Search Advanced

AIMS Neuroscience

2024, Volume 11, Issue 3: 212-225. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024014
Previous Article Next Article
Review

Efficacy and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for the treatment of nicotine addiction: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

  • 1.
    Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, Contesse, Messina 98125, Italy
  • 2.
    Department of Medical Sciences, Neurology and Psychiatry, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
  • 3.
    Psychiatry Unit, Polyclinic Hospital University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, Contesse, 98125 Messina, Italy
  • Received: 22 May 2024 Revised: 17 June 2024 Accepted: 25 June 2024 Published: 01 July 2024

  • Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) techniques seem to be effective in treating tobacco use disorder. We aimed to analyze what kinds of protocols are used to treat nicotine addiction in term of cessation and/or reduction and to evaluate the long-term effects of NIBS techniques.We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for papers published, with combinations of the following search terms: “Non-invasive brain stimulation OR TMS OR transcranial magnetic stimulation OR tDCS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR transcranial electrical stimulation OR TES AND Nicotine addiction”.We conducted a preliminary search, which revealed papers on the topic. Articles were included in the review according to the following inclusion criteria: English language, publication in peer reviewed journals, articles about studies performed on non-invasive brain stimulations techniques, and RCT studies. Studies involving clinical populations with organic or psychiatric diseases were excluded. We found 280 articles. Of these, at the first screening and conducted by title and abstract, 63 studies were excluded after duplicates were removed (118). After the second screening conducted by full-text examination, 45 articles were excluded. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review.The clinical benefits of NIBS, including the fast onset and minor side effects, showed that this kind of treatment could be helpful in patients with a long history of smoking in terms of cessation and abstinence rates.

    Citation: Fiammetta Iannuzzo, Silvia Crudo, Gianpaolo Antonio Basile, Fortunato Battaglia, Carmenrita Infortuna, Maria Rosaria Anna Muscatello, Antonio Bruno. Efficacy and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for the treatment of nicotine addiction: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2024, 11(3): 212-225. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024014

    Related Papers:

  • Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) techniques seem to be effective in treating tobacco use disorder. We aimed to analyze what kinds of protocols are used to treat nicotine addiction in term of cessation and/or reduction and to evaluate the long-term effects of NIBS techniques.We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for papers published, with combinations of the following search terms: “Non-invasive brain stimulation OR TMS OR transcranial magnetic stimulation OR tDCS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR transcranial electrical stimulation OR TES AND Nicotine addiction”.We conducted a preliminary search, which revealed papers on the topic. Articles were included in the review according to the following inclusion criteria: English language, publication in peer reviewed journals, articles about studies performed on non-invasive brain stimulations techniques, and RCT studies. Studies involving clinical populations with organic or psychiatric diseases were excluded. We found 280 articles. Of these, at the first screening and conducted by title and abstract, 63 studies were excluded after duplicates were removed (118). After the second screening conducted by full-text examination, 45 articles were excluded. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review.The clinical benefits of NIBS, including the fast onset and minor side effects, showed that this kind of treatment could be helpful in patients with a long history of smoking in terms of cessation and abstinence rates.


    加载中

    Acknowledgments


    None.

    Conflict of interest


    Authors declare no conflict of interests.

    Author Contributions


    Fiammetta Iannuzzo: conceptualization, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, and writing – original draft.
    Silvia Crudo: investigation, data curation, formal analysis.
    Gianpaolo Antonio Basile: investigation, data curation, formal analysis.
    Fortunato Battaglia: validation, data curation, formal analysis.
    Carmenrita Infortuna: validation, data curation, formal analysis.
    Maria Rosaria Anna Muscatello: supervision, and writing – review & editing
    Antonio Bruno: conceptualisation, methodology, supervision, writing – original draft, and writing – review & editing.

    [1] Reitsma MB, Kendrick PJ, Ababneh E, et al. (2021) Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 397: 2337-2360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01169-7
    [2] Rezk-Hanna M, Benowitz NL (2019) Cardiovascular Effects of Hookah Smoking: Potential Implications for Cardiovascular Risk. Nicotine Tob Res 21: 1151-1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty065
    [3] Bade BC, Dela Cruz CS (2020) Lung Cancer 2020. Clin Chest Med 41: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2019.10.001
    [4] Duffy SP, Criner GJ (2019) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Med Clin N Am 103: 453-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2018.12.005
    [5] Le Foll B, Piper ME, Fowler CD, et al. (2022) Tobacco and nicotine use. Nat Rev Dis Primers 8: 19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00346-w
    [6] Potvin S, Tikàsz A, Dinh-Williams LL-A, et al. (2015) Cigarette Cravings, Impulsivity, and the Brain. Front Psychiatry 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00125
    [7] Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND (2011) Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci 12: 652-669. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3119
    [8] Basile GA, Bertino S, Bramanti A, et al. (2021) Striatal topographical organization: Bridging the gap between molecules, connectivity and behavior. Eur J Histochem 65. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2021.3284
    [9] Pipe AL, Evans W, Papadakis S (2022) Smoking cessation: health system challenges and opportunities. Tob Control 31: 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056575
    [10] Rachid F (2016) Neurostimulation techniques in the treatment of nicotine dependence: A review. Am J Addict 25: 436-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.12405
    [11] Chase HW, Boudewyn MA, Carter CS, et al. (2020) Transcranial direct current stimulation: a roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation. Mol Psychiatry 25: 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0499-9
    [12] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ : n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
    [13] Abdelrahman AA, Noaman M, Fawzy M, et al. (2021) A double-blind randomized clinical trial of high frequency rTMS over the DLPFC on nicotine dependence, anxiety and depression. Sci Rep 11: 1640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80927-5
    [14] Amiaz R, Levy D, Vainiger D, et al. (2009) Repeated high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduces cigarette craving and consumption. Addiction 104: 653-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02448.x
    [15] Li X, Hartwell KJ, Henderson S, et al. (2020) Two weeks of image-guided left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves smoking cessation: A double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Brain Stimul 13: 1271-1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.007
    [16] Sheffer CE, Bickel WK, Brandon TH, et al. (2018) Preventing relapse to smoking with transcranial magnetic stimulation: Feasibility and potential efficacy. Drug Alcohol Depend 182: 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.037
    [17] Trojak B, Meille V, Achab S, et al. (2015) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Brain Stimul 8: 1168-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.06.004
    [18] Dieler AC, Dresler T, Joachim K, et al. (2014) Can Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation as Add-On to Psychotherapy Improve Nicotine Abstinence? Results from a Pilot Study. Eur Addict Res 20: 248-253. https://doi.org/10.1159/000357941
    [19] Dinur-Klein L, Dannon P, Hadar A, et al. (2014) Smoking Cessation Induced by Deep Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Prefrontal and Insular Cortices: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. Biol Psychiatry 76: 742-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.020
    [20] Zangen A, Moshe H, Martinez D, et al. (2021) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for smoking cessation: a pivotal multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial. World Psychiatry 20: 397-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20905
    [21] Ibrahim C, Tang VM, Blumberger DM, et al. (2023) Efficacy of insula deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with varenicline for smoking cessation: A randomized, double-blind, sham controlled trial. Brain Stimul 16: 1501-1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.10.002
    [22] Ghorbani Behnam S, Mousavi SA, Emamian MH (2019) The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation compared to standard bupropion for the treatment of tobacco dependence: A randomized sham-controlled trial. Eur Psychiat 60: 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.04.010
    [23] Tseng P, Jeng J, Zeng B, et al. (2022) Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation interventions in reducing smoking frequency in patients with nicotine dependence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Addiction 117: 1830-1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15624
    [24] Petit B, Dornier A, Meille V, et al. (2022) Non-invasive brain stimulation for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 117: 2768-2779. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15889
    [25] Lefaucheur J-P, Aleman A, Baeken C, et al. (2020) Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol 131: 474-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002
    [26] Lefaucheur J-P, André-Obadia N, Antal A, et al. (2014) Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol 125: 2150-2206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021
    [27] Mahoney JJ, Hanlon CA, Marshalek PJ, et al. (2020) Transcranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and other forms of neuromodulation for substance use disorders: Review of modalities and implications for treatment. J Neurol Sci 418: 117149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2020.117149
    [28] Liu Q, Yuan T (2021) Noninvasive brain stimulation of addiction: one target for all?. Psychoradiology 1: 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkab016
    [29] Kang N, Kim RK, Kim HJ (2019) Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on symptoms of nicotine dependence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict Behav 96: 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.006
    [30] Watson NL, Carpenter MJ, Saladin ME, et al. (2010) Evidence for greater cue reactivity among low-dependent vs. high-dependent smokers. Addict Behav 35: 673-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.02.010
    [31] Kim W-S, Paik N-J (2021) Safety Review for Clinical Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Brain Neurorehabilitation 14. https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2021.14.e6
    [32] Mattioli F, Maglianella V, D'Antonio S, et al. (2024) Non-invasive brain stimulation for patients and healthy subjects: Current challenges and future perspectives. J Neurol Sci 456: 122825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2023.122825
    [33] Wessel MJ, Egger P, Hummel FC (2021) Predictive models for response to non-invasive brain stimulation in stroke: A critical review of opportunities and pitfalls. Brain Stimul 14: 1456-1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.09.006
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
AIMS Neuroscience
3.1 4.2

Metrics

Article views(673) PDF downloads(74) Cited by(0)

Preview PDF
Download XML
Export Citation
Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog