
Linked to poverty, rheumatic heart disease (RHD) disproportionately burdens the developing world, receiving less attention than other infectious diseases. Resampling and cost-sensitive learning techniques are applied to predict the mortality risk of imbalanced RHD datasets. A total of 57 models were constructed, and was comprised of 50 resampled machine learning (ML) models and 7 cost-sensitive learning models. The results from the Friedman and Nemenyi tests highlight the superior performance of the cost-sensitive support vector classification model, with an AUC of 0.888, sensitivity of 0.800, G-means of 0.806, and a Brier score of 0.061. The global and local interpretability are advanced through two post-hoc interpretable ML methods, facilitating the prioritization of key features associated with mortality risk, the determination of thresholds for features, and a comprehension of how variations in these features influence patient mortality rates. These findings may prove to be clinically valuable, assisting clinicians in tailoring precise management that is essential to maximize the survival of RHD patients.
Citation: Yiwen Tao, Zhenqiang Zhang, Bengbeng Wang, Jingli Ren. Motality prediction of ICU rheumatic heart disease with imbalanced data based on machine learning[J]. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2024, 8: 43-64. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2024003
[1] | Nitesha Dwarika . The risk-return relationship in South Africa: tail optimization of the GARCH-M approach. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2022, 2(4): 391-415. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2022020 |
[2] | Moses Khumalo, Hopolang Mashele, Modisane Seitshiro . Quantification of the stock market value at risk by using FIAPARCH, HYGARCH and FIGARCH models. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2023, 3(4): 380-400. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2023022 |
[3] | Xiaoling Chen, Xingfa Zhang, Yuan Li, Qiang Xiong . Daily LGARCH model estimation using high frequency data. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2021, 1(2): 165-179. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2021009 |
[4] | Samuel Asante Gyamerah, Collins Abaitey . Modelling and forecasting the volatility of bitcoin futures: the role of distributional assumption in GARCH models. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2022, 2(3): 321-334. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2022016 |
[5] | Changlin Wang . Different GARCH model analysis on returns and volatility in Bitcoin. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2021, 1(1): 37-59. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2021003 |
[6] | Alexandra Piryatinska, Boris Darkhovsky . Retrospective technology of segmentation and classification for GARCH models based on the concept of the ϵ-complexity of continuous functions. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2022, 2(3): 237-253. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2022012 |
[7] | Kasra Pourkermani . VaR calculation by binary response models. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2024, 4(3): 350-361. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2024015 |
[8] | Changlin Wang . Correction: Different GARCH models analysis of returns and volatility in Bitcoin. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2022, 2(3): 205-208. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2022010 |
[9] | Deniz Sevinç . Volatility spillovers among MIST stock markets. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2022, 2(2): 80-95. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2022004 |
[10] | Katleho Makatjane, Ntebogang Moroke . Examining stylized facts and trends of FTSE/JSE TOP40: a parametric and Non-Parametric approach. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2022, 2(3): 294-320. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2022015 |
Linked to poverty, rheumatic heart disease (RHD) disproportionately burdens the developing world, receiving less attention than other infectious diseases. Resampling and cost-sensitive learning techniques are applied to predict the mortality risk of imbalanced RHD datasets. A total of 57 models were constructed, and was comprised of 50 resampled machine learning (ML) models and 7 cost-sensitive learning models. The results from the Friedman and Nemenyi tests highlight the superior performance of the cost-sensitive support vector classification model, with an AUC of 0.888, sensitivity of 0.800, G-means of 0.806, and a Brier score of 0.061. The global and local interpretability are advanced through two post-hoc interpretable ML methods, facilitating the prioritization of key features associated with mortality risk, the determination of thresholds for features, and a comprehension of how variations in these features influence patient mortality rates. These findings may prove to be clinically valuable, assisting clinicians in tailoring precise management that is essential to maximize the survival of RHD patients.
Asymmetric datasets modeling utilizing generalized continuous distributions is quite an interesting area of research in recent times, and quite a number of generalized continuous distributions have been proposed, established and utilized in different fields of study. Besides with the new progressions in probability distribution theory, more vigorous forms of continuous distributions have been proposed utilizing the exponentiated method, transformer-transformer method, beta-generated method and gamma-generated method, among others. Shockingly, these recent distributions have been valuable in resolving issues in different fields of study other than in GARCH-type volatility models. Along these lines, it is important to develop new conditional innovation distributions capable of handling both significant skewness and excess kurtosis present in financial asset returns. Jones (2001) proposed a simplified extension of the symmetric Student's-t distribution known as the skew-t distribution to handle real-life asymmetric datasets. Jones and Faddy (2003) described the distribution as a simplified skew-t distribution and provided some important structural properties. Some other forms of the skew-t distribution that have been developed can be found in the literature (Johnson et al., 1995; Sahu et al., 2003; Azzalini and Capitanio, 2003). More so, the statistical literature consists several extended forms of the skew-t distribution. For example, the generalized hyperbolic skew-t distribution (Aas and Haff, 2006), beta skew-t distribution (Shittu et al., 2014), Balakrishnan skew-t distribution (Shafiei and Doostparast, 2014), Kumaraswamy skew-t distribution (Khamis et al., 2017), exponentiated skew-t distribution (Dikko and Agboola, 2017), generalized alpha skew-t distribution (Altun et al., 2018), odd exponentiated skew-t distribution (Adubisi et al., 2021a), and type I half-logistic skew-t distribution (Adubisi et al., 2021b).
For any baseline distribution with parameter vector ζ, Cordeiro et al. (2014) proposed the exponentiated half-logistic-G (EHL-G) family based on the T-X method (Alzaatreh et al., 2013). Given that k(t) and K(t) are the probability density function (pdf) and cumulative distribution function (cdf) of a random variable (r.v) T∈[c,d] for [c,d]∈(−∞,+∞), respectively. Let R[H(y;ζ)] be a function of the cdf of another r. v Y satisfying the following conditions: [i] R[H(y;ζ)]∈[c,d]; [ii] R[H(y;ζ)]→c as y→−∞ and R[H(y;ζ)]→d as y→∞; and [iii] R[H(y;ζ)] is differentiable and monotonically non-decreasing. The cdf of the T-X method is given by
F(y)=∫R[H(y;ζ)]ck(t)dt=K(R[H(y;ζ)]), | (1) |
Setting k(t)=2αφe−αt[1−e−αt]φ−1(1+e−αt)φ+1,t>0, where α,φ>0 are the shape parameters, and
21R[H(y;ζ)]=− log [1−H(y;ζ)], the cdf of the EHL-G family is given by
F(y;α,φ,ζ)={1−[1−H(y;ζ)]α1+[1−H(y;ζ)]α}φ, | (2) |
and the corresponding pdf to Equation 2 is
f(y;α,φ,ζ)=2αφh(y;ζ)[1−H(y;ζ)]α−1{1−[1−H(y;ζ)]α}φ−1{1+[1−H(y;ζ)]α}φ+1, | (3) |
where α,φ>0 are two additional shape parameters. H(y;ζ) and h(y;ζ) are the baseline cdf and pdf.
In this research work, a hybrid form of the skew-t distribution developed by Jones and Faddy (2003) using the exponentiated half logistic-G family of distributions is proposed. The new three-parameter model called the exponentiated half logistic skew t (EHLST) distribution appropriate for modeling right or left skewed and heavy-tailed datasets is developed. By inserting the skew-t cdf H(y;κ)=12(1+y√κ+y2) into Equation 2 leads to
F(y)={1−[1−(12(1+y√κ+y2))]α1+[1−(12(1+y√κ+y2))]α}φ, | (4) |
The corresponding pdf to Equation 4 is
f(y)=2αφκ[1−(12(1+y√κ+y2))]α−1{1−[1−(12(1+y√κ+y2))]α}φ−12(κ+y2)32{1+[1−(12(1+y√κ+y2))]α}φ+1, | (5) |
where α>0 and φ>0 are two shape parameters, and κ denote the skew parameter. From now onward, Y∼EHLST(α,φ,κ) denotes a random variable with pdf Equation 5. The hazard rate function (hrf) of Y is
η(y)=αφ(κ(κ+y2)32)[1−(12(1+y√κ+y2))]α−1{1−[1−(12(1+y√κ+y2))]α}φ−1({1+[1−(12(1+y√κ+y2))]α}φ−{1−[1−(12(1+y√κ+y2))]α}φ{1+[1−(12(1+y√κ+y2))]α}). | (6) |
Detailed properties of the EHLST model can be found in Adubisi et al. (2021c). Lately, there has been a key interest in the comparison of different estimation procedures for the parameter estimation of several distributions. For example, the extended exponential geometric (Louzada et al., 2016), Binomial exponential 2 (Bakouch et al., 2017), Poisson exponential (Rodrigues et al., 2018), type-I half-logistic Top-Leone (ZeinEldin et al., 2019), polynomial exponential (Chesneau et al., 2020), Fréchet (Ramos et al., 2020), odd exponential half-logistic exponential (Aldahlan and Afify, 2020), among others. The motivation in developing the new model is to create a more flexible heavy-tailed distribution with right-skewed, left-skewed, symmetric and unimodal features capable of handling the stylized features in financial datasets. The aim of this work is to estimate the parameters of the EHLST distribution using different frequentist estimation criterions such as the maximum likelihood, Anderson-Darling, maximum product of spacing, ordinary least squares, Cramer-von mises and weighted least squares. These estimation criterions using extensive Monte Carlo simulation are compared to discourse their performance. Also, Altun (2019) noted that the assumption of the conditional innovation density of the GARCH volatility model directly impacts on the accuracy of volatility predictions. Hence, the standardized form of the EHLST model is also derived to serve as an alternative conditional innovation density in modeling and forecasting the volatility of the inflation rates in sub-Sahara Africa, specifically Nigeria inflation rate using the GARCH-type volatility models. The rest of this research work is designed as follows. The quantile function of the EHLST is derived in Section 2. Six estimation criterions for estimating the parameters of the EHLST model are presented in Section 3. Simulation study to compare these criterions and real-life application are presented in Section 4. The application of the EHLST density in volatility modeling is illustrated via GARCH-type models in Section 5. The empirical results of the GARCH process are presented in Section 6. Conclusion of the work in Section 7.
Figures 1 and 2 provides plots of the pdf and hazard rate function of the EHLST distribution for selected values of the parameters. The plot in figure 2, shows that the hazard rate function can be J-shape, increasing and decreasing.
The quantile function, Q(u)=F−1(u) of Y can be derived by inverting Equation 4. The quantile function of the EHLST distribution takes the form:
Q(u)=κ12[1−2(1−u1φ1+u1φ)1α][1−(1−2(1−u1φ1+u1φ)1α)2]12,0≤u≤1. | (7) |
The quantile function in Equation 7 can define various quantile measures such as Bowley's skewness and Moor's kurtosis of the EHLST distribution. Figure 3 depicts the three-dimensional plots of these skewness and kurtosis measures. It is clear that the skewness was increasing in φ and decreasing in α while the kurtosis is increasing in α and decreasing in φ, and were independent of κ.
This section discusses six estimation criterions, these are the maximum likelihood (ML), maximum product of spacing (MPS), Anderson-Darling (ANDA), ordinary least squares (OLS), weighted least squares (WLS) and Cramer-von Mises (CVM) to estimate the new model parameters.
The ML estimation is considered the best for estimating distribution parameters given its excellent characteristics. Let y1,…,yT be the observed values of sizes (T) from the EHLST distribution. The log-likelihood function derived from Equation 6 is given by
l(α,φ,κ)=T ln α+T ln φ+T ln κ−32T∑k=1 ln (κ+y2k)+(α−1)T∑k=1 ln (zk)+(φ−1)T∑k=1 ln (1−(zk)α)−(φ+1)∑Tk=1 ln (1+(zk)α) | (8) |
where zk=(1−12(1+yk√κ+y2k)) | (9) |
Let ˆαMLE,ˆφMLE and ˆκMLE be the ML estimates of α,φ and κ. These can be obtained numerically by maximizing l(α,φ,κ) or solving the following differential equations:
Uα=Tα+∑Tk=1 ln (zk)−(φ−1)∑Tk=1(zk)α ln (zk){1−(zk)α}−(φ+1)∑Tk=1(zk)α ln (zk){1+(zk)α}=0, | (10) |
Uφ=Tφ+∑Tk=1 ln (1−(zk)α)−∑Tk=1 ln {1+(zk)α}=0, | (11) |
and
Uη=Tκ−32T∑k=11(κ+y2k)+(α−1)T∑k=1yk4(κ+y2k)32(zk)−α(φ−1)T∑k=1yk(zk)α4(κ+y2k)32(zk){1+(zk)α}−α(φ+1)∑Tk=1yk(zk)α4(κ+y2k)32(zk){1+(zk)α}=0 | (12) |
Let y(1:T),y(2:T),…,y(T:T) be the ordered sample of size (T) from the EHLST distribution with cdf in Equation 5. The OLS estimates ˆαOLS,ˆφOLS and ˆκOLS of α,φ and κ can be obtained numerically by minimizing
OL(α,φ,κ)=∑Tk=1[{1−[1−(12(1+y(k:T)√κ+y2(k:T)))]α1+[1−(12(1+y(k:T)√κ+y2(k:T)))]α}φ−℘(k,T)]2, | (13) |
where ℘(k,T)=(T+1−k)(T+1), with respect to α,φ and κ.Also, the model estimates can be obtained by solving the following differential equations:
∂OL(α,φ,κ)∂α=∑Tk=1[{1−[z(k:T)]α1+[z(k:T)]α}φ−℘(k,T)]Φ1(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)=0, | (14) |
∂OL(α,φ,κ)∂φ=∑Tk=1[{1−[z(k:T)]α1+[z(k:T)]α}φ−℘(k,T)]Φ2(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)=0, | (15) |
and
∂OL(α,φ,κ)∂κ=∑Tk=1[{1−[z(k:T)]α1+[z(k:T)]α}φ−℘(k,T)]Φ3(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)=0, | (16) |
where z(k:T) is the order transformed value of zk given by Equation 9, and
Φ1(y(k:T ) |α,φ,κ)={(1−(z(k:T ) )α1+(z(k:T ) )α)φφ(−(z(k:T ) )α log (z(k:T ) )1+(z(k:T ) )α−[1−(z(k:T ) )α ](z(k:T ) )α log (z(k:T ) )[1+(z(k:T ) )α ] 2)[1+(z(k:T ) )α ]}1−(z(k:T ) )α | (17) |
Φ2(y(k:T ) |α,φ,κ)=(1−(z(k:T ) )α1+(z(k:T ) )α)φ log (1−(z(k:T ) )α1+(z(k:T ) )α) | (18) |
and
Φ3(y(k:T ) |α,φ,κ)={(1−(z(k:T ) )α1+(z(k:T ) )α)φφ(−αy(z(k:T ) )α4(κ+y2(k:T ) )32(z(k:T ) )[1+(z(k:T ) )α ]−αy[1−(z(k:T ) )α ](z(k:T ) )α4[1+(z(k:T ) )α ]2(κ+y2(k:T ) )32(z(k:T ) ))[1+(z(k:T ) )α ]}1−(z(k:T ) )α | (19) |
Applying the same symbolization as in the preceding subsection, the WLS estimates ˆαWLS,ˆφWLS and ˆκWLS of α,φ and κ can be obtained numerically by minimizing
WL(α,φ,κ)=∑Tk=1Ψ(k,T)[{1−[1−(12(1+y(k:T ) √κ+y2(k:T ) )) ]α1+[1−(12(1+y(k:T ) √κ+y2(k:T ) )) ]α}φ−℘(k,T) ]2, | (20) |
where Ψ(k,T)=(T+1)2(T+2)k(T−k+1), relative to α,φ and κ. Also, the model estimates can be obtained by solving the following differential equations:
∂WL(α,φ,κ)∂α=∑Tk=1Ψ(k,T)[{1−[z(k:T)]α1+[z(k:T)]α}φ−℘(k,T)]Φ1(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)=0, | (21) |
∂WL(α,φ,κ)∂φ=∑Tk=1Ψ(k,T)[{1−[z(k:T)]α1+[z(k:T)]α}φ−℘(k,T)]Φ2(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)=0, | (22) |
and
∂OL(α,φ,κ)∂κ=∑Tk=1Ψ(k,T)[{1−[z(k:T)]α1+[z(k:T)]α}φ−℘(k,T)]Φ3(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)=0, | (23) |
where z(k:T) and Φi(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ), i=1,2,3 are given by Eqs 9, 17, 18 and 19, respectively.
Cheng and Amin(1979, 1983) proposed the MPS estimator for the estimation of unknown parameters with ordered sample y(1:T),y(2:T),…,y(T:T) from the EHLST distribution and uniform spacing for this random sample is given by:
Dk(α,φ,κ)=F(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)−F(y(k−1:T)|α,φ,κ), for k=1,2,…,T, | (24) |
where F(y(0:T)|α,φ,κ)=0 and F(y(T+1:T)|α,φ,κ)=1. The MPS estimates ˆαMPS, ˆφMPS and ˆκMPS of α,φ, and κ can be obtained by maximizing
MP(α,φ,κ)=1T+1∑T+1k=1 log ⟨Dk(α,φ,κ)⟩ | (25) |
relative to α,φ, and κ. Also, the estimates can be obtained by solving the following differential equations:
∂MP(α,φ,κ)∂α=∑T+1k=11Dk(α,φ,κ)⟨Φ1(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)−Φ1(y(k−1:T)|α,φ,κ)⟩=0, | (26) |
∂MP(α,φ,κ)∂φ=∑T+1k=11Dk(α,φ,κ)⟨Φ2(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)−Φ2(y(k−1:T)|α,φ,κ)⟩=0, | (27) |
and
∂MP(α,φ,κ)∂κ=∑T+1k=11Dk(α,φ,κ)⟨Φ3(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)−Φ3(y(k−1:T)|α,φ,κ)⟩=0 | (28) |
where Φi(.|α,φ,κ), i=1,2,3 are specified in Equation s 17, 18 and 19, respectively.
The ANDA estimates ˆαANDA, ˆφANDA and ˆκANDA of the EHLST parameters can be obtained by minimizing relative to α,φ, and κ, the function
AD(α,φ,κ)=−T−1T∑Tk=1(2k−1)⟨ log [F(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)]+ log [ˉF(y(T+1−k:n)|α,φ,κ)]⟩, | (29) |
Also, estimates obtained by solving the following nonlinear equations:
∂AD(α,φ,κ)∂α=∑Tk=1(2k−1)[Φ1(y(k:T ) |α,φ,κ)F(y(k:T ) |α,φ,κ)−Φ1(y(T+1−k:T ) |α,φ,κ)ˉF(y(T+1−k:T ) |α,φ,κ)]=0, | (30) |
∂AD(α,φ,κ)∂φ=∑Tk=1(2k−1)[Φ2(y(k:T ) |α,φ,κ)F(y(k:T ) |α,φ,κ)−Φ2(y(T+1−k:T ) |α,φ,κ)ˉF(y(T+1−k:T ) |α,φ,κ)]=0, | (31) |
and
∂AD(α,φ,κ)∂κ=∑Tk=1(2k−1)[Φ3(y(k:T ) |α,φ,κ)F(y(k:T ) |α,φ,κ)−Φ3(y(T+1−k:T ) |α,φ,κ)ˉF(y(T+1−k:T ) |α,φ,κ)]=0, | (32) |
where Φi(.|α,φ,κ), i=1,2,3 are specified in Eqs 17, 18 and 19, respectively.
The CVM estimates ˆαCVM, ˆφCVM and ˆκCVM of the EHLST parameters can be obtained by minimizing relative to α,φ, and κ, the function
CV(α,φ,κ)=112T+∑Tk=1[{1−[1−(12(1+y(k:T ) √κ+y2(k:T ) ))]α1+[1−(12(1+y(k:T ) √κ+y2(k:T ) ))]α}φ−{2(k−1)+12T}]2, | (33) |
Solving the following nonlinear equations, the CVM estimates can also be obtained as follows:
∂OL(α,φ,κ)∂α=∑Tk=1[{1−[z(k:T)]α1+[z(k:T)]α}φ−{2(k−1)+12T}]Φ1(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)=0, | (34) |
∂OL(α,φ,κ)∂φ=∑Tk=1[{1−[z(k:T)]α1+[z(k:T)]α}φ−{2(k−1)+12T}]Φ2(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)=0, | (35) |
and
∂OL(α,φ,κ)∂κ=∑Tk=1[{1−[z(k:T)]α1+[z(k:T)]α}φ−{2(k−1)+12T}]Φ3(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ)=0, | (36) |
where z(k:T) and Φi(y(k:T)|α,φ,κ), i=1,2,3 are given by Eqs 9, 17, 18 and 19, respectively.
The performance of the six estimators defined in Section 5 are compared using Monte Carlo simulations. The parameter combinations (Comb), i.e., Comb 1 (α=1.0,φ=1.3,κ=0.5), Comb 2 (α=1.3,φ=1.7,κ=1.0), Comb 3 (α=2.0,φ=2.5,κ=1.5), and Comb 4 (α=2.5,φ=3.0,κ=2.0). The datasets are produced from the EHLST distribution under these combinations by selecting n = 10, 50,100 and 200. For each process, 1000 random samples from the EHLST distribution are produced using the quantile function in Eq 6. The parameter estimates performance are evaluated through the average values (AVEs), average absolute biases (AVABs), mean square errors (MSEs) and root mean square errors (RMSEs) for the different sample sizes (n). For the estimates, the AVAB, MSE and RMSE are computed using
AVAB(ˆϑi)=110001000∑j=1|ˆϑi,j−ϑi|,MSE(ˆϑi)=110001000∑j=1(ˆϑi,j−ϑi)2, |
RMSE(ˆϑi)=√110001000∑j=1(ˆϑi,j−ϑi)2 |
where, ˆϑ=(ˆα,ˆφ,ˆκ) and ϑ=(α,φ,κ). The partial and overall ranks of the six estimators for the combinations to determine the best method for estimating the EHLST parameters are provided in Table 1. Based on the results, it is realistic to use the ML and MPS methods for estimating the unknown parameters of the EHLST distribution.
Parameter (pa) | n | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
α=1.0,φ=1.3,κ=0.5 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
50 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | |
100 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | |
200 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
α=1.3,φ=1.7,κ=1.0 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
50 | 2 | 1 | 4.5 | 6 | 4.5 | 3 | |
100 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
200 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
α=2.0,φ=2.5,κ=1.5 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
50 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
100 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | |
200 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
α=2.5,φ=3.0,κ=2.0 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
50 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | |
100 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | |
200 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | |
∑ranks | 32 | 33 | 67.5 | 87 | 62.5 | 56 | |
Overall rank | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
Tables 2–5 provides the AVEs, AVABs, MSEs and RMSEs of the six estimators. More so, these tables show the rank of each estimator among all the estimators in each row, the superscripts are the rank indicators and ∑ranks is the partial sum of the ranks for each column and sample size (n).
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 1.4661(5) | 1.4066(4) | 1.6544(6) | 1.3840(3) | 1.1710(2) | 1.1590(1) |
φ | 2.4233(3) | 4.8935(5) | 8.1802(6) | 2.6132(4) | 1.9540(1) | 2.0060(2) | ||
κ | 1.1683(1) | 2.3008(5) | 2.4332(6) | 1.3781(4) | 1.2180(2) | 1.2700(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.4661(5) | 0.4066(4) | 0.6544(6) | 0.3840(3) | 0.1713(2) | 0.1594(1) | |
φ | 1.1233(3) | 3.5935(5) | 6.8802(6) | 1.3132(4) | 0.6536(1) | 0.7063(2) | ||
κ | 0.6683(1) | 1.8008(5) | 1.9332(6) | 0.8781(4) | 0.7178(2) | 0.7701(3) | ||
MSE | α | 0.8648(3) | 2.3453(5) | 3.3241(6) | 1.0758(4) | 0.6714(1) | 0.7021(2) | |
φ | 4.1873(1) | 172.4338(5) | 472.9212(6) | 19.7630(4) | 15.0648(2) | 15.7997(3) | ||
κ | 2.4706(1) | 35.4217(5) | 36.2999(6) | 6.9764(3) | 5.3805(2) | 7.9437(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.9300(3) | 1.5314(5) | 1.8232(6) | 1.0372(4) | 0.8194(1) | 0.8379(2) | |
φ | 2.0463(1) | 13.1314(5) | 21.7468(6) | 4.4456(4) | 3.8813(2) | 3.9749(3) | ||
κ | 1.5718(1) | 5.9516(6) | 6.0249(7) | 2.6413(3) | 2.3196(2) | 2.8185(4) | ||
∑ranks | 28(2) | 49(5) | 73(6) | 44(4) | 20(1) | 29(3) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 1.1687(5) | 0.9853(1) | 1.1595(3) | 1.2278(6) | 1.1672(4) | 1.1501(2) |
φ | 1.5906(2) | 1.3920(1) | 2.1469(6) | 1.8565(5) | 1.7203(4) | 1.6610(3) | ||
κ | 0.7185(2) | 0.6255(1) | 0.8535(5) | 0.8632(6) | 0.8289(4) | 0.7911(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1687(5) | 0.0147(1) | 0.1595(3) | 0.2278(6) | 0.1672(4) | 0.1501(2) | |
φ | 0.2906(2) | 0.0920(1) | 0.8469(6) | 0.5565(5) | 0.4203(4) | 0.3610(3) | ||
κ | 0.2185(2) | 0.1255(1) | 0.3535(4) | 0.3632(5) | 1.3812(6) | 0.2911(3) | ||
MSE | α | 0.2171(1) | 0.2513(2) | 0.5655(6) | 0.4314(5) | 0.3657(4) | 0.3091(3) | |
φ | 0.5725(1) | 2.5172(2) | 38.3736(6) | 3.8641(3) | 3.9756(4) | 4.4224(5) | ||
κ | 0.3991(1) | 0.9812(2) | 3.3622(6) | 1.5146(4) | 1.3812(3) | 1.8538(5) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.4659(1) | 0.5013(2) | 0.7520(6) | 0.6568(5) | 0.6047(4) | 0.5559(3) | |
φ | 0.7567(1) | 1.5866(2) | 6.1946(6) | 1.9657(3) | 1.9939(4) | 2.1029(5) | ||
κ | 0.6317(1) | 0.9905(2) | 1.8336(6) | 1.2307(4) | 1.1752(3) | 1.3616(5) | ||
∑ranks | 24(2) | 18(1) | 63(6) | 57(5) | 48(4) | 42(3) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 1.0768(4) | 0.9461(1) | 1.0561(2) | 1.1320(6) | 1.0928(5) | 1.0652(3) |
φ | 1.4224(2) | 1.2463(1) | 1.5157(4) | 1.6517(6) | 1.5443(5) | 1.4523(3) | ||
κ | 0.6022(2) | 0.4996(1) | 0.6226(4) | 0.7279(6) | 0.6878(5) | 0.6203(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0768(4) | 0.0539(1) | 0.0561(2) | 0.1320(6) | 0.0928(5) | 0.0652(3) | |
φ | 0.1224(2) | 0.0537(1) | 0.2157(4) | 0.3517(6) | 0.2443(5) | 0.1523(3) | ||
κ | 0.1022(2) | 0.0004(1) | 0.1226(5) | 0.2279(6) | 0.1878(3) | 0.1203(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0831(2) | 0.0682(1) | 0.1692(4) | 0.2889(6) | 0.2350(5) | 0.1393(3) | |
φ | 0.1652(2) | 0.1829(3) | 6.2211(6) | 3.6319(5) | 2.1739(4) | 1.4473(1) | ||
κ | 0.1402(1) | 0.1508(2) | 1.0192(5) | 1.1513(6) | 0.8198(4) | 0.3606(3) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.2882(2) | 0.2612(1) | 0.4113(4) | 0.5375(6) | 0.4848(5) | 0.3732(3) | |
φ | 0.4065(1) | 0.4277(2) | 2.4942(6) | 1.9058(5) | 1.4744(4) | 1.2030(3) | ||
κ | 0.3744(1) | 0.3883(2) | 1.0096(5) | 1.0730(6) | 0.9054(4) | 0.6005(3) | ||
∑ranks | 25(2) | 17(1) | 51(4) | 70(6) | 54(5) | 35(3) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 1.0360(4) | 0.9541(1) | 1.0240(2) | 1.0588(6) | 1.0415(5) | 1.0285(3) |
φ | 1.3576(3) | 1.2478(1) | 1.3482(2) | 1.4147(6) | 1.3846(5) | 1.3593(4) | ||
κ | 0.5436(3) | 0.4775(1) | 0.5384(2) | 0.5821(6) | 0.5722(5) | 0.5493(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0360(3) | 0.0459(5) | 0.0240(1) | 0.0588(6) | 0.0415(4) | 0.0285(2) | |
φ | 0.0576(3) | 0.0522(2) | 0.0482(1) | 0.1147(6) | 0.0846(5) | 0.0593(4) | ||
κ | 0.0436(3) | 0.0225(1) | 0.0384(2) | 0.0821(6) | 0.0722(5) | 0.0493(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0329(2) | 0.0270(1) | 0.0441(3) | 0.0917(6) | 0.0824(5) | 0.0567(4) | |
φ | 0.0624(2) | 0.0455(1) | 0.0849(3) | 0.2907(6) | 0.2382(5) | 0.1839(4) | ||
κ | 0.0417(2) | 0.0291(1) | 0.0552(3) | 0.1570(6) | 0.1399(5) | 0.0947(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.1813(2) | 0.1645(1) | 0.2101(3) | 0.3028(6) | 0.2871(5) | 0.2380(4) | |
φ | 0.2498(2) | 0.2133(1) | 0.2914(3) | 0.5392(6) | 0.4881(5) | 0.4289(4) | ||
κ | 0.2041(2) | 0.1706(1) | 0.2350(3) | 0.3963(6) | 0.3741(5) | 0.3077(4) | ||
∑ranks | 31(3) | 17(1) | 28(2) | 82(6) | 59(5) | 45(4) |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 1.1024(3) | 1.1175(5) | 1.4136(6) | 1.0918(4) | 0.9769(2) | 0.9432(1) |
φ | 2.7852(4) | 5.2337(5) | 9.8213(6) | 2.7427(3) | 2.0152(2) | 1.8648(1) | ||
κ | 1.9428(1) | 4.5719(5) | 6.0877(6) | 2.7247(3) | 2.9305(4) | 2.4634(2) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.3024(4) | 0.3175(5) | 0.6136(6) | 0.2918(3) | 0.1769(2) | 0.1432(1) | |
φ | 1.2852(4) | 3.7337(5) | 8.3213(6) | 1.2427(3) | 0.5152(2) | 0.3648(1) | ||
κ | 0.9428(1) | 3.5719(5) | 5.0877(6) | 1.7247(3) | 1.9305(4) | 1.4634(2) | ||
MSE | α | 0.5045(3) | 1.4348(5) | 2.5202(6) | 0.5695(4) | 0.4175(2) | 0.3182(1) | |
φ | 7.3621(3) | 151.9961(5) | 634.1503(6) | 16.9030(4) | 6.2433(2) | 3.1990(1) | ||
κ | 7.4544(1) | 153.2414(5) | 298.9136(6) | 33.2122(3) | 40.8208(4) | 13.8077(2) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.7103(3) | 1.1978(5) | 1.5875(6) | 0.7546(4) | 0.6461(2) | 0.5641(1) | |
φ | 2.7133(3) | 12.3287(5) | 25.1823(6) | 4.1113(4) | 2.4987(2) | 1.7886(1) | ||
κ | 2.7303(1) | 12.3791(5) | 17.2891(6) | 5.7630(3) | 6.3891(4) | 3.7159(2) | ||
∑ranks | 31(2) | 60(5) | 72(6) | 41(4) | 32(3) | 16(1) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 0.8833(4) | 0.7896(1) | 0.8815(3) | 0.9182(6) | 0.8904(5) | 0.8811(2) |
φ | 1.6996(3) | 1.4800(1) | 1.8893(6) | 1.7904(5) | 1.7388(4) | 1.6990(2) | ||
κ | 1.2704(2) | 1.1696(1) | 1.4091(3) | 1.4440(5) | 1.4889(6) | 1.4167(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0833(4) | 0.0104(1) | 0.0815(3) | 0.1182(6) | 0.0904(5) | 0.0811(2) | |
φ | 0.1996(3) | 0.0200(1) | 0.3893(6) | 0.2904(5) | 0.2388(4) | 0.1990(2) | ||
κ | 0.2704(2) | 0.1696(1) | 0.4091(3) | 0.4440(5) | 0.4889(6) | 0.4167(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0794(2) | 0.0681(1) | 0.1771(6) | 0.1309(4) | 0.1464(5) | 0.1199(3) | |
φ | 0.3262(2) | 0.3085(1) | 20.5402(6) | 0.7886(3) | 1.7903(5) | 1.0740(4) | ||
κ | 0.9907(1) | 1.1406(2) | 7.5480(6) | 1.9706(3) | 4.2142(5) | 3.7125(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.2819(2) | 0.2610(1) | 0.4209(6) | 0.3618(4) | 0.3826(5) | 0.3462(3) | |
φ | 0.5711(2) | 0.5554(1) | 4.5321(6) | 0.8880(3) | 1.3380(5) | 1.0363(4) | ||
κ | 0.9907(1) | 1.0680(2) | 2.7474(6) | 1.4038(3) | 2.0528(5) | 1.9268(4) | ||
∑ranks | 28(2) | 14(1) | 60(4.5) | 62(6) | 60(4.5) | 38(3) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 0.8324(5) | 0.7737(1) | 0.8214(2) | 0.8476(6) | 0.8292(4) | 0.8239(3) |
φ | 1.5765(5) | 1.4469(1) | 1.5593(3) | 1.6181(6) | 1.5676(4) | 1.5566(2) | ||
κ | 1.1040(3) | 1.0233(1) | 1.0901(2) | 1.1638(6) | 1.1483(5) | 1.1139(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0324(5) | 0.0263(3) | 0.0214(1) | 0.0476(6) | 0.0292(4) | 0.0239(2) | |
φ | 0.0765(5) | 0.0531(1) | 0.0593(3) | 0.1181(6) | 0.0676(4) | 0.0566(2) | ||
κ | 0.1040(3) | 0.0233(1) | 0.0901(2) | 0.1638(6) | 0.1483(5) | 0.1139(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0258(2) | 0.0222(1) | 0.0298(3) | 0.0507(6) | 0.0445(5) | 0.0323(4) | |
φ | 0.0948(2) | 0.0745(1) | 0.1090(3) | 0.2038(6) | 0.1641(5) | 0.1151(4) | ||
κ | 0.2745(2) | 0.0233(1) | 0.2965(3) | 0.5554(6) | 0.4886(5) | 0.3328(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.1607(2) | 0.1491(1) | 0.1727(3) | 0.2251(6) | 0.2109(5) | 0.1797(4) | |
φ | 0.3079(2) | 0.2729(1) | 0.3301(3) | 0.4514(6) | 0.4051(5) | 0.3392(4) | ||
κ | 0.5240(2) | 0.4679(1) | 0.5445(3) | 0.7453(6) | 0.6990(5) | 0.5769(4) | ||
∑ranks | 38(3) | 14(1) | 31(2) | 72(6) | 56(5) | 41(4) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 0.8155(5) | 0.7798(1) | 0.8117(3) | 0.8206(6) | 0.8122(4) | 0.8102(2) |
φ | 1.5382(5) | 1.4621(1) | 1.5325(3) | 1.5549(6) | 1.5328(4) | 1.5277(2) | ||
κ | 1.0486(3) | 0.9959(1) | 1.0469(2) | 1.0692(6) | 1.0643(5) | 1.0491(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0155(4) | 0.0202(5) | 0.0117(2) | 0.0206(6) | 0.0122(3) | 0.0102(1) | |
φ | 0.0382(5) | 0.0359(4) | 0.0325(2) | 0.0549(6) | 0.0328(3) | 0.0277(1) | ||
κ | 0.0486(3) | 0.0041(1) | 0.0469(2) | 0.0692(6) | 0.0643(5) | 0.0491(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0110(2) | 0.0109(1) | 0.0141(3) | 0.0204(6) | 0.0193(5) | 0.0144(4) | |
φ | 0.0380(2) | 0.0359(1) | 0.0460(3) | 0.0648(6) | 0.0597(5) | 0.0466(4) | ||
κ | 0.1041(2) | 0.0949(1) | 0.1258(3) | 0.1858(6) | 0.1794(5) | 0.1280(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.1049(1.5) | 0.1049(1.5) | 0.1186(3) | 0.1427(6) | 0.1390(5) | 0.1198(4) | |
φ | 0.1950(2) | 0.1894(1) | 0.2144(3) | 0.2546(6) | 0.2443(5) | 0.2158(4) | ||
κ | 0.3227(2) | 0.3080(1) | 0.3547(3) | 0.4310(6) | 0.4236(5) | 0.3578(4) | ||
∑ranks | 36.5(3) | 19.5(1) | 32(2) | 72(6) | 64(5) | 38(4) |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 2.8336(3) | 2.5944(1) | 3.1558(5) | 3.3131(6) | 2.8120(2) | 2.9230(4) |
φ | 2.0036(1) | 8.0269(5) | 19.3064(6) | 5.4068(4) | 4.1680(2) | 4.4550(3) | ||
κ | 1.4579(1) | 3.2311(5) | 3.6263(6) | 3.0043(4) | 2.8950(2) | 2.9920(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.8336(3) | 0.5944(1) | 1.1558(5) | 1.3131(6) | 0.8124(2) | 0.9231(4) | |
φ | 1.0036(1) | 7.0269(5) | 18.3064(6) | 4.4068(4) | 3.1675(2) | 3.4554(3) | ||
κ | 0.7579(1) | 2.5311(5) | 2.9263(6) | 2.3043(4) | 2.1952(2) | 2.2918(3) | ||
MSE | α | 2.1274(1) | 6.7714(5) | 9.2849(6) | 5.0302(4) | 3.5630(2) | 3.9500(3) | |
φ | 3.3320(1) | 648.1073(5) | 3383.9749(6) | 204.2319(4) | 177.4580(3) | 152.0100(2) | ||
κ | 2.8070(1) | 49.8495(5) | 60.4505(6) | 28.6379(3) | 27.8840(2) | 33.0500(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 1.4586(1) | 2.6022(5) | 3.0471(6) | 2.2428(4) | 1.8870(2) | 1.9870(3) | |
φ | 1.8254(1) | 25.4580(5) | 58.1719(6) | 14.2910(4) | 13.3210(3) | 12.3290(2) | ||
κ | 1.6754(1) | 7.0404(5) | 7.7750(6) | 5.3514(3) | 5.2800(2) | 5.7490(4) | ||
∑ranks | 16(1) | 52(5) | 70(6) | 50(4) | 26(2) | 38(3) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 2.2547(3) | 1.8578(1) | 2.1777(2) | 2.5788(6) | 2.4490(5) | 2.3520(4) |
φ | 1.2645(2) | 1.0723(1) | 1.5965(3) | 2.3717(6) | 2.1870(5) | 2.0330(4) | ||
κ | 0.9587(2) | 0.7912(1) | 1.0157(3) | 1.4816(6) | 1.4490(5) | 1.2750(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.2547(3) | 0.1422(1) | 0.1777(2) | 0.5788(6) | 0.4486(5) | 0.3518(4) | |
φ | 0.2645(2) | 0.0723(1) | 0.5965(3) | 1.3717(6) | 1.1873(5) | 1.0332(4) | ||
κ | 0.2587(2) | 0.0912(1) | 0.3157(3) | 0.7816(6) | 0.7489(5) | 0.5751(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.4982(1) | 0.6380(2) | 0.8915(3) | 1.6694(6) | 1.5060(5) | 1.1900(4) | |
φ | 0.4962(1) | 1.4375(2) | 32.6387(5) | 30.5760(4) | 28.1190(3) | 49.6000(6) | ||
κ | 0.5600(1) | 0.7722(2) | 1.7465(3) | 3.9829(5) | 4.1170(6) | 3.2910(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.7058(1) | 0.7988(2) | 0.9442(3) | 1.2921(6) | 1.2270(5) | 1.0910(4) | |
φ | 0.7044(1) | 1.1990(2) | 5.7130(5) | 5.5296(4) | 5.3030(3) | 7.0430(6) | ||
κ | 0.7483(1) | 0.8788(2) | 1.3215(3) | 1.9957(5) | 2.0290(6) | 1.8140(4) | ||
∑ranks | 20(2) | 18(1) | 28(3) | 64(6) | 58(5) | 52(4) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 2.1444(3) | 1.8589(1) | 2.0854(2) | 2.3221(6) | 2.2590(5) | 2.1566(4) |
φ | 1.1384(3) | 0.9579(1) | 1.1305(2) | 1.6180(5) | 1.5510(4) | 1.6937(6) | ||
κ | 0.1510(1) | 0.6947(2) | 0.8403(3) | 1.1163(6) | 1.0970(5) | 0.9608(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1444(3) | 0.1411(2) | 0.0854(1) | 0.3221(6) | 0.2591(5) | 0.1566(4) | |
φ | 0.1384(3) | 0.0421(1) | 0.1305(2) | 0.6180(5) | 0.5507(4) | 0.6937(6) | ||
κ | 0.1510(3) | 0.0053(1) | 0.1403(2) | 0.4163(6) | 0.3975(5) | 0.2608(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.2375(1) | 0.2656(2) | 0.3276(3) | 0.8324(6) | 0.7795(5) | 0.5226(4) | |
φ | 0.1731(2) | 0.1389(1) | 0.3441(3) | 9.3730(5) | 9.3187(4) | 168.1577(6) | ||
κ | 0.2335(2) | 0.2183(1) | 0.3689(3) | 1.5424(5) | 1.5302(4) | 1.6901(6) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.4873(1) | 0.5154(2) | 0.5724(3) | 0.9123(6) | 0.8829(5) | 0.7229(4) | |
φ | 0.4161(2) | 0.3728(1) | 0.5866(3) | 3.0615(5) | 3.0526(4) | 12.9676(6) | ||
κ | 0.4832(2) | 0.4672(1) | 0.6074(3) | 1.2420(5) | 1.2370(4) | 1.3001(6) | ||
∑ranks | 26(2) | 16(1) | 30(3) | 66(6) | 54(4) | 60(5) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 2.0655(4) | 1.8856(1) | 2.0368(2) | 2.1254(6) | 2.0920(5) | 2.0566(3) |
φ | 1.0615(3) | 0.9484(1) | 1.0528(2) | 1.1499(6) | 1.1250(5) | 1.0714(4) | ||
κ | 0.7647(3) | 0.6606(1) | 0.7589(2) | 0.8454(6) | 0.8340(5) | 0.7822(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0655(3) | 0.1144(5) | 0.0368(1) | 0.1254(6) | 0.0922(4) | 0.0566(2) | |
φ | 0.0615(3) | 0.0516(1) | 0.0528(2) | 0.1499(6) | 0.1246(5) | 0.0714(4) | ||
κ | 0.0647(3) | 0.0394(1) | 0.0589(2) | 0.1454(6) | 0.1340(5) | 0.0822(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.1055(1) | 0.1232(2) | 0.1489(3) | 0.2735(6) | 0.2627(5) | 0.1648(4) | |
φ | 0.0582(2) | 0.0498(1) | 0.0816(3) | 0.2593(6) | 0.2387(5) | 0.1083(4) | ||
κ | 0.0765(2) | 0.0688(1) | 0.1080(3) | 0.2400(6) | 0.2333(5) | 0.1343(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.3248(1) | 0.3509(2) | 0.3858(3) | 0.5229(6) | 0.5126(5) | 0.4059(4) | |
φ | 0.2412(2) | 0.2231(1) | 0.2857(3) | 0.5092(6) | 0.4886(5) | 0.3290(4) | ||
κ | 0.2766(2) | 0.2622(1) | 0.3286(3) | 0.4899(6) | 0.4830(5) | 0.3665(4) | ||
∑ranks | 25(2) | 18(1) | 29(3) | 72(6) | 59(5) | 45(4) |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 1.9113(4) | 1.8080(3) | 2.1893(6) | 2.0102(5) | 1.6790(1) | 1.7030(2) |
φ | 3.4196(3) | 6.6547(5) | 13.4896(6) | 4.6929(4) | 3.1980(1.5) | 3.1980(1.5) | ||
κ | 1.6351(1) | 2.9747(5) | 3.4465(6) | 2.4926(4) | 2.2030(3) | 2.1720(2) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.4113(4) | 0.3080(3) | 0.6893(6) | 0.5102(5) | 0.1787(1) | 0.2032(2) | |
φ | 1.4196(3) | 4.6547(5) | 11.4896(6) | 2.6929(4) | 1.1978(1) | 1.1980(2) | ||
κ | 0.6351(1) | 1.9747(5) | 2.4465(6) | 1.4926(4) | 1.2034(3) | 1.1716(2) | ||
MSE | α | 0.8424(1) | 2.6556(5) | 4.2739(6) | 1.6544(4) | 1.0310(2) | 1.0990(3) | |
φ | 6.2459(1) | 242.8573(5) | 1099.2808(6) | 63.1670(4) | 34.3340(2) | 36.4950(3) | ||
κ | 2.8238(1) | 37.3047(5) | 47.8131(6) | 17.0243(4) | 12.9340(3) | 10.7970(2) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.9178(1) | 1.6296(5) | 2.0673(6) | 1.2862(4) | 1.0150(3) | 1.0480(2) | |
φ | 2.4992(1) | 15.5839(5) | 33.1554(6) | 7.9478(4) | 5.8600(2) | 6.0410(3) | ||
κ | 1.6804(1) | 6.1078(5) | 6.9147(6) | 4.1261(4) | 3.5960(3) | 3.2860(2) | ||
∑ranks | 22(1) | 56(5) | 72(6) | 50(4) | 25.5(2) | 26.5(3) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 1.6952(2) | 1.4342(1) | 1.8042(5) | 1.8992(6) | 1.7690(3) | 1.8000(4) |
φ | 2.4984(2) | 2.1884(1) | 4.9115(6) | 3.7973(4) | 3.1380(3) | 3.3830(5) | ||
κ | 1.3226(2) | 1.1667(1) | 1.9301(6) | 1.8651(5) | 1.7060(3) | 1.7400(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1952(2) | 0.0658(1) | 0.3042(5) | 0.3992(6) | 0.2692(3) | 0.3001(4) | |
φ | 0.4984(2) | 0.1884(1) | 2.9115(6) | 1.7973(5) | 1.1377(3) | 1.3826(4) | ||
κ | 0.3226(2) | 0.1667(1) | 0.9301(6) | 0.8651(5) | 0.7060(3) | 0.7402(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.3337(1) | 0.5070(2) | 1.5355(6) | 1.0502(5) | 0.7593(3) | 0.8669(4) | |
φ | 1.5498(1) | 4.0449(2) | 155.5950(6) | 60.8746(5) | 17.0518(3) | 29.0772(4) | ||
κ | 0.9269(1) | 1.7944(2) | 11.4674(6) | 6.4988(5) | 4.3962(3) | 5.1792(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.5776(1) | 0.7120(2) | 1.2391(6) | 1.0248(5) | 0.8714(3) | 0.9311(4) | |
φ | 1.2449(1) | 2.0112(2) | 12.4738(6) | 7.8022(5) | 4.1294(4) | 5.3923(3) | ||
κ | 0.9627(1) | 1.3396(2) | 3.3864(6) | 2.5493(5) | 2.0967(3) | 2.2758(4) | ||
∑ranks | 18(1.5) | 18(1.5) | 70(6) | 61(5) | 37(3) | 48(4) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 1.6264(2) | 1.3950(1) | 1.6954(3) | 1.7879(6) | 1.7060(4) | 1.7390(5) |
φ | 2.3116(2) | 1.9354(1) | 3.4363(6) | 3.2511(5) | 2.8230(3) | 3.0510(4) | ||
κ | 1.2179(2) | 0.9918(1) | 1.5569(4) | 1.6311(6) | 1.5010(3) | 1.5570(5) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1264(2) | 0.1050(1) | 0.1954(3) | 0.2879(6) | 0.2062(4) | 0.2393(5) | |
φ | 0.3116(2) | 0.0646(1) | 1.4363(6) | 1.2511(5) | 0.8234(3) | 1.0510(4) | ||
κ | 0.2179(2) | 0.0082(1) | 0.5569(5) | 0.6311(6) | 0.5009(3) | 0.5567(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.2014(1) | 0.4738(2) | 0.8545(6) | 0.7787(5) | 0.5939(3) | 0.6521(4) | |
φ | 0.8984(1) | 0.9734(2) | 56.0050(6) | 25.6484(5) | 9.4794(3) | 21.8101(4) | ||
κ | 0.5434(1) | 0.6022(2) | 5.2431(6) | 3.9995(5) | 2.7885(3) | 3.5394(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.4488(1) | 0.4738(2) | 0.9244(6) | 0.8824(5) | 0.7706(3) | 0.8075(4) | |
φ | 0.9478(1) | 0.9734(2) | 7.4836(6) | 5.0644(5) | 3.0789(3) | 4.6701(4) | ||
κ | 0.7372(1) | 0.7760(2) | 2.2898(6) | 1.9999(5) | 1.6699(3) | 1.8813(4) | ||
∑ranks | 18(1.5) | 18(1.5) | 63(5) | 64(6) | 38(3) | 51(4) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 1.5676(2) | 1.4003(1) | 1.5936(3) | 1.6640(6) | 1.6350(5) | 1.6210(4) |
φ | 2.1555(2) | 1.8840(1) | 2.4471(3) | 2.5978(6) | 2.5470(5) | 2.4900(4) | ||
κ | 1.1155(2) | 0.9290(1) | 1.2360(3) | 1.3342(6) | 1.2990(5) | 1.2790(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0676(1) | 0.0997(3) | 0.0936(2) | 0.1640(6) | 0.1254(5) | 0.1210(4) | |
φ | 0.1555(2) | 0.1160(1) | 0.4471(3) | 0.5978(6) | 0.5470(5) | 0.4895(4) | ||
κ | 0.1155(2) | 0.0710(1) | 0.2360(3) | 0.3342(6) | 0.2988(5) | 0.2790(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0927(1) | 0.0972(2) | 0.3192(3) | 0.4075(6) | 0.3785(5) | 0.3419(4) | |
φ | 0.3186(2) | 0.2844(1) | 8.2814(5) | 5.1207(3) | 10.0634(6) | 5.8513(4) | ||
κ | 0.2216(2) | 0.1781(1) | 1.5037(5) | 1.4824(4) | 1.5757(6) | 1.4326(3) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.3045(2) | 0.3117(1) | 0.5650(3) | 0.6384(6) | 0.6152(5) | 0.5847(4) | |
φ | 0.5645(2) | 0.5333(1) | 2.8777(5) | 2.2629(3) | 3.1723(6) | 2.4190(4) | ||
κ | 0.4708(2) | 0.4221(1) | 1.2263(5) | 1.2175(4) | 1.2553(6) | 1.1969(3) | ||
∑ranks | 22(2) | 15(1) | 43(3) | 62(5) | 64(6) | 46(4) |
The results in Tables 2–5 show that the mean square errors (MSEs) decrease for all parameter combinations as the sample size (n) increases, that is, all the estimators are quite consistent since their RMSE tend to zero for large sample size (n). Hence, the estimates of the EHLST parameters provide credible MSEs and low AVABs for all the parameter combinations using the six estimation methods for large sample size (n). Additionally, the average absolute biases (AVABs) approach zero as the sample size (n) increase, proving that all the estimators are quite asymptotically unbiased.
The model evaluation in relation to some existing distributions from the same family of distributions using the inflation rates (INF) monthly dataset is performed. The few existing distributions from the same family are the exponentiated half logistic Lomax (EHLL), exponentiated half logistic Fréchet (EHLF) and exponentiated half logistic log-logistic (EHLLL). The model parameters are estimated using the maximum likelihood and maximum product of spacing estimation procedures. Using the R-software package "AdequacyModel", the following performance measures: negative log-likelihood, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) statistic and its p-value including the ML estimates (MLEs) and standard errors (SEs) of the parameters are provided in Table 6 while the MPS estimates (MPSEs), log-likelihood and other measures are provided in Table 7. The results in Tables 6 and 7 show that the new model is quite competitive with the existing four-parameter distributions in fitting the inflation rates dataset.
Model | Par | MLE (SE) | -LL | AIC | K-S | p-value |
EHLST | ˆα | 3.2407(0.5773) | 588.256 | 1182.513 | 0.070 | 0.263 |
ˆφ | 67.8208(27.2116) | |||||
ˆκ | 217.1097(81.7760) | |||||
EHLL | ˆα | 4.2120(2.2915) | 590.130 | 1188.260 | 0.077 | 0.165 |
ˆβ | 9.9874(1.6320) | |||||
ˆa | 4.2120(2.2951) | |||||
ˆb | 0.0186(0.0047) | |||||
EHLF | ˆα | 1.2744(0.4305) | 585.933 | 1179.867 | 0.069 | 0.267 |
ˆλ | 26.4325(15.3670) | |||||
ˆa | 0.7669(0.1661) | |||||
ˆb | 48.0005(23.9203) | |||||
EHLLL | ˆα | 0.5109(0.4213) | 583.900 | 1175.800 | 0.052 | 0.627 |
ˆλ | 0.7105(0.6145) | |||||
ˆa | 11.3008(0.9864) | |||||
ˆb | 7.5646(5.2527) |
Model | Par | MPS (SE) | LL | AIC | K-S | p-value |
EHLST | ˆα | 3.1763(0.0286) | −590.015 | 1186.000 | 0.069 | 0.269 |
ˆφ | 64.0223(1.7981) | |||||
ˆκ | 218.3550(4.2330) | |||||
EHLL | ˆα | 3.3253(0.0749) | −592.43 | 1192.900 | 0.089 | 0.072 |
ˆβ | 9.9379(0.1238) | |||||
ˆa | 3.3075(0.0745) | |||||
ˆb | 0.0318(0.0007) | |||||
EHLF | ˆα | 1.4956(0.3689) | −587.234 | 1182.500 | 0.068 | 0.300 |
ˆλ | 30.5011(13.4873) | |||||
ˆa | 0.7660(0.0970) | |||||
ˆb | 50.1275(26.6395) | |||||
EHLLL | ˆα | 0.5220(0.2593) | −585.169 | 1178.300 | 0.059 | 0.460 |
ˆλ | 0.8105(0.58140) | |||||
ˆa | 11.5673(0.7104) | |||||
ˆb | 6.9976 (7.3261) |
The standardized form of the EHLST density function is derived using the transformed random variable z=⟨y−μ⟩√h2, where E(z)=0 and var(z)=1. Thus, the standardized EHLST density function with z=ε√h2 and ∂z∂ε=1√h2 is given by
f(ε;α,φ,κ,h2t)=(1{h2t}12)2αφκ[1−(12(1+εt√h2t√κ+(εt√h2t)2))]α−1{1−[1−(12(1+εt√h2t√κ+(εt√h2t)2))]α}φ−12(κ+(εt√h2t)2)32{1+[1−(12(1+εt√h2t√κ+(εt√h2t)2))]α}φ+1 | (37) |
The log-likelihood function (LL) is given by
LL(ξ)=n log α+n log φ+n log κ−32n∑t=1 log (κ+(εt√h2t)2)+(α−1)n∑t=1 log {1−(12(1+εt√h2t√κ+(εt√h2t)2))} |
+(φ−1)∑nt=1 log {1−[1−(12(1+εt√h2t√κ+(εt√h2t)2))]ϑ} | (38) |
−(φ+1)∑nt=1 log {1+[1−(12(1+εt√h2t√κ+(εt√h2t)2))]ϑ}−12∑nt=1 log (h2t) |
where ξ=(α,φ,κ,h2t) and h2t denote the GARCH-type volatility models with unknown vector parameters.
The applicability of the standardized EHLST density function as the conditional innovation density in GARCH-type volatility models are demonstrated using the monthly all-items Nigeria inflation rates (year on change) dataset from January 2003 to August 2021. The dataset can be sourced from the Central Bank of Nigeria website at www.cbn.gov.ng.
In financial time series, volatility modeling is a dynamic direction for both advisors and financial expert. Engle (1982) and Bollerslev (1986) introduced the autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) and the generalized ARCH (GARCH) models for volatility modeling. The log-return is denoted as rt, and the GARCH (1, 1) model is expressed as follows:
rt=μ+εt,εt=zt√h2t,zt∼i.i.d. |
h2t=ω+η1ε2t−1+η2h2t−1, | (39) |
where ω>0, η1>0, η2>0, zt is the conditional innovation distribution with E(zt)=0 and var(zt)=1. The conditional variance and mean are denoted as h2t and μ, respectively. In this research work, the GARCH model (Bollerslev, 1986) and GJRGARCH model (Glosten et al., 1993) are considered. The GARCH model is used as the benchmark in this research. The GJRGARCH (1, 1) model conditional variance functional form is expressed as:
h2t=ω+η1ε2t−1+η3It−1ε2t−1+η2h2t−1 | (40) |
where η3 is the leverage effect, and It−1 is an indicator function expressed as:
It−1={1,ifεt−1<0,0,ifεt−1≥0, |
The GJRGARCH model checks for leverage effects and when the parameter η3 is positive it implies that negative shocks have a larger effect on volatility than positive shocks. The common conditional innovations are provided in Appendix A.
The accuracy of both models is appraised using the modified information criteria of Brooks and Burke (2003). The modified Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), criteria are given by
AIC=2cT−2LLTBIC=c log e(T)T−2LLT | (41) |
where T is the number of observations, c is number of estimated parameters, and LL denotes the log-likelihood value. The model with the least AIC and BIC values is regarded as the finest model in terms of the specified conditional innovation density.
The predictive ability of the GARCH-type models is evaluated using the mean square error (MSE), root mean square root (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The MSE, RMSE, and MAE for the volatility forecasts are given by
MSE=1TT∑t=1(ˆht−ht)2,RMSE=√1TT∑t=1(ˆht−ht)2,MAE=1TT∑t=1|ˆht−ht| |
where ht and ˆht represent the realized volatility and predicted volatility, and T is the sample size. The model with the least MSE, RMSE, and MAE values is regarded as the most suitable for predicting the volatility of the financial dataset.
To assess the ability of the GARCH-type volatility models using the EHLST density in relation to the commonly existing densities in modeling and predicting volatility, the all-items Nigeria inflation rates is utilized. The utilized data consist of 224 inflation rates from January 2003 to August 2021. Table 8 presents the summary statistics of 223 monthly Inflation rate (INF) log-returns. Negative skewness and excess kurtosis are quite evident, leading to large Jarque-Bera (JB) test statistic value (p < 0.001) indicating that the monthly log-returns are non-normally distributed. More so, the Lagrange-multiplier (LM) test specifies the prevalence of ARCH effects in the conditional variance. The graphical plots of the log-returns, squared log-returns and absolute log-returns including their autocorrelation functions are depicted in Figure 4.
INF | |
Number of observations | 223 |
Mean | 0.2121 |
Median | 0.4906 |
Minimum | −104.1454 |
Maximum | 53.2217 |
Standard Deviation | 14.3681 |
Skewness | −1.3377 |
Kurtosis | 13.1953 |
Jarque-Bera | 1721.3 (p < 0.001) |
ARCH (2) | 15.406 (p < 0.001) |
The plots in Figure 4(b, c) show evidence of volatility clustering; that is low volatility values followed by low volatility values and high volatility values followed by high volatility values. More so, the monthly log-returns show no clear evidence of serial correlation, but the squared and absolute log-returns are positively autocorrelated as depicted in Figures 4(e, f).
The GARCH-type volatility models are estimated under the normal (NORM), Student-t (STD), generalized error (GED) and their skewed versions, generalized hyperbolic (GHYP), Johnson (SU) reparametrized (JSU), generalized hyperbolic skew-Student (GHST), Normal inverse Gaussian (NIG) and EHLST innovation densities. To acquire the parameter estimates of both models under NORM, STD, GED, SNORM, SSTD, SGED, GHYP, JSU, GHST and NIG densities, the rugarch package in R-software is used. The Optim function in R-software is utilized for the estimation of the model's parameter with the EHLST innovation density. Table 9 shows the GARCH (1, 1) and GJRGARCH (1, 1) models parameter estimates under eleven innovation densities.
GARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
Pa. | NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST |
μ | 0.6403 | 0.5656 | 0.6504'***' | 0.5158 | 0.3304 | 0.3277'***' | 0.4667 | 0.3513 | 0.1605 | 0.3589 | 0.1824 |
ω | 0.0900 | 0.7026 | 1.0661 | 0.1468'*' | 0.9007 | 1.4755'***' | 0.8444 | 1.0241'.' | 0.9637'.' | 1.2821'.' | 0.1891 |
η1 | 0.0602'*' | 0.2777'*' | 0.2536'.' | 0.0586'***' | 0.3115'*' | 0.2957'***' | 0.2904'*' | 0.3100'*' | 0.2876'*' | 0.3088'*' | 0.1112 |
η2 | 0.9292'***' | 0.7213'***' | 0.7454'***' | 0.9289'***' | 0.6875'***' | 0.7033'***' | 0.7086'***' | 0.6889'***' | 0.7114'***' | 0.6902'***' | 0.6069'***' |
η3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
α | - | - | - | 0.9423'***' | - | - | 0.2500 | - | 8.1967'***' | 0.6823'.' | 1.7778'***' |
ξ | - | - | - | - | 0.8956'***' | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ν | - | 4.1458'***' | 0.9782'***' | - | 4.1743'***' | 0.8941'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
η | - | - | - | - | - | 0.9696'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
β | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.3260 | - | -1.1452'' | -0.1358 | - |
λ | - | - | - | - | - | - | -1.9370'*' | - | - | - | - |
υ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.1940 | - | - | - |
ϑ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.3328'***' | - | - | - |
φ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.2070'***' |
κ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6.6593 |
GJRGARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
Pa. | NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST |
μ | 0.8364'.' | 0.5669'.' | 0.6504'***' | 0.7550'' | 0.3233 | 0.3215'***' | 0.4650 | 0.3452 | -0.0555 | 0.3574 | 0.2001 |
ω | 0.0000 | 0.6843 | 1.1503 | 0.0000 | 0.8795 | 1.4925'***' | 0.8253 | 1.0071 | 1.2293'.' | 1.2783'' | 0.2750 |
η1 | 0.0864'*' | 0.2833'*' | 0.2414'.' | 0.0804'*' | 0.3254'*' | 0.2893'***' | 0.2978'*' | 0.3194'*' | 0.2800'*' | 0.3105'.' | 0.1692 |
η2 | 0.9397'***' | 0.7255'***' | 0.7322'***' | 0.9402'***' | 0.6912'***' | 0.7004'***' | 0.7125'***' | 0.6918'***' | 0.7322'***' | 0.6908'***' | 0.6113'***' |
η3 | −0.0643 | −0.0195 | 0.0508 | −0.0562 | −0.0371 | 0.0200 | −0.0232 | −0.0258 | −0.0292 | −0.0049 | −0.0004 |
α | - | - | - | 0.9651'***' | - | - | 0.2500 | - | 8.1943'***' | 0.6824'*' | 1.7571'***' |
ξ | - | - | - | - | 0.8923'***' | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ν | - | 4.1432'***' | 0.9821'***' | - | 4.1776'***' | 0.8923'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
η | - | - | - | - | - | 0.9694'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
β | - | - | - | - | - | - | −0.3324 | - | -1.8837'.' | −0.1365 | - |
λ | - | - | - | - | - | - | −1.9378'**' | - | - | - | - |
υ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.1988 | - | - | - |
ϑ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.3332'***' | - | - | - |
φ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1858'***' |
κ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4.2176 |
Significance level 0'***', 0.01'*', 0.05'*', 0.1'', 1 |
The parameter estimates of the conditional variance for the GARCH-EHLST are statistically significant at various standard levels including the leverage effect parameter η3. Hence, the impact of the shocks is asymmetric in nature which implies that the impact of positive shocks is higher than negative shocks of the same magnitude on volatility. Tables 10 provides vital statistics for model selection, which shows that the GARCH-EHLST has the highest log-likelihood, and least AIC and BIC values relative to other models. Hence, the GARCH-EHLST model is selected as the best model for modeling the volatility of the financial data series.
Model | Log-Likelihood | AIC | BIC |
GARCH-NORM | −808.135 | 7.2837 | 7.3448 |
GARCH-STD | −772.170 | 6.9701 | 7.0665 |
GARCH-GED | −776.818 | 7.0118 | 7.0882 |
GARCH-SNORM | −807.730 | 7.2891 | 7.3655 |
GARCH-SSTD | −771.494 | 6.9730 | 7.0647 |
GARCH-SGED | −775.870 | 7.0123 | 7.1040 |
GARCH-GHYP | −772.006 | 6.9866 | 7.0936 |
GARCH-JSU | −772.083 | 6.9783 | 7.0700 |
GARCH-GHST | −778.603 | 7.0368 | 7.1285 |
GARCH- NIG | −773.341 | 6.9896 | 7.0813 |
GARCH- EHLST | −768.492 | 6.9551 | 7.0620 |
GJRGARCH-NORM | −807.280 | 7.2850 | 7.3614 |
GJRGARCH-STD | −772.159 | 6.9790 | 7.0900 |
GJRGARCH-GED | −776.764 | 7.0203 | 7.1120 |
GJRGARCH-SNORM | −807.129 | 7.2926 | 7.3843 |
GJRGARCH-SSTD | −771.455 | 6.9817 | 7.0923 |
GJRGARCH-SGED | −775.843 | 7.0210 | 7.1280 |
GJRGARCH-GHYP | −771.991 | 6.9954 | 7.1177 |
GJRGARCH-JSU | −772.066 | 6.9871 | 7.0941 |
GJRGARCH-GHST | −781.977 | 7.0760 | 7.1830 |
GJRGARCH- NIG | −773.340 | 6.9986 | 7.1055 |
GJRGARCH- EHLST | −768.846 | 6.9672 | 7.0895 |
Table 11 provides the diagnostic analysis tests for the GARCH-type volatility models which indicates that the GARCH-EHLST model did well in describing the conditional variance dynamics as well as other models. Basically, the Ljung-Box statistic (p-value) indicates no sign of serial-correlation in the squared standardized residuals, and the ARCH-LM statistic indicates no extra ARCH processes in the standardized residuals which implies that the conditional variance equations are well-defined.
Model | Ljung-Box Statistic |
p-value | ARCH-LM Statistic | p-value |
GARCH-NORM | 3.331 | 0.9725 | 2.932 | 0.9830 |
GARCH-STD | 1.542 | 0.9988 | 1.715 | 0.9981 |
GARCH-GED | 1.797 | 0.9977 | 1.991 | 0.9964 |
GARCH-SNORM | 3.226 | 0.9756 | 2.848 | 0.9848 |
GARCH-SSTD | 1.735 | 0.9980 | 1.982 | 0.9965 |
GARCH-SGED | 1.891 | 0.9971 | 2.141 | 0.9951 |
GARCH-GHYP | 1.679 | 0.9983 | 1.893 | 0.9971 |
GARCH-JSU | 1.810 | 0.9976 | 2.073 | 0.9958 |
GARCH-GHST | 1.800 | 0.9977 | 2.033 | 0.9961 |
GARCH- NIG | 1.898 | 0.9965 | 2.176 | 0.9948 |
GARCH- EHLST | 1.511 | 0.9989 | 1.774 | 0.9978 |
GJRGARCH-NORM | 4.328 | 0.9313 | 3.617 | 0.9630 |
GJRGARCH-STD | 1.545 | 0.9988 | 1.714 | 0.9981 |
GJRGARCH-GED | 1.832 | 0.9975 | 2.054 | 0.9959 |
GJRGARCH-SNORM | 4.292 | 0.9332 | 3.610 | 0.9632 |
GJRGARCH-SSTD | 3.429 | 0.9991 | 1.997 | 0.9964 |
GJRGARCH-SGED | 1.903 | 0.9970 | 2.165 | 0.9949 |
GJRGARCH-GHYP | 1.684 | 0.9982 | 1.895 | 0.9971 |
GJRGARCH-JSU | 1.815 | 0.9976 | 2.075 | 0.9957 |
GJRGARCH-GHST | 1.849 | 0.9974 | 2.038 | 0.9960 |
GJRGARCH- NIG | 1.897 | 0.9971 | 2.172 | 0.9948 |
GJRGARCH- EHLST | 1.472 | 0.9990 | 1.711 | 0.9981 |
The in-sample volatility predictive measures for the models are provided in Table 12, and Table 13 provides the partial and total ranking of the innovation densities based on the three predictive performance measures. The results show that the GARCH (1, 1) and GJRGARCH (1, 1) models has the least MSE, RMSE and MAE values under the EHLST innovation density. Overall, the results indicate that the GARCH-EHLST model is statistically effective in forecasting the volatility of the inflation log-returns relative to other models based on the MSE and RMSE results while the GJRGARCH-EHLST model is statistically effective based on the MAE result. Furthermore, the EHLST innovation density has the least total rank value based on the performance measures among the eleven innovation densities considered in this study.
Model | MSE | RMSE | MAE |
GARCH-NORM | 112.720 | 10.617 | 7.011 |
GARCH-STD | 122.686 | 11.076 | 6.671 |
GARCH-GED | 122.269 | 11.057 | 6.776 |
GARCH-SNORM | 111.427 | 10.556 | 6.952 |
GARCH-SSTD | 123.930 | 11.132 | 6.650 |
GARCH-SGED | 123.902 | 11.131 | 6.764 |
GARCH-GHYP | 123.204 | 11.100 | 6.673 |
GARCH-JSU | 123.939 | 11.133 | 6.670 |
GARCH-GHST | 123.355 | 11.106 | 6.693 |
GARCH- NIG | 124.100 | 11.140 | 6.712 |
GARCH- EHLST | 109.109 | 10.445 | 5.396 |
GJRGARCH-NORM | 156.588 | 12.513 | 9.119 |
GJRGARCH-STD | 124.678 | 11.166 | 6.757 |
GJRGARCH-GED | 117.606 | 10.845 | 6.555 |
GJRGARCH-SNORM | 149.356 | 12.221 | 8.828 |
GJRGARCH-SSTD | 127.418 | 11.288 | 6.791 |
GJRGARCH-SGED | 122.197 | 11.054 | 6.686 |
GJRGARCH-GHYP | 125.462 | 11.201 | 6.768 |
GJRGARCH-JSU | 126.321 | 11.239 | 6.768 |
GJRGARCH-GHST | 126.353 | 11.241 | 6.911 |
GJRGARCH- NIG | 124.527 | 11.159 | 6.730 |
GJRGARCH- EHLST | 104.874 | 10.241 | 5.446 |
GARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST | |
MSE | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 1 |
RMSE | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 1 |
MAE | 11 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 1 |
TOTAL | 17 | 14 | 17 | 14 | 20 | 24 | 17 | 23 | 20 | 29 | 3 |
GJRGARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST | |
MSE | 11 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
RMSE | 11 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
MAE | 11 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 9 | 4 | 1 |
TOTAL | 33 | 15 | 6 | 30 | 26 | 9 | 18.5 | 20.5 | 25 | 12 | 3 |
Overall, the comparison between the volatility models in this study basically supports the use of the symmetric GARCH-EHLST model for estimating and forecasting the volatility of the inflation rates. More so, the proposed EHLST density seems generally the best innovation density for both the GARCH (1, 1) and GJRGARCH (1, 1) models.
In this research, the estimation of the exponentiated half logistic skew-t (EHLST) distribution parameters using six classical estimation procedures, namely the maximum likelihood, maximum product of spacing, least squares, Anderson-Darling, weighted least squares and Cramer-von mises is considered. Given that the theoretical comparison between these classical estimation procedures is not quite practicable, an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study is performed to compare the estimators in terms of average absolute biases, mean square error of each estimate and average parameter estimates. The results show that the criterions performance ordering from finest to poorest, using the overall ranks is MLE, MPS, WLS, OLS, ANDA, and CVM for all the parameter combinations. The MLE outperform all the other criterions with an overall rank of 32. Consequently, the performance of the EHLST model in fitting the inflation rates, showed that the EHLST model is quite competitive against the existing four-parameter models from the same family of distributions. Furthermore, volatility modeling of the inflation log-returns using the GARCH (1, 1) and GJRGARCH (1, 1) models with EHLST innovation density relative to the normal, student-t, generalized error and their skewed versions, generalized hyperbolic, Johnson (SU) reparametrized, generalized hyperbolic skew-Student, Normal inverse Gaussian innovation densities in terms of predictive performance using three forecast performance measures was carried-out. The research findings confirm that GARCH (1, 1) and GJRGARCH (1, 1) models with EHLST innovation density is optimally the best model based on model selection criteria and forecasts performance measures among other models. Overall, the results validate the superiority of the GARCH (1, 1) and GJRGARCH (1, 1) models with EHLST innovation density in both in-and-out samples performance over other models for inflation rates volatility modeling.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Marijon E, Mirabel M, Celermajer DS, Jouven X, (2012) Rheumatic heart disease. Lancet 379: 953–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61171-9 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61171-9
![]() |
[2] |
Carapetis JR, Beaton A, Cunningham MW, Guilherme L, Karthikeyan G, Mayosi BM, et al. (2016) Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2: 15084. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.84 doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.84
![]() |
[3] |
Muhamed B, Parks T, Sliwa K, (2020) Genetics of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 17: 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-019-0258-2 doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0258-2
![]() |
[4] |
Ordunez P, Martinez R, Soliz P, Giraldo G, Mujica OJ, Nordet P, et al. (2019) Rheumatic heart disease burden, trends, and inequalities in the Americas, 1990–2017: A population-based study. Lancet Global Health 7: e1388–e1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30360-2 doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30360-2
![]() |
[5] |
Watkins DA, Johnson CO, Colquhoun SM, Karthikeyan G, Beaton A, Bukhman G, et al. (2017) Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatic heart disease, 1990–2015. N Engl J Med 377: 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1603693 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603693
![]() |
[6] | Xie J, Su B, Li C, Lin K, Li H, Hu Y, et al. (2017) A review of modeling methods for predicting in-hospital mortality of patients in intensive care unit. J Emerg Crit Care Med 1: 1–10. |
[7] |
Rehman S, Akhtar N, Saba N, Munir S, Ahmed W, Mohyuddin A, et al. (2013) A study on the association of TNF-α-308, IL-6-174, IL-10-1082 and IL-1RaVNTR gene polymorphisms with rheumatic heart disease in Pakistani patients. Cytokine 61: 527–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2012.10.020 doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.10.020
![]() |
[8] |
Dooley LM, Ahmad TB, Pandey M, Good MF, Kotiw M, (2021) Rheumatic heart disease: A review of the current status of global research activity. Autoimmun Rev 20: 102740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102740 doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102740
![]() |
[9] |
Arvind B, Ramakrishnan S, (2020) Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in children. Indian J Pediatr 87: 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-019-03128-7 doi: 10.1007/s12098-019-03128-7
![]() |
[10] | Xu Y, Han D, Huang T, Zhang X, Lu H, Shen S, et al. (2022) Predicting ICU mortality in rheumatic heart disease: Comparison of XGBoost and logistic regression, 9: 847206. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.847206 |
[11] |
Lee YW, Choi JW, Shin EH, (2021) Machine learning model for predicting malaria using clinical information. Comput Biol Med 129: 104151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104151 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104151
![]() |
[12] |
Akter S, Das D, Haque RU, Tonmoy MIQ, Hasan MR, Mahjabeen S, et al. (2022) AD-CovNet: An exploratory analysis using a hybrid deep learning model to handle data imbalance, predict fatality, and risk factors in Alzheimer's patients with COVID-19. Comput Biol Med 146: 105657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105657 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105657
![]() |
[13] |
Fan Z, Jiang J, Xiao C, Chen Y, Xia Q, Wang J, et al. (2023) Construction and validation of prognostic models in critically Ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: Interpretable machine learning approach. J Transl Med 21: 406. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04205-4 doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04205-4
![]() |
[14] |
Martins JFB, Nascimento ER, Nascimento BR, Sable CA, Beaton AZ, Ribeiro AL, et al. (2021) Towards automatic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease on echocardiographic exams through video-based deep learning. J Am Med Inf Assoc 28: 1834–1842. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab061 doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab061
![]() |
[15] |
Ali F, Hasan B, Ahmad H, Hoodbhoy Z, Bhuriwala Z, Hanif M, et al. (2021) Protocol: Detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease in children using a deep learning algorithm on digital stethoscope: A study protocol. BMJ Open 11: e044070. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044070 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044070
![]() |
[16] |
Katarya R, Meena SK, (2021) Machine learning techniques for heart disease prediction: A comparative study and analysis. Health Technol 11: 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-020-00505-7 doi: 10.1007/s12553-020-00505-7
![]() |
[17] |
Shahid S, Khurram H, Billah B, Akbar A, Shehzad MA, Shabbir MF, (2022) Machine learning methods for predicting major types of rheumatic heart diseases in children of Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Front. Cardiovasc. Med 9: 996225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.996225 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.996225
![]() |
[18] |
Thabtah F, Hammoud S, Kamalov F, Gonsalves A, (2020) Data imbalance in classification: Experimental evaluation. Inf Sci 513: 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.11.004
![]() |
[19] |
Ghorbani M, Kazi A, Baghshah MS, Rabiee HR, Navab N, (2022) RA-GCN: Graph convolutional network for disease prediction problems with imbalanced data. Med Image Anal 75: 102272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102272 doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102272
![]() |
[20] |
Razzaghi T, Safro I, Ewing J, Sadrfaridpour E, Scott JD, (2019) Predictive models for bariatric surgery risks with imbalanced medical datasets. Ann Oper Res 280: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03156-8 doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03156-8
![]() |
[21] |
Pera M, Gibert J, Gimeno M, Garsot E, Eizaguirre E, Miró M, et al. (2022) Machine learning risk prediction model of 90-day mortality after gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surgery 276: 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005616 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005616
![]() |
[22] |
Ghamari SH, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Saeedi Moghaddam, S, Aminorroaya A, Rezaei N, Shobeiri P, et al. (2022) Rheumatic heart disease is a neglected disease relative to its burden worldwide: Findings from global burden of disease 2019. J Am Heart Association 11: e025284. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025284 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025284
![]() |
[23] |
Tao Y, Zhao J, Cui H, Liu L, He L, (2024) Exploring the impact of socioeconomic and natural factors on pulmonary tuberculosis incidence in China (2013–2019) using explainable machine learning: A nationwide study. Acta Trop 253: 107176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107176 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107176
![]() |
[24] | Lundberg SM, Lee SI, (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv Neural Inf Proc Syst 2017: 30. |
[25] | Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C, (2016) "Why should I trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier, In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778 |
[26] | Friedman M, (1937) The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 32: 675–701. |
[27] | Nemenyi PB, (1963) Distribution-Free Multiple Comparisons, Princeton University. |
[28] | Sharma S, Bellinger C, Krawczyk B, Zaiane O, Japkowicz N, (2018) Synthetic oversampling with the majority class: A new perspective on handling extreme imbalance, In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2018.00060 |
[29] | Han H, Wang WY, Mao BH, (2005) Borderline-SMOTE: A new over-sampling method in imbalanced data sets learning, In: International Conference on Intelligent Computing, 878–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/11538059_91 |
[30] | He H, Bai Y, Garcia EA, Li S, (2008) ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning, In: 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 1322–1328. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2008.4633969 |
[31] | Chawla NV, (2010) Data mining for imbalanced datasets: An overview, In: Maimon O, Rokach L, (eds) Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, Boston: Springer, 565–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09823-4_45 |
[32] | Fan W, Stolfo SJ, Zhang J, Chan PK, (1999) AdaCost: misclassification cost-sensitive boosting, In: Proceeding of 16th International Conference on Machine Learning, 99: 97–105. |
[33] |
Marijon E, Mocumbi A, Narayanan K, Jouven X, Celermajer DS, (2021) Persisting burden and challenges of rheumatic heart disease, Eur Heart J 42: 3338–3348. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab407 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab407
![]() |
[34] |
He VY, Condon JR, Ralph AP, Zhao Y, Roberts K, de Dassel JL, et al. (2016) Long-term outcomes from acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: A data-linkage and survival analysis approach. Circulation 134: 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020966 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020966
![]() |
[35] |
Lawrence JG, Carapetis JR, Griffiths K, Edwards K, Condon JR, (2013) Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: Incidence and progression in the Northern Territory of Australia, 1997 to 2010. Circulation, 128: 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001477 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001477
![]() |
[36] | Liu J, Wang D, Xiong Y, Liu B, Lin J, Zhang S, et al. (2017) Association between coagulation function and cerebral microbleeds in ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation and/or rheumatic heart disease. Aging Dis 8: 131. https://doi.org/10.14336%2FAD.2016.0715 |
[37] |
Arrigo M, Jessup M, Mullens W, Reza N, Shah AM, Sliwa K, et al. (2020) Acute heart failure. Nat Rev Dis Primers 6: 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-0151-7 doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0151-7
![]() |
[38] | Pradhan RR, Jha A, Nepal G, Sharma M, (2018) Rheumatic heart disease with multiple systemic emboli: A rare occurrence in a single subject. Cureus 10: 7. https://doi.org/10.7759%2Fcureus.2964 |
[39] |
DeBakey ME (1971) Left ventricular bypass pump for cardiac assistance: clinical experience. Am J Cardiol 27: 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(71)90076-2 doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(71)90076-2
![]() |
[40] | Mickerson J, Swale J, (1959) Diuretic effect of steroid therapy in obstinate heart failure. Br Med J 1: 876. https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.1.5126.876 |
[41] |
Janssens U, Dujardin R, Graf J, Lepper W, Ortlepp J, Merx M, et al. (2001) Value of SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score and total maximum SOFA score in 812 patients with acute cardiovascular disorders. Crit Care 5: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1292 doi: 10.1186/cc1292
![]() |
[42] |
McClave SA, Snider HL, Spain DA, (1999) Preoperative issues in clinical nutrition. Chest 115: 64S–70S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.115.suppl_2.64S doi: 10.1378/chest.115.suppl_2.64S
![]() |
[43] |
Evans AS, Hosseinian L, Mohabir T, Kurtis S, Mechanick JI, (2015) Nutrition and the cardiac surgery intensive care unit patient—An update. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 29: 1044–1050. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2015.03.021 doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.03.021
![]() |
[44] |
Horwich TB, Kalantar-Zadeh K, MacLellan RW, Fonarow GC, (2008) Albumin levels predict survival in patients with systolic heart failure. Am Heart J 155: 883–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.043 doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.043
![]() |
[45] |
Uthamalingam S, Kandala J, Daley M, Patvardhan E, Capodilupo R, Moore SA, et al. (2010) Serum albumin and mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure. Am Heart J 160: 1149–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.09.004
![]() |
[46] |
Don BR, Kaysen G, (2004) Poor nutritional status and inflammation: Serum albumin: Relationship to inflammation and nutrition. Semin Dial 17: 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0894-0959.2004.17603.x doi: 10.1111/j.0894-0959.2004.17603.x
![]() |
1. | O.D. Adubisi, A. Abdulkadir, D.J. Adashu, Improved parameter estimators for the flexible extended skew-t model with extensive simulations, applications and volatility modeling, 2023, 19, 24682276, e01443, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01443 |
Parameter (pa) | n | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
α=1.0,φ=1.3,κ=0.5 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
50 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | |
100 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | |
200 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
α=1.3,φ=1.7,κ=1.0 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
50 | 2 | 1 | 4.5 | 6 | 4.5 | 3 | |
100 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
200 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
α=2.0,φ=2.5,κ=1.5 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
50 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
100 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | |
200 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
α=2.5,φ=3.0,κ=2.0 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
50 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | |
100 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | |
200 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | |
∑ranks | 32 | 33 | 67.5 | 87 | 62.5 | 56 | |
Overall rank | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 1.4661(5) | 1.4066(4) | 1.6544(6) | 1.3840(3) | 1.1710(2) | 1.1590(1) |
φ | 2.4233(3) | 4.8935(5) | 8.1802(6) | 2.6132(4) | 1.9540(1) | 2.0060(2) | ||
κ | 1.1683(1) | 2.3008(5) | 2.4332(6) | 1.3781(4) | 1.2180(2) | 1.2700(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.4661(5) | 0.4066(4) | 0.6544(6) | 0.3840(3) | 0.1713(2) | 0.1594(1) | |
φ | 1.1233(3) | 3.5935(5) | 6.8802(6) | 1.3132(4) | 0.6536(1) | 0.7063(2) | ||
κ | 0.6683(1) | 1.8008(5) | 1.9332(6) | 0.8781(4) | 0.7178(2) | 0.7701(3) | ||
MSE | α | 0.8648(3) | 2.3453(5) | 3.3241(6) | 1.0758(4) | 0.6714(1) | 0.7021(2) | |
φ | 4.1873(1) | 172.4338(5) | 472.9212(6) | 19.7630(4) | 15.0648(2) | 15.7997(3) | ||
κ | 2.4706(1) | 35.4217(5) | 36.2999(6) | 6.9764(3) | 5.3805(2) | 7.9437(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.9300(3) | 1.5314(5) | 1.8232(6) | 1.0372(4) | 0.8194(1) | 0.8379(2) | |
φ | 2.0463(1) | 13.1314(5) | 21.7468(6) | 4.4456(4) | 3.8813(2) | 3.9749(3) | ||
κ | 1.5718(1) | 5.9516(6) | 6.0249(7) | 2.6413(3) | 2.3196(2) | 2.8185(4) | ||
∑ranks | 28(2) | 49(5) | 73(6) | 44(4) | 20(1) | 29(3) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 1.1687(5) | 0.9853(1) | 1.1595(3) | 1.2278(6) | 1.1672(4) | 1.1501(2) |
φ | 1.5906(2) | 1.3920(1) | 2.1469(6) | 1.8565(5) | 1.7203(4) | 1.6610(3) | ||
κ | 0.7185(2) | 0.6255(1) | 0.8535(5) | 0.8632(6) | 0.8289(4) | 0.7911(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1687(5) | 0.0147(1) | 0.1595(3) | 0.2278(6) | 0.1672(4) | 0.1501(2) | |
φ | 0.2906(2) | 0.0920(1) | 0.8469(6) | 0.5565(5) | 0.4203(4) | 0.3610(3) | ||
κ | 0.2185(2) | 0.1255(1) | 0.3535(4) | 0.3632(5) | 1.3812(6) | 0.2911(3) | ||
MSE | α | 0.2171(1) | 0.2513(2) | 0.5655(6) | 0.4314(5) | 0.3657(4) | 0.3091(3) | |
φ | 0.5725(1) | 2.5172(2) | 38.3736(6) | 3.8641(3) | 3.9756(4) | 4.4224(5) | ||
κ | 0.3991(1) | 0.9812(2) | 3.3622(6) | 1.5146(4) | 1.3812(3) | 1.8538(5) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.4659(1) | 0.5013(2) | 0.7520(6) | 0.6568(5) | 0.6047(4) | 0.5559(3) | |
φ | 0.7567(1) | 1.5866(2) | 6.1946(6) | 1.9657(3) | 1.9939(4) | 2.1029(5) | ||
κ | 0.6317(1) | 0.9905(2) | 1.8336(6) | 1.2307(4) | 1.1752(3) | 1.3616(5) | ||
∑ranks | 24(2) | 18(1) | 63(6) | 57(5) | 48(4) | 42(3) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 1.0768(4) | 0.9461(1) | 1.0561(2) | 1.1320(6) | 1.0928(5) | 1.0652(3) |
φ | 1.4224(2) | 1.2463(1) | 1.5157(4) | 1.6517(6) | 1.5443(5) | 1.4523(3) | ||
κ | 0.6022(2) | 0.4996(1) | 0.6226(4) | 0.7279(6) | 0.6878(5) | 0.6203(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0768(4) | 0.0539(1) | 0.0561(2) | 0.1320(6) | 0.0928(5) | 0.0652(3) | |
φ | 0.1224(2) | 0.0537(1) | 0.2157(4) | 0.3517(6) | 0.2443(5) | 0.1523(3) | ||
κ | 0.1022(2) | 0.0004(1) | 0.1226(5) | 0.2279(6) | 0.1878(3) | 0.1203(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0831(2) | 0.0682(1) | 0.1692(4) | 0.2889(6) | 0.2350(5) | 0.1393(3) | |
φ | 0.1652(2) | 0.1829(3) | 6.2211(6) | 3.6319(5) | 2.1739(4) | 1.4473(1) | ||
κ | 0.1402(1) | 0.1508(2) | 1.0192(5) | 1.1513(6) | 0.8198(4) | 0.3606(3) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.2882(2) | 0.2612(1) | 0.4113(4) | 0.5375(6) | 0.4848(5) | 0.3732(3) | |
φ | 0.4065(1) | 0.4277(2) | 2.4942(6) | 1.9058(5) | 1.4744(4) | 1.2030(3) | ||
κ | 0.3744(1) | 0.3883(2) | 1.0096(5) | 1.0730(6) | 0.9054(4) | 0.6005(3) | ||
∑ranks | 25(2) | 17(1) | 51(4) | 70(6) | 54(5) | 35(3) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 1.0360(4) | 0.9541(1) | 1.0240(2) | 1.0588(6) | 1.0415(5) | 1.0285(3) |
φ | 1.3576(3) | 1.2478(1) | 1.3482(2) | 1.4147(6) | 1.3846(5) | 1.3593(4) | ||
κ | 0.5436(3) | 0.4775(1) | 0.5384(2) | 0.5821(6) | 0.5722(5) | 0.5493(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0360(3) | 0.0459(5) | 0.0240(1) | 0.0588(6) | 0.0415(4) | 0.0285(2) | |
φ | 0.0576(3) | 0.0522(2) | 0.0482(1) | 0.1147(6) | 0.0846(5) | 0.0593(4) | ||
κ | 0.0436(3) | 0.0225(1) | 0.0384(2) | 0.0821(6) | 0.0722(5) | 0.0493(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0329(2) | 0.0270(1) | 0.0441(3) | 0.0917(6) | 0.0824(5) | 0.0567(4) | |
φ | 0.0624(2) | 0.0455(1) | 0.0849(3) | 0.2907(6) | 0.2382(5) | 0.1839(4) | ||
κ | 0.0417(2) | 0.0291(1) | 0.0552(3) | 0.1570(6) | 0.1399(5) | 0.0947(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.1813(2) | 0.1645(1) | 0.2101(3) | 0.3028(6) | 0.2871(5) | 0.2380(4) | |
φ | 0.2498(2) | 0.2133(1) | 0.2914(3) | 0.5392(6) | 0.4881(5) | 0.4289(4) | ||
κ | 0.2041(2) | 0.1706(1) | 0.2350(3) | 0.3963(6) | 0.3741(5) | 0.3077(4) | ||
∑ranks | 31(3) | 17(1) | 28(2) | 82(6) | 59(5) | 45(4) |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 1.1024(3) | 1.1175(5) | 1.4136(6) | 1.0918(4) | 0.9769(2) | 0.9432(1) |
φ | 2.7852(4) | 5.2337(5) | 9.8213(6) | 2.7427(3) | 2.0152(2) | 1.8648(1) | ||
κ | 1.9428(1) | 4.5719(5) | 6.0877(6) | 2.7247(3) | 2.9305(4) | 2.4634(2) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.3024(4) | 0.3175(5) | 0.6136(6) | 0.2918(3) | 0.1769(2) | 0.1432(1) | |
φ | 1.2852(4) | 3.7337(5) | 8.3213(6) | 1.2427(3) | 0.5152(2) | 0.3648(1) | ||
κ | 0.9428(1) | 3.5719(5) | 5.0877(6) | 1.7247(3) | 1.9305(4) | 1.4634(2) | ||
MSE | α | 0.5045(3) | 1.4348(5) | 2.5202(6) | 0.5695(4) | 0.4175(2) | 0.3182(1) | |
φ | 7.3621(3) | 151.9961(5) | 634.1503(6) | 16.9030(4) | 6.2433(2) | 3.1990(1) | ||
κ | 7.4544(1) | 153.2414(5) | 298.9136(6) | 33.2122(3) | 40.8208(4) | 13.8077(2) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.7103(3) | 1.1978(5) | 1.5875(6) | 0.7546(4) | 0.6461(2) | 0.5641(1) | |
φ | 2.7133(3) | 12.3287(5) | 25.1823(6) | 4.1113(4) | 2.4987(2) | 1.7886(1) | ||
κ | 2.7303(1) | 12.3791(5) | 17.2891(6) | 5.7630(3) | 6.3891(4) | 3.7159(2) | ||
∑ranks | 31(2) | 60(5) | 72(6) | 41(4) | 32(3) | 16(1) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 0.8833(4) | 0.7896(1) | 0.8815(3) | 0.9182(6) | 0.8904(5) | 0.8811(2) |
φ | 1.6996(3) | 1.4800(1) | 1.8893(6) | 1.7904(5) | 1.7388(4) | 1.6990(2) | ||
κ | 1.2704(2) | 1.1696(1) | 1.4091(3) | 1.4440(5) | 1.4889(6) | 1.4167(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0833(4) | 0.0104(1) | 0.0815(3) | 0.1182(6) | 0.0904(5) | 0.0811(2) | |
φ | 0.1996(3) | 0.0200(1) | 0.3893(6) | 0.2904(5) | 0.2388(4) | 0.1990(2) | ||
κ | 0.2704(2) | 0.1696(1) | 0.4091(3) | 0.4440(5) | 0.4889(6) | 0.4167(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0794(2) | 0.0681(1) | 0.1771(6) | 0.1309(4) | 0.1464(5) | 0.1199(3) | |
φ | 0.3262(2) | 0.3085(1) | 20.5402(6) | 0.7886(3) | 1.7903(5) | 1.0740(4) | ||
κ | 0.9907(1) | 1.1406(2) | 7.5480(6) | 1.9706(3) | 4.2142(5) | 3.7125(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.2819(2) | 0.2610(1) | 0.4209(6) | 0.3618(4) | 0.3826(5) | 0.3462(3) | |
φ | 0.5711(2) | 0.5554(1) | 4.5321(6) | 0.8880(3) | 1.3380(5) | 1.0363(4) | ||
κ | 0.9907(1) | 1.0680(2) | 2.7474(6) | 1.4038(3) | 2.0528(5) | 1.9268(4) | ||
∑ranks | 28(2) | 14(1) | 60(4.5) | 62(6) | 60(4.5) | 38(3) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 0.8324(5) | 0.7737(1) | 0.8214(2) | 0.8476(6) | 0.8292(4) | 0.8239(3) |
φ | 1.5765(5) | 1.4469(1) | 1.5593(3) | 1.6181(6) | 1.5676(4) | 1.5566(2) | ||
κ | 1.1040(3) | 1.0233(1) | 1.0901(2) | 1.1638(6) | 1.1483(5) | 1.1139(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0324(5) | 0.0263(3) | 0.0214(1) | 0.0476(6) | 0.0292(4) | 0.0239(2) | |
φ | 0.0765(5) | 0.0531(1) | 0.0593(3) | 0.1181(6) | 0.0676(4) | 0.0566(2) | ||
κ | 0.1040(3) | 0.0233(1) | 0.0901(2) | 0.1638(6) | 0.1483(5) | 0.1139(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0258(2) | 0.0222(1) | 0.0298(3) | 0.0507(6) | 0.0445(5) | 0.0323(4) | |
φ | 0.0948(2) | 0.0745(1) | 0.1090(3) | 0.2038(6) | 0.1641(5) | 0.1151(4) | ||
κ | 0.2745(2) | 0.0233(1) | 0.2965(3) | 0.5554(6) | 0.4886(5) | 0.3328(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.1607(2) | 0.1491(1) | 0.1727(3) | 0.2251(6) | 0.2109(5) | 0.1797(4) | |
φ | 0.3079(2) | 0.2729(1) | 0.3301(3) | 0.4514(6) | 0.4051(5) | 0.3392(4) | ||
κ | 0.5240(2) | 0.4679(1) | 0.5445(3) | 0.7453(6) | 0.6990(5) | 0.5769(4) | ||
∑ranks | 38(3) | 14(1) | 31(2) | 72(6) | 56(5) | 41(4) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 0.8155(5) | 0.7798(1) | 0.8117(3) | 0.8206(6) | 0.8122(4) | 0.8102(2) |
φ | 1.5382(5) | 1.4621(1) | 1.5325(3) | 1.5549(6) | 1.5328(4) | 1.5277(2) | ||
κ | 1.0486(3) | 0.9959(1) | 1.0469(2) | 1.0692(6) | 1.0643(5) | 1.0491(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0155(4) | 0.0202(5) | 0.0117(2) | 0.0206(6) | 0.0122(3) | 0.0102(1) | |
φ | 0.0382(5) | 0.0359(4) | 0.0325(2) | 0.0549(6) | 0.0328(3) | 0.0277(1) | ||
κ | 0.0486(3) | 0.0041(1) | 0.0469(2) | 0.0692(6) | 0.0643(5) | 0.0491(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0110(2) | 0.0109(1) | 0.0141(3) | 0.0204(6) | 0.0193(5) | 0.0144(4) | |
φ | 0.0380(2) | 0.0359(1) | 0.0460(3) | 0.0648(6) | 0.0597(5) | 0.0466(4) | ||
κ | 0.1041(2) | 0.0949(1) | 0.1258(3) | 0.1858(6) | 0.1794(5) | 0.1280(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.1049(1.5) | 0.1049(1.5) | 0.1186(3) | 0.1427(6) | 0.1390(5) | 0.1198(4) | |
φ | 0.1950(2) | 0.1894(1) | 0.2144(3) | 0.2546(6) | 0.2443(5) | 0.2158(4) | ||
κ | 0.3227(2) | 0.3080(1) | 0.3547(3) | 0.4310(6) | 0.4236(5) | 0.3578(4) | ||
∑ranks | 36.5(3) | 19.5(1) | 32(2) | 72(6) | 64(5) | 38(4) |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 2.8336(3) | 2.5944(1) | 3.1558(5) | 3.3131(6) | 2.8120(2) | 2.9230(4) |
φ | 2.0036(1) | 8.0269(5) | 19.3064(6) | 5.4068(4) | 4.1680(2) | 4.4550(3) | ||
κ | 1.4579(1) | 3.2311(5) | 3.6263(6) | 3.0043(4) | 2.8950(2) | 2.9920(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.8336(3) | 0.5944(1) | 1.1558(5) | 1.3131(6) | 0.8124(2) | 0.9231(4) | |
φ | 1.0036(1) | 7.0269(5) | 18.3064(6) | 4.4068(4) | 3.1675(2) | 3.4554(3) | ||
κ | 0.7579(1) | 2.5311(5) | 2.9263(6) | 2.3043(4) | 2.1952(2) | 2.2918(3) | ||
MSE | α | 2.1274(1) | 6.7714(5) | 9.2849(6) | 5.0302(4) | 3.5630(2) | 3.9500(3) | |
φ | 3.3320(1) | 648.1073(5) | 3383.9749(6) | 204.2319(4) | 177.4580(3) | 152.0100(2) | ||
κ | 2.8070(1) | 49.8495(5) | 60.4505(6) | 28.6379(3) | 27.8840(2) | 33.0500(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 1.4586(1) | 2.6022(5) | 3.0471(6) | 2.2428(4) | 1.8870(2) | 1.9870(3) | |
φ | 1.8254(1) | 25.4580(5) | 58.1719(6) | 14.2910(4) | 13.3210(3) | 12.3290(2) | ||
κ | 1.6754(1) | 7.0404(5) | 7.7750(6) | 5.3514(3) | 5.2800(2) | 5.7490(4) | ||
∑ranks | 16(1) | 52(5) | 70(6) | 50(4) | 26(2) | 38(3) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 2.2547(3) | 1.8578(1) | 2.1777(2) | 2.5788(6) | 2.4490(5) | 2.3520(4) |
φ | 1.2645(2) | 1.0723(1) | 1.5965(3) | 2.3717(6) | 2.1870(5) | 2.0330(4) | ||
κ | 0.9587(2) | 0.7912(1) | 1.0157(3) | 1.4816(6) | 1.4490(5) | 1.2750(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.2547(3) | 0.1422(1) | 0.1777(2) | 0.5788(6) | 0.4486(5) | 0.3518(4) | |
φ | 0.2645(2) | 0.0723(1) | 0.5965(3) | 1.3717(6) | 1.1873(5) | 1.0332(4) | ||
κ | 0.2587(2) | 0.0912(1) | 0.3157(3) | 0.7816(6) | 0.7489(5) | 0.5751(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.4982(1) | 0.6380(2) | 0.8915(3) | 1.6694(6) | 1.5060(5) | 1.1900(4) | |
φ | 0.4962(1) | 1.4375(2) | 32.6387(5) | 30.5760(4) | 28.1190(3) | 49.6000(6) | ||
κ | 0.5600(1) | 0.7722(2) | 1.7465(3) | 3.9829(5) | 4.1170(6) | 3.2910(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.7058(1) | 0.7988(2) | 0.9442(3) | 1.2921(6) | 1.2270(5) | 1.0910(4) | |
φ | 0.7044(1) | 1.1990(2) | 5.7130(5) | 5.5296(4) | 5.3030(3) | 7.0430(6) | ||
κ | 0.7483(1) | 0.8788(2) | 1.3215(3) | 1.9957(5) | 2.0290(6) | 1.8140(4) | ||
∑ranks | 20(2) | 18(1) | 28(3) | 64(6) | 58(5) | 52(4) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 2.1444(3) | 1.8589(1) | 2.0854(2) | 2.3221(6) | 2.2590(5) | 2.1566(4) |
φ | 1.1384(3) | 0.9579(1) | 1.1305(2) | 1.6180(5) | 1.5510(4) | 1.6937(6) | ||
κ | 0.1510(1) | 0.6947(2) | 0.8403(3) | 1.1163(6) | 1.0970(5) | 0.9608(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1444(3) | 0.1411(2) | 0.0854(1) | 0.3221(6) | 0.2591(5) | 0.1566(4) | |
φ | 0.1384(3) | 0.0421(1) | 0.1305(2) | 0.6180(5) | 0.5507(4) | 0.6937(6) | ||
κ | 0.1510(3) | 0.0053(1) | 0.1403(2) | 0.4163(6) | 0.3975(5) | 0.2608(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.2375(1) | 0.2656(2) | 0.3276(3) | 0.8324(6) | 0.7795(5) | 0.5226(4) | |
φ | 0.1731(2) | 0.1389(1) | 0.3441(3) | 9.3730(5) | 9.3187(4) | 168.1577(6) | ||
κ | 0.2335(2) | 0.2183(1) | 0.3689(3) | 1.5424(5) | 1.5302(4) | 1.6901(6) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.4873(1) | 0.5154(2) | 0.5724(3) | 0.9123(6) | 0.8829(5) | 0.7229(4) | |
φ | 0.4161(2) | 0.3728(1) | 0.5866(3) | 3.0615(5) | 3.0526(4) | 12.9676(6) | ||
κ | 0.4832(2) | 0.4672(1) | 0.6074(3) | 1.2420(5) | 1.2370(4) | 1.3001(6) | ||
∑ranks | 26(2) | 16(1) | 30(3) | 66(6) | 54(4) | 60(5) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 2.0655(4) | 1.8856(1) | 2.0368(2) | 2.1254(6) | 2.0920(5) | 2.0566(3) |
φ | 1.0615(3) | 0.9484(1) | 1.0528(2) | 1.1499(6) | 1.1250(5) | 1.0714(4) | ||
κ | 0.7647(3) | 0.6606(1) | 0.7589(2) | 0.8454(6) | 0.8340(5) | 0.7822(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0655(3) | 0.1144(5) | 0.0368(1) | 0.1254(6) | 0.0922(4) | 0.0566(2) | |
φ | 0.0615(3) | 0.0516(1) | 0.0528(2) | 0.1499(6) | 0.1246(5) | 0.0714(4) | ||
κ | 0.0647(3) | 0.0394(1) | 0.0589(2) | 0.1454(6) | 0.1340(5) | 0.0822(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.1055(1) | 0.1232(2) | 0.1489(3) | 0.2735(6) | 0.2627(5) | 0.1648(4) | |
φ | 0.0582(2) | 0.0498(1) | 0.0816(3) | 0.2593(6) | 0.2387(5) | 0.1083(4) | ||
κ | 0.0765(2) | 0.0688(1) | 0.1080(3) | 0.2400(6) | 0.2333(5) | 0.1343(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.3248(1) | 0.3509(2) | 0.3858(3) | 0.5229(6) | 0.5126(5) | 0.4059(4) | |
φ | 0.2412(2) | 0.2231(1) | 0.2857(3) | 0.5092(6) | 0.4886(5) | 0.3290(4) | ||
κ | 0.2766(2) | 0.2622(1) | 0.3286(3) | 0.4899(6) | 0.4830(5) | 0.3665(4) | ||
∑ranks | 25(2) | 18(1) | 29(3) | 72(6) | 59(5) | 45(4) |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 1.9113(4) | 1.8080(3) | 2.1893(6) | 2.0102(5) | 1.6790(1) | 1.7030(2) |
φ | 3.4196(3) | 6.6547(5) | 13.4896(6) | 4.6929(4) | 3.1980(1.5) | 3.1980(1.5) | ||
κ | 1.6351(1) | 2.9747(5) | 3.4465(6) | 2.4926(4) | 2.2030(3) | 2.1720(2) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.4113(4) | 0.3080(3) | 0.6893(6) | 0.5102(5) | 0.1787(1) | 0.2032(2) | |
φ | 1.4196(3) | 4.6547(5) | 11.4896(6) | 2.6929(4) | 1.1978(1) | 1.1980(2) | ||
κ | 0.6351(1) | 1.9747(5) | 2.4465(6) | 1.4926(4) | 1.2034(3) | 1.1716(2) | ||
MSE | α | 0.8424(1) | 2.6556(5) | 4.2739(6) | 1.6544(4) | 1.0310(2) | 1.0990(3) | |
φ | 6.2459(1) | 242.8573(5) | 1099.2808(6) | 63.1670(4) | 34.3340(2) | 36.4950(3) | ||
κ | 2.8238(1) | 37.3047(5) | 47.8131(6) | 17.0243(4) | 12.9340(3) | 10.7970(2) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.9178(1) | 1.6296(5) | 2.0673(6) | 1.2862(4) | 1.0150(3) | 1.0480(2) | |
φ | 2.4992(1) | 15.5839(5) | 33.1554(6) | 7.9478(4) | 5.8600(2) | 6.0410(3) | ||
κ | 1.6804(1) | 6.1078(5) | 6.9147(6) | 4.1261(4) | 3.5960(3) | 3.2860(2) | ||
∑ranks | 22(1) | 56(5) | 72(6) | 50(4) | 25.5(2) | 26.5(3) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 1.6952(2) | 1.4342(1) | 1.8042(5) | 1.8992(6) | 1.7690(3) | 1.8000(4) |
φ | 2.4984(2) | 2.1884(1) | 4.9115(6) | 3.7973(4) | 3.1380(3) | 3.3830(5) | ||
κ | 1.3226(2) | 1.1667(1) | 1.9301(6) | 1.8651(5) | 1.7060(3) | 1.7400(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1952(2) | 0.0658(1) | 0.3042(5) | 0.3992(6) | 0.2692(3) | 0.3001(4) | |
φ | 0.4984(2) | 0.1884(1) | 2.9115(6) | 1.7973(5) | 1.1377(3) | 1.3826(4) | ||
κ | 0.3226(2) | 0.1667(1) | 0.9301(6) | 0.8651(5) | 0.7060(3) | 0.7402(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.3337(1) | 0.5070(2) | 1.5355(6) | 1.0502(5) | 0.7593(3) | 0.8669(4) | |
φ | 1.5498(1) | 4.0449(2) | 155.5950(6) | 60.8746(5) | 17.0518(3) | 29.0772(4) | ||
κ | 0.9269(1) | 1.7944(2) | 11.4674(6) | 6.4988(5) | 4.3962(3) | 5.1792(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.5776(1) | 0.7120(2) | 1.2391(6) | 1.0248(5) | 0.8714(3) | 0.9311(4) | |
φ | 1.2449(1) | 2.0112(2) | 12.4738(6) | 7.8022(5) | 4.1294(4) | 5.3923(3) | ||
κ | 0.9627(1) | 1.3396(2) | 3.3864(6) | 2.5493(5) | 2.0967(3) | 2.2758(4) | ||
∑ranks | 18(1.5) | 18(1.5) | 70(6) | 61(5) | 37(3) | 48(4) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 1.6264(2) | 1.3950(1) | 1.6954(3) | 1.7879(6) | 1.7060(4) | 1.7390(5) |
φ | 2.3116(2) | 1.9354(1) | 3.4363(6) | 3.2511(5) | 2.8230(3) | 3.0510(4) | ||
κ | 1.2179(2) | 0.9918(1) | 1.5569(4) | 1.6311(6) | 1.5010(3) | 1.5570(5) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1264(2) | 0.1050(1) | 0.1954(3) | 0.2879(6) | 0.2062(4) | 0.2393(5) | |
φ | 0.3116(2) | 0.0646(1) | 1.4363(6) | 1.2511(5) | 0.8234(3) | 1.0510(4) | ||
κ | 0.2179(2) | 0.0082(1) | 0.5569(5) | 0.6311(6) | 0.5009(3) | 0.5567(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.2014(1) | 0.4738(2) | 0.8545(6) | 0.7787(5) | 0.5939(3) | 0.6521(4) | |
φ | 0.8984(1) | 0.9734(2) | 56.0050(6) | 25.6484(5) | 9.4794(3) | 21.8101(4) | ||
κ | 0.5434(1) | 0.6022(2) | 5.2431(6) | 3.9995(5) | 2.7885(3) | 3.5394(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.4488(1) | 0.4738(2) | 0.9244(6) | 0.8824(5) | 0.7706(3) | 0.8075(4) | |
φ | 0.9478(1) | 0.9734(2) | 7.4836(6) | 5.0644(5) | 3.0789(3) | 4.6701(4) | ||
κ | 0.7372(1) | 0.7760(2) | 2.2898(6) | 1.9999(5) | 1.6699(3) | 1.8813(4) | ||
∑ranks | 18(1.5) | 18(1.5) | 63(5) | 64(6) | 38(3) | 51(4) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 1.5676(2) | 1.4003(1) | 1.5936(3) | 1.6640(6) | 1.6350(5) | 1.6210(4) |
φ | 2.1555(2) | 1.8840(1) | 2.4471(3) | 2.5978(6) | 2.5470(5) | 2.4900(4) | ||
κ | 1.1155(2) | 0.9290(1) | 1.2360(3) | 1.3342(6) | 1.2990(5) | 1.2790(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0676(1) | 0.0997(3) | 0.0936(2) | 0.1640(6) | 0.1254(5) | 0.1210(4) | |
φ | 0.1555(2) | 0.1160(1) | 0.4471(3) | 0.5978(6) | 0.5470(5) | 0.4895(4) | ||
κ | 0.1155(2) | 0.0710(1) | 0.2360(3) | 0.3342(6) | 0.2988(5) | 0.2790(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0927(1) | 0.0972(2) | 0.3192(3) | 0.4075(6) | 0.3785(5) | 0.3419(4) | |
φ | 0.3186(2) | 0.2844(1) | 8.2814(5) | 5.1207(3) | 10.0634(6) | 5.8513(4) | ||
κ | 0.2216(2) | 0.1781(1) | 1.5037(5) | 1.4824(4) | 1.5757(6) | 1.4326(3) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.3045(2) | 0.3117(1) | 0.5650(3) | 0.6384(6) | 0.6152(5) | 0.5847(4) | |
φ | 0.5645(2) | 0.5333(1) | 2.8777(5) | 2.2629(3) | 3.1723(6) | 2.4190(4) | ||
κ | 0.4708(2) | 0.4221(1) | 1.2263(5) | 1.2175(4) | 1.2553(6) | 1.1969(3) | ||
∑ranks | 22(2) | 15(1) | 43(3) | 62(5) | 64(6) | 46(4) |
Model | Par | MLE (SE) | -LL | AIC | K-S | p-value |
EHLST | ˆα | 3.2407(0.5773) | 588.256 | 1182.513 | 0.070 | 0.263 |
ˆφ | 67.8208(27.2116) | |||||
ˆκ | 217.1097(81.7760) | |||||
EHLL | ˆα | 4.2120(2.2915) | 590.130 | 1188.260 | 0.077 | 0.165 |
ˆβ | 9.9874(1.6320) | |||||
ˆa | 4.2120(2.2951) | |||||
ˆb | 0.0186(0.0047) | |||||
EHLF | ˆα | 1.2744(0.4305) | 585.933 | 1179.867 | 0.069 | 0.267 |
ˆλ | 26.4325(15.3670) | |||||
ˆa | 0.7669(0.1661) | |||||
ˆb | 48.0005(23.9203) | |||||
EHLLL | ˆα | 0.5109(0.4213) | 583.900 | 1175.800 | 0.052 | 0.627 |
ˆλ | 0.7105(0.6145) | |||||
ˆa | 11.3008(0.9864) | |||||
ˆb | 7.5646(5.2527) |
Model | Par | MPS (SE) | LL | AIC | K-S | p-value |
EHLST | ˆα | 3.1763(0.0286) | −590.015 | 1186.000 | 0.069 | 0.269 |
ˆφ | 64.0223(1.7981) | |||||
ˆκ | 218.3550(4.2330) | |||||
EHLL | ˆα | 3.3253(0.0749) | −592.43 | 1192.900 | 0.089 | 0.072 |
ˆβ | 9.9379(0.1238) | |||||
ˆa | 3.3075(0.0745) | |||||
ˆb | 0.0318(0.0007) | |||||
EHLF | ˆα | 1.4956(0.3689) | −587.234 | 1182.500 | 0.068 | 0.300 |
ˆλ | 30.5011(13.4873) | |||||
ˆa | 0.7660(0.0970) | |||||
ˆb | 50.1275(26.6395) | |||||
EHLLL | ˆα | 0.5220(0.2593) | −585.169 | 1178.300 | 0.059 | 0.460 |
ˆλ | 0.8105(0.58140) | |||||
ˆa | 11.5673(0.7104) | |||||
ˆb | 6.9976 (7.3261) |
INF | |
Number of observations | 223 |
Mean | 0.2121 |
Median | 0.4906 |
Minimum | −104.1454 |
Maximum | 53.2217 |
Standard Deviation | 14.3681 |
Skewness | −1.3377 |
Kurtosis | 13.1953 |
Jarque-Bera | 1721.3 (p < 0.001) |
ARCH (2) | 15.406 (p < 0.001) |
GARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
Pa. | NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST |
μ | 0.6403 | 0.5656 | 0.6504'***' | 0.5158 | 0.3304 | 0.3277'***' | 0.4667 | 0.3513 | 0.1605 | 0.3589 | 0.1824 |
ω | 0.0900 | 0.7026 | 1.0661 | 0.1468'*' | 0.9007 | 1.4755'***' | 0.8444 | 1.0241'.' | 0.9637'.' | 1.2821'.' | 0.1891 |
η1 | 0.0602'*' | 0.2777'*' | 0.2536'.' | 0.0586'***' | 0.3115'*' | 0.2957'***' | 0.2904'*' | 0.3100'*' | 0.2876'*' | 0.3088'*' | 0.1112 |
η2 | 0.9292'***' | 0.7213'***' | 0.7454'***' | 0.9289'***' | 0.6875'***' | 0.7033'***' | 0.7086'***' | 0.6889'***' | 0.7114'***' | 0.6902'***' | 0.6069'***' |
η3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
α | - | - | - | 0.9423'***' | - | - | 0.2500 | - | 8.1967'***' | 0.6823'.' | 1.7778'***' |
ξ | - | - | - | - | 0.8956'***' | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ν | - | 4.1458'***' | 0.9782'***' | - | 4.1743'***' | 0.8941'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
η | - | - | - | - | - | 0.9696'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
β | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.3260 | - | -1.1452'' | -0.1358 | - |
λ | - | - | - | - | - | - | -1.9370'*' | - | - | - | - |
υ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.1940 | - | - | - |
ϑ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.3328'***' | - | - | - |
φ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.2070'***' |
κ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6.6593 |
GJRGARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
Pa. | NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST |
μ | 0.8364'.' | 0.5669'.' | 0.6504'***' | 0.7550'' | 0.3233 | 0.3215'***' | 0.4650 | 0.3452 | -0.0555 | 0.3574 | 0.2001 |
ω | 0.0000 | 0.6843 | 1.1503 | 0.0000 | 0.8795 | 1.4925'***' | 0.8253 | 1.0071 | 1.2293'.' | 1.2783'' | 0.2750 |
η1 | 0.0864'*' | 0.2833'*' | 0.2414'.' | 0.0804'*' | 0.3254'*' | 0.2893'***' | 0.2978'*' | 0.3194'*' | 0.2800'*' | 0.3105'.' | 0.1692 |
η2 | 0.9397'***' | 0.7255'***' | 0.7322'***' | 0.9402'***' | 0.6912'***' | 0.7004'***' | 0.7125'***' | 0.6918'***' | 0.7322'***' | 0.6908'***' | 0.6113'***' |
η3 | −0.0643 | −0.0195 | 0.0508 | −0.0562 | −0.0371 | 0.0200 | −0.0232 | −0.0258 | −0.0292 | −0.0049 | −0.0004 |
α | - | - | - | 0.9651'***' | - | - | 0.2500 | - | 8.1943'***' | 0.6824'*' | 1.7571'***' |
ξ | - | - | - | - | 0.8923'***' | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ν | - | 4.1432'***' | 0.9821'***' | - | 4.1776'***' | 0.8923'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
η | - | - | - | - | - | 0.9694'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
β | - | - | - | - | - | - | −0.3324 | - | -1.8837'.' | −0.1365 | - |
λ | - | - | - | - | - | - | −1.9378'**' | - | - | - | - |
υ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.1988 | - | - | - |
ϑ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.3332'***' | - | - | - |
φ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1858'***' |
κ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4.2176 |
Significance level 0'***', 0.01'*', 0.05'*', 0.1'', 1 |
Model | Log-Likelihood | AIC | BIC |
GARCH-NORM | −808.135 | 7.2837 | 7.3448 |
GARCH-STD | −772.170 | 6.9701 | 7.0665 |
GARCH-GED | −776.818 | 7.0118 | 7.0882 |
GARCH-SNORM | −807.730 | 7.2891 | 7.3655 |
GARCH-SSTD | −771.494 | 6.9730 | 7.0647 |
GARCH-SGED | −775.870 | 7.0123 | 7.1040 |
GARCH-GHYP | −772.006 | 6.9866 | 7.0936 |
GARCH-JSU | −772.083 | 6.9783 | 7.0700 |
GARCH-GHST | −778.603 | 7.0368 | 7.1285 |
GARCH- NIG | −773.341 | 6.9896 | 7.0813 |
GARCH- EHLST | −768.492 | 6.9551 | 7.0620 |
GJRGARCH-NORM | −807.280 | 7.2850 | 7.3614 |
GJRGARCH-STD | −772.159 | 6.9790 | 7.0900 |
GJRGARCH-GED | −776.764 | 7.0203 | 7.1120 |
GJRGARCH-SNORM | −807.129 | 7.2926 | 7.3843 |
GJRGARCH-SSTD | −771.455 | 6.9817 | 7.0923 |
GJRGARCH-SGED | −775.843 | 7.0210 | 7.1280 |
GJRGARCH-GHYP | −771.991 | 6.9954 | 7.1177 |
GJRGARCH-JSU | −772.066 | 6.9871 | 7.0941 |
GJRGARCH-GHST | −781.977 | 7.0760 | 7.1830 |
GJRGARCH- NIG | −773.340 | 6.9986 | 7.1055 |
GJRGARCH- EHLST | −768.846 | 6.9672 | 7.0895 |
Model | Ljung-Box Statistic |
p-value | ARCH-LM Statistic | p-value |
GARCH-NORM | 3.331 | 0.9725 | 2.932 | 0.9830 |
GARCH-STD | 1.542 | 0.9988 | 1.715 | 0.9981 |
GARCH-GED | 1.797 | 0.9977 | 1.991 | 0.9964 |
GARCH-SNORM | 3.226 | 0.9756 | 2.848 | 0.9848 |
GARCH-SSTD | 1.735 | 0.9980 | 1.982 | 0.9965 |
GARCH-SGED | 1.891 | 0.9971 | 2.141 | 0.9951 |
GARCH-GHYP | 1.679 | 0.9983 | 1.893 | 0.9971 |
GARCH-JSU | 1.810 | 0.9976 | 2.073 | 0.9958 |
GARCH-GHST | 1.800 | 0.9977 | 2.033 | 0.9961 |
GARCH- NIG | 1.898 | 0.9965 | 2.176 | 0.9948 |
GARCH- EHLST | 1.511 | 0.9989 | 1.774 | 0.9978 |
GJRGARCH-NORM | 4.328 | 0.9313 | 3.617 | 0.9630 |
GJRGARCH-STD | 1.545 | 0.9988 | 1.714 | 0.9981 |
GJRGARCH-GED | 1.832 | 0.9975 | 2.054 | 0.9959 |
GJRGARCH-SNORM | 4.292 | 0.9332 | 3.610 | 0.9632 |
GJRGARCH-SSTD | 3.429 | 0.9991 | 1.997 | 0.9964 |
GJRGARCH-SGED | 1.903 | 0.9970 | 2.165 | 0.9949 |
GJRGARCH-GHYP | 1.684 | 0.9982 | 1.895 | 0.9971 |
GJRGARCH-JSU | 1.815 | 0.9976 | 2.075 | 0.9957 |
GJRGARCH-GHST | 1.849 | 0.9974 | 2.038 | 0.9960 |
GJRGARCH- NIG | 1.897 | 0.9971 | 2.172 | 0.9948 |
GJRGARCH- EHLST | 1.472 | 0.9990 | 1.711 | 0.9981 |
Model | MSE | RMSE | MAE |
GARCH-NORM | 112.720 | 10.617 | 7.011 |
GARCH-STD | 122.686 | 11.076 | 6.671 |
GARCH-GED | 122.269 | 11.057 | 6.776 |
GARCH-SNORM | 111.427 | 10.556 | 6.952 |
GARCH-SSTD | 123.930 | 11.132 | 6.650 |
GARCH-SGED | 123.902 | 11.131 | 6.764 |
GARCH-GHYP | 123.204 | 11.100 | 6.673 |
GARCH-JSU | 123.939 | 11.133 | 6.670 |
GARCH-GHST | 123.355 | 11.106 | 6.693 |
GARCH- NIG | 124.100 | 11.140 | 6.712 |
GARCH- EHLST | 109.109 | 10.445 | 5.396 |
GJRGARCH-NORM | 156.588 | 12.513 | 9.119 |
GJRGARCH-STD | 124.678 | 11.166 | 6.757 |
GJRGARCH-GED | 117.606 | 10.845 | 6.555 |
GJRGARCH-SNORM | 149.356 | 12.221 | 8.828 |
GJRGARCH-SSTD | 127.418 | 11.288 | 6.791 |
GJRGARCH-SGED | 122.197 | 11.054 | 6.686 |
GJRGARCH-GHYP | 125.462 | 11.201 | 6.768 |
GJRGARCH-JSU | 126.321 | 11.239 | 6.768 |
GJRGARCH-GHST | 126.353 | 11.241 | 6.911 |
GJRGARCH- NIG | 124.527 | 11.159 | 6.730 |
GJRGARCH- EHLST | 104.874 | 10.241 | 5.446 |
GARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST | |
MSE | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 1 |
RMSE | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 1 |
MAE | 11 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 1 |
TOTAL | 17 | 14 | 17 | 14 | 20 | 24 | 17 | 23 | 20 | 29 | 3 |
GJRGARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST | |
MSE | 11 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
RMSE | 11 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
MAE | 11 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 9 | 4 | 1 |
TOTAL | 33 | 15 | 6 | 30 | 26 | 9 | 18.5 | 20.5 | 25 | 12 | 3 |
Parameter (pa) | n | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
α=1.0,φ=1.3,κ=0.5 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
50 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | |
100 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | |
200 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
α=1.3,φ=1.7,κ=1.0 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
50 | 2 | 1 | 4.5 | 6 | 4.5 | 3 | |
100 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
200 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
α=2.0,φ=2.5,κ=1.5 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
50 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
100 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | |
200 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
α=2.5,φ=3.0,κ=2.0 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
50 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | |
100 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | |
200 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | |
∑ranks | 32 | 33 | 67.5 | 87 | 62.5 | 56 | |
Overall rank | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 1.4661(5) | 1.4066(4) | 1.6544(6) | 1.3840(3) | 1.1710(2) | 1.1590(1) |
φ | 2.4233(3) | 4.8935(5) | 8.1802(6) | 2.6132(4) | 1.9540(1) | 2.0060(2) | ||
κ | 1.1683(1) | 2.3008(5) | 2.4332(6) | 1.3781(4) | 1.2180(2) | 1.2700(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.4661(5) | 0.4066(4) | 0.6544(6) | 0.3840(3) | 0.1713(2) | 0.1594(1) | |
φ | 1.1233(3) | 3.5935(5) | 6.8802(6) | 1.3132(4) | 0.6536(1) | 0.7063(2) | ||
κ | 0.6683(1) | 1.8008(5) | 1.9332(6) | 0.8781(4) | 0.7178(2) | 0.7701(3) | ||
MSE | α | 0.8648(3) | 2.3453(5) | 3.3241(6) | 1.0758(4) | 0.6714(1) | 0.7021(2) | |
φ | 4.1873(1) | 172.4338(5) | 472.9212(6) | 19.7630(4) | 15.0648(2) | 15.7997(3) | ||
κ | 2.4706(1) | 35.4217(5) | 36.2999(6) | 6.9764(3) | 5.3805(2) | 7.9437(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.9300(3) | 1.5314(5) | 1.8232(6) | 1.0372(4) | 0.8194(1) | 0.8379(2) | |
φ | 2.0463(1) | 13.1314(5) | 21.7468(6) | 4.4456(4) | 3.8813(2) | 3.9749(3) | ||
κ | 1.5718(1) | 5.9516(6) | 6.0249(7) | 2.6413(3) | 2.3196(2) | 2.8185(4) | ||
∑ranks | 28(2) | 49(5) | 73(6) | 44(4) | 20(1) | 29(3) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 1.1687(5) | 0.9853(1) | 1.1595(3) | 1.2278(6) | 1.1672(4) | 1.1501(2) |
φ | 1.5906(2) | 1.3920(1) | 2.1469(6) | 1.8565(5) | 1.7203(4) | 1.6610(3) | ||
κ | 0.7185(2) | 0.6255(1) | 0.8535(5) | 0.8632(6) | 0.8289(4) | 0.7911(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1687(5) | 0.0147(1) | 0.1595(3) | 0.2278(6) | 0.1672(4) | 0.1501(2) | |
φ | 0.2906(2) | 0.0920(1) | 0.8469(6) | 0.5565(5) | 0.4203(4) | 0.3610(3) | ||
κ | 0.2185(2) | 0.1255(1) | 0.3535(4) | 0.3632(5) | 1.3812(6) | 0.2911(3) | ||
MSE | α | 0.2171(1) | 0.2513(2) | 0.5655(6) | 0.4314(5) | 0.3657(4) | 0.3091(3) | |
φ | 0.5725(1) | 2.5172(2) | 38.3736(6) | 3.8641(3) | 3.9756(4) | 4.4224(5) | ||
κ | 0.3991(1) | 0.9812(2) | 3.3622(6) | 1.5146(4) | 1.3812(3) | 1.8538(5) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.4659(1) | 0.5013(2) | 0.7520(6) | 0.6568(5) | 0.6047(4) | 0.5559(3) | |
φ | 0.7567(1) | 1.5866(2) | 6.1946(6) | 1.9657(3) | 1.9939(4) | 2.1029(5) | ||
κ | 0.6317(1) | 0.9905(2) | 1.8336(6) | 1.2307(4) | 1.1752(3) | 1.3616(5) | ||
∑ranks | 24(2) | 18(1) | 63(6) | 57(5) | 48(4) | 42(3) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 1.0768(4) | 0.9461(1) | 1.0561(2) | 1.1320(6) | 1.0928(5) | 1.0652(3) |
φ | 1.4224(2) | 1.2463(1) | 1.5157(4) | 1.6517(6) | 1.5443(5) | 1.4523(3) | ||
κ | 0.6022(2) | 0.4996(1) | 0.6226(4) | 0.7279(6) | 0.6878(5) | 0.6203(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0768(4) | 0.0539(1) | 0.0561(2) | 0.1320(6) | 0.0928(5) | 0.0652(3) | |
φ | 0.1224(2) | 0.0537(1) | 0.2157(4) | 0.3517(6) | 0.2443(5) | 0.1523(3) | ||
κ | 0.1022(2) | 0.0004(1) | 0.1226(5) | 0.2279(6) | 0.1878(3) | 0.1203(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0831(2) | 0.0682(1) | 0.1692(4) | 0.2889(6) | 0.2350(5) | 0.1393(3) | |
φ | 0.1652(2) | 0.1829(3) | 6.2211(6) | 3.6319(5) | 2.1739(4) | 1.4473(1) | ||
κ | 0.1402(1) | 0.1508(2) | 1.0192(5) | 1.1513(6) | 0.8198(4) | 0.3606(3) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.2882(2) | 0.2612(1) | 0.4113(4) | 0.5375(6) | 0.4848(5) | 0.3732(3) | |
φ | 0.4065(1) | 0.4277(2) | 2.4942(6) | 1.9058(5) | 1.4744(4) | 1.2030(3) | ||
κ | 0.3744(1) | 0.3883(2) | 1.0096(5) | 1.0730(6) | 0.9054(4) | 0.6005(3) | ||
∑ranks | 25(2) | 17(1) | 51(4) | 70(6) | 54(5) | 35(3) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 1.0360(4) | 0.9541(1) | 1.0240(2) | 1.0588(6) | 1.0415(5) | 1.0285(3) |
φ | 1.3576(3) | 1.2478(1) | 1.3482(2) | 1.4147(6) | 1.3846(5) | 1.3593(4) | ||
κ | 0.5436(3) | 0.4775(1) | 0.5384(2) | 0.5821(6) | 0.5722(5) | 0.5493(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0360(3) | 0.0459(5) | 0.0240(1) | 0.0588(6) | 0.0415(4) | 0.0285(2) | |
φ | 0.0576(3) | 0.0522(2) | 0.0482(1) | 0.1147(6) | 0.0846(5) | 0.0593(4) | ||
κ | 0.0436(3) | 0.0225(1) | 0.0384(2) | 0.0821(6) | 0.0722(5) | 0.0493(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0329(2) | 0.0270(1) | 0.0441(3) | 0.0917(6) | 0.0824(5) | 0.0567(4) | |
φ | 0.0624(2) | 0.0455(1) | 0.0849(3) | 0.2907(6) | 0.2382(5) | 0.1839(4) | ||
κ | 0.0417(2) | 0.0291(1) | 0.0552(3) | 0.1570(6) | 0.1399(5) | 0.0947(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.1813(2) | 0.1645(1) | 0.2101(3) | 0.3028(6) | 0.2871(5) | 0.2380(4) | |
φ | 0.2498(2) | 0.2133(1) | 0.2914(3) | 0.5392(6) | 0.4881(5) | 0.4289(4) | ||
κ | 0.2041(2) | 0.1706(1) | 0.2350(3) | 0.3963(6) | 0.3741(5) | 0.3077(4) | ||
∑ranks | 31(3) | 17(1) | 28(2) | 82(6) | 59(5) | 45(4) |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 1.1024(3) | 1.1175(5) | 1.4136(6) | 1.0918(4) | 0.9769(2) | 0.9432(1) |
φ | 2.7852(4) | 5.2337(5) | 9.8213(6) | 2.7427(3) | 2.0152(2) | 1.8648(1) | ||
κ | 1.9428(1) | 4.5719(5) | 6.0877(6) | 2.7247(3) | 2.9305(4) | 2.4634(2) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.3024(4) | 0.3175(5) | 0.6136(6) | 0.2918(3) | 0.1769(2) | 0.1432(1) | |
φ | 1.2852(4) | 3.7337(5) | 8.3213(6) | 1.2427(3) | 0.5152(2) | 0.3648(1) | ||
κ | 0.9428(1) | 3.5719(5) | 5.0877(6) | 1.7247(3) | 1.9305(4) | 1.4634(2) | ||
MSE | α | 0.5045(3) | 1.4348(5) | 2.5202(6) | 0.5695(4) | 0.4175(2) | 0.3182(1) | |
φ | 7.3621(3) | 151.9961(5) | 634.1503(6) | 16.9030(4) | 6.2433(2) | 3.1990(1) | ||
κ | 7.4544(1) | 153.2414(5) | 298.9136(6) | 33.2122(3) | 40.8208(4) | 13.8077(2) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.7103(3) | 1.1978(5) | 1.5875(6) | 0.7546(4) | 0.6461(2) | 0.5641(1) | |
φ | 2.7133(3) | 12.3287(5) | 25.1823(6) | 4.1113(4) | 2.4987(2) | 1.7886(1) | ||
κ | 2.7303(1) | 12.3791(5) | 17.2891(6) | 5.7630(3) | 6.3891(4) | 3.7159(2) | ||
∑ranks | 31(2) | 60(5) | 72(6) | 41(4) | 32(3) | 16(1) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 0.8833(4) | 0.7896(1) | 0.8815(3) | 0.9182(6) | 0.8904(5) | 0.8811(2) |
φ | 1.6996(3) | 1.4800(1) | 1.8893(6) | 1.7904(5) | 1.7388(4) | 1.6990(2) | ||
κ | 1.2704(2) | 1.1696(1) | 1.4091(3) | 1.4440(5) | 1.4889(6) | 1.4167(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0833(4) | 0.0104(1) | 0.0815(3) | 0.1182(6) | 0.0904(5) | 0.0811(2) | |
φ | 0.1996(3) | 0.0200(1) | 0.3893(6) | 0.2904(5) | 0.2388(4) | 0.1990(2) | ||
κ | 0.2704(2) | 0.1696(1) | 0.4091(3) | 0.4440(5) | 0.4889(6) | 0.4167(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0794(2) | 0.0681(1) | 0.1771(6) | 0.1309(4) | 0.1464(5) | 0.1199(3) | |
φ | 0.3262(2) | 0.3085(1) | 20.5402(6) | 0.7886(3) | 1.7903(5) | 1.0740(4) | ||
κ | 0.9907(1) | 1.1406(2) | 7.5480(6) | 1.9706(3) | 4.2142(5) | 3.7125(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.2819(2) | 0.2610(1) | 0.4209(6) | 0.3618(4) | 0.3826(5) | 0.3462(3) | |
φ | 0.5711(2) | 0.5554(1) | 4.5321(6) | 0.8880(3) | 1.3380(5) | 1.0363(4) | ||
κ | 0.9907(1) | 1.0680(2) | 2.7474(6) | 1.4038(3) | 2.0528(5) | 1.9268(4) | ||
∑ranks | 28(2) | 14(1) | 60(4.5) | 62(6) | 60(4.5) | 38(3) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 0.8324(5) | 0.7737(1) | 0.8214(2) | 0.8476(6) | 0.8292(4) | 0.8239(3) |
φ | 1.5765(5) | 1.4469(1) | 1.5593(3) | 1.6181(6) | 1.5676(4) | 1.5566(2) | ||
κ | 1.1040(3) | 1.0233(1) | 1.0901(2) | 1.1638(6) | 1.1483(5) | 1.1139(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0324(5) | 0.0263(3) | 0.0214(1) | 0.0476(6) | 0.0292(4) | 0.0239(2) | |
φ | 0.0765(5) | 0.0531(1) | 0.0593(3) | 0.1181(6) | 0.0676(4) | 0.0566(2) | ||
κ | 0.1040(3) | 0.0233(1) | 0.0901(2) | 0.1638(6) | 0.1483(5) | 0.1139(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0258(2) | 0.0222(1) | 0.0298(3) | 0.0507(6) | 0.0445(5) | 0.0323(4) | |
φ | 0.0948(2) | 0.0745(1) | 0.1090(3) | 0.2038(6) | 0.1641(5) | 0.1151(4) | ||
κ | 0.2745(2) | 0.0233(1) | 0.2965(3) | 0.5554(6) | 0.4886(5) | 0.3328(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.1607(2) | 0.1491(1) | 0.1727(3) | 0.2251(6) | 0.2109(5) | 0.1797(4) | |
φ | 0.3079(2) | 0.2729(1) | 0.3301(3) | 0.4514(6) | 0.4051(5) | 0.3392(4) | ||
κ | 0.5240(2) | 0.4679(1) | 0.5445(3) | 0.7453(6) | 0.6990(5) | 0.5769(4) | ||
∑ranks | 38(3) | 14(1) | 31(2) | 72(6) | 56(5) | 41(4) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 0.8155(5) | 0.7798(1) | 0.8117(3) | 0.8206(6) | 0.8122(4) | 0.8102(2) |
φ | 1.5382(5) | 1.4621(1) | 1.5325(3) | 1.5549(6) | 1.5328(4) | 1.5277(2) | ||
κ | 1.0486(3) | 0.9959(1) | 1.0469(2) | 1.0692(6) | 1.0643(5) | 1.0491(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0155(4) | 0.0202(5) | 0.0117(2) | 0.0206(6) | 0.0122(3) | 0.0102(1) | |
φ | 0.0382(5) | 0.0359(4) | 0.0325(2) | 0.0549(6) | 0.0328(3) | 0.0277(1) | ||
κ | 0.0486(3) | 0.0041(1) | 0.0469(2) | 0.0692(6) | 0.0643(5) | 0.0491(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0110(2) | 0.0109(1) | 0.0141(3) | 0.0204(6) | 0.0193(5) | 0.0144(4) | |
φ | 0.0380(2) | 0.0359(1) | 0.0460(3) | 0.0648(6) | 0.0597(5) | 0.0466(4) | ||
κ | 0.1041(2) | 0.0949(1) | 0.1258(3) | 0.1858(6) | 0.1794(5) | 0.1280(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.1049(1.5) | 0.1049(1.5) | 0.1186(3) | 0.1427(6) | 0.1390(5) | 0.1198(4) | |
φ | 0.1950(2) | 0.1894(1) | 0.2144(3) | 0.2546(6) | 0.2443(5) | 0.2158(4) | ||
κ | 0.3227(2) | 0.3080(1) | 0.3547(3) | 0.4310(6) | 0.4236(5) | 0.3578(4) | ||
∑ranks | 36.5(3) | 19.5(1) | 32(2) | 72(6) | 64(5) | 38(4) |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 2.8336(3) | 2.5944(1) | 3.1558(5) | 3.3131(6) | 2.8120(2) | 2.9230(4) |
φ | 2.0036(1) | 8.0269(5) | 19.3064(6) | 5.4068(4) | 4.1680(2) | 4.4550(3) | ||
κ | 1.4579(1) | 3.2311(5) | 3.6263(6) | 3.0043(4) | 2.8950(2) | 2.9920(3) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.8336(3) | 0.5944(1) | 1.1558(5) | 1.3131(6) | 0.8124(2) | 0.9231(4) | |
φ | 1.0036(1) | 7.0269(5) | 18.3064(6) | 4.4068(4) | 3.1675(2) | 3.4554(3) | ||
κ | 0.7579(1) | 2.5311(5) | 2.9263(6) | 2.3043(4) | 2.1952(2) | 2.2918(3) | ||
MSE | α | 2.1274(1) | 6.7714(5) | 9.2849(6) | 5.0302(4) | 3.5630(2) | 3.9500(3) | |
φ | 3.3320(1) | 648.1073(5) | 3383.9749(6) | 204.2319(4) | 177.4580(3) | 152.0100(2) | ||
κ | 2.8070(1) | 49.8495(5) | 60.4505(6) | 28.6379(3) | 27.8840(2) | 33.0500(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 1.4586(1) | 2.6022(5) | 3.0471(6) | 2.2428(4) | 1.8870(2) | 1.9870(3) | |
φ | 1.8254(1) | 25.4580(5) | 58.1719(6) | 14.2910(4) | 13.3210(3) | 12.3290(2) | ||
κ | 1.6754(1) | 7.0404(5) | 7.7750(6) | 5.3514(3) | 5.2800(2) | 5.7490(4) | ||
∑ranks | 16(1) | 52(5) | 70(6) | 50(4) | 26(2) | 38(3) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 2.2547(3) | 1.8578(1) | 2.1777(2) | 2.5788(6) | 2.4490(5) | 2.3520(4) |
φ | 1.2645(2) | 1.0723(1) | 1.5965(3) | 2.3717(6) | 2.1870(5) | 2.0330(4) | ||
κ | 0.9587(2) | 0.7912(1) | 1.0157(3) | 1.4816(6) | 1.4490(5) | 1.2750(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.2547(3) | 0.1422(1) | 0.1777(2) | 0.5788(6) | 0.4486(5) | 0.3518(4) | |
φ | 0.2645(2) | 0.0723(1) | 0.5965(3) | 1.3717(6) | 1.1873(5) | 1.0332(4) | ||
κ | 0.2587(2) | 0.0912(1) | 0.3157(3) | 0.7816(6) | 0.7489(5) | 0.5751(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.4982(1) | 0.6380(2) | 0.8915(3) | 1.6694(6) | 1.5060(5) | 1.1900(4) | |
φ | 0.4962(1) | 1.4375(2) | 32.6387(5) | 30.5760(4) | 28.1190(3) | 49.6000(6) | ||
κ | 0.5600(1) | 0.7722(2) | 1.7465(3) | 3.9829(5) | 4.1170(6) | 3.2910(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.7058(1) | 0.7988(2) | 0.9442(3) | 1.2921(6) | 1.2270(5) | 1.0910(4) | |
φ | 0.7044(1) | 1.1990(2) | 5.7130(5) | 5.5296(4) | 5.3030(3) | 7.0430(6) | ||
κ | 0.7483(1) | 0.8788(2) | 1.3215(3) | 1.9957(5) | 2.0290(6) | 1.8140(4) | ||
∑ranks | 20(2) | 18(1) | 28(3) | 64(6) | 58(5) | 52(4) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 2.1444(3) | 1.8589(1) | 2.0854(2) | 2.3221(6) | 2.2590(5) | 2.1566(4) |
φ | 1.1384(3) | 0.9579(1) | 1.1305(2) | 1.6180(5) | 1.5510(4) | 1.6937(6) | ||
κ | 0.1510(1) | 0.6947(2) | 0.8403(3) | 1.1163(6) | 1.0970(5) | 0.9608(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1444(3) | 0.1411(2) | 0.0854(1) | 0.3221(6) | 0.2591(5) | 0.1566(4) | |
φ | 0.1384(3) | 0.0421(1) | 0.1305(2) | 0.6180(5) | 0.5507(4) | 0.6937(6) | ||
κ | 0.1510(3) | 0.0053(1) | 0.1403(2) | 0.4163(6) | 0.3975(5) | 0.2608(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.2375(1) | 0.2656(2) | 0.3276(3) | 0.8324(6) | 0.7795(5) | 0.5226(4) | |
φ | 0.1731(2) | 0.1389(1) | 0.3441(3) | 9.3730(5) | 9.3187(4) | 168.1577(6) | ||
κ | 0.2335(2) | 0.2183(1) | 0.3689(3) | 1.5424(5) | 1.5302(4) | 1.6901(6) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.4873(1) | 0.5154(2) | 0.5724(3) | 0.9123(6) | 0.8829(5) | 0.7229(4) | |
φ | 0.4161(2) | 0.3728(1) | 0.5866(3) | 3.0615(5) | 3.0526(4) | 12.9676(6) | ||
κ | 0.4832(2) | 0.4672(1) | 0.6074(3) | 1.2420(5) | 1.2370(4) | 1.3001(6) | ||
∑ranks | 26(2) | 16(1) | 30(3) | 66(6) | 54(4) | 60(5) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 2.0655(4) | 1.8856(1) | 2.0368(2) | 2.1254(6) | 2.0920(5) | 2.0566(3) |
φ | 1.0615(3) | 0.9484(1) | 1.0528(2) | 1.1499(6) | 1.1250(5) | 1.0714(4) | ||
κ | 0.7647(3) | 0.6606(1) | 0.7589(2) | 0.8454(6) | 0.8340(5) | 0.7822(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0655(3) | 0.1144(5) | 0.0368(1) | 0.1254(6) | 0.0922(4) | 0.0566(2) | |
φ | 0.0615(3) | 0.0516(1) | 0.0528(2) | 0.1499(6) | 0.1246(5) | 0.0714(4) | ||
κ | 0.0647(3) | 0.0394(1) | 0.0589(2) | 0.1454(6) | 0.1340(5) | 0.0822(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.1055(1) | 0.1232(2) | 0.1489(3) | 0.2735(6) | 0.2627(5) | 0.1648(4) | |
φ | 0.0582(2) | 0.0498(1) | 0.0816(3) | 0.2593(6) | 0.2387(5) | 0.1083(4) | ||
κ | 0.0765(2) | 0.0688(1) | 0.1080(3) | 0.2400(6) | 0.2333(5) | 0.1343(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.3248(1) | 0.3509(2) | 0.3858(3) | 0.5229(6) | 0.5126(5) | 0.4059(4) | |
φ | 0.2412(2) | 0.2231(1) | 0.2857(3) | 0.5092(6) | 0.4886(5) | 0.3290(4) | ||
κ | 0.2766(2) | 0.2622(1) | 0.3286(3) | 0.4899(6) | 0.4830(5) | 0.3665(4) | ||
∑ranks | 25(2) | 18(1) | 29(3) | 72(6) | 59(5) | 45(4) |
n | Measures | Pa. | ML | MPS | ANDA | CVM | OLS | WLS |
10 | AVE | α | 1.9113(4) | 1.8080(3) | 2.1893(6) | 2.0102(5) | 1.6790(1) | 1.7030(2) |
φ | 3.4196(3) | 6.6547(5) | 13.4896(6) | 4.6929(4) | 3.1980(1.5) | 3.1980(1.5) | ||
κ | 1.6351(1) | 2.9747(5) | 3.4465(6) | 2.4926(4) | 2.2030(3) | 2.1720(2) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.4113(4) | 0.3080(3) | 0.6893(6) | 0.5102(5) | 0.1787(1) | 0.2032(2) | |
φ | 1.4196(3) | 4.6547(5) | 11.4896(6) | 2.6929(4) | 1.1978(1) | 1.1980(2) | ||
κ | 0.6351(1) | 1.9747(5) | 2.4465(6) | 1.4926(4) | 1.2034(3) | 1.1716(2) | ||
MSE | α | 0.8424(1) | 2.6556(5) | 4.2739(6) | 1.6544(4) | 1.0310(2) | 1.0990(3) | |
φ | 6.2459(1) | 242.8573(5) | 1099.2808(6) | 63.1670(4) | 34.3340(2) | 36.4950(3) | ||
κ | 2.8238(1) | 37.3047(5) | 47.8131(6) | 17.0243(4) | 12.9340(3) | 10.7970(2) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.9178(1) | 1.6296(5) | 2.0673(6) | 1.2862(4) | 1.0150(3) | 1.0480(2) | |
φ | 2.4992(1) | 15.5839(5) | 33.1554(6) | 7.9478(4) | 5.8600(2) | 6.0410(3) | ||
κ | 1.6804(1) | 6.1078(5) | 6.9147(6) | 4.1261(4) | 3.5960(3) | 3.2860(2) | ||
∑ranks | 22(1) | 56(5) | 72(6) | 50(4) | 25.5(2) | 26.5(3) | ||
50 | AVE | α | 1.6952(2) | 1.4342(1) | 1.8042(5) | 1.8992(6) | 1.7690(3) | 1.8000(4) |
φ | 2.4984(2) | 2.1884(1) | 4.9115(6) | 3.7973(4) | 3.1380(3) | 3.3830(5) | ||
κ | 1.3226(2) | 1.1667(1) | 1.9301(6) | 1.8651(5) | 1.7060(3) | 1.7400(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1952(2) | 0.0658(1) | 0.3042(5) | 0.3992(6) | 0.2692(3) | 0.3001(4) | |
φ | 0.4984(2) | 0.1884(1) | 2.9115(6) | 1.7973(5) | 1.1377(3) | 1.3826(4) | ||
κ | 0.3226(2) | 0.1667(1) | 0.9301(6) | 0.8651(5) | 0.7060(3) | 0.7402(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.3337(1) | 0.5070(2) | 1.5355(6) | 1.0502(5) | 0.7593(3) | 0.8669(4) | |
φ | 1.5498(1) | 4.0449(2) | 155.5950(6) | 60.8746(5) | 17.0518(3) | 29.0772(4) | ||
κ | 0.9269(1) | 1.7944(2) | 11.4674(6) | 6.4988(5) | 4.3962(3) | 5.1792(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.5776(1) | 0.7120(2) | 1.2391(6) | 1.0248(5) | 0.8714(3) | 0.9311(4) | |
φ | 1.2449(1) | 2.0112(2) | 12.4738(6) | 7.8022(5) | 4.1294(4) | 5.3923(3) | ||
κ | 0.9627(1) | 1.3396(2) | 3.3864(6) | 2.5493(5) | 2.0967(3) | 2.2758(4) | ||
∑ranks | 18(1.5) | 18(1.5) | 70(6) | 61(5) | 37(3) | 48(4) | ||
100 | AVE | α | 1.6264(2) | 1.3950(1) | 1.6954(3) | 1.7879(6) | 1.7060(4) | 1.7390(5) |
φ | 2.3116(2) | 1.9354(1) | 3.4363(6) | 3.2511(5) | 2.8230(3) | 3.0510(4) | ||
κ | 1.2179(2) | 0.9918(1) | 1.5569(4) | 1.6311(6) | 1.5010(3) | 1.5570(5) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.1264(2) | 0.1050(1) | 0.1954(3) | 0.2879(6) | 0.2062(4) | 0.2393(5) | |
φ | 0.3116(2) | 0.0646(1) | 1.4363(6) | 1.2511(5) | 0.8234(3) | 1.0510(4) | ||
κ | 0.2179(2) | 0.0082(1) | 0.5569(5) | 0.6311(6) | 0.5009(3) | 0.5567(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.2014(1) | 0.4738(2) | 0.8545(6) | 0.7787(5) | 0.5939(3) | 0.6521(4) | |
φ | 0.8984(1) | 0.9734(2) | 56.0050(6) | 25.6484(5) | 9.4794(3) | 21.8101(4) | ||
κ | 0.5434(1) | 0.6022(2) | 5.2431(6) | 3.9995(5) | 2.7885(3) | 3.5394(4) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.4488(1) | 0.4738(2) | 0.9244(6) | 0.8824(5) | 0.7706(3) | 0.8075(4) | |
φ | 0.9478(1) | 0.9734(2) | 7.4836(6) | 5.0644(5) | 3.0789(3) | 4.6701(4) | ||
κ | 0.7372(1) | 0.7760(2) | 2.2898(6) | 1.9999(5) | 1.6699(3) | 1.8813(4) | ||
∑ranks | 18(1.5) | 18(1.5) | 63(5) | 64(6) | 38(3) | 51(4) | ||
200 | AVE | α | 1.5676(2) | 1.4003(1) | 1.5936(3) | 1.6640(6) | 1.6350(5) | 1.6210(4) |
φ | 2.1555(2) | 1.8840(1) | 2.4471(3) | 2.5978(6) | 2.5470(5) | 2.4900(4) | ||
κ | 1.1155(2) | 0.9290(1) | 1.2360(3) | 1.3342(6) | 1.2990(5) | 1.2790(4) | ||
AVAB | α | 0.0676(1) | 0.0997(3) | 0.0936(2) | 0.1640(6) | 0.1254(5) | 0.1210(4) | |
φ | 0.1555(2) | 0.1160(1) | 0.4471(3) | 0.5978(6) | 0.5470(5) | 0.4895(4) | ||
κ | 0.1155(2) | 0.0710(1) | 0.2360(3) | 0.3342(6) | 0.2988(5) | 0.2790(4) | ||
MSE | α | 0.0927(1) | 0.0972(2) | 0.3192(3) | 0.4075(6) | 0.3785(5) | 0.3419(4) | |
φ | 0.3186(2) | 0.2844(1) | 8.2814(5) | 5.1207(3) | 10.0634(6) | 5.8513(4) | ||
κ | 0.2216(2) | 0.1781(1) | 1.5037(5) | 1.4824(4) | 1.5757(6) | 1.4326(3) | ||
RMSE | α | 0.3045(2) | 0.3117(1) | 0.5650(3) | 0.6384(6) | 0.6152(5) | 0.5847(4) | |
φ | 0.5645(2) | 0.5333(1) | 2.8777(5) | 2.2629(3) | 3.1723(6) | 2.4190(4) | ||
κ | 0.4708(2) | 0.4221(1) | 1.2263(5) | 1.2175(4) | 1.2553(6) | 1.1969(3) | ||
∑ranks | 22(2) | 15(1) | 43(3) | 62(5) | 64(6) | 46(4) |
Model | Par | MLE (SE) | -LL | AIC | K-S | p-value |
EHLST | ˆα | 3.2407(0.5773) | 588.256 | 1182.513 | 0.070 | 0.263 |
ˆφ | 67.8208(27.2116) | |||||
ˆκ | 217.1097(81.7760) | |||||
EHLL | ˆα | 4.2120(2.2915) | 590.130 | 1188.260 | 0.077 | 0.165 |
ˆβ | 9.9874(1.6320) | |||||
ˆa | 4.2120(2.2951) | |||||
ˆb | 0.0186(0.0047) | |||||
EHLF | ˆα | 1.2744(0.4305) | 585.933 | 1179.867 | 0.069 | 0.267 |
ˆλ | 26.4325(15.3670) | |||||
ˆa | 0.7669(0.1661) | |||||
ˆb | 48.0005(23.9203) | |||||
EHLLL | ˆα | 0.5109(0.4213) | 583.900 | 1175.800 | 0.052 | 0.627 |
ˆλ | 0.7105(0.6145) | |||||
ˆa | 11.3008(0.9864) | |||||
ˆb | 7.5646(5.2527) |
Model | Par | MPS (SE) | LL | AIC | K-S | p-value |
EHLST | ˆα | 3.1763(0.0286) | −590.015 | 1186.000 | 0.069 | 0.269 |
ˆφ | 64.0223(1.7981) | |||||
ˆκ | 218.3550(4.2330) | |||||
EHLL | ˆα | 3.3253(0.0749) | −592.43 | 1192.900 | 0.089 | 0.072 |
ˆβ | 9.9379(0.1238) | |||||
ˆa | 3.3075(0.0745) | |||||
ˆb | 0.0318(0.0007) | |||||
EHLF | ˆα | 1.4956(0.3689) | −587.234 | 1182.500 | 0.068 | 0.300 |
ˆλ | 30.5011(13.4873) | |||||
ˆa | 0.7660(0.0970) | |||||
ˆb | 50.1275(26.6395) | |||||
EHLLL | ˆα | 0.5220(0.2593) | −585.169 | 1178.300 | 0.059 | 0.460 |
ˆλ | 0.8105(0.58140) | |||||
ˆa | 11.5673(0.7104) | |||||
ˆb | 6.9976 (7.3261) |
INF | |
Number of observations | 223 |
Mean | 0.2121 |
Median | 0.4906 |
Minimum | −104.1454 |
Maximum | 53.2217 |
Standard Deviation | 14.3681 |
Skewness | −1.3377 |
Kurtosis | 13.1953 |
Jarque-Bera | 1721.3 (p < 0.001) |
ARCH (2) | 15.406 (p < 0.001) |
GARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
Pa. | NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST |
μ | 0.6403 | 0.5656 | 0.6504'***' | 0.5158 | 0.3304 | 0.3277'***' | 0.4667 | 0.3513 | 0.1605 | 0.3589 | 0.1824 |
ω | 0.0900 | 0.7026 | 1.0661 | 0.1468'*' | 0.9007 | 1.4755'***' | 0.8444 | 1.0241'.' | 0.9637'.' | 1.2821'.' | 0.1891 |
η1 | 0.0602'*' | 0.2777'*' | 0.2536'.' | 0.0586'***' | 0.3115'*' | 0.2957'***' | 0.2904'*' | 0.3100'*' | 0.2876'*' | 0.3088'*' | 0.1112 |
η2 | 0.9292'***' | 0.7213'***' | 0.7454'***' | 0.9289'***' | 0.6875'***' | 0.7033'***' | 0.7086'***' | 0.6889'***' | 0.7114'***' | 0.6902'***' | 0.6069'***' |
η3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
α | - | - | - | 0.9423'***' | - | - | 0.2500 | - | 8.1967'***' | 0.6823'.' | 1.7778'***' |
ξ | - | - | - | - | 0.8956'***' | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ν | - | 4.1458'***' | 0.9782'***' | - | 4.1743'***' | 0.8941'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
η | - | - | - | - | - | 0.9696'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
β | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.3260 | - | -1.1452'' | -0.1358 | - |
λ | - | - | - | - | - | - | -1.9370'*' | - | - | - | - |
υ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.1940 | - | - | - |
ϑ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.3328'***' | - | - | - |
φ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.2070'***' |
κ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6.6593 |
GJRGARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
Pa. | NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST |
μ | 0.8364'.' | 0.5669'.' | 0.6504'***' | 0.7550'' | 0.3233 | 0.3215'***' | 0.4650 | 0.3452 | -0.0555 | 0.3574 | 0.2001 |
ω | 0.0000 | 0.6843 | 1.1503 | 0.0000 | 0.8795 | 1.4925'***' | 0.8253 | 1.0071 | 1.2293'.' | 1.2783'' | 0.2750 |
η1 | 0.0864'*' | 0.2833'*' | 0.2414'.' | 0.0804'*' | 0.3254'*' | 0.2893'***' | 0.2978'*' | 0.3194'*' | 0.2800'*' | 0.3105'.' | 0.1692 |
η2 | 0.9397'***' | 0.7255'***' | 0.7322'***' | 0.9402'***' | 0.6912'***' | 0.7004'***' | 0.7125'***' | 0.6918'***' | 0.7322'***' | 0.6908'***' | 0.6113'***' |
η3 | −0.0643 | −0.0195 | 0.0508 | −0.0562 | −0.0371 | 0.0200 | −0.0232 | −0.0258 | −0.0292 | −0.0049 | −0.0004 |
α | - | - | - | 0.9651'***' | - | - | 0.2500 | - | 8.1943'***' | 0.6824'*' | 1.7571'***' |
ξ | - | - | - | - | 0.8923'***' | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ν | - | 4.1432'***' | 0.9821'***' | - | 4.1776'***' | 0.8923'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
η | - | - | - | - | - | 0.9694'***' | - | - | - | - | - |
β | - | - | - | - | - | - | −0.3324 | - | -1.8837'.' | −0.1365 | - |
λ | - | - | - | - | - | - | −1.9378'**' | - | - | - | - |
υ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.1988 | - | - | - |
ϑ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.3332'***' | - | - | - |
φ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1858'***' |
κ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4.2176 |
Significance level 0'***', 0.01'*', 0.05'*', 0.1'', 1 |
Model | Log-Likelihood | AIC | BIC |
GARCH-NORM | −808.135 | 7.2837 | 7.3448 |
GARCH-STD | −772.170 | 6.9701 | 7.0665 |
GARCH-GED | −776.818 | 7.0118 | 7.0882 |
GARCH-SNORM | −807.730 | 7.2891 | 7.3655 |
GARCH-SSTD | −771.494 | 6.9730 | 7.0647 |
GARCH-SGED | −775.870 | 7.0123 | 7.1040 |
GARCH-GHYP | −772.006 | 6.9866 | 7.0936 |
GARCH-JSU | −772.083 | 6.9783 | 7.0700 |
GARCH-GHST | −778.603 | 7.0368 | 7.1285 |
GARCH- NIG | −773.341 | 6.9896 | 7.0813 |
GARCH- EHLST | −768.492 | 6.9551 | 7.0620 |
GJRGARCH-NORM | −807.280 | 7.2850 | 7.3614 |
GJRGARCH-STD | −772.159 | 6.9790 | 7.0900 |
GJRGARCH-GED | −776.764 | 7.0203 | 7.1120 |
GJRGARCH-SNORM | −807.129 | 7.2926 | 7.3843 |
GJRGARCH-SSTD | −771.455 | 6.9817 | 7.0923 |
GJRGARCH-SGED | −775.843 | 7.0210 | 7.1280 |
GJRGARCH-GHYP | −771.991 | 6.9954 | 7.1177 |
GJRGARCH-JSU | −772.066 | 6.9871 | 7.0941 |
GJRGARCH-GHST | −781.977 | 7.0760 | 7.1830 |
GJRGARCH- NIG | −773.340 | 6.9986 | 7.1055 |
GJRGARCH- EHLST | −768.846 | 6.9672 | 7.0895 |
Model | Ljung-Box Statistic |
p-value | ARCH-LM Statistic | p-value |
GARCH-NORM | 3.331 | 0.9725 | 2.932 | 0.9830 |
GARCH-STD | 1.542 | 0.9988 | 1.715 | 0.9981 |
GARCH-GED | 1.797 | 0.9977 | 1.991 | 0.9964 |
GARCH-SNORM | 3.226 | 0.9756 | 2.848 | 0.9848 |
GARCH-SSTD | 1.735 | 0.9980 | 1.982 | 0.9965 |
GARCH-SGED | 1.891 | 0.9971 | 2.141 | 0.9951 |
GARCH-GHYP | 1.679 | 0.9983 | 1.893 | 0.9971 |
GARCH-JSU | 1.810 | 0.9976 | 2.073 | 0.9958 |
GARCH-GHST | 1.800 | 0.9977 | 2.033 | 0.9961 |
GARCH- NIG | 1.898 | 0.9965 | 2.176 | 0.9948 |
GARCH- EHLST | 1.511 | 0.9989 | 1.774 | 0.9978 |
GJRGARCH-NORM | 4.328 | 0.9313 | 3.617 | 0.9630 |
GJRGARCH-STD | 1.545 | 0.9988 | 1.714 | 0.9981 |
GJRGARCH-GED | 1.832 | 0.9975 | 2.054 | 0.9959 |
GJRGARCH-SNORM | 4.292 | 0.9332 | 3.610 | 0.9632 |
GJRGARCH-SSTD | 3.429 | 0.9991 | 1.997 | 0.9964 |
GJRGARCH-SGED | 1.903 | 0.9970 | 2.165 | 0.9949 |
GJRGARCH-GHYP | 1.684 | 0.9982 | 1.895 | 0.9971 |
GJRGARCH-JSU | 1.815 | 0.9976 | 2.075 | 0.9957 |
GJRGARCH-GHST | 1.849 | 0.9974 | 2.038 | 0.9960 |
GJRGARCH- NIG | 1.897 | 0.9971 | 2.172 | 0.9948 |
GJRGARCH- EHLST | 1.472 | 0.9990 | 1.711 | 0.9981 |
Model | MSE | RMSE | MAE |
GARCH-NORM | 112.720 | 10.617 | 7.011 |
GARCH-STD | 122.686 | 11.076 | 6.671 |
GARCH-GED | 122.269 | 11.057 | 6.776 |
GARCH-SNORM | 111.427 | 10.556 | 6.952 |
GARCH-SSTD | 123.930 | 11.132 | 6.650 |
GARCH-SGED | 123.902 | 11.131 | 6.764 |
GARCH-GHYP | 123.204 | 11.100 | 6.673 |
GARCH-JSU | 123.939 | 11.133 | 6.670 |
GARCH-GHST | 123.355 | 11.106 | 6.693 |
GARCH- NIG | 124.100 | 11.140 | 6.712 |
GARCH- EHLST | 109.109 | 10.445 | 5.396 |
GJRGARCH-NORM | 156.588 | 12.513 | 9.119 |
GJRGARCH-STD | 124.678 | 11.166 | 6.757 |
GJRGARCH-GED | 117.606 | 10.845 | 6.555 |
GJRGARCH-SNORM | 149.356 | 12.221 | 8.828 |
GJRGARCH-SSTD | 127.418 | 11.288 | 6.791 |
GJRGARCH-SGED | 122.197 | 11.054 | 6.686 |
GJRGARCH-GHYP | 125.462 | 11.201 | 6.768 |
GJRGARCH-JSU | 126.321 | 11.239 | 6.768 |
GJRGARCH-GHST | 126.353 | 11.241 | 6.911 |
GJRGARCH- NIG | 124.527 | 11.159 | 6.730 |
GJRGARCH- EHLST | 104.874 | 10.241 | 5.446 |
GARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST | |
MSE | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 1 |
RMSE | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 1 |
MAE | 11 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 1 |
TOTAL | 17 | 14 | 17 | 14 | 20 | 24 | 17 | 23 | 20 | 29 | 3 |
GJRGARCH (1, 1) | |||||||||||
NORM | STD | GED | SNORM | SSTD | SGED | GHYP | JSU | GHST | NIG | EHLST | |
MSE | 11 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
RMSE | 11 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
MAE | 11 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 9 | 4 | 1 |
TOTAL | 33 | 15 | 6 | 30 | 26 | 9 | 18.5 | 20.5 | 25 | 12 | 3 |