The insulated and perfect conductivity problems arising from high-contrast composite materials are considered in all dimensions. The solution and its gradient, respectively, represent the electric potential and field. The novelty of this paper lies in finding exact solutions for the insulated and perfect conductivity problems with concentric balls. Our results show that there appears no electric field concentration for the insulated conductivity problem, while the electric field for the perfect conductivity problem exhibits sharp singularity with respect to the small distance between interfacial boundaries of the interior and exterior balls. This discrepancy reveals that concentric balls is the optimal structure of insulated composites, but not for superconducting composites.
Citation: Zhiwen Zhao. Exact solutions for the insulated and perfect conductivity problems with concentric balls[J]. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 1-11. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023060
[1] | Filippo Gazzola, Gianmarco Sperone . Remarks on radial symmetry and monotonicity for solutions of semilinear higher order elliptic equations. Mathematics in Engineering, 2022, 4(5): 1-24. doi: 10.3934/mine.2022040 |
[2] | Yoshikazu Giga, Hirotoshi Kuroda, Michał Łasica . The fourth-order total variation flow in $ \mathbb{R}^n $. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(6): 1-45. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023091 |
[3] | Antonio Greco, Francesco Pisanu . Improvements on overdetermined problems associated to the $ p $-Laplacian. Mathematics in Engineering, 2022, 4(3): 1-14. doi: 10.3934/mine.2022017 |
[4] | Riccardo Adami, Raffaele Carlone, Michele Correggi, Lorenzo Tentarelli . Stability of the standing waves of the concentrated NLSE in dimension two. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(2): 1-15. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021011 |
[5] | Stefano Biagi, Serena Dipierro, Enrico Valdinoci, Eugenio Vecchi . A Hong-Krahn-Szegö inequality for mixed local and nonlocal operators. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(1): 1-25. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023014 |
[6] | Yannick Sire, Susanna Terracini, Stefano Vita . Liouville type theorems and regularity of solutions to degenerate or singular problems part II: odd solutions. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(1): 1-50. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021005 |
[7] | Luigi Provenzano, Alessandro Savo . Isoparametric foliations and the Pompeiu property. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(2): 1-27. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023031 |
[8] | Ben J. Ransom, Dean R. Wheeler . Rapid computation of effective conductivity of 2D composites by equivalent circuit and spectral methods. Mathematics in Engineering, 2022, 4(3): 1-24. doi: 10.3934/mine.2022020 |
[9] | Rupert L. Frank, Tobias König, Hynek Kovařík . Energy asymptotics in the Brezis–Nirenberg problem: The higher-dimensional case. Mathematics in Engineering, 2020, 2(1): 119-140. doi: 10.3934/mine.2020007 |
[10] | Takeyuki Nagasawa, Kohei Nakamura . Asymptotic analysis for non-local curvature flows for plane curves with a general rotation number. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(6): 1-26. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021047 |
The insulated and perfect conductivity problems arising from high-contrast composite materials are considered in all dimensions. The solution and its gradient, respectively, represent the electric potential and field. The novelty of this paper lies in finding exact solutions for the insulated and perfect conductivity problems with concentric balls. Our results show that there appears no electric field concentration for the insulated conductivity problem, while the electric field for the perfect conductivity problem exhibits sharp singularity with respect to the small distance between interfacial boundaries of the interior and exterior balls. This discrepancy reveals that concentric balls is the optimal structure of insulated composites, but not for superconducting composites.
High-contrast fiber-reinforced composite materials have been widely used in industrial field due to their properties of less expensive, lighter, stronger or more durable by contrast with common materials. Each year, high-contrast composites bring hundreds of new technical innovations and applications, from golf clubs, tennis rackets, buildings, bridges to microchips, aircraft, missiles and spacecraft. Quantitative analysis on mechanical properties of high-contrast composites is the key to their applications, especially to the finding of optimal structure of composites.
High-contrast composites with closely located inclusions can be described by the insulated and perfect conductivity equations. It is well known that the electric field, which is the gradient of solution, concentrates highly in the thin gaps between inclusions. The problem of estimating the gradient of solution has been actively investigated since the famous work of Babuška et al. [5] and has resulted in a large number of papers involving different methods and cases based on shapes of inclusions, dimensions, applied boundary conditions, for example, see [1,2,3,6,7,8,11,12,14,15,16,17,18,19] and the references therein. The gradient blow-up rate has been captured in these papers. To be specific, with regard to the perfect conductivity problem, when the distance ε between two strictly convex inclusions goes to zero, the gradient of the solution blows up at the rate of ε−1/2, |εlnε|−1 and ε−1, respectively, in dimensions d=2, d=3 and d≥4. Different from the perfect conductivity problem, it has been recently proved in [12] that the gradient blow-up rate for the insulated conductivity problem depends not only on the dimension but also on the principal curvature of the surfaces of inclusions. In addition, for nonlinear equation, we refer to [9,10,13].
We should point out that the volumes of the whole matrix domains considered in all the aforementioned work are of constant order with respect to the distance ε and the electric field only appears blow-up in the narrow region between two inclusions. So a natural problem is that when the volume of the considered matrix domain degenerates to be of infinitely small quantity order in terms of ε such as order O(ε), that is, the whole matrix domain becomes the thin gap, whether the electric field concentrates highly in the whole matrix domain. In order to answer this question, in this paper we consider a mathematical model of high-contrast composite materials with the core-shell geometry modeled by concentric balls in all dimensions. Let Br0,Br0+ε⊂Rd(d≥2) be two balls centered at the origin with the radii r0 and r0+ε, respectively, where r0 and ε are two positive constants. In the presence of concentric balls Br0 and Br0+ε, we consider the following insulated and perfect conductivity problems:
{Δu=0,inBr0+ε∖¯Br0,∂u∂ν=0,on∂Br0,u=φ,on∂Br0+ε, | (1.1) |
and
{Δu=0,inBr0+ε∖¯Br0,u=C0,on¯Br0,∫∂Br0∂u∂ν=0,u=φ,on∂Br0+ε, | (1.2) |
where C0 is the free constant determined by the third line of (1.2), ν denotes the unit outer normal to the domain, the boundary data φ belongs to C2(∂Br0+ε)∩Ck,α(∂Br0+ε) with k≥0,α∈(0,1] satisfying the following condition:
k+α>12ifd=2,andk+α>d2−1ifd≥3. | (1.3) |
In physics, the interior ball Br0 denotes the stiff inclusion (or the fiber) and the domain Br0+ε∖¯Br0 represents the matrix. With regard to the existence, uniqueness and regularity of weak solutions to problems (1.1) and (1.2), see [6,7].
For x∈¯Br0+ε∖Br0, write the polar coordinates as x=(r,ξ)∈[r0,r0+ε]×Sd−1, where r=|x|. Let Nk,d represent the dimension of the space of the homogeneous harmonics of degree k in d dimensions, whose value is given as follows:
Nk,d={(2k+d−2)(k+d−3)!k!(d−2)!,k≥1,d≥2,1,k=0,d≥2. | (1.4) |
Then using Theorem 2.36 and Corollary 4.14 in [4], we can use spherical harmonics to expand the above boundary data φ as follows:
φ((r0+ε)ξ)=limm→∞m∑k=0Nk,d∑l=1⟨φ,Yk,l⟩Sd−1Yk,l(ξ),uniformly inξ∈Sd−1, | (1.5) |
where Nk,d is given by (1.4), ⟨φ,Yk,l⟩Sd−1=∫Sd−1φ((r0+ε)ξ)Yk,l(ξ)dξ, the set {Yk,l}k,l, whose element Yk,l(ξ) is a spherical harmonic of degree k, forms an orthonormal basis of L2(Sd−1). Note that for k=0, we have Y0,1(ξ)=|Sd−1|−1/2. The expansion in (1.5) actually provides a selection method of finite-dimensional approximation sequence for the boundary data φ. For simplicity, for any integer m≥0, denote
φm(x):=m∑k=0Nk,d∑l=1aklYk,l(ξ),on∂Br0+ε, | (1.6) |
where akl:=⟨φ,Yk,l⟩Sd−1=∫Sd−1φ((r0+ε)ξ)Yk,l(ξ)dξ. Remark that if φ≢C on ∂Br0+ε, then we have m>0. Then we restate (1.5) as follows:
supx∈∂Br0+ε|φm(x)−φ(x)|→0,asm→∞. | (1.7) |
For r∈[r0,r0+ε] and any integer i, define
ρi(r):={−lnr,i=2,r2−i,i≠2. | (1.8) |
For k≥1, introduce some constants as follows:
{c(1)k:=kρ4−d−2k(r0)ρ4−d−k(r0+ε)kρ4−d−2k(r0)+(k+d−2)ρ4−d−2k(r0+ε),c(2)k:=(k+d−2)ρ4−d−k(r0+ε)kρ4−d−2k(r0)+(k+d−2)ρ4−d−2k(r0+ε). | (1.9) |
The first main result is concerned with explicit solution for the insulated conductivity problem with concentric balls.
Theorem 1.1. Suppose that d≥2 and ε>0. For the nonconstant boundary data φ∈C2(∂Br0+ε)∩Ck,α(∂Br0+ε) with indices k≥0,α∈(0,1] satisfying condition (1.3), let u∈H1(Br0+ε)∩C1(¯Br0+ε∖Br0) be the solution of the insulated conductivity problem (1.1). Then for x=rξ∈Br0+ε∖¯Br0,
u(x)=a01|Sd−1|−1/2+∞∑k=1Nk,d∑l=1akl(c(1)kr2−d−k+c(2)krk)Yk,l(ξ), | (1.10) |
where Nk,d is given in (1.4), akl=∫Sd−1φ((r0+ε)ξ)Yk,l(ξ)dξ, the values of c(i)k, i=1,2,k≥1 are given by (1.9).
Remark 1.2. From (1.10), we obtain that for x=rξ∈Br0+ε∖¯Br0,
∇u(x)=ξ∂ru+1r∇Sd−1u=∞∑k=1Nk,d∑l=1akl(c(1)k(2−d−k)r1−d−k+c(2)kkrk−1)Yk,l(ξ)ξ+∞∑k=1Nk,d∑l=1akl(c(1)kr1−d−k+c(2)krk−1)∇Sd−1Yk,l(ξ), | (1.11) |
where ∇Sd−1 is the first-order Beltrami operator on Sd−1. Observe that
‖φ‖2L2(∂Br0+ε)=∞∑k=0Nk,d∑l=1a2kl, |
which, together with the fact that r∈(r0,r0+ε), reads that
|∇u|≤C(∞∑k=0Nk,d∑l=1a2kl)12≤C‖φ‖L∞(∂Br0+ε), |
for some ε-independent constant C. This implies that concentric balls is the optimal insulation structure of composite materials.
Remark 1.3. By contrast with all the previous work on the blow-up of the electric field for the insulated and perfect conductivity problems, the novelty of our results obtained in Theorems 1.1 and 1.4 lies in the following two aspects. On one hand, the solution and its gradient are exactly given. On the other hand, our results in Theorems 1.1 and 1.4 hold for any ε>0, that is, the distance ε allows to be a large positive constant.
For k≥1 and r∈[r0,r0+ε], define
{˜c(1)k(r)=ρd(r)−ρd(r0+ε)ρd(r0)−ρd(r0+ε),˜c(2)k(r)=(ρ2−k(r)−ρ4−d−2k(r0)ρd+k(r))ρ4−d−k(r0+ε)ρ4−d−2k(r0+ε)−ρ4−d−2k(r0). | (1.12) |
With regard to the perfect conductivity problem with concentric balls, we have
Theorem 1.4. Suppose that d≥2 and ε>0. For the nonconstant boundary data φ∈C2(∂Br0+ε)∩Ck,α(∂Br0+ε) with indices k≥0,α∈(0,1] satisfying condition (1.3), let u∈H1(Br0+ε)∩C1(¯Br0+ε∖Br0) be the solution of the perfect conductivity problem (1.2). Then for x=rξ∈Br0+ε∖¯Br0,
u(x)=a01|Sd−1|1/2+∞∑k=1Nk,d∑l=1akl(˜c(1)k(r)−∫Sd−1Yk,l(ξ)dξ+˜c(2)k(r)Yk,l(ξ)), | (1.13) |
where Nk,d is given by (1.4), akl=∫Sd−1φ((r0+ε)ξ)Yk,l(ξ)dξ, ˜c(i)k(r), i=1,2,k≥1 are defined by (1.12).
Remark 1.5. Similar to (1.11), we deduce from (1.13) that for x=rξ∈Br0+ε∖¯Br0,
∇u(x)=∞∑k=1Nk,d∑l=1akl(∂r˜c(1)k(r)−∫Sd−1Yk,l(ξ)dξ+∂r˜c(2)k(r)Yk,l(ξ))+∞∑k=1Nk,d∑l=1akl˜c(2)k(r)r∇Sd−1Yk,l(ξ). | (1.14) |
By Taylor expansion, it follows from a direct calculation that for a sufficiently small ε>0,
∂rρd(r)={−r−1,d=2,−(d−2)r1−d,d≥3,{∂rρ2−k(r)=krk−1,∂rρd+k(r)=−(d+k−2)r1−d−k, |
and
ρd(r0)−ρd(r0+ε)={εr0+O(ε2),d=2,(d−2)rd−30ε+O(ε2),d≥3,ρ4−d−2k(r0+ε)−ρ4−d−2k(r0)=(d+2k−2)rd+2k−30ε+O(ε2). |
Then we obtain that for r∈(r0,r0+ε),
∂r˜c(i)k(r)∼ε−1,i=1,2,k≥1,˜c(2)k(r)r∼ε−1. |
Substituting this into (1.14), we have |∇u|∼ε−1. Recall that ε−1 is the greatest blow-up rate captured in all the above-mentioned work. Then for the perfect conductivity problem with concentric spheres, the gradient of the solution exhibits sharp singularity with respect to the distance ε, which is greatly different from the result in Remark 1.2 in terms of the insulated conductivity problem.
The detailed proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.4 are given in the next section.
In the following, we will find the exact solutions for the insulated and perfect conductivity problems by combining the method of separation of variables and spherical harmonic theory. This idea is based on the observation that the considered domain satisfies the radial symmetry.
Proof of Theorem 1.1. To begin with, for any integer m≥0, consider the following boundary data problem
{Δum=0,inBr0+ε∖¯Br0,∂um∂ν=0,on¯Br0,um=φm,on∂Br0+ε, | (2.1) |
where φm is given by (1.6). In view of (1.7), it follows from the Hopf's Lemma and the maximum principle that
supx∈¯Br0+ε∖Br0|um(x)−u(x)|≤supx∈∂Br0+ε|φm(x)−φ(x)|→0,asm→∞. |
That is, the sequence {um} converges uniformly to the solution u of the original problem (1.1) in ¯Br0+ε∖Br0. Then the problem is reduced to solving the explicit solution for problem (2.1) in the following.
According to (1.6), we carry out the linear decomposition for the solution um to problem (2.1) as follows:
um=m∑k=0Nk,d∑l=1aklvkl,inBr0+ε∖¯Br0, |
where, for k=0,1,...,m and l=1,...,Nk,d, vkl verifies
{Δvkl=0,inBr0+ε∖¯Br0,∂vkl∂ν=0,on∂Br0,vkl=Yk,l(ξ),on∂Br0+ε. | (2.2) |
First, in the case of k=0, we know that ∂v01∂ν=0 on ∂Br0 and v01=Y0,1(ξ)=|Sd−1|−1/2 on ∂Br0+ε. Then applying the maximum principle and the Hopf's Lemma, we obtain that v01=|Sd−1|−1/2 in Br0+ε∖¯Br0.
We now proceed to consider the case when k>0. Due to the radial symmetry of the domain, we assume that the solution of Eq (2.2) possesses the form of separation of variables vkl=fk(r)Yk,l(ξ). Recall that under the polar coordinates, the Laplace operator Δ can be expressed as
Δ=∂rr+d−1r∂r+1r2ΔSd−1, | (2.3) |
where ΔSd−1 is the Laplace-Beltrami operator satisfying that ΔSd−1Yk,l(ξ)=−k(k+d−2)Yk,l(ξ), which implies that spherical harmonics are eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator. Substituting these relations into (2.2), we deduce
{∂rrfk(r)+d−1r∂rfk(r)−k(k+d−2)r2fk(r)=0,forr∈(r0,r0+ε),∂rfk(r0)=0,fk(r0+ε)=1. | (2.4) |
Picking test function fk(r)=rs and substituting it into the first line of (2.4), we obtain
s2+s(d−2)−k(k+d−2)=0, |
which reads that s=k or s=−(d−2+k). Since second-order homogeneous linear differential equation only has two linear independent solutions, then the general solution of (2.4) can be written as
fk(r)=c(1)kr−(d−2+k)+c(2)krk, |
for some constants c(i)k, i=1,2. This, together with the second and third lines of (2.4), shows that
{−c(1)k(d+k−2)r−(d+k−1)0+c(2)kkrk−10=0,c(1)kr−(d+k−2)0+c(2)k(r0+ε)k=1. |
A direct computation shows that the values of c(i)k, i=1,2 are given by (1.9). Combining these facts above, we have
um=a01|Sd−1|−1/2+m∑k=1Nk,d∑l=1akl(c(1)kr2−d−k+c(2)krk)Yk,l(ξ). |
By sending m→∞, the proof of Theorem 1.1 is finished.
Proof of Theorem 1.4. Analogously as before, for any integer m≥0, consider
{Δum=0,inBr0+ε∖¯Br0,u=C0m,on¯Br0,∫∂Br0∂um∂ν=0,um=φm,on∂Br0+ε, | (2.5) |
where the free constant C0m is determined by the third line of (2.5), φm is given by (1.6) satisfying (1.7). We first split the solution um of problem (2.5) as follows:
um=C0mv1+m∑k=0Nk,d∑l=1aklvkl, | (2.6) |
where v1 and vkl, respectively, solve
{Δv1=0,inBr0+ε∖¯Br0,v1=1,on∂Br0,v1=0,on∂Br0+ε,{Δvkl=0,inBr0+ε∖¯Br0,vkl=0,on∂Br0,vkl=Yk,l(ξ),on∂Br0+ε. | (2.7) |
In view of the radial symmetry of the domain, we consider the solutions of the following forms:
v1(x)=g(r),vkl(x)=fk(r)Yk,l(ξ),x=(r,ξ)∈(r0,r0+ε)×Sd−1. | (2.8) |
In light of (2.3) and substituting (2.8) into (2.7), we derive
{∂rrg(r)+d−1r∂rg(r)=0,forr∈(r0,r0+ε),g(r0)=1,g(r0+ε)=0, | (2.9) |
and
{∂rrfk(r)+d−1r∂rfk(r)−k(k+d−2)r2fk(r)=0,forr∈(r0,r0+ε),fk(r0)=0,fk(r0+ε)=1. | (2.10) |
From the first line of (2.9), we know that g(r) is the radial solution of the Laplace equation. Then we have
v1={c(1)2lnr+c(2)2,d=2,c(1)dr2−d+c(2)d,d≥3, |
for some constants c(i)d, i=1,2,d≥2. Using the Dirichlet-type boundary value conditions in the second and third lines of (2.9), we solve the explicit values of these constants as follows:
{c(1)2=−1ln(r0+ε)−lnr0,c(2)2=ln(r0+ε)ln(r0+ε)−lnr0,{c(1)d=1r2−d0−(r0+ε)2−d,c(2)d=−(r0+ε)2−dr2−d0−(r0+ε)2−d,ford≥3. |
By (1.8), the explicit solution of v1 can be unified as
v1=ρd(r)−ρd(r0+ε)ρd(r0)−ρd(r0+ε),ford≥2. | (2.11) |
With regard to fk(r) defined by (2.10), if k=0, then f0(r) becomes the radial solution of the Laplace equation. Then it follows from a similar calculation that
v01=f0(r)Y0,1(ξ)=(ρd(r0)−ρd(r))|Sd−1|−1/2ρd(r0)−ρd(r0+ε),ford≥2. | (2.12) |
On the other hand, if k>0, similar to (2.4), we also have
fk(r)=c(1)klr−(d−2+k)+c(2)klrk, |
for some constants c(i)k, i=1,2. By the second and third lines in (2.10), these constants must verify
{c(1)kr−(d+k−2)0+c(2)krk0=0,c(1)k(r0+ε)−(d+k−2)+c(2)k(r0+ε)k=1, |
which yields that
c(1)k=−rd+2k−20(r0+ε)d+k−2(r0+ε)d+2k−2−rd+2k−20,c(2)k=(r0+ε)d+k−2(r0+ε)d+2k−2−rd+2k−20. |
Then we have
vkl=(ρ2−k(r)−ρ4−d−2k(r0)ρd+k(r))ρ4−d−k(r0+ε)ρ4−d−2k(r0+ε)−ρ4−d−2k(r0)Yk,l(ξ). | (2.13) |
From (2.6), it remains to calculate the free constant C0m. Using the third line of (2.5), it follows from integration by parts that
C0m=−∑mk=0∑Nk,dl=1akl∫∂Br0∂vkl∂ν∫∂Br0∂v1∂ν=∫∂Br0+ε∂v1∂νφm∫∂Br0∂v1∂ν. | (2.14) |
By the same argument, we have
C0=∫∂Br0+ε∂v1∂νφ∫∂Br0∂v1∂ν. |
Using (1.7), we obtain that C0m→C0, as m→∞. For simplicity, denote
χd={1,d=2,d−2,d≥3. |
By a straightforward computation, we obtain
∫∂Br0∂v1∂ν=−|Sd−1|χdρd(r0)−ρd(r0+ε), |
and
∫∂Br0+ε∂v1∂νφm=−χdρd(r0)−ρd(r0+ε)m∑k=0Nk,d∑l=1akl∫Sd−1Yk,l(ξ)dξ. |
Therefore, substituting these two equations into (2.14), we obtain
C0m=m∑k=0Nk,d∑l=1akl−∫Sd−1Yk,l(ξ)dξ. |
This, together with (2.6) and (2.11)–(2.13), shows that
um=a01|Sd−1|1/2+m∑k=1Nk,d∑l=1akl(˜c(1)k(r)−∫Sd−1Yk,l(ξ)dξ+˜c(2)k(r)Yk,l(ξ)), | (2.15) |
where ˜c(i)k(r), i=1,2,k=1,...,m are defined in (1.12). Combining (1.7) and the maximum principle, we have
supx∈¯Br0+ε∖Br0|um(x)−u(x)|≤max{supx∈∂Br0+ε|φm(x)−φ(x)|,|C0m−C0|}→0, |
as m→∞. Hence, by letting m→∞ in (2.15), we complete the proof.
The author would like to thank Prof. C. X. Miao for his constant encouragement and useful discussions. The author was partially supported by CPSF (2021M700358).
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
[1] |
H. Ammari, G. Ciraolo, H. Kang, H. Lee, K. Yun, Spectral analysis of the Neumann-Poincaré operator and characterization of the stress concentration in anti-plane elasticity, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 208 (2013), 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-012-0590-8 doi: 10.1007/s00205-012-0590-8
![]() |
[2] |
H. Ammari, H. Kang, M. Lim, Gradient estimates for solutions to the conductivity problem, Math. Ann., 332 (2005), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-004-0626-y doi: 10.1007/s00208-004-0626-y
![]() |
[3] |
H. Ammari, H. Kang, H. Lee, J. Lee, M. Lim, Optimal estimates for the electric field in two dimensions, J. Math. Pure. Appl., 88 (2007), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2007.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2007.07.005
![]() |
[4] | K. Atkinson, W. M. Han, Spherical harmonics and approximations on the unit sphere: an introduction, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25983-8 |
[5] |
I. Babuška, B. Andersson, P. Smith, K. Levin, Damage analysis of fiber composites. I. Statistical analysis on fiber scale, Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Eng., 172 (1999), 27–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00225-4 doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00225-4
![]() |
[6] |
E. Bao, Y. Y. Li, B. Yin, Gradient estimates for the perfect conductivity problem, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 193 (2009), 195–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-008-0159-8 doi: 10.1007/s00205-008-0159-8
![]() |
[7] |
E. Bao, Y. Y. Li, B. Yin, Gradient estimates for the perfect and insulated conductivity problems with multiple inclusions, Commun. Part. Diff. Eq., 35 (2010), 1982–2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605300903564000 doi: 10.1080/03605300903564000
![]() |
[8] |
E. Bonnetier, F. Triki, On the spectrum of the Poincaré variational problem for two close-to-touching inclusions in 2D, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 209 (2013), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-013-0636-6 doi: 10.1007/s00205-013-0636-6
![]() |
[9] |
G. Ciraolo, A. Sciammetta, Gradient estimates for the perfect conductivity problem in anisotropic media, J. Math. Pure. Appl., 127 (2019), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2018.09.006 doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2018.09.006
![]() |
[10] |
G. Ciraolo, A. Sciammetta, Stress concentration for closely located inclusions in nonlinear perfect conductivity problems, J. Differ. Equations, 266 (2019), 6149–6178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2018.10.041 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.10.041
![]() |
[11] | H. J. Dong, Y. Y. Li, Z. L. Yang, Optimal gradient estimates of solutions to the insulated conductivity problem in dimension greater than two, arXiv: 2110.11313v2. |
[12] | H. J. Dong, Y. Y. Li, Z. L. Yang, Gradient estimates for the insulated conductivity problem: the non-umbilical case, arXiv: 2203.10081. |
[13] |
Y. Gorb, A. Novikov, Blow-up of solutions to a p-Laplace equation, Multiscale Model. Simul., 10 (2012), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1137/110857167 doi: 10.1137/110857167
![]() |
[14] | Y. Y. Li, Z. L. Yang, Gradient estimates of solutions to the insulated conductivity problem in dimension greater than two, Math. Ann., in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-022-02368-x |
[15] |
M. Lim, K. Yun, Blow-up of electric fields between closely spaced spherical perfect conductors, Commun. Part. Diff. Eq., 34 (2009), 1287–1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605300903079579 doi: 10.1080/03605300903079579
![]() |
[16] | B. Weinkove, The insulated conductivity problem, effective gradient estimates and the maximum principle, Math. Ann., in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-021-02314-3 |
[17] |
K. Yun, Estimates for electric fields blown up between closely adjacent conductors with arbitrary shape, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 67 (2007), 714–730. https://doi.org/10.1137/060648817 doi: 10.1137/060648817
![]() |
[18] |
K. Yun, Optimal bound on high stresses occurring between stiff fibers with arbitrary shaped cross-sections, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 350 (2009), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.09.057 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.09.057
![]() |
[19] |
K. Yun, An optimal estimate for electric fields on the shortest line segment between two spherical insulators in three dimensions, J. Differ. Equations, 261 (2016), 148–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2016.03.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.03.005
![]() |
1. | Qionglei Chen, Zhiwen Zhao, Stress concentration for nonlinear insulated conductivity problem with adjacent inclusions, 2024, 0, 1078-0947, 0, 10.3934/dcds.2024158 |