Citation: Yan Li, Junwei Wang, Shuangkui Ge, Xiangyang Luo, Bo Wang. A reversible database watermarking method with low distortion[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 4053-4068. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019200
[1] | Hai-yan Zhang, Ji-jun Ao, Fang-zhen Bo . Eigenvalues of fourth-order boundary value problems with distributional potentials. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7294-7317. doi: 10.3934/math.2022407 |
[2] | Haixia Lu, Li Sun . Positive solutions to a semipositone superlinear elastic beam equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4227-4237. doi: 10.3934/math.2021250 |
[3] | Zhanbing Bai, Wen Lian, Yongfang Wei, Sujing Sun . Addendum: Solvability for some fourth order two-point boundary value problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1175-1176. doi: 10.3934/math.2021071 |
[4] | Erdal Bas, Ramazan Ozarslan, Resat Yilmazer . Spectral structure and solution of fractional hydrogen atom difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1359-1371. doi: 10.3934/math.2020093 |
[5] | Xiaoping Li, Dexin Chen . On solvability of some $ p $-Laplacian boundary value problems with Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13622-13633. doi: 10.3934/math.2021792 |
[6] | Kun Li, Peng Wang . Properties for fourth order discontinuous differential operators with eigenparameter dependent boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 11487-11508. doi: 10.3934/math.2022640 |
[7] | Batirkhan Turmetov, Valery Karachik . On solvability of some inverse problems for a nonlocal fourth-order parabolic equation with multiple involution. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6832-6849. doi: 10.3934/math.2024333 |
[8] | Erdal Bas, Ramazan Ozarslan . Theory of discrete fractional Sturm–Liouville equations and visual results. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 593-612. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.593 |
[9] | Mukhamed Aleroev, Hedi Aleroeva, Temirkhan Aleroev . Proof of the completeness of the system of eigenfunctions for one boundary-value problem for the fractional differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 714-720. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.714 |
[10] | Yanyu Xiang, Aiping Wang . On symmetry of the product of two higher-order quasi-differential operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9483-9505. doi: 10.3934/math.2023478 |
In scientific research and engineering technology, many problems, such as the deformation of engineering building beams and the load of turbine blades under the impact of airflow in fluid mechanics, can be attributed to the existence of solutions of differential equations. And in elastic mechanics and engineering physics, elastic beam is one of the basic components of engineering building. The nonlinear boundary value problem of the fourth order differential equation with different boundary conditions can describes the deflection of elastic beam under external force, the reflects, and the stress. The static beam equation:
y(4)(x)=f(x,y(x)),0<x<1, | (1.1) |
is most studied under the following boundary conditions:
y(0)=y(1)=y″(0)=y″(1)=0, | (1.2) |
or
y(0)=y′(1)=y″(0)=y‴(1)=0, | (1.3) |
where f:[0,1]×[0,∞)→[0,∞) is continuous. They are often used to describe the equilibrium state of the elastic beams. While the problem (1.1), (1.2) describes the static beam with simple support at both ends, the problem (1.1), (1.3) describes the static beam with simple support at one end and sliding support at the other end. These two types of problems, can be converted into second-order equation by simple transformation. Therefore, some methods of studying ordinary differential equations can be applied to the study of problems (1.1), (1.2) and (1.1), (1.3).
The problem (1.1), (1.2) has been investigated in many literutures, see [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Among them, Bai [1] used a new maximum principle to give the solutions for the problem. Gabriele [2] used a local minimum theorem to give the existence of at least one non-trivial solution. Li [3] got the existence of positive solutions based on the fixed point index theory. And Yao [6] used the approximation by operators of completely continuous operator sequence and the Guo-Krasnosel'skii fixed point theorem for cone expansion and compression.
The problem (1.1), (1.3) also has been investigated by many authors, see [7,8,9]. Yao gave the existence of n solutions by choosing suitable cone and using the Krasnosel'skii fixed point theorem in [7]. Yao and Li [8] used the Leray-schauder fixed point theorem to get the existence of positive solutions. Zhao [9] used the fixed point theorem due to Avery-Peterson and Leggett-williams to get the existence of positive solutions. The upper and lower solution method and the fixed-point techniques have been used to study many other problems. We provide reference alone this line for some research on beam equation [10,11].
The typical static elastic beam equation with fixed ends can be described by Eq (1.1) with boundary condition
y(0)=y(1)=y′(0)=y′(1)=0. | (1.4) |
Compared with the above two type problems, this problem can not be solved by directly converting it into some second-order problems. But due to its wide application, many authors set out to find a positive solution to problem (1.1), (1.4). In 1984, Agarwal [12] first considered the problem, and used the compression mapping principle and numerical iteration method to study the existence of solutions. Later, Wu and Ma [13,14] used the Krasnoselskii's fixed point theorem to get the existence results under the following conditions:
(1)¯liml→0min{f(x,v)|(x,v)∈[14,34]×[l24,l]}/l>A;(2)¯liml→∞min14≤x≤34f(x,l)/l>A24. |
Caballero [15] applied a fixed point theorem in partially ordered metric spaces to get a unique symmetric positive solution for problem (1.1), (1.4), where f(x,y) is a nondecreasing function with respect to y for each x∈[0,1], and satisfy the Lipschitz type condition. Obviously the function f(x,y) has strong constraints in above literatures.
This paper study the existence of positive solutions for the following fourth-order two-point boundary value problem:
y(4)(x)=f(x,y(x)),0<x<1, | (1.5) |
y(0)=y(1)=y′(0)=y′(1)=0, | (1.6) |
where f:[0,1]×[0,∞)→[0,∞) is continuous. In section 2, the Green's function is given by the use of the Laplace transform, and some preliminary lemmas also be obtained. In section 3, the eigenvalue of the linear equation corresponding to problem (1.5), (1.6) is given by Ritz method in calculus of variations with the help of the mathematical tool software. The fixed point index value is obtained by using the theory of the self-adjoint operator, and the existence of positive solutions is given by the use of the fixed point index theorem. In section 4, an examples is given to illustrate the main results.
Compared with other literature, in this paper, the way to get the eigenvalue of problem considered is new. We use Laplace transform to get the Green function of this problem, this way is more convenient and easier. And the constraint of f(t,u) in this paper is more weaker than which get in other paper.
For convenience, we introduce some symbols,
ˉf0=¯limy→0+maxx∈[0,1]f(x,y)y,f_0=lim_y→0+minx∈[0,1]f(x,y)y, |
ˉf∞=¯limy→+∞maxx∈[0,1]f(x,y)y,f_∞=lim_y→+∞minx∈[0,1]f(x,y)y. |
Lemma 2.1. Given h∈C[0,1], the unique solution of
y(4)(x)−h(x)=0,0<x<1, | (2.1) |
y(0)=y(1)=y′(0)=y′(1)=0 | (2.2) |
is
y(x)=∫10G(x,s)h(s)ds, | (2.3) |
where
G(x,s)={s2(1−x)2[(x−s)+2(1−s)x]6,0≤s≤x≤1;x2(1−s)2[(s−x)+2(1−x)s]6,0≤x≤s≤1. | (2.4) |
Proof. By the use of Laplace transform on equation (2.1), one has
s4Y(s)−s3y(0)−s2y′(0)−sy″(0)−y‴(0)=H(s), |
where Y(s)=£[y(x)],H(s)=£[h(x)]. Thus,
Y(s)=1s4H(s)+1s4y‴(0)++1s3y″(0)+1s2y′(0)+1sy(0). |
By the use of the inverse Laplace transform and the boundary condition (2.2), one has
y(x)=£−1[Y(s)]=16x3∗h(x)+16x3y‴(0)+12x2y″(0)=16∫x0(x−s)3h(s)ds+16x3y‴(0)+12x2y″(0), | (2.5) |
then
y′(x)=∫x012(x−s)2h(s)ds+12x2y‴(0)+xy″(0). | (2.6) |
Let x=1 in (2.5) and (2.6), then we can get
y″(0)=∫10s(1−s)2h(s)ds, |
y‴(0)=−∫10(1+2s)(1−s)2h(s)ds. |
Put them into Eq (2.5), we get
y(x)=∫x016(x−s)3h(s)ds−∫1016x3(1+2s)(1−s)2h(s)ds+∫1012x2s(1−s)2h(s)ds=∫x016s2(1−x)2[(x−s)+2(1−s)x]h(s)ds+∫1x16x2(1−s)2[(s−x)+2(1−x)s]h(s)ds=∫10G(x,s)h(s)ds. |
The proof is completed.
Remark 2.1. The Green's function (2.4) have been obtained before in some literatures, but to my best knowledge, the way to get it by Laplace transform hadn't been mentioned yet. Obviously, this way is more convenient and easier.
Lemma 2.2. [13] Let a(s):[0,1]→[0,1] define as
G(a(s),s)=max0≤x≤1G(x,s), |
then a(s)=13−2s, for 0≤s≤12;a(s)=21+2s, for 12≤s≤1.
Lemma 2.3. [13] The function G(x,s) defined by (2.4) satisfies:
(i) G(x,s)=G(s,x)>0, for x,s∈[0,1];
(ii) G(x,s)G(a(s),s)≥q(x), where q(x)=min{23x2,23(1−x)2}, for x,s∈[0,1];
(iii) G(x,s)≥124G(a(s),s), for x∈[14,34],s∈[0,1].
Let C+[0,1] be the cone of all nonnegative functions in C[0,1] which is a Banach space with ‖y‖=maxx∈[0,1]|y(x)|. And the cone
D={y∈C+[0,1]|y(x)≥124‖y‖,∀x∈[14,34]}⊂C+[0,1]. |
Then denote
m=min14≤s≤34G(12,s)=34, |
and define T:C+[0,1]→C+[0,1] by
(Ty)(x):=∫10G(x,s)f(s,y(s))ds. | (2.7) |
Lemma 2.4. [13] By Lemma 2.3 and formula (2.7), there holds
(Ty)(x)=∫10G(x,s)f(s,y(s))ds≥q(x)‖Ty‖,x∈[0,1]. |
Lemma 2.5. Let f:[0,1]×[0,∞)→[0,∞) be continuous, then
(1) the operator T:D→D is completely continuous,
(2) the solution of boundary value problem (1.5), (1.6) y(x) satisfies
y(x)≥q(x)‖y‖. |
Proof. The positive solution of problem (1.5), (1.6) is equivalent to the nonzero fixed point of T. On the one hand,
minx∈[14,34](Ty)(x)=minx∈[14,34]∫10G(x,s)f(s,y(s))ds≥124‖Ty‖. |
By the arbitrariness of y and G(x,s)≥0, we obtain T(D)⊂D. Then by the continuity of f and Arzela-Ascoli Theorem, we get (1) holds. On the other hand, by the definition of the operator T and the function a(s), we have
‖Ty‖≤∫10G(a(s),s)f(s,y(s))ds. |
Suppose y∈D is a solution of problem (1.5), (1.6), then
y(x)=(Ty)(x)=∫10G(x,s)f(s,y(s))ds≥q(x)‖Ty‖=q(x)‖y‖. |
The proof is completed.
Given b>0, let
Db={y∈D|y(x)<b}and∂Db={y∈D|y(x)=b}. |
Lemma 2.6. [16] Suppose T:D→D is completely continuous and
(i)infy∈∂Db‖Ty‖>0,
(ii)αTy≠y for ∀y∈∂Db and α≥1.
Then i(T,Db,D)=0.
Lemma 2.7. [16] Suppose T:D→D is completely continuous. If αTy≠y for ∀y∈∂Db and 0<α≤1, then i(T,Db,D)=1.
Lemma 2.8. Assume that G(x,s) is defined as formula (2.4). Then the operator H:C[0,1]→C[0,1],
(Hz)(x)=∫10G(x,s)z(s)ds, |
is a self-adjoint operator.
Proof. By Lemma 2.1, it is clear that G(x,s) is a real symmetric function, that is to say that, G(x,s)=G(s,x) for 0≤s,x≤1. Thus, for ∀z1=z1(s),z2=z2(s)∈C[0,1], there holds
(Hz1,z2)=∫10(Hz1)(x)z2(x)dx=∫10∫10G(x,s)z1(s)z2(x)dsdx=∫10z1(s)∫10G(x,s)z2(x)dxds=∫10z1(s)∫10G(s,x)z2(x)dxds=∫10z1(s)(Hz2)(s)ds=(z1,Hz2). |
So, the operator H is a self-adjoint operator.
Lemma 3.1. The first eigenvalue λ1 of the problem
y(4)(x)−λy(x)=0, | (3.1) |
y(0)=y(1)=y′(0)=y′(1)=0, | (3.2) |
is λ1≈500.564.
Proof. Define the linear differential operator L:{y∈C4[0,1]∣y(0)=y(1)=y′(0)=y′(1)=0}→C[0,1] as
(Ly)(x)=y(4)(x). | (3.3) |
With Ritz method, the problem which to get the first eigenvalue λ1 can be transformed to get the extreme value of the functional
J[y]=∫10yLydx=∫10y(x)[y(4)(x)]dx, | (3.4) |
under the normalization condition
∫10y2(x)dx=1. | (3.5) |
Combing the definition of the functional J and the boundary condition (3.2), one has
J[y]=∫10y(x)[y(4)(x)]dx=∫10[y″(x)]2dx. |
Choose the primary function as
yk(x)=(1−x)2x2k,(k=1,2,3,⋯), |
then, the n-th order approximate solution of the functional extremum function is
yn(x)=x2(1−x)2(a1+a2x+⋯+anxn−1). | (3.6) |
By (3.4), (3.5), there is
J[yn(x)]=∫10[y″n(x)]2dx, | (3.7) |
∫10y2n(x)dx=1. | (3.8) |
Then the Lagrangian function
F(a1,a2,⋯,an,τ)=J[yn(x)]+τ[∫10y2n(x)dx−1]=∫10[y″n(x)]2dx+τ[∫10y2n(x)dx−1]. |
Now, we solve the following equation system by the use of the mathematical tool software Mathematica,
∂F∂ai=0(i=1,2,3,⋯,n),and∂F∂τ=0. |
Firstly, we get ai(i=1,2,3,⋯,n) and τ, then, plug them into (3.6) to get yn(x). By Eq (3.7) we get the corresponding eigenvalue λ1=J[yn(x)]≈500.564 for n≥6. The proof is completed.
Remark 3.1. Although some authors mentioned the eigenvalue before, but to my best knowledge, the eigenvalue of problem (3.1), (3.2) hadn't been obtained yet. However, we use the Ritz-Method to get the concrete eigenvalue λ1 here.
Theorem 3.1. Suppose one of the following relation is true:
(i) ˉf0<λ1, f_∞>λ1;
(ii) f_0>λ1,ˉf∞<λ1.
Then boundary value problem (1.5), (1.6) has at least one positive solution.
Proof. (i) By ˉf0<λ1, for ϵ∈(0,λ1), there exists b0>0 such that
f(x,y)≤(λ1−ϵ)y,∀x∈[0,1],y∈[0,b0]. | (3.9) |
Set b∈(0,b0). Assume there exist y0∈∂Db and α0∈(0,1] such that α0Ty0=y0. Then y0 satisfies
y(4)0(x)=α0f(x,y0(x)),0≤x≤1. | (3.10) |
Taking into account (3.9) and (3.10), there is
y(4)0(x)=α0f(x,y0(x))≤α0(λ1−ϵ)y0(x)≤(λ1−ϵ)y0(x). |
Due to the fact that the inverse operator of a self-adjoint operator is self-adjoint and Lemma 2.8, the operator L defined by (3.3) is a self-adjoint operator. Suppose ˆy∈D is a eigenfunction of L with respect to λ1 such that ∫10ˆy(x)dx=1, that is to say that
Lˆy=λ1ˆy. |
Then
(Ly0,ˆy)=(y0,Lˆy)=(y0,λ1ˆy)=λ1(y0,ˆy). |
So we get
λ1(y0,ˆy)≤(λ1−ϵ)(y0,ˆy). |
obviously this is a contradictory. Hence Lemma 2.7 yields that
i(T,Db,D)=1. | (3.11) |
Since f_∞>λ1, for given ϵ>0, there exists K>0 such that
f(x,y)≥(λ1+ϵ)y,∀x∈[0,1],y≥K, | (3.12) |
suppose C=max0≤x≤1,0≤y≤K|f(x,y)−(λ1+ϵ)y|+1, then
f(x,y)≥(λ1+ϵ)y−C,∀x∈[0,1],y∈[0,+∞). |
Let r>r0:=max{24K,b0}. For y∈∂Dr, there is y(s)≥124‖y‖>K for s∈[14,34], then, by (3.12)
‖Ty‖≥(Ty)(12)=∫10G(12,s)f(s,y(s))ds≥∫3414m(λ1+ϵ)y(s)ds≥124∫3414m(λ1+ϵ)‖y‖ds≥148m(λ1+ϵ)‖y‖ | (3.13) |
So infy∈∂Dr‖Ty‖>0.
Suppose there exist y0∈Dr and μ0≥1 such that μ0Ty0=y0, then
(Ly0)(x)=μ0f(x,y0(x))≥(λ1+ϵ)y0(x)−C. |
Thus,
λ1(y0,ˆy)=(y0,λ1ˆy)=(y0,Lˆy)=(Ly0,ˆy)≥(λ1+ϵ)(y0,ˆy)−C. |
So,
(y0,ˆy)≤Cϵ. |
Similar to the proof of Lemma 2.5, by μ0Ty0=y0, one has
y0(x)≥(Ty0)(x)≥q(x)‖y0‖. |
So,
(y0,ˆy)≥‖y0‖∫10q(x)ˆy(x)dx. |
Thus,
‖y0‖≤Cϵ[∫10q(x)ˆy(x)dx]−1:=ˉr. | (3.14) |
Now set r>max{ˉr,b0}, then there is μTy≠y for ∀y∈∂Dr and μ≥1. Consequently, two conditions of Lemma 2.6 all hold, thus
i(T,Dr,D)=0. | (3.15) |
By (3.11) and (3.15) there is
i(T,Dr∖¯Db,D)=i(T,Dr,D)−i(T,Db,D)=−1. | (3.16) |
Hence T has a fixed point in Dr∖¯Db.
(ii) Since f_0>λ1, for ϵ>0, there exists h0>0 such that
f(x,y)≥(λ1+ϵ)y,∀x∈[0,1],0≤y≤h0. | (3.17) |
Set h∈(0,h0), similar to (3.13), one has
‖Ty‖≥148m(λ1+ϵ)‖y‖,∀y∈∂Dh, |
so infy∈∂Db‖Ty‖>0.
Assume there exist y1∈∂Dh and α1≥1 such that α1Ty1=y1, then
λ1(y1,ˆy)=(y1,λ1ˆy)=(y1,Lˆy)=(Ly1,ˆy)≥(λ1+ϵ)(y1,ˆy). |
Obviously this is a contradiction, because (y1,ˆy)>0. Therefore, Lemma 2.5 yields that
i(T,Dh,D)=0. | (3.18) |
On the other hand, since ˉf∞<λ1, for ϵ∈(0,λ1), there exists K2>0 such that
f(x,y)≤(λ1−ϵ)y,∀x∈[0,1],y≥K2. |
Let C=max0≤x≤1,0≤y≤K2|f(x,y)−(λ1−ϵ)y|+1, then
f(x,y)≤(λ1−ϵ)y+C,∀x∈[0,1],y∈[0,+∞). | (3.19) |
Assume there exist y2∈D and α2∈(0,1] such that α2Ty2=y2, then
λ1(y2,ˆy)=(y2,λ1ˆy)=(y1,Lˆy)=(Ly1,ˆy)≤(λ1−ϵ)(y2,ˆy)+C. |
Similar to the previous proof, one has ‖y2‖≤ˉr. Set r>max{ˉr,h0}, we get αTy≠y for ∀y∈∂Dr and α∈(0,1]. Hence by Lemma 2.7,
i(T,Dr,D)=1, | (3.20) |
then
i(T,Dr∖¯Db,D)=i(T,Dr,D)−i(T,Db,D)=1. |
In conclusion, the boundary value problem (1.5), (1.6) has at least one positive solution.
Remark 3.2. Compared with literatures [14,15] and so on, the constraint of f(x,y) in our results is weaker.
Example 4.1. Consider the problem:
y(4)(x)=[y(x)]θ+(300−x)y(x),0<x<1,θ≠1, | (4.1) |
y(0)=y(1)=y′(0)=y′(1)=0. | (4.2) |
It's obviously that f(x,y)y=yθ−1+300−x.
Case (1): θ>1, there are
(i)ˉf0=¯limy→0+maxx∈[0,1]f(x,y)y=300<500.564≊ |
Case (2) : \theta < 1 , there are
\begin{eqnarray*} &(i)& \underline{f}_0 = \varliminf\limits_{y \to 0+} \min\limits_{x\in[0, 1]} \frac{f(x, y)}{y} = +\infty \gt 500.564\approxeq \lambda_1; \\ &(ii)& \bar{f}_{\infty} = \varlimsup\limits_{y \to +\infty} \max\limits_{x\in[0, 1]} \frac{f(x, y)}{y} = 300 \lt 500.564\approxeq \lambda_1, \end{eqnarray*} |
By Theorem 3.1, for \theta\neq1 , Problem (4.1), (4.2) has at least one positive solution.
The fourth order differential equations have been applied in different aspects of applied mathematics and physics, especially in the theory of elastic beams and stability. In this paper, the fourth-order two-point boundary value problem is studied, which can describe some changes when the elastic beam deforms or rotates when it is subjected to external forces, and provides an important theoretical basis for solving the problem. And compare with other literature, our method in this paper makes the equation more widely used and describes the equilibrium state of the elastic beam better.
This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.11571207), the Taishan Scholar project, and SDUST graduate innovation project SDKDYC190237.
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] | N. Gursale and A. Mohanpurkar, A robust, distortion minimization fingerprinting technique for relational database, IJRITCC, 2(2014), 1737–1741. |
[2] | R. Agrawal and J. Kiernan, Watermarking relational databases, VLDB, Elsevier, Hong Kong, China, 28 (2002), 155–166. |
[3] | R. Sion, Proving ownership over categorical data, ICDE, Boston, (2004), 584–596. |
[4] | R. Sion, M. Atallah and S. Prabhakar, Rights protection for categorical data, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 17(2005), 912–926. |
[5] | S. Liu, S. Wang, R. Deng, et al, A block oriented fingerprinting scheme in relational database, ISCISC, Seoul, Korea, (2004), 145–192. |
[6] | M. Shehab, E. Bertino and A. Ghafoor, Watermarking relational databases using optimization-based techniques, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 20 (2008), 116–129. |
[7] | Y. Zhang, B. Yang and X. Niu, Reversible watermarking for relational database authentication, JCP, 17 (2006), 59–65. |
[8] | J. Chang and H. Wu, Reversible fragile database watermarking technology using difference expansion based on SVR prediction, IS3C, Taiwan, China, (2012), 690–693. |
[9] | E. Mahmoud, H. Farfoura and X. Wang, A novel blind reversible method for watermarking relational databases, JCIE, 36 (2013), 87–97. |
[10] | V. Khanduja, S. Chakraverty and O. Verma, Enabling information recovery with ownership using robust multiple watermarks, JISA, 29 (2016), 80–92. |
[11] | G. Gupta and J. Pieprzyk, Reversible and blind database watermarking using difference expansion, IJDCF, 1 (2008), 42–54. |
[12] | G. Gupta and J. Pieprzyk, Database relation watermarking resilient against secondary watermarking attacks, Inform. System. Secur., Springer, (2009), 222–236. |
[13] | S. Bhattacharya and A. Cortesi, A distortion free watermark framework for relational databases, ICSDT, Sofia, Bulgaria, (2013), 229–234. |
[14] | K. Jawad and A. Khan, Genetic algorithm and difference expansion based reversible watermarking for relational databases, J. System Software, 86 (2013), 2742–2753. |
[15] | M. Farfoura and A. Horng, A novel blind reversible method for watermarking relational databases, ISPA, (2010), 563–569. |
[16] | S. Iftikhar, M. Kamran and Z. Anwar, RRW-a robust and reversible watermarking technique for relational data, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 27 (2015), 1132–1145. |
[17] | D. H. Hu, D. Zhao and S. L. Zheng, A new robust approach for reversible database watermarking with distortion control, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., (2018), DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2018.2851517. |
[18] | Y. Cao, Z. L. Zhou, X. M. Su, et al., Coverless information hiding based on the molecular structure images of material, CMC, 54 (2018), 197–207. |
[19] | W.J. Xu, S.J. Xiang and V. Sachnev, A Cryptograph Domain Image Retrieval Method Based on Paillier Homomorphic Block Encryption, CMC, 55 (2018), 285–295. |
[20] | J. W. Wang, T. Li, X. Y. Luo, et al., Identifying computer generated images based on quaternion central moments in color quaternion wavelet domain, TCSVT, (2018), DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT.2018.2867786. |
[21] | Y. Du, Z. X. Yin and X. P. Zhang, Improved lossless data hiding for jpeg images based on histogram modification, CMC, 55 (2018), 495–507. |
[22] | Y. Zhang, C. Qin, W. M. Zhang, et al., On the fault-tolerant performance for a class of robust image steganography, Signal Process.g, 146 (2018), 99–111. |
[23] | X. Y. Luo, X. F. Song, X. L. Li, et al., Steganalysis of HUGO steganography based on parameter recognition of syndrome-trellis-codes, Mult Tool Appl., 75 (2016), 13557–13583. |
[24] | T. Qiao, R. Shi, X. Y. Luo, et al., Statistical model-based detector via texture weight map: Application in re-sampling authentication, TMM, (2018), DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2018.2872863. |
[25] | Y. Y. Ma, X. Y. Luo, X. L. Li, et al., Selection of rich model steganalysis features based on decision rough set α-positive region reduction, TCSVT, 29 (2019), 336–350. |
1. | Yanhong Zhang, Li Chen, Positive solution for a class of nonlinear fourth-order boundary value problem, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 1014, 10.3934/math.2023049 | |
2. | Lucía López-Somoza, F. Adrián F. Tojo, Asymptotic properties of PDEs in compact spaces, 2021, 23, 1661-7738, 10.1007/s11784-021-00905-w | |
3. | Khudija Bibi, Solutions of initial and boundary value problems using invariant curves, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 22057, 10.3934/math.20241072 | |
4. | Nikolay D. Dimitrov, Jagan Mohan Jonnalagadda, Existence of Three Positive Solutions for Boundary Value Problem of Fourth Order with Sign-Changing Green’s Function, 2024, 16, 2073-8994, 1321, 10.3390/sym16101321 | |
5. | Abdissalam Sarsenbi, Abdizhahan Sarsenbi, Boundary value problems for a second-order differential equation with involution in the second derivative and their solvability, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 26275, 10.3934/math.20231340 | |
6. | Xinyuan Pan, Xiaofei He, Aimin Hu, EXISTENCE AND NONEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS FOR A CLASS OF p-LAPLACIAN-TYPE FRACTIONAL FOUR-POINT BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEMS WITH A PARAMETER, 2023, 53, 0035-7596, 10.1216/rmj.2023.53.1537 |