gallot, Isoperimetric inequalities based on integral norms of Ricci curvature, Astérisque, 157 (1988), 191–216.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1031) PDF downloads(55) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog