Research article

Double-quantized-based H tracking control of T-S fuzzy semi-Markovian jump systems with adaptive event-triggered

  • Received: 08 November 2022 Revised: 03 December 2022 Accepted: 19 December 2022 Published: 10 January 2023
  • MSC : 93C15, 93B36

  • This paper investigates the issue of asynchronous H tracking control for nonlinear semi-Markovian jump systems (SMJSs) based on the T-S fuzzy model. Firstly, in order to improve the performance of network control systems (NCSs) and the efficiency of data transmission, this paper adopts a double quantization strategy which quantifies the input and output of the controllers. Secondly, for the purpose of reducing the burden of network communication, an adaptive event-triggered mechanism (AETM) is adopted. Thirdly, due to the influence of network-induce delay, the system mode information can not be transmitted to the controller synchronously, thus, a continuous-time hidden Markov model (HMM) is established to describe the asynchronous phenomenon between the system and the controller. Additionally, with the help of some improved Lyapunov-Krasovski (L-K) functions with fuzzy basis, some sufficient criteria are derived to co-guarantee the state stability and the H performance for the closed-loop tracking control system. Finally, a numerical example and a practical example are given to verify the effectiveness of designed mentality.

    Citation: Yuxin Lou, Mengzhuo Luo, Jun Cheng, Xin Wang, Kaibo Shi. Double-quantized-based H tracking control of T-S fuzzy semi-Markovian jump systems with adaptive event-triggered[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6942-6969. doi: 10.3934/math.2023351

    Related Papers:

    [1] Mingzhou Xu, Xuhang Kong . Note on complete convergence and complete moment convergence for negatively dependent random variables under sub-linear expectations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 8504-8521. doi: 10.3934/math.2023428
    [2] He Dong, Xili Tan, Yong Zhang . Complete convergence and complete integration convergence for weighted sums of arrays of rowwise m-END under sub-linear expectations space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6705-6724. doi: 10.3934/math.2023340
    [3] Mingzhou Xu, Kun Cheng, Wangke Yu . Complete convergence for weighted sums of negatively dependent random variables under sub-linear expectations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 19998-20019. doi: 10.3934/math.20221094
    [4] Lunyi Liu, Qunying Wu . Complete integral convergence for weighted sums of negatively dependent random variables under sub-linear expectations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22319-22337. doi: 10.3934/math.20231138
    [5] Mingzhou Xu . On the complete moment convergence of moving average processes generated by negatively dependent random variables under sub-linear expectations. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3369-3385. doi: 10.3934/math.2024165
    [6] Shuyan Li, Qunying Wu . Complete integration convergence for arrays of rowwise extended negatively dependent random variables under the sub-linear expectations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12166-12181. doi: 10.3934/math.2021706
    [7] Mingzhou Xu . Complete convergence of moving average processes produced by negatively dependent random variables under sub-linear expectations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 17067-17080. doi: 10.3934/math.2023871
    [8] Mingzhou Xu . Complete convergence and complete moment convergence for maximal weighted sums of extended negatively dependent random variables under sub-linear expectations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19442-19460. doi: 10.3934/math.2023992
    [9] Qingfeng Wu, Xili Tan, Shuang Guo, Peiyu Sun . Strong law of large numbers for weighted sums of m-widely acceptable random variables under sub-linear expectation space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 29773-29805. doi: 10.3934/math.20241442
    [10] Baozhen Wang, Qunying Wu . Almost sure convergence for a class of dependent random variables under sub-linear expectations. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17259-17275. doi: 10.3934/math.2024838
  • This paper investigates the issue of asynchronous H tracking control for nonlinear semi-Markovian jump systems (SMJSs) based on the T-S fuzzy model. Firstly, in order to improve the performance of network control systems (NCSs) and the efficiency of data transmission, this paper adopts a double quantization strategy which quantifies the input and output of the controllers. Secondly, for the purpose of reducing the burden of network communication, an adaptive event-triggered mechanism (AETM) is adopted. Thirdly, due to the influence of network-induce delay, the system mode information can not be transmitted to the controller synchronously, thus, a continuous-time hidden Markov model (HMM) is established to describe the asynchronous phenomenon between the system and the controller. Additionally, with the help of some improved Lyapunov-Krasovski (L-K) functions with fuzzy basis, some sufficient criteria are derived to co-guarantee the state stability and the H performance for the closed-loop tracking control system. Finally, a numerical example and a practical example are given to verify the effectiveness of designed mentality.



    Mathematical equations that contain two or more independent variables are called partial differential equations. They are found in various scientific applications, such as chemistry, physics, engineering and mathematics, which is why researchers have developed many techniques to solve such equations as homotopy perturbation method, variation iteration method, Adomian decomposition method and others [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].

    Fractional calculus is a generalization of regular calculus, that calculates derivatives of functions of non-integer orders. Many definitions of fractional derivatives have been presented in the literature such as Riemann Louville, Caputo, conformable and others [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Furthermore, using each of these definitions can be viewed as a generalization of the normal calculus. For this reason, applying either of these definitions allows us to generalize our research to normal calculus, and since Caputo's fractional derivative is one of the most popular definitions, we establish our new results in terms of Caputo's fractional definition in this article. There are a number of different methods that mathematicians have used to solve ordinary and partial differential equations and systems in fractional calculus. One of these methods is the power series method, because it can solve such problems. On the other hand, there are too many methods that depend on the idea of power series, such as residual power series method [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26], and some other techniques that combine the power series idea with transformations just as Laplace transform, ARA-transform, formable transform and others [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37] to construct new ones. However, all these methods, introduce the solution in a convergent series form, but the difference lies in the level of difficulty during the applications.

    The direct power series method (DPSM) used in this work was first introduced in [38], transformations are unnecessary, no limits or differentiations are required, this method only focuses on finding the nth coefficients of the series expansion of the analytic solution.

    In DPSM we find the solution by computing a general term of the nth coefficients without going back to the hole power series every time we want to compute new coefficients. For this reason, DPSM helps mathematicians to find the approximate solutions better and faster. This method only takes two steps to write the general solution of some equations or systems that can be solved with other power series methods. At the end of the second step, we have a general form of the solution, expressed as an infinite series, and this makes it easier to find too many new coefficients of the series solution with computer programs. Furthermore, some different illustrative examples are presented in the fourth chapter and solved with the proposed method. We show that DPSM could be used to solve different types of problems and systems.

    This paper is organized as follows, in the next section, we introduce some preparatory explanations on fractional operators, Section 3 introduces the methodology and the basic idea of DPSM and finally we consider some different examples on fractional partial differential equations and systems.

    In this section we introduce the definition of the fractional Caputo and some theorems about power series.

    Definition 2.1. If ψ(χ,τ) is a function of two variables and n is any natural number, then Caputo fractional partial derivative of order α with respect to τ is denoted and defined as

    Dατψ(χ,τ)={1Γ(nα)τ0(τt)nα1nτnψ(χ,τ)dt,n1<α<n,nτnψ(χ,τ),n=α, (2.1)

    where nN.

    It is worth noting here that Caputo fractional partial derivative has the memory property. For more details and properties, see [39,40,41].

    Lemma 2.1. [10,11]. Let ϱ(χ) be a real valued continuous function and α,τ>0. Then the following properties of Caputo's derivative are hold:

    1) Dατϱ(χ)=0.

    2) Dατ(τβϱ(χ))=Γ(β+1)Γ(β+1α)τβαϱ(χ).

    3) Dkατ(τnαϱ(χ))={Γ(nα+1)Γ((nk)α+1)τ(nk)αϱ(χ),nk,0n<k.

    4) Dkατ(n=0ϱn(χ)(γτ)nαΓ(nα+1))=n=0γ(n+k)αϱn+k(χ)τnαΓ(nα+1).

    Definition 2.2. [22] For any α such that, r1<αr, rN a power series of the form:

    n=0ϱn(χ)(ττ0)nαΓ(nα+1)=ϱ0(χ)+ϱ1(χ)(ττ0)αΓ(α+1)+ϱ2(χ)(ττ0)2αΓ(2α+1)+, (2.2)

    is called the multiple fractional power series about τ=τ0, where τ is a variable and ϱn(χ),n=0,1, are functions of χ called the coefficients of the series.

    Theorem 2.1. [22,23] Suppose that ψ(χ,τ) has a fractional power series representation at τ=0, of the form:

    ψ(χ,τ)=n=0ϱn(χ)τnαΓ(nα+1),α>0,χI, (2.3)

    where 0τ<R and Ris the radius of convergence. If Dnατψ(χ,τ) is continuous on (0,R), then, the coefficients ϱn(χ); n=0,1,, of the power series (2.3) are given by

    ϱn(χ)=Dnατψ(χ,0). (2.4)

    For the proof, see [22].

    The convergence analysis of the presented power series are illustrated in the following theorem. We mention here, that these conditions are the required convergence conditions for DPSM [13].

    Theorem 2.2. [35,36] Consider the fractional power series representation in (2.3), then we have the following cases:

    a) If τ=0, the series representation (2.3) is convergent and the radius of convergence is R=0.

    b) If τ0, the series representation (2.3) is convergent and the radius of convergence is R=.

    c) If τ[0,R], the series representation (2.3) is convergent for some positive real number R and is divergent for τ>R, where R is the radius of convergence.

    In the following arguments, we state some properties of the fractional power series (2.3):

    1) The kth derivative of the fractional power series representation (2.3) is given by

    Dkχψ(χ,τ)=n=0ϱ(k)n(χ)τnαΓ(nα+1), (2.5)

    and the coefficients of the equation ϱ(m)n(χ); n=0,1, are given by

    ϱ(k)n(χ)=Dkχ(Dnατψ(χ,0)). (2.6)

    2) If we have {ψi(χ,τ)}mi=1 a sequence of functions of two variables, that has a power series expansion as follows:

    ψi(χ,τ)=n=0ϱin(χ)τnαΓ(nα+1), (2.7)

    then the coefficients of τnαΓ(nα+1) of mi=1ψi(χ,τ) can be written by the following summation:

    mi=1ψi(χ,τ)=j1,j2,jm;j1+j2++jm=nϱ1j1(χ)ϱ2j2(χ)ϱmjm(χ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(j1α+1)Γ(j2α+1)Γ(jmα+1)τnαΓ(nα+1). (2.8)

    In this section we present the main idea of the DPSM for solving time fractional partial differential equations (TFPDEs). We illustrate the technique of using DPSM to solve TFPDEs.

    Assume that ψ(χ,τ) can be presented in the series representation (2.3). Consider the FPDE,

    L[ψ(χ,τ)]+N[ψ(χ,τ)]=0, (3.1)

    where L and N denote linear and nonlinear operators respectively of fractional or integer orders derivatives. Using DPSM we can get the solution of some cases-that will be considered in Theorem 3.1, below-of Eq (3.1) in a series representation which means, to find the values of the coefficients ϱn(χ) of the series expansion (2.3). The Caputo fractional derivative affects the series formula and changes the summation, so we need to illustrate the following theorem that study the effects of the fractional derivatives on the power series representations.

    Theorem 3.1. [32] Suppose that ψ(χ,τ) and φ(χ,τ) have fractional power series representations such as:

    ψ(χ,τ)=n=0ϱn(χ)τnαΓ(nα+1)andφ(χ,τ)=m=0ρm(χ)τmαΓ(mα+1), (3.2)

    where ψ(χ,τ) and φ(χ,τ) are analytical functions, then we haveϱn(χ) and ρm(χ) are the coefficients of τnαΓ(nα+1)and τmαΓ(mα+1) in ψ(χ,τ) and φ(χ,τ) respectively,m=0,1,, and n=0,1,. Then we have:

    a) ϱn+k(χ) is the coefficient for τnαΓ(nα+1) in the series expansion of Dkατψ(χ,τ) for any k=0,1,.

    b) γ(n+k)αϱn+k(χ) is the coefficient for τnαΓ(nα+1) in the series expansion of Dkατψ(χ,γτ) for any k=0,1,, where γR.

    c) ni=0ϱi(χ)ρni(χ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1) is the coefficient for τnαΓ(nα+1) in the series expansion of ψ(χ,τ)φ(χ,τ).

    d) ni=0βiαγ(ni)αϱi(χ)ρni(χ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1) is the coefficient for τnαΓ(nα+1) in the series expansion of ψ(χ,βτ)φ(χ,γτ), where β and γR.

    e) ni=0β(i+k)αγ(ni+m)αϱi+k(χ)ρni+m(χ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1) is the coefficient for τnαΓ(nα+1) in the series expansion of Dkατψ(χ,βτ)Dsατφ(χ,γτ), where β, γRandk,s=0,1,.

    Proof. Substituting the series expansion of ψ(χ,τ) in Dkατψ(χ,τ),

    Dkατψ(χ,τ)=Dkατ(n=0ϱn(χ)τnαΓ(nα+1)). (3.3)

    Using part (4) of Lemma 2.1, we get

    Dkατψ(χ,τ)=n=jϱn(χ)τ(nk)αΓ((nk)α+1). (3.4)

    Thus, the series expansion can be written as

    Dkατψ(χ,τ)=n=0ϱn+k(χ)τnαΓ(nα+1). (3.5)

    Proof. Substituting the series expansion of ψ(χ,γτ)in Dkατψ(χ,γτ), we get

    Dkατψ(χ,γτ)=Dkατ(n=0ϱn(χ)(γτ)nαΓ(nα+1)). (3.6)

    Using part (4) of Lemma 2.1, we get

    Dkατψ(χ,γτ)=n=jγnαϱn(χ)τ(nk)αΓ((nk)α+1). (3.7)

    Thus, Eq (3.7), can be written as

    Dkατψ(χ,γτ)=n=0γ(n+k)αϱn+k(χ)τnαΓ(nα+1). (3.8)

    Proof. Multiplying the series expansion of ψ(χ,τ) and φ(χ,τ),

    ψ(χ,τ)φ(χ,τ)=n=0ϱn(χ)τnαΓ(nα+1)m=0ρm(χ)τmαΓ(mα+1). (3.9)

    Equation (3.9), can be simplified as

    ψ(χ,τ)φ(χ,τ)=n=0m=0ϱn(χ)ρm(χ)τ(n+m)αΓ(nα+1)Γ(mα+1), (3.10)

    which can be rewritten as

    ψ(χ,τ)φ(χ,τ)=n=0(ni=0ϱi(χ)ρni(χ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1))τnαΓ(nα+1). (3.11)

    Proof. Multiplying the series expansion of ψ(χ,βτ) and φ(χ,γτ),

    ψ(χ,βτ)φ(χ,γτ)=(n=0ϱn(χ)(βτ)nαΓ(nα+1))(m=0ρm(χ)(γτ)mαΓ(mα+1)). (3.12)

    Equation (3.12), can be written as

    ψ(χ,βτ)φ(χ,γτ)=n=0m=0ϱn(χ)ρm(χ)βnαγmατ(n+m)αΓ(nα+1)Γ(mα+1), (3.13)

    which can be simplified as

    ψ(χ,βτ)φ(χ,γτ)=n=0(ni=0βiαγ(ni)αϱi(χ)ρni(χ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1))τnαΓ(nα+1). (3.14)

    Proof. Substituting the series expansion of ψ(χ,γτ) and φ(χ,γτ)in Dkατψ(χ,βτ)Dsατφ(χ,γτ), we get:

    Dkατψ(χ,βτ)Dsατφ(χ,γτ),=Djαt(i=0ϱi(χ)(βτ)iαΓ(iα+1))Dmαt(j=0ρj(χ)(γτ)kαΓ(kα+1)). (3.15)

    Using part (2) of Lemma 2.1, Eq (3.15) can be written as

    Dkατψ(χ,βτ)Dsατφ(χ,γτ)=(n=0β(n+k)αϱn+k(χ)τnαΓ(nα+1))(m=0γ(m+s)αρm+s(χ)τmαΓ(mα+1)), (3.16)

    which can be simplified as

    Dkατψ(χ,βτ)Dsατφ(χ,γτ)=n=0m=0β(n+k)αγ(m+s)αϱn+k(χ)ρm+s(χ)τ(n+m)αΓ(nα+1)Γ(mα+1). (3.17)

    Equation (3.17) can be written as

    Dkατψ(χ,βτ)Dsατφ(χ,γτ)=n=0(ni=0β(i+k)αγ(ni+m)αϱi+k(χ)ρni+m(χ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1))τnαΓ(nα+1). (3.18)

    The proof is complete.

    The main idea of DPSM depends on replacing each part of the target equation or system with its τnαΓ(nα+1) coefficients, in any equation that contains similar terms in Theorem 3.1, these replacements can be applied separately for each additive part, or if each part is multiplied by a real number. The main idea of the method is to do some replacements in the target equation and simplify the obtained series expansions in one series after simple computations, to get a general term of the coefficients in the series expansion (2.3) and hence, we get the analytic series solution of the equation by substituting n=1,2,in the series form and so on.

    Our goal in this section, is to explain the usage of DPSM in solving some TFPDEs and get numerical solutions for them. The method is basically, depends on assuming the series representation (2.3) of the solution and then find a general term of the series coefficients, that allows researchers to get better approximate solutions by getting many terms of the numerical solution they study.

    The following steps illustrate the algorithm of DPSM in solving TFPDEs:

    Step 3.1. Apply the replacements from Theorem 3.1 that is, replace each term of the target equation by its suitable similar coefficient ϱn(χ) of τnαΓ(nα+1).

    Step 3.2. Simplify the obtained series representations from Step 3.1, and define a general form of the series solution by putting the higher index ϱn+k(χ) to the left-hand side and the rest of the coefficients into the right, to get a formula of the shape:

    ϱn+k(χ)=ρ(an+k1,an+k2,,a0). (3.19)

    Step 3.3. Substitute the values of n, recursively from n=1,2, as much as you need terms of the series solution.

    In this section, some interesting examples on TFPDEs are solved, we clarify the steps of DPSM by solving fractional partial differential equations and system of fractional partial differential equations, each example is of different kind.

    Example 4.1.[26] Consider the following temporal-fractional Burger equation of the form:

    Dατψ(χ,τ)ψχχ(χ,τ)+ψ(χ,τ)ψχ(χ,τ)=0,0<α1, (4.1)

    subject to the initial condition,

    ψ(χ,0)=2χ. (4.2)

    Note that, when α=1 the exact solution of Eq (4.1) the integer case is

    ψ(χ,τ)=2χ1+2τ. (4.3)

    Solution 4.1. Applying the replacements of Theorem 3.1 on Eq (4.1), we get

    Dατψ(χ,τ)ϱn+1(χ),
    ψχχ(χ,τ)ϱ''n(χ),

    and

    ψ(χ,τ)ψχ(χ,τ)ni=0ϱi(χ)ϱ'ni(χ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1).

    Substituting the new terms from the replacements into Eq (4.1), we get

    ϱn+1(χ)ϱ''n(χ)+ni=0ϱi(χ)ϱ'ni(χ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1)=0. (4.4)

    Then the Eq (4.1) can be expressed as

    ϱn+1(χ)=ϱ''n(χ)ni=0ϱi(χ)ϱ'ni(χ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1). (4.5)

    From the initial condition in (4.2),

    for n=0, ϱ1(χ)=4χ,

    for n=1, ϱ2(χ)=16χ,

    for n=2, ϱ3(χ)=16χ(4+Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1)),

    for n=3, ϱ4(χ)=64χ(4+Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1)+2Γ(3α+1)Γ(2α+1)Γ(α+1)),

    for n=4, ϱ5(χ)=256χ(4+Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1)+2Γ(3α+1)Γ(2α+1)Γ(α+1)+Γ(4α+1)Γ2(2α+1))128χ(4+Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1))Γ(4α+1)Γ(3α+1)Γ(α+1), which are the same results obtained in [26]. DPSM save a lot of time in calculating the coefficients and the steps here are written completely.

    Thus, the solution of Eqs (4.1) and (4.2), can be expressed as

    ψ(χ,τ)=ϱ0(χ)+ταϱ1(χ)Γ(1+α)+τ2αϱ2(χ)Γ(1+2α)+τ3αϱ3(χ)Γ(1+3α)+τ4αϱ4(χ)Γ(1+4α)+τ5αϱ5(χ)Γ(1+5α)
    =2χ4χταΓ(1+α)+16χτ2αΓ(1+2α)16χ(4+Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1))τ3αΓ(1+3α)
    +64χ(4+Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1)+2Γ(3α+1)Γ(2α+1)Γ(α+1))τ4αΓ(1+4α)
    +(256χ(4+Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1)+2Γ(3α+1)Γ(2α+1)Γ(α+1)+Γ(4α+1)Γ2(2α+1))128χ(4+Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1))Γ(4α+1)Γ(3α+1)Γ(α+1))τ5αΓ(1+5α)+. (4.6)

    Substituting α=1we get

    ψ(χ,τ)=2χ4τχ+8τ2χ16τ3χ+32τ4χ64τ5χ+128τ6χ
    =2χ(12τ+4τ28τ3+16τ432τ5χ+64τ6χ), (4.7)

    this result agrees, with the Maclaurin series of the exact solution of Eq (4.1) in the integer case, which is

    ψ(χ,τ)=2χ1+2τ. (4.8)

    The following figures illustrate some simulations of Example 4.1.

    In Figure 1, we sketch the solution of Example 4.1 in 3D space with α=1. We compare the exact solution of the integer order case of Example 4.1 with the fifth approximate solution from DPSM and sketch the error in Figure 2. Figure 3 present the contour graphs of the solution with different values of α.

    Figure 1.  The 3D surface plot of the solution ψ(χ,τ) for Example 4.1 with α=1,2χ2 and 2τ2.
    Figure 2.  The 3D surface plot of (a) exact solution ψ(χ,τ), (b) the fifth approximation solution ψ5(χ,τ) and (c) the absolute error of the exact solution and approximation solution, with α=1,0χ1 and 0τ0.2.
    Figure 3.  The contour graph of the solution ψ(χ,τ) of the fractional Burger equation at several values of α in Example 4.1.

    Example 4.2. [28] Consider the following time-fractional Phi-4 equation of the form:

    D2ατψ(χ,τ)=ψχχ(χ,τ)μ2ψ(χ,τ)λψ3(χ,τ), (4.9)

    with initial conditions,

    ψ(χ,0)=μ2λtanh(μχ12(ν21)), (4.10)
    Dατψ(χ,0)=μνμ2λ(ν21)sech2(μχ12(ν21)), (4.11)

    where ν is the speed of the traveling wave αϵ(0,1). The exact solution for α=1 is given by [28],

    ψ(χ,τ)=μ2λtanh(μ(χvτ)12(ν21)). (4.12)

    Solution 4.2. The solution by DPSM can be obtained replacing each part of Eq (4.9) with its suitable coefficient of τnαΓ(nα+1) as in Theorem 3.1 to get the following:

    ϱn+2(χ)=ϱ''n(χ)μ2ϱn(χ)λi,j,ki+j+k=nϱi(χ)ϱj(χ)ϱk(χ)Γ((i+j+k)α+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ(jα+1)Γ(kα+1), (4.13)

    from the initial conditions we have that ϱ0(χ)=ψ(χ,0) and ϱ1(χ)=Dατψ(χ,0).

    For n=0,

    ϱ2(χ)=ϱ''0(χ)μ2ϱ0(χ)λϱ30(χ)
    =λ(μ2λ)3/2ν2Sech2(μ11+ν2χ2)Tanh(μ11+ν2χ2)1+ν2. (4.14)

    For n=1,

    ϱ3(χ)=ϱ''1(χ)μ2ϱ1(χ)3λϱ1(χ)ϱ20(χ)
    =μ3ν3(2+cosh(2μ11+ν2χ))sech4(μ11+ν2χ2)μλ(1+ν2)2(1+ν2). (4.15)

    For n=2,

    ϱ4(χ)=ϱ''2(χ)μ2ϱ2(χ)3λϱ21(χ)ϱ0(χ)3λϱ2(χ)ϱ20(χ)
    =12(ν21)2λ(ν21)λμν2(μ2λ)3/2tanh(μ1ν21χ2)sech4(μ1ν21χ2)
    (2μλ(ν21)(ν2cosh(2μ1ν21χ)2ν23)3λ(ν21)2). (4.16)

    For n=3,

    ϱ5(χ)=ϱ''3(χ)μ2ϱ3(χ)λϱ31(χ)6λϱ0(χ)ϱ1(χ)ϱ2(χ)3λϱ3(χ)ϱ30(χ)
    =182(ν21)2μ3ν3(μλ(ν21))3/2[sech7(μ1ν21χ2)μλ(ν21)48ν2μ2λsinh(μ1ν21χ2)
    21ν2μ2λsinh(3μ1ν21χ2)+3ν2μ2λsinh(5μ1ν21χ2)48μ2λsinh(μ1ν21χ2)
    +21μ2λsinh(3μ1ν21χ2)3μ2λsinh(5μ1ν21χ2)+ν2(cosh(5μ1ν21χ2))
    +20(ν2+3)cosh(μ1ν21χ2)(11ν2+39)cosh(3μ1ν21χ2)
    +3cosh(5μ1ν21χ2)+4λ(ν21)2cosh(μ1ν21χ2)], (4.17)

    and then the 5th truncated series for ψ(χ,τ) can be expressed as,

    ψ5(χ,τ)=ϱ0(χ)+ϱ1(χ)(ττ0)Γ(α+1)+5i=2ϱi(χ)(tt0)iαΓ(iα+1)
    =μ2λtanh(μ1ν21χ2)μνsech2(μ1ν21χ2)μλ(ν21)(ττ0)2Γ(α+1)
    +λ(μ2λ)3/2ν2sech2(μ1ν21χ2)tanh(μ1ν21χ2)(ττ0)2α(ν21)Γ(2α+1)
    μ3ν3(cosh(2μ1ν21χ)2)sech4(μ1ν21χ2)μλ(ν21)(ττ0)3α2(ν21)Γ(3α+1)
    +λμ(μ2λ)3/2ν2sech4(μ1ν21χ2)tanh(μ1ν21χ2)(2μ(cosh(2μ1ν21χ)ν22ν23)λ(ν21)3λ(ν21)2)(ττ0)4α2(ν21)2Γ(4α+1)λ(ν21)
    +182(ν21)2Γ(5α+1)μ3ν3sech7(μ1ν21χ2)(μλ(ν21))3/2[4λcosh(μ1ν21χ2)(ν21)2
    +μ[cosh(5μ1ν21χ2)ν2+48μ2λsinh(μ1ν21χ2)ν221μ2λsinh(3μ1ν21χ2)ν2
    +3μ2λsinh(5μ1ν21χ2)ν2+20(ν2+3)cosh(μ1ν21χ2)(11ν2+39)cosh(3μ1ν21χ2)
    +3cosh(5μ1ν21χ2)48μ2λsinh(μ1ν21χ2)+21μ2λsinh(3μ1ν21χ2)
    3μ2λsinh(5μ1ν21χ2)]λ(ν21)](ττ0)5α. (4.18)

    We mention, that it's hard to find the fifth term by other analytical methods. By DPSM we can get many terms of the series solution by computer software.

    In the following Figures 4 and 5, we sketch the exact solution of Example 4.2 in the integer case and compare it with approximate solution of fifth order in 2D and 3D. Also, we sketch the application solution in the 2D plane with different values of to show how the approximation solution converges to the exact solution of integer order.

    Figure 4.  The 3D surface plot of (a) exact solution ψ(χ,τ), (b) the fifth approximation solution ψ5(χ,τ) and (c) the absolute error of the exact solution and approximation solution, for time-fractional Phi-4 at τ(0,1), χ(10,10), α=1,μ=1,λ=1,υ=3.
    Figure 5.  The 2D plot of (a) approximation solution ψ5(χ,τ) and exact solution ψ(χ,τ)for time-fractional Phi-4 at τ(0,1), χ=0.6, α=1,μ=1,λ=1,υ=3, (b) the DPSM solutions of different values of α in Example 4.2.

    Example 4.3. [22] The following form is considered:

    Dατψ(χ,τ)+φχχ(χ,τ)+2(ψ2(χ,τ)+φ2(χ,τ))φ(χ,τ)=0, (4.19)
    Dατφ(χ,τ)ψχχ(χ,τ)2(ψ2(χ,τ)+φ2(χ,τ))ψ(χ,τ)=0, (4.20)

    with initial conditions,

    ψ(χ,0)=cos(χ), (4.21)
    φ(χ,0)=sin(χ). (4.22)

    To find the general form of solutions by DPSM just do the replacements in Theorem 3.1 which could be directly written by,

    ϱn+1(χ)=ρ''n(χ)2i,j,ki+j+k=n(ϱi(χ)ϱj(χ)ρk(χ)+ρi(χ)ρj(χ)ρk(χ))Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ(jα+1)Γ(kα+1), (4.23)
    ρn+1(χ)=ϱ''n(χ)+2i,j,ki+j+k=n(ϱi(χ)ϱj(χ)ϱk(χ)+ρi(χ)ρj(χ)ϱk(χ))Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ(jα+1)Γ(kα+1). (4.24)

    For n=0,

    ϱ1(χ)=δρ''0(χ)γ(ϱ0(χ)ϱ0(χ)ρ0(χ)+ρ0(χ)ρ0(χ)ρ0(χ))φ(χ)ρ0(χ)=sinx,
    ρ1(χ)=δϱ''0(χ)+γ(ϱ0(χ)ϱ0(χ)ϱ0(χ)+ρ0(χ)ρ0(χ)ϱ0(χ))+φ(χ)ϱ0(χ)=cosx.

    For n=1,

    ϱ2(χ)=cosx,
    ρ2(χ)=sinx.

    For n=2,

    ϱ3(χ)=(52Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+α)2)sinx,
    ρ3(χ)=(52Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+α)2)cosx.

    For n=3,

    ϱ4(χ)=(52Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+α)2+4Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)2Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)3)cosx,
    ρ4(χ)=(52Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+α)2+4Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)2Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)3)sinx,

    which is the same general form of the solutions obtained in [22].

    Example 4.4. [37] Consider the following time-fractional 3-dimentional Navier Stokes equation:

    Dατψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)+ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)χ+ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ς+ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ζ
    =υ(2ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)χ2+2ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ς2+2ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ζ2), (4.25)
    Dατψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)+ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)χ+ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ς+ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ζ
    =υ(2ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)χ2+2ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ς2+2ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ζ2), (4.26)
    Dατψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)+ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)χ+ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ς+ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ζ
    =υ(2ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)χ2+2ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ς2+2ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)ζ2), (4.27)

    where φR, and with the ICs,

    ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,0)=0.5χ+ς+ζ, (4.28)
    ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,0)=χ0.5ς+ζ, (4.29)
    ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,0)=χ+ς0.5ζ. (4.30)

    The exact solution, when α=1, of the integer case is

    ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)=0.5χ+ς+ζ2.25χτ12.25τ2,
    ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)=χ0.5ς+ζ2.25ςτ12.25τ2,
    ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)=χ+ς0.5ζ2.25ζτ12.25τ2.

    Solution 4.3. The solution by DPSM can be obtained by replacing each part of Eqs (4.25)–(4.27) with its suitable coefficient of τnαΓ(nα+1) as in Theorem 3.1 to get the following relations:

    ϱn+1(χ,ς,ζ)=ni=0(ϱi(χ,ς,ζ)ϱni(χ,ς,ζ)χ+ρi(χ,ς,ζ)ϱni(χ,ς,ζ)ς+σi(χ,ς,ζ)ϱni(χ,ς,ζ)ζ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1)
    +υ(2ϱn(χ,ς,ζ)χ2+2ϱn(χ,ς,ζ)ς2+2ϱn(χ,ς,ζ)ζ2),
    ρn+1(χ,ς,ζ)=ni=0(ϱi(χ,ς,ζ)ρni(χ,ς,ζ)χ+ρiρni(χ,ς,ζ)ς+σiρni(χ,ς,ζ)ζ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1)
    +υ(2ρn(χ,ς,ζ)χ2+2ρn(χ,ς,ζ)ς2+2ρn(χ,ς,ζ)ζ2),
    σn+1(χ,ς,ζ)=ni=0(ϱi(χ,ς,ζ)σni(χ,ς,ζ)χ+σiσni(χ,ς,ζ)ς+σiσni(χ,ς,ζ)ζ)Γ(nα+1)Γ(iα+1)Γ((ni)α+1)
    +υ(2σn(χ,ς,ζ)χ2+2σn(χ,ς,ζ)ς2+2σnζ2).

    For n=0,

    ϱ1=ϱ0ϱ0χρ0ϱ0ςσ0ϱ0ζ+υ(2ϱ0χ2+2ϱ0ς2+2ϱ0ζ2)
    =(0.5χ+ς+ζ)(0.5)(χ0.5ς+ζ)(1)(χ+ς0.5ζ)(1)=2.25χ,
    ρ1=ϱ0ρ0χρ0ρ0ςσ0ρ0ζ+υ(2ρ0χ2+2ρ0ς2+2ρ0ζ2)
    =(0.5χ+ς+ζ)(1)(χ0.5ς+ζ)(0.5)(χ+ς0.5ζ)(1)=2.25ς,
    σ1=ϱ0σ0χρ0σ0ςσ0σ0ζ+υ(2σ0χ2+2σ0ς2+2σ0ζ2)
    =(0.5χ+ς+ζ)(1)(χ0.5ς+ζ)(1)(χ+ς0.5ζ)(0.5)=2.25ζ.

    For n=1,

    ϱ2=ϱ1ϱ0χϱ0ϱ1χρ1ϱ0ςρ0ϱ1ςσ1ϱ0ζσ0ϱ1ζ+υ(2ϱ1χ2+2ϱ1ς2+2ϱ1ζ2)
    =(2.25χ)(0.5)(0.5χ+ς+ζ)(2.25)(2.25ς)(1)(2.25ζ)(1)
    =2(0.5)(2.25)χ+2(2.25)ς+2(2.25)ζ=2(2.25)(0.5χ+ς+ζ)=4.5ϱ0,
    ρ2=ϱ1ρ0χϱ0ρ1χρ1ρ0ςρ0ρ1ςσ1ρ0ζσ0ρ1ζ+υ(2ρ1χ2+2ρ1ς2+2ρ1ζ2)
    =2(2.25)χ2(0.5)(2.25)ς+2(2.25)ζ=2(2.25)(χ0.5ς+ζ)=4.5ρ0,
    σ2=ϱ1σ0χϱ0σ1χρ1σ0ςρ0σ1ςσ1σ0ζσ0σ1ζ+υ(2σ1χ2+2σ1ς2+2σ1ζ2)
    =2(2.25)χ+2(2.25)ς2(0.5)(2.25)ζ=2(2.25)(χ+ς0.5ζ)=4.5σ0,

    For n=2,

    ϱ3=(20.25+5.0625Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1))χ,
    ρ3=(20.25+5.0625Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1))ς,
    σ3=(20.25+5.0625Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1))ζ.

    For n=3,

    ϱ4=(40.5+10.125Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1)+20.25Γ(3α+1)Γ(2α+1)Γ(α+1))(0.5χ+ς+ζ),
    ρ4=(40.5+10.125Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1)+20.25Γ(3α+1)Γ(2α+1)Γ(α+1))(χ0.5ς+ζ),
    σ4=(40.5+10.125Γ(2α+1)Γ2(α+1)+20.25Γ(3α+1)Γ(2α+1)Γ(α+1))(χ+ς0.5ζ).

    So, the solution of systems (4.25)–(4.27) and (4.28)–(4.30) has the following series form:

    ψ1(χ,ς,ζ,τ)=0.5χ+ς+ζ2.25Γ(1+α)χτα
    +2(2.25)Γ(1+2α)(0.5χ+ς+ζ)τ2α(2.25)2Γ(1+3α)(4+Γ(1+2α)Γ2(1+α))χτ3α
    +(2.25)2Γ(1+4α)(8+2Γ(1+2α)Γ2(1+α)+4Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))(0.5χ+ς+ζ)τ4α+, (4.31)
    ψ2(χ,ς,ζ,τ)=χ0.5ς+ζ2.25Γ(1+α)ςτα
    +2(2.25)Γ(1+2α)(χ0.5ς+ζ)τ2α(2.25)2Γ(1+3α)(4+Γ(1+2α)Γ2(1+α))ςτ3α
    +(2.25)2Γ(1+4α)(8+2Γ(1+2α)Γ2(1+α)+4Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))(χ0.5ς+ζ)τ4α+, (4.32)
    ψ3(χ,ς,ζ,τ)=χ+ς0.5ζ2.25Γ(1+α)ζτα
    +2(2.25)Γ(1+2α)(χ+ς0.5ζ)τ2α(2.25)2Γ(1+3α)(4+Γ(1+2α)Γ2(1+α))ζτ3α
    +(2.25)2Γ(1+4α)(8+2Γ(1+2α)Γ2(1+α)+4Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))(χ+ς0.5ζ)τ4α+. (4.33)

    The following figure (Figure 6) illustrates the graph of the exact solution of Example 4.3 and the 10th approximation solutions.

    Figure 6.  The 3D surface plot of the 10th approximate solutions of ψ1,ψ2, and ψ3 at various values of α and τ=0.5 & ζ=3 for the problem in Example 4.3. (a) α=0.6, (b) α=0.8, (c) α=1, (d) α=1 (exact solutions).

    In several types of science like mathematics, physics, engineering statics, etc., there are massive numbers of equations and systems that need solutions. Mathematicians created and developed many analytical and numerical methods to find the solution accurately or approximately. Power series methods like residual power series, Laplace residual power series, and many others give exact solutions or sometimes provide approximate solutions that converge to the exact one. However, these methods require a lot of steps each time, especially for solving nonlinear equations and systems. In this paper, a new technique has been presented for the first time called the DPSM for solving TFPDEs. In the following, we mention some remarks on the new method

    1) DPSM introduces an analytical series solution depending on the idea of power series representation.

    2) The method is simple and applicable in presenting series solutions.

    3) DPSM can obtain many terms of the series solution.

    4) The proposed method, need no discretization, transformation differentiation or taking limit.

    5) All numerical results obtained in this article by Mathematica 3.12.

    This method is a simple method among all analytical methods. It depends on the idea of the power series expansion for solving time-fractional differential equations or systems. In the future, we attend to expand the replacements and solve integral equations.

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.



    [1] Q. T. Jiang, X. H. Zhou, R. L. Wang, W. P. Ding, Y. Chu, S. Z. Tang, et al., Intelligent monitoring for infectious diseases with fuzzy systems and edge computing: a survey, Appl. Soft Comput., 123 (2022), 108835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108835 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108835
    [2] D. Dell'Anna, A. Jamshidnejad, Evolving fuzzy logic systems for creative personalized socially assistive robots, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel., 114 (2022), 105064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105064 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105064
    [3] Y. J. Liu, X. Y. Zhao, J. H Park, F. Fang, Fault-tolerant control for T-S fuzzy systems with an aperiodic adaptive event-triggered sampling, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 452 (2022), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2022.04.019 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2022.04.019
    [4] P. Shi, F. B. Li, L. G. Wu, C. Lim, Neural network-based passive filtering for delayed neutral-type semi-Markovian jump systems, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 28 (2017), 2101–2114. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2573853 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2573853
    [5] Y. L. Wei, J. H. Park, J. B. Qiu, L. G. Wu, H. Y. Jung, Sliding mode control for semi-Markovian jump systems via output feedback, Automatica, 81 (2017), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2017.03.032 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.03.032
    [6] H. Shen, F. Li, S. Y. Xu, V. Sreeram, Slow state variables feedback stabilization for semi-Markov jump systems with singular perturbations, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 63 (2018), 2709–2714. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2017.2774006 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2017.2774006
    [7] X. Xing, D. Y. Yao, Q. Lu, X. C. Li, Finite-time stability of Markovian jump neural networks with partly unknown transition probabilities, Neurocomputing, 159 (2015), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.01.033 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.01.033
    [8] Z. L. Xia, S. P. He, Finite-time asynchronous H fault-tolerant control for nonlinear hidden Markov jump systems with actuator and sensor faults, Appl. Math. Comput., 428 (2022), 127212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127212 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127212
    [9] T. Wu, L. L. Xiong, J. D. Cao, J. H. Park, Hidden Markov model-based asynchronous quantized sampled-data control for fuzzy nonlinear Markov jump systems, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 432 (2022), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2021.08.016 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2021.08.016
    [10] F. Li, S. Y. Xu, B. Y. Zhang, Resilient asynchronous H control for discrete-time Markov jump singularly perturbed systems based on hidden Markov model, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 50 (2020), 2860–2869. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2018.2837888 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2837888
    [11] Z. H. Xiao, Z. Y. Wu, J. Tao, Asynchronous filtering for Markov jump systems within finite time: a general event-triggered communication, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 114 (2022), 106634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.106634 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.106634
    [12] D. Zhang, C. Deng, G. Feng, Resilient cooperative output regulation for nonlinear multi-agent systems under DoS attacks, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 2022, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2022.3184388 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2022.3184388
    [13] L. G. Wu, Y. B. Gao, J. X. Liu, H. Y. Li, Event-triggered sliding mode control of stochastic systems via output feedback, Automatica, 82 (2017), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2017.04.032 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.04.032
    [14] Z. D. Lu, G. T. Ran, F. X. Xu, J. X. Lu, Novel mixed-triggered filter design for interval type-2 fuzzy nonlinear Markovian jump systems with randomly occurring packet dropouts, Nonlinear Dyn., 97 (2019), 1525–1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05070-x doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-05070-x
    [15] H. Shen, M. S. Chen, Z. G. Wu, J. D. Cao, J. H. Park, Reliable event-triggered asynchronous extended passive control for semi-Markov jump fuzzy systems and its application, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 28 (2020), 1708–1722. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2921264 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2921264
    [16] H. J. Wang, A. K. Xue, J. H. Wang, R. Q. Lu, Event-based H filtering for discrete-time Markov jump systems with network-induced delay, J. Franklin Inst., 354 (2017), 6170–6189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.07.017 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.07.017
    [17] M. Xue, H. C. Yan, H. Zhang, Z. C. Li, S. M. Chen, C. Y. Chen, Event-triggered guaranteed cost controller design for T-S fuzzy Markovian jump systems with partly unknown transition probabilities, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 29 (2021), 1052–1064. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2968866 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2968866
    [18] Z. H. Ye, D. Zhang, J. Cheng, Z. G. Wu, Event-triggering and quantized sliding mode control of UMV systems under DoS attacks, IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech., 71 (2022), 8199–8211. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2022.3175726 doi: 10.1109/TVT.2022.3175726
    [19] L. Su, G. Chesi, Robust stability of uncertain discrete-time linear systems with input and output quantization, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50 (2017), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.161 doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.161
    [20] L. L. Su, G. Chesi, Robust stability of uncertain linear systems with input and output quantization and packet loss, Automatica, 87 (2018), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2017.10.014 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.10.014
    [21] H. J. Tang, X. M. Zhang, H. Zhu, J. Lv, Quantized feedback control for time-delay systems via sliding mode observers, IMA J. Math. Control Inform., 35 (2018), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/imamci/dnw014 doi: 10.1093/imamci/dnw014
    [22] J. H. Wang, Q. L. Zhang, F. Bai, Robust control of discrete-time singular Markovian jump systems with partly unknown transition probabilities by static output feedback, Int. J. Control Automat. Syst., 13 (2015), 1313–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-014-0290-2 doi: 10.1007/s12555-014-0290-2
    [23] S. C. Zhang, B. Zhao, D. R. Liu, Y. W. Zhang, Observer-based H tracking control scheme and its application to robot arms, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53 (2020), 536–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.04.199 doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.04.199
    [24] D. Cui, Y. Wang, H. Y. Su, Z. W. Xu, H. Y. Que, Fuzzy-model-based tracking control of Markov jump nonlinear systems with incomplete mode information, J. Franklin Inst., 358 (2021), 3633–3650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.02.039 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.02.039
    [25] S. Harshavarthini, O. M. Kwon, S. M. Lee, Uncertainty and disturbance estimator-based resilient tracking control design for fuzzy semi-Markovian jump systems, Appl. Math. Comput., 426 (2022), 127123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127123 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127123
    [26] Z. H. Ye, D. Zhang, Z. G. Wu, H. C. Yan, A3C-based intelligent event-triggering control of networked nonlinear unmanned marine vehicles subject to hybrid attacks, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 23 (2022), 12921–12934. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3118648 doi: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3118648
    [27] Z. Gu, E. G. Tian, J. L. Liu, Adaptive event-triggered control of a class of nonlinear networked systems, J. Franklin Inst., 354 (2017), 3854–3871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.02.026 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.02.026
    [28] C. Peng, T. C. Yang, Event-triggered communication and H control co-design for networked control systems, Automatica, 49 (2013), 1326–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.01.038 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.01.038
    [29] A. H. Hu, J. D. Cao, M. F. Hu, L. X. Guo, Event-triggered consensus of Markovian jumping multi-agent systems via stochastic sampling, IET Control Theory Appl., 9 (2015), 1964–1972. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2014.1164 doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2014.1164
    [30] C. Gong, G. P. Zhu, P. Shi, Adaptive event-triggered and double-quantized consensus of leader-follower multiagent systems with semi-Markovian jump parameters, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 51 (2021), 5867–5879. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2019.2957530 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2957530
    [31] M. Y. Fu, L. H. Xie, The sector bound approach to quantized feedback control, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 50 (2005), 1698–1711. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2005.858689 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2005.858689
    [32] S. Liu, T. Li, L. H. Xie, M. Y. Fu, J. F. Zhang, Continuous-time and sampled-data-based average consensus with logarithmic quantizers, Automatica, 49 (2013), 3329–3336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.07.016 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.07.016
    [33] J. S. Li, D. W. C. Ho, J. M. Li, Adaptive consensus of multi-agent systems under quantized measurements via the edge Laplacian, Automatica, 92 (2018), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2018.03.022 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.03.022
    [34] S. L. Hu, D. Yue, Event-triggered control design of linear networked systems with quantizations, ISA Trans., 51 (2012), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2011.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2011.09.002
    [35] M. Xue, H. C. Yan, H. Zhang, J. Sun, H. Lam, Hidden-Markov-model-based asynchronous H tracking control of fuzzy Markov jump systems, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 29 (2021), 1081–1092. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2968878 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2968878
    [36] N. Zhao, P. Shi, W. Xing, C. P. Lim, Resilient adaptive event-triggered fuzzy tracking control and filtering for nonlinear networked systems under denial-of-service attacks, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2022), 3191–3201. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3106674 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3106674
    [37] K. Gu, An integral inequality in the stability problem of time-delay systems, In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187), 3 (2000), 2805–2810. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2000.914233
    [38] H. K. Lam, F. H. F. Leung, Stability analysis of fuzzy control systems subject to uncertain grades of membership, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B, 35 (2005), 1322–1325. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2005.850181 doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2005.850181
    [39] H. K. Lam, A review on stability analysis of continuous-time fuzzy-model-based control systems: from membership-function-independent to membership-function-dependent analysis, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 67 (2018), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.09.007 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.09.007
    [40] H. K. Lam, S. H. Tsai, Stability analysis of polynomial-fuzzy-model-based control systems with mismatched premise membership functions, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 22 (2014), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2243735 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2243735
    [41] Y. N. Pan, G. H. Yang, Event-triggered fault detection filter design for nonlinear networked systems, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 48 (2018), 1851–1862. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2017.2719629 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2719629
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ahmad Qazza, Rania Saadeh, Said El Kafhali, On the Analytical Solution of Fractional SIR Epidemic Model, 2023, 2023, 1687-9732, 1, 10.1155/2023/6973734
    2. Rania Saadeh, Analytic Computational Method for Solving Fractional Nonlinear Equations in Magneto-Acoustic Waves, 2022, 17, 2224-347X, 241, 10.37394/232013.2022.17.22
    3. D. G. Prakasha, Rania Saadeh, Krunal Kachhia, Ahmad Qazza, Naveen Sanju Malagi, Amin Jajarmi, A New Computational Technique for Analytic Treatment of Time-Fractional Nonlinear Equations Arising in Magneto-Acoustic Waves, 2023, 2023, 1563-5147, 1, 10.1155/2023/6229486
    4. Haifa Bin Jebreen, S. A. Edalatpanah, Spectral Element Method for Fractional Klein–Gordon Equations Using Interpolating Scaling Functions, 2023, 2023, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2023/8453459
    5. Tareq Eriqat, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad El-Ajou, Ahmad Qazza, Moa'ath N. Oqielat, Ahmad Ghazal, A new analytical algorithm for uncertain fractional differential equations in the fuzzy conformable sense, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 9641, 10.3934/math.2024472
    6. Haifa Bin Jebreen, Carlo Cattani, Solving Fractional Gas Dynamics Equation Using Müntz–Legendre Polynomials, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 2076, 10.3390/sym15112076
    7. Rania Saadeh, Motasem Mustafa, Aliaa Burqan, 2024, Chapter 17, 978-981-97-4875-4, 239, 10.1007/978-981-97-4876-1_17
    8. Rania Saadeh, Laith Hamdi, Ahmad Qazza, 2024, Chapter 18, 978-981-97-4875-4, 259, 10.1007/978-981-97-4876-1_18
    9. Shams A. Ahmed, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad Qazza, Tarig M. Elzaki, Modified conformable double Laplace–Sumudu approach with applications, 2023, 9, 24058440, e15891, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15891
    10. Osama Ala'yed, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad Qazza, Numerical solution for the system of Lane-Emden type equations using cubic B-spline method arising in engineering, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 14747, 10.3934/math.2023754
    11. Mohammed Berir, 2023, A Fractional Study for Solving the Smoking Model and the Chaotic Engineering Model, 979-8-3503-7336-3, 1, 10.1109/EICEEAI60672.2023.10590561
    12. Rania Saadeh, Mohamed A. Abdoon, Ahmad Qazza, Mohammed Berir, A Numerical Solution of Generalized Caputo Fractional Initial Value Problems, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 332, 10.3390/fractalfract7040332
    13. Amjad E. Hamza, Abdelilah K. Sedeeg, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad Qazza, Raed Khalil, A New Approach in Solving Regular and Singular Conformable Fractional Coupled Burger’s Equations, 2023, 22, 2224-2880, 298, 10.37394/23206.2023.22.36
    14. Fathelrhman EL Guma, Abdelaziz G.M. Musa, Fatimah Dhafer Alkhathami, Rania Saadehm, Ahmad Qazza, 2023, Prediction of Visceral Leishmaniasis Incidences Utilizing Machine Learning Techniques, 979-8-3503-7336-3, 1, 10.1109/EICEEAI60672.2023.10590369
    15. Md. Nur Alam, An analytical technique to obtain traveling wave solutions to nonlinear models of fractional order, 2023, 8, 26668181, 100533, 10.1016/j.padiff.2023.100533
    16. Haifa Bin Jebreen, The Müntz–Legendre Wavelet Collocation Method for Solving Weakly Singular Integro-Differential Equations with Fractional Derivatives, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 763, 10.3390/fractalfract7100763
    17. Fahad Alsidrani, Adem Kılıçman, Norazak Senu, A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs, 2024, 22, 2391-5455, 10.1515/math-2024-0036
    18. Faeza Hasan, Mohamed Abdoon, Rania Saadeh, Mohammed Berir, Ahmad Qazza, A New Perspective on the Stochastic Fractional Order Materialized by the Exact Solutions of Allen-Cahn Equation, 2023, 8, 2455-7749, 912, 10.33889/IJMEMS.2023.8.5.052
    19. H. B. Chethan, Rania Saadeh, D. G. Prakasha, Ahmad Qazza, Naveen S. Malagi, M. Nagaraja, Deepak Umrao Sarwe, An efficient approximate analytical technique for the fractional model describing the solid tumor invasion, 2024, 12, 2296-424X, 10.3389/fphy.2024.1294506
    20. Boyu Liu, Wenyan Wang, An efficient numerical scheme in reproducing kernel space for space fractional partial differential equations, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 33286, 10.3934/math.20241588
    21. Tao Liu, Runqi Xue, Bolin Ding, Davron A. Juraev, Behzad Nemati Saray, Fazlollah Soleymani, A Novel and Effective Scheme for Solving the Fractional Telegraph Problem via the Spectral Element Method, 2024, 8, 2504-3110, 711, 10.3390/fractalfract8120711
    22. Raed M. Khalil, Rania Saadeh, Mohamed A. Abdoon, Mohammed Berir, Ahmad Qazza, Ali Elrashidi, 2024, Analyzing Chaotic Jerk System with Hyperbolic Sine: a new algorithm for Engineering Applications, 979-8-3315-4001-2, 1, 10.1109/ACIT62805.2024.10877120
    23. Iqbal M. Batiha, Rania Saadeh, Iqbal H. Jebril, Ahmad Qazza, Abeer A. Al-Nana, Shaher Momani, Composite Fractional Trapezoidal Rule with Romberg Integration, 2024, 140, 1526-1506, 2729, 10.32604/cmes.2024.051588
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1678) PDF downloads(85) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(11)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog