To calculate fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on computed tomography angiography (i.e., FFRCT) by considering the branch flow distribution in the coronary arteries.
FFR is the gold standard to diagnose myocardial ischemia caused by coronary stenosis. An accurate and noninvasive method for obtaining total coronary blood flow is needed for the calculation of FFRCT.
A mathematical model for estimating the coronary blood flow rate and two approaches for setting the patient-specific flow boundary condition were proposed. Coronary branch flow distribution methods based on a volume-flow approach and a diameter-flow approach were employed for the numerical simulation of FFRCT. The values of simulated FFRCT for 16 patients were compared with their clinically measured FFR.
The ratio of total coronary blood flow to cardiac output and the myocardial blood flow under the condition of hyperemia were 16.97% and 4.07 mL/min/g, respectively. The errors of FFRCT compared with clinical data under the volume-flow approach and diameter-flow approach were 10.47% and 11.76%, respectively, the diagnostic accuracies of FFRCT were 65% and 85%, and the consistencies were 95% and 90%.
The mathematical model for estimating the coronary blood flow rate and the coronary branch flow distribution method can be applied to calculate the value of clinical noninvasive FFRCT.
Citation: Honghui Zhang, Jun Xia, Yinlong Yang, Qingqing Yang, Hongfang Song, Jinjie Xie, Yue Ma, Yang Hou, Aike Qiao. Branch flow distribution approach and its application in the calculation of fractional flow reserve in stenotic coronary artery[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 5978-5994. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021299
[1] | Wenxue Huang, Yuanyi Pan . On Balancing between Optimal and Proportional categorical predictions. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(1): 129-137. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016.1.129 |
[2] | Dongyang Yang, Wei Xu . Statistical modeling on human microbiome sequencing data. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2019, 4(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2019001 |
[3] | Wenxue Huang, Xiaofeng Li, Yuanyi Pan . Increase statistical reliability without losing predictive power by merging classes and adding variables. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(4): 341-348. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016014 |
[4] | Jianguo Dai, Wenxue Huang, Yuanyi Pan . A category-based probabilistic approach to feature selection. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2018, 3(1): 14-21. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017020 |
[5] | Amanda Working, Mohammed Alqawba, Norou Diawara, Ling Li . TIME DEPENDENT ATTRIBUTE-LEVEL BEST WORST DISCRETE CHOICE MODELLING. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2018, 3(1): 55-72. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2018010 |
[6] | Xiaoxiao Yuan, Jing Liu, Xingxing Hao . A moving block sequence-based evolutionary algorithm for resource investment project scheduling problems. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2017, 2(1): 39-58. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017007 |
[7] | Yaguang Huangfu, Guanqing Liang, Jiannong Cao . MatrixMap: Programming abstraction and implementation of matrix computation for big data analytics. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(4): 349-376. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016015 |
[8] | Tao Wu, Yu Lei, Jiao Shi, Maoguo Gong . An evolutionary multiobjective method for low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2017, 2(1): 23-37. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017006 |
[9] | Wenxue Huang, Qitian Qiu . Forward Supervised Discretization for Multivariate with Categorical Responses. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(2): 217-225. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016005 |
[10] | Yiwen Tao, Zhenqiang Zhang, Bengbeng Wang, Jingli Ren . Motality prediction of ICU rheumatic heart disease with imbalanced data based on machine learning. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2024, 8(0): 43-64. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2024003 |
To calculate fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on computed tomography angiography (i.e., FFRCT) by considering the branch flow distribution in the coronary arteries.
FFR is the gold standard to diagnose myocardial ischemia caused by coronary stenosis. An accurate and noninvasive method for obtaining total coronary blood flow is needed for the calculation of FFRCT.
A mathematical model for estimating the coronary blood flow rate and two approaches for setting the patient-specific flow boundary condition were proposed. Coronary branch flow distribution methods based on a volume-flow approach and a diameter-flow approach were employed for the numerical simulation of FFRCT. The values of simulated FFRCT for 16 patients were compared with their clinically measured FFR.
The ratio of total coronary blood flow to cardiac output and the myocardial blood flow under the condition of hyperemia were 16.97% and 4.07 mL/min/g, respectively. The errors of FFRCT compared with clinical data under the volume-flow approach and diameter-flow approach were 10.47% and 11.76%, respectively, the diagnostic accuracies of FFRCT were 65% and 85%, and the consistencies were 95% and 90%.
The mathematical model for estimating the coronary blood flow rate and the coronary branch flow distribution method can be applied to calculate the value of clinical noninvasive FFRCT.
Multi-nominal data are common in scientific and engineering research such as biomedical research, customer behavior analysis, network analysis, search engine marketing optimization, web mining etc. When the response variable has more than two levels, the principle of mode-based or distribution-based proportional prediction can be used to construct nonparametric nominal association measure. For example, Goodman and Kruskal [3,4] and others proposed some local-to-global association measures towards optimal predictions. Both Monte Carlo and discrete Markov chain methods are conceptually based on the proportional associations. The association matrix, association vector and association measure were proposed by the thought of proportional associations in [9]. If there is no ordering to the response variable's categories, or the ordering is not of interest, they will be regarded as nominal in the proportional prediction model and the other association statistics.
But in reality, different categories in the same response variable often are of different values, sometimes much different. When selecting a model or selecting explanatory variables, we want to choose the ones that can enhance the total revenue, not just the accuracy rate. Similarly, when the explanatory variables with cost weight vector, they should be considered in the model too. The association measure in [9],
To implement the previous adjustments, we need the following assumptions:
It needs to be addressed that the second assumption is probably not always the case. The law of large number suggests that the larger the sample size is, the closer the expected value of a distribution is to the real value. The study of this subject has been conducted for hundreds of years including how large the sample size is enough to simulate the real distribution. Yet it is not the major subject of this article. The purpose of this assumption is nothing but a simplification to a more complicated discussion.
The article is organized as follows. Section 2 discusses the adjustment to the association measure when the response variable has a revenue weight; section 3 considers the case where both the explanatory and the response variable have weights; how the adjusted measure changes the existing feature selection framework is presented in section 4. Conclusion and future works will be briefly discussed in the last section.
Let's first recall the association matrix
γs,t(Y|X)=E(p(Y=s|X)p(Y=t|X))p(Y=s)=α∑i=1p(X=i|Y=s)p(Y=t|X=i);s,t=1,2,..,βτY|X=ωY|X−Ep(Y)1−Ep(Y)ωY|X=EX(EY(p(Y|X)))=β∑s=1α∑i=1p(Y=s|X=i)2p(X=i)=β∑s=1γssp(Y=s) | (1) |
Our discussion begins with only one response variable with revenue weight and one explanatory variable without cost weight. Let
Definition 2.1.
ˆωY|X=β∑s=1α∑i=1p(Y=s|X=i)2rsp(X=i)=β∑s=1γssp(Y=s)rsrs>0,s=1,2,3...,β | (2) |
Please note that
It is easy to see that
Example.Consider a simulated data motivated by a real situation. Suppose that variable
1000 | 100 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 300 | 200 | 1500 | |||
200 | 1500 | 500 | 300 | 500 | 400 | 400 | 50 | |||
400 | 50 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 700 | |||
300 | 700 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 400 | 1000 | 100 | |||
200 | 500 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 400 | 500 | 200 |
Let us first consider the association matrix
0.34 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.25 | |||
0.13 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.23 | |||
0.24 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.15 | |||
0.25 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.46 |
Please note that
The correct prediction contingency tables of
471 | 6 | 121 | 83 | 98 | 34 | 19 | 926 | |||
101 | 746 | 159 | 107 | 177 | 114 | 113 | 1 | |||
130 | 1 | 167 | 157 | 114 | 124 | 42 | 256 | |||
44 | 243 | 145 | 85 | 109 | 81 | 489 | 6 | |||
21 | 210 | 114 | 32 | 36 | 119 | 206 | 28 |
The total number of the correct predictions by
total revenue | average revenue | |||
0.3406 | 0.456 | 4313 | 0.4714 | |
0.3391 | 0.564 | 5178 | 0.5659 |
Given that
In summary, it is possible for an explanatory variable
Let us further discuss the case with cost weight vector in predictors in addition to the revenue weight vector in the dependent variable. The goal is to find a predictor with bigger profit in total. We hence define the new association measure as in 3.
Definition 3.1.
ˉωY|X=α∑i=1β∑s=1p(Y=s|X=i)2rscip(X=i) | (3) |
Example. We first continue the example in the previous section with new cost weight vectors for
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.3057 | 12016.17 | 1.3132 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.8546 | 17072.17 | 1.8658 |
By
We then investigate how the change of cost weight affect the result. Suppose the new weight vectors are:
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.7420 | 15938.17 | 1.7419 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.3424 | 12268.17 | 1.3408 |
Hence
By the updated association defined in the previous section, we present the feature selection result in this section to a given data set
At first, consider a synthetic data set simulating the contribution factors to the sales of certain commodity. In general, lots of factors could contribute differently to the commodity sales: age, career, time, income, personal preference, credit, etc. Each factor could have different cost vectors, each class in a variable could have different cost as well. For example, collecting income information might be more difficult than to know the customer's career; determining a dinner waitress' purchase preference is easier than that of a high income lawyer. Therefore we just assume that there are four potential predictors,
total profit | average profit | ||||
7 | 0.3906 | 3.5381 | 35390 | 3.5390 | |
4 | 0.3882 | 3.8433 | 38771 | 3.8771 | |
4 | 0.3250 | 4.8986 | 48678 | 4.8678 | |
8 | 0.3274 | 3.7050 | 36889 | 3.6889 |
The first variable to be selected is
total profit | average profit | ||||
28 | 0.4367 | 1.8682 | 18971 | 1.8971 | |
28 | 0.4025 | 2.1106 | 20746 | 2.0746 | |
56 | 0.4055 | 1.8055 | 17915 | 1.7915 | |
16 | 0.4055 | 2.3585 | 24404 | 2.4404 | |
32 | 0.3385 | 2.0145 | 19903 | 1.9903 |
As we can see, all
In summary, the updated association with cost and revenue vector not only changes the feature selection result by different profit expectations, it also reflects a practical reality that collecting information for more variables costs more thus reduces the overall profit, meaning more variables is not necessarily better on a Return-Over-Invest basis.
We propose a new metrics,
The presented framework can also be applied to high dimensional cases as in national survey, misclassification costs, association matrix and association vector [9]. It should be more helpful to identify the predictors' quality with various response variables.
Given the distinct character of this new statistics, we believe it brings us more opportunities to further studies of finding the better decision for categorical data. We are currently investigating the asymptotic properties of the proposed measures and it also can be extended to symmetrical situation. Of course, the synthetical nature of the experiments in this article brings also the question of how it affects a real data set/application. It is also arguable that the improvements introduced by the new measures probably come from the randomness. Thus we can use
[1] | E. Conte, J. Sonck, S. Mushtaq, C. Collet, T. Mizukami, E. Barbato, et al., FFRCT and CT perfusion: A review on the evaluation of functional impact of coronary artery stenosis by cardiac CT, Int. J. Cardiol., 9 (2020), 289-296. |
[2] |
A. Cesaro, F. Gragnano, D. D. Girolamo, E. Moscarella, V. Diana, I. Pariggiano, et al., Functional assessment of coronary stenosis: an overview of available techniques. Is quantitative flow ratio a step to the future?, Expert. Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther., 16 (2018), 951-962. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1540303
![]() |
[3] | G. Y. Li, H. R. Wang, M. Z. Zhang, S. Tupin, A. K. Qiao, Y. J. Liu, et al., Prediction of 3D cardiovascular hemodynamics before and after coronary artery bypass surgery via deep learning, Commun. Biol., 99 (2021), 1-12. |
[4] |
N. S. Kleiman, Bringing it all together: integration of physiology with anatomy during cardiac catheterization, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 58 (2011), 1219-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.019
![]() |
[5] |
C. A. Taylor, T. A. Fonte, J. K. Min, Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 61 (2013), 2233-2241. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.083
![]() |
[6] |
J. K. Min, C. A. Taylor, S. Achenbach, B. K. Koo, J. Leipsic, B. L. Nørgaard, et al., Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: clinical data and scientific principles, JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging, 8 (2015), 1209-1222. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.006
![]() |
[7] |
C. Tesche, C. N. D. Cecco, M. H. Albrecht, T. M. Duguay, R. R. Bayer, S. E. Litwin, et al., Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve, Radiology, 285 (2017), 17-33. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162641
![]() |
[8] |
M. van Assen, C. N. D. Cecco, M. Eid, P. von Knebel Doeberitz, M. Scarabello, F. Lavra, et al., Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease, J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr., 13 (2019), 26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.02.005
![]() |
[9] | K. Nieman. The feasibility, findings and future of CT-FFR in the emergency ward, J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr., 19 (2019), 287-288. |
[10] |
B. K. Koo, A. Erglis, J. H. Doh, D. V. Daniels, S. Jegere, H. S. Kim, et al., Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (diagnosis of ischemia-causing stenoses obtained via noninvasive fractional flow reserve) study, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 58 (2011), 1989-1997. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066
![]() |
[11] |
J. K. Min, B. K. Koo, A. Erglis, J. H. Doh, D. V. Daniels, S. Jegere, et al., Effect of image quality on diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the prospective multicenter international DISCOVER-FLOW study, J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr., 6 (2012), 191-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.04.010
![]() |
[12] |
J. K. Min, D. S. Berman, M. J. Budoff, F. A. Jaffer, J. Leipsic, M. B. Leon MB, et al., Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (determination of fractional flow reserve by anatomic computed tomographic angiography) study, J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr., 5 (2011), 301-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.08.003
![]() |
[13] |
J. K. Min, J. Leipsic, M. J. Pencina, D. S. Berman, B. K. Koo, C. van Mieghem, et al., Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography, JAMA, 308 (2012), 1237-1245. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11274
![]() |
[14] |
R Nakazato, H. B. Park, D. S. Berman, H. Gransar, B. K. Koo, A. Erglis, et al., Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity results from the DeFACTO study, Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging, 6 (2013), 881-889. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000297
![]() |
[15] |
J. Leipsic, T. H. Yang, A. Thompson, B. K. Koo, G. B. J. Mancini, C. Taylor, et al., CT angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the determination of fractional flow reserve by anatomic CTA (DEFACTO) study, AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol., 202 (2014), 989-994. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11441
![]() |
[16] |
S. Gaur, S. Achenbach, L. Leipsic, L. Mauri, H. G. Bezerra, Jensen JM, et al., Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (heartflow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps) study, J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr., 7(2013), 279-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.09.003
![]() |
[17] |
B. L. Nørgaard, J. Leipsic, S. Gaur, S. Seneviratne, B. S. Ko, H. Ito, et al., Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: The NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps), J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 63 (2014), 1145-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043
![]() |
[18] |
T. Miyoshi, K. Osawa, H. Ito, S. Kanazawa, T. Kimura, H, Shiomi, et al., Non-invasive computed fractional flow reserve from computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing coronary artery disease, Circ. J., 79 (2015), 406-412. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-1051
![]() |
[19] |
K. Tanaka, H. G. Bezerra, S. Gaur, G. F. Attizzani, H. E. Bøtker, M. A. Costa, et al., Comparison between nNon-invasive (coronary computed tomography angiography derived) and invasive-fractional flow reserve in patients with serial stenoses within one coronary artery-A NXT trial substudy, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 44 (2016), 580-589. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1436-y
![]() |
[20] |
C. X. Tang, C. Y. Liu, M. J. Lu, U. J. Schoepf, C. Tesche, R. R. Bayer, et al., CT FFR for ischemia-specific CAD with a new computational fluid dynamics algorithm: a Chinese multicenter study, JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging, 13 (2020), 980-990. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.018
![]() |
[21] |
L. D. Rasmussen, S. Winther, J. Westra, C. Isaksen, J. A. Ejlersen, L. Brix, et al., Danish study of non-Invasive testing in coronary artery disease 2 (Dan-NICAD 2): Study design for a controlled study of diagnostic accuracy, Am. Heart. J, 215 (2019), 114-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.03.016
![]() |
[22] | J. M. Carson, S. Pant, C. Roobottom, R. Alcock, Non-invasive coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: A benchmark study comparing the diagnostic performance of four different computational methodologies, Int. J. Numer. Method. Biomed. Eng., 17 (2019), e3235. |
[23] |
J. S. Choy, G. S. Kassab. Scaling of myocardial mass to flow and morphometry of coronary arteries, J. Appl. Physiol., 104 (2008), 1281-1286. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01261.2007
![]() |
[24] |
C. J. Arthurs, K. D. Lau, K. N. Asrress, S. R. Redwood, C. A. Figueroa, A mathematical model of coronary blood flow control: simulation of patient-specific three-dimensional hemodynamics during exercise, Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 310 (2016), 1242-1258. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00517.2015
![]() |
[25] | Z. Duanmu, W. W. Chen, H. Gao, X. L. Yang, X. Luo, N. A. Hill, A one-dimensional hemodynamic model of the coronary arterial tree, Front. Physiol., 10 (2019), 853. |
[26] | Z. Duanmu, M. Yin, X. Fan, X. Yang, X. Luo, A patient-specific lumped-parameter model of coronary circulation, Sci. Rep., 8 (2018), 1-10. |
[27] |
Y. Huo, G. S. Kassab, The scaling of blood flow resistance: from a single vessel to the entire distal tree, Biophys. J., 96 (2009), 339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.038
![]() |
[28] |
J. M. Zhang, L. Zhong, T. Luo, A. M. Lomarda, Y. Huo, J. Yap, et al., Simplified models of non-invasive fractional flow reserve based on CT images, PLoS One, 11 (2016), e0153070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153070
![]() |
[29] |
M. Abe, H. Tomiyama, H. Yoshida, D. Doba, Diastolic fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of moderate coronary artery stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve, Circulation, 102 (2000), 2365-2370. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.19.2365
![]() |
[30] | M. Yang, X. Shen, S. Chen, Assessment of the effect of pulmonary hypertension on right ventricular volume and free wall mass by dynamic three-dimensional voxel imaging of echocardiography, Chin. J. Uitrasonography, 7 (2000), 401-404. |
[31] |
C. H. Lorenz, E. S. Walker, V. L. Morgan, S. S. Klein, T. P. Graham, Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging, J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Res., 1 (1999), 7-21. doi: 10.3109/10976649909080829
![]() |
[32] | P. Sharma, L. Itu, X. Zheng, A. Kamen, D. Bernhardt, C. Suciu, et al., A framework for personalization of coronary flow computations during rest and hyperemia, Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2012, 6665-6668. |
[33] | L. Itu, S. Rapaka, T. Passerini, B. Georgescu, C. Schwemmer, M. Schoebinger, et al., A machine-learning approach for computation of fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomography, J. Appl. Physiol., 121 (2018), 42-52. |
[34] |
H. Anderson, M. Stokes, M. Leon, S. Abu-Halawa, Y. Stuart, R. Kirkeeide, Coronary artery flow velocity is related to lumen area and regional left ventricular mass, Circulation, 102 (2000), 48-54. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.1.48
![]() |
[35] | Y. X. Zhao, J. M. Liu, D. G. Xu, X. B. Yan, L. C. Lu, S. Z. Xiao, et al., Population based study of change trend of the ratio of diastolic to systolic duration during exercise, Chin. J. Appl. Physiol., 29 (2013), 134-136. |
[36] |
N. G. Uren, J. A. Melin, B. De Brunye, W. Wijns, T. Baudhuin, P. G. Camici, Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis, N. Engl. J. Med., 330 (1994), 1782-1788. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406233302503
![]() |
[37] |
C. D. Murray, The physiological principle of minimum work I. the vascular system and the cost of blood volume, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 12 (1926), 207-214. doi: 10.1073/pnas.12.3.207
![]() |
[38] |
C. Seiler, K. L. Gould, R. L. Kirkeeide, Basic structure-function relations of the epicardial coronary vascular tree. Basis of quantitative coronary arteriography for diffuse coronary artery disease, Circulation, 85 (1992), 1987-2003. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.85.6.1987
![]() |
[39] |
C. Seiler, R. L. Kirkeeide, K. L. Gould, Measurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary vascular tree for assessing anatomic area at risk, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 21 (1993), 783-797. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90113-F
![]() |
[40] |
K. E. Lee, S. S. Kwon, Y. C. Ji, E. S. Shin, J. H. Choi, S. J. Kim, et al., Estimation of the flow resistances exerted in coronary arteries using a vessel length-based method, Pflugers. Arch., 468 (2016), 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00424-015-1762-9
![]() |
[41] |
S. Sakamoto, S. Takahashi, A. U. Coskun, M. I. Papafaklis, A. Takahashi, S. Saito, et al., Relation of distribution of coronary blood flow volume to coronary artery dominance, Am. J. Cardiol., 111 (2013), 1420-1424. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.290
![]() |
[42] |
C. A. Bulant, P. J. Blanco, G. D. Maso Talou, C. G. Bezerra, P. A. Lemos, R. A. Feij, A head-to-head comparison between CT- and IVUS-derived coronary blood flow models, J. Biomech., 51 (2017), 65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.070
![]() |
[43] |
E. Kato, S. Fujimoto, K. K. Kumamaru, Y. O. Kawaguchi, T. Dohi, C. Aoshima, et al., Adjustment of CT-fractional flow reserve based on fluid-structure interaction underestimation to minimize 1-year cardiac events, Heart Vessels, 35 (2020), 162-169. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01480-4
![]() |
[44] | H. Mejía-Rentería, J. M. Lee, F. Lauri, N. W. van der Hoeven, G. A de Waard, F. Macaya, et al., Influence of microcirculatory dysfunction on angiography-based functional assessment of coronary stenoses, JACC Cardiovasc. Interv., 23 (2018), 741-753. |
[45] | J. J. Layland, R. J. Whitbourn, A. T. Burns, J. Somaratne, G. Leitl, A. I. Macisaac et al., The index of microvascular resistance identifies patients with periprocedural myocardial infarction in elective percutaneous coronary intervention, J. Interv. Cardiol., 98 (2012), 1492-1497. |
[46] |
A. Erkol, S. Pala, C. Kırma, V. Oduncu, C. Dündar, A. Izgi, et al., Relation of circulating osteoprotegerin levels on admission to microvascular obstruction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention, Am. J. Cardiol., 107 (2011), 857-862. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.10.071
![]() |
1000 | 100 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 300 | 200 | 1500 | |||
200 | 1500 | 500 | 300 | 500 | 400 | 400 | 50 | |||
400 | 50 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 700 | |||
300 | 700 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 400 | 1000 | 100 | |||
200 | 500 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 400 | 500 | 200 |
0.34 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.25 | |||
0.13 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.23 | |||
0.24 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.15 | |||
0.25 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.46 |
471 | 6 | 121 | 83 | 98 | 34 | 19 | 926 | |||
101 | 746 | 159 | 107 | 177 | 114 | 113 | 1 | |||
130 | 1 | 167 | 157 | 114 | 124 | 42 | 256 | |||
44 | 243 | 145 | 85 | 109 | 81 | 489 | 6 | |||
21 | 210 | 114 | 32 | 36 | 119 | 206 | 28 |
total revenue | average revenue | |||
0.3406 | 0.456 | 4313 | 0.4714 | |
0.3391 | 0.564 | 5178 | 0.5659 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.3057 | 12016.17 | 1.3132 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.8546 | 17072.17 | 1.8658 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.7420 | 15938.17 | 1.7419 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.3424 | 12268.17 | 1.3408 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
7 | 0.3906 | 3.5381 | 35390 | 3.5390 | |
4 | 0.3882 | 3.8433 | 38771 | 3.8771 | |
4 | 0.3250 | 4.8986 | 48678 | 4.8678 | |
8 | 0.3274 | 3.7050 | 36889 | 3.6889 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
28 | 0.4367 | 1.8682 | 18971 | 1.8971 | |
28 | 0.4025 | 2.1106 | 20746 | 2.0746 | |
56 | 0.4055 | 1.8055 | 17915 | 1.7915 | |
16 | 0.4055 | 2.3585 | 24404 | 2.4404 | |
32 | 0.3385 | 2.0145 | 19903 | 1.9903 |
1000 | 100 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 300 | 200 | 1500 | |||
200 | 1500 | 500 | 300 | 500 | 400 | 400 | 50 | |||
400 | 50 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 700 | |||
300 | 700 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 400 | 1000 | 100 | |||
200 | 500 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 400 | 500 | 200 |
0.34 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.25 | |||
0.13 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.23 | |||
0.24 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.15 | |||
0.25 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.46 |
471 | 6 | 121 | 83 | 98 | 34 | 19 | 926 | |||
101 | 746 | 159 | 107 | 177 | 114 | 113 | 1 | |||
130 | 1 | 167 | 157 | 114 | 124 | 42 | 256 | |||
44 | 243 | 145 | 85 | 109 | 81 | 489 | 6 | |||
21 | 210 | 114 | 32 | 36 | 119 | 206 | 28 |
total revenue | average revenue | |||
0.3406 | 0.456 | 4313 | 0.4714 | |
0.3391 | 0.564 | 5178 | 0.5659 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.3057 | 12016.17 | 1.3132 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.8546 | 17072.17 | 1.8658 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.7420 | 15938.17 | 1.7419 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.3424 | 12268.17 | 1.3408 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
7 | 0.3906 | 3.5381 | 35390 | 3.5390 | |
4 | 0.3882 | 3.8433 | 38771 | 3.8771 | |
4 | 0.3250 | 4.8986 | 48678 | 4.8678 | |
8 | 0.3274 | 3.7050 | 36889 | 3.6889 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
28 | 0.4367 | 1.8682 | 18971 | 1.8971 | |
28 | 0.4025 | 2.1106 | 20746 | 2.0746 | |
56 | 0.4055 | 1.8055 | 17915 | 1.7915 | |
16 | 0.4055 | 2.3585 | 24404 | 2.4404 | |
32 | 0.3385 | 2.0145 | 19903 | 1.9903 |