Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/MathOperators.js

The Wigner-Lohe model for quantum synchronization and its emergent dynamics

  • Received: 01 February 2017 Revised: 01 June 2017
  • Primary: 35Q40; Secondary: 82C22, 93D20, 35B40

  • We present the Wigner-Lohe model for quantum synchronization which can be derived from the Schrödinger-Lohe model using the Wigner formalism. For identical one-body potentials, we provide a priori sufficient framework leading the complete synchronization, in which L2-distances between all wave functions tend to zero asymptotically.

    Citation: Paolo Antonelli, Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Pierangelo Marcati. The Wigner-Lohe model for quantum synchronization and its emergent dynamics[J]. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(3): 403-416. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017018

    Related Papers:

    [1] Seung-Yeal Ha, Gyuyoung Hwang, Dohyun Kim . On the complete aggregation of the Wigner-Lohe model for identical potentials. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2022, 17(5): 665-686. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2022022
    [2] Paolo Antonelli, Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Pierangelo Marcati . The Wigner-Lohe model for quantum synchronization and its emergent dynamics. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(3): 403-416. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017018
    [3] Santosh Kumar Henge, Gitanjali Jayaraman, M Sreedevi, R Rajakumar, Mamoon Rashid, Sultan S. Alshamrani, Mrim M. Alnfiai, Ahmed Saeed AlGhamdi . Secure keys data distribution based user-storage-transit server authentication process model using mathematical post-quantum cryptography methodology. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(3): 1313-1334. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023057
    [4] Seung-Yeal Ha, Gyuyoung Hwang, Hansol Park . Emergent behaviors of Lohe Hermitian sphere particles under time-delayed interactions. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(3): 459-492. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021013
    [5] Seung-Yeal Ha, Jaeseung Lee, Zhuchun Li . Emergence of local synchronization in an ensemble of heterogeneous Kuramoto oscillators. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(1): 1-24. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017001
    [6] Tingting Zhu . Emergence of synchronization in Kuramoto model with frustration under general network topology. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2022, 17(2): 255-291. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2022005
    [7] Tingting Zhu . Synchronization of the generalized Kuramoto model with time delay and frustration. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(4): 1772-1798. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023077
    [8] Robert Carlson . Dirichlet to Neumann maps for infinite quantum graphs. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7(3): 483-501. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.483
    [9] Hyungjin Huh . Remarks on the Schrödinger-Lohe model. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14(4): 759-769. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019030
    [10] Sergei Avdonin, Julian Edward . An inverse problem for quantum trees with observations at interior vertices. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(2): 317-339. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021008
  • We present the Wigner-Lohe model for quantum synchronization which can be derived from the Schrödinger-Lohe model using the Wigner formalism. For identical one-body potentials, we provide a priori sufficient framework leading the complete synchronization, in which L2-distances between all wave functions tend to zero asymptotically.



    Synchronization represents a phenomenon in which rhythms of weakly coupled oscillators are adjusted to the common frequency due to their weak interactions. It is often observed in many complex systems, e.g., the flashing of fireflies, clapping of hands in a concert hall, and heartbeat regulation by pacemaker cells, etc., [1,6,7,33,35]. However, rigorous mathematical treatment of such collective phenomena were begun only several decades ago by two scientists Winfree [37] and Kuramoto [26,27]. For the mathematical modeling of synchronization, they adopted a continuous dynamical system approach based on their heuristic and intuitive arguments. In this paper, we are mainly interested in quantum Lohe oscillators with all-to-all couplings under one-body potential. To fix the idea, consider a classical complete network consisting of N nodes, where each pair of nodes is connected with an equal capacity which is assumed to be unity. We also assume that quantum Lohe oscillators with the same unit mass are positioned on the nodes of the underlying complete network. To avoid unnecessary physical complexity, we ignore entanglement and decoherence effects inherent to the quantum many-body systems. For a better physical modeling, such genuine quantum effects need to be taken into account.

    Let ψi=ψi(t,x) be the wave function of the i-th Lohe oscillator on the spatial domain Rd. Then, the dynamics of Lohe oscillators with unit mass is governed by the Schrödinger-Lohe (S-L) model: for (t,x)R+×Rd.

    itψi=12Δψi+Viψi+iK2NNk=1(ψiψkψkψk,ψiψiψiψk),1iN, (1)

    where :=L2 and , are the standard L2 norm and an inner product on Rd, and Vi=Vi(x) and K correspond to the one-body potential and nonnegative coupling strength, respectively. The S--L model (1) was first introduced by Australian physicist Max Lohe [28] several years ago as an infinite state generalization of the Lohe matrix model [29]. As discussed in [28,29], quantum synchronization has received much attention from the quantum optics community because of its possible applications in quantum computing and quantum information [14,23,24,25,30,36,39,40]. The emergent dynamics of the S-L system (1) has been partially treated in [11,12] for some restricted class of initial data and a large coupling strength. Recently, a new approach based on the finite-dimensional reduction has been proposed in [5,15] which significantly improve the previous results [11,12] by the Lyapunov functional approach. However, a complete resolution of the synchronization problem for (1) is still far from complete.

    Our main purpose of this paper is to present a quantum kinetic analogue of the S-L model (1) and study its emergent dynamics. The study on the quantum kinetic model for the Schrödinger equation dates back to Wigner's paper [38], in which Wigner considered the quantum mechanical motion of a large ensemble of electrons in a vacuum under the action of the Coulomb force generated by the charge of the electrons. For the modeling of large ensemble, he introduced a quasi one-particle distribution function, so called the Wigner function and showed that it satisfies the quantum Liouville equation [8,9,19,20,32,41].

    Before we briefly describe our main results, we first recall the Wigner transform of wave function on Rd. For more basic facts on Wigner transforms we refer the reader to [22,21].

    Definition 1.1. For any two wave functions ψ,ϕL2, we define the Wigner transform

    w[ψ,ϕ](x,p)=1(2π)dRdeiypˉψ(x+y2)ϕ(xy2)dy.

    If we choose ψ=ϕ, then we write w[ψ]:=w[ψ,ψ].

    In order to shorten the formulas, we are going to introduce the following notation: if ψj, j=1,,N is the solution to the S-L system (1), then we write

    wj:=w[ψj],    wjk:=w[ψj,ψk],     w+jk:=Re wjk     and     wjk:=Im wjk.

    Our main results of this paper are as follows. First, we show that the Wigner transforms wi and w±ij satisfies a coupled non-local system:

    {twj+pxwj+Θ[V](wj)=KNNk=1[w+jk(w+jkdpdx)wj],tw+jk+pxw+jk+Θ[V](w+jk)=K2NN=1[w+j+w+k((w+j+w+k)dpdx)w+jk+((wj+wk)dpdx)wjk],twjk+pxwjk+Θ[V](wjk)=K2NN=1[wj+wk((w+j+w+k)dpdx)wjk+((wj+wk)dpdx)w+jk]. (2)

    Second, we derive a sufficient condition for the complete synchronization of the coupled system (2). Finally, we also investigate the hydrodynamic formulation for the Schrödinger-Lohe system (1) and derive synchronization estimates in some special cases.

    The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the Schrödinger-Lohe model for quantum synchronization and discuss previous works on the complete synchronization of the S-L model. In Section 3, we derive our augmented Wigner-Lohe model from the S-L model using the Wigner transform. In Section 4, we present a priori complete synchronization estimates for some restricted class of initial data. In Section 5, we also discuss a hydrodynamic model which can be obtained from the S-L model for two-oscillator case.

    In this section, we briefly present the Schrödinger-Lohe (S-L) model for Lohe synchronization, and review earlier results on the synchronization problem for the S-L model.

    As a phenomenological model for the quantum synchronization generalizing classical Kuramoto synchronization, Lohe proposed a coupled Schrödinger-type model in [28]. For (t,x)R+×Rd and 1iN,

    itψi=12Δψi+Viψi+iK2NNk=1(ψiψkψkψk,ψiψiψiψk), (3)

    where we normalized =1 and m=1.

    Lemma 2.1. [28] Let Ψ=(ψ1,ψN) be a smooth solution to (3) with initial data Ψ0=(ψ01,,ψ0N). Then, the L2 norm of ψi is constant along the flow (3):

    ψi(t)=ψ0ifort0, 1iN.

    In view of the previous lemma, from now on we will assume that ψ0i=1, 1iN, so that system (3) becomes

    itψj=12Δψj+Vjψj+iK2NNk=1(ψkψk,ψjψj). (4)

    For the space-homogeneous case, we set the spatial domain to be a periodic domain Td and choose a special choice of Vi:

    Vi(x)=Ωi:constant,     ψi(t,x)=ψi(t),(t,x)R+×Td.

    system (3) can be reduced to the Kuramoto model which is a prototype model for classical synchronization. In this special setting, the S-L model becomes

    idψidt=Ωiψi+iK2NNk=1(|ψi|ψk|ψk|ψi,ψkψi|ψi||ψk|). (5)

    We next simply take the ansatz for ψi:

    ψi:=eiθi,1iN (6)

    and substitute this ansatz into (5) to obtain

    ˙θiψi=Ωiψi+iK2NNk=1(ψkei(θiθk)ψi).

    Then, we take the inner product of the above relation with ψi and compare the real part of the resulting relation to get the Kuramoto model for classical synchronization [1,6,13,16,17,18]:

    ˙θi=Ωi+KNNk=1sin(θkθi). (7)

    Thus, the S-L model can be viewed as a quantum generalization of the Kuramoto model.

    In this subsection, we briefly review the previous results [11,12,15,5] on the complete synchronization of the S-L model. For this, we first recall the definition of the complete synchronization as follows.

    Definition 2.2. Let Ψ=(ψ1,ψN) be a smooth solution to (3) with initial data Ψ0=(ψ01,,ψ0N). Then, the S-L model exhibits an asymptotic phase-locking if the following relations holds:

      limtψi,ψj=αijC. (8)

    Remark 1. For the classical phase models such as (7), asymptotic phase-locking is defined as the following condition:

      limt|θi(t)θj(t)|=θij. (9)

    Via the relation (6), we can see that (8) and (9) are closely related. In fact, in [12] for identical potentials Vi=Vj, the complete synchronization is defined as

    limtψi(t)ψj(t)=0,1i,jN. (10)

    Note that the condition (10) and normalization condition ||ψi||=1 yield

    limtψi(t),ψj(t)=1.

    Thus, the condition (10) satisfies the condition (8). Recently, in [5,15] the case with different one-body potentials was treated, at least for N=2. In this framework it is shown that, in some regimes, the limit in (8) is not 1 but depends on the difference between the potentials. Hence the limit in (10) gives a non-zero constant. This is indeed the more general case, when the system (4) exhibits complete frequency synchronization but not phase synchronization. For more details we address the reader to [5,15].

    As mentioned in the Introduction, the S-L model was first considered in Lohe's work [28] for the non-Abelian generalization of the Kuramoto model. However, the first rigorous mathematical studies of the S-L model were treated by the second author and his collaborators in [12,15] in two different methodologies. The first methodology is to use L2-diameters for {ψi} as a Lyapunov functional and derive a Gronwall type differential inequality to conclude the complete synchronization with αij=1. More precisely, we set

    D(Ψ):=maxi,j||ψiψj||.

    In [12], authors derived a differential inequality for the diameter D(Ψ):

    ddtD(Ψ)K(D(Ψ))(D(Ψ)12),t>0.

    This leads to an exponential synchronization of the (1).

    Theorem 2.3. [12] Suppose that the coupling strength and initial data satisfy

    K>0,Vi=V,ψ0iL2=1,1iN,D(Ψ0)<12.

    Then, for any solution Ψ=(ψ1,,ψN) to (1), the diameter D(Ψ) satisfies

    D(Ψ(t))D(Ψ0)D(Ψ0)+(12D(Ψ0))eKt,t0.

    Remark 2. For distinct one-body potentials, we do not have an asymptotic phase-locking estimate for the S-L model yet, however in [11], for some restricted class of initial data and large coupling strength, a weaker concept of synchronization, namely practical synchronization estimates have been obtained:

    limKlim suptmaxi,j||ψiψj||=0.

    On the other hand, at least in the two oscillator case, it is possible to improve considerably the practical synchronization result: indeed in [5,15] a complete picture of different regimes is shown, where the system (4) exhibits complete synchronization or dephasing, i.e. time periodic orbits for the correlation function.

    Recently, an alternative approach to prove synchronization for the S-L model was proposed both in [5] and [15], by using a finite dimensional reduction. More precisely, in both papers the authors consider the correlations between the wave functions,

    zjk(t):=ψj,ψk(t)=rjk(t)+isjk(t), (11)

    and they study their asymptotic behavior. Moreover, in [5] the introduction of the order parameter, defined in analogy with the classical Kuramoto model, allows to give a more general result.

    Theorem 2.4. [5] Let (ψ1,,ψN)C(R+;L2(Rd))N be the solution to (4) with initial data (ψ1(0),,ψN(0))=(ψ01,,ψ0N)L2(Rd)N, and we assume that

    Nk=1Re zjk(0)>0,   for   any   j=1,,N. (12)

    Then we have

    |1zjk(t)|

    As we will see in the next sections, the same approach used in [5,15] will also be exploited to infer the synchronization results for the Wigner-Lohe model (13) and the hydrodynamical system (19). More precisely, for the quantum hydrodynamic system (19) we are going to need also some synchronization estimates proved at the H^1 regularity level. Such estimates are proved in [5].

    In this section we present a kinetic quantum analogue "the Wigner-Lohe (W-L) model" for the quantum synchronization, which can be derived from the Schrödinger-Lohe (S-L) model [28,29] via the Wigner transform. In this and following sections, we assume that all one-body potentials are identical

    V_j(x)=V(x),1\leq j\leq N.

    Recall that for a given a solution \psi to the free Schrödinger equation:

    i\partial_t\psi=-\frac12\Delta\psi+V\psi,

    then its Wigner transform w=w[\psi] satisfies

    \partial_tw+p\cdot\nabla_xw+\Theta[V]w=0,

    where the operator \Theta[V] is defined by

    \Theta[V](w)(x, p) :=-\frac{i}{(2\pi)^d}\int e^{i(p-p')\cdot y}\left(V\left(x+\frac{y}{2}\right)-V\left(x-\frac{y}{2}\right)\right)w(x, p')\,dp'dy.

    Hence, to derive the Wigner-Lohe system (2) we just need to see how the nonlocal coupling in (4) translates at the Wigner level. More precisely, let \psi_j be a solution to (4), then by defining w_j=w[\psi_j], we see that it satisfies

    \partial_tw_j+p\cdot\nabla w_j+\Theta[V]w_j=R_j,

    where the remainder term R_j is given by

    \begin{aligned} R_j=&\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N\int e^{ip\cdot y}\Big[ \bar\psi_k\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)\psi_j\left(t, x-\frac{y}{2}\right) \cr &+\bar\psi_j\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)\psi_k\left(t, x-\frac{y}{2}\right)\Big]\,dy -\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N2r_{jk}w_j\\ =&\frac{K}{N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N\left(w_{jk}^+-r_{jk}w_j\right), \end{aligned}

    where r_{jk}(t) :={\rm Re} \ \langle\psi_j, \psi_k\rangle(t)=\int w_{jk}^+(t, x, p)\,dxdp. Let us recall that this last equality comes from one of the basic properties of Wigner transforms, namely

    \int w[f, g](x, p)\,dxdp=\langle f, g\rangle,

    for any f, g \in L^2. Resuming, the equation for w_j is given by

    \partial_tw_j+p\cdot\nabla_xw_j+\Theta[V]w_j=\frac{K}{N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N\left(w_{jk}^+-r_{jk}w_j\right).

    We now need to derive the equation for w_{jk}=w[\psi_j, \psi_k]. Since the linear part in the S-L model (4) is common for every wave functions (remember we chose identical potentials, V_j\equiv V), then the linear part in the Wigner equation for w_{jk} will be exactly the same as for w_j. Consequently we also have

    \partial_tw_{jk}+p\cdot\nabla_xw_{jk}+\Theta[V]w_{jk}=R_{jk},

    where

    \begin{aligned} R_{jk}=&\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N\int e^{iy\cdot p}\left(\bar\psi_\ell\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)\psi_k\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)+\bar\psi_j\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)\psi_\ell \right.\\ &\left.\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)\right)\,dy-\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N\left(z_{j\ell}w_{jk}+z_{\ell k}w_{jk}\right). \end{aligned}

    Let us recall that z_{jk} is defined in (11) and we notice that \overline{z_{jk}}=z_{kj}. Hence we obtain

    R_{jk}=\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N\left(w_{j\ell}+w_{\ell k}-(z_{j\ell}+z_{\ell k})w_{jk}\right)

    and the equation for w_{jk} becomes

    \partial_tw_{jk}+p\cdot\nabla w_{jk}+\Theta[V]w_{jk}=\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N\left(w_{j\ell}+w_{\ell k}-(z_{j\ell}+z_{\ell k})w_{jk}\right).

    By using definitions for w_{jk}^\pm and the linearity of operator \Theta[V], we then obtain the Wigner-Lohe system

    \label{W-L} \begin{cases} \displaystyle \partial_t w_j+ p \cdot \nabla_x w_j \Theta[V]w_j = \frac{K}{N} \sum\limits_{k=1}^N \Big( w^+_{jk} - r_{jk}w_j\Big),\\ \displaystyle \partial_t w^+_{jk} + p \cdot \nabla_x w^+_{jk} \Theta[V](w^+_{jk}) \\ \displaystyle \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ = \frac{K}{2N} \sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N \Big[w^+_{j\ell}+w^+_{\ell k}-(r_{j\ell}+r_{\ell k})w^+_{jk} -i(s_{j\ell}+s_{\ell k}) w^-_{jk} \Big], \\ \displaystyle \partial_t w^-_{jk} + p \cdot \nabla_x w^-_{jk} \Theta[V](w^-_{jk}) \\ \displaystyle \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ = \frac{K}{2N} \sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N \Big[w^-_{j\ell}+w^-_{\ell k}-(r_{j\ell}+R_{\ell k})w^-_{jk} -i(s_{j\ell}+s_{\ell k}) w^+_{jk} \Big], \\ \end{cases} (13)

    In this section, we focus on the Wigner-Lohe model with N=2. In this case, system (13) becomes

    \left\{\begin{aligned} &\partial_tw_1+p\cdot\nabla_xw_1+\Theta[V]w_1=\frac{K}{2}(w_{12}^+-r_{12}w_1), \\ &\partial_tw_2+p\cdot\nabla_x w_2+\Theta[V]w_2=\frac{K}{2}(w_{12}^+-r_{12}w_2), \\ &\partial_tw_{12}+p\cdot\nabla_xw_{12}+\Theta[V]w_{12}=\frac{K}{4}(w_1+w_2-2z_{12}w_{12}), \end{aligned}\right. (14)

    where we have

    w_{12}^+={\rm Re} \ w_{12}, \ \ \ z_{12}=z_{12}(t)=\int w_{12}\,dxdp, \ \ \ r_{12}={\rm Re} \ z_{12}. (15)

    Let us remark that the system (14), complemented with the definitions (15) above, can be considered independently on the S-L system (4). For such a system we will prescribe initial data w_1^0, w_2^0, w_{12}^0 such that w_1^0 and w_2^0 are real valued, \int w_1^0\,dxdp=\int w_2^0\,dxdp=1, w_{12}^0 is complex valued, |\int w_{12}^0\,dxdp|\leq1. Let us also notice that the last equation is complex valued, so that we don't split it into two coupled equations for w_{12}^+ and w_{12}^- as in (13).

    Let us now prove the synchronization for (14). First of all we remark that, by integrating the last equation over the whole phase space, we find the following ODE

    \dot z_{12}=\frac{K}{2}(1-z_{12}^2), (16)

    for which it is straightforward to give its asymptotic behavior.

    Lemma 4.1. Let z_{12}(0)\in\mathbb C be such that |z_{12}(0)|\leq1 and z_{12}(0)\neq-1, then the solution z_{12}(t) to (16) satisfies

    |1-z_{12}(t)|\lesssim e^{-Kt}.

    Proof. By integrating (16) we obtain

    z_{12}(t)=\frac{(1+z_{12}(0))e^{Kt}-(1-z_{12}(0))}{(1+z_{12}(0))e^{Kt}+(1-z_{12}(0))}.

    By using the Lemma above it is then possible to show the complete synchronization for the W-L model (14).

    Theorem 4.2. Let (w_1, w_2, w_{12}) be a solution to (14) with initial data (w_1(0), w_2(0), w_{12}(0))=(w_1^0, w_2^0, w_{12}^0) such that

    \int w_1^0(x, p)\,dxdp=\int w_2^0(x, p)\,dxdp=1,

    and

    \Big|\int w_{12}^0(x, p)\,dxdp \Big|\leq1,\int w_{12}^0(x, p)\,dxdp\neq-1.

    Then we have

    \|w_1(t)-w_2(t)\|_{L^2}^2\leq e^{-Kt}, \ \ as\ \ \;t\to\infty.

    Proof. It follows from (14) that it is possible to write down the equation for the difference w_1-w_2,

    \partial_t(w_1-w_2)+p\cdot\nabla_x(w_1-w_2)+\Theta[V](w_1-w_2)=-\frac{Kr_{12}}{2}(w_1-w_2).

    By multiplying it by 2(w_1-w_2) and by integrating over the whole phase space we obtain

    \frac{d}{dt}\|w_1(t)-w_2(t)\|_{L^2}^2=-Kr_{12}(t)\|w_1(t)-w_2(t)\|_{L^2}^2.

    By Lemma 4.1 we know that |1-r_{12}(t)|\lesssim e^{-Kt}, hence by Gronwall's inequality we obtain the synchronization result.

    Remark 3. In Theorem 4.2 the case \int w_{12}^0\,dxdp=-1 has been excluded. This case can be treated under the additional hypothesis w_1^0=w_2^0=-w_{12}^0, which can be interpreted as a natural consistency assumption with the analogue Schrödinger-Lohe model. Indeed, let us consider initial wave functions \psi_1^0, \psi_2^0\in L^2, such that \|\psi_1^0\|_{L^2}=\|\psi_2^0\|_{L^2}=1 and \langle\psi_1^0, \psi_2^0\rangle=\int w[\psi_1^0, \psi_2^0]\,dxdp=\int w_{12}^0\,dxdp=-1, then \psi_1^0=-\psi_2^0 and hence w[\psi_1^0]=w[\psi_2^0]=-w[\psi_1^0, \psi_2^0]. In this particular case, w_1, w_2, w_{12} in (14) evolve independently, according to the free Wigner equation

    \partial_tw+p\cdot\nabla_x w+\Theta[V]w=0. (17)

    To see that, first of all we notice that w_1, w_2 both satisfy the same equation with the same initial data, so they coincide. Moreover, under the above assumptions on the initial data, we have z_{12}(0)=-1 and hence z_{12}(t)=-1 for all t>0. Consequently we have

    \partial_tw_{12}+p\cdot\nabla_x w_{12}+\Theta[V]w_{12}=\frac{K}{2}(w_1-w_{12})

    and hence

    \|w_1(t)+w_{12}(t)\|_{L^2}=\|w_1(0)+w_{12}(0)\|_{L^2}=0.

    Concluding, we see that the right hand sides in (14) are all zero and the dynamics is determined by (17). This case corresponds to complete decorrelation between the quantum nodes.

    In this Section, we derive the hydrodynamic equations associated to the Schrödinger-Lohe model (4). Here we follow the approach developed in [2,3,4] where a polar factorisation method is exploited in order to define the hydrodynamical quantities also in the vacuum region. In order to simplify the exposition we mainly focus on the case of two identical oscillators. In this case the Schrödinger-Lohe model reads

    \left\{\begin{aligned} {\mathrm i} \partial_t\psi_1=&-\frac12\Delta\psi_1+V\psi_1+ \frac{{\mathrm i} K}{4}(\psi_2-\langle\psi_2, \psi_1\rangle\psi_1)\\ {\mathrm i} \partial_t\psi_2=&-\frac12\Delta\psi_2+V\psi_2+ \frac{{\mathrm i}K}{4}(\psi_1-\langle\psi_1, \psi_2, \rangle\psi_2). \end{aligned}\right. (18)

    The case with N non-identical oscillators can be treated similarly with obvious modifications, but the study of this special case will simplify substantially the exposition.

    In order to derive the hydrodynamics associated to system (18), we first need to ensure that it is globally well-posed in H^1(\mathbb R^d). This is indeed a straightforward application of the standard theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equations [10], see for example Proposition 2.1 in [5]. Furthermore, let us notice that by defining z_{12}(t)=\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle(t), then this function satisfies the ODE (16). This is not surprising because the W-L model was indeed derived from (18) and because of the property \int w[\psi_1, \psi_2]\,dxdp=\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle. This implies that, under the same assumptions of Lemma 4.1, in this case we also have

    |1-z_{12}(t)|\lesssim e^{-Kt}.

    However, this synchronization result is too weak to be exploited for quantum hydrodynamic system derived from (18). Indeed, as we already remarked above, the natural space for the hydrodynamics is the finite energy space, namely H^1 for the wave functions. Hence we need to improve the result in the space of energy. Here we will make use of Theorem 4.5 in [5], where we address the reader for more general results in this direction.

    Let us now consider the solution (\psi_1, \psi_2)\in\mathcal C(\mathbb R _+;H^1) to system (18), given by Proposition 2.1 in [5]. To derive the hydrodynamic system associated with (18), we first define the mass densities, namely \rho_1=|\psi_1|^2 and \rho_2=|\psi_2|^2. By differentiating those quantities with respect to time and by using the equations above, we obtain

    \left\{\begin{aligned} \partial_t\rho_1+{\rm{div}} J_1=&\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_1),\\ \partial_t\rho_2+{\rm{div}} J_2=&\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_2), \end{aligned}\right.

    where the associated current densities are respectively given by

    J_1 :={\rm Im} \ (\bar\psi_1\nabla\psi_1), J_2 :={\rm Im} \ (\bar\psi_2\nabla\psi_2).

    Furthermore, in the equation for the mass density we also find the interaction term \rho_{12}={\rm Re} \ (\bar\psi_1\psi_2), so that r_{12}={\rm Re} \ \langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle=\int\rho_{12}\,dx.

    Let us notice that \rho_{12} is not a mass density, since in general it can also be negative. By using those definitions we can derive the evolution equations for the current densities J_1 and J_2. For instance, by differentiating J_1 with respect to time we find that

    \partial_tJ_1+{\rm{div}}({\rm Re} \ (\nabla\bar\psi_1\otimes\nabla\psi_1))+\rho_1\nabla V=\frac14\nabla\Delta\rho_1+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_1),

    where the new interaction term here is given by

    J_{12}=\frac12{\rm Im} \ (\bar\psi_1\nabla\psi_2+\bar\psi_2\nabla\psi_1).

    Next, we use the polar factorisation Lemma in [2,3] to infer that, for \psi_1\in H^1(\mathbb R ^d), we have

    {\rm Re} \ (\nabla\bar\psi_1\otimes\nabla\psi_1)=\nabla\sqrt{\rho_1}\otimes\nabla\sqrt{\rho_1}+\Lambda_1\otimes\Lambda_1, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \textrm{a.e. in }\mathbb R ^d,

    where \sqrt{\rho_1}=|\psi_1|, \Lambda_1={\rm Im} \ (\bar\phi_1\nabla\psi_1), \phi_1 is the polar factor for the wave function \psi_1 and we have \sqrt{\rho_1}\Lambda_1=J_1, see [2,3,4] for more details on the polar factorisation. In this way we can write down the following equation for the current density J_1:

    \partial_tJ_1+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_1\otimes J_1}{\rho_1}\right)+\rho_1\nabla V=\frac12\rho_1\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_1}}{\sqrt{\rho_1}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_1).

    By using the equation for \psi_2 we obtain an analogous equation for J_2:

    \partial_tJ_2+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_2\otimes J_2}{\rho_2}\right)+\rho_2\nabla V=\frac12\rho_2\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_2}}{\sqrt{\rho_2}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_2).

    Resuming, by defining the hydrodynamical quantities \rho_1, J_1, \rho_2, J_2 associated to \psi_1, \psi_2, respectively, we can derive the following system:

    \left\{\begin{aligned} &\partial_t\rho_1+{\rm{div}} J_1=\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_1),\\ &\partial_t\rho_2+{\rm{div}} J_2=\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_2),\\ &\partial_tJ_1+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_1\otimes J_1}{\rho_1}\right)+\rho_1\nabla V=\frac12\rho_1\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_1}}{\sqrt{\rho_1}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_1),\\ &\partial_tJ_2+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_2\otimes J_2}{\rho_2}\right)+\rho_2\nabla V=\frac12\rho_2\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_2}}{\sqrt{\rho_2}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_2). \end{aligned}\right.

    Note that the above hydrodynamical system is not closed, as we need to derive also the evolution equations for the quantities \rho_{12}, J_{12}. However, it is quite troublesome to derive a hydrodynamical equation for the quantity J_{12}. For this reason we consider the following auxiliary variables

    \rho_d :=|\psi_1-\psi_2|^2, \ \ \ \ \ \ J_d :={\rm Im} \ ((\overline{\psi_1-\psi_2})\nabla(\psi_1-\psi_2)).

    By using those variables, it is straightforward to derive their dynamical equations,

    \begin{aligned} \partial_t\rho_d=&2{\rm Re} \ \left\{(\overline{\psi_1-\psi_2})\left(\frac{i}{2}\Delta(\psi_1-\psi_2)-iV(\psi_1-\psi_2)\right.\right.\\ &+\left.\left.\frac{K}{4}(\psi_2-\psi_1-\langle\psi_2, \psi_1\rangle\psi_1+\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle\psi_2)\right)\right\}\\ =&-{\rm{div}} J_d+\frac{K}{2}{\rm Re} \ \left\{(\overline{\psi_1-\psi_2})\left((1+\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle)(\psi_2-\psi_1)+2i{\rm Im} \ \langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle\psi_1\right)\right\}\\ =&-{\rm{div}} J_d-\frac{K}{2}(1+r_{12})\rho_d+Ks_{12}\sigma_{12}, \end{aligned}

    where we denoted \sigma_{12}={\rm Im} \ (\bar\psi_1\psi_2), so that

    s_{12}={\rm Im} \ \langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle=\int_{\mathbb R ^d} \sigma_{12}\,dx.

    Define \psi_d :=\psi_1-\psi_2, then by following some similar calculations as before we find out

    \begin{aligned} \partial_tJ_d=&-\frac12{\rm Re} \ (\Delta\bar\psi_d\nabla\psi_d-\bar\psi_d\nabla\Delta\psi_d)-\rho_d\nabla V\\ &+\frac{K}{4}\left[-2J_d+{\rm Im} \ \left(\langle\psi_2, \psi_1\rangle(-\bar\psi_1\nabla\psi_d+\bar\psi_d\nabla\psi_2)\right.\right.\\ &+\left.\left.\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle(\bar\psi_2\nabla\psi_d-\bar\psi_d\nabla\psi_1)\right)\right]. \end{aligned}

    After some simple algebra, we obtain that

    \begin{aligned} {\rm Im} \ &\left(\langle\psi_2, \psi_1\rangle(-\bar\psi_1\nabla\psi_d+\bar\psi_d\nabla\psi_2)+\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle(\bar\psi_2\nabla\psi_d-\bar\psi_d\nabla\psi_1)\right)\\ =&-2r_{12}J_d-4s_{12}G_{12}, \end{aligned}

    where G_{12} :=\frac12{\rm Re} \ (\bar\psi_2\nabla\psi_1-\bar\psi_1\nabla\psi_2). Hence the equation for J_d is given by

    \partial_tJ_d+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_d\otimes J_d}{\rho_d}\right)+\rho_d\nabla V=\frac12\rho_d\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_d}}{\sqrt{\rho_d}}\right)-\frac{K}{2}\left((1+r_{12})J_d+2s_{12}G_{12}\right).

    Once again, to close the hydrodynamic equations, we still need to determine the evolution for \sigma_{12}, G_{12}. As before, the equation derived for G_{12} would be too involved, for this reason we alternatively define \psi_a=\psi_1-{\mathrm i}\psi_2 and its hydrodynamical quantities \rho_a=\frac12|\psi_a|^2, J_a=\frac12{\rm Im} \ (\bar\psi_a\nabla\psi_a). If we write down the equation for \psi_a,

    i\partial_t\psi_a=-\frac12\Delta\psi_a+V\psi_a+\frac{K}{4}\left(i\psi_2+\psi_1-i\langle\psi_2, \psi_1\rangle\psi_1-\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle\psi_2\right),

    we can then infer the equations for \rho_a and J_a. By proceeding as before with some straightforward but long calculations, we find out

    \begin{aligned} &\partial_t\rho_a+{\rm{div}} J_a=\frac{K}{2}\left((1-s_{12})\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_a\right)\\ &\partial_tJ_a+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_a\otimes J_a}{\rho_a}\right)+\rho_a\nabla V=\frac12\rho_a\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_a}}{\sqrt{\rho_a}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}\Big((1-s_{12})J_{12}-r_{12}J_a\Big). \end{aligned}

    We can now resume and write down the whole set of hydrodynamic equations associated to the Schrödinger-Lohe system (18):

    \begin{aligned} &\partial_t\rho_1+{\rm{div}} J_1=\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_1)\\ &\partial_t\rho_2+{\rm{div}} J_2=\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_2),\\ &\partial_tJ_1+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_1\otimes J_1}{\rho_1}\right)+\rho_1\nabla V=\frac12\rho_1\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_1}}{\sqrt{\rho_1}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_1),\\ &\partial_tJ_2+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_2\otimes J_2}{\rho_2}\right)+\rho_2\nabla V=\frac12\rho_2\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_2}}{\sqrt{\rho_2}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_2),\\ &\partial_t\rho_d+{\rm{div}} J_d=-\frac{K}{2}(1+r_{12})\rho_d+Ks_{12}\sigma_{12},\\ &\partial_tJ_d+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_d\otimes J_d}{\rho_d}\right)+\rho_d\nabla V=\frac12\rho_d\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_d}}{\sqrt{\rho_d}}\right)-\frac{K}{2}\left((1+r_{12})J_d+2s_{12}G_{12}\right),\\ &\partial_t\rho_a+{\rm{div}} J_a=\frac{K}{2}\left((1-s_{12})\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_a\right)\\ &\partial_tJ_a+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_a\otimes J_a}{\rho_a}\right)+\rho_a\nabla V=\frac12\rho_a\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_a}}{\sqrt{\rho_a}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}\left((1-s_{12})J_{12}-r_{12}J_a\right), \end{aligned} (19)

    where

    \rho_{12} :=\frac12(\rho_1+\rho_2-\rho_d), J_{12} :=\frac12(J_1+J_2-J_d),
    \sigma_{12} :=\rho_a -\frac{1}{2}(\rho_1+\rho_2), G_{12} :=J_a-\frac{1}{2}(J_1+J_2).

    By considering the system (19) above we can now prove the synchronization property. In view of the previous synchronization results we expect that

    \lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\left(\|\nabla\sqrt{\rho_1}-\nabla\sqrt{\rho_2}\|_{L^2}+\|\Lambda_1-\Lambda_2\|_{L^2}\right)=0

    and furthermore

    \lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\left(\|\nabla\sqrt{\rho_d}\|_{L^2}+\|\Lambda_d\|_{L^2}\right)=0.

    To show the above properties we are going to use a synchronization result in H^1 for system (18) given in [5], which will be stated in the following Theorem. The result below actually holds in a more general case, see [5] for more details, however here we will only state the synchronization property we are going to use for our system (19).

    Theorem 5.1. [5] Let (\psi^0_{1}, \psi^0_{2})\in H^1 be such that

    \langle\psi^0_{1}, \psi^0_{2}\rangle\neq-1.

    Then, for the solution (\psi_1, \psi_2)\in\mathcal C(\mathbb R _+;H^1) emanated from such initial data, we have

    \|\psi_1(t)-\psi_2(t)\|_{H^1}\lesssim e^{-Kt}, \ \ as \ \ \;t\to\infty. (20)

    We apply now this result for the synchronization of system (19), First of all, from (20) we then infer that

    \lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\|\psi_d(t)\|_{H^1}=0.

    This and the polar factorisation Lemma 3 in [3] then readily implies that

    \lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\left(\|\nabla\sqrt{\rho_d}(t)\|_{L^2}+\|\Lambda_d(t)\|_{L^2}\right)=0.

    Furthermore, from the fact that \psi_d\to0 in H^1 as t\to\infty and the polar factorisation Lemma, again, we can also show that

    \lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\left(\|\nabla\sqrt{\rho_1}(t)-\nabla\sqrt{\rho_2}(t)\|_{L^2}+\|\Lambda_1(t)-\Lambda_2(t)\|_{L^2}\right)=0.
    [1] The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. (2005) 77: 137-185.
    [2] The quantum hydrodynamics system in two space dimensions. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. (2012) 203: 499-527.
    [3] On the finite weak solutions to a system in quantum fluid dynamics. Comm. Math. Phys. (2009) 287: 657-686.
    [4] P. Antonelli and P. Marcati, Some results on systems for quantum fluids, in Recent Advances in Partial Differential Equations and Applications an International Conference (in honor of H. Beirão da Veiga's 70th birthday), ed. by V. D. Radulescu, A. Sequeira, V. A. Solonnikov. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 666 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2016).
    [5] P. Antonelli and P. Marcati, A model of Synchronization over Quantum Networks, J. Phys. A. , 50 (2017), 315101. doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/aa79c9
    [6] A shocking display of synchrony. Physica D (2000) 143: 21-55.
    [7] Biology of synchronous flashing of fireflies. Nature (1966) 211: 562-564.
    [8] Some remarks on the Wigner transform and the Wigner-Poisson system. Matematiche (1991) 46: 429-438.
    [9] The three-dimensional Wigner-Poisson problem: Existence, uniqueness and appproximation. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (1991) 14: 35-61.
    [10] T. Cazenave, Semilinear Schrödinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol. 10, New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, AMS, 2003. doi: 10.1090/cln/010
    [11] S. -H. Choi, J. Cho and S. -Y. Ha Practical quantum synchronization for the Schrödinger-Lohe system, J. Phys. A, 49 (2016), 205203, 17pp. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/49/20/205203
    [12] S. -H. Choi and S. -Y. Ha, Quantum synchronization of the Schrödinger-Lohe model, J. Phys. A, 47 (2014), 355104, 16pp. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/47/35/355104
    [13] Asymptotic formation and orbital stability of phase-locked states for the Kuramoto model. Physica D (2012) 241: 735-754.
    [14] L. -M. Duan, B. Wang and H. J. Kimble, Robust quantum gates on neutral atoms with cavityassisted photon scattering. Phys. Rev. A, 72 (2005), 032333. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032333
    [15] Dynamical system approach to synchronization of the coupled Schrödinger-Lohe system. Quart. Appl. Math. (2017) 75: 555-579.
    [16] Emergence of phase-locked states for the Kuramoto model in a large coupling regime. Commun. Math. Sci. (2016) 14: 1073-1091.
    [17] Interplay of inertia and heterogeneous dynamics in an ensemble of Kuramoto oscillators. Analysis and Applications (2017) 15: 837-861.
    [18] Practical synchronization of generalized Kuramoto system with an intrinsic dynamics. Netw. Heterog. Media (2015) 10: 787-807.
    [19] uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of Wigner-Poisson and VlasovPoisson systems: A survey. Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. (1997) 26: 195-207.
    [20] Global existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of solutions of the Wigner-Poisson and Schrödinger-Poisson systems. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (1994) 17: 349-376.
    [21] Dispersion and moment lemmas revisited. J. Diff. Eq. (1999) 156: 254-281.
    [22] Homogenization limits and Wigner transforms. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (1997) 50: 323-379.
    [23] I. Goychuk, J. Casado-Pascual, M. Morillo, J. Lehmann and P. Hänggi, , Quantum stochastic synchronization, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 97 (2006), 210601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.210601
    [24] G. L. Giorgi, F. Galve, G. Manzano, P. Colet and R. Zambrini, Quantum correlations and mutual synchronization, Phys. Rev. A, 85 (2012), 052101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.052101
    [25] The quantum internet. Nature (2008) 453: 1023-1030.
    [26] Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence, Springer-Verlag. Berlin. 1984. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-69689-3
    [27] Y. Kuramoto, International symposium on mathematical problems in mathematical physics, Lecture Notes in Theoretical Physics, 30 (1975), p420.
    [28] M. A. Lohe, Quantum synchronization over quantum networks, J. Phys. A, 43 (2010), 465301, 20pp. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/43/46/465301
    [29] M. A. Lohe, Non-Abelian Kuramoto model and synchronization, J. Phys. A, 42 (2009), 395101, 25pp. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/42/39/395101
    [30] Quantum synchronization effects in intrinsic Josephson junctions. Physica C (2008) 468: 689-694.
    [31] Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form. Z. Phys. (1927) 40: 322-326.
    [32] On the equivalence of the Schrödinger and the quantum Liouville equation. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (1989) 11: 459-469.
    [33] C. S. Peskin, Mathematical Aspects of Heart Physiology, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York, 1975.
    [34] The one-dimensional Wigner-Poisson problem and a relation to the SchrödingerPoisson problem. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (1991) 22: 957-972.
    [35] From Kuramoto to Crawford: Exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators. Physica D (2000) 143: 1-20.
    [36] Superinsulator and quantum synchronization. Nature (2008) 452: 613-615.
    [37] Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators. J. Theor. Biol. (1967) 16: 15-42.
    [38] On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium. Part Ⅰ: Physical Chemistry. Part Ⅱ: Solid State Physics (1997) 110-120.
    [39] O. V. Zhirov and D. L. Shepelyansky, Quantum synchronization and entanglement of two qubits coupled to a driven dissipative resonator, Phys. Rev. B, 80 (2009), 014519. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB. 80. 014519
    [40] Quantum synchronization. Eur. Phys. J. D (2006) 38: 375-379.
    [41] The Wigner transform and the Wigner-Poisson system. Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. (1993) 22: 459-484.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Emergence of synchronous behaviors for the Schrödinger–Lohe model with frustration, 2019, 32, 0951-7715, 4609, 10.1088/1361-6544/ab3626
    2. M A Lohe, Higher-dimensional generalizations of the Watanabe–Strogatz transform for vector models of synchronization, 2018, 51, 1751-8113, 225101, 10.1088/1751-8121/aac030
    3. Hyungjin Huh, Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Asymptotic behavior and stability for the Schrödinger-Lohe model, 2018, 59, 0022-2488, 102701, 10.1063/1.5041463
    4. Seung-Yeal Ha, Gyuyoung Hwang, Dohyun Kim, On the complete aggregation of the Wigner-Lohe model for identical potentials, 2022, 17, 1556-1801, 665, 10.3934/nhm.2022022
    5. Weizhu Bao, Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Qinglin Tang, Collective synchronization of the multi-component Gross–Pitaevskii–Lohe system, 2019, 400, 01672789, 132158, 10.1016/j.physd.2019.132158
    6. M. A. Lohe, Systems of matrix Riccati equations, linear fractional transformations, partial integrability and synchronization, 2019, 60, 0022-2488, 072701, 10.1063/1.5085248
    7. Paolo Antonelli, David N. Reynolds, Schrödinger-Lohe type models of quantum synchronization with nonidentical oscillators, 2023, 366, 00220396, 345, 10.1016/j.jde.2023.04.017
    8. Seung-Yeal Ha, Gyuyoung Hwang, Dohyun Kim, On the semiclassical limit of the Schrödinger-Lohe model and concentration estimates, 2024, 65, 0022-2488, 10.1063/5.0194571
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5160) PDF downloads(258) Cited by(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog