Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) powder was prepared by mixing hydrogen peroxide (30% H2O2) with pure gallium metal (99.999%) inside a hydrothermal cell. The resulting white powder was subjected to different characterization techniques. X-ray diffraction (XRD) revealed the presence of multiple crystalline phases of gallium oxide, including monoclinic β-Ga2O3, and rhombohedral α-Ga2O3, as well as gallium suboxide Ga2O. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) divulged Ga3+ as the dominant oxidation state of gallium in Ga2O3. However, a lower oxidation state, Ga1+, was also detected. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed a high degree of morphological diversity with a wide variety in shape and size of powder particles. Porosity measurements were performed to determine the total surface area, pore diameter, and pore volume of Ga2O3 powder. The values were found to be 50 m2 g−1, 2.6 nm, and 0.07 cm3 g−1, respectively. Fascinatingly, gallium oxide powder was directly used to fabricate a symmetrical supercapacitor without any binder. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) measurements were performed to examine the electrochemical energy storage capabilities of Ga2O3 powder using 1M KOH as electrolyte. The fabricated supercapacitor demonstrated a maximum specific capacitance of 1176 F g−1, at a current density of 2 A g−1, an energy density of 104.5 Wh kg−1, and a high-power density of 1.6 kW kg−1. Additionally, following 5000 charge-discharge cycles, the supercapacitor demonstrated outstanding capacitance retention stability of 91.18%. The obtained energy density of 104.5 Wh kg−1 is among the highest reported for metal oxide-based supercapacitors. The presence of multiple crystalline phases in the gallium oxide powder likely contributed significantly to the remarkable results observed in this study.
Citation: Jamal Alnofiay, Ahmed Al-Shahrie, Elsayed Shalaan. Green synthesis of high-performance gallium oxide supercapacitor: A path to outstanding energy density[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(6): 1065-1082. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024051
Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) powder was prepared by mixing hydrogen peroxide (30% H2O2) with pure gallium metal (99.999%) inside a hydrothermal cell. The resulting white powder was subjected to different characterization techniques. X-ray diffraction (XRD) revealed the presence of multiple crystalline phases of gallium oxide, including monoclinic β-Ga2O3, and rhombohedral α-Ga2O3, as well as gallium suboxide Ga2O. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) divulged Ga3+ as the dominant oxidation state of gallium in Ga2O3. However, a lower oxidation state, Ga1+, was also detected. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed a high degree of morphological diversity with a wide variety in shape and size of powder particles. Porosity measurements were performed to determine the total surface area, pore diameter, and pore volume of Ga2O3 powder. The values were found to be 50 m2 g−1, 2.6 nm, and 0.07 cm3 g−1, respectively. Fascinatingly, gallium oxide powder was directly used to fabricate a symmetrical supercapacitor without any binder. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) measurements were performed to examine the electrochemical energy storage capabilities of Ga2O3 powder using 1M KOH as electrolyte. The fabricated supercapacitor demonstrated a maximum specific capacitance of 1176 F g−1, at a current density of 2 A g−1, an energy density of 104.5 Wh kg−1, and a high-power density of 1.6 kW kg−1. Additionally, following 5000 charge-discharge cycles, the supercapacitor demonstrated outstanding capacitance retention stability of 91.18%. The obtained energy density of 104.5 Wh kg−1 is among the highest reported for metal oxide-based supercapacitors. The presence of multiple crystalline phases in the gallium oxide powder likely contributed significantly to the remarkable results observed in this study.
[1] | Yang YB, Zhu SM, Xu HF (2022) Study on capacitance properties of redox ion doped Zn-based electrode materials. Defect Diffus Forum 421: 143–148. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-u2pe4h doi: 10.4028/p-u2pe4h |
[2] | Jayakumar S, Santhosh PC, Mohideen MM, et al. (2024) A comprehensive review of metal oxides (RuO2, Co3O4, MnO2 and NiO) for supercapacitor applications and global market trends. J Alloys Compd 976: 173170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.173170 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.173170 |
[3] | Majumdar D, Maiyalagan T, Jiang Z (2019) Recent progress in ruthenium oxide-based composites for supercapacitor applications. ChemElectroChem 6: 4343–4372. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201900668 doi: 10.1002/celc.201900668 |
[4] | Sugimoto W (2014) Ruthenium oxides as supercapacitor electrodes, In: Kreysa G, Ota Ki, Savinell RF, Encyclopedia of Applied Electrochemistry, New York: Springer, 1813–1821. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6996-5_511 |
[5] | Nisha B, Vidyalakshmi Y, Abdul Razack S (2020) Enhanced formation of ruthenium oxide nanoparticles through green synthesis for highly efficient supercapacitor applications. Adv Powder Technol 31: 1001–1006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2019.12.026 doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2019.12.026 |
[6] | Guo Y, Zhu Z, Chen Y, et al. (2020) High-performance supercapacitors of ruthenium-based nanohybrid compounds. J Alloys Compd 842: 155798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155798 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155798 |
[7] | Kim IH, Kim KB (2001) Ruthenium oxide thin film electrodes for supercapacitors. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 4: A62. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1.1359956 |
[8] | Zhang M, Dai X, Zhang C, et al. (2020) High specific capacitance of the electrodeposited MnO2 on porous foam Nickel soaked in alcohol and its dependence on precursor concentration. Materials 13: 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010181 doi: 10.3390/ma13010181 |
[9] | Brousse T, Bélanger D, Long JW (2015) To be or not to be pseudocapacitive? J Electrochem Soc 162: A5185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.0201505jes doi: 10.1149/2.0201505jes |
[10] | Lang X, Hirata A, Fujita T, et al. (2011) Nanoporous metal/oxide hybrid electrodes for electrochemical supercapacitors. Nat Nanotechnol 6: 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.13 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.13 |
[11] | Ryu I, Kim G, Yoon H, et al. (2016) Hierarchically nanostructured MnO2 electrodes for pseudocapacitor application. RSC Adv 6: 102814–102820. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA22841K doi: 10.1039/C6RA22841K |
[12] | Liu Y, Liu S, Wang X, et al. (2023) One-step synthesis of self-standing porous Co-doped NiO electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors. J Alloys Compd 934: 167821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167821 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167821 |
[13] | Manibalan G, Govindaraj Y, Yesuraj J, et al. (2021) Facile synthesis of NiO@Ni(OH)2-α-MoO3 nanocomposite for enhanced solid-state symmetric supercapacitor application. J Colloid Interface Sci 585: 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.032 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.032 |
[14] | Veeresh S, Ganesha H, Nagaraju YS, et al. (2023) Activated carbon incorporated graphene oxide with SnO2 and TiO2-Zn nanocomposite for supercapacitor application. J Alloys Compd 952: 169907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169907 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169907 |
[15] | Asen P, Haghighi M, Shahrokhian S, et al. (2019) One step synthesis of SnS2-SnO2 nano-heterostructured as an electrode material for supercapacitor applications. J Alloys Compd 782: 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.176 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.176 |
[16] | Huang X, Zhang W, Tan Y, et al. (2016) Facile synthesis of rod-like Bi2O3 nanoparticles as an electrode material for pseudocapacitors. Ceram Int 42: 2099–2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.157 doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.157 |
[17] | Wu YL, Guo W, Lian XJ, et al. (2019) Self-assembled three-dimensional hierarchical CoMoO4 nanosheets on NiCo2O4 for high-performance supercapacitor. J Alloys Compd 793: 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.189 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.189 |
[18] | Nandagopal T, Balaji G, Vadivel S (2023) Enhanced electrochemical performance of CoMoO4 nanorods/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) as asymmetric supercapacitor devices. J Energy Storage 68: 107710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.107710 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107710 |
[19] | Gao Y, Tao J, Li J, et al. (2022) Construction of CoMoO4 nanorods wrapped by Ni–Co–S nanosheets for high-performance supercapacitor. J Alloys Compd 925: 166705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166705 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166705 |
[20] | Jiang S, Pang M, Pang M, et al. (2023) 3D emerging nanosheets comprising hierarchical CoMoO4/MnO2 composites for flexible all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors. Colloids Surf A 656: 130536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130536 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130536 |
[21] | Nasser R, Wang XL, Tiantian J, et al. (2022) Hydrothermal design of CoMoO4@CoWO4 core-shell heterostructure for flexible all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors. J Energy Storage 51: 104349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104349 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2022.104349 |
[22] | Nashim A, Mohanty R, Ray PK, et al. (2023) Gallium-based nascent electrode materials towards promising supercapacitor applications: A review. RSC Adv 13: 24536–24553. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA04537D doi: 10.1039/D3RA04537D |
[23] | Roy R, Hill VG, Osborn EF (1952) Polymorphism of Ga2O3 and the system Ga2O3–H2O. J Am Chem Soc 74: 719–722. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01123a039 doi: 10.1021/ja01123a039 |
[24] | Lyons JL (2019) Electronic properties of Ga2O3 polymorphs. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 8: Q3226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.0331907jss doi: 10.1149/2.0331907jss |
[25] | El-Sayed EI, Al-Ghamdi AA, Al-Heniti S, et al. (2011) Synthesis of ultrafine β-Ga2O3 nanopowder via hydrothermal approach: A strong UV "excimer-like" emission. Mater Lett 65: 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2010.10.007 doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.10.007 |
[26] | Yu J, Fu N, Zhao J, et al. (2019) High specific capacitance electrode material for supercapacitors based on resin-derived nitrogen-doped porous carbons. ACS Omega 4: 15904–15911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01916 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01916 |
[27] | Tornheim A, O'Hanlon DC (2020) What do coulombic efficiency and capacity retention truly measure? A deep dive into cyclable lithium inventory, limitation type, and redox side reactions. J Electrochem Soc 167: 110520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab9ee8 doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9ee8 |
[28] | Pearton SJ, Yang J, Cary PHIV, et al. (2018) A review of Ga2O3 materials, processing, and devices. Appl Phys Rev 5: 011301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5006941 doi: 10.1063/1.5006941 |
[29] | Briggs D (1981) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, In: Wanger CD, Riggs WM, Davis LE, et al. Physical Electronics Division, Minnesota: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.740030412 |
[30] | Moulder JF, Stickle WF, Sobol WM, et al. (1992) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. |
[31] | Swallow JEN, Vorwerk C, Mazzolini P, et al. (2020) Influence of polymorphism on the electronic structure of Ga2O3. Chem Mater 32: 8460–8470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02465 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02465 |
[32] | Makeswaran N, Battu AK, Swadipta R, et al. (2019) Spectroscopic characterization of the electronic structure, chemical bonding, and band gap in thermally annealed polycrystalline Ga2O3 thin films. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 8: Q3249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.0461907jss doi: 10.1149/2.0461907jss |
[33] | Vogt P, Bierwagen O (2016) Reaction kinetics and growth window for plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy of Ga2O3: Incorporation of Ga vs. Ga2O desorption. Appl Phys Lett 108: 072101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4942002 doi: 10.1063/1.4942002 |
[34] | Azarov A, Park JH, Jeon DW, et al. (2023) High mobility of intrinsic defects in α-Ga2O3. Appl Phys Lett 122: 182104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0149870 doi: 10.1063/5.0149870 |
[35] | Pratiyush AS, Krishnamoorthy S, Muralidharan R, et al. (2019) 16—Advances in Ga2O3 solar-blind UV photodetectors, In: Pearton S, Ren F, Mastro M, Gallium Oxide, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 369–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-01768-8 |
[36] | Lee YJ, Schweitz MA, Oh JM, et al. (2020) Influence of annealing atmosphere on the characteristics of Ga2O3/4H-SiC n-n heterojunction diodes. Materials 13: 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020434 doi: 10.3390/ma13020434 |
[37] | Zhang P, Li Y, Wang M, et al. (2023) Self-doped (N/O/S) nanoarchitectonics of hierarchically porous carbon from palm flower for high-performance supercapacitors. Diam Relat Mater 136: 109976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2023.109976 doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.109976 |
[38] | Molahalli V, Bhat VS, Shetty A, et al. (2023) ZnO doped SnO2 nano flower decorated on graphene oxide/polypyrrole nanotubes for symmetric supercapacitor applications. J Energy Storage 69: 107953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.107953 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107953 |
[39] | Fei F, Zhou H, Lin J, et al. (2023) Facile synthesis of nanostructured bismuth oxide on nickel foam with outstanding electrochemical behavior for supercapacitor application. Mater Today Commun 36: 106797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106797 doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106797 |
[40] | Sudhakar K, Rajeswaran P, Kamatchi T, et al. (2023) Facile one-pot synthesis of porous NiCoP@reduced graphene oxide composite as active electrode material for high energy density asymmetric supercapacitor. Chem Phys Lett 826: 140635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2023.140635 doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2023.140635 |
[41] | Gowdhaman A, Kumar SA, Elumalai D, et al. (2023) Ni-MOF derived NiO/Ni/r-GO nanocomposite as a novel electrode material for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitor. J Energy Storage 61: 106769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.106769 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.106769 |
[42] | Naveenkumar P, Maniyazagan M, Yesuraj J, et al. (2022) Electrodeposited MnS@Ni(OH)2 core-shell hybrids as an efficient electrode materials for symmetric supercapacitor applications. Electrochim Acta 412: 140138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140138 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140138 |
[43] | Dong L, Zhao W, Liu T, et al. (2022) In situ growth of Ni-Co-S nanosheet arrays on rGO decorated Ni foam toward high-performance supercapacitors. J Electroanal Chem 921: 116658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116658 doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116658 |
[44] | Mane SA, Kashale AA, Kamble GP, et al. (2022) Facile synthesis of flower-like Bi2O3 as an efficient electrode for high performance asymmetric supercapacitor. J Alloys Compd 926: 166722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166722 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166722 |
[45] | Guo W, Lian X, Tian Y, et al. (2021) Facile fabrication 1D/2D/3D Co3O4 nanostructure in hydrothermal synthesis for enhanced supercapacitor performance. J Energy Storage 38: 102586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102586 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102586 |
[46] | Al-Harbi MY, Abdel-Daiem AM, Shalaan E (2023) Self-supporting electrodes obtained by electrochemical dealloying of Zr-based metallic glass alloys for energy storage applications. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 34: 1358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-10750-x doi: 10.1007/s10854-023-10750-x |
[47] | Chang BY (2020) Conversion of a constant phase element to an equivalent capacitor. J Electrochem Sci Technol 11: 318–321. https://doi.org/10.33961/jecst.2020.00815 doi: 10.33961/jecst.2020.00815 |
[48] | Jorcin JB, Orazem ME, Pébère N, et al. (2006) CPE analysis by local electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Electrochim Acta 51: 1473–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.128 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.128 |
[49] | Li X, Zhou L, Zhao S, et al. (2023) Reduced graphite oxide wrapped ZnO-SnO2 hollow nanospheres with as anodes for hybrid high energy density supercapacitors. Diam Relat Mater 136: 110076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110076 doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110076 |
[50] | Suganya S, Alam MM, Kousi F, et al. (2023) Facile one-pot synthesis of ternary Ni-Mn-Zn oxide nanocomposites for high-performance hybrid supercapacitors. J Energy Storage 71: 108176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108176 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.108176 |