Research article Special Issues

Classical and Bayesian inferences on the stress-strength reliability $ {R = P[Y < X < Z]} $ in the geometric distribution setting

  • Received: 16 April 2023 Revised: 25 May 2023 Accepted: 12 June 2023 Published: 27 June 2023
  • MSC : 60E05, 62F10, 62N02

  • The subject matter described herein includes the analysis of the stress-strength reliability of the system, in which the discrete strength of the system is impacted by two random discrete stresses. The reliability function of such systems is denoted by $ R = P[Y < X < Z] $, where $ X $ is the strength of the system and $ Y $ and $ Z $ are the stresses. We look at how $ X $, $ Y $ and $ Z $ fit into a well-known discrete distribution known as the geometric distribution. The stress-strength reliability of this form is not widely studied in the current literature, and research in this area has only considered the scenario when the strength and stress variables follow a continuous distribution, although it is essentially nil in the case of discrete stress and strength. There are numerous applications wherein a system is exposed to external stress, and its functionality depends on whether its intrinsic physical strength falls within specific stress limits. Furthermore, the continuous measurement of stress and strength variables presents inherent difficulties and inconveniences in such scenarios. For the suggested distribution, we obtain the maximum likelihood estimate of the variable $ R $, as well as its asymptotic distribution and confidence interval. Additionally, in the classical setup, we find the boot-p and boot-t confidence intervals for $ R $. In the Bayesian setup, we utilize the widely recognized Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique and the Lindley approximation method to find the Bayes estimate of $ R $ under the squared error loss function. A Monte Carlo simulation study and real data analysis are demonstrated to show the applicability of the suggested model in the real world.

    Citation: Amit Singh Nayal, Bhupendra Singh, Abhishek Tyagi, Christophe Chesneau. Classical and Bayesian inferences on the stress-strength reliability $ {R = P[Y < X < Z]} $ in the geometric distribution setting[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20679-20699. doi: 10.3934/math.20231054

    Related Papers:

  • The subject matter described herein includes the analysis of the stress-strength reliability of the system, in which the discrete strength of the system is impacted by two random discrete stresses. The reliability function of such systems is denoted by $ R = P[Y < X < Z] $, where $ X $ is the strength of the system and $ Y $ and $ Z $ are the stresses. We look at how $ X $, $ Y $ and $ Z $ fit into a well-known discrete distribution known as the geometric distribution. The stress-strength reliability of this form is not widely studied in the current literature, and research in this area has only considered the scenario when the strength and stress variables follow a continuous distribution, although it is essentially nil in the case of discrete stress and strength. There are numerous applications wherein a system is exposed to external stress, and its functionality depends on whether its intrinsic physical strength falls within specific stress limits. Furthermore, the continuous measurement of stress and strength variables presents inherent difficulties and inconveniences in such scenarios. For the suggested distribution, we obtain the maximum likelihood estimate of the variable $ R $, as well as its asymptotic distribution and confidence interval. Additionally, in the classical setup, we find the boot-p and boot-t confidence intervals for $ R $. In the Bayesian setup, we utilize the widely recognized Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique and the Lindley approximation method to find the Bayes estimate of $ R $ under the squared error loss function. A Monte Carlo simulation study and real data analysis are demonstrated to show the applicability of the suggested model in the real world.



    加载中


    [1] S. Kotz, Y. Lumelskii, M. Pensky, The stress-strength model and its generalizations: Theory and applications, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., 2003. https://doi.org/10.1142/5015
    [2] D. Kundu, R. D. Gupta, Estimation of $P [Y < X]$ for Weibull distributions, IEEE Trans. Reliab., 55 (2006), 270–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tr.2006.874918 doi: 10.1109/tr.2006.874918
    [3] M. Z. Raqab, M. T. Madi, D. Kundu, Estimation of $P(Y < X)$ for the three-parameter generalized exponential distribution, Commun. Stat.-Theor. M., 37 (2008), 2854–2864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610920802162664 doi: 10.1080/03610920802162664
    [4] A. Barbiero, Inference on reliability of stress-strength models for Poisson data, J. Qual. Reliab. Eng., 2013 (2013), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/530530 doi: 10.1155/2013/530530
    [5] M. Obradovic, M. Jovanovic, B. Milosevic, V. Jevremovic, Estimation of P (X $\le$ Y) for geometric-Poisson model, Hacet. J. Math. Stat., 44 (2015), 949–964.
    [6] M. Jovanovic, Estimation of P (X < Y) for geometric-exponential model based on complete and censored samples, Commun. Stat.-Simul. C., 46 (2016), 3050–3066. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2015.1073302 doi: 10.1080/03610918.2015.1073302
    [7] A. Kohansal, Large estimation of the stress-strength reliability of progressively censored inverted exponentiated Rayleigh distributions, J. Appl. Math. Stat. Inf., 13 (2017), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/jamsi-2017-0004 doi: 10.1515/jamsi-2017-0004
    [8] A. S. Yadav, S. K. Singh, U. Singh, Estimation of stress-strength reliability for inverse Weibull distribution under progressive type-II censoring scheme, J. Ind. Prod. Eng., 35 (2018), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2017.1421590 doi: 10.1080/21681015.2017.1421590
    [9] R. Goel, B. Singh, Estimation of P (Y < X) for modified Weibull distribution under progressive Type-II censoring, Life Cycle Reliab. Safety Eng., 9 (2020), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-020-00109-0 doi: 10.1007/s41872-020-00109-0
    [10] B. Singh, A. S. Nayal, A. Tyagi, Estimation of P [Y < Z] under Geometric-Lindley model, Ric. Mat., 2023, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-022-00753-x
    [11] T. R. Rasethuntsa, On the UMVUE and closed-form Bayes estimator for P (X < Y < Z) and its generalizations, arXiv: 2012.06487, 2020.
    [12] N. Singh, On the estimation of $Pr (X_1 < Y < X_2)$, Commun. Stat.-Theor. M., 9 (1980), 1551–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928008827982 doi: 10.1080/03610928008827982
    [13] K. Dutta, G. L. Sriwastav, An n-standby system with $P (X < Y < Z)$, IAPQR Trans., 12 (1986), 95–97.
    [14] V. V. Ivshin, On the estimation of the probabilities of a double linear inequality in the case of uniform and two-parameter exponential distributions, J. Math. Sci., 88 (1998), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02365367 doi: 10.1007/BF02365367
    [15] P. Guangming, W. Xiping, Z. Wang, Nonparametric statistical inference for P(X < Y < Z), Sankhya A, 75 (2013), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-012-0010-z doi: 10.1007/s13171-012-0010-z
    [16] N. Choudhary, A. Tyagi, B. Singh, Estimation of $R = P[Y < X < Z]$ under progressive type-II censored data from Weibull distribution, Lobachevskii J. Math., 42 (2021), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080221020086 doi: 10.1134/S1995080221020086
    [17] B. Singh, R. P. Singh, A. S. Nayal, A. Tyagi, Discrete inverted Nadarajah-Haghighi distribution: Properties and classical estimation with application to complete and censored data, Stat. Optim. Inform. Comput., 10 (2022), 1293–1313. https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-1365 doi: 10.19139/soic-2310-5070-1365
    [18] B. Singh, V. Agiwal, A. S. Nayal, A. Tyagi, A discrete analogue of Teissier distribution: Properties and classical estimation with application to count data, Reliab. Theor. Appl., 17 (2022), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.24412/1932-2321-2022-167-340-355 doi: 10.24412/1932-2321-2022-167-340-355
    [19] R. V. Hogg, J. W. McKean, A. T. Craig, Introduction to mathematical statistics, 6 Eds., Pearson, Prentice Hall, 2005.
    [20] B. Efron, The Jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1982.
    [21] P. Hall, P. G. Hall, Introduction to the theory of coverage processes, John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, 1988.
    [22] S. Geman, D. Geman, Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images, IEEE T. Pattern Anal., 6 (1984), 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
    [23] M. H. Chen, Q. M. Shao, Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 8 (1999), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1999.10474802 doi: 10.1080/10618600.1999.10474802
    [24] D. V. Lindley, Fiducial distributions and Bayes' theorem, J. R. Stat. Soc. B (Methodological), 20 (1958), 102–107.
    [25] A. C. Kimber, Exploratory data analysis for possibly censored data from skewed distributions, J. R. Stat. Soc. C-Appl., 39 (1990), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347808 doi: 10.2307/2347808
    [26] M. Crowder, Tests for a family of survival models based on extremes, Recent Advances in Reliability Theory. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA., 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1384-0_20
    [27] M. M. Pedersen, O. Ø. Mouritsen, M. R. Hansen, J. G. Andersen, J. Wenderby, Comparison of post-weld treatment of high-strength steel welded joints in medium cycle fatigue, Weld. World, 54 (2010), R208–R217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263506 doi: 10.1007/BF03263506
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1481) PDF downloads(101) Cited by(2)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(9)  /  Tables(6)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog