We derive the general formulas for a special configuration of the sequential warped-product semi-Riemannian manifold to be Einstein, where the base-manifold is the product of two manifolds both equipped with a generic diagonal conformal metrics. Subsequently we study the case in which these two manifolds are conformal to a n1-dimensional and n2-dimensional pseudo-Euclidean space, respectively. For the latter case, we prove the existence of a family of solutions that are invariant under the action of a (n1−1)-dimensional group of transformations to the case of positive constant Ricci curvature (λ>0).
Citation: Alexander Pigazzini, Cenap Özel, Saeid Jafari, Richard Pincak, Andrew DeBenedictis. A family of special case sequential warped-product manifolds[J]. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 116-127. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023006
[1] | Markus Schlarb . A multi-parameter family of metrics on stiefel manifolds and applications. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 147-187. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023008 |
[2] | Valentin Duruisseaux, Melvin Leok . Time-adaptive Lagrangian variational integrators for accelerated optimization. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 224-255. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023010 |
[3] | Jacob R. Goodman . Local minimizers for variational obstacle avoidance on Riemannian manifolds. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 59-72. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023003 |
[4] | Jordi Gaset, Arnau Mas . A variational derivation of the field equations of an action-dependent Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 357-374. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023014 |
[5] | Francesco Bonechi, Jian Qiu, Marco Tarlini . Generalised Kähler structure on $ \mathbb{C}P^2 $ and elliptic functions. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 188-223. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023009 |
[6] | William Clark, Anthony Bloch . Existence of invariant volumes in nonholonomic systems subject to nonlinear constraints. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 256-286. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023011 |
[7] | Maulik Bhatt, Amit K. Sanyal, Srikant Sukumar . Asymptotically stable optimal multi-rate rigid body attitude estimation based on lagrange-d'alembert principle. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 73-97. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023004 |
[8] | Marcin Zając . The dressing field method in gauge theories - geometric approach. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 128-146. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023007 |
[9] | Robert I McLachlan, Christian Offen . Backward error analysis for conjugate symplectic methods. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 98-115. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023005 |
[10] | Xavier Rivas, Daniel Torres . Lagrangian–Hamiltonian formalism for cocontact systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2023, 15(1): 1-26. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2023001 |
We derive the general formulas for a special configuration of the sequential warped-product semi-Riemannian manifold to be Einstein, where the base-manifold is the product of two manifolds both equipped with a generic diagonal conformal metrics. Subsequently we study the case in which these two manifolds are conformal to a n1-dimensional and n2-dimensional pseudo-Euclidean space, respectively. For the latter case, we prove the existence of a family of solutions that are invariant under the action of a (n1−1)-dimensional group of transformations to the case of positive constant Ricci curvature (λ>0).
The warped-product manifolds are type of manifolds introduced by Bishop and O'Neill [1]. These manifolds have become very important in the context of differential geometry and are also extensively studied in the arena of General Relativity, for instance with respect to generalized Friedmann-Robrtson-Walker spacetimes. Many properties for warped product manifolds and submanifolds were presented by B.-Y. Chen in [2].
A warped-product manifold can be constructed as follows. Let (B,gB) and (F,gF) be two semi-Riemannian manifolds and τ, σ be the projection of B×F onto B and F, respectively.
The warped-product M=B×fF is the manifold B×F equipped with the metric tensor g=τ∗gB+f2σ∗gF, where ∗ denotes the pullback and f is a positive smooth function on B, the so-called warping function.
Explicitly, if X is tangent to B×F at (p,q) (where p is a point on B and q is a point on F), then:
⟨X,X⟩=⟨dτ(X),dτ(X)⟩+f2(p)(dσ(X),dσ(X)). |
B is called the base-manifold of M=B×fF and F is the fiber-manifold. If f=1, then B×fF reduces to a semi-Riemannian product manifold. The leaves B×q=σ−1(q) and the fibers p×F=τ−1(p) are Riemannian submanifolds of M. Vectors tangent to leaves are called horizontal and those tangent to fibers are called vertical. ByH we denote the orthogonal projection of T(p,q)M onto its horizontal subspace T(p,q)(B×q) and V denotes the projection onto the vertical subspace T(p,q)(p×F), see [3].
If M is an n-dimensional manifold, and gM is its metric tensor, the Einstein condition means that RicM=λgM for some constant λ, where RicM denotes the Ricci tensor of gM. An Einstein manifold with λ=0 is called Ricci-flat manifolds.
Then keeping this in mind, we get that a warped-product manifold (M,gM)=(B,gB)×f(F,gF) (where (B,gB) is the base-manifold, (F,gF) is the fiber-manifold), with gM=gB+f2gF, is Einstein if only if (see [2]):
RicM=λgM⟺{RicB−dfHess(f)=λgBRicF=μgFfΔf+(d−1)|∇f|2+λf2=μ | (1.1) |
where λ and μ are constants, d is the dimension of F, Hess(f), Δf and ∇f are, respectively, the Hessian, the Laplacian (given by trHess(f)) and the gradient of f for gB, with f:(B)→R+ a smooth positive function. Contracting first equation of (1.1) we get:
RBf2−fΔfd=nf2λ | (1.2) |
where n and RB is the dimension and the scalar curvature of B respectively. From third equation, considering d≠0 and d≠1, we have:
fΔfd+d(d−1)|∇f|2+λf2d=μd | (1.3) |
Now from (1.2) and (1.3) we obtain:
|∇f|2+[λ(d−n)+RBd(d−1)]f2=μ(d−1). | (1.4) |
In 2017 de Sousa and Pina [4], studied warped-product semi-Riemannian Einstein manifolds in case that base-manifold is conformal to an n-dimensional pseudo-Euclidean space and invariant under the action of an (n−1)-dimensional group with Ricci-flat fiber F. In [5] the authors extend the work done for multiply warped space. In [6], the author introduced a new type of warped-products called sequential warped-products, i.e. (M,gM) where M=(B1×hB2)×fF and gM=(gB1+h2gB2)+f2gF, to cover a wider variety of exact solutions to Einstein's field equation.
Regarding the sequential warped-product manifolds, some works have been published in recent years ([7,8,9,10,11,12]).
The main aim of the present paper is largely to continue to extend the work done in [4] (as was done for the multiply warped-product manifold in [5]), also for a special case of sequential warped-product manifolds, (i.e. for h=1, with B2 as an Einstein manifold, and flat fiber F, where the base-manifold B=B1×B2 is the product of two manifolds both equipped with a conformal metrics, and the warping function is a smooth positive function f(x,y)=f1(x)+f2(y) where each is a function on its individual manifold). The method will be as follows: first deriving the general formulas to be Einstein and second, providing the existence of solutions that are invariant under the action of a (n1−1)-dimensional group of transformations to the case of positive constant Ricci curvature. In fact, since in both references, [4] and [5], the authors show solutions for the Ricci-flat case (λ=0), we, following their same construction, show the existence of a family solutions for constant positive Ricci curvature (λ>0). In particular, this proof of the existence of a family of solutions also holds for [4] considering dimF=dimB.
Definition 1.1. We consider the special case of the Einstein sequential warped-product manifold, that satisfies (1.1). The manifold (M,gM) comprises the base-manifold (B,gB) which is a Riemannian (or pseudo-Riemannian) product-manifold B=B1×B2, with B2 as an Einstein manifold (i.e., RicB2=λgB2, where λ is the same for (1.1) and gB2 is the metric for B2), and dim(B2)=n2, dim(B1)=n1 the dimension of B2 and B1, respectively, so that dim(B)=n=n1+n2. The warping function f:B→R+ is a smooth positive function f(x,y)=f1(x)+f2(y) (where each is a function on its individual manifold, i.e., f1:B1→R+ and f2:B2→R+). The fiber-manifold (F,gF) is the Rd, with orthogonal Cartesian coordinates such that gab=−δab.
Proposition 1.2. If we write the B-product as B=B1×B2, where:
i) RicBi is the Ricci tensor of Bi referred to gBi, where i=1,2,
ii) f(x,y)=f1(x)+f2(y), is the smooth warping function, where fi:Bi→R+,
iii) Hess(f)=∑iτ∗iHessi(fi) is the Hessian referred on its individual metric, where τ∗i are the respective pullbacks, (and τ∗2Hess2(f2)=0 since B2 is Einstein),
iv) ∇f is the gradient (then |∇f|2=∑i|∇ifi|2), and
v) Δf=∑iΔifi is the Laplacian, (from (iii) therefore also Δ2f2=0).
Then the Ricci curvature tensor will be:
{RicM(Xi,Xj)=RicB1(Xi,Xj)−dfHess1(f1)(Xi,Xj)RicM(Yi,Yj)=RicB2(Yi,Yj)RicM(Ui,Uj)=RicF(Ui,Uj)−gF(Ui,Uj)f∗RicM(Xi,Yj)=0RicM(Xi,Uj)=0,RicM(Yi,Uj)=0, | (1.5) |
where f∗=Δ1f1f+(d−1)|∇f|2f2, and Xi, Xj, Yi, Yj, Ui, Uj are vector fields on B1, B2 and F, respectively.
Theorem 1.3. A warped-product manifold is a special case of an Einstein sequential warped-product manifold, as defined in Definition 1.1, if and only if:
RicM=λgM⟺{RicB1−dfτ∗1Hess1(f1)=λgB1τ∗2Hess2(f2)=0RicB2=λgB2RicF=0fΔ1f1+(d−1)|∇f|2+λf2=0, | (1.6) |
(since RicB is the Ricci curvature of B referred to gB, then RicB=RicB1+RicB2=λ(gB1+gB2)+dfτ∗1Hess1(f1).
Therefore from (1.2) and (1.3):
RM=λ(n+d)⟺{RB1f−Δ1f1d=n1fλΔ2f2=0RB2=λn2RF=0fΔ1f1+(d−1)|∇f|2+λf2=0. | (1.7) |
where n1 and R1 are the dimension and the scalar curvature of B1 referred to gB1, respectively.
Proof. We applied the condition that the warped-product manifold of system (1.5) is Einstein.
This particular type of Einstein sequential warped-product manifold, as per Definition 1.1, allows to cover a wider variety of exact solutions of Einstein's field equation, without complicating the calculations much, compared to the Einstein warped-product manifolds with Ricci-flat fiber (F,gF), also considered by the authors of [4].
In this section we will consider a special type of sequential warped-product manifold (M,gM), as described in the previous section, but in which the base-manifold is the product of two manifolds both equipped with a conformal metrics. First we will show the general formulas for which such a manifold M is Einstein, then we will show the same in the case where the conformal metrics are both diagonal, and finally for the case in which the base-manifold is the product of two conformal manifolds to a n1-dimensional and n2-dimensional pseudo-Euclidean space, respectively.
Theorem 2.1. Let (B,gB), be the base-manifold B=(B1×B2), B1=Rn1, with coordinates (x1,x2,..xn1), B2=Rn2, with coordinates (y1,y2,..yn2), where n1,n2≥3, and let gB=gB1+gB2 be the metrics on B, where gB1=ϵiδij and gB2=ϵlδlr.
Let f1:Rn1→R, f2:Rn2→R, ϕ1:Rn1→R and ϕ2:Rn2→R, be smooth functions, where f1 and f2 are positive functions, such that f=f1+f2 as in Definition 1.1. Finally, let (M,gM) be ((B1×B2)×f=f1+f2F,gM), with gM=ˉgB+(f1+f2)2gF, with conformal metric ˉgB=ˉgB1+ˉgB2, where ˉgB1=1ϕ21gB1, ˉgB2=1ϕ22gB2, and F=Rd with gF=−δab.
Then the warped-product metric gM=ˉgB+(f1+f2)2gF is Einstein with constant Ricci curvature λ if and only if, the functions f1, f2, ϕ1 and ϕ2 satisfy:
(I) (n1−2)fϕ1,xixj−ϕ1f1,xixjd−ϕ1,xif1,xjd−ϕ1,xjf1,xid=0 for i≠j,
(II) (n2−2)ϕ2,ylyr=0 for l≠r,
(III) ϕ1[(n1−2)fϕ1,xixi−ϕ1f1,xixid−2ϕ1,xif1,xid]+
+ϵi[fϕ1∑n1k=1ϵkϕ1,xkxk−(n1−1)f∑n1k=1ϵkϕ12,xk+ϕ1d∑n1k=1ϵkϕ1,xkf1,xk]=ϵiλf,
(IV) ϕ2(n2−2)ϕ2,ylyl+ϵlϕ2∑n2s=1ϵsϕ2,ysys−(n2−1)ϵl∑n2s=1ϵsϕ22,ys=λϵl,
(V) −fϕ12∑n1k=1ϵkf1,xkxk+(n1−2)fϕ1∑n1k=1ϵkϕ1,xkf1,xk+
−(d−1)(ϕ12∑n1k=1ϵkf12,xk+ϕ22∑n2s=1ϵsf22,ys)=λf2.
Before proving Theorem 2.1, and showing the existence of a solution for λ>0, we want to deduce the formulas for generic diagonal conformal metrics gB1 and gB2.
Based on this, we consider (B,gB), the base-manifold B=(B1×B2), with dim(B1)=n1, dim(B2)=n2, and gB=gB1+gB2. We also consider f1:Rn1→R, f2:Rn2→R, ϕ1:Rn1→R and ϕ2:Rn2→R, are smooth functions, where f1 and f2 are positive functions, such that f=f1+f2 as in Definition 1.1. And finally, we consider (M,gM) with ((B1×B2)×(f1+f2)F,gM), with gM=ˉgB+(f1+f2)2gF, with conformal metric ˉgB=ˉgB1+ˉgB2, where ˉgB1=1ϕ21gB1, ˉgB2=1ϕ22gB2, and F=Rd with gF=−δab.
From (1.6), considering the conformal metric on B1 and B2, it is easy to deduce that M is Einstein if and only if:
RicˉB1=λˉgB1+dfHessˉ1(f1), | (2.1) |
or equivalently
RˉB1=λn1+dfΔˉ1(f1), | (2.2) |
RicˉB2=λˉgB2, | (2.3) |
or equivalently
RˉB2=λn2, | (2.4) |
0=λf2+fΔˉ1f1+(d−1)[|∇ˉ1f1|2+|∇ˉ2f2|2]. | (2.5) |
If we consider a generic diagonal metric, ˉgBij=ˉgB1ij+ˉgB2ij=ηij, and ηij=0 for i≠j, then M is Einstein if and only if (2.1), (2.3) (or equivalently (2.2), (2.4)), (2.5) and the following, are satisfied:
RicˉB1=dfHessˉ1(f1),fori≠j, | (2.6) |
RicˉB2=0,fori≠j. | (2.7) |
Proof. (of Theorem 2.1): At this point we can calculate:
RicˉB1=1ϕ21{(n1−2)ϕ1Hess1(ϕ1)+[ϕ1Δ1ϕ1−(n1−1)|∇1ϕ1|2]gB1}, | (2.8) |
RicˉB2=1ϕ22{(n2−2)ϕ2Hess2(ϕ2)+[ϕ2Δ2ϕ2−(n2−1)|∇2ϕ22]gB2}, | (2.9) |
so we can write:
RicˉB1(Xi,Xj)=1ϕ21{(n1−2)ϕ1Hess1(ϕ1)(Xi,Xj)+[ϕ1Δ1ϕ1−(n1−1)|∇1ϕ1|2]gB1(Xi,Xj)}, | (2.10) |
RicˉB2(Yl,Yr)=1ϕ22{(n2−2)ϕ2Hess2(ϕ2)(Yl,Yr)+[ϕ2Δ2ϕ2−(n2−1)|∇2ϕ2|2]gB2(Yl,Yr)}, | (2.11) |
RicM(Xi,Xj)=RicˉB1(Xi,Xj)−dfHessˉ1(f1)(Xi,Xj), | (2.12) |
for what was stated in Proposition 1.2 we have:
RicM(Yl,Yr)=RicˉB2(Yl,Yr), | (2.13) |
and in the end
RicM(Xi,Yj)=0. | (2.14) |
RicM(Xi,Uj)=0. | (2.15) |
RicM(Yi,Uj)=0. | (2.16) |
Since RicF=0 we obtain:
RicM(Ui,Uj)=−gM(Ui,Uj)(Δˉ1f1f+(d−1)gM(∇f,∇f)f2), | (2.17) |
where, analogous to Proposition 1.2, we consider gM(∇f,∇f)=ˉgB1(∇f1,∇f1)+ˉgB2(∇f2,∇f2).
Let ϕ1,xixj, ϕ1,xi, f1,xixj, f1,xi, ϕ2,ylyr, ϕ2,yl, f2,ylyr and f2,yl, be the second and the first order derivatives of ϕ1, ϕ2, f1 and f2, respectively, with respect to xixj and ylyr. Now we have:
Hess1(ϕ1)(Xi,Xj)=ϕ1,xixj, | (2.18) |
Δ1(ϕ1)=n1∑k=1ϵkϕ1,xkxk, | (2.19) |
|∇1(ϕ1)|2=n1∑k=1ϵkϕ21,xk, | (2.20) |
Hess2(ϕ2)(Yl,Yr)=ϕ2,ylyr, | (2.21) |
Δ2(ϕ2)=n2∑s=1ϵsϕ2,ylyr | (2.22) |
|∇2(ϕ2)|2=n2∑s=1ϵsϕ22,ys. | (2.23) |
Hessˉ1(f1)(Xi,Xj)=f1,xixj−∑kˉΓkijf1,xk, | (2.24) |
where ˉΓkij=0, ˉΓiij=−ϕ1,xjϕ1, ˉΓkii=ϵiϵkϕ1,xkϕ1 and ˉΓiii=−ϕ1,xjϕ1, so (2.24) becomes:
Hessˉ1(f1)(Xi,Xj)=f1,xixj+ϕ1,xjϕ1f1,xi+ϕ1,xiϕ1f1,xj, | (2.25) |
for i≠j, and
Hessˉ1(f1)(Xi,Xi)=f1,xixi+2ϕ1,xiϕ1f1,xi−ϵin1∑k=1ϵkϕ1,xkϕ1f1,xk. | (2.26) |
Since Hessˉ2(f2)(Yl,Yr)=0, we get:
Hessˉ2(f2)(Yl,Yr)=f2,ylyr+ϕ2,yrϕ2f2,yl+ϕ2,ylϕ2f2,yr=0, | (2.27) |
for l≠r, and
Hessˉ2(f2)(Yl,Yl)=f2,ylyl+2ϕ2,ylϕ2f2,yl−ϵln2∑s=1ϵsϕ2,ysϕ2f2,ys=0. | (2.28) |
Then the Ricci tensors are:
RicˉB1(Xi,Xj)=(n1−2)ϕ1,xixjϕ1, | (2.29) |
for i≠j,
RicˉB1(Xi,Xi)=(n1−2)ϕ1,xixi+ϵi∑n1k=1ϵkϕ1,xkxkϕ1−(n1−1)ϵin1∑k=1ϵkϕ21,xkϕ21, | (2.30) |
RicˉB2(Yl,Yr)=(n2−2)ϕ2,ylyrϕ2, | (2.31) |
for l≠r,
RicˉB2(Yl,Yl)=(n2−2)ϕ2,ylyl+ϵl∑n2s=1ϵsϕ2,ysysϕ2−(n2−1)ϵln2∑s=1ϵsϕ22,ysϕ22. | (2.32) |
Using (2.29) and (2.25) in the (2.12) and then using (2.30) and (2.26) in the (2.12) we obtain respectively:
RicM(Xi,Xj)=(n1−2)ϕ1,xixjϕ1−df[f1,xixj+ϕ1,xjϕ1f1,xi+ϕ1,xiϕ1f1,xj], | (2.33) |
for i≠j,
RicM(Xi,Xi)=(n1−2)ϕ1,xixi+ϵi∑n1k=1ϵkϕ1,xkxkϕ1−(n1−1)ϵi∑n1k=1ϵkϕ21,xkϕ21+−df[f1,xixi+2ϕ1,xiϕ1f1,xi−ϵi∑n1k=1ϵkϕ1,xkϕ1f1,xk], | (2.34) |
while, using (2.31) and (2.27) in the (2.13) and then using (2.32) and (2.28) in the (2.13) we obtain respectively:
RicM(Yl,Yr)=(n2−2)ϕ2,ylyrϕ2, | (2.35) |
for l≠r,
RicM(Yl,Yl)=(n2−2)ϕ2,ylyl+ϵl∑n2s=1ϵsϕ2,ysysϕ2−(n2−1)ϵln2∑s=1ϵsϕ2,ysϕ22. | (2.36) |
Now considering:
RicF=0, | (2.37) |
gM(Ui,Uj)=f2gF(Ui,Uj), | (2.38) |
with f=f1+f2,
Δˉ2(f2)=0 | (2.39) |
Δˉ1(f1)=ϕ21n1∑k=1ϵkf1,xkxk−(n1−2)ϕ1n1∑k=1ϵkϕ1,xkf1,xk, | (2.40) |
gM(∇f,∇f)=ϕ21n1∑k=1ϵkf21,xk+ϕ22n2∑s=1ϵsf22,ys, | (2.41) |
and by replacing them in (2.17):
RicM(Ui,Uj)={−fϕ21∑n1k=1ϵkf1,xkxk+(n1−2)fϕ1∑n1k=1ϵkϕ1,xkf1,xk+−(d−1)(ϕ21∑n1k=1ϵkf21,xk+ϕ22∑n2s=1ϵsf22,ys)}gF(Ui,Uj). | (2.42) |
Using the equations (2.33), (2.34), (2.35), (2.36) and (2.42), it follows that (M,gM) is an Einstein manifold if and only if, the equations (I), (II), (III), (IV), (V) are satisfied.
In this section we look for the existence of a solution to the positive constant Ricci curvature case (λ>0) when the base-manifold is the product of two conformal manifolds to a n1-dimensional and n2-dimensional pseudo-Euclidean space, respectively, invariant under the action of a (n1−1)-dimensional group of transformations and that the fiber F is flat.
Theorem 3.1. Let (B,gB), be the base-manifold B=(B1×B2), B1=Rn1, with coordinates (x1,x2,..xn1), B2=Rn2, with coordinates (y1,y2,..yn2), where n1,n2≥3, and let gB=gB1+gB2 be the metrics on B, where gB1=ϵiδij and gB2=ϵlδlr.
Let f1:Rn1→R, f2:Rn2→R, ϕ1:Rn1→R and ϕ2:Rn2→R, be smooth functions f1(ξ1), f2(ξ2), ϕ1(ξ2) and ϕ2(ξ2), such that f(ξ1,ξ2)=f1(ξ1)+f2(ξ2) be as in Definition 1.1, where ξ1=∑n1i=1αixi, αi∈R, and ∑iϵiα2i=ϵi0 or ∑iϵiα2i=0, and by the same token ξ2=∑n2l=1αlyl, αl∈R, and ∑lϵlα2l=ϵl0 or ∑lϵlα2l=0.
Finally, let (M,gM) be ((B1×B2)×f=f1+f2F,gM), with gM=ˉgB+(f1+f2)2gF, with conformal metric ˉgB=ˉgB1+ˉgB2, where ˉgB1=1ϕ21gB1, ˉgB2=1ϕ22gB2, and F=Rd with gF=−δab.
Then, whenever ∑iϵiα2i=ϵi0 (and ∑lϵlα2l=ϵl0), the warped-product metric
gM=ˉgB+(f1+f2)2gF is Einstein with constant Ricci curvature λ if and only if the functions f1, f2, ϕ1 and ϕ2 satisfy the following conditions:
(Ia) (n1−2)fϕ″1−ϕ1f″1d−2ϕ′1f′1d=0, for i≠j,
(IIa) ϕ″2=0, for l≠r,
(IIIa) ∑kϵkα2k[fϕ1ϕ″1−(n1−1)fϕ′21+ϕ1ϕ′1f′1d]=λf,
(IVa) ∑sϵsα2s[−(n2−1)ϕ′22]=λ
(Va) ∑kϵkα2k[−fϕ21f″1+(n1−2)fϕ1ϕ′1f′1−(d−1)ϕ21f′21]+
−∑sϵsα2s[(d−1)ϕ22f′22]=λf2.
Proof. We have:
ϕ1,xixj=ϕ″1αiαj, ϕ1,xi=ϕ′1αi, f1,xixj=f″1αiαj, f1,xi=f′1αi,
and
ϕ2,ylyr=ϕ″2αlαr, ϕ2,yl=ϕ′2αl, f2,ylyr=f″2αlαr, f2,yl=f′2αl.
Substituting these in (I) and (II) and if i≠j and l≠r such that αiαj≠0 and αlαr≠0, we obtain (Ia) and (IIa).
In the same manner for (III) and (IV), by considering the relation between ϕ″1 and f″1 from (Ia) and ϕ″2=0 from (IIa), we get (IIIa) and (IVa) respectively. Analogously, the equation (V) reduces to (Va).
Now we are going to look for the existence of a solution to the positive constant Ricci curvature case (λ>0), considering f2(ξ2)=1, and dim(B1)=dim(F), i.e., n1=d. So, whenever ∑n1i=1α2iϵi≠0, without loss of generality, we may consider ∑n1i=1α2iϵi=−1 (the same for ∑n2l=1α2lϵl≠0, in which we consider ∑n2l=1α2lϵl=−1).
In this way the equations (Ia), (IIa), (IIIa), (IVa) (Va) become:
(Ib) (n1−2)(f1+1)ϕ″1−n1ϕ1f″1−2n1ϕ′1f′1=0, for i≠j,
(IIb) ϕ″2=0, for l≠r,
(IIIb) −(f1+1)ϕ1ϕ″1+(n1−1)(f1+1)ϕ′21−n1ϕ1ϕ′1f′1=λ(f1+1),
(IVb) (n2−1)ϕ′22=λ,
(Vb) (f1+1)ϕ21f″1−(n1−2)(f1+1)ϕ1ϕ′1f′1+(n1−1)ϕ21f′21=λ(f1+1)2.
Note that since f2(ξ2)=constant, then the equations (2.27) and (2.28), concerning the condition Hessˉ2(f2)=0, are obviously satisfied.
It is worth noticing that there is no reason to believe that any nontrivial solutions exist, since the system is overdetermined. One must first check out the compatibility conditions and fortunately this is easy to figure out. Changing the notation: from (ξ1,ϕ1(ξ1),f1(ξ1)), to (t,β(t),γ(t)−1) (in order to simplify the writing and avoid confusion with the indexes), and also writing λ=qm2/2>0, where q=n1, i.e. dim(B1), our system of equations then becomes:
{(q−2)γβ″−qβγ″−2qβ′γ′=0−βγβ″−(q−1)γβ′2−qβ′γ′−12qm2γ=0γβ2γ″−(q−2)βγβ′γ′+(q−1)β2γ′2−12qm2γ2=0 | (3.1) |
So, if we solve the second and third equations for β″ and γ″ and substituting them into the first equation, we note that the first equation can be replaced by a first order equation, that is:
(q−2)γ2β′2−2qβγβ′γ′+qβ2γ′2−qm2γ2=:Z(β,γ,β′,γ′)=0. | (3.2) |
Now, differentiating Z with respect to t and then eliminating β″ and γ″ using the second and third equations of (3.1), the resulting expression in (β,γ,β′,γ′) is a multiple of Z(β,γ,β′,γ′). This shows us that the combined system of equations (3.1) and (3.2) satisfies the compatibility conditions, so that the system has solutions, specifically, a 3-parameter family of them.
If we want to describe these solutions more explicitly, we must note that the equations are t-autonomous and have a 2-parameter family of scaling symmetries. In particular, the equations are invariant under the 3-parameter group of transformations of the form:
Φa,b,c(t,β,γ)=(at+c,aβ,bγ) | (3.3) |
where a and b are nonzero constants and c is any constant. In fact, the equation (3.2) implies that there is a function ω(t) such that
{β′=2mqω(ω−1)((q−2)ω2−2qω+q)γ′=mγ((q−2)ω2−q)β((q−2)ω2−2qω+q) | (3.4) |
and then the second and third equations of (3.1) imply that ω must satisfy
ω′=m(q+2qω−(3q−2)ω2)β. | (3.5) |
Conversely, the combined system of (3.4) and (3.5) gives the general solution of the original system. This latter system is easily integrated by the usual separation of variables method, i.e., by eliminating t yields a system of the form:
dββ=R(ω)dω | (3.6) |
and
dγγ=S(ω)dω | (3.7) |
where R(ω) and S(ω) are rational functions of ω. Writing β and γ as elementary functions of ω, then we can also write:
dt=βT(ω)dω, | (3.8) |
where T is a rational function of ω, so that t can be written as a function of ω by quadrature. Thus, we have the integral curves in (t,β,γ,ω)-space in terms of explicit functions.
In conclusion (because of the 3-parameter family of equivalences of solutions), we can say that in certain sense, these solutions are all equivalent to a finite number of possibilities.
Remark 3.2. As is well known, an Einstein warped product manifold with Riemannian-metric and Ricci-flat fiber-manifold can only admit zero or negative Ricci tensor, Ric≤0. Here we have shown, that a simple pseudo-Riemannian metric construction allows, an Einstein warped product manifold with Ricci-flat fiber-manifold, to obtain Ric>0, and this may find interest, for example, in how to build warped-product spacetime models, with positive curvature, whose fiber is Ricci-flat.
All sources of funding of the study must be disclosed. The fourth author is thankful to Slovak Science Agency for providing partial financial by VEGA fund under grant number VEGA 2/0076/23.
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
[1] |
R. L. Bishop, B. O'Neil, Manifolds of negative curvature, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 145 (1969), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0251664-4 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0251664-4
![]() |
[2] | B.Y. Chen, Differential Geometry of Warped Product Manifolds and Submanifolds, World Scientific, (2017). |
[3] | B. O'Neill, Semi-Riemannian Geometry with applications to Relativity, Academic Press, (1983). |
[4] |
M. L. De Sousa, R. Pina, A family of warped-product semi-Riemannian Einstein metrics, Differ. Geom. Appl., 50 (2017), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.difgeo.2016.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.difgeo.2016.11.004
![]() |
[5] |
B. Pal, P. Kumar, A family of multiply warped-product semi-Riemannian Einstein metrics, J. Geom. Mech., 12 (2020), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.3934/jgm.2020017 doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020017
![]() |
[6] | S. Shenway, A note in sequential warped product manifolds, Preprint, https://arXiv.org/abs/1506.06056v1. |
[7] |
U. Chand De, S. Shenawy, B. Unal, Sequential Warped Products: Curvature and Conformal Vector Fields, Filomat., 33 (2019), 4071–4083. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1913071D doi: 10.2298/FIL1913071D
![]() |
[8] |
B. Sahin, Sequential warped-product submanifolds having holomorphic, totally real and pointwise slant factors, Period. Math. Hung., 85 (2022), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10998-021-00422-w doi: 10.1007/s10998-021-00422-w
![]() |
[9] | S. Güler, Sequential Warped Products and Their Applications, Int. Electron. J. Geom., 14 (2021), 277–291. |
[10] |
S. Pahan, B. Pal, On Einstein Sequential Warped Product Spaces, J. Math. Phys. Anal. Geo., 15 (2019), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0229 doi: 10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0229
![]() |
[11] | F. Karaca, C. Özgür, On quasi-Einstein sequential warped-product manifolds, J. Geom. Phys., 165 (2021), 104248. |
[12] | A. Kumar, A. Sharma, Chen type inequality for sequential warped product submanifolds of nearly Kahler manifolds, Asian-Eur.J. Math., (2022). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793557122502230. |