Health care systems around the world do not have sufficient medical services to immediately offer elective (e.g., scheduled or non-emergency) services to all patients. The goal of patient admission scheduling (PAS) as a complicated decision making issue is to allocate a group of patients to a limited number of resources such as rooms, time slots, and beds based on a set of preset restrictions such as illness severity, waiting time, and disease categories. This is a crucial issue with multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM). In order to address this issue, we first conduct an assessment of the admission process and gather four (4) aspects that influence patient admission and design a set of criteria. Even while many of these indicators may be accurately captured by the picture fuzzy set, we use an advanced MCGDM approach that incorporates generalized aggregation to analyze patients' hospitalization. Finally, numerical real-world applications of PAS are offered to illustrate the validity of the suggested technique. The advantages of the proposed approaches are also examined by comparing them to various existing decision methods. The proposed technique has been proved to assist hospitals in managing patient admissions in a flexible manner.
Citation: Shahzaib Ashraf, Noor Rehman, Saleem Abdullah, Bushra Batool, Mingwei Lin, Muhammad Aslam. Decision support model for the patient admission scheduling problem based on picture fuzzy aggregation information and TOPSIS methodology[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(3): 3147-3176. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022146
Health care systems around the world do not have sufficient medical services to immediately offer elective (e.g., scheduled or non-emergency) services to all patients. The goal of patient admission scheduling (PAS) as a complicated decision making issue is to allocate a group of patients to a limited number of resources such as rooms, time slots, and beds based on a set of preset restrictions such as illness severity, waiting time, and disease categories. This is a crucial issue with multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM). In order to address this issue, we first conduct an assessment of the admission process and gather four (4) aspects that influence patient admission and design a set of criteria. Even while many of these indicators may be accurately captured by the picture fuzzy set, we use an advanced MCGDM approach that incorporates generalized aggregation to analyze patients' hospitalization. Finally, numerical real-world applications of PAS are offered to illustrate the validity of the suggested technique. The advantages of the proposed approaches are also examined by comparing them to various existing decision methods. The proposed technique has been proved to assist hospitals in managing patient admissions in a flexible manner.
[1] | S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, A. O. Almagrabi, A new emergency response of spherical intelligent fuzzy decision process to diagnose of COVID-19, Soft Comput., (2020), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05287-8 doi: 10.1007/s00500-020-05287-8 |
[2] | S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, Decision aid modeling based on sine trigonometric spherical fuzzy aggregation information, Soft Comput., 25 (2021), 8549–8572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05712-6 doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-05712-6 |
[3] | S. Ceschia, A. Schaerf, Modeling and solving the dynamic patient admission scheduling problem under uncertainty, Artif. Intell. Med., 56 (2012), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2012.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.09.001 |
[4] | K. Decker, J. Li, Coordinated hospital patient scheduling, in Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (1998) (Cat. No. 98EX160), IEEE, (1998), 104–111. |
[5] | A. B. Khoshaim, S. Abdullah, S. Ashraf, M. Naeem, Emergency decision-making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough aggregation information, Comput. Mater. Contin., 69 (2021), 4077–4094. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.016973 doi: 10.32604/cmc.2021.016973 |
[6] | M. Polikandrioti, M. Ntokou, Needs of hospitalized patients, Health Sci. J., 5 (2011), 15–22. |
[7] | Ș. Gür, T. Eren, Application of operational research techniques in operating room scheduling problems: Literature overview, J. Healthc. Eng., 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5341394 doi: 10.1155/2018/5341394 |
[8] | D. N. Pham, A. Klinkert, Surgical case scheduling as a generalized job shop scheduling problem, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 185 (2008), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.059 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.059 |
[9] | A. K. Abera, M. M. O'Reilly, B. R. Holland, M. Fackrell, M. Heydar, Decision support model for the patient admission scheduling problem with random arrivals and departures, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Matrix-Analytic Methods in Stochastic Models, (2019), 10–14. |
[10] | Q. L. Lin, L. Liu, H. C. Liu, D. J. Wang, Integrating hierarchical balanced scorecard with fuzzy linguistic for evaluating operating room performance in hospitals, Expert Syst. Appl., 40 (2013), 1917–1924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.007 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.007 |
[11] | N. Mahdavi-Amiri, S. H. Nasseri, Duality results and a dual simplex method for linear programming problems with trapezoidal fuzzy variables, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 158 (2007), 1961–1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2007.05.005 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2007.05.005 |
[12] | S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, Muneeza, Some novel aggregation operators for cubic picture fuzzy information: application in multi-attribute decision support problem, Granul. Comput., 6 (2021), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00219-1 doi: 10.1007/s41066-020-00219-1 |
[13] | R. Jain, Decision-making in the presence of fuzzy variables, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 10 (1976), 698–703. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1976.4309421 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1976.4309421 |
[14] | S. Zeng, N. Zhang, C. Zhang, W. Su, L. A. Carlos, Social network multiple-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating unmanned ground delivery vehicles under the Pythagorean fuzzy environment, Technol. Forecast Soc. Change, 175 (2022), 121414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121414 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121414 |
[15] | S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, T. Mahmood, F. Ghani, T. Mahmood, Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems, Int. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36 (2019), 2829–2844. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-172009 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-172009 |
[16] | S. J. Chen, S. M. Chen, Fuzzy risk analysis based on the ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Appl. Intell., 26 (2007), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-006-0003-5 doi: 10.1007/s10489-006-0003-5 |
[17] | Nr. Shahsavari-Pour, Re. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, M. A. Basiri, A new method for trapezoidal fuzzy numbers ranking based on the Shadow length and its application to manager's risk taking, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 26 (2014), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-120716 doi: 10.3233/IFS-120716 |
[18] | S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, Emergency decision support modeling for COVID-19 based on spherical fuzzy information, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 35 (2020), 1601–1645. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22262 doi: 10.1002/int.22262 |
[19] | A. Khan, S. S. Abosuliman, S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, Hospital admission and care of COVID-19 patients problem based on spherical hesitant fuzzy decision support system, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 36 (2021), 4167–4209. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22455 doi: 10.1002/int.22455 |
[20] | C. C. Chou, A new similarity measure of fuzzy numbers, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 26 (2014), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-120737 doi: 10.3233/IFS-120737 |
[21] | S. Zeng, S. Ali, M. K. Mahmood, F. Smarandache, D. Ahmad, Decision-making problems under the environment of m-Polar diophantine neutrosophic N-soft set, Comput. Model Eng. Sci., 130 (2022), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2022.017397 doi: 10.32604/cmes.2022.017397 |
[22] | S. Zeng, J. Zhou, C. Zhang, J. M. Merigó, Intuitionistic fuzzy social network hybrid MCDM model for an assessment of digital reforms of manufacturing industry in China, Technol. Forecast Soc. Change, 176 (2022), 121435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121435 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121435 |
[23] | T. Chu, C. Tsao, Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point, Comput. Math. with Appl., 43 (2002), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00277-2 doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00277-2 |
[24] | F. Choobineh, H. Li, An index for ordering fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 54 (1993), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(93)90374-Q doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(93)90374-Q |
[25] | M. Lin, Y. Chen, R. Chen, Bibliometric analysis on Pythagorean fuzzy sets during 2013–2020, Int. J. Intell. Comput. Cybern., 14 (2020), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJICC-06-2020-0067 doi: 10.1108/IJICC-06-2020-0067 |
[26] | M. Lin, X. Li, L. Chen, Linguistic q‐rung orthopair fuzzy sets and their interactional partitioned Heronian mean aggregation operators, Int. J. Intell. Comput. Syst., 35 (2020), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22136 doi: 10.1002/int.22136 |
[27] | M. Lin, X. Li, R. Chen, H. Fujita, J. Lin, Picture fuzzy interactional partitioned Heronian mean aggregation operators: an application to MADM process, Artif. Intell. Rev., (2021), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09953-7 doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-09953-7 |
[28] | M. Lin, W. Xu, Z. Lin, R. Chen, Determine OWA operator weights using kernel density estimation, Econ Res-Ekon Istraz, 33 (2020), 1441–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1748509 doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1748509 |
[29] | K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy sets Syst., 20 (1986), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 |
[30] | B. C. Cuong, Picture Fuzzy Sets, J. Comput. Sci Cybern., 30 (2014), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032 doi: 10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032 |
[31] | P. H. Phong, D. T. Hieu, R. H. Ngan, P. T. Them, Some composition of picture fuzzy relations, in Proceedings of the 7th national conference on fundamental and applied information technology research (FAIR'7), Thai Nguyen, (2014), 19–20. |
[32] | S. Ashraf, T. Mahmood, S. Abdullah, Q. Khan, Different approaches to multi-criteria group decision making problems for picture fuzzy environment, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc., 50 (2019), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00574-018-0103-y doi: 10.1007/s00574-018-0103-y |
[33] | P. Singh, Correlation coefficients for picture fuzzy sets, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 28 (2015), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-141338 doi: 10.3233/IFS-141338 |
[34] | M. Qiyas, S. Abdullah, S. Ashraf, M. Aslam, Utilizing linguistic picture fuzzy aggregation operators for multiple-attribute decision-making problems, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 22 (2020), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00726-7 doi: 10.1007/s40815-019-00726-7 |
[35] | L. H. Son, Generalized picture distance measure and applications to picture fuzzy clustering, Appl. Soft Comput., 46 (2016), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.05.009 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.05.009 |
[36] | S. Khan, S. Abdullah, S. Ashraf, Picture fuzzy aggregation information based on Einstein operations and their application in decision making, Math. Sci., 13 (2019), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-019-0291-7 doi: 10.1007/s40096-019-0291-7 |
[37] | S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, T. Mahmood, M. Aslam, Cleaner production evaluation in gold mines using novel distance measure method with cubic picture fuzzy numbers, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 21 (2019), 2448–2461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00681-3 doi: 10.1007/s40815-019-00681-3 |
[38] | G. W. Wei, Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 17 (2016), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1197147 doi: 10.3846/16111699.2016.1197147 |
[39] | H. Garg, Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to mul-ticriteria decision-making, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 42 (2017), 5275–5290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2625-9 doi: 10.1007/s13369-017-2625-9 |
[40] | M. J. Khan, P. Kumam, S. Ashraf, W. Kumam, Generalized picture fuzzy soft sets and their application in decision support systems, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030415 doi: 10.3390/sym11030415 |
[41] | S. Khan, S. Abdullah, L. Abdullah, S. Ashraf, Logarithmic aggregation operators of picture fuzzy numbers for multi-attribute decision making problems, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7070608 doi: 10.3390/math7070608 |
[42] | L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inf. Control., 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X |
[43] | L. M. Zhang, H. Y. Chang, R. T. Xu, The patient admission scheduling of an ophthalmic hospital using genetic algorithm, in Advanced Materials Research, 756 (2013), 1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.756-759.1423 |
[44] | M. S. Moreno, A. M. Blanco, A fuzzy programming approach for the multi-objective patient appointment scheduling problem under uncertainty in a large hospital, Comput. Ind. Eng., 123 (2018), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.06.013 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.06.013 |
[45] | K. P. Yoon, C. L. Hwang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage publications, 1995. |
[46] | Z. Yue, A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS, Appl. Math. Model., 35 (2011), 1926–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.001 |
[47] | G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. H. Lotfi, M. Izadikhah, An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data, Appl. math. comput., 175 (2006), 1375–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.08.048 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.08.048 |
[48] | C. Kao, Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis, Appl. Math. Model., 34 (2010), 1779–1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.09.022 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.09.022 |
[49] | E. Roghanian, J. Rahimi, A. Ansari, Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS, Appl. Math. Model., 34 (2010), 3754–3766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.02.039 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.02.039 |