Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

Involvement of the fixed point technique for solving a fractional differential system

  • Some physical phenomena were described through fractional differential equations and compared with integer-order differential equations which have better results, which is why researchers of different areas have paid great attention to study this direction. So, in this manuscript, we discuss the existence and uniqueness of solutions to a system of fractional deferential equations (FDEs) under Riemann-Liouville (R-L) integral boundary conditions. The solution method is obtained by two basic rules, the first rule is the Leray-Schauder alternative and the second is the Banach contraction principle. Finally, the theoretical results are supported by an illustrative example.

    Citation: Hasanen A. Hammad, Manuel De la Sen. Involvement of the fixed point technique for solving a fractional differential system[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7093-7105. doi: 10.3934/math.2022395

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ahmed Morsy, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Chokkalingam Ravichandran, Chandran Anusha . Sequential fractional order Neutral functional Integro differential equations on time scales with Caputo fractional operator over Banach spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5934-5949. doi: 10.3934/math.2023299
    [2] Saeed M. Ali, Mohammed S. Abdo, Bhausaheb Sontakke, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad . New results on a coupled system for second-order pantograph equations with $ \mathcal{ABC} $ fractional derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19520-19538. doi: 10.3934/math.20221071
    [3] Donny Passary, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon . Hilfer fractional quantum system with Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives and integrals in boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 218-239. doi: 10.3934/math.2024013
    [4] Isra Al-Shbeil, Abdelkader Benali, Houari Bouzid, Najla Aloraini . Existence of solutions for multi-point nonlinear differential system equations of fractional orders with integral boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18142-18157. doi: 10.3934/math.2022998
    [5] Ymnah Alruwaily, Lamya Almaghamsi, Kulandhaivel Karthikeyan, El-sayed El-hady . Existence and uniqueness for a coupled system of fractional equations involving Riemann-Liouville and Caputo derivatives with coupled Riemann-Stieltjes integro-multipoint boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10067-10094. doi: 10.3934/math.2023510
    [6] Ayub Samadi, Chaiyod Kamthorncharoen, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon . Mixed Erdélyi-Kober and Caputo fractional differential equations with nonlocal non-separated boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32904-32920. doi: 10.3934/math.20241574
    [7] Bounmy Khaminsou, Weerawat Sudsutad, Jutarat Kongson, Somsiri Nontasawatsri, Adirek Vajrapatkul, Chatthai Thaiprayoon . Investigation of Caputo proportional fractional integro-differential equation with mixed nonlocal conditions with respect to another function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 9549-9576. doi: 10.3934/math.2022531
    [8] Abd-Allah Hyder, Mohamed A. Barakat, Doaa Rizk, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon . Study of HIV model via recent improved fractional differential and integral operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1656-1671. doi: 10.3934/math.2023084
    [9] Ahmed Alsaedi, Bashir Ahmad, Afrah Assolami, Sotiris K. Ntouyas . On a nonlinear coupled system of differential equations involving Hilfer fractional derivative and Riemann-Liouville mixed operators with nonlocal integro-multi-point boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12718-12741. doi: 10.3934/math.2022704
    [10] Yujun Cui, Chunyu Liang, Yumei Zou . Existence and uniqueness of solutions for a class of fractional differential equation with lower-order derivative dependence. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3797-3818. doi: 10.3934/math.2025176
  • Some physical phenomena were described through fractional differential equations and compared with integer-order differential equations which have better results, which is why researchers of different areas have paid great attention to study this direction. So, in this manuscript, we discuss the existence and uniqueness of solutions to a system of fractional deferential equations (FDEs) under Riemann-Liouville (R-L) integral boundary conditions. The solution method is obtained by two basic rules, the first rule is the Leray-Schauder alternative and the second is the Banach contraction principle. Finally, the theoretical results are supported by an illustrative example.



    Many physical processes appear to exhibit fractional order behavior that may vary with time or space. The continuum of order in the fractional calculus allows the order of the fractional operator to be considered as a variable, see [1,2,3,4]. The fractional calculus has allowed to formulate the operations of integration and differentiation to for fractional order. The order may take on any real or imaginary value. This fact enables us to consider the order of the fractional integrals and derivatives to be a function of time or of some other variable.

