Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/mathchoice.js
Special Issues

Well-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the two-dimensional MHD boundary layer equations without viscosity

  • We consider the two-dimensional MHD Boundary layer system without hydrodynamic viscosity, and establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions in Sobolev spaces under the assumption that the tangential component of magnetic fields dominates. This gives a complement to the previous works of Liu-Xie-Yang [Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72 (2019)] and Liu-Wang-Xie-Yang [J. Funct. Anal. 279 (2020)], where the well-posedness theory was established for the MHD boundary layer systems with both viscosity and resistivity and with viscosity only, respectively. We use the pseudo-differential calculation, to overcome a new difficulty arising from the treatment of boundary integrals due to the absence of the diffusion property for the velocity.

    Citation: Wei-Xi Li, Rui Xu. Well-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the two-dimensional MHD boundary layer equations without viscosity[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4243-4255. doi: 10.3934/era.2021082

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xiaolei Dong . Well-posedness of the MHD boundary layer equations with small initial data in Sobolev space. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(12): 6618-6640. doi: 10.3934/era.2024309
    [2] Wei-Xi Li, Rui Xu . Well-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the two-dimensional MHD boundary layer equations without viscosity. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4243-4255. doi: 10.3934/era.2021082
    [3] Yong Zhou, Jia Wei He, Ahmed Alsaedi, Bashir Ahmad . The well-posedness for semilinear time fractional wave equations on RN. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(8): 2981-3003. doi: 10.3934/era.2022151
    [4] Xu Zhao, Wenshu Zhou . Vanishing diffusion limit and boundary layers for a nonlinear hyperbolic system with damping and diffusion. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(10): 6505-6524. doi: 10.3934/era.2023329
    [5] Long Fan, Cheng-Jie Liu, Lizhi Ruan . Local well-posedness of solutions to the boundary layer equations for compressible two-fluid flow. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4009-4050. doi: 10.3934/era.2021070
    [6] Shaban Khidr, Salomon Sambou . Lp-theory for the ¯-equation and isomorphisms results. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(1): 68-86. doi: 10.3934/era.2025004
    [7] Xiao Su, Hongwei Zhang . On the global existence and blow-up for the double dispersion equation with exponential term. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(1): 467-491. doi: 10.3934/era.2023023
    [8] Linlin Tan, Bianru Cheng . Global well-posedness of 2D incompressible Navier–Stokes–Darcy flow in a type of generalized time-dependent porosity media. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(10): 5649-5681. doi: 10.3934/era.2024262
    [9] Yang Liu . Long-time behavior of a class of viscoelastic plate equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(1): 311-326. doi: 10.3934/era.2020018
    [10] Jianxia He, Qingyan Li . On the global well-posedness and exponential stability of 3D heat conducting incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with temperature-dependent coefficients and vacuum. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(9): 5451-5477. doi: 10.3934/era.2024253
  • We consider the two-dimensional MHD Boundary layer system without hydrodynamic viscosity, and establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions in Sobolev spaces under the assumption that the tangential component of magnetic fields dominates. This gives a complement to the previous works of Liu-Xie-Yang [Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72 (2019)] and Liu-Wang-Xie-Yang [J. Funct. Anal. 279 (2020)], where the well-posedness theory was established for the MHD boundary layer systems with both viscosity and resistivity and with viscosity only, respectively. We use the pseudo-differential calculation, to overcome a new difficulty arising from the treatment of boundary integrals due to the absence of the diffusion property for the velocity.



    In this work we study the existence and uniqueness of solution to the two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) boundary layer system without viscosity which reads, letting Ω:=T×R+={(x,y)R2; xT,y>0} be the fluid domain,

    {tu+(ux+vy)u(fx+gy)f+xp=0,tf+(uxf+vy)f(fx+gy)uμ2yf=0,tg+(ux+vy)gμ2yg=fxvgxu,xu+yv=0,xf+yg=0,(v,yf,g)|y=0=(0,0,0),limy+(u,f)=(U,B),u|t=0=u0,f|t=0=f0 (1)

    where (u,v) and (f,g) stand for velocity and magnetic fields, respectively, and μ is resistivity coefficients, and U,B and p are the values on the boundary of the tangential velocity, magnetic fields and pressure, respectively, in the ideal MHD system satisfying the Bernoulli's law:

    {tU+UxU+xp=BxB,tB+UxB=BxU. (2)

    Note the MHD boundary system with a nonzero hydrodynamic viscosity will reduce to the classical Prandtl equations in the absence of a magnetic field, and the main difficulty for investigating Prandtl equation lies in the nonlocal property coupled with the loss of one order tangential derivative when dealing with the terms vyu. The mathematical study on the Prandtl boundary layer has a long history, and there have been extensive works concerning its well/ill-posedness theories. So far the two-dimensional (2D) Prandtl equation is well-explored in various function spaces, see, e.g., [1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,13,14,22,23,24] and the references therein. Compared with the Prandtl equation the treatment is more complicated since we have a new difficulty caused by the additional loss of tangential derivative in the magnetic field. So far the MHD boundary layer system is mainly explored in the two settings.

    ● Without any structural assumption on initial data the well-posedness for 2D and 3D MHD boundary systems was established in Gevrey space by the first author and T. Yang [15] with Gevrey index up to 3/2, and it remains interesting to relax the Gevrey index therein to 2 inspired the previous works of [4,12] on the well-posedness for the Prandtl equations in Gevrey space with optimal index 2.

    ● Under the structural assumption that the tangential magnetic field dominates, i.e., f0, the well-posedness in weighted Sobolev space was established by Liu-Xie-Yang [18] and Liu-Wang-Xie-Yang [16] without Oleinik's monotonicity assumption, where the two cases that with both viscosity and resistivity and with only viscosity are considered, respectively; see also the work of Gérard-Varet and Prestipino [8] for the stability analysis of the MHD boundary layer system with insulating boundary conditions (i.e. f|y=0=0). These works, together with the essential role of the Oleinik's monotonicity for well-posedness theory of the Prandtl equations (see, e.g., [1,19,20]), justify the stabilizing effect of the magnetic field on MHD boundary layer, no matter whether or not there is resistivity in the magnetic boundary layer equation.

    The aforementioned works [18,16] investigated the well-posedness for MHD boundary layer system with the nonzero viscosity coefficient. This work aims to consider the case without viscosity coefficient, giving a complement to the previous works [18,16]. To simply the argument we will assume without loss of generality that μ=1 and (U,B)0 in the system (1) since the result will hold true in the general case if we use some kind of the nontrivial weighted functions similar to those used in for the Prandtl equation. Hence we consider the following 2D MHD boundary layer system in the region Ω=T×R+

    {(t+ux+vy)u(fx+gy)f=0,(t+ux+vy2y)f(fx+gy)u=0,(t+ux+vy2y)g=fxvgxu,xu+yv=xf+yg=0,(v,yf,g)|y=0=(0,0,0),(u,f)|y+=(0,0),(u,f)|t=0=(u0,f0). (3)

    By the boundary condition and divergence-free condition above, we have

    v(t,x,y)=y0xu(t,x,˜y)d˜y,g(t,x,y)=y0xf(t,x,˜y)d˜y.

    We remark that the equation for g in (3) can be derived from the one for f and the main difficulty in analysis is the loss of x-derivatives in the two terms v and g. As to be seen in the next Section 2, The system (3) can be derived from the MHD system

    {tuε+(uε)uε(Hε)Hε+Pε=0,tHε+(uε)Hε=(Hε)uε+εΔHε,uε=Hε=0, (4)

    where uε=(uε,vε),Hε=(fε,gε) denote velocity and magnetic field, respectively. The MHD system (4) is complemented with the boundary condition that

    vε|y=0=0,(yfε, gε)|y=0=(0,0).

    It is an important issue in both mathematics and physics to ask the high Reynolds number limit for MHD systems, and so far it is justified mathematically by Liu-Xie-Yang [17] with the presence of viscosity and the other cases remain unclear.

    Notation. Before stating the main result we first list some notation used frequently in this paper. Given the domain Ω=T×R+, we will use L2 and (,)L2 to denote the norm and inner product of L2=L2(Ω) and use the notation L2x and (,)L2x when the variable x is specified. Similar notation will be used for L. Moreover, we use Lpx(Lqy)=Lp(T;Lq(R+)) for the classical Sobolev space. Let Hm=Hm(Ω) be the standard Sobolev space and define the weighted Sobolev space Hm by setting, for R,

    Hm={f(x,y):ΩR;f2Hm:=i+jmy+jixjyf(x,y)2L2<+},

    where here and below y=(1+|y|2)1/2. With the above notation the well-posedness theory of (1) in weighted Sobolev space can be stated as below. Here the main assumption is that the tangential magnetic field in (1) dominates, that is, f0.

    Theorem 1.1. Let >12 and δ>+12 be two given numbers. Suppose the initial data u0,f0 of (3) lie in H4(Ω) satisfying that there exists a constant c0>0 such that for any (x,y)Ω,

    f0(x,y)c0yδ and j2|jyf0(x,y)|c10yδj. (5)

    Then the MHD boundary layer system (3) admits a unique local-in-time solution

    u,fL([0,T];H4)

    for some T>0. Moreover a constant c>0 exists such that for any (t,x,y)[0,T]×Ω,

    f(t,x,y)cyδ and j2|jyf(t,x,y)|c1yδj.

    Remark 1. The solution in Theorem 1.1 lies in the same Sobolev space as that for initial data, different from the previous works [15,16,18] where the loss of regularity occurs at positive time. Here the tangential magnetic field is allowed to decay polynomially at infinity, and this relaxes the condition in [16,18] where the infimum of the tangential component is strictly positive.

    Remark 2. The result above confirms that the magnetic field may act as a stabilizing factor on MHD boundary layer. The stabilizing effect was justified by [18] for the case with both viscosity and resistivity, and by [16] for the case without resistivity.

    This section is devoted to deriving the boundary layer system (1). We consider the MHD system in Ω

    {tuε+(uε)uε(Hε)Hε+pε=0,tHε+(uε)Hε(Hε)uεμεΔHε=0,uε=Hε=0,uε|t=0=u0,Hε|t=0=b0, (6)

    where uε=(uε,vε),Hε=(fε,gε) denote velocity and magnetic fields, respectively. The above system is complemented with the no-slip boundary condition on the normal component of velocity field and perfectly conducting boundary condition on the magnetic field, that is,

    vε|y=0=(0),(yfε,gε)|y=0=(0,0). (7)

    A boundary layer will appear in order to overcome a mismatch on the boundary y=0 for the tangential magnetic fields between (6) and the limiting equations by letting ε0. To derive the governing equations for boundary layers we consider the ansatz

    {uε(t,x,y)=u0(t,x,y)+ub(t,x,˜y)+O(ε),vε(t,x,y)=v0(t,x,y)+εvb(t,x,˜y)+O(ε),fε(t,x,y)=f0(t,x,y)+fb(t,x,˜y)+O(ε),gε(t,x,y)=g0(t,x,y)+εgb(t,x,˜y)+O(ε),pε(t,x,y)=p0(t,x,y)+pb(t,x,˜y)+O(ε), (8)

    where we used the notation ˜y=y/ε. We suppose ub,fb, and pb in the expansion (8) polynomially trend to zero as ˜y+, that is, as ε0. Similarly for the expansion of the initial data.

    Boundary conditions. Taking trace on y=0 for the second and the fourth expansions in (8) and recalling the boundary condition (7), we derive that

    v0|y=0=g0|y=0=0, (9)

    and using again the second and the fourth equations in (8) and letting ε0, we get that

    vb|y=0=gb|y=0=0. (10)

    Moreover observe

    0=yfε|y=0=yf0|y=0+1ε˜yfb|˜y=0+o(1).

    This gives

    ˜yfb|˜y=0=0. (11)

    The governing equations of the fluid behavior near and far from the boundary. We substitute the ansatz (8) into (6) and consider the order of ε. At the order ε1/2 we get

    ˜ypb0.

    This with the assumption that pb goes to 0 as ˜y+ implies

    pb0. (12)

    At the order ε0, letting ˜y+ (ε0) and taking into account (9) and fact that ub,fb, and pb polynomially trend to zero as ε0, we see the limiting system is the ideal incompressible MHD system:

    {tu0+(u0)u0(H0)H0+p0=0,tH0+(u0)H0(H0)u0=0,u0=H0=0, (13)

    complemented with the boundary condition (9) and initial data u0in and H0in, where u0=(u0,v0),H0=(f0,g0).

    Next we will derive the boundary layer equations. Let u0=(u0,v0),H0=(f0,g0) be the solution to the ideal MHD system (13). By Taylor expansion we write u0(t,x,y) as

    0(t,x,y)=u0(t,x,0)+yyu0(t,x,0)+y222yu0(t,x,0)+=¯u0+ε˜y¯yu0+O(ε),

    where here and below we use the notation ¯h to stand for the trace of a function h on the boundary y=0. Similarly,

    v0(t,x,y)=ε˜y¯yv0+O(ε),f0(t,x,y)=¯f0+ε˜y¯yf0+O(ε),g0(t,x,y)=ε˜y¯yg0+O(ε),p0(t,x,y)=¯p0+ε˜y¯yg0+O(ε).

    Now we compare the order ε0 for the resulting equation by substituting the ansatz (8) as well as the above Taylor expansion of u0=(u0,v0),H0=(f0,g0) into (6); this gives, by virtue of (12) and (13),

    {t(¯u0+ub)+(¯u0+ub)x(¯u0+ub)+(˜y¯yv0+vb)˜yub(¯f0+fb)x(¯f0+fb)(˜y¯yg0+gb)˜yfb+x¯p0=0,t(¯f0+fb)+(¯u0+ub)x(¯f0+fb)+(˜y¯yv0+vb)˜yfb(¯f0+fb)x(¯u0+ub)(˜y¯yg0+gb)˜yubμ2˜yfb=0,x(¯u0+ub)+y(˜y¯yv0+vb)=x(¯f0+fb)+y(˜y¯yg0+gb)=0. (14)

    Denoting

    u(t,x,˜y)=¯u0+ub(t,x,˜y),v(t,x,˜y)=˜yy¯v0+vb(t,x,˜y),f(t,x,˜y)=¯f0+fb(t,x,˜y),g(t,x,˜y)=˜yy¯g0+gb(t,x,˜y),

    and recalling ub,fb polynomially trend to 0 as ˜y+, we combine (14) and the boundary conditions (9)–(11) to conclude that all equations except the third one in (1) are fulfilled by u,v,f, and g. For simplicity of notation, we have replaced ˜y by y. Note that the third equation in (1) can be derived from the second one and the boundary condition yf|y=0=0 by observing that

    g(t,x,y)=y0xf(t,x,z)dz.

    Finally we remark the Bernoulli's law (2) follows by taking trace on y=0 for the ideal MHD system (13).

    The general strategy for constructing solutions to (3) involves mainly two ingredients. One is to construct appropriate approximate solutions, which reserve a similar properties as (5) for initial data by applying the standard maximum principle for parabolic equations in the domain Ω (see [19,Lemmas E.1 and E.2 ] for instance). Next we need to deduce the uniform estimate for these approximate solutions. For sake of simplicity we only present the following a priori estimate for regular solutions, which is a key part to prove the main result Theorem 1.1.

    Theorem 3.1. Let >12 and δ>+12 be two given numbers, and let u,fL([0,T];H4) solve the MHD boundary layer system (3) satisfying that a constant c>0 exists such that for any (t,x,y)[0,T]×Ω,

    f(t,x,y)cyδ and j2|jyf(t,x,y)|c1yδj.

    Then there exists a constant C>0 such that

    E(t)+t0D(s)dsC(E(0)+t0(E(s)+E(s)2)ds),

    where here and below

    E(t):=u(t)2H4+f(t)2H4,D(t):=yf(t)2H4. (15)

    We will present the proof of Theorem 3.1 in the next two subsections, one of which is devoted to the estimates on tangential and another to the normal derivatives. To simplify the notation we will use the capital letter C in the following argument to denote some generic constants that may vary from line to line, and moreover use Cε to denote some generic constants depending on a given number 0<ε1.

    In this part, we will derive the estimate on tangential derivatives, following the cancellation mechanism observed in the previous work of Liu-Xie-Yang [18].

    Lemma 3.2. Under the same assumption as in Theorem 3.1 we have, for any t[0,T],

    i4(yixu(t)2L2+yixf(t)2L2)+i4t0yixyf(s)2L2dsC(E(0)+t0(E(s)+E(s)2)ds).

    Recall E is defined in (15).

    Proof. Without loss of generality we may consider i=4, apply 4x to the first second equations and 3x to the third equation in (3), respectively, this gives

    {(t+ux+vy)4xu(fx+gy)4xf=(yu)4xv+(yf)4xg+F4,(t+ux+vy2y)4xf(fx+gy)4xu=(yf)4xv+(yu)4xg+P4,(t+ux+vy2y)3xg=f4xvg4xu+Q4, (16)

    where

    and

    In order to eliminate the terms and where the fifth order tangential derivatives are involved, we introduce, observing by assumption,

    (17)

    Multiplying the third equation in (16) by and then taking summation with the second one in (16), we obtain the equation solved by , that is,

    (18)

    where

    with and given in (16). Similarly we multiply the third equation in (16) by and then add the resulting equation by the first one in (16), to obtain

    (19)

    where

    with and given in (16). Note that (18) is complemented with the boundary condition that

    Thus we perform the weighted energy estimate for (18) and (19) and use the fact that

    to get

    (20)

    where here and below we use to denote the commutator between two operators , that is

    (21)

    Observe the derivatives are at most up to the fourth order for the terms on the right of (20). Then by direct compute we have

    Substituting the above estimate into (20) and then integrating over for any gives

    (22)

    Next we will derive the estimates for from the ones of . In fact in view of the representation of given in (17), we use Hardy-type inequality (cf. [19,Lemma B.1] for instance) to conclude

    As a result, using the representation of and given in (17) and the fact that gives

    and

    Moreover, using again (17),

    Combining these inequality with (22) we conclude

    Note the above estimate still holds true if we replace by with . This gives the desired estimate in Lemma 3.2, completing the proof.

    In this part, we perform the estimate for normal derivatives. Compared with [18] a new difficulty arises when dealing the boundary integrals because of the absence of the hydrodynamic viscosity.

    Lemma 3.3. Under the same assumption as in Theorem 3.1 we have, for any ,

    Recall are defined by (15).

    Proof. Step 1). We first consider the case of and . In this step we will prove that, for any ,

    (23)

    Applying to (3) yields that

    and

    Recall is given by (21), standing for the commutator between two operators. Taking inner product with to the first equation above, and with to the second one, and then taking summation and observing

    we obtain

    (24)

    with

    Direct computation shows

    (25)

    It remains to deal with the boundary integeral on the right of (24). We first apply to the second equation in (3) and then take trace on ; this together with the boundary condition in (3) gives

    (26)

    By virtue of the above representation of , we compute directly that

    (27)

    As a result we combine (27) with Sobolev's inequality to conclude

    Substituting the above inequality and (25) into (24) and then integrating over for any we obtain the desired estimate (23).

    Step 2). In this step we will treat the first term on the right of (23) and prove that

    (28)

    holds true for any . To do so we recall some facts on the Fourier multiplier. Let be the partial Fourier dual variable of and let be the Fourier multiplier with symbol , that is,

    where stands for the Fourier transform with respect to variable:

    Similarly we define by setting

    Given a function of with bounded derivatives, we have, for ,

    (29)

    with a constant depending only on , recalling the commutator is defined by (21). Note the counterpart for of (29) is clear, see, e.g., [3,Pages 702–704], the estimate (29) can be proven in a similar inspirit and we omit it for brevity and and refer to [21] and references therein for the comprehensive argument on the extension of the classical pseudo-differential calculus in to the torus case .

    With the Fourier multipliers introduced above we use (29) to compute

    (30)

    On the other hand, using the fact that

    we compute

    A similar argument gives

    Substituting the two inequalities above into (30) yields

    This gives the desired estimate (28).

    Step 3). We combine (23) and (28) to obtain

    Observe the above inequality still holds true if we replace by with and use the boundary conditions (26) and . Since the argument is straightforward we omit it for brevity. The proof of Lemma 3.3 is completed.

    Combining the estimates in Lemmas 3.2–3.3 and letting be small enough we obtain the desired energy estimate, completing the proof of Theorem 3.1.



    [1] Well-posedness of the Prandtl equation in Sobolev spaces. J. Amer. Math. Soc. (2015) 28: 745-784.
    [2] Well-posedness of the linearized Prandtl equation around a non-monotonic shear flow. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire (2018) 35: 1119-1142.
    [3] Gevrey hypoellipticity for a class of kinetic equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equations (2011) 36: 693-728.
    [4] H. Dietert and D. Gérard-Varet, Well-posedness of the Prandtl equations without any structural assumption, Ann. PDE, 5 (2019), Paper No. 8, 51 pp. doi: 10.1007/s40818-019-0063-6
    [5] Blowup of solutions of the unsteady Prandtl's equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (1997) 50: 1287-1293.
    [6] On the ill-posedness of the Prandtl equation. J. Amer. Math. Soc. (2010) 23: 591-609.
    [7] D. Gérard-Varet and N. Masmoudi, Well-posedness for the Prandtl system without analyticity or monotonicity, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4), 48 (2015), 1273–1325. doi: 10.24033/asens.2270
    [8] D. Gérard-Varet and M. Prestipino, Formal derivation and stability analysis of boundary layer models in MHD, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 68 (2017), Paper No. 76, 16 pp. doi: 10.1007/s00033-017-0820-x
    [9] A note on Prandtl boundary layers. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (2011) 64: 1416-1438.
    [10] Almost global existence for the Prandtl boundary layer equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. (2016) 220: 809-848.
    [11] On the local well-posedness of the Prandtl and hydrostatic Euler equations with multiple monotonicity regions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (2014) 46: 3865-3890.
    [12] W.-X. Li, N. Masmoudi and T. Yang, Well-posedness in Gevrey function space for 3D Prandtl equations without structural assumption, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., (2021). doi: 10.1002/cpa.21989
    [13] Gevrey class smoothing effect for the Prandtl equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (2016) 48: 1672-1726.
    [14] Well-posedness in Gevrey function spaces for the Prandtl equations with non-degenerate critical points. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) (2020) 22: 717-775.
    [15] Well-posedness of the MHD boundary layer system in Gevrey function space without structural assumption. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (2021) 53: 3236-3264.
    [16] C.-J. Liu, D. Wang, F. Xie and T. Yang, Magnetic effects on the solvability of 2D MHD boundary layer equations without resistivity in Sobolev spaces, J. Funct. Anal., 279 (2020), 108637, 45 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108637
    [17] Justification of Prandtl ansatz for MHD boundary layer. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (2019) 51: 2748-2791.
    [18] MHD boundary layers theory in Sobolev spaces without monotonicity Ⅰ: Well-posedness theory. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (2019) 72: 63-121.
    [19] Local-in-time existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Prandtl equations by energy methods. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (2015) 68: 1683-1741.
    [20] O. A. Oleinik and V. N. Samokhin, Mathematical Models in Boundary Layer Theory, vol. 15 of Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Computation, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1999.
    [21] M. Ruzhansky and V. Turunen, On the {F}ourier analysis of operators on the torus, in Modern Trends in Pseudo-Differential Operators, vol. 172 of Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., Birkhäuser, Basel, (2007), 87–105. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8116-5_5
    [22] On the global existence of solutions to the Prandtl's system. Adv. Math. (2004) 181: 88-133.
    [23] Long time well-posedness of Prandtl equations in Sobolev space. J. Differential Equations (2017) 263: 8749-8803.
    [24] Long time well-posedness of Prandtl system with small and analytic initial data. J. Funct. Anal. (2016) 270: 2591-2615.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Zhong Tan, Zhonger Wu, Global Small Solutions of Mhd Boundary Layer Equations in Gevrey Function Space, 2023, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.4349314
    2. Wei-Xi Li, Rui Xu, Tong Yang, Global well-posedness of a Prandtl model from MHD in Gevrey function spaces, 2022, 42, 0252-9602, 2343, 10.1007/s10473-022-0609-7
    3.
    4. Xiaolei Dong, Local existence of solutions to the 2D MHD boundary layer equations without monotonicity in Sobolev space, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 5294, 10.3934/math.2024256
    5. Zhong Tan, Zhonger Wu, Global small solutions of MHD boundary layer equations in Gevrey function space*, 2023, 366, 00220396, 444, 10.1016/j.jde.2023.04.019
    6. Zhong Tan, Mingxue Zhang, The local well-posedness of 2D magneto-micropolar boundary layer equations without resistivity, 2024, 0, 1534-0392, 0, 10.3934/cpaa.2024086
    7. Shengxin Li, Feng Xie, Prandtl boundary layer expansion with strong boundary layers for inhomogeneous incompressible magnetohydrodynamics equations in Sobolev framework, 2024, 287, 00221236, 110653, 10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110653
    8.
    9.
    10.
    11.
    12.
    13.
    14.
    15.
    16.
    17.
    18.
    19.
    20.
    21.
    22.
    23.
    24.
    25.
    26.
    27.
    28.
    29.
    30.
    31.
    32.
    33.
    34.
    35.
    36.
    37.
    38.
    39.
    40.
    41.
    42.
    43.
    44.
    45.
    46.
    47.
    48.
    49.
    50.
    51.
    52.
    53.
    54.
    55.
    56.
    57.
    58.
    59.
    60.
    61.
    62.
    63.
    64.
    65.
    66.
    67.
    68.
    69.
    70.
    71.
    72.
    73.
    74.
    75.
    76.
    77.
    78.
    79.
    80.
    81.
    82.
    83.
    84.
    85.
    86.
    87.
    88.
    89.
    90.
    91.
    92.
    93.
    94.
    95.
    96.
    97.
    98.
    99.
    100.
    101.
    102.
    103.
    104.
    105.
    106.
    107.
    108.
    109.
    110.
    111.
    112.
    113.
    114.
    115.
    116.
    117.
    118.
    119.
    120.
    121.
    122.
    123.
    124.
    125.
    126.
    127.
    128.
    129.
    130.
    131.
    132.
    133.
    134.
    135.
    136.
    137.
    138.
    139.
    140.
    141.
    142.
    143.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2175) PDF downloads(164) Cited by(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog