Modelling random antibody adsorption and immunoassay activity

  • Received: 01 December 2015 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 01 August 2016
  • MSC : Primary: 97M60, 92C50, 92C45; Secondary: 60K40, 92C40.

  • One of the primary considerations in immunoassay design is optimizingthe concentrationof capture antibodyin order to achieve maximal antigen binding and, subsequently, improved sensitivityand limit of detection.Many immunoassay technologies involve immobilizationof theantibody to solid surfaces.Antibodies are large molecules in whichthe position and accessibility of the antigen-binding sitedepend on their orientation and packing density.
       In this paper we propose a simple mathematical model, based on the theoryknown as random sequential adsorption (RSA), in order tocalculate how the concentration ofcorrectly oriented antibodies (active site exposed forsubsequent reactions) evolves during the deposition process.It has been suggested by experimental studies that high concentrationswill decrease assay performance, due to molecule denaturation andobstruction of active binding sites. However, crowding of antibodies can alsohave the opposite effect by favouring upright orientations.A specific aim of our model is topredict which of thesecompeting effects prevails under different experimental conditionsand study the existence of an optimalcoverage, which yields the maximum expectedconcentration of activeparticles (and hence the highest signal).

    Citation: D. Mackey, E. Kelly, R. Nooney. Modelling random antibody adsorption and immunoassay activity[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2016, 13(6): 1159-1168. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016036

    Related Papers:

    [1] A. M. Elaiw, Raghad S. Alsulami, A. D. Hobiny . Global dynamics of IAV/SARS-CoV-2 coinfection model with eclipse phase and antibody immunity. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 3873-3917. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023182
    [2] Sarah Kadelka, Stanca M Ciupe . Mathematical investigation of HBeAg seroclearance. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 7616-7658. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019382
    [3] Eric Salgado, Yanguang Cao . Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutic antibodies in tumors and tumor-draining lymph nodes. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(1): 112-131. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021006
    [4] Emilio N. M. Cirillo, Matteo Colangeli, Adrian Muntean, T. K. Thoa Thieu . A lattice model for active-passive pedestrian dynamics: a quest for drafting effects. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(1): 460-477. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020025
    [5] Tae Jin Lee, Jose A. Vazquez, Arni S. R. Srinivasa Rao . Mathematical modeling of impact of eCD4-Ig molecule in control and management of HIV within a host. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 6887-6906. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021342
    [6] A. M. Elaiw, N. H. AlShamrani, A. D. Hobiny . Stability of an adaptive immunity delayed HIV infection model with active and silent cell-to-cell spread. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 6401-6458. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020337
    [7] Songfeng Liu, Jinyan Wang, Wenliang Zhang . Federated personalized random forest for human activity recognition. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(1): 953-971. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022044
    [8] Yuyang Xiao, Juan Shen, Xiufen Zou . Mathematical modeling and dynamical analysis of anti-tumor drug dose-response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(4): 4120-4144. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022190
    [9] Abulajiang Aili, Zhidong Teng, Long Zhang . Dynamical behavior of a coupling SEIR epidemic model with transmission in body and vitro, incubation and environmental effects. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 505-533. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023023
    [10] Kuo-Sheng Huang, Yu-Chiau Shyu, Chih-Lang Lin, Feng-Bin Wang . Mathematical analysis of an HBV model with antibody and spatial heterogeneity. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1820-1837. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020096
  • One of the primary considerations in immunoassay design is optimizingthe concentrationof capture antibodyin order to achieve maximal antigen binding and, subsequently, improved sensitivityand limit of detection.Many immunoassay technologies involve immobilizationof theantibody to solid surfaces.Antibodies are large molecules in whichthe position and accessibility of the antigen-binding sitedepend on their orientation and packing density.
       In this paper we propose a simple mathematical model, based on the theoryknown as random sequential adsorption (RSA), in order tocalculate how the concentration ofcorrectly oriented antibodies (active site exposed forsubsequent reactions) evolves during the deposition process.It has been suggested by experimental studies that high concentrationswill decrease assay performance, due to molecule denaturation andobstruction of active binding sites. However, crowding of antibodies can alsohave the opposite effect by favouring upright orientations.A specific aim of our model is topredict which of thesecompeting effects prevails under different experimental conditionsand study the existence of an optimalcoverage, which yields the maximum expectedconcentration of activeparticles (and hence the highest signal).


    [1] J. Math. Biol., 55 (2007), 517-539.
    [2] Rev. Mod. Phys., 65 (1993), 1281.
    [3] Analyst, 136 (2011), 2533-2541.
    [4] Phys. Rev. E, 65 (2002), 045103.
    [5] J. Stat. Phys., 69 (1992), 135-150.
    [6] Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci, 3 (1958), 109-127.
    [7] Genome Research, 10 (2000), 1020-1030.
    [8] Anal. Chem., 86 (2014), 8158-8166.
    [9] Anal. Biochem., 205 (1992), 47-56.
    [10] Colloids Surf. A, 165 (2000), 287-324.
    [11] Anal. Chem., 77 (2005), 2426-2431.
    [12] 3rd edition, Elsevier, 2005.
    [13] Langmuir, 28 (2012), 1765-1774.
    [14] J. Phys. Chem. B, 110 (2006), 1907-1914.
    [15] Langmuir, 22 (2006), 6313-6320.
    [16] Langmuir, 27 (2011), 7654-7662.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. George Tsekenis, Marianneza Chatzipetrou, Maria Massaouti, Ioanna Zergioti, Comparative Assessment of Affinity-Based Techniques for Oriented Antibody Immobilization towards Immunosensor Performance Optimization, 2019, 2019, 1687-725X, 1, 10.1155/2019/6754398
    2. Dana Mackey, Eilís Kelly, Robert Nooney, Richard O'Kennedy, Direct immunoassays and their performance – theoretical modelling of the effects of antibody orientation and associated kinetics, 2018, 10, 1757-9694, 598, 10.1039/C8IB00077H
    3. Dana Mackey, Eilis Kelly, Robert Nooney, 2017, Chapter 103, 978-3-319-63081-6, 687, 10.1007/978-3-319-63082-3_103
    4. Lewis Roberts, Thom Griffith, Alan Champneys, Martina Piano, Janice Kiely, Richard Luxton, Mathematical modelling of a magnetic immunoassay, 2017, 82, 0272-4960, 1253, 10.1093/imamat/hxx034
    5. Elizabeth A. Campbell, Katily Ramirez, Meghana Holegadde, Nayana Yeshlur, Akram Khaja, Todd A. Sulchek, Tuning Antibody Presentation to Enhance T-Cell Activation for Downstream Cytotoxicity, 2021, 0743-7463, 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03203
    6. Tamás Pfeil, Blanka Herbály, A linear model for polyclonal antibody–antigen reactions, 2022, 198, 03784754, 20, 10.1016/j.matcom.2022.02.004
    7. Jianguo Chang, Nailong Gao, Peng Dai, Ziming Zhu, Hui You, Wei Han, Lu Li, Facile engineered polymeric microdevice via co-coupling of phenylboronic acid and Protein A for oriented antibody immobilization enables substantial signal enhancement for an enhanced fluorescence immunoassay, 2021, 346, 09254005, 130444, 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130444
    8. Hamid Aghamohammadi, Seied Ali Hosseini, Sanjana Srikant, Alexander Wong, Mahla Poudineh, Computational and Experimental Model to Study Immunobead-Based Assays in Microfluidic Mixing Platforms, 2022, 94, 0003-2700, 2087, 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04228
    9. Jiewen Chen, Guangshuai Yao, Chundong Huang, Qidong Shen, Jian Miao, Lingyun Jia, Biparatopic Nanobody-Based Immunosorbent for the Highly Selective Elimination of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, 2024, 2373-9878, 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01765
    10. Song Liu, Xiaolu Li, Huyang Gao, Jing Chen, Hongfeng Jiang, Progress in Aptamer Research and Future Applications, 2025, 2191-1363, 10.1002/open.202400463
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2443) PDF downloads(511) Cited by(10)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog