Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

On energy ordering of vertex-disjoint bicyclic sidigraphs

  • Received: 09 March 2020 Accepted: 13 July 2020 Published: 28 August 2020
  • MSC : 05C35, 05C50

  • The energy and iota energy of signed digraphs are respectively defined by E(S)= nk=1|Re(ρk)| and Ec(S)=nk=1|Im(ρk)|, where ρ1,,ρn are eigenvalues of S, and Re(ρk) and Im(ρk) are respectively real and imaginary values of the eigenvalue ρk. Recently, Yang and Wang (2018) found the energy and iota energy ordering of digraphs in Dn and computed the maximal energy and iota energy, where Dn denotes the set of vertex-disjoint bicyclic digraphs of a fixed order n. In this paper, we investigate the energy ordering of signed digraphs in Dsn and find the maximal energy, where Dsn denotes the set of vertex-disjoint bicyclic sidigraphs of a fixed order n.

    Citation: Sumaira Hafeez, Rashid Farooq. On energy ordering of vertex-disjoint bicyclic sidigraphs[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6693-6713. doi: 10.3934/math.2020430

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yinzhen Mei, Chengxiao Guo, Mengtian Liu . The bounds of the energy and Laplacian energy of chain graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4847-4859. doi: 10.3934/math.2021284
    [2] Nuttawoot Nupo, Sayan Panma . Certain structural properties for Cayley regularity graphs of semigroups and their theoretical applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16228-16239. doi: 10.3934/math.2023830
    [3] Eleonora Amoroso, Giuseppina D'Aguì, Valeria Morabito . On a complete parametric Sturm-Liouville problem with sign changing coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6499-6512. doi: 10.3934/math.2024316
    [4] Yan Wang, Kai Yuan, Ying Zhao . Perfect directed codes in Cayley digraphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23878-23889. doi: 10.3934/math.20241160
    [5] Sizhong Zhou, Quanru Pan . The existence of subdigraphs with orthogonal factorizations in digraphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1223-1233. doi: 10.3934/math.2021075
    [6] Mengyu Wang, Xinmin Qu, Huiqin Lu . Ground state sign-changing solutions for fractional Laplacian equations with critical nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5028-5039. doi: 10.3934/math.2021297
    [7] Andrea Ratto . Higher order energy functionals and the Chen-Maeta conjecture. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1089-1104. doi: 10.3934/math.2020076
    [8] Yinzhen Mei, Chengxiao Guo . The minimal degree Kirchhoff index of bicyclic graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19822-19842. doi: 10.3934/math.2024968
    [9] Li Zhang, Maohua Ran, Hanyue Zhang . Energy analysis of the ADI-FDTD method with fourth-order accuracy in time for Maxwell's equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 264-284. doi: 10.3934/math.2023012
    [10] Xintian Pan . A high-accuracy conservative numerical scheme for the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation with wave operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27388-27402. doi: 10.3934/math.20241330
  • The energy and iota energy of signed digraphs are respectively defined by E(S)= nk=1|Re(ρk)| and Ec(S)=nk=1|Im(ρk)|, where ρ1,,ρn are eigenvalues of S, and Re(ρk) and Im(ρk) are respectively real and imaginary values of the eigenvalue ρk. Recently, Yang and Wang (2018) found the energy and iota energy ordering of digraphs in Dn and computed the maximal energy and iota energy, where Dn denotes the set of vertex-disjoint bicyclic digraphs of a fixed order n. In this paper, we investigate the energy ordering of signed digraphs in Dsn and find the maximal energy, where Dsn denotes the set of vertex-disjoint bicyclic sidigraphs of a fixed order n.


    If every arc of a digraph is assigned a weight +1 or 1 then it is called a signed digraph (henceforth, sidigraph). Each arc of a sidigraph is called a signed arc. We denote by uw, the arc from a vertex u to a vertex w. The sign of the arc uw is denoted by φ(u,w). A directed signed path Pn is a sidigraph on n vertices {wjj=1,2,,n} with signed arcs {wjwj+1j=1,2,,n1}. A signed directed cycle Cn of order n2 is a sidigraph with vertices {wjj=1,2,,n} and signed arcs {wjwj+1j=1,2,,n1}{wnw1}. The product of sign of the arcs of a sidigraph S is called the sign of S. A sidigraphs S is said to be a strongly connected sidigraph if for every pair of vertices v,w, a path from v to w and a path from w to v exist.

    A sidigraph with equal number of vertices and arcs and contains only one directed cycle is said to be a unicyclic sidigraph. A sidigraph with connected underlying sigraph and has exactly two directed cycles is said to be bicyclic sidigraph. We denote a positive (respectively, negative) cycle of order n by Cn (respectively, Cn). A cycle of order n which is either positive or negative is denoted by Cn. A positive cycle is a cycle with positive sign and a negative cycle is a cycle with negative sign. We denote by Dsn, the class of vertex-disjoint bicyclic sidigraphs of a fixed order n.

    Let S be an n-vertex sidigraphs. Then the adjacency matrix A(S)=[aij]n×n of S is given by:

    aij={φ(wi,wj)if there is an arc from wi to wj0otherwise.

    The eigenvalues of A(S) are said to be the eigevalues of S.

    Pe˜na and Rada [1] put forward the idea of digraph energy. Let ρ1,,ρn are the eigenvalues of a sidigraph S. Pirzada and Bhat [2] defined the energy of a sidigraph S as E(S)=nk=1|Re(ρk)|, where Re(ρk) denotes the real value of the eigenvalue ρk. Khan et al. [3] and Farooq et al. [4] put forward the idea of iota energy of digraph (sidigraph) and defined iota energy as Ec(S)=nk=1|Im(ρk)|, where Im(ρk) denotes the imaginary value of the eigenvalue ρk. Khan et al. [5,6] found the extremal energy of digraphs and sidigraphs among all vertex-disjoint bicyclic digraphs and sidigraphs of order n. Farooq et al. [7,8] found the extremal iota energy of digraphs and sidigraphs among all vertex-disjoint bicyclic digraphs and sidigraphs of order n. In 2016, Monslave and Rada [9] investigated the general class of bicyclic digraphs and found extremal energy. Hafeez et al. [10] considered the class of all bicyclic sidigraphs and finds extremal energy.

    Recently, Yang and Wang [11] determined the energy and iota ordering of digraphs in Dn and found the extremal energy and iota energy, where Dn is the class of vertex-disjoint bicyclic digraphs of order n. Yang and Wang [12] considered the problem of finding energy ordering in Dsn, where both directed cycles are of even length. Yang and Wang [13] also considered the problem of finding iota energy ordering in Dsn, where both directed cycles are of even length. Motivated by Yang and Wang [11,12,13], we consider the problem of finding the ordering of sidigraphs in Dsn with respect to energy and also investigate extremal energy of sidigraphs in this class, where Dsn is the class of vertex-disjoint bicyclic sidigraphs of order n. The results for the case, when both directed cycles are even are obtained in [12]. Therefore we have solved the remaining cases for energy ordering in Dsn.

    Let p,q2 and Dsn[p,q] be the disjoint union of directed cycles Cp and Cq and Dsn[p,q] be the disjoint union of directed cycles Cp and Cq. Also suppose Dsn[p,q] denotes the disjoint union of directed cycles Cp and Cq and Dsn[p,q] denotes the disjoint union of directed cycles Cp and Cq and Dsn[p,q] denotes the disjoint union of directed cycles Cp and Cq. Let Dsn[p,q]={Dsn[p,q],Dsn[p,q],Dsn[p,q],Dsn[p,q]}.

    Let S be a sidigraph with eigenvalues ρ1,,ρn. Then energy of S is defined as E(S)=nk=1|Re(ρk)|, where Re(ρk) represents the real value of ρk.

    Relationship between energy of strong components of a sidigraph S and energy of S is given in the following result.

    Lemma 2.1 (Pirzada and Bhat [2]). Let Q1,,Qk are strong components of a sidigraph S. Then E(S)=kj=1E(Qj).

    Pirzada and Bhat [2] gave the following energy formulae for positive and negative directed cycles of order n2.

    E(Cn)={2cotπnif n0(mod4)2cscπnif n2(mod4)cscπ2nif n1(mod2) (2.1)
    E(Cn)={2cscπnif n0(mod4)2cotπnif n2(mod4)cscπ2nif n1(mod2). (2.2)

    For any SDsn, its strong components are: a sidigraph from the set Dsn[p,q] and few isolated vertices. Therefore using Lemma 2.1, we can only use the energy of strong components to find the energy ordering in Dsn.

    Using Lemma 2.1, we give the following equations.

    E(Dsn[p,q])=E(Cp)+E(Cq),E(Dsn[p,q])=E(Cp)+E(Cq),E(Dsn[p,q])=E(Cp)+E(Cq),E(Dsn[p,q])=E(Cp)+E(Cq).

    Let n>4. In Lemmas 2.22.8, we give some results about the monotonicity of some functions which will be used to find the energy ordering of sidigraphs in Dsn.

    Lemma 2.2 (Farooq et al. [7]). Suppose f(z)=2(cotπz+cotπnz). For z[2,n2], f(z) is increasing and for z[n2,n2], f(z) is decreasing.

    Lemma 2.3 (Yang and Wang [11]). Let f(z)=2(cscπz+cotπnz). For z[2,n2], f(z) is decreasing.

    Lemma 2.4 (Yang and Wang [11]). Suppose f(z)=2(cscπz+cscπnz). For z[2,n2], f(z) is decreasing.

    Lemma 2.5 (Farooq et al. [7]). Let f(z)=zsinπz. For z[2,), f(z) is increasing.

    Lemma 2.6 (Yang and Wang [11]). Suppose f(z)=πz2cosπzcsc2πz. For z[2,n2], f(z) is increasing.

    The proof of next lemma is similar to the proof of Lemma 2.6 and is thus omitted.

    Lemma 2.7. Suppose f(z)=πz2cosπ2zcsc2π2z and g(z)=πz2cosπzcsc2πz. For z[2,), f(z) and g(z) are increasing.

    Now we prove the following results.

    Lemma 2.8. Suppose f(z)=2(cotπz+cscπnz). For z[2,n2], f(z) is increasing.

    Proof. To prove the result, we will show that for all z[2,n2], f(z)0.

    Now

    f(z)=2(πz2csc2πzπ(nz)2cscπnzcotπnz) (2.3)

    To prove f(z)0, we divide the interval in two parts. Firstly let z[n2,n2]. Then znz. By Lemma 2.6, we know that for z[2,n2], πz2cosπzcsc2πz is increasing. Therefore π(nz)2cscπnzcotπnz=π(nz)2csc2πnzcosπnzπz2csc2πzcosπz<πz2csc2πz. Hence using (2.3), f(z)0 for z[n2,n2].

    Now let z[2,n2]. Then znz. By Lemma 2.5, we know that zsinπz is strictly increasing on [2,). We have zsinπz(nz)sinπnz. From this, we get 1zcscπnz1nzcscπnz0. Consider

    πz2csc2πzπ(nz)2csc2πnz=π(1zcscπz+1nzcscπnz)(1zcscπz1nzcscπnz).

    Clearly 1zcscπz+1nzcscπnz>0 and 1zcscπz1nzcscπnz0. Hence πz2csc2πzπ(nz)2csc2πnz0. This implies that π(nz)2cscπnzcotπnz=π(nz)2cosπnzcsc2πnz<π(nz)2csc2πnz<πz2csc2πz. Hence using (2.3) and all these facts, f(z)0 for z[2,n2]. Thus f(z)0 for z[2,n2]. This proves the result.

    Lemma 2.9. Let z[2,n2]. The following holds.

    (1) Let f(z)=cscπ2z+cscπ2(nz) is decreasing on [2,n2] and increasing on [n2,n2].

    (2) The function f(z)=2cscπz+cscπ2(nz) is decreasing on [2,2n3] and increasing on [2n3,n2].

    (3) The function f(z)=cscπ2z+2cscπ(nz) is decreasing on [2,n3] and increasing on [n3,n2].

    Proof. (1) To show that f(z) is decreasing on [2,n2], it is sufficient to show that f(z)0.

    Since z(nz) for z[2,n2], therefore using Lemma 2.7, we get

    f(z)=π2z2csc2π2zcosπ2zπ2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)π2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)π2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)=0

    Hence f(z) is decreasing on [2,n2].

    Now we will show that f(z)0. Since z(nz) for z[n2,n2], therefore using Lemma 2.7, we obtain

    f(z)=π2z2csc2π2zcosπ2zπ2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)π2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)π2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)=0

    Hence f(z) is increasing on [n2,n2].

    (2) To show that f(z) is decreasing on [2,2n3], it is enough to prove that f(z)0.

    Since z2(nz) for z[2,2n3], therefore using Lemma 2.7, we get

    f(z)=2πz2csc2πzcosπzπ2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)2π4(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)π2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)=0

    Hence f(z) is decreasing on [2,2n3].

    Now we will show that f(z)0. Since z2(nz) for z[2n3,n2], therefore using Lemma 2.7, we obtain

    f(z)=2πz2csc2πzcosπzπ2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)2π4(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)π2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)=0

    Hence f(z) is increasing on [2n3,n2].

    Analogously (3) can be proved.

    Lemma 2.10. Suppose f(z)=2cotπz+cscπ2(nz). For z[2,n2], f(z) is increasing.

    Proof. We will show that f(z)0 for z[2,n2].

    Since cosπz1 and z2(nz) for z[2n3,n2], therefore by Lemma 2.7, we have

    f(z)=2πz2csc2πzπ2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)2πz2csc2πzcosπzπ2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)2π4(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)π2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)=0

    Also cosπz1 and z2(nz) for z[2,2n3], therefore by proof of Lemma 2.4 [7], we see that

    f(z)=2πz2csc2πzπ2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)cosπ2(nz)2πz2csc2πzπ2(nz)2csc2π2(nz)0.

    Hence f(z) is increasing on [2,n2].

    Sidigraphs in Dsn are classified into three categories: the sidigraphs whose directed cycles are of even length, the sidigraphs whose directed cycles are of odd length and the sidigraphs whose one directed cycle is of even length and one is of odd length. Yang and Wang [12] investigated the energy ordering in first category where both cycles are of even length. Therefore in the following section, we separately investigate energy ordering in other two categories and find maximal energy.

    Yang and Wang [12] investigated the energy ordering of bicyclic sidigraphs in Dsn, where each directed cycle is of even length. For details see [12].

    Yang and Yang also proved the following theorem about the extremal energy of those bicyclic sidigraphs in the class Dsn whose both directed cycles are of even length.

    Theorem 3.1 (Xang and Wang [12]). Suppose a sidigraph SDsn has even directed cycles.

    (i) For n0(mod4), the largest energy of S is obtained if SDsn[2,n2].

    (ii) For n1(mod4), the largest energy of S is obtained if SDsn[2,n3].

    (iii) For n2(mod4), the largest energy of S is obtained if SDsn[2,n2].

    (iv) For n3(mod4), the largest energy of S is obtained if SDsn[2,n3].

    (v) The smallest energy of S is obtained if SDsn[2,2].

    In this section, we find energy ordering of those bicyclic sidigraphs in Dsn that contain directed cycles of odd length. Note that for r1(mod2), E(Cr)=E(Cr). Hence we only consider the case when both directed cycles are positive.

    Lemma 3.2. Let n>5 and n0(mod4). Take r[2,n2] satisfying r1(mod2) and nr1(mod2). Then E(Dsn[r,nr]) has maximum value at r=3. Therefore the following energy ordering holds:

    E(Dsn[3,n3])>E(Dsn[5,n5])>>E(Dsn[n22,n+22]).

    Proof. Using Eq (2.1), we get

    E(Dsn[r,nr])=cscπ2r+cscπ2(nr).

    By Part (1) of Lemma 2.9, we see that cscπ2r+cscπ2(nr) is decreasing on [2,n2] and increasing on [n2,n2]. Therefore the smallest odd number in [2,n2] where E(Dsn[r,nr]) has maximum value is r=3 and the largest odd number in [n2,n2] where E(Dsn[r,nr]) has maximum value is r=n3. Thus we have

    E(Dsn[3,n3])>E(Dsn[5,n5])>>E(Dsn[n21,n2+1]).

    The proof is complete.

    Similar to Lemma 3.2, the following result can be proved.

    Lemma 3.3. Let n>5 and n2(mod4). Take r[2,n2] satisfying r1(mod2) and nr1(mod2). Then E(Dsn[r,nr]) has maximum value at r=3. Therefore the following energy ordering holds:

    E(Dsn[3,n3])>E(Dsn[5,n5])>>E(Dsn[n2,n2]).

    Lemma 3.4. Let n>5 and n1(mod4). Take r[2,n2] satisfying r1(mod2) and nr11(mod2). Then E(Dsn[r,nr1]) has maximum value at r=3. Therefore the following energy ordering holds:

    E(Dsn[3,n4])>E(Dsn[5,n6])>>E(Dsn[n32,n+12]).

    Proof. Since r1(mod2) and n1(mod4), therefore nr1(mod2). Using Eq (2.1), we have

    E(Dsn[r,nr1]=cscπ2r+cscπ2(nr1).

    Hence by changing n to n1 is Lemma 3.2, we get the desired result.

    By changing n in Lemma 3.3 to n1, the following result is obtained.

    Lemma 3.5. Let n>5 and n3(mod4). Take r[2,n2] satisfying r1(mod2) and nr11(mod2). Then E(Dsn[r,nr1]) has maximum value at r=3. Therefore the following energy ordering holds:

    E(Dsn[3,n4])>E(Dsn[5,n6])>>E(Dsn[n12,n12]).

    Combining Lemmas 3.2 3.5, the following corollary is obtained.

    Corollary 3.6. Suppose r1(mod2) and n>5.

    (i) If n0(mod2) then E(Dsn[3,n3])E(Dsn[r,nr]).

    (ii) If n1(mod2) then E(Dsn[3,n4])E(Dsn[r,nr1]).

    Now we give the extremal energy of bicyclic sidigraphs in the class Dsn.

    Theorem 3.7. Let SDsn be a sidigraph with odd directed cycles.

    (i) For n0(mod2), the maximal energy of S is attained if SDsn[3,n3].

    (ii) For n1(mod2), the maximal energy of S is attained if SDsn[3,n4].

    (iii) The minimal energy of S is attained if SDsn[3,3].

    Proof. The proof of Part (i) and (ii) follows from Corollary 3.6.

    (iii). As for odd integers r1 and r2 with r1r23, it holds that E(Cr1)E(Cr2). Hence the minimal energy of S is attained if SDsn[3,3].

    In next theorem, we give the energy ordering of those bicyclic sidigraphs in Dsn whose both directed cycles are of odd length.

    Theorem 3.8. Let n>5 and r[2,n2].

    (i) If n0(mod4) then we have the following energy ordering:

    E(Dsn[3,n3])>E(Dsn[5,n5])>>E(Dsn[n22,n+22])>E(Dsn[n62,n+22])>>E(Dsn[3,n+22])>E(Dsn[3,n22])>E(Dsn[3,n62])>>E(Dsn[3,3]).

    (ii) If n1(mod4) then we have the following energy ordering:

    E(Dsn[3,n4])>E(Dsn[5,n6])>>E(Dsn[n32,n+12])>E(Dsn[n72,n+12])>>E(Dsn[3,n+12])>E(Dsn[3,n32])>E(Dsn[3,n72])>>E(Dsn[3,3]).

    (iii) If n2(mod4) then we have the following energy ordering:

    E(Dsn[3,n3])>E(Dsn[5,n5])>>E(Dsn[n2,n2])>E(Dsn[n42,n2])>>E(Dsn[3,n2])>E(Dsn[3,n42])>E(Dsn[3,n82])>>E(Dsn[3,3]).

    (iv) If n3(mod4) then we have the following energy ordering:

    E(Dsn[3,n4])>E(Dsn[5,n6])>>E(Dsn[n12,n12])>E(Dsn[n52,n12])>>E(Dsn[3,n12])>E(Dsn[3,n52])>E(Dsn[3,n92])>>E(Dsn[3,3]).

    Example 3.9. We illustrate Theorem 3.8 by considering sidigraphs of different order.

    (i) Take n=12, that is, n0(mod4). Then

    E(Dsn[5,n5])=E(Dsn[n22,n+22])=E(Dsn[5,7])=7.7300E(Dsn[3,n3])=E(Dsn[3,9])=7.7588E(Dsn[n62,n+22])=E(Dsn[3,5])=6.4940E(Dsn[3,n22])=EE(Dsn[3,5])=5.2361E(Dsn[3,3])=4.

    It follows that

    E(Dsn[3,9])>E(Dsn[5,7])>E(Dsn[3,5])>E(Dsn[3,3]).

    (ii) Take n=17, that is, n1(mod4). Then

    E(Dsn[7,n7])=E(Dsn[n32,n+12])=E(Dsn[7,9])=10.2527E(Dsn[3,n4])=E(Dsn[3,13])=10.2962E(Dsn[5,n6])=E(Dsn[5,11])=10.2627E(Dsn[n72,n+12])=E(Dsn[5,9])=8.9948E(Dsn[3,n+12])=E(Dsn[3,9])=7.7588E(Dsn[3,n32])=E(Dsn[3,7])=6.4940E(Dsn[3,n72])=E(Dsn[3,5])=5.2361E(Dsn[3,n112])=E(Dsn[3,3])=4.

    Therefore we get,

    E(Dsn[3,13])>E(Dsn[5,11])>E(Dsn[7,9])>E(Dsn[5,9])>E(Dsn[3,9])>E(Dsn[3,7])>E(Dsn[3,5])>E(Dsn[3,3]).

    (iii) Take n=14, that is, n2(mod4). Then

    E(Dsn[7,n7])=E(Dsn[n2,n2])=E(Dsn[7,7])=8.9879E(Dsn[n82,n2])=E(Dsn[3,n2])=E(Dsn[3,7])=6.4940E(Dsn[3,n3])=E(Dsn[3,11])=9.0267E(Dsn[5,n5])=E(Dsn[5,9])=8.9948E(Dsn[n42,n2])=E(Dsn[5,7])=7.7300E(Dsn[3,n42])=E(Dsn[3,5])=5.2361E(Dsn[3,n82])=E(Dsn[3,3])=4.

    Hence we get,

    E(Dsn[3,11])>E(Dsn[5,9])>E(Dsn[7,7])>E(Dsn[5,7])>E(Dsn[3,7])>E(Dsn[3,5])>E(Dsn[3,3]).

    (iv) Taken=19, that is, n3(mod4). Then

    E(Dsn[9,n9]=E(Dsn[n12,n12])=E(Dsn[9,9])=11.5175E(Dsn[3,n12])=E(Dsn[n132,n12])=E(Dsn[3,9])=7.7588E(Dsn[n52,n12])=E(Dsn[7,9])=10.2527E(Dsn[n92,n12])=E(Dsn[5,9])=8.9948E(Dsn[3,n4])=E(Dsn[3,15])=11.5688E(Dsn[5,n6])=E(Dsn[5,13])=11.5323E(Dsn[7,n8])=E(Dsn[7,11])=11.5206E(Dsn[3,n52])=E(Dsn[3,7])=6.4940E(Dsn[3,n92])=E(Dsn[3,5])=5.2361E(Dsn[3,n132])=E(Dsn[3,3])=4.

    Therefore, we obtain

    E(Dsn[3,15])>E(Dsn[5,13])>E(Dsn[7,11])>E(Dsn[9,9])>E(Dsn[7,9])>E(Dsn[5,9])>E(Dsn[3,9])>E(Dsn[3,7])>E(Dsn[3,5])>E(Dsn[3,3]).

    In this section, we find energy ordering of those bicyclic sidigraphs in Dsn whose one directed cycle is of even length and one is of odd length. For n0(mod2), if r1(mod2) then nr1(mod2) and if r0(mod2) then nr0(mod2). So we only consider the case when n1(mod2). Note that for r0(mod2) and nr1(mod2) then E(Dsn[r,nr])=E(Dsn[r,nr]). Hence we only have to give the energy ordering of those bicyclic sidigraphs in Dsn whose both directed cycles are positive or both directed cycles are negative. The proofs are similar to the proofs of Lemmas 3.2 3.5 and thus omitted.

    Now we give the energy ordering of those bicyclic sidigraphs in Dsn whose both directed cycles are positive.

    Lemma 3.10. Suppose n>5, n0(mod3) and r[2,n2] satisfying r0(mod2) and nr1(mod2). Then we have the following energy ordering:

    (i) Let r2(mod4).

    (a) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[6,n6])>>E(Dsn[2n3,n3]).

    (b) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n3,n3]).

    (c) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n3,n3]).

    (ii) Let r0(mod4).

    (a) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[4,n4]).

    (b) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[4,n4]).

    Lemma 3.11. Suppose n>5, n1(mod3) and r[2,n2] satisfying r0(mod2) and nr1(mod2). Then we have the following energy ordering:

    (i) Let r2(mod4).

    (a) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[6,n6])>>E(Dsn[2n83,n+83]).

    (b) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n+43,n43]).

    (c) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n+43,n43]).

    (ii) Let r0(mod4).

    (a) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[4,n4]).

    (b) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[4,n4]).

    Lemma 3.12. Suppose n>5, n2(mod3) and r[2,n2] satisfying r0(mod2) and nr1(mod2). Then we have the following energy ordering:

    (i) Let r2(mod4).

    (a) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[6,n6])>>E(Dsn[2n43,n+43]).

    (b) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n+83,n83]).

    (c) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n+83,n83]).

    (ii) Let r0(mod4).

    (a) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[4,n4]).

    (b) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[4,n4]).

    Now we give the energy ordering of those bicyclic sidigraphs in Dsn whose both directed cycles are negative.

    Lemma 3.13. Suppose n>5, n0(mod3) and r[2,n2] satisfying r0(mod2) and nr1(mod2). Then we have the following energy ordering:

    (i) Let r0(mod4).

    (a) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[8,n8])>>E(Dsn[2n63,n+63]).

    (b) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n+63,n63]).

    (c) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n+63,n63]).

    (ii) Let r2(mod4).

    (a) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2,n2]).

    (b) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2,n2]).

    Lemma 3.14. Suppose n>5, n1(mod3) and r[2,n2] satisfying r0(mod2) and nr1(mod2). Then we have the following energy ordering:

    (i) Let r0(mod4).

    (a) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[8,n8])>>E(Dsn[2n23,n+23]).

    (b) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n+103,n103]).

    (c) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n+103,n103]).

    (ii) Let r2(mod4).

    (a) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2,n2]).

    (b) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2,n2]).

    Lemma 3.15. Suppose n>5, n2(mod3) and r[2,n2] satisfying r0(mod2) and nr1(mod2). Then we have the following energy ordering:

    (i) Let r0(mod4).

    (a) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[8,n8])>>E(Dsn[2n103,n+103]).

    (b) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n+23,n23]).

    (c) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n+23,n23]).

    (ii) Let r2(mod4).

    (a) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2,n2]).

    (b) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2,n2]).

    Now we give the extremal energy of bicyclic sidigraphs in the class Dsn.

    Theorem 3.16. Let SDsn be a sidigraph with one directed cycle of even length and one of odd length.

    (i) For n1(mod2), the maximal energy of S is attained if SDsn[2,n2].

    (ii) The minimal energy of S is attained if SDsn[2,3].

    Proof. (i). For proof, see Theorem 7 [5].

    (ii). Since for odd integers r1 and r2 with r1r23, it holds that E(Cr1)E(Cr2) and E(C2)=0. Hence the minimal energy of S is attained if SDsn[2,3].

    In next theorem, we give the energy ordering of those bicyclic sidigraphs in Dsn whose one directed cycle is of even length and one is of odd length.

    Theorem 3.17. Let n is odd with n>5 and r[2,n2].

    (1) If n0(mod3) then we have the following energy ordering:

    (i) Let r2(mod4).

    (a) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[6,n6])>>E(Dsn[2n3,n3])>E(Dsn[2n123,n3])>E(Dsn[2n243,n3])>>E(Dsn[2,n3])>E(Dsn[2,n63])>E(Dsn[2,n123])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (b) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n3,n3])>E(Dsn[2n3,n63])>E(Dsn[2n3,n123])>>E(Dsn[2n3,3])>E(Dsn[2n123,3])E(Dsn[2n243,3])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (c) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n3,n3])>E(Dsn[2n123,n3])>E(Dsn[2n243,n3])>>E(Dsn[2,n3])>E(Dsn[2,n63])>E(Dsn[2,n123])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (d) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[2,n4])>E(Dsn[2,n6])>>E(Dsn[2,3])>E(Dsn[2,2]).

    (e) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[2,n4])>E(Dsn[2,n6])>>E(Dsn[2,3])>E(Dsn[2,2]).

    (ii) Let r0(mod4).

    (a) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[4,n6])>E(Dsn[4,n8])>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (b) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,5])>>E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[4,n6])>E(Dsn[4,n8])>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (c) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[8,n8])>>E(Dsn[2n63,n+63])>E(Dsn[2n183,n+63])>E(Dsn[2n303,n+63])>>E(Dsn[4,n+63])>E(Dsn[4,n3])>E(Dsn[4,n63])>>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (d) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n+63,n63])>E(Dsn[2n63,n63])>E(Dsn[2n183,n63])>>E(Dsn[4,n63])>E(Dsn[4,n123])>E(Dsn[4,n183])>>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (e) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n+63,n63])>E(Dsn[2n+63,n123])>E(Dsn[2n+63,n183])>>E(Dsn[2n+63,3])>E(Dsn[2n63,3])>E(Dsn[2n183,3])>>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (2) If n1(mod3) then we have the following energy ordering:

    (i) Let r2(mod4).

    (a) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[6,n6])>>E(Dsn[2n83,n+83])>E(Dsn[2n203,n+83])>E(Dsn[2n323,n+83])>>E(Dsn[2,n+83])>E(Dsn[2,n+23])>E(Dsn[2,n43])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (b) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n+43,n43])>E(Dsn[2n83,n43])>E(Dsn[2n203,n43])>>E(Dsn[2,n43])>E(Dsn[2,n103])>E(Dsn[2,n163])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (c) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n+43,n43])>E(Dsn[2n+43,n103])>E(Dsn[2n+43,n163])>>E(Dsn[2n+43,3])>E(Dsn[2n83,3])>E(Dsn[2n203,3])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (d) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[2,n4])>E(Dsn[2,n6])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (e) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[2,n4])>E(Dsn[2,n6])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (ii) Let r0(mod4).

    (a) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[4,n6])>E(Dsn[4,n8])>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (b) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[4,n6])>E(Dsn[4,n8])>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (c) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[8,n8])>>E(Dsn[2n23,n+23])>E(Dsn[2n143,n+23])>E(Dsn[2n263,n+23])>>E(Dsn[4,n+23])>E(Dsn[4,n43])>E(Dsn[4,n103])>>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (d) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n+103,n103])>E(Dsn[2n23,n103])>E(Dsn[2n143,n103])>>E(Dsn[4,n103])>E(Dsn[4,n163])>E(Dsn[4,n223])>>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (e) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n+103,n103])>E(Dsn[2n+103,n163])>E(Dsn[2n+103,n223])>E(Dsn[2n+103,3])>E(Dsn[2n23,3])>E(Dsn[2n143,3])>>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (3) If n2(mod3) then we have the following energy ordering:

    (i) Let r2(mod4).

    (a) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[6,n6])>>E(Dsn[2n43,n+43])>E(Dsn[2n163,n+43])>E(Dsn[2n263,n+43])>>E(Dsn[2,n+43])>E(Dsn[2,n23])>E(Dsn[2,n83])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (b) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n+83,n83])>E(Dsn[2n43,n83])>E(Dsn[2n163,n83])>>E(Dsn[2,n83])>E(Dsn[2,n143])>E(Dsn[2,n203])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (c) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n+83,n83])>E(Dsn[2n+83,n143])>E(Dsn[2n+83,n203])>>E(Dsn[2n+83,3])>E(Dsn[2n43,3])>E(Dsn[2n163,3])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (d) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[2,n4])>E(Dsn[2,n6])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (e) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2,n2])>E(Dsn[2,n4])>E(Dsn[2,n6])>>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (ii) Let r0(mod4).

    (a) If n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[4,n6])>E(Dsn[4,n8])>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (b) If n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[4,n6])>E(Dsn[4,n8])>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (c) If r[2,2n3] then

    E(Dsn[4,n4])>E(Dsn[8,n8])>>E(Dsn[2n103,n+103])>E(Dsn[2n223,n+103])>E(Dsn[2n343,n+103])>>E(Dsn[4,n+103])>E(Dsn[4,n+43])>E(Dsn[4,n23])>>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (d) If r[2n3,n2] and n32(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n5,5])>E(Dsn[n9,9])>>E(Dsn[2n+23,n23])>E(Dsn[2n103,n23])>E(Dsn[2n223,n23])>E(Dsn[4,n23])>E(Dsn[4,n83])>E(Dsn[4,n143])>>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (e) If r[2n3,n2] and n30(mod4) then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])>E(Dsn[n7,7])>>E(Dsn[2n+23,n23])>E(Dsn[2n+23,n83])>E(Dsn[2n+23,n143])>>E(Dsn[2n+23,3])>E(Dsn[2n103,3])>E(Dsn[2n223,3])>>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    Example 3.18. We illustrate Theorem 3.17 by considering sidigraphs of different order.

    (1) Take n=15, that is, n0(mod3) and n30(mod4).

    (i) Let r2(mod4).

    (a) Let r[2,2n3]=[2,10]. Then

    E(Dsn[10,n10]=E(Dsn[2n3,n3])=E(Dsn[10,5])=9.7082E(Dsn[2n243,n3])=E(Dsn[2,n3])=E(Dsn[2,5])=5.2361E(Dsn[2n123,n3])=E(Dsn[6,5])=7.2361E(Dsn[2,n2])=E(Dsn[2,13])=10.2962E(Dsn[6,n6])=E(Dsn[6,9])=9.7588E(Dsn[2,n62])=E(Dsn[2,3])=4.

    Above calculations yield.

    E(Dsn[2,13])>E(Dsn[6,9])>E(Dsn[10,5])>E(Dsn[6,5])>E(Dsn[2,5])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (b) Let r[2,2n3]=[10,13]. Then

    E(Dsn[n3,3]=E(Dsn[2n3,n3])=E(Dsn[10,5])=9.7082E(Dsn[2n123,n3])=E(Dsn[2,n3])=E(Dsn[2,5])=5.2361E(Dsn[2n123,n3])=E(Dsn[6,5])=7.2361E(Dsn[2,n62])=E(Dsn[2,3])=4.

    It follows that

    E(Dsn[10,5])>E(Dsn[6,5])>E(Dsn[2,5])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (c) Since n3=120(mod4). Therefore we have

    E(Dsn[n13,13])=E(Dsn[2,n2])=E(Dsn[2,13])=8.2962E(Dsn[n5,5])=E(Dsn[10,5])=9.3914E(Dsn[n9,9])=E(Dsn[6,9])=9.2229E(Dsn[2,n4])=E(Dsn[2,11])=7.0267E(Dsn[2,n6])=E(Dsn[2,9])=5.7588E(Dsn[2,n8])=E(Dsn[2,7])=4.4940E(Dsn[2,n10])=E(Dsn[2,5])=3.2361E(Dsn[2,n12])=E(Dsn[2,3])=2E(Dsn[2,2])=0.

    Hence we get,

    E(Dsn[10,5])>E(Dsn[6,9])>E(Dsn[2,13])>E(Dsn[2,11])>E(Dsn[2,9])>E(Dsn[2,7])>E(Dsn[2,5])>E(Dsn[2,3])>E(Dsn[2,2]).

    (ii) Let r0(mod4).

    (a) Since n3=120(mod4). Therefore we have

    E(Dsn[n11,11])=E(Dsn[4,n4])=E(Dsn[4,11])=9.0267E(Dsn[n3,3])=E(Dsn[12,3])=9.4641E(Dsn[n7,7])=E(Dsn[8,7])=9.3224E(Dsn[4,n6])=E(Dsn[4,9])=7.7588E(Dsn[4,n8])=E(Dsn[4,7])=6.4940E(Dsn[4,n10])=E(Dsn[4,5])=5.2361E(Dsn[4,n12])=E(Dsn[4,3])=4E(Dsn[2,3])=2.

    Above calculations yield,

    E(Dsn[12,3])>E(Dsn[8,7])>E(Dsn[4,11])>E(Dsn[4,9])>E(Dsn[4,7])>E(Dsn[4,5])>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3]).

    (b) Let r[2,2n3]=[2,10]. Then

    E(Dsn[4,n3])=E(Dsn[4,5])=6.0645E(Dsn[8,n8])=E(Dsn[2n63,n+63])=E(Dsn[8,7])=9.7202E(Dsn[2n183,n+63])=E(Dsn[4,7]=7.3224E(Dsn[4,n63])=E(Dsn[4,3])=4.8284E(Dsn[4,n4])=E(Dsn[4,11])=9.8551E(Dsn[2,3])=2E(Dsn[2,2])=0.

    Therefore, we conclude

    E(Dsn[4,11])>E(Dsn[8,7])>E(Dsn[4,7])>E(Dsn[4,5])>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3])>E(Dsn[2,2]).

    (c) Let r[2n3,n2]=[10,13]. Then

    E(Dsn[n3,3])=E(Dsn[2n+63,n63])=E(Dsn[12,3])=9.7274E(Dsn[2n63,3])=E(Dsn[8,3])=7.2263E(Dsn[2n183,3])=E(Dsn[4,3])=4.8284.

    Hence,

    E(Dsn[12,3])>E(Dsn[8,3])>E(Dsn[4,3])>E(Dsn[2,3])>E(Dsn[2,2]).

    Analogously, for a fixed n, one can verify the energy ordering of Parts (2) and (3) of Theorem 3.17.

    Let Dn denotes the set of vertex-disjoint bicyclic digraphs of a fixed order n. We investigate the energy ordering of signed digraphs in Dsn and find the maximal energy. The results for the case, when both directed cycles are even are obtained in [12]. Therefore we have solved the remaining cases for energy ordering in Dsn.

    The authors wish to thank to the National University of Sciences and Technology for providing favorable environment for research.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] I. Peña, J. Rada, Energy of digraphs, Linear Multilinear A., 56 (2008), 565-579. doi: 10.1080/03081080701482943
    [2] S. Pirzada, M. A. Bhat, Energy of signed digraphs, Discrete Appl. Math., 169 (2014), 195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2013.12.018
    [3] M. Khan, R. Farooq, J. Rada, Complex adjacency matrix and energy of digraphs, Linear Multilinear A., 65 (2017), 2170-2186. doi: 10.1080/03081087.2016.1265064
    [4] R. Farooq, M. Khan, S. Chand, On iota energy of signed digraphs, Linear Multilinear A., 67 (2019), 705-724. doi: 10.1080/03081087.2018.1431200
    [5] M. Khan, R. Farooq, On the energy of bicyclic signed digraphs, J. Math. Inequal., 11 (2017), 845-862 .
    [6] M. Khan, R. Farooq, A. A. Siddiqui, On the extremal energy of bicyclic digraphs, J. Math. Inequal., 9 (2015), 799-810.
    [7] R. Farooq, M. Khan, F. Ahmad, Extremal iota energy of bicyclic digraphs, Appl. Math. Comput., 303 (2017), 24-33.
    [8] R. Farooq, S. Chand, M. Khan, Iota energy of bicyclic signed digraphs, Asian-European J. Math., 12 (2019), 1-14.
    [9] J. Monslave, J. Rada, Bicyclic digraphs with maximal energy, Appl. Math. Comput., 280 (2016), 124-131.
    [10] S. Hafeez, R. Farooq, M. Khan, Bicylic signed digraphs with maximal energy, Appl. Math. Comput., 347 (2019), 702-711.
    [11] X. Yang, L. Wang, On the ordering of bicyclic digraphs with respect to energy and iota energy, Appl. Math. Comput., 339 (2018), 768-778.
    [12] X. Yang, L. Wang, Ordering of bicyclic signed digraphs by energy, Filomat, to appear.
    [13] X. Yang, L. Wang, Iota energy ordering of bicyclic signed digraphs, arXiv:2004.01412v1.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3021) PDF downloads(75) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog