We consider the two-dimensional MHD Boundary layer system without hydrodynamic viscosity, and establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions in Sobolev spaces under the assumption that the tangential component of magnetic fields dominates. This gives a complement to the previous works of Liu-Xie-Yang [Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72 (2019)] and Liu-Wang-Xie-Yang [J. Funct. Anal. 279 (2020)], where the well-posedness theory was established for the MHD boundary layer systems with both viscosity and resistivity and with viscosity only, respectively. We use the pseudo-differential calculation, to overcome a new difficulty arising from the treatment of boundary integrals due to the absence of the diffusion property for the velocity.
Citation: Wei-Xi Li, Rui Xu. Well-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the two-dimensional MHD boundary layer equations without viscosity[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4243-4255. doi: 10.3934/era.2021082
[1] | Xiaolei Dong . Well-posedness of the MHD boundary layer equations with small initial data in Sobolev space. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(12): 6618-6640. doi: 10.3934/era.2024309 |
[2] | Wei-Xi Li, Rui Xu . Well-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the two-dimensional MHD boundary layer equations without viscosity. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4243-4255. doi: 10.3934/era.2021082 |
[3] | Yong Zhou, Jia Wei He, Ahmed Alsaedi, Bashir Ahmad . The well-posedness for semilinear time fractional wave equations on RN. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(8): 2981-3003. doi: 10.3934/era.2022151 |
[4] | Xu Zhao, Wenshu Zhou . Vanishing diffusion limit and boundary layers for a nonlinear hyperbolic system with damping and diffusion. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(10): 6505-6524. doi: 10.3934/era.2023329 |
[5] | Long Fan, Cheng-Jie Liu, Lizhi Ruan . Local well-posedness of solutions to the boundary layer equations for compressible two-fluid flow. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4009-4050. doi: 10.3934/era.2021070 |
[6] | Shaban Khidr, Salomon Sambou . Lp-theory for the ∂¯∂-equation and isomorphisms results. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(1): 68-86. doi: 10.3934/era.2025004 |
[7] | Xiao Su, Hongwei Zhang . On the global existence and blow-up for the double dispersion equation with exponential term. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(1): 467-491. doi: 10.3934/era.2023023 |
[8] | Linlin Tan, Bianru Cheng . Global well-posedness of 2D incompressible Navier–Stokes–Darcy flow in a type of generalized time-dependent porosity media. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(10): 5649-5681. doi: 10.3934/era.2024262 |
[9] | Yang Liu . Long-time behavior of a class of viscoelastic plate equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(1): 311-326. doi: 10.3934/era.2020018 |
[10] | Jianxia He, Qingyan Li . On the global well-posedness and exponential stability of 3D heat conducting incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with temperature-dependent coefficients and vacuum. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(9): 5451-5477. doi: 10.3934/era.2024253 |
We consider the two-dimensional MHD Boundary layer system without hydrodynamic viscosity, and establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions in Sobolev spaces under the assumption that the tangential component of magnetic fields dominates. This gives a complement to the previous works of Liu-Xie-Yang [Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72 (2019)] and Liu-Wang-Xie-Yang [J. Funct. Anal. 279 (2020)], where the well-posedness theory was established for the MHD boundary layer systems with both viscosity and resistivity and with viscosity only, respectively. We use the pseudo-differential calculation, to overcome a new difficulty arising from the treatment of boundary integrals due to the absence of the diffusion property for the velocity.
In this work we study the existence and uniqueness of solution to the two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) boundary layer system without viscosity which reads, letting
{∂tu+(u∂x+v∂y)u−(f∂x+g∂y)f+∂xp=0,∂tf+(u∂xf+v∂y)f−(f∂x+g∂y)u−μ∂2yf=0,∂tg+(u∂x+v∂y)g−μ∂2yg=f∂xv−g∂xu,∂xu+∂yv=0,∂xf+∂yg=0,(v,∂yf,g)|y=0=(0,0,0),limy→+∞(u,f)=(U,B),u|t=0=u0,f|t=0=f0 | (1) |
where
{∂tU+U∂xU+∂xp=B∂xB,∂tB+U∂xB=B∂xU. | (2) |
Note the MHD boundary system with a nonzero hydrodynamic viscosity will reduce to the classical Prandtl equations in the absence of a magnetic field, and the main difficulty for investigating Prandtl equation lies in the nonlocal property coupled with the loss of one order tangential derivative when dealing with the terms
● Without any structural assumption on initial data the well-posedness for 2D and 3D MHD boundary systems was established in Gevrey space by the first author and T. Yang [15] with Gevrey index up to
● Under the structural assumption that the tangential magnetic field dominates, i.e.,
The aforementioned works [18,16] investigated the well-posedness for MHD boundary layer system with the nonzero viscosity coefficient. This work aims to consider the case without viscosity coefficient, giving a complement to the previous works [18,16]. To simply the argument we will assume without loss of generality that
{(∂t+u∂x+v∂y)u−(f∂x+g∂y)f=0,(∂t+u∂x+v∂y−∂2y)f−(f∂x+g∂y)u=0,(∂t+u∂x+v∂y−∂2y)g=f∂xv−g∂xu,∂xu+∂yv=∂xf+∂yg=0,(v,∂yf,g)|y=0=(0,0,0),(u,f)|y→+∞=(0,0),(u,f)|t=0=(u0,f0). | (3) |
By the boundary condition and divergence-free condition above, we have
v(t,x,y)=−∫y0∂xu(t,x,˜y)d˜y,g(t,x,y)=−∫y0∂xf(t,x,˜y)d˜y. |
We remark that the equation for
{∂tuε+(uε⋅∇)uε−(Hε⋅∇)Hε+∇Pε=0,∂tHε+(uε⋅∇)Hε=(Hε⋅∇)uε+εΔHε,∇⋅uε=∇⋅Hε=0, | (4) |
where
vε|y=0=0,(∂yfε, gε)|y=0=(0,0). |
It is an important issue in both mathematics and physics to ask the high Reynolds number limit for MHD systems, and so far it is justified mathematically by Liu-Xie-Yang [17] with the presence of viscosity and the other cases remain unclear.
Notation. Before stating the main result we first list some notation used frequently in this paper. Given the domain
Hmℓ={f(x,y):Ω→R;‖f‖2Hmℓ:=∑i+j≤m‖⟨y⟩ℓ+j∂ix∂jyf(x,y)‖2L2<+∞}, |
where here and below
Theorem 1.1. Let
f0(x,y)≥c0⟨y⟩−δ and ∑j≤2|∂jyf0(x,y)|≤c−10⟨y⟩−δ−j. | (5) |
Then the MHD boundary layer system (3) admits a unique local-in-time solution
u,f∈L∞([0,T];H4ℓ) |
for some
f(t,x,y)≥c⟨y⟩−δ and ∑j≤2|∂jyf(t,x,y)|≤c−1⟨y⟩−δ−j. |
Remark 1. The solution in Theorem 1.1 lies in the same Sobolev space as that for initial data, different from the previous works [15,16,18] where the loss of regularity occurs at positive time. Here the tangential magnetic field is allowed to decay polynomially at infinity, and this relaxes the condition in [16,18] where the infimum of the tangential component is strictly positive.
Remark 2. The result above confirms that the magnetic field may act as a stabilizing factor on MHD boundary layer. The stabilizing effect was justified by [18] for the case with both viscosity and resistivity, and by [16] for the case without resistivity.
This section is devoted to deriving the boundary layer system (1). We consider the MHD system in
{∂tuε+(uε⋅∇)uε−(Hε⋅∇)Hε+∇pε=0,∂tHε+(uε⋅∇)Hε−(Hε⋅∇)uε−μεΔHε=0,∇⋅uε=∇⋅Hε=0,uε|t=0=u0,Hε|t=0=b0, | (6) |
where
vε|y=0=(0),(∂yfε,gε)|y=0=(0,0). | (7) |
A boundary layer will appear in order to overcome a mismatch on the boundary
{uε(t,x,y)=u0(t,x,y)+ub(t,x,˜y)+O(√ε),vε(t,x,y)=v0(t,x,y)+√εvb(t,x,˜y)+O(ε),fε(t,x,y)=f0(t,x,y)+fb(t,x,˜y)+O(√ε),gε(t,x,y)=g0(t,x,y)+√εgb(t,x,˜y)+O(ε),pε(t,x,y)=p0(t,x,y)+pb(t,x,˜y)+O(√ε), | (8) |
where we used the notation
Boundary conditions. Taking trace on
v0|y=0=g0|y=0=0, | (9) |
and using again the second and the fourth equations in (8) and letting
vb|y=0=gb|y=0=0. | (10) |
Moreover observe
0=∂yfε|y=0=∂yf0|y=0+1√ε∂˜yfb|˜y=0+o(1). |
This gives
∂˜yfb|˜y=0=0. | (11) |
The governing equations of the fluid behavior near and far from the boundary. We substitute the ansatz (8) into (6) and consider the order of
∂˜ypb≡0. |
This with the assumption that
pb≡0. | (12) |
At the order
{∂tu0+(u0⋅∇)u0−(H0⋅∇)H0+∇p0=0,∂tH0+(u0⋅∇)H0−(H0⋅∇)u0=0,∇⋅u0=∇⋅H0=0, | (13) |
complemented with the boundary condition (9) and initial data
Next we will derive the boundary layer equations. Let
0(t,x,y)=u0(t,x,0)+y∂yu0(t,x,0)+y22∂2yu0(t,x,0)+⋯=¯u0+√ε˜y¯∂yu0+O(ε), |
where here and below we use the notation
v0(t,x,y)=√ε˜y¯∂yv0+O(ε),f0(t,x,y)=¯f0+√ε˜y¯∂yf0+O(ε),g0(t,x,y)=√ε˜y¯∂yg0+O(ε),p0(t,x,y)=¯p0+√ε˜y¯∂yg0+O(ε). |
Now we compare the order
{∂t(¯u0+ub)+(¯u0+ub)∂x(¯u0+ub)+(˜y⋅¯∂yv0+vb)⋅∂˜yub−(¯f0+fb)∂x(¯f0+fb)−(˜y⋅¯∂yg0+gb)⋅∂˜yfb+∂x¯p0=0,∂t(¯f0+fb)+(¯u0+ub)∂x(¯f0+fb)+(˜y⋅¯∂yv0+vb)⋅∂˜yfb−(¯f0+fb)∂x(¯u0+ub)−(˜y⋅¯∂yg0+gb)⋅∂˜yub−μ∂2˜yfb=0,∂x(¯u0+ub)+∂y(˜y⋅¯∂yv0+vb)=∂x(¯f0+fb)+∂y(˜y⋅¯∂yg0+gb)=0. | (14) |
Denoting
u(t,x,˜y)=¯u0+ub(t,x,˜y),v(t,x,˜y)=˜y∂y¯v0+vb(t,x,˜y),f(t,x,˜y)=¯f0+fb(t,x,˜y),g(t,x,˜y)=˜y∂y¯g0+gb(t,x,˜y), |
and recalling
g(t,x,y)=−∫y0∂xf(t,x,z)dz. |
Finally we remark the Bernoulli's law (2) follows by taking trace on
The general strategy for constructing solutions to (3) involves mainly two ingredients. One is to construct appropriate approximate solutions, which reserve a similar properties as (5) for initial data by applying the standard maximum principle for parabolic equations in the domain
Theorem 3.1. Let
f(t,x,y)≥c⟨y⟩−δ and ∑j≤2|∂jyf(t,x,y)|≤c−1⟨y⟩−δ−j. |
Then there exists a constant
E(t)+∫t0D(s)ds≤C(E(0)+∫t0(E(s)+E(s)2)ds), |
where here and below
E(t):=‖u(t)‖2H4ℓ+‖f(t)‖2H4ℓ,D(t):=‖∂yf(t)‖2H4ℓ. | (15) |
We will present the proof of Theorem 3.1 in the next two subsections, one of which is devoted to the estimates on tangential and another to the normal derivatives. To simplify the notation we will use the capital letter
In this part, we will derive the estimate on tangential derivatives, following the cancellation mechanism observed in the previous work of Liu-Xie-Yang [18].
Lemma 3.2. Under the same assumption as in Theorem 3.1 we have, for any
∑i≤4(‖⟨y⟩ℓ∂ixu(t)‖2L2+‖⟨y⟩ℓ∂ixf(t)‖2L2)+∑i≤4∫t0‖⟨y⟩ℓ∂ix∂yf(s)‖2L2ds≤C(E(0)+∫t0(E(s)+E(s)2)ds). |
Recall
Proof. Without loss of generality we may consider
{(∂t+u∂x+v∂y)∂4xu−(f∂x+g∂y)∂4xf=−(∂yu)∂4xv+(∂yf)∂4xg+F4,(∂t+u∂x+v∂y−∂2y)∂4xf−(f∂x+g∂y)∂4xu=−(∂yf)∂4xv+(∂yu)∂4xg+P4,(∂t+u∂x+v∂y−∂2y)∂3xg=f∂4xv−g∂4xu+Q4, | (16) |
where
and
In order to eliminate the terms
(17) |
Multiplying the third equation in (16) by
(18) |
where
with
(19) |
where
with
Thus we perform the weighted energy estimate for (18) and (19) and use the fact that
to get
(20) |
where here and below we use
(21) |
Observe the derivatives are at most up to the fourth order for the terms on the right of (20). Then by direct compute we have
Substituting the above estimate into (20) and then integrating over
(22) |
Next we will derive the estimates for
As a result, using the representation of
and
Moreover, using again (17),
Combining these inequality with (22) we conclude
Note the above estimate still holds true if we replace
In this part, we perform the estimate for normal derivatives. Compared with [18] a new difficulty arises when dealing the boundary integrals because of the absence of the hydrodynamic viscosity.
Lemma 3.3. Under the same assumption as in Theorem 3.1 we have, for any
Recall
Proof. Step 1). We first consider the case of
(23) |
Applying
and
Recall
we obtain
(24) |
with
Direct computation shows
(25) |
It remains to deal with the boundary integeral on the right of (24). We first apply
(26) |
By virtue of the above representation of
(27) |
As a result we combine (27) with Sobolev's inequality to conclude
Substituting the above inequality and (25) into (24) and then integrating over
Step 2). In this step we will treat the first term on the right of (23) and prove that
(28) |
holds true for any
where
Similarly we define
Given a
(29) |
with
With the Fourier multipliers introduced above we use (29) to compute
(30) |
On the other hand, using the fact that
we compute
A similar argument gives
Substituting the two inequalities above into (30) yields
This gives the desired estimate (28).
Step 3). We combine (23) and (28) to obtain
Observe the above inequality still holds true if we replace
Combining the estimates in Lemmas 3.2–3.3 and letting
[1] |
Well-posedness of the Prandtl equation in Sobolev spaces. J. Amer. Math. Soc. (2015) 28: 745-784. ![]() |
[2] |
Well-posedness of the linearized Prandtl equation around a non-monotonic shear flow. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire (2018) 35: 1119-1142. ![]() |
[3] |
Gevrey hypoellipticity for a class of kinetic equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equations (2011) 36: 693-728. ![]() |
[4] |
H. Dietert and D. Gérard-Varet, Well-posedness of the Prandtl equations without any structural assumption, Ann. PDE, 5 (2019), Paper No. 8, 51 pp. doi: 10.1007/s40818-019-0063-6
![]() |
[5] |
Blowup of solutions of the unsteady Prandtl's equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (1997) 50: 1287-1293. ![]() |
[6] |
On the ill-posedness of the Prandtl equation. J. Amer. Math. Soc. (2010) 23: 591-609. ![]() |
[7] |
D. Gérard-Varet and N. Masmoudi, Well-posedness for the Prandtl system without analyticity or monotonicity, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4), 48 (2015), 1273–1325. doi: 10.24033/asens.2270
![]() |
[8] |
D. Gérard-Varet and M. Prestipino, Formal derivation and stability analysis of boundary layer models in MHD, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 68 (2017), Paper No. 76, 16 pp. doi: 10.1007/s00033-017-0820-x
![]() |
[9] |
A note on Prandtl boundary layers. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (2011) 64: 1416-1438. ![]() |
[10] |
Almost global existence for the Prandtl boundary layer equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. (2016) 220: 809-848. ![]() |
[11] |
On the local well-posedness of the Prandtl and hydrostatic Euler equations with multiple monotonicity regions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (2014) 46: 3865-3890. ![]() |
[12] |
W.-X. Li, N. Masmoudi and T. Yang, Well-posedness in Gevrey function space for 3D Prandtl equations without structural assumption, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., (2021). doi: 10.1002/cpa.21989
![]() |
[13] |
Gevrey class smoothing effect for the Prandtl equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (2016) 48: 1672-1726. ![]() |
[14] |
Well-posedness in Gevrey function spaces for the Prandtl equations with non-degenerate critical points. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) (2020) 22: 717-775. ![]() |
[15] |
Well-posedness of the MHD boundary layer system in Gevrey function space without structural assumption. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (2021) 53: 3236-3264. ![]() |
[16] |
C.-J. Liu, D. Wang, F. Xie and T. Yang, Magnetic effects on the solvability of 2D MHD boundary layer equations without resistivity in Sobolev spaces, J. Funct. Anal., 279 (2020), 108637, 45 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108637
![]() |
[17] |
Justification of Prandtl ansatz for MHD boundary layer. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (2019) 51: 2748-2791. ![]() |
[18] |
MHD boundary layers theory in Sobolev spaces without monotonicity Ⅰ: Well-posedness theory. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (2019) 72: 63-121. ![]() |
[19] |
Local-in-time existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Prandtl equations by energy methods. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (2015) 68: 1683-1741. ![]() |
[20] | O. A. Oleinik and V. N. Samokhin, Mathematical Models in Boundary Layer Theory, vol. 15 of Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Computation, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1999. |
[21] |
M. Ruzhansky and V. Turunen, On the {F}ourier analysis of operators on the torus, in Modern Trends in Pseudo-Differential Operators, vol. 172 of Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., Birkhäuser, Basel, (2007), 87–105. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8116-5_5
![]() |
[22] |
On the global existence of solutions to the Prandtl's system. Adv. Math. (2004) 181: 88-133. ![]() |
[23] |
Long time well-posedness of Prandtl equations in Sobolev space. J. Differential Equations (2017) 263: 8749-8803. ![]() |
[24] |
Long time well-posedness of Prandtl system with small and analytic initial data. J. Funct. Anal. (2016) 270: 2591-2615. ![]() |
1. | Zhong Tan, Zhonger Wu, Global Small Solutions of Mhd Boundary Layer Equations in Gevrey Function Space, 2023, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.4349314 | |
2. | Wei-Xi Li, Rui Xu, Tong Yang, Global well-posedness of a Prandtl model from MHD in Gevrey function spaces, 2022, 42, 0252-9602, 2343, 10.1007/s10473-022-0609-7 | |
3. | ||
4. | Xiaolei Dong, Local existence of solutions to the 2D MHD boundary layer equations without monotonicity in Sobolev space, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 5294, 10.3934/math.2024256 | |
5. | Zhong Tan, Zhonger Wu, Global small solutions of MHD boundary layer equations in Gevrey function space*, 2023, 366, 00220396, 444, 10.1016/j.jde.2023.04.019 | |
6. | Zhong Tan, Mingxue Zhang, The local well-posedness of 2D magneto-micropolar boundary layer equations without resistivity, 2024, 0, 1534-0392, 0, 10.3934/cpaa.2024086 | |
7. | Shengxin Li, Feng Xie, Prandtl boundary layer expansion with strong boundary layers for inhomogeneous incompressible magnetohydrodynamics equations in Sobolev framework, 2024, 287, 00221236, 110653, 10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110653 | |
8. | ||
9. | ||
10. | ||
11. | ||
12. | ||
13. | ||
14. | ||
15. | ||
16. | ||
17. | ||
18. | ||
19. | ||
20. | ||
21. | ||
22. | ||
23. | ||
24. | ||
25. | ||
26. | ||
27. | ||
28. | ||
29. | ||
30. | ||
31. | ||
32. | ||
33. | ||
34. | ||
35. | ||
36. | ||
37. | ||
38. | ||
39. | ||
40. | ||
41. | ||
42. | ||
43. | ||
44. | ||
45. | ||
46. | ||
47. | ||
48. | ||
49. | ||
50. | ||
51. | ||
52. | ||
53. | ||
54. | ||
55. | ||
56. | ||
57. | ||
58. | ||
59. | ||
60. | ||
61. | ||
62. | ||
63. | ||
64. | ||
65. | ||
66. | ||
67. | ||
68. | ||
69. | ||
70. | ||
71. | ||
72. | ||
73. | ||
74. | ||
75. | ||
76. | ||
77. | ||
78. | ||
79. | ||
80. | ||
81. | ||
82. | ||
83. | ||
84. | ||
85. | ||
86. | ||
87. | ||
88. | ||
89. | ||
90. | ||
91. | ||
92. | ||
93. | ||
94. | ||
95. | ||
96. | ||
97. | ||
98. | ||
99. | ||
100. | ||
101. | ||
102. | ||
103. | ||
104. | ||
105. | ||
106. | ||
107. | ||
108. | ||
109. | ||
110. | ||
111. | ||
112. | ||
113. | ||
114. | ||
115. | ||
116. | ||
117. | ||
118. | ||
119. | ||
120. | ||
121. | ||
122. | ||
123. | ||
124. | ||
125. | ||
126. | ||
127. | ||
128. | ||
129. | ||
130. | ||
131. | ||
132. | ||
133. | ||
134. | ||
135. | ||
136. | ||
137. | ||
138. | ||
139. | ||
140. | ||
141. | ||
142. | ||
143. |