Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Review

Vagus nerve stimulation in dementia: A scoping review of clinical and pre-clinical studies

  • Background 

    Dementia is a prevalent, progressive, neurodegenerative condition with multifactorial causes. Due to the lack of effective pharmaceutical treatments for dementia, there are growing clinical and research interests in using vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a potential non-pharmacological therapy for dementia. However, the extent of the research volume and nature into the effects of VNS on dementia is not well understood. This study aimed to examine the extent and nature of research activities in relation to the use of VNS in dementia and disseminate research findings for the potential utility in dementia care.

    Methods 

    We performed a scoping review of literature searches in PubMed, HINARI, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane databases from 1980 to November 30th, 2023, including the reference lists of the identified studies. The following search terms were utilized: brain stimulation, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, vagal stimulation, memory loss, Deme*, cognit*, VNS, and Cranial nerve stimulation. The included studies met the following conditions: primary research articles pertaining to both humans and animals for both longitudinal and cross-sectional study designs and published in English from January 1st, 1980, to November 30th, 2023; investigated VNS in either dementia or cognitive impairment; and were not case studies, conference proceedings/abstracts, commentaries, or ordinary review papers.

    Findings and conclusions 

    We identified 8062 articles, and after screening for eligibility (sequentially by titles, abstracts and full text reading, and duplicate removal), 10 studies were included in the review. All the studies included in this literature review were conducted over the last three decades in high-income geographical regions (i.e., Europe, the United States, the United Kingdom, and China), with the majority of them (7/10) being performed in humans. The main reported outcomes of VNS in the dementia cases were enhanced cognitive functions, an increased functional connectivity of various brain regions involved in learning and memory, microglial structural modifications from neurodestructive to neuroprotective configurations, a reduction of cerebral spinal fluid tau-proteins, and significant evoked brain tissue potentials that could be utilized to diagnose neurodegenerative disorders. The study outcomes highlight the potential for VNS to be used as a non-pharmacological therapy for cognitive impairment in dementia-related diseases such as Alzheimer's disease.

    Citation: Ronald Kamoga, Godfrey Zari Rukundo, Samuel Kalungi, Wilson Adriko, Gladys Nakidde, Celestino Obua, Johnes Obongoloch, Amadi Ogonda Ihunwo. Vagus nerve stimulation in dementia: A scoping review of clinical and pre-clinical studies[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2024, 11(3): 398-420. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024024

    Related Papers:

    [1] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Sameh Askar, Thongchai Botmart, Aqeel Ahmad, Hijaz Ahmad . Modeling and analysis of fractional order Zika model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3912-3938. doi: 10.3934/math.2022216
    [2] Sabri T. M. Thabet, Reem M. Alraimy, Imed Kedim, Aiman Mukheimer, Thabet Abdeljawad . Exploring the solutions of a financial bubble model via a new fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8587-8614. doi: 10.3934/math.2025394
    [3] Zongmin Yue, Yitong Li, Fauzi Mohamed Yusof . Dynamic analysis and optimal control of Zika virus transmission with immigration. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21893-21913. doi: 10.3934/math.20231116
    [4] Jonas Ogar Achuobi, Edet Peter Akpan, Reny George, Austine Efut Ofem . Stability analysis of Caputo fractional time-dependent systems with delay using vector lyapunov functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28079-28099. doi: 10.3934/math.20241362
    [5] Liping Wang, Peng Wu, Mingshan Li, Lei Shi . Global dynamics analysis of a Zika transmission model with environment transmission route and spatial heterogeneity. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4803-4832. doi: 10.3934/math.2022268
    [6] Jutarat Kongson, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Weerawat Sudsutad . Analysis of a fractional model for HIV CD4+ T-cells with treatment under generalized Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7285-7304. doi: 10.3934/math.2021427
    [7] Muhammad Altaf Khan, Sajjad Ullah, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan . Fractional order SEIR model with generalized incidence rate. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 2843-2857. doi: 10.3934/math.2020182
    [8] Fidel Meléndez-Vázquez, Guillermo Fernández-Anaya, Aldo Jonathan Muñóz-Vázquez, Eduardo Gamaliel Hernández-Martínez . Generalized conformable operators: Application to the design of nonlinear observers. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12952-12975. doi: 10.3934/math.2021749
    [9] Miled El Hajji, Mohammed Faraj S. Aloufi, Mohammed H. Alharbi . Influence of seasonality on Zika virus transmission. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19361-19384. doi: 10.3934/math.2024943
    [10] Zafar Iqbal, Muhammad Aziz-ur Rehman, Muhammad Imran, Nauman Ahmed, Umbreen Fatima, Ali Akgül, Muhammad Rafiq, Ali Raza, Ali Asrorovich Djuraev, Fahd Jarad . A finite difference scheme to solve a fractional order epidemic model of computer virus. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2337-2359. doi: 10.3934/math.2023121
  • Background 

    Dementia is a prevalent, progressive, neurodegenerative condition with multifactorial causes. Due to the lack of effective pharmaceutical treatments for dementia, there are growing clinical and research interests in using vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a potential non-pharmacological therapy for dementia. However, the extent of the research volume and nature into the effects of VNS on dementia is not well understood. This study aimed to examine the extent and nature of research activities in relation to the use of VNS in dementia and disseminate research findings for the potential utility in dementia care.

    Methods 

    We performed a scoping review of literature searches in PubMed, HINARI, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane databases from 1980 to November 30th, 2023, including the reference lists of the identified studies. The following search terms were utilized: brain stimulation, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, vagal stimulation, memory loss, Deme*, cognit*, VNS, and Cranial nerve stimulation. The included studies met the following conditions: primary research articles pertaining to both humans and animals for both longitudinal and cross-sectional study designs and published in English from January 1st, 1980, to November 30th, 2023; investigated VNS in either dementia or cognitive impairment; and were not case studies, conference proceedings/abstracts, commentaries, or ordinary review papers.

    Findings and conclusions 

    We identified 8062 articles, and after screening for eligibility (sequentially by titles, abstracts and full text reading, and duplicate removal), 10 studies were included in the review. All the studies included in this literature review were conducted over the last three decades in high-income geographical regions (i.e., Europe, the United States, the United Kingdom, and China), with the majority of them (7/10) being performed in humans. The main reported outcomes of VNS in the dementia cases were enhanced cognitive functions, an increased functional connectivity of various brain regions involved in learning and memory, microglial structural modifications from neurodestructive to neuroprotective configurations, a reduction of cerebral spinal fluid tau-proteins, and significant evoked brain tissue potentials that could be utilized to diagnose neurodegenerative disorders. The study outcomes highlight the potential for VNS to be used as a non-pharmacological therapy for cognitive impairment in dementia-related diseases such as Alzheimer's disease.



    Zika infection is a kind of vector-borne disease caused and spread by the bite infected Aedes mosquitos. The Zika infection was first discovered in Uganda in 1947. In 2007, the first case of Zika virus was reported occurred in the Island of Yap (Federated States of Micronesia). After that, it spread very quickly in Asia, Africa and USA [1]. The Aides mosquitoes is the main source from which the Zika virus is spread and is also responsible for dengue infection. The transmission of virus of Zika infection to humans occurred by the bites of infected female mosquitoes from the Aedes genus. This infection can also be transmitted having unprotected sexual relations, if one partner is suffering from Zika virus. People who have infected with Zika will have mild symptom due to which they feel mild illness and get severe ailment. Zika infected people main symptoms are skin rashes, headache, mild fever, conjunctivitis, and muscle pains. Usually the symptoms last for 2–7 days but sometimes the infected individuals due to Zika virus de not developed symptoms. This infection can also affect a pregnant women to her developing fetus [2,3]. If this happened then most probably the newly born babies have abnormal brain and small head development along with muscle weakness which effects nervous system.

    Epidemic models are used as powerful tool to predict the dynamics and control of various communicable diseases. These models usually consist of nonlinear differential equations describing the dynamics of the concern disease. A number of transmission models and effective possible controlling strategies have been developed in literature to explore the effective strategies for controlling of Zika infection in different regions around the globe. Kucharsk et al. [4] proposed a mathematical model and provided a detail analysis of French Polynesia Zika outbreak appeared in 2013-14. Kucharsk et al. used the total Zika infected cases between October 2013 till April 2014 which are reported in six main places of French Polynesia for model parameters estimation. Bonyah and Okosun [5] used optimal control theory to derived three different controlling strategies to reduce the spreed of this infection. The impact of bednets, used of insecticides spry and possible treatment was studied in detail in [6]. However, these models are based integer-order classical differential systems. The classical integer-order derivatives have some limitations as they are local in nature and do not posses the memory effects which are appear in most of biological systems. Secondly, classical derivative are unable to provides information about the rate of changes between two points not necessarily same. To overcome such limitations of local derivatives, various concepts on new derivatives with non-integer or fractional order were developed in recent years and can e found in [7,9,10]. The classical Caputo fractional operator [7] has been used to model many complex phenomena in different fields. For example in [11], a numerical scheme was proposed for of the diffusive fractional HBV model in Caputo sense. A numerical scheme for Caputo fractional reaction-diffusion equation and its stability analysis can be found in [12]. Also a detail stability analysis and simulations of Caputo sub-diffusion equation has been developed in [13]. The real world application of non-local and non-singular fractional operator [9] can be found in [14]. A comparative analysis Sturm-Liouville fractional problems has been carried out in [15]. Other applications of singular and non-singular fractional order operators in modeling various phenomena can be found in [18,16,19,20,17]. There is no rich literate on the modeling of Zika virus in fractional order. Only few models with fractional order has been presented in literature for Zika infection [21,22]. Keeping the above discussion in view and applicability of fractional order derivatives, in the preset investigation, a mathematical transmission model is considered in the Caputo sense in order to explore the dynamics of the Zika virus. We simulate the proposed Zika model for different values of relevant parameters and for several values of arbitrary fractional order α.

    The structure of the paper is follows is as: groundwork of the fractional derivative is given in Section 2. The basic model formulation is given in Section 3. Sections 4 is devoted to explore the basic properties of the model. Sections 5 and 6 are concern to obtain the stability results of the model equilibria. Graphical analysis are given in Section 7. The whole work is summarized with a brief conclusion in Section 8.

    The basic definitions regarding the fractional derivative in Caputo sense are as follows [7,8]:

    Definition 2.1. The Caputo fractional derivative of order α(n1,n) with nN for a function hCn is stated as follow:

    CDαt(h(t))=1Γ(nα)t0h(n)ξ(tξ)αn+1dξ.

    Clearly CDαt(h(t)) approaches to h(t) as α1.

    Definition 2.2. The corresponding fractional integral having order α>0 of the function h:R+R is described by the following expression

    Iαt(h(t))=1Γ(α)t0(tξ)α1h(ξ)dξ,

    where Γ represent the Gamma function.

    Definition 2.3. The constant point x is said to be an equilibrium point of the following Caputo fractional dynamic system:

    CDαtx(t)=h(t,x(t)),α(0,1), (2.1)

    if and only if it observed that h(t,x)=0.

    To present the stability analysis of nonlinear fractional systems in the Caputo sense via Lyapunov method we first recall the following necessary results from [23,24].

    Theorem 2.4. Suppose x be an equilibrium point for the above system (2.1) and ΩRn be a domain containing x. Let L:[0,)×Ω into to R be a continuously differentiable function such that

    W1(x)L(t,x(t))W2(x),

    and

    CDαtL(t,x(t))W3(x),

    α(0,1) and xΩ. Whereas W1(x), W2(x) and W3(x) are continuously positive definite functions on Ω. Then x is uniformly asymptotically stable equilibrium point for the model (2.1).

    Next we recall the following lemma from [24], which we will use in presenting the global stability via Lyapunov function.

    Lemma 2.5. For a continuous and derivable function z(t)R+ and α(0,1), then for any time tt0 we have

    CDαt{z(t)zzlnz(t)z}(1zz(t))CDαtz(t),zR+.

    To formulate the model, we divide the human population into two sub-classes, susceptible individuals and infected individuals. The total human population is represented by xh(t)=x1(t)+x2(t), where x1 represent susceptible and x2 represent numbers of infected human individuals. Similarly, xm is the total number of mosquitos which are further divided into susceptible mosquitos x3, and infected mosquitos x4, so that xm(t)=x3(t)+x4(t). The compartmental mathematical model is given by the following system of four ordinary differential equations to describe the mechanism of the transmission of Zika virus.

    {CDαtx1=Λhβ1γ1x1(t)x4(t)d1x1(t),CDαtx2=β1γ1x1(t)x4(t)d1x2(t),CDαtx3=Λmβ2γ2x2(t)x3(t)d2x3(t),CDαtx4=β2γ2x2(t)x3(t)d2x4(t), (3.1)

    with the initial conditions

    x1(0)=x100, x2(0)=x200, x3(0)=x300, x4(0)=x400.

    In the above proposed model Λh and Λm respectively represent the recruitment rate of human and mosquito populations. The natural death rate of the human and mosquitos are d1 and d2 respectively. The contact rate of suspectable human and infected mosquitos is β1, while β2 is the contact rate OF susceptible mosquitos and infected humans. The parameters γ1 and γ2 shows the transmission probabilities of humans and mosquitos.

    In order to present the non-negativity of the system solution, let

    R4+={yR4y0}  and  y(t)=(x1(t),x2(t),x3(t),x4(t))T.

    To proceeds further, first we recall the generalized mean values theorem [25].

    Lemma 4.1. Let suppose that h(t)C[a,b] and CDαth(t)(a,b], then

    h(t)=h(a)+1Γ(α)(CDαth)(ζ)(ta)α,

    with aζt,t(a,b].

    Corollary 4.2. Suppose that h(t)C[a,b] and CDαth(t)(a,b], where α(0,1]. Then if

    (i)  CDαth(t)0,  t(a,b),  then  h(t)  is  nondecreasing.
    (ii)  CDαth(t)0,  t(a,b),  then  h(t)  is  nonincreasing.

    We are now able to give the following result.

    Theorem 4.3. A unique solution y(t) of the model (3.1) exists and will remain in R4+. Further more, the solution is positive.

    Proof. The exitance of the Caputo fractional Zika model can be shown with the help of theorem 3.1 from [26,27], while the uniqueness of the solution can be easily obtained by making use of the Remark 3.2 in [26] for all positive values of t. In order to explore the solution positivity, it is necessary to show that on each hyperplane bounding the positive orthant, the vector field points to R4+. Form the system (3.1), we deduced that

    CDαtx1x1=0=Λh0,  CDαtx2x2=0=β1γ1x1(t)x4(t)0,CDαtx3x3=0=Λm0,  CDαtx4x4=0=β2γ2x2(t)x3(t)0.

    Hence, using the above corollary (4.2), we obtain the desired target i.e. the solution will remain in R4+ and hence biologically feasible region is constructed as:

    Φ={(x1,x2,x3,x4)R4+:x1,x2,x3,x40 }.

    Next we explore the equilibria and basic threshold quantity R0 of the model (3.1) in the following subsection.

    The equilibria of our proposed system (3.1) are obtained by solving the system below

    CDαtx1= CDαtx2= CDαtx3= CDαtx4=0.

    Hence we deduced that the proposed model exhibit two type of equilibrium points. The disease free equilibrium (DFE) calculated as

    E0=(x01,x02,x03,x04)=(Λhd1,0,Λmd2,0),

    and the endemic equilibrium (EE) is as evaluated as follows E1=(x1,x2,x3,x4), where

    x1=Λhd1+x4β1γ1,x2=Λhx4β1γ1d1(d1+x4β1γ1),x3=d1Λm(d1+β1γ1x4)β1γ1x4(d1d2+β2γ2Λh)+d2d21. (4.1)

    The EE E1, exist only if R0>1. The threshold quantity known as the basic reproduction number for the fractional Zika model is obtained by using the well known approach discussed in [28]. The basic reproduction number is biologically very important and determine the global dynamics of the model. The corresponding matrices F and V are given by

    F=(0β1γ1Λhd1β2γ2Λmd20),  V=(d100d2).

    Further, the inverse of V is

    V1=(1d1001d2), FV1=(0β1γ1Λhd1d2β2γ2Λmd1d20)

    The spectral radius ρ(FV1) is the basic reproduction number of the model and after some simplification the reproduction number is

    R0=ΛhΛmβ2γ2β1γ1d21d22.

    In this section we proceed to confirm the stability results in both local and global case. The Jacobian of linearization matrix of model (3.1).

    JE0=(d100β1γ1Λhd10d10β1γ1Λhd10β2γ2Λmd2d200β2γ2Λmd20d2).

    Theorem 5.1. For positive integers r1 and r2 such that gcd(r1,r2)=1. Let α=(r1r2) and define N=r2, then the model DFE denoted by E0 is stable locally asymptotically provided that |arg(λ)|>π2N, where λ denotes the possible roots of the characteristic equation of the matrix JE0 given below.

    det(diag[λp1λp1λp1λp1]JE0)=0. (5.1)

    Proof. By expansion of Eq. (5.1), we get the below equation in term of λ.

    (λr1+d1)(λr1+d2)(λ2r1+a1λr1+a2)=0, (5.2)

    where the coefficients are given below:

    a1=d1+d2,a2=d1d1(1R0).

    The arguments of the roots of the equation λp1+d1=0 are as follow:

    arg(λk)=πr1+k2πr1>πN>π2N,wherek=0,1,(r11). (5.3)

    In similar pattern, it can be shown that argument of the roots of λp1+d2=0 are also greater than π2M. Further, if R0<1, then the desired condition (|arg(λ)|>π2N) is satisfied for all roots of polynomial (5.2). For R0>1, then with the help of Descartes rule of signs, there exits exactly one root of characteristic equation with |arg(λ)|<π2N. Thus the DFE is locally asymptotically stable for R0<1, otherwise unstable.

    For global stability result we prove the following theorem. This subsection provide the global analysis of the model for the DF and endemic case. We have the following results.

    Theorem 5.2. For arbitrary fractional order α in the interval (0, 1], and R0<1, the DFE of the proposed model is stable globally asymptotically and unstable otherwise.

    Proof. To prove our result we define consider the following Lyapunov function

    V(t)=W1(x1x01x01lnx1x01)+W2x2+W3(x3x03x03lnx3x03)+W4x4. (5.4)

    Where Wi, i=1,24, are arbitrary positive constants to be chosen latter. Using lemma (5.1), the time derivative of (5.4), along the solution of (3.1) is given by

    CDαtV(t)=W1(x1x01x1) CDαtx1+W2 CDαtx2+W3(x3x03x3) CDαtx3+W4 CDαtx4=W1(x1x01x1)[Λhd1x1β1γ1x4x1]+W2[β1γ1x4x1d1x2]+W3(x3x03x3)[Λmd2x3β2γ2x3x2]+W4[β2γ2x3x2d2x4]=(W2W1)[β1γ1x4x1]+(W4W3)[β2γ2x3x2]+x4(W1β1γ1x01W4d2)+x2(W3β2γ2x03W2d1).

    Using x01=Λhd1 and x03=Λmd2, we get

    CDαtV=(W2W1)[β1γ1x4x1]+(W4W3)[β2γ2x3x2]+x4(W1β1γ1Λhd1W4d2)+x2(W3β1γ1Λmd2W2d1).

    Choosing the constants W1=W2=β2γ2Λmd2 and W3=W4=d1 and after simplification, we get

    CDαtV=x4d1d2(R01).

    CDαtV(t) is negative for R0<1. Therefore, by theorem (2.4) [23,24], the DFE E0, is globally asymptotically stable in Φ.

    Here, we present the global stability of the system (3.1) at E1. At the steady state the model (3.1) at E1 we obtained

    {Λh=β1γ1x4x1+d1x1,d1x2=β1γ1x4x1,Λm=β2γ2x3x2+d2x3,d2x4=β2γ2x3x2. (6.1)

    Theorem 6.1. If R0>1, the EE E1 of the system (3.1) is stable globally asymptotically.

    Proof. We consider the following Lyapunov function:

    L(t)=(x1x1x1logx1x1)+(x2x2x2logx2x2)+(x3x3x3logx3x3)+(x4x4x4logx4x4).

    Using lemma (5.1), the derivative of L(t) along the solutions of (3.1) is as follows

     CDαtL=(1x1x1) CDαtx1+(1x2x2) CDαtx2+(1x3x3) CDαtx3+(1x4x4) CDαtx4.   

    By direct calculations, we have that:

    (1x1x1) CDαtx1=(1x1x1)(Λhd1x1β1γ1x4x1)(1x2x2) CDαtx2=(1x2x2)(β1γ1x4x1d1x2)(1x3x3) CDαtx3=(1x3x3)(Λmd2x3β2γ2x3x2)(1x4x4) CDαtx2=(1x4x4)(β2γ2x3x2d2x4).     (6.2)
    (1x1x1) CDαtx1=(1x1x1)(Λhd1x1β1γ1x4x1)=(1x1x1)(d2x1+β1γ1x4x1d2x1β1γ1x4x1)=d2x1(1x1x1)(1x1x1)+(1x1x1)(β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1)=d2x1(2x1x1x1x1)+β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1x1x1+β1γ1x4x1.     (6.3)
    (1x2x2) CDαtx2=(1x2x2)(β1γ1x4x1d1x2)=β1γ1x4x1d1x2β1γ1x4x1x2x2+d1x2=β1γ1x4x1β1γ1x4x1x2x2β1γ1x4x1x2x2+β1γ1x4x1.     (6.4)
    (1x3x3) CDαtx3=(1x3x3)(Λmd2x3β2γ2x3x2)=(1x3x3)(d2x3+β2γ2x3x2d2x3β2γ2x3x2)=d2x3(1x3x3)(1x3x3)+(1x3x3)(β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3x2)=d2x3(2x3x3x3x3)+β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3x3x3x3+β2γ2x3x2. (6.5)
    (1x4x4) CDαtx4=(1x4x4)(β2γ2x3x2d2x4)=β2γ2x3x2d2x4β2γ2x3x2x4x4+d2x4=β2γ2x3x2β2γ2x3xx2x4x4β2γ2x3x2x4x4+β2γ2x3x2.     (6.6)

    It follows from (6.3-6.6)

     CDαtL=d1x1(2x1x1x1x1)+β1γ1x4x1(2x1x1x2x2x4x4(x1x2x1x21))+d2x3(2x3x3x3x3)+β2γ2x3x2(2x3x3x4x4x2x2(x3x4x3x41)).      (6.7)

    Make use of arithmetical-geometrical inequality we have in equation (6.7)

    d1x1(2x1x1x1x1)0,d2x3(2x3x3x3x3)0,β1γ1x4x1(2x1x1xx2x2x3x3(x1x2x1x21))0,β2γ2x3x2(2x3x3x4x4x2x2(x3x4x3x41))0.    

    Therefore,  CDαtL0 and hence by using theorem (2.4) the EE E1 of the proposed model is globally asymptotically stable whenever R0>1.

    The present section is devoted to obtain the numerical results of the proposed Zika fractional order model (3.1). The Adams-type predictor-corrector method is applied to obtained the approximate solution of the model. The numerical values used in the simulations are Λh=1.2, Λm=0.3, β1=0.0004, β2=0.005, d1=0.004, d2=0.0014, γ1=0.02. γ2=0.0003. The graphical results using different five values of fractional order α=1,0.95,0.9,0.85,0.8 are presented in the Figures 1-4. From these figures we can see than the susceptible human and mosquitoes are increasing when we decreases the fractional order α. While there is a significant decrease in the graphs of infected humans and mosquitoes with decrease in α. Hence, the fractional order α has an important role in the model.

    Figure 1.  The graph shows the behavior of the susceptible humans for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.
    Figure 2.  The graph shows the behavior of the infected humans for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.
    Figure 3.  The graph shows the behavior of the susceptible mosquitos for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.
    Figure 4.  The graph shows the behavior of the infected mosquitos for α=1,0.95,0.90,0.85,0.8.

    Zika is a rapidly spreading epidemic and is one of serious health issue, specially for pregnant women. A number of deterministic models have been presented in last few year, for the possible control and eradication of this infection from the community. But, almost all of these models are based on classical or local derivative. In order to better explore the complex behavior of Zika infection, in this paper, a fractional order transmission model in Caputo sense is developed. The detail analysis such as positivity and existence of the solution, basic reproduction numberer and model equilibria of the proposed model are presented. The stability results for both local and global cases are derived in detail in fractional environment. From the numerical results we conclude that the fractional order derivative provides more information about the proposed model which are unable by classical integer-order epidemic models. Also these results ensure that by including the memory effects in the model seems very appropriate for such an investigation. In future, we will explore the proposed model using non-local and non-singular fractional derivatives presented in [9,10].

    All authors declare no conflict of interest.


    Acknowledgments



    I acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Nduhukire Abraham and Dr. Evelyn Kirabo Biseki for their participation in data extraction and screening. I appreciate Mrs. Sarah Lubega Nambi for your invaluable emotional and financial support during the preparation of this work.

    Authors contribution



    Contributions to the scoping review's conceptualization and design came from RK, GZR, GN, AOI, and JO. WA and RK performed the systematic search across all databases. The data extraction and article screening were carried out by GN, RK, GZR and SK. Each author made a contribution to the data's analysis and interpretation. The scoping review was originally written by RK, and all authors edited the document to bring it to its current state and approved the submitted version.

    Conflict of interest



    All authors declared no conflict of interest.

    [1] WHOGlobal action plan on the public health response to Dementia 2017-2025. In (2023).
    [2] Von Ah D, Jansen CE, Allen D, et al. (2011) Putting evidence into practice: evidence-based interventions for cancer and cancer treatment-related cognitive impairment. Clin J Oncol Nurs 15: 607-615. https://doi.org/10.1188/11.CJON.607-615
    [3] Metin B, Krebs RM, Wiersema JR, et al. (2015) Dysfunctional modulation of default mode network activity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 124: 208-214. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000013
    [4] Wolf A, Bauer B, Abner EL, et al. (2016) A comprehensive behavioral test battery to assess learning and memory in 129S6/Tg2576 mice. PloS One 11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147733
    [5] Shafqat S (2008) Alzheimer disease therapeutics: perspectives from the developing world. J Alzheimers Dis 15: 285-287. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2008-15211
    [6] Chang CH, Lane HY, Lin CH (2018) Brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease. Front Psychiatry 9: 201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00201
    [7] Conway CR, Kumar A, Xiong W, et al. (2018) Chronic vagus nerve stimulation significantly improves quality of life in treatment-resistant major depression. J Clin Psychiatry 79: 22269. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.18m12178
    [8] De Ferrari GM, Schwartz PJ (2011) Vagus nerve stimulation: from pre-clinical to clinical application: challenges and future directions. Heart Fail Rev 16: 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-010-9216-0
    [9] Kumar A, Bunker MT, Aaronson ST, et al. (2019) Durability of symptomatic responses obtained with adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation in treatment-resistant depression. Neuropsych Dis Treat : 457-468. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S196665
    [10] Ruffoli R, Giorgi FS, Pizzanelli C, et al. (2011) The chemical neuroanatomy of vagus nerve stimulation. J Chem Neuroanat 42: 288-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2010.12.002
    [11] Engineer ND, Kimberley TJ, Prudente CN, et al. (2015) Targeted Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Rehabilitation After Stroke. Front Neurosci 13: 280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00280
    [12] Friedman NI (2016) Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 54: 789-791. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160719
    [13] Ma X, Wang Q, Ong JJ, et al. (2018) Prevalence of human papillomavirus by geographical regions, sexual orientation and HIV status in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 94: 434-442. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2017-053412
    [14] Pesavento E, Capsoni S, Domenici L, et al. (2002) Acute cholinergic rescue of synaptic plasticity in the neurodegenerating cortex of anti-nerve-growth-factor mice. Eur J Neurosci 15: 1030-1036. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01937.x
    [15] Ansari S, Chaudhri K, Moutaery KA (2007) Vagus nerve stimulation: indications and limitations. Acta Neurochir Suppl 97: 281-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_31
    [16] Ghacibeh GA, Shenker JI, Shenal B, et al. (2006) The influence of vagus nerve stimulation on memory. Cogn Behav Neurol 19: 119-122. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnn.0000213908.34278.7d
    [17] Kosel M, Schlaepfer TE (2003) Beyond the treatment of epilepsy: new applications of vagus nerve stimulation in psychiatry. CNS Spectrums 8: 515-521. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852900018988
    [18] Merrill CA, Jonsson MAG, Minthon L, et al. (2006) Vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Alzheimer's disease: additional follow-up results of a pilot study through 1 year. J Clin Psychiatry 67: 1171-1178. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v67n0801
    [19] Roy DS, Arons A, Mitchell TI, et al. (2016) Memory retrieval by activating engram cells in mouse models of early Alzheimer's disease. Nature 531: 508-512. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17172
    [20] Sun Q, Xie N, Tang B, et al. (2017) Alzheimer's disease: from genetic variants to the distinct pathological mechanisms. Front Mol Neurosci 10: 319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2017.00319
    [21] Ghacibeh GA, Shenker JI, Shenal B, et al. (2006) Effect of vagus nerve stimulation on creativity and cognitive flexibility. Epilepsy Behav 8: 720-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.03.008
    [22] Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. (2018) PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169: 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
    [23] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151: 264-269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
    [24] Broncel A, Bocian R, Kłos-Wojtczak P, et al. (2020) Vagal nerve stimulation as a promising tool in the improvement of cognitive disorders. Brain Res Bull 155: 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.11.011
    [25] Vargas-Caballero M, Warming H, Walker R, et al. (2022) Vagus nerve stimulation as a potential therapy in early Alzheimer's disease: A review. Front Hum Neurosci 16: 866434. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.866434
    [26] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151: 264-269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
    [27] Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. (2015) Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement 13: 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
    [28] MDJ P, GC M: Scoping Review. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual (2017) .
    [29] Wang L, Zhang J, Lu X, et al. The Mechanism Underlying Chronic Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Through the Enhancement of the Functional Connectivity between the Left Precuneus and Parahippocampus Gyrus (2023). Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4369340
    [30] Wang L, Zhang J, Guo C, et al. (2022) The efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a double blinded randomized clinical trial. Brain Stimul 15: 1405-1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.09.003
    [31] Metzger FG, Polak T, Aghazadeh Y, et al. (2012) Vagus somatosensory evoked potentials--a possibility for diagnostic improvement in patients with mild cognitive impairment?. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 33: 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339359
    [32] Murphy AJ, O'Neal AG, Cohen RA, et al. (2023) The Effects of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Functional Connectivity Within Semantic and Hippocampal Networks in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Neurotherapeutics 20: 419-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-022-01318-4
    [33] Merrill CA, Bunker M (2004) P3-032 Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on cognition, CSF-Tau and cerebral blood flow in patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a 1 year pilot study. Neurobiol Aging 25: S360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(04)81186-2
    [34] Kaczmarczyk R, Tejera D, Simon BJ, et al. (2018) Microglia modulation through external vagus nerve stimulation in a murine model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurochem 146: 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14284
    [35] Smith DC, Modglin AA, Roosevelt RW, et al. (2005) Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve enhances cognitive and motor recovery following moderate fluid percussion injury in the rat. J Neurotraum 22: 1485-1502. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2005.22.1485
    [36] Dolphin H, Dyer A, Commins S, et al. (2023) 264 Improvements in associative memory and spatial navigation with acute transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment: preliminary data. Age Ageing 52: afad156. 032. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad156.032
    [37] O'Neal AG, Cohen R, Porges EC, et al. (2023) 43 Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Effects on Functional Connectivity of the Hippocampus in Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Int Neuropsych Soc 29: 454-454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617723005933
    [38] Clark KB, Naritoku DK, Smith DC, et al. (1999) Enhanced recognition memory following vagus nerve stimulation in human subjects. Nat Neurosci 2: 94-98. https://doi.org/10.1038/4600
    [39] Merrill CA, Jonsson MA, Minthon L, et al. (2006) Vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Alzheimer's disease: additional follow-up results of a pilot study through 1 year. J Clin Psychiatry 67: 1171-1178. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v67n0801
    [40] Sjogren MJ, Hellstrom PT, Jonsson MA, et al. (2002) Cognition-enhancing effect of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study. J Clin Psychiatry 63: 972-980. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v63n1103
    [41] Kaczmarczyk R, Tejera D, Simon BJ, et al. (2018) Microglia modulation through external vagus nerve stimulation in a murine model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurochem 146: 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14284
    [42] Metzger FG, Polak T, Aghazadeh Y, et al. (2012) Vagus Somatosensory Evoked Potentials–A Possibility for Diagnostic Improvement in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment?. Dement Geriatr Cogn 33: 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339359
    [43] Murphy AJ, O'Neal AG, Cohen RA, et al. (2023) The effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on functional connectivity within semantic and hippocampal networks in mild cognitive impairment. Neurotherapeutics 20: 419-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-022-01318-4
    [44] Mattap SM, Mohan D, McGrattan AM, et al. (2022) The economic burden of dementia in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 7: e007409. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007409
    [45] Schaller S, Mauskopf J, Kriza C, et al. (2015) The main cost drivers in dementia: a systematic review. IntJ Geriatr Psych 30: 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4198
    [46] Hojman DA, Duarte F, Ruiz-Tagle J, et al. (2017) The cost of dementia in an unequal country: the case of Chile. PLoS One 12: e0172204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172204
    [47] Hopkins S (2010) Health expenditure comparisons: low, middle and high income countries. Open Health Serv Policy J 3: 21-27.
    [48] Kamoga R, Rukundo GZ, Wakida EK, et al. (2019) Dementia assessment and diagnostic practices of healthcare workers in rural southwestern Uganda: a cross-sectional qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4850-2
    [49] Chamma E, Daradich A, Côté D, et al. (2014) Intravital Microscopy, Pathobiology of Human Disease. Academic Press : 3959-3972. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386456-7.07607-3
    [50] Johnson RL, Wilson CG (2018) A review of vagus nerve stimulation as a therapeutic intervention. J Inflamm Res 11: 203-213. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S163248
    [51] Braak H, Del Tredici K (2015) The preclinical phase of the pathological process underlying sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Brain 138: 2814-2833. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv236
    [52] Luo T, Wang Y, Lu G, et al. (2022) Vagus nerve stimulation for super-refractory status epilepticus in febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome: a pediatric case report and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst 38: 1401-1404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05410-6
    [53] Révész D, Rydenhag B, Ben-Menachem E (2016) Complications and safety of vagus nerve stimulation: 25 years of experience at a single center. J Neurosurg Pediatr 18: 97-104. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.1.PEDS15534
    [54] Smucny J, Visani A, Tregellas JR (2015) Could vagus nerve stimulation target hippocampal hyperactivity to improve cognition in schizophrenia?. Front Psychiatry 6: 135146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00043
    [55] Carreno FR, Frazer A (2017) Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression. Neurotherapeutics 14: 716-727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0537-8
    [56] Hamilton P, Soryal I, Dhahri P, et al. (2018) Clinical outcomes of VNS therapy with AspireSR(®) (including cardiac-based seizure detection) at a large complex epilepsy and surgery centre. Seizure 58: 120-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2018.03.022
    [57] Yap JYY, Keatch C, Lambert E, et al. (2020) Critical Review of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Challenges for Translation to Clinical Practice. Front Neurosci 14: 284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00284
    [58] Stefan H, Kreiselmeyer G, Kerling F, et al. (2012) Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (t-VNS) in pharmacoresistant epilepsies: a proof of concept trial. Epilepsia 53: e115-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03492.x
    [59] Hein E, Nowak M, Kiess O, et al. (2013) Auricular transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in depressed patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neural Transm 120: 821-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-012-0908-6
    [60] Broncel A, Bocian R, Kłos-Wojtczak P, et al. (2020) Vagal nerve stimulation as a promising tool in the improvement of cognitive disorders. Brain Res Bull 155: 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.11.011
    [61] Révész D, Rydenhag B, Ben-Menachem E (2016) Complications and safety of vagus nerve stimulation: 25 years of experience at a single center. J Neurosurg Pediatr 18: 97-104. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.1.PEDS15534
    [62] Vonck K, Raedt R, Naulaerts J, et al. (2014) Vagus nerve stimulation... 25 years later! What do we know about the effects on cognition?. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 45: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.005
    [63] Metin B, Krebs RM, Wiersema JR, et al. (2015) Dysfunctional modulation of default mode network activity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 124: 208. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000013
    [64] Wolf A, Bauer B, Abner EL, et al. (2016) A comprehensive behavioral test battery to assess learning and memory in 129S6/Tg2576 mice. PloS One 11: e0147733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147733
    [65] Butt MF, Albusoda A, Farmer AD, et al. (2020) The anatomical basis for transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation. J Anat 236: 588-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13122
    [66] Clancy JA The effects of non-invasive neuromodulation on autonomic nervous system function in humans: University of Leeds (2013).
    [67] Colzato L, Beste C (2020) A literature review on the neurophysiological underpinnings and cognitive effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: challenges and future directions. J Neurophysiol 123: 1739-1755. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00057.2020
    [68] Ventura-Bort C, Wirkner J, Wendt J, et al. (2021) Establishment of emotional memories is mediated by vagal nerve activation: evidence from noninvasive taVNS. J Neurosci 41: 7636-7648. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2329-20.2021
    [69] Warren CM, Tona KD, Ouwerkerk L, et al. (2019) The neuromodulatory and hormonal effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation as evidenced by salivary alpha amylase, salivary cortisol, pupil diameter, and the P3 event-related potential. Brain Stimul 12: 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.224
    [70] Simmonds L, Lagrata S, Stubberud A, et al. (2023) An open-label observational study and meta-analysis of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in medically refractory chronic cluster headache. Front Neurol 14: 100426. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1100426
    [71] Murray AR, Atkinson L, Mahadi MK, et al. (2016) The strange case of the ear and the heart: The auricular vagus nerve and its influence on cardiac control. Auton Neurosci 199: 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2016.06.004
    [72] Frangos E, Ellrich J, Komisaruk BR (2015) Non-invasive access to the vagus nerve central projections via electrical stimulation of the external ear: fMRI Evidence in Humans. Brain Stimul 8: 624-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.018
    [73] Clancy JA, Mary DA, Witte KK, et al. (2014) Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in healthy humans reduces sympathetic nerve activity. Brain Stimul 7: 871-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.07.031
    [74] Wang L, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. (2022) Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulators: a review of past, present, and future devices. Expert Rev Med Devic 19: 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2022.2020095
    [75] Kaczmarczyk M, Antosik-Wójcińska A, Dominiak M, et al. (2021) Use of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in the treatment of drug-resistant depression - a pilot study, presentation of five clinical cases. Psychiatr Pol 55: 555-564. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/115191
    [76] Sun L, Peräkylä J, Holm K, et al. (2017) Vagus nerve stimulation improves working memory performance. J Clin Exp Neuropsyc 39: 954-964. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2017.1285869
    [77] Ghacibeh GA, Shenker JI, Shenal B, et al. (2006) The influence of vagus nerve stimulation on memory. Cogn Behav Neurol 19: 119-122. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnn.0000213908.34278.7d
    [78] Wang C, Wang P, Qi G (2023) A new use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: Role of bioelectric technology in resistant hypertension. Biomed Rep 18: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2023.1621
    [79] Jongkees BJ, Immink MA, Finisguerra A, et al. (2018) Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) enhances response selection during sequential action. Front Psychol 9: 1159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01159
    [80] Giraudier M, Ventura-Bort C, Weymar M (2020) Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) improves high-confidence recognition memory but not emotional word processing. Front Psychol 11: 1276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01276
    [81] Clark K, Krahl S, Smith D, et al. (1995) Post-training unilateral vagal stimulation enhances retention performance in the rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem 63: 213-216. https://doi.org/10.1006/nlme.1995.1024
    [82] Desbeaumes Jodoin V, Richer F, Miron JP, et al. (2018) Long-term Sustained Cognitive Benefits of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Refractory Depression. J Ect 34: 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000502
    [83] Rosso P, Iannitelli A, Pacitti F, et al. (2020) Vagus nerve stimulation and Neurotrophins: a biological psychiatric perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 113: 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.034
    [84] Follesa P, Biggio F, Gorini G, et al. (2007) Vagus nerve stimulation increases norepinephrine concentration and the gene expression of BDNF and bFGF in the rat brain. Brain Res 1179: 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.045
    [85] Gavrilyuk V, Russo CD, Heneka MT, et al. (2002) Norepinephrine increases IκBα expression in astrocytes. J Biol Chem 277: 29662-29668. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M203256200
    [86] Korchounov A, Ziemann U (2011) Neuromodulatory neurotransmitters influence LTP-like plasticity in human cortex: a pharmaco-TMS study. Neuropsychopharmacology 36: 1894-1902. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2011.75
    [87] Nagahara AH, Merrill DA, Coppola G, et al. (2009) Neuroprotective effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rodent and primate models of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med 15: 331-337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1912
    [88] Heneka MT, Nadrigny F, Regen T, et al. (2010) Locus ceruleus controls Alzheimer's disease pathology by modulating microglial functions through norepinephrine. P Natl Acad Sci 107: 6058-6063. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909586107
    [89] Streit WJ, Khoshbouei H, Bechmann I (2020) Dystrophic microglia in late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Glia 68: 845-854. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23782
    [90] Perry VH, Holmes C (2014) Microglial priming in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol 10: 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.38
    [91] Mertens A, Naert L, Miatton M, et al. (2020) Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation does not affect verbal memory performance in healthy volunteers. Front Psychol 11: 525888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00551
    [92] Helmstaedter C, Hoppe C, Elger CE (2001) Memory alterations during acute high-intensity vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsy Res 47: 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-1211(01)00291-1
    [93] Klinkenberg S, Aalbers MW, Vles JS, et al. (2012) Vagus nerve stimulation in children with intractable epilepsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 54: 855-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04305.x
    [94] McGlone J, Valdivia I, Penner M, et al. (2008) Quality of life and memory after vagus nerve stimulator implantation for epilepsy. Can J Neurol Sci 35: 287-296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0317167100008854
    [95] Zuo Y, Smith DC, Jensen RA (2007) Vagus nerve stimulation potentiates hippocampal LTP in freely-moving rats. Physiol Behav 90: 583-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.11.009
    [96] Arksey H, O'Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8: 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
    [97] Mays N, Roberts E, Popay J (2001) Synthesising research evidence. Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Research Methods. London: Routledge 188-220.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Sania Qureshi, Real life application of Caputo fractional derivative for measles epidemiological autonomous dynamical system, 2020, 134, 09600779, 109744, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109744
    2. Bahatdin DAŞBAŞI, Stability analysis of the hiv model through incommensurate fractional-order nonlinear system, 2020, 137, 09600779, 109870, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109870
    3. Muhammad Farooq Khan, Hussam Alrabaiah, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Farooq, Mustafa bin Mamat, Muhammad Imran Asjad, A new fractional model for vector-host disease with saturated treatment function via singular and non-singular operators, 2021, 60, 11100168, 629, 10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.057
    4. Khaled M. Saad, Manal Alqhtani, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Fractal-fractional study of the hepatitis C virus infection model, 2020, 19, 22113797, 103555, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103555
    5. Wenbin Yang, Xiaozhou Feng, Shuhui Liang, Xiaojuan Wang, Asymptotic Behavior Analysis of a Fractional-Order Tumor-Immune Interaction Model with Immunotherapy, 2020, 2020, 1076-2787, 1, 10.1155/2020/7062957
    6. Parikshit Gautam Jamdade, Shrinivas Gautamrao Jamdade, Modeling and prediction of COVID-19 spread in the Philippines by October 13, 2020, by using the VARMAX time series method with preventive measures, 2021, 20, 22113797, 103694, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103694
    7. Kolade M. Owolabi, Analysis and simulation of herd behaviour dynamics based on derivative with nonlocal and nonsingular kernel, 2021, 22, 22113797, 103941, 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103941
    8. Dawei Ding, Yecui Weng, Nian Wang, Dynamics analysis of a fractional-order delayed SBT memristive chaotic system without equilibrium points, 2019, 134, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12688-8
    9. Giro Candelario, Alicia Cordero, Juan R. Torregrosa, Multipoint Fractional Iterative Methods with (2α + 1)th-Order of Convergence for Solving Nonlinear Problems, 2020, 8, 2227-7390, 452, 10.3390/math8030452
    10. Abdon Atangana, Seda İğret Araz, New concept in calculus: Piecewise differential and integral operators, 2021, 145, 09600779, 110638, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110638
    11. Bahar Acay, Ramazan Ozarslan, Erdal Bas, Fractional physical models based on falling body problem, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 2608, 10.3934/math.2020170
    12. M. A. Khan, Arshad Khan, A. Elsonbaty, A. A. Elsadany, Modeling and simulation results of a fractional dengue model, 2019, 134, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12765-0
    13. Subhasis Bhattacharya, Suman Paul, The behaviour of infection, survival and testing effort variables of SARS-CoV-2: A theoretical modelling based on optimization technique, 2020, 19, 22113797, 103568, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103568
    14. Abdon Atangana, Seda İğret Araz, Nonlinear equations with global differential and integral operators: Existence, uniqueness with application to epidemiology, 2021, 20, 22113797, 103593, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103593
    15. Alicia Cordero, Ivan Girona, Juan R. Torregrosa, A Variant of Chebyshev’s Method with 3αth-Order of Convergence by Using Fractional Derivatives, 2019, 11, 2073-8994, 1017, 10.3390/sym11081017
    16. Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Ismail, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan, Fractional order SIR model with generalized incidence rate, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 1856, 10.3934/math.2020124
    17. Taza Gul, Haris Anwar, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Ilyas Khan, Poom Kumam, Integer and Non-Integer Order Study of the GO-W/GO-EG Nanofluids Flow by Means of Marangoni Convection, 2019, 11, 2073-8994, 640, 10.3390/sym11050640
    18. Hegagi Mohamed Ali, Ismail Gad Ameen, Optimal control strategies of a fractional order model for Zika virus infection involving various transmissions, 2021, 146, 09600779, 110864, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110864
    19. M. M. El-Dessoky, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Application of Caputo-Fabrizio derivative to a cancer model with unknown parameters, 2020, 0, 1937-1179, 0, 10.3934/dcdss.2020429
    20. S.O. Akindeinde, Eric Okyere, A.O. Adewumi, R.S. Lebelo, Olanrewaju. O. Fabelurin, Stephen. E. Moore, Caputo Fractional-order SEIRP model for COVID-19 epidemic, 2021, 11100168, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.097
    21. Chellamuthu Gokila, Muniyagounder Sambath, Modeling and simulations of a Zika virus as a mosquito-borne transmitted disease with environmental fluctuations, 2021, 0, 1565-1339, 10.1515/ijnsns-2020-0145
    22. M. R. Vinagre, G. Blé, L. Esteva, Dynamical Analysis of a Model for Secondary Infection of the Dengue, 2023, 0971-3514, 10.1007/s12591-022-00628-5
    23. Zain Ul Abadin Zafar, Nigar Ali, Mustafa Inc, Zahir Shah, Samina Younas, Mathematical modeling of corona virus (COVID-19) and stability analysis, 2022, 1025-5842, 1, 10.1080/10255842.2022.2109020
    24. Peijiang Liu, Anwarud Din, Rahat Zarin, Numerical dynamics and fractional modeling of hepatitis B virus model with non-singular and non-local kernels, 2022, 39, 22113797, 105757, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105757
    25. Aatif Ali, Saeed Islam, M. Riaz Khan, Saim Rasheed, F.M. Allehiany, Jamel Baili, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Hijaz Ahmad, Dynamics of a fractional order Zika virus model with mutant, 2022, 61, 11100168, 4821, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.031
    26. Sunil Kumar, Ram P. Chauhan, Mohamed S. Osman, S. A. Mohiuddine, A study on fractional HIV‐AIDs transmission model with awareness effect, 2021, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.7838
    27. Xinjie Fu, JinRong Wang, Dynamic stability and optimal control of SISqIqRS epidemic network, 2022, 163, 09600779, 112562, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112562
    28. Xiaotao Han, Hua Liu, Xiaofen Lin, Yumei Wei, Ma Ming, Yao Zhong Zhang, Dynamic Analysis of a VSEIR Model with Vaccination Efficacy and Immune Decline, 2022, 2022, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2022/7596164
    29. Emmanuel Addai, Lingling Zhang, Joseph Ackora-Prah, Joseph Frank Gordon, Joshua Kiddy K. Asamoah, John Fiifi Essel, Fractal-fractional order dynamics and numerical simulations of a Zika epidemic model with insecticide-treated nets, 2022, 603, 03784371, 127809, 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127809
    30. Thongchai Botmart, Qusain Hiader, Zulqurnain Sabir, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Wajaree Weera, Stochastic Investigations for the Fractional Vector-Host Diseased Based Saturated Function of Treatment Model, 2023, 74, 1546-2226, 559, 10.32604/cmc.2023.031871
    31. Giro Candelario, Alicia Cordero, Juan R. Torregrosa, María P. Vassileva, 2022, 9780323900898, 119, 10.1016/B978-0-32-390089-8.00010-6
    32. Shewafera Wondimagegnhu Teklu, Birhanu Baye Terefe, Khalid Hattaf, Mathematical Modeling Investigation of Violence and Racism Coexistence as a Contagious Disease Dynamics in a Community, 2022, 2022, 1748-6718, 1, 10.1155/2022/7192795
    33. Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Jutarat Kongson, Weerawat Sudsutad, Jehad Alzabut, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Analysis of a nonlinear fractional system for Zika virus dynamics with sexual transmission route under generalized Caputo-type derivative, 2022, 68, 1598-5865, 4273, 10.1007/s12190-021-01663-1
    34. Jutarat Kongson, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Apichat Neamvonk, Jehad Alzabut, Weerawat Sudsutad, Investigation of fractal-fractional HIV infection by evaluating the drug therapy effect in the Atangana-Baleanu sense, 2022, 19, 1551-0018, 10762, 10.3934/mbe.2022504
    35. Liping Wang, Peng Wu, Mingshan Li, Lei Shi, Global dynamics analysis of a Zika transmission model with environment transmission route and spatial heterogeneity, 2021, 7, 2473-6988, 4803, 10.3934/math.2022268
    36. Xiao-Ping Li, Mahmoud H. DarAssi, Muhammad Altaf Khan, C.W. Chukwu, Mohammad Y. Alshahrani, Mesfer Al Shahrani, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Assessing the potential impact of COVID-19 Omicron variant: Insight through a fractional piecewise model, 2022, 38, 22113797, 105652, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105652
    37. Muhammad Altaf Khan, Abdon Atangana, Emile Franc D Goufo, Mathematical analysis of an eco-epidemiological model with different competition factors in its fractional-stochastic form, 2021, 96, 0031-8949, 104015, 10.1088/1402-4896/ac1026
    38. M. Higazy, Shami A.M. Alsallami, Sayed Abdel-Khalek, A. El-Mesady, Dynamical and structural study of a generalized Caputo fractional order Lotka-Volterra model, 2022, 37, 22113797, 105478, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105478
    39. Mohammed A. Almalahi, Satish K. Panchal, Fahd Jarad, Mohammed S. Abdo, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, Qualitative analysis of a fuzzy Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equation with an Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 15994, 10.3934/math.2022876
    40. D. Baleanu, S. Arshad, A. Jajarmi, W. Shokat, F. Akhavan Ghassabzade, M. Wali, Dynamical behaviours and stability analysis of a generalized fractional model with a real case study, 2022, 20901232, 10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.010
    41. Yi Zhao, Ehab E. Elattar, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Mohammed Asiri, Pongsakorn Sunthrayuth, The dynamics of the HIV/AIDS infection in the framework of piecewise fractional differential equation, 2022, 40, 22113797, 105842, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105842
    42. Muhammad Farhan, Zhi Ling, Zahir Shah, Saeed Islam, Mansoor H. Alshehri, Elisabeta Antonescu, A multi-layer neural network approach for the stability analysis of the Hepatitis B model, 2024, 113, 14769271, 108256, 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108256
    43. A. Alla Hamou, E. Azroul, S. L'Kima, The effect of migration on the transmission of HIV/AIDS using a fractional model: Local and global dynamics and numerical simulations, 2024, 47, 0170-4214, 6868, 10.1002/mma.9946
    44. Yeliz Karaca, Mati ur Rahman, Dumitru Baleanu, 2023, Chapter 11, 978-3-031-37104-2, 144, 10.1007/978-3-031-37105-9_11
    45. Asifa Tassaddiq, Sania Qureshi, Amanullah Soomro, Omar Abu Arqub, Mehmet Senol, Comparative analysis of classical and Caputo models for COVID-19 spread: vaccination and stability assessment, 2024, 2024, 2730-5422, 10.1186/s13663-024-00760-7
    46. Sapan Kumar Nayak, P. K. Parida, Abhimanyu Kumar, A study of 3μ
    th-order of convergence of Chebyshev–Halley family method and its convergence plane, 2024, 81, 2254-3902, 457, 10.1007/s40324-023-00326-4
    47. Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Rashid Jan, Saeed Islam, A fractional modeling approach of Buruli ulcer in Possum mammals, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 065219, 10.1088/1402-4896/acd27d
    48. Waleed Ahmed, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, 2023, Chapter 8, 978-981-99-5000-3, 181, 10.1007/978-981-99-5001-0_8
    49. Linji Yang, Qiankun Song, Yurong Liu, Stability and Hopf bifurcation analysis for fractional-order SVEIR computer virus propagation model with nonlinear incident rate and two delays, 2023, 547, 09252312, 126397, 10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126397
    50. Mutaz Mohammad, Mohyeedden Sweidan, Alexander Trounev, Piecewise fractional derivatives and wavelets in epidemic modeling, 2024, 101, 11100168, 245, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.05.053
    51. Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Zhi Ling, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, Saeed Islam, Hakim A. L. Garalleh, Yury E Khudyakov, Global dynamics and computational modeling for analyzing and controlling Hepatitis B: A novel epidemic approach, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0304375, 10.1371/journal.pone.0304375
    52. Muhammad Farhan, Fahad Aljuaydi, Zahir Shah, Ebraheem Alzahrani, Ebenezer Bonyah, Saeed Islam, A fractional modeling approach to a new Hepatitis B model in light of asymptomatic carriers, vaccination and treatment, 2024, 24, 24682276, e02127, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02127
    53. Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Rashid Jan, Saeed Islam, Mansoor H. Alshehri, Zhi Ling, A fractional modeling approach for the transmission dynamics of measles with double-dose vaccination, 2023, 1025-5842, 1, 10.1080/10255842.2023.2297171
    54. Preety Kumari, Harendra Pal Singh, Swarn Singh, Modeling COVID-19 and heart disease interactions through Caputo fractional derivative: memory trace analysis, 2024, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02133-w
    55. Jhoana P. Romero-Leiton, Elda K.E. Laison, Rowin Alfaro, E. Jane Parmley, Julien Arino, Kamal R. Acharya, Bouchra Nasri, Exploring Zika's Dynamics: A Scoping Review Journey from Epidemic to Equations Through Mathematical Modelling, 2024, 24680427, 10.1016/j.idm.2024.12.016
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1325) PDF downloads(52) Cited by(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog