
The multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index is a significant topological index. This paper is devoted to the exact formulas for the expected value of the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index in random polygonal chains. Moreover, on the basis of the result above, the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of all polygonal chains with extremal values and average values are obtained.
Citation: Xinmei Liu, Xinfeng Liang, Xianya Geng. Expected Value of Multiplicative Degree-Kirchhoff Index in Random Polygonal Chains[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 707-719. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023032
[1] | Wanlin Zhu, Minglei Fang, Xianya Geng . Enumeration of the Gutman and Schultz indices in the random polygonal chains. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(11): 10826-10845. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022506 |
[2] | Saylé C. Sigarreta, Saylí M. Sigarreta, Hugo Cruz-Suárez . On degree–based topological indices of random polyomino chains. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(9): 8760-8773. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022406 |
[3] | Zahid Raza, Juan LG Guirao, Ghada Bassioni . The comparative analysis of two molecular indices in random polyphenyl and spiro chains. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 12500-12517. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022583 |
[4] | V. R. Kulli, J. A. Méndez-Bermúdez, José M. Rodríguez, José M. Sigarreta . Revan Sombor indices: Analytical and statistical study. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 1801-1819. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023082 |
[5] | J. A. Méndez-Bermúdez, José M. Rodríguez, José L. Sánchez, José M. Sigarreta . Analytical and computational properties of the variable symmetric division deg index. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(9): 8908-8922. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022413 |
[6] | Ricai Luo, Khadija Dawood, Muhammad Kamran Jamil, Muhammad Azeem . Some new results on the face index of certain polycyclic chemical networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(5): 8031-8048. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023348 |
[7] | Edil D. Molina, Paul Bosch, José M. Sigarreta, Eva Tourís . On the variable inverse sum deg index. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(5): 8800-8813. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023387 |
[8] | Sheng-I Chen, Chia-Yuan Wu . A stochastic programming model of vaccine preparation and administration for seasonal influenza interventions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 2984-2997. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020169 |
[9] | Ping Wang, Rui Chen, Qiqing Huang . Does supply chain finance business model innovation improve capital allocation efficiency? Evidence from the cost of capital. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(9): 16421-16446. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023733 |
[10] | Cheng-Peng Li, Cheng Zhonglin, Mobeen Munir, Kalsoom Yasmin, Jia-bao Liu . M-polynomials and topological indices of linear chains of benzene, napthalene and anthracene. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2384-2398. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020127 |
The multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index is a significant topological index. This paper is devoted to the exact formulas for the expected value of the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index in random polygonal chains. Moreover, on the basis of the result above, the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of all polygonal chains with extremal values and average values are obtained.
Throughout this article, all graphs we considered here are finite, undirected and simple connected. We can refer to [1,2] for the details of the terminologies and notations mentioned but not defined here. Nowadays, the scholars have done extensive research on chemical compounds by representing vertices as atoms and edges stand for the covalent bonds connecting atoms.
Topological index is one of the most important predicting methods for combining the physicochemical properties with their molecular structures [3,4,5,6]. Similar to the other topological indices[7,8,9], Kirchhoff index is a structure descriptor. The resistance distance is intrinsic to the graph with several physical and purely mathematical explanations [10,11]. Meanwhile, the Kirchhoff index has been found useful in assessing cyclicity of polycyclic structures including linear polygonal chains, fullerenes and some other molecular graphs [12], such as circulate graphs, distance-regular graphs and so on.
Let G=(V(G),E(G)) be a connected graph with ∣V(G)∣ vertices and ∣E(G)∣ edges. For any vertex m∈V(G), denote the degree of u by dG(u)(short for d(u)), which is the number of the vertices adjacent to u. Klein and Randić[13] defined the resistance distance based on the power grid theory, and they regarded each edge of the connected graph as a unit resistance, the whole connected graph G is regarded as a power grid N. Therefore, the effective resistance of u and m in grid N is the resistance distance between u and m, defined as r(u,m). The r(u,m) is the potential difference between u and m of G induced by the particular u−m flow intensity 1 satisfying Kirchhoff's cycle law [14]. And the Kirchhoff index of G is denoted by Kf(G)=∑{u,m}⊆VGr(u,m).
The multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index is proposed by Chen and Zhang in 2007 [15], which was denoted by
Kf∗(G)=∑{u,m}⊆VGd(u)d(m)r(u,m) |
A random polygonal chain RSCn+1 with n+1 polygons can be considered as a new terminal polygon Gn+1 has been attached to a polygonal chain RSCn with n polygons through vertex-to-vertex connection, see Figure 1.
For n≥3, there are q ways to connect the terminal polygon Gn+1 with front random polygonal chain RSCn, which results in the local arrangements, they can be described as RSC1n+1,RSC2n+1,⋯,RSCq−1n+1 and RSCqn+1, respectively, see Figure 2.
A random polygonal chain RSCn with n polygons is acquired by adding the terminal polygons step by step. At every step t(=3,4,…,n), the connection method is selected from one of the following q possible cases:
● RSCt→RSC1t+1 with probability p1,
● RSCt→RSC2t+1 with probability p2,
● RSCt→RSC3t+1 with probability p3,
⋯⋯
● RSCt→RSCqt+1 with probability pq,
where pq=1−p1−p2−p3−⋯−pq−1, and the probabilities p1,p2,⋯,pq−1 and pq are constants, irrelevant to the parameter t We denote by RSCn(1,0,⋯,0,0),RSCn(0,1,⋯,0,0),⋯,RSCn(0,0,⋯,0,1),RSCn(0,0,⋯,0,0), the meta-chain Mn, the orth-chain O1n, the orth-chain O2n, ⋯, the orth-chain Oq−2n, the para-chain Pn, respectively.
In [16], Huang, Kuang and Deng obtained exact formulas for the expected values of the Kirchhoff indices of the random polyphenyl and spiro chains. Later, Zhang, Li, Li and Zhang [17] obtained the expected values for the four indices including Schultz index, Gutman index, multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index and additive degree-Kirchhoff index of a random polyphenylene chain. Recently, Liu, Zeng, Deng, Tang [18], obtained the indices as mentioned above in the random spiro chains, determined the expected values of these indices in the random spiro chain, and the extremal values among all spiro chain with n hexagons.
Motivated by [16,18], we consider the expected values of the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of random polygonal chains and explore the property of the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of polygonal chains and determine the expected value of the index E(Kf∗(RSCn)) in the random polygonal chains with n polygons. This not only proves the correctness of the previous work, but also summarizes the expected value of the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index for all polygons containing an even number of edges.
For the random polygonal chain RSCn. Denote RSCn+1 the graph acquired by connecting a new terminal polygon Gn+1 to RSCn, which is spanned by vertices x1,x2,⋯,x2q and x1 is un, (see Figure 1). It is evident that, for all m∈RSCn,
r(m,xi)={r(m,un)+(i−1)[2q−(i−1)]2q, 1<i≤2qr(m,un), i=1. ∑m∈V(RSCn)dRSCn+1(m)=4kn+2. | (2.1) |
2q∑j=12q∑i=1d(xi)r(xi,xj)={4q2−13+(j−1)[2q−(j−1)]q, 1<j≤2q4q2−13, j=1. | (2.2) |
Theorem 2.1. The expected value for the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index RSCn(n≥1) of the random polygonal chain is
E[kf∗(RSCn)]=43q{q−1∑i=1[i(2q−i)−q2]pi+q2}n3+4q{q−1∑i=1[−i(2q−i)+q2]pi +4q2−13−q2}n2+23q{4q−1∑i=1[i(2q−i)−q2]pi+1}n. |
Proof. Let Kf∗(RSCn)=A+B+C.
A=∑{u,m}⊆RSCnd(u)d(m)r(u,m), =∑{u,m}⊆RSCn∖{un}d(u)d(m)r(u,m)+∑m∈RSCn∖{un}dRSCn+1(un)d(m)r(un,m), =∑{u,m}⊆RSCn∖{un}d(u)d(m)r(u,m)+∑m∈RSCn∖{un}[dRSCn(un)+2]d(m)r(un,m), =Kf∗(RSCn)+2∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(un,m).B=∑m∈RSCn∖{un}∑xi∈Gn+1∖{x1}d(m)d(xi)r(m,xi), =∑m∈RSCn∑xi∈Gn+1d(m)d(xi)r(m,xi)−4∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(m,un)−4∑m∈Gn+1d(m)r(m,x1), =∑m∈RSCnd(m){4r(m,un)+4[r(m,un)+2q−12q]+4[r(m,un)+2(2q−2)2q] +⋯+4[r(m,un)+(q−1)(q+1)2q]+2[r(m,un)+q22q]} −4∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(m,un)−4(4q2−1)3, =(4q−2)∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(m,un)+4q2−13(4qn−2).C=∑{xi,xj}⊆Gn+1d(xi)d(xj)r(xi,xj), =122q∑i=1d(xi)(2q∑j=1d(xj)r(xj,xi)), =(2q+2)4q2−13. |
So, Kf∗(RSCn+1)=Kf∗(RSCn)+4q∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(m,un)+4q⋅4q2−13n+2q⋅4q2−13.
For a random polygonal chain RSCn, ∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(m,un) is a random variable. Here, we could denote
In:=E(∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(m,un)). |
Thus, a recurrence relation is obtained as follows:
E(Kf∗(RSCn+1))=E(Kf∗(RSCn))+4qIn+4q⋅4q2−13n+2q⋅4q2−13. |
By thinking about the following q possible ways, we can obtain In.
Case 1. RSCn⟶RSC1n+1, then un coincides with the vertex x2 or x2q. Hence, ∑m∈VRSCnr(un,m) is given by ∑m∈VRSCnr(x2,m) or ∑m∈VRSCnr(x2q,m) with probability p1.
Case 2. RSCn⟶RSC2n+1, then un coincides with the vertex x3 or x2q−1. Hence, ∑m∈VRSCnr(un,m) is given by ∑m∈VRSCnr(x3,m) or ∑m∈VRSCnr(x2q−1,m) with probability p2.
⋯⋯
Case q-2. RSCn⟶RSCq−2n+1, then un coincides with the vertex xq−1 or xq+3. Hence, ∑m∈VRSCnr(un,m) is given by ∑m∈VRSCnr(xq−1,m) or ∑m∈VRSCnr(xq+3,m) with probability pq−2.
Case q-1. RSCn⟶RSCq−1n+1, then un coincides with the vertex xq or xq+2. Hence, ∑m∈VRSCnr(un,m) is given by ∑m∈VRSCnr(xq,m) or ∑m∈VRSCnr(xq+2,m) with probability pq−1.
Case q. RSCn⟶RSCqn+1, then un coincides with the vertex xq+1. Hence, ∑m∈VRSCnr(un,m) is given by ∑m∈VRSCnr(xq+1,m) with probability pq=1−p1−p2−⋯−pq−1.
According to the above cases, we have that
In=p1∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(m,x2)+p2∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(m,x3)+⋯+pq−1∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(m,xq) +(1−p1−p2−⋯−pq−1)∑m∈RSCnd(m)r(m,xq+1), =p1[∑m∈RSCn−1d(m)r(m,un−1)+2q−12q∑m∈RSCn−1∖{un−1}d(m)+4q2−13+2q−1q] +p2[∑m∈RSCn−1d(m)r(m,un−1)+2(2q−2)2q∑m∈RSCn−1∖{un−1}d(m)+4q2−13 +2(2q−2)q]+⋯+pq−1[∑m∈RSCn−1d(m)r(m,un−1) +(q−1)(q+1)2q∑m∈RSCn−1∖{un−1}d(m)+4q2−13+(q−1)(q+1)q] +(1−p1−p2−⋯−pq−1)[∑m∈RSCn−1d(m)r(m,un−1)+q22q∑m∈RSCn−1∖{un−1}d(m) +4q2−13+q2q], =p1[∑m∈RSCn−1d(m)r(m,un−1)+2(2q−1)+4q2−13−2(2q−1)] +p2[∑m∈RSCn−1d(m)r(m,un−1)+4(2q−2)n+4q2−13−4(2q−2)] +⋯+pq−1[∑m∈RSCn−1d(m)r(m,un−1)+2(q−1)(q+1)n+4q2−13−2(q−1)(q+1)] +(1−p1−p2−⋯−pq−1)[∑m∈RSCn−1d(m)r(m,un−1)+2q2n+4q2−13−2q2], =In−1+{2q−1∑i=1[i(2q−i)−q2]pi+2q2}n+{−2q−1∑i=1[i(2q−i)−q2]pi+4q2−13−2q2}. |
And the original value is I1=∑m∈RSC1d(m)r(m,u1)=4q2−13. Therefore,
In={q−1∑i=1[i(2q−i)−q2]pi+q2}n2+{q−1∑i=1[−i(2q−i)+q2]pi+4q2−13−q2}n. |
Due to
E(Kf∗(RSCn+1))=E(Kf∗(RSCn))+4qIn+4q⋅4q2−13n+2q⋅4q2−13. |
From the original value,
E(Kf∗(RSC1))=2×2q(2×2q−12q+2×2(2q−2)2q+⋯+2×2(q−1)(q+1)2q+q22q) +8q3−2q3, |
and the above recurrence relation we may calculate that
E(Kf∗(RSCn))=43q{q−1∑i=1[i(2q−i)−q2]pi+q2}n3+4q{q−1∑i=1[−i(2q−i)+q2]pi +4q2−13−q2}n2+23q{4q−1∑i=1[i(2q−i)−q2]pi+1}n. |
The proof is completed.
Specially, if p1=1 which implies p2=p3=⋯=pq=0, then RSCn≅Mn. Similarly, if p2=1 which implies p1=p3=⋯=pq=0, then RSCn≅O1n; if p3=1 which implies p1=p2=p4=⋯=pq=0, then RSCn≅O2n and so on; if pq−1=1 which implies p1=p2=⋯=pq−2=pq=0, then RSCn≅Oq−2n; if pq=1 which implies p1=p2=⋯=pq−1=0, then RSCn≅Pn.
Corollary 2.2. The multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of the meta-chain Mn, the ortho-chains O1n,O2n,⋯,Oq−2n, the para-chain Pn are
Kf∗(Mn)=43q(2q−1)n3+4q[−(2q−1)+4q2−13]n2+23q[4(2q−1−q2)+1]n; |
Kf∗(O1n)=43q[2(2q−2)]n3+4q[−2(2q−2)+4q2−13]n2+23q{4[2(2q−2)−q2]+1}n; |
Kf∗(O2n)=43q[3(2k−3)]n3+4q[−3(2q−3)+4q2−13]n2+23q{4[3(2q−3)−q2]+1}n; ⋯⋯ |
Kf∗(Oq−2n)=43q[(q−1)(q+1)]n3+4q[−(q−1)(q+1)+4q2−13]n2+23q{4[(q−1)(q+1)−q2]+1}n; |
Kf∗(Pn)=43q3n3+4q(4q2−13−q2)n2+23qn. |
Corollary 2.3. Among the polygonal chains with n(n⩾3) polygons, Pn realizes the maximum of E(Kf∗(RSCn)) and Mn realizes that of the minimum.
Proof. On the basis of Theorem 2.1, we have
f1=E(Kf∗(RSCn)), ={43q[(2q−1)−q2]n3+4q[−(2q−1)+q2]n2+83q[(2q−1)−q2]n}p1 +{43q[2(2q−2)−q2]n3+4q[−2(2q−2)+q2]n2+83q[2(2q−2)−q2]n}p2+⋯ +{43q[(q−1)(q+1)−q2]n3+4q[−(q−1)(q+1)+q2]n2 +83q[(q−1)(q+1)−q2]n}pq−1+[43q3n3+(16q3−4q3−4q3)n2+23qn]. |
as n≥3, we have that
∂f1∂p1=43q[(2q−1)−q2]n3+4q[−(2q−1)+q2]n2+83q[(2q−1)−q2]n<0; |
∂f1∂p2=43q[2(2q−2)−q2]n3+4q[−2(2q−2)+q2]n2+83q[2(2q−2)−q2]n<0; ⋯⋯ |
∂f1∂pq−1=43q[(q−1)(q+1)−q2]n3+4q[−(q−1)(q+1)+q2]n2+83q[(q−1)(q+1)−q2]n<0. |
When p1=p2=⋯=pq−1=0 (i.e. pq=1), Pn realizes the maximum of E[Kf∗(RSCn)], that is RSCn≅Pn. If p1+p2+⋯+pq−1=1, let pq−1=1−p1−p2−⋯−pq−2 (0≤pl≤1,l∈[1,q−2]), we have
E(Kf∗(RSCn))={43q[(2q−1)−q2]n3+4q[−(2q−1)+q2]n2+83q[(2q−1)−q2]n}p1 +{43q[2(2q−2)−q2]n3+4q[−2(2q−2)+q2]n2 +83q[2(2q−2)−q2]n}p2+⋯+{43q[(q−1)(q+1)−q2]n3 +4q[−(q−1)(q+1)+q2]n2 +83q[(q−1)(q+1)−q2]n}(1−p1−p2−⋯−pq−2) +[43q3n3+(16q3−4q3−4q3)n2+23qn]. |
Thus,
∂E(Kf∗(RSCn))∂p1=43q[(2q−1)−(q−1)(q+1)]n3+4q[−(2q−1)+(q−1)(q+1)]n2 +83q[(2q−1)−(q−1)(q+1)]n<0, |
∂E(Kf∗(RSCn))∂p2=43q[2(2q−2)−(q−1)(q+1)]n3+4q[−2(2q−2)+(q−1)(q+1)]n2 +83q[2(2q−2)−(q−1)(q+1)]n<0, ⋯⋯ |
∂E(Kf∗(RSCn))∂pq−2=43q[(q−2)(q+2)−(q−1)(q+1)]n3+4q[−(q−2)(q+2) +(q−1)(q+1)]n2+83q[(q−2)(q+2)−(q−1)(q+1)]n<0. |
But p1=p2=⋯=pq−2=0 (i.e. pq−1=1), E(Kf∗(RSCn)) can't attain the minimum value. If p1+p2+⋯+pq−2=1, let pq−2=1−p1−p2−⋯−pq−3 (0≤pl≤1,l∈[1,q−3]).
E(Kf∗(RSCn))={43q[(2q−1)−q2]n3+4q[−(2q−1)+q2]n2+83q[(2q−1)−q2]n}p1 +{43q[2(2q−2)−q2]n3+4q[−2(2q−2)+q2]n2 +83q[2(2q−2)−q2]n}p2+⋯+{43q[(q−2)(q+2)−q2]n3 +4q[−(q−2)(q+2)+q2]n2 +83q[(q−2)(q+2)−q2]n}(1−p1−p2−⋯−pq−3) +[43q3n3+(16q3−4q3−4q3)n2+23qn]. |
Thus,
∂E(Kf∗(RSCn))∂p1=43q[(2q−1)−(q−2)(q+2)]n3+4q[−(2q−1)+(q−2)(q+2)]n2 +83q[(2q−1)−(q−2)(q+2)]n<0,∂E(Kf∗(RSCn))∂p2=43q[2(2q−2)−(q−2)(q+2)]n3+4q[−2(2q−2)+(q−2)(q+2)]n2 +83q[2(2q−2)−(q−2)(q+2)]n<0, ⋯⋯ |
∂E(Kf∗(RSCn))∂pq−3=43q[(q−3)(q+3)−(q−2)(q+2)]n3+4q[−(q−3)(q+3) +(q−2)(q+2)]n2+83q[(q−3)(q+3)−(q−2)(q+2)]n<0. |
But p1=p2=⋯=pq−3=0 (i.e. pq−2=1), E(Kf∗(RSCn)) can't attain the minimum value. By that analogy, If p1+p2=1, let p1=1−p2(0≤p2≤1).
E(Kf∗(RSCn))={43q[(2q−1)−q2]n3+4q[−(2q−1)+q2]n2 +83q[(2q−1)−q2]n}(1−p2)+{43q[2(2q−2)−q2]n3 +4q[−2(2q−2)+q2]n2+83q[2(2q−2)−q2]n}p2 +[43q3n3+(16q3−4q3−4q3)n2+23qn]. |
Thus,
∂E(Kf∗(RSCn))∂p2=43q[2(2q−2)−(2q−1)]n3+4q[−2(2q−2)+(2q−1)]n2 +83q[2(2q−2)−(2q−1)]n>0, |
Hence, E(Kf∗(RSCn)) achieves the minimum value, if p2=0 (i.e. p1=1), that is RSCn≅Mn. This completes the proof.
Denote by ¯ξn the set of all polygonal chains with n polygons. In this paragraph, We can characterize the average value of the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index with respected to ¯ξn.
Kf∗ave(¯ξn)=1|¯ξn|∑G∈GnKf∗(G). |
Theorem 3.1. The average value for the index with respect to ¯ξn is
Kf∗avr(¯ξn)=29(4q3+3q2−q)n3+23(4q3−3q2−q)n2+29(−4q3+6q2+q)n. |
Proof. In order to obtain the average Kf∗avr(¯ξn), it suffices to take p1=p2=⋯=pq=1q in the expected value E(Kf∗(RSCn)). According to Theorem 2.1, we have
Kf∗avr(¯ξn)=43q{q−1∑i=11q[i(2q−i)−q2]+q2}n3+4q{q−1∑i=11q[−i(2q−i)+q2] +4q2−13−q2}n2+23q{4q−1∑i=11q[i(2q−i)−q2]+1}n, =29(4q3+3q2−q)n3+23(4q3−3q2−q)n2+29(−4q3+6q2+q)n. |
After verification, the equation is
Kf∗avr(¯ξn)=1qKf∗(Mn)+1qKf∗(O1n)+1qKf∗(O2n)+⋯+1qKf∗(Pn). |
In contrast to the articles wrote by Zhang, Li, Li and Zhang [17] and Liu, Zeng, Deng, and Tang [18], we used a similar method to prove the expected value of the index. But here is the difference, the former calculated the expected values for the indices of a random polyphenylene chain which is consist of n hexagons connected by the cut edges randomly. The latter established the expected values of the above-mentioned four indices in a random spiro chain which is consist of n hexagons which connected by squeezing the cut edges so that the two vertices coincide. However, the figure we study consists of n polygons, each has 2q edges. That is to say, we can get multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of any even polygon by plugging in the number of edges of the polygon.
We mainly established the explicit formulas for the expected value of the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of a random polygonal chain, discussed the maximum value and the minimum value of the E(Kf∗(RSCn)) [19,20], meanwhile, obtained the extremal value and average value of the index. All these results will be useful to the study of the topological index of graphs and build some kind of mathematical model from the structure of the chemical, then use that model to predict the activity and the physicochemical properties of more novel compounds, which can provide the microscopic basis for new molecules in synthetic chemistry [21,22].
In chemical graph theory, the matter of polygonal chain is being widely studied by researchers [23,24,25,26]. The molecular structures of polygonal chemicals are various and its physicochemical properties also become more and more important [27,28,29,30]. It is possible to establish exact formulas for the expected values of some other indices in random polygonal chains with n regular polygons.
Valuable, comments and suggestions from the editor and anonymous reviewers are appreciatively acknowledged. This work is partially supported by National Science Foundation of China(Grant No.12171190), Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province(Grant No.2008085MA01) and Youth fund of Anhui Natural Science Foundation(Grant No.2008085QA01).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] | J. A. Bondy, U. S. R. Murty, Graph Theory, Springer, New York, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-970-5 |
[2] | D. J. Klein, Graph geometry, graph metrics and Wiener, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 35 (1997), 7–27. |
[3] |
H. Hosoya, K. Kawasaki, K. Mizutani, Topological index and thermodynamic properties, Ⅰ. Empirical rules on the boiling point of saturated hydrocarbons, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 45 (1972), 3415–3421. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.45.3415 doi: 10.1246/bcsj.45.3415
![]() |
[4] |
Y. D. Gao, H. Hosoya, Topological index and thermodynamic properties, Ⅳ. Size dependency of the structure activity correlation of alkanes, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 61 (1988), 3093–3102. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.61.3093 doi: 10.1246/bcsj.61.3093
![]() |
[5] |
H. Hosoya, M. Murakami, Topological index as applied to π-electronic systems, Ⅱ. Topological bond order, J. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 48 (1975), 3512–3517. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.48.3512 doi: 10.1246/bcsj.48.3512
![]() |
[6] |
H. Narumi, H. Hosoya, Topological index and thermodynamic properties. Ⅱ. Analysis of the topological factors on the absolute entropy of acyclic saturated hydrocarbons, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 53 (1980), 1228–1237. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.53.1228 doi: 10.1246/bcsj.53.1228
![]() |
[7] |
H. Deng, Wiener indices of spiro and polyphenyl hexagonal chains, Math. Comput. Model., 55 (2012), 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.08.037 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.08.037
![]() |
[8] |
J. F. Qi, M. L. Fang, X. Y. Geng, The expected value for the wiener index in the random spiro chains, Polycycl. Aromat. Compounds., (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10406638.2022.2038218 doi: 10.1080/10406638.2022.2038218
![]() |
[9] |
I. Gutman, Selected properties of the Schultz molecular topological index, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34 (1994), 1087–1089. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci00021a009 doi: 10.1021/ci00021a009
![]() |
[10] |
D. J. Klein, H. Y. Zhu, Distances and volumina for graphs, J. Math. Chem., 23 (1998), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019108905697 doi: 10.1023/A:1019108905697
![]() |
[11] |
L. Sun, Wang, W. Zhou, Some results on resistance distances and resistance matrices, Linear Multil. Algebra., 63 (2015), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2013.877011 doi: 10.1080/03081087.2013.877011
![]() |
[12] | H. Deng, Z. Tang, Kirchhoff indices of spiro and polyphenyl hexagonal chains, Util. Math., 95 (2014), 113–128. |
[13] |
D. J.Klein, M. Randić, Resistance distance, J. Math. Chem., 12 (1993), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01164627 doi: 10.1007/BF01164627
![]() |
[14] |
A. Georgakopoulos, Uniqueness of electrical currents in a network of finite total resistance, J. Lond. Math. Soc., 82 (1998), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/jdq034 doi: 10.1112/jlms/jdq034
![]() |
[15] |
H. Chen, F. Zhang, Resistance distance and the normalized Laplacian spectrum, Discrete Appl. Math., 155 (2007), 654–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2006.09.008 doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2006.09.008
![]() |
[16] |
G.H. Huang, M.J. Kuang, H.Y. Deng, The expected values of Kirchhoff indices in the random polyphenyl and spiro chains, Ars Math. Contemp., 2 (2015), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.26493/1855-3974.458.7b0 doi: 10.26493/1855-3974.458.7b0
![]() |
[17] |
L. L. Zhang, Q. S. Li, S. C. Li, M. J. Zhang, The expected values for the Schultz index, Gutman index, multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index and additive degree-Kirchhoff index of a random polyphenylene chain, J. Discrete Appl. Math., 282 (2020), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2019.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2019.11.007
![]() |
[18] | H. C. Liu, M. Y. Zeng, H. Y. Deng, Z. K. Tang, Some indices in the random spiro chains, Iranian J. Math. Chem., , 11 (2020), 255–270. |
[19] |
Z. Zhu, C. Yuan, E. O. D. Andriantiana, S. Wagner, Graphs with maximal Hosoya index and minimal Merrifield-Simmons index, Discret. Math., 329 (2014), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2014.04.009 doi: 10.1016/j.disc.2014.04.009
![]() |
[20] | P. Zhao, B. Zhao, X. Chen, Y. Bai, Two classes of chains with maximal and minimal total π−electron energy, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 62 (2009), 525–536. |
[21] |
H. Hosoya, M. Gotoh, M. Murakami, S. Ikeda, Topological index and thermodynamic properties, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 392 (1999), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci980058l doi: 10.1021/ci980058l
![]() |
[22] |
H.E. Simmons, R.E. Merrifield, Mathematical description of molecular structure, Roc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 742 (1977), 2616–2619. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.7.2616 doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.2616
![]() |
[23] |
Z. Raza, The expected values of arithmetic bond connectivity and geometric indices in random phenylene chains, Authorea, (2020). https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158976905.50760887 doi: 10.22541/au.158976905.50760887
![]() |
[24] |
Z. Raza, The harmonic and second Zagreb Indices of random polyphenyl and spiro chains, Polycycl. Aromat. Compounds., (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10406638.2020.1749089 doi: 10.1080/10406638.2020.1749089
![]() |
[25] |
Y. Bai, B. Zhao, P. Zhao, Extremal Merrifield-Simmons index and Hosoya index of polyphenyl chains, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 62 (2019), 649–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2008.00605.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9892.2008.00605.x
![]() |
[26] |
H. Deng, Wiener indices of spiro and polyphenyl hexagonal chains, Math. Computer Model., 55 (2012), 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.08.037 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.08.037
![]() |
[27] |
R. E. Merrifield, H. E. Simmons, Enumeration of structure-sensitive graphical subsets, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78 (1981), 692–695. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.2.692 doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.692
![]() |
[28] |
R. Todeschini, V. Consonni, Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Wiley-VCH, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527613106 doi: 10.1002/9783527613106
![]() |
[29] |
G. Luthe, J. A. Jacobus, L. W. Robertson, Receptor interactions by polybrominated diphenyl ethers versus polychlobrinated biphenyls: A theoretical structure-activity assessment, Environ. Toxicol. Pharm., 25 (2008), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2007.10.017 doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2007.10.017
![]() |
[30] |
M. Traetteberg, G. Hagen, S. J. Cyvin, Ⅳ. 1, 3, 5, 7-Cyclooctatetraene, Zeitschrift Fr Naturforschung B., 25 (1970), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-1970-0201 doi: 10.1515/znb-1970-0201
![]() |
1. | Yasir Ahmad, Xiang-Feng Pan, Umar Ali, Zhuo Diao, Computing the expected value of invariants based on resistance distance for random spiro-polynomio chains, 2025, 361, 0166218X, 111, 10.1016/j.dam.2024.09.026 |