
This paper addresses the new concatenation model incorporating quintic-order dispersion, incorporating four well-known nonlinear models. The concatenated models are the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the Hirota equation, the Lakshmanan-Porsezian-Daniel equation, and the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with quintic-order dispersion. The model itself is innovative and serves as an encouragement for investigating and analyzing the extracted optical solitons. These models play a crucial role in nonlinear optics, especially in studying optical fibers. Three integration algorithms are implemented to investigate the optical solitons with the governing model. These techniques are the Weierstrass-type projective Riccati equation expansion method, the addendum to Kudryashov's method, and the new mapping method. The solutions obtained include various solitons, such as bright, dark, and straddled solitons. Additionally, the paper reports hyperbolic solutions and Weierstrass-type doubly periodic solutions. These solutions are novel and have never been reported before. Visual depictions of some selected solitons illustrate these solutions' dynamic behavior and wave structure.
Citation: Elsayed M. E. Zayed, Mona El-Shater, Khaled A. E. Alurrfi, Ahmed H. Arnous, Nehad Ali Shah, Jae Dong Chung. Dispersive optical soliton solutions with the concatenation model incorporating quintic order dispersion using three distinct schemes[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8961-8980. doi: 10.3934/math.2024437
[1] | Nafissa Toureche Trouba, Mohamed E. M. Alngar, Reham M. A. Shohib, Haitham A. Mahmoud, Yakup Yildirim, Huiying Xu, Xinzhong Zhu . Novel solitary wave solutions of the (3+1)–dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with generalized Kudryashov self–phase modulation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 4374-4411. doi: 10.3934/math.2025202 |
[2] | Islam Samir, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Wafaa Rabie, W. Abbas, Ola Mostafa . Construction optical solitons of generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation with quintuple power-law nonlinearity using Exp-function, projective Riccati, and new generalized methods. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3392-3407. doi: 10.3934/math.2025157 |
[3] | Dumitru Baleanu, Kamyar Hosseini, Soheil Salahshour, Khadijeh Sadri, Mohammad Mirzazadeh, Choonkil Park, Ali Ahmadian . The (2+1)-dimensional hyperbolic nonlinear Schrödinger equation and its optical solitons. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9568-9581. doi: 10.3934/math.2021556 |
[4] | Tianyong Han, Ying Liang, Wenjie Fan . Dynamics and soliton solutions of the perturbed Schrödinger-Hirota equation with cubic-quintic-septic nonlinearity in dispersive media. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 754-776. doi: 10.3934/math.2025035 |
[5] | Mahmoud Soliman, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Niveen Badra, Taher A. Nofal, Islam Samir . Highly dispersive gap solitons for conformable fractional model in optical fibers with dispersive reflectivity solutions using the modified extended direct algebraic method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25205-25222. doi: 10.3934/math.20241229 |
[6] | Yazid Alhojilan, Islam Samir . Investigating stochastic solutions for fourth order dispersive NLSE with quantic nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15201-15213. doi: 10.3934/math.2023776 |
[7] | Emad H. M. Zahran, Ahmet Bekir, Reda A. Ibrahim, Ratbay Myrzakulov . The new soliton solution types to the Myrzakulov-Lakshmanan-XXXII-equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6145-6160. doi: 10.3934/math.2024300 |
[8] | Da Shi, Zhao Li, Dan Chen . New traveling wave solutions, phase portrait and chaotic patterns for the dispersive concatenation model with spatio-temporal dispersion having multiplicative white noise. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25732-25751. doi: 10.3934/math.20241257 |
[9] | Ghazala Akram, Saima Arshed, Maasoomah Sadaf, Hajra Mariyam, Muhammad Nauman Aslam, Riaz Ahmad, Ilyas Khan, Jawaher Alzahrani . Abundant solitary wave solutions of Gardner's equation using three effective integration techniques. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 8171-8184. doi: 10.3934/math.2023413 |
[10] | Abeer S. Khalifa, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Niveen M. Badra, Wafaa B. Rabie, Farah M. Al-Askar, Wael W. Mohammed . New soliton wave structure and modulation instability analysis for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with cubic, quintic, septic, and nonic nonlinearities. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 26166-26181. doi: 10.3934/math.20241278 |
This paper addresses the new concatenation model incorporating quintic-order dispersion, incorporating four well-known nonlinear models. The concatenated models are the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the Hirota equation, the Lakshmanan-Porsezian-Daniel equation, and the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with quintic-order dispersion. The model itself is innovative and serves as an encouragement for investigating and analyzing the extracted optical solitons. These models play a crucial role in nonlinear optics, especially in studying optical fibers. Three integration algorithms are implemented to investigate the optical solitons with the governing model. These techniques are the Weierstrass-type projective Riccati equation expansion method, the addendum to Kudryashov's method, and the new mapping method. The solutions obtained include various solitons, such as bright, dark, and straddled solitons. Additionally, the paper reports hyperbolic solutions and Weierstrass-type doubly periodic solutions. These solutions are novel and have never been reported before. Visual depictions of some selected solitons illustrate these solutions' dynamic behavior and wave structure.
Different dispersion characteristics can be designed into modern optical fibers. Thus, it is not as absurd as it might first appear to think that some predictions might allow for experimental confirmations. Realistically, when pulses are near 20 ps in length, fifth-order concatenation model dispersion does affect current laser studies [1]. A universal paradigm for modelling wave dynamics in many nonlinear systems is the nonlinear Schrö dinger equation (NLSE). The only two terms in the NLSE that permit bright and dark soliton-type pulse propagation in anomalous and normal dispersion regimes for picosecond light pulses are the self-phase modulation and the group velocity dispersion (GVD), which are well-known in the fiber [2,3,4,5]. For instance, the χ5 nonlinearity (cubic-quintic medium) should be included in the NLSE at high light intensities. Be aware that semiconductor double-doped optical fibers can realize the competing cubic-quintic nonlinearity. Additionally, it has been shown that higher-order effects in nonlinear media become significant for pulses shorter than 100 femto-seconds.
The study of solitons in nonlinear models has become increasingly common in engineering and science, emerging as a dynamic and quickly advancing field of research. Researchers from different fields have investigated this area of study in recent years, leading to its rapid growth and progress. The NLSE describes the behavior of optical solitons in optical fiber. This equation is considered integrable, meaning it can be solved exactly. It is worth noting that different dispersion regions give rise to distinct types of optical solitons. The NLSE-types are formulated as a theoretical framework within the field of quantum mechanics. This model has become one of the most widely used to study solitons in different media types, such as plasma, water waves, and optical fibers. Multiple governing models can be utilized to investigate the transmission of solitons across optical fibers. However, there has been a recent development in this specific field that involves combining existing models to construct new structures for efficiently controlling the flow of solitons over vast distances between continents [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
Note that the NLSE with higher order elements has undergone substantial numerical and theoretical study [17,18,19,20], making it a model with physical importance. Having optical soliton solutions is the most crucial aspect of nonlinear science. There are numerous schemes created by authors, such as the extended auxiliary equation method [21,22], new mapping method [23,24,25,26], an addendum to Kudryashov's method [27,28,29,30], the enhanced Kudryashov's method [31,32], unified Riccati equation expansion method [33,34], unified Auxiliary equation [33], Jacobi elliptic function method [35], and so on. However, because of the unique differential equation structure, the previously successful method of constructing exact solutions using the logistic function is insufficiently effective in constructing the optical solitons that are defined by generalized Schrödinger equations [36,37,38,39,40,41,42].
In dimensionless form, the quintic operator, Lakshmanan-Porsezian-Daniel operator [6,7,8], Hirota operator [43,44,45], and nonlinear Schrödinger operator are four well-known nonlinear models that make up the fifth-order concatenation model. The notation for this concatenation model is [46,47,48,49,50,51,52]:
ιqx+12qtt+|q|2q−ια(qttt+6|q|2qt)+γ(qtttt+8|q|2qtt+6q|q|4+4q|qt|2+6q2tq∗+2q2q∗tt)−ιδ[qttttt+10|q|2qttt+30|q|4qt+10qqtq∗tt+10q∗qtqtt+20qq∗tqtt+10q2tq∗t]=0, | (1.1) |
where q(x,t) is a complex envelope of the waves; q∗(x,t) is the complex conjugate; x is the propagation variable, and t is the transverse variable; ι2=−1; and α,γ, and δ are non-zero constants. The coefficient of α is the Hirota operator, the coefficient of γ is the Lakshmanan-Porsezian-Daniel (LPD) operator, and the coefficient of δ is the quintic operator. If α=γ=δ=0, then Eq (1.1) can be reduced to the standard NLSE which describes the propagation of picosecond pulses in optical fibers. If γ=δ=0, then Eq (1.1) can be reduced to the Hirota equation. If α=δ=0, then Eq (1.1) can be reduced to the LPD equation. If α=γ=0, then Eq (1.1) can be reduced to quintic NLSE. Eq (1.1) has been discussed in [46] when α,γ, and δ are non-zero constants using the ansatz approach. The authors have found just one solution, via bright soliton. Equation (1.1) has also been discussed in [50] when δ=0 and in [48] when α=γ=0. In this paper, Eq (1.1) is solved when the parameters α,γ, and δ are non-zero constants. The novelty of Eq (1.1) is unique because it is a combination of four well-known equations that describe the propagation of soliton dynamics through optical fibers across inter-continental distances. Equation (1.1) with α,γ, and δ as non-zero constants is also unique in the sense that all the perturbations and dispersive effects describe the soliton propagations dynamics.
The following is the organization of this project: In Section 2, the governing model is provided. Section 3 introduces the mathematical analysis. The fifth-order concatenation model (1.1) is solved in Section 4 by the Weierstrass type projective Riccati equation expansion method. Using the Kudryashov method addendum, we solve the fifth-order concatenation model (1.1) in Section 5. Using the new mapping strategy, we solve the fifth-order concatenation model (1.1) in Section 6. Several numerical simulations that were obtained are shown in Section 7. Section 8 presents the conclusions.
For solving Eq (1.1), set
q(x,t)=φ(ξ)eι(−κx+wt+θ0),ξ=t−Vx, | (2.1) |
where w is the wave number, θ0 is the phase constant, V is the shift of the soliton's inverse group velocity, and κ is the soliton frequency. The shape of the pluse is represented by φ(ξ), which is a valued function of ξ, where ξ is the traveling coordinate. Plugging (2.1) into Eq (1.1) with the real and imaginary parts separated, we have the ordinary differential equation (ODE):
(γ+5δω)φ(4)(ξ)+(12+3αω−6γω2−10δω3)φ′′(ξ)−(12ω2−κ+αω3−γω4−δω5)φ(ξ)+(1+6αω−12γω2−20δω3)φ3(ξ)+6(γ+5δω)φ5(ξ)+10(γ+5δω)φ2(ξ)φ′′(ξ)+10(γ+5δω)φ(ξ)φ′2(ξ)]=0, | (2.2) |
and
δφ(5)(ξ)+(α−4γω−10δω2)φ′′′(ξ)−(ω−V+3αω2−4γω3−5δω4)φ′(ξ)+6(α−4γω−10δω2)φ2(ξ)φ′(ξ)+30δφ4(ξ)φ′(ξ)+10δφ2(ξ)φ′′′(ξ)+40δφ(ξ)φ′(ξ)φ′′(ξ)+10δφ′3(ξ)=0. | (2.3) |
Integrating (2.2) with zero constant of integration, we get:
δφ(4)(ξ)+(α−4γω−10δω2)φ′′(ξ)−(ω−V+3αω2−4γω3−5δω4)φ(ξ)+2(α−4γω−10δω2)φ3(ξ)+6δφ5(ξ)+10δφ2(ξ)φ′′(ξ)+10δφ(ξ)φ′2(ξ)=0. | (2.4) |
Equations (2.2) and (2.4) are equivalent if the following conditions are satisfied:
γ+5ωδ=δ12+3αω−6γω2−10δω3=α−4γω−10δω212ω2−κ+αω3−γω4−δω5=ω−V+3αω2−4γω3−5δω41+6αω−12γω2−20δω3=2(α−4γω−10δω2). | (2.5) |
We obtain
ω=δ−γ5δα=1+8γω−4ω2(3γ−5δ)−20δω32(1−3ω)V=κ+ω+(3α−12)ω2−(4γ+α)ω3+(γ−5δ)ω4−δω5, | (2.6) |
provided ω≠13. Equation (2.2) can be written in the form:
φ(4)(ξ)+Δ1φ′′(ξ)+10φ2(ξ)φ′′(ξ)+10φ(ξ)φ′2(ξ)−Δ2φ(ξ)+Δ3φ3(ξ)+6φ5(ξ)=0, | (2.7) |
where
{Δ1=12+3αω−6γω2−10δω3γ+5δω,Δ2=12ω2−κ+αω3−γω4−δω5γ+5δω,Δ3=(1+6αω−12γω2−20δω3)γ+5δω,γ+5δω≠0. | (2.8) |
provided δ≠0, δ≠γ, ω≠13. Let us now solve the ODE (2.7) using the following three mathematical methods, the Weierstrass type projective Riccati equation expansion method, an addendum to Kudryashov's method, and the new mapping approach.
To apply the Weierstrass method [53,54] to Eq (2.7), we first balance φ(4)(ξ) with φ5(ξ) to get the balance number n=1. The solution of Eq (2.7) is:
φ(ξ)=a0+a1F(ξ)+b1G(ξ), | (3.1) |
where a0,a1, and b1 are constants that need to be found, a21+b21≠0; and F(ξ) and G(ξ) are solutions of the projective Riccati equations
F′(ξ)=pF(ξ)G(ξ),G′(ξ)=q+pG2(ξ)−rF(ξ) | (3.2) |
such that p,q, and r are constants. Weierstrass elliptic solutions to Eqs (3.2) are known in reference [53]. They are as follows:
Set 1:
F(ξ)=q6r+2pr℘(ξ,g2,g3),G(ξ)=12℘′(ξ,g2,g3)p[pq+12℘(ξ,g2,g3)],G2(ξ)=−qp+2rpF(ξ).} | (3.3) |
Set 2:
F(ξ)=5q6r+5q2p27r℘(ξ,g2,g3),G(ξ)=−q℘′(ξ,g2,g3)[qp+12℘(ξ,g2,g3)]℘(ξ,g2,g3),G2(ξ)=−qp+2rpF(ξ)−24r225pqF2(ξ).} | (3.4) |
Set 3:
F(ξ)=(2+q)[pq+12℘(ξ,g2,g3)]r[12p+pq+12℘(ξ,g2,g3)],G(ξ)=℘′(ξ,g2,g3)(℘(ξ,g2,g3)+p2+pq12)2−p24,G2(ξ)=−qp+2rpF(ξ)−r2(q+4)p(q+2)2F2(ξ),} | (3.5) |
where g2 and g3, the invariants, are provided by
g2=p2q212,g3=p3q3216. | (3.6) |
Furthermore, the Weierstrass function (℘) satisfies the relations
℘(ξ,θ212,−θ3216)=θ12−θ4sech2(√θ2ξ),θ>0,℘(ξ,θ212,−θ3216)=θ12+θ4csch2(√θ2ξ),θ>0,℘(ξ,θ212,−θ3216)=θ12−θ4sec2(√−θ2ξ),θ<0,℘(ξ,θ212,−θ3216)=θ12−θ4csc2(√−θ2ξ),θ<0.} | (3.7) |
Type 1: Add Eqs (3.1), (3.2), and (3.3) to Eq (2.7); collect each coefficient of Fi(ξ)Gj(ξ) (i=1,..,5,j=0,1); and then set them to zero, then we have the following algebraic equations:
F5(ξ):6a51=0,F4(ξ):50a31pr+30a0a41+120pb21a31r=0,F3(ξ):30r2p2a1−20pqa31+60ra1(pa0a1+rb21)+90r2a1b21 +20pra0a21+Δ3a31−60b21a31qp+60a20a31+360b21a0a21rp+120b41a1r2p2=0,F2(ξ):−15rp2qa1+3Δ1a1pr−40qra1b21+20qa1(pa0a1+rb21) +30a1r(pa20−qb21)+50r2a0b21−10pqa0a21+Δ3(3a0a21+6b21a1rp) −180a0b21a21qp+60a30a21−120b41a1rqp2+360b21a20a1rp+120b41a0r2p2=0,F(ξ):p2q2a1+Δ1a1pq−20qra0b21−10qa1(pa20−qb21) +Δ3(3a1a20+6b21a0rp−3b21a1qp)−Δ2a1+30b41a1q2p2−180b21a20a1qp+30a40a1 −120b41a0rqp2+120b21a30rp=0,F0(ξ):Δ3a30+3a0b21q−Δ2a0+30b41a0q2p2−60b21a30qp+6a50=0,F0(ξ)G(ξ):−b31Δ3qp+3Δ3a20b1−Δ2b1+6b1p2(5p2a40−10pqa20b21+q2b41)=0F(ξ)G(ξ):−p2qrb1+Δ1prb1−10b1(2pqa0a1−pra20+qrb21)+6Δ3a0a1b1 +2Δ3b31rp+24b1p2(5p2a30a1−5pqa0a1b21+5pra20b21−qrb41)=0,F2(ξ)G(ξ):6p2r2b1−20b1(pqa21−4pra0a1−r2b21)−10pqa21b1+20pra0a1b1 +10r2b31+12b1p2(15p2a20a21−5pqa21b21+20pra0a1b21+2r2b41)=0,F3(ξ)G(ξ):110rpa21b1+120a21b1p(pa0a1+rb21)=0,F4(ξ)G(ξ):30a41b1=0.} | (3.8) |
Using Maple to solve the algebraic Eqs (3.8) yields:
a0=0,a1=0,b1=ϵ6√−3p(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)q, | (3.9) |
provided pq(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)<0,(Δ3+24Δ2)>0. Substituting (3.9), (3.3) into Eq (3.1) by using (2.1) we derive the travelling wave solution of the Weierstrass type of Eq (1.1) as:
q(x,t)=√−3(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)q2ϵp℘′(ξ,θ212,−θ3216)[pq+12℘(ξ,θ212,−θ3216)]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (3.10) |
provided q(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)<0. By substituting the conversion formula (3.7) with θ=−pq into Eq (3.10), the dark soliton solution is:
q1(x,t)=ϵp6√3p(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)tanh[√−pq2(t−Vx)]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (3.11) |
and the singular soliton solution:
q2(x,t)=ϵp6√3p(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)coth[√−pq2(t−Vx)]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (3.12) |
provided pq<0,p(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)>0.
Type 2: Substite Eqs (3.1), (3.2), and (3.4) into Eq (2.7); collect each coefficient of Fi(ξ)Gj(ξ) (i=1,..,5,j=0,1); set them to zero. Then, we get these algebraic equations, we can solve with Maple, to get
a0=5ϵ18√−6Δ1,a1=−8rϵ15√−6Δ1q,b1=0,p=−16Δ19q, | (3.13) |
provided Δ1<0,q>0, ϵ=±1. Substituting Eqs (3.13) and (3.4) into Eq (3.1), the following Weierstrass type travelling wave solution is obtained:
q(x,t)=ϵ√−6Δ118[−3+32Δ127℘(ξ,θ212,−θ3216)]]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (3.14) |
where g2 and g3, the invariants, are provided by
g2=64Δ21243,g3=−512Δ3119683. | (3.15) |
Substituting the conversion formula (3.7) with θ=−pq=16Δ19 into Eq (3.14), we get the following solitary wave solutions:
q(x,t)=ϵ√−6Δ118[−3+32Δ127[−pq12+pq4sech2(√−pq2(t−Vx))]]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (3.16) |
q(x,t)=ϵ√−6Δ118[−3+32Δ127[−pq12−pq4csch2(√−pq2(t−Vx))]]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (3.17) |
provided Δ1<0,p<0,ϵ=±1.
Type 3: Substite Eqs (3.1), (3.2), and (3.5) into Eq (2.7); collect every coefficient of Fi(ξ)Gj(ξ) (i=1,..,5,j=0,1), and then set them to zero. Then, we get these algebraic equations that we can solve using Maple to obtain:
a0=ϵ6√−3(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3),a1=ϵ√pr(q+4)(q+2),b1=0. | (3.18) |
Substituting Eqs (3.18) and (3.5) into Eq (3.1), the following Weierstrass type travelling wave solution is obtained:
q(x,t)=[ϵ6√−3(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)+ϵ√p(q+4)[pq+12℘(ξ,θ212,−θ3216)][12p+pq+12℘(ξ,θ212,−θ3216)]]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (3.19) |
where (√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)<0,(Δ3+24Δ2)>0,p>0, and ϵ=±1. Substituting the conversion formula (3.7) with θ=−pq into Eq (3.19), we get the following straddled soliton solutions:
q1(x,t)=[ϵ6√−3(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)−ϵ√pq(q+4)sech2(√−pq2(t−Vx))4+qsech2(√−pq2(t−Vx))]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (3.20) |
q2(x,t)=[ϵ6√−3(√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)−ϵ√pq(q+4)csch2(√−pq2(t−Vx))4−qcsch2(√−pq2(t−Vx))]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (3.21) |
provided (√Δ3+24Δ2−Δ3)<0,(Δ3+24Δ2)>0,pq<0,ϵ=±1.
Using this technique [27,28,29,30,31,32], Eq (2.7) has the formal solution:
φ(ξ)=M∑j=0BjRj(ξ), | (4.1) |
where Bj (j=1,2,...,M) are constants, such that BM≠0, and R(ξ) represents the auxiliary equation's solution:
R′(ξ)2=R2(ξ)[1−χ R2p(ξ)]ln2K, 0<K≠1, | (4.2) |
where χ is a constant. It is simple to demonstrate that the solution to Eq (4.2) is:
R(ξ)=[4A4A2expK(pξ)+χ expK(−pξ)]1p, | (4.3) |
where A is a constant that is not zero, p is a positive constant and expK(pξ)=Kpξ. Balancing φ(4)(ξ) with φ5(ξ) in Eq (2.7), we get:
M+4p=5M⟹M=p. | (4.4) |
Now, the following are different cases that arise: Case–1. If we choose p=1, then M=1. Thus, we deduce that:
φ(ξ)=B0+B1R(ξ). | (4.5) |
Substituting Eqs (4.5) and Eq (4.2) where p=1 into Eq (2.7), assembling every power of a coefficient of [R(ξ)]q1 [R′(ξ)]q2,(q1=0,1,2,...5, q2=0,1), and setting each of these coefficients to zero, the following results are the outcome of Maple solving the algebraic equations:
B0=0,B1=√χln2K, | (4.6) |
and
Δ1=Δ32,Δ2=12ln2K(2ln2K+Δ3) | (4.7) |
provided χ>0. Substituting Eqs (4.6) and (4.3) into Eq (4.5), one gets the solutions of Eq (1.1) in the forms:
q(x,t)= [4A√χln2K4A2K(t−Vx)+χ K−(t−Vx)]eι(−κx+ωt+θ). | (4.8) |
It is easy to see that Eq (4.8) reduces to the straddled soliton solution:
q(x,t)= [4A√χln2K(4A2+χ)coshξlnK+(4A2−χ)sinhξlnK]eι(−κx+ωt+θ). | (4.9) |
In particular, if we set χ=4A2 in Eq (4.9), then we have the bright soliton solutions of Eq (1.1) as
q(x,t)= lnKsech[(t−Vx)lnK]eι(−κx+ωt+θ). | (4.10) |
Under the conditions (4.7), the solutions (4.8)–(4.10) exist.
Case–2. If we choose p=2, then M=2. Thus, Eq (2.7) has the formal solution:
φ(ξ)=B0+B1R(ξ)+B2R2(ξ). | (4.11) |
Substituting Eqs (4.11) and Eq (4.2) where p=2 into Eq (2.7), collecting all coefficients for every power of [R(ξ)]q1 [R′(ξ)]q2,(q1=0,1,2,...10, q2=0,1), and setting these coefficients to zero, we get an algebraic equation system that we can solve with Maple to get
B0=0,B1=0,B2=2√χln2K, | (4.12) |
and
Δ1=Δ32,Δ2=2ln2K(Δ3+8ln2K) | (4.13) |
provided χ>0. The solutions of Eq (1.1) can be obtained by substituting Eqs (4.12) and (4.3) into Eq (4.11).
q(x,t)= [8A√χln2K4A2K2(t−Vx)+χ K−2(t−Vx)]eι(−κx+ωt+θ). | (4.14) |
It is easy to see that Eq (4.14) reduces to the straddled soliton solution in the form
q(x,t)= [8A√χln2K(4A2+χ)cosh(2ξlnK)+(4A2−χ)sinh(2ξlnK)]eι(−κx+ωt+θ). | (4.15) |
In particular, if we set χ=4A2 in Eq (4.15), we have the bright soliton solution of Eq (1.1):
q(x,t)=2 lnKsech[2(t−Vx)lnK]eι(−κx+ωt+θ), | (4.16) |
Under the condition (4.13), the solutions (4.14)–(4.16) exist.
Similar to that, we can find a variety of solutions by selecting various values for p and M; however, for simplicity, those solutions have been excluded here.
With the new mapping method [23,24,25,26], the solution to Eq (2.7) is as follows:
φ(ξ)=α0+α1Z(ξ)+α2Z2(ξ), | (5.1) |
where α0,α1 and α2 are constants which will be determined, also α2≠0, the function Z(ξ) satisfies the first order equation:
Z′2(ξ)=r+p Z2(ξ)+q2Z4(ξ)+s3Z6(ξ), | (5.2) |
Let r, p, q, and s be constants, where s is not equal to zero. By substituting Eqs (5.1) and (5.2) into Eq (2.7), and gathering the coefficients of each power of Zh(ξ)[Z′(ξ)]j,(h=0→10,j=0,1), we can analyse the resulting expression. By setting these coefficients to zero, the following algebraic equations are obtained.
Z10(ξ):1283s2α2+40sα32+6α52=0,Z9(ξ):353s2α1+90sα1α22+30α1α42=0,Z8(ξ):80qsα2+2003sα0α22+1903sα21α2+5qα32+30α0α42+60α21α32=0,Z7(ξ):20qsα1+2603sα0α1α2+110qα1α22+403sα31+120α0α1α32+60α31α22=0,Z6(ξ):3203psα2+30qα2+83Δ1sα2+803sα20α2+20sα0α21+60qα0α22+75qα21α2+100pα32 20qα0α22+103sα0α21+Δ3α32+60α20α32+30α41α2+190α0α21α22=0,Z5(ξ):26psα1+6q2α1+Δ1sα1+10sα20α1+100qα0α1α2+15qα31+190pα1α22 +3Δ3α1α22+24α20α1α32+123α20α1α2+120α0α31α2+24α0α21α2=0,Z4(ξ):60pqα2+80rsα2+3Δ1qα2+30qα20α2+25qα0α21+100pα0α22+110pα21α2+40rα32 +3Δ3α0α22+3Δ3α21α2+60α30α22+168α20α21α2+48α0α41=0,Z3(ξ):10pqα1+20rsα1+Δ1qα1+10qα20α1+140pα0α1α2+20pα31+100rα1α22+Δ3[6α0α1α2+α31] +24α40α1α2+60α30α1α2+24α20α31+12α20α1α22+24α20α1α2+144α30α31α2=0,Z2(ξ):16p2α2+36qrα2+4Δ1pα2+40pα20α2+30pα0α21+60rα0α22+70rα21α2 −Δ2α2+3Δ3[α20α2+α0α21]+30α40α2+60α30α21=0,Z(ξ):p2α1+6qrα1+Δ1pα1+10pα20α1+80rα0α1α2+10rα31−Δ2α1+3Δ3α20α1 +30α40α1=0,Z0(ξ):8pα2r+2Δ1α2r+20rα20α2+10rα0α21−Δ2α0+Δ3α30+6α50=0.} | (5.3) |
With reference to [23,24,25,26], algebraic equations can be solved by three cases.
Case 1.The following are the results of substituting s=3q216p, r=16p227q into the system of algebraic equations (5.3) and solving them by Maple or Mathematica:
α0=√−Δ12,α1=0,α2=√−q22Δ1, | (5.4) |
and
p=Δ12, Δ2=−5Δ2154, Δ3=2Δ1 | (5.5) |
provided Δ1<0. From Eqs (5.1) and (5.4), the straddled soliton solutions have been obtained as follows:
q(x,t)=√−Δ12[1− 8tanh2[ϵ√−Δ16 (t−Vx)]3(3+tanh2[ϵ√−Δ16 (t−Vx)])]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (5.6) |
and
q(x,t)=√−Δ12[1− 8coth2[ϵ√−Δ16 (t−Vx)]3(3+coth2[ϵ√−Δ16 (t−Vx)])]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (5.7) |
where ϵ=±1. Under the conditions (5.5), solutions (5.6) and (5.7) are possible.
Case 2.Inserting s=3q216p, r=0 into the algebraic equations (5.3) and solving them by Maple or Mathematica, we obtain the following results:
α0=115√15(−2Δ3+Δ1),α1=0,α2=−2q√15(−2Δ3+Δ1), | (5.8) |
and
p=−Δ3+12Δ130,Δ2=−125(Δ1Δ3+2Δ213−2Δ233), | (5.9) |
provided (−2Δ3+Δ1)>0. From Eqs (5.1) and (5.8), the dark soliton solution is
q(x,t)=−115√15(−2Δ3+Δ1)tanh[ϵ√(−2Δ3+Δ1)60 (t−Vx)]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (5.10) |
and the singular soliton solution is
q(x,t)=−115√15(−2Δ3+Δ1)coth[ϵ√(−2Δ3+Δ1)60 (t−Vx)]eι(−κx+wt+θ0). | (5.11) |
With the constraint conditions (5.9), the solutions (5.10) and (5.11) exist.
Case 3.Inserting r=0 into the system of algebraic equations (5.3), if we extract those equations and solving them by Maple, we get
α0=0, α1=0, α2=√−16sΔ1, | (5.12) |
and
p=−Δ120,Δ2=(225q2+285Δ1)Δ1120s,Δ3=Δ2112, | (5.13) |
provided sΔ1<0. From Eqs (5.1) and (5.12), we get the straddled soliton solutions:
q(x,t)=√−36sΔ1q225[sech2(√−Δ120(t−Vx))3q2+Δ1s5(1+ϵtanh(√−Δ120(t−Vx)))2]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (5.14) |
q(x,t)=−√−36sΔ1q225[csch2(√−Δ120(t−Vx))3q2+Δ1s5(1+ϵcoth(√−Δ120(t−Vx)))2]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (5.15) |
q(x,t)=√−36sΔ125[sech2(√−Δ120(t−Vx))3q+4ϵ√−3Δ1s20tanh(√−Δ120(t−Vx))]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (5.16) |
q(x,t)=−√−36sΔ125[csch2(√−Δ120(t−Vx))3q+4ϵ√−3Δ1s20coth(√−Δ120(t−Vx))]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (5.17) |
q(x,t)=−√−9sΔ125[ϵsech(√−Δ15(t−Vx))√M−3ϵqsech(√−Δ15(t−Vx))]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (5.18) |
q(x,t)=−12√−sΔ125[1ϵ√Mcosh(√−Δ15(t−Vx))−3q]eι(−κx+wt+θ0), | (5.19) |
provided s>0,Δ1<0,M=(9q2+12sΔ15)>0, and ϵ=±1.Under the constraint conditions (5.13), the solutions (5.14)–(5.19) are valid.
Visual representation is the most efficient technique for understanding the visible bodily movements of real-life situations. The graphs in this section depict solitons retrieved with the concatenation model having quintic-order dispersion. We obtain solutions of the Weierstrass type projective Riccati equation expansion approach by employing the Weierstrass type. These solutions can be further reduced using the conversion formula to yield dark, singular, and straddled soliton solutions. We utilize the dark soliton solution (3.11) to generate Figure 1 by carefully selecting appropriate values for the parameters Δ2=0.96,Δ3=0.59,p=1.45,q=−0.27, and v=0.5. By employing the addendum to Kudryashov's method, we obtain closed-form expressions for exact solutions. These solutions can be simplified to bright soliton solutions. To demonstrate this, we select solution (4.10) and plot it with specific parameter values K=1.661 and v=0.5, as depicted in Figure 2. Finally, by employing the new mapping method, we can obtain explicit dark and straddled soliton solutions. In contrast, for the straddled soliton solution (5.6), we utilize the values Δ1=−1.5 and v=0.5 which correspond to bright soliton solutions (refer to Figure 3). We select the values Δ1=1.7, Δ3=−1.72, and v=0.5, for the dark soliton solution (5.10) (refer to Figure 4).
This work has successfully derived various types of solitons, including bright solitons, dark solitons, and combo straddled solitons, for the fifth-order concatenation model with four combined well-known nonlinear NLSE-type models. The study has also identified the novel Weierstrass-type traveling wave solutions, which can be reduced to optical soliton solutions using the conversion formula. These findings contribute to the understanding of soliton dynamics and have implications for various fields of research. Three distinct methods have been employed in this study to obtain solutions for the model at hand. These include the Weierstrass-type projective Riccati equation expansion method, the addendum to Kudryashov's method, and the new mapping methods. These approaches have contributed to the advancement of research in this field.
The findings of this research provide substantial evidence and accuracy in elucidating various physical phenomena and provide a comprehensive overview of the requirements for the existence of soliton solutions. The listed criteria serve as crucial guidelines for identifying and understanding the behaviour of solitons in various physical systems. By establishing these conditions, researchers can effectively analyze and predict the presence and characteristics of solitons, contributing to advancements in fields such as nonlinear optics, fluid dynamics, and quantum mechanics. The behaviour of the solutions (3.11), (4.10), (5.6), and (5.10) has been visually represented through the plotting of their 2D, 3D, and contour plots in Section 6. These figures provide valuable insights into the characteristics and patterns exhibited by these solutions. The findings validate the advantages and applicability of the employed methodologies. Furthermore, the approaches described are reliable and applicable to a wide range of nonlinear models in mathematical physics. Finally, the obtained results were validated through the utilization of Maple, as satisfied by the verification of Eq (1.1).
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (20018869, Development of Waste Heat and Waste Cold Recovery Bus Air-conditioning System to Reduce Heating and Cooling Load by 10%) funded By the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] |
S. Backus, C. Durfee, G. Mourou, H. C. Kapteyn, M. M. Murnane, 0.2-TW laser system at 41 kHz, Opt. lett., 22 (1997), 1256–1258. http://doi.org/10.1364/OL.22.001256 doi: 10.1364/OL.22.001256
![]() |
[2] |
Y.-L. Ma, Interaction and energy transition between the breather and rogue wave for a generalized nonlinear Schrödinger system with two higher-order dispersion operators in optical fibers, Nonlinear Dyn., 97 (2019), 95–105. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-04956-0 doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-04956-0
![]() |
[3] |
J. Vega-Guzman, M. F. Mahmood, Q. Zhou, H. Triki, A. H. Arnous, A. Biswas, et al., Solitons in nonlinear directional couplers with optical metamaterials, Nonlinear Dyn., 87 (2016), 427–458. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3052-2 doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-3052-2
![]() |
[4] |
A. H. Arnous, Optical solitons to the cubic quartic Bragg gratings with anti-cubic nonlinearity using new approach, Optik, 251 (2022), 168356. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168356 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168356
![]() |
[5] |
A. H. Arnous, A. Biswas, Y. Yildirim, L. Moraru, M. Aphane, S. Moshokoa, et al., Quiescent optical solitons with Kudryashov's generalized quintuple-power and nonlocal nonlinearity having nonlinear chromatic dispersion, Universe, 8 (2022), 501. http://doi.org/10.3390/universe8100501 doi: 10.3390/universe8100501
![]() |
[6] |
B.-Q. Li, Y.-L. Ma, Optical soliton resonances and soliton molecules for the Lakshmanan-Porsezian-Daniel system in nonlinear optics, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2022), 6689–6699. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-08195-8 doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-08195-8
![]() |
[7] |
Y.-L. Ma, B.-Q. Li, Novel optical soliton structures for a defocusing Lakshmanan-Porsezian-Daniel optical system, Optik, 284 (2023), 170931. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170931 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170931
![]() |
[8] |
Y.-L. Ma, B.-Q. Li, Optical soliton resonances, soliton molecules to breathers for a defocusing Lakshmanan-Porsezian- Daniel system, Opt. Quant. Electron., 56 (2023), 151. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05687-8 doi: 10.1007/s11082-023-05687-8
![]() |
[9] |
Y.-L. Ma, A.-M. Wazwaz, B.-Q. Li, Soliton resonances, soliton molecules, soliton oscillations and heterotypic solitons for the nonlinear Maccari system, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2023), 113327–113341. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08529-0 doi: 10.1007/s11071-023-08529-0
![]() |
[10] |
Y.-L. Ma, B.-Q. Li, Soliton resonances for a transient stimulated Raman scattering system, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2022), 2631–2640. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07945-y doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-07945-y
![]() |
[11] |
B.-Q. Li, Y.-L. Ma, A firewall effect during the rogue wave and breather interactions to the Manakov system, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2023), 1565–1575. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07878-6 doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-07878-6
![]() |
[12] |
B.-Q. Li, Y.-L. Ma, Soliton resonances and soliton molecules of pump wave and Stokes wave for a transient stimulated Raman scattering system in optics, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137 (2022), 1227. http://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03455-3 doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03455-3
![]() |
[13] |
B.-Q. Li, Y.-L. Ma, Interaction properties between rogue wave and breathers to the manakov system arising from stationary self-focusing electromagnetic systems, Chaos, Soliton. Fract., 156 (2022), 111832. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111832 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111832
![]() |
[14] |
B.-Q. Li, Loop-like kink breather and its transition phenomena for the Vakhnenko equation arising from high-frequency wave propagation in electromagnetic physics, Appl. Math. Lett., 112 (2021), 106822. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2020.106822 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2020.106822
![]() |
[15] | A. R. Seadawy, A. H. Arnous, A. Biswas, M. Belic, Optical solitons with sasa-satsuma equation by F-expansion scheme, Optoelectron. Adv. Mater., Rapid Commun., 13 (2019), 31–36. |
[16] |
A. H. Arnous, M. S. Hashemi, K. S. Nisar, M. Shakeel, J. Ahmad, I. Ahmad, et al., Investigating solitary wave solutions with enhanced algebraic method for new extended Sakovich equations in fluid dynamics, Results Phys., 57 (2024), 107369. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107369 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107369
![]() |
[17] |
Z. Li, L.Li, H. Tian, G. Zhou, New types of solitary wave solutions for the higher order nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84 (2000), 4096. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4096 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4096
![]() |
[18] |
H. Triki, F.Azzouzi, P. Grelu, Multipole solitary wave solutions of the higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation with quintic non-Kerr terms, Opt. Commun., 309 (2013), 71–79. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2013.06.039 doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2013.06.039
![]() |
[19] |
F. Azzouzi, H. Triki, K. Mezghiche, A. El Akrmi, Solitary wave solutions for high dispersive cubic-quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 39 (2009), 1304–1307. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.024 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.024
![]() |
[20] |
W. P. Hong, Optical solitary wave solutions for the higher order nonlinear Schrödinger equation with cubic-quintic non- Kerr terms, Optics Commun., 194 (2001), 217–223. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2022.104616 doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2022.104616
![]() |
[21] |
G. Xu, Extended auxiliary equation method and its applications to three generalized NLS equations, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 7 (2014), 541370. http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/541370 doi: 10.1155/2014/541370
![]() |
[22] |
E. M. E. Zayed, K. A. E. Alurrfi, Extended auxiliary equation method and its applications for finding the exact solutions for a class of nonlinear Schrödinger-type equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 289 (2016), 111–131. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.04.014 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2016.04.014
![]() |
[23] |
E. M. E. Zayed, M. E. M. El-Ngar, A. G. Al-Nowehy, On solving the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with an anti-cubic nonlinearity in presence of Hamiltonian perturbation terms, Optik, 178 (2019), 488–508. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.09.064 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.09.064
![]() |
[24] |
E. M. E. Zayed, K. A. E. Alurrfi, Solitons and other solutions for two nonlinear Schrödinger equations using the new mapping method, Optik, 144 (2017), 132–148, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.06.101 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.06.101
![]() |
[25] |
E. M. E. Zayed, A. G. Al-Nowehy, Many new exact solutions to the higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation with derivative non Kerr nonlinear terms using three different techniques, Optik, 143 (2017), 84–103. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.06.025 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.06.025
![]() |
[26] |
X. Zeng, X. Yong, A new mapping method and its applications to nonlinear partial differential equations, Phys. Lett. A, 372 (2008), 6602–6607. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.09.025 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.09.025
![]() |
[27] |
E. M. E. Zayed, M. E. M. Alngar, A. Biswas, Y. Yildirim, M. Ekici, H. M. Alshehri, et al., Cubic–quartic solitons in couplers with optical metamaterials having parabolic law nonlinearity, Optik, 247 (2021), 167960. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167960 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167960
![]() |
[28] |
K. A. Gepreel, E. M. E. Zayed, M. E. M. Alngar, New optical solitons perturbation in the birefringent fibers for the CGL equation with Kerr law nonlinearity using two integral schemes methods, Optik, 227 (2021), 166099. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166099 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166099
![]() |
[29] |
T. A. Nofal, E. M. E. Zayed, M. E. M. Alngar, R. M. A. Shohib, M. Ekici, Highly dispersive optical solitons perturbation having Kudryashov's arbitrary form with sextic-power law refractive index and generalized non-local laws, Optik, 228 (2021), 166120. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166120 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166120
![]() |
[30] |
N. A. Kudryashov, Highly dispersive optical solitons of the generalized nonlinear eighth-order Schrödinger equation, Optik, 206 (2020), 164335. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164335 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164335
![]() |
[31] |
E. M. E. Zayed, A. H. Arnous, A. Secer, M. Ozisik, M. Bayram, N. Ali Shah, et al., Highly dispersive optical solitons in fiber Bragg Gratings for stochastic Lakshmanan-Porsezian-Daniel equation with spatio-temporal dispersion and multiplicative white noise, Results Phys., 55 (2023), 107177. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107177 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107177
![]() |
[32] |
A. H. Arnous, M. Mirzazadeh, M. S. Hashemi, N. Ali Shah, J. D. Chung, Three different integration schemes for finding soliton solutions in the (1+1)-dimensional Van Der Waals gas system, Results Phys., 55 (2023), 107178. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107178 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107178
![]() |
[33] | E. M. E. Zayed, R. M. A. Shohib, M. E. M. Alngar, A. Biswas, Y. Yildirim, A. Dakova, et al., Optical solitons in the Sasa-Satsuma model with multiplicative noise via Ito calculus, Ukr. J. Phys. Opt., 23 (2022), 9–14. |
[34] |
N. Sirendaoreji, Unified Riccati equation expansion method and its application to two new classes of Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equations, Nonlinear Dyn., 89 (2017), 333–344. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3457-6 doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3457-6
![]() |
[35] |
C. Xiang, Jacobi elliptic function solutions for (2+1)-dimensional Boussinesq and Kadomtsev-Petviashvilli equation, Appl. Math, 2 (2011), 1313–1316. http://doi.org/10.4236/am.2011.211183 doi: 10.4236/am.2011.211183
![]() |
[36] |
N. A. Kudryashov, First integral and general solution of traveling wave reduction for the Triki–Biswas equation, Optik, 185 (2019), 275–281. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.03.087 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.03.087
![]() |
[37] |
N. A. Kudryashov, A generalized model for description pulses in optical fiber, Optik, 189 (2019), 42–52. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.069 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.069
![]() |
[38] |
N. A. Kudryashov, Traveling wave solutions of the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation with cubic–quintic nonlinearity, Optik, 188 (2019), 27–35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.026 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.026
![]() |
[39] |
N. A. Kudryashov, General solution of the traveling wave reduction for the Kundu–Mukherjee–Naskar model, Optik, 186 (2019), 22–27. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.04.072 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.04.072
![]() |
[40] |
N. A. Kudryashov, General solution of the traveling wave reduction for the Chen–Lee–Liu equation, Optik, 186 (2019), 339–349. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.04.127 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.04.127
![]() |
[41] |
N. A. Kudryashov, Traveling wave solutions of the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation with cubic-quintic, Optik, 186 (2019), 27–35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.026 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.026
![]() |
[42] |
N. A. Kudryashov, First integrals and general solution of the Fokas–Lenells equation, Optik, 195 (2019), 163135. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163135 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163135
![]() |
[43] | R. Hirota, Exact envelope-soliton solutions of a nonlinear wave equation, J. Math. Phys., 14 (1973), 805–809. |
[44] |
A. Ankiewicz, J. M. Soto-Crespo, N. Akhmediev, Rogue waves and rational solutions of the Hirota equation, Phys. Rev. E, 81 (2010), 046602. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046602 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046602
![]() |
[45] | A. Maccari, A generalized Hirota equation in 2+1 dimensions, J. Math. Phys., 39 (1998), 6547–6551. |
[46] |
H. Triki, F. Azzouzi, A. Biswas, S. P. Moshokoa, M. Belic, Bright Optical Solitons With Kerr law Nonlinearity and Fifth Order Dispersion, Optik, 128 (2017), 172–177. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.026 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.026
![]() |
[47] |
A. Chowdury, D. J. Kedziora, A. Ankiewicz, N. Akhmediev, Breather-to-soliton conversions described by the quintic equation of the nonlinear Schrödinger hierarchy, Phys. Rev. E, 91 (2015), 032928. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.032928 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.032928
![]() |
[48] |
A. Chowdury, D. J. Kedziora, A. Ankiewicz, N. Akhmediev, Soliton solutions of an integrable nonlinear Schrödinger equation with quintic terms, Phys. Rev. E, 91 (2014), 032922. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032922 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032922
![]() |
[49] |
A. Chowdury, D. J. Kedziora, A. Ankiewicz, N. Akhmediev, Breather solutions of the integrable quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation and their interactions, Phys. Rev. E, 91 (2015), 022919. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.022919 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.022919
![]() |
[50] |
A. Ankiewicz, N. Akhmedie, Higher-order integrable evolution equation and its soliton solutions, Phys. Lett. A, 378 (2014), 358–361. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.11.031 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2013.11.031
![]() |
[51] |
A. H. Arnous, A. Biswas, A. H. Kara, Y. Yildirim, L. Moraru, C. Iticescu, et al., Optical Solitons and Conservation Laws for the Concatenation Model with Spatio-Temporal Dispersion (Internet Traffic Regulation), J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 19 (2023), 35. http://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2023031 doi: 10.1051/jeos/2023031
![]() |
[52] |
A. H. Arnous, A. Biswas, A. H. Kara, Y. Yildirim, L. Moraru, C. Iticescu, et al., Optical Solitons and Conservation Laws for the Concatenation Model: Power-Law Nonlinearity, Ain Shams Eng. J., 15 (2023), 102381. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102381 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102381
![]() |
[53] | N. Sirendaoreji, A method for constructing Weierstrass elliptic function solutions and their degenerated solutions of the mKdV equation, 2022, arXiv: 2210.03302v1. http://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.03302 |
[54] | E. M. E. Zayed, A. H. Arnous, A. Biswas, Y. Yildirim, A. Asiri, Optical solitons for the concatenation model with multiplicative white noise, J. Opt., 2023. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-023-01381-w |
1. | Abeer S. Khalifa, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Niveen M. Badra, Wafaa B. Rabie, Homan Emadifar, Investigating innovative optical solitons for a (3+1)- dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger’s equation under the influences of 4th-order dispersive and parabolic law of nonlinearities, 2024, 17, 26669501, 100754, 10.1016/j.rio.2024.100754 | |
2. | Anwar Ja’afar Mohamad Jawad, Anjan Biswas, Yakup Yildirim, Ali Saleh Alshomrani, Highly dispersive optical solitons with generalized quadratic—cubic form of self—phase modulation by Sardar sub—equation scheme, 2024, 0972-8821, 10.1007/s12596-024-01848-4 | |
3. | Elsayed. M. E. Zayed, Khaled A. E. Alurrfi, Rabeaa A. Alshbear, Ahmed H. Arnous, Yakup Yildirim, Layth Hussein, Anwar Ja’afar Mohamad Jawad, Ali Saleh Alshomrani, Anjan Biswas, Solitons in magneto-optic waveguides with generalized Kudryashov’s form of self-phase modulation structure, 2024, 0972-8821, 10.1007/s12596-024-02188-z | |
4. | O. González-Gaxiola, Yakup Yildirim, Layth Hussein, Anjan Biswas, Quiescent pure-quartic optical solitons with Kerr and non-local combo self-phase modulation by Laplace-Adomian decomposition, 2024, 0972-8821, 10.1007/s12596-024-02257-3 | |
5. | Handenur Esen, Aydin Secer, Muslum Ozisik, Mustafa Bayram, Stochastic perturbed Fokas‑Lenells equation having the polynomial law of self‑phase modulation in the presence of spatio‑temporal dispersion, 2024, 0972-8821, 10.1007/s12596-024-02355-2 | |
6. | Bing-Wen Zhang, The perturbed concatenated model of the Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel and the Sasa–Satsuma equations having the Kerr law in the presence of spatio-temporal dispersion and multiplicative white noise, 2025, 193, 09600779, 116106, 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116106 |