Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js

Integrating release and dispatch policies in production models

  • Received: 01 December 2014 Revised: 01 February 2015
  • 35B37, 35L60, 93C20.

  • Aggregate production planning for highly re--entrant production processes is typically generated by finding optimal release rates based on clearing function models. For production processes with very long cycle times, like in semiconductor production, dispatch policies are used to cover short term fluctuations. We extend the concept of a clearing function to allow control over both, the release rates and priority allocations in re-entrant production. This approach is used to improve the production planning problem using combined release and the allocation dispatch policy. The control parameter for priority allocation, called the push-pull point (PPP), separates the beginning of the factory which employs a push policy from the end of the factory, which uses a pull policy. The extended clearing function model describes the output of the factory as a function of the work in progress (wip) and the position of the PPP. The model's qualitative behavior is analyzed. Numerical optimization results are compared to production planning based only on releases. It is found that controlling the PPP significantly reduces the average wip in the system and hence leads to much shorter cycle times.

    Citation: Dieter Armbruster, Michael Herty, Xinping Wang, Lindu Zhao. Integrating release and dispatch policies in production models[J]. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10(3): 511-526. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.511

    Related Papers:

    [1] Muhammad Asim, Ghada AlNemer . Boundedness on variable exponent Morrey-Herz space for fractional multilinear Hardy operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 117-136. doi: 10.3934/math.2025007
    [2] Jie Sun, Jiamei Chen . Weighted estimates for commutators associated to singular integral operator satisfying a variant of Hörmander's condition. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25714-25728. doi: 10.3934/math.20231311
    [3] Kieu Huu Dung, Do Lu Cong Minh, Pham Thi Kim Thuy . Commutators of Hardy-Cesàro operators on Morrey-Herz spaces with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19147-19166. doi: 10.3934/math.20221051
    [4] Yueping Zhu, Yan Tang, Lixin Jiang . Boundedness of multilinear Calderón-Zygmund singular operators on weighted Lebesgue spaces and Morrey-Herz spaces with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11246-11262. doi: 10.3934/math.2021652
    [5] Wanjing Zhang, Suixin He, Jing Zhang . Boundedness of sublinear operators on weighted grand Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17381-17401. doi: 10.3934/math.2023888
    [6] Babar Sultan, Mehvish Sultan, Qian-Qian Zhang, Nabil Mlaiki . Boundedness of Hardy operators on grand variable weighted Herz spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24515-24527. doi: 10.3934/math.20231250
    [7] Javeria Younas, Amjad Hussain, Hadil Alhazmi, A. F. Aljohani, Ilyas Khan . BMO estimates for commutators of the rough fractional Hausdorff operator on grand-variable-Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23434-23448. doi: 10.3934/math.20241139
    [8] Ming Liu, Bin Zhang, Xiaobin Yao . Weighted variable Morrey-Herz space estimates for $ m $th order commutators of $ n- $dimensional fractional Hardy operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20063-20079. doi: 10.3934/math.20231022
    [9] Shuhui Yang, Yan Lin . Multilinear strongly singular integral operators with generalized kernels and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13533-13551. doi: 10.3934/math.2021786
    [10] Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Aslam . Some weighted estimates for the commutators of $p$-adic Hardy operator on two weighted $p$-adic Herz-type spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9633-9646. doi: 10.3934/math.2021561
  • Aggregate production planning for highly re--entrant production processes is typically generated by finding optimal release rates based on clearing function models. For production processes with very long cycle times, like in semiconductor production, dispatch policies are used to cover short term fluctuations. We extend the concept of a clearing function to allow control over both, the release rates and priority allocations in re-entrant production. This approach is used to improve the production planning problem using combined release and the allocation dispatch policy. The control parameter for priority allocation, called the push-pull point (PPP), separates the beginning of the factory which employs a push policy from the end of the factory, which uses a pull policy. The extended clearing function model describes the output of the factory as a function of the work in progress (wip) and the position of the PPP. The model's qualitative behavior is analyzed. Numerical optimization results are compared to production planning based only on releases. It is found that controlling the PPP significantly reduces the average wip in the system and hence leads to much shorter cycle times.


    Let $ T $ be the Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator and $ b $ be a locally integrable function on $ R^n $. The commutator generated by $ b $ and $ T $ is defined by $ [b, T]f = bT(f)-T(bf) $. The investigation of the commutator begins with Coifman-Rochberg-Weiss pioneering study and classical result (see [6]). The classical result of Coifman, Rochberg and Weiss (see [6]) states that the commutator $ [b, T]f = T(bf)-bTf $ is bounded on $ L^p(R^n) $ for $ 1 < p < \infty $ if and only if $ b\in BMO(R^n) $. The major reason for considering the problem of commutators is that the boundedness of commutator can produces some characterizations of function spaces (see [1,6]). Chanillo (see [1]) proves a similar result when $ T $ is replaced by the fractional integral operator. In [11], the boundedness properties of the commutators for the extreme values of $ p $ are obtained. In recent years, the theory of Herz space and Herz type Hardy space, as a local version of Lebesgue space and Hardy space, have been developed (see [8,9,12,13]). The main purpose of this paper is to establish the endpoint continuity properties of some multilinear operators related to certain non-convolution type fractional singular integral operators on Herz and Herz type Hardy spaces.

    First, let us introduce some notations (see [8,9,10,12,13,15]). Throughout this paper, $ Q $ will denote a cube of $ R^n $ with sides parallel to the axes. For a cube $ Q $ and a locally integrable function $ f $, let $ f_Q = |Q|^{-1}\int_Qf(x)dx $ and $ f^{\#}(x) = \sup\limits_{Q\ni x}|Q|^{-1}\int_Q|f(y)-f_Q|dy $. Moreover, $ f $ is said to belong to $ BMO(R^n) $ if $ f^{\#} \in L^\infty $ and define $ ||f||_{BMO} = ||f^{\#}||_{L^\infty} $; We also define the central $ BMO $ space by $ CMO(R^n) $, which is the space of those functions $ f\in L_{loc}(R^n) $ such that

    $ ||f||_{CMO} = \sup\limits_{r > 1}|Q(0, r)|^{-1}\int_Q|f(y)-f_Q|dy < \infty. $

    It is well-known that (see [9,10])

    $ ||f||_{CMO}\approx\sup\limits_{r > 1}\inf\limits_{c\in C}|Q(0, r)|^{-1}\int_Q|f(x)-c|dx. $

    For $ k\in Z $, define $ B_k = \{x\in R^n: |x|\le 2^k\} $ and $ C_k = B_k\setminus B_{k-1} $. Denote by $ \chi_k $ the characteristic function of $ C_k $ and $ \tilde\chi_k $ the characteristic function of $ C_k $ for $ k\ge1 $ and $ \tilde\chi_0 $ the characteristic function of $ B_0 $.

    Definition 1. Let $ 0 < p < \infty $ and $ \alpha\in R $.

    (1) The homogeneous Herz space $ \dot K_p^\alpha(R^n) $ is defined by

    $ \dot K_p^\alpha(R^n) = \{f\in L_{loc}^p (R^n \setminus \{0\}): ||f||_{\dot K_p^\alpha} < \infty\}, $

    where

    $ ||f||_{\dot K_p^\alpha} = \sum\limits_{k = -\infty}^\infty 2^{k\alpha}||f\chi_k||_{L^p}; $

    (2) The nonhomogeneous Herz space $ K_p^\alpha(R^n) $ is defined by

    $ K_p^\alpha(R^n) = \{f\in L_{loc}^p (R^n): ||f||_{K_p^\alpha} < \infty\}, $

    where

    $ ||f||_{K_p^\alpha} = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^\infty 2^{k\alpha}||f\tilde\chi_k||_{L^p}. $

    If $ \alpha = n(1-1/p) $, we denote that $ \dot K_p^\alpha(R^n) = \dot K_p(R^n) $, $ K_p^\alpha(R^n) = K_p(R^n) $.

    Definition 2. Let $ 0 < \delta < n $ and $ 1 < p < n/\delta $. We shall call $ B_p^{\delta}(R^n) $ the space of those functions $ f $ on $ R^n $ such that

    $ ||f||_{B_p^{\delta}} = \sup\limits_{d > 1}d^{-n(1/p-\delta/n)}||f\chi_{Q(0, d)}||_{L^p} < \infty. $

    Definition 3. Let $ 1 < p < \infty $.

    (1) The homogeneous Herz type Hardy space $ H \dot K_p(R^n) $ is defined by

    $ H \dot K_p(R^n) = \{f\in S'(R^n): G(f)\in \dot K_p(R^n)\}, $

    where

    $ ||f||_{H\dot K_p} = ||G(f)||_{\dot K_p}. $

    (2) The nonhomogeneous Herz type Hardy space $ HK_p(R^n) $ is defined by

    $ HK_p(R^n) = \{f\in S'(R^n): G(f)\in K_p(R^n)\}, $

    where

    $ ||f||_{HK_p} = ||G(f)||_{K_p}. $

    where $ G(f) $ is the grand maximal function of $ f $.

    The Herz type Hardy spaces have the atomic decomposition characterization.

    Definition 4. Let $ 1 < p < \infty $. A function $ a(x) $ on $ R^n $ is called a central $ (n(1-1/p), p) $-atom (or a central $ (n(1-1/p), p) $-atom of restrict type), if

    1) Supp$ a\subset B(0, d) $ for some $ d > 0 $ (or for some $ d\ge 1 $),

    2) $ ||a||_{L^p}\le |B(0, d)|^{1/p-1} $,

    3) $ \int a(x)dx = 0 $.

    Lemma 1. (see [9,13]) Let $ 1 < p < \infty $. A temperate distribution $ f $ belongs to $ H\dot K_p(R^n) $(or $ HK_p(R^n) $) if and only if there exist central $ (n(1-1/p), p) $-atoms(or central $ (n(1-1/p), p) $-atoms of restrict type) $ a_j $ supported on $ B_j = B(0, 2^j) $ and constants $ \lambda_j $, $ \sum_j|\lambda_j| < \infty $ such that $ f = \sum_{j = -\infty}^\infty \lambda_ja_j $ (or $ f = \sum_{j = 0}^\infty \lambda_j a_j $)in the $ S'(R^n) $ sense, and

    $ ||f||_{H\dot K_p}(\ or \ ||f||_{HK_p})\approx\sum\limits_j|\lambda_j|. $

    In this paper, we will consider a class of multilinear operators related to some non-convolution type singular integral operators, whose definition are following.

    Let $ m $ be a positive integer and $ A $ be a function on $ R^n $. We denote that

    $ R_{m+1}(A;x, y) = A(x)-\sum\limits_{|\beta|\le m}\frac{1}{\beta!}D^\beta A(y)(x-y)^\beta $

    and

    $ Q_{m+1}(A;x, y) = R_m(A;x, y)-\sum\limits_{|\beta| = m}\frac{1}{\beta!}D^\beta A(x)(x-y)^\beta. $

    Definition 5. Fixed $ \varepsilon > 0 $ and $ 0 < \delta < n $. Let $ T_\delta : S\to S' $ be a linear operator. $ T_\delta $ is called a fractional singular integral operator if there exists a locally integrable function $ K(x, y) $ on $ R^n \times R^n $ such that

    $ T_\delta(f)(x) = \int_{R^n} K(x, y)f(y)dy $

    for every bounded and compactly supported function $ f $, where $ K $ satisfies:

    $ |K(x, y)|\le C|x-y|^{-n+\delta} $

    and

    $ |K(y, x)-K(z, x)|+|K(x, y)-K(x, z)|\le C|y-z|^\varepsilon|x-z|^{-n-\varepsilon+\delta} $

    if $ 2|y-z|\le |x-z| $. The multilinear operator related to the fractional singular integral operator $ T_\delta $ is defined by

    $ T_\delta^A(f)(x) = \int_{R^n}\frac{R_{m+1}(A;x, y)}{|x-y|^m}K(x, y)f(y)dy; $

    We also consider the variant of $ T_\delta^A $, which is defined by

    $ \tilde T_\delta^A(f)(x) = \int_{R^n}\frac{Q_{m+1}(A;x, y)}{|x-y|^m}K(x, y)f(y)dy. $

    Note that when $ m = 0 $, $ T_\delta^A $ is just the commutators of $ T_\delta $ and $ A $ (see [1,6,11,14]). It is well known that multilinear operator, as a non-trivial extension of commutator, is of great interest in harmonic analysis and has been widely studied by many authors (see [3,4,5]). In [7], the weighted $ L^p $($ p > 1 $)-boundedness of the multilinear operator related to some singular integral operator are obtained. In [2], the weak ($ H^1 $, $ L^1 $)-boundedness of the multilinear operator related to some singular integral operator are obtained. In this paper, we will study the endpoint continuity properties of the multilinear operators $ T_\delta^A $ and $ \tilde T_\delta^A $ on Herz and Herz type Hardy spaces.

    Now we state our results as following.

    Theorem 1. Let $ 0 < \delta < n $, $ 1 < p < n/\delta $ and $ D^\beta A\in BMO(R^n) $ for all $ \beta $ with $ |\beta| = m $. Suppose that $ T_\delta^A $ is the same as in Definition 5 such that $ T_\delta $ is bounded from $ L^p(R^n) $ to $ L^q(R^n) $ for any $ p, q\in (1, +\infty] $ with $ 1/q = 1/p-\delta/n $. Then $ T_\delta^A $ is bounded from $ B_p^{\delta}(R^n) $ to $ CMO(R^n) $.

    Theorem 2. Let $ 0 < \delta < n $, $ 1 < p < n/\delta $, $ 1/q = 1/p-\delta/n $ and $ D^\beta A\in BMO(R^n) $ for all $ \beta $ with $ |\beta| = m $. Suppose that $ \tilde T_\delta^A $ is the same as in Definition 5 such that $ \tilde T_\delta^A $ is bounded from $ L^p(R^n) $ to $ L^q(R^n) $ for any $ p, q\in (1, +\infty) $ with $ 1/q = 1/p-\delta/n $. Then $ \tilde T_\delta^A $ is bounded from $ H\dot K_p(R^n) $ to $ \dot K_q^\alpha(R^n) $ with $ \alpha = n(1-1/p) $.

    Theorem 3. Let $ 0 < \delta < n $, $ 1 < p < n/\delta $ and $ D^\beta A\in BMO(R^n) $ for all $ \beta $ with $ |\beta| = m $. Suppose that $ \tilde T_\delta^A $ is the same as in Definition 5 such that $ \tilde T_\delta^A $ is bounded from $ L^p(R^n) $ to $ L^q(R^n) $ for any $ p, q\in (1, +\infty) $ with $ 1/q = 1/p-\delta/n $. Then the following two statements are equivalent:

    (ⅰ) $ \tilde T_\delta^A $ is bounded from $ B_p^{\delta}(R^n) $ to $ CMO(R^n) $;

    (ⅱ) for any cube $ Q $ and $ z\in 3Q\setminus 2Q $, there is

    $ \frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q\left|\sum\limits_{|\beta| = m}\frac{1}{\beta!}|D^\beta A(x)-(D^\beta A)_Q| \int_{(4Q)^c}K_{\beta}(z, y)f(y)dy\right|dx\le C||f||_{B_p^{\delta}}, $

    where $ K_{\beta}(z, y) = \frac{(z-y)^\beta}{|z-y|^m}K(z, y) $ for $ |\beta| = m $.

    Remark. Theorem 2 is also hold for nonhomogeneous Herz and Herz type Hardy space.

    To prove the theorem, we need the following lemma.

    Lemma 2. (see [5]) Let $ A $ be a function on $ R^n $ and $ D^\beta A\in L^q(R^n) $ for $ |\beta| = m $ and some $ q > n $. Then

    $ |R_m(A;x, y)|\le C|x-y|^m\sum\limits_{|\beta| = m}\left(\frac{1}{|\tilde Q(x, y)|}\int_{\tilde Q(x, y)}|D^\beta A(z)|^q dz\right)^{1/q}, $

    where $ \tilde Q(x, y) $ is the cube centered at $ x $ and having side length $ 5\sqrt{n}|x-y| $.

    Proof of Theorem 1. It suffices to prove that there exists a constant $ C_Q $ such that

    $ \frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q|T_\delta^A(f)(x)-C_Q|dx \le C||f||_{B_p^{\delta}} $

    holds for any cube $ Q = Q(0, d) $ with $ d > 1 $. Fix a cube $ Q = Q(0, d) $ with $ d > 1 $. Let $ \tilde Q = 5\sqrt{n}Q $ and $ \tilde A(x) = A(x)-\sum\limits_{|\beta| = m}\frac{1}{\beta!}(D^\beta A)_{\tilde Q}x^\beta $, then $ R_{m+1}(A; x, y) = R_{m+1}(\tilde A; x, y) $ and $ D^\beta\tilde A = D^\beta A-(D^\beta A)_{\tilde Q} $ for all $ \beta $ with $ |\beta| = m $. We write, for $ f_1 = f\chi_{\tilde Q} $ and $ f_2 = f\chi_{R^n\setminus\tilde Q} $,

    $ TAδ(f)(x)=RnRm+1(˜A;x,y)|xy|mK(x,y)f(y)dy=RnRm(˜A;x,y)|xy|mK(x,y)f1(y)dy|β|=m1β!RnK(x,y)(xy)β|xy|mDβ˜A(y)f1(y)dy+RnRm+1(˜A;x,y)|xy|mK(x,y)f2(y)dy, $

    then

    $ 1|Q|Q|TAδ(f)(x)T˜Aδ(f2)(0)|dx1|Q|Q|Tδ(Rm(˜A;x,)|x|mf1)(x)|dx+|β|=m1β!1|Q|Q|Tδ((x)β|x|mDβ˜Af1)(x)|dx+|T˜Aδ(f2)(x)T˜Aδ(f2)(0)|dx:=I+II+III. $

    For $ I $, note that for $ x\in Q $ and $ y\in \tilde Q $, using Lemma 2, we get

    $ R_m(\tilde A; x, y)\le C|x-y|^m\sum\limits_{|\beta| = m}||D^\beta A||_{BMO}, $

    thus, by the $ L^p(R^n) $ to $ L^q(R^n) $-boundedness of $ T_\delta^A $ for $ 1 < p, q < \infty $ with $ 1/q = 1/p-\delta/n $, we get

    $ IC|Q|Q|Tδ(|β|=m||DβA||BMOf1)(x)|dxC|β|=m||DβA||BMO(1|Q|Q|Tδ(f1)(x)|qdx)1/qC|β|=m||DβA||BMO|Q|1/q||f1||LpC|β|=m||DβA||BMOrn(1/pδ/n)||fχ˜Q||LpC|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. $

    For $ II $, taking $ 1 < s < p $ such that $ 1/r = 1/s-\delta/n $, by the $ (L^s, L^r) $-boundedness of $ T_\delta $ and Holder's inequality, we gain

    $ IIC|Q|Q|Tδ(|β|=m(DβA(DβA)˜Q)f1)(x)|dxC|β|=m(1|Q|Q|Tδ((DβA(DβA)˜Q)f1)(x)|rdx)1/rC|Q|1/r|β|=m||(DβA(DβA)˜Q)f1||LsC|Q|1/r||f1||Lp|β|=m(1|Q|˜Q|DβA(y)(DβA)˜Q|ps/(ps)dy)(ps)/(ps)|Q|(ps)/(ps)C|β|=m||DβA||BMOrn/q||fχ˜Q||LpC|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. $

    To estimate $ III $, we write

    $ T˜Aδ(f2)(x)T˜Aδ(f2)(0)=Rn[K(x,y)|xy|mK(0,y)|y|m]Rm(˜A;x,y)f2(y)dy+RnK(0,y)f2(y)|y|m[Rm(˜A;x,y)Rm(˜A;0,y)]dy|β|=m1β!Rn(K(x,y)(xy)β|xy|mK(0,y)(y)β|y|m)Dβ˜A(y)f2(y)dy:=III1+III2+III3. $

    By Lemma 2 and the following inequality (see [15])

    $ |b_{Q_1}-b_{Q_2}|\le C\log(|Q_2|/|Q_1|)||b||_{BMO} \ for \ Q_1 \subset Q_2, $

    we know that, for $ x\in Q $ and $ y\in 2^{k+1}\tilde Q\setminus 2^k\tilde Q $,

    $ |Rm(˜A;x,y)|C|xy|m|β|=m(||DβA||BMO+|(DβA)˜Q(x,y)(DβA)˜Q|)Ck|xy|m|β|=m||DβA||BMO. $

    Note that $ |x-y|\sim |y| $ for $ x\in Q $ and $ y\in R^n\setminus\tilde Q $, we obtain, by the condition of $ K $,

    $ |III1|CRn(|x||y|m+n+1δ+|x|ε|y|m+n+εδ)|Rm(˜A;x,y)||f2(y)|dyC|β|=m||DβA||BMOk=02k+1˜Q2k˜Qk(|x||y|n+1δ+|x|ε|y|n+εδ)|f(y)|dyC|β|=m||DβA||BMOk=1k(2k+2εk)(2kr)n(1/pδ/n)||fχ2k˜Q||LpC|β|=m||DβA||BMOk=1k(2k+2εk)||f||BδpC|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. $

    For $ III_2 $, by the formula (see [5]):

    $ R_m(\tilde A; x, y)-R_m(\tilde A; x_0, y) = \sum\limits_{|\gamma| < m}\frac{1}{\gamma!}R_{m-|\gamma|}(D^\gamma\tilde A; x, x_0)(x-y)^\gamma $

    and Lemma 2, we have

    $ |R_m(\tilde A; x, y)-R_m(\tilde A; x_0, y)|\le C\sum\limits_{|\gamma| < m}\sum\limits_{|\beta| = m}|x-x_0|^{m-|\gamma|}|x-y|^{|\gamma|}||D^\beta A||_{BMO}, $

    thus, similar to the estimates of $ III_1 $, we get

    $ |III_2| \le C\sum\limits_{|\beta| = m}||D^\beta A||_{BMO}\sum\limits_{k = 0}^\infty\int_{2^{k+1}\tilde Q\setminus2^k\tilde Q} \frac{|x|}{|y|^{n+1-\delta}}|f(y)|dy \le C\sum\limits_{|\beta| = m}||D^\beta A||_{BMO}||f||_{B_p^{\delta}}. $

    For $ III_3 $, by Holder's inequality, similar to the estimates of $ III_1 $, we get

    $ |III3|C|β|=mk=02k+1˜Q2k˜Q(|x||y|n+1δ+|x|ε|y|n+εδ)|Dβ˜A(y)||f(y)|dyC|β|=mk=1(2k+2εk)(2kr)n(1/pδ/n)(|2k˜Q|12k˜Q|DβA(y)(DβA)˜Q|pdy)1/p||fχ2k˜Q||LpC|β|=m||DβA||BMOk=1(2k+2εk)(2kr)n(1/pδ/n)||fχ2k˜Q||LpC|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. $

    Thus

    $ III\le C\sum\limits_{|\beta| = m}||D^\beta A||_{BMO}||f||_{B_p^{\delta}}, $

    which together with the estimates for $ I $ and $ II $ yields the desired result. This finishes the proof of Theorem 1.

    Proof of Theorem 2. Let $ f\in H\dot K_p(R^n) $, by Lemma 1, $ f = \sum_{j = -\infty}^\infty\lambda_ja_j $, where $ a_j's $ are the central $ (n(1-1/p), p) $-atom with supp$ a_j \subset B_j = B(0, 2^j) $ and $ ||f||_{H\dot K_p}\approx\sum_j|\lambda_j| $. We write

    $ ||˜TAδ(f)||˙Kαq=k=2kn(11/p)||χk˜TAδ(f)||Lqk=2kn(11/p)k1j=|λj|||χk˜TAδ(aj)||Lq+k=2kn(11/p)j=k|λj|||χk˜TAδ(aj)||Lq=J+JJ. $

    For $ JJ $, by the $ (L^p, L^q) $-boundedness of $ \tilde T_\delta^A $ for $ 1/q = 1/p-\delta/n $, we get

    $ JJCk=2kn(11/p)j=k|λj|||aj||LpCk=2kn(11/p)j=k|λj|2jn(1/p1)Cj=|λj|jk=2(kj)n(11/p)Cj=|λj|C||f||H˙Kp. $

    To obtain the estimate of $ J $, we denote that $ \tilde A(x) = A(x)-\sum_{|\beta| = m}\frac{1}{\beta!}(D^\beta A)_{2B_j}x^\beta $. Then $ Q_m(A; x, y) = Q_m(\tilde A; x, y) $ and $ Q_{m+1}(A; x, y) = R_m(A; x, y)-\sum_{|\beta| = m}\frac{1}{\beta!} (x-y)^\beta D^\beta A(x) $. We write, by the vanishing moment of $ a $ and for $ x \in C_k $ with $ k\ge j+1 $,

    $ ˜TAδ(aj)(x)=RnK(x,y)Rm(A;x,y)|xy|maj(y)dy|β|=m1β!RnK(x,y)Dβ˜A(x)(xy)β|xy|maj(y)dy=Rn[K(x,y)|xy|mK(x,0)|x|m]Rm(˜A;x,y)aj(y)dy+RnK(x,0)|x|m[Rm(˜A;x,y)Rm(˜A;x,0)]aj(y)dy|β|=m1β!Rn[K(x,y)(xy)β|xy|mK(x,0)xβ|x|m]Dβ˜A(x)aj(y)dy. $

    Similar to the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain

    $ |˜TAδ(aj)(x)|CRn[|y||x|m+n+1δ+|y|ε|x|m+n+εδ]|Rm(˜A;x,y)||aj(y)|dy+C|β|=mRn[|y||x|n+1δ+|y|ε|x|n+εδ]|Dβ˜A(x)||aj(y)|dyC|β|=m||DβA||BMO[2j2k(n+1δ)+2jε2k(n+εδ)]+C|β|=m[2j2k(n+1δ)+2jε2k(n+εδ)]|Dβ˜A(x)|, $

    thus

    $ JC|β|=m||DβA||BMOk=2kn(11/p)k1j=|λj|[2j2k(n+1δ)+2jε2k(n+εδ)]2kn/q+C|β|=mk=2kn(11/p)k1j=|λj|[2j2k(n+1δ)+2jε2k(n+εδ)](Bk|Dβ˜A(x)|qdx)1/qC|β|=m||DβA||BMOk=2kn(1δ/n)k1j=|λj|[2j2k(n+1δ)+2jε2k(n+εδ)]C|β|=m||DβA||BMOj=|λj|k=j+1[2jk+2(jk)ε]C|β|=m||DβA||BMOj=|λj|C|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||H˙Kp. $

    This completes the proof of Theorem 2.

    Proof of Theorem 3. For any cube $ Q = Q(0, r) $ with $ r > 1 $, let $ f \in B_p^{\delta} $ and $ \tilde A(x) = A(x) -\sum\limits_{|\beta| = m}\frac{1}{\beta!}(D^\beta A)_{\tilde Q}x^\beta $. We write, for $ f = f\chi_{4Q}+f\chi_{(4Q)^c} = f_1+f_2 $ and $ z\in 3Q\setminus2Q $,

    $ ˜TAδ(f)(x)=˜TAδ(f1)(x)+RnRm(˜A;x,y)|xy|mK(x,y)f2(y)dy|β|=m1β!(DβA(x)(DβA)Q)(Tδ,β(f2)(x)Tδ,β(f2)(z))|β|=m1β!(DβA(x)(DβA)Q)Tδ,β(f2)(z)=I1(x)+I2(x)+I3(x,z)+I4(x,z), $

    where $ T_{\delta, \beta} $ is the singular integral operator with the kernel $ \frac{(x-y)^\beta}{|x-y|^m}K(x, y) $ for $ |\beta| = m $. Note that $ (I_4(\cdot, z))_Q = 0 $, we have

    $ \tilde T_\delta^A(f)(x)-(\tilde T_\delta^A(f))_Q = I_1(x)-(I_1(\cdot))_Q+I_2(x)-I_2(z)-[I_2(\cdot)-I_2(z)]_Q-I_3(x, z)+(I_3(x, z))_Q-I_4(x, z). $

    By the $ (L^p, L^q) $-bounded of $ \tilde T_\delta^A $, we get

    $ \frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q |I_1(x)|dx \le \left(\frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q|\tilde T_\delta^A(f_1)(x)|^qdx\right)^{1/q} \le C|Q|^{-1/q}||f_1||_{L^p}\le C||f||_{B_p^{\delta}}. $

    Similar to the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain

    $ |I_2(x)-I_2(z)|\le C||f||_{B_p^{\delta}} $

    and

    $ \frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q |I_3(x, z)|dx \le C||f||_{B_p^{\delta}}. $

    Then integrating in $ x $ on $ Q $ and using the above estimates, we obtain the equivalence of the estimate

    $ \frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q |\tilde T_\delta^A(f)(x)-(\tilde T_\delta^A(f))_Q|dx \le C||f||_{B_p^{\delta}} $

    and the estimate

    $ \frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q |I_4(x, z)|dx \le C||f||_{B_p^{\delta}}. $

    This completes the proof of Theorem 3.

    In this section we shall apply the theorems of the paper to some particular operators such as the Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator and fractional integral operator.

    Application 1. Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator.

    Let $ T $ be the Calderón-Zygmund operator defined by (see [10,11,15])

    $ T(f)(x) = \int_{R^n} K(x, y)f(y)dy, $

    the multilinear operator related to $ T $ is defined by

    $ T^A(f)(x) = \int_{R^n}\frac{R_{m+1}(A; x, y)}{|x-y|^m}K(x, y)f(y)dy. $

    Then it is easily to see that $ T $ satisfies the conditions in Theorems 1–3, thus the conclusions of Theorems 1–3 hold for $ T^A $.

    Application 2. Fractional integral operator with rough kernel.

    For $ 0 < \delta < n $, let $ T_\delta $ be the fractional integral operator with rough kernel defined by (see [2,7])

    $ T_\delta f(x) = \int_{R^n}\frac{\Omega(x-y)}{|x-y|^{n-\delta}}f(y)dy, $

    the multilinear operator related to $ T_\delta $ is defined by

    $ T_\delta^A f(x) = \int_{R^n}\frac{R_{m+1}(A;x, y)}{|x-y|^{m+n-\delta}}\Omega(x-y)f(y)dy, $

    where $ \Omega $ is homogeneous of degree zero on $ R^n $, $ \int_{S^{n-1}}\Omega(x')d\sigma(x') = 0 $ and $ \Omega\in Lip_\varepsilon(S^{n-1}) $ for some $ 0 < \varepsilon\le 1 $, that is there exists a constant $ M > 0 $ such that for any $ x, y\in S^{n-1} $, $ |\Omega(x)-\Omega(y)|\le M|x-y|^\varepsilon $. Then $ T_\delta $ satisfies the conditions in Theorem 1. In fact, for $ supp f \subset (2Q)^c $ and $ x\in Q = Q(x_0, d) $, by the condition of $ \Omega $, we have (see [16])

    $ \left|\frac{\Omega(x-y)}{|x-y|^{n-\delta}}-\frac{\Omega(x_0-y)}{|x_0-y|^{n-\delta}}\right| \le C\left(\frac{|x-x_0|^\varepsilon}{|x_0-y|^{n+\varepsilon-\delta}}+\frac{|x-x_0|}{|x_0-y|^{n+1-\delta}}\right), $

    thus, the conclusions of Theorems 1–3 hold for $ T_\delta^A $.

    The author would like to express his deep gratitude to the referee for his/her valuable comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11901126), the Scientific Research Funds of Hunan Provincial Education Department. (Grant No. 19B509).

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    [1] D. Armbruster, P. Degond and C. Ringhofer, A model for the dynamics of large queuing networks and supply chains, SIAM J. Applied Mathematics, 66 (2006), 896-920. doi: 10.1137/040604625
    [2] D. Armbruster, M. Herty and C. Ringhofer, A continuum description for a des control problem, in 2012 IEEE 51st Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, 2012, 7372-7376. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2012.6425934
    [3] D. Armbruster, D. Marthaler, C. Ringhofer, K. G. Kempf and T.-C. Jo, A continuum model for a re-entrant factory, Operations Research, 54 (2006), 933-950. doi: 10.1287/opre.1060.0321
    [4] D. Armbruster and R. Uzsoy, Continuous dynamic models, clearing functions, and discrete-event simulation in aggregate production planning, in New Directions in Informatics, Optimization, Logistics, and Production (ed. J. C. Smith), vol. TutORials in Operations Research, INFORMS, 2012. doi: 10.1287/educ.1120.0102
    [5] J. Asmundsson, R. L. Rardin, C. H. Turkseven and R. Uzsoy, Production planning with resources subject to congestion, Naval Res. Logist., 56 (2009), 142-157. doi: 10.1002/nav.20335
    [6] J. Asmundsson, R. L. Rardin and R. Uzsoy, Tractable nonlinear production planning: Models for semiconductor wafer fabrication facilities, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Wafer Fabrication Facilities, 19 (2006), 95-111. doi: 10.1109/TSM.2005.863214
    [7] J. H. Blackstone, D. T. Philips and G. L. Hogg, A state-of-the-art survey of dispatching rules for manufacturing job shop operations, International Journal of Production Research, 20 (1982), 27-45. doi: 10.1080/00207548208947745
    [8] R. Courant, K. O. Friedrichs and H. Lewy, Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik, Mathematische Annalen, 100 (1928), 32-74. doi: 10.1007/BF01448839
    [9] C. D'Apice, S. Göttlich, M. Herty and B. Piccoli, Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization of Supply Chains, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2010. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898717600
    [10] C. D'Apice, R. Manzo and B. Piccoli, Optimal input flows for a PDE-ODE model of supply chains, Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 10 (2012), 1225-1240. doi: 10.4310/CMS.2012.v10.n4.a10
    [11] C. D'Apice, R. Manzo and B. Piccoli, Numerical schemes for the optimal input flow of a supply-chain, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 51 (2013), 2634-2650. doi: 10.1137/120889721
    [12] G. D. Eppen and R. Kipp Martin, Determining safety stock in the presence of stochastic lead time and demand, Management Science, 34 (1988), 1380-1390. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.34.11.1380
    [13] J. W. Fowler, G. L. Hogg and S. J. Mason, Workload control in the semiconductor industry, Production Planning and Control, 13 (2002), 568-578. doi: 10.1080/0953728021000026294
    [14] S. Göttlich, M. Herty and A. Klar, Modelling and optimization of supply chains on complex networks, Commun. Math. Sci., 4 (2006), 315-330. doi: 10.4310/CMS.2006.v4.n2.a3
    [15] S. T. Hackman and R. C. Leachman, A general framework for modeling production, Management Science, 35 (1989), 478-495. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.4.478
    [16] K. Itoh, D. Huang and T. Enkawa, Twofold look-ahead search for multi-criterion job shop scheduling, International Journal of Production Research, 31 (1993), 2215-2234. doi: 10.1080/00207549308956854
    [17] N. B. Kacar, Fitting Clearing Functions to Empirical Data: Simulation, Optimization and Heuristic Algorithms, Ph.D Thesis, North Carolina State University, 2012.
    [18] U. S. Karmarkar, Capacity loading and release planning with work-in-progress (wip) and lead-times, Journal of Manufacturing and Operations Management, 2 (1989), 105-123.
    [19] M. La Marca, D. Armbruster, M. Herty and C. Ringhofer, Control of continuum models of production systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 55 (2010), 2511-2526. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2010.2046925
    [20] Y. H. Lee, K. Bhaskaran and M. A. Pinedo, A heuristic to minimize the total weighted tardiness with sequence dependent setups, IEEE Transactions on Design and Manufacturing, 29 (1997), 45-52. doi: 10.1080/07408179708966311
    [21] R.-K. Li, Y.-T. Shyu and S. Adiga, A heuristic rescheduling algorithm for computer-based production scheduling systems, International Journal of Production Research, 31 (1993), 1815-1826. doi: 10.1080/00207549308956824
    [22] K. N. McKay, F. R. Safayeni and J. A. Buzacott, Job shop scheduling theory: What is relevant?, Interfaces, 18 (1988), 84-90. doi: 10.1287/inte.18.4.84
    [23] H. Missbauer and R. Uzsoy, Optimization models for production planning, in Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise: A State of the Art Handbook (eds. K. Kempf, P. Keskinocak and R. Uzsoy), Springer-Verlag, New York, 2010, 437-508.
    [24] S. S. Panwalkar and W. Iskander, A survey of scheduling rules, Operations Research, 25 (1977), 45-61. doi: 10.1287/opre.25.1.45
    [25] D. Perdaen, D. Armbruster, K. G. Kempf and E. Lefeber, Controlling a re-entrant manufacturing line via the push-pull point, Decision Policies for Production Networks, (2012), 103-117. doi: 10.1007/978-0-85729-644-3_5
    [26] V. Subramaniam, G. K. Lee, G. S. Hong, Y. S. Wong and T. Ramesh, Dynamic selection of dispatching rules for job shop scheduling, Management of Operations, 11 (2000), 73-81. doi: 10.1080/095372800232504
    [27] R. Uzsoy, C. Y. Lee and L. A. Martin-Vega, A review of production planning and scheduling models in the semiconductor industry part II: Shop-floor control, IIE Transactions, 26 (1994), 44-55. doi: 10.1080/07408179408966627
    [28] R. Vancheeswaran and M. A. Townsend, Two-stage heuristic procedure for scheduling job shops, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 12 (1993), 315-325. doi: 10.1016/0278-6125(93)90322-K
    [29] L. M. Wein, Scheduling semiconductor wafer fabrication, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 1 (1988), 115-130. doi: 10.1109/66.4384
    [30] M. J. Zeestraten, The look ahead dispatching procedure, International Journal of Production Research, 28 (1990), 369-384. doi: 10.1080/00207549008942717
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4117) PDF downloads(71) Cited by(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog