n | a=an | b=bn | x=2a2+1 | y=2a3+3a | z=2ab |
1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
3 | 7 | 5 | 99 | 707 | 70 |
5 | 41 | 29 | 3363 | 137965 | 2378 |
7 | 239 | 169 | 114243 | 27304555 | 80782 |
In this paper, we consider the simultaneous Pell equations (a2+2)x2−y2=2 and x2−bz2=1 where a is a positive integer and b>1 is squarefree and has at most three prime divisors. We obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions that the above simultaneous Pell equations have positive integer solutions by using only the elementary methods of factorization, congruence, the quadratic residue and fundamental properties of Lucas sequence and the associated Lucas sequence. Moreover, we prove that these simultaneous Pell equations have at most one solution in positive integers. When a solution exists, assuming the positive solutions of the Pell equation (a2+2)x2−y2=2 are x=xm and y=ym with m≥1 odd, then the only solution of the system is given by m=3 or m=5 or m=7 or m=9.
Citation: Cencen Dou, Jiagui Luo. Complete solutions of the simultaneous Pell's equations (a2+2)x2−y2=2 and x2−bz2=1[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19353-19373. doi: 10.3934/math.2023987
[1] | Changsheng Luo, Jiagui Luo . Complete solutions of the simultaneous Pell equations (a2+1)y2−x2=y2−bz2=1. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9919-9938. doi: 10.3934/math.2021577 |
[2] | Bingzhou Chen, Jiagui Luo . On the Diophantine equations x2−Dy2=−1 and x2−Dy2=4. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(4): 1170-1180. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.4.1170 |
[3] | Jinyan He, Jiagui Luo, Shuanglin Fei . On the exponential Diophantine equation (a(a−l)m2+1)x+(alm2−1)y=(am)z. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7187-7198. doi: 10.3934/math.2022401 |
[4] | Ziyu Dong, Zhengjun Zhao . An application of p-adic Baker method to a special case of Jeśmanowicz' conjecture. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11617-11628. doi: 10.3934/math.2023588 |
[5] | Cheng Feng, Jiagui Luo . On the exponential Diophantine equation (q2l−p2k2n)x+(pkqln)y=(q2l+p2k2n)z. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8609-8621. doi: 10.3934/math.2022481 |
[6] | Wei Zhao, Jian Lu, Lin Wang . On the integral solutions of the Egyptian fraction equation ap=1x+1y+1z. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4930-4937. doi: 10.3934/math.2021289 |
[7] | Zhihua Wang, Choonkil Park, Dong Yun Shin . Additive ρ-functional inequalities in non-Archimedean 2-normed spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1905-1919. doi: 10.3934/math.2021116 |
[8] | Yahui Yu, Jiayuan Hu . On the generalized Ramanujan-Nagell equation x2+(2k−1)y=kz with k≡3 (mod 4). AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10596-10601. doi: 10.3934/math.2021615 |
[9] | Jiayuan Hu, Yu Zhan . Pythagorean triples and quadratic residues modulo an odd prime. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 957-966. doi: 10.3934/math.2022057 |
[10] | Yunfeng Wei, Hongwei Yang, Hongwang Yu . On stable solutions of the weighted Lane-Emden equation involving Grushin operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2623-2635. doi: 10.3934/math.2021159 |
In this paper, we consider the simultaneous Pell equations (a2+2)x2−y2=2 and x2−bz2=1 where a is a positive integer and b>1 is squarefree and has at most three prime divisors. We obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions that the above simultaneous Pell equations have positive integer solutions by using only the elementary methods of factorization, congruence, the quadratic residue and fundamental properties of Lucas sequence and the associated Lucas sequence. Moreover, we prove that these simultaneous Pell equations have at most one solution in positive integers. When a solution exists, assuming the positive solutions of the Pell equation (a2+2)x2−y2=2 are x=xm and y=ym with m≥1 odd, then the only solution of the system is given by m=3 or m=5 or m=7 or m=9.
The study of positive integer solutions of Pell equations has a wide range of applications in finding integer points on elliptic curves, which is an important part of many scientific problems, as shown in the reference [1,2,3]. In [4], A. Thue showed that the system Diophantine equations
a1x2−b1y2=c1,a2y2−b2z2=c2,a1b2≠a2b1 | (1.1) |
have at most finitely many solutions. Let sqf(b) denote the square-free part of positive integer b. In [5], Cipu proved the following
Theorem CIPU. Let a and b be integers greater than 1, with b not a perfect square.
a) Assume b is odd and its square-free part has at most two prime divisors. Then the system
x2−(a2−1)y2=y2−bz2=1 | (1.2) |
is solvable in positive integers if and only if b divides 4a2−1 and the quotient is a perfect square. When it exists, this solution is
(x,y,z)=(2a2−1,2a,√(4a2−1)/b). |
b) Assume sqf(b)=2p with p either prime or equal to 1. Then the system (1.2) is solvable in positive integers if and only if (2a2−1)/p is a perfect square and b divides 8a2(2a2−1) and the quotient is a perfect square. When it exists, this solution is
(x,y,z)=(4a3−3a,4a2−1,√8a2(2a2−1)/b). |
Bennett [6] showed that the system Pell equations
x2−ay2=y2−bz2=1 | (1.3) |
has at most three solutions, where a and b are distinct positive integers. Yuan [7] conjectured that for any positive integers a and b, (1.1) has at most one solution and he proved that the conjecture holds for a=4m(m+1). Walsh [8] proved that the system Pell equations
x2−(m2−c)y2=c,y2−bz2=1,c∈{±1,±2,±4} | (1.4) |
has at most one solution, where m and b>1 are positive integers with b squarefree, and m2−c is a positive nonsquare integer. In [9], the authors considered the simultaneous Pell equations
(a2+1)x2−y2=x2−bz2=1 | (1.5) |
where a>0 is an integer and b>1 is squarefree and has at most three prime divisors. Assuming the positive integer solutions of the Pell equation (a2+1)x2−y2=1 are x=xm and y=ym with m≥1 an odd integer, they proved that the only possible solution of system (1.5) is given by m=3 or m=5 or m=7 or m=9.
In this paper, we consider the simultaneous Pell equations
(a2+2)x2−y2=2,x2−bz2=1 | (1.6) |
where a is a positive integer and b>1 is squarefree and has at most three prime divisors. By the results of Walsh [8], we know that (1.5) and (1.6) has at most one solution for any positive integer a and b>1 squarefree. Assuming the positive integer solutions of the Pell equation (a2+2)x2−y2=2 are x=xm and y=ym with m≥1 an odd integer, we prove that system (1.6) has solutions only when m=3 or m=5 or m=7 or m=9. We prove the following results.
Theorem 1.1. Let p be a prime and let a be a positive integer. Then the simultaneous Pell equations
(a2+2)x2−y2=2,x2−pz2=1 | (1.7) |
have positive integer solutions if and only if a2+1 is a product of p and a square integer. When a solution exists there is exactly one solution. The only one solution is given by
(x,y,z)=(x3,y3,√x23−1p)=(2a2+1,2a3+3a,2a√a2+1p). |
Theorem 1.2. Let p and q be two distinct primes and let a be a positive integer. Then the simultaneous Pell equations
(a2+2)x2−y2=2,x2−pqz2=1 | (1.8) |
have at most one positive integer solution. Moreover, the solution exists if and only if one of the following two conditions holds:
α)a2+1 is a product of pq and a square integer.
β)a≡2(mod4),a2+1=pb2,2a2+1=c2,and2a2+3=qd2.
When it exists, the solution is given by formula
(x,y,z)=(x3,y3,√x23−1pq)=(2a2+1,2a3+3a,2a√a2+1pq)incaseα). |
(x,y,z)=(x5,y5,√x25−1pq)incaseβ). |
We shall denote by ◻ an unspecified perfect square.
Theorem 1.3. Let p,q and r be distinct primes and let a be a positive integer. Then the simultaneous Pell equations
(a2+2)x2−y2=2,x2−pqrz2=1 | (1.9) |
have at most one positive integer solution. Moreover, the solution exists if and only if one of the following conditions holds:
α)a2+1=pqr◻.
β)a2+1=p◻,2a2+1=q◻,and2a2+3=r◻or
a2+1=p◻,2a2+1=◻,and2a2+3=qr◻or |
a≡2(mod4),a2+1=pq◻,2a2+1=◻,and2a2+3=r◻. |
γ)a2+1=2◻,2a4+4a2+1=p◻,2a2+1=q◻,and2a2+3=r◻or
a≡2(mod4),p=2,a2+1=q◻,2a4+4a2+1=◻,2a2+1=◻,and2a2+3=r◻. |
δ)a2+1=2◻,2a4+4a2+1=p◻,4a4+6a2+1=q◻,and4a4+10a2+5=r◻.
When it exists, the solution is given by formula
(x,y,z)=(x3,y3,√x23−1pqr)=(2a2+1,2a3+3a,2a√a2+1pqr)incaseα). |
(x,y,z)=(x5,y5,√x25−1pqr)incaseβ). |
(x,y,z)=(x7,y7,√x27−1pqr)incaseγ). |
(x,y,z)=(x9,y9,√x29−1pqr)incaseδ). |
We organize this paper as follows. In Section 2, we present some basic definitions and some lemmas which are needed in the proofs of our main results. Consequently, in Sections 3–5, we give the proofs of Theorems 1.1 to 1.3, respectively. In Section 6, we give some examples of applications of Theorems 1.1–1.3.
In the proof of our main result, Lehmer sequences and the associated Lehmer sequences play an essential role. So, we need to recall them. Let P>0, Q be nonzero coprime integers, let D=P−4Q be called discriminant, and assume that D>0. Consider the polynomial x2−√Px+Q, called characteristic polynomial, which has the roots
α=√P+√D2andβ=√P−√D2. |
For each n≥0, define the Lehmer sequence Un=Un(P,Q) and the associated Lehmer sequence Vn=Vn(P,Q) as follows:
Un={αn−βnα−β,if2⧸|n,αn−βnα2−β2,if2|n, |
and
Vn={αn+βnα+β,if2⧸|n,αn+βn,if2|n. |
Consider the Pell equation
kx2−ly2=c,c=1,2, | (2.1) |
with k>1 when c=1. Let α=x1√k+y1√l√c,β=x1√k−y1√l√c, where x1√k+y1√l is the minimal positive integer solution of the Eq (2.1), then all positive integer solutions of this equation are given by
xn√k+yn√l√c=αn |
with n≥1 an odd integer. Moreover, α2 is the fundamental solution of the equation
x2−kly2=1, | (2.2) |
all positive integer solutions of this equation are given by
Xn+Yn√kl=α2n |
with n≥1.
The next results are classical, so well known and frequently employed that it is very difficult to locate their first appearance in print.
Lemma 2.1. Let x1√k+y1√l be the minimal positive integer solution of the Eq (2.1). Then all positive integer solutions of the Eq (2.1) are given by
xn=x1Vn(4kx21c,1)andyn=y1Un(4kx21c,1) |
with n an odd integer. All positive integer solutions of the Eq (2.2) are given by
Xn=V2n(4kx21c,1)2andYn=x1y1U2n(4kx21c,1) |
with n≥1.
The following identities are fairly well known and valid for the numbers Un=Un(P,1) and Vn=Vn(P,1):
Ifd=gcd(m,n),thengcd(Um,Un)=Ud, | (2.3) |
U2n=UnVn. | (2.4) |
Let m=2ak, n=2bl, k and l odd, a, b≥0, and d=gcd(m,n).
gcd(Um,Vn)={Vd,ifa>b,1or2,ifa≤b. | (2.5) |
If P is even, then Vn is always even and Um is even iff m is even. When P is even and a≤b, we get gcd(Um,Vn)=2 if m is even and gcd(Um,Vn)=1 if m is odd. Moreover, if n is odd, we have
U2n−1=(α+β)2Un−1Un+1,V2n−1=(α−β)2Un−1Un+1. | (2.6) |
We omit the proofs of the following lemmas, as they are based on straightforward induction. The details can be also seen in the references [10,11,12,13].
Lemma 2.2. Let α=x1√k+y1√l√c,β=x1√k−y1√l√c, then we have
v2(Un(P,1))={0,if2⧸|n,v2(n)−1,if2|n, |
and
v2(Vn(P,1))={0,if2⧸|n,1,if2|n. |
Lemma 2.3. ([14]) Let the minimal positive integer solution of the equation Ax2−By2=1 be ε=x0√A+y0√B, where A>1 and B are coprime positive integers with d=AB not a square. Then the only possible solution of the equation Ax2−By4=1 is given by x√A+y2√B=εl where y0=lf2 for some odd squarefree integer l.
Lemma 2.4. ([15]) Let A>1 and B be coprime positive integers with d=AB not a square. The Diophantine equation
AX4−BY2=1 | (2.7) |
has at most two positive integer solutions. Moreover, (2.7) is solvable if and only if x0 is a square, where ε=x0√A+y0√B is the minimal positive integer solution of the equation AU2−BV2=1. And if x2√A+y√B=εk, then k=1 or k=p≡3(mod4) is a prime.
Lemma 2.5. ([16,17]) Let the fundamental solution of the equation v2−du2=1 be a+b√d. Then the only possible solutions of the equation X4−dY2=1 are given by X2=a and X2=2a2−1; both solutions occur in the following cases: d=1785,7140,28560.
Lemma 2.6. ([18]) Let D>0 be a nonsquare integer. Define
Tn+Un√D=(T1+U1√D)n, |
where T1+U1√D is the fundamental solution of the Pell equation
X2−DY2=1. | (2.8) |
There are at most two positive integer solutions (X,Y) to the equation
X2−DY4=1. | (2.9) |
(1) If two solutions Y1<Y2 exist, then Y21=U1 and Y22=U2, except only if D=1785 or D=16⋅1785, in which case Y21=U1 and Y22=U4.
(2) If only one positive integer solution (X,Y) to Eq (2.9) exists, then Y2=Ul where U1=lv2 for some squarefree integer l, and either l=1,l=2 or l=p for some prime p≡3(mod4).
Let (x1,y1) be the minimal positive integer solution to (2.1) with c=2, and define
α=x1√k+y1√l√2. |
Furthermore, for n odd, define
αn=xn√k+yn√l√2, |
where xn,yn are positive integers.
Lemma 2.7. ([19]) (1) If y1 is not a square, then equation
kx2−ly4=2 | (2.10) |
has no solutions.
(2) If y1 is a square and y3 is not a square, then (x1,y1) is the only solution of (2.10).
(3) If y1 and y3 are both squares, then (x1,y1) and (x3,y3) are the only solutions of (2.10).
Lemma 2.8. ([20]) The Diophantine equation
kx4−ly2=2 |
has at most one solution in positive integers, and such a solution must arise from the minimal positive integer solution to (2.1) with c=2.
Lemma 2.9. The Diophantine equation
x2−a2(a2+2)y4=1 | (2.11) |
has at most one positive integer solution other than (x,y)=(a2+1,1), which is
(x,y2)=(2(a2+1)2−1,2(a2+1)). |
Proof. It is easy to see that (x,y)=(a2+1,1) is the fundamental solution of (2.11) with D=a2(a2+2). The result immediately follows by Lemma 2.5.
Lemma 2.10. The simultaneous Diophantine equations
x2−2y2=1,3z2−x2=2 | (2.12) |
has no positive integer solutions.
Proof. Assume that (x,y,z) is a positive integer solution of (2.12). By Lemma 2.1 we know that
z=V2m+1,x=U2m+1 |
for some positive integer m. We shall discuss separately two cases.
The case m is even, say m=2k for some positive integer k. Since U24k+1−1=2y2, it follows from (2.6) that 6U4kU4k+2=(α+β)2U4kU4k+2=2y2, where α=√3+1√2,β=√3−1√2. Using the fact that gcd(4k,4k+2)=2, we get gcd(U4k,U4k+2)=U2=1 by (2.3). Then either
U4k=b2,U4k+2=3c2 | (2.13) |
or
U4k=3b2,U4k+2=c2 | (2.14) |
for some positive integers b and c.
The former equation of (2.13) yields U2kV2k=b2, so that U2k=b21, V2k=b22 for some positive integers b1 and b2, which is impossible since v2(V2k)=1 by Lemma 2.2.
The latter equation of (2.14) yields that (V4k+22,c) is a solution of X2−3Y4=1. We get by Lemma 2.5 that c=1, which leads to U4k+2=1=U2, a contradiction, or U4k+2=c2=4=V2, which is impossible. Hence, both of these are impossible.
The case m is odd, say m=2k+1 for some nonnegative integer k. Since U24k+3−1=2y2, it follows from (2.6) that 6U4k+4U4k+2=(α+β)2U4k+4U4k+2=2y2. Using the fact that gcd(4k+4,4k+2)=2, we get gcd(U4k+4,U4k+2)=U2=1 by (2.3). Then either
U4k+4=b2,U4k+2=3c2 | (2.15) |
or
U4k+4=3b2,U4k+2=c2 | (2.16) |
for some positive integers b and c.
The former equation of (2.15) yields U2k+2V2k+2=b2, so that U2k+2=b21, V2k+2=b22 for some positive integers b1 and b2, which is impossible since v2(V2k+2)=1 by Lemma 2.2.
According to the above discussion of (2.14), we know that (2.16) is impossible. Hence, both of these are impossible.
The first equation of (1.6)
(a2+2)x2−y2=2 | (2.17) |
has the minimal positive integer solution √a2+2+a with a odd. Then all positive integer solutions of the Eq (2.17) are given by
x=V2m+1(2(a2+2),1),y=aU2m+1(2(a2+2),1),m≥0 |
by Lemma 2.1. If a is even, then let a=2a1, the equation
(2a21+1)x2−2y2=1 | (2.18) |
has the minimal positive integer solution √2a21+1+a1√2. Then all positive integer solutions of the Eq (2.18) are given by
x=V2m+1(2(a2+2),1),y=a1U2m+1(2(a2+2),1),m≥0 |
by Lemma 2.1. In the sequel, we write Vm and Um instead of Vm(2(a2+2),1) and Um(2(a2+2),1), respectively. We have the following:
Lemma 2.11. Let a be positive integer.
(a) If U2m=2◻, then the equation there is no positive integer solutions.
(b) If, for m>0, U2m=◻, then m=1 and x=1 or m=2 and a2+1=2◻.
Proof. (a) Assume that U2m=2x2 for some positive integers m and x. We get by Lemma 2.2 that m is even. Write m=2k. This yields U2kV2k2=x2, so that U2k=u2, V2k2=v2 for some positive integers u and v odd since v2(V2k)=1 by Lemma 2.2. Then (v2,u) is a solution of (2.11) by Lemma 2.1. We get by Lemma 2.9 that a2+1=v2, which is impossible for a>1, or
2(a2+1)2−1=v2,2(a2+1)=u2. |
Therefore 8(u2)4−v2=1. It follows v2≡−1(mod8), which is impossible.
(b) Assume that U2m=x2 for some positive integer m and some positive integer x. This yields (V2m2,x) is a solution of (2.11). We get by Lemma 2.9 that U2m=1=U2 or U2m=x2=2(a2+1)=V2. The former case means that m=1 and x=1. The latter case yields m=2, a2+1=2◻.
Lemma 2.12. Let p be odd prime.
(a) If, for m>0, U2m=2p◻, then m=2 or m=4, a2+1=2◻,\: 2a4+4a2+1=p◻.
(b) If, for m>0, U4m+2=p◻, then 2m+1=P≡3(mod4) is a prime and a is even.
Proof. (a) Assume that U2m=2px2 for some positive integers m and x. We get by Lemma 2.2 that m is even. Write m=2k. This yields U2kV2k2=px2, so that U2k=u2,V2k2=pv2 or U2k=pu2, V2k2=v2 for some positive integers u and v odd. By Lemma 2.11 and the former equation, we have k=1 or k=2, a2+1=2◻ and 2a4+4a2+1=V42=p◻. The latter equation yields (v,pu2) is a solution of x4−a2(a2+2)y2=1. Since a2(a2+2)≠1785,4⋅1785,16⋅1785, we get by Lemma 2.5 that pu2=1, a contradiction, or U2k=pu2=2(a2+1)=U4. It follows that k=2 and 2a4+4a2+1=V42=v2, 2⧸|a. Taking modulo 8 yields 7≡v2(mod8), which is impossible.
(b) Assume that U2m+1V2m+1=U4m+2=px2 for some positive integer m and some positive integer x. This yields U2m+1=pu2, V2m+1=v2 or U2m+1=u2, V2m+1=pv2.
We first consider the case 2⧸|a. If U2m+1=pu2, V2m+1=v2, then (v,pu2) is a solution of (a2+2)x4−a2y2=2. We get by Lemma 2.8 that pu2=1, which is impossible. If V2m+1=pv2, U2m+1=u2, then (pv2,u) is a solution of (a2+2)x2−a2y4=2. We get by Lemma 2.7 that pv2=1 or u2=2a2+3. Two cases that are obviously not true.
We now consider the case 2|a. If U2m+1=u2, V2m+1=pv2, then (pv2,u) is a solution of (2a21+1)X2−2a21Y4=1. Since (1,1) is the minimal positive integer solution of (2a21+1)U2−2a21V2=1, we know that is impossible by Lemma 2.3. If U2m+1=pu2, V2m+1=v2, then (v,pu2) is a solution of (2a21+1)X4−2a21Y2=1. Then we get by Lemma 2.4 that pu2=1, a contradiction, or V2m+1=v2=VP for some prime P≡3(mod4).
Case 1: a is odd. Assume that (x,y,z) is a positive integer solution of (1.7). By Lemma 2.1 we know that
x=V2m+1,y=aU2m+1 | (3.1) |
for some positive integer m. We shall discuss separately two cases.
The case m is even, say m=2k for some positive integer k. Since V24k+1−1=pz2, it follows from (2.6) that 2a2U4kU4k+2=pz2. Using the fact that gcd(4k,4k+2)=2, we get gcd(U4k,U4k+2)=U2=1 by (2.3). By Lemma 2.2, we have 2|U4k, 2⧸|U4k+2. Then we get by Lemma 2.10 that
U4k=2pb2,U4k+2=c2 | (3.2) |
for some positive integers b and c.
We get from the latter equation of (3.2) and Lemma 2.11 that k=0, which contradicts k>0.
The case m is odd, say m=2k+1 for some nonnegative integer k. Since V24k+3−1=pz2, it follows from (2.6) that 2a2U4k+4U4k+2=pz2. Using the fact that gcd(4k+4,4k+2)=2, we get gcd(U4k+4,U4k+2)=U2=1 by (2.3). By Lemma 2.2, we have 2|U4k+4, 2⧸|U4k+2. Then by Lemma 2.11, we have
U4k+4=2pb2,U4k+2=c2 | (3.3) |
for some integers b and c. Again by Lemma 2.11 and the latter equation of (3.3), we get that k=0. This means that m=1 and 2(a2+1)=U2V2=U4=2pb2, which implies a2+1=pb2. Conversely, when a2+1=pb2, by calculation one can easily find that
(x,y,z)=(x3,y3,√x23−1p)=(2a2+1,2a3+3a,2ab) |
is a solution of (1.7).
Case 2: a is even. Let a=2a1. Then (1.7) becomes
(2a21+1)x2−2y2=1,x2−pz2=1. | (3.4) |
Assume that (x,y,z) is a positive integer solution of (3.4). By Lemma 2.1 we know that
x=V2m+1,y=a1U2m+1 | (3.5) |
for some positive integer m. We shall discuss separately two cases.
The case m is even, say m=2k for some positive integer k. Since V24k+1−1=pz2, it follows from (2.6) that 2a2U4kU4k+2=pz2. Using the fact that gcd(4k,4k+2)=2, we get gcd(U4k,U4k+2)=U2=1 by (2.3). By Lemma 2.2, we have 2|U4k, 2⧸|U4k+2. Then we get by Lemma 2.10 that
U4k=2pb2,U4k+2=c2 | (3.6) |
for some positive integers b and c.
We get from the latter equation of (3.6) that k=0, by Lemma 2.11, which contradicts the assumption k>0. Hence (3.6) is impossible.
The case m is odd, say m=2k+1 for some nonnegative integer k. Since V24k+3−1=pz2, it follows from (2.6) that 2a2U4k+4U4k+2=pz2. Using the fact that gcd(4k+4,4k+2)=2, we get gcd(U4k+4,U4k+2)=U2=1 by (2.3). By Lemma 2.2, we have 2|U4k+4, 2⧸|U4k+2. Then
U4k+4=2pb2,U4k+2=c2 | (3.7) |
for some integers b and c.
By Lemma 2.11, we get from the latter equation of (3.7) that k=0. This means that m=1 and 2(a2+1)=U2V2=U4=2pb2, which implies a2+1=pb2. Conversely, when a2+1=pb2, by calculation one can easily find that
(x,y,z)=(x3,y3,√x23−1p)=(2a2+1,8a31+3a1,2ab) |
is a solution of (3.4) and
(x,y,z)=(2a2+1,2a3+3a,2ab) |
is a solution of (1.7). This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.
Case 1: a is odd. Assume that (x,y,z) is a positive integer solution of (1.8). By Lemma 2.1 we know that
x=V2m+1,y=aU2m+1 | (4.1) |
for some positive integer m. We shall discuss separately two cases.
The case m is even, say m=2k for some positive integer k. Since V24k+1−1=pqz2, it follows from (2.6) that 2a2U4kU4k+2=pqz2. Using the fact that gcd(4k,4k+2)=2, we get gcd(U4k,U4k+2)=U2=1 by (2.3). By Lemma 2.2, we have 2|U4k, 2⧸|U4k+2. Then
U4k=2pqb2,U4k+2=c2 | (4.2) |
or
U4k=2pb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=qc2 | (4.3) |
for some integers b and c.
Lemma 2.11 and the latter equation of (4.2) give k=0, which contradicts k>0. By Lemma 2.12 (2), we know that the latter equation of (4.3) is impossible. Hence, both (4.2) and (4.3) are impossible.
The case m is odd, say m=2k+1 for some nonnegative integer k. Since V24k+3−1=pqz2, it follows from (2.6) that 2a2U4k+4U4k+2=pqz2. Using the fact that gcd(4k+4,4k+2)=2, we get gcd(U4k+4, U4k+2)=U2=1 by (2.3). By Lemma 2.2, we have 2|U4k+4,2⧸|U4k+2. Then
U4k+4=2pqb2,U4k+2=c2 | (4.4) |
or
U4k+4=2pb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=qc2 | (4.5) |
for some integers b and c.
Lemma 2.12 (1) and the former equation of (4.5) give k=0. Thus U2=1=qc2, which is impossible. Hence, (4.5) is impossible.
Lemma 2.11 and the latter equation of (4.4) give k=0. Substituting the value into the former Eq (4.4) gives 2(a2+1)=U2V2=U4=2pqb2. It follows that a2+1=pqb2. Clearly, when a2+1=pqb2, we get that
(x,y,z)=(x3,y3,√x23−1pq)=(2a2+1,2a3+3a,2ab) |
is a solution of (1.8).
Case 2: a is even. Let a=2a1. Then (1.8) becomes
(2a21+1)x2−2y2=1,x2−pqz2=1. | (4.6) |
Assume that (x,y,z) is a positive integer solution of (4.6). By Lemma 2.1 we know that
x=V2m+1,y=a1U2m+1 | (4.7) |
for some positive integer m. We shall discuss separately two cases.
The case m is even, say m=2k for some positive integer k. Then, as see before, either
U4k=2pqb2,U4k+2=c2 | (4.8) |
or
UkVkV2k=U4k=2pb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=qc2 | (4.9) |
for some integers b and c.
Lemma 2.11 and the latter equation of Eq (4.8) give k=0, which leads to a contradiction. Hence, (4.8) is impossible.
Lemma 2.12 (1) and the former equation of (4.9) yield k=1. Substituting the value into Eq (4.9) gives 2(a2+1)=V2=2pb2 and (2a2+1)(2a2+3)=U3V3=qc2 that implies a2+1=pb2, 2a2+1=c21, 2a2+3=qc22 since 2a2+3 is never a square. We claim that a≡2(mod4). Otherwise 4|a. We get by Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2 that c1+a√2=(3+2√2)n for some even n. It follows that c1+a√2=(17+12√2)n1,n1=n/2, so 3|a. We get from the equation 2a2+3=qc22 that q=3 and c21−2a2=1, 3c22−c21=2, which is impossible by Lemma 2.10. Clearly, when a2+1=pb2,2a2+1=u2,2a2+3=qv2, we get
(x,y,z)=(x5,y5,√x25−1pq)=(4a4+6a2+1,64a51+80a31+5a1,2abuv) |
is a solution of (4.6) and
(x,y,z)=(4a4+6a2+1,4a5+10a3+5a,2abuv) |
is a solution of (1.8).
The case m is odd, say m=2k+1 for some nonnegative integer k. From V24k+3−1=pqz2 we get that one of the following holds:
U4k+4=2pqb2,U4k+2=c2 | (4.10) |
or
U2k+2V2k+2=U4k+4=2pb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=qc2 | (4.11) |
for some integers b and c.
Lemma 2.12 (1) and the former equation of (4.11) yield k=0. Thus we get from the latter equation of (4.11) that U2=1=qc2, which is impossible.
Lemma 2.11 and the latter equation of (4.10) give k=0. Substituting the value into the former Eq (4.10) gives 2(a2+1)=U2V2=U4=2pqb2. It follows that a2+1=pqb2. Clearly, when a2+1=pqb2, we get that
(x,y,z)=(x3,y3,√x23−1pq)=(2a2+1,8a31+3a1,2ab) |
is a solution of (4.6) and
(x,y,z)=(2a2+1,2a3+3a,2ab) |
is a solution of (1.8). This completes the proof of Theorem 1.2.
Case 1: a is odd. Assume that (x,y,z) is a positive integer solution of (1.9). By Lemma 2.1 we know that
x=V2m+1,y=aU2m+1 | (5.1) |
for some positive integer m. We shall discuss separately two cases.
The case m is even, say m=2k for some positive integer k. From V24k+1−1=pqrz2 we get that one of the following holds:
U4k=2pqrb2,U4k+2=c2 | (5.2) |
or
U2kV2k=U4k=2pqb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=rc2 | (5.3) |
or
U4k=2pb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=qrc2 | (5.4) |
for some integers b and c.
By Lemma 2.12 (2), we know that the latter equation of (5.3) is impossible. Lemma 2.11 and the latter equation of (5.2) give k=0, which contradicts the assumption k>0.
Lemma 2.12 (1) and the former equation of (5.4) give k=1 or k=2. Substituting the value k=1 into the (5.4) leads to
2(a2+1)=U2V2=U4=2pb2,(2a2+1)(2a2+3)=U3V3=U6=qrc2. |
Neither 2a2+1 nor 2a2+3 is square since a is odd. Therefore we get
a2+1=pb2,2a2+1=qu2,2a2+3=rv2. |
Clearly, when a2+1=pb2, 2a2+1=qu2, 2a2+3=rv2, we get that
(x,y,z)=(x5,y5,√x25−1pqr)=(4a4+6a2+1,4a5+10a3+5a,2abuv) |
is a solution of (1.9).
Substituting the value k=2 into the latter Eq (5.4) gives 4a4+6a2+1=V5=qu2, 4a4+10a2+5=U5=rv2. Clearly, when 2(a2+1)=b21, 2(a2+1)2−1=pb22, 4a4+6a2+1=V5=qu2, 4a4+10a2+5=U5=rv2, we get that
(x,y,z)=(x9,y9,√x29−1pqr)=(16a8+56a6+60a4+20a2+1,16a9+72a7+108a5+60a3+9a,2abuv) |
is a solution of (1.9).
The case m is odd, say m=2k+1 for some nonnegative integer k. As before, we get that one of the following holds:
U4k+4=2pqrb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=c2 | (5.5) |
or
U2k+2V2k+2=U4k+4=2pqb2,U4k+2=rc2 | (5.6) |
or
U2k+2V2k+2=U4k+4=2pb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=qrc2 | (5.7) |
for some integers b and c.
By Lemma 2.12 (2), we know that the latter equation of (5.6) is impossible.
The latter equation of (5.5) yields k=0 by Lemma 2.11. Substituting the value k=0 into the former Eq (5.5) gives 2(a2+1)=U2V2=U4=2pqrb2, so that a2+1=pqrb2. Clearly, when a2+1=pqrb2, we get that
(x,y,z)=(x3,y3,√x23−1pqr)=(2a2+1,2a3+3a,2ab) |
is a solution of (1.9).
By Lemma 2.12 (1) and the former equation of (5.7), we get k=0 or k=1,a2+1=2◻,2a4+4a2+1=p◻. If k=0, substituting the value into the latter Eq (5.7) gives 1=U2=qrc2, which is a contradiction. Substituting the value k=1,a2+1=2◻,2a4+4a2+1=p◻ into the Eq (5.7) leads to
a2+1=2◻,2a4+4a2+1=p◻,a2+1=2a2+1=qu2,2a2+3=rv2. |
Clearly, when a2+1=2◻, 2a4+4a2+1=p◻, 2a2+1=qu2, 2a2+3=rv2, we get that
(x,y,z)=(x7,y7,√x27−1pqr)=(8a6+20a4+12a2+1,8a7+28a5+28a3+7a,2abuv) |
is a solution of (1.9).
Case 2: a is even. Let a=2a1. Then (1.9) becomes
(2a21+1)x2−2y2=1,x2−pqrz2=1. | (5.8) |
Assume that (x,y,z) is a positive integer solution of (5.8). By Lemma 2.1 we know that
x=V2m+1,y=a1U2m+1 | (5.9) |
for some positive integer m. We shall discuss separately two cases.
The case m is even, say m=2k for some positive integer k. As before, we get that one of the following holds:
U4k=2pqrb2,U4k+2=c2 | (5.10) |
or
UkVkV2k2=U4k2=pqb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=rc2 | (5.11) |
or
U2kV2k2=U4k2=pb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=qrc2 | (5.12) |
for some integers b and c.
Lemma 2.12 (2) and the latter equation of (5.11) give 2k+1=P≡3(mod4) is a prime. We claim that k=1. Otherwise k>1, then we know that Vk is not a square again by Lemma 2.4. The former equation of (5.11) yields one of Uk and V2k2 is a square. If Uk=u2, then (Vk,u) is a solution of (2a21+1)X2−2a21Y4=1. Then we get by Lemma 2.3 that Vk=p◻=1, which is a contradiction. If V2k2=v2, then (v,U2k) is a solution of X4−a2(a2+2)Y2=1. Thus we get by Lemma 2.5 that pq◻=U2k=1, which is impossible or U2k=2(a2+1)=V2=U4. It follows that k=2, which contradicts with 2k+1=P≡3(mod4). Hence
k=1,a2+1=pqb2,2a2+1=u2,2a2+3=rv2, |
with a≡2(mod4) according to the discussion of (4.9). Clearly, when a2+1=pqb2, 2a2+1=u2, 2a2+3=rv2, we get that
(x,y,z)=(x5,y5,√x25−1pqr)=(4a4+6a2+1,64a51+80a31+5a1,2abuv) |
is a solution of (5.8) and
(x,y,z)=(4a4+6a2+1,4a5+10a3+5a,2abuv) |
is a solution of (1.9).
Lemma 2.11 and the latter equation of (5.10) give k=0, which contradicts the assumption k>0. Hence (5.10) cannot hold.
The former equation of (5.12) gives k=1,a2+1=pb2 according to the discussion of (4.9). Substituting k=1 into (5.12) leads to
(2a2+1)(2a2+3)=U3V3=U6=qrc2. |
It is easy to see that 2a2+3 is not a square. Therefore we get a2+1=pb2, 2a2+1=u2, 2a2+3=qrv2 or a2+1=pb2, 2a2+1=qu2, 2a2+3=rv2. Clearly, when a2+1=pb2, 2a2+1=u2, 2a2+3=qrv2 or a2+1=pb2, 2a2+1=qu2, 2a2+3=rv2, we get that
(x,y,z)=(x5,y5,√x25−1pqr)=(4a4+6a2+1,64a51+80a31+5a1,2abuv) |
is a solution of (5.8) and
(x,y,z)=(4a4+6a2+1,4a5+10a3+5a,2abuv) |
is a solution of (1.9).
The case m is odd, say m=2k+1 for some nonnegative integer k. Then
U4k+4=2pqrb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=c2 | (5.13) |
or
U2k+2V2k+2=U4k+4=2pqb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=rc2 | (5.14) |
or
U2k+2V2k+2=U4k+4=2pb2,U2k+1V2k+1=U4k+2=qrc2 | (5.15) |
for some integers b and c.
According to the discussion of (5.11), we know that the Eq (5.14) leads to k=1 and 2a2+1=U3=u2. Substituting the value k=1 into the former Eq (5.14) yields
2a2+1=◻,2a2+3=r◻,4(a2+1)(2a4+4a2+1)=2pqb2. |
Therefore we get
p=2,a2+1=q◻,2a4+4a2+1=◻. |
Clearly, when p=2, a2+1=q◻, 2a4+4a2+1=◻, 2a2+1=◻, 2a2+3=rv2, we get that
(x,y,z)=(x7,y7,√x27−1pqr)=(8a6+20a4+12a2+1,512a71+448a51+112a31+7a1,2abuv) |
is a solution of (5.8) and
(x,y,z)=(x7,y7,√x27−1pqr)=(8a6+20a4+12a2+1,8a7+28a5+28a3+7a,2abuv) |
is a solution of (1.9).
Lemma 2.11 and the latter equation of (5.13) gives k=0. Substituting the value into the former Eq (5.13) gives 2(a2+1)=2pqrb2. It follows that a2+1=pqrb2. Thus in this case we proved that
(x,y,z)=(x3,y3,√y23−1pqr)=(2a2+1,8a31+3a1,2ab) |
is a solution of (5.8) with a2+1=pqrb2 and
(x,y,z)=(2a2+1,2a3+3a,2ab) |
is a solution of (1.9) with a2+1=pqrb2.
Lemma 2.12 (1) and the former equation of (5.15) give k=0. Substituting the value into the latter Eq (5.15) gives 1=U2=qrc2, which is a contradiction.
This completes the proof of Theorem 1.3.
In this section, we give some examples of applications of the results.
(1) Let p be a prime such that x2−py2=−1 has solution, and let (a1,b1) be its fundamental solution. Define
an+bn√p=(a1+b1√p)n |
for some odd integer. Let a=an. Then
(x,y,z)=(2a2n+1,2a3n+3an,2anbn) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations (1.7).
Let p=2. Then (a1,b1)=(1,1) is the fundamental solution of
x2−2y2=−1. |
Define
an+bn√2=(1+√2)n |
for some odd integer n. Then
(x,y,z)=(2a2n+1,2a3n+3an,2anbn) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations
(a2n+2)x2−y2=2,x2−2z2=1 |
(results of n=1,3,5,7 see the following Table 1).
n | a=an | b=bn | x=2a2+1 | y=2a3+3a | z=2ab |
1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
3 | 7 | 5 | 99 | 707 | 70 |
5 | 41 | 29 | 3363 | 137965 | 2378 |
7 | 239 | 169 | 114243 | 27304555 | 80782 |
(2) Let p and q be two distinct primes such that x2−pqy2=−1 has solution, and let (a1,b1) be its fundamental solution. Define
an+bn√p=(a1+b1√pq)n |
for some odd integer n. Let a=an. Then
(x,y,z)=(2a2n+1,2a3n+3an,2anbn) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations (1.8) satisfying the condition α) of Theorem 1.2.
Let p=2, q=5. Then (a1,b1)=(3,1) is the fundamental solution of x2−10y2=−1. Define
an+bn√10=(3+√10)n |
for some odd integer n. Then
(x,y,z)=(2a2n+1,2a3n+3an,2anbn) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations
(a2n+2)x2−y2=2,x2−10z2=1 |
(results of n=1,3,5,7 see the following Table 2).
n | a=an | b=bn | x=2a2+1 | y=2a3+3a | z=2ab |
1 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 63 | 6 |
3 | 117 | 37 | 27379 | 3203577 | 8658 |
5 | 4443 | 1405 | 39480499 | 175411865943 | 12484830 |
7 | 168717 | 53353 | 56930852179 | 9605202587421777 | 18003116202 |
(3) Let a=2. Then a2+1=5, 2a2+1=32, and 2a2+3=11. Thus
(a,p,q,x,y,z)=(2,5,11,89,218,12) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 6x2−y2=2, x2−55z2=1 satisfying the condition β) of Theorem 1.2.
Let a=70. Then a2+1=29⋅132, 2a2+1=992, and 2a2+3=9803. Thus
(a,p,q,x,y,z)=(70,29,9803,96069401,6726230350,180180) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 4902x2−y2=2, x2−29⋅9803z2=1 satisfying the condition β) of Theorem 1.2.
(4) Let p, q and r be three distinct primes such that x2−pqry2=−1 has solution, and let (a1,b1) be its fundamental solution. Define
an+bn√pqr=(a1+b1√pqr)n. |
for some odd integer n. Let a=an. Then
(x,y,z)=(2a2n+1,2a3n+3an,2anbn) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations (1.9) satisfying the condition α) of Theorem 1.3.
Let p=2, q=5, r=17. Then (a1,b1)=(13,1) is the fundamental solution of x2−170y2=−1. Define
an+bn√170=(13+√170)n. |
Then
(x,y,z)=(2a2n+1,2a3n+3an,2anbn) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations
(a2n+2)x2−y2=2,x2−170z2=1 |
(results of n=1,3,5 see the following Table 3).
n | a=an | b=bn | x=2a2+1 | y=2a3+3a | z=2ab |
1 | 13 | 1 | 339 | 4433 | 26 |
3 | 8827 | 677 | 155831859 | 1375527837047 | 11951758 |
5 | 5984693 | 459005 | 71633100608499 | 428702115779991675193 | 5494008020930 |
(5) Let a=1. Then a2+1=2, 2a2+1=3 and 2a2+3=5. Thus
(a,p,q,r,x,y,z)=(1,2,3,5,11,19,2) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 3x2−y2=2, x2−30z2=1 satisfying the condition β) of Theorem 1.3.
Let a=7. Then a2+1=2⋅52, 2a2+1=11⋅32 and 2a2+3=101. Thus
(a,p,q,r,x,y,z)=(7,2,11,101,9899,10099,210) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 51x2−y2=2, x2−2222z2=1 satisfying the condition β) of Theorem 1.3.
Let a=6. Then a2+1=37, 2a2+1=73 and 2a2+3=3⋅52. Thus
(a,p,q,r,x,y,z)=(6,37,73,3,33294,5401,60) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 38x2−y2=2, x2−8103z2=1 satisfying the condition β) of Theorem 1.3.
Let a=110. Then a2+1=12101, 2a2+1=2689⋅32 and 2a2+3=24203. Thus
(a,p,q,r,x,y,z)=(110,12101,2689,24203,64433710550,585712601,660) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 12102x2−y2=2, x2−787555672567z2=1 satisfying the condition β) of Theorem 1.3.
Let a=160. Then a2+1=25601, 2a2+1=5689⋅32 and 2a2+3=51203. Thus
(a,p,q,r,x,y,z)=(160,25601,5689,51203,419471360800,2621593601,960) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 25602x2−y2=2, x2−7457414289067z2=1 satisfying the condition β) of Theorem 1.3.
(6) Let a=1. Then a2+1=2, 2a4+4a2+1=7, 2a2+1=3 and 2a2+3=5. Thus
(a,p,q,r,x,y,z)=(1,7,3,5,41,71,16) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 3x2−y2=2, x2−105z2=1 satisfying the condition γ) of Theorem 1.3.
Let a=2. Then a2+1=5, 2a4+4a2+1=72, 2a2+1=32 and 2a2+3=11. Thus
(a,p,q,r,x,y,z)=(2,2,5,11,881,2158,989801,84) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 6x2−y2=2, x2−110z2=1 satisfying the condition γ) of Theorem 1.3.
Let a=7. Then 2(a2+1)=102, 2a4+4a2+1=4999, 2a2+1=11⋅32 and 2a2+3=101. Thus
(a,p,q,r,x,y,z)=(7,4999,11,101,7068593,989801,420) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 51x2−y2=2, x2−5553889z2=1 satisfying the condition γ) of Theorem 1.3.
(7) Let a=1. Then a2+1=2, 2a4+4a2+1=7, 4a4+6a2+1=11 and 4a4+10a2+5=19. Thus
(a,p,q,r,x,y,z)=(1,7,11,19,153,265,4) |
is the only solution of the simultaneous Pell equations 3x2−y2=2, x2−1463z2=1 satisfying the condition δ) of Theorem 1.3.
Let a,b be distinct positive integers and b has at most three prime divisors. We proved that the system Pell equations
(a2+2)x2−y2=2,x2−bz2=1 |
has at most one solutions and get the sufficient and necessary conditions for it to have a solution. When a solution exists, assuming that x1√a2+2+y1 is the fundamental solution of (a2+2)x2−y2=2, then the only solutions of the system is given by
x√a2+2+y=xm√a2+2+ym,m∈{3,5,7,9}, |
where xm√a2+2+ym√2=(x1√a2+2+y1√2)m, m is odd.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This research was supported by the Major Project of Education Department in Sichuan (No. 16ZA0173) and NSF of China (No. 11871058) and Nation project cultivation project of China West Normal University (No. 22KA018).
All authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] |
Y. Fujita, N. Terai, Generators and integer points on the elliptic curve y2=x3−nx, Acta Arith., 160 (2013), 333–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.4064/aa160-4-3 doi: 10.4064/aa160-4-3
![]() |
[2] |
F. Najman, Compact representation of quadratic integers and integer points on some elliptic curves, Rocky Mountain J. Math., 40 (2010), 1979–2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1216/RMJ-2010-40-6-1979 doi: 10.1216/RMJ-2010-40-6-1979
![]() |
[3] |
T. Jedrzejak, M. Wieczorek, Integral points on elliptic curves y2=x(x−2m)(x+p), Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math., 67 (2019), 53–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.4064/ba8152-1-2019 doi: 10.4064/ba8152-1-2019
![]() |
[4] |
A. Thue, Über Annäherungswerte Zahlen (German), J. Reine Angew. Math., 1909 (1909), 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1909.135.284 doi: 10.1515/crll.1909.135.284
![]() |
[5] |
M. Cipu, Explicit formula for the solution of simultaneous Pell equations x2−(a2−1)y2=1, y2−bz2=1, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 146 (2018), 983–992. https://doi.org/10.1090/PROC/13802 doi: 10.1090/PROC/13802
![]() |
[6] |
M. A. Bennett, On the number of solutions of the simultaneous Pell equations, J. Reine Angew. Math., 1998 (1998), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1998.049 doi: 10.1515/crll.1998.049
![]() |
[7] |
P. Z. Yuan, On the number of solutions of x2−4m(m+1)y2=y2−bz2=1, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 132 (2004), 1561–1566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07418-0 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07418-0
![]() |
[8] |
P. G. Walsh, Sharp bounds for the number of solutions to simultaneous Pellian equations, Acta Arith., 126 (2007), 125–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.4064/aa126-2-3 doi: 10.4064/aa126-2-3
![]() |
[9] |
C. S. Luo, J. G. Luo, Complete solutions of the simultaneous Pell equations (a2+1)y2−x2=y2−bz2=1, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 9919–9938. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021577 doi: 10.3934/math.2021577
![]() |
[10] |
D. H. Lehmer, An extended theory of Lucas' functions, Ann. Math., 31 (1930), 419–448. https://doi.org/10.2307/1968235 doi: 10.2307/1968235
![]() |
[11] | P. Ribenboim, The book of prime number records, 2 Eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989. |
[12] | P. Z. Yuan, A note on the divisibility of the generalized Lucas' sequences, Fibonacci Quart., 40 (2002), 153–156. |
[13] |
J. G. Luo, P. Z. Yuan, Square-classes in Lehmer sequences having odd parameters and their applications, Acta Arith., 127 (2007), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.4064/aa127-1-4 doi: 10.4064/aa127-1-4
![]() |
[14] | W. Ljunggren, Ein Satz über die diophantische Gleichung Ax2−By4=C(C=1,2,4), Tolfte Skand. Mat.-Kongr., 1953 (1954), 188–194. |
[15] |
S. Akhtari, The Diophantine equation aX4−by2=1, J. Reine Angew. Math., 2009 (2009), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/CRELLE.2009.034 doi: 10.1515/CRELLE.2009.034
![]() |
[16] | Q. Sun, P. Z. Yuan, A note on the Diophantine equation x4−Dy2=1, J. Sichuan Univ., 34 (1997), 265–268. |
[17] | J. H. E. Cohn, The Diophantine equation x4−Dy2=1, Ⅱ, Acta Arith., 78 (1997), 401–403. |
[18] |
A. Togbé, P. M. Voutier, P. G. Walsh, Solving a family of Thue equations with an application to the equation x2−Dy4=1, Acta Arith., 120 (2005), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.4064/aa120-1-3 doi: 10.4064/aa120-1-3
![]() |
[19] |
F. Luca, P. G. Walsh, Squares in Lehmer sequences and some Diophantine applications, Acta Arith., 100 (2001), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.4064/aa100-1-4 doi: 10.4064/aa100-1-4
![]() |
[20] |
P. Z. Yuan, Y. Li, Squares in Lehmer sequences and the Diophantine equation Ax4−By2=2, Acta Arith., 139 (2009), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.4064/aa139-3-6 doi: 10.4064/aa139-3-6
![]() |
n | a=an | b=bn | x=2a2+1 | y=2a3+3a | z=2ab |
1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
3 | 7 | 5 | 99 | 707 | 70 |
5 | 41 | 29 | 3363 | 137965 | 2378 |
7 | 239 | 169 | 114243 | 27304555 | 80782 |
n | a=an | b=bn | x=2a2+1 | y=2a3+3a | z=2ab |
1 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 63 | 6 |
3 | 117 | 37 | 27379 | 3203577 | 8658 |
5 | 4443 | 1405 | 39480499 | 175411865943 | 12484830 |
7 | 168717 | 53353 | 56930852179 | 9605202587421777 | 18003116202 |
n | a=an | b=bn | x=2a2+1 | y=2a3+3a | z=2ab |
1 | 13 | 1 | 339 | 4433 | 26 |
3 | 8827 | 677 | 155831859 | 1375527837047 | 11951758 |
5 | 5984693 | 459005 | 71633100608499 | 428702115779991675193 | 5494008020930 |
n | a=an | b=bn | x=2a2+1 | y=2a3+3a | z=2ab |
1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
3 | 7 | 5 | 99 | 707 | 70 |
5 | 41 | 29 | 3363 | 137965 | 2378 |
7 | 239 | 169 | 114243 | 27304555 | 80782 |
n | a=an | b=bn | x=2a2+1 | y=2a3+3a | z=2ab |
1 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 63 | 6 |
3 | 117 | 37 | 27379 | 3203577 | 8658 |
5 | 4443 | 1405 | 39480499 | 175411865943 | 12484830 |
7 | 168717 | 53353 | 56930852179 | 9605202587421777 | 18003116202 |
n | a=an | b=bn | x=2a2+1 | y=2a3+3a | z=2ab |
1 | 13 | 1 | 339 | 4433 | 26 |
3 | 8827 | 677 | 155831859 | 1375527837047 | 11951758 |
5 | 5984693 | 459005 | 71633100608499 | 428702115779991675193 | 5494008020930 |