
Binary options have a payoff that is either a fixed value or nothing at all. In this paper, the generalized pricing formulas of binary options, including European binary call options, European binary put options, American binary call options and American binary put options, are investigated in uncertain financial markets. By applying the Liu's stock model to describe the stock price, the explicit pricing formulas of binary options are derived successfully. Besides, the corresponding numerical examples for the above four kinds of binary options are discussed in this paper.
Citation: Ming Yang, Yin Gao. Pricing formulas of binary options in uncertain financial markets[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23336-23351. doi: 10.3934/math.20231186
[1] | Hua Zhao, Yue Xin, Jinwu Gao, Yin Gao . Power-barrier option pricing formulas in uncertain financial market with floating interest rate. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20395-20414. doi: 10.3934/math.20231040 |
[2] | Guiwen Lv, Ping Xu, Yanxue Zhang . Pricing of vulnerable options based on an uncertain CIR interest rate model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11113-11130. doi: 10.3934/math.2023563 |
[3] | Hanjie Liu, Yuanguo Zhu, Yiyu Liu . European option pricing problem based on a class of Caputo-Hadamard uncertain fractional differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15633-15650. doi: 10.3934/math.2023798 |
[4] | Javed Hussain, Saba Shahid, Tareq Saeed . Pricing forward-start style exotic options under uncertain stock models with periodic dividends. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24934-24954. doi: 10.3934/math.20241215 |
[5] | Shaoling Zhou, Huixin Chai, Xiaosheng Wang . Barrier option pricing with floating interest rate based on uncertain exponential Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25809-25833. doi: 10.3934/math.20241261 |
[6] | Zhe Li, Xiao-Tian Wang . Valuation of bid and ask prices for European options under mixed fractional Brownian motion. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7199-7214. doi: 10.3934/math.2021422 |
[7] | Jun Zhao, Peibiao Zhao . Quantile hedging for contingent claims in an uncertain financial environment. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15651-15669. doi: 10.3934/math.2023799 |
[8] | Xiaodie Lv, Yi Liu, Yihua Zhong . A novel method to solve the optimization problem of uncertain network system based on uncertainty theory. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5445-5461. doi: 10.3934/math.2023274 |
[9] | Kefan Liu, Jingyao Chen, Jichao Zhang, Yueting Yang . Application of fuzzy Malliavin calculus in hedging fixed strike lookback option. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9187-9211. doi: 10.3934/math.2023461 |
[10] | Nana Tao, Chunxiao Ding . Global attractivity for uncertain differential systems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2142-2159. doi: 10.3934/math.2022122 |
Binary options have a payoff that is either a fixed value or nothing at all. In this paper, the generalized pricing formulas of binary options, including European binary call options, European binary put options, American binary call options and American binary put options, are investigated in uncertain financial markets. By applying the Liu's stock model to describe the stock price, the explicit pricing formulas of binary options are derived successfully. Besides, the corresponding numerical examples for the above four kinds of binary options are discussed in this paper.
Binary options, as a special kind of barrier options, are also called digital options, including binary call options and binary put options, and are the class of options where the return for holder is a fixed cash or nothing, in other words, the holder knows that it has a chance to obtain the amount of money in advance. Moreover, it has been the fastest growing trading product and is used to finish the hedging and speculation in the over-the-counter markets. In addition, it is an important tool for financial engineers to design the more complex derivative products.
Since binary options are the simplest and the most popular options for investors, the related research work under the framework of probability theory has been investigated by many scholars. For example, Buchen [1] investigated the binary options based on the stock price modelled by Itô stochastic differential equation, Reiner and Rubinstein [12] studied the pricing problem of binary options based on the Black-Scholes model and Ballestra [2] explored the pricing problem of binary options by means of the repeated spatial extrapolation. Specially, Hyong-Chol et al. [7] solved the pricing problem of i-th binary options.
Traditionally, the stock price was assumed to follow the stochastic differential equation. Is it really reasonable? In fact, this widely accepted presumption was challenged among others by Liu[11], and provided the uncertain differential equation driven by Liu process in uncertainty theory to describe the stock price. In other words, frequency is the empirical basis of probability theory, while belief degree is the empirical basis of the uncertainty theory, probability theory and uncertainty theory that complementary mathematical systems.
Based on the context of the uncertainty theory, the stock price was assumed to follow the uncertain differential equations, and many kinds of barrier options in uncertain financial markets have been investigated, such as the pricing problem of European barrier options was considered by Yao and Qin [18], the pricing problem of geometric Asian barrier options was explored by Gao et al. [5], the pricing problem of arithmetic Asian barrier options was initialled by Yang et al. [17] and the pricing problem of lookback barrier options was studied by Gao and Jia [6]. The above research work were based on the stock price that was described by Liu's stock model and the other different kinds of uncertain stock model were applied to obtain the price of barrier options. For example, the barrier options based on uncertain fractional first-hitting time model with Caputo type were presented by Jin et al. [9], the barrier options based on uncertain mean-reverting stock model were constructed by Tian et al. [14] and the knock-in barrier options based on uncertain stock model with floating interest rate were given by Jia and Chen [8].
Except for the barrier options explored in uncertain financial markets, European options in uncertain financial markets were studied by Liu [11], American options in uncertain financial markets were presented by Chen [3], Lookback options in uncertain financial markets were considered by Zhang et al. [21], Gao et al. [4] and Tian et al. [15], Asian options in uncertain markets were investigated by Sun and Chen [13] and Zhang and Liu [19], Power options in uncertain financial markets were developed by Zhang et al. [20].
This paper investigates the pricing problem of binary options in uncertain financial markets. The rest of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 reviews some relevant basic contents. Section 3 investigates the pricing problem of binary options, including European binary call options, European binary put options, American binary call options and American binary put options, and their corresponding generalized pricing formulas and corresponding explicit pricing formulas are derived. Section 4 summarizes some results of this paper.
Uncertainty theory was initialled by Liu [10], and investigated by many scholars. This section provides some significant contents for uncertain differential equations. Let Γ be a nonempty set (sometimes called universal set), and let L be a σ-algebra over Γ. The element Λ in L is called a measurable set. In order to rationally deal with belief degree, the uncertain measure M on the σ-algebra L is defined to follow the following four axioms:
Axiom 1. (Normality Axiom) M{Γ}=1 for the universal set Γ.
Axiom 2. (Duality Axiom) M{Λ}+M{Λc}=1 for any event Λ.
Axiom 3. (Subadditivity Axiom) For every countable sequence of events Λ1,Λ2,⋯, we have
M{∞⋃i=1Λi}≤∞∑i=1M{Λi}. |
Axiom 4. (Product Axiom) Let (Γk,Lk,Mk) be uncertainty spaces for k=1,2,⋯. The product uncertain measure M is an uncertain measure satisfying
M{∞∏k=1Λk}=∞⋀k=1Mk{Λk}, |
where Λk are arbitrarily chosen events from Lk for k=1,2,⋯, respectively.
Definition 2.1. An uncertain variable is a function from an uncertainty space (Γ,L,M) to the set of real numbers, such that, for any Borel set B of real numbers, the set
{ξ∈B}={γ∈Γ|ξ(γ)∈B} |
is an event.
Definition 2.2. [10] As we consider the uncertain event B, and its complementary event Bc, then the duality axiom is
M{B}+M{Bc}=1. |
Theorem 2.1. [10] As we consider two uncertain events B1 and B2. If B1⊂B2, then we have
M{B1}≤M{B2}. |
Definition 2.3. The uncertain variables ζ1,ζ2,⋯,ζm are said to be independent if
M{m⋂i=1{ζi∈Bi}}=m⋀i=1M{ζi∈Bi} |
for any Borel sets B1,B2,⋯,Bm of real numbers.
The uncertainty distribution of an uncertain variable ζ is defined as
Θ(x)=M{ζ≤x} |
for any real number x. An uncertainty distribution Θ(x) is said to be regular if it is a continuous and strictly increasing function with respect to x at which 0<Θ(x)<1, and
limx→−∞Θ(x)=0,limx→+∞Θ(x)=1. |
If ζ has a regular uncertainty distribution Θ(x), then the inverse function Θ−1(α) is called the inverse uncertainty distribution of ζ. By means of the inverse uncertain distribution (IUD), we can obtain the expected value
E[ζ]=∫10Θ−1(θ)dθ. | (2.1) |
Theorem 2.2. [16] Let the uncertain differential equation
dSt=a(t,St)dt+b(t,St)dCt |
has a solution St, and the related equation of the uncertain differential equation
dSαt=a(t,Sαt)dt+|b(t,Sαt)|Λ−1(α)dt |
has a solution α-path Sαt, where
Λ−1(α)=√3πlnα1−α. |
Then,
M{St≤Sαt,∀t}=α,M{St>Sαt,∀t}=1−α, |
and St has an IUD
Θ−1t(α)=Sαt. |
Moreover, two important functions
ΥH(y)={1,ify≥H,0,ify<H |
and
LH1H2={H1−H2,ifH1≥H2,0,ifH1<H2 |
are defined herein, where H, H1 and H2 represent the positive constant number.
Binary options as a kind of barrier options have four cases, including European binary call options, European binary put options, American binary call options and American binary put options. Assume the binary options with a expiration time T and a exercise price H, and apply the Liu's stock model to describe the stock price, where the Liu's stock model has an IUD, that is
Φ−1t(α)=S0exp(h1t+√3h2tπlnα1−α),S0≥0,h2>0. | (3.1) |
European binary call options are the options that pay zero if the terminal stock price is below the exercise price or pay a fixed cash. Apply the generalized uncertain stock model to describe the stock price, the payoff of European binary call options is given below:
Payoff={C,ifS(T)≥H,0,otherwise. |
At time T, the buyer of European binary call options pays
C⋅ΥH(S(T)). |
Assume that the price of the European binary call options is fec, then, at time zero, the profit of buyer is
−fec+C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅ΥH(S(T)). |
Moreover, at time T, the seller of European binary call options receives
C⋅ΥH(S(T)). |
Then, at time zero, the profit of seller is
fec−C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅ΥH(S(T)). |
According to the fairness principle, at time zero, the expected profit of the buyer and the seller should be the same, so we have
−fec+C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅E[ΥH(S(T))]=fec−C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅E[ΥH(S(T))]. |
Thus, the definition of European binary call options pricing formula is presented as below.
Definition 3.1. Apply the generalized uncertain stock model to describe the stock price, then the pricing formula of European binary call options is
fec=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅E[ΥH(S(T))]. |
Theorem 3.1. Apply the Liu's stock model to model the stock price, then the price of European binary call options is
fec=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−α1), |
where
α1=(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1. |
Proof. Firstly, we can easily obtain
{ΥH(S(T))≤ΥH(S(Tα))}⊇{S(T)≤S(Tα)} |
and
{ΥH(S(T))>ΥH(S(Tα))}⊇{S(T)>S(Tα)}. |
According to the Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, we have
M{ΥH(S(T))≤ΥH(S(Tα))}≥M{S(T)≤S(Tα)}=α |
and
M{ΥH(S(T))>ΥH(S(Tα))}≥M{S(T)>S(Tα)}=1−α. |
By using the Definition 2.2, we can obtain
M{ΥH(S(T))≤ΥH(S(Tα))}+M{ΥH(S(T))>ΥH(S(Tα))}=1. |
Thus,
M{ΥH(S(T))≤ΥH(S(Tα))}=α, |
which indicates the uncertain variable
ΥH(S(T)) |
has an IUD
ΥH(S(Tα)). |
When S(Tα)≥H, we obtain
α≥(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1 |
and then set
α1=(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1. |
Therefore, the price is
fec=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅E[ΥH(S(T))]=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅∫10ΥH(S(Tα))dα=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−α1). |
Example 3.1. Set h1=0.04, h2=0.02 and h3=0.06 in Liu's stock model, and let S0=4, T=16, C=10 and H=8 for European binary call options. Then, fec=1.6283.
As the exercise price is increasing and the other parameters keep unchanged in Example 3.1, then Figure 1 presents that the price of European binary call options fec is decreasing.
European binary put options are the options that pay zero if the terminal stock price is over the exercise price or pay a fixed cash. Apply the generalized uncertain stock model to describe the stock price, the payoff of European binary put options is given below:
Payoff={C,ifS(T)≤H,0,otherwise. |
At time T, the buyer of European binary put options pays
C⋅(1−ΥH(S(T))). |
Assume that the price of the European binary put options is fep, then, at time zero, the profit of buyer is
−fep+C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−ΥH(S(T))). |
Moreover, at time T, the seller of European binary put options receives
C⋅(1−ΥH(S(T))). |
Then, at time zero, the profit of seller is
fep−C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−ΥH(S(T))). |
According to the fairness principle, at time zero, the expected profit of the buyer and the seller should be the same, so we have
−fep+C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−E[ΥH(S(T))])=fep−C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−E[ΥH(S(T))]). |
Thus, the definition of European binary put options pricing formula is presented as below.
Definition 3.2. Apply the generalized uncertain stock model to describe the stock price, then the pricing formula of European binary put options is
fep=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−E[ΥH(S(T))]). |
Theorem 3.2. Apply the Liu's stock model to describe the stock price, then the price of European binary put options is
fep=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅α2, |
where
α2=(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1. |
Proof. Firstly, it exists an IUD
ΥH(S(Tα)) |
for the uncertain variable
ΥH(S(T)) |
from the Theorem 3.1, where
S(Tα)=S0exp(h1T+√3h2Tπlnα1−α). |
When S(Tα)≥H, we obtain
α≥(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1 |
and then set
α2=(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1. |
Therefore, the price is
fep=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−E[ΥH(S(T))])=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−∫10ΥH(S(Tα))dα)=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅α2. |
Example 3.2. Set h1=0.02, h2=0.05 and h3=0.03 in Liu's stock model, and let S0=8, T=18, C=12 and H=6 for the European binary put options. Then, fep=1.4914.
As the exercise price is increasing and the other parameters keep unchanged in Example 3.2, then Figure 2 presents that the price of European binary put options fep is increasing.
American binary call options are the options that pay zero if the maximum value of stock price is below the exercise price or pay a fixed cash during the lifetime. Apply the generalized uncertain stock model to describe the stock price, the payoff of American binary call options is provided as below:
Payoff={C,ifmax0≤t≤T{S(t)}≥H,0,otherwise. |
At time T, the buyer of American binary call options pays
C⋅ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)}). |
Assume that the price of the American binary call options is the character fac, at time zero, then the profit of buyer is
−fac+C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)}). |
Moreover, at time T, the seller of American binary call options receives
C⋅ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)}). |
Then, at time zero, the profit of seller is
fac−C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)}). |
According to the fairness principle, at time zero, the expected profit of the buyer and the seller should be the same, so we have
−fac+C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅E[ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})]=fac−C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅E[ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})]. |
Thus, the definition of American binary call options pricing formula is presented below.
Definition 3.3. Apply the generalized uncertain stock model to describe the stock price, then the pricing formula of American binary call options is
fac=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅E[ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})]. |
Theorem 3.3. Apply the Liu's stock model to describe the stock price, then set h=max{α0,α3}, the price of American binary call options is
fac=C⋅exp(−μ3T)⋅(1−h), |
where
α0=(exp(πh1√3h2+1))−1 |
and
α3=(1+exp(π(μ1T+ln(S0/H))√3μ2T))−1. |
Proof. Firstly, we can easily obtain
{ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})≤ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}⊇{max0≤t≤T{S(t)}≤max0≤t≤T{S(tα)}}⊇{S(t)≤S(tα),∀t∈[0,T]} |
and
{ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})>ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}⊇{max0≤t≤T{S(t)}>max0≤t≤T{S(tα)}}⊇{S(t)>S(tα),∀t∈[0,T]}. |
According to the Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, we have
M{ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})≤ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}≥M{S(t)≤S(tα),∀t∈[0,T]}=α |
and
M{ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})>ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}≥M{S(t)>S(tα),∀t∈[0,T]}=1−α. |
By using the Definition 2.2, we can obtain
M{ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})≤ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}+M{ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})>ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}=1. |
Thus,
M{ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})≤ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}=α, |
which indicates the uncertain variable
ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)}) |
has an IUD
ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)}). |
Meanwhile, we have
dSαt/dt=Sαt⋅(h1+√3h2πlnα1−α). |
Thus, we can set
α0=(exp(πh1√3h2+1))−1 |
and easily obtain that, if α>α0, Sαt is increasing with respect to t, then max0≤t≤T{Sαt}≥H means SαT≥H. When SαT≥H, we obtain
α≥(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1 |
and then set
α3=(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1. |
Conversely, if α≤α0, Sαt is decreasing with respect to t, then max0≤t≤T{Sαt}≥H means S0≥H, this will be not established. Therefore, we set h=max{α0,α3}, the price is
fac=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅E[ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})]=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅∫10ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)})dα=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−h). |
Example 3.3. Set h1=0.05, h2=0.02 and h3=0.06 in Liu's stock model, and let S0=4, T=16, C=10 and H=6 for the American binary call options. Then, fac=3.4593.
As the exercise price is increasing and the other parameters keep unchanged in Example 3.3, then Figure 3 presents that the price of American binary call option fac is decreasing.
American binary put options are the options that pay nothing if the minimum value of stock price is above the exercise price or pay a fixed cash during the life time. Apply the generalized uncertain stock model to describe the stock price, the payoff of American binary put options is provided as below:
Payoff={C,ifmin0≤t≤T{S(t)}≤H,0,otherwise. |
At time T, the buyer of American binary put options pays
C⋅(1−ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})). |
Assume that the price of the American binary put options is the character fap, at time zero, then the profit of buyer is
−fap+C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})). |
Moreover, at time T, the seller of American binary put options receives
C⋅(1−ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})). |
Then, at time zero, the profit of seller is
fac−C⋅exp(−μ3T)⋅(1−ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})). |
According to the fairness principle, at time zero, the expected of the buyer and the seller should be the same, so we have
−fac+C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−E[ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})])=fac−C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−E[ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})]). |
Thus, the definition of the American binary put option pricing formula is provided below.
Definition 3.4. Apply the generalized uncertain stock model to describe the stock price, then the pricing formula of American binary put options is
fac=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−E[ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})]). |
Theorem 3.4. Apply Liu's stock model to describe the stock price, then the price of American binary put options is
fac=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(α0−(α0−α4)⋅Lα0α4), |
where
α0=(exp(πh1√3h2+1))−1 |
and
α4=(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1. |
Proof. Firstly, we can easily have
{ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})≤ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}⊇{min0≤t≤T{S(t)}≤min0≤t≤T{S(tα)}}⊇{S(t)≤S(tα),∀t∈[0,T]} |
and
{ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})>ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}⊇{min0≤t≤T{S(t)}>min0≤t≤T{S(tα)}}⊇{S(t)>S(tα),∀t∈[0,T]}. |
According to the Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, we have
M{ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})≤ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}≥M{S(t)≤S(tα),∀t∈[0,T]}=α |
and
M{ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(t)})>ΥH(max0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}≥M{S(t)>S(tα),∀t∈[0,T]}=1−α. |
By using the Definition 2.2, we can obtain
M{ΥH(S(t))≤ΥH(S(tα)),∀t∈[0,T]}+M{ΥH(S(t))>ΥH(S(tα)),∀t∈[0,T]}=1. |
Thus,
M{ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})≤ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(tα)})}=α, |
which indicates the uncertain variable
ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)}) |
has an IUD
ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(tα)}). |
Meanwhile, we have
dSαt/dt=Sαt⋅(h1+√3h2πlnα1−α). |
Thus, we can set
α0=(exp(πh1√3h2+1))−1 |
and easily obtain that, if α>α0, Sαt is increasing with respect to t, then min0≤t≤T{Sαt}≥H means S0≥H, this will be always established. Conversely, if α≤α0, Sαt is decreasing with respect to t, then min0≤t≤T{Sαt}≥H means SαT≥H. When SαT≥H, we obtain
α≥(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1 |
and then set
α4=(1+exp(π(h1T+ln(S0/H))√3h2T))−1, |
if α4<α0, then we obtain α4≤α≤α0, if α4≥α0, it becomes no solution. Therefore, the price is
fap=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−E[ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(t)})])=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(1−∫10ΥH(min0≤t≤T{S(tα)})dα)=C⋅exp(−h3T)⋅(α0−(α0−α4)⋅Lα0α4). |
Example 3.4. Set h1=0.03, h2=0.02 and h3=0.04 in Liu's stock model, and let S0=10, T=18, C=20 and H=8 for American binary put options. Then, fac=0.2038.
As the exercise price is increasing and the other parameters keep unchanged in Example 3.4, then Figure 4 presents that the price of the binary put option fap is increasing.
In this paper, the generalized pricing formulas of binary options in uncertain financial markets, including European binary call options, European binary put options, American binary call options and American binary put options, were derived by means of the fairness principle. By applying the Liu's stock model to describe the stock price, the explicit pricing formulas for the above four kinds of binary options were obtained, respectively.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this article.
[1] |
P. W. Buchen, The pricing of dual-expiry exotics, Quant. Financ., 4 (2004), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1469-7688/4/1/009 doi: 10.1088/1469-7688/4/1/009
![]() |
[2] |
L. V. Ballestra, Repeated spatial extrapolation: An extraordinarily efficient approach for option pricing, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 256 (2014), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2013.07.033 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.07.033
![]() |
[3] | X. W. Chen, American option pricing formula for uncertain financial market, Int. J. Oper. Res., 8 (2011), 27–32. |
[4] |
Y. Gao, X. F. Yang, Z. F. Fu, Lookback option pricing problem of uncertain exponential Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model, Soft Comput., 22 (2018), 5647–5654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2558-y doi: 10.1007/s00500-017-2558-y
![]() |
[5] |
R. Gao, W. Wu, C. Lang, L. Y. Lang, Geometric Asian barrier option pricing formulas of uncertain stock model, Chaos Solitons Fract., 140 (2020), 110178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110178 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110178
![]() |
[6] |
Y. Gao, L. F. Jia, Pricing formulas of barrier-lookback option in uncertain financial markets, Chaos Solitons Fract., 147 (2021), 110986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110986 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110986
![]() |
[7] | H. C. O, D. H. Kim, J. J. Jo, S. H. Ri, Integrals of higher binary options and defaultable bonds with discrete default information, Electron. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2 (2014), 190–214. |
[8] |
L. F. Jia, W. Chen, Knock-in options of an uncertain stock model with floating interest rate, Chaos Solitons Fract., 141 (2020), 110324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110324 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110324
![]() |
[9] |
T. Jin, H. Ding, H. X. Xia, J. F. Bao, Reliability index and Asian barrier option pricing formulas of the uncertain fractional first-hitting time model with Caputo type, Chaos Solitons Fract., 142 (2021), 110409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110409 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110409
![]() |
[10] | B. D. Liu, Uncertainty theory, 2 Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73165-8 |
[11] |
B. D. Liu, Toward uncertain finance theory, J. Uncertain. Anal. Appl., 1 (2013), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2195-5468-1-1 doi: 10.1186/2195-5468-1-1
![]() |
[12] | M. Rubinstein, E. Reiner, Unscrambling the binary code, Risk, 4 (1991), 75–83. |
[13] |
J. J. Sun, X. W. Chen, Asian option pricing formula for uncertain financial market, J. Uncertain. Anal. Appl., 3 (2015), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40467-015-0035-7 doi: 10.1186/s40467-015-0035-7
![]() |
[14] |
M. Tian, X. F. Yang, Y. Zhang, Barrier option pricing of mean-reverting stock model in uncertain environment, Math. Comput. Simul., 166 (2019), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2019.04.009 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2019.04.009
![]() |
[15] |
M. Tian, X. Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, Lookback option pricing problem of mean-reverting stock model in uncertain environment, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 17 (2021), 2703–2714. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2020090 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020090
![]() |
[16] |
K. Yao, X. W. Chen, A numerical method for solving uncertain differential equations, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 25 (2013), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-120688 doi: 10.3233/IFS-120688
![]() |
[17] |
X. F. Yang, Z. Q. Zhang, X. Gao, Asian-barrier option pricing formulas of uncertain financial market, Chaos Soliton Fract., 123 (2019), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.03.037 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.03.037
![]() |
[18] |
K. Yao, Z. F. Qin, Barrier option pricing formulas of an uncertain stock model, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making, 20 (2021), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09333-w doi: 10.1007/s10700-020-09333-w
![]() |
[19] | Z. Q. Zhang, W. Q. Liu, Geometric average Asian option pricing for uncertain financial market, J. Uncertain Syst., 8 (2014), 317–320. |
[20] |
Z. Q. Zhang, W. Q. Liu, Y. H. Sheng, Valuation of power option for uncertain financial market, Appl. Math. Comput., 286 (2016), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.04.032 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2016.04.032
![]() |
[21] |
Z. Q. Zhang, H. Ke, W. Q. Liu, Lookback options pricing for uncertain financial market, Soft Comput., 23 (2019), 5537–5546. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3211-0 doi: 10.1007/s00500-018-3211-0
![]() |
1. | Haoxuan Li, Xiangfeng Yang, Yaodong Ni, Pricing of shout option in uncertain financial market, 2024, 23, 1568-4539, 449, 10.1007/s10700-024-09428-8 | |
2. | Weiwei Wang, Dan A. Ralescu, Panpan Zhang, Valuation of convertible bond based on uncertain fractional differential equation, 2024, 23, 1568-4539, 513, 10.1007/s10700-024-09431-z | |
3. | Yichen Lu, Ruili Song, Pricing of a Binary Option Under a Mixed Exponential Jump Diffusion Model, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 3233, 10.3390/math12203233 | |
4. | Yin Gao, Miao Tian, Pricing problem and sensitivity analysis of knock-in external barrier options based on uncertain stock model, 2024, 187, 09600779, 115356, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115356 | |
5. | Hong Huang, Meihua Jiang, Yufu Ning, Shuai Wang, A Structural Credit Risk Model with Jumps Based on Uncertainty Theory, 2025, 13, 2227-7390, 897, 10.3390/math13060897 |