We present the Wigner-Lohe model for quantum synchronization which can be derived from the Schrödinger-Lohe model using the Wigner formalism. For identical one-body potentials, we provide a priori sufficient framework leading the complete synchronization, in which L2-distances between all wave functions tend to zero asymptotically.
Citation: Paolo Antonelli, Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Pierangelo Marcati. The Wigner-Lohe model for quantum synchronization and its emergent dynamics[J]. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(3): 403-416. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017018
[1] | Seung-Yeal Ha, Gyuyoung Hwang, Dohyun Kim . On the complete aggregation of the Wigner-Lohe model for identical potentials. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2022, 17(5): 665-686. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2022022 |
[2] | Paolo Antonelli, Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Pierangelo Marcati . The Wigner-Lohe model for quantum synchronization and its emergent dynamics. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(3): 403-416. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017018 |
[3] | Santosh Kumar Henge, Gitanjali Jayaraman, M Sreedevi, R Rajakumar, Mamoon Rashid, Sultan S. Alshamrani, Mrim M. Alnfiai, Ahmed Saeed AlGhamdi . Secure keys data distribution based user-storage-transit server authentication process model using mathematical post-quantum cryptography methodology. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(3): 1313-1334. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023057 |
[4] | Seung-Yeal Ha, Gyuyoung Hwang, Hansol Park . Emergent behaviors of Lohe Hermitian sphere particles under time-delayed interactions. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(3): 459-492. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021013 |
[5] | Seung-Yeal Ha, Jaeseung Lee, Zhuchun Li . Emergence of local synchronization in an ensemble of heterogeneous Kuramoto oscillators. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(1): 1-24. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017001 |
[6] | Tingting Zhu . Emergence of synchronization in Kuramoto model with frustration under general network topology. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2022, 17(2): 255-291. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2022005 |
[7] | Tingting Zhu . Synchronization of the generalized Kuramoto model with time delay and frustration. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(4): 1772-1798. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023077 |
[8] | Robert Carlson . Dirichlet to Neumann maps for infinite quantum graphs. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7(3): 483-501. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.483 |
[9] | Hyungjin Huh . Remarks on the Schrödinger-Lohe model. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14(4): 759-769. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019030 |
[10] | Sergei Avdonin, Julian Edward . An inverse problem for quantum trees with observations at interior vertices. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(2): 317-339. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021008 |
We present the Wigner-Lohe model for quantum synchronization which can be derived from the Schrödinger-Lohe model using the Wigner formalism. For identical one-body potentials, we provide a priori sufficient framework leading the complete synchronization, in which L2-distances between all wave functions tend to zero asymptotically.
Synchronization represents a phenomenon in which rhythms of weakly coupled oscillators are adjusted to the common frequency due to their weak interactions. It is often observed in many complex systems, e.g., the flashing of fireflies, clapping of hands in a concert hall, and heartbeat regulation by pacemaker cells, etc., [1,6,7,33,35]. However, rigorous mathematical treatment of such collective phenomena were begun only several decades ago by two scientists Winfree [37] and Kuramoto [26,27]. For the mathematical modeling of synchronization, they adopted a continuous dynamical system approach based on their heuristic and intuitive arguments. In this paper, we are mainly interested in quantum Lohe oscillators with all-to-all couplings under one-body potential. To fix the idea, consider a classical complete network consisting of
Let
i∂tψi=−12Δψi+Viψi+iK2NN∑k=1(‖ψi‖ψk‖ψk‖−⟨ψk,ψi⟩ψi‖ψi‖‖ψk‖),1≤i≤N, | (1) |
where
Our main purpose of this paper is to present a quantum kinetic analogue of the S-L model (1) and study its emergent dynamics. The study on the quantum kinetic model for the Schrödinger equation dates back to Wigner's paper [38], in which Wigner considered the quantum mechanical motion of a large ensemble of electrons in a vacuum under the action of the Coulomb force generated by the charge of the electrons. For the modeling of large ensemble, he introduced a quasi one-particle distribution function, so called the Wigner function and showed that it satisfies the quantum Liouville equation [8,9,19,20,32,41].
Before we briefly describe our main results, we first recall the Wigner transform of wave function on
Definition 1.1. For any two wave functions
w[ψ,ϕ](x,p)=1(2π)d∫Rdeiy⋅pˉψ(x+y2)ϕ(x−y2)dy. |
If we choose
In order to shorten the formulas, we are going to introduce the following notation: if
wj:=w[ψj], wjk:=w[ψj,ψk], w+jk:=Re wjk and w−jk:=Im wjk. |
Our main results of this paper are as follows. First, we show that the Wigner transforms
{∂twj+p⋅∇xwj+Θ[V](wj)=KNN∑k=1[w+jk−(∫w+jkdpdx)wj],∂tw+jk+p⋅∇xw+jk+Θ[V](w+jk)=K2NN∑ℓ=1[w+jℓ+w+ℓk−(∫(w+jℓ+w+ℓk)dpdx)w+jk+(∫(w−jℓ+w−ℓk)dpdx)w−jk],∂tw−jk+p⋅∇xw−jk+Θ[V](w−jk)=K2NN∑ℓ=1[w−jℓ+w−ℓk−(∫(w+jℓ+w+ℓk)dpdx)w−jk+(∫(w−jℓ+w−ℓk)dpdx)w+jk]. | (2) |
Second, we derive a sufficient condition for the complete synchronization of the coupled system (2). Finally, we also investigate the hydrodynamic formulation for the Schrödinger-Lohe system (1) and derive synchronization estimates in some special cases.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the Schrödinger-Lohe model for quantum synchronization and discuss previous works on the complete synchronization of the S-L model. In Section 3, we derive our augmented Wigner-Lohe model from the S-L model using the Wigner transform. In Section 4, we present a priori complete synchronization estimates for some restricted class of initial data. In Section 5, we also discuss a hydrodynamic model which can be obtained from the S-L model for two-oscillator case.
In this section, we briefly present the Schrödinger-Lohe (S-L) model for Lohe synchronization, and review earlier results on the synchronization problem for the S-L model.
As a phenomenological model for the quantum synchronization generalizing classical Kuramoto synchronization, Lohe proposed a coupled Schrödinger-type model in [28]. For
i∂tψi=−12Δψi+Viψi+iK2NN∑k=1(‖ψi‖ψk‖ψk‖−⟨ψk,ψi⟩ψi‖ψi‖‖ψk‖), | (3) |
where we normalized
Lemma 2.1. [28] Let
‖ψi(t)‖=‖ψ0i‖fort≥0, 1≤i≤N. |
In view of the previous lemma, from now on we will assume that
i∂tψj=−12Δψj+Vjψj+iK2NN∑k=1(ψk−⟨ψk,ψj⟩ψj). | (4) |
For the space-homogeneous case, we set the spatial domain to be a periodic domain
Vi(x)=Ωi:constant, ψi(t,x)=ψi(t),(t,x)∈R+×Td. |
system (3) can be reduced to the Kuramoto model which is a prototype model for classical synchronization. In this special setting, the S-L model becomes
idψidt=Ωiψi+iK2NN∑k=1(|ψi|ψk|ψk|−⟨ψi,ψk⟩ψi|ψi||ψk|). | (5) |
We next simply take the ansatz for
ψi:=e−iθi,1≤i≤N | (6) |
and substitute this ansatz into (5) to obtain
˙θiψi=Ωiψi+iK2NN∑k=1(ψk−e−i(θi−θk)ψi). |
Then, we take the inner product of the above relation with
˙θi=Ωi+KNN∑k=1sin(θk−θi). | (7) |
Thus, the S-L model can be viewed as a quantum generalization of the Kuramoto model.
In this subsection, we briefly review the previous results [11,12,15,5] on the complete synchronization of the S-L model. For this, we first recall the definition of the complete synchronization as follows.
Definition 2.2. Let
∃ limt→∞⟨ψi,ψj⟩=αij∈C. | (8) |
Remark 1. For the classical phase models such as (7), asymptotic phase-locking is defined as the following condition:
∃ limt→∞|θi(t)−θj(t)|=θ∞ij. | (9) |
Via the relation (6), we can see that (8) and (9) are closely related. In fact, in [12] for identical potentials
limt→∞‖ψi(t)−ψj(t)‖=0,1≤i,j≤N. | (10) |
Note that the condition (10) and normalization condition
limt→∞⟨ψi(t),ψj(t)⟩=1. |
Thus, the condition (10) satisfies the condition (8). Recently, in [5,15] the case with different one-body potentials was treated, at least for
As mentioned in the Introduction, the S-L model was first considered in Lohe's work [28] for the non-Abelian generalization of the Kuramoto model. However, the first rigorous mathematical studies of the S-L model were treated by the second author and his collaborators in [12,15] in two different methodologies. The first methodology is to use
D(Ψ):=maxi,j||ψi−ψj||. |
In [12], authors derived a differential inequality for the diameter
ddtD(Ψ)≤K(D(Ψ))(D(Ψ)−12),t>0. |
This leads to an exponential synchronization of the (1).
Theorem 2.3. [12] Suppose that the coupling strength and initial data satisfy
K>0,Vi=V,‖ψ0i‖L2=1,1≤i≤N,D(Ψ0)<12. |
Then, for any solution
D(Ψ(t))≤D(Ψ0)D(Ψ0)+(1−2D(Ψ0))eKt,t≥0. |
Remark 2. For distinct one-body potentials, we do not have an asymptotic phase-locking estimate for the S-L model yet, however in [11], for some restricted class of initial data and large coupling strength, a weaker concept of synchronization, namely practical synchronization estimates have been obtained:
limK→∞lim supt→∞maxi,j||ψi−ψj||=0. |
On the other hand, at least in the two oscillator case, it is possible to improve considerably the practical synchronization result: indeed in [5,15] a complete picture of different regimes is shown, where the system (4) exhibits complete synchronization or dephasing, i.e. time periodic orbits for the correlation function.
Recently, an alternative approach to prove synchronization for the S-L model was proposed both in [5] and [15], by using a finite dimensional reduction. More precisely, in both papers the authors consider the correlations between the wave functions,
zjk(t):=⟨ψj,ψk⟩(t)=rjk(t)+isjk(t), | (11) |
and they study their asymptotic behavior. Moreover, in [5] the introduction of the order parameter, defined in analogy with the classical Kuramoto model, allows to give a more general result.
Theorem 2.4. [5] Let
N∑k=1Re zjk(0)>0, for any j=1,…,N. | (12) |
Then we have
|1−zjk(t)|≲ |
As we will see in the next sections, the same approach used in [5,15] will also be exploited to infer the synchronization results for the Wigner-Lohe model (13) and the hydrodynamical system (19). More precisely, for the quantum hydrodynamic system (19) we are going to need also some synchronization estimates proved at the
In this section we present a kinetic quantum analogue "the Wigner-Lohe (W-L) model" for the quantum synchronization, which can be derived from the Schrödinger-Lohe (S-L) model [28,29] via the Wigner transform. In this and following sections, we assume that all one-body potentials are identical
V_j(x)=V(x),1\leq j\leq N. |
Recall that for a given a solution
i\partial_t\psi=-\frac12\Delta\psi+V\psi, |
then its Wigner transform
\partial_tw+p\cdot\nabla_xw+\Theta[V]w=0, |
where the operator
\Theta[V](w)(x, p) :=-\frac{i}{(2\pi)^d}\int e^{i(p-p')\cdot y}\left(V\left(x+\frac{y}{2}\right)-V\left(x-\frac{y}{2}\right)\right)w(x, p')\,dp'dy. |
Hence, to derive the Wigner-Lohe system (2) we just need to see how the nonlocal coupling in (4) translates at the Wigner level. More precisely, let
\partial_tw_j+p\cdot\nabla w_j+\Theta[V]w_j=R_j, |
where the remainder term
\begin{aligned} R_j=&\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N\int e^{ip\cdot y}\Big[ \bar\psi_k\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)\psi_j\left(t, x-\frac{y}{2}\right) \cr &+\bar\psi_j\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)\psi_k\left(t, x-\frac{y}{2}\right)\Big]\,dy -\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N2r_{jk}w_j\\ =&\frac{K}{N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N\left(w_{jk}^+-r_{jk}w_j\right), \end{aligned} |
where
\int w[f, g](x, p)\,dxdp=\langle f, g\rangle, |
for any
\partial_tw_j+p\cdot\nabla_xw_j+\Theta[V]w_j=\frac{K}{N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N\left(w_{jk}^+-r_{jk}w_j\right). |
We now need to derive the equation for
\partial_tw_{jk}+p\cdot\nabla_xw_{jk}+\Theta[V]w_{jk}=R_{jk}, |
where
\begin{aligned} R_{jk}=&\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N\int e^{iy\cdot p}\left(\bar\psi_\ell\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)\psi_k\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)+\bar\psi_j\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)\psi_\ell \right.\\ &\left.\left(t, x+\frac{y}{2}\right)\right)\,dy-\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N\left(z_{j\ell}w_{jk}+z_{\ell k}w_{jk}\right). \end{aligned} |
Let us recall that
R_{jk}=\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N\left(w_{j\ell}+w_{\ell k}-(z_{j\ell}+z_{\ell k})w_{jk}\right) |
and the equation for
\partial_tw_{jk}+p\cdot\nabla w_{jk}+\Theta[V]w_{jk}=\frac{K}{2N}\sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N\left(w_{j\ell}+w_{\ell k}-(z_{j\ell}+z_{\ell k})w_{jk}\right). |
By using definitions for
\label{W-L} \begin{cases} \displaystyle \partial_t w_j+ p \cdot \nabla_x w_j \Theta[V]w_j = \frac{K}{N} \sum\limits_{k=1}^N \Big( w^+_{jk} - r_{jk}w_j\Big),\\ \displaystyle \partial_t w^+_{jk} + p \cdot \nabla_x w^+_{jk} \Theta[V](w^+_{jk}) \\ \displaystyle \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ = \frac{K}{2N} \sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N \Big[w^+_{j\ell}+w^+_{\ell k}-(r_{j\ell}+r_{\ell k})w^+_{jk} -i(s_{j\ell}+s_{\ell k}) w^-_{jk} \Big], \\ \displaystyle \partial_t w^-_{jk} + p \cdot \nabla_x w^-_{jk} \Theta[V](w^-_{jk}) \\ \displaystyle \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ = \frac{K}{2N} \sum\limits_{\ell=1}^N \Big[w^-_{j\ell}+w^-_{\ell k}-(r_{j\ell}+R_{\ell k})w^-_{jk} -i(s_{j\ell}+s_{\ell k}) w^+_{jk} \Big], \\ \end{cases} | (13) |
In this section, we focus on the Wigner-Lohe model with
\left\{\begin{aligned} &\partial_tw_1+p\cdot\nabla_xw_1+\Theta[V]w_1=\frac{K}{2}(w_{12}^+-r_{12}w_1), \\ &\partial_tw_2+p\cdot\nabla_x w_2+\Theta[V]w_2=\frac{K}{2}(w_{12}^+-r_{12}w_2), \\ &\partial_tw_{12}+p\cdot\nabla_xw_{12}+\Theta[V]w_{12}=\frac{K}{4}(w_1+w_2-2z_{12}w_{12}), \end{aligned}\right. | (14) |
where we have
w_{12}^+={\rm Re} \ w_{12}, \ \ \ z_{12}=z_{12}(t)=\int w_{12}\,dxdp, \ \ \ r_{12}={\rm Re} \ z_{12}. | (15) |
Let us remark that the system (14), complemented with the definitions (15) above, can be considered independently on the S-L system (4). For such a system we will prescribe initial data
Let us now prove the synchronization for (14). First of all we remark that, by integrating the last equation over the whole phase space, we find the following ODE
\dot z_{12}=\frac{K}{2}(1-z_{12}^2), | (16) |
for which it is straightforward to give its asymptotic behavior.
Lemma 4.1. Let
|1-z_{12}(t)|\lesssim e^{-Kt}. |
Proof. By integrating (16) we obtain
z_{12}(t)=\frac{(1+z_{12}(0))e^{Kt}-(1-z_{12}(0))}{(1+z_{12}(0))e^{Kt}+(1-z_{12}(0))}. |
By using the Lemma above it is then possible to show the complete synchronization for the W-L model (14).
Theorem 4.2. Let
\int w_1^0(x, p)\,dxdp=\int w_2^0(x, p)\,dxdp=1, |
and
\Big|\int w_{12}^0(x, p)\,dxdp \Big|\leq1,\int w_{12}^0(x, p)\,dxdp\neq-1. |
Then we have
\|w_1(t)-w_2(t)\|_{L^2}^2\leq e^{-Kt}, \ \ as\ \ \;t\to\infty. |
Proof. It follows from (14) that it is possible to write down the equation for the difference
\partial_t(w_1-w_2)+p\cdot\nabla_x(w_1-w_2)+\Theta[V](w_1-w_2)=-\frac{Kr_{12}}{2}(w_1-w_2). |
By multiplying it by
\frac{d}{dt}\|w_1(t)-w_2(t)\|_{L^2}^2=-Kr_{12}(t)\|w_1(t)-w_2(t)\|_{L^2}^2. |
By Lemma 4.1 we know that
Remark 3. In Theorem 4.2 the case
\partial_tw+p\cdot\nabla_x w+\Theta[V]w=0. | (17) |
To see that, first of all we notice that
\partial_tw_{12}+p\cdot\nabla_x w_{12}+\Theta[V]w_{12}=\frac{K}{2}(w_1-w_{12}) |
and hence
\|w_1(t)+w_{12}(t)\|_{L^2}=\|w_1(0)+w_{12}(0)\|_{L^2}=0. |
Concluding, we see that the right hand sides in (14) are all zero and the dynamics is determined by (17). This case corresponds to complete decorrelation between the quantum nodes.
In this Section, we derive the hydrodynamic equations associated to the Schrödinger-Lohe model (4). Here we follow the approach developed in [2,3,4] where a polar factorisation method is exploited in order to define the hydrodynamical quantities also in the vacuum region. In order to simplify the exposition we mainly focus on the case of two identical oscillators. In this case the Schrödinger-Lohe model reads
\left\{\begin{aligned} {\mathrm i} \partial_t\psi_1=&-\frac12\Delta\psi_1+V\psi_1+ \frac{{\mathrm i} K}{4}(\psi_2-\langle\psi_2, \psi_1\rangle\psi_1)\\ {\mathrm i} \partial_t\psi_2=&-\frac12\Delta\psi_2+V\psi_2+ \frac{{\mathrm i}K}{4}(\psi_1-\langle\psi_1, \psi_2, \rangle\psi_2). \end{aligned}\right. | (18) |
The case with
In order to derive the hydrodynamics associated to system (18), we first need to ensure that it is globally well-posed in
|1-z_{12}(t)|\lesssim e^{-Kt}. |
However, this synchronization result is too weak to be exploited for quantum hydrodynamic system derived from (18). Indeed, as we already remarked above, the natural space for the hydrodynamics is the finite energy space, namely
Let us now consider the solution
\left\{\begin{aligned} \partial_t\rho_1+{\rm{div}} J_1=&\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_1),\\ \partial_t\rho_2+{\rm{div}} J_2=&\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_2), \end{aligned}\right. |
where the associated current densities are respectively given by
J_1 :={\rm Im} \ (\bar\psi_1\nabla\psi_1), J_2 :={\rm Im} \ (\bar\psi_2\nabla\psi_2). |
Furthermore, in the equation for the mass density we also find the interaction term
Let us notice that
\partial_tJ_1+{\rm{div}}({\rm Re} \ (\nabla\bar\psi_1\otimes\nabla\psi_1))+\rho_1\nabla V=\frac14\nabla\Delta\rho_1+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_1), |
where the new interaction term here is given by
J_{12}=\frac12{\rm Im} \ (\bar\psi_1\nabla\psi_2+\bar\psi_2\nabla\psi_1). |
Next, we use the polar factorisation Lemma in [2,3] to infer that, for
{\rm Re} \ (\nabla\bar\psi_1\otimes\nabla\psi_1)=\nabla\sqrt{\rho_1}\otimes\nabla\sqrt{\rho_1}+\Lambda_1\otimes\Lambda_1, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \textrm{a.e. in }\mathbb R ^d, |
where
\partial_tJ_1+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_1\otimes J_1}{\rho_1}\right)+\rho_1\nabla V=\frac12\rho_1\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_1}}{\sqrt{\rho_1}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_1). |
By using the equation for
\partial_tJ_2+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_2\otimes J_2}{\rho_2}\right)+\rho_2\nabla V=\frac12\rho_2\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_2}}{\sqrt{\rho_2}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_2). |
Resuming, by defining the hydrodynamical quantities
\left\{\begin{aligned} &\partial_t\rho_1+{\rm{div}} J_1=\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_1),\\ &\partial_t\rho_2+{\rm{div}} J_2=\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_2),\\ &\partial_tJ_1+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_1\otimes J_1}{\rho_1}\right)+\rho_1\nabla V=\frac12\rho_1\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_1}}{\sqrt{\rho_1}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_1),\\ &\partial_tJ_2+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_2\otimes J_2}{\rho_2}\right)+\rho_2\nabla V=\frac12\rho_2\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_2}}{\sqrt{\rho_2}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_2). \end{aligned}\right. |
Note that the above hydrodynamical system is not closed, as we need to derive also the evolution equations for the quantities
\rho_d :=|\psi_1-\psi_2|^2, \ \ \ \ \ \ J_d :={\rm Im} \ ((\overline{\psi_1-\psi_2})\nabla(\psi_1-\psi_2)). |
By using those variables, it is straightforward to derive their dynamical equations,
\begin{aligned} \partial_t\rho_d=&2{\rm Re} \ \left\{(\overline{\psi_1-\psi_2})\left(\frac{i}{2}\Delta(\psi_1-\psi_2)-iV(\psi_1-\psi_2)\right.\right.\\ &+\left.\left.\frac{K}{4}(\psi_2-\psi_1-\langle\psi_2, \psi_1\rangle\psi_1+\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle\psi_2)\right)\right\}\\ =&-{\rm{div}} J_d+\frac{K}{2}{\rm Re} \ \left\{(\overline{\psi_1-\psi_2})\left((1+\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle)(\psi_2-\psi_1)+2i{\rm Im} \ \langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle\psi_1\right)\right\}\\ =&-{\rm{div}} J_d-\frac{K}{2}(1+r_{12})\rho_d+Ks_{12}\sigma_{12}, \end{aligned} |
where we denoted
s_{12}={\rm Im} \ \langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle=\int_{\mathbb R ^d} \sigma_{12}\,dx. |
Define
\begin{aligned} \partial_tJ_d=&-\frac12{\rm Re} \ (\Delta\bar\psi_d\nabla\psi_d-\bar\psi_d\nabla\Delta\psi_d)-\rho_d\nabla V\\ &+\frac{K}{4}\left[-2J_d+{\rm Im} \ \left(\langle\psi_2, \psi_1\rangle(-\bar\psi_1\nabla\psi_d+\bar\psi_d\nabla\psi_2)\right.\right.\\ &+\left.\left.\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle(\bar\psi_2\nabla\psi_d-\bar\psi_d\nabla\psi_1)\right)\right]. \end{aligned} |
After some simple algebra, we obtain that
\begin{aligned} {\rm Im} \ &\left(\langle\psi_2, \psi_1\rangle(-\bar\psi_1\nabla\psi_d+\bar\psi_d\nabla\psi_2)+\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle(\bar\psi_2\nabla\psi_d-\bar\psi_d\nabla\psi_1)\right)\\ =&-2r_{12}J_d-4s_{12}G_{12}, \end{aligned} |
where
\partial_tJ_d+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_d\otimes J_d}{\rho_d}\right)+\rho_d\nabla V=\frac12\rho_d\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_d}}{\sqrt{\rho_d}}\right)-\frac{K}{2}\left((1+r_{12})J_d+2s_{12}G_{12}\right). |
Once again, to close the hydrodynamic equations, we still need to determine the evolution for
i\partial_t\psi_a=-\frac12\Delta\psi_a+V\psi_a+\frac{K}{4}\left(i\psi_2+\psi_1-i\langle\psi_2, \psi_1\rangle\psi_1-\langle\psi_1, \psi_2\rangle\psi_2\right), |
we can then infer the equations for
\begin{aligned} &\partial_t\rho_a+{\rm{div}} J_a=\frac{K}{2}\left((1-s_{12})\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_a\right)\\ &\partial_tJ_a+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_a\otimes J_a}{\rho_a}\right)+\rho_a\nabla V=\frac12\rho_a\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_a}}{\sqrt{\rho_a}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}\Big((1-s_{12})J_{12}-r_{12}J_a\Big). \end{aligned} |
We can now resume and write down the whole set of hydrodynamic equations associated to the Schrödinger-Lohe system (18):
\begin{aligned} &\partial_t\rho_1+{\rm{div}} J_1=\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_1)\\ &\partial_t\rho_2+{\rm{div}} J_2=\frac{K}{2}(\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_2),\\ &\partial_tJ_1+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_1\otimes J_1}{\rho_1}\right)+\rho_1\nabla V=\frac12\rho_1\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_1}}{\sqrt{\rho_1}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_1),\\ &\partial_tJ_2+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_2\otimes J_2}{\rho_2}\right)+\rho_2\nabla V=\frac12\rho_2\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_2}}{\sqrt{\rho_2}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}(J_{12}-r_{12}J_2),\\ &\partial_t\rho_d+{\rm{div}} J_d=-\frac{K}{2}(1+r_{12})\rho_d+Ks_{12}\sigma_{12},\\ &\partial_tJ_d+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_d\otimes J_d}{\rho_d}\right)+\rho_d\nabla V=\frac12\rho_d\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_d}}{\sqrt{\rho_d}}\right)-\frac{K}{2}\left((1+r_{12})J_d+2s_{12}G_{12}\right),\\ &\partial_t\rho_a+{\rm{div}} J_a=\frac{K}{2}\left((1-s_{12})\rho_{12}-r_{12}\rho_a\right)\\ &\partial_tJ_a+{\rm{div}}\left(\frac{J_a\otimes J_a}{\rho_a}\right)+\rho_a\nabla V=\frac12\rho_a\nabla\left(\frac{\Delta\sqrt{\rho_a}}{\sqrt{\rho_a}}\right)+\frac{K}{2}\left((1-s_{12})J_{12}-r_{12}J_a\right), \end{aligned} | (19) |
where
\rho_{12} :=\frac12(\rho_1+\rho_2-\rho_d), J_{12} :=\frac12(J_1+J_2-J_d), |
\sigma_{12} :=\rho_a -\frac{1}{2}(\rho_1+\rho_2), G_{12} :=J_a-\frac{1}{2}(J_1+J_2). |
By considering the system (19) above we can now prove the synchronization property. In view of the previous synchronization results we expect that
\lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\left(\|\nabla\sqrt{\rho_1}-\nabla\sqrt{\rho_2}\|_{L^2}+\|\Lambda_1-\Lambda_2\|_{L^2}\right)=0 |
and furthermore
\lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\left(\|\nabla\sqrt{\rho_d}\|_{L^2}+\|\Lambda_d\|_{L^2}\right)=0. |
To show the above properties we are going to use a synchronization result in
Theorem 5.1. [5] Let
\langle\psi^0_{1}, \psi^0_{2}\rangle\neq-1. |
Then, for the solution
\|\psi_1(t)-\psi_2(t)\|_{H^1}\lesssim e^{-Kt}, \ \ as \ \ \;t\to\infty. | (20) |
We apply now this result for the synchronization of system (19), First of all, from (20) we then infer that
\lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\|\psi_d(t)\|_{H^1}=0. |
This and the polar factorisation Lemma 3 in [3] then readily implies that
\lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\left(\|\nabla\sqrt{\rho_d}(t)\|_{L^2}+\|\Lambda_d(t)\|_{L^2}\right)=0. |
Furthermore, from the fact that
\lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\left(\|\nabla\sqrt{\rho_1}(t)-\nabla\sqrt{\rho_2}(t)\|_{L^2}+\|\Lambda_1(t)-\Lambda_2(t)\|_{L^2}\right)=0. |
[1] |
The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. (2005) 77: 137-185. ![]() |
[2] |
The quantum hydrodynamics system in two space dimensions. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. (2012) 203: 499-527. ![]() |
[3] |
On the finite weak solutions to a system in quantum fluid dynamics. Comm. Math. Phys. (2009) 287: 657-686. ![]() |
[4] | P. Antonelli and P. Marcati, Some results on systems for quantum fluids, in Recent Advances in Partial Differential Equations and Applications an International Conference (in honor of H. Beirão da Veiga's 70th birthday), ed. by V. D. Radulescu, A. Sequeira, V. A. Solonnikov. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 666 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2016). |
[5] |
P. Antonelli and P. Marcati, A model of Synchronization over Quantum Networks, J. Phys. A. , 50 (2017), 315101. doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/aa79c9
![]() |
[6] |
A shocking display of synchrony. Physica D (2000) 143: 21-55. ![]() |
[7] |
Biology of synchronous flashing of fireflies. Nature (1966) 211: 562-564. ![]() |
[8] | Some remarks on the Wigner transform and the Wigner-Poisson system. Matematiche (1991) 46: 429-438. |
[9] |
The three-dimensional Wigner-Poisson problem: Existence, uniqueness and appproximation. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (1991) 14: 35-61. ![]() |
[10] |
T. Cazenave,
Semilinear Schrödinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol. 10, New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, AMS, 2003. doi: 10.1090/cln/010
![]() |
[11] |
S. -H. Choi, J. Cho and S. -Y. Ha
Practical quantum synchronization for the Schrödinger-Lohe system,
J. Phys. A, 49 (2016), 205203, 17pp. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/49/20/205203
![]() |
[12] |
S. -H. Choi and S. -Y. Ha, Quantum synchronization of the Schrödinger-Lohe model, J. Phys. A, 47 (2014), 355104, 16pp. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/47/35/355104
![]() |
[13] |
Asymptotic formation and orbital stability of phase-locked states for the Kuramoto model. Physica D (2012) 241: 735-754. ![]() |
[14] |
L. -M. Duan, B. Wang and H. J. Kimble, Robust quantum gates on neutral atoms with cavityassisted photon scattering. Phys. Rev. A, 72 (2005), 032333. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032333
![]() |
[15] |
Dynamical system approach to synchronization of the coupled Schrödinger-Lohe system. Quart. Appl. Math. (2017) 75: 555-579. ![]() |
[16] |
Emergence of phase-locked states for the Kuramoto model in a large coupling regime. Commun. Math. Sci. (2016) 14: 1073-1091. ![]() |
[17] |
Interplay of inertia and heterogeneous dynamics in an ensemble of Kuramoto oscillators. Analysis and Applications (2017) 15: 837-861. ![]() |
[18] |
Practical synchronization of generalized Kuramoto system with an intrinsic dynamics. Netw. Heterog. Media (2015) 10: 787-807. ![]() |
[19] | uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of Wigner-Poisson and VlasovPoisson systems: A survey. Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. (1997) 26: 195-207. |
[20] |
Global existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of solutions of the Wigner-Poisson and Schrödinger-Poisson systems. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (1994) 17: 349-376. ![]() |
[21] |
Dispersion and moment lemmas revisited. J. Diff. Eq. (1999) 156: 254-281. ![]() |
[22] |
Homogenization limits and Wigner transforms. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (1997) 50: 323-379. ![]() |
[23] |
I. Goychuk, J. Casado-Pascual, M. Morillo, J. Lehmann and P. Hänggi, , Quantum stochastic synchronization, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 97 (2006), 210601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.210601
![]() |
[24] |
G. L. Giorgi, F. Galve, G. Manzano, P. Colet and R. Zambrini, Quantum correlations and mutual synchronization, Phys. Rev. A, 85 (2012), 052101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.052101
![]() |
[25] |
The quantum internet. Nature (2008) 453: 1023-1030. ![]() |
[26] |
Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence, Springer-Verlag. Berlin. 1984. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-69689-3
![]() |
[27] | Y. Kuramoto, International symposium on mathematical problems in mathematical physics, Lecture Notes in Theoretical Physics, 30 (1975), p420. |
[28] |
M. A. Lohe, Quantum synchronization over quantum networks, J. Phys. A, 43 (2010), 465301, 20pp. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/43/46/465301
![]() |
[29] |
M. A. Lohe, Non-Abelian Kuramoto model and synchronization, J. Phys. A, 42 (2009), 395101, 25pp. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/42/39/395101
![]() |
[30] |
Quantum synchronization effects in intrinsic Josephson junctions. Physica C (2008) 468: 689-694. ![]() |
[31] |
Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form. Z. Phys. (1927) 40: 322-326. ![]() |
[32] |
On the equivalence of the Schrödinger and the quantum Liouville equation. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (1989) 11: 459-469. ![]() |
[33] | C. S. Peskin, Mathematical Aspects of Heart Physiology, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York, 1975. |
[34] |
The one-dimensional Wigner-Poisson problem and a relation to the SchrödingerPoisson problem. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (1991) 22: 957-972. ![]() |
[35] |
From Kuramoto to Crawford: Exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators. Physica D (2000) 143: 1-20. ![]() |
[36] |
Superinsulator and quantum synchronization. Nature (2008) 452: 613-615. ![]() |
[37] |
Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators. J. Theor. Biol. (1967) 16: 15-42. ![]() |
[38] |
On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium. Part Ⅰ: Physical Chemistry. Part Ⅱ: Solid State Physics (1997) 110-120. ![]() |
[39] |
O. V. Zhirov and D. L. Shepelyansky, Quantum synchronization and entanglement of two
qubits coupled to a driven dissipative resonator, Phys. Rev. B, 80 (2009), 014519. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB. 80. 014519
![]() |
[40] |
Quantum synchronization. Eur. Phys. J. D (2006) 38: 375-379. ![]() |
[41] |
The Wigner transform and the Wigner-Poisson system. Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. (1993) 22: 459-484. ![]() |
1. | Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Emergence of synchronous behaviors for the Schrödinger–Lohe model with frustration, 2019, 32, 0951-7715, 4609, 10.1088/1361-6544/ab3626 | |
2. | M A Lohe, Higher-dimensional generalizations of the Watanabe–Strogatz transform for vector models of synchronization, 2018, 51, 1751-8113, 225101, 10.1088/1751-8121/aac030 | |
3. | Hyungjin Huh, Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Asymptotic behavior and stability for the Schrödinger-Lohe model, 2018, 59, 0022-2488, 102701, 10.1063/1.5041463 | |
4. | Seung-Yeal Ha, Gyuyoung Hwang, Dohyun Kim, On the complete aggregation of the Wigner-Lohe model for identical potentials, 2022, 17, 1556-1801, 665, 10.3934/nhm.2022022 | |
5. | Weizhu Bao, Seung-Yeal Ha, Dohyun Kim, Qinglin Tang, Collective synchronization of the multi-component Gross–Pitaevskii–Lohe system, 2019, 400, 01672789, 132158, 10.1016/j.physd.2019.132158 | |
6. | M. A. Lohe, Systems of matrix Riccati equations, linear fractional transformations, partial integrability and synchronization, 2019, 60, 0022-2488, 072701, 10.1063/1.5085248 | |
7. | Paolo Antonelli, David N. Reynolds, Schrödinger-Lohe type models of quantum synchronization with nonidentical oscillators, 2023, 366, 00220396, 345, 10.1016/j.jde.2023.04.017 | |
8. | Seung-Yeal Ha, Gyuyoung Hwang, Dohyun Kim, On the semiclassical limit of the Schrödinger-Lohe model and concentration estimates, 2024, 65, 0022-2488, 10.1063/5.0194571 |