Research article

Solvability for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type

  • Received: 10 October 2019 Accepted: 06 December 2019 Published: 12 December 2019
  • MSC : 34N05, 34A12

  • In this paper, we consider the solvability for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type. The expression of the solution for the boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type is discussed based on the definition and the property of the Caputo differential operators. By the fixed point theorem in Banach algebra due to Dhage, an existence theorem for the boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type is given under mixed Lipschitz and Carathéodory conditions. As an application, an example is presented to illustrate the main results. Our results in this paper extend and improve some well-known results. To some extent, our work fills the gap on some basic theory for the boundary value problems of fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type involving Caputo differential operator.

    Citation: Yige Zhao, Yibing Sun, Zhi Liu, Yilin Wang. Solvability for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 557-567. doi: 10.3934/math.2020037

    Related Papers:

    [1] Naimi Abdellouahab, Keltum Bouhali, Loay Alkhalifa, Khaled Zennir . Existence and stability analysis of a problem of the Caputo fractional derivative with mixed conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6805-6826. doi: 10.3934/math.2025312
    [2] Md. Asaduzzaman, Md. Zulfikar Ali . Existence of positive solution to the boundary value problems for coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 880-895. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.880
    [3] Djamila Chergui, Taki Eddine Oussaeif, Merad Ahcene . Existence and uniqueness of solutions for nonlinear fractional differential equations depending on lower-order derivative with non-separated type integral boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(1): 112-133. doi: 10.3934/Math.2019.1.112
    [4] Lakhdar Ragoub, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, Eduardo Pérez-Careta, Dumitru Baleanu . On a class of Lyapunov's inequality involving λ-Hilfer Hadamard fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 4907-4924. doi: 10.3934/math.2024239
    [5] Xiping Liu, Mei Jia, Zhanbing Bai . Nonlocal problems of fractional systems involving left and right fractional derivatives at resonance. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3331-3345. doi: 10.3934/math.2020214
    [6] Hasanen A. Hammad, Hassen Aydi, Manuel De la Sen . The existence and stability results of multi-order boundary value problems involving Riemann-Liouville fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11325-11349. doi: 10.3934/math.2023574
    [7] Gang Chen, Jinbo Ni, Xinyu Fu . Existence, and Ulam's types stability of higher-order fractional Langevin equations on a star graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 11877-11909. doi: 10.3934/math.2024581
    [8] Weerawat Sudsutad, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Sotiris K. Ntouyas . Existence and stability results for ψ-Hilfer fractional integro-differential equation with mixed nonlocal boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 4119-4141. doi: 10.3934/math.2021244
    [9] Karim Guida, Lahcen Ibnelazyz, Khalid Hilal, Said Melliani . Existence and uniqueness results for sequential ψ-Hilfer fractional pantograph differential equations with mixed nonlocal boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8239-8255. doi: 10.3934/math.2021477
    [10] Bashir Ahmad, Manal Alnahdi, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Ahmed Alsaedi . On a mixed nonlinear boundary value problem with the right Caputo fractional derivative and multipoint closed boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11709-11726. doi: 10.3934/math.2023593
  • In this paper, we consider the solvability for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type. The expression of the solution for the boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type is discussed based on the definition and the property of the Caputo differential operators. By the fixed point theorem in Banach algebra due to Dhage, an existence theorem for the boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type is given under mixed Lipschitz and Carathéodory conditions. As an application, an example is presented to illustrate the main results. Our results in this paper extend and improve some well-known results. To some extent, our work fills the gap on some basic theory for the boundary value problems of fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type involving Caputo differential operator.


    In this paper, we discuss the following boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type

    {CDα0+[u(t)k(t,u(t))f(t,u(t))]=g(t,u(t)),tJ=[0,T],a[u(t)k(t,u(t))f(t,u(t))]t=0+b[u(t)k(t,u(t))f(t,u(t))]t=T=c, (1.1)

    where 0<α1, CDα0+ is Caputo fractional derivative, fC(J×R,R{0}), kC(J×R,R), gC(J×R,R), and a,b,c are real constants with a+b0.

    Let J=[0,T] be a bounded interval in R with T>0. Let C(J×R,R) denote the class of all continuous functions k:J×RR. Let C(J×R,R) denote the class of functions g:J×RR such that

    (ⅰ) the map tuk(t,u)f(t,u) is measurable for each uR, and

    (ⅱ) the map uuk(t,u)f(t,u) is continuous for each tJ.

    The class C(J×R,R) is called the Carathéodory class of functions on J×R which are Lebesgue integrable when bounded by a Lebesgue integrable function on J.

    By a solution of the boundary value problem (1.1), we mean a function u such that

    (ⅰ) the function tuk(t,u)f(t,u) is continuous for each uR, and

    (ⅱ) u satisfies the equations in (1.1).

    Fractional calculus has been drawn people's attention extensively. This is because of its extensive development by the theory and by its applications in various fields, such as physics, engineering, chemistry and biology; see [1]. Compared with integer derivatives, fractional derivatives are used for a better description of considered material properties, and the design of mathematical models by the differential equations of fractional order can be more accurately illustrated the characteristics of the real-world phenomena, such as the exothermic reactions model having constant heat source [2], the fractional SIRS-SI model describing the transmission of malaria disease [3], the fractional model of nonlinear wave-like equations [4], the fractional Biswas-Milovic model having Kerr and parabolic law nonlinearities [5] and the fractional-order chaotic and hyperchaotic systems [6,7,8]. Many papers about the solvability for fractional equations and systems have appeared; see [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].

    Benchohra et al. [17] investigated the existence of solutions for first order boundary value problems for fractional order differential equations

    {CDα0+x(t)=f(t,x(t)),t[0,T],ax(0)+bx(T)=c,

    where 0<α<1, CDα0+ is the Caputo fractional derivative, f:[0,T]×RR is a continuous function, and a,b,c are real constants with a+b0.

    In recent years, the theory of nonlinear differential equations with perturbations has been a hot research topic; see [18,19,20,21,22]. Dhage [22] discussed the following first order hybrid differential equation with mixed perturbations of the second type

    {ddt[x(t)k(t,x(t))f(t,x(t))]=g(t,x(t)),t[t0,t0+a],x(t0)=x0R,

    where [t0,t0+a] is a bounded interval in R for some t0, aR with a>0, fC([t0,t0+a]×R,R{0}) and k, gC([t0,t0+a]×R,R). They developed the theory of hybrid differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type, and gave some original and interesting results.

    As far as we know, there are no results for the boundary value problem (1.1) of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type. From the above works, we consider the solvability of the boundary value problem (1.1). An existence theorem for the boundary value problem (1.1) is given under mixed Lipschitz and Carathéodory conditions. Our results in this paper extend and improve some well-known results.

    The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 gives some definitions and lemmas to prove our main results. Section 3 establishes an existence theorem for the boundary value problem (1.1) under mixed Lipschitz and Carathéodory conditions by the fixed point theorem in Banach algebra due to Dhage. Section 4 presents an example to illustrate the main results, which is followed by the conclusion in Section 5.

    For the convenience of the reader, we give some background materials from fractional calculus theory to facilitate analysis of the boundary value problem (1.1). These materials can be found in the recent literature, see [23,24].

    Definition 2.1. ([24]) The Caputo fractional derivative of order α>0 of a continuous function f:(0,+)R is given by

    CDα0+f(t)=1Γ(nα)t0f(n)(s)(ts)αn+1ds,

    where n is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α, provided that the right side is pointwise defined on (0,+).

    Definition 2.2. ([24]) The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order α>0 of a function f:(0,+)R is given by

    Iα0+f(t)=1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1f(s)ds,

    provided that the right side is pointwise defined on (0,+).

    From the definition of the Caputo derivative, we can obtain the following statement.

    Lemma 2.1. ([24]) Let α>0. If we assume uC(0,1)L(0,1), then the fractional differential equation

    CDα0+u(t)=0

    has u(t)=c0+c1t+c2t2++cn1tn1, ciR, i=0,1,2,,n1, as unique solutions, where n is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.

    Lemma 2.2. ([24]) Assume that uCn[0,1] with a fractional derivative of order α>0 that belongs to Cn[0,1]. Then

    Iα0+CDα0+u(t)=u(t)+c0+c1t+c2t2++cn1tn1,

    for some ciR, i=0,1,2,,n1, where n is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.

    The following fixed point theorem in Banach algebra due to Dhage [23] is useful in the proofs of our main results.

    Lemma 2.3. ([23]) Let Q be a closed convex and bounded subset of the Banach space P and let A, C: PP and B: QP be three operators such that

    (a) A and C are Lipschitz with the Lipschitz constants α and β respectively,

    (b) B is compact and continuous,

    (c) u=AuBv+Cu for all vQuQ, and

    (d) αM+β<1, where M=B(Q)=sup{B(u): uQ}.

    Then the operator equation AuBu+Cu=u has a solution in Q.

    In this section, we discuss the existence results for boundary value problems (1.1).

    We place the boundary value problem (1.1) in the space C(J,R) of all continuous functions defined on J. denotes a supremum norm in C(J,R) by

    u=suptJ|u(t)|,

    and a multiplication "" in C(J,R) by

    (uv)(t)=(uv)(t)=u(t)v(t)

    for u, vC(J,R). Clearly C(J,R) is a Banach algebra with respect to above norm and multiplication in it. L1(J,R) denotes the space of Lebesgue integrable functions on J equipped with the norm L1 defined by

    uL1=T0|u(s)|ds.

    We present the following hypotheses.

    (A1) There exist constants L1>0 and L2>0 such that

    |f(t,u)f(t,v)|L1|uv|

    and

    |k(t,u)k(t,v)|L2|uv|

    for all tJ and u,vR. (A2) There exists a function hL1(J,R) such that

    |g(t,u)|h(t), tJ

    for all uR.

    Lemma 3.1. Suppose that a,b,c are real constants with a+b0. Then for any vL1(J,R), the function u is a solution of the boundary value problem

    CDα0+[u(t)k(t,u(t))f(t,u(t))]=v(t), 0<α1, tJ, (3.1)

    and

    a[u(t)k(t,u(t))f(t,u(t))]t=0+b[u(t)k(t,u(t))f(t,u(t))]t=T=c, (3.2)

    if and only if u satisfies the integral equation

    u(t)=f(t,u(t))(1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1v(s)ds+1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1v(s)ds))+k(t,u(t)),tJ. (3.3)

    Proof. Let u be a solution of the problem (3.1) and (3.2). Applying the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral Iα0+ on both sides of (3.1), by Lemma 2.2, then we obtain

    u(t)k(t,u(t))f(t,u(t))=Iα0+v(t)+˜c,

    for some ˜cR. Consequently, the general solution of (3.1) is

    u(t)=k(t,u(t))+f(t,u(t))(1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1v(s)ds+˜c).

    Substituting t=0 and t=T in the above equality implies

    u(0)k(0,u(0))f(0,u(0))=˜c,
    u(T)k(T,u(T))f(T,u(T))=1Γ(α)T0(Ts)α1v(s)ds+˜c.

    By (3.2), then we have

    a˜c+bΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1v(s)ds+b˜c=c,

    that is

    ˜c=1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1v(s)ds).

    Therefore, (3.3) holds.

    Conversely, suppose that u satisfies the equation (3.3). Applying the Caputo fractional operator of the order α on both sides of (3.3), then (3.1) is satisfied. Thus, substituting t=0 and t=T in (3.1) implies

    u(0)k(0,u(0))f(0,u(0))=1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1v(s)ds),
    u(T)k(T,u(T))f(T,u(T))=1Γ(α)T0(Ts)α1v(s)ds+1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1v(s)ds).

    Then,

    a[u(t)k(t,u(t))f(t,u(t))]t=0+b[u(t)k(t,u(t))f(t,u(t))]t=T=aa+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1v(s)ds)+bΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1v(s)ds+ba+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1v(s)ds)=c.

    Hence, (3.2) also holds.

    Now we will give the following existence theorem for the boundary value problem (1.1).

    Theorem 3.1. Suppose that (A1) and (A2) hold. Furthermore, if

    L1(TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)+L2<1, (3.4)

    then the boundary value problem (1.1) has a solution defined on J.

    Proof. Set U=C(J,R) and define a subset S of U by

    S={uU| uN},

    where

    N=F0(TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)+K01L1(TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)L2,

    F0=suptJ|f(t,0)| and K0=suptJ|k(t,0)|.

    Clearly, S is a closed, convex and bounded subset of the Banach space U. By Lemma 3.1, the boundary value problem (1.1) is equivalent to the nonlinear integral equation

    u(t)=f(t,u(t))(1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1g(s,u(s))ds+1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1g(s,u(s))ds))+k(t,u(t)),tJ. (3.5)

    Define three operators A,C: UU and B: SU by

    Au(t)=f(t,u(t)),tJ, (3.6)
    Bu(t)=1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1g(s,u(s))ds+1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1g(s,u(s))ds),tJ, (3.7)

    and

    Cu(t)=k(t,u(t)),tJ. (3.8)

    Then the equation (3.5) is transformed into the operator equation as

    u(t)=Au(t)Bu(t)+Cu(t),tJ.

    Next, we prove the operators A,B and C satisfy all the conditions of Lemma 2.3.

    Firstly, we prove that A is a Lipschitz operator on U with the Lipschitz constant L1. Let u,vU. Then by (A1),

    |Au(t)Av(t)|=|f(t,u(t))f(t,v(t))|L1|u(t)v(t)|L1uv,

    for all tJ. Taking supremum over t, then we have

    AuAvL1uv,

    for all u,vU. This shows that A is a Lipschitz operator on U with the Lipschitz constant L1. Similarly, it can be implied that C is also a Lipschitz operator on U with the Lipschitz constant L2.

    Next, we prove B is a compact and continuous operator on S into U. Firstly, we prove B is continuous on S. Let {un} be a sequence in S converging to a point uS. Then by the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem,

    limnBun(t)=limn(1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1g(s,un(s))ds+1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1g(s,un(s))ds))=limn1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1g(s,un(s))ds+limn1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1g(s,un(s))ds)=1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1g(s,u(s))ds+1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1g(s,u(s))ds)=Bu(t)

    for all tJ. This shows that B is a continuous operator on S.

    Next we prove B is a compact operator on S. It is enough to show that B(S) is a uniformly bounded and equicontinuous set in U. On the one hand, let uS be arbitrary. Then by (A2),

    |Bu(t)|=|1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1g(s,u(s))ds+1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1g(s,u(s))ds)||1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1g(s,u(s))ds|+|1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1g(s,u(s))ds)|1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1|g(s,u(s))|ds+|b||a+b|Γ(α)T0(Ts)α1|g(s,u(s))|ds+|c||a+b|1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1|h(s)|ds+|b||a+b|Γ(α)T0(Ts)α1|h(s)|ds+|c||a+b|TαΓ(α+1)hL1+|b|Tα|a+b|Γ(α+1)hL1+|c||a+b|TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|,

    for all tJ. Taking supremum over t,

    BuTαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|

    for all uS. This shows that B is uniformly bounded on S.

    On the other hand, let t1,t2J. Then for any uS, we get

    |Bu(t1)Bu(t2)|=|1Γ(α)t10(t1s)α1g(s,u(s))ds1Γ(α)t20(t2s)α1g(s,u(s))ds|TαΓ(α+1)|t1t2|g(s,u(s))|ds|TαΓ(α+1)|t1t2h(s)ds|=TαΓ(α+1)|p(t1)p(t2)|,

    where p(t)=t0h(s)ds. Since the function p is continuous on compact J, it is uniformly continuous. Hence, for ε>0, there exists a δ>0 such that

    |t1t2|<δ|Bu(t1)Bu(t2)|<ε,

    for all t1,t2J and uS. This shows that B(S) is an equicontinuous set in U. Now the set B(S) is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous set in U, so it is compact by Arzela-Ascoli Theorem. Thus, B is a and compact operator on S.

    Next, we show that (c) of Lemma 2.3 is satisfied. Let uU and vS be arbitrary such that u=AuBv+Cu. Then, by assumption (A1), we have

    |u(t)||Au(t)||Bv(t)|+|Cu(t)|=|f(t,u(t))||1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1g(s,v(s))ds+1a+b(cbΓ(α)T0(Ts)α1g(s,v(s))ds)|+|k(t,u(t))|[|f(t,u(t))f(t,0)|+|f(t,0)|](TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)+|k(t,u(t))k(t,0)|+|k(t,0)|[L1|u(t)|+F0](TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)+L2|u(t)|+K0.

    Thus, we get

    |u(t)|F0(TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)+K01L1(TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)L2.

    Taking supremum over t,

    uF0(TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)+K01L1(TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)L2=N.

    This shows that (c) of Lemma 2.3 is satisfied.

    Finally, we obtain

    M=B(S)=sup{B(u): uS}(TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|),

    and so,

    L1M+L2L1(TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)+L2<1.

    Thus, all the conditions of Lemma 2.3 are satisfied and hence the operator equation AuBu+Cu=u has a solution in S. Therefore, the boundary value problem (1.1) has a solution defined on J.

    Remark 3.1. Some existence results were given for the boundary value problem (1.1):

    (I) with k0, and f1 by Benchohra et al. in [17];

    (II) with α=1, a=1, and b=0 by Dhage in [22];

    (III) with α=1, k0, and f1 by Tisdell in [25].

    In this section, we will present an example to illustrate the main results.

    Example 4.1 Consider the following boundary value problem

    {CD120+[u(t)18sinu(t)u2(t)+1]=cosu(t),tJ=[0,1],[u(t)18sinu(t)u2(t)+1]t=0+[u(t)18sinu(t)u2(t)+1]t=1=14, (4.1)

    where α=12, T=1, k(t,u(t))=18sinu(t), f(t,u(t))=u2(t)+1, g(t,u(t))=cosu(t), a=b=1 with a+b0, and c=14.

    Let L1=1, L2=18, h(t)1. Then hypotheses (A1) and (A2) hold. Since

    L1(TαΓ(α+1)hL1(1+|b||a+b|)+|c||a+b|)+L2=1Γ(12+1)(1+12)+18+18<1.

    Hence, (3.4) holds. Therefore, by Theorem 3.1, the boundary value problem (4.1) has a solution.

    In this paper, we have studied the solvability for the boundary value problem (1.1) of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type. We have presented an existence theorem for the boundary value problem (1.1) of nonlinear fractional differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type under mixed Lipschitz and Carathéodory conditions due to the fixed point theorem in Banach algebra due to Dhage. The main results have been well illustrated with the help of an example. Our results in this paper have been extended and improved some well-known results.

    This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61703180, 61803176, 61877028, 61807015, 61773010), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019MF032, ZR2017BA010), the Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program (J18KA230, J17KA157), and the Scientific Research Foundation of University of Jinan (1008399, 160100101).

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this paper.



    [1] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, mathematics in science and engineering, Academic Press, New York, 1999.
    [2] D. Kumar, J. Singh, K. Tanwar, et al. A new fractional exothermic reactions model having constant heat source in porous media with power, exponential and Mittag-Leffler laws, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 138 (2019), 1222-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.04.094
    [3] D. Kumar, J. Singh, M. Al Qurashi, et al. A new fractional SIRS-SI malaria disease model with application of vaccines, antimalarial drugs, and spraying, Adv. Differ. Equa., 2019 (2019), 278.
    [4] D. Kumar, J. Singh, S. D. Purohit, et al. A hybrid analytical algorithm for nonlinear fractional wave-like equations, Math. Model. Nat. Pheno., 14 (2019), 304.
    [5] J. Singh, D. Kumar, D. Baleanu, New aspects of fractional Biswas-Milovic model with MittagLeffler law, Math. Model. Nat. Pheno., 14 (2019), 303.
    [6] D. Peng, K. Sun, S. He, et al. Numerical analysis of a simplest fractional-order hyperchaotic system, Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 9 (2019), 220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.taml.2019.03.006
    [7] S. He, K. Sun, Y. Peng, Detecting chaos in fractional-order nonlinear systems using the smaller alignment index, Phys. Lett. A, 383 (2019), 2267-2271. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2019.04.041
    [8] Y. Peng, K. Sun, D. Peng, et al. Dynamics of a higher dimensional fractional-order chaotic map, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 525 (2019), 96-107. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.03.058
    [9] D. Chergui, T. E. Oussaeif, M. Ahcene, Existence and uniqueness of solutions for nonlinear fractional differential equations depending on lower-order derivative with non-separated type integral boundary conditions, AIMS Mathematics, 4 (2019), 112-133. doi: 10.3934/Math.2019.1.112
    [10] M. Asaduzzaman, M. Z. Ali, Existence of positive solution to the boundary value problems for coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations, AIMS Mathematics, 4 (2019), 880-895. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.880
    [11] Y. Zhao, X. Hou, Y. Sun, et al. Solvability for some class of multi-order nonlinear fractional systems, Adv. Differ. Equa., 2019 (2019), 23.
    [12] Q. Song, Z. Bai, Positive solutions of fractional differential equations involving the RiemannStieltjes integral boundary condition, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2018 (2018), 183.
    [13] K. Sheng, W. Zhang, Z. Bai, Positive solutions to fractional boundary value problems with pLaplacian on time scales, Bound. Value Probl., 2018 (2018), 70.
    [14] Z. Bai, Y. Chen, H. Lian, et al. On the existence of blow up solutions for a class of fractional differential equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 17 (2014), 1175-1187.
    [15] Z. Bai, Y. Zhang, Solvability of fractional three-point boundary value problems with nonlinear growth, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2011), 1719-1725.
    [16] Y. Zhao, S. Sun, Z. Han, et al. Positive solutions for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2011), 6950-6958.
    [17] M. Benchohra, S. Hamani, S. K. Ntouyas, Boundary value problems for differential equations with fractional order, Surveys in Mathematics & its Applications, 3 (2008), 1-12.
    [18] H. Lu, S. Sun, D. Yang, et al. Theory of fractional hybrid differential equations with linear perturbations of second type, Bound. Value Probl., 2013 (2013), 23.
    [19] S. Sun, Y. Zhao, Z. Han, et al. The existence of solutions for boundary value problem of fractional hybrid differential equations, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 17 (2012), 4961-4967. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.06.001
    [20] Y. Zhao, S. Sun, Z. Han, et al. Theory of fractional hybrid differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 1312-1324. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.041
    [21] Y. Zhao, Y. Sun, Z. Liu, et al. Basic theory of differential equations with mixed perturbations of the second type on time scales, Adv. Differ. Equa., 2019 (2019), 268.
    [22] B. C. Dhage, Basic results in the theory of hybrid differential equations with mixed perturbations of second type, Funct. Differ. Equ., 19 (2012), 87-106.
    [23] B. C. Dhage, A fixed point theorem in Banach algebras with applications to functional integral equations, Kyungpook Math. J., 44 (2004), 145-155.
    [24] A. A. Kilbas, H. H. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam, 2006.
    [25] C. C. Tisdell, On the solvability of nonlinear first-order boundary-value problems, Electron. J. Differ. Equa., 2006 (2006), 1-8.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Yige Zhao, On the existence for a class of periodic boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional hybrid differential equations, 2021, 08939659, 107368, 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107368
    2. Abderrahim GUERFİ, Abdelouaheb ARDJOUNİ, Existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for nonlinear hybrid Caputo fractional integro-differential equations via fixed point theorems, 2021, 4, 2636-7556, 207, 10.53006/rna.935737
    3. S. Suganya, V. Parthiban, L. Shangerganesh, S. Hariharan, Transmission dynamics of fractional order SVEIR model for African swine fever virus with optimal control analysis, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-78140-9
    4. Ghaus ur Rahman, Humaira Naz, Hussam Alrabaiah, J F Gómez-Aguilar, Study of integral type implicit multi term fractional delay differential equation with multi strip conditions, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 115261, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad85a2
    5. GAUHAR ALI, MUHAMMAD MARWAN, UBAID UR RAHMAN, MANEL HLEILI, INVESTIGATION OF FRACTIONAL-ORDERED TUMOR-IMMUNE INTERACTION MODEL VIA FRACTIONAL-ORDER DERIVATIVE, 2024, 32, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X24501196
    6. Zeshan Aslam Khan, Muhammad Waqar, Naveed Ishtiaq Chaudhary, Muhammad Junaid Ali Asif Raja, Saadia Khan, Farrukh Aslam Khan, Iqra Ishtiaq Chaudhary, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Fractional gradient optimized explainable convolutional neural network for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, 2024, 10, 24058440, e39037, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39037
    7. Yingyan Zhao, Changjin Xu, Yiya Xu, Jinting Lin, Yicheng Pang, Zixin Liu, Jianwei Shen, Mathematical exploration on control of bifurcation for a 3D predator-prey model with delay, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 29883, 10.3934/math.20241445
    8. Wafa F. Alfwzan, Ali Raza, Nauman Ahmed, Amr Elsonbaty, Muhammad Rafiq, Waleed Adel, Ammar Alsinai, Nonstandard Computational and Bifurcation Analysis of the Rabies Epidemic Model, 2024, 2024, 2314-4629, 10.1155/2024/3909089
    9. Rui Ma, Mengmeng Li, On Stability for Non-Instantaneous Impulsive Delay Differential Equations, 2024, 23, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-01146-1
    10. Rizwan Ahmed, M. Zubair Akbar Qureshi, Muhammad Abbas, Nida Mumtaz, Bifurcation and chaos control in a heterogeneous Cournot-Bertrand duopoly game model, 2025, 190, 09600779, 115757, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115757
    11. Kaushal Soni, Arvind Kumar Sinha, Modeling marburg virus control with limited hospital beds: a fractional approach, 2025, 100, 0031-8949, 015251, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad9ae6
    12. Jinxing Zhao, Yuanfu Shao, Stability of a delayed prey–predator model with fear, stochastic effects and Beddington–DeAngelis functional response, 2025, 2025, 2731-4235, 10.1186/s13662-025-03875-2
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4198) PDF downloads(338) Cited by(12)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog