Research article

Analysis of the COVID-19 model with self-protection and isolation measures affected by the environment


  • Received: 03 December 2023 Revised: 21 February 2024 Accepted: 22 February 2024 Published: 29 February 2024
  • Since the global outbreak of COVID-19, the virus has continuously mutated and can survive in the air for long periods of time. This paper establishes and analyzes a model of COVID-19 with self-protection and quarantine measures affected by viruses in the environment to investigate the influence of viruses in the environment on the spread of the outbreak, as well as to develop a rational prevention and control measure to control the spread of the outbreak. The basic reproduction number was calculated and Lyapunov functions were constructed to discuss the stability of the model equilibrium points. The disease-free equilibrium point was proven to be globally asymptotically stable when R0<1, and the endemic equilibrium point was globally asymptotically stable when R0>1. The model was fitted using data from COVID-19 cases in Chongqing between November 1 to November 25, 2022. Based on the numerical analysis, the following conclusion was obtained: clearing the virus in the environment and strengthening the isolation measures for infected people can control the epidemic to a certain extent, but enhancing the self-protection of individuals can be more effective in reducing the risk of being infected and controlling the transmission of the epidemic, which is more conducive to the practical application.

    Citation: Jiangbo Hao, Lirong Huang, Maoxing Liu, Yangjun Ma. Analysis of the COVID-19 model with self-protection and isolation measures affected by the environment[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 4835-4852. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024213

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yujie Sheng, Jing-An Cui, Songbai Guo . The modeling and analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic with vaccination and isolation: a case study of Italy. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(3): 5966-5992. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023258
    [2] Adil Yousif, Awad Ali . The impact of intervention strategies and prevention measurements for controlling COVID-19 outbreak in Saudi Arabia. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 8123-8137. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020412
    [3] Rong Yuan, Yangjun Ma, Congcong Shen, Jinqing Zhao, Xiaofeng Luo, Maoxing Liu . Global dynamics of COVID-19 epidemic model with recessive infection and isolation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(2): 1833-1844. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021095
    [4] Yong Zhou, Minrui Guo . Isolation in the control of epidemic. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(11): 10846-10863. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022507
    [5] Xinmiao Rong, Liu Yang, Huidi Chu, Meng Fan . Effect of delay in diagnosis on transmission of COVID-19. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2725-2740. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020149
    [6] Juan Li, Wendi Bao, Xianghong Zhang, Yongzhong Song, Zhigui Lin, Huaiping Zhu . Modelling the transmission and control of COVID-19 in Yangzhou city with the implementation of Zero-COVID policy. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(9): 15781-15808. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023703
    [7] Shina D. Oloniiju, Olumuyiwa Otegbeye, Absalom E. Ezugwu . Investigating the impact of vaccination and non-pharmaceutical measures in curbing COVID-19 spread: A South Africa perspective. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(1): 1058-1077. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022049
    [8] Shuang Zhang, Peng Jing, Daibiao Yuan, Chenlu Yang . On parents' choice of the school travel mode during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(9): 9412-9436. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022438
    [9] Cheng-Cheng Zhu, Jiang Zhu . Spread trend of COVID-19 epidemic outbreak in China: using exponential attractor method in a spatial heterogeneous SEIQR model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3062-3087. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020174
    [10] Fernando Saldaña, Hugo Flores-Arguedas, José Ariel Camacho-Gutiérrez, Ignacio Barradas . Modeling the transmission dynamics and the impact of the control interventions for the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 4165-4183. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020231
  • Since the global outbreak of COVID-19, the virus has continuously mutated and can survive in the air for long periods of time. This paper establishes and analyzes a model of COVID-19 with self-protection and quarantine measures affected by viruses in the environment to investigate the influence of viruses in the environment on the spread of the outbreak, as well as to develop a rational prevention and control measure to control the spread of the outbreak. The basic reproduction number was calculated and Lyapunov functions were constructed to discuss the stability of the model equilibrium points. The disease-free equilibrium point was proven to be globally asymptotically stable when R0<1, and the endemic equilibrium point was globally asymptotically stable when R0>1. The model was fitted using data from COVID-19 cases in Chongqing between November 1 to November 25, 2022. Based on the numerical analysis, the following conclusion was obtained: clearing the virus in the environment and strengthening the isolation measures for infected people can control the epidemic to a certain extent, but enhancing the self-protection of individuals can be more effective in reducing the risk of being infected and controlling the transmission of the epidemic, which is more conducive to the practical application.



    COVID-19 [1,2] is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, which was first detected in December 2019 in Wuhan, Hubei, China; since then, it has been found in other parts of the country and in other countries. The virus is highly contagious and causes respiratory infections that can lead to difficulty breathing, pneumonia, and other serious complications; the elderly and those with chronic illnesses are more susceptible to infections and serious conditions that can even lead to death [3,4]. In an effort to contain the outbreak, countries have implemented embargo measures and restrictions, thus leading to the disruption of business activities, business closures, and increased unemployment. Disruptions in global supply chains and reduced consumption have slowed economic growth, thus leading to a severe recession [5]. Since the outbreak, scientists around the world have been actively researching information on the biological properties, epidemiological characteristics, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic strategies of the virus in order to better respond to the outbreak [6]. The development of vaccines has played a key role in protecting people's health and reducing the risk of the virus. However, the diversity and variability of SARS-CoV-2 prevent the vaccine from completely helping people avoid the risk of infection. Therefore, other measures are needed to either reduce the risk of infection or to inhibit the spread of the disease.

    Isolation measures are an important prevention and control tool that are widely used in disease control and prevention. They can curb the spread of disease by separating patients from healthy people, thus reducing the chances of disease transmission and minimizing the risks resulting from interpersonal contact. Additionally, they facilitate early diagnoses and interventions, thus improving the cure and survival rates. At the same time, isolation measures also help to track and investigate the transmission pathways of diseases, thereby providing important data and information for the development of appropriate prevention and control strategies. Therefore, many scholars have investigated the importance of isolation measures for COVID-19 control in mathematical models [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Zhang et al. [13] studied the effect of soft isolation of susceptible populations on the spread of COVID-19 based on case data from Wuhan. Numerical simulations showed that when the isolation rate of susceptible populations was larger or the exposure rate of susceptible populations was smaller, the number of infected people reached the peak value earlier, the peak value was lower, the duration of the epidemic was smaller, and the final size of the infected people was significantly smaller. Tang et al. [14] designed a deterministic house model based on the clinical progression of the disease, the epidemiologic status of various individuals, and interventions; estimates based on likelihood and modeling analyses indicated that the number of controlled reproductions could be as high as 6.47 (95% CI 5.71–7.23). Sensitivity analyses indicated that interventions, such as close contact tracing followed by isolation and quarantine, could be effective in reducing the number of controlled reproductions and the risk of transmission. Yuan et al. [15] considered a model of infectious disease with asymptomatic infection and isolation, and numerically analyzed the data statistics of the number of infected people in India; the study concluded that the greater the recovery rate of the isolates, the shorter the treatment period, and the faster the disease disappears. Therefore, the study of potent drugs is important. Moreover, when the isolation rate was 0.3519–0.5411, asymptomatic infected people affected the spread of infectious diseases. Isolation of symptomatic people is very important to control and eliminate the disease. Maryam et al. [16] proposed a mathematical model for the deterministic delineation of neococcal pneumonia with different isolation and segregation types, thereby dividing segregation compartments into short-term and long-term segregation compartments, and into detected and non-detected home segregated individuals and institutional segregated individuals. Numerical simulations were performed using the Omani dataset to demonstrate the impact of some model parameters associated with the different types of isolation and segregation on the dynamics of disease transmission. In the face of infectious diseases, the rational implementation of quarantine measures is crucial. In order to make an effective and reasonable plan to prevent the spread of variant COVID-19, Guo et al. [17] established a new vaccination population epidemic model. By fitting the data of the Delta strain epidemic in Jiangsu Province, China, and analyzing the parameters, it was found that the best control measure was to dynamically adjust three control measures (vaccination, isolation and nucleic acid testing) to achieve the lowest number of infections at the lowest cost.

    Although vaccines can reduce and against the risk to human beings, it cannot completely protect them from being infected. Therefore, in times of epidemics, people need to take greater protective measures for themselves to either avoid contact with patients or reduce interpersonal contact, thus lowering the risk of infection and protecting their own health and the health of others. Self-protection measures [18,19,20] can reduce the number of people who become ill, thereby reducing the burden on the health-care system and allowing health-care resources to be better utilized when treating patients in need of urgent care. The literature [21] described a reaction-diffusion SEIR model for self-protection of susceptible individuals, and treatment of infected individuals, using numerical simulations to demonstrate the existence of traveling waves and to show that self-protection and treatment reduced the rate of transmission of infectious diseases. Using epidemiological data on COVID-19 and anonymized data on human mobility, Lai et al. [22] constructed a modeling framework to simulate different outbreaks and intervention scenarios across China using daily travel networks. It was found that early detection and isolation of cases prevented more infections than travel restriction and contact reduction; however, non-pharmacological interventions had the strongest and most rapid combined effect. Hu et al. [23] constructed a kinetic model that described the spread of COVID-19 in wildlife, human populations, and the environment, which also introduced asymptomatically infected populations and susceptible populations with self-protection awareness. Numerical simulations showed that stopping all human migration, increasing treatment intensity, enhancing personal protection awareness, and especially improving the ability to recognize asymptomatically infected people were indispensable control tools to control the spread of the disease in the early stages of a malignant outbreak.

    According to the World Health Organization's scientific briefing on the spread of COVID-19, the mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 included contaminated environments in addition to close contact [24]. Therefore, we should also pay attention to the impact of viruses in the environment on the spread of the epidemic. Wang et al. [25] designed a two-strain, nonlinear kinetic model that considered the simultaneous transmission of mutated and wild strains, environmental transmission, and implementation of vaccination in the context of a shortage of basic healthcare resources. Findings suggest that reducing the prevalence of the mutant strain, increasing viral clearance in the environment, and enhancing the ability to treat infected individuals are critical to mitigate and control the spread of COVID-19, especially in resource-limited areas. Musa et al. [26] proposed a new dynamic model to study the spread of COVID-19. The model incorporated possible recurrence, reinfection, and environmental contributions to assess their combined impact on the overall transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2. The model was numerically simulated using standard Eulerian techniques to elucidate the impact of some key parameters on the overall transmission dynamics. The results of the study indicated that exposure, hospitalization, and reactivation rates were essential parameters that required special attention for pandemic prevention, mitigation, and control.

    During outbreaks in countries such as China, a large number of researchers have studied the effectiveness of isolation measures and analysed the impact of the virus on the environment. However, few papers have considered site-specific isolation measures, as well as the simultaneous isolation of confirmed and asymptomatic patients. Numberous papers considered the importance of vaccinations, though they neglected the importance of individual self-protection.

    Motivated by the aforementioned literature, in order to reveal the impact of isolation measures and self-protection on the spread of COVID-19, we will establish an epidemic model that includes the aforementioned factors and conduct in-depth study. In addition, considering the influence factors of viruses in the environment is also a highlight of this article, which can further analyze the spread of COVID-19. This article will analyze the reliability of the model based on actual data from Chongqing, China. Chongqing is one of the municipalities directly under the central government in China, and the outbreak started on November 1, 2022. The outbreak rapidly spread and the situation was critical, which was mainly caused by Omicron BA5.2, which can be transmitted by aerosol, respiratory droplets, and close contact. Chongqing is a mountainous city with a lot of water mist, which makes it easy for virus aerosols to be suspended in the air and spread. Moreover, the large population and the different living patterns from other cities, with old high-rise buildings densely packed and poorly sealed, make it easy for the virus to spread and propagate. Based on the above studies and the actual situation in Chongqing, the model combines self-protection, isolation measures, and measures to remove the virus from the environment to assess their combined impact on the overall transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2. The main points of this paper are as follows: (1) the stability of the equilibrium point is theoretically demonstrated; (2) the accuracy of the model is verified by fitting it to the actual data; and (3) parametric analyses illustrate the validity of self-protection and the necessity of isolation measures for both diagnosed and asymptomatic patients.

    In this paper, we categorize susceptible individuals into unconscious susceptible individuals and conscious susceptible individuals, where conscious susceptible individuals are those who will take personal protective measures to reduce the probability of infection when a disease is prevalent. When infected with SARS-CoV-2, the infected person is often accompanied by fever, cough, sputum, shortness of breath, fatigue, and other symptoms; additionally, confirmed infected individuals have positive nucleic acid test results. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to mutate, there are infected individuals who do not have any clinical symptoms but have a positive nucleic acid test results. Moreover, these infected individuals are at risk of harboring and transmitting the virus, and are referred to as asymptomatic infected individuals [27]. Therefore, the dynamical model is described as follows:

    {dS1dt=Λβ1S1I1β2S1I2βWS1WρS1dS1,dS2dt=ρS1β1σS2I1β2σS2I2βWσS2WdS2,dEdt=β1S1I1+β2S1I2+βWS1W+β1σS2I1+β2σS2I2+βWσS2WτEdE,dI1dt=τpEγ1I1μI1dI1k1I1,dI2dt=τ(1p)Eγ2I2μI2dI2k2I2,dQdt=k1I1+k2I2μQdQϕQ,dRdt=γ1I1+γ2I2+ϕQdR,dWdt=λ1I1+λ2I2δW, (2.1)

    where S1(t),S2(t),E(t),I1(t),I2(t),Q(t), and R(t) represent the number of the unconscious susceptible individuals, conscious susceptible individuals, exposed, confirmed infected, asymptomatic infected, quarantined, and the recovered population at time t, respectively. The viral spread in the environment is denoted as W(t). Λ>0 describes the annual birth rate, and ρ is the migration rate from S1 to S2. σ is the rate at which susceptible individuals with self-protection reduce contacts with infectious. β1 is a constant, β2 represent the infection rates, and βW represents the infection rates of the virus in the environment. 1τ represents the mean incubation period. p is the proportion of the confirmed infected. k1 and k2 are the quarantine rates. μ is the disease-induced death rate. γ1 and γ2 are the recovery rates of infected persons. ϕ is the recovery rate after treatment. d is the natural human mortality rates. δ is the clearance rate of viruses in the environment. λ1 and λ2 are the virus released rates.

    Define N(t)=S1(t)+S2(t)+E(t)+I1(t)+I2(t)+Q(t)+R(t)0 and W(t)0, from system (2.1), we know that

    dNdt=ΛdS1dS2dEdI1μI1dI2μI2dQμQdR=ΛdNμ(I1+I2+Q)ΛdN,

    and

    dWdt=λ1I1+λ2I2δW(λ1+λ2)NδW,

    so, limt+sup(N(t))Λd and limt+sup(W(t))Λ(λ1+λ2)dδ.

    This is implies that the solutions of system (2.1) are bounded and the region

    X={(S1(t),S2(t),E(t),I1(t),I2(t),Q(t),R(t),W(t))R8+:0S1(t)+S2(t)+E(t)+I1(t)+I2(t)+Q(t)+R(t)Λd,0W(t)Λ(λ1+λ2)dδ}

    is a positively invariant with respect to system (2.1).

    In this section, we show that the system (2.1) has a unique disease-free equilibrium P0. Then, we derive the basic reproduction number R0 using the next generation matrix method. Finally, we prove system (2.1) has a unique endemic equilibrium P when R0>1.

    Making the right end of the system (2.1) equal to 0 gives the only disease-free equilibrium point P0=(S01,S02,0,0,0,0,0,0) of the system, and

    S01=Λρ+d,  S02=ρΛd(ρ+d).

    Using the next generation matrix formulated in Diekmam et al. [28] and van den Driessche and Watmough [29], we define the basic reproduction number by the following:

    R0=R1+R2+R3,

    where,

    R1=τp(k1+γ1+d+μ)(τ+d)(β1S01+σβ1S02),R2=τ(1p)(k2+γ2+d+μ)(τ+d)(β2S01+σβ2S02),R3=(τpλ1δ(k1+γ1+d+μ)(τ+d)+τ(1p)λ2δ(k2+γ2+d+μ)(τ+d))(βWS01+σβWS02).

    Here, R1 is the average number of infections transmitted by confirmed infected individuals during their illness period, R2 is the average number of asymptomatic infections transmitted during the disease period, and R3 is the average number of infections caused by viruses in the environment. Thus, we have the following theorem.

    Theorem 1. System (2.1) has a unique endemic equilibrium P if and only if R0>1 holds.

    Proof. By the equilibrium equations of system (2.1), we can conclude that

    {Λβ1S1I1β2S1I2βWS1WρS1dS1=0,ρS1β1σS2I1β2σS2I2βWσS2WdS2=0,β1S1I1+β2S1I2+βWS1W+β1σS2I1+β2σS2I2+βWσS2WτEdE=0,τpEγ1I1μI1dI1k1I1=0,τ(1p)Eγ2I2μI2dI2k2I2=0,k1I1+k2I2μQdQϕQ=0,γ1I1+γ2I2+ϕQdR=0,λ1I1+λ2I2δW=0. (3.1)

    Combining with the equations in system (3.1), one can obtain the following:

    S1=Λβ1I1+β2I2+βWW+ρ+d,  S2=ρS1σβ1I1+σβ2I2+σβWW+d,E=(μ+d+k1+γ1)I1τp,  I2=τ(1p)Eμ+d+k2+γ2,  W=λ1I1+λ2I2δ. (3.2)

    Because I10, it can be obtained through (3.2) that

    S1+σS2=Λβ1I1+β2I2+βWW+ρ+d+σρS1σβ1I1+σβ2I2+σβWW+d=ΛδpBMI1+(ρ+d)δpBσMI1+(d+σρ)δpBσMI1+dδpB. (3.3)

    By the third equations of the system (3.1), we can conclude that

    S1+σS2=(τ+d)Eβ1I1+β2I2+βWW=δ(τ+d)ABτM; (3.4)

    here, we denote A=k1+γ1+d+μ, B=k2+γ2+d+μ and M=δpBβ1+δ(1p)Aβ2+(λ1pB+λ2(1p)A)βW. Combining (3.3) and (3.4), we have

    F(I1)=δpBMI1+(ρ+d)δpBσMI1+(d+σρ)δpBσMI1+dδpBδ(τ+d)ABτMΛ

    and

    dF(I1)dt=F1(I1)(σMI1+dδpB)2[MI1+(ρ+d)δpB]2

    and

    F1(I1)=δpBM(σ2M2(I1)2+2BMδpρσ2I1+2BMdδpσI1+B2d2p2δ2+B2dδ2p2ρσ2+B2dδ2p2ρσ+B2δ2p2ρ2σ2)<0.

    Therefore, we obtain the derivative dF(I1)dt<0. Thus, F(I1) is a monotone decreasing function.

    Then,

    F(0)=δpB(ρ+d)δpB(d+σρ)δpBdδpBδ(τ+d)ABτMΛ=S01+σS02Λδ(τ+d)ABτMΛ=δ(τ+d)ABτMΛτM(S01+σS02)δ(τ+d)ABδ(τ+d)ABτMΛ=δ(τ+d)ABτMΛ(R01).

    Because the inequality [MI1+δpB(ρ+d)](σMI1+δdpB)>MI1[σMI1+(d+σρ)δpB], we can obtain the following:

    F(Λd)=δpBMΛd+(ρ+d)δpBσMΛd+(d+σρ)δpBσMΛd+dδpBδ(τ+d)ABτMΛ<δpBdΛMδ(τ+d)ABτΛMδBdΛMδ(τ+d)ABτΛM<0.

    According to the monotonicity of the function of F(I1), when R0>1, the equation has a unique positive root on the interval of (0,Λd). When R0<1, the equation has no positive root on the interval of (0,Λd).

    Therefore, if R0>1, then the system (2.1) has an endemic equilibrium P=(S1,S2,E, I1,I2,Q,R,W).

    In this section, we will prove the global stability of the equilibrium points by constructing the Lyapunov function. Now, we provide the following two key Theorems to provide the global stability.

    Theorem 2. If R0<1, then the disease-free equilibrium P0 of the system (2.1) is global asymptotically stable.

    Proof. Define the Lyapunov function as follows:

    V=Eτ+d+(β1S01+β1σS02)I1(τ+d)(μ+d+k1+γ1)+(β2S01+β2σS02)I2(τ+d)(μ+d+k2+γ2)+(βWS01+βWσS02)λ1I1(τ+d)(μ+d+k1+γ1)δ+(βWS01+βWσS02)λ2I2(τ+d)(μ+d+k2+γ2)δ+(βWS01+βWσS02)W(τ+d)δ.

    For all t>0, the derivative of V(t) is as follows:

    dVdt=1τ+d(β1S1I1+β2S1I2+βWS1W+β1σS2I1+β2σS2I2+βWσS2WτEdE)+(β1S01+β1σS02)(τ+d)(μ+d+k1+γ1)(τpEγ1I1μI1dI1k1I1)+(β2S01+β2σS02)(τ+d)(μ+d+k2+γ2)(τ(1p)Eγ2I2μI2dI2k2I2)+(βWS01+βWσS02)λ1(τ+d)(μ+d+k1+γ1)δ(τpEγ1I1μI1dI1k1I1)+(βWS01+βWσS02)λ2(τ+d)(μ+d+k2+γ2)δ(τ(1p)Eγ2I2μI2dI2k2I2)+(βWS01+βWσS02)(τ+d)δ(λ1I1+λ2I2δW)(β1S01+β1σS02)τ+dI1+(β2S01+β2σS02)τ+dI2+(βWS01+βWσS02)τ+dWE+τp(β1S01+β1σS02)(τ+d)(μ+d+k1+γ1)E(β1S01+β1σS02)τ+dI1+τ(1p)(β2S01+β2σS02)(τ+d)(μ+d+k2+γ2)E+τpλ1(βWS01+βWσS02)(τ+d)(μ+d+k1+γ1)δE(βWS01+βWσS02)(τ+d)δλ1I1+τ(1p)λ2(βWS01+βWσS02)(τ+d)(μ+d+k2+γ2)δE(βWS01+β2WσS02)(τ+d)δλ2I2+(βWS01+βWσS02)(τ+d)δλ1I1+(βWS01+βWσS02)(τ+d)δλ2I2(β2S01+β2σS02)τ+dI2(βWS01+βWσS02)τ+dW=E(R01).

    Thus, dVdt<0 if R0<1. Using LaSalle's [30] extension to the Lyapunov's method, the disease-free equilibrium P0 is globally asymptotically stable.

    Theorem 3. The equilibrium point P of system (2.1) is globally asymptotically stable if and only if R0>1.

    Proof. Since the equilibrium point P of endemic diseases is determined by system (2.1), we have the following:

    {ρ+d=ΛS1β1I1β2I2βWW,d=ρS1S2σβ1I1σβ2I2σβWW,d+τ=β1S1I1E+β2S1I2E+βWS1WE+σβ1S2I1E+σβ2S2I2E+σβWS2WE,k1+γ1+d+μ=τpEI1,k2+γ2+d+μ=τ(1p)EI2,d+ϕ+μ=k1I1Q+k2I2Q,d=γ1I1R+γ2I2R+ϕQR,δ=λ1I1W+λ2I2W. (4.1)

    We denote

    x=S1S1,y=S2S2,e=EE,a=I1I1,b=I2I2,c=WW.

    Define the Lyapunov function as follows:

    V=S1(x1lnx)+S2(y1lny)+E(e1lne)+nI1(a1lna)+mI2(b1lnb)+fW(c1lnc). 

    The derivative of V(t) is as follows:

    dVdt=(11x)dS1dt+(11y)dS2dt+(11e)dEdt+n(11a)dI1dt+m(11b)dI2dt+f(11c)dWdt=(11x)[Λ(1x)β1S1I1(a1)xβ2S1I2(b1)xβWS1W(c1)x]+(11y)[ρS1(xy)σβ1S2I1(a1)yσβ2S2I2(b1)yσβWS2W(c1)y]+(11e)[β1I1S1(xae)+β2I2S1(xbe)+βWS1W(cxe)+σβ1S2I1(yae)+σβ2S2I2(ybe)+σβWS2W(cye)]+n(11a)[τpE(ea)]+m(11b)[τ(1p)E(eb)]+f(11c)[λ1I1(ac)+λ2I2(bc)]=β1S1I1(31xxaeea)+β2S1I2(31xxbeeb)+βWS1W(41xcxeeaac)+σβ1S2I1(41xyaeeaxy)+σβ2S2I2(41xybeebxy)+σβWS2W(51xxycyeebbc)+dS1(2x1x)+dS2(3y1xxy),

    where the constants n=β1S1I1+σβ1S2I1+βWS1WτpE,m=β2S1I2+σβ2S2I2+σβWS2Wτ(1p)E,f=βWS1Wλ1I1=σβWS2Wλ2I2.

    According to the relationship of inequality, we have 31xxaeea0, 31xxbeeb0, 41xcxeeaac0, 41xyaeeaxy0, 41xybeebxy0, 51xxycyeebbc0, 2x1x0,3y1xxy0, so, the derivative of dVdt0. Additionally, dVdt=0 if and only if x=y=1,a=b=c=e. Using the LaSalle's [30] extension to Lyapunov's method, the equilibrium P is globally asymptotically stable.

    In this paper, the number of newly reported cases of COVID-19 in Chongqing between November and December 2022 was obtained from the Chongqing Municipal Health Planning Commission [31]. The Chongqing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention [32] sequenced the viral genes of the infected persons, and the results showed that this Chongqing outbreak was mainly caused by the Omicron variant strain, and the incubation period of the Omicron variant virus was about 3.86 days. Because the state gradually relaxed the control of the epidemic, epidemic data were no longer collected on a daily basis in various places. In order to ensure the reasonableness of the data analysis, the data used in this paper were from November 1, 2022 to November 25, 2022. Since the epidemic mainly occurred in the main urban area of Chongqing, this paper adopted the data of the main urban area, so the total number of people was N=10,343,100, the daily increase in the population was approximately 310 people, and the natural mortality rate was 2.203×105. There was not a single case of death due to the disease in this outbreak: the case fatality rate was 0. The number of asymptomatic infected people was about 10 times of the number of diagnosed infected people; the disease could be cured in about 7 days after isolation treatment [33]. Based on the mathematical model and specific data, the model was fitted to the actual data and parameters using the least squares method. The parameters and initial values were estimated in Tables 1 and 2. Moreover, Figure 1 shows that the simulation results were consistent with the actual data, thus verifying the accuracy of the model.

    Table 1.  The parameters of system (2.1).
    Parameter Value Source Parameter Value Source
    Λ 310 [33] d 2.203×105 [33]
    β1 2.4724×106 Fitted β2 1.5258×107 Fitted
    βW 1.982×109 Fitted ρ 0.1325 Fitted
    σ 0.14 Fitted p 0.12 [32]
    μ 0 [32] τ 1/3.86 [34]
    k1 0.6 Fitted k2 0.5 Fitted
    γ1 0.0714 Data γ2 0.0714 Data
    ϕ 0.1429 Data δ 0.5 [26]
    λ1 0.2 [26] λ2 0.2 [26]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  Initial values in Chongqing.
    Initial values Mean Source
    S1(0) 7,240,170 Estimated
    S2(0) 3,102,930 Estimated
    E(0) 1400 Fitted
    I1(0) 6 Data
    I2(0) 0 Data
    Q(0) 0 Data
    R(0) 0 Data
    W(0) 0 Estimated

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1.  The fitting results of the system (2.1) with real data from November 1, 2022 to November 25, 2022 in Chongqing.

    The basic reproduction number R0 is an indicative factor to consider whether the virus can be epidemic or not; therefore, we analyzed the sensitivity of the basic reproduction number of the system (2.1) to find out the key factors that affects the spread of COVID-19, so that effective measures can be taken to control the spread of the disease. Based on the parameter values in Table 1, we found that the basic reproduction number R0=R1+R2+R3 was greater than 1, which meant that the disease would persist. In addition, as can be seen from Table 3, R1 and R2 were much larger than R3, which implied that the probability of being infected by confirmed and asymptomatic infected persons was very high, while the probability of being infected by viruses in contaminated environments was low.

    Table 3.  The value of the basic reproduction number.
    R1 R2 R3 R0
    0.87129 0.46331 0.0026868 1.3373

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We used a method based on Latin hypercube sampling to quantify the uncertainty and sensitivity of all model parameters. As shown in Figure 2, a positive partial rank correlation coefficient (PRCC) value indicated that an increase in the parameter led to an increase in R0, while a negative value showed that an increase in the parameter decreased R0.

    Figure 2.  PRCCs of R0 performed on model parameters.

    If there were no infected individuals in a certain area for a long time, the public would relax their vigilance against the epidemic and lack self-protection measures. Once an infected person appeared, people would receive information through media channels and strengthen their prevention and control awareness, thereby transitioning from unconscious susceptible individuals to conscious susceptible individuals. Using the Matlab software, we drew a curve between the parameter ρ and the basic regeneration number R0, as shown in Figure 3(a). It can be seen that as the immigration rate increased, the basic regeneration number R0 decreased; however, the effect was not significant, so only having self-protection awareness and not taking effective prevention and control measures when the epidemic breaks out could not effectively control the epidemic.

    Figure 3.  (a) The relationship between parameter ρ and R0. (b) The relationship between parameter δ and R0.

    Through Figure 3(b), found that increasing the clearance rate δ of viruses in polluted environments could reduce the spread of viruses. For example, attention should be paid to hazardous areas such as sewage outlets, toilets, bathtubs in the restroom, and floor drains; if there is an infected person in the downstairs residents, the virus may spread through aerosols to the upstairs and downstairs, and it is necessary to avoid staying on the balcony for too long. Isolation areas and hospitals should strengthen infection control measures to avoid cross infection. In addition, when taking any value within the range shown in Figure 3(b), R0 was greater than 1, which means that the disease would persist.

    In Figure 4(a), we found that there was a positive correlation between the regulatory factors for the contact rate σ between conscious susceptible and infected individuals and the basic number of regenerations R0. Figure 4(b), (c) show the number of confirmed infections and the number of cumulative infections for different parameters. When the moderating factor was smaller, there were fewer confirmed infections and fewer cumulative infections; when the moderating factor was larger, there were more infections and isolates. This suggests that when the moderating factor is smaller (i.e., the more effective the individual's self-protection measures are), the lower the probability of being infected, and the spread of the epidemic could be effectively controlled.

    Figure 4.  (a) The relationship between parameter R0 and σ. (b) Simulations of the confirmed cases(I1) with respect to parameter σ. (c) Simulations of the accumulated confirmed cases with respect to parameter σ.

    Figure 5(a), (b) show the negative correlation between the isolation rate and the basic regeneration number R0, respectively. As the isolation rate increased, the R decreased, but the effect was not significant. This is because, in this outbreak, both confirmed and asymptomatic carriers were infectious and could be detected by nucleic acid antigen detection. Therefore, we should isolate both confirmed and asymptomatic patients. Through R0 in terms of the parameters k1 and k2 in Figure 5(c), we can clearly show that isolating both can more effectively control the epidemic. We chose different comparison values to demonstrate the importance of implementing isolation measures for infected individuals to control the spread of the disease (in Figure 5(e), (f)).

    Figure 5.  (a) The relationship between parameter R0 and k1.(b) The relationship between parameter R0 and k2. (c) R0 in terms of parameters k1 and k2. (e) Simulations of the confirmed cases(I1) with respect to parameter k1 and k2. (f) Simulations of the accumulated confirmed cases with respect to parameter k1 and k2.

    Due to the fact that multiple measures can be taken equally when implementing specific measures, the advantages and disadvantages of using both self-protection and isolation measures were simultaneously simulated in Figure 6. From the figure, it can be seen that the combination of self-protection and isolation measures had a significant effect on controlling the epidemic.

    Figure 6.  R0 in terms of parameters σ and k1.

    This paper focused on a COVID-19 model with self-protection and isolation measures affected by viruses in the environment. The model extended an existing model by taking the effects of self-protection measures, isolation measures, and viruses in the contaminated environment on disease transmission into account. By calculating the basic regeneration number and the equilibrium point of the model, it was proven that the disease-free equilibrium point P0 was globally asymptotically stable when R0<1, and the endemic equilibrium point P was globally asymptotically stable when R0>1. A numerucak analysis revealed that viruses in the environment could affect the spread of disease, but the removal of viruses in the environment alone was not effective to control the spread of epidemics. At the same time, it was found that strengthening the isolation of confirmed infected and asymptomatic infected could effectively control the spread of the epidemic. However, the actual situation is complex and variable, and it is impossible to effectively implement isolation measures. By analyzing the parameter σ, it is obvious that effective self-protection, such as correctly wearing masks, reducing activities in crowded places, and maintaining good hygiene habits, can more effectively reduce the risk of being infected and quickly contain the epidemic; at the same time, it can be more conducive to the practical application of the epidemic, and it is an effective and low-cost prevention and control measures.

    In this article, we only considered the case of being transferred to centralized isolation after infection; we did not consider the case of self-imposed home isolation. Due to the highly contagious nature of the virus, there will be a large increase in the number of patients at a given time, and we have ignored the limited availability of medical resources and the time lag in treatment. Therefore, if self-isolation and limited hospital resources can be taken into account in the model, this will make the model more complete as well as more realistic. We have taken this as future work.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors would like to thank the referees for helpful comments which resulted in much improve- ment of the paper. Project Supported by Starting Research Fund from Chongqing Jiaotong University under contract No. 2020021022, F1220004, the Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission under contract No. KJQN202100709, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 12071445 and 12271519) and the High-level Talent Introduction Support Project (No. GDRC20220802).

    The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] J. Cohen, D. Normile, New SARS-like virus in China triggers alarm, Science, 367 (2020), 234–235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.367.6475.234 doi: 10.1126/science.367.6475.234
    [2] C. Eastin, T. Eastin, Risk factors as sociated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China, J. Emerg. Med., 367 (2020), 234–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.007
    [3] C. Eastin, T. Eastin, Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China, J. Emerg. Med., 58 (2020), 711–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.004
    [4] S. Richardson, J. S. Hirsch, M. Narasimhan, Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area, Jama, 323 (2020), 2052–2059. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6775 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775
    [5] Z. Kolahchi, M. Domenico, L. Uddin, V. Cauda, N. Rezaei, COVID-19 and its global economic impact, in Coronavirus Disease-COVID-19, 1318 (2021), 825–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63761-3_46
    [6] S. J. Thomas, E. D. Moreira, N. Kitchin, J. Absalon, A. Gurtman, S. Lockhart, et al., Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine through 6 months, New. Engl. J. Med., 385 (2021), 1761–1773. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA2110345 doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA2110345
    [7] W. Xu, H. Shu, L. Wang, X. Wang, J. Watmough, The importance of quarantine: modelling the COVID-19 testing process, J. Math. Biol., 86 (2023), 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-023-01916-6 doi: 10.1007/s00285-023-01916-6
    [8] M. Ali, S. T. H. Shah, M. Imran, A. Khan, The role of asymptomatic class, quarantine and isolation in the transmission of COVID-19, J. Biol. Dyn., 14 (2020), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2020.1773000 doi: 10.1080/17513758.2020.1773000
    [9] M. A. A. Oud, A. Ali, H. Alrabaiah, S. Ullah, A fractional order mathematical model for COVID-19 dynamics with quarantine, isolation, and environmental viral load, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2021 (2021), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03265-4 doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03265-4
    [10] M. A. Khan, A. Atangana, E. Alzahrani, The dynamics of COVID-19 with quarantined and isolation, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2020 (2020), 425. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02882-9 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02882-9
    [11] Q. Pan, T. Gao, M. He, Influence of isolation measures for patients with mild symptoms on the spread of COVID-19, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 139 (2020), 110022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110022 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110022
    [12] Y. Guo, T. Li, Modeling the competitive transmission of the Omicron strain and Delta strain of COVID-19, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 526 (2023), 127283–127283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127283 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127283
    [13] J. Zhang, Y. Li, M. Yao, J. Zhang, H. Zhu, Z. Jin, Analysis of the relationship between transmission of COVID-19 in Wuhan and soft quarantine intensity in susceptible population, Acta. Math. Appl. Sin., 43 (2020), 162–173.
    [14] B. Tang, X. Wang, Q. Li, Estimation of the transmission risk of the 2019-nCoV and its implication for public health interventions, J. Clin. Med. Res., 9 (2020), 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020462 doi: 10.3390/jcm9020462
    [15] R. Yuan, Y. Ma, C. Shen, Global dynamics of COVID-19 epidemic model with recessive infection and isolation, Math. Biosci. Eng., 18 (2021), 1833–1844. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021095 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021095
    [16] M. Al-Yahyai, F. Al-Musalhi, I. Elmojtaba, N. Al-Salti, Mathematical analysis of a COVID-19 model with different types of quarantine and isolation, Math. Biosci. Eng., 20 (2023), 1344–1375 https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023061 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023061
    [17] T. Li, Y. Guo, Modeling and optimal control of mutated COVID-19 (Delta strain) with imperfect vaccination, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 156 (2022), 111825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111825 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111825
    [18] X. Chen, R. Wang, D. Yang, J. Xian, Q. Li, Effects of the Awareness-Driven Individual Resource Allocation on the Epidemic Dynamics, Complexity, 2020 (2020), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8861493 doi: 10.1155/2020/8861493
    [19] Y. Guo, T. Li, Modeling the transmission of second-wave COVID-19 caused by imported cases: A case study, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), 8096–8114. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8041 doi: 10.1002/mma.8041
    [20] M. S. Ullah, M. Higazy, K. M. A. Kabir, Modeling the epidemic control measures in overcoming COVID-19 outbreaks: A fractional-order derivative approach, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 155 (2022), 111636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111636 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111636
    [21] H. Huo, S. Hu, H. Xiang, Traveling wave solution for a diffusion SEIR epidemic model with self-protection and treatment, Electron. Res. Arch., 29 (2021), 2325–2358. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2020118 doi: 10.3934/era.2020118
    [22] S. Lai, N. W. Ruktanonchai, L. Zhou, O. Prosper, W. Luo, J. R. Floyd, et al., Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China, Nature, 585 (2020), 410–413. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2293-x doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2293-x
    [23] L. Hu, L. Nie, Dynamic modeling and analysis of COVID‐19 in different transmission process and control strategies, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 44 (2021), 409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6839 doi: 10.1002/mma.6839
    [24] World Health Organization, Listings of WHO's response to COVID-19, 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/29-06-2020-covidtimeline
    [25] A. Wang, X. Zhang, R. Yan, D. Bai, J. He, Evaluating the impact of multiple factors on the control of COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling analysis using India as a case study, Math. Biosci. Eng., 20 (2023), 6237–6272. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023269 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023269
    [26] S. Musa, A. Yusuf, S. Zhao, Z. Abdullahi, H. Abu-Odah, F. T. Saad, et al., Transmission dynamics of COVID-19 pandemic with combined effects of relapse, reinfection and environmental contribution: A modeling analysis, Results Phys., 38 (2022), 105653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105653 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105653
    [27] Y. Bai, L. Yao, T. Wei, Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19, Jama, 323 (2020), 1406–1407. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2565 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2565
    [28] O. Diekmann, J. A. P. Heesterbeek, J. A. J. Metz, On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations, J. Math. Biol., 28 (1990), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178324 doi: 10.1007/BF00178324
    [29] P. van den Driessche., J. Watmough, Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission, Math. Biosci., 180 (2002), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6 doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6
    [30] J. P. LaSalle, The Stability of Dynamical Systems, Society for industrial and applied mathematics, USA, 1976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970432
    [31] Chongqing Municipal Health Commission. Available from: https://wsjkw.cq.gov.cn/.
    [32] Chongqing Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: https://www.cqcdc.org/.
    [33] Chongqing Municipal People's Government. Available from: http://www.cq.gov.cn/.
    [34] B. Li, A. Deng, K. Li, Y. Hu, Z. Li, Y. Shi, et al., Viral infection and transmission in a large, well-traced outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant, Nat. Commun., 13 (2020), 460. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28089-y doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28089-y
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1335) PDF downloads(146) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog