Research article Special Issues

Advancement of Environmental Monitoring System Using IoT and Sensor: A Comprehensive Analysis

  • The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) has brought a revolution in global communication network technology. It has acquired many day-to-day applications in healthcare, education, agriculture, etc. In addition, IoT has also had a significant impact in the field of environmental monitoring.The significant factors in a healthy environment are air quality, water pollution, and waste management, where the world's population can live securely. Monitoring is necessary for us to achieve global sustainability. As monitoring technology has advanced in recent years, environmental monitoring systems have evolved from essential remote monitoring to an advanced environment monitoring (AEM) system, incorporating Internet of Things (IoT) technology and sophisticated sensor modules.The present manuscript aims to accomplish a critical review of noteworthy contributions and research studies about environmental monitoring systems, which involve monitoring air quality, water quality, and waste management.The rapid growth of the world's population and the exhaustion of natural resources, coupled with the increasing unpredictability of environmental conditions, lead to significant concerns about worldwide food security, global warming, water pollution, and waste overflowing. Automating tasks in the building environment, based on the Internet of Things (IoT) application, is meant to eliminate problems with the traditional approach. This study aims to examine and evaluate numerous studies involving monitoring air, water, waste, and overall environmental pollution, as well as their effect on the environment. This article categorizes studies based on their research purposes, techniques, and findings. This paper examines advanced environmental monitoring systems through sensor technology, IoT, and machine learning.

    Citation: Suprava Ranjan Laha, Binod Kumar Pattanayak, Saumendra Pattnaik. Advancement of Environmental Monitoring System Using IoT and Sensor: A Comprehensive Analysis[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(6): 771-800. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022044

    Related Papers:

    [1] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Sameh Askar, Thongchai Botmart, Aqeel Ahmad, Hijaz Ahmad . Modeling and analysis of fractional order Zika model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3912-3938. doi: 10.3934/math.2022216
    [2] Sabri T. M. Thabet, Reem M. Alraimy, Imed Kedim, Aiman Mukheimer, Thabet Abdeljawad . Exploring the solutions of a financial bubble model via a new fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8587-8614. doi: 10.3934/math.2025394
    [3] Zongmin Yue, Yitong Li, Fauzi Mohamed Yusof . Dynamic analysis and optimal control of Zika virus transmission with immigration. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21893-21913. doi: 10.3934/math.20231116
    [4] Jonas Ogar Achuobi, Edet Peter Akpan, Reny George, Austine Efut Ofem . Stability analysis of Caputo fractional time-dependent systems with delay using vector lyapunov functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28079-28099. doi: 10.3934/math.20241362
    [5] Liping Wang, Peng Wu, Mingshan Li, Lei Shi . Global dynamics analysis of a Zika transmission model with environment transmission route and spatial heterogeneity. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4803-4832. doi: 10.3934/math.2022268
    [6] Jutarat Kongson, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Weerawat Sudsutad . Analysis of a fractional model for HIV CD4+ T-cells with treatment under generalized Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7285-7304. doi: 10.3934/math.2021427
    [7] Muhammad Altaf Khan, Sajjad Ullah, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan . Fractional order SEIR model with generalized incidence rate. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 2843-2857. doi: 10.3934/math.2020182
    [8] Fidel Meléndez-Vázquez, Guillermo Fernández-Anaya, Aldo Jonathan Muñóz-Vázquez, Eduardo Gamaliel Hernández-Martínez . Generalized conformable operators: Application to the design of nonlinear observers. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12952-12975. doi: 10.3934/math.2021749
    [9] Miled El Hajji, Mohammed Faraj S. Aloufi, Mohammed H. Alharbi . Influence of seasonality on Zika virus transmission. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19361-19384. doi: 10.3934/math.2024943
    [10] Zafar Iqbal, Muhammad Aziz-ur Rehman, Muhammad Imran, Nauman Ahmed, Umbreen Fatima, Ali Akgül, Muhammad Rafiq, Ali Raza, Ali Asrorovich Djuraev, Fahd Jarad . A finite difference scheme to solve a fractional order epidemic model of computer virus. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2337-2359. doi: 10.3934/math.2023121
  • The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) has brought a revolution in global communication network technology. It has acquired many day-to-day applications in healthcare, education, agriculture, etc. In addition, IoT has also had a significant impact in the field of environmental monitoring.The significant factors in a healthy environment are air quality, water pollution, and waste management, where the world's population can live securely. Monitoring is necessary for us to achieve global sustainability. As monitoring technology has advanced in recent years, environmental monitoring systems have evolved from essential remote monitoring to an advanced environment monitoring (AEM) system, incorporating Internet of Things (IoT) technology and sophisticated sensor modules.The present manuscript aims to accomplish a critical review of noteworthy contributions and research studies about environmental monitoring systems, which involve monitoring air quality, water quality, and waste management.The rapid growth of the world's population and the exhaustion of natural resources, coupled with the increasing unpredictability of environmental conditions, lead to significant concerns about worldwide food security, global warming, water pollution, and waste overflowing. Automating tasks in the building environment, based on the Internet of Things (IoT) application, is meant to eliminate problems with the traditional approach. This study aims to examine and evaluate numerous studies involving monitoring air, water, waste, and overall environmental pollution, as well as their effect on the environment. This article categorizes studies based on their research purposes, techniques, and findings. This paper examines advanced environmental monitoring systems through sensor technology, IoT, and machine learning.



    Zika infection is a kind of vector-borne disease caused and spread by the bite infected Aedes mosquitos. The Zika infection was first discovered in Uganda in 1947. In 2007, the first case of Zika virus was reported occurred in the Island of Yap (Federated States of Micronesia). After that, it spread very quickly in Asia, Africa and USA [1]. The Aides mosquitoes is the main source from which the Zika virus is spread and is also responsible for dengue infection. The transmission of virus of Zika infection to humans occurred by the bites of infected female mosquitoes from the Aedes genus. This infection can also be transmitted having unprotected sexual relations, if one partner is suffering from Zika virus. People who have infected with Zika will have mild symptom due to which they feel mild illness and get severe ailment. Zika infected people main symptoms are skin rashes, headache, mild fever, conjunctivitis, and muscle pains. Usually the symptoms last for 2–7 days but sometimes the infected individuals due to Zika virus de not developed symptoms. This infection can also affect a pregnant women to her developing fetus [2,3]. If this happened then most probably the newly born babies have abnormal brain and small head development along with muscle weakness which effects nervous system.

    Epidemic models are used as powerful tool to predict the dynamics and control of various communicable diseases. These models usually consist of nonlinear differential equations describing the dynamics of the concern disease. A number of transmission models and effective possible controlling strategies have been developed in literature to explore the effective strategies for controlling of Zika infection in different regions around the globe. Kucharsk et al. [4] proposed a mathematical model and provided a detail analysis of French Polynesia Zika outbreak appeared in 2013-14. Kucharsk et al. used the total Zika infected cases between October 2013 till April 2014 which are reported in six main places of French Polynesia for model parameters estimation. Bonyah and Okosun [5] used optimal control theory to derived three different controlling strategies to reduce the spreed of this infection. The impact of bednets, used of insecticides spry and possible treatment was studied in detail in [6]. However, these models are based integer-order classical differential systems. The classical integer-order derivatives have some limitations as they are local in nature and do not posses the memory effects which are appear in most of biological systems. Secondly, classical derivative are unable to provides information about the rate of changes between two points not necessarily same. To overcome such limitations of local derivatives, various concepts on new derivatives with non-integer or fractional order were developed in recent years and can e found in [7,9,10]. The classical Caputo fractional operator [7] has been used to model many complex phenomena in different fields. For example in [11], a numerical scheme was proposed for of the diffusive fractional HBV model in Caputo sense. A numerical scheme for Caputo fractional reaction-diffusion equation and its stability analysis can be found in [12]. Also a detail stability analysis and simulations of Caputo sub-diffusion equation has been developed in [13]. The real world application of non-local and non-singular fractional operator [9] can be found in [14]. A comparative analysis Sturm-Liouville fractional problems has been carried out in [15]. Other applications of singular and non-singular fractional order operators in modeling various phenomena can be found in [18,16,19,20,17]. There is no rich literate on the modeling of Zika virus in fractional order. Only few models with fractional order has been presented in literature for Zika infection [21,22]. Keeping the above discussion in view and applicability of fractional order derivatives, in the preset investigation, a mathematical transmission model is considered in the Caputo sense in order to explore the dynamics of the Zika virus. We simulate the proposed Zika model for different values of relevant parameters and for several values of arbitrary fractional order α.

    The structure of the paper is follows is as: groundwork of the fractional derivative is given in Section 2. The basic model formulation is given in Section 3. Sections 4 is devoted to explore the basic properties of the model. Sections 5 and 6 are concern to obtain the stability results of the model equilibria. Graphical analysis are given in Section 7. The whole work is summarized with a brief conclusion in Section 8.

    The basic definitions regarding the fractional derivative in Caputo sense are as follows [7,8]:

    Definition 2.1. The Caputo fractional derivative of order α(n1,n) with nN for a function hCn is stated as follow:

    CDαt(h(t))=1Γ(nα)t0h(n)ξ(tξ)αn+1dξ.

    Clearly CDαt(h(t)) approaches to h(t) as α1.

    Definition 2.2. The corresponding fractional integral having order α>0 of the function h:R+R is described by the following expression

    Iαt(h(t))=1Γ(α)t0(tξ)α1h(ξ)dξ,

    where Γ represent the Gamma function.

    Definition 2.3. The constant point x is said to be an equilibrium point of the following Caputo fractional dynamic system:

    CDαtx(t)=h(t,x(t)),α(0,1), (2.1)

    if and only if it observed that h(t,x)=0.

    To present the stability analysis of nonlinear fractional systems in the Caputo sense via Lyapunov method we first recall the following necessary results from [23,24].

    Theorem 2.4. Suppose x be an equilibrium point for the above system (2.1) and ΩRn be a domain containing x. Let L:[0,)×Ω into to R be a continuously differentiable function such that

    W1(x)L(t,x(t))W2(x),

    and

    CDαtL(t,x(t))W3(x),

    α(0,1) and xΩ. Whereas W1(x), W2(x) and W3(x) are continuously positive definite functions on Ω. Then x is uniformly asymptotically stable equilibrium point for the model (2.1).

    Next we recall the following lemma from [24], which we will use in presenting the global stability via Lyapunov function.

    Lemma 2.5. For a continuous and derivable function z(t)R+ and α(0,1), then for any time tt0 we have

    CDαt{z(t)zzlnz(t)z}(1zz(t))CDαtz(t),zR+.

    To formulate the model, we divide the human population into two sub-classes, susceptible individuals and infected individuals. The total human population is represented by xh(t)=x1(t)+x2(t), where x1 represent susceptible and x2 represent numbers of infected human individuals. Similarly, xm is the total number of mosquitos which are further divided into susceptible mosquitos x3, and infected mosquitos x4, so that xm(t)=x3(t)+x4(t). The compartmental mathematical model is given by the following system of four ordinary differential equations to describe the mechanism of the transmission of Zika virus.

    {CDαtx1=Λhβ1γ1x1(t)x4(t)d1x1(t),CDαtx2=β1γ1x1(t)x4(t)d1x2(t),CDαtx3=Λmβ2γ2x2(t)x3(t)d2x3(t),CDαtx4=β2γ2x2(t)x3(t)d2x4(t), (3.1)

    with the initial conditions

    x1(0)=x100, x2(0)=x200, x3(0)=x300, x4(0)=x400.

    In the above proposed model Λh and Λm respectively represent the recruitment rate of human and mosquito populations. The natural death rate of the human and mosquitos are d1 and d2 respectively. The contact rate of suspectable human and infected mosquitos is β1, while β2 is the contact rate OF susceptible mosquitos and infected humans. The parameters γ1 and γ2 shows the transmission probabilities of humans and mosquitos.

    In order to present the non-negativity of the system solution, let

    R4+={yR4y0}  and  y(t)=(x1(t),x2(t),x3(t),x4(t))T.

    To proceeds further, first we recall the generalized mean values theorem [25].

    Lemma 4.1. Let suppose that h(t)C[a,b] and CDαth(t)(a,b], then

    h(t)=h(a)+1Γ(α)(CDαth)(ζ)(ta)α,

    with aζt,t(a,b].

    Corollary 4.2. Suppose that h(t)C[a,b] and CDαth(t)(a,b], where α(0,1]. Then if

    (i)  CDαth(t)0,  t(a,b),  then  h(t)  is  nondecreasing.
    (ii)  CDαth(t)0,  t(a,b),  then  h(t)  is  nonincreasing.

    We are now able to give the following result.

    Theorem 4.3. A unique solution y(t) of the model (3.1) exists and will remain in R4+. Further more, the solution is positive.

    Proof. The exitance of the Caputo fractional Zika model can be shown with the help of theorem 3.1 from [26,27], while the uniqueness of the solution can be easily obtained by making use of the Remark 3.2 in [26] for all positive values of t. In order to explore the solution positivity, it is necessary to show that on each hyperplane bounding the positive orthant, the vector field points to R4+. Form the system (3.1), we deduced that

    CDαtx1x1=0=Λh0,  CDαtx2x2=0=β1γ1x1(t)x4(t)0,CDαtx3x3=0=Λm0,  CDαtx4x4=0=β2γ2x2(t)x3(t)0.

    Hence, using the above corollary (4.2), we obtain the desired target i.e. the solution will remain in R4+ and hence biologically feasible region is constructed as:

    Φ={(x1,x2,x3,x4)R4+:x1,x2,x3,x40 }.

    Next we explore the equilibria and basic threshold quantity R0 of the model (3.1) in the following subsection.

    The equilibria of our proposed system (3.1) are obtained by solving the system below

    CDαtx1= CDαtx2= CDαtx3= CDαtx4=0.

    Hence we deduced that the proposed model exhibit two type of equilibrium points. The disease free equilibrium (DFE) calculated as

    E0=(x01,x02,x03,x04)=(Λhd1,0,Λmd2,0),

    and the endemic equilibrium (EE) is as evaluated as follows E1=(x1,x2,x3,x4), where

    x1=Λhd1+x4β1γ1,x2=Λhx4β1γ1d1(d1+x4β1γ1),x3=d1Λm(d1+β1γ1x4)β1γ1x4(d1d2+β2γ2Λh)+d2d21. (4.1)

    The EE E1, exist only if R0>1. The threshold quantity known as the basic reproduction number for the fractional Zika model is obtained by using the well known approach discussed in [28]. The basic reproduction number is biologically very important and determine the global dynamics of the model. The corresponding matrices F and V are given by

    F=(0β1γ1Λhd1β2γ2Λmd20),  V=(d100d2).

    Further, the inverse of V is

    V1=(1d1001d2), FV1=(0β1γ1Λhd1d2β2γ2Λmd1d20)

    The spectral radius ρ(FV1) is the basic reproduction number of the model and after some simplification the reproduction number is

    R0=ΛhΛmβ2γ2β1γ1d21d22.

    In this section we proceed to confirm the stability results in both local and global case. The Jacobian of linearization matrix of model (3.1).

    JE0=(d100β1γ1Λhd10d10β1γ1Λhd10β2γ2Λmd2d200β2γ2Λmd20d2).

    Theorem 5.1. For positive integers r1 and r2 such that gcd(r1,r2)=1. Let α=(r1r2) and define N=r2, then the model DFE denoted by E0 is stable locally asymptotically provided that |arg(λ)|>π2N, where λ denotes the possible roots of the characteristic equation of the matrix JE0 given below.

    det(diag[λp1λp1λp1λp1]JE0)=0. (5.1)

    Proof. By expansion of Eq. (5.1), we get the below equation in term of λ.

    (λr1+d1)(λr1+d2)(λ2r1+a1λr1+a2)=0, (5.2)

    where the coefficients are given below:

    a1=d1+d2,a2=d1d1(1R0).

    The arguments of the roots of the equation λp1+d1=0 are as follow:

    arg(λk)=πr1+k2πr1>πN>π2N,wherek=0,1,(r11). (5.3)

    In similar pattern, it can be shown that argument of the roots of λp1+d2=0 are also greater than π2M. Further, if R0<1, then the desired condition (|arg(λ)|>π2N) is satisfied for all roots of polynomial (5.2). For R0>1, then with the help of Descartes rule of signs, there exits exactly one root of characteristic equation with |arg(λ)|<π2N. Thus the DFE is locally asymptotically stable for R0<1, otherwise unstable.

    For global stability result we prove the following theorem. This subsection provide the global analysis of the model for the DF and endemic case. We have the following results.

    Theorem 5.2. For arbitrary fractional order α in the interval (0, 1], and R0<1, the DFE of the proposed model is stable globally asymptotically and unstable otherwise.

    Proof. To prove our result we define consider the following Lyapunov function

    V(t)=W1(x1x01x01lnx1x01)+W2x2+W3(x3x03x03lnx3x03)+W4x4. (5.4)

    Where Wi, i=1,24, are arbitrary positive constants to be chosen latter. Using lemma (5.1), the time derivative of (5.4), along the solution of (3.1) is given by

    CDαtV(t)=W1(x1x01x1) CDαtx1+W2 CDαtx2+W3(x3x03x3) CDαtx3+W4 CDαtx4=W1(x1x01x1)[Λhd1x1β1γ1x4x1]+W2[β1γ1x4x1d1x2]+W3(x3x03x3)[Λmd2x3β2γ2x3x2]+W4[β2γ2x3x2d2x4]=(W2W1)[β1γ1x4x1]+(W4W3)[β2γ2x3x2]+x4(W1β1γ1x01W4d2)+x2(W3β2γ2x03W2d1).

    Using x01=Λhd1 and x03=Λmd2, we get

    CDαtV=(W2W1)[β1γ1x4x1]+(W4W3)[β2γ2x3x2]+x4(W1β1γ1Λhd1W4d2)+x2(W3β1γ1Λmd2W2d1).

    Choosing the constants W1=W2=β2γ2Λmd2 and W3=W4=d1 and after simplification, we get

    CDαtV=x4d1d2(R01).

    CDαtV(t) is negative for R0<1. Therefore, by theorem (2.4) [23,24], the DFE E0, is globally asymptotically stable in Φ.

    Here, we present the global stability of the system (3.1) at E1. At the steady state the model (3.1) at E1 we obtained

    {Λh=β1γ1x4x1+d1x1,d1x2=β1γ1x4x1,Λm=β2γ2x3x2+d2x3,d2x4=β2γ2x3x2. (6.1)

    Theorem 6.1. If R0>1, the EE E1 of the system (3.1) is stable globally asymptotically.

    Proof. We consider the following Lyapunov function:

    L(t)=(x1x1x1logx1x1)+(x2x2x2logx2x2)+(x3x3x3logx3x3)+(x4x4x4logx4x4).

    Using lemma (5.1), the derivative of L(t) along the solutions of (3.1) is as follows

     CDαtL=(1x1x1) CDαtx1+(1x2x2) CDαtx2+(1x3x3) CDαtx3+(1x4x4) CDαtx4.   

    By direct calculations, we have that:

    (1x1x1) CDαtx1=(1x1x1)(Λhd1x1β1γ1x4x1)(1x2x2) CDαtx2=(1x2x2)(β1γ1x4x1d1x2)(1x3x3) CDαtx3=(1x3x3)(Λmd2x3β2γ2x3x2)(1x4x4) CDαtx2=(1x4x4)(β2γ2x3x2d2x4).     (6.2)
    (1x1x1) CDαtx1=(1x1x1)(Λhd1x1β1γ1x4x1)=(1x1x1)(d2x1+β1γ1x4x1d2x1β1γ1x4x1)=d2x1(1x1x1)(1x1x1)+(1x1x1)(β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1)=d2x1(2x1x1x1x1)+β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1x1x1+β1γ1x4x1.     (6.3)
    (1x2x2) CDαtx2=(1x2x2)(β1γ1x4x1d1x2)=β1γ1x4x1d1x2β1γ1x4x1x2x2+d1x2=β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1x2x2β1γ1x4x1x2x2+β1γ1x4x1.     (6.4)
    (1x3x3) CDαtx3=(1x3x3)(Λmd2x3β2γ2x3x2)=(1x3x3)(d2x3+β2γ2x3x2d2x3β2γ2x3x2)=d2x3(1x3x3)(1x3x3)+(1x3x3)(β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3x2)=d2x3(2x3x3x3x3)+β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3x3x3x3+β2γ2x3x2. (6.5)
    (1x4x4) CDαtx4=(1x4x4)(β2γ2x3x2d2x4)=β2γ2x3x2d2x4β2γ2x3x2x4x4+d2x4=β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3xx2x4x4β2γ2x3x2x4x4+β2γ2x3x2.     (6.6)

    It follows from (6.3-6.6)

     CDαtL=d1x1(2x1x1x1x1)+β1γ1x4x1(2x1x1x2x2x4x4(x1x2x1x21))+d2x3(2x3x3x3x3)+β2γ2x3x2(2x3x3x4x4x2x2(x3x4x3x41)).      (6.7)

    Make use of arithmetical-geometrical inequality we have in equation (6.7)

    d1x1(2x1x1x1x1)0,d2x3(2x3x3x3x3)0,β1γ1x4x1(2x1x1xx2x2x3x3(x1x2x1x21))0,β2γ2x3x2(2x3x3x4x4x2x2(x3x4x3x41))0.    

    Therefore,  CDαtL0 and hence by using theorem (2.4) the EE E1 of the proposed model is globally asymptotically stable whenever R0>1.

    The present section is devoted to obtain the numerical results of the proposed Zika fractional order model (3.1). The Adams-type predictor-corrector method is applied to obtained the approximate solution of the model. The numerical values used in the simulations are Λh=1.2, Λm=0.3, β1=0.0004, β2=0.005, d1=0.004, d2=0.0014, γ1=0.02. γ2=0.0003. The graphical results using different five values of fractional order α=1,0.95,0.9,0.85,0.8 are presented in the Figures 1-4. From these figures we can see than the susceptible human and mosquitoes are increasing when we decreases the fractional order α. While there is a significant decrease in the graphs of infected humans and mosquitoes with decrease in α. Hence, the fractional order α has an important role in the model.

    Figure 1.  The graph shows the behavior of the susceptible humans for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.
    Figure 2.  The graph shows the behavior of the infected humans for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.
    Figure 3.  The graph shows the behavior of the susceptible mosquitos for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.
    Figure 4.  The graph shows the behavior of the infected mosquitos for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.

    Zika is a rapidly spreading epidemic and is one of serious health issue, specially for pregnant women. A number of deterministic models have been presented in last few year, for the possible control and eradication of this infection from the community. But, almost all of these models are based on classical or local derivative. In order to better explore the complex behavior of Zika infection, in this paper, a fractional order transmission model in Caputo sense is developed. The detail analysis such as positivity and existence of the solution, basic reproduction numberer and model equilibria of the proposed model are presented. The stability results for both local and global cases are derived in detail in fractional environment. From the numerical results we conclude that the fractional order derivative provides more information about the proposed model which are unable by classical integer-order epidemic models. Also these results ensure that by including the memory effects in the model seems very appropriate for such an investigation. In future, we will explore the proposed model using non-local and non-singular fractional derivatives presented in [9,10].

    All authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] Rath M, Pattanayak B (2018) Technological improvement in modern health care applications using Internet of Things (IoT) and proposal of novel health care approach. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-01-2018-0007
    [2] Ramlowat DD, Pattanayak BK (2019) Exploring the Internet of things (IoT) in education: a review. Information systems design and intelligent applications 2019: 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3338-5_23 doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3338-5_23
    [3] BiswalAK, Singh D, Pattanayak B K, et al. (2021) IoT-based smart alert system for drowsy driver detection. Wireless communications and mobile computing 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6627217
    [4] Rath M, Swain J, Pati B, et al. (2018) Network security: attacks and control in MANET. InHandbook of Research on Network Forensics and Analysis Techniques 2018: 19–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4100-4.ch002 doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-4100-4.ch002
    [5] Rath M, Pati B, Pattanayak BK, et al. (2018) Relevance of soft computing techniques in the significant management of wireless sensor networks. In Soft Computing in Wireless Sensor Networks 2018: 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429438639-4 doi: 10.1201/9780429438639-4
    [6] Hosenkhan MR, Pattanayak BK (2020) Security issues in Internet of things (IoT): a comprehensive review. New Paradigm in Decision Science and Management 2020: 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9330-3_36 doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-9330-3_36
    [7] Biswal AK, Singh D, Pattanayak BK (2021) IoT-based voice-controlled energy-efficient intelligent traffic and street light monitoring system. In Green Technology for Smart City and Society 2021: 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8218-9_4 doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-8218-9_4
    [8] Biswal AK, Singh D, Pattanayak BK, et al. (2021) Adaptive fault-tolerant system and optimal power allocation for smart vehicles in smart cities using controller area network. Security and Communication Networks 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2147958
    [9] Hosenkhan R, Pattanayak BK (2019) A secured communication model for IoT. In Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications 2019: 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3338-5_18 doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3338-5_18
    [10] Swain J, Pattanayak BK, Pati B (2021) A systematic study and analysis of security issues in mobile ad-hoc networks. In Research anthology on securing mobile technologies and applications 2021: 144–150. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8545-0.ch008 doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8545-0.ch008
    [11] Rath M, Darwish A, Pati B, et al. (2020) Swarm intelligence as a solution for technological problems associated with the Internet of Things. In Swarm Intelligence for Resource Management in Internet of Things 2020: 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818287-1.00005-X doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818287-1.00005-X
    [12] Rath M, Pati B, Pattanayak BK (2020) Manifold surveillance issues in wireless network and the secured protocol. International Journal of Information Security and Privacy (IJISP) 14: 16–26. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISP.2020010102 doi: 10.4018/IJISP.2020010102
    [13] Pattanayak BK, Amic S (2020) Modified lightweight aes based two-level security model for communication on IoT. TEST Eng Manage 82: 2323–2330.
    [14] Pattanayak BK, Nohur D, Cowlessur SK, et al. (2021) An IoT-Based System Architecture for Environmental Monitoring. In Progress in Advanced Computing and Intelligent Engineering 2021: 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4299-6_42 doi: 10.1007/978-981-33-4299-6_42
    [15] Laha SR, Mahapatra SK, Pattnaik S, et al. (2021) U-INS: an android-based navigation system. In Cognitive Informatics and Soft Computing 2021: 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1056-1_11 doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-1056-1_11
    [16] Pattnaik S, Banerjee S, Laha SR, et al. (2022) A Novel Intelligent Street Light Control System Using IoT. In Intelligent and Cloud Computing 2022: 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9873-6_13 doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-9873-6_13
    [17] Mendez-Monroy PE, Cruz May E, Jiménez Torres M, et al. (2022) IoT System for the Continuous Electrical and Environmental Monitoring into Mexican Social Housing Evaluated under Tropical Climate Conditions. Journal of Sensors 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5508713
    [18] Sharma R, Arya R (2022) UAV based long-range environment monitoring system with Industry 5.0 perspectives for smart city infrastructure. Computers & Industrial Engineering 168: 108066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108066 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108066
    [19] Xu J, Gu B, Tian G (2022) Review of agricultural IoT technology. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2022.01.001
    [20] Canning J, Guo Y, Chazcko Z (2022) Towards a bionic IoT: environmental monitoring using smartphone interrogated plant sensors. bioRxiv.
    [21] Osman N, Jamlos MF, Dzaharudin F, et al. (2022). Real-time and predictive analytics of air quality with iot system: A review. Recent Trends in Mechatronics Towards Industry 4.0 2022: 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4597-3_11 doi: 10.1007/978-981-33-4597-3_11
    [22] Kho EP, Chua SND, Lim SF, et al. (2022) Development of young sago palm environmental monitoring system with wireless sensor networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 193: 106723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106723 doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106723
    [23] Islam MM, Kashem MA, Uddin J (2022) An internet of things framework for real-time aquatic environment monitoring using an Arduino and sensors. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 12: 826. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v12i1.pp826-833 doi: 10.11591/ijece.v12i1.pp826-833
    [24] Quy VK, Hau NV, Anh DV, et al. (2022) IoT-Enabled Smart Agriculture: Architecture, Applications, and Challenges. Applied Sciences 12: 3396. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073396 doi: 10.3390/app12073396
    [25] Zibetti GR, Wickboldt JA, de Freitas EP (2022) Context-aware environment monitoring to support LPWAN-based battlefield applications. Computer Communications 189: 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2022.02.020 doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2022.02.020
    [26] Trevathan J, Read W, Sattar A (2022) Implementation and Calibration of an IoT Light Attenuation Turbidity Sensor. Internet of Things 2022: 100576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2022.100576 doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2022.100576
    [27] Dong M, Sun Z, Yu H, et al. (2022) Performance Evaluation of the Transmission Quality of the Internet of Things in Farmland Environmental Monitoring Based on ns-3. Mobile Information Systems 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3148348 doi: 10.1155/2022/3148348
    [28] Sarramia D, Claude A, Ogereau F, et al. (2022) CEBA: A Data Lake for Data Sharing and Environmental Monitoring. Sensors 22: 2733. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072733 doi: 10.3390/s22072733
    [29] Zhang S, Guo Y, Li S, et al. (2022) Investigation on environment monitoring system for a combination of hydroponics and aquaculture in greenhouse. Information Processing in Agriculture 9: 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2021.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.inpa.2021.06.006
    [30] Sinha BB, Dhanalakshmi R (2022) Recent advancements and challenges of Internet of Things in smart agriculture: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems 126: 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.08.006
    [31] Rehman A, Saba T, Kashif M, et al. (2022) A revisit of Internet of things technologies for monitoring and control strategies in smart agriculture. Agronomy 12: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010127 doi: 10.3390/agronomy12010127
    [32] Yan W, Wang Z, Wang H, et al. (2022) Survey on recent smart gateways for smart home: Systems, technologies, and challenges. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies 33: e4067. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4067
    [33] Kim D, Yoon Y, Lee J, et al. (2022) Design and Implementation of Smart Buildings: A Review of Current Research Trend. Energies 15: 4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124278 doi: 10.3390/en15124278
    [34] Jat AS, Grønli TM (2022) Smart Watch for Smart Health Monitoring: A Literature Review. In International Work-Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering 2022: 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07704-3_21 doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-07704-3_21
    [35] Avina-Bravo EG, Cassirame J, Escriba C, et al. (2022) Smart electrically assisted bicycles as health monitoring systems: a review. Sensors 22: 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020468 doi: 10.3390/s22020468
    [36] Dashkevych O, Portnov BA (2022) Criteria for Smart City Identification: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 14: 4448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084448 doi: 10.3390/su14084448
    [37] Schmidt DN, Pieraccini M, Evans L (2022) Marine protected areas in the context of climate change: key challenges for coastal social-ecological systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 377: 20210131. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0131 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0131
    [38] da Costa Filho BM, Duarte AC, Santos TAR (2022) Environmental monitoring approaches for the detection of organic contaminants in marine environments: a critical review. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2022: e00154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00154 doi: 10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00154
    [39] Osman N, Jamlos MF, Dzaharudin F, et al. (2022). Real-time and predictive analytics of air quality with iot system: A review. Recent Trends in Mechatronics Towards Industry 4.0 2022: 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4597-3_11
    [40] Khanna A, Kaur S (2020) Internet of things (IoT), applications and challenges: a comprehensive review. Wireless Personal Communications 114: 1687–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07446-4 doi: 10.1007/s11277-020-07446-4
    [41] Razmjoo A, Gandomi A, Mahlooji M, et al. (2022). An Investigation of the Policies and Crucial Sectors of Smart Cities Based on IoT Application. Applied Sciences 12: 2672. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052672 doi: 10.3390/app12052672
    [42] Mori H, Kundaliya J, Naik K, et al. (2022) IoT technologies in smart environment: security issues and future enhancements. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20132-1 doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20132-1
    [43] Shah AAI, Fauzi SSM, Gining RAJM, et al. (2021) A review of IoT-based smart waste level monitoring system for smart cities. Indonesia J Electr Eng Comput Sci 21: 450–456. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v21.i1.pp450-456 doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v21.i1.pp450-456
    [44] Akram SV, Singh R, Gehlot A, et al. (2021) Role of wireless aided technologies in the solid waste management: A comprehensive review. Sustainability 13: 13104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313104 doi: 10.3390/su132313104
    [45] Putra RH, Kusuma FT, Damayanti TN, et al. (2019) IoT: smart garbage monitoring using android and real time database. TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control) 17: 1483–1491. https://doi.org/10.12928/telkomnika.v17i3.10121 doi: 10.12928/telkomnika.v17i3.10121
    [46] Abuga D, Raghava NS (2021) Real-time smart garbage bin mechanism for solid waste management in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 75: 103347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103347 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103347
    [47] Ramson SR, Moni DJ, Vishnu S, et al. (2021) An IoT-based bin level monitoring system for solid waste management. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 23: 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01137-9 doi: 10.1007/s10163-020-01137-9
    [48] Alobaidy HA, Nordin R, Mandeep JS, et al. (2022) Low Altitude Platform-based Airborne IoT Network (LAP-AIN) for Water Quality Monitoring in Harsh Tropical Environment. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9: 20034–20054. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3171294 doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3171294
    [49] Yusof NM, Zulkifli MF, Yusof M, et al. (2018) Smart waste bin with real-time monitoring system. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7: 725–729. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.14006 doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.14006
    [50] Lozano Á, Caridad J, De Paz JF, et al. (2018). Smart waste collection system with low consumption LoRaWAN nodes and route optimization. Sensors 18: 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051465 doi: 10.3390/s18051465
    [51] Kamm M, Gau M, Schneider J, et al. (2020) Smart Waste Collection Processes-A Case Study about Smart Device Implementation. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.810
    [52] Kang KD, Kang H, Ilankoon IMSK, et al. (2020) Electronic waste collection systems using Internet of Things (IoT): Household electronic waste management in Malaysia. Journal of cleaner production 252: 119801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119801 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119801
    [53] Shanthini E, Sangeetha V, Jagadeeswari M, et al. (2022) IoT based Smart City Garbage Bin for Waste Management. In 2022 4th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) 2022: 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT53264.2022.9716343 doi: 10.1109/ICSSIT53264.2022.9716343
    [54] Wen Z, Hu S, De Clercq D, et al. (2018) Design, implementation, and evaluation of an Internet of Things (IoT) network system for restaurant food waste management. Waste management 73: 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.054 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.054
    [55] Idwan S, Mahmood I, Zubairi JA., et al. (2020) Optimal management of solid waste in smart cities using the Internet of things. Wireless Personal Communications 110: 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06738-8 doi: 10.1007/s11277-019-06738-8
    [56] Al-Masri E, Diabate I, Jain R, et al. (2018) Recycle. io: An IoT-enabled framework for urban waste management. In 2018 IEEE international conference on big data (big data) 2018: 5285–5287. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8622117 doi: 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622117
    [57] Chen WE, Wang YH, Huang PC, et al. (2018) A smart IoT system for waste management. In 2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3) 2018: 202–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2018.00-24 doi: 10.1109/IC3.2018.00-24
    [58] Marques P, Manfroi D, Deitos E, et al. (2019) An IoT-based smart cities infrastructure architecture applied to a waste management scenario. Ad Hoc Networks 87: 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.12.009 doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.12.009
    [59] Thürer M, Pan YH, Qu T, et al. (2019) Internet of Things (IoT) driven kanban system for reverse logistics: solid waste collection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 30: 2621–2630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1278-y doi: 10.1007/s10845-016-1278-y
    [60] Misra D, Das G, Chakrabortty T, et al. (2018) An IoT-based waste management system monitored by cloud. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 20: 1574–1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0720-y doi: 10.1007/s10163-018-0720-y
    [61] Pardini K, Rodrigues JJ, Kozlov SA, et al. (2019) IoT-based solid waste management solutions: a survey. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks 8: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan8010005 doi: 10.3390/jsan8010005
    [62] Asefa EM, Damtew YT, Barasa KB (2021) Landfill site selection using GIS-based multicriteria evaluation technique in Harar City, Eastern Ethiopia. Environmental health insights 15: 11786302211053174. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302211053174 doi: 10.1177/11786302211053174
    [63] Singh A (2019) Remote sensing and GIS applications for municipal waste management. Journal of environmental management 243: 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.017 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.017
    [64] Vu HL, Ng KTW, Fallah B, et al. (2020) Interactions of residential waste composition and collection truck compartment design on GIS route optimization. Waste management 102: 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.028 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.028
    [65] Tarone AV, Katgube AA, Shendre HH, et al. (2018) IoT based smart garbage monitoring system using ESP8266 with GPS link. Int Res J Eng Technol 5: 5–6.
    [66] Ferronato N, Preziosi G, Portillo MAG, et al. (2020) Assessment of municipal solid waste selective collection scenarios with geographic information systems in Bolivia. Waste Management 102: 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.010
    [67] Okot P, Ogao PJ, Abandu J (2019) Site selection model for urban solid waste disposal management using GIS and remote sensing: a case of Gulu Municipality. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management 24: 405–436. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2019.103645 doi: 10.1504/IJEWM.2019.103645
    [68] Ahmad S, Kim DH (2020) Quantum GIS based descriptive and predictive data analysis for effective planning of waste management. Ieee Access 8: 46193–46205. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2979015 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2979015
    [69] MİHİRETİE (2020) A Suitable Solid Waste Disposal Site Selection Using Geographical Information System: A Case of Debre Markos Town, Ethiopia. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 9: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.784087 doi: 10.30897/ijegeo.784087
    [70] Amal L, Son LH, Chabchoub H, et al. (2020) Analysis of municipal solid waste collection using GIS and multi-criteria decision aid. Applied Geomatics 12: 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-019-00291-6 doi: 10.1007/s12518-019-00291-6
    [71] Mussa A, Suryabhagavan KV (2021) Solid waste dumping site selection using GIS-based multi-criteria spatial modeling: a case study in Logia town, Afar region, Ethiopia. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes 5: 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2019.1703311 doi: 10.1080/24749508.2019.1703311
    [72] Zeeshan S, Shahid Z, Khan S, et al. (2018) Solid waste management in Korangi District of Karachi using GPS and GIS: a case study. In 2018 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE) 2018: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCE.2018.8539241 doi: 10.1109/ICCCE.2018.8539241
    [73] Gautam S, Brema J, Dhasarathan R (2020) Spatio-temporal estimates of solid waste disposal in an urban city of India: A remote sensing and GIS approach. Environmental Technology & Innovation 18: 100650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.100650 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100650
    [74] Ali N, Awais M, Muzammul M, et al. (2018) Intelligent System for Garbage collection: IoT technology with Ultrasonic sensor and Arduino Mega. Int J Comput Sci Netw 18: 102.
    [75] Sohag MU, Podder AK (2020) Smart garbage management system for a sustainable urban life: An IoT based application. Internet of Things 11: 100255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100255 doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2020.100255
    [76] Ramson SR, Moni DJ, Vishnu S, et al. (2021) An IoT-based bin level monitoring system for solid waste management. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 23: 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01137-9 doi: 10.1007/s10163-020-01137-9
    [77] Hussain A, Draz U, Ali T, et al. (2020) Waste management and Prediction of air pollutants using IoT and machine learning approach. Energies 13: 3930. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153930 doi: 10.3390/en13153930
    [78] Li Y, Wang X, Zhao Z, et al. (2020) Lagoon water quality monitoring based on digital image analysis and machine learning estimators. Water Research 172 115471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115471
    [79] Aliyu AG, Jamil NRB, Adam MBB, et al. (2020) Spatial and seasonal changes in monitoring water quality of Savanna River system. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 13: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-5026-4 doi: 10.1007/s12517-019-5026-4
    [80] Ragi NM, Holla R, Manju G (2019) Predicting water quality parameters using machine learning. In 2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT) 2019: 1109–1112. https://doi.org/10.1109/RTEICT46194.2019.9016825 doi: 10.1109/RTEICT46194.2019.9016825
    [81] Budiarti RPN, Sukaridhoto S, Hariadi M, et al. (2019) Big data technologies using SVM (case study: surface water classification on regional water utility company in Surabaya). In 2019 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering (ICOMITEE) 2019: 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOMITEE.2019.8920823 doi: 10.1109/ICOMITEE.2019.8920823
    [82] Sharmila RS, Sushma R, Mahanth MU, et al. (2022) Water Pollution Monitoring System Using IoT. In ICDSMLA 2020: 1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3690-5_111 doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-3690-5_111
    [83] Porwal A, Mishra SK, Kela A, et al. (2022) Prediction and Prevention of Water Pollution by Industries using IoT based Monitoring System. In 2022 IEEE 11th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT) 2022: 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNT54456.2022.9787664 doi: 10.1109/CSNT54456.2022.9787664
    [84] Buhion J, Buhion J, Ocon J (2022) The development of a real time, interactive water level monitoring system through SMS with AC loads control. https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v4i5.6698
    [85] Chen Q, Cheng G, Fang Y, et al. (2018) Real-time learning-based monitoring system for water contamination. In 2018 4th International Conference on Universal Village (UV) 2018: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/UV.2018.8642146 doi: 10.1109/UV.2018.8642146
    [86] Islam MA, Khan RH, Syeed M (2020) A smart and integrated surface water monitor system architecture: Bangladesh perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements 2020: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377049.3377103 doi: 10.1145/3377049.3377103
    [87] Nasto I, Zanaj E, Bakaj A, et al. (2022) Smart Water Quality Monitoring in Vlora: Design of an expert system for real-time monitoring of drinking water and detection of contamination in the aqueduct of the city of Vlora, Albania. In 2022 11th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO) 2022: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/MECO55406.2022.9797157
    [88] Jan F, Min-Allah N, Düştegör D (2021) IoT based smart water quality monitoring: Recent techniques, trends and challenges for domestic applications. Water 13: 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13131729 doi: 10.3390/w13131729
    [89] Rao KR, Srinija S, Bindu KH, et al. (2018) IOT based water level and quality monitoring system in overhead tanks. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7: 379–383. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.7.10747 doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.7.10747
    [90] Shrutika AD, Suhas K, Swapnil K (2020) Smart Tank Water Monitoring System using IOT. In International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 6.
    [91] Pasika S, Gandla ST (2020) Smart water quality monitoring system with cost-effective using IoT. Heliyon 6: e04096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04096 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04096
    [92] Srivastava S, Vaddadi S, Sadistap S (2018) Smartphone-based System for water quality analysis. Applied Water Science 8: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0780-0 doi: 10.1007/s13201-018-0780-0
    [93] Alam AU, Clyne D, Deen MJ (2021) A low-cost multi-parameter water quality monitoring system. Sensors 21: 3775. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113775 doi: 10.3390/s21113775
    [94] Jha MK, Sah RK, Rashmitha MS, et al. (2018) Smart water monitoring system for real-time water quality and usage monitoring. In 2018 International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (CIRCA) 2018: 617–621.
    [95] Sui H, Zheng G, Zhou J, et al. (2020) Application of NB-IoT Technology in City Open Water Monitoring. 2020 6th International Symposium on System and Software Reliability (ISSSR) 2020: 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSSR51244.2020.00023 doi: 10.1109/ISSSR51244.2020.00023
    [96] Amado TM, Cruz JCD (2018) Development of machine learning-based predictive models for air quality monitoring and characterization. In TENCON 2018-2018 IEEE Region 10 Conference 2018: 0668–0672. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2018.8650518 doi: 10.1109/TENCON.2018.8650518
    [97] Mihăiţă AS, Dupont L, Chery O, et al. (2019) Evaluating air quality by combining stationary, smart mobile pollution monitoring and data-driven modelling. Journal of cleaner production 221: 398–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.179 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.179
    [98] Shetty C, Sowmya BJ, Seema S, et al. (2020) Air pollution control model using machine learning and IoT techniques. In Advances in Computers 117: 187–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adcom.2019.10.006 doi: 10.1016/bs.adcom.2019.10.006
    [99] Mohan Kalyan C, Deepthi N, Harshitha D (2022) Air And Noise Cognizer using IoT And Machine Learning.
    [100] Yang H, Zhao J, Li G (2022) A new hybrid prediction model of PM2.5 concentration based on secondary decomposition and optimized extreme learning machine. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20375-y doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20375-y
    [101] Ayele TW, Mehta R (2018) Air pollution monitoring and Prediction using IoT. In second international conference on inventive communication and computational technologies (ICICCT) 2018: 1741–1745. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICCT.2018.8473272 doi: 10.1109/ICICCT.2018.8473272
    [102] Thu MY, Htun W, Aung YL, et al. (2018) Smart air quality monitoring system with LoRaWAN. In IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS) 2018: 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTAIS.2018.8600904 doi: 10.1109/IOTAIS.2018.8600904
    [103] Ou CH, Chen YA, Huang TW, et al. (2020) Design and implementation of anomaly condition detection in agricultural IoT platform system. In 2020 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN) 2020: 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIN48656.2020.9016618 doi: 10.1109/ICOIN48656.2020.9016618
    [104] Deng F, Zuo P, Wen K, et al. (2020) Novel soil environment monitoring system based on RFID sensor and LoRa. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 169: 105169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105169 doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105169
    [105] Rosero-Montalvo PD, Caraguay-Procel JA, Jaramillo ED, et al. (2018) Air quality monitoring intelligent system using machine learning techniques. In International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Science (INCISCOS) 2018: 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/INCISCOS.2018.00019 doi: 10.1109/INCISCOS.2018.00019
    [106] Cheng M, Fang F, Navon IM, et al. (2022) Spatio-Temporal Hourly and Daily Ozone Forecasting in China Using a Hybrid Machine Learning Model: Autoencoder and Generative Adversarial Networks. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 14: e2021MS002806. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002806 doi: 10.1029/2021MS002806
    [107] Ali A, Zhu Y, Zakarya M (2021) A data aggregation based approach to exploit dynamic Spatio-temporal correlations for citywide crowd flows Prediction in fog computing. Multimedia Tools and Applications 80: 31401–31433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10486-4 doi: 10.1007/s11042-020-10486-4
    [108] Wong MS, Wang T, Ho HC, et al. (2018) Towards a smart city: Development and application of an improved integrated environmental monitoring system. Sustainability 10: 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030623 doi: 10.3390/su10030623
    [109] Siddique AB, Kazmi R, Khan HU, et al. (2022) An Intelligent and Secure Air Quality Monitoring System Using Neural Network Algorithm and Blockchain. IETE Journal of Research 2022: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2022.2052984 doi: 10.1080/03772063.2022.2052984
    [110] Arroyo P, Gómez-Suárez J, Suárez JI, et al. (2021) Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement System Based on Electrochemical and PM Sensors with Cloud Connection. Sensors 21: 6228. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186228 doi: 10.3390/s21186228
    [111] Radovanovic I, Popovic I (2021) Identification of Degrading Effects in the Operation of Neighboring Photovoltaic Systems in Urban Environments. Electronics 10: 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10070762 doi: 10.3390/electronics10070762
    [112] Saini J, Dutta M, Marques G (2021) Indoor air quality monitoring systems and COVID-19. In Emerging Technologies During the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic 2021: 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67716-9_9 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-67716-9_9
    [113] Kristiani E, Yang CT, Huang CY, et al. (2021) The implementation of a cloud-edge computing architecture using Open Stack and Kubernetes for air quality monitoring application. Mobile Networks and Applications 26: 1070–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01620-5 doi: 10.1007/s11036-020-01620-5
    [114] Chaudhary V, Ashraf N, Khalid M, et al. (2022) Emergence of MXene–Polymer Hybrid Nanocomposites as High-Performance Next-Generation Chemiresistors for Efficient Air Quality Monitoring. Advanced Functional Materials 2022: 2112913. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202112913 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202112913
    [115] Amuthadevi C, Vijayan DS, Ramachandran V (2021) Development of air quality monitoring (QAM) models using different machine learning approaches. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 2021: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02724-2 doi: 10.1007/s12652-020-02724-2
    [116] Popović I, Radovanovic I, Vajs I, et al. (2022) Building Low-Cost Sensing Infrastructure for Air Quality Monitoring in Urban Areas Based on Fog Computing. Sensors 22: 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031026 doi: 10.3390/s22031026
    [117] Lambey V, Prasad AD (2021) A review on air quality measurement using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 232: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04973-5 doi: 10.1007/s11270-020-04973-5
    [118] Saini J, Dutta M, Marques G (2020) A comprehensive review on indoor air quality monitoring systems for enhanced public health. Sustainable environment research 30: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-020-0047-y doi: 10.1186/s42834-020-0047-y
    [119] Chojer H, Branco PTBS, Martins FG, et al. (2020) Development of low-cost indoor air quality monitoring devices: Recent advancements. Science of The Total Environment 727: 138385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138385 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138385
    [120] Ameer S, Shah MA, Khan A, et al. (2019) Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for predicting air quality in smart cities. IEEE Access 7: 128325–128338. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925082 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925082
    [121] Barot V, Kapadia V, Pandya S (2020) QoS enabled IoT based low cost air quality monitoring system with power consumption optimization. Cybernetics and Information Technologies 20: 122–140. https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2020-0021 doi: 10.2478/cait-2020-0021
    [122] Okokpujie K, Noma-Osaghae E, Modupe O, et al. (2018) A smart air pollution monitoring system. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) 9: 799–809.
    [123] Liu L, Liu W, Zheng Y, et al. (2018) Third-eye: A mobile phone-enabled crowdsensing system for air quality monitoring. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3191752 doi: 10.1145/3191752
    [124] Anand P, Sekhar C, Cheong D, et al. (2019) Occupancy-based zone-level VAV system control implications on thermal comfort, ventilation, indoor air quality and building energy efficiency. Energy and Buildings 204: 109473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109473 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109473
    [125] Jo J, Jo B, Kim J, et al. (2020) Development of an IoT-based indoor air quality monitoring platform. Journal of Sensors 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8749764 doi: 10.1155/2020/8749764
    [126] Goyal S (2022) IoT-Based Smart Air Quality Control System: Prevention to COVID-19. In IoT and Cloud Computing for Societal Good 2022: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73885-3_2 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-73885-3_2
    [127] Kenarkoohi A, Noorimotlagh Z, Falahi S, et al. (2020) Hospital indoor air quality monitoring for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus. Science of the Total Environment 748: 141324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141324 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141324
    [128] Ha QP, Metia S, Phung MD (2020) Sensing data fusion for enhanced indoor air quality monitoring. IEEE Sensors Journal 20: 4430–4441. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2964396 doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2964396
    [129] Benammar M, Abdaoui A, Ahmad SH, et al. (2018) A modular IoT platform for real-time indoor air quality monitoring. Sensors 18: 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020581 doi: 10.3390/s18020581
    [130] Lee J, Jung Y, Sung SH, et al. (2021) High-performance gas sensor array for indoor air quality monitoring: The role of Au nanoparticles on WO 3, SnO 2, and NiO-based gas sensors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 9: 1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA08743B doi: 10.1039/D0TA08743B
    [131] Singer BC, Delp WW (2018) Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles. Indoor Air 28: 624–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12463 doi: 10.1111/ina.12463
    [132] Agarwal N, Meena CS, Raj BP, et al. (2021) Indoor air quality improvement in COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainable Cities and Society 70: 102942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102942 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102942
    [133] Saini J, Dutta M, Marques G (2021) Indoor air quality monitoring systems and COVID-19. In Emerging Technologies During the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic 2021: 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67716-9_9 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-67716-9_9
    [134] Pietrogrande MC, Casari L, Demaria G, et al. (2021) Indoor air quality in domestic environments during periods close to Italian COVID-19 lockdown. International journal of environmental research and public health 18: 4060. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084060 doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084060
    [135] Chang HS, Capuozzo B, Okumus B, et al. (2021) Why cleaning the invisible in a restaurant is important during COVID-19: A case study of indoor air quality of an open-kitchen restaurant. International Journal of Hospitality Management 94: 102854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102854 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102854
    [136] Megahed NA, Ghoneim EM (2021) Indoor Air Quality: Rethinking rules of building design strategies in post-pandemic architecture. Environmental Research 193: 110471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110471 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110471
    [137] Alonso A, Llanos J, Escandón R, et al. (2021) Effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on indoor air quality and thermal comfort of primary schools in winter in a Mediterranean climate. Sustainability 13: 2699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052699 doi: 10.3390/su13052699
    [138] Elsaid AM, Ahmed MS (2021) Indoor air quality strategies for air-conditioning and ventilation systems with the spread of the global coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic: Improvements and recommendations. Environmental Research 199: 111314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111314 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111314
    [139] Meiss A, Jimeno-Merino H, Poza-Casado I, et al. (2021) Indoor air quality in naturally ventilated classrooms. Lessons learned from a case study in a COVID-19 scenario. Sustainability 13: 8446. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158446 doi: 10.3390/su13158446
    [140] Anil I, Alagha O (2021) The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the air quality of Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 14: 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00918-3 doi: 10.1007/s11869-020-00918-3
    [141] Nandan A, Siddiqui NA, Singh C, et al. (2021) COVID-19 pandemic in Uttarakhand, India: Environmental recovery or degradation? Journal of environmental chemical engineering 9: 106595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106595 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106595
    [142] Mousavi A, Wu J (2021) Indoor-generated PM2. 5 during COVID-19 shutdowns across California: application of the PurpleAir indoor–outdoor low-cost sensor network. Environmental science & technology 55: 5648–5656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06937 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06937
    [143] Filonchyk M, Hurynovich V, Yan H (2021) Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on air pollution in Poland based on surface measurements and satellite data. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 21: 200472. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200472 doi: 10.4209/aaqr.200472
    [144] Sangkham S, Thongtip S, Vongruang P (2021) Influence of air pollution and meteorological factors on the spread of COVID-19 in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region and air quality during the outbreak. Environmental Research 197: 111104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111104 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111104
    [145] Horb EC, Wentworth GR, Makar PA, et al. (2022) A decadal synthesis of atmospheric emissions, ambient air quality, and deposition in the oil sands region. Integrated environmental assessment and management 18: 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4539 doi: 10.1002/ieam.4539
    [146] Lolli S (2021) Is the air too polluted for outdoor activities? Check by using your photovoltaic system as an air-quality monitoring device. Sensors 21: 6342. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196342 doi: 10.3390/s21196342
    [147] Wang Z, Ma P, Zhang L, Chen H, et al. (2021) Systematics of atmospheric environment monitoring in China via satellite remote sensing. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 14: 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00922-7 doi: 10.1007/s11869-020-00922-7
    [148] Assanov D, Zapasnyi V, Kerimray A (2021) Air quality and industrial emissions in the cities of Kazakhstan. Atmosphere 12: 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12030314 doi: 10.3390/atmos12030314
    [149] Danesi N, Jain M, Lee YH, et al. (2021) Monitoring atmospheric pollutants from ground-based observations. In 2021 IEEE USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (Joint with AP-S Symposium) 2021: 98–99. https://doi.org/10.23919/USNC-URSI51813.2021.9703595 doi: 10.23919/USNC-URSI51813.2021.9703595
    [150] Ascenso A, Augusto B, Silveira C, et al. (2021) Impacts of nature-based solutions on the urban atmospheric environment: a case study for Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 57: 126870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126870 doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126870
    [151] Saravanan K, Anusuya E, Kumar R, et al. (2018) Real-time water quality monitoring using Internet of Things in SCADA. Environmental monitoring and assessment 190: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6914-x doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6914-x
    [152] George G, Menon NN, Abdulaziz A, et al. (2021) Citizen scientists contribute to real-time monitoring of lake water quality using 3D printed mini Secchi disks. Frontiers in Water 40. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.662142
    [153] Wu Z, Wang J, Bian C, et al. (2020) A MEMS-based multi-parameter integrated chip and its portable system for water quality detection. Micromachines 11: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11010063 doi: 10.3390/mi11010063
    [154] Schima R, Krüger S, Bumberger J, et al. (2019) Mobile monitoring—open-source based optical sensor system for service-oriented turbidity and dissolved organic matter monitoring. Frontiers in Earth Science 7: 184. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00184 doi: 10.3389/feart.2019.00184
    [155] Cui L, Qiu M, Fan H, et al. (2018) Design and Research of Water Quality Monitoring System Based on nRF24L01 Wireless Communication. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 208: 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/208/1/012074 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/208/1/012074
    [156] Alam, AU, Clyne D, Lush W, et al. (2021) A reusable, reagent-less free chlorine sensor using gold thin film electrode. Analyst 146: 2626–2631. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AN00038A doi: 10.1039/D1AN00038A
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Sania Qureshi, Real life application of Caputo fractional derivative for measles epidemiological autonomous dynamical system, 2020, 134, 09600779, 109744, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109744
    2. Bahatdin DAŞBAŞI, Stability analysis of the hiv model through incommensurate fractional-order nonlinear system, 2020, 137, 09600779, 109870, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109870
    3. Muhammad Farooq Khan, Hussam Alrabaiah, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Farooq, Mustafa bin Mamat, Muhammad Imran Asjad, A new fractional model for vector-host disease with saturated treatment function via singular and non-singular operators, 2021, 60, 11100168, 629, 10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.057
    4. Khaled M. Saad, Manal Alqhtani, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Fractal-fractional study of the hepatitis C virus infection model, 2020, 19, 22113797, 103555, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103555
    5. Wenbin Yang, Xiaozhou Feng, Shuhui Liang, Xiaojuan Wang, Asymptotic Behavior Analysis of a Fractional-Order Tumor-Immune Interaction Model with Immunotherapy, 2020, 2020, 1076-2787, 1, 10.1155/2020/7062957
    6. Parikshit Gautam Jamdade, Shrinivas Gautamrao Jamdade, Modeling and prediction of COVID-19 spread in the Philippines by October 13, 2020, by using the VARMAX time series method with preventive measures, 2021, 20, 22113797, 103694, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103694
    7. Kolade M. Owolabi, Analysis and simulation of herd behaviour dynamics based on derivative with nonlocal and nonsingular kernel, 2021, 22, 22113797, 103941, 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103941
    8. Dawei Ding, Yecui Weng, Nian Wang, Dynamics analysis of a fractional-order delayed SBT memristive chaotic system without equilibrium points, 2019, 134, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12688-8
    9. Giro Candelario, Alicia Cordero, Juan R. Torregrosa, Multipoint Fractional Iterative Methods with (2α + 1)th-Order of Convergence for Solving Nonlinear Problems, 2020, 8, 2227-7390, 452, 10.3390/math8030452
    10. Abdon Atangana, Seda İğret Araz, New concept in calculus: Piecewise differential and integral operators, 2021, 145, 09600779, 110638, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110638
    11. Bahar Acay, Ramazan Ozarslan, Erdal Bas, Fractional physical models based on falling body problem, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 2608, 10.3934/math.2020170
    12. M. A. Khan, Arshad Khan, A. Elsonbaty, A. A. Elsadany, Modeling and simulation results of a fractional dengue model, 2019, 134, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12765-0
    13. Subhasis Bhattacharya, Suman Paul, The behaviour of infection, survival and testing effort variables of SARS-CoV-2: A theoretical modelling based on optimization technique, 2020, 19, 22113797, 103568, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103568
    14. Abdon Atangana, Seda İğret Araz, Nonlinear equations with global differential and integral operators: Existence, uniqueness with application to epidemiology, 2021, 20, 22113797, 103593, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103593
    15. Alicia Cordero, Ivan Girona, Juan R. Torregrosa, A Variant of Chebyshev’s Method with 3αth-Order of Convergence by Using Fractional Derivatives, 2019, 11, 2073-8994, 1017, 10.3390/sym11081017
    16. Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Ismail, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan, Fractional order SIR model with generalized incidence rate, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 1856, 10.3934/math.2020124
    17. Taza Gul, Haris Anwar, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Ilyas Khan, Poom Kumam, Integer and Non-Integer Order Study of the GO-W/GO-EG Nanofluids Flow by Means of Marangoni Convection, 2019, 11, 2073-8994, 640, 10.3390/sym11050640
    18. Hegagi Mohamed Ali, Ismail Gad Ameen, Optimal control strategies of a fractional order model for Zika virus infection involving various transmissions, 2021, 146, 09600779, 110864, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110864
    19. M. M. El-Dessoky, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Application of Caputo-Fabrizio derivative to a cancer model with unknown parameters, 2020, 0, 1937-1179, 0, 10.3934/dcdss.2020429
    20. S.O. Akindeinde, Eric Okyere, A.O. Adewumi, R.S. Lebelo, Olanrewaju. O. Fabelurin, Stephen. E. Moore, Caputo Fractional-order SEIRP model for COVID-19 epidemic, 2021, 11100168, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.097
    21. Chellamuthu Gokila, Muniyagounder Sambath, Modeling and simulations of a Zika virus as a mosquito-borne transmitted disease with environmental fluctuations, 2021, 0, 1565-1339, 10.1515/ijnsns-2020-0145
    22. M. R. Vinagre, G. Blé, L. Esteva, Dynamical Analysis of a Model for Secondary Infection of the Dengue, 2023, 0971-3514, 10.1007/s12591-022-00628-5
    23. Zain Ul Abadin Zafar, Nigar Ali, Mustafa Inc, Zahir Shah, Samina Younas, Mathematical modeling of corona virus (COVID-19) and stability analysis, 2022, 1025-5842, 1, 10.1080/10255842.2022.2109020
    24. Peijiang Liu, Anwarud Din, Rahat Zarin, Numerical dynamics and fractional modeling of hepatitis B virus model with non-singular and non-local kernels, 2022, 39, 22113797, 105757, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105757
    25. Aatif Ali, Saeed Islam, M. Riaz Khan, Saim Rasheed, F.M. Allehiany, Jamel Baili, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Hijaz Ahmad, Dynamics of a fractional order Zika virus model with mutant, 2022, 61, 11100168, 4821, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.031
    26. Sunil Kumar, Ram P. Chauhan, Mohamed S. Osman, S. A. Mohiuddine, A study on fractional HIV‐AIDs transmission model with awareness effect, 2021, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.7838
    27. Xinjie Fu, JinRong Wang, Dynamic stability and optimal control of SISqIqRS epidemic network, 2022, 163, 09600779, 112562, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112562
    28. Xiaotao Han, Hua Liu, Xiaofen Lin, Yumei Wei, Ma Ming, Yao Zhong Zhang, Dynamic Analysis of a VSEIR Model with Vaccination Efficacy and Immune Decline, 2022, 2022, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2022/7596164
    29. Emmanuel Addai, Lingling Zhang, Joseph Ackora-Prah, Joseph Frank Gordon, Joshua Kiddy K. Asamoah, John Fiifi Essel, Fractal-fractional order dynamics and numerical simulations of a Zika epidemic model with insecticide-treated nets, 2022, 603, 03784371, 127809, 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127809
    30. Thongchai Botmart, Qusain Hiader, Zulqurnain Sabir, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Wajaree Weera, Stochastic Investigations for the Fractional Vector-Host Diseased Based Saturated Function of Treatment Model, 2023, 74, 1546-2226, 559, 10.32604/cmc.2023.031871
    31. Giro Candelario, Alicia Cordero, Juan R. Torregrosa, María P. Vassileva, 2022, 9780323900898, 119, 10.1016/B978-0-32-390089-8.00010-6
    32. Shewafera Wondimagegnhu Teklu, Birhanu Baye Terefe, Khalid Hattaf, Mathematical Modeling Investigation of Violence and Racism Coexistence as a Contagious Disease Dynamics in a Community, 2022, 2022, 1748-6718, 1, 10.1155/2022/7192795
    33. Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Jutarat Kongson, Weerawat Sudsutad, Jehad Alzabut, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Analysis of a nonlinear fractional system for Zika virus dynamics with sexual transmission route under generalized Caputo-type derivative, 2022, 68, 1598-5865, 4273, 10.1007/s12190-021-01663-1
    34. Jutarat Kongson, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Apichat Neamvonk, Jehad Alzabut, Weerawat Sudsutad, Investigation of fractal-fractional HIV infection by evaluating the drug therapy effect in the Atangana-Baleanu sense, 2022, 19, 1551-0018, 10762, 10.3934/mbe.2022504
    35. Liping Wang, Peng Wu, Mingshan Li, Lei Shi, Global dynamics analysis of a Zika transmission model with environment transmission route and spatial heterogeneity, 2021, 7, 2473-6988, 4803, 10.3934/math.2022268
    36. Xiao-Ping Li, Mahmoud H. DarAssi, Muhammad Altaf Khan, C.W. Chukwu, Mohammad Y. Alshahrani, Mesfer Al Shahrani, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Assessing the potential impact of COVID-19 Omicron variant: Insight through a fractional piecewise model, 2022, 38, 22113797, 105652, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105652
    37. Muhammad Altaf Khan, Abdon Atangana, Emile Franc D Goufo, Mathematical analysis of an eco-epidemiological model with different competition factors in its fractional-stochastic form, 2021, 96, 0031-8949, 104015, 10.1088/1402-4896/ac1026
    38. M. Higazy, Shami A.M. Alsallami, Sayed Abdel-Khalek, A. El-Mesady, Dynamical and structural study of a generalized Caputo fractional order Lotka-Volterra model, 2022, 37, 22113797, 105478, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105478
    39. Mohammed A. Almalahi, Satish K. Panchal, Fahd Jarad, Mohammed S. Abdo, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, Qualitative analysis of a fuzzy Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equation with an Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 15994, 10.3934/math.2022876
    40. D. Baleanu, S. Arshad, A. Jajarmi, W. Shokat, F. Akhavan Ghassabzade, M. Wali, Dynamical behaviours and stability analysis of a generalized fractional model with a real case study, 2022, 20901232, 10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.010
    41. Yi Zhao, Ehab E. Elattar, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Mohammed Asiri, Pongsakorn Sunthrayuth, The dynamics of the HIV/AIDS infection in the framework of piecewise fractional differential equation, 2022, 40, 22113797, 105842, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105842
    42. Muhammad Farhan, Zhi Ling, Zahir Shah, Saeed Islam, Mansoor H. Alshehri, Elisabeta Antonescu, A multi-layer neural network approach for the stability analysis of the Hepatitis B model, 2024, 113, 14769271, 108256, 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108256
    43. A. Alla Hamou, E. Azroul, S. L'Kima, The effect of migration on the transmission of HIV/AIDS using a fractional model: Local and global dynamics and numerical simulations, 2024, 47, 0170-4214, 6868, 10.1002/mma.9946
    44. Yeliz Karaca, Mati ur Rahman, Dumitru Baleanu, 2023, Chapter 11, 978-3-031-37104-2, 144, 10.1007/978-3-031-37105-9_11
    45. Asifa Tassaddiq, Sania Qureshi, Amanullah Soomro, Omar Abu Arqub, Mehmet Senol, Comparative analysis of classical and Caputo models for COVID-19 spread: vaccination and stability assessment, 2024, 2024, 2730-5422, 10.1186/s13663-024-00760-7
    46. Sapan Kumar Nayak, P. K. Parida, Abhimanyu Kumar, A study of 3μ
    th-order of convergence of Chebyshev–Halley family method and its convergence plane, 2024, 81, 2254-3902, 457, 10.1007/s40324-023-00326-4
    47. Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Rashid Jan, Saeed Islam, A fractional modeling approach of Buruli ulcer in Possum mammals, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 065219, 10.1088/1402-4896/acd27d
    48. Waleed Ahmed, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, 2023, Chapter 8, 978-981-99-5000-3, 181, 10.1007/978-981-99-5001-0_8
    49. Linji Yang, Qiankun Song, Yurong Liu, Stability and Hopf bifurcation analysis for fractional-order SVEIR computer virus propagation model with nonlinear incident rate and two delays, 2023, 547, 09252312, 126397, 10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126397
    50. Mutaz Mohammad, Mohyeedden Sweidan, Alexander Trounev, Piecewise fractional derivatives and wavelets in epidemic modeling, 2024, 101, 11100168, 245, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.05.053
    51. Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Zhi Ling, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, Saeed Islam, Hakim A. L. Garalleh, Yury E Khudyakov, Global dynamics and computational modeling for analyzing and controlling Hepatitis B: A novel epidemic approach, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0304375, 10.1371/journal.pone.0304375
    52. Muhammad Farhan, Fahad Aljuaydi, Zahir Shah, Ebraheem Alzahrani, Ebenezer Bonyah, Saeed Islam, A fractional modeling approach to a new Hepatitis B model in light of asymptomatic carriers, vaccination and treatment, 2024, 24, 24682276, e02127, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02127
    53. Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Rashid Jan, Saeed Islam, Mansoor H. Alshehri, Zhi Ling, A fractional modeling approach for the transmission dynamics of measles with double-dose vaccination, 2023, 1025-5842, 1, 10.1080/10255842.2023.2297171
    54. Preety Kumari, Harendra Pal Singh, Swarn Singh, Modeling COVID-19 and heart disease interactions through Caputo fractional derivative: memory trace analysis, 2024, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02133-w
    55. Jhoana P. Romero-Leiton, Elda K.E. Laison, Rowin Alfaro, E. Jane Parmley, Julien Arino, Kamal R. Acharya, Bouchra Nasri, Exploring Zika's Dynamics: A Scoping Review Journey from Epidemic to Equations Through Mathematical Modelling, 2024, 24680427, 10.1016/j.idm.2024.12.016
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(8436) PDF downloads(715) Cited by(24)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog