Digital infrastructure strategies: the case of the province of Caserta

Paolo Pane; Federico de Andreis; Paolo Pane; Federico de Andreis

doi:10.3934/geosci.2023014

AIMS Geosciences

2023, Volume 9, Issue 2: 243-257. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023014

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Digital infrastructure strategies: the case of the province of Caserta

Paolo Pane ^{1
,
,},
Federico de Andreis ^{2
,
,}

1.
Dipartimento di Scienze politiche, Università di Napoli Federico Ⅱ, Italy
2.
Scienze e tecnologie dei trasporti, Università Giustino Fortunato, Italy

Received: 12 September 2022 Revised: 17 February 2023 Accepted: 12 March 2023 Published: 31 March 2023

The digital economy and the associated productivity gains generated by the diffusion of the Internet are considered fundamental components of growth models. Scientific reflection converges in considering balanced access to digital services as a diriment factor for the promotion of competitiveness, equity, economic development and social and environmental sustainability. Although the availability of infrastructure is not sufficient to achieve the full development of the territory and the community, it is nevertheless an unavoidable prerequisite for today's and future technological and digital applications and, therefore, investigating the type of association between the presence of communication networks and the socio-economic structure of the territories is essential to understanding the very nature of multidimensional inequalities and their spatial and geographical distribution, within a framework that sees infrastructure as a conversion factor and means of development for capabilities. Based on the theories of social exclusion, the capability approach and critical theory, the research presented aims to investigate, through the analysis of a case study, the possible association between the state of progress of broadband implementation and specific territorial configurations, considering also different variables of a geographical nature.
- digital infrastructure,
- ultra-wideband,
- socio-economic dynamics,
- digital divide,
- Regione Campania,
- Italy
Citation: Paolo Pane, Federico de Andreis. Digital infrastructure strategies: the case of the province of Caserta[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2023, 9(2): 243-257. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023014

Related Papers:

Abstract

The digital economy and the associated productivity gains generated by the diffusion of the Internet are considered fundamental components of growth models. Scientific reflection converges in considering balanced access to digital services as a diriment factor for the promotion of competitiveness, equity, economic development and social and environmental sustainability. Although the availability of infrastructure is not sufficient to achieve the full development of the territory and the community, it is nevertheless an unavoidable prerequisite for today's and future technological and digital applications and, therefore, investigating the type of association between the presence of communication networks and the socio-economic structure of the territories is essential to understanding the very nature of multidimensional inequalities and their spatial and geographical distribution, within a framework that sees infrastructure as a conversion factor and means of development for capabilities. Based on the theories of social exclusion, the capability approach and critical theory, the research presented aims to investigate, through the analysis of a case study, the possible association between the state of progress of broadband implementation and specific territorial configurations, considering also different variables of a geographical nature.

References

[1]	Helpman E (1998) Introduction. In General purpose technologies and economic growth, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1–14.
[2]	Malecki EJ (2002) The economic geography of the Internet's infrastructure. Econ Geogr 78: 399–424. https://doi.org/10.2307/4140796 doi: 10.2307/4140796
[3]	Doyle E, Perez-Alaniz M (2017) From the Concept to the Measurement of Sustainable Competitiveness: Social and Environmental Aspects. Entrepreneurial Bus Econ Rev 5: 35–59. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050402 doi: 10.15678/EBER.2017.050402
[4]	European Commission, 8th Cohesion Report, 2022. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/communications/2022/cohesion-in-europe-towards-2050-8th-cohesion-report.
[5]	Rekowski M, Piekarz T, Sztokfisz B, et al. (2020) International competition in the digital age, Geopolitics of emerging and disruptive technologies, Krakow: The Kosciuszko Institute, 13–24.
[6]	Costa JDS, Ellson RW, Martin RC (1987) Public capital, regional output and development: some empirical evidence. J Regional Sci 27: 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1987.tb01171.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1987.tb01171.x
[7]	Holtz-Eakin D (1994) Public sector capital and the productivity puzzle. Rev Econ Stat 76: 12–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109822 doi: 10.2307/2109822
[8]	Holtz-Eakin D, Schwartz AE (1995) Spatial productivity spillovers from public infrastructure: evidence from state highways. Int Tax Public Finan 2: 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872777 doi: 10.1007/BF00872777
[9]	Boarnet MG (1998) Spillovers and the locational effects of public infrastructure. J Regional Sci 38: 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00099 doi: 10.1111/0022-4146.00099
[10]	Sloboda BW, Yao VW (2008) Interstate spillovers of private capital and public spending. Ann Reg Sci 42: 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0181-z doi: 10.1007/s00168-007-0181-z
[11]	Crescenzi R, Rodríguez-Pose A (2012) Infrastructure and regional growth in the European Union. Pap Reg Sci 91: 487–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00439.x doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00439.x
[12]	Borowiecki R, Siuta-Tokarska B, Maroń J, et al. (2021) Developing Digital Economy and Society in the Light of the Issue of Digital Convergence of the Markets in the European Union Countries. Energies 14: 2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092717 doi: 10.3390/en14092717
[13]	Seitz H, Licht G (1995) The impact of public infrastructure capital on regional manufacturing production cost. Reg Stud 29: 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409512331348923 doi: 10.1080/00343409512331348923
[14]	Moomaw RL, Mullen JK, Williams M (1995) The interregional impact of infrastructure capital. South Econ J 61: 830–845. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061001 doi: 10.2307/1061001
[15]	Jimenez MMS (2003) Efficiency and TFP growth in the Spanish regions: the role of human and public capital. Growth Change 34: 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2257.00212 doi: 10.1111/1468-2257.00212
[16]	Pereira AM, Sagales OR (2003) Spillover effects of public capital formation: evidence from the Spanish regions. J Urban Econ 53: 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00517-X doi: 10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00517-X
[17]	Pereira AM, Andraz JM (2006) Public investment in transportation infrastructures and regional asymmetries in Portugal. Ann Reg Sci 40: 803–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0066-6 doi: 10.1007/s00168-006-0066-6
[18]	Kara MA, Taş S, Ada S (2016) The Impact of Infrastructure Expenditure Types on Regional Income in Turkey. Reg Stud 50: 1509–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1041369 doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1041369
[19]	Geuna A, Guerzoni M, Nuccio M, et al. (2021) Resilience and Digital Disruption: Regional Competition in the Age of Industry 4.0., Berlin: Springer Nature.
[20]	Kanai JM, Schindler S (2019) Peri-urban promises of connectivity: Linking project-led polycentrism to the infrastructure scramble. Environ Plann A Econ Space 51: 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18763370 doi: 10.1177/0308518X18763370
[21]	Tranos E (2011) The topology and the emerging urban geographies of the Internetbackbone and aviation networks in Europe: A comparative study. Environ Plann A Econ Space 43: 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43288 doi: 10.1068/a43288
[22]	He S, Yu S, Wang L (2021) The nexus of transport infrastructure and economic output in city-level China: a heterogeneous panel causality analysis. Ann Reg Sci 66: 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-020-01012-3 doi: 10.1007/s00168-020-01012-3
[23]	Lorenzetti M, Matteucci N (2016) Sviluppo socio-economico e dotazione di banda larga nei comuni marchigiani. PRISMA Economia-Società-Lavoro 3: 199–217. https://doi.org/10.3280/PRI2016-003014 doi: 10.3280/PRI2016-003014
[24]	Medeiros E (2012) Territorial Cohesion: a conceptual analysis, Regional Studies Association European Conference. 13–16.
[25]	Rauhut D, Ludlow D (2013) Services of General Interest andTerritorial Cohesion: What, How and by Whom. ESPON SeGI. Indicators and perspectives for services of general interest in territorial cohesion and development. (Draft) Scientific Report, 29–41. Available from: http://www.espon.eu.
[26]	Colomb C, Santinha G (2014) European Union Competition Policyand the European Territorial Cohesion Agenda: An impossible Reconciliation? State AidRules and Public Service Liberalization through the European Spatial Planning Lens. Eur Plan Stud 22: 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.744384 doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.744384
[27]	Molle W (2007) European Cohesion Policy, Abingdon: Routledge.
[28]	Van De Walle S (2009) When is a service an essential public service? Ann Public Coop Econ 80: 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00397.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00397.x
[29]	Suriñach J, Moreno R (2012) Introduction: Intangible Assets and Regional Economic Growth. Reg Stud 46: 1277–1281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.735087 doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.735087
[30]	Gilbert MR, Masucci M (2020) Defining the Geographic and Policy Dynamics of the Digital Divide. Handbook Changing World Language Map, 3653–3671. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_39 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_39
[31]	Haefner L, Sternberg R (2020) Spatial implications of digitization: State of the field and research agenda. Geogr Compass 14: e12544. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12544 doi: 10.1111/gec3.12544
[32]	Huddleston JR, Pangotra PP (1990) Regional and local economic impacts of transportation investment. Transp Quartely 44: 579–594. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.c104685899?urlappend = %3Bseq = 603
[33]	Banister D, Berechman J (1999) Transport investment and economic development, 1 Eds., London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203220870
[34]	Gillespie A, Robins K (1989) Geographical Inequalities: the spatial bias of the new communications technology. J Commun 39: 7–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01037.x
[35]	Gibbs D, Tanner K (1997) Information and Communication Technologies and Local Economic Development Policies: The British Case. Reg Stud 31: 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/713693400 doi: 10.1080/713693400
[36]	Graham S (1999) Global grids of glass: on global cities, telecommunications and planetary urban networks. Urban Studies 36: 929–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993286 doi: 10.1080/0042098993286
[37]	Hackler D (2003) Invisible Infrastructure and the City: The Role of Telecommunications in Economic Development. Am Behav Sci 46: 1034–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764202250493 doi: 10.1177/0002764202250493
[38]	Baldwin R (2016) The World Trade Organization and the Future of Multilateralism. J Econ Perspect 30: 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.95 doi: 10.1257/jep.30.1.95
[39]	Zalta EN, Nodelman U, Allen C, et al. (2005) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. California, CA: Stanford University Press.
[40]	Feenberg A (2017) Technosystem: the social life of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[41]	Oberhauser AM (2011) Information and Communication Technology Geographies: Strategies for Bridging a Digital Divide. Melissa R. Gilbert and Michele Masucci. Urban Geogr 32: 920–922. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.32.6.920 doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.32.6.920
[42]	Gerli P, Pontarollo E (2013) La concorrenza negata. I comportamenti strategici nella telefonia fissa, Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
[43]	Matteucci N (2019) The EU State aid policy for broadband: An evaluation of the Italian experience with first generation networks. Telecommun Policy 43: 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101830 doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101830
[44]	Gòmez-Barroso JL, Perez-Martınez J (2005) Public intervention in the access to advanced telecommunication services: Assessing its theoretical economic basis. Gov Inf Q 22: 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.08.001
[45]	Bonet Rull L (2021) Towards a Just Digital Transition: Urban Digital Policy in Europe After Covid-19, In: Boni AL, Zevi AT, Next Generation EU Cities: Local Communities in a post-pandemic Future, Milano: ISPI, 97–113.
[46]	National Recovery and Resilience Plan, 2021. Available from: https://www.mef.gov.it/focus/Il-Piano-Nazionale-di-Ripresa-e-Resilienza-PNRR/.
[47]	Infratel Italia, Mappatura reti fisse 2021. Available from: https://www.infratelitalia.it/archivio-documenti/documenti/esiti-mappatura-reti-fisse-2021.
[48]	Lareose R, Strover S, Gregg J, et al. (2011) The Impact of Rural Broadband Development: Lessons from a Natural Field Experiment. Gov Inf Q 28: 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.013 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.013
[49]	Whitacre B, Gallardo R, Strover S (2014) Broadbands contribution to economic growth in rural areas: Moving towards a causal relationship. Telecommun Policy 38: 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.05.005 doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2014.05.005
[50]	Nevado-Peña D, López-Ruizb VR, Alfaro-Navarro JL (2019) Improving quality of life perception with ICT use and technological capacity in Europe. Technol Forecast Soc 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119734 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119734
[51]	Reddick CG, Enriquez R, Harris RJ, et al. (2020) An analysis of a community survey on the digital divide. Cities 106:102904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102904 doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102904
[52]	Centro Studi Camere di Commercio, Istituto Tagliacarne, Il 2018 dell'economia della provincia di Caserta e delle sue sottoaree. Disponibile su, 2018. Available from: https://www.ce.camcom.it/sites/default/files/contenuto_redazione/allegati/2018_-_nota_economica.pdf.
[53]	Galperin H, Le TV, Wyatt K (2021) Who gets access to fast broadband? Evidence from Los Angeles County. Gov Inf Q 38: 101594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101594 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101594
[54]	Infratel Italia, Relazione sullo stato di avanzamento del Progetto Nazionale Banda Ultralarga al 31 dicembre 2022. Available from: https://www.infratelitalia.it/-/media/infratel/documents/2023/relazione-stato-avanzamento-bul_dicembre2022.pdf?la = it-it & hash = 3F922319467798FF3E8DB30F230DFD4323D47B57.
[55]	Mack E, Faggian A (2013) Productivity and Broadband: The Human Factor. Int Regional Sci Rev 36: 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017612471191 doi: 10.1177/0160017612471191
[56]	McCoy D, Lyons S, Morgenroth E, et al. (2018) The impact of broadband and other infrastructure on the location of new business establishments. J Reg Sci 58: 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12376 doi: 10.1111/jors.12376
[57]	World Bank (2009) World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography, World Bank, Washington, DC.
[58]	Pike A, Rodríguez-Pose A, Tomaney J (2011) Handbook of Local and Regional Development, 1 Eds., Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842393
[59]	Feenberg A (2008) Critical Theory of Technology: An Overview. Tailoring Biotechnol 1: 47–64.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)