Search Advanced

AIMS Environmental Science

2021, Volume 8, Issue 1: 1-17. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021001
Previous Article Next Article
Research article

Modeling consumer home composting intentions for sustainable municipal organic waste management in Iran

  • 1.
    Yasouj University, Yasouj, Kohgilouyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province, Iran
  • 2.
    Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555, Boulevard de l"Université, Canda

  • Home composting (HC) can be a cost-effective strategy for organic solid waste management. This option is also desirable since HC is increasingly automated, with HC machines composting faster than conventional composting in outdoor settings. Besides, HC may reduce organic solid waste management costs, especially for developing countries with scarcer resources. Taking Iran as a study case, the paper examines the influence of variables pertaining to the theory of planned behavior, the value-belief-norm framework, and the technology acceptance model. This study uses data collected from a territory-wide survey (n = 367) of Isfahan's residents to predict HC intentions. The results show that both attitude and subjective norms appear as the most impactful of all variables. These results further vary according to sex, with women being significantly more prone to HC than men. The findings may provide a reference to implement HC in Iran and other developing countries and possibly developed ones.

    Citation: Hamid Rastegari Kopaei, Mehdi Nooripoor, Ayatollah Karami, Myriam Ertz. Modeling consumer home composting intentions for sustainable municipal organic waste management in Iran[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(1): 1-17. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021001

    Related Papers:

    [1] Nur Raihan Abdullah, Faez Sharif, Nur Hafizah Azizan, Ismail Fitri Mohd Hafidz, Sugenendran Supramani, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar . Pellet diameter of Ganoderma lucidum in a repeated-batch fermentation for the trio total production of biomass-exopolysaccharide-endopolysaccharide and its anti-oral cancer beta-glucan response. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(4): 379-400. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020023
    [2] Ahmed Houari, Patrick Di Martino . Polysaccharide-hydrolysing enzymes enhance the in vitro cleaning efficiency of Nanofiltration membranes. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(4): 368-378. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.368
    [3] Vakhtang V. Dzhavakhiya, Elena V. Glagoleva, Veronika V. Savelyeva, Natalia V. Statsyuk, Maksim I. Kartashov, Tatiana M. Voinova, Alla V. Sergeeva . New bacitracin-resistant nisin-producing strain of Lactococcus lactis and its physiological characterization. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 608-621. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.608
    [4] Joseph O. Falkinham . Mycobacterium avium complex: Adherence as a way of life. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 428-438. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.428
    [5] Ananya Mukherjee, Puja Bhattacharjee, Rituparna Das, Arundhati Pal, Amal K. Paul . Endophytic bacteria with plant growth promoting abilities from Ophioglossum reticulatum L.. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 596-612. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.596
    [6] Thomas Bintsis . Lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures: An update in their metabolism and genetics. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 665-684. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.665
    [7] Zoya Samoilova, Alexey Tyulenev, Nadezhda Muzyka, Galina Smirnova, Oleg Oktyabrsky . Tannic and gallic acids alter redox-parameters of the medium and modulate biofilm formation. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(4): 379-392. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.379
    [8] Javier Fernández, Sául Redondo-Blanco, Elisa M. Miguélez, Claudio J. Villar, Alfonso Clemente, Felipe Lombó . Healthy effects of prebiotics and their metabolites against intestinal diseases and colorectal cancer. AIMS Microbiology, 2015, 1(1): 48-71. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2015.1.48
    [9] Yen Thi Ngoc Phan, Minh Thuy Tang, Tu Thi Minh Tran, Van Huu Nguyen, Trang Hien Nguyen, Takeshi Tsuruta, Naoki Nishino . Diversity of lactic acid bacteria in vegetable-based and meat-based fermented foods produced in the central region of Vietnam. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 61-70. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.61
    [10] Garmasheva I . Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from Ukrainiantraditional dairy products. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 372-387. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.372

  • Home composting (HC) can be a cost-effective strategy for organic solid waste management. This option is also desirable since HC is increasingly automated, with HC machines composting faster than conventional composting in outdoor settings. Besides, HC may reduce organic solid waste management costs, especially for developing countries with scarcer resources. Taking Iran as a study case, the paper examines the influence of variables pertaining to the theory of planned behavior, the value-belief-norm framework, and the technology acceptance model. This study uses data collected from a territory-wide survey (n = 367) of Isfahan's residents to predict HC intentions. The results show that both attitude and subjective norms appear as the most impactful of all variables. These results further vary according to sex, with women being significantly more prone to HC than men. The findings may provide a reference to implement HC in Iran and other developing countries and possibly developed ones.


    1.   Introduction

    Ganoderma lucidum is a mushroom traditionally used in Chinese medicine for the prevention and treatment of human disease. Studies on G. lucidum and its products have reported beneficial biological, health-preserving and therapeutic effects [1]–[5]. Fungal polysaccharide has been shown to possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activities [4],[6]–[10], and can be obtained via solid substrate fermentation (SSF) or submerged-liquid fermentation (SLF). However, owing to the inherent nature of the solid substrate in SSF, fungal growth occurs through mycelial colonization of the substrate bed [11]. Furthermore, poor mass transfer and heterogeneity issues within solid matrix render polysaccharide production in SSF a highly time-consuming method. SLF has been shown to be superior to SSF in this respect [11],[12].

    In SLF, a suspended biomass grows as a cluster of mycelia that eventually stabilize to form pellets [13] in the form of densely branched hyphae forming a compact ovoid shape. Fungal polysaccharide exists in two forms, exopolysaccharide (EPS) and intracellular polysaccharide (IPS). EPS is secreted outside the mycelium whereas IPS is produced inside the mycelium [10],[14]. Generally, total polysaccharide content produced by the mushroom thus comprises both EPS and IPS. Many factors affect the cultivation of biomass and polysaccharide production in SLF, including pH, agitation speed, oxygen transfer rate (OTR), glucose concentration and temperature [15],[16].

    Hence, to enhance the cultivation of biomass and polysaccharide production in SLF, where the key parameters interact with each other in a complex manner, response surface methodology (RSM) represents the most effective solution compared with the one-factor-at-a-time (OFAAT) method [15]. In this study, RSM was used to study the interaction and correlation between the set of experimental variables and obtained results, and to subsequently establish the optimised conditions. The medicinal mushroom G. lucidum was subjected to morphological and molecular analyses prior to liquid fermentation. Next, a preliminary study was conducted using the OFAAT method to obtain baseline data and the working ranges of the selected SLF parameters, prior to the optimisation of biomass, exopolysaccharide (EPS) and intracellular polysaccharide (IPS) production. The selected parameters were initial pH, glucose concentration and agitation rate.

    2.   Materials and methods

    2.1.   Molecular characterisation

    2.1.1.   Mushroom mycelium

    The fruiting body of Ganoderma lucidum was obtained from the Mushroom Unit, Expo Hill, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). The appearance and structure of the fruiting body (Figure 1A) and the basidiospores structure (Figure 1C) was first evaluated to validate the fungus. Next, with some modification of the Stamets [17] method, tissue culture was performed to obtain the mycelium. The fruiting body was washed with 99.9% ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) for 10 s and dried in a laminar flow. Then, it was cracked using a scalpel and the inner part of the fruiting body was twisted and removed using forceps (Figure 1B). The tissue obtained was placed on malt extract agar (MEA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) and maintained at room temperature until signs of mycelium growth were observed. The mycelium was then sub-cultured onto fresh MEA to obtain pure mycelium (Figure 1D), which was used as an initial culture for preservation in a potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) slant at 4 °C.

    2.1.2.   Preparation of mycelium for DNA extraction

    The mycelium was separated from agar and placed in pre-cooled pestle and ground to a fine powder under liquid nitrogen. The powder was freeze-dried and stored in an Eppendorf tube (Eppendorf no. 0030120973, Hamburg, Germany) at −20 °C [18],[19].

    2.1.3.   gDNA extraction

    The fine powdered mycelium (30 mg) was resuspended and lysed in lysis buffer (500 µL) by pipetting multiple times until the suspension became foamy. RNAase A (EN0531, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was added and the mixture was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C. To remove the cell debris, polysaccharide and protein, NaCl2 solution (165 µL, 5 mol/L) was added and the tube was inverted multiple times before centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 20 min, 4 °C). The resulting supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and mixed with chloroform (400 µL) and phenol (400 µL) by gentle inversion of the tube multiple times until the solution turned cloudy. The mixture was centrifuged (13,000 rpm, 20 min, 4 °C) and the aqueous phase was removed and extracted using an equal volume of chloroform. DNA was precipitated using 95% ethanol (2 volumes) and purified from polysaccharide by the addition of lysis buffer (500 µL) and mixing by gentle pipetting. NaCl (165 µL, 5 mol/L) was added and mixed by gentle inversion multiple times. To extract the purified DNA, chloroform (2 volumes) was added and the sample was centrifuged (13,000 rpm, 10 min, 4 °C). DNA was precipitated using ethanol (95%) and washed three times in ice-cold ethanol (70%). The washed DNA was dried, dissolved in Tris-EDTA buffer (50 µL) and stored at −20 °C [19].

    Figure 1.  Different stages of Ganoderma lucidum QRS 5120 (A) obtained from Expo Hill, Mushroom Unit, University Putra Malaysia. (B) sliced fruiting body of Ganoderma lcuidum QRS 5120. (C) Basidiospores of Ganoderma lucidum QRS 5120 (Bar = 10 µm). (D) mycelium of Ganoderma lucidum QRS 5120 (Day 7). (E) pellets formation in submerged fermentation at day 7 (Bar = 0.05 cm).
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    2.1.4.   PCR amplification

    DNA dissolved in TE buffer (Thermo Fisher no. 12090015, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was brought to room temperature slowly from −20 °C. Using universal primers (ITS1 and ITS4), the fungal ITS gene was amplified. First, the solution (500 µL) was added to PCR tubes (Eppendorf no. 0030124332, Hamburg, Germany). Then, 0.5 pmol of ITS1 and ITS4 was added following by deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs, 200 μM each) (Promega no. U1511, Madison, OH, USA), 0.5 U DNA polymerase (Promega no. D1501, Madison, OH, USA), supplied PCR buffer (ThermoFisher no. 14966123, Platinum II Green PCR Buffer) and water. PCR was performed as follow: 1 cycle (98 °C for 2 min) for initial denaturation; 25 cycles (98 °C for 15 secs; 60 °C for 30 secs; 72 °C for 30 sec) for annealing and extension, and 1 cycle (72 °C for 10 min) for final extension of the amplified DNA (Eppendorf Mastercycler gradient, Hamburg, Germany) [20].

    2.1.5.   PCR-amplified product purification and sequencing

    The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced using a 16-capillary 3100 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). A BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol.

    2.1.6.   Data analysis

    The obtained gDNA sequence was entered into BLAST. The NCBI Nucleotide Collection (nr/nt) database was selected and the query was submitted. Sequences producing significant alignment were identified, and the top 10 hit blast was selected for Multiple Sequencing Alignment (MSA) using Clustal Omega [21].

    2.1.7.   Phylogenetic analysis

    Using the neighbouring-joining (NJ) in Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis (MEGA-X), the evolutionary distance (Knuc) of identical fungal species was calculated and a phylogenetic tree was generated. The species with closest Knuc were considered the same species [21].

    2.2.   Submerged-liquid fermentation

    G. lucidum QRS 5120 was subjected to batch fermentation in a 500-mL Erlenmeyer flask using the optimal media compositions and growth parameters (Table 1).

    Table 1.  Experimental range and levels of the independent variables.
    Independent variables Range and levels
    −1 0 1
    Initial pH 4 5 6
    Glucose (g/L) 10 30 50
    Agitation (rpm) 90 100 110
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    2.2.1.   Optimisation of media (initial pH, glucose and agitation) using RSM

    Based on the preliminary studies, initial pH was shown to have a high significance for the responses (mycelial biomass, EPS production and IPS production) [data not shown]. The media composition of seed culture in the shake flask were constant at (g/L): yeast extract 1 (Oxoid no. LP0021, Dardilly, France), KH2PO4 0.5 (Bendosen Laboratory Chemicals no. C0637, Bendosen, Norway), K2HPO4 0.5 (Bendosen Laboratory Chemicals no. C0680-2296192, Bendosen, Norway), MgSO4 0.5 (Bendosen Laboratory Chemicals no. C0481, Bendosen, Norway), and NH4Cl2 4 (Bendosen Laboratory Chemicals no. C0055, Bendosen, Norway), unless otherwise stated [21]. To optimise the mycelium biomass, EPS and IPS production, CCD was used. The levels and range of the variables for this study are shown in Table 1. The lowest level of variables was initial pH 4; starting glucose concentration = 10 g/L; agitation rate = 90 rpm and the highest level of variables were initial pH 6; starting glucose concentration = 50 g/L; agitation rate = 110 rpm.

    To analyse the impact of factors and their interaction, an empirical model was established based on a second-order quadratic model for the responses, as shown in Eq 1:

    Y=b′0+n∑i=1biXi+n∑i=1biiX2i+n∑i=1n∑j>1bijXiXj
    where Y is the predicted response, b′0 is the constant coefficient, bi is the linear coefficient, bij is the interaction coefficient, bii is the quadratic coefficient and XiXj are the coded values.

    2.3.   Analytical methods

    2.3.1.   Mycelium biomass

    After the tenth day of fermentation, a 50 mL of sample was filtered using a Buchner funnel filter and the mycelial biomass (Figure 1E) was washed three times with distilled water. The filtered mycelial was dried in a food dehydrator at 35 °C to a constant weight. The mycelial biomass was calculated by subtracting the weight of pre-dried filter paper before filtering from the weight of filter paper with mycelial biomass. To obtain the concentration of mycelial biomass, the value obtained from the subtraction was multiplied by the dilution factor [12].

    2.3.2.   Exopolysaccharide (EPS)

    The supernatant obtained from filtering the mycelial biomass (Section 2.3.1) was mixed with ethanol (95%; 4 volumes), stirred and maintained at 4 °C overnight. The mixture was then transferred to a pre-weighed 50 mL Falcon tube and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 15 min). The supernatant was discarded upon centrifuging and the pellet was placed in a food dehydrator at the lowest temperature until a constant weight was achieved. Next, the EPS yield was estimated by multiplying the dilution factor by the EPS weight [12].

    2.3.3.   Intracellular polysaccharide (IPS)

    After weighing, the filtered mycelial biomass (Section 2.3.1) was mixed with distilled water (10 volumes). Then, the mixture was sterilised (121 °C, 30 min, 15 psi) in an autoclave and the mixture was filtered to obtain the supernatant, mixed with ethanol (95%; 4 volumes), stirred and maintained at 4 °C overnight. Next, the mixture was transferred to a pre-weighed 50 mL Falcon tube and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 15 min). The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was placed in a food dehydrator at the lowest temperature until a constant weight was achieved. The IPS yield was estimated by multiplying the dilution factor by the IPS weight [14].

    3.   Results and discussion

    3.1.   Molecular characterisation

    3.1.1.   Gel electrophoresis

    Molecular identification of a wild fungal sample is important to determine the species of the sample [22]. Thus, molecular identification was performed on wild G. lucidum. The base pairs of wild G. lucidum were estimated using agarose gel electrophoresis under UV light (Figure 2). The marker (Lane 1) represented the standard curve, and the base pairs of QRS 5120 were estimated to be 637 bp.

    Figure 2.  Agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA isolated from Ganoderma lucidum mycelium. Lane 1 corresponds to 10 kb marker. Lane 2 corresponds to negative control (−ve), Lane 3 corresponds to positive control (+ve) and Lane 4 corresponds to the sample (QRS_5120).
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    3.1.2.   Phylogenetic tree

    Upon sequencing of the product, it was aligned with the top-10 related species as retrieved from NCBI BLAST. Based on the BLAST reference databases, QRS 5120 was found to be 99% similar to Ganoderma sp. Detailed phylogenetic analyses (Figure 3) showed the evolutionary distance (Knuc) values. Clade A showed that G. lucidum QRS 5120 was closely related to G. lucidum isolate 39s compared with G. lucidum isolate 49s.

    Figure 3.  Phylogenetic tree of Ganoderma lucidum strain QRS_5120 with evolutionary distance. Bar = 0.00020.
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    3.2.   Optimization

    Using RSM, the effect of initial pH, starting glucose concentration and agitation rate on the biomass, EPS and IPS production was investigated. CCD design, the level of each variable and the responses are shown in Table 2. In total, twenty experiments were designated by CCD, where the coefficients were evaluated using non-linear regression analysis. To estimate the significance of the model coefficient, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. The significance of each coefficient was indicated by p < 0.05.

    Table 2.  Experimental design matrix using RSM with CCD and responses for the mycelial biomass (DCW), EPS and IPS production from the mycelium of G. lucidum strain QRS 5120.
    Run No. Variables
    		 Responses
    Initial pH Glucose (g/L) Agitation (rpm) Biomass (DCW g/L)
    		 EPS (g/L)
    		 IPS (g/L)
    Actual Predicted Actual Predicted Actual Predicted
    1 4 10 90 4.6 4.52 2.2 2.31 1.2 1.28
    2 6 50 110 3.8 3.92 1.2 1.13 0.2 0.14
    3 6 50 90 3.1 2.97 0.9 0.91 0.2 0.25
    4 5 30 100 4.1 4.12 1.1 1.31 0.8 0.85
    5 5 30 90 3.9 3.6 1.3 1.15 0.7 0.73
    6 5 50 100 3.8 3.96 1 0.91 0.9 0.83
    7 5 30 100 4.2 4.12 1.4 1.31 0.9 0.85
    8 4 50 110 5.1 4.79 2.1 2.18 1.4 1.53
    9 5 30 100 3.8 4.12 1 1.31 0.9 0.85
    10 4 50 90 4.9 5.04 1.9 1.96 1.5 1.44
    11 5 30 100 3.9 4.12 1.3 1.31 0.7 0.85
    12 5 30 110 4.2 4.3 1.4 1.37 0.9 0.77
    13 5 30 100 4.2 4.12 1.5 1.31 0.8 0.85
    14 5 30 100 4.1 4.12 1.2 1.31 0.8 0.85
    15 4 30 100 5.2 5.26 2.9 2.61 1.7 1.57
    16 6 10 110 4.1 4 1.2 1.18 0.1 0.18
    17 6 30 100 4 3.74 1.3 1.41 0.3 0.33
    18 4 10 110 4.8 4.97 2.5 2.53 1.5 1.47
    19 5 10 100 4.1 3.74 1.2 1.11 0.8 0.77
    20 6 10 90 2 2.35 1 0.96 0.3 0.19
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    3.2.1.   Optimization of mycelium biomass production

    The ANOVA for mycelium biomass production is shown in Table 3. The predicted coefficient determination indicates that 91.47% (R2 = 0.9147) of the variability in the response can be explained using this model. The model is significant (p < 0.005). The adjusted coefficient determination value (Adj. R2 = 0.84) implies the significance of the model and is in reasonable agreement with the predicted R2 value. By considering the significant terms, the model, in terms of actual variables of biomass, was regressed and is expressed by Eq 2.

    Biomass=9.515227273−7.661136364 ×pH+0.126295455×Glucose+0.238522727×Agitation+0.386363636×pH2−0.000659091×Glucose2−0.001636364×Agitation2+0.00125×pH×Glucose+0.03×pH×Agitation−0.00875×Glucose×Agitation

    Table 3.  Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the experimental results of the CCD quadratic model for biomass from the mycelium of G. lucidum strain QRS_5120.
    Source Sum of Squares DF Mean Square F Value Prob > F
    Model 8.588136364 9 0.954237374 11.90767001 0.0003* significant
    A: pH 5.776 1 5.776 72.07714124 <0.0001* significant
    B: Glucose 0.121 1 0.121 1.509926262 0.2473
    C: Agitation 1.225 1 1.225 15.28644356 0.0029* significant
    A2 0.410511364 1 0.410511364 5.122660238 0.0471* significant
    B2 0.191136364 1 0.191136364 2.385138968 0.1535
    C2 0.073636364 1 0.073636364 0.918888259 0.3604
    AB 0.005 1 0.005 0.062393647 0.8078
    AC 0.72 1 0.72 8.984685196 0.0134* significant
    BC 0.245 1 0.245 3.057288712 0.1109
    Residual 0.801363636 10 0.080136364
    Lack of Fit 0.666363636 5 0.133272727 4.936026936 0.0522 not significant
    Pure Error 0.135 5 0.027
    Cor Total 9.3895 19
    Std. Dev. = 0.28308366896796 R2 = 0.91465321514845 Adeq Precision = 14.52399050576
    Mean = 4.095 Adjusted R2 = 0.83784110878205

    * Significant value.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    From the model, initial pH (A) shows the strongest effect (p < 0.0001) on biomass, while agitation (C) shows a significant effect at p < 0.05. Both quadratic terms of initial pH (AA) and initial pH and agitation (AC) show significance effect at p < 0.05 on the yield of mycelium biomass. However, negative effects are shown by glucose (B) and quadratic terms (B2, C2, AB, and BC). Figure 4 shows the combined effect of initial pH, glucose concentration and agitation in three-dimensional (3D) plots. One factor is at the optimum level and the other two factors are within experimental range. Figure 4a shows the effect of initial pH (A) and starting glucose concentration (B), Figure 4b shows the effect of A and agitation rate (C), and Figure 4c shows the effect of B and C on biomass production. From Figure 4a,b, it is clear that increasing the initial pH leads to a decrease in the mycelium biomass, while agitation at all rates shows that high mycelium biomass production and starting glucose concentration is normally distributed. The maximum mycelium biomass obtained was at initial pH 4, glucose concentration 26.5 g/L and 100 rpm. From Figure 4c, no significance effect of B and C on mycelium biomass production was observed.

    Figure 4.  Response surface curve (3D plot) of mycelium biomass from G. lucidum strain QRS 5120 showing the interaction between (a) pH and glucose, (b) pH and agitation, (c) Glucose and agitation.
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    3.2.2.   Optimization of EPS production

    The ANOVA of EPS production is shown in Table 4. The predicted coefficient determination indicates that 93.58% (R2 = 0.9358) of the variability in the response can be explained using this model. The model was significant (p < 0.005). The adjusted coefficient determination value (Adj. R2 = 0.8780) implies the significance of the model and is in reasonable agreement with the predicted R2 value. By considering the significant terms, the model, in terms of actual variables of biomass, was regressed and is expressed in Eq 3.

    EPS=15.17090909−7.667045455 ×pH+0.021931818×Glucose+0.120090909×Agitation+0.695454545×pH2−0.000761364×Glucose2−0.000545455×Agitation2+0.00375×pH×Glucose+4.76916e−16×pH×Agitation−3.80257e−18×Glucose×Agitation

    Table 4.  Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the experimental results of the CCD quadratic model for EPS production the mycelium of G. lucidum strain QRS_5120.
    Source Sum of Squares DF Mean Square F Value Prob > F
    Model 5.364181818 9 0.596020202 16.20420717 <0.0001* significant
    A: pH 3.6 1 3.6 97.8744439 <0.0001* significant
    B: Glucose 0.1 1 0.1 2.718734553 0.1302
    C: Agitation 0.121 1 0.121 3.289668809 0.0998
    A2 1.330056818 1 1.330056818 36.16071429 0.0001* significant
    B2 0.255056818 1 0.255056818 6.934317845 0.0250* significant
    C2 0.008181818 1 0.008181818 0.222441918 0.6473
    AB 0.045 1 0.045 1.223430549 0.2946
    AC 0 1 0 0 1.0000
    BC 0 1 0 0 1.0000
    Residual 0.367818182 10 0.036781818
    Lack of Fit 0.192818182 5 0.038563636 1.101818182 0.4589 not significant
    Pure Error 0.175 5 0.035
    Cor Total 5.732 19
    Std. Dev. = 0.19178586543804 R2 = 0.93583074287889 Adeq Precision = 12.53566341056
    Mean = 1.48 Adjusted R2 = 0.8780784114699

    * Significant value.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    From the model, initial pH (A) shows the strongest effect (p < 0.0001) on EPS concentration while both quadratic terms of initial pH (AA) and initial pH and glucose (BB) show a significance effect at p < 0.005 and p < 0.05, respectively, on EPS production. However, negative effects are shown by glucose (B), agitation (C) and quadratic terms (C2, AB, AC and BC). Figure 5 shows the combined effect of initial pH, glucose concentration and agitation in 3D plots. One factor is at the optimum level and the other two factors are within experimental range. Figure 5a shows the effect of initial pH (A) and starting glucose concentration (B), Figure 5b shows the effect of A and agitation rate (C) and Figure 5c shows the effect of B and C on biomass production. From Figure 5a,b, increasing initial pH leads decreased EPS production, agitation at all rates shows high EPS production and starting glucose concentration is normally distributed. The maximum EPS obtained was at initial pH 4, glucose concentration 26.5 g/L and 100 rpm. From Figure 5c, no significance effect of B and C on mycelium biomass production was observed.

    Figure 5.  Response surface curve (3D plot) of EPS production from G. lucidum strain QRS 5120 showing the interaction between (a) pH and glucose, (b) pH and agitation, (c) Glucose and agitation.
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    3.2.3.   Optimization of IPS production

    The ANOVA of IPS production is shown in Table 5. The predicted coefficient determination indicates that 96.88% (R2 = 0.9688) of the variability in the response can be explained using this model. The model is highly significant (p < 0.0001). The adjusted coefficient determination value (Adj. R2 = 0.9407) implies the significance of the model and is in reasonable agreement with the predicted R2 value. By considering the significant terms, the model, in terms of actual variables of biomass, was regressed and is expressed in Eq 4.

    IPS=−6.393409091−1.127954545 ×pH+0.027068182×Glucose+0.221659091×Agitation+0.104545455×pH2−0.000113636×Glucose2−0.000954545×Agitation2−0.00125×pH×Glucose−0.005×pH×Agitation−0.000125×Glucose×Agitation

    Table 5.  Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the experimental results of the CCD quadratic model for IPS production the mycelium of G. lucidum strain QRS_5120.
    Source Sum of Squares DF Mean Square F Value Prob > F
    Model 3.935181818 9 0.437242424 34.47789725 <0.0001* significant
    A: pH 3.844 1 3.844 303.1111111 <0.0001* significant
    B: Glucose 0.009 1 0.009 0.709677419 0.4192
    C: Agitation 0.004 1 0.004 0.315412186 0.5867
    A2 0.030056818 1 0.030056818 2.370071685 0.1547
    B2 0.005681818 1 0.005681818 0.448028674 0.5184
    C2 0.025056818 1 0.025056818 1.975806452 0.1901
    AB 0.005 1 0.005 0.394265233 0.5441
    AC 0.02 1 0.02 1.577060932 0.2377
    BC 0.005 1 0.005 0.394265233 0.5441
    Residual 0.126818182 10 0.012681818
    Lack of Fit 0.098484848 5 0.01969697 3.475935829 0.0989 not significant
    Pure Error 0.028333333 5 0.005666667
    Cor Total 4.062 19
    Std. Dev. = 0.11261357902943 R2 = 0.96877937424466 Adeq Precision = 17.969511850411
    Mean = 0.83 Adjusted R2 = 0.94068081106486

    * Significant value.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    From the model, initial pH (A) shows the strongest effect (p < 0.0001) on IPS concentration. However, negative effects are shown by glucose (B), agitation (C) and quadratic terms (A2, B2, C2, AB, AC and BC). Figure 6 shows the combined effect of initial pH, glucose concentration and agitation in 3D plots. One factor is at the optimum level and the other two factors are within experimental range. Figure 6a shows the effect of initial pH (A) and starting glucose concentration (B), Figure 6b shows the effect of A and agitation rate (C) and Figure 6c shows the effect of B and C on biomass production. From Figure 6a,b, it is clear that increasing initial pH leads to decreased IPS production, agitation at all rates shows high IPS production and all concentrations of starting glucose give high IPS concentration. By this, it was concluded that there was no interaction between the factors. The maximum IPS obtained was at initial pH 4, glucose concentration 40.45 g/L and 103 rpm. From Figure 6c, no significance effect of B and C on IPS production was observed.

    Figure 6.  Response surface curve (3D plot) of IPS production from G. lucidum strain QRS 5120 showing the interaction between (a) pH and glucose, (b) pH and agitation, (c) Glucose and agitation.
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    3.2.4.   Verification of the optimized conditions

    Table 6 shows the optimised conditions applied to verify the mycelium biomass, EPS and IPS production statistical model. To verify the strength and precision of the model under Eq 2, Eq 3 and Eq 4, various experiments were performed. The mycelium biomass obtained was 5.12 g/L, EPS production under optimized conditions was 2.49 g/L, and IPS production under optimized conditions was 1.52 g/L, which aligns with the predicted values (5.25 g/L, 2.69 g/L and 1.59 g/L, respectively). This shows that the model (Eq 2, Eq 3 and Eq 4) is valid for mycelium biomass, EPS and IPS production.

    Table 6.  Validation of the model with the optimized conditions.
    Run Variables
    		 Response
    pH Glucose Agitation Biomass (DCW g/L) EPS (g/L) IPS (g/L)
    Biomass 4.01 32.09 102.45 5.12 ± 0.5 − −
    EPS 4 24.25 110 − 2.49 ± 0.8 −
    IPS 4 40.43 103 − − 1.52 ± 0.4
    Biomass + EPS 4 24.75 107.58 5.11 ± 0.4 2.57 ± 0.7 −
    Biomass + IPS 4 40.45 102.95 5.13 ± 0.5 − 1.57 ± 0.3
    EPS + IPS 4 26.5 105.92 − 2.62 ± 0.4 1.52 ± 0.6
    Biomass + EPS + IPS 4 26.5 100 5.19 ± 0.6 2.64 ± 0.6 1.52 ± 0.4
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    3.3.   Comparison of the current study with the literature

    The current statistical optimization approach to determine the preeminent parameters for obtaining efficient biomass, EPS and IPS production using G. lucidum in controlled shake-flask fermentation is shown in Table 7. As reported, only two studies utilizing G. lucidum for this purpose have previously been reported, utilizing only EPS and biomass production. ChangTsai and Houng [23] stated that mycelium formation and polysaccharide production were markedly improved by cultivation in optimal medium under optimal operating conditions. YuanChi and Zhang [24] also supported this observation by stating that optimal media markedly increases EPS production and mycelium formation. The process described in the current study was more efficient in producing biomass and EPS concentration compared with the results of YuanChi and Zhang [24] and ChangTsai and Houng [23], with the addition of IPS. The optimized key parameters reported in this study are the most up-to-date for G. lucidum using RSM on initial pH, glucose concentration and agitation for enhancing the production of biomass, EPS and IPS. The current optimized method can therefore be applied to achieve a combination of lower biomass with higher EPS and IPS in specialized bioreactors.

    Table 7.  Comparison of Ganoderma lucidum optimization using submerged-liquid fermentation with the literature.
    Optimization method Cultivation mode Initial pH Glucose concentration (g/L) Agitation (rpm) EPS (g/L) IPS (g/L) Biomass (g/L) Reference
    Response surface methodology Shake Flask 4 26.5 100 2.64 1.52 5.19 Current study
    Taguchi's orthogonal array Shake Flask 6.5 12.1 160 0.420 NA 18.70 [23]
    Orthogonal matrix Shake Flask − 50 150 1.723 NA 7.235 [24]

    *NA = Not available, EPS = Exopolysaccharide, IPS = Intracellular polysaccharide.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    4.   Conclusions

    The wild-cultivated Malaysian medicinal mushroom G. lucidum strain QRS 5120 was successfully identified using morphological and biomolecular methods. Using response surface methodology in a submerged-liquid fermentation, maximum mycelial biomass (5.19 ± 0.6 g/L) and EPS (2.64 ± 0.6 g/L) were obtained under optimized conditions of initial pH 4, 26.52 g/L glucose concentration and 103 rpm. On the other hand, maximum IPS production (1.57 ± 0.3 g/L) was obtained under optimized conditions of initial pH 4, glucose concentration 40.45 g/L and agitation 103 rpm. In addition, in order to maximise all three responses together, i.e. biomass, EPS and IPS (5.19 g/L, 2.64 g/L and 1.52 g/L respectively), the optimised conditions were initial pH 4, glucose concentration at 26.5 g/L and 100 rpm. It was found that by using the optimised conditions, the biomass, EPS and IPS production could be maximized. The initial pH could significantly affect biomass, EPS and IPS production in comparison to glucose concentration and agitation rate. The current work is suitable to be applied for other type of fungal fermentation for efficient EPS, IPS and biomass production.



    [1] Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Bates MP (2004) Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behavior: Waste minimization compared to recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 42: 27–48. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.02.001
    [2] Abdel-Shafy HI, Mansour MSM (2018) Solid waste issue: Sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization. Egypt J Pet 27: 1275–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003
    [3] Price JL, Joseph JB (2000) Demand management–a basis for waste policy: a critical review of the applicability of the waste hierarchy in terms of achieving sustainable waste management. Sustain Dev 8: 96–105. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(200005)8:2<96::AID-SD133>3.0.CO;2-J
    [4] Mosler HJ, Tamas A, Tobias R, et al. (2008) Deriving Interventions on the Basis of Factors Influencing Behavioral Intentions for Waste Recycling, Composting, and Reuse in Cuba. Environ Behav 40: 522–544. doi: 10.1177/0013916507300114
    [5] Llatas C, Osmani M (2016) Development and validation of a building design waste reduction model. Waste Manage 56: 318–336. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.026
    [6] Morone P, Koutinas A, Gathergood N, et al. (2019) Food waste: Challenges and opportunities for enhancing the emerging bio-economy. J Clean Prod 221: 10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.258
    [7] Wang J, Li Z, Tam VWY (2015) Identifying best design strategies for construction waste minimization. J Clean Prod 92: 237–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.076
    [8] Zorpas AA, Lasaridi K, Voukkali I, et al. (2015) Household waste compositional analysis variation from insular communities in the framework of waste prevention strategy plans. Waste Manage 38: 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.030
    [9] Yau Y (2012) Stakeholder engagement in waste recycling in a high-rise setting. Sustain Dev 20: 115–127. doi: 10.1002/sd.468
    [10] Meng X, Tan X, Wang Y, et al. (2019) Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents' household solid waste classification and recycling behaviors. Resour Conserv Recycl 140: 224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.021
    [11] Ng SL (2019) An assessment of multi-family dwelling recycling in Hong Kong: A managerial perspective. Waste Manage 89: 294–302. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.014
    [12] Yang H, Zhang S, Ye W, et al. (2020) Emission reduction benefits and efficiency of e-waste recycling in China. Waste Manage 102: 541–549. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.016
    [13] Ertz M, Karakas F, Sarigöllü E (2016) Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors. J Bus Res 69: 3971–3980. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.010
    [14] Ertz M, Durif F, Lecompte A, et al. (2018) Does "sharing" mean "socially responsible consuming"? Exploration of the relationship between collaborative consumption and socially responsible consumption. JCM 35: 392–402. doi: 10.1108/JCM-09-2016-1941
    [15] Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. Urban development series; knowledge papers, no. 15. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank.
    [16] Xu Z, Elomri A, Pokharel S, et al. (2017) Global reverse supply chain design for solid waste recycling under uncertainties and carbon emission constraint. Waste Manage 64: 358–370. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.02.024
    [17] Andersen MS (2007) An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy. Sustain Sci 2: 133–140. doi: 10.1007/s11625-006-0013-6
    [18] Shams M, Nabipour I, Dobaradaran S, et al. (2013) An environmental friendly and cheap adsorbent (municipal solid waste compost ash) with high efficiency in removal of phosphorus from aqueous solution. Fresenius Environ Bull 22.
    [19] Loan LTT, Takahashi Y, Nomura H, et al. (2019) Modeling home composting behavior toward sustainable municipal organic waste management at the source in developing countries. Resour Conserv Recycl 140: 65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.016
    [20] Edgerton E, McKechnie J, Dunleavy K (2009) Behavioral Determinants of Household Participation in a Home Composting Scheme. Environ Behav 41: 151–169. doi: 10.1177/0013916507311900
    [21] Colón J, Martínez-Blanco J, Gabarrell X, et al. (2010) Environmental assessment of home composting. Resour Conserv Recycl 54: 893–904. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.01.008
    [22] Bartelings H, Sterner T (1999) Household Waste Management in a Swedish Municipality: Determinants of Waste Disposal, Recycling and Composting. ERE 13: 473–491.
    [23] Andersen JK, Boldrin A, Christensen TH, et al. (2012) Home composting as an alternative treatment option for organic household waste in Denmark: An environmental assessment using life cycle assessment-modelling. Waste Manage 32: 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.014
    [24] Tanaka M (2007) Waste management for a sustainable society. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Manage 9: 2–6. doi: 10.1007/s10163-006-0164-7
    [25] Ueta K, Koizumi H (2001) Reducing Household Waste: Japan Learns from Germany. Environ Sci Policy 43: 20–32.
    [26] Isfahan Municipal Waste Management Organization (2019) Isfahan Municipal Waste Management Organization. Available from: http://pasmand.isfahan.ir/fa
    [27] Statistical Centre of Iran (2016) Statistical-Yearbook-2016-2017. Available from: https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Iran-Statistical-Yearbook/Statistical-Yearbook-2016-2017
    [28] Ando A W, Gosselin A Y (2005) Recycling in Multifamily Dwellings: Does Convenience Matter? Econ Inq 43: 426–438.
    [29] Weinstein D, Norton C (2014) Recycling and Waste Reduction—Center for Environmental Policy and Management. Available from: https://louisville.edu/cepm/project-areas-1/recycling-and-waste-reduction
    [30] Foley M (2009) Indoor Composting Systems. Chowhound. Available from: https://www.chowhound.com/food-news/54730/indoor-composting-systems/
    [31] McCandless SG (2010) How Indoor Automatic Composting Systems Work. HowStuffWorks. Available from: https://home.howstuffworks.com/indoor-automatic-composting-system.htm
    [32] Na W, Gang L, Hongming Z (2019) Design and Research of Home Automatic Kitchen Waste Composting device. In E3S Web of Conferences 136: 04013. EDP Sciences.
    [33] Fishbein M (1979) A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. Nebr Symp Motiv 27: 65–116.
    [34] Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2011) Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach (1st Ed.). Psychology Press.
    [35] Chase K, Reicks M, Jones J M (2003) Applying the theory of planned behavior to promotion of whole-grain foods by dietitians. J Am Diet Assoc 103: 1639–1642. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2003.09.026
    [36] Liou D, Bauer K (2007) Exploratory Investigation of Obesity Risk and Prevention in Chinese Americans. J Nutr Educ Behav 39: 134–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.07.007
    [37] Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50: 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
    [38] Ajzen I (2002) Residual Effects of Past on Later Behavior: Habituation and Reasoned Action Perspectives. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 6: 107–122. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_02
    [39] Taylor S, Todd P (1997) Understanding the Determinants of Consumer Composting Behavior1. J Appl Soc Psychol 27: 602–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00651.x
    [40] Thøgersen J (1999) Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. J Econ Psychol 20: 53–81. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00043-9
    [41] Barr S (2003) Strategies for sustainability: Citizens and responsible environmental behaviour. Area 35: 227–240. doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00172
    [42] Chen MF, Tung PJ (2010) The Moderating Effect of Perceived Lack of Facilities on Consumers' Recycling Intentions. Environ Behav 42: 824–844. doi: 10.1177/0013916509352833
    [43] Tucker P, Speirs D (2003) Attitudes and Behavioural Change in Household Waste Management Behaviours. J Environ Plan. Manag. 46: 289–307.
    [44] Meng X, Wen Z, Qian Y (2018) Multi-agent based simulation for household solid waste recycling behavior. Resour Conserv Recycl 128: 535–545. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.033
    [45] Valle POD, Rebelo E, Reis E, et al. (2005) Combining Behavioral Theories to Predict Recycling Involvement. Environ Behav 37: 364–396. doi: 10.1177/0013916504272563
    [46] Knussen C, Yule F, MacKenzie J, et al. (2004) An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: The roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. J Environ Psychol 24: 237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.001
    [47] Kim TG, Lee JH, Law R (2008) An empirical examination of the acceptance behaviour of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model. Tour Manag 29: 500–513. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.016
    [48] Benbasat I, Barki H (2007) Quo vadis TAM? J Assoc Inf Syst 8: 211–218.
    [49] Saade R, Kira D (2006) The Emotional State of Technology Acceptance. ⅡSIT 3: 529–539.
    [50] Broman TM, Schuitema G, Thøgersen J (2014) Responsible technology acceptance: Model development and application to consumer acceptance of Smart Grid technology. Appl Energy 134: 392–400. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.048
    [51] Davies J, Foxall GR, Pallister J (2002) Beyond the Intention–Behaviour Mythology. Mark Theory 2: 29–113. doi: 10.1177/1470593102002001645
    [52] Bamberg S, Moser G M (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 27: 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
    [53] Zeweld W, Van Huylenbroeck G, Tesfay G, et al. (2017) Smallholder farmers' behavioural intentions towards sustainable agricultural practices. J Environ Manage 187: 71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.014
    [54] Yuan Y, Nomura H, Takahashi Y, et al. (2016) Model of Chinese Household Kitchen Waste Separation Behavior: A Case Study in Beijing City. Sustainability 8: 1083–1083. doi: 10.3390/su8101083
    [55] Bamberg S, Hunecke M, Blöbaum A (2007) Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. J Environ Psychol 27: 190–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.001
    [56] Byun J, Jang S (2019) Can signaling impact customer satisfaction and behavioral intentions in times of service failure? Evidence from open versus closed kitchen restaurants. J Hosp Mark Manag 28: 785–806.
    [57] Onwezen MC, Antonides G, Bartels J (2013) The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. J Econ Psychol 39: 141–153. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.005
    [58] Park J, Ha S (2014) Understanding Consumer Recycling Behavior: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Norm Activation Model. Fam Consum Sci Res J 42: 278–291. doi: 10.1111/fcsr.12061
    [59] Han H, Hwang J, Lee M J, et al. (2019) Word-of-mouth, buying, and sacrifice intentions for eco-cruises: Exploring the function of norm activation and value-attitude-behavior. Tour Manag 70: 430–443. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.006
    [60] Liao C, Zhao D, Zhang S, et al. (2018) Determinants and the moderating effect of perceived policy effectiveness on residents' separation intention for rural household solid waste. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15: 726. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040726
    [61] Oztekin C, Teksöz G, Pamuk S, et al. (2017) Gender perspective on the factors predicting recycling behavior: Implications from the theory of planned behavior. Waste Manage 62: 290–302. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.036
    [62] Zhou Y, Zhou Q, Gan S, et al. (2018) Factors affecting farmers' willingness to pay for adopting vegetable residue compost in North China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 38: 401–411. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2018.04.001
    [63] Pedhazur EJ (1997) Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction, 3rd Ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1997. (p. 1058). Wadsworth.
    [64] Chu PY, Chiu J (2003) Factors Influencing Household Waste Recycling Behavior: Test of an Integrated Model. J Appl Soc Psychol 33: 604–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01915.x
    [65] Miles J, Shevlin M (2001) Applying Regression and Correlation: A Guide for Students and Researchers (First edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.
    [66] Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle C M, et al. (2017) Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. J Acad Mark. 45: 616–632.
    [67] Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. J Mark Res 18: 382–388. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800313
    [68] Tenenhaus M, Vinzi V E, Chatelin Y-M, et al. (2005) PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data An, 48: 159–205. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
    [69] Ipsos (2018) Global views on the environment–2018. Available from: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/Global_Views_on_the_Environment.pdf (accessed on 17-02-2020).
    [70] Stern PC (2000) New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. J Soc Issues 56: 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175 doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175
    [71] de Leeuw A, Valois P, Ajzen I, et al. (2015) Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. J Environ Psychol 42: 128–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005
    [72] Ertz M, Huang R, Jo MS, et al. (2017) From single-use to multi-use: Study of consumers' behavior toward consumption of reusable containers. J Environ Manage 193: 334–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.060
    [73] Dutta S, Bhaskar S (2018) Bengaluru's All Women Trio Teaches Composting Via WhatsApp To Learners Across The World | Women's Day. NDTV-Dettol Banega Swasth Swachh India. Available from: https://swachhindia.ndtv.com/bengalurus-all-women-trio-teaches-composting-via-whatsapp-to-learners-across-the-world-17788/
    [74] CCAP (2015) Tackling waste through community-based composting – Bangladesh. Available from: https://ccap.org/assets/CCAP-Booklet_BangladeshCompost.pdf (accessed on 17-02-2020).
    [75] Sutta S, Bhaskar S (2018) Bengaluru's All Women Trio Teaches Composting via WhatsApp to Learners across the World. Available from: https://swachhindia.ndtv.com/bengalurus-all-women-trio-teaches-composting-via-whatsapp-to-learners-across-the-world-17788/ (accessed on 17-02-2020).
    [76] Pearson AR, Ballew MT, Naiman S, et al. (2017) Race, Class, Gender and Climate Change Communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.412
    [77] Ballew M, Marlon J, Leiserowitz A, et al. (2018) Gender Differences in Public Understanding of Climate Change. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. Available from: https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/gender-differences-in-public-understanding-of-climate-change/
  • Environ-08-01-01-S1.pdf

  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Hassimi Abu Hasan, Henriette Stokbro Jensen, Anita Klaus, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Performance of wild-Serbian Ganoderma lucidum mycelium in treating synthetic sewage loading using batch bioreactor, 2019, 9, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-019-52493-y
    2. Norhidayah Mohd Taufek, Hanis H. Harith, Muhamad Hafiz Abd Rahim, Zul Ilham, Neil Rowan, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Performance of mycelial biomass and exopolysaccharide from Malaysian Ganoderma lucidum for the fungivore red hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) in Zebrafish embryo, 2020, 17, 23525134, 100322, 10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100322
    3. Mohamad Nor Azzimi Sohedein, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Yeong Hui-Yin, Zul Ilham, Jo-Shu Chang, Sugenendran Supramani, Phang Siew-Moi, Optimisation of biomass and lipid production of a tropical thraustochytrid Aurantiochytrium sp. UMACC-T023 in submerged-liquid fermentation for large-scale biodiesel production, 2020, 23, 18788181, 101496, 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101496
    4. Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Norfaizah Mahmud, Zul Ilham, Nur Kusaira Khairul Ikram, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, In-depth spectral characterization of antioxidative (1,3)-β-D-glucan from the mycelium of an identified tiger milk mushroom Lignosus rhinocerus strain ABI in a stirred-tank bioreactor, 2020, 23, 18788181, 101455, 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101455
    5. Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Norhidayah Mohd Taufek, Jaganath Puvanen Thiran, Janathu Ferdaus Pajaru Rahman, Grema Yerima, Kumeera Subramaniam, Neil Rowan, Investigations on the use of exopolysaccharide derived from mycelial extract of Ganoderma lucidum as functional feed ingredient for aquaculture-farmed red hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.), 2021, 3, 26668335, 100018, 10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100018
    6. Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Norhidayah Mohd Taufek, Grema Yerima, Janathu Rahman, Jaganath P. Thiran, Kumeera Subramaniam, Vikineswary Sabaratnam, Effect of bioreactor-grown biomass from Ganoderma lucidum mycelium on growth performance and physiological response of red hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) for sustainable aquaculture, 2020, 1879-4238, 10.1007/s13165-020-00303-5
    7. Saeideh Ahmadifar, syed Mohsen Hosseini, Ebrahim Mohammadi Goltapeh, Akbar Jahedi, Optimal method for production of mycelia biomass of Ganoderma lucidum in sugarcane molasses, 2020, 9, 2251-9270, 1, 10.29252/pps.9.1.1
    8. Nurul Amirah Hassan, Sugenendran Supramani, Mohamad Nor Azzimi Sohedein, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Anita Klaus, Zul Ilham, Wei-Hsin Chen, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Efficient biomass-exopolysaccharide production from an identified wild-Serbian Ganoderma lucidum strain BGF4A1 mycelium in a controlled submerged fermentation, 2019, 21, 18788181, 101305, 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101305
    9. Anita Klaus, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Biljana Nikolić, Stefana Cvetković, Jovana Vunduk, Pink oyster mushroom Pleurotus flabellatus mycelium produced by an airlift bioreactor—the evidence of potent in vitro biological activities, 2021, 37, 0959-3993, 10.1007/s11274-020-02980-6
    10. Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Neil Rowan, Use of Zebrafish Embryo Assay to Evaluate Toxicity and Safety of Bioreactor-Grown Exopolysaccharides and Endopolysaccharides from European Ganoderma applanatum Mycelium for Future Aquaculture Applications, 2021, 22, 1422-0067, 1675, 10.3390/ijms22041675
    11. Silambarasi Mooralitharan, Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Teh Sabariah Binti Abd Manan, Hassimi Abu Hasan, Henriette S. Jensen, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Optimization of mycoremediation treatment for the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonia nitrogen (AN) removal from domestic effluent using wild-Serbian Ganoderma lucidum (WSGL), 2021, 0944-1344, 10.1007/s11356-021-12686-3
    12. Jovana Vunduk, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Shaiful Azuar Mohamad, Nur Hafizati Abd Halim, Ahmad Zainuri Mohd Dzomir, Željko Žižak, Anita Klaus, Polysaccharides of Pleurotus flabellatus strain Mynuk produced by submerged fermentation as a promising novel tool against adhesion and biofilm formation of foodborne pathogens, 2019, 112, 00236438, 108221, 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.119
    13. Z Ilham, M R A Mansor, Optimized Conversion of Nyamplung Seeds Oil to Biodiesel Using Box-Behnken Response Surface Methodology (RSM), 2020, 877, 1757-899X, 012029, 10.1088/1757-899X/877/1/012029
    14. Fátima R. Viceconte, Marina L. Diaz, Daniela S. Soresi, Ileana B. Lencinas, Alicia Carrera, María Inés Prat, María Soledad Vela Gurovic, Ganoderma sessile is a fast polysaccharide producer among Ganoderma species, 2021, 0027-5514, 1, 10.1080/00275514.2020.1870255
    15. Liping Liu, Jie Feng, Kun Gao, Shuai Zhou, Mengqiu Yan, Chuanhong Tang, Jing Zhou, Yanfang Liu, Jingsong Zhang, Influence of carbon and nitrogen sources on structural features and immunomodulatory activity of exopolysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum, 2022, 119, 13595113, 96, 10.1016/j.procbio.2022.05.016
    16. Arman Hamza, Shreya Ghanekar, Devarai Santhosh Kumar, Current trends in health-promoting potential and biomaterial applications of edible mushrooms for human wellness, 2023, 51, 22124292, 102290, 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102290
    17. Besek Mariam Mohamad Jahis, Zul Ilham, Sugenendran Supramani, Mohamad Nor Azzimi Sohedein, Mohamad Faizal Ibrahim, Suraini Abd-Aziz, Neil Rowan, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Ganodiesel: A New Biodiesel Feedstock from Biomass of the Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum, 2022, 14, 2071-1050, 10764, 10.3390/su141710764
    18. Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Nur Raihan Abdullah, Neil Rowan, In vivo toxicity of bioreactor-grown biomass and exopolysaccharides from Malaysian tiger milk mushroom mycelium for potential future health applications, 2021, 11, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-021-02486-7
    19. Rahayu Ahmad, Srivani Sellathoroe, Ehwan Ngadi, Tengku Shafazila Tengku Saharuddin, Iffah Izzati Zakaria, Suguna Selvakumaran, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Isolation, identification, cultivation and determination of antimicrobial β-glucan from a wild-termite mushroom Termitomyces heimii RFES 230662, 2021, 37, 18788181, 102187, 10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102187
    20. Z. M. Hanafiah, W. H. M. Wan Mohtar, H. A. Hasan, H. S. Jensen, A. Klaus, S. Sharil, W. A. A. Q. I. Wan-Mohtar, Ability of Ganoderma lucidum mycelial pellets to remove ammonia and organic matter from domestic wastewater, 2022, 19, 1735-1472, 7307, 10.1007/s13762-021-03633-3
    21. Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Enhancing Biomass-Exopolysaccharides Production of Lignosus rhinocerus in a High-Scale Stirred-Tank Bioreactor and Its Potential Lipid as Bioenergy, 2023, 16, 1996-1073, 2330, 10.3390/en16052330
    22. Sugenendran Supramani, Nur Ardiyana Rejab, Zul Ilham, Rahayu Ahmad, Pau-Loke Show, Mohamad Faizal Ibrahim, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Performance of Biomass and Exopolysaccharide Production from the Medicinal Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum in a New Fabricated Air-L-Shaped Bioreactor (ALSB), 2023, 11, 2227-9717, 670, 10.3390/pr11030670
    23. Joshini Pillai Balamurugan, Sugenendran Supramani, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Zul Ilham, Anita Klaus, Nur Kusaira Khairul Ikram, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Efficient biomass-endopolysaccharide production from an identified wild-Serbian Ganoderma applanatum strain BGS6Ap mycelium in a controlled submerged fermentation, 2021, 37, 18788181, 102166, 10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102166
    24. Alireza Tajik, Hamid Reza Samadlouie, Amir Salek Farrokhi, Amir Ghasemi, Optimization of chemical conditions for metabolites production by Ganoderma lucidum using response surface methodology and investigation of antimicrobial as well as anticancer activities, 2024, 14, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1280405
    25. Jianying Huang, Tao Liu, Yimin Zhang, Pengcheng Hu, Comparative study of microwave-assisted and hydrothermal hydroxyapatite synthesis from neutralization slag: Optimization, energy, and adsorption, 2024, 50, 02728842, 42157, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.08.059
    26. Arman Hamza, Ankit Mylarapu, K. Vijay Krishna, Devarai Santhosh Kumar, An insight into the nutritional and medicinal value of edible mushrooms: A natural treasury for human health, 2024, 381, 01681656, 86, 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2023.12.014
    27. Lina Dávila Giraldo, Paula Villanueva Baez, Cristian Zambrano Forero, Walter Murillo Arango, Production, Extraction, and Solubilization of Exopolysaccharides Using Submerged Cultures of Agaricomycetes, 2023, 13, 2331-8325, 10.21769/BioProtoc.4841
    28. Arman Hamza, Abdul Khalad, Devarai Santhosh Kumar, Enhanced production of mycelium biomass and exopolysaccharides of Pleurotus ostreatus by integrating response surface methodology and artificial neural network, 2024, 399, 09608524, 130577, 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130577
    29. Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Ammar Radzi Azmi, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Fabrizio Olivito, Giovanni Golemme, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Nadzmin Razali, Sarina Abdul Halim-Lim, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Water Quality Assessment and Decolourisation of Contaminated Ex-Mining Lake Water Using Bioreactor Dye-Eating Fungus (BioDeF) System: A Real Case Study, 2024, 12, 2305-6304, 60, 10.3390/toxics12010060
    30. Khalid Sayed, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Teh Sabariah Binti Abd Manan, Sarah Athirah Binti Mohamad Sharif, Simultaneous enhanced removal of pharmaceuticals and hormone from wastewaters using series combinations of ultra-violet irradiation, bioremediation, and adsorption technologies, 2024, 57, 22147144, 104589, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104589
    31. Teik Chee Lim, Zul Ilham, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Production of Ganodiesel from the biomass of Ganoderma lucidum in air-L-shaped bioreactor (ALSB), 2024, 10, 24058440, e35170, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35170
    32. Niketan Deshmukh, Lakshmi Bhaskaran, Optimization of cultural and nutritional conditions to enhance mycelial biomass of Cordyceps militaris using statistical approach, 2024, 55, 1517-8382, 235, 10.1007/s42770-023-01222-9
    33. Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Aziza Sultana Bithi, Rosiah Rohani, Antonius Indarto, Zaher Mundher Yaseen, Suraya Sharil, Teh Sabariah Binti Abdul Manan, Removal of pharmaceutical compounds and toxicology study in wastewater using Malaysian fungal Ganoderma lucidum, 2024, 358, 00456535, 142209, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142209
    34. Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Anggita Rahmi Hafsari, Malini Elango, Zul Ilham, Febri Doni, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Yusufjon Gafforov, Yong Jie Wong, Khairul Nizam Abdul Maulud, Nor Hidayah Ismail, Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Removal of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (HABs) from contaminated local park lake using Ganoderma lucidum mycelial pellets, 2025, 11, 24058440, e41205, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41205
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
AIMS Environmental Science
1.6 2.9

Metrics

Article views(3429) PDF downloads(355) Cited by(9)

Preview PDF
Download XML
Export Citation
Article outline
Abstract
   Introduction
   Materials and methods
   Results and discussion
   Conclusions
References

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(4)

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Copyright © AIMS Press

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog