
In order to treat the diseases caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) more efficiently, the concentration of HCV in blood, cells, tissues and the body has attracted widespread attention from related scholars. This paper studies a dynamic dependent HCV model (more specifically, including age structure and treatment methods model) that concludes states of infection-free and infected equilibrium. Through eigenvalue analysis and Volterra integral formula, it proves that E0 is globally asymptotically stable when R<1. After explaining the existence, uniqueness and positive properties of the solution of the system, we have proved the global asymptotic stability of E∗ when R>1 by constructing a suitable Lyapunov function. Through the above proofs, it can be concluded that effective treatment measures can significantly reduce the number of HCVs, so many related researchers are aware of the importance of highly efficient nursing methods and are committed to applying relevant methods to practice.
Citation: Xiaowen Xiong, Yanqiu Li, Bingliang Li. Global stability of age-of-infection multiscale HCV model with therapy[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(3): 2182-2205. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021110
[1] | Lu Gao, Yuanshun Tan, Jin Yang, Changcheng Xiang . Dynamic analysis of an age structure model for oncolytic virus therapy. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 3301-3323. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023155 |
[2] | Elamin H. Elbasha . Model for hepatitis C virus transmissions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(4): 1045-1065. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1045 |
[3] | Amar Nath Chatterjee, Fahad Al Basir, Yasuhiro Takeuchi . Effect of DAA therapy in hepatitis C treatment — an impulsive control approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(2): 1450-1464. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021075 |
[4] | Jinliang Wang, Ran Zhang, Toshikazu Kuniya . A note on dynamics of an age-of-infection cholera model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2016, 13(1): 227-247. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016.13.227 |
[5] | Yuming Chen, Junyuan Yang, Fengqin Zhang . The global stability of an SIRS model with infection age. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(3): 449-469. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.449 |
[6] | Gang Huang, Edoardo Beretta, Yasuhiro Takeuchi . Global stability for epidemic model with constant latency and infectious periods. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2012, 9(2): 297-312. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.297 |
[7] | Xiaohong Tian, Rui Xu, Jiazhe Lin . Mathematical analysis of an age-structured HIV-1 infection model with CTL immune response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 7850-7882. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019395 |
[8] | Andrey V. Melnik, Andrei Korobeinikov . Lyapunov functions and global stability for SIR and SEIR models withage-dependent susceptibility. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(2): 369-378. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.369 |
[9] | Abdennasser Chekroun, Mohammed Nor Frioui, Toshikazu Kuniya, Tarik Mohammed Touaoula . Global stability of an age-structured epidemic model with general Lyapunov functional. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(3): 1525-1553. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019073 |
[10] | Mostafa Adimy, Abdennasser Chekroun, Claudia Pio Ferreira . Global dynamics of a differential-difference system: a case of Kermack-McKendrick SIR model with age-structured protection phase. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1329-1354. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020067 |
In order to treat the diseases caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) more efficiently, the concentration of HCV in blood, cells, tissues and the body has attracted widespread attention from related scholars. This paper studies a dynamic dependent HCV model (more specifically, including age structure and treatment methods model) that concludes states of infection-free and infected equilibrium. Through eigenvalue analysis and Volterra integral formula, it proves that E0 is globally asymptotically stable when R<1. After explaining the existence, uniqueness and positive properties of the solution of the system, we have proved the global asymptotic stability of E∗ when R>1 by constructing a suitable Lyapunov function. Through the above proofs, it can be concluded that effective treatment measures can significantly reduce the number of HCVs, so many related researchers are aware of the importance of highly efficient nursing methods and are committed to applying relevant methods to practice.
In medicine, hepatitis C (HC) is generally divided into acute and chronic HC. It is worth noting that the commonality of the two is that their early symptoms are not obvious, so it is easy to be ignored by most people in the early stage of the disease. According to medical research, the root of HC is the highly contagious hepatitis C virus (HCV), and once infected by this virus, it is difficult to be cured. What is worrying is that if early HC patients are not treated promptly, they may develop cirrhosis and liver cancer. Nowadays, there is neither an effective vaccine against HC nor a suitable treatment option. And people infected with the virus can only use some antiviral drugs for intervention treatment, such as ribavirin.
For decades, interferon (IFN)-based treatment [1,2] is the standard treatment method for chronic HCV infection, and about 50% to 60% of patients can obtain sustained virological response (SVR). The SVR of the IFN inducer can reduce the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by about four times [3,4]. During the past several years, major breakthrough has been made about the treatment of HC. The use of new direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) [5,6] can effectively remove HCV in a short time (generally 12 weeks) with an efficiency of up to 95%–99%. Above results has been basically verified in a number of clinical trials. With more and more breakthroughs in the research and development of new antiviral drugs, the cure of chronic HC has become within reach. In that case, we have sufficient reasons to speculate that the number of people whose disease caused by HC has deteriorated to liver cirrhosis and liver cancer will considerably be reduced.
Theoretical research on HCV with treatment has been focused on. In 1998, Neumannd et al. [7] was utilized a mathematical model to illustrate the viral decline of patients under the antiviral effect of IFN-α-2b. And they have used the model to show that the main initial function of IFN was to prevent the production or drop of virus particles. It also proved that the early monitor of the virus can help guide the treatment. In 2013, Guedj and Rong et al.were inspired by the HCV model [7] and used the multi-scale age-structured model [8,9,10], combined with related dynamics knowledge, to reasonably explain the changes of HCV virus under DAA, regardless of whether the patient has been treated or not. In 2017, Goyal et al. [11] were regarded HCV-RNA as an infectious virus, and a model was established to predict the time required for cure. The model has been successful in explaining the effects of short-term drug interventions and is consistent with actual data. In the same year, Quintela et al. [12] were considered the age structure of both the positive and negative strands of HCV-RNA. They studied the earlier multiscale model and discovered that HCV-RNA cells can effectively prevent the production and release of new viruses.
In the study of the treatment of HC, we found a key point worthy of attention. We cannot prevent the re-infection with HC, and then the vaccine plays a role in terms of the prevention and treatment of the disease. Echevarria et al. and Lombardo et al. [13,14] combined the immune response and the production of alanine-aminotransferase together. In particular, they took into account the treatment of HCV and the status of antibodies, to illustrated the importance of post-treatment vaccines.
In existing research, most HCV multiscale models are expressed in the form of a partial differential equation (PDE). But its disadvantages such as time-consuming numerical calculation and poor convergence cannot be ignored. In order to solve the above problems, Kitagawa and Nakaoka et al. [15] considered "the problem of model agammaegation" and converted the PDE model into an ordinary differential equation (ODE) model, which greatly improved computational efficiency.
In this paper, we mainly study the multiscale age-structured model of the treatment stage of HCV infection. Let us first briefly review the following theorems, which will help to understand the proof process and results of the theorem present in this article.
Theorem 1. (Theorem 2.33 in [16]) The following statements are equivalent:
(ⅰ) There exists a compact attractor of bounded sets (which is unique and contains every bounded backward invariant set).
(ⅱ) Φ is point-dissipative, asymptotically smooth, and eventually bounded on every bounded set in X.
Theorem 2. (Theorem 2.39 in [16]) Let the semiflow Φ be state-continuous, uniformly in finite time, and A be a compact forward invariant subset of X that attracts all compact subsets of a neighborhood of itself (e.g a local compact attractor of compact sets). Then A is locally asymptotically stable.
Theorem 3. (Theorem 2.46 in [16])
Let X be a closed subset of a Banach space E,J a time set and Φ:J×X→X a state-continuous semiflow. Then Φ is asymptotically smooth if there are maps Ψ, Θ:J×X→X such that
Φ(t,x)=Θ(t,x)+Ψ(t,x) |
and the following hold for any bounded closed set C that is forward invariant under Φ:
(ⅰ) liminfJ∋t→∞ diamθt(C)=0,
(ⅱ) there is some rC∈J such that Ψt(C) has compact closure for all t∈J,t≥rC.
Theorem 4. (Theorem 5.2 in [16]) If X0≠∅, ρ∘Φ is continuous, and Φ is uniformly weakly ρ-persistent, then Φ is uniformly ρ-persistent.
Theorem 5. (Theorem 5.7 in [16])
Assume that X0≠∅, Φ is uniformly weakly ρ-persistent, ρ∘Φ is continuous, and
(H1) there exists no total Φ-trajectory with range in A such that
ρ(ϕ(−r))>0,ρ(ϕ(0))=0,andρ(ϕ(s))>0withr,s∈J |
Then the attractor A is the disjoint union
A=A0∪C∪A1 |
of three invariant sets A0, C, A1. A0 and A1 are compact and the following hold.
(ⅰ) A0=A∩X0 is compact attractor of comparct subsets of X0; more strongly, every compact subset K of X0 has a neighborhood in X0 that is attracted by A0. Further, A0 attracts every subset of X0 that is attracted by A.
(ⅱ) A1 is uniformly ρ-persistent and is the compact attractor of neighborhoods of compact sets in X∖X0. It also attracts all sets that are attracted by A and on which Φ is eventually uniformly ρ-persistent. In particular, A1 is stable.
(ⅲ) If x∈X∖A1 and ϕ is a total Φ-trajectory through x with pre-compact range, then ϕ(t)→A0 for t→−∞.
If x∈X∖A0 and ϕ is a total Φ-trajectory through x with pre-compact range, then ϕ(t)→A1 for t→∞.
In particular, the set C consists of those points x∈A through which there exists a total trajectory ϕ with ϕ(−t)→A0 and ϕ(t)→A1 as t→∞.
Corollary 1. (Corollary B.6 in [16]) Let w,r and g be nonnegative and locally integrable,
w(t)≥∫t0k(s)w(t−s)ds+g(t). |
Assume that k is not zero a.e. Then there exists some b>0, which only depends on k and not on g, such that w(t)>0 for all t>b with ∫t−b0g(s)ds>0.
In particular, if g is continuous at 0 and g(0)>0, then w(t)>0 for all t>b.
Theorem 6. (Theorem 3.1 in [17]) Let K be a subset of L1(R+). Then K has compact closure if and only if the following conditions hold:
(ⅰ) supf∈K∞∫0|f(a)|da<∞ ,
(ⅱ) limr→∞∞∫r|f(a)|da=0 uniformly in f∈K,
(ⅲ) limh→0+∞∫0|f(a+h)−f(a)|da=0 uniformly in f∈K,
(ⅳ) limh→0+h∫0|f(a)|da=0 uniformly in f∈K.
Lemma 1. (Lemma 5.6 in [18]) The following alternative holds: either B is 0 everywhere on R or B is positive everywhere on R.
In order to study the problem that HCV decreases rapidly in the early stage but slowly in the later treatment with IFN, the following model [7] has been constructed
dTdt=s−βVT−dT,dIdt=βVT−δI,dVdt=(1−ε)pI−cV. | (3.1) |
The intracellular viral dynamics were incorporated into the multi-scale model and another variable R [9] was introduced, which is expressed by the following formula:
dRda=α(a)−[ρ(a)+μ(a)]R(a), | (3.2) |
R represents the quantity of intracellular genomic RNA (i.e., positive-strand HCV RNA) within an infected cell.
Combining Eqs (1) and (2), the multi-scale model was obtained that include the dynamics of intracellular viral RNA replication and extracellular viral infection, which were described by the following partial differential equations (PDEs).
ddtT(t)=s−βV(t)T(t)−dT(t),∂∂ti(t,a)+∂∂ai(t,a)=−δ(a)i(t,a),i(t,0)=βV(t)T(t),i(0,a)=i0(a),∂∂tr(t,a)+∂∂ar(t,a)=(1−ϵa)α(a)−[(1−ϵs)ρ(a)+κμ(a)]r(t,a),r(t,0)=1,r(0,a)=r0(a),ddtV(t)=(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)r(t,a)i(t,a)da−cV(t). | (3.3) |
The detailed parameters of the model are explained as follows:
(1) The amount of uninfected target cells at time t within unit volume is denoted by T(t); V(t) is the number of free virus.
(2) i(t,a) and r(t,a) are numbers of infected cells and positive-strand HCV RNA at time t with infection age a.
(3) s presents the production rate, d is per capita death rate of target cells, in addition, βV(t)T(t) is the viral infection rate.
(4) a is the age of infection, and a→δ(a) is assumed to be the mortality of infected cells at the infection age of a. We take the second equation of (3.1) as an example to explain the influence of infection age on infected cells. The fourth equation can be obtained similarly. Let a+ be the upper limit of the age of infection and it is reasonable to consider i(t,a+)=0. Obviously,
∫a2a1i(t,a)da,∫a+0i(t,a)da |
can respectively represent the population number in the interval [a1,a2] of infection age at time t and total population number. If △a is small, then
i(t,a)△a,δ(a)i(t,a)△a |
respectively represent the approximate values of the population number and the number of deaths in the interval [a,a+△a] of infection age at time t. Given a small time interval △t, the population with infection age a at time t becomes that with infection age a+△t at time t+△t. Therefore, i(t,a)△a becomes
i(t+△t,a+△t)△a |
after △t. Combined the mortality rate in △t, an equation can be established
i(t+△t,a+△t)△a−i(t,a)△a=−δ(a)i(t,a)△a△t. |
Divide △a△t on both sides of the above formula, and let △t→0, we can get our equation.
a→α(a),a→μ(a) are assumed to be age-dependent rates of intracellular viral RNA production and degradation at a, respectively. And ρ(a) represents the rate with infection age a at which RNA is assembled/secreted.
The age-dependent relationship of δ(a),α(a),μ(a) and ρ(a) can be given by data fitting (such as least squares regression) of experimental data.
(5) Virus increases by ∫∞0ρ(a)r(t,a)i(t,a)da and disappears at rate c.
(6) ϵα,ϵs,κ are assumed to be the effects of inhibiting intracellular viral RNA production, blocking assembly/ secretion as virus into plasma, and enhancing RNA degradation, respectively, and 0≤ϵα,ϵs≤1,κ≥1.
(7) i0(a) and r0(a) stand for the initial distributions of infected cells and intracellular viral RNA; "r(t,0)=1" declares that the infected cell has one viral RNA at the beginning.
In the beginning, we need the following assumption to analyze the model (3.1).
Assumption 1. a→δ(a),a→α(a) as well as a→μ(a) belong to L∞+(0,+∞) and ς(a)=min{δ(a),c}≥d for almost every a≥0.
Taking m(t,a)=i(t,a)r(t,a), the model (3.1) is transformed into
ddtT(t)=s−βV(t)T(t)−dT(t),∂∂ti(t,a)+∂∂ai(t,a)=−δ(a)i(t,a),i(t,0)=βV(t)T(t),i(0,a)=i0(a),∂∂tm(t,a)+∂∂am(t,a)=(1−ϵα)α(a)i(t,a)−γ(a)m(t,a),m(t,0)=βV(t)T(t),m(0,a)=i0(a)r0(a),ddtV(t)=(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)m(t,a)da−cV(t) | (3.4) |
where γ(a)=(1−ϵs)ρ(a)+κμ(a)+δ(a).
Define X:=R×L1(R+)×L1(R+)×R to be a functional space holding norm
‖(T,i,m,V)‖X=|T|+∫∞0|i(a)|da+∫∞0|m(a)|da+|V|,T,V∈R,i,m∈L1(R+), |
and X+=R+×L1+(R+)×L1+(R+)×R+ is the positive cone of X.
According to the results from Theorem 1.1 in [19], we draw the following conclusion.
Theorem 7. The problem (3.4) has a unique non-negative solution (T,i,m, V)∈C1(R+)×C(R+,L1+(R+))×C(R+,L1+(R+))×C1(R+,R+) for the initial condition in X+.
Utilizing the method in section 8.2.1 in [20], add R(t) satisfying
{ddtR(t)=∫∞0(δ(a)−(1−ϵα)α(a)−d)i(t,a)da+∫∞0(γ(a)−(1−ϵs)ρ(a)−d)m(t,a)da+(c−d)V(t)−dR(t),R(0)=R0≥0 |
into (3.4). R(0)≥0 gives R(t)≥0(∀t≥0) by Assumption 1. Denote N(t):=T(t)+∫∞0i(t,a)da+∫∞0m(t,a)da+V(t)+R(t) and
{ddtN(t)=s−dN(t)−βV(t)T(t)≤s−dN(t),N(0)=T0+∫∞0i0(a)da+∫∞0m0(a)da+V0+R0. |
Therefore, it is followed that
Theorem 8. N(t)≤M:=max{N(0),s/d} for t>0 and limt→∞N(t)=s/d. We also have
lim inft→∞T(t)≥sd+βs/d. |
The equilibrium (ˉT,ˉi(a),ˉm(a),ˉV) of (3.4) satisfies
s−βˉVˉT−dˉT=0,dˉi(a)da=−δ(a)ˉi(a),ˉi(0)=βˉVˉT,dˉm(a)da=(1−ϵα)α(a)ˉi(a)−γ(a)ˉm(a),ˉm(0)=βˉVˉT,(1−ϵs)∫+∞0ρ(a)ˉm(a)da=cˉV. | (4.1) |
The solutions of initial value problem for ˉi(a) and ˉm(a) are as follows:
ˉi(a)=βˉVˉTω(a),ˉm(a)=βˉVˉTτ(a) |
where τ(a)=π(a)[1+(1−ϵα)∫a0α(s)ω(s)π(s)ds],ω(a)=e−∫a0δ(l)dl,π(a)=e−∫a0γ(l)dl.
Let K=(1−ϵs)∫+∞0ρ(a)τ(a)da, then we have
cˉV=βˉVˉTK | (4.2) |
leading to ˉT=cβK and ˉV=s−dˉTβˉT=βsK−dcβc.
As a result, define
R=βsKdc, |
then E∗(ˉT,ˉi(a),ˉm(a),ˉV) is the unique positive equilibrium of (3.4) when R>1, and there always exists an infection-free equilibrium marked by E0(s/d,0,0,0).
The linearized system of (3.4) at E0 is
{ddtT(t)=−dT(t)−βs/dV(t),∂∂ti(t,a)+∂∂ai(t,a)=−δ(a)i(t,a),i(t,0)=βs/dV(t),∂∂tm(t,a)+∂∂am(t,a)=(1−ϵα)α(a)i(t,a)−γ(a)m(t,a),m(t,0)=βs/dV(t),ddtV(t)=(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)m(t,a)da−cV(t) | (5.1) |
leading to the characteristic equation
|λ+d00βs/d010−βω(a)s/d001−βτ(a)s/d000λ+c−βs/d(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)τ(a)e−λada|=0 |
that is,
(λ+d)(λ+c−βs/d(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)τ(a)e−λada)=0. |
Obviously, one eigenvalue marks λ=−d and others are produced by
λ+c=βs/d(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)τ(a)e−λada, |
therefore
|λ+c|=|βs/d(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)τ(a)e−λada|≤βsK/d. |
When R<1, if there is an eigenvalue λ0 such that Reλ0≥0, then
c≤|λ0+c|≤βsK/d |
i.e. R≥1. This means a contradiction. It is declared that all eigenvalues of (5.1) at E0 are negative while R<1.
Theorem 9. When R<1, the infection-free equilibrium E0 is locally asymptotically stable.
Next, we study the global stability of E0. By using Volterra integral formulation, we get
i(t,a)={i(t−a,0)ω(a),a<ti(0,a−t)ω(a)ω(a−t),a≥t. | (5.2) |
Thus, it is obtained that
i(t,a)={ω(a)B1(t−a),a<tω(a)ω(a−t)i0(a−t),a≥t | (5.3) |
where B1(t):=i(t,0).
m(t,a)={m(t−a,0)π(a)+(1−ϵα)∫a0π(a)α(s)π(s)i(t−a+s,s)ds,a<tm(0,a−t)π(a)π(a−t)+(1−ϵα)∫aa−tπ(a)α(s)π(s)i(t−a+s,s)ds,a≥t. | (5.4) |
That is,
m(t,a)={B2(t−a)π(a)+(1−ϵα)∫a0π(a)α(s)π(s)ω(s)B1(t−a)ds,a<tm0(a−t)π(a)π(a−t)+(1−ϵα)∫aa−tπ(a)α(s)π(s)ω(s)ω(a−t)i0(a−t)ds,a≥t. | (5.5) |
where B2(t):=m(t,0). In fact, B1(t)=B2(t):=B(t) gives that
m(t,a)={B(t−a)π(a)τ(a),a<tπ(a)[m0(a−t)π(a−t)+(1−ϵα)i0(a−t)ω(a−t)∫aa−tα(s)ω(s)π(s)ds],a≥t, | (5.6) |
and
dV(t)dt=(1−ϵs)∫t0ρ(a)π(a)τ(a)B(t−a)da+(1−ϵs)∫∞tρ(a)π(a)[m0(a−t)π(a−t)+(1−ϵα)i0(a−t)ω(a−t)∫aa−tα(s)ω(s)π(s)ds]da−cV(t). | (5.7) |
From Theorem 8 and fluctuation method Proposition A.14 in [16], there exist sequences tn,sn,rn,ϑn→∞(n→∞) such that as n→∞
T(tn)→T∞,T′(tn)→0,B(sn)→B∞, |
B(rn)→B∞,V(ϑn)→V∞,V′(ϑn)→0 |
where
(T∞,B∞,B∞,V∞)=lim supt→+∞(T(t),B(t),B(t),V(t)). |
Plugging ϑn into (5.7) and letting n→∞, we deduce that
V∞≤B∞Kc=βV∞T∞Kc. | (5.8) |
Theorem 2 produces that
V∞≤βsKV∞dc=RV∞, |
so V∞=0 when R<1. Furthermore, it is also proved that B∞=0 and T(t) as t→∞ obeys the equation ddtT(t)=s−dT(t), implying that T(t)→s/d(t→∞). As a result, it is received that
Theorem 10. Provided that R<1, the infection-free equilibrium E0 exhibits global asymptotic stability.
In this part, we focus on a compact attractor of all bounded subset of X+. The unique solution of (3.4) can generate the semiflow Φ:R+×X+→X+ with
Φ(t,(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0))=(T(t),i(t,⋅),m(t,⋅),V(t)),(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)∈X+. | (6.1) |
Indeed, the semiflow is continuous.
Theorem 11. There exists a compact attractor A of bounded subsets of X+ of the semiflow Φ.
Proof. In order to prove this conclusion, we need to get that Φ is eventually bounded, point-dissipative on every bounded set of X+ and asymptotically smooth followed by Theorem 1 (Theorem 2.33 in [16]). The first two parts hold from Theorem 7. We only prove that Φ is asymptotically smooth applying Theorem 3 (Theorem 2.46 in [16]). Denote
Φ(t,(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0))=Φ1(t,(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0))+Φ2(t,(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)) |
with
Φ1(t,(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0))=(0,u1(t,⋅),v1(t,⋅),0),Φ2(t,(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0))=(T(t),u2(t,⋅),v2(t,⋅),V(t)) |
where
u1(t,a)={0,a<t,ω(a)ω(a−t)i0(a−t),a>t, |
u2(t,a)={ω(a)B(t−a),a<t,0,a>t, |
v1(t,a)={0,a<t,π(a)[m0(a−t)π(a−t)+(1−ϵα)i0(a−t)ω(a−t)∫aa−tα(s)ω(s)π(s)ds],a>t, |
v2(t,a)={B(t−a)π(a)τ(a),a<t,0,a>t. |
Let C be a bounded closed set that is forward invariant under Φ.
‖Φ1‖1=∫∞0|u1(t,a)|da+∫∞0|v1(t,a)|da=∫∞0ω(a+t)ω(a)i0(a)da+∫∞0π(a+t)[m0(a)π(a)+(1−ϵα)i0(a)ω(a)∫a+taα(s)ω(s)π(s)ds]da=e−dt[∫∞0e−∫a+ta(δ(l)−d)dli0(a)da+∫∞0e−∫a+ta(γ(l)−d)dlm0(a)da+(1−ϵα)∫∞0i0(a)(∫a+taα(s)e−∫a+ts(γ(l)−d)dle−∫sa(δ(l)−d)dlds)da]≤e−dt(‖i0‖1+‖m0‖1+(1−ϵα)‖i0‖1‖α‖∞t), |
as a result, Φ1→0 as t→∞ uniformly for (T0,i0,m0,V0)∈C. Next, it is necessary to show that Φ2 has a compact closure. Thus, we have to check assertions of Theorem 6 (Theorem 3.1 in [17]). Obviously, it is easy to check (ⅰ), (ⅱ) and (ⅳ) and let us prove (ⅲ). Set
Ih=∫∞0|u2(t,a+h)−u2(t,a)|da=∫t−h0|ω(a+h)B(t−a−h)−ω(a)B(t−a)|da+∫tt−h|ω(a)B(t−a)|da, |
and ∫tt−h|ω(a)B(t−a)|da→0 as h→0. The first term of Ih satisfies
∫t−h0|ω(a+h)B(t−a−h)−ω(a)B(t−a)|da≤∫t−h0|ω(a+h)(B(t−a−h)−B(t−a))|da+∫t−h0|(ω(a+h)−ω(a))B(t−a)|da=β∫t−h0|ω(a+h)(V(t−a−h)T(t−a−h)−V(t−a)T(t−a))|da+β∫t−h0|V(t−a)T(t−a)(ω(a+h)−ω(a))|da |
≤β∫t−h0ω(a+h)|V(t−a−h)||T(t−a−h)−T(t−a)|da+β∫t−h0ω(a+h)|T(t−a)||V(t−a−h)−V(t−a)|da+β∫t−h0|ω(a+h)−ω(a)||V(t−a)||T(t−a)|da. |
Referring to Theorem 8, it is observed that
N(t)≤max{T0+‖i0‖1+‖m0‖1+V0+R0,s/d}. |
Let
M1=sup{T0+‖i0‖1+‖m0‖1+V0+R0,(T0,i0,m0,V0)∈C} |
and
M2={M1,s/d}. |
Then
∫t−h0|ω(a+h)B(t−a−h)−ω(a)B(t−a)|da≤βM2∫t−h0ω(a+h)|T(t−a−h)−T(t−a)|da+βM2∫t−h0ω(a+h)|V(t−a−h)−V(t−a)|da+βM22∫t−h0|ω(a+h)−ω(a)|da→0(h→0+). |
Hence, Ih goes to 0 uniformly in C as h→0+.
Let ϕ:R→X+ be the total Φ-trajectories, ϕ(t)=(T(t),i(t,⋅),m(t,⋅), V(t)) and ϕ(t+r)=Φ(t,ϕ(r)),t≥0,r∈R. Following the discussions in [16,17], the trajectory is illustrated by
{T′(t)=s−βV(t)T(t)−dT(t),i(t,a)=βω(a)V(t−a)T(t−a),m(t,a)=βτ(a)V(t−a)T(t−a),i(t,0)=m(t,0)=βV(t)T(t),V′(t)=(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)m(t,a)da−cV(t) | (6.2) |
for t∈R.
We can give the estimates on total trajectories.
Lemma 2. For all (T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)∈A, the estimates hold for all t∈R
T0+∫∞0i0(a)da≤s/μ1, |
T0+∫∞0m0(a)da≤C0:=sμ1+s‖α‖∞μ1μ2, |
V0≤‖ρ‖∞C0/c, |
i0(a)≤β‖ρ‖∞C20/c, |
m0(a)≤β‖ρ‖∞C20(1+(1−ϵα)∫a0α(s)ω(s)π(s)ds)/c, |
T0≥sβ‖ρ‖∞C0/c+d |
where μ1=min{d,infa∈R{δ(a)}},μ2=min{d,infa∈R{γ(a)}}.
Proof. Consider
I(t)=∫∞0i(t,a)daβ∫∞0ω(a)V(t−a)T(t−a)da=β∫t−∞ω(t−l)V(l)T(l)dl |
and we have
I′(t)=βV(t)T(t)−β∫t−∞δ(t−l)ω(t−l)V(l)T(l)dl. |
Then
T′(t)+I′(t)=s−dT(t)−β∫t−∞δ(t−l)ω(t−l)V(l)T(l)dl≤s−μ1(T(t)+I(t)) |
where μ1=min{d,infa∈R{δ(a)}}. By comparison theorem,
T(t)+I(t)≤s/μ1,t∈R. | (6.3) |
Similarly, in terms of m(t,a), calculation leads to
M′(t)=(∫∞0m(t,a)da)′=βV(t)T(t)−β∫t−∞γ(t−l)τ(t−l)V(l)T(l)dl+β(1−ϵα)∫t−∞α(t−l)ω(t−l)V(l)T(l)dl, |
and
T′(t)+M′(t)=s−dT(t)−β∫t−∞γ(t−l)τ(t−l)V(l)T(l)dl+β(1−ϵα)∫t−∞α(t−l)ω(t−l)V(l)T(l)dl≤s−μ2(T(t)+M(t))+(1−ϵα)‖α‖∞I(t)≤s−μ2(T(t)+M(t))+(1−ϵα)‖α‖∞s/μ1 |
where μ2=min{d,infa∈R{γ(a)}}.
By integrating from r to t and letting r→−∞,
T(t)+M(t)≤C0 | (6.4) |
with C0=sμ1+s(1−ϵα)‖α‖∞μ1μ2.
V′(t)=(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)m(t,a)da−cV(t)≤(1−ϵs)‖ρ‖∞M(t)−cV(t)≤(1−ϵs)‖ρ‖∞C0−cV(t), |
gives us
V(t)≤(1−ϵs)‖ρ‖∞C0/c. | (6.5) |
Furthermore, adopting conclusions above, the following facts are correct
i(t,a)≤β(1−ϵs)‖ρ‖∞C20/c,m(t,a)≤β(1−ϵs)‖ρ‖∞C20(1+(1−ϵα)∫a0α(s)ω(s)π(s)ds)/c. |
From (6.2), we also have
T′(t)≥s−β(1−ϵs)‖ρ‖∞C0T(t)/c−dT(t), |
producing
T(t)≥sβ(1−ϵs)‖ρ‖∞C0/c+d. |
Our main purpose is to discuss the global stability of E∗. Firstly, according to Theorem 4 (Theorem 5.2 in [16]), the uniform persistence of the disease is investigated.
Set the subset X0 of X+ defined by
X0={(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)∈X+|V0+∫∞0m0(σ)ˉπ(σ)dσ+∫∞0i0(σ)ˉω(σ)dσ>0} |
with ˉπ(σ)=(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(σ+s)π(σ+s)π(σ)ds,ˉω(σ)=(1−ϵs)(1−ϵα)∫∞0ρ(σ+s)π(σ+s)ω(σ) (∫σ+s0α(l)ω(l)π(l)dl)ds. Clearly, we have the lemma as follows:
Lemma 3. If (T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)∈X0, then there exists t0>0 such that B(t)>0 for all t>t0. If (T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)∈X+∖X0, then B(t)=0 for all t≥0.
Proof. Solving the last equation in (3.4) gives us
V(t)=V0e−ct+(1−ϵs)∫t0e−c(s−t)(∫∞0ρ(σ)m(s,σ)dσ)ds, |
implying
B(t)=βT(t)[V0e−ct+(1−ϵs)∫t0e−c(s−t)(∫s0ρ(σ)π(σ)τ(σ)B(s−σ)dσ+(1−ϵs)∫∞sρ(σ)π(σ)(m0(σ−s)π(σ−s)+(1−ϵα)i0(σ−s)ω(σ−s)∫σσ−sα(l)ω(l)π(l)dl)dσ)ds]. | (7.1) |
If V0>0, then B(t)>0 for all t≥0. Set
I0(s):=(1−ϵs)∫∞sρ(σ)π(σ)(m0(σ−s)π(σ−s)+(1−ϵα)i0(σ−s)ω(σ−s)∫σσ−sα(l)ω(l)π(l)dl)dσ=(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(σ+s)π(σ+s)(m0(σ)π(σ)+(1−ϵα)i0(σ)ω(σ)∫σ+sσα(l)ω(l)π(l)dl)dσ. | (7.2) |
Suppose (T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)∈X0, and then integrating I0 yields
∫∞0I0(s)ds=(1−ϵs)∫∞0m0(σ)dσ∫∞0ρ(σ+s)π(σ+s)π(σ)ds+(1−ϵs)(1−ϵα)∫∞0i0(σ)dσ∫∞0ρ(σ+s)π(σ+s)ω(σ)(∫σ+s0α(l)ω(l)π(l)dl)ds=∫∞0m0(σ)ˉπ(σ)dσ+∫∞0i0(σ)ˉω(σ)dσ>0. |
Moreover, by Theorem 8, we have
B(t)≥βs(1−ϵs)d+βs/d∫t0e−c(s−t)(∫s0ρ(σ)π(σ)τ(σ)B(s−σ)dσ)ds=βs(1−ϵs)ectc(d+βs/d)[−e−ct∫t0ρ(σ)π(σ)τ(σ)B(t−σ)dσ+∫t0e−cs(∫s0ρ(σ)π(σ)τ(σ)B′(s−σ)dσ+ρ(s)π(s)τ(s)B(0))ds]≥βs(1−ϵs)ectc(d+βs/d)[−e−ct∫t0ρ(σ)π(σ)τ(σ)B(t−σ)dσ+∫t0e−csρ(s)π(s)τ(s)B(0)ds]. |
Using Corollary 1 (Corollary B.6 in [16]),
k(t):=−βs(1−ϵs)c(d+βs/d)ρ(t)π(t)τ(t)≠0forallt≥0, |
and
g(t):=β2s(1−ϵs)V0T0ectc(d+βs/d)∫t0e−csρ(s)π(s)τ(s)ds |
demonstrate t0>0 such that B(t)>0 for any t>t0 provided that T0>0.
If (T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)∈X+∖X0, then it is demonstrated that
B(t)≤βM(1−ϵs)∫t0e−c(s−t)(∫s0ρ(σ)π(σ)τ(σ)B(s−σ)dσ)ds |
Fubini's Theorem leads to
B(t)≤βM(1−ϵs)c‖ρ‖∞‖τ‖∞∫t0B(a)da. |
Applying Gronwall's inequality, it is declared that B(t)=0 for all t≥0.
Denote the persistence function by ρ:X+→R+, that is,
ρ(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)=βT0V0, |
ρ(Φ(t,(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)))=B(t). |
Theorem 4 (Theorem 5.2 in [16]) gives information that weakly uniform persistence produces strongly uniformly persistence.
Lemma 4. Suppose that x∈X0, then there is some ε>0 such that
lim supt→∞ρ(Φ(t,x))>ε |
for each solution of (3.4) while R>1.
Proof. It is assumed that Φ is not weakly uniformly persistent. In other words, there is an arbitrarily small ε0>0 giving
lim supt→∞ρ(Φ(t,x))<ε0. |
Denote T∞=lim inft→∞T(t), and tk→∞(k→+∞) is a sequence satisfying T(tk)→T∞ together with T′(tk)→0. Thus,
T∞≥s−ε0d. |
Owing to R>1, there is a small positive constant ε1 giving
h(ε1)=βs(1−ϵs)d(ε1+c)∫∞0ρ(a)τ(a)e−ε1ada>1. | (7.3) |
On the other hand, for any t≥0,
V′(t)=(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)m(t,a)da−cV(t)≥(1−ϵs)∫t0ρ(a)m(t,a)da−cV(t)=(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)τ(a)B(t−a)da−cV(t). |
For λ>0, Laplace transform to the above inequality leads to
λˆV(λ)−V(0)≥ˆρ(λ)ˆB1(λ)+ˆξ(λ)ˆB1(λ)−cˆV(λ) |
where
ˆB1(λ)=∫∞0B(a)e−λada,ˆρ(λ)=(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)π(a)e−λada,ˆξ(λ)=(1−ϵs)(1−ϵα)∫∞0ρ(a)π(a)e−λa(∫a0α(s)ω(s)π(s)ds)da. |
Now, we obtain
ˆV(λ)≥ˆρ(λ)+ˆξ(λ)λ+cˆB1(λ). |
Because B(t)=βV(t)T(t)≥β(s−ε0)dV(t), it is deduced that
ˆB1(λ)≥β(s−ε0)dˆV(λ)≥β(s−ε0)dˆρ(λ)+ˆξ(λ)λ+cˆB1(λ), |
causing
β(s−ε0)dˆρ(λ)+ˆξ(λ)λ+c≤1. |
Choosing λ=ε0, we have
h(ε0)≤1 |
which contradicts (7.3).
Based on Lemma 4, we need another hypothesis (H1) of Theorem 4 (Theorem 5.2 in [16]). It is quite easy to check the following result.
Lemma 5. If ρ(ϕ(t))=0 for any t≤0, it holds that ρ(ϕ(t))=0 for all t>0.
Referring to the proving method of Lemma 1 (Lemma 5.6 in [18]), we can also show that
Lemma 6. Either B(t)=0 or B(t)>0 for all t∈R holds.
On account of Lemmas 4–6, Theorem 4 (Theorem 5.2 in [16]) produces the strong uniform persistence of the disease.
Theorem 12. Provided that R>1, each solution of (3.4) is strongly uniformly persistent for (T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)∈X0.
Furthermore, we obtain the result in view of Theorem 5 (Theorem 5.7 in [16]).
Theorem 13. There is a compact invariant set A1 that is uniformly ρ-positive. In other words, there exists some δ>0 such that
ρ(Φ(t,(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)))≥δ,for(T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)∈A1, |
attracting every solution as (T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0)∈X0.
The next part is devote to the main conclusion about the global asymptotic stability of E∗.
Theorem 14. If R>1, then it is demonstrated that E∗ of (6.2) has globally asymptotical stability in X0.
Proof. Let Ψ:R→A1 be a total Φ-trajectory, where Ψ(t)=(T(t),i(t,⋅),m(t, ⋅),V(t)) is the solution of (6.2) with initial value (T0,i0(⋅),m0(⋅),V0). Denote the function H(y)=y−1−lny, Ω=βˉVˉTc, and for a≥0,
ϕ(a)=(1−ϵs)βˉVˉTK∫∞aρ(s)π(s)ds,ψ(a)=(1−ϵs)(1−ϵα)βˉVˉTK∫∞aρ(s)π(s)(∫s0α(σ)ω(σ)π(σ)dσ)ds. | (7.4) |
For Ψ(t)=(T(t),i(t,⋅),m(t,⋅),V(t))∈A1, define Lyapunov functional V(Ψ(t))=V1(Ψ(t))+V2(Ψ(t))+V3(Ψ(t))+V4(Ψ(t)) where
V1(Ψ(t))=T(t)−ˉT−∫T(t)ˉTˉTηdη, |
V2(Ψ(t))=∫∞0H(i(t,a)ˉi(a))ϕ(a)da, |
V3(Ψ(t))=∫∞0H(m(t,a)ˉm(a))ψ(a)da |
and
V4(Ψ(t))=ΩH(V(t)ˉV). |
Using the initial equation of (6.2), we have
ddtV1(Ψ(t))=(1−ˉTT(t))(s−βV(t)T(t)−dT(t))=d(ˉT−T(t))(1−ˉTT(t))+β(1−ˉTT(t))(ˉVˉT−V(t)T(t)). |
After a process of Lemma 9.18 in [16], it is obtained that
ddtV2(Ψ(t))=ϕ(0)H(i(t,0)ˉi(0))+∫∞0ϕ′(a)H(i(t,a)ˉi(a))da=ϕ(0)H(V(t)T(t)ˉVˉT)+∫∞0ϕ′(a)H(i(t,a)ˉi(a))da, |
and
ddtV3(Ψ(t))=ψ(0)H(m(t,0)ˉm(0))+∫∞0ψ′(a)H(m(t,a)ˉm(a))da=ψ(0)H(V(t)T(t)ˉVˉT)+∫∞0ψ′(a)H(m(t,a)ˉm(a))da. |
Next, the last equation of (6.2) gives us
ddtV4(Ψ(t))=ΩˉVH′(V(t)ˉV)((1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)m(t,a)da−cV(t))=cΩˉV(1−ˉVV(t))(ˉV−V(t))+ΩˉVH′(V(t)ˉV)(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)ˉm(a)(m(t,a)ˉm(a)−V(t)ˉV)da+ΩˉVH′(V(t)ˉV)(V(t)ˉV−1)(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)ˉm(a)da. |
Finally, we have
V′(Ψ(t))=Σ4i=1V′i(Ψ(t))=d(ˉT−T(t))(1−ˉTT(t))+β(1−ˉTT(t))(ˉVˉT−V(t)T(t))+ϕ(0)H(V(t)T(t)ˉVˉT)+∫∞0ϕ′(a)H(i(t,a)ˉi(a))da+ψ(0)H(V(t)T(t)ˉVˉT)+∫∞0ψ′(a)H(m(t,a)ˉm(a))da+cΩˉV(1−ˉVV(t))(ˉV−V(t))+ΩˉVH′(V(t)ˉV)(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)ˉm(a)(m(t,a)ˉm(a)−V(t)ˉV)da+ΩˉVH′(V(t)ˉV)(V(t)ˉV−1)(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)ˉm(a)da. |
Noticing that ∫∞0ρ(a)ˉm(a)da=cˉV,
ϕ(0)H(V(t)T(t)ˉVˉT)+ψ(0)H(V(t)T(t)ˉVˉT)=β(V(t)T(t)−ˉVˉT)−βˉVˉT(lnV(t)T(t)−lnˉVˉT), |
and some simple calculation to ϕ′(a),ψ′(a), then V′(Ψ(t)) becomes
V′(Ψ(t))=d(ˉT−T(t))(1−ˉTT(t))−βˉTT(t)(ˉVˉT−V(t)T(t))−βˉVˉT(lnV(t)T(t)−lnˉVˉT)+∫∞0ϕ′(a)H(i(t,a)ˉi(a))da+∫∞0ψ′(a)H(m(t,a)ˉm(a))da+ΩˉVH′(V(t)ˉV)(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)ˉm(a)(m(t,a)ˉm(a)−V(t)ˉV)da=d(ˉT−T(t))(1−ˉTT(t))+βˉVˉT(−lnT(t)ˉT−ˉTT(t)+1)+βˉVˉTH(V(t)ˉV)−βˉVˉT(1−ϵs)K∫∞0ρ(a)τ(a)H(V(t−a)T(t−a)ˉVˉT)da+ΩˉVH′(V(t)ˉV)(1−ϵs)∫∞0ρ(a)ˉm(a)(V(t−a)T(t−a)ˉVˉT−V(t)ˉV)da |
≤d(ˉT−T(t))(1−ˉTT(t))+βˉVˉT(−lnT(t)ˉT−ˉTT(t)+1)+∫∞0[H(V(t)ˉV)−H(V(t−a)T(t−a)ˉVˉT)+H′(V(t)ˉV)(V(t−a)T(t−a)ˉVˉT−V(t)ˉV)](1−ϵs)Ωρ(a)ˉm(a)ˉVda. |
Based on −ln(1/x)−x+1≤0 and H(b)−H(a)+(a−b)H′(b)≤0, it is derived that
V′(Ψ(t))≤0. |
Obviously, V′(Ψ(t))=0 implies Ψ=E∗. LaSalle's Invariance Principle tells us that the largest invariant set satisfying V′(Ψ(t))=0 is {E∗}. In that A1 is compact, α and ω-limit sets are compact, invariant, non-empty and attract Ψ(t) as t→±∞, respectively. V′(Ψ(t))≤0, as a consequence, V=0 on ω and α-limit sets that includes only E∗. Therefore, Ψ(t)→E∗ as t→±∞, that is,
V(Ψ(t))→V(E∗)ast→±∞. |
Due to
limt→+∞V(Ψ(t))≤V(Ψ(t))≤limt→−∞V(Ψ(t)), |
V(Ψ(t))=V(E∗) for any t∈R meaning Ψ(t)=E∗. Then, A1 is E∗ in reality, linked to the local asymptotical stability of A1 of Theorem 2 (Theorem 2.39 in [16]), consequently, E∗ is globally asymptotically stable.
In this part, we choose a set of parameters to display the theoretical part above. s=1.3×104 cells/mL, d=1 day−1, β=5×10−5 mL day−1 virion−1, c=22.3 day−1, ϵα=0.5, ϵs=0.01, κ=4 and ρ(a),δ(a),μ (a),α(a) are seen as constants ρ=2 day−1, δ=0.3 day−1, μ=1 day−1, α=7 day−1. Calculations gives that R=0.1164<1, s/d=1.3×104 and ˉr(a)=0.5853+0.4147e−5.98a. Transfer (3.1) into an ODE system by discretizing a and MATLAB ODE solver provides the solutions in Figure 1. At this time, the equilibrium (s/d,0,ˉr(a),0) of (3.1) corresponding to E0 in system (3.4) is globally asymptotically stable, where ˉr(a)=τ(a)ω(a).
Setting β=5×10−4 mL day−1 virion−1 and unchanged other parameters leads to R=1.1641>1,ˉT=1.188×104,ˉi(a)=1.8322×103e−0.3a,ˉr(a)=0.5853+0.4147e−5.98a,ˉV=189. Considering the case of model (3.1) without therapy, i.e., ϵα=ϵs=0 and κ=1, we have R=4.2986>1 under the parameters above. At this time, there exists an infected equilibrium (˜T,˜i(a),˜r(a),˜V), where ˜T=3.0242×103,˜i(a)=9.9758×103e−0.3a,˜r(a)=2.3333−1.3333e−3a,˜V=6.5972×103. In order to observe the effect of treatment, we choose (˜T,˜i(a),˜r(a),˜V) as the initial value in our simulation. According to both the theory above and Figure 2, we obtain a globally asymptotically stable infected equilibrium (ˉT,ˉi(a),ˉr(a),ˉV) of (3.1). Also, it is clear that the quantity of HCV RNA, viruses and infected cells are all decreasing, and the treatment is effective.
In the present paper, the global stability of an age-dependent HCV model under the treatment with multiscale structure is explored. Two equilibria including infection-free E0 and infected ones E∗ of this model are obtained initially for the deformed model (3.4). Subsequently, we define a quantity R to separate the existence of infected equilibrium or not. Provided that R<1, E0 is locally and globally asymptotically stable by means of the eigenvalue analysis and Volterra integral formulation. Furthermore, the existence, uniqueness and positivity of solutions of (3.4) are able to be proved, based on that we construct a Lyapunov functional declaring the globally asymptotical stability of infected equilibrium E∗ under therapy.
Our results demonstrate that virus is extinct with R<1, on the contrary, it continues to exist with R>1. However, from the numerical simulation, it can be seen that the amount of virus significantly reduces after the treatment.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 11301263, 11701306, 11701275]; the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [grant number 2018M630547]; the Natural Science Fund Development Project by Nanjing Tech University; the Second Batch of High Level Demonstration Project for Sino-foreign Cooperative Education in Jiangsu; and the China Scholarship Council.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] |
J. J. Feld, J. H. Hoofnagle, Mechanism of action of interferon and ribavirin in treatment of hepatitis C, Nature, 436 (2005), 967–972. doi: 10.1038/nature04082
![]() |
[2] |
B. Hajarizadeh, J. Grebely, H. McManus, C. Estes, H. Razavi, R. T. Gray, et al., Chronic hepatitis C burden and care cascade in australia in the era of interferon-based treatment, J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 32 (2017), 229–236. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13453
![]() |
[3] |
R. L. Morgan, B. Baack, B. D. Smith, A. Yartel, M. Pitasi, Y. Falck-Ytter, Eradication of hepatitis C virus infection and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies, Ann. Intern. Med., 158 (2013), 329–337. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00005
![]() |
[4] |
P. Nahon, V. Bourcier, R. Layese, E. Audureau, C. Cagnot, P. Marcellin, et al., Eradication of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with cirrhosis reduces risk of liver and non-liver complications, Gastroenterology, 152 (2017), 142–156. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.009
![]() |
[5] |
T. Asselah, N. Boyer, D. Saadoun, M. Martinot-Peignoux, P. Marcellin, Direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: optimizing current ifn-free treatment and future perspectives, Liver Int., 36 (2016), 47–57. doi: 10.1111/liv.13027
![]() |
[6] |
T. M. Nápoles, A. W. Batchelder, A. Lin, L. Moran, M. O. Johnson, M. Shumway, et al., Hcv treatment barriers among hiv/hcv co-infected patients in the us: a qualitative study to understand low uptake among marginalized populations in the daa era, J. Publ. Health, 41 (2019), e283–e289. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz045
![]() |
[7] |
A. U. Neumann, N. P. Lam, H. Dahari, D. R. Gretch, T. E. Wiley, T. J. Layden, et al., Hepatitis c viral dynamics in vivo and the antiviral efficacy of interferon-α therapy, Science, 282 (1998), 103–107. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5386.103
![]() |
[8] |
J. Guedj, H. Dahari, L. Rong, N. D. Sansone, R. E. Nettles, S. J. Cotler, et al., Modeling shows that the ns5a inhibitor daclatasvir has two modes of action and yields a shorter estimate of the hepatitis C virus half-life, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110 (2013), 3991–3996. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203110110
![]() |
[9] |
L. Rong, A. S. Perelson, Mathematical analysis of multiscale models for hepatitis c virus dynamics under therapy with direct-acting antiviral agents, Math. Biosci., 245 (2013), 22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2013.04.012
![]() |
[10] |
L. Rong, J. Guedj, H. Dahari, D. J. Coffield Jr, M. Levi, P. Smith, et al., Analysis of hepatitis c virus decline during treatment with the protease inhibitor danoprevir using a multiscale model, PLoS Comput. Biol., 9 (2013), e1002959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002959
![]() |
[11] |
A. Goyal, Y. Lurie, E. G. Meissner, M. Major, N. Sansone, S. L. Uprichard, et al., Modeling hcv cure after an ultra-short duration of therapy with direct acting agents, Antiviral Res., 144 (2017), 281–285. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.06.019
![]() |
[12] | B. M. Quintela, J. M. Conway, J. Hyman, R. Reis, R. dos Santos, M. Lobosco, et al., An age-based multiscale mathematical model of the hepatitis C virus life-cycle during infection and therapy: including translation and replication, Ⅶ Latin American Congress on Biomedical Engineering CLAIB 2016, 2016. |
[13] | D. Echevarria, A. Gutfraind, B. Boodram, S. Cotler, M. Major, H. Dahari, Modeling vaccine and daa treatment scale up effect on hepatitis c prevalence among persons who inject drugs in metropolitan chicago, J. Hepatol., 66 (2017), S505–S506. |
[14] | S. D. Lombardo, S. Lombardo, Global stability for a mathematical model of hepatitis c: Impact of a possible vaccination with daas therapy, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2019. |
[15] |
K. Kitagawa, S. Nakaoka, Y. Asai, K. Watashi, S. Iwami, A pde multiscale model of hepatitis c virus infection can be transformed to a system of odes, J. Theor. Biol., 448 (2018), 80–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.04.006
![]() |
[16] | H. L. Smith, H. R. Thieme, Dynamical systems and population persistence, American Mathematical Society, 2011. |
[17] |
B. Soufiane, T. M. Touaoula, Global analysis of an infection age model with a class of nonlinear incidence rates, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 434 (2016), 1211–1239. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.09.066
![]() |
[18] |
A. Chekroun, M. N. Frioui, T. Kuniya, T. M. Touaoula, Global stability of an age-structured epidemic model with general lyapunov functional, Math. Biosci. Eng., 16 (2019), 1525–1553. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019073
![]() |
[19] |
M. N. Frioui, T. M. Touaoula, B. Ainseba, Global dynamics of an age-structured model with relapse, Discrete Contin. Dyna. Syst. B, 25 (2020), 2245. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019226
![]() |
[20] | P. Magal, S. Ruan, Theory and applications of abstract semilinear Cauchy problems, Springer, 2018. |
1. | Xia Wang, Hongyan Zhao, Lin Wang, Dynamics of an age‐structured multiscale hepatitis C virus model with two infection modes and antibody immune response, 2024, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.10352 |