    Recently, many authors have addressed differential equations with fractional derivatives for a different category of problems. FDEs arise in various engineering and scientific areas, where they are found in the mathematical modeling of systems and processes in the specialists of aerodynamics and electrodynamics of complex medium, physics, biophysics, chemistry, economics, blood flow phenomena, quantum theory, signal and image processing, polymer functional science, see, for example [5,6,7,8,9].

    It should be noted that FDEs are better prepared to depict the genetic characteristics of different materials and processes than proper differential equations. Based on this advantage, fractional differential models become more realistic, practical and precise in obtaining the objective of classical models in differential. For better understanding of some real world problems, some researchers suggested recently discovered fractional operators. Among these operators, we mention the ones considered in [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].

    Fixed point theory (FPT) is an important pillar of non-linear analysis due to its many applications in various mathematical disciplines. The fixed-point style shined after Banach launched his famous principle, known as the Banach contraction principle. It is mainly involved in fractional differential equations by which the existence and uniqueness of solutions of many differential and integral equations with initial and boundary stipulations can be studied. For more details, see [22,23,24,25,26,27].

    One of the most important theorem of nonlinear functional analysis is the Leray-Schauder alternative, proved in 1934 by the topological degree [28]. A lot of authors proved several kinds of Leray-Schauder type alternatives by different methods, not based on topological degree and applied this methodology in many applications to ordinary differential equations, for more details, see [29,30].

    Similar to earlier, by the standard fixed-point principle and Leray-Schauder alternative, the existence and unique solutions for a tripled system of FDEs via R-L integral boundary stipulations of different order are studied. The system takes the form:

    {cDω0+a(s)=X(s,a(s),b(s),c(s)),0s1,cDϰ0+b(s)=Y(s,a(s),b(s),c(s)),0s1,cDϱ0+c(s)=Z(s,a(s),b(s),c(s)),0s1,a(0)=ρIea(η)=ρη0(η)e1Γ(e)a()d,η(0,1),b(0)=σIfb(θ)=σθ0(θ)f1Γ(f)b()d,θ(0,1),c(0)=ςIgc(ϑ)=ςϑ0(ϑ)g1Γ(g)c()d,ϑ(0,1), (1.1)

    where cDω0+, cDϰ0+ and cDϱ0+ represent the Caputo Fractional Differentials (CFDs), 0<ω,ϰ,ϱ1, X,Y,ZC([0,1]×R3,R), and ρ,σ,ς,e,f,gR. Ultimately, an example to support the results is given. Further, classical derivatives are in local nature, i.e., using classical derivatives we can describe changes in a neighborhood of a point but using fractional derivatives (our system) we can describe changes in an interval. Namely, the fractional derivative is in non-local nature. This property makes these derivatives suitable to simulate more physical phenomena such as earthquake vibrations, polymers, etc. Moreover, it is explain time delay and some fractal properties. Therefore, the search for solutions to these systems has received great attention from researchers.

    Assume that Ξ={a(s):a(s)C1([0,1])} is equipped with a=maxs[0,1]{|a(s)|}. Clearly (Ξ,.) is a Banach space (BS).

    Again, let Λ={b(s):b(s)C1([0,1])} be endowed with b=maxs[0,1]{|b(s)|}. It is clear that the product (Ξ×Λ,(a,b)) is also a BS with (a,b)=a+b.

    Also, consider ={c(s):c(s)C1([0,1])} under the norm c=maxs[0,1]{|c(s)|}. Then (Ξ×Λ×,(a,b,c)) is a BS too with (a,b,c)=a+b+c.

    The following definitions and lemmas are follows immediately from [5,8].

    Definition 2.1. The standard CFD of order f for continuously differentiable function L:[0,)R is described by

    cDfL(s)=1Γ(nf)s0(s)nf1Ln()d,n1<f<n,n=[f]+1,

    where [f] represents the integer part of the real number f.

    Definition 2.2. The R-L fractional integral of order f is described by

    IfL(s)=1Γ(f)s0L()(s)1fd,f>0,

    provided the integral exists.

    The lemmas below illustrate some properties of CFDs and R-L fractional integrals [5].

    Lemma 2.3. Suppose that f,g0, XL1[a,b]. Then IfIgX(s)=If+gX(s) and cDfIfX(s)=X(s), s[0,1].

    Lemma 2.4. Assume that ϰ>ω>0, XL1[a,b]. Then cDωIϰX(s)=Iϰω(s), s[0,1].

    Lemma 2.5. Let ρΓ(1+e)ηe, then for XC([0,1],R) be a given function, the solution of the FDE

    cDωl(s)=X(s),ω(0,1],

    under the boundary stipulation

    l(0)=ρIel(η)=ρη0(η)e1Γ(e)l()d,η(0,1),

    is constructed by

    l(s)=1Γ(ω)s0(s)ω1X()d+ρΓ(1+e)Γ(1+e)ρηωη0(η)e+ω1Γ(ω+e)X()d,s[0,1].

    We will start our results with the following assumptions:

    A1=1Γ(ω+1)+|ρ|ηe+ωΓ(1+e)Γ(e+ω+1)|Γ(1+e)ρηe|, (3.1)
    A2=1Γ(ϰ+1)+|σ|θf+ϰΓ(1+f)Γ(f+ϰ+1)|Γ(1+f)σθf|, (3.2)
    A3=1Γ(ϱ+1)+|ς|ϑg+ϱΓ(1+g)Γ(g+ϱ+1)|Γ(1+g)ςϑg|, (3.3)

    and

    A0=min{1(A1α1+A2β1+A3γ1),1(A1α2+A2β2+A3γ2),1(A1α3+A2β3+A3γ3)}, (3.4)

    where αi,βi,γi0, (i=1,2,3).

    Assume that Ω:Ξ×Λ×Ξ×Λ× be an operator described by:

    Ω(a,b,c)(s)=(Ω1(a,b,c)(s)Ω2(a,b,c)(s)Ω3(a,b,c)(s))=(1Γ(ω)s0(s)ω1X(,a(),b(),c())d+ρΓ(1+e)Γ(1+e)ρηωη0(η)e+ω1Γ(ω+e)X(,a(),b(),c())d1Γ(ϰ)s0(s)ϰ1Y(,a(),b(),c())d+σΓ(1+f)Γ(1+f)σθϰθ0(θ)f+ϰ1Γ(ϰ+f)Y(,a(),b(),c())d1Γ(ϱ)s0(s)ϱ1Z(,a(),b(),c())d+ςΓ(1+g)Γ(1+g)ςϑϱϑ0(ϑ)g+ϱ1Γ(ϱ+g)Z(,a(),b(),c())d).

    The results of this part are based on two rules: The first rule based on Leray-Schauder alternative.

    Lemma 3.1. [31] Assume that is a normed linear spaces and the mapping φ: is a completely continuous mapping if

    (φ)={δ:δ=βφ(δ),forsomeβ(0,1)}.

    Then either (φ) is at the boundary, or φ has at least one fixed point.

    Theorem 3.2. Assume that ρΓ(1+e)ηe, σΓ(1+f)θf and ςΓ(1+g)ϑg. Supposethat there are real constants αi,βi,γi0 (i=1,2,3) and α0>0, β0>0, γ0>0 so that foreach δiR (i=1,2,3), we get

    |X(s,δ1,δ2,δ3)|α0+α1|δ1|+α2|δ2|+α3|δ3|,|Y(s,δ1,δ2,δ3)|β0+β1|δ1|+β2|δ2|+β3|δ3|,

    and

    |Z(s,δ1,δ2,δ3)|γ0+γ1|δ1|+γ2|δ2|+γ3|δ3|.

    Furthermore, suppose

    A1α1+A2β1+A3γ1<1,A1α2+A2β2+A3γ2<1andA1α3+A2β3+A3γ3<1,

    where A1A3 are described in (3.1)–(3.3). Then the boundary value problem (BVP) (1.1) has at least one solution.

    Proof. In the beginning, it must be proved the completely continuous for Ω:Ξ×Λ×Ξ×Λ×. Because the functions X,Y and Z are continuous, then Ω is continuous too. Suppose that ψΞ×Λ× is a bounded set, then there exists positive coefficients 1,2 and 3 so that, for all (a,b,c)ψ.

    |X(s,a(s),b(s),c(s))|1,|Y(s,a(s),b(s),c(s))|2and|Z(s,a(s),b(s),c(s))|3.

    Then for any (a,b,c)ψ, we can get

    |Ω1(a,b,c)(s)|1Γ(ω)s0(s)ω1|X(,a(),b(),c())|d+|ρ|Γ(1+e)|Γ(1+e)ρηω|η0(η)e+ω1Γ(ω+e)|X(,a(),b(),c())|d1[1Γ(ω+1)+|ρ|Γ(1+e)Γ(ω+e+1)|Γ(1+e)ρηω|]=1A1. (3.5)

    Similarly, one can obtain that

    |Ω2(a,b,c)(s)|2[1Γ(ϰ+1)+|σ|θf+ϰΓ(1+f)Γ(f+ϰ+1)|Γ(1+f)σθf|]=2A2, (3.6)

    and

    |Ω3(a,b,c)(s)|3[1Γ(ϱ+1)+|ς|ϑg+ϱΓ(1+g)Γ(g+ϱ+1)|Γ(1+g)ςϑg|]=3A3. (3.7)

    It follows from (3.5)–(3.7) that Ω is uniformly bounded.

    Thereafter, we prove that Ω is equi-continuous. Consider 0s1s21, so, we get

    |Ω1(a(s2),b(s2),c(s2))Ω1(a(s1),b(s1),c(s1))||s20(s2)ω1Γ(ω)X(,a(),b(),c())ds10(s1)ω1Γ(ω)X(,a(),b(),c())d|1Γ(ω)|s10[(s2)ω1(s1)ω1]d+s2s1(s2)ω1d|1Γ(ω+1)(sω2sω1),

    analogously, we see that

    |Ω2(a(s2),b(s2),c(s2))Ω2(a(s1),b(s1),c(s1))|2Γ(ϰ)|s10[(s2)ϰ1(s1)ϰ1]d+s2s1(s2)ϰ1d|2Γ(ϰ+1)(sϰ2sϰ1),

    and

    |Ω3(a(s2),b(s2),c(s2))Ω3(a(s1),b(s1),c(s1))|3Γ(ω)|s10[(s2)ϱ1(s1)ϱ1]d+s2s1(s2)ϱ1d|3Γ(ϱ+1)(sϱ2sϱ1).

    This proves that Ω(a,b,c) is equicontinuous, and thus the operator Ω(a,b,c) is completely continuous.

    Ultimately, we shall check the set ={(a,b,c)Ξ×Λ×:(a,b,c)=βΩ(a,b,c),β[0,1]} is bounded. Consider (a,b,c), then (a,b,c)=βΩ(a,b,c). For each 0s1, we get

    a(s)=βΩ1(a,b,c)(s),b(s)=βΩ2(a,b,c)(s)andc(s)=βΩ3(a,b,c)(s).

    Then

    |a(s)|[1Γ(ω+1)+|ρ|ηe+ωΓ(1+e)Γ(e+ω+1)|Γ(1+e)ρηe|]×(α0+α1|a(s)|+α2|b(s)|+α3|c(s)|),|b(s)|[1Γ(ϰ+1)+|σ|θf+ϰΓ(1+f)Γ(f+ϰ+1)|Γ(1+f)σθf|]×(β0+β1|a(s)|+β2|b(s)|+β3|c(s)|),

    and

    |c(s)|[1Γ(ϱ+1)+|ς|ϑg+ϱΓ(1+g)Γ(g+ϱ+1)|Γ(1+g)ςϑg|]×(γ0+γ1|a(s)|+γ2|b(s)|+γ3|c(s)|).

    The above three inequalities can be written as

    aA1(α0+α1a+α2b+α3c),bA2(β0+β1a+β2b+β3c),

    and

    cA3(γ0+γ1a+γ2b+γ3c),

    which implies that

    a+b+c(A1α0+A2β0+A3γ0)+(A1α1+A2β1+A3γ1)a+(A1α2+A2β2+A3γ2)b+(A1α3+A2β3+A3γ3)c,

    this leads to

    (a,b,c)A1α0+A2β0+A3γ0A0,foreachs[0,1],

    where A0 is given by (3.4), which illustrates that is bounded. Hence according to Lemma 3.1 there is at least one FP for the operator Ω, which is a solution to the BVP (1.1). This finishes the proof.

    The second rule based on Banach's FP theorem [32]. By using it, we prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the BVP (1.1).

    Theorem 3.3. Let the functions X,Y,Z:[0,1]×R3R be continuous and there are coefficients pi,qi,ri, i=1,2,3 so that for each s[0,1] and ai,biR, i=1,2,3,

    |X(s,a1,a2,a3)X(s,b1,b2,b3)|p1|a1b1|+p2|a2b2|+p3|a3b3|,|Y(s,a1,a2,a3)Y(s,b1,b2,b3)|q1|a1b1|+q2|a2b2|+q3|a3b3|,

    and

    |Z(s,a1,a2,a3)Z(s,b1,b2,b3)|r1|a1b1|+r2|a2b2|+r3|a3b3|.

    In addition, suppose that

    A1(p1+p2+p3)+A2(q1+q2+q3)+A3(r1+r2+r3)<1,

    where A1A3 are described in (3.1)–(3.3). Then there exists a unique solution for the BVP (1.1).

    Proof. Consider

    sups[0,1]X(s,0,0,0)=χ1<,sups[0,1]Y(s,0,0,0)=χ2<,

    and

    sups[0,1]Z(s,0,0,0)=χ3<,

    so that

    ξχ1A1+χ2A2+χ3A31A1(p1+p2+p3)A2(q1+q2+q3)A3(r1+r2+r3).

    Now, we shall show that Ωϝξϝξ, where ϝξ={(a,b,c)Ξ×Λ×:(a,b,c)ξ}.

    For (a,b,c)ϝξ, we get

    |Ω1(a,b,c)(s)|1Γ(ω)s0(s)ω1|X(,a(),b(),c())|d+|ρ|Γ(1+e)|Γ(1+e)ρηω|η0(η)e+ω1Γ(ω+e)|X(,a(),b(),c())|d1Γ(ω)s0(s)ω1(|X(,a(),b(),c())||X(,0,0,0)|+|X(,0,0,0)|)d+|ρ|Γ(1+e)|Γ(1+e)ρηω|η0(η)e+ω1Γ(ω+e)(|X(,a(),b(),c())||X(,0,0,0)|+|X(,0,0,0)|)d(1Γ(ω+1)+|ρ|ηe+ωΓ(1+e)Γ(e+ω+1)|Γ(1+e)ρηe|)(p1a+p2b+p3c+χ1)A1[(p1+p2+p3)ξ+χ1].

    Hence

    Ω1(a,b,c)(s)A1[(p1+p2+p3)ξ+χ1].

    By the same manner, we can get

    Ω2(a,b,c)(s)A2[(q1+q2+q3)ξ+χ2],

    and

    Ω3(a,b,c)(s)A3[(r1+r2+r3)ξ+χ3].

    Thus, Ω(a,b,c)(s)ξ.

    Finally, we show that the operator Ω is a contraction. Indeed for (a2,b2,c2),(a1,b1,c1)Ξ×Λ× and for any s[0,1], we can write

    |Ω1(a2,b2,c2)(s)Ω1(a1,b1,c1)(s)|1Γ(ω)s0(s)ω1|X(,a2(),b2(),c2())X(,a1(),b1(),c1())|d+|ρ|Γ(1+e)|Γ(1+e)ρηω|η0(η)e+ω1Γ(ω+e)|X(,a2(),b2(),c2())X(,a1(),b1(),c1())|d(1Γ(ω+1)+|ρ|ηe+ωΓ(1+e)Γ(e+ω+1)|Γ(1+e)ρηe|)(p1a2a1+p2b2b1+p3c2c1)A1(p1a2a1+p2b2b1+p3c2c1)A1(p1+p2+p3)(a2a1+b2b1+c2c1),

    consequently, we get

    Ω1(a2,b2,c2)Ω1(a1,b1,c1)A1(p1+p2+p3)(a2a1+b2b1+c2c1). (3.8)

    Analogously, we obtain

    Ω2(a2,b2,c2)Ω2(a1,b1,c1)A2(q1+q2+q3)(a2a1+b2b1+c2c1), (3.9)

    and

    Ω3(a2,b2,c2)Ω3(a1,b1,c1)A3(r1+r2+r3)(a2a1+b2b1+c2c1). (3.10)

    Inequalities (3.8)–(3.10) implies that

    Ω(a2,b2,c2)Ω(a1,b1,c1)(A1(p1+p2+p3)+A2(q1+q2+q3)+A3(r1+r2+r3))×(a2a1+b2b1+c2c1).

    Because

    (A1(p1+p2+p3)+A2(q1+q2+q3)+A3(r1+r2+r3))<1,

    then Ω is a contraction. So, according to Banach's contraction principle, there is a unique FP of the operator Ω, which is a unique solution of Problem (1.1). This complete the required.

    The example below support the theoretical results.

    Example 3.4. Assume that the system of fractional BVP below:

    {cD13a(s)=120(1+s)2|a(s)|1+|a(s)|+1+125cosb(s)+130sinc(s),s[0,1],cD13b(s)=130πcos(π2a(s))+120sinb(s)+132(1+s)2|c(s)|1+|a(s)|+12,s[0,1],cD13c(s)=120cosa(s)+125(1+s)2|b(s)|1+|b(s)|+13+132πsin(2πc(s)),s[0,1],a(0)=5I52a(13),b(0)=3I32b(12),c(0)=2I12b(34). (3.11)

    Here, ω=ϰ=ϱ=13, ρ=5, σ=3, ς2, η=13, Z=12, ϑ=34, e=52, f=32, g=12,

    X(s,a(s),b(s),c(s))=120(1+s)2|a(s)|1+|a(s)|+1+125cosb(s)+130sinc(s),Y(s,a(s),b(s),c(s))=130πcos(π2a(s))+120sinb(s)+132(1+s)2|c(s)|1+|a(s)|+12,

    and

    Z(s,a(s),b(s),c(s))=120cosa(s)+125(1+s)2|b(s)|1+|b(s)|+13+132πsin(2πc(s)).

    It should be noted that

    ρ=5Γ(72)327=Γ(52+1)(13)52=Γ(e+1)ηe,
    σ=3Γ(52)122=Γ(52)(12)32=Γ(f+1)Zf,

    and

    ς=2Γ(32)32=Γ(1+12)(34)12=Γ(g+1)ϑg.

    Furthermore,

    |X(s,a1(s),a2(s),a3(s))X(s,b2(s),b2(s),b2(s))|125|a1b1|+125|a2b2|+125|a3b3|,
    |Y(s,a1(s),a2(s),a3(s))Y(s,b2(s),b2(s),b2(s))|125|a1b1|+125|a2b2|+125|a3b3|,

    and

    |Z(s,a1(s),a2(s),a3(s))Z(s,b2(s),b2(s),b2(s))|125|a1b1|+125|a2b2|+125|a3b3|.

    Moreover,

    A1(p1+p2+p3)+A2(q1+q2+q3)+A3(r1+r2+r3)325(3Γ(13)+0.330515.5379)+325(3Γ(13)+0.33051.2364)+325(3Γ(13)+0.98610.3185)0.8093004<1.

    Thus, all requirements of Theorem 3.3 are fulfilled, hence Problem (3.11) has a unique solution.

    Fractional derivatives do not take into account only local characteristics of the dynamics but considers the global evolution of the system; for that reason, when dealing with certain phenomena, they provide more accurate models of real-world behavior than standard derivatives. Nonlinear systems describing different phenomena can be modeled with fractional derivatives. Chaotic behavior has also been reported in some fractional models. There exist theoretical results related to existence and uniqueness of solutions to initial and boundary value problems with fractional differential equations; for the nonlinear case, there are still few of them. So, in this manuscript, we were able to study existence of a unique solution to a system of FDEs with nonlocal integral boundary conditions using Banach contraction principle. Ultimately, theoretical results were supported by an illustrative example. As a future work, our method can be applied to obtain existence of solutions for two fractional qdifferential inclusions under some integral boundary value conditions as the work of [33,34]. Moreover, the kernel can be taken as a singular one to solve partial integro-differential equations and to study Hyers-Ulam stability for a nonlinear singular fractional differential equations with Mittag-Leffler kernel motivated by the work of [35,36,37]. In addition, we can replace Caputo fractional derivatives with conformable derivative functions to obtain a solution to fractional-order differential equations. These new investigations and applications would enhance the impact of the new setup.

    ● FDEs        Fractional derivative equations

    ● CFDs        Caputo fractional derivatives

    ● FPT        Fixed point technique

    ● BS        Banach space

    ● R-L        Riemann-Liouville

    ● BVP        Boundary value problem

    The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

    The authors thank the Spanish Government and the European Fund of Regional Development FEDER for Grant RTI2018-094336-B-I00 (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) and the Basque Government for Grant IT1207-19.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests concerning the publication of this article.



    [1] G. S. Samko, B. Ross, Integration and differentiation to a variable fractional order, Integr. Transf. Spec. F., 1 (2007), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652469308819027 doi: 10.1080/10652469308819027
    [2] C. F. Lorenzo, T. T. Hartley, Variable order and distributed order fractional operators, Nonlinear Dyn., 29 (2002), 57–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016586905654 doi: 10.1023/A:1016586905654
    [3] X. Zheng, H. Wang, A hidden-memory variable-order time-fractional optimal control model: Analysis and approximation, SIAM J. Control Optim., 59 (2021), 1851–1880. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1344962 doi: 10.1137/20M1344962
    [4] X. Zheng, H. Wang, An error estimate of a numerical approximation to a hidden-memory variable-order space-time fractional diffusion equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 58 (2020), 2492–2514. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M132420X doi: 10.1137/20M132420X
    [5] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Vol. 204, Elsevier, 2006.
    [6] V. Lakshmikantham, S. Leela, J. Vasundhara Devi, Theory of fractional dynamic systems, Cambridge: Cambridge Scientific Publishers, 2009.
    [7] V. Lakshmikantham, A. S. Vatsala, Basic theory of fractional differential equations, Nonlinear Anal.: Theory Methods Appl., 69 (2008), 2677–2682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.08.042 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2007.08.042
    [8] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, San Diego: Academic Press, 1999.
    [9] J. Sabatier, O. P. Agrawal, J. A. Tenreiro Machado, Advances in fractional calculus, Theoretical developments and applications in physics and engineering, Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6042-7
    [10] B. Ahmad, Existence of solutions for irregular boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 23 (2010), 390–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2009.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2009.11.004
    [11] X. Su, Boundary value problem for a coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 22 (2009), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2008.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2008.03.001
    [12] J. Wang, H. Xiang, Z. Liu, Positive solution to nonzero boundary values problem for a coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations, Int. J. Differ. Equ., 2010 (2010), 186928. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/186928 doi: 10.1155/2010/186928
    [13] D. Bǎleanu, O. G. Mustafa, R. P. Agarwal, An existence result for a superlinear fractional differential equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 23 (2010), 1129–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2010.04.049 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2010.04.049
    [14] J. Sun, Y. Liu, G. Liu, Existence of solutions for fractional differential systems with antiperiodic boundary conditions, Comput. Math. Appl., 64 (2012), 1557–1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.083 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.083
    [15] C. Bai, Impulsive periodic boundary value problems for fractional differential equation involving Riemann-Liouville sequential fractional derivative, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 384 (2011), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.05.082 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.05.082
    [16] M. Cichoń, H. A. H. Salem, On the lack of equivalence between differential and integral forms of the Caputo-type fractional problems, J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl., 11 (2020), 1869–1895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11868-020-00345-z doi: 10.1007/s11868-020-00345-z
    [17] A. Shah, R. A. Khan, A. Khan, H. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, Investigation of a system of nonlinear fractional order hybrid differential equations under usual boundary conditions for existence of solution, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 44 (2020), 1628–1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6865 doi: 10.1002/mma.6865
    [18] Kamran, G. Ali, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, Approximation of partial integro differential equations with a weakly singular kernel using local meshless method, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 2091–2100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.010
    [19] H. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, T. Abdeljwad, A. Khan, Existence results and stability criteria for ABC-fuzzy-Volterra integro-differential equation, Fractals, 28 (2020), 2040048. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X20400484 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X20400484
    [20] O. Martínez-Fuentes, F. Meléndez-Vázquez, G. Fern ández-Anaya, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, Analysis of fractional-order nonlinear dynamic systems with general analytic kernels: Lyapunov stability and inequalities, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172084 doi: 10.3390/math9172084
    [21] Asma, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, G. ur Rahman, M. Javed, Stability analysis for fractional order implicit Ψ-Hilfer differential equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7948
    [22] H. A. Hammad, H. Aydi, N. Mlaiki, Contributions of the fixed point technique to solve the 2D Volterra integral equations, Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals, and Atangana-Baleanu integral operators, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03255-6 doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03255-6
    [23] H. A. Hammad, M. De la Sen, Tripled fixed point techniques for solving system of tripled fractional differential equations, AIMS Math., 6 (2020), 2330–2343. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021141 doi: 10.3934/math.2021141
    [24] H. A. Hammad, H. Aydi, M. De la Sen, Solutions of fractional differential type equations by fixed point techniques for multi-valued contractions, Complexity, 2021 (2021), 5730853. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5730853 doi: 10.1155/2021/5730853
    [25] H. A. Hammad, W. Chaolamjiak, Solving singular coupled fractional differential equations with integral boundary constraints by coupled fixed point methodology, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 13370–13391. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021774 doi: 10.3934/math.2021774
    [26] H. A. Hammad, P. Agarwal, S. Momani, F. Alsharari, Solving a fractional-order differential equation using rational symmetric contraction mappings, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040159 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5040159
    [27] N. Fabiano, N. Nikolić, S. Thenmozhi, S. Radenović, N. Čıtaković, Tenth order boundary value problem solution existence by fixed point theorem, J. Inequal. Appl., 2020 (2020), 166. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020-02429-2 doi: 10.1186/s13660-020-02429-2
    [28] J. Leray, J. Schauder, Topologie et équations fonctionnelles, Ann. Sci. É. N. S., 51 (1934), 45–78.
    [29] H. Ben-El-Mechaiekh, A. Idzik, A Leray-Schauder type theorem for approximable maps, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 122 (1994), 105–109.
    [30] S. Park, Generalized Leray-Schauder principles for compact admissible multifuctions, Topol. Methods Nonl. An., 5 (1995), 271–277.
    [31] A. Granas, J. Dugundji, Fixed point theory, New York: Springer, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21593-8
    [32] S. Banach, Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales, Fund. Math., 3 (1922), 133–181.
    [33] S. M. Aydojan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, D. Baleanu, S. Rezapour, M. E. Sami, Approximate endpoint solutions for a class of fractional q-differential inclusions by computational results, Fractals, 28 (2020), 2040029. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X20400290 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X20400290
    [34] P. Pedi, A. Kumar, T. Abdeljwad, A. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, Mild solutions of coupled hybrid fractional order system with Caputo-Hadamard derivatives, Fractals, 29 (2021), 2150158. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X21501589 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X21501589
    [35] Kamran, G. Ali, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, Approximation of partial integro differential equations with a weakly singular kernel using local meshless method, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 2091–2100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.010
    [36] A. Khan, H. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, T. Abdeljwad, Existence and Hyers-Ulam stability for a nonlinear singular fractional differential equations with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 127 (2019), 422–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.026 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.026
    [37] H. Khan, T. Abdeljwad, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, H. Tajadodi, A. Khan, Fractional order Volterra integro-differential equation with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Fractals, 29 (2021), 2150154. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X21501541 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X21501541
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Alireza Khastan, Juan J. Nieto, Rosana Rodríguez-López, Existence of solutions to uncertain differential equations of nonlocal type via an extended Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem, 2022, 137, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03447-3
    2. Aftab Hussain, Fractional Differential Boundary Value Equation Utilizing the Convex Interpolation for Symmetry of Variables, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1189, 10.3390/sym15061189
    3. Hasanen A. Hammad, Doha A. Kattan, Strong tripled fixed points under a new class of F-contractive mappings with supportive applications, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 5785, 10.3934/math.2025266
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1926) PDF downloads(62) Cited by(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog