Research article

Determinants of switching behavior to wear helmets when riding e-bikes, a two-step SEM-ANFIS approach


  • Received: 12 January 2023 Revised: 12 February 2023 Accepted: 26 February 2023 Published: 14 March 2023
  • E-bikes have become one of China's most popular travel modes. The authorities have issued helmet-wearing regulations to increase wearing rates to protect e-bike riders' safety, but the effect is unsatisfactory. To reveal the factors influencing the helmet-wearing behavior of e-bike riders, this study constructed a theoretical Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) model to analyze the factor's relationship from the perspective of travel behavior switching. A two-step SEM-ANFIS method is proposed to test relationships, rank importance and analyze the combined effect of psychological variables. The Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) was used to obtain the significant influencing factors. The Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), a nonlinear approach, was applied to analyze the importance of the significant influencing factors and draw refined conclusions and suggestions from the analysis of the combined effects. The PPM model we constructed has a good model fit and high model predictive validity (GOF = 0.381, R2 = 0.442). We found that three significant factors tested by PLS-SEM, perceived legal norms (β = 0.234, p < 0.001), perceived inconvenience (β = -0.117, p < 0.001) and conformity tendency (β = 0.241, p < 0.05), are the most important factors in the effects of push, mooring and pull. The results also demonstrated that legal norm is the most important factor but has less effect on people with low perceived vulnerability, and low subjective norms will make people with high conformity tendency to follow the crowd blindly. This study could contribute to developing refined interventions to improve the helmet-wearing rate effectively.

    Citation: Peng Jing, Weichao Wang, Chengxi Jiang, Ye Zha, Baixu Ming. Determinants of switching behavior to wear helmets when riding e-bikes, a two-step SEM-ANFIS approach[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(5): 9135-9158. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023401

    Related Papers:

  • E-bikes have become one of China's most popular travel modes. The authorities have issued helmet-wearing regulations to increase wearing rates to protect e-bike riders' safety, but the effect is unsatisfactory. To reveal the factors influencing the helmet-wearing behavior of e-bike riders, this study constructed a theoretical Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) model to analyze the factor's relationship from the perspective of travel behavior switching. A two-step SEM-ANFIS method is proposed to test relationships, rank importance and analyze the combined effect of psychological variables. The Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) was used to obtain the significant influencing factors. The Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), a nonlinear approach, was applied to analyze the importance of the significant influencing factors and draw refined conclusions and suggestions from the analysis of the combined effects. The PPM model we constructed has a good model fit and high model predictive validity (GOF = 0.381, R2 = 0.442). We found that three significant factors tested by PLS-SEM, perceived legal norms (β = 0.234, p < 0.001), perceived inconvenience (β = -0.117, p < 0.001) and conformity tendency (β = 0.241, p < 0.05), are the most important factors in the effects of push, mooring and pull. The results also demonstrated that legal norm is the most important factor but has less effect on people with low perceived vulnerability, and low subjective norms will make people with high conformity tendency to follow the crowd blindly. This study could contribute to developing refined interventions to improve the helmet-wearing rate effectively.



    加载中


    [1] J. A. Zhu, S. Dai, X. Y. Zhu, Characteristics of Electric Bike Accidents and Safety Enhancement Strategies, Urban Transp. China, 2018 (2018), 15–20.
    [2] CNBN, Electric Bicycles Are Nearly 300 Million in China, Available from: http://news.cnr.cn/rebang/20211011/t20211011_525629773.shtml.
    [3] D. Zhang, T. F. Ren, M. M. Zhang, Y. C. Zheng, H. Y Zhou, Analysis and prevention of the causes of electric bicycle accidents based on safety checklists (in Chinese), Sci. Technol. Innovation, 07 (2021), 37–39. https://doi.org/10.15913/j.cnki.kjycx.2021.07.011 doi: 10.15913/j.cnki.kjycx.2021.07.011
    [4] H. Leijdesdorff, J. van Dijck, P. Krijnen, C. Vleggeert-Lankamp, I. Schipper, Injury pattern, hospital triage, and mortality of 1250 patients with severe traumatic brain injury caused by road traffic accidents, J. Neurotrauma, 31 (2014), 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.3111 doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3111
    [5] M. F. Zavareh, A. M. Hezaveh, T. Nordfjærn, Intention to use bicycle helmet as explained by the Health Belief Model, comparative optimism and risk perception in an Iranian sample, Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav., 54 (2018), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.003
    [6] J. Olivier, P. Creighton, Bicycle injuries and helmet use: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int. J. Epidemiol., 46 (2017), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw153 doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw153
    [7] Y. N. Song, W. W. Ma, J. Shen, J. G. Shen, Analysis of the relationship between helmet wearing and casualty among electric vehicle drivers (in Chinese), Urban Rural Enterp. Health China, 35 (2020), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.16286/j.1003-5052.2020.12.003 doi: 10.16286/j.1003-5052.2020.12.003
    [8] J. Kumphong, T. Satiennam, W. Satiennam, The determinants of motorcyclists helmet use: urban arterial road in Khon Kaen City, Thailand, J. Saf. Res., 67 (2018), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.09.011 doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.09.011
    [9] N. Xu, N. Gao, J. H. Su, Y. Yan, D. D. Zhou, J. J. Peng, Investigation on knowledge, attitude and behavior of electric bicycle drivers and riders wearing safety helmets based on wechat public account (in Chinese), Shanghai J. Preventative Med., 30 (2018), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18803 doi: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18803
    [10] C. X. Ma, D. Yang, J. B. Zhou, Z. X. Feng, Q. Yuan, Risk riding behaviors of urban e-bikes: a literature review, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16 (2019), 2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132308 doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132308
    [11] J. B. Zhou, Y. Y. Guo, Y. Wu, S. Dong, Assessing factors related to e-bike crash and e-bike license Plate Use, J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 17 (2017), 229–234.
    [12] L. T. Truong, H. T. T. Nguyen, C. De Gruyter, Mobile phone use among motorcyclists and electric bike riders: a case study of Hanoi, Vietnam, Accid. Anal. Prev., 91 (2016), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.007 doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.007
    [13] N. Haworth, A. K. Debnath, How similar are two-unit bicycle and motorcycle crashes, Accid. Anal. Prev., 58 (2013), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.014 doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.014
    [14] J. Zhou, T. Zheng, S. Dong, X. Mao, C. Ma, Impact of helmet-wearing policy on e-bike safety riding behavior: a bivariate ordered probit analysis in Ningbo, China, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19 (2022), 2830. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052830 doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052830
    [15] X. S. Wang, J. Chen, M. Quddus, W. Zhou, M. Shen, Influence of familiarity with traffic regulations on delivery riders' e-bike crashes and helmet use: two mediator ordered logit models, Accid. Anal. Prev., 159 (2021), 106277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106277 doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106277
    [16] The Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China, The Traffic Management Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security has deployed a "One Helmet, One Belt" security operation, 2020, Available from: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-04/21/content_5504613.htm.
    [17] M. Karkhaneh, Effectiveness of bicycle helmet legislation to increase helmet use: a systematic review, Inj. Prev., 12 (2006), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2005.010942 doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010942
    [18] Guangzhou Public Security Bureau, In January, these cities in Guangdong had the lowest helmet wearing rate, 2021, Available from: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id = 1691405130964298455 & wfr = spider & for = pc
    [19] T. Tang, H. Wang, B. Guo, Study on helmet wearing intention of electric bicycle riders (in Chinese), J. Transp. Eng. Inf., 20 (2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19961/j.cnki.1672-4747.2021.11.024 doi: 10.19961/j.cnki.1672-4747.2021.11.024
    [20] B. Foroughi, P. V. Nhan, M. Iranmanesh, M. Ghobakhloo, M. Nilashi, E. Yadegaridehkordi, Determinants of intention to use autonomous vehicles: findings from PLS-SEM and ANFIS, J. Retailing Consum. Serv., 70 (2023), 103158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103158 doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103158
    [21] Q. F. Li, O. Adetunji, C. V. Pham, N. T. Tran, E. Chan, A. M. Bachani, Helmet use among motorcycle riders in ho chi minh city, vietnam: results of a five-year repeated cross-sectional study, Accid. Anal. Prev., 144 (2020), 105642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105642 doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105642
    [22] K. Brijs, T. Brijs, S. Sann, T. A. Trinh, G. Wets, R. A. C. Ruiter, Psychological determinants of motorcycle helmet use among young adults in Cambodia, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 26 (2014), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.08.002 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.08.002
    [23] Y. C. Ho, C. T. Tsai, Comparing ANFIS and SEM in linear and nonlinear forecasting of new product development performance, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011), 6498–6507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.095 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.095
    [24] E. Yadegaridehkordi, M. Nilashi, M. H. N. B. M. Nasir, O. Ibrahim, Predicting determinants of hotel success and development using structural equation modelling (SEM)-ANFIS method, Tourism Manage., 66 (2018), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.11.012 doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.11.012
    [25] B. Moon, Paradigms in migration research: exploring 'moorings' as a schema, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 19 (1995), 504–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259501900404 doi: 10.1177/030913259501900404
    [26] J. K. Hsieh, Y. C. Hsieh, H. C. Chiu, Y. C. Feng, Post-adoption switching behavior for online service substitutes: a perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework, Comput. Hum. Behav., 28 (2012), 1912–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.010 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.010
    [27] Y. Sun, D. Liu, S. J. Chen, X. R. Wu, X. L. Shen, X. Zhang, Understanding users' switching behavior of mobile instant messaging applications: an empirical study from the perspective of push-pull-mooring framework, Comput. Hum. Behav., 75 (2017), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.014 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.014
    [28] J. Y. Lai, J. Wang, Switching attitudes of taiwanese middle-aged and elderly patients toward cloud healthcare services: an exploratory study, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 92 (2015), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.004 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.004
    [29] H. S. Bansal, S. Taylor, Y. St. James, "Migrating" to new service providers: toward a unifying framework of consumers' switching behaviors, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 33 (2005), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304267928 doi: 10.1177/0092070304267928
    [30] S. Wang, J. Wang, F. Yang, From willingness to action: do push-pull-mooring factors matter for shifting to green transportation, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 79 (2020), 102242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102242 doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102242
    [31] H. Kim, The role of legal and moral norms to regulate the behavior of texting while driving, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 52 (2018), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.004
    [32] M. J. Paschall, J. W. Grube, S. Thomas, C. Cannon, R. Treffers, Relationships between local enforcement, alcohol availability, drinking norms, and adolescent alcohol use in 50 california cities, J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 73 (2012), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2012.73.657 doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.657
    [33] M. Limayem, S. G. Hirt, W. W. Chin, Intention does not always matter: the contingent role of habit on it usage behavior, in the 9th European Conference on Information Systems, 13 (2001).
    [34] C. Barbarossa, P. De Pelsmacker, Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: a comparison between green and non-green consumers, J. Bus. Ethics, 134 (2016), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2425-z doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2425-z
    [35] A. Mehrabian, C. A. Stefl, Basic temperament components of loneliness, shyness, and conformity, Social Behav. Pers. Int. J., 23 (1995), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1995.23.3.253 doi: 10.2224/sbp.1995.23.3.253
    [36] R. Zhou, W. J. Horrey, Predicting adolescent pedestrians' behavioral intentions to follow the masses in risky crossing situations, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 13 (2010), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2009.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2009.12.001
    [37] T. P. Tang, Y. T. Guo, X. Z. Zhou, S. Labi, S. L. Zhu, Understanding electric bike riders' intention to violate traffic rules and accident proneness in China, Travel Behav. Soc., 23 (2021), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.10.010 doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.10.010
    [38] P. Janmaimool, Application of protection motivation theory to investigate sustainable waste management behaviors, Sustainability, 9 (2017), 1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071079 doi: 10.3390/su9071079
    [39] K. Chamroonsawasdi, S. Chottanapund, R. A. Pamungkas, P. Tunyasitthisundhorn, B. Sornpaisarn, O. Numpaisan, Protection motivation theory to predict intention of healthy eating and sufficient physical activity to prevent Diabetes Mellitus in Thai population: A path analysis, Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev., 15 (2021), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.017 doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.017
    [40] L. Ajzen, From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior, in Action Control, Springer, (1985), 11–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
    [41] A. Shafiei, H. Maleksaeidi, Pro-environmental behavior of university students: application of protection motivation theory, Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 22 (2020), e00908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00908 doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00908
    [42] R. Meade, W. Barnard, Conformity and anticonformity among Americans and Chinese, J. Social Psychol., 89 (1973), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1973.9922563 doi: 10.1080/00224545.1973.9922563
    [43] M. N. Borhan, A. N. H. Ibrahim, M. A. A. Miskeen, Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external influence, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 130 (2019), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.058 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.058
    [44] L. Ross, T. Ross, S. Farber, C. Davidson, M. Trevino, A. Hawkins, The theory of planned behavior and helmet use among college students, Am. J. Health Behav., 35 (2011), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.35.5.7 doi: 10.5993/AJHB.35.5.7
    [45] S. O. Olsen, J. Scholderer, K. Brunsø, W. Verbeke, Exploring the relationship between convenience and fish consumption: A cross-cultural study, Appetite, 49 (2007), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.12.002 doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.12.002
    [46] T. N. Nguyen, A. Lobo, S. Greenland, Pro-environmental purchase behaviour: the role of consumers' biospheric values, J. Retailing Consum. Serv., 33 (2016), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.010
    [47] National Bureau of Statistics, China Statistical Yearbook (2022). Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj./ndsj/.
    [48] SUHO.COM, Characteristics of electric bicycle traffic accidents and safety improvement measures, (2019). Available from: https://www.sohu.com/a/289681314_782444.
    [49] J. Mandhani, J. K. Nayak, M. Parida, Interrelationships among service quality factors of Metro Rail Transit System: An integrated Bayesian networks and PLS-SEM approach, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 140 (2020), 320–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.08.014 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.08.014
    [50] T. F. Golob, Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 37 (2003), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00046-7 doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00046-7
    [51] J. Henseler, G. Hubona, P. A. Ray, Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines, Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 116 (2016), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382 doi: 10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
    [52] A. Leguina, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), Int. J. Res. Method Educ., 38 (2015), 220–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806 doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
    [53] J. F. Hair Jr, M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins, V. Kuppelwieser, Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research, Eur. Bus. Rev., 26 (2014), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128 doi: 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
    [54] M. Tenenhaus, V. E. Vinzi, Y. M. Chatelin, C. Lauro, PLS path modeling, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 48 (2005), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005 doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
    [55] J. R. Jang, ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 23 (1993), 665–685.
    [56] D. Nauck, F. Klawonn, R. Kruse, Foundation of Neuro-fuzzy Systems, Wiley, 1997.
    [57] S. Zhang, P. Jing, D. Yuan, C. Yang, On parents' choice of the school travel mode during the covid-19 pandemic, Math. Biosci. Eng., 19 (2022), 9412–9436. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022438 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022438
    [58] W. Chin, A. Gopal, W. D. Salisbury, Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: the development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation, Inf. Syst. Res., 8 (1997), 342–367. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.4.342 doi: 10.1287/isre.8.4.342
    [59] C. Fornell, D. F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res., 18 (1981), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 doi: 10.2307/3151312
    [60] A. García-Ferrer, A. de Juan, P. Poncela, Forecasting traffic accidents using disaggregated data. Int. J. Forecasting, 22 (2006), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2005.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2005.11.001
    [61] H. Zhou, S. B. Romero, X. Qin, An extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict pedestrians' violating crossing behavior using structural equation modeling, Accid. Anal. Prev., 95 (2016), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.009 doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.009
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1240) PDF downloads(83) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)  /  Tables(6)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog