Research article Special Issues

Influence of COVID-19 vaccination on the dynamics of new infected cases in the world


  • The initial COVID-19 vaccinations were created and distributed to the general population in 2020 thanks to emergency authorization and conditional approval. Consequently, numerous countries followed the process that is currently a global campaign. Taking into account the fact that people are being vaccinated, there are concerns about the effectiveness of that medical solution. Actually, this study is the first one focusing on how the number of vaccinated people might influence the spread of the pandemic in the world. From the Global Change Data Lab "Our World in Data", we were able to get data sets about the number of new cases and vaccinated people. This study is a longitudinal one from 14/12/2020 to 21/03/2021. In addition, we computed Generalized log-Linear Model on count time series (Negative Binomial distribution due to over dispersion in data) and implemented validation tests to confirm the robustness of our results. The findings revealed that when the number of vaccinated people increases by one new vaccination on a given day, the number of new cases decreases significantly two days after by one. The influence is not notable on the same day of vaccination. Authorities should increase the vaccination campaign to control well the pandemic. That solution has effectively started to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in the world.

    Citation: Mustafa Kamal, Mintodê Nicodème Atchadé, Yves Morel Sokadjo, Sabir Ali Siddiqui, Fathy H. Riad, M. M. Abd El-Raouf, Ramy Aldallal, Eslam Hussam, Huda M. Alshanbari, Hassan Alsuhabi, Ahmed M. Gemeay. Influence of COVID-19 vaccination on the dynamics of new infected cases in the world[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 3324-3341. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023156

    Related Papers:

    [1] Doaa Al-Sharoa . (α1, 2, β1, 2)-complex intuitionistic fuzzy subgroups and its algebraic structure. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 8082-8116. doi: 10.3934/math.2023409
    [2] Ayesha Shareef, Uzma Ahmad, Saba Siddique, Mohammed M. Ali Al-Shamiri . Pythagorean fuzzy incidence graphs with application in illegal wildlife trade. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21793-21827. doi: 10.3934/math.20231112
    [3] Supriya Bhunia, Ganesh Ghorai, Qin Xin . On the characterization of Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 962-978. doi: 10.3934/math.2021058
    [4] Sizhao Li, Xinyu Han, Dapeng Lang, Songsong Dai . On the stability of two functional equations for (S,N)-implications. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1822-1832. doi: 10.3934/math.2021110
    [5] Rizwan Gul, Muhammad Shabir, Tareq M. Al-shami, M. Hosny . A Comprehensive study on (α,β)-multi-granulation bipolar fuzzy rough sets under bipolar fuzzy preference relation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25888-25921. doi: 10.3934/math.20231320
    [6] Abdul Razaq, Ghaliah Alhamzi . On Pythagorean fuzzy ideals of a classical ring. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4280-4303. doi: 10.3934/math.2023213
    [7] Akarachai Satirad, Ronnason Chinram, Aiyared Iampan . Pythagorean fuzzy sets in UP-algebras and approximations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6002-6032. doi: 10.3934/math.2021354
    [8] Anas Al-Masarwah, Abd Ghafur Ahmad . Subalgebras of type (α, β) based on m-polar fuzzy points in BCK/BCI-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1035-1049. doi: 10.3934/math.2020072
    [9] Li Li, Mengjing Hao . Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy entropy and its application to multi-criterion group decision-making. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12511-12528. doi: 10.3934/math.2024612
    [10] Saleem Abdullah, Muhammad Qiyas, Muhammad Naeem, Mamona, Yi Liu . Pythagorean Cubic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application in green supply selection problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4735-4766. doi: 10.3934/math.2022263
  • The initial COVID-19 vaccinations were created and distributed to the general population in 2020 thanks to emergency authorization and conditional approval. Consequently, numerous countries followed the process that is currently a global campaign. Taking into account the fact that people are being vaccinated, there are concerns about the effectiveness of that medical solution. Actually, this study is the first one focusing on how the number of vaccinated people might influence the spread of the pandemic in the world. From the Global Change Data Lab "Our World in Data", we were able to get data sets about the number of new cases and vaccinated people. This study is a longitudinal one from 14/12/2020 to 21/03/2021. In addition, we computed Generalized log-Linear Model on count time series (Negative Binomial distribution due to over dispersion in data) and implemented validation tests to confirm the robustness of our results. The findings revealed that when the number of vaccinated people increases by one new vaccination on a given day, the number of new cases decreases significantly two days after by one. The influence is not notable on the same day of vaccination. Authorities should increase the vaccination campaign to control well the pandemic. That solution has effectively started to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in the world.



    Lagrange's theorem is one of the most fundamental theorem of Abstract algebra. In the late 18th century, Lagrange's theorem first appeared to handle the polynomial equation of degree five or more and its relation with symmetric functions. But, Lagrange stated his version of the theorem before the invention of group theory. This theorem developed over the decades. Pietro first gave the complete proof of this theorem. This theorem is an important tool for the study of finite groups as it gives an overview of the size of subgroups. Lagrange's theorem has various applications in number theory. This theorem has a significant role in the proof of Fermat's Little theorem. For further details, we refer to [1,2].

    Uncertainty is a part of our daily life. This world is neither based on hypothesis nor on accurate measurements. There is not always possible to make an obvious decision. Handling the errors in decision-making situation is a real challenge for us. In 1965, Zadeh [3] first introduced the notion of fuzzy set to handle vagueness in real-life problems, where he broke the conventional idea of yes or not that is zero or one. He defined fuzzy set as a mapping from any set to [0,1]. So the membership value of an element is any number between 0 and 1. After that fuzzy set becomes a trend in worldwide research. In 1971, Rosenfeld [4] first studied the concept of fuzzy subgroup and investigated various properties of it. In 1979, the notion of fuzzy subgroup was redefined by Anthony and Sherwood [5,6]. Fuzzy level subgroups were introduced by Das [7]. In 1992, Ajmal and Prajapati [8] introduced the ideas of fuzzy normal subgroup, fuzzy coset and fuzzy quotient subgroup. In 1988, Choudhury et al. [9] proved various properties of fuzzy subgroups and fuzzy homomorphisms. In 1990, Dixit et al. [10] discussed fuzzy level subgroups and union of fuzzy subgroups. The notion of anti-fuzzy subgroup was first proposed by Biswas [11]. Chakraborty and Khare [12] studied various properties of fuzzy homomorphisms. Ajmal [13] also studied homomorphisms of fuzzy subgroups. In 1994, Kim [14] defined the order of fuzzy subgroups and fuzzy p-subgroups. Many more results on fuzzy subgroups were introduced by Mukherjee [15,16] and Bhattacharya [17,18]. In 1999, Ray [19] introduced the product of fuzzy subgroups. In recent years many researchers studied various properties of fuzzy groups. In 2015, Tarnauceanu [20] classified fuzzy normal subgroups of finite groups. In 2016, Onasanya [21] reviewed some anti fuzzy properties of fuzzy subgroups. Shuaib [22] and Shaheryar [23] studied the properties of omicron fuzzy subgroups and omicron anti fuzzy subgroups. In 2018, Addis [24] developed fuzzy homomorphism theorems on groups.

    In decision-making problems, sometimes assigning membership values is not enough. In 1986, assigning non-membership degree with membership degree Atanassov [25] developed intuitionistic fuzzy set. Using this concept, intuitionistic fuzzy subgroups were studied by Zhan and Tan [26]. In 2013, Yager [27] defined Pythagorean fuzzy set. This set gives a modern way to model vagueness and uncertainty with high precision and accuracy compared to intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In 2021, Bhunia et al. [28] introduced Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. In recent years, some results related to Pythagorean fuzzy sets were given by [29,30,31,32]. In 2021, Bhunia [33] and Ghorai first initiated the study of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy sets, where they imposed the restrictions α and β for more accuracy. They proved that (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy sets are more precise than intuitionistic fuzzy sets and Pythagorean fuzzy sets. They defined the notion of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroup and proved various algebraic aspects of it. One of the most important results of finite group theory is the Lagrange's theorem. Our main motive of this paper is to give an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy version of Lagrange's theorem in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. We introduce the concept of relative subgroup of a group and define the (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of an element in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. We make a comparison between order of an element in a group and (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of that element in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroup. We define the extension principle in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy environments and study the effect of group homomorphism on (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. We introduce (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy quotient group and the index of an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroup. Finally, we give an approach to Lagrange's theorem in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups.

    An outline of this paper is given as follows: we recall some important definitions and concepts in Section 2. In Section 3, we define the notion of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of elements of groups and discuss many properties of it. Section 4 deals with some algebraic attributes of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroup. In Section 5, we introduce the concept of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy quotient group and give an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy version of Lagrange's theorem. Finally, we make a conclusion in Section 6.

    In this section, we recall some basic definitions which are used for the development of later sections.

    Definition 2.1. [33] Let S be a crisp set and α, β[0,1] be such that 0α2+β21. An (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy set ψ in S is an object having the form ψ={(u,μα(u),νβ(u)|uS} where μα(u)=μ(u)α and νβ(u)=ν(u)β are membership degree and non-membership degree of uS respectively, which satisfies the condition 0(μα(u))2+(νβ(u))21.

    Definition 2.2. [33] Let ψ be an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy set of a group G. Then ψ is said to be an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroup of the group G if the following conditions hold:

    μα(uv)μα(u)μα(v) and νβ(uv)νβ(u)νβ(v) for all u,vG

    μα(u1)μα(u) and νβ(u1)νβ(u) for all uG.

    Throughout this paper, we will write (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy set as (α,β)-PFS and (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroup as (α,β)-PFSG. Also, we will denote (α,β)-PFS as ψ=(μα,νβ) instead of ψ={(a,μα(a),νβ(a)|aS}.

    Proposition 2.1. [33] Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFS of a group G. Then ψ is an (α,β)-PFSG of G if and only if μα(uv1)μα(u)μα(v) and νβ(uv1)νβ(u)νβ(v) for all u,vG.

    Definition 2.3. [33] Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then for uG, (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy left coset (PFLC) of ψ is the (α,β)-PFS uψ=(uμα,uνβ), defined by (uμα)(m)=μα(u1m), (uνβ)(m)=νβ(u1m) and (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy right coset (PFRC) of ψ is the (α,β)-PFS ψu=(μαu,νβu), defined by (μαu)(m)=μα(mu1), (νβu)(m)=νβ(mu1) for all mG.

    Definition 2.4. [33] Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then ψ is an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy normal subgroup (PFNSG) of the group G if every (α,β)-PFLC of ψ is also an (α,β)-PFRC of ψ in G.

    Equivalently, uψ=ψu for all uG.

    Proposition 2.2. [33] Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then ψ is an (α,β)-PFNSG of G if and only if μα(uv)=μα(vu) and νβ(uv)=νβ(vu) for all u,vG.

    Proposition 2.3. [33] Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then ψ is an (α,β)-PFNSG of G if and only if μα(vuv1)=μα(u) and νβ(vuv1)=νβ(u) for all u,vG.

    In this section, we introduce the concept of relative subgroup of a group and define the (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of elements in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. Further, We compare between the fuzzy order of elements in fuzzy subgroups and (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of elements in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. Moreover, we discuss various algebraic properties of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of elements in (α,β)-PFSGs.

    First of all, we will construct a theorem which will be the building block of this section.

    Theorem 3.1. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G and u be any element of G. Then Ω(u)={vG|μα(v)μα(u), νβ(v)νβ(u)} forms a subgroup of the group G.

    Proof. For any element uG, we have Ω(u)={vG|μα(v)μα(u), νβ(v)νβ(u)}.

    Clearly uΩ(u), so Ω(u) is a non empty subset of G.

    Since ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFSG of the group G, then μα(e)μα(u) and νβ(e)νβ(u), where e is the identity element of G. So, eΩ(u).

    Let m and n be two arbitrary elements of Ω(u). Therefore

    μα(mn1)μα(m)μα(n1)=μα(m)μα(n)μα(u).

    Similarly, we can show that νβ(mn1)νβ(u).

    Consequently mn1Ω(u).

    Hence Ω(u) is a subgroup of the group G.

    Definition 3.1. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G and u be any element of G. Then the subgroup Ω(u) is called the relative subgroup of the group G corresponding to the element u.

    Definition 3.2. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G and u be any element of G. Then the (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of u in ψ is denoted by (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ and defined by the order of the relative subgroup of u in G.

    Therefore, (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=O(Ω(u)) for all u in G.

    Example 3.1. Let us consider the Klein's 4-group V4={e,a,b,c}, where e is the identity element of V4 and each element has its own inverse. Define the membership degree and non-membership degree of the elements of V4 by

    μ(e)=0.9, μ(a)=0.6, μ(b)=0.6, μ(c)=0.8,ν(e)=0.3, ν(a)=0.8, ν(b)=0.8, ν(c)=0.5.

    We choose α=0.8 and β=0.5. Then an (α,β)-PFS ψ=(μα,νβ) of V4 is given by

    μα(e)=0.8, μα(a)=0.6, μα(b)=0.6, μα(c)=0.8,νβ(e)=0.5, νβ(a)=0.8, νβ(b)=0.8, νβ(c)=0.5.

    Clearly, ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFSG of the group V4.

    Then the (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of the elements of V4 in ψ is given by

    (α,β)-PFO (e)ψ=O(Ω(e))=2, (α,β)-PFO (a)ψ=O(Ω(a))=4,

    (α,β)-PFO (b)ψ=O(Ω(b))=4 and (α,β)-PFO (c)ψ=O(Ω(c))=2.

    Now, we will make a comparison between order and (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of an element in a group.

    From the above example, we can see that (α,β)-PFO (e)ψO(e) and (α,β)-PFO (e)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (c)ψ=2. Again there is no element of order four in the Klein's 4-group but here (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of a and b in ψ is four.

    Remark 3.1. For any group, the identity element is the unique element of order one but in (α,β)-PFSG the (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of identity element may not be equal to one. Also, (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of an element in (α,β)-PFSG may not be equal to the order of that element in the group.

    Proposition 3.1. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then (α,β)-PFO (e)ψ(α,β)-PFO (u)ψ for all uG, where e is the identity of G.

    Proof. Let (α,β)-PFO (e)ψ=p, where p is a positive integer.

    Assume that Ω(e)={u1,u2,,up}, where uiuj for all i, j.

    Then μα(u1)=μα(u2)==μα(up)=μα(e) and

    νβ(u1)=νβ(u2)==νβ(up)=νβ(e).

    Since ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFSG of the group G, then

    μα(e)μα(u) and νβ(e)νβ(u) for all uG.

    So, u1, u2, , upΩ(u). Thus Ω(e)Ω(u).

    Consequently, O(Ω(e))O(Ω(u)) for all uG.

    Hence (α,β)-PFO (e)ψ(α,β)-PFO (u)ψ for all uG.

    Theorem 3.2. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then for all uG, (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (u1)ψ.

    Proof. Let u be an element of G.

    Then (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=O(Ω(u)), where Ω(u)={vG|μα(v)μα(u), νβ(v)νβ(u)}.

    Since ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFSG of the group G, therefore μα(u)=μα(u1) and νβ(u)=νβ(u1).

    So Ω(u)={vG|μα(v)μα(u1), νβ(v)νβ(u1)}=Ω(u1).

    This implies that, O(Ω(u))=O(Ω(u1)).

    Hence, (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (u1)ψ.

    Since u is an arbitrary element of G,

    (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (u1)ψ for all uG.

    Now, we will now introduce (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of (α,β)-PFSG of a group.

    Definition 3.3. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then (α,β)- Pythagorean fuzzy order of the (α,β)-PFSG ψ is denoted by (α,β)-PFO (ψ) and is defined by (α,β)-PFO (ψ)={(α,β)-PFO (u)ψ|uG}.

    Example 3.2. We consider the (α,β)-PFSG ψ of Klein's 4-group V4 in Example 3.1.

    (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of the elements of V4 in ψ is given by

    (α,β)-PFO (e)ψ=2, (α,β)-PFO (a)ψ=4, (α,β)-PFO (b)ψ=4 and (α,β)-PFO (c)ψ=2.

    Therefore (α,β)-PFO (ψ)={(α,β)-PFO (u)ψ|uV4}=4.

    Theorem 3.3. For any (α,β)-PFSG of a group, (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of that (α,β)-PFSG is same as the order of the group.

    Proof. Suppose ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G.

    Let u be any element of G.

    Without loss of generality, we may assume that

    μα(v)μα(u) and νβ(v)νβ(u) for all vG.

    Since Ω(u)={vG|μα(v)μα(u), νβ(v)νβ(u)}, then Ω(u)=G.

    Also, |Ω(u)||Ω(v)| for all vG.

    Consequently (α,β)-PFO (ψ)=(α,β)-PFO (u)ψ.

    Again (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=O(Ω(u)).

    Therefore (α,β)-PFO (ψ)=O(G).

    Hence (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of any (α,β)-PFSG of a group is the same as the order of the group.

    Remark 3.2. For any (α,β)-PFSG of a group G, (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of each element of G divides (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of the (α,β)-PFSG.

    Theorem 3.4. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G and u be an element of G such that (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=p. If gcd(p,q)=1 for a positive integer q, then μα(uq)=μα(u) and νβ(uq)=νβ(u).

    Proof. Since (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=p, then we have up=e.

    Again ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G, then

    μα(uq)μα(u) and νβ(uq)νβ(u) for any positive integer q.

    Also gcd(p,q)=1, then there exists positive integers a and b such that ap+bq=1. Now

    μα(u)=μα(uap+bq)μα(uap)μα(ubq)μα(e)μα(uq)=μα(uq).

    Therefore μα(u)μα(uq). Similarly, we can show that νβ(u)νβ(uq).

    Hence μα(uq)=μα(u) and νβ(uq)=νβ(u).

    Theorem 3.5. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G and u be any element of G. If for an integer q, μα(uq)=μα(e) and νβ(uq)=νβ(e) then q|(α,β)-PFO (u)ψ.

    Proof. Let (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=p.

    Without loss of generality, we may assume that q is the minimum integer for which μα(uq)=μα(e) and νβ(uq)=νβ(e) holds.

    By division algorithm, there exists two integers m and r such that p=mq+r where 0r<q. Now \newpage

    μα(ur)=μα(upmq)μα(up)μα((u1)mq)=μα(up)μα(umq)=μα(e)μα((uq)m)μα(e)μα(uq)=μα(e).

    Similarly, we can show that νβ(ur)νβ(e).

    Consequently, μα(ur)=μα(e) and νβ(ur)=νβ(e).

    This result contradicts the minimality of q as 0r<q.

    Therefore r must be zero, so p=mq.

    Hence q|(α,β)-PFO (u)ψ.

    In the next result, we will show how to find (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of integral power of an element.

    Theorem 3.6. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G and u be any element of G. If (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=p then for an integer k, (α,β)-PFO (uk)ψ=pgcd(p,k).

    Proof. Let (α,β)-PFO (uk)ψ=m and assume that gcd(p,k)=g.

    Since (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=p, then up=e where e is the identity of G. Now

    μα((uk)pg)=μα((up)kg)=μα(ekg)=μα(e).

    Similarly, we can show that νβ((uk)pg)=νβ(e).

    Therefore by Theorem 3.5, we can say pg divides m.

    Also we have gcd(p,k)=g, then there exists two integers s and t such that ps+kt=g. Therefore

    μα(ugm)=μα(u(ps+kt)m)=μα(upsmuktm)μα((up)sm)μα((ukm)t)μα(up)μα((uk)m)=μα(e)μα(e)=μα(e).

    Therefore the only possibility is μα(ugm)=μα(e).

    Similarly, we can prove that νβ(ugm)=νβ(e).

    Thus using Theorem 3.5 we have gm|p, that is m|pg.

    Therefore m=pg.

    Hence (α,β)-PFO (uk)ψ=pgcd(p,k).

    Theorem 3.7. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G and u be any element of G. If (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=p and rs(mod p) then (α,β)-PFO (ur)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (us)ψ, where r,sZ.

    Proof. Let (α,β)-PFO (ur)ψ=x and (α,β)-PFO (us)ψ=y.

    Since rs(mod p) then r=pq+s for some integer q. Now

    μα((ur)y)=μα((upq+s)y)=μα(upqyusy)μα((up)qy)μα((us)y)=μα(e)μα(e)=μα(e).

    Therefore the only possibility is μα((ur)y)=μα(e).

    Similarly, we can prove νβ((ur)y)=νβ(e).

    By using Theorem 3.5, we have y|x.

    In the same manner, we can prove that x|y. Thus x=y.

    Hence (α,β)-PFO (ur)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (us)ψ, where r,sZ.

    Theorem 3.8. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFNSG of a group G and u be any element of G. Then (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (vuv1)ψ for all vG.

    Proof. Let v be an arbitrary element of G.

    Since ψ is an (α,β)-PFNSG of the group G, then μα(u)=μα(vuv1) and νβ(u)=νβ(vuv1).

    Therefore the relative subgroups corresponding to u is the same as that of vuv1.

    This implies that Ω(u)=Ω(vuv1).

    Consequently, O(Ω(u))=O(Ω(vuv1)).

    Since v is an arbitrary element of G, hence (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (vuv1)ψ for all vG.

    Theorem 3.9. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFNSG of a group G. Then (α,β)-PFO (uv)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (vu)ψ for all u,vG.

    Proof. Let u and v be any two elements of G.

    We have μα(uv)=μα((v1v)(uv))=μα(v1(vu)v).

    Similarly, νβ(uv)=νβ(v1(vu)v).

    Therefore Ω(uv)=Ω(v1(vu)(v1)1).

    Consequently, (α,β)-PFO (uv)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (v1(vu)(v1)1)ψ.

    Again by Theorem 3.8, we have (α,β)-PFO (v(vu)v1)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (vu)ψ.

    Since u and v are arbitrary elements of G, hence (α,β)-PFO (uv)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (vu)ψ for all u,vG.

    Theorem 3.10. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of an abelian group G and u,v be two elements of G such that gcd((α,β)-PFO (u)ψ,(α,β)-PFO (v)ψ)=1. If μα(uv)=μα(e) and νβ(uv)=νβ(e) then (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (v)ψ=1.

    Proof. Let (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=p and (α,β)-PFO (v)ψ=q.

    So, we have gcd(p,q)=1. Now

    μα(uqvq)=μα((uv)q)μα(uv)=μα(e).

    Therefore the only possibility is μα(uqvq)=μα(e). Again

    μα(uq)=μα(uqvqvq)μα(uqvq)μα((v1)q)=μα(e)μα(e)=μα(e).

    So, we have μα(uq)=μα(e). Similarly, we can prove that νβ(uq)=νβ(e).

    Therefore by Theorem 3.5, we have q|p. Again gcd(p,q)=1, thus q=1.

    Similarly, we can show that p=1.

    Hence (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (v)ψ=1.

    Theorem 3.11. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a cyclic group G. Then any two generators of the cyclic group G have same (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order in ψ.

    Proof. Let G be a finite cyclic group of order n.

    Also, let u and v be two generators of G. Therefore un=e and vn=e.

    Since u is a generator of G, then v=uk for some positive integer k.

    So, k and n are co-prime that is gcd(k,n)=1.

    Therefore by applying Theorem 3.10, (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (uk)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (v)ψ.

    Now, if G is an infinite cyclic group then it has only two generators.

    Suppose u is a generator of G then u1 is the only other generator.

    Therefore by using Theorem 3.2, we have (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=(α,β)-PFO (u1)ψ.

    Hence (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of any two generators of a cyclic group is equal.

    In this section, we define the extension principle in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy environment. We study the effect of group homomorphism on (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. Further, we develop the concept of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy normalizer and (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy centralizer. Moreover, we investigate many algebraic attributes of it.

    Definition 4.1. Let ψ1=(μα1,νβ1) and ψ2=(μα2,νβ2) be two (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy sets on G1 and G2 respectively. Let h be a mapping from G1 to G2. Then h(ψ1) is an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy set on G2 and defined by h(ψ1)(v)=(h(μα1)(v),h(νβ1)(v)) for all vG2, where

    h(μα1)(v)={{μα1(u)|uG1 and h(u)=v},whenh1(v)0,elsewhere

    and

    h(νβ1)(v)={{νβ1(u)|uG1 and h(u)=v},whenh1(v)1,elsewhere.

    Also, h1(ψ2) is an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy set on G1 and defined by

    h1(ψ2)(u)=(h1(μα2)(u),h1(νβ2)(u)) for all uG1, where

    (h1(μα2))(u)=(μα2(h(u)) and (h1(νβ2))(u)=(νβ2(h(u)).

    Example 4.1. We consider two groups G1=(Z,+) and G2=({1,1},.).

    Let h be a mapping from G1 to G2 defined by

    h(u)={1,if uiseven1,elsewhere.

    Let ψ1=(μα1,νβ1) and ψ2=(μα2,νβ2) be two (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy sets on G1 and G2 respectively, is given by

    μα1(u)={0.9,whenu2Z0.6,elsewhere
    νβ1(u)={0.2,whenu2Z0.7,elsewhere

    and μα2(1)=0.8, μα2(1)=0.4, νβ2(1)=0.5, νβ2(1)=0.6.

    Then h(ψ1) is an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy set on G2 is given by h(μα1)(1)=0.9, h(μα1)(1)=0.6, h(νβ1)(1)=0.2 and h(νβ1)(1)=0.7.

    Also, h1(ψ2) is an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy set on G1 is given by

    h1(μα2)(u)={0.8,whenu2Z0.4,elsewhere
    h1(νβ2)(u)={0.5,whenu2Z0.6,elsewhere.

    Theorem 4.1. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G1 and h be a group homomorphism from G1 onto G2. Then h(ψ) is an (α,β)-PFSG of the group G2.

    Proof. Since h:G1G2 is an onto homomorphism, therefore h(G1)=G2.

    Let u2 and v2 be two elements of G2.

    Suppose u2=h(u1) and v2=h(v1) for some u1, v1G1.

    We have h(ψ)(v)=(h(μα)(v),h(νβ)(v)) for all vG2. Now

    h(μα)(u2v2)={μα(w)|wG1,h(w)=u2v2}{μα(u1v1)|u1,v1G1 and h(u1)=u2,h(v1)=v2}{μα(u1)μα(v1)|u1,v1G1 and h(u1)=u2,h(v1)=v2}=({μα(u1)|u1G1 and h(u1)=u2})({μα(v1)|v1G1 and h(v1)=v2})=h(μα)(u2)h(μα)(v2).

    Therefore h(μα)(u2v2)h(μα)(u2)h(μα)(v2) for all u2 and v2G2.

    Similarly, we can prove that h(νβ)(u2v2)h(νβ)(u2)h(νβ)(v2) for all u2 and v2G2. Again

    h(μα)(u12)={μα(w)|wG1 and h(w)=(u12)}={μα(w1)|wG1 and h(w1)=(u2)}=h(μα)(u2).

    Therefore h(μα)(u12)=h(μα)(u2) for all u2G2.

    Similarly, we can show that h(νβ)(u12)=h(νβ)(u2) for all u2G2.

    Hence h(ψ)=(h(μα),h(νβ)) is an (α,β)-PFSG of the group G2.

    Theorem 4.2. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G2 and h be a bijective group homomorphism from G1 onto G2. Then h1(ψ) is an (α,β)-PFSG of the group G1.

    Proof. Let u1 and v1 be any two elements of G1.

    We have h1(ψ)(u)=(h1(μα)(u),h1(νβ)(u)) for all uG1. Now

    h1(μα)(u1v1)=μα(h(u1v1))=μα(h(u1)h(v1)) (Since h is a homomorphism)μα(h(u1))μα(h(v1))=h1(μα)(u1)h1(μα)(v1).

    Therefore h1(μα)(u1v1)h1(μα)(u1)h1(μα)(v1) for all u1 and v1G1.

    Similarly, we can show that h1(νβ)(u1v1)h1(νβ)(u1)h1(νβ)(v1) for all u1 and v1G1. Again

    h1(μα)(u11)=μα(h(u11))=μα(h(u1)1)=μα(h(u1))=h1(μα)(u1).

    Therefore h1(μα)(u11)=h1(μα)(u1) for all u1G1.

    Similarly, we can show that h1(νβ)(u11)=h1(νβ)(u1) for all u1G1.

    Hence h1(ψ)=(h1(μα),h1(νβ)) is an (α,β)-PFSG of the group G1.

    Definition 4.2. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then the (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy normalizer of ψ is denoted by (ψ) and defined by

    (ψ)={u| uG, μα(p)=μα(upu1) and νβ(u)=νβ(upu1) for all pG.

    Example 4.2. We consider the (α,β)-PFSG ψ1=(μα1,νβ1) of the group G1=(Z,+) in Example 4.1.

    Then the (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy normalizer of ψ is (ψ)=Z.

    Theorem 4.3. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a finite group G. Then (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy normalizer (ψ) is a subgroup of the group G.

    Proof. Let u and v be two elements of (ψ).

    Then we have

    μα(p)=μα(upu1), νβ(p)=νβ(upu1) pG (4.1)

    and

    μα(q)=μα(vqv1), νβ(q)=νβ(vqv1) qG. (4.2)

    Clearly e(ψ), so (ψ) is a non-empty finite subset of G.

    To show that (ψ) is a subgroup of G, it is enough to show uv(ψ).

    Now put p=vqv1 in (4.1), we have

    μα(vqv1)=μα(uvqv1u1) and νβ(vqv1)=νβ(uvqv1u1). (4.3)

    Then by applying (4.2) in (4.3), we get μα(q)=μα(uvqv1u1) and νβ(q)=νβ(uvqv1u1).

    This implies that μα(q)=μα((uv)q(uv)1) and νβ(q)=νβ((uv)q(uv)1).

    Therefore uv(ψ).

    Hence (ψ) is a subgroup of the group G.

    Proposition 4.1. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFNSG of the group G if and only if (ψ)=G.

    Proof. We have (ψ)={u| uG, μα(p)=μα(upu1) and νβ(u)=νβ(upu1) for all pG.

    Therefore (ψ)G.

    Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be a (α,β)-PFNSG of a group G.

    Then we have μα(u)=μα(vuv1) and νβ(u)=νβ(vuv1) for all u,vG.

    This shows that G(ψ).

    Hence (ψ)=G.

    Conversely, let (ψ)=G.

    Then μα(u)=μα(vuv1) and νβ(u)=νβ(vuv1) for all u,vG.

    Therefore ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFNSG of the group G.

    Proposition 4.2. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then ψ is an (α,β)-PFNSG of the group (ψ).

    Proof. Let u and v be any elements of (ψ).

    Then μα(w)=μα(uwu1) and νβ(w)=νβ(uwu1) for all wG.

    Since (ψ) is a subgroup of the group G, then vu(ψ).

    Putting w=vu in the above relation we get

    μα(vu)=μα(uvuu1) and νβ(vu)=νβ(uvuu1).

    This implies that μα(vu)=μα(uv) and νβ(vu)=νβ(uv), which is a necessary condition for an (α,β)-PFSG to be an (α,β)-PFNSG of a group.

    Hence ψ is an (α,β)-PFNSG of the group (ψ).

    Definition 4.3. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy centralizer of ψ is denoted by Cψ and defined by Cψ={u| uG, μα(uv)=μα(vu) and νβ(uv)=νβ(vu)} for all vG.

    Example 4.3. We consider the (α,β)-PFSG ψ of the Klein's 4-group V4 in Example 3.1.

    Then the (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy centralizer of ψ is Cψ=V4.

    Theorem 4.4. (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy centralizer of an (α,β)-PFSG of a group is a subgroup of that group.

    Proof. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G.

    Then (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy centralizer of ψ is given by

    Cψ={u| uG, μα(uv)=μα(vu) and νβ(uv)=νβ(vu)} for all vG.

    Let p and q be any two elements of Cψ. Now for any rG, we have

    μα((pq)r)=μα(p(qr))=μα((qr)p)=μα(q(rp))=μα((rp)q)=μα(r(pq)).

    Therefore μα((pq)r)=μα(r(pq)) for all rG.

    Similarly, we can show that νβ((pq)r)=νβ(r(pq)) for all rG.

    This shows that pqCψ. Again for any sG, we have

    μα(p1s)=μα((s1p)1)=μα(s1p)=μα(ps1)=μα((sp1)1)=μα(sp1).

    Therefore μα(p1s)=μα(sp1) for all sG.

    Similarly, we can prove that νβ(p1s)=νβ(sp1) for all sG.

    This proves that for pCψ, we have p1Cψ.

    Hence Cψ is a subgroup of the group G.

    In this section, we introduce the notion of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy quotient group of an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroup and define the index of an (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroup. We prove Lagrange's theorem for (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroup.

    Theorem 5.1. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFNSG of a finite group G and Φ be the collection of all (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy cosets of ψ in G. Then Φ forms a group under the composition uψvψ=(uv)ψ for all u,vG.

    Proof. To show (Φ,) is a group under the composition uψvψ=(uv)ψ for all u,vG, first we have to show that this is a well defined binary operation.

    Let u,v,w,x be elements of G such that uψ=wψ and vψ=xψ.

    That is uμα(p)=wμα(p), uνβ(p)=wνβ(p) and vμα(p)=xμα(p), vνβ(p)=xνβ(p)pG.

    This implies that for all pG,

    μα(u1p)=μα(w1p), νβ(u1p)=νβ(w1p) (5.1)

    and

    μα(v1p)=μα(x1p), νβ(v1p)=νβ(x1p). (5.2)

    We have to show that uψvψ=wψxψ.

    That is (uv)ψ=(wx)ψ.

    We have (uv)μα(p)=μα(v1u1p) and (wx)μα(p)=μα(x1w1p)pG. Now

    μα(v1u1p)=μα(v1u1ww1p)=μα(v1u1wxx1w1p)μα(v1u1wx)μα(x1w1p).

    So,

    μα(v1u1p)μα(v1u1wx)μα(x1w1p) pG. (5.3)

    Putting p=u1wx in (5.2), we get

    μα(v1u1wx)=μα(x1u1wx).

    Since ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFNSG of G, then μα(x1u1wx)=μα(u1w).

    Putting p=w in (5.1), we get

    μα(u1w)=μα(w1w)=μα(e).

    Consequently, μα(v1u1wx)=μα(e).

    So from (5.3), we have μα(v1u1p)μα(x1w1p).

    Similarly, we can show that μα(x1w1p)μα(v1u1p).

    Therefore μα(v1u1p)=μα(x1w1p), pG.

    Similarly, we can prove that νβ(v1u1p)=νβ(x1w1p), pG.

    This shows that, (uv)μα(p)=(wx)μα(p) and (uv)νβ(p)=(wx)νβ(p), pG.

    Consequently, (uv)ψ=(wx)ψ.

    Hence the composition is well defined on Φ.

    Since G is a finite group, then there is no ambiguity in closed and associativity of the composition on Φ.

    Clearly, eψ is the identity of Φ.

    Also, inverse of any element uψ of Φ is u1ψΦ.

    That is (uψ)(u1ψ)=eψ.

    Hence (Φ,) is a group under the composition uψvψ=(uv)ψ for all u,vG.

    Definition 5.1. Order of the group (Φ,), collection of all (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy cosets of an (α,β)-PFNSG ψ in a finite group G is called the index of ψ and denoted by [G:ψ].

    Example 5.1. Let us consider the group G=(Z3,+3), where '+3' is addition of integers modulo 3.

    Define the α-membership value and β-non-membership value of the elements of Z3 by

    μα(0)=0.8, μα(1)=0.7, μα(2)=0.7,νβ(0)=0.1, νβ(1)=0.2, νβ(2)=0.2.

    We can easily varify that ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFNSG of the group G=(Z3,+3).

    Then the collection of all (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy cosets of ψ, Φ={0ψ,1ψ,2ψ}.

    Now (1μα)(1)=μα(11+31)=μα(2+31)=μα(0)=0.8 and (2μα)(1)=μα(21+31)=μα(1+31)=μα(2)=0.7.

    Therefore (1μα)(1)(2μα)(1). This shows that 1ψ2ψ.

    Hence the index of ψ, [G:ψ]=3.

    Theorem 5.2. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFNSG of a finite group G. Then an (α,β)-PFS Ψ=(μα,νβ) of Φ defined by μα(uμα)=μα(u) and νβ(uνβ)=νβ(u) is an (α,β)-PFSG of the group (Φ,) for all uG.

    Proof. Let uψ and vψ be any two elements of Φ, where u,vG. Now

    μα((uμα)(vμα))=μα((uv)μα)=μα(uv)μα(u)μα(v)=μα(uμα)μα(vμα).

    Therefore μα((uμα)(vμα))μα(uμα)μα(vμα).

    Similarly, we can show that νβ((uνβ)(vνβ))νβ(uνβ)νβ(vνβ).

    Again, μα(u1μα)=μα(u1)=μα(u)=μα(uμα).

    Similarly, we have νβ(u1νβ)=νβ(uνβ).

    Hence Ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFSG of the group (Φ,).

    Definition 5.2. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFNSG of a finite group G. Then the (α,β)-PFSG Ψ=(μα,νβ) of the group (Φ,) is called (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy quotient group of ψ.

    Example 5.2. We consider the (α,β)-PFNSG ψ of the group (Z,+3) in Example 5.1.

    Therefore the collection of all (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy cosets of ψ, Φ={0ψ,1ψ,2ψ}.

    We define an (α,β)-PFS Ψ=(μα,νβ) of Φ by μα(uμα)=μα(u) and νβ(uνβ)=νβ(u).

    Then μα(0μα)=μα(0)=0.8, μα(1μα)=μα(1)=0.7, μα(2μα)=μα(2)=0.7 and

    νβ(0νβ)=νβ(0)=0.1, νβ(1νβ)=νβ(1)=0.2, νβ(2νβ)=νβ(2)=0.2.

    Now we can easily check that Ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFSG of Φ.

    Therefore Ψ=(μα,νβ) is the (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy quotient group of ψ.

    Theorem 5.3. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFNSG of a finite group G and Φ be the collection of all (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy cosets of ψ in G. We define a mapping Δ:GΦ by Δ(u)=uψ for all uG. Then Δ is a group homomorphism from G to Φ with kernel (Δ)={uG| μα(u)=μα(e), νβ(u)=νβ(e).

    Proof. We have Δ:GΦ defined by Δ(u)=uψ for all uG.

    Let u and v be any elements of G. Then we have Δ(uv)=(uv)ψ=(uψ)(vψ)=Δ(u)Δ(v).

    This proves that Δ is a group homomorphism from G to Φ.

    Now the kernel of Δ is given by

    ker(Δ)={uG|Δ(u)=eψ}={uG|uψ=eψ}={uG|uψ(v)=eψ(v), vG}={uG|uμα(v)=eμα(v), uνβ(v)=eνβ(v), vG}={uG|μα(u1v)=μα(v), νβ(u1v)=νβ(v), vG}={uG|μα(u)=μα(e), νβ(u)=νβ(e)}.

    Hence ker(Δ)={uG|μα(u)=μα(e), νβ(u)=νβ(e)}.

    Remark 5.1. ker(Δ) is a subgroup of the group G.

    Theorem 5.4. (An approach to Lagrange's theorem in (α,β)-PFSG)

    Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFNSG of a finite group G. Then [G:ψ] divides O(G).

    Proof. We have ψ=(μα,νβ) is an (α,β)-PFNSG of a finite group G.

    Then Φ={uψ|uG}, the collection of all (α,β)-PFC of ψ in G is also finite.

    In Theorem 5.3, We have seen that there is a group homomorphism Δ from G to Φ by Δ(u)=uψ for all uG.

    We set M={uG|uψ=eψ}.

    Then M=ker(Δ), which is a subgroup of G.

    Now, we decompose G as a disjoint union of left cosets of G modulo m as follows

    G=u1M  u2M  u3M umM

    where umM=M.

    We have to show that there is a one-one correspondence between cosets uiM of G and the elements of Φ.

    We consider any coset uiM of G and any element mM.

    Then we have Δ(uim)=uimψ=(uiψ)(mψ)=(uiψ)(eψ)=(uiψ).

    This shows that Δ maps every element of uiM to the (α,β)-PFC uiψ.

    Now, we construct a mapping Δ_ between {uiM| 1im} and Φ by Δ_(uiM)=uiψ.

    Let upψ=uqψ. Then we have u1qupψ=eψ.

    Therefore u1qupM.

    This implies that upM=uqM.

    Hence Δ_(uiM)=uiψ is a one-one mapping.

    Therefore we can conclude that the number of distinct cosets is equal to the cardinality of Φ.

    That is [G:M]=[G:ψ].

    Since [G:M] divides O(G), then [G:ψ] must divide O(G).

    Lagrange's theorem is a very useful theorem in finite group theory. Now we will give some applications of this theorem in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups.

    Corollary 5.1. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then O(u)|(α,β)-PFO (u)ψ for all uG.

    Proof. Let u be any element of G and O(u)=k, where k is a positive integer.

    Then uk=e, where e is the identity element of G.

    We consider H=<u> is a subgroup of G.

    Now, μα(u2)μα(u)μα(u)=μα(u) and νβ(u2)νβ(u)νβ(u)=νβ(u).

    Thus by induction, we can show that μα(up)μα(u) and νβ(up)νβ(u) for all positive integer p.

    So, u, u2, , ukΩ(u). Consequently, HΩ(u).

    Therefore H is a subgroup of Ω(u).

    Thus by Lagrange's theorem, O(H)|O(Ω(u)).

    Therefore O(u)|(α,β)-PFO (u)ψ.

    Since u is an arbitrary element of G, O(u)|(α,β)-PFO (u)ψ for all uG.

    Corollary 5.2. Let ψ=(μα,νβ) be an (α,β)-PFSG of a group G. Then (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of each element of G in ψ divides the order of the group.

    Proof. According to the definition of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of an element of G in ψ, (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ=O(Ω(u)) for all uG.

    From Theorem 3.1, Ω(u) is a subgroup of the group G.

    Therefore by Lagrange's theorem, the order of Ω(u) divides the order of the group (G,).

    That is O(Ω(u))|O(G).

    This implies that (α,β)-PFO (u)ψ|O(G) for all uG.

    Hence (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of each element of G in ψ divides the order of the group.

    The purpose of this paper is to explore the study of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. The whole paper revolved around the development of theories for fuzzification of Lagrange's theorem in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. All the sections of this paper are arranged in such a way that we can approach Lagrange's theorem. We have introduced the concept of relative subgroup of a group and defined the notion of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of an element in (α,β)-PFSG. Various algebraic attributes of it are discussed. We have established a relation between order and (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy order of an element in a group and defined the extension principle for (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy sets. It is shown that homomorphic image and pre-image of an (α,β)-PFSG is also an (α,β)-PFSG. Further, the concept of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy normalizer and (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy centralizer of an (α,β)-PFSG are given. We have proved that (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy normalizer and (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy centralizer of an (α,β)-PFSG are subgroups of that group. Moreover, we have introduced (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy quotient group and defined the index of an (α,β)-PFSG. Finally, we have presented the (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy version of Lagrange's theorem. We have produced some applications of Lagrange's theorem in (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups. In future, we will work on the number of (α,β)-Pythagorean fuzzy subgroups of a group.

    This research work of first author is sponsored by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Human Resource Development Group (HRDG), INDIA. Sanctioned file no. is 09/599(0081)/2018-EMR-I. This work is partially supported by Research Council Faroe Islands and University of the Faroe Islands for the third author. The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for a careful checking of the details and for helpful comments that improved the overall presentation of this paper.

    All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] Y. Diao, S. Kodera, D. Anzai, J. Gomez-Tames, E. A. Rashed, A. Hirata, Influence of population density, temperature, and absolute humidity on spread and decay durations of COVID-19: a comparative study of scenarios in China, England, Germany, and Japan, One Health, 12 (2021), 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100203 doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100203
    [2] Y. Kubota, T. Shiono, B. Kusumoto, J. Fujinuma, Multiple drivers of the COVID-19 spread: the roles of climate, international mobility, and region-specific conditions, PLoS One, 15 (2020), e0239385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239385 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239385
    [3] Y. M. Sokadjo, M. N. Atchadé, The influence of passenger air traffic on the spread of COVID-19 in the world, Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., 8 (2020), 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100213 doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100213
    [4] A. Miller, M. J. Reandelar, K. Fasciglione, V. Roumenova, Y. Li, G. H. Otazu, Correlation between universal bcg vaccination policy and reduced mortality for COVID-19, medRxiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.24.20042937 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.24.20042937
    [5] N. Curtis, A. Sparrow, T. A. Ghebreyesus, M. G. Netea, Considering bcg vaccination to reduce the impact of COVID-19, Lancet, 395 (2020), 1545–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31025-4 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31025-4
    [6] P. K. Hegarty, A. M. Kamat, H. Zafirakis, A. Dinardo, Bcg vaccination may be protective against COVID-19, 2020. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340224580.
    [7] S. Shivendu, S. Chakraborty, A. Onuchowska, A. Patidar, A. Srivastava, Is there evidence that bcg vaccination has non-specific protective effects for COVID-19 infections or is it an illusion created by lack of testing, medRxiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.18.20071142 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.18.20071142
    [8] J. Hensel, K. M. McAndrews, D. J. McGrail, D. P. Dowlatshahi, V. S. LeBleu, R. Kalluri, Protection against SARS-CoV-2 by bcg vaccination is not supported by epidemiological analyses, Sci. Rep., 10 (2020), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75491-x doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75491-x
    [9] A. Gulati, C. Pomeranz, Z. Qamar, S. Thomas, D. Frisch, G. George, et al., A comprehensive review of manifestations of novel coronaviruses in the context of deadly COVID-19 global pandemic, Am. J. Med. Sci., 360 (2020), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2020.05.006 doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.05.006
    [10] A. Atkeson, How deadly is COVID-19? Understanding the difficulties with estimation of its fatality rate, Nat. Bur. Econ. Res., 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3386/w26965 doi: 10.3386/w26965
    [11] Z. Zaharah, G. I. Kirilova, A. Windarti, Impact of corona virus outbreak towards teaching and learning activities in indonesia, SALAM: J. Sosial Budaya Syar-I, 7 (2020), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i3.15104 doi: 10.15408/sjsbs.v7i3.15104
    [12] R. Saini, Impact of corona virus on indian economy, 2020. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3595300.
    [13] P. P. Sahoo, S. Rath, Potential impact of corona virus on agriculture sector, Biotica Res. Today, 2 (2020), 64–65. Available from: https://www.biospub.com/index.php/biorestoday/article/view/52.
    [14] R. Siche, What is the impact of COVID-19 disease on agriculture, Sci. Agropecu., 11 (2020), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.01.00 doi: 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.01.00
    [15] S. Dubey, P. Biswas, R. Ghosh, S. Chatterjee, M. J. Dubey, S. Chatterjee, et al., Psychosocial impact of COVID-19, Diabetes Metab. Syndr., 14 (2020), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.035 doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.035
    [16] S. Grover, S. Sahoo, A. Mehra, A. Avasthi, A. Tripathi, A. Subramanyan, et al., Psychological impact of COVID-19 lockdown: an online survey from India, Indian J. Psychiatry, 62 (2020), 354. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_427_20 doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_427_20
    [17] Q. Wang, M. Su, A preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on environment–a case study of China, Sci. Total Environ., 728 (2020), 138915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138915 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138915
    [18] H. Alsuhabi, I. Alkhairy, E. M. Almetwally, H. M. Almongy, A. M. Gemeay, E. Hafez, et al., A superior extension for the lomax distribution with application to COVID-19 infections real data, Alexandria Eng. J., 61 (2022), 11077–11090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.067 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.067
    [19] B. Meriem, A. M. Gemeay, E. M. Almetwally, Z. Halim, E. Alshawarbeh, A. T. Abdulrahman, et al., The power xlindley distribution: statistical inference, fuzzy reliability, and COVID-19 application, J. Funct. Spaces, 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9094078 doi: 10.1155/2022/9094078
    [20] P. Jiménez-Rodríguez, G. A. Muñoz-Fernández, J. C. Rodrigo-Chocano, J. B. Seoane-Sepúlveda, A. Weber, A population structure-sensitive mathematical model assessing the effects of vaccination during the third surge of COVID-19 in italy, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 514 (2022), 125975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.125975 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.125975
    [21] J. Panovska-Griffiths, B. Swallow, R. Hinch, J. A. Cohen, K. Rosenfeld, R. M. Stuart, et al., Statistical and agent-based modelling of the transmissibility of different SARS-CoV-2 variants in england and impact of different interventions, Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 380 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0315 doi: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0315
    [22] B. Tang, W. Zhou, X. Wang, H. Wu, Y. Xiao, Controlling multiple COVID-19 epidemic waves: an insight from a multi-scale model linking the behaviour change dynamics to the disease transmission dynamics, Bull. Math. Biol., 84 (2022), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01061-z doi: 10.1007/s11538-022-01061-z
    [23] C. A. Varotsos, V. F. Krapivin, A new model for the spread of COVID-19 and the improvement of safety, Saf. Sci., 132 (2020), 104962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104962 doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104962
    [24] M. N. Atchadé, Y. M. Sokadjo, Overview and cross-validation of COVID-19 forecasting univariate models, Alexandria Eng. J., 61 (2021), 3021–3036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.028 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.028
    [25] M. N. Atchadé, Y. M. Sokadjo, A. D. Moussa, S. V. Kurisheva, M. V. Bochenina, Cross-validation comparison of COVID-19 forecast models, SN Comput. Sci., 2 (2021), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00699-1 doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00699-1
    [26] O. Agossou, M. N. Atchadé, A. M. Djibril, Modeling the effects of preventive measures and vaccination on the COVID-19 spread in benin republic with optimal control, Results Phys., 2021 (2021), 104969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104969 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104969
    [27] T. T. Le, Z. Andreadakis, A. Kumar, R. G. Román, S. Tollefsen, M. Saville, et al., The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 19 (2020), 305–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5 doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5
    [28] S. Loomba, A. de Figueiredo, S. J. Piatek, K. de Graaf, H. J. Larson, Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA, Nat. Hum. Behav., 5 (2021), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1 doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1
    [29] R. Schiavo, Vaccine communication in the age of COVID-19: getting ready for an information war, J. Commun. Healthcare, 13 (2020), 73–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2020.1778959 doi: 10.1080/17538068.2020.1778959
    [30] I. Benati, M. Coccia, Global analysis of timely COVID-19 vaccinations: improving governance to reinforce response policies for pandemic crises, Int. J. Health Governance, 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-07-2021-0072 doi: 10.1108/ijhg-07-2021-0072
    [31] A. A. Malik, S. M. McFadden, J. Elharake, S. B. Omer, Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US, EClinicalMedicine, 26 (2020), 100495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100495 doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100495
    [32] G. Troiano, A. Nardi, Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19, Public Health, 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025 doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025
    [33] P. Peretti-Watel, V. Seror, S. Cortaredona, O. Launay, J. Raude, P. Verger, et al., A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation, Lancet Infect. Dis., 20 (2020), 769–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30426-6 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30426-6
    [34] S. M. Saied, E. M. Saied, I. A. Kabbash, S. A. E. F. Abdo, Vaccine hesitancy: beliefs and barriers associated with COVID-19 vaccination among egyptian medical students, J. Med. Virol., 93 (2021), 4280–4291. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26910 doi: 10.1002/jmv.26910
    [35] C. L. Lackner, C. H. Wang, Demographic, psychological, and experiential correlates of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination intentions in a sample of canadian families, Vaccine: X, 8 (2021), 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100091 doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100091
    [36] P. Verger, E. Dubé, Restoring confidence in vaccines in the COVID-19 era, Expert Rev. Vaccines, 19 (2020), 991–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2020.1825945 doi: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1825945
    [37] H. M. Almongy, E. M. Almetwally, H. H. Ahmad, A. H. Al-Nefaie, Modeling of COVID-19 vaccination rate using odd lomax inverted nadarajah-haghighi distribution, PLoS One, 17 (2022), e0276181. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276181 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276181
    [38] H. M. Alshanbari, O. H. Odhah, E. M. Almetwally, E. Hussam, M. Kilai, A. A. H. El-Bagoury, Novel type I half logistic burr-weibull distribution: application to COVID-19 data, Comput. Math. Methods Med., 18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1444859 doi: 10.1155/2022/1444859
    [39] E. M. Almetwally, S. Dey, S. Nadarajah, An overview of discrete distributions in modelling COVID-19 data sets, Sankhya A, 2022 (2022), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-022-00291-6 doi: 10.1007/s13171-022-00291-6
    [40] B. Meriem, A. M. Gemeay, E. M. Almetwally, Z. Halim, E. Alshawarbeh, A. T. Abdulrahman, et al., The power xlindley distribution: Statistical inference, fuzzy reliability, and covid-19 application, J. Funct. Spaces, 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9094078 doi: 10.1155/2022/9094078
    [41] F. H. Riad, B. Alruwaili, E. M. Almetwally, E. Hussam, Fuzzy reliability analysis of the COVID-19 mortality rate using a new modified kies kumaraswamy model, J. Math., 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3427521 doi: 10.1155/2022/3427521
    [42] E. M. Almetwally, The odd weibull inverse topp–leone distribution with applications to COVID-19 data, Ann. Data Sci., 9 (2022), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-021-00329-w doi: 10.1007/s40745-021-00329-w
    [43] M. M. Higdon, A. Baidya, K. K. Walter, M. K. Patel, H. Issa, E. Espié, et al., Duration of effectiveness of vaccination against COVID-19 caused by the omicron variant, Lancet Infect. Dis., 22 (2022), 1114–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00409-1 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00409-1
    [44] M. Coccia, Optimal levels of vaccination to reduce COVID-19 infected individuals and deaths: a global analysis, Environ. Res., 204 (2022), 112314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112314 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112314
    [45] G. N. Ioannou, E. R. Locke, A. M. O'Hare, A. S. Bohnert, E. J. Boyko, D. M. Hynes, et al., COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness against infection or death in a national us health care system: a target trial emulation study, Ann. Intern. Med., 175 (2022), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.7326/M21-3256 doi: 10.7326/M21-3256
    [46] L. Lin, Y. Zhao, B. Chen, D. He, Multiple COVID-19 waves and vaccination effectiveness in the united states, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19 (2022), 2282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042282 doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042282
    [47] E. Mathieu, H. Ritchie, L. Rodés-Guirao, C. Appel, C. Giattino, J. Hasell, et al., Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), Our World in Data, 2020. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus.
    [48] T. Liboschik, K. Fokianos, R. Fried, tscount: An R package for analysis of count time series following generalized linear models, Universitätsbibliothek Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany, 2015. https://doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-7239
    [49] R. I. Harris, Testing for unit roots using the augmented dickey-fuller test: some issues relating to the size, power and the lag structure of the test, Econ. Lett., 38 (1992), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(92)90022-Q doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(92)90022-Q
    [50] C. Laine, D. Cotton, D. V. Moyer, COVID-19 vaccine: promoting vaccine acceptance, Ann. Intern. Med., 174 (2021), 252–253. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-8008 doi: 10.7326/M20-8008
    [51] S. Su, L. Du, S. Jiang, Learning from the past: development of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 19 (2020), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-00462-y doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00462-y
    [52] R. N. Kostoff, M. B. Briggs, A. L. Porter, D. A. Spandidos, A. Tsatsakis, [Comment] COVID-19 vaccine safety, Int. J. Mol. Med., 46 (2020), 1599–1602. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2020.4733 doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4733
    [53] I. Jones, P. Roy, Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine candidate appears safe and effective, Lancet, 397 (2021), 642–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00191-4 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00191-4
    [54] W. E. Wei, Z. Li, C. J. Chiew, S. E. Yong, M. P. Toh, V. J. Lee, Presymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2-singapore, January 23-March 16, 2020, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 69 (2020), 411–415. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6914e1 doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6914e1
    [55] L. Luo, D. Liu, X. L. Liao, X. B. Wu, Q. L. Jing, J. Z. Zheng, et al., Modes of contact and risk of transmission in COVID-19 among close contacts, Ann. Intern. Med., 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7326/m20-2671 doi: 10.7326/m20-2671
    [56] S. Patrikar, A. Kotwal, V. Bhatti, A. Banerjee, K. Chatterjee, R. Kunte, et al., Incubation period and reproduction number for novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in India, Asia Pac. J. Public Health, 32 (2020), 458–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539520956427 doi: 10.1177/1010539520956427
    [57] S. Khailaie, T. Mitra, A. Bandyopadhyay, M. Schips, P. Mascheroni, P. Vanella, et al., Development of the reproduction number from coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 case data in germany and implications for political measures, BMC Med., 19 (2020), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01884-4 doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01884-4
    [58] J. Riou, C. L. Althaus, Pattern of early human-to-human transmission of Wuhan 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), December 2019 to January 2020, Euro. Surveill., 25 (2020), 2000058. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.4.2000058 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.4.2000058
    [59] B. Machado, L. Antunes, C. Caetano, J. F. Pereira, B. Nunes, P. Patrício, et al., The impact of vaccination on the evolution of COVID-19 in Portugal, Math. Biosci. Eng., 19 (2022), 936–952. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022043 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022043
    [60] V. Piccirillo, COVID-19 pandemic control using restrictions and vaccination, Math. Biosci. Eng., 19 (2022), 1355–1372. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022062 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022062
    [61] T. Kobayashi, H. Nishiura, Prioritizing COVID-19 vaccination. Part 2: Real-time comparison between single-dose and double-dose in Japan, Math. Biosci. Eng., 19 (2022), 7410–7424. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022350 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022350
    [62] M. V. Reyes, The disproportional impact of COVID-19 on African Americans, Health Hum. Rights, 22 (2020), 299–307.
    [63] R. Cappi, L. Casini, D. Tosi, M. Roccetti, Questioning the seasonality of SARS-CoV-2: a fourier spectral analysis, BMJ Open, 12 (2022), e061602. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061602 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061602
    [64] F. F. Zhang, Z. Jin, Effect of travel restrictions, contact tracing and vaccination on control of emerging infectious diseases: transmission of COVID-19 as a case study, Math. Biosci. Eng., 19 (2022), 3177–3201. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022147 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022147
    [65] E. Iboi, O. O. Sharomi, C. Ngonghala, A. B. Gumel, Mathematical modeling and analysis of COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria, Math. Biosci. Eng., 17 (2020), 7192–7220. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2020369 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020369
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Supriya Bhunia, Ganesh Ghorai, Qin Xin, Muhammad Gulzar, On the Algebraic Attributes of (α, β)-Pythagorean Fuzzy Subrings and (α, β)-Pythagorean Fuzzy Ideals of Rings, 2022, 10, 2169-3536, 11048, 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3145376
    2. Hongping Liu, Qian Ge, Ruiju Wei, On a new kind of ordered fuzzy group, 2022, 43, 10641246, 187, 10.3233/JIFS-212027
    3. Supriya Bhunia, Ganesh Ghorai, Marwan Amin Kutbi, Muhammad Gulzar, Md Ashraful Alam, Sarfraz Nawaz Malik, On the Algebraic Characteristics of Fuzzy Sub e-Groups, 2021, 2021, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2021/5253346
    4. Abd Ulazeez Alkouri, Eman A. Abuhijleh, Eman Almuhur, Ghada Alafifi, Sana Abu-Ghurra, Subgroups and Homomorphism Structures of Complex Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets, 2024, 23, 2224-2880, 614, 10.37394/23206.2024.23.65
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2337) PDF downloads(79) Cited by(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